Slashdot Mirror


HP/Compaq Merger Official Today

Ankou writes: "Today (May 6th, 2002) marks the first day of the Hewlett Packard and Compaq merger. The finalized buyout of Compaq is expected to be done today and are expected to be working together "as a combined entity" by tomorrow. This also means a new stock symbol will replace the old HWP to the new symbol HPQ. Behind the hype this merger will cost, according resources at CNN on this article, a total loss of 15,000 more jobs with over 150,000 following the next two years. The same article details more information regarding the new merger and the recent events which have lead to today." Update: 05/06 15:03 GMT by T : Note: that job-loss figure is off; the 15,000 jobs projected to be cut are from a total of 150,000 between the two companies.

184 comments

  1. HP/Compaq today by dhuck · · Score: 0

    Pepsi-MS-HP and Coke-AOL/TW-Ford tomorrow...

  2. New Name... by swordboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    From now on, you will refer to them collectively as "Hewlett Paqard".

    Change is good!

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:New Name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, known to their gangster customers as H-PaQ.

    2. Re:New Name... by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

      ...or Hompack, Pewlett Hackard, Comwet, HPC, CHiPs...

    3. Re:New Name... by tinrobot · · Score: 1

      Considering Hewlett's lawsuit and opposition to the merger, perhaps they should drop his name and call it Com Packard.

    4. Re:New Name... by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

      And give the HP name back to Agilent!!!!!!

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    5. Re:New Name... by red_dragon · · Score: 2
      From now on, you will refer to them collectively as "Hewlett Paqard".

      I've always thought it would be Hewcom Packpaq.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Jesus asks: "What Would You Do?"
    6. Re:New Name... by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

      ... or Screw-you Packards, Bankrupt-in-60-days, Spewey Crapart...

    7. Re:New Name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that is truly funny. Just wanted to let you know since the moderators around here are obviously all sheltered hermits who have never seen the sky in real life and listen to Yanni.

    8. Re:New Name... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The stock symbol is hpq, so hpaq.

  3. Content error by ckaminski · · Score: 5, Informative

    Read the article. It says:

    It also will result in the loss of at least 15,000 jobs out of a combined work force of 150,000 during the next two years.

    Not that 165,000 jobs will be cut....

    -Chris

    1. Re:Content error by Decimal · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not that 165,000 jobs will be cut....

      Nah. Those jobs won't be lost until Fiorna drives the company into the ground.

      I'd estimate one, perhaps two years.

      --

      Remember "Bring 'em on"? *sigh
    2. Re:Content error by AlgUSF · · Score: 1


      "Step 1: Invest in Microsoft. Step 2: ... Step 3: Profit! "

      Could Step 2 be sell it short?

      --


      I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
    3. Re:Content error by Gaijin42 · · Score: 1

      If you are selling short, you dont have to do step 1. Step one is buying long (followed at some point in the future with selling long)

    4. Re:Content error by Ankou · · Score: 1

      Terribly sorry about the mistake. You are correct, my appologies. 15K jobs however is still a large number even if it is spread out over 2 years.

    5. Re:Content error by jhaberman · · Score: 2

      This error was especially disturbing to me since I work for HP and we only have a TOTAL of 84,000 workers world wide. So, if we were to layoff a combined 150,000 HP would just about cease to exist...

      Jason

      --
      He's totally creeping out the Great One, eh...
    6. Re:Content error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      15,000 tech workers looking for jobs?

      Good thing we imported all those H1-B visa foreigners!

    7. Re:Content error by cballowe · · Score: 0, Troll

      Read the article. It says:

      It also will result in the loss of at least 15,000 jobs out of a combined work force of 150,000 during the next two years.

      Not that 165,000 jobs will be cut....

      -Chris


      well -- you assume that the company will remain standing. If it falls, all of the jobs will have effectively been cut.

      And - Tru64 is one of the best OSs out there. HP/UX needs an S somewhere in it's name - you can guess where. All of the good stuff that Compaq has is stuff they picked up when they bought DEC and didn't know what to do with. The Alpha rules the processor world, but Compaq insists on pushing PCs and not real machines. Anybody remember altavista.digital.com, now known as altavista.com. It wasn't built as a search service, it was built to show off the Alpha. There used to be a bunch of pages about the hardware and software behind it. DEC research had some of the best stuff that they just didn't know how to market.

      I guess I'll find out how the merger goes, but my gut tells me not to like it.
    8. Re:Content error by blair1q · · Score: 2

      What's so funny?

      I'm guessing three years, tops.

      --Blair

    9. Re:Content error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hewlett Packard fucking SHOULD cease to exist.

      Right now, it's just a highjacked brand-name out hunting for credibility. Packard Bell was the name of a company that made fine radio equipment in the early part of the 20th Century. Now it's a shit-brand. Hewlett Packard is headed down the same path.

      That stupid cunt who's taken over needs to leave.

  4. Surprise! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is quite a surprise to me. Considering the company's respective markets, and the amount of products that they produce, I would have suspected that Compaq would have bought out HP, not the way it turned out. Seems to me as if Compaq produces a lot more products in general, does more research, has more of a market presence, etc..

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    1. Re:Surprise! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2

      Of course, they'll keep their 'original' brand names, to feign competition and keep the prices as high as possible. (Not that much profit margin is even possible anymore in retail, really)

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    2. Re:Surprise! by powerbarr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's called printing. HP makes more profit than Compaq from the printing side alone. Not sure about the revenue side. I believe overall revenues are/were nearly the same for the companies. However, HP had a market cap of about 40 billion before the merger while Compaq's was on the order of 20 billion. Also, HP produces a lot of products on their own, especially imaging and printing.

    3. Re:Surprise! by cholokoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      HP has always been bigger than Compaq by looking at their revenues. HP is into more markets - large Unix systems and Workstations with their PA-RISC architecture while Compaq does not have such until their aquisition of DEC. HP has always been second to IBM revenue-wise and competes with them in many markets unlike Compaq who is very strong only on the Intel-based PC market.

      Its printing business is just a shadow of HP's while they are strongest in servers and PCs, HP is not far behind.

      --
      Return the bells of Balangiga.
    4. Re:Surprise! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although it may look like that on the consumer side, it is certainly not true on the corporate side.

    5. Re:Surprise! by hndrcks · · Score: 2

      to feign competition and keep the prices as high as possible

      Posts like this make my head hurt. Since when does competition, feigned or otherwise, keep prices high? The reason 15,000 people are going to get the 'pink slip' is to reduce competition (and redundancy in manufacturing), thus improving profitability. Or so the theory goes. Time will tell.

      --
      Everyone will start to cheer when you put on your sailin' shoes.
    6. Re:Surprise! by n9hmg · · Score: 1

      Since when does competition, feigned or otherwise,

      Real competition does help keep prices low. The point was that this is only the appearance of competition.

    7. Re:Surprise! by joib · · Score: 2

      ...Seems to me as if Compaq ..... does more research...


      That's a load of bollocks. Compaq always were vacuum cleaner salesmen compared to HP. As is Dell. Ok Compaq tried to fix this situation by buying Digital, which as everyone knows, was a real tech company like HP. They also bought Tandem, I think. Not that it changed stuff much. Even after Compaq bought Digital they still were hoover salesmen. I mean, via Digital they had the arguably best RISC processor architecture ever (alpha), a reasonably good commercial unix which made their high-end offerings quite good, had they pumped enough capital into it to keep it going. But no, instead they sold they whole lot to Intel, so that they could focus on selling low-margin-pc:s. Sheesh! Compete with Dell in a super-low-margin-cut-throat market. What a blindingly stupid idea! Uh, sorry, "focusing on services (the niche where there is little if none competition, right?)" is the buzzword du jour which masks all management blunders. And yes, well there were rumours that the Alpha sellout was in fact a part of the deal with HP, which perhaps puts it in a different light.

    8. Re:Surprise! by Drakin · · Score: 1

      The point was that this is only the appearance of competition.


      Ie they make all the computers in the same place and slap a differnt sticker on 'em.
    9. Re:Surprise! by chrisbell · · Score: 0

      No, this isn't true. HP is much older, first of all, and has considerably greater investments in R&D in the form of HP Labs, which is a worldwide research entity. The product lines are quite similar, but HP has more coverage there, too. Compaq has PCs, servers, Unix servers, storage, and handhelds. HP has all that plus printers, extensive imaging, etc. Finally, HP has greater market share in all areas (yeah, you could have argued - last week!), except PCs.

      But it is a moot point now, eh?

    10. Re:Surprise! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > [Compaq] does more research

      I don't think so. Any research done at Compaq was thanks to the ex-DEC guys - which the Compaq people wasted no time in alienating. On the other hand, HP has very strong research groups at HP Labs, where they are world leaders at things like, say, nanotechnology.

      It is my hope that HP will extinguish (or, at least, keep on a short leash) the MS dogs from Compaq.

    11. Re:Surprise! by MrResistor · · Score: 2
      Not true. Compaq may sell more computer products than HP, but HP definately produces more products. Compaq is just a computer company, whereas HP has it's fingers in a lot of pies, like calculators, test equipment, printers (Compaq just repackages other manufacturers printers), etc.

      HP is much bigger than Compaq, and always has been.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    12. Re:Surprise! by glenmark · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "...whereas HP has it's fingers in a lot of pies, like calculators, test equipment,..."

      Actually, HP spun off their test equipment line into a new company, Agilent, back in 1999.

      Long live RPN!

      --
      *** Quantum Mechanics: The Dreams of Which Stuff is Made ***
    13. Re:Surprise! by murr · · Score: 1
      Even after Compaq bought Digital they still were hoover salesmen.

      Shouldn't that be VAX salesmen?

    14. Re:Surprise! by Big+Ben+August · · Score: 1
      Didn't HP kill its calculator division last year?
      I think so...

      here

      --
      --Ben
    15. Re:Surprise! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No we spun off the computor shit and let them keep the name "HP" so they would stop bitching about being abandoned to the wicked witch of the west (AKA Carly). Agilent is the real company. 10 years from now, after we have recovered from 10 years of having our R&D funds sucked dry funding the startup of a failing pc buisness ( now called HP) to satisfy the brainless lust of the board of directors, we will be what HP use to be. And the company shamfully called HP won't even exist.

    16. Re:Surprise! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first terminal I used to log onto BBSes, before I could afford a computer, was an old printing DecWriter. That was one HELL of a high quality printer, if only a 9 pin dot matrix.

      I would plug an acoustic coupler into the terminal, stuff the phone handset into those rubber cups and away I'd go!

    17. Re:Surprise! by SunCrushr · · Score: 0

      This could only be a surprise to someone who has been buried under a rock for the last year. If you keep up with the industry at all, you would have been reading the press releases about the vote quite a few months ago.

  5. Wrong by powerbarr · · Score: 2, Informative

    15,000 jobs out of 150,000 jobs total in the company over the next two years will be eliminated. Not great but, not 150,000 jobs lost.

    1. Re:Wrong by scrytch · · Score: 2

      I dunno, maybe when the combined incompetence of these two companies reaches a head, then we will see a loss of all 150,000 jobs...

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
  6. Lot of vision behind this one... by sphealey · · Score: 2
    I actually can't tell if this article from The Register is real or a paraody!

    Keep the synergy flowing! Anyone know any good replacements for HP laser printers?

    sPh

    1. Re:Lot of vision behind this one... by eples · · Score: 1


      Anyone know any good replacements for HP laser printers?

      Lexmark has one for $100 (@ OfficeMax). Of course, the replacement toner is $90 a shot, so....

      --
      I'm a 2000 man.
    2. Re:Lot of vision behind this one... by Ankou · · Score: 1

      Samsung also makes linux friendly laser printers with included with linux drivers. Price aint too bad either I paid 200 bucks for a ML-4500 Samsung.

    3. Re:Lot of vision behind this one... by bonzoesc · · Score: 2

      ML-1210 = win. I saved my D&D run with this bitch, running off 24 pages of character sheets in three minutes flat. And that's with the shitty slow official program on Win98.

    4. Re:Lot of vision behind this one... by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      I bought a lexmark e210 laser printer at staples for $150 (there's a $50 rebate, dropping it to $100). It works great, but it doesn't have it's own character set, so the printer driver must create a bitmap and send it to the printer. They include a linux driver for use with ghostscript, but it's for an older version, and closed (and I use FreeBSD). The bitmap format is undefined, but I've been working on reverse engineering it.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    5. Re:Lot of vision behind this one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And to think you could have done it text-only, in twelve minutes using Ghostscript on Linux....

  7. good news for geeks! by tps12 · · Score: 5, Funny
    I'd like to be the first to say, I'm really excited about the possibilities of this merger. Historically, especially in the computer industry, we have seen that mergers of two good companies often create new companies that are "greater than the sum of their constituent parts." And this is no exception.

    Compaq has a stellar track record, from their sleek designs to their top-of-the-line reliability and support. Their support of the old standby DEC technology has truly been a boon to IT and engineering houses. As I type this, I am using a svelte Compaq tower with a P4 chugging away. This baby is sweet, and runs Linux with nary a hitch.

    As for HP, they have demonstrated time and again that they can reign supreme in the realms of laser printing and server mainframes. Their own Unix OS was a champion in its heydey, and with their recent efforts in the Linux world, we have nothing but good things to look forward to from them.

    In short, in a few years we will be looking back at this as the beginning of a new era for enterprise technology. Let's hope they keep raising the bar.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:good news for geeks! by looieprima · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thanks for sharing, Carly.

    2. Re:good news for geeks! by PurpleFloyd · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Dear God, this is one of the best trolls I've ever read. Either that, or you've never used a Compaq (insert rant about Setup programs being on hard drive rather than on BIOS here).

      I recently had the joy of setting up an old Compaq server. Win2K, Linux, nothing would run without all sorts of special drivers. Finding them, then getting them to work them was a pain in the ass like a concrete enema.

      While I've heard decent things about HP PCs and servers, and I love the Laserjets, I can't help but think Compaq will have a negative effect on HP's altogether decent PC division.

      --

      That's it. I'm no longer part of Team Sanity.
    3. Re:good news for geeks! by nomadic · · Score: 2

      Huh? What exactly did Compaq do with DEC's stuff that was so great? I mean, they're not a chip designer, what on earth are they going to do with the Alpha?

      As far as I can tell, HP/Compaq is a merging of an average PC manufacturer and a mediocre one, and I'm not sure exactly what they're going to do together that they couldn't do separately.

      As for me, I've decided to buy my computers from either a small screwdriver factory, or Apple. The only large PC manufacturer I'd feel comfortable buying from is Dell.

    4. Re:good news for geeks! by BlueFall · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this is really great for all those geeks losing their jobs...

    5. Re:good news for geeks! by blankmange · · Score: 2

      Huh? How could this possibly be good news for geeks? Have you ever tried to upgrade a Presario or Pavilion? Proprietary crap all over the inside of these boxes. I credit both of these manufacturers with the initial disposable PC -- can't upgrade it, so you have buy a new one...H-P's printers are ok, but I have since switched to Canon's (and they rock); I have never considered one of their boxes - probably never will now. "Sleek designs" by Compaq? When you make claims like this, you really should supply a .jpg as well -- beige boxes, etc. And don't even begin on the LS-120 fiasco....

      --
      ...we are from the government - we are here to help...
    6. Re:good news for geeks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? What exactly did Compaq do with DEC's stuff that was so great? I mean, they're not a chip designer, what on earth are they going to do with the Alpha?

      Well, some chip company thought highly enough of the designs of that chip to have purchased the team that was in the process of designing the next generation of Alphas (EV8). The Alpha chip was a legacy of Digital, and continues to be the speed demon for single and multi-chip systems.

      The only large PC manufacturer I'd feel comfortable buying from is Dell.

      Why? How is Dell superior to Compaq, HP, IBM, or any other PC packager?

    7. Re:good news for geeks! by nomadic · · Score: 2

      Well, some chip company [intel.com] thought highly enough of the designs of that chip to have purchased the team that was in the process of designing the next generation of Alphas (EV8). The Alpha chip was a legacy of Digital, and continues to be the speed demon for single and multi-chip systems.

      Well, sure, the Alpha's an impressive piece of technology; I wasn't criticizing it, but rather the silliness of a non-chip company buying it. It makes sense for Intel to acquire it, but why Compaq?

      Why? How is Dell superior to Compaq, HP, IBM, or any other PC packager?

      In my experience (helping support a few hundred workstations), and in the opinions of just about all my coworkers, Dell just makes good machines. They're reliable and they're easy to repair and troubleshoot, primarily because they tend not to use shoddy and/or non-standard parts.

    8. Re:good news for geeks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sir or madam, whatever you are on, please share it with the rest of us.

      The only decent product Compaq makes (that I can attest to) is their server line. Workstation and home line suck bollocks.

      HP on the other hand, their printers are superb.

    9. Re:good news for geeks! by buckeyeguy · · Score: 1
      WTF?! Did you ever have to deal with Unisys, the combined Sperry and Burroughs? Apparently not.

      Or, the parent post is one heck of a troll.

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    10. Re:good news for geeks! by zbuffered · · Score: 2

      They're reliable and they're easy to repair and troubleshoot, primarily because they tend not to use shoddy and/or non-standard parts.
      actually, they use non-standard power supplies. Don't try and throw another motherboard in there unless you bought it from them. Or unless you plan on upgrading your PSU as well.

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    11. Re:good news for geeks! by Srass · · Score: 1

      Gee. Sounds like I can look forward to HPQ following in the footsteps of Packard Bell NEC... >:)

    12. Re:good news for geeks! by blair1q · · Score: 2

      I bought a Compaq notebook in '96, and hated the way it tried to lord over Win95.

      I bought Compaq desktops in '97 for work, and couldn't get common hardware to work under WinNT.

      I haven't given Compaq a nickel since. The only good thing about that experience is it sent me to the white-box market, which I've discovered is really cool and easy, because they don't mistake corporate inveigling for enhancement.

      --Blair

    13. Re:good news for geeks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > Compaq has a stellar track record, from their sleek designs to their top-of-the-line reliability and support.

      Compaq has been living off the memory and reputation of solidly built systems. Even its 'industry standard' intel servers have seen a decline in quality and reliability over the last few years as they seek to squeeze profits out. As to their support... well, the support offered to commercial customers is better than what the poor home users get (experience speaking, though after those experiences the 8 people I knew with Compaq at home now have Dell or Gateway instead). Memories, again, of better days.

      > Their support of the old standby DEC technology has truly been a boon to IT and engineering houses.

      Their support of Digital customers has been at best adequate, and so uneven that it is difficult as a reseller and maintainer to convince customers that its worth the price. Their 'technical' support of the OpenVMS and Tru64 products has been decent, but that is more a reflection on the quality of the people they retained; service responsiveness is dramatically poorer than it was under Digital, and it had suffered there under GQ Palmer's reign. And the sheer volume of broken 'commitments', and the anger it has caused in the customer base, would have choked a smaller company. The big one, of course, being the termination of Alpha development, with the apparent pending elimination of Tru64 not far behind (we remind the audience of many commitments to the long term advancement of the Alpha platform, signed and in writing, and the 'commitment' to port Tru64 to Itanium, and the commitment to move Tandem systems to Alpha, with the addition to Alpha of the necessary lockstepping capabilities.) There were numerous smaller commitments to their customers conveniently forgotten or abrogated as well.

      Now the enterprise customers (a number of whom we work with and for) see themselves being railroaded towards Itanium when there is reasonable and considerable doubt about the long term viability of that platform (especially given the recent accolades for the AMD Hammers, with MS support and apparent nudging of Intel towards supporting that instruction set, and the continuing problems getting performance out of Itanium,and bugs out of its compilers). If the Hammer family succeeds... there goes the volume market, the possibility of affordable low end servers in the same family as the big ones... and the 'Industry Standard' appelation that apparently Compaq and HP both so desparately desired to apply to the big iron.

      I opposed the merger, as a customer and shareholder in both companies. I do not expect the new company to be any better at marketing or fixing its myriad problems because the merger did not fix the basic problems: Fiorina. Capellas. Winkler, and an inbred top level heirarchy incapable of seeing anything but windows on PCs as being worthy of selling, supporting, or owning. Short-sighted, inability to conceive of anything not from microsoft (or maybe Linux, depending on who they're talking to) being a capable, desireable or profitable product, even when those very 'legacy, proprietary' products keep their company afloat while the 'industry standard' systems dragged them down.

      > In short, in a few years we will be looking back at this as the beginning of a new era for enterprise technology

      If the merger had failed, if the top management had been swept out as a result, and someone with a little vision, and the courage to look around and see what the companies they ran were really capable of, rather than being bound by two leashes running to Microsoft and Intel, and blindly following where they lead.... then you might really be looking at 'a new era for enterprise technology'. If some turnaround at the top happens, you might still see that even with the merger. But not with the current self-serving short sighted self perpetuating management team this 'new, improved' company kept itself saddled with.

    14. Re:good news for geeks! by Surak · · Score: 2

      While I've heard decent things about HP PCs and servers, and I love the Laserjets, I can't help but think Compaq will have a negative effect on HP's altogether decent PC division.

      'Decent PC division'? I guess that depends on which HP PCs you're talking about. Their Kayak and Visualize Workstations are nice... their Pavilions are wretched heaps.

    15. Re:good news for geeks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would anybody be stupid enough to try to put another motherboard in a Dell or Compaq box?

      You sell that machine. You can easily get more than enough money to buy a really nice clone case to put your motherboard in with the money you'll get.

      Or you save the whole machine and throw it in the backroom as a server.

    16. Re:good news for geeks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      H-P's printers are ok, but I have since switched to Canon's (and they rock);

      We are talking about grown-up printers, not those ink bottle spray-printers.

  8. correction by selectspec · · Score: 2

    a total loss of 15,000 more jobs with over 150,000 following the next two years.

    The combined payroll of both companies is 150,000.

    --

    Someone you trust is one of us.

    1. Re:correction by davmct · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think they meant that HPQ will be going bankrupt in two years time, hence the 150K employees getting sacked. But don't worry, I believe Carla and Cappy will be well-imbursed for their troubles.

    2. Re:correction by n9hmg · · Score: 1

      Everybody knows the havoc Carly leaves in her wake, and this just lets her kill two dinosaurs with one stone, so to speak.
      My hope is that somehow, The good basic infrastructure of the PA-RISC systems gets the Alpha processor, HP-UX dies an slow, painful death, then goes to hell, to be replaced by OSF/1(Digital UNIX(Tru64 UNIX)) or Linux, and the unit escapes before the rest goes away.
      It could happen. The test unit escaped, so you can still get a decent O-scope... why not the unix side?

  9. I'm sorry but... by eples · · Score: 2


    a total loss of 15,000 more jobs with over 150,000 following the next two years

    It sounded as if a lot of people were against this in the first place - and considering the job losses indicated above, explain to me who exactly is going to benefit from this?!?!?! Why was this a good idea? Both companies' computers are just "eh" to begin with..

    --
    I'm a 2000 man.
    1. Re:I'm sorry but... by tb3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Carly and Mike, and a number of senior execs, are going to take home about $75 million in bonuses, IIRC.

      And you thought that management worked for the shareholders...

      --

      www.lucernesys.comHorizon: Calendar-based personal finance

    2. Re:I'm sorry but... by fwr · · Score: 2

      It's usually viewed as a good idea by most management in large companies because large companies almost always have at least 10% of their work force that they would out-right fire if they could easily. Think about it. Any company that is over say 10,000 is going to have slackers. It's easy to hide in such a large company. Do the minimal amount of work that isn't really enough to justify your salary, but knowing that the company can't easily fire you after a certain amount of time. By merging or buying out another company the combined company gets to lay off thousands of dead-beat people that they would otherwise face numerous lawsuits to try and get rid of. Now, this does not mean that some innocent and "non-deadbeat" employees will unfortunately get layed off, but from the larger picture it's worth it to upper management to cut out the accumulated fat in a company and run lean for quite a few years again. Now, I know nothing about HP or Compaq people, so I can't say what the actual percentage of slackers are in each company, but anyone who is honest with themselves has to admit that the percentage is over 0%...

    3. Re:I'm sorry but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with HP is that that 10% is management.

  10. of course by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    these layoffs are all the fault of big business capitalism... why if we were all communists like most of you /.ers want, we would all have jobs. Of course we would all be farmers, we wouldn't actually get paychecks, and oh yeah, we wouldn't have this internet thingy...

    just makes me sick all the anti business stuff on here, lets all go work for the government because they somehow aren't as evil as a business.... then want to explain how America kicks everyones ass in just about everything?

    Okay, mod me down, flame on, troll, and all that happy crappy, but after you do that go take Economics 101 at your local place of learning.

    1. Re:of course by foobar104 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You know, the parent post was a little light on content and heavy on ire, but if I had any points today I would have been willing to spend one just to encourage unpopular opinions. I, too, get frustrated with the vocal "Slashdot hippies" who spend all of their time advocating "free" software-- which carries a pretty twisted definition of "free," by the way-- and complaining endlessly about the "evil" actions of any and every corporation, big or small, good or bad, right or wrong.

      While the Slashcode moderation system is inherently a good thing, I think, it also serves as a pretty darn good object lesson in Plato's critique of pure democracy.

    2. Re:of course by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      thanks, nice to know Im not all alone out here... free markets mean freedom, communism does not...

    3. Re:of course by Grax · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Life is about balance. Business does many good things but it has to be kept in check. Left unchecked it becomes as bad or worse than communism with a few powerful people controlling the whole deal.

      We have laws to try and keep them in check. Laws against abusing monopoly power, requiring companies to be responsible for their actions, and other things to keep them from being totally cut-throat, screw everyone as long as I get my money sort of entities.

      I think we have every right to complain when they misbehave and a responsibility as voters and government to keep them in line.

      As a small business owner I have other issues to contend with, such as big business making barriers to entry for small businesses and amateurs.

      Of course the layoffs are the fault of big business capitalism but the existence of the jobs in the first place is also the fault of big business capitalism.

      I'm not sure who or what you are arguing against but saying "if we were all communists like most of you /.ers want" is completely without foundation. My view is that /.ers are more open-minded about the benefits of different forms of government and are happy as long as it works, allows them freedom to create and allows them freedom to put food on the table. However, my view is as baseless is yours and we could both be completely wrong.

    4. Re:of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      While I agree with your viewpoint, the point here is that only the executives of such large companies actually stand to profit, and not shareholders, as should be the case under capitalism. IMHO, these execs have co-opted the system to their benefit... while it is true that executives do deserve high compensation for the work they do, it seems that they are bilking their companies for their own profit. Witness John Roth (ex-CEO of Nortel) who stands to make >$100mill, while shaving 50k jobs from his company and losing >$100/share of value from the stock. Who get's fucked? The employees and the shareholders, that's who!

      So while I like capitalism, I don't like what these few people are doing to it. I want to see more accountability that's all, not more controls. The accountability would be in the form of full disclosure of their expenses and so on on the annual reports.

    5. Re:of course by Ngwenya · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, both parent posts carry the unfortunate tone of right-wing political correctness. The tarring of advocates of free software as hippies (and seeking to associate them with the usual "hippie" attributes of unworldliness or immorality), is an example of the "everybody knows" argument - sounds good in polemic, but from an informational point of view is pretty useless - mainly because the information that "everybody knows" is actually a poorly distilled version of out-of-context snippets from the most vocal and least thoughtful proponents of a point of view.

      Are you willing to explore what this twisted version of "free" is, which you claim that others purport? Are you also willing to explain your use of what seems like an arbitrary appeal to authority (ie, Plato's Laws), and why it lends support to your argument?

      --Ng

    6. Re:of course by foobar104 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Are you willing to explore what this twisted version of "free" is, which you claim that others purport?

      Yup. It's not very complicated, and it's also not a new argument.

      The BSD license is a good example of a free license, in the traditional sense of free: "Exempt from subjection to the will of others; not under restraint, control, or compulsion; able to follow one's own impulses, desires, or inclinations; determining one's own course of action; not dependent; at liberty." Webster's, 1913.

      The GPL, on the other hand, doesn't meet that definition of "free." GPL-licensed software is rife with restrictions. If I want to use GPL'd software in my own project, and not release the source to my own project, I am prohibited from doing this. That, to me, doesn't meet the definition of "free," sense 1, as given by Webster's. Whether the GPL is a good thing or not is a point for another debate. My objection-- at the moment-- is to what I perceive to be the misuse of the word "free" in characterizing that particular license.

      Are you also willing to explain your use of what seems like an arbitrary appeal to authority (ie, Plato's Laws), and why it lends support to your argument?

      Yeah, but Google does a better job than I could. Finding more information is left as an exercise for the reader.

      Plato's Republic contains a dialogue on forms of government, one of which is democracy. The problem with democracy, as defined by and discussed in this dialogue, is that political power rests with individuals who have no responsibility. Democracy, therefore, is fundamentally unstable and rapidly descends into tyranny.

      Contrast Socrates's definition of "democracy" with the modern definition of "democracy." Modern democracy is more like what Socrates would have called a republic, although we have long since abandoned the idea of the philosopher-king. Alas.

      Slashdot is similar, by analogy. Instead of political power, we're talking about editorial power. In a pure democracy, a charismatic individual could accumulate power by giving the masses what they want to hear, because democracy is based on the idea of positive feedback: you vote for, not against.

      On Slashdot, it's possible to accumulate karma (the Slashdot equivalent of political power, although karma carries with it no actual privileges) by giving the masses what they want to hear. Moderators are more likely to moderate comments up than down, so some ideas and patterns become highly moderated regularly.

      The old joke goes, "Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these!" This comment, or one like it, appears with virtually every article. Because this particular idea was so over-used, it became a joke. Comments that were once moderated "insightful" are now left unmoderated-- unless they're funny.

      Similarly, every story about some software product seems to include at least one comment either applauding the vendor for releasing source code, or deriding the vendor for opposite of same. These comments carry an implied converse, and they get moderated up often enough that an outside observer might conclude that the prevailing opinion on Slashdot is that keeping source code secret is unacceptable. I don't believe that's the most commonly held opinion by Slashdot readers. It just appears that way because of the way moderation works.

      The same principle applies to this particular story. Every time an article appears about a corporation, it seems that there appears one or more highly moderated comments on the subject of the "inherent" evils of commercialism or corporations. Again, I don't believe this is the majority opinion among Slashdot readers. It just appears to be because comments that have been moderated up are less likely to be moderated down.

      These situations all basically reflect the principles that were laid out thousands of years ago in the Republic: pure democracy, be it political or editorial, is unstable, and leads to tyranny, either social or intellectual.

      That's why I said that I would have spent a moderator point-- had I had any at the time-- to support the poster of the comment to which I replied. Contrary opinions are a good thing, and should be encouraged.

      In closing, I'd like to let you know that the fact that your post challenged the structure of my post, and not its content, is not lost on me.

    7. Re:of course by colmore · · Score: 2

      since when does being against layoffs mean being for communism?

      i'm sure the 15,000 people who have been let go in this oh-so-promising tech market are proud to be part of this corporate climate that makes America "kick everyones ass"

      America is an OK place. Our employment rate stays reasonably high. Aside from that, the real advantages of America are big guns and cheap gas. There are other nice places to live though.

      My real problem with America isn't the government. I think Adam Smith's invisible hand still works (with some modification) in the modern world. America's problem is philosophical. We seem to be so eager to kill ourselves with work in order to buy bigger things. I for one prefer to take less money and have more free time. I'll never have the big house in the suburbs like my parents. But that isn't the only way to live. I have a different American dream.

      The suburbs are the worst though. The only advantage of living in the suburbs is it minimizes the necessity of interacting with other people. I'd rather live somewhere where I can walk to the grocery store and the park. I like the freedom my car provides me, but I also like the freedom of not having to drive it all the time. From my (limited) travel and discussions with those abroad, I think other places have a better philosophy as far as communities are concerned.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    8. Re:of course by JimmytheGeek · · Score: 1

      Economics 101 It's just the right-wing mirror of sociology. If you have contempt for one, the criticisms apply for the other. If you like numerology, major in econ.

      It's got the same academic rigor as astrology, without the predictive success.

      Seriously - not trolling/flaming here. Science is based on experiment, and falsifiability. To the extent that there have been experiments in economic development, the orthadox theory subscribed to by the world bank has been an abject failure. What has worked for economically successful states has been flakey economic policies. The Asian Tigers had amazing success for a couple of generations (slowed for a while now), while Latin America, following the World Bank, has had essentially none.

    9. Re:of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you on some points. However, if company A is going to merge with Company B just to make a few of the top players richer, and they will then just leave the company, that is wrong. This is also one of the FEW times that they had to disclose how many people they were going to "let go". Merger ALLWAYS means layoffs. I have some serious problems with a government that promotes companies to screw their employees. My case in point is that the HP chick will get $50 MILLION dollars for this deal. Does she give a rats ass if it is really good for her business? Would you? I like to consider myself an honest hard working right wing American, but my God! $50 Million!

      I personally love competition of companies, and don't want to see too much government regulation in this type of stuff, but I do feel the government should step in and set some ground rules when it comes to mergers. By that I mean, EVERY type of merger, not just large companies.

      When companies do stupid stuff like this, it promotes people to start talking about unions. It is hard for the average hard working american to love the fact that this woman will make $50 million and over 15,000 workers will be laid off, and that the companies combined stock has not been doing so well of late. If you took her $50 Million and divided it among the 15k employees that are going to be laid off, it would give them an extra 3.3k to go live on for a while. Hell she would still be a multi-millionair! But NOOOO she won't even think about that. So in comes the union talk. It is bound to happen, maby not in the next couple of years, but soon.

      All this type of crap could be avoided, if the people at the top aren't so greedy, but then I ask "Would you do any different?" So that is why we need the government to set some basic rules for mergers.

      Steve Michael
      smichael@netcapade.net

    10. Re:of course by i0lanthe · · Score: 2

      Moderators are more likely to moderate comments up than down

      'cause we're good little sheep... (the moderator guidelines recommend doing this, as you know).

      Comments that were once moderated "insightful" are now left unmoderated-- unless they're funny.

      It's much easier to say something funny than to get modded up any other way, in my experience, but maybe that's just the class clown in me. /. is not the only bastard-child-of-applause-meter system that I've observed this on. (It's just the least obscure. :)
      Personally I try to avoid modding anything down, or modding anything "+1 funny", or modding anything to above 3. Other people are sure to do these things so it's not worth spending my points on.

      I'd say something funny about the DecComPaqard trend, but I can't really think of anything. I interned for a summer in Silly Valley at another research lab, and all the summer interns in a particular handful of places (that had this deal with each other) spent a few days going to each of the other companies and seeing "we're doing cool stuff and you should come here next summer, or else whenever it is that you graduate" presentations by various research groups. (Indeed there was some cool stuff.) It's not real funny to think about how many of these groups and labs are still around to work for now. :-b

      --
      "The Crystal Wind is the Storm, and the Storm is Data, and the Data is Life"
    11. Re:of course by snarfer · · Score: 1

      What I think is funny is how all the /.s used to be libertarians, until the layoff started in the tech business. Now they're complaining about their unemployment checks being so small.

      It's all where you sit. If you're going to GET the management bonuses at HP, it's a great thing. If your getting laid off to PAY FOR those bonuses, it's a bad thing.

      Overall for the economy and the shareholders, I think it's pretty clearly a bad thing.

  11. Struggling to survive by Diabolical · · Score: 2

    Well.. they had to do something to stay alive? Both companies were having problems that would have made them a serious takeover target for other companies. They decided that they would rather risk a merger than to be taken over by a company like Dell or IBM.

    And yes, they seriously were in that position.

    If they made a wise decision or not is something for the future. Although some "visionairs" say they know the future of the new company.

    There's a saying which could be applied here:

    A visionair (or pundit or whatever) is someone who can explain _exactly_ to you why a merger will not work before the merger and when the merger succeeds they can tell you _exactly_ why this success was the unwritten exception on the rule..

  12. Competition by keep_it_simple_stupi · · Score: 1

    Great... Now there will be even more competition for the few jobs that ARE still available. The biggest problem is that when you find an open job now, they want a specific set of skills. This used to be okay, because they could just train you on the skills that you don't have. But now, we have so many people available that they'll just pass on you until they can find someone who already knows the systems they have in place. I wonder if the heads of these huge companies even have a clue what they're doing to all the little guys that will be losing their jobs now... ARGH!

  13. Is it all that good? by dalassa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I admit I don't know much about the merger so feel free to take my comments with a grain of salt:

    Right after all the reports about the massive money pit that is AOL and how it is hurting Time Warner why do these companies rush into mergers? And why right after the Enron and Global-Crossing fiascos is no one examining the benefits to the CEOs of the companies? While the Compaq-HP deal was announced last year there was alot of criticism about the benefits to both companies, where has it all gone? Was this a self defense merger? Were the two companies afraid that with out a merger they wouldn't be able to compete with other companies?

    Well I suppose I can look foward to good printers being sold with lousy computers and less hope of HP ever having decent Mac support.

    As I said, not knowing much about the deal and the two companies, feel free to ignore.

    --
    Feminism is the radical notion that women are people.
    1. Re:Is it all that good? by shawnce · · Score: 1
      Right after all the reports about the massive money pit that is AOL and how it is hurting Time Warner why do these companies rush into mergers?
      What? HP/Compaq did not rush into this merger. A select few have been working on it for over a year. With thousands working on the merge plans over the last six months. HP & Compaq have spent a lot of time and energy into making sure this merger was right and to get working as soon as possible.

      And why right after the Enron and Global-Crossing fiascos is no one examining the benefits to the CEOs of the companies?
      Who says they aren't? The SEC and private investigators have been watching this thing closely. Hell even Hewlett "Jr." has been doing this will a twist of misinformation. The simple fact is the details of this merge have be discussed very openly for more so the most other merges before it (partly thank to the proxy fight).

      While the Compaq-HP deal was announced last year there was alot of criticism about the benefits to both companies, where has it all gone?
      It has continued (just look at the proxy fight) but the people in the know about how the merge is going to take place have increased their belief that it can and will work based on their research (with Hewlett being an obvious exception). Do people realize that HP/Compaq had hundreds of people from both companies setup with free access to all information about both companies over 6 months ago? It is not like HP or Compaq jump over the fence without knowing what is on the other side.

      Was this a self defense merger? Were the two companies afraid that with out a merger they wouldn't be able to compete with other companies?
      Yes. HP & Compaq did this not because some body had a dream one night or some CEO saw money to be made but because both companies needed a change to compete with IBM, SUN & DELL. Basically both companies have been trying to grow in the same market areas and gain the same skill sets. Neither of them had been able to grow what they needed as fast as they needed... this merge can achieve this (with hard work and some sacrifice).

      Well I suppose I can look foward to good printers being sold with lousy computers and less hope of HP ever having decent Mac support.
      HP is about much more then printers and consumer computers... That is what this merge is about. It is about growing the server division, storage division, enterprise software division, solution & consulting, marketing and sales force all while improving the ability of the consumer computer division to better compete with the like of Dell. Basically consumer computers and low-end servers are mostly commodity items, the money to be made lives else where now.

      The don't do to bad with Mac printer support but it could always be better.
    2. Re:Is it all that good? by zbuffered · · Score: 2

      I'm guessing that HP found a lot in Compaq that it lacked (servers, support facilities, handhelds, whatever), and basically decided that they could buy Compaq at a good price. I imagine that they're going to let a lot of Compaq's revenue sources dwindle in the wind in favor of the HP versions, and just keep the things compaq does better than HP. Which in a way is good, it'll result in a more robust single company, but they're going to have to lay off a lot more people. I hope I don't get the ax.

      Honestly, Compaq was hurting. They were not making money. HP was making money, had money, saw something in Compaq that it wanted, and said, "well, why not?" And the rest is history. I don't really know why Hewlett was so against the merger, probably because he saw a lot of overlap, niches in both companies that would not benefit from the merger. but the pro-merger folks saw beyond that and said, "look, this that and the other thing will be better as a result of this!"

      As with any story, there are two sides. As a Compaq employee (until tomorrow! today is Compaq apparel day--break out your compaq and Digital garb and don it for basically the last time),Am I worried as a result of this merger? Yes, not for my job(I'm in a pretty safe area) so much as my personal well-being. I'm certainly uncertain about the future, but everybody here seems to be against this merger, and have a personal vendetta against ms. Fiorina. Why? I think yer all just jealous that she makes more money than you. But in all seriousness, while I have serious doubts about this merger, that's just the skeptic. I'd be delighted to be proved wrong. Most of my cow-orkers are pro-merger, even though it could mean bad things for us on the other side. We'll see.

      --
      Synergy is your friend
    3. Re:Is it all that good? by shawnce · · Score: 1

      I guess I shouldn't post a response until I drink my first cup o' coffee in the morning. Sorry about the butchered English.

      (...cowering in the corner waiting for the grammar police to come knocking...)

    4. Re:Is it all that good? by snarfer · · Score: 2

      Right after all the reports about the massive money pit that is AOL and how it is hurting Time Warner why do these companies rush into mergers?

      The individuals who set up the mergers make tens or hundred of millions of dollars, Everyone else loses. But that's who set up these mergers. "The people" have no say in this way of doing "business."

      AOL lost $54 BILLION !!!!!!

    5. Re:Is it all that good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "The people" have no say in this way of doing "business."
      Uummm... the share holders had a say, many of whom are employees, private investors, or managers representing investors.

      When a company doesn't do what is needed to survive and insure it can empolyee people do you voice this same concern? Sure some abuse happens in the system but that doesn't mean that everyone does it.

      How about proving things...?

    6. Re:Is it all that good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I have a personal vendetta against Fiorina for the same reason I despise Larry Ellison and Scot McNeely. They are non-techical people lording it over technical companies. Fucking suits.

    7. Re:Is it all that good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's great for Carly. She stands to make a good fortune from it all, without having any responsibility for the destruction of those two companies.

  14. Wasn't this already posted today? by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 2

    I could swear this article talks about the same thing....

    Seriously, the thing I'm curious about is what's going to happen to the Unix divisions? Both HP and Compaq have their own flavors of Unix. Will we see a merging of the two (Join me...and together we will rule the root as father and son!) or will they decide to ditch both, and focus on a FreeBSD-GNU/Linux style solution?

    There is some interesting possibilities between these two companies with their development houses and expertise - it all depends on whether they can actually make the good pieces fit together to make a better whole.

    1. Re:Wasn't this already posted today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will we see a merging of the two (Join me...and together we will rule the root as father and son!) or will they decide to ditch both, and focus on a FreeBSD-GNU/Linux style solution?

      HP/SUX has been dying for a long time. This merger is next step of the exit strategy, the last step was when the Florham Park site was shut down.

    2. Re:Wasn't this already posted today? by Hanul · · Score: 1

      For both UNIX flavors there are contracts to be fulfilled, but since HP-UX has a far larger customer base, it looks very likely that True64 is going the way of the Dodo.

    3. Re:Wasn't this already posted today? by glenmark · · Score: 2
      "Seriously, the thing I'm curious about is what's going to happen to the Unix divisions? Both HP and Compaq have their own flavors of Unix. Will we see a merging of the two (Join me...and together we will rule the root as father and son!) or will they decide to ditch both, and focus on a FreeBSD-GNU/Linux style solution?"

      It was announced quite some time ago that efforts to port Tru64 Unix to IA-64 were being halted. HPQ will move forward with HPUX running on IA-64 with some juicy bits from Tru64 rolled in. Also, OpenVMS and NonStop NSK are being ported to IA-64 as well.

      --
      *** Quantum Mechanics: The Dreams of Which Stuff is Made ***
  15. Jobs dont matter... by tempestdata · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The shareholders and investors of a company dont really care how many people it employs, wether is succeeds, or gets bought out. All they DO care about is how much profit they will make on their investment. Thats it. If it means laying off people, making the company succeed, or having it bought out, they will do it.

    So it doesn't matter how many jobs are lost or how much restructuring has to be done as long as the investor gets his 'bang for the buck'. In my own opinion, this is a bad idea. But I can see why the shareholders voted for the merger. They just did some simple calculations and figure 'we're gonna get ourselves some big bonuses, and pocket a whole lot of money if we go this route'.

    --
    - Tempestdata
    1. Re:Jobs dont matter... by daviskw · · Score: 2

      Actually I am a share holder and an employee and I care a great deal about both areas. I like money, I want my investments to make money.

      I also like having a job. It is wrong to assume that the shareholders don't care. It is correct to assume that they entrust there savings and investments in people whom we all pray are doing the best job that they know how to do.

      Now there are CEOs who will cut jobs just to make there stock look good but you must be aware that long term investors care very little for short term bounces. Nobody that I know is looking forward to the next year or three in the new HP but from an envestment perspective we hope that ten years from now what is HP will really be a good company to have owned stock in.

      From a job perspective, it is inconceivable that the people laying off 15,000 people are not going to have really grim dreams for the next little while.

      My point is that regardless of whether this merger was a good or a bad idea, the people who thought it up did so because they felt that it was the best possible choice out of series of really bad options. They deserve the right to see if they can make a go of it.

      I only hope I don't loose my job or my envestments loose value in the face of this effort.

      --
      Beware the wood elf!!!
  16. Re:Europe is Our Playground by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but in Europe you'd have free medical care! What do you say now, huh? HUH?

    Oh, your employer pays your medical insurance? Oh shit, nevermind.

  17. Prophetic symbol by crow · · Score: 3, Funny

    When a company goes into bankruptcy, a 'Q' gets appended to the end of the ticker symbol. HPQ. Hmmm.

    1. Re:Prophetic symbol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That makes no sense. Why doesn't APPL have a Q after it? Do they forget bankruptcies after a certian amount of time and the Q can come off? Or was Apple's bankruptcy a different kind than HPs? I'm puzzled. Why a Q?

    2. Re:Prophetic symbol by StormRider01 · · Score: 1

      It's when the company is about to be delisted, not bankruptcy that gets the Q appended.

    3. Re:Prophetic symbol by crudeboy · · Score: 1

      On Nasdaq... good for HPQ they're traded on NYSE then.

  18. 150,000? by dan14807 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The article says 15,000 jobs will be cut out of a workforce of 150,000 over the next 2 years, not that 150,000 jobs will be cut. Original post wasn't that clear....

    1. Re:150,000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if Capellas keeps making gaffs, either in product strategy or articulation of same, like he did last week at Merrill-Lynch, it will be 165 thousand.

      HP-UX has twice the market share of Tru64. Plans are in place for HP-UX to subsume TruClusters and some other important components from Tru64 and continue to build its UNIX business. That's a bit tough to do when your CEO is a Wintel Weenie telling the world that Windoze and Linux will eviscerate the mid-range proprietary UNIX market.

      He's probably being dumb like a fox, of course - he probably figures that if he discourages and pisses off his UNIX people (on both coasts as well as the rest of the world), then he won't have to pay them generous (or any) severance packages. Of course, then, a couple of years from now, when his strategy is proven wrong and he needs talented engineers to come work for them, they won't submit their resume's, which is part of the battle that the Tru64 crew has been fighting for a while.

      So, I just hope that Sun and IBM's personnel departments brush up on their UNIX-speak - they'll need it.

      Thanks, Michael - you really earned your eight-figure bonus with that one... Have a Marvel-less time, you idiot!

  19. Official??? by lar3ry · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've been told that tomorrow is "Day One."

    But if you prefer to start counting at zero, then I guess you might think it's official today ("Day Zero").

    But then, I just work for Digital^H^H^H^H^H^H^HCompaq^H^H^H^H^H^HHP...

    --
    "May I have ten thousand marbles, please?"
    1. Re:Official??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of it this way... The next time around, you'll only have to delete two characters. :)

    2. Re:Official??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I just got to work (NW Houston 249 & Louetta) and ALL instances of Compaq are already gone except for the ones people are wearing. It sure LOOKS like today is day 1.

  20. New stock symbol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HPQ, what does that stand for, Hewlett-Paqard?

    1. Re:New stock symbol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It stands for: Hardly Passable Quality

  21. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  22. Wow, 100% layoffs! by Turtle+Master · · Score: 1

    a total loss of 15,000 more jobs with over 150,000 following the next two years.

    Come on dude, read the article. That's 15,000 layoffs in the next two years out of a combined workforce of 150,000. I.e., the combined size of the new company will be about 150,000 employees, of which ~15,000 (10%) will be fired in the next two years.

  23. HP + COMPAQ IBM by Shivetya · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They may have sold the investors on HP+COMPAQ=IBM but previous experience shows that X + COMPAQ X seems more true.

    I would be surprised if it only cost 15 thousand jobs as they have a lot of overlap in products. Consider also that most of this overlap isn't exactly in a profitable area (PC and PC peripheals)

    I think its best HP bought Compaq and not the other away around. The key to the merger will be how much control HP maintains over the process...

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  24. Yes, you've never used a Compaq PC obviously by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 1

    But besides that, while HP's desktop boxes used to be somewhat keen, and I used to recommend them to family looking for a new PC, I've began to accuse them of having Compaqitis. Lots of useless crap silently installed into the OS out of the factory that has "gee whiz" value but only leads to lowered system performance and stability, hardware and case designs from hell, and a general feeling of "ewww yuck" surrounding their systems...
    The only benefit to the geek is that we'll have one less name on our long list of "Avoid these manufacturers..."

    --
    Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
    Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    1. Re:Yes, you've never used a Compaq PC obviously by rhost89 · · Score: 1

      While i do agree that HP and compaq Desktop PC's are landfill waiting to happen, i have always said (and recomended) that their notebooks and server lines is rock solid (From both companys) and will continue to recomend them in the future.

      --
      I will bend your mind with my spoon
  25. JOB LOSS -- "Correction" by Timothy? by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 2

    Note: that job-loss figure is off; the 15,000 jobs projected to be cut are from a total of 150,000 between the two companies.

    Timothy, are you sure you want to make that correction? Your previous statement, while more speculative, may actually be closer to the truth! ;)

  26. HPQ Website by snawdjj2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone notice that hpq.com is active. (But it's just hp's home page right now.)

    1. Re:HPQ Website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, who else's home page would it be?

      DEC, Tandem, and Compaq no longer exist...

  27. 15,000 Layoffs you say. by nobodyman · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    I really love it when newspeople mention how the economic downturn is over, yet in the same breath mention that company abc is laying off thousands of worker.

    With 15,000 being layed off, it seems the matter of this merger being a "good thing" depends entirely on who you ask.

    1. Re:15,000 Layoffs you say. by elefantstn · · Score: 2

      That's a totally pointless comment. If this merger existed in a bubble, and was the entire US economy, and 15,000 just lost their jobs without any chance of future employment, then you're right. The reason analysts say the downturn is over is because they believe jobs are being created at a faster rate than they're being lost -- disagree with this if you want, but "some people lost their jobs" is not sufficient evidence to prove "the economy is doing poorly."

      --
      If it ain't broke, you need more software.
    2. Re:15,000 Layoffs you say. by AtariDatacenter · · Score: 1

      For all of the tech jobs laying off, you believe that the new positions opening at McDonalds, even if in greater quantity, is an upside for the economy?

      Yes... yes... I know. I don't have sufficient evidence to prove that either. But I believe in that as a trend, on a general level.

    3. Re:15,000 Layoffs you say. by colmore · · Score: 2

      and which companies announced today that they'd be hiring 15,000 new employees?

      When the biggest employer in the nation is a temp agency, I don't think you can say that the economy is healthy, at least not any definition of "healthy" that applies to normal people.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    4. Re:15,000 Layoffs you say. by /dev/trash · · Score: 1
      and which companies announced today that they'd be hiring 15,000 new employees? When the biggest employer in the nation is a temp agency, I don't think you can say that the economy is healthy, at least not any definition of "healthy" that applies to normal people.

      I agree wholeheartedly. It's a damn tuff market out there.

  28. The King demands a Queen by Anti-Microsoft+Troll · · Score: 0

    King of All Geeks Bill Gates demands the hand of Carly Fiorina as his Queen.

    Other potential suitors for the fair maiden will be forced to best Gates in a tournament, which will consist of contests to see who can release the most buggy software, who can best leverage a monopoly, and who has the worst personal hygene.

  29. Re:HP + COMPAQ IBM by mckwant · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Rave on, brother. I still can't figure out why anybody thinks this is a good deal, unless there's something in Compaq's server offerings that I'm missing. It strikes me that HP's got printing, and some relatively big iron, while Compaq is just nowhere, competitively. Esp. since you can't make serious money with PCs any more.

    Prove me wrong, kids.

    --
    ceci n'est pas un sig.
  30. Employment is a Trailing Indicator by wiredog · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That is, firing trails the downturn and hiring trails the upturn. First things go to hell, then people get fired, then things get better, then people get hired.

  31. Only Commies diss Compaq HP merger by d^2b · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Commies like Walter Hewlett. Commies like the (many) shareholders who dumped their stock in both companies. Commies like the many who wonder what the heck happened to Compaq+DEC.

    Gotta run. Have to go rally the proleteriat.

  32. Wall Street Seems To Like the New HP...... by 8127972 · · Score: 1

    According to this story, the stock is up so far today. That's a shock to me considering that according to this story that the street expressed it's displeasure with the idea by pushing HP stock down 25%.

    Maybe it's a post merger hangover?

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
    1. Re:Wall Street Seems To Like the New HP...... by buckeyeguy · · Score: 2

      Well, as of noon Eastern US time, HPQ is up a whopping 2%. Any buying into the stock is likely a combination of "ok, the wait is over, the merger is done" buying (arbitrage crowd closing out their positions), and mutual fund start-of-quarter buying. Given the sell-off of the previous several months, it's questionable to say that market liked this deal.

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
  33. That makes two this week. by r_j_prahad · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Two funerals to go to, that is. The other was a longtime personal friend. Rest in Peace, H-P. I will miss you.

    1. Re:That makes two this week. by Ngwenya · · Score: 1

      Well, in the immortal words of a man slung over John Cleese's shoulders -

      "I'm not dead yet"

      "I'm getting better"

      "I think I might go for a walk"

      Of course, then Eric Idle bludgeons him to death, but you never know - HP might just survive. And if it doesn't, it won't be for lack of effort from its workforce (and no, I'm not Carly)

      --Ng

  34. Mixing ingredients isn't always good by div_2n · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I like chili. I like chocolate chip cookies. That doesn't mean I would like the two of them together.

    I like Compaq. I like HP (mostly). I do not remain convinced and have neither seen nor heard any evidence that leads me to believe this is a good thing for consumers and employees. Thus far, the only people I see benefiting completely are those on top getting nice compensation.

    I am not trolling, I really would like someone to explain why this is a good thing. Maybe I missed it somewhere.

  35. Compaq? Research? Bwahahahaha by nosferatu-man · · Score: 2

    Not hardly. Compaq's just a screwdriver shop, albeit a huge and stupidly-run one. There's no one at Compaq with brains enough to pour piss out of a boot -- the only thing that they do is package up other people's research (while taking a massive loss.) Sadly, this is also becoming true of HP.

    I give HPaq 18 months, until they sell off printing and imaging and go bankrupt in an orgy of finger-pointing and recrimination. Fiorina, the architect of this train-wreck, will, naturally, be fired upwards. Again.

    'jfb

    --
    To spur "enterprise Linux," Big Bang, the distributed two-phase commit.
  36. Re:HP + COMPAQ IBM by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Compaq is a major player in the storage industry. IIRC, HP's offerings are rebranded OEM, while Compaq actually did something with DEC's StorageWorks platform.

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  37. TROLL ALERT!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have used and worked on Compaq DeskPro's and Compaq Proliants. They pretty much suck.

    WTF, are you as clueless as you seem about Compaq products, or just a member of the HP board of directors?

  38. Hey assholes, parent post isn't flamebait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the poster disagrees with your anti-capitalist views and now he's flamebait? Great way to be a bunch of knee jerk, reactionary censors! Instead of refuting anything he says, he gets modded down.

    15,000 lose their jobs. Cry me a fucking river. You welfare lovers are now going to make the lower and middle class bear the burden of supporting them because that's the way the "progressive income tax" works. 15% income tax on a family of 4 making $70,000 hurts them far more than 70% on a family of 6 making $500,000.

    How many of you socialist goons rose up from the working class ranks? Probably not a damn one of you. Grew up in nice comfy little middle and upper class families.

  39. I'm sure it will be a big success... by dpbsmith · · Score: 2

    just like the merger of AT&T and NCR, the merger of Burroughs and Sperry, and the merger of Digital and Compaq.

  40. Hewlett Compaqard by daviskw · · Score: 3, Informative

    The heading above is mistating the facts just a little. The new HP doesn't roll out until Tuesday, May 7th. Today is the last day that Compaq is an individual.

    --
    Beware the wood elf!!!
  41. Re:HP + COMPAQ IBM by laserjet · · Score: 2

    This is not true, and has not been trued for about the last two years. HP used to rebrand storage offerings, but in the last couple of years they have actually developed their very own, in house, Virtual Array series.

    --
    Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
  42. Re:HP + COMPAQ IBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummm, Compaq buys its disk drives from Fujitsu, Maxtor and Seagate. They stopped buying from IBM a few quarters ago following a debacle on some high-profile Tandem Himalaya systems, causing the Tandem engineers to make an emergency buy from Seagate.

    StorageWorks is all about enclosures, FC switches, RAID controllers and the like. StoryWorks does NOT make its own drives (tapes or disks).

    It will be interesting to see how they fare against EMC and others now...

  43. And thus... by infernalC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    we see the obsolescence another one of those cute little topic icons on /. RIP, Compaq.

    You know, maybe it would be nice for nostalgia's sake to post an article under the Digital logo once in a while. Of course, a small piece of DEC lives on in the Digital Networking Products Group. It's a real shame that Compaq cut off the DEC.com and Digital.com domains this year. DEC = 3 letters, Compaq = 6. More to type.

    Maybe this signals the need for a mechanism to merge topics of old in the slashcode.

    Time to go see if that VAX I booted 9 years ago is still heating, er, running...

    1. Re:And thus... by glenmark · · Score: 2
      "It's a real shame that Compaq cut off the DEC.com and Digital.com "

      Er, typing "http://www.digital.com" into my browser takes me to Compaq's website. "http://www.dec.com" takes me to "http://www.openvms.compaq.com", as does "http://www.openvms.digital.com"....

      --
      *** Quantum Mechanics: The Dreams of Which Stuff is Made ***
    2. Re:And thus... by infernalC · · Score: 1

      Another great example of the failures exibited by my school's BIND servers.

  44. Re:HP + COMPAQ IBM by red_dragon · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Consider also that most of this overlap isn't exactly in a profitable area (PC and PC peripheals)

    Are you sure of that? To me, it looks like the two companies are almost identical. To list:

    • Pavilion v. Presario
    • Vectra v. Deskpro
    • Omnibook v. Armada
    • Jornada v. iPaq
    • Kayak (name no longer used) v. Evo
    • Visualize v. AlphaStation
    • Netserver v. Proliant
    • HP 9000 v. AlphaServer (Tru64)
    • HP 3000 v. AlphaServer (OpenVMS)
    • ... and so on.

    That's all I can think of off the top of my head, but I know there are many more parallels between the two. The only differences I can recall are HP's printing and networking hardware product lines, for which Compaq doesn't have equals.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Jesus asks: "What Would You Do?"
  45. Wrong sketch by r_j_prahad · · Score: 2

    I think it would be better to compare H-P to the Monty Python dead parrot sketch; it is an ex-company, it has ceased to be, it has gone to meet its makers.

  46. Bankruptcies end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do they forget bankruptcies after a certian amount of time

    Financial bankruptcies do end after a period of time. Moral bankruptcies, on the other hand...

  47. Re:HP + COMPAQ IBM by jrstewart · · Score: 1
    StorageWorks is all about enclosures, FC switches, RAID controllers and the like. StoryWorks does NOT make its own drives (tapes or disks).

    Um, drives are commodity. Drive companies have razor thin margins. Enclosures, FC switches, RAID controllers and the like are where the storage industry makes money. Well, that and software.

  48. Q is nasdaq for Bankruptcy proceedings by yerricde · · Score: 1

    It's when the company is about to be delisted, not bankruptcy that gets the Q appended.

    No. According to this page, if a company's Nasdaq stock symbol ends in Q, then the company is in bankruptcy proceedings. C is for "may be delisted soon."

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  49. Re:Compaq? Research? Bwahahahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Poor misguided individual. I can only assume that you think "computers" are simply the things that sit on your desk and make pretty pictures for you to point at while you wipe the drool off your face.

    Unlike Dell, and the other "screwdriver shops", Compaq does do a lot of R&D for their server line. You know, servers: the really BIG computers. Think of your computer, and then think BIG. I think you should be able to grasp that idea.

    I'm sure this will get modded into oblivion because of the tone, but some response to the above garbage is warranted.

  50. The update is wrong by nagora · · Score: 2
    Actually, I for one expect most of the 150,000 others to go over the next couple of years. At the end of the day this is a stupid merger for stupid "I can piss further than you" corperate ego reasons. As such, no one will win except the execs that pushed it through who'll get nice big cheques to push off once it's clear how much damage they've done.

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  51. Re:Compaq? Research? Bwahahahaha by nosferatu-man · · Score: 2

    Oh, you mean "big" like a 64 processor E10k? Or "big" like an SGI Origin 3k? Or "huge", like an IBM zSeries, for that matter?

    Oh, sorry, you meant "big" as in quad processor x86. Or were you referring to the Tandem Nonstop technology that Compaq bought (*not* designed)? Or the big DEC Alpha machines -- again, you do know that they didn't do anything to Alpha but fuck it royally right up, yes?

    Putting the best quality parts -- as purchased from other people -- into a box with a copy of NT and a custom powersupply doesn't really qualify as building "big" computers.

    'jfb

    --
    To spur "enterprise Linux," Big Bang, the distributed two-phase commit.
  52. History will show this deal was nuts. by diabolus_in_america · · Score: 1

    You can't be all things to all people. There's just no way to grow and retain a customer base, if you don't have a solid plan as to which customers to target.

    As a current HP customer, but in almost all certainly not a future one, I can say there's no roadmap, there's no strategy, there's no plan for this new company that seems any different than for the old one. Sure, there may be lots of wonderful ideas, full of "synegry" and other intangible buzzwords, hopping around between Fiorina and her lieutenants in internal e-mail and voice mail. But that doesn't help the customer.

    It just seems to me that the general rule of thumb at HP is "throw as much crap as possible against the wall, and let's hope something sticks!" Printers. UNIX. Windows. Linux, et. al. All that Compaq brings them is just more crap to throw and more hands to throw it with.

    I think Dell and IBM are going to chew this new company up within a span of three years, maybe even sooner. Both of those companies have real solid business plans and clear cut strategies they openly share with their customers. HP is doomed unless it can identify its customer base, and then keep them happy.

    It's unfortunate for HP and its shareholders that such basic common sense as "keep the customer happy" was not a part of this deal.

  53. Friend's job "eliminated" by snarfer · · Score: 2

    I just heard from a friend at HP that he was told today that his position no longer exists. Sounds like there's a lot of that over at HP today.

    Gotta pay those executive bonuses somehow.

  54. Re:Compaq? Research? Bwahahahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree that Compaq totally dropped the ball with the Alpha and it's pretty much a dead technology because of that.

    I shouldn't have been so condescending, and apparently there is no way I am going to be able to convince you that you are wrong, but I do know, that Compaq does design many of its components and form-factors for its servers.
    The simple truth is that you are wrong about Compaq purchasing all of the parts from other people and assembling them.

  55. AC Replies courteously! Pope, Jewish! by nosferatu-man · · Score: 2

    Heh.

    "The simple truth is that you are wrong about Compaq purchasing all of the parts from other people and assembling them."

    You are of course correct. I plead rhetorical exaggeration: in this instance, because the HPaq merger is idiotic for HP, which at least passes a semblance of being a research-driven technology company. Truly, you have to admit that there's nothing at Compaq like the PA-RISC people (oops, sold to Intel), or their compiler team (uh oh, off to MS and Intel), or their printer and instrumentation folks (how much longer can they last)?

    Compaq's been on a downward spiral since, well, since Dell. The fact that the DL740 (or whatever the 8 Xeon box is) has some tidy h/w engineering in it is swamped by the fact that nobody needs them, at least, nobody needs them badly enough to shell out the premium over Dell's offerings.

    The commodity PC market -- and yes, those servers *are* commodity PCs, even if they're bigger -- is dead. HP is buying a huge exposure to zero margin commodity PCs in addition to the dysfunctional and hateful "services" group. The only winners are IBM and Dell. Oh, and Fiorina, who'll no doubt ride off with another $18,000,000 payday as HPaq dies an ignominous death. Lucent, anyone?

    'jfb

    --
    To spur "enterprise Linux," Big Bang, the distributed two-phase commit.
  56. Tech Support for CPQ by halo8 · · Score: 1

    Ya... *sigh* i work the night shift

    so now when i get to work i have to reprogram myself to say "thank you for calling compaq... a part of the NEW HP"

    geez ppl.. who writes this stuff?

    i wonder whats going to happen to Compaq.Com now?

    --
    The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
  57. JOB LOSS FIGURE IS CORRECT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They ARE laying off 15,000 now. They WILL be laying off another 150,000 in the next few years, as their blatant mismanagement drives them into Chapter 11. What business is HPQ in now, anyway?

  58. Re:HP + COMPAQ IBM by mateub · · Score: 1
    If your scale for "most" is product categories, then yes, you might be right. However, printing generates something like 40% of the revenue and lately, approximately all the profit for HP. And there are a lot of printer models: personal, workgroup, all-in-one, high-end network, and the recently purchased Indigo digital press company. All of this information is in HP's 10K on http://edgar.sec.gov/ . The idea is that the areas you mentioned become profitable once HewPaq is buying in HP+Compaq's combined volumes and gets price breaks.

    and you don't want to forget HP's digital cameras or projectors, either...both seem likely to make some good money.

    adéu,
    Mateu

    --
    "And we're happy here, but we live in fear, we've seen a lot of temples crumble..." - Concrete Blonde
  59. Smoke 'em if you got 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, that article is quoting the Carly Fiorina fantasy world figures which HP management used to bamboozle shareholders into approving this deal. Numerous internal memos leaked from HP since the beginning of the merger plans have showed that reality will be closer to 24,000+ jobs cut as well as steadily increasing flows of red ink for at least the first two years. Everything HP management has said about how this deal will benefit either company is complete bullshit, and the combined company will be even fatter, slower, and less able to compete with the likes of Dell in the consumer and small business marketplace. The only winners in this deal are the investment bankers who put it together and the senior management of both companies who are rewarding themselves with bonus packages in the hundred-million dollar range in the first year just for coming up with the whole idea.

    The bottom line is that the real H & P worked for forty years to build a company with one of the most successful, productive, and motivational corporate cultures in the entire industry, and it only took one retarded CEO five years to destroy it all.

    The majority of former HP people I work with (and that's quite a lot since my own company was split from HP just a few years ago) plans to dump every single share of HPQ they have the next time it reaches at least a break-even point for them.

  60. Re:HP + COMPAQ IBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you wrongly equate Compaq server = Proliant. You have overlooked three entire product sets. BTW these three products generate profit, which is not the case for PC systems.

    The Nonstop division is a very profitable part of Compaq. Himalaya servers compete at the very high end with IBM BIG iron. HP did not have an equivalent offering. Systems with ultra high availability and scalability is a growth market.

    VMS is a profitable part of Compaq. This is entrenched in the goverment/military so is not going to go away any time soon. HP did not have an equivalent offering.

    TRU64/AlphaServers are extremely competive in the technical computing markets, especially those requiring advanced clustering. HP did not have this technology.

    I expect TRU64 and AphaServers to die, though much of it will live on in a future versions of HP-UX and SuperDome. NSK/Himlaya will benefit from the merger and will have even faster market growth than it does today. VMS will live on.

  61. Compaq signs coming down by Animats · · Score: 2

    The gold "Compaq" letters were removed from the old DEC Systems Research Labs building in Palo Alto just a few minutes ago. Unknown at this time whether they get replaced with "HP", or "Available".

  62. The Day HP Died... by thogard · · Score: 2

    Seen in rec.humor.funny (by King Ables)
    With apologies to Don McLean...

    A long, long time ago
    I can still remember how computing
    used to be worthwhile.

    And I knew from the day I was born
    that I could make that code perform
    and maybe I could do it with some style.

    But last September made me shudder,
    with every 'nouncement Carly uttered.

    Bad news in my In-tray,
    I couldn't take one more day.

    I can't remember if I sighed when I
    read about our latest stride,
    something cut me deep inside,
    the day the HPWay died.

    So

    Purge, purge, Ms. Technology Scourge,
    Drove my Beetle to the Needle,
    Now my job's on the verge.

    Them Compaq boys were
    drinking Starbuck's and Surge
    singing "This'll be the day that we merge,
    This'll be the day that we merge."

    Did you write the Book of DOS
    And do you believe an albatross
    Can really save our company?
    Now do you believe in buying time?
    Can Compaq save our bottom line?
    And can you teach me how write a resume?

    For all the words in a much better formated way (thanks lameness filter!) go here

  63. Re:HP + COMPAQ IBM by red_dragon · · Score: 2

    I agree, HP's printing business accounts for the greater share of the company's revenue, and looking at it that way, it is obvious that HP is much larger than Compaq. And yes, there are other product lines in HP's catalogue that Compaq doesn't have (cameras and projectors, as you mentioned, as well as scanners), mostly targetted at consumers. The point I tried to make was that their offerings could be matched item by item (and then some, in HP's case). Basically, HP has acquired a subset of HP, which more than likely will end up in the scrapper, and that oh-so-important-to-Princess-Fiorina services unit. In the end, HewCom PackPaq != HP + Compaq.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Jesus asks: "What Would You Do?"
  64. Not Technically..... by Saint+Mitchell · · Score: 1

    Well since they like to have 95% temps, technically you didn't get laid off. You are "released to your temp agency". "we're on a hiring freeze". Bastards. I hope the stock goes down. It's not right the way they treat people in the name of profit. In indy we used to say we were the last stop before Mexico. They love to hire temps who have never even touched a computer, let alone put one together. You would be amazed at how many broken p4s happen because they can't remember to lift the latch on the ZIF socket. Then you turn it on.....poof. MB, CPU, and sometimes RAM up in a lovely ozone-plastic smelling cloud.

    Am I bitter about my lack of being hired? Yes. Am i pissed that the temp agenct tells everyone who goes in there if they do a good job they'll be hired in three months? Yes. Would I buy a compaq PC? Hell no. Still buy a server though...that's good stuff.

  65. Re:AC Replies courteously! Pope, Jewish! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't we hire a syphilitic or someone to rape Fiorina?

  66. Re:Europe is Our Playground by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't want fucking mediocre 'free' health care. I don't use the doctor a lot, but when I do I want to spend my money and get high quality service.

    Letting all the trash people tromp around in the clinics for free doesn't get me that. Letting massive layers of fucking bureaucrats get involved in the equation just drives the price up for cash customers.

  67. Vote Tally by SunCrushr · · Score: 0

    In case anyone wanted to know:
    838,401,376 shares voted for the merger.
    793,094,105 shares voted against.
    13,950,651 shares abstained.

    Sounded pretty close to me.
    Mergers of companies this big usually have close votes though.

  68. Re:I hate Carly Fiorina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I liked her in the sopranos. That's the definition of a MILF....hoha.

  69. Re:HP + COMPAQ IBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, compaq makes projectors also. It's part of their iPaq product line...

    http://www.compaq.com/products/projectors/

  70. re:RPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I figure Carly will likely destroy HP or sell off anything of value to keep what's left afloat.

    I'm very worried that RPN calcs won't exist in a few years. I probably ought to stockpile enough to last me the next 40 or so.

  71. Calculators? by bjb · · Score: 1
    Hmm, wonder if the new line of HP calculators would be in the form of an iPaq..

    Actually, I'm miffed by the idea that HP (cough.. carly) dropped the calculator line. Go around Wall Street trading desks and EVERYONE has a 12C/17Bii/19Bii on their desk. Go to any business school and you'll find the same situation. The TI calculators are fine, but HP is (soon to be 'was' I guess) the standard.

    --
    Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
  72. Say Good night by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To a cool company, and the bitch-whore that destroied it. She will leave with millions of bling bling to piss away while the company is crushed under all that debt. To buy a company that is fucking going out of business anyway! But hey lawyers and CEOs gotta eat, so lets do a big big deal that won't explode for a couple of years, so we wont get blamed, and we can sell all of our stock options before doomsday. Fuck everybody else! Can you say Enron?