Slashdot Mirror


Mysteries of the Las Vegas Telecom System

Reverend Raven writes "This is from Security Focus and deals with how some people believe a group of uber-hackers controls the Vegas telecom system. Interesting read, indeed." A follow-up to this old story. The case seems to be still winding its way through the bureaucracy.

127 comments

  1. telecom security by CmdrTaco+(editor) · · Score: 0, Interesting
    "Going over your testimony, you seem to blame Sprint for the loss of your business," Riley says, with mock bewilderment. "Is that correct?"

    "They're providing a service to me, and they're not providing the security they should," Reubel replies. "So, yes."

    If his argument holds up (which it most likely won't) this could mean interesting things for other telecom companies that provide less than spectacular security and maybe even the software industry (ahem... Microsoft anyone?).
    1. Re:telecom security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh well, maybe next time #564483, maybe next time.

    2. Re:telecom security by TheMaccLads · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Only slightly related to the story, more to your comment:

      I do not understand why more people/corporations in the USA do not take legal action against their electric power suppliers. You guys suffer brown-outs, interupptions, and so on. Why, one slashdot poll was "how many surge protectors do you own?" or something like that.

      It's about time that we had more _even_ rights to complain (compare class action against ciggy manufacturers with lack of people complaining about electric power delivery.

      --
      Money implies poverty (Ian M. Banks)
    3. Re:telecom security by dardallas · · Score: 1

      Having done tech support for a telcom out of Vegas there is little wonder..that one(a telcom) could be hacked...Every time it rains,due to the infrastuctur's layout there is always a rigged fix just to get the population back on line..This has to create a huge oppertunity to anyone that would like to hone their hacking skills.

    4. Re:telecom security by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Informative

      You must have been mis-informed by the media. That happens. The only places in the USA that have power problems are the ones that haven't built any additional power capacity in the last 10 years due to environmentalist protests.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    5. Re:telecom security by Rasta+Prefect · · Score: 3, Informative

      I do not understand why more people/corporations in the USA do not take legal action against their electric power suppliers. You guys suffer brown-outs, interupptions, and so on. Why, one slashdot poll was "how many surge protectors do you own?" or something like that.

      I'm not sure what media coverage of us is like over where you are, but don't get the wrong idea. I've never suffered through a brown out, or non-weather related blackout(Tornados and Thunderstorms destroying power lines really isn't their fault). Yes a certain section of the country did last year - mostly because they built no new capacity for years and compounded the problem with a regulatory cock up.

      Anyway, as far as surge protectors go, they're nessecary. Really, it's not the power companie's fault that your electricity isn't 100% clean. Things are going to get a little messy when your neighbor fires up his arc welder for a little heavy duty car maintnance. Or for that matter, when the de-humidifier I have sitting in the corner kicks in and dims the light. Hence, we have surge protectors.

      --
      Why?
    6. Re:telecom security by dubl-u · · Score: 2

      The only places in the USA that have power problems are the ones that haven't built any additional power capacity in the last 10 years due to environmentalist protests.

      I'm glad to blame leftist kooks for all sorts of dumbness, but they are entirely innocent in California's power crisis.

      California's celebrated (and really pretty minor) brownouts happened during the winter, the time of lowest electricity demand. The problem wasn't capacity, it was a poorly constructed market regulated by the naive and gamed by many of the major power companies, Enron prime among them.

    7. Re:telecom security by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      Oh, so California did build new capacity during the 10 years leading up to the shortage? Oh, they didn't? Darn, then I guess they're at the mercy of the market. Better regulate the market because California is too good to have to pay for its shortsighted ways.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    8. Re:telecom security by dubl-u · · Score: 2

      Darn, then I guess they're at the mercy of the market. Better regulate the market because California is too good to have to pay for its shortsighted ways.

      You seem to be missing the point. The "shortage" was artificially created by manipulating the market. There was no shortage of electricity during the crisis, and the recently exposed Enron memos prove that.

      You'd be hard pressed to find an economist who doesn't think there should be rules against market manipulation. Take our stock market: it's widely regarded as the world's most successful, so much so that foreign corporations will list themselves here. Is that because we don't regulate it? Hardly. The SEC is one of the toughest regulators in the world; CEOs fear them universally. The tight regulation creates the level playing field necessary for a liquid market.

      This isn't to say that California doesn't have a NIMBY problem, and it may yet come to bite them. But it hasn't yet, and claiming that the power crisis is an example of too much regulation is missing the point entirely.

  2. what a movie by antistuff · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is exactly the kind of stuff they have been making movies about, uber hackers taking over stuff and causing trouble. This would make a kinda boring movie though, because its probobly not some glamish kids who talk funny and rollarblade around some big city, its probobly some old fat guys who drink too much diet pepsi.

    1. Re:what a movie by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just show lots of footage of the poor hot babes who don't get their phone calls. Let's call that movie Showgirls 2.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    2. Re:what a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hello? Hello?? WHO IS THIS!?! STOP CALLING ME! Why don't you answer me!!!!????"

      We'll call it "Telespammers".

    3. Re:what a movie by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      As long as they're handing out cyanide tablets at the premiere, I'm there. No way I'm gonna live through another Showgirls with that Saved by the Bell chick jerking about spasmodically.

    4. Re:what a movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they did it right, I'd watch it.

      A movie more like "Sneakers" than "Hackers" that shows the real "business" potential of hacking, rather than script kiddies that just break stuff. Or some overly sensationalistic international mello-drama.

      The first scene in Sneakers where they crack the bank was really enjoyable. I doubt this movie would be a box office smash, but it would still make a fun watch to me. You probably would have to make the cracking take a back seat to the seedy underworld of Las Vegas.

      A Vegas mob movie where they are heavy on tech maybe?

    5. Re:what a movie by jo42 · · Score: 1

      Didn't they already do that at least once? Wasn't the latest stink bomb called Swordfish?

  3. 1984 by AlastairMurray · · Score: 0

    Could this be the start of a belated "1984"?
    Ok, sure it's not the goverment that's doing it - but you can bet at least a few people from one of the agencies is wondering how much it'd cost to hire these guys.

  4. From reading the article by phaze3000 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    callers from outside Vegas, or from payphones and cell phones, get through, he says, but hotel callers frequently get false busy signals, or reach silence

    This sounds to me like systematic hacking of hotel telephone exchanges, so assuming Sprint isn't responsible for these (I don't see why it would be) I'm really not sure that this is Sprint's fault or problem.

    --
    Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
    1. Re:From reading the article by Evil+Al · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's interesting... I wonder if it's illegal in the US for the hotels to do that, since they're not a public telecoms service? It certainly would open up a whole new (evil) revenue stream for them. I bet pizza delivery restaurants would pay good money for that too.

      I know it's illegal in the UK now under the RIP bill, but can anyone say for definite if it is in the US?

      --
      Ah, computer dating -- it's like pimping, but you rarely have to use the phrase "upside your head" -- Bender
    2. Re:From reading the article by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 2

      I would have to assume that intentionally misrouting a call for financial gain would fall under wire fraud no matter who owns the phone hardware.

      The reason that this scam (assuming it is) works and your proposed pizza one would not, is that when someone looks up Dominos and calls Dominos, they notice when a Papa Johns guy comes to their door. When you're calling a bail bond agency or a hooker (let's call a hooker a hooker), you don't care who you get on the phone, as long as they provide the service you want. A vast majority of the people who were misrouted would have had no idea. And since at least half of the companies involved are quasi-legal at best, nobody complains to the cops.

      -B

  5. yeah, i hate that too... by nostromo_42 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "Munoz believes that test was compromised, and the hackers cleverly arranged for him to receive the test calls, while still blocking the other hotels."

    seriously, if they're that good, why don't they just hack into the FBI computer systems and invent a nice little file on him? why bother ruining his life by taking away his livelihood when they could just as easily be ruining it by sending him to jail for 20 years?

    1. Re:yeah, i hate that too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Because you'd simply leave too much of a trail. How about making the guy sound like some fanatical old cook talking about hackers. Who's gonna really wanna spend time and/or money listening to this guy? We protect our racket; we get paid "X" amount of dollars per month and you get your calls. As an added bonus for an extra "X" amount of dollars we'll make it so that you get business and your competitor doesn't.

      After we milk these SOB's we'll fucking buy Las Vegas or start our own little joint and then cut them all out. . I'm so glad whats his name retired and those case files were burned. That was the only evidence on paper at all. . It's too late.. Do you hear me "Officials, Gov't etc" It's too FUCKING LATE!..

      Kinda got carried away ;)

      On a diff but slightly similar note the hacking of exchanges is nothing new and if you look in the 80-90's you'll see similar cases where a 14 yr old and some time could own an exchange.

    2. Re:yeah, i hate that too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, because their objective isn't ruining his life. They divert calls to other services of the same type, in effect stealing the guy's clients, and make money off the stolen clients either directly or indirectly.

    3. Re:yeah, i hate that too... by Grax · · Score: 1

      Because the FBI is a little more serious about security than Sprint. Any time you hear "To my knowledge there's no way that a computer hacker could get into our systems" that means that their knowledge is lacking, not that their computers are safe.

    4. Re:yeah, i hate that too... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like Napster, except illegal.

    5. Re:yeah, i hate that too... by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      "How about making the guy sound like some fanatical old cook talking about hackers. "

      Hmm, a fanatical old cook eh? I think I know the one you're talking about, he's called the Swedish Chef.

  6. Re:Moziiiila... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    background: tell me have you seen herrrrr; OHHHHHHHHHH; de de doo doo doo de de doo doo doooooo.

  7. Its not hackers... its Vegas... by MosesJones · · Score: 3, Funny


    So lets get this straight, in a hotel in Vegas you may or may not get through when you dial out...

    Next week "$5 on getting through on the 4th occasion at 3-2"

    And "The Gamblers Suite, where even the phone has the element of chance, get through when the blue light is on and win a free meal for two at the Belagio"

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  8. Never... by HiQ · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nah, I don't believe those hackers are good enough too control the phonesys[beep]..[beep]..[beep]...[beep]...[beep].. .

    1. Re:Never... by epsalon · · Score: 2

      Yeah! They won't do anything against data ca*I$&#(*%F

      NO CARRIER

  9. So lemme see... by Knoxvill3 · · Score: 1

    A man in the porno biz get's the shaft and decides its because of 'Uber Hackers' employed by the higher powers in vegas to take business from him. Sounds way too Hollywood'ish to me, which I fully believe if they somehow win some sort of settlement in this, there will be at least some sort of T.V. Mini-Series that glams up this already semingly Fictional account of innocient victims in the Porn Industry.

    And if this story is even true, then why are these guys in court/hearings? It's only going to get them a cash settlement at best. But to me, despite the fact the basis of this whole ordeal is money apparently, I wonder why, or if they tried, to hire own their own 'Uber Hackers' to help 'counter' the others. Granted that would just make this whole thing sound way more bizarre than it already does. But these people deal in Sleeze, and I wouldn't think Sleeze would run to the authorities right off the bat, I'd think they'd feel more comfortable about my wonderings (of countering as opposed to having hearings.). Then again, who knows, they could have tried it and failed so their next option was to call on the P.U.C. to help lynch Sprint of Nevada.

    But I'll admit, I'm going to attempt to keep an eye on this story, curiousity, and I've got 8 lives to spare.

    --
    ======
    Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish. - Euripides
    1. Re:So lemme see... by MontyP · · Score: 1

      I wonder why, or if they tried, to hire own their own 'Uber Hackers' to help 'counter' the others. Granted that would just make this whole thing sound way more bizarre than it already does

      "Bardarson says he discovered what appears to be computer security weakness in Sprint's infrastructure. He's not the only one. As SecurityFocus Online reported last year, former hacker claims extensive penetrations into Sprint's Las Vegas systems from approximately 1992 until his February, 1995 arrest -- smack dab in the middle of the call diversion complaints. Mitnick's access gave him the power to monitor or reprogram any phone line in town. Following that story, Munoz retained Mitnick as a technical consultant in his case, only to give him up later. Munoz says Mitnick wanted to run too many pointless tests; Mitnick says Munoz stiffed him and a partner for thousands of dollars in fees and expenses.",

      --


      There is no .sig
    2. Re:So lemme see... by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      Then again, who knows, they could have tried it and failed so their next option was to call on the P.U.C. to help lynch Sprint of Nevada.

      Given how often my DSL line at work goes down, Sprint deserves to be lynched. (At least we also have a cable-modem line that we can use as a backup...)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  10. Oh crap! by xpurple · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I've been found out, time to move to montana...

    --
    http://www.xpurple.com
  11. a whole cast of sleazy characters...... by Troll+on+ice · · Score: 0

    ....and no mention of microsoft or the music publishing industry? who would have thunk it?

    --
    Karma: Bad (mostly affected by moderation done to your comments)...Now i know why.
  12. Bring your cell phone... by Ironpoint · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    Phone calls in xome Vegas Hotels can run about $20 / min.

  13. Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't read this :-(

  14. Kevin Free by rjamestaylor · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I was all settled into my overstuffed leather chair ready to read about a hacking conspiracy in Las Vegas and -- BAM! -- out of the blue I'm broadsided with reference to über Hacker Kevin Mitnick.

    Can't a guy get a break? Surely there's a hacking story out there that doesn't mention Kevin Mitnick. Isn't there?

    Anyway, did the cretins who run these prostitution rings ever think that just perhaps word got out that their girls were all used up? Why is it that a business people are more apt to blame a WILD-EYED CONSPIRACY THEORY instead of accepting the market's decision to cut them out of the loop? It's like die-hard Catholics blaming the Devil for all the slander against their holy priests and other dwellers of the demonic branches of the tree of deformity (see Matt 13 for a description of the annual herb that becomes a perennial roosting place for the demons). Pure self-delusion.

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    1. Re:Kevin Free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kevin may be free. But he's not Free.
      And how can you have a story about haxoring the Vegas teleco's without mentioning him?

    2. Re:Kevin Free by stray · · Score: 1

      [OT RANT]

      yup, you got a point there. same with music industry. of course file swapping is to blame that their revenues don't keep rising indefinitely, not the fact that they are producing crap.

      maybe i'm just old-fashioned, but i liked it better back then when musicians were ugly but could play their guitars like the devil to the songs they wrote THEMSELVES. today, those show puppets sure may be pretty, but they're not musicians anymore, not by a long call.

      ahem.. got a bit carried away there..

    3. Re:Kevin Free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Kevin may be free. But he's not Free.

      Kevin is free as in beer, but not free as in speech?

      Woohoo!! Free Kevin!!! (Limited time offer, limit one per customer)

    4. Re:Kevin Free by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      free as in beer?

      sorry but i really wouldlike an explanation of this. I have bee reading /. for about 5 and ahalf years now... and I see "free as in beer" a lot on here - but i dont know where the reference comes from. please humor me and lfill me in...

      thanks

    5. Re:Kevin Free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Free as in Beer:

      This expression refers to the product being available for free, but its receipe (source code) may be closed. You can download it and use. So long as the binary satisfies your needs you're gonna be happy.

      From: http://ringlord.com/legal.html

      Enjoy.

  15. Uberhackers==police? by rufusdufus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It seems likely to me that the so-called uber hackers are really the police. Look at the the people involved in this: pimps and smut sellers and Gambino's [and somehow Kevin Mitnik]. The mobsters were caught in a sting when they tried to "muscle-in" on the phone racket. They could only have been caught if the Law knew what was going on.

    Last time I went to Vegas, it was much cleaned up from several years ago. Almost no porn and fewer hooker adds. Used to be you couldnt see the sidewalk for them. I say the police did it by jamming the unsavory's phones.

    1. Re:Uberhackers==police? by foofy · · Score: 1

      uhh.. no hookers? what the hell do you think these agencies that advertise "private dancers" for hotel rooms really are? thats exactly what this fellow in the courtoom is selling and thats exactly the business he's complaining about dropping off.

    2. Re:Uberhackers==police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh, no. These hackers are taking business from whores and pimps, and giving it to _other_ whores and pimps.

    3. Re:Uberhackers==police? by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 3, Informative

      Prostitution is illegal in Las Vegas, and in fact in the whole county (Clark County).

      You have to go to other counties in the state to be where it is legal.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    4. Re:Uberhackers==police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I went to DefCon9 I almost died laughing. A friend of mine grabbed one of the little papers in the little yellow boxes, you know the ones I am talking about, on every street corner, if you ever get to street level.

      At any rate, there was an ad:

      "Live Nude College Co-Eds. Live nude college students will visit your hotel room, and talk to you in the nude, FOR FREE!!!!"

      I almost was tempted to call, but couldn't bring myself to do it.

    5. Re:Uberhackers==police? by mosch · · Score: 2
      no hooker ads? did you accidentally get a ticket to salt lake city?

      apparently you haven't walked down the strip. see those mexican immigrants tapping pamphlets against their hands to get your attention? yes, that's a book full of hooker ads. No, you're not going to find them on casino property, and more and more of the walk really is casino property on the new strip, but you'll find them everywhere else.

  16. Old news... by hardcode · · Score: 1

    ...again, this appeared word for word as early as March 18 2002, google on "Larry Duke Reubel"

    hc

  17. Lemme guess... by boomer_rehfield · · Score: 3, Funny

    " A man in the porno biz get's the shaft..."

    Lemme guess...no pun intended?

    --
    Carpe Canem - Seize the Dog
    1. Re:Lemme guess... by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      Lemme guess...

      No cum intended....

  18. Re:Uberhackers==police? or sprint employee? by Organic_Info · · Score: 1

    Could be an inside job - easier to do than an external hack. You'd know when the system is being checked aswell.

    --
    "Things that you own end up owning you" - Tyler Durden (via Diogenes of Sinope).
  19. LV by Konster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Prostitution in Las Vegas is illegal. Refer to Nevada State Law, Chapter 244, Counties: Government General Provisions, section 8 for more info (NRS 244,345):

    8. In a county whose population is 400,000 or more, the license board shall not grant any license to a petitioner for the purpose of operating a house of ill fame or repute or any other business employing any person for the purpose of prostitution.

    Since Las Vegas is in Clark County, a county that has a population that is indeed over 400k, we can plainly see that prostitution is illegal in the area. Laws won't stop the average criminal from committing crimes, so we must assume that there is a fairly profitable business in LV selling flesh for pleasure.

    As far as I know, police would derive a greater benefit from simply arresting people who were breaking the law, other than jumping through some serious hoops to stealthily put people who derive their livelihood, directly or indirectly, upon the sale or aiding in the sale of illegal activities.

    It's far more likely that some people with money are paying people with some knowledge to put some technological legerdemain on their competition.

    Is this is some type of surprise? Hell, if I were a cop, I'd let the small fish get eaten by all the big fish, so I could catch and mount the big ones later.

    ...much later, it would seem.

    And someone named Escobar is in charge of the Utilities Cartel. Er, commission.

    1. Re:LV by csmiller · · Score: 1
      I assume 'license' is the for the building, akin to a liquor or firesafety (public saftey) license.

      If I read that law correctly, then you can't get a brothel or 'rest-station' (somewhere for the prostitues to stay when they are oncall, but not attending a client). But if the pimp works out of an office, and calls the girls at home to go to out, does this need a license? Or for that matter, if the girl just works for herself, giving out a mobile (cell) phone's number, I can't see that needing a license.

      --
      It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity. --- Albert Einstein
    2. Re:LV by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 1

      Prostitution in Las Vegas is illegal. Refer to Nevada State Law, Chapter 244, Counties: Government General Provisions, section 8 for more info (NRS 244,345):

      MOM! you know it embarrasses me when you post on slash dot!

    3. Re:LV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heh heh... you said "mount the big ones"... heh heh... that was cool

  20. ARGH! wrong wrong wrong wrong!! by phunhippy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Its not uber-hackers!!!

    IT's PHREAKERS

    Why can't anyone figure this out correctly?

    1. Re:ARGH! wrong wrong wrong wrong!! by gclef · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Because no one cares.

    2. Re:ARGH! wrong wrong wrong wrong!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if they cracked the computer system to redirect calls.

      Phreaking is if you use your phone, they probably cracked the computers, so it is probably UberHackers.

      Or is this what the elusive pink box does, steal phone solicitations for hookers?

  21. no unauthorised call forwarding.. by martin · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The gaunt and grizzled Hill is a former NYPD captain, and he testifies like a pro, giving short quick answers and volunteering little. "I remember investigating many cases of this nature," Hill says. "We would generally check to see that all the programming on the complainant's line was in order... We determined in every case that there was no unauthorized call-forwarding."

    so what was the 'authorised' call forwarding then?

    Anyway as a previous poster says..

    Sounds like the hotel's PABX's where hacked not Sprint's as it only effects calls from hotels not cell or other land lines..

  22. Interesting testamony by chrisos · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "To my knowledge there's no way that a computer hacker could get into our systems," says Hill.

    Is it just me, or is it not surprising, that an ex-cop with no technical skills, knows of no way to hack into his ex-employer's network?

    If on the other hand, they had purchased some white hat experience for a week or two and the hat said the same thing, I might just think the same statement carried some weight.

    I wonder, if his car has never been stolen, does he belive that his car is un-stealable?

    I for one, have never cut my legs off, but I still do believe that it is possible.
    --
    If nature abhors a vacuum, why isn't there more dust in the world?
    1. Re:Interesting testamony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except Kevin Mitnik will happily tell you that he owned SPRINT of Las Vegas.

      Believe him.

  23. Biiig money by Flu · · Score: 1
    If a single ad-publisher gets $0.25M in commision just for running ads for "escorts", I would guess the organization behind the prostitutes gets _lots_ more.

    Say, 75% of the prostitutes' income, then another 90% of their money as they buy their drugs.

    There are biiig money involved behind the scenes. Street violence, bodies of gang-members in the bushes etc, is only what "we" see of the underground world, but they surely have the resources to use technology as well for their purposes.

    Getting a competitor out of business using non-violent methods might not be as "impressive" (or frigthening) among the other competitors, but surely doesn't attract the police and media as much.

    /FLu

  24. No - the switch has been hacked. by Innominate+Recreant · · Score: 5, Informative
    I write telephony software. It's not the hacking of hotel telephone exchanges - it's the hacking of the swtiches at the telco. When you make a telephone call, the telco not only sends the ANI (caller id - phone number) it sends infodigits - a two-digit number identifying the type of phone from which you are calling - a residential phone, a hotel, payphone, prison, etc. It's very easy to program a switch to reroute calls to a particular DNIS based on infodigits so that if someone at a payphone calls 800-555-1234 the call goes through, but if someone from a hotel calls the same DNIS, it gets routed to a different DNIS, or goes to reorder. It's equally easy to create a conference on the switch, allowing a third party to "listen in" to call - explaining the appearance of one his competitor's "dancers" at a customer's hotel room.

    This is what the plaintiff in the story is alleging - that Sprint's switches are being reprogrammed by uberhackers in the employ of the Mob or some other competing organizations.

    1. Re:No - the switch has been hacked. by phaze3000 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I hadn't considered this possibility, but from what I know of telecoms systems (I don't write telephony software, but I have some knowledge of the domain) what you say certainly sounds possible.

      Without further evidence it's impossible to say, but either explanation could be correct.
      Also, if it were the hotels that were compromised, it could be not a group of 'uber-hackers', but instead just an old-fashioned case of bribery and corruption, with hotels paid/forced to alter their exchanges by the mob.

      --
      Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
    2. Re:No - the switch has been hacked. by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 2


      As a former adminstrator of hotel telephone switches, I suspect that either the hotel's switches are being hacked into (most hotels retain default passwords) or the hotel or someone at the hotel is being paid to change the hotel switch's call routing tables. This is a simpler explanation than the telco switches being hacked and is right in line with the plaintiff's "it only happened from hotels" statement.

      maru

    3. Re:No - the switch has been hacked. by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      either the hotel's switches are being hacked into or the hotel or someone at the hotel is being paid to change the hotel switch's call routing tables.

      Or someone at a company that installs/maintains PBXs for hotels.

      I would expect that would be a fairly cost efficient way of affecting multiple hotel phone systems. The less people who need to get bribed/keept quiet, the better for the success of any scam.

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    4. Re:No - the switch has been hacked. by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      Why couldn't it be the PBXs at the hotels? Many of those hotels continue to have shady associations (though they've been mostly taken over by large media consortiums, the mob hasn't left Las Vegas. Speaking of that I recall the ?excellent series on professional gamblers), and each represents thousands of patrons, many of whom are looking to separate themselves from their money (and some bodily fluids) : It would not surprize me whatsoever if, at the motivational hands of either a baseball bat or a bag of cash, individual hotels contracted on to selectively block/forward calls (and I'd be curious of the legality of that: Technically it is their phone and their PBX...this is the same sort of BS that we see online all the time). You could take it lower and imagine it being just the IT manager, or IT department. Pretty much anyone can be bought, and it wouldn't surprize me a bit, especially when one could easily moralize and justify (at least to themselves) if all you're hurting are sex trade workers.

      I'm sure additionally that when the PUC or Sprint went into the hotel to do tests, they likely broadcast their arrival, probably booking the test times in advance. It seems to me that the hotels would be the first place I'd check, and I'd presume them to be hostile "witnesses" so to speak and wouldn't let them in on the tests.

    5. Re:No - the switch has been hacked. by 56ker · · Score: 2

      I remember hearing something similar to this before. It was a premium rate operator in Las Vegas who suddenly found all his calls were being diverted (he presumed by the mob) unfortunately I can't remember any more details.

    6. Re:No - the switch has been hacked. by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 1


      Yeah, excellent theory. I am surprised that the investigation has not focused more in this direction. Everything I have read about this issue seems to indicate that the investigation ignores the fact that the guy has said it only happens from hotels and the presence of the hotel PBX.

      maru

    7. Re:No - the switch has been hacked. by Innominate+Recreant · · Score: 2
      Why couldn't it be the PBXs at the hotels? Many of those hotels continue to have shady associations (though they've been mostly taken over by large media consortiums, the mob hasn't left Las Vegas.
      It could be, if whatever group was behind this was able to get to every PBX in every hotel. Since it was reported that all hotel calls were being rerouted - and in the case of the bail bonds company, every payphone being rerouted, logic would dictate that the target of the reroutnig scam is the telco.
    8. Re:No - the switch has been hacked. by vlag · · Score: 1

      I spent 4 months hacking your software. It was my fulltime job! Phone switches are easier to hack then most home router/gateway combos.

      --
      Do you want to remove linux?
  25. That hurts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ow... that hurts..

    now your phone is re-routed to a p0rn line phool!

  26. Uber Phreaks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know of at least 3 major "organizations" that operate using phone hackers in LV. These 3 groups make hundreds of millions a year for escort services and provide substantial kickbacks to several regional heads and a select group if repair crews to keep it quiet. This is why Sprint never sees a problem with these small-fry operators' connections.

    Unfortunately, the phreakers make VERY little compared to the top guys in this, but that will be changing very soon...

  27. Really? by kpetruse · · Score: 3, Funny

    You mean, there's someone carrying out illegal activity in Las Vegas?

    And the Police aren't doing anything to stop it?

    And a large company appears to be in the hands of mobsters?

    Whatever next?

    Before you know it, there will be stories about corporations buying influence in the US Government...but that could never happen...

  28. Throw the Bullsh!t Flag! by BerserkDog · · Score: 1

    It's not "uber hackers" or Phreaks. It's simply a case of crappy service- Possibly an employee of Sprint(disgruntled)who had access to their switch translations network(CCS/SS7 links).

  29. Vega$ Phone$ by bjb · · Score: 1
    So is this why making a phone call in Las Vegas costs an arm and a leg? Even at the cheapest hotels, calling something across the street will cost you at least $2 for the connection.

    Yes, I know that any casino area (read: Atlantic City, Vegas, reservations) nickle-and-dime you every chance they get, but sometimes it is a bit ridiculous.

    Even calling an 800 number costs money!

    --
    Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
    1. Re:Vega$ Phone$ by swb · · Score: 2

      This is pretty much common in *any* hotel. I stayed in a Radisson in Chicago in March and the ratecard for the phones charged some outrageous rate for long distance ($4-5 per minute), an equally ridiculous rate for the local calls ($1-2 per minute) and I think toll free calls over 10 minutes were charged a few bucks, too.

      I can't remember the last time I stayed in a hotel that had "free" local calls. It might have been a Super 8 in Stumblefuck, Nebraska -- where are you going to call there?

      I'm not a super world traveler (maybe 4-5 trips per year), but it seems that the biggest trend is the clampdown on toll-free calls. I'm sure the rationale is to (1) make a buck where they weren't before and (2) by charging, maybe limit the number of outbound trunks they need.

    2. Re:Vega$ Phone$ by balloonpup · · Score: 1

      Well, not to sound like an ad or anything, but every Motel 6 I ever stayed in has had free *local* calls, along with all the nasty sleezy hotels over in West Springfield (Massachusetts) (and the one REALLY sleezy one in Agawam). I've stayed in a few with ludicrous rates, though.

      --
      I sing the doggie electric!
    3. Re:Vega$ Phone$ by swb · · Score: 2

      I'm sure small motels have really minimalist phone systems that lack the accounting capability to charge for local calls. Minimalist may mean no phone system at all, relying on telco centrex capability with some crude reporting to charge you for long distance calls.

      There's also the argument to be made that most people who stay in cheap motels don't make many phone calls, either because they're just sleeping or fucking there or because small motels are in the middle of nowhere and there's just no reason to call anybody.

      Besides, Motel 6 and Super 8 have to advertise *something*..

    4. Re:Vega$ Phone$ by manofherb · · Score: 1

      that's prob. the one that my friend works at in good old lexington, ne. if you ever stay there again, smell the hallways at night, they sure do smell good:)

    5. Re:Vega$ Phone$ by balloonpup · · Score: 1

      ::chuckles:: Yeah, I suppose you have a point, there...but just two things in my defense:

      -- The Riviera Beach Motor Inn (right on the ocean in S. Yarmouth, MA) doesn't, and it's hardly a small motel, or a cheap one (on season, $250 or so a night)

      -- The Shearaton in Springfield, MA and the Hilton in Valley Forge, PA don't charge either.

      I imagine that the possibility of charging is proportional to how much they believe they can ream you for. Hehe.

      --
      I sing the doggie electric!
    6. Re:Vega$ Phone$ by swb · · Score: 2

      No, this Super 8 was somewhere east of Grand Island, NE. Real small town, I think it might have had a mainstreet with the usual BS -- bars, implement dealers, gas station and a bad pancake joint by the interstate exit.

      I will give Super 8s a lot of credit, especially in small towns. They're almost universally very clean and the people who work at them are usually pretty friendly. This particular one was actually "luxurious" and had won like the Super 8 of the year award or something.

      We always bring our own towels when stay at them, though, as the towels provided are small and scratchy. Other than that, we stay at Super 8 almost exclusively when we travel on the road. We have one of their lodging directories and plan our driving around the Super 8 locations.

  30. 3 billion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You realize that gambling in Las Vegas, is a three billion dollar industry. The casios are laced with extra oxgen to get people to stay awake gambling. They have it optimized right down to the lemon scent that they clean the slot machine with?

    "Jisms are best used when the person is lest expecting them" overheard in the IRC #E...tell them mej sent you

  31. This is only news in a loose definition by GMontag · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Okay folks, everyplace with a large mob influence has had it's phones tinkered with by the mob. This is old, but has not been talked about for a while, so it is a visit back to news.

    Back in the day, New York City had a privat phone network for the "mob", created with "idle" equipment and bribes to phone workers. Result, FBI taps were tapping the known phone numbers and the mob guys were using the "secret" network.

    Also, as far as rerouting disconnected numbers for fun and profit, lookup Poulsen's antics, plus other fun stuff.

    I will have to say that it is about time that a Telco is getting called on the carpet for their lack of security, rather than just grebbing another Kevin Mitnic or whomever and blaming every problem on them, then discovering the problem still exists after you take away his access to communications.

    1. Re:This is only news in a loose definition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember when the mob had red boxes mass produced and you could buy one on the street for $25 to $50 dollars? Hence New York City was the first place in the US that red boxes no longer worked.....

      Back in the Day .. Back in the Day ..

      Something like this was mentioned in Secrets of the Little Blue Box, the mob getting blue boxes produced for their associates.

      Now if I could only figure out where they are selling the switchblades and fireworks in these post-Giulliani days.

  32. All your phone... by Guido69 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...are belong to us.

    --
    - If we aren't supposed to eat animals, then why are they made out of meat? - Steven Wright
    1. Re:All your phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Uber-Phreaks have set us up the Blonde!

  33. Standard Bureaucratic cover-up by darkonc · · Score: 2
    "It's against that backdrop that the PUC staff -- the only players in the room without their own chips in the game -- have adopted the position that Munoz hasn't proven his case," yet . . . . the PUC staff is recommending that the commission open a new investigatory docket to explore Sprint's security issues, and to force the company to undergo security audits,"

    This is a standard bureaucratic coverup. "There's no problem here, but we're taking steps to solve the problem that we're sure doesn't exist in spite of the evidence to the contrary".

    To admit that Ruebel is correct, the commission would have to admit that they were asleep at the switch (excuse the pun). It's far more politically prudent for them to belittle pooh pooh, and nay-say him, while at the same time, responding (or appearing to respond) to the publicity around his complaints.

    In the meantime, Ruebel spends years of his life proving that Organized Crime (of some sort) is messing with the LA phone system but gets no compensation for his work, or his lost 'business' (I have a bit less sympathy for the latter).

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  34. bureaucracy? by simpl3x · · Score: 1

    you wouldn't think that people within the bureaucracy would have a vested interest/disinterest in this? oh dear, that would be a conspiracy--and crazy! "the police and the criminals are generally the same people." BTW, you need to talk to a taxi driver.

  35. I was in Vegas last month by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 4, Funny

    On the wall in my hotel lobby I saw this really cool "AT&T" slot machine with a phone attached. I kept putting in quarters and never won anything or got any money back. Phreakers have obviously hacked the slots too!

  36. Why hackers? by edremy · · Score: 2, Troll
    Why are they assuming some sort of uber-hackers are doing this? There are a lot of people who could do it better.

    They're called Sprint engineers. Anyone who thinks that every single one of these folks is incorruptable is nuts- an extra $10k here and there and I bet you could get 20% to come to the dark side.

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    1. Re:Why hackers? by King_TJ · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is exactly the conclusion I came to.
      This smacks of an inside job.... How in the world could they know that test calls were being carried out for several days, and make sure those test calls went through fine? Well, gee... if you're one of the employees, you'd know about it, wouldn't you?

      It's pretty smart on the part of the Sprint employees involved, too. If you pit these shady businesses against each other, ultimately, who is going to care enough to get you in trouble for it? They're probably counting on the majority of people saying "My heart bleeds for you... You can't make millions off of your porn anymore because someone's keeping some of your calls from going through. Cry me a river...." Meanwhile, they're getting a nice kick-back off the top of all those big profits - plus keeping a respectable day job.

  37. How does this guy know Mitnick? by Nobody's+Hero · · Score: 1

    So he pulls mitnick in on the case?

    What i want to know is how does this guy know mitnick? If he knows one hacker(and a prominent one at that) doesn't it stand to reason that he knows other hackers? I mean you can't just hire mitnick off of hire-a-teleco-hacker.com.

    "As SecurityFocus Online reported last year, former hacker Kevin Mitnick claims extensive penetrations into Sprint's Las Vegas systems from approximately 1992 until his February, 1995 arrest -- smack dab in the middle of the call diversion complaints. Mitnick's access gave him the power to monitor or reprogram any phone line in town. Following that story, Munoz retained Mitnick as a technical consultant in his case, only to give him up later. Munoz says Mitnick wanted to run too many pointless tests; Mitnick says Munoz stiffed him and a partner for thousands of dollars in fees and expenses."

    Who's to say he didn't step on one of his "associates" toes. And a disgrntled hacker decides he's gonna wreck the guys business.

    At the very least his problems wouldn't have ended after he stiffed mitnick for money. it only would have gotten worse. Heck a few phonecall's by mitnick and...BAM...his problem get's worse. I think this guy is full of crap. That's why he didn't want mitnick "to run too many pointless tests". Not to mention who is this guy to know what tests are pointless or not?

    Something is smells Fishy....and it's not just this guys employees....;) LOL

    --
    The Only Person Willing to be Me is ME!
    1. Re:How does this guy know Mitnick? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Mitnick is proud of all the hacking he did, and hasn't denied any of the smaller stuff.

      Countless interviews have him yapping about how many phone systems he cracked. Vegas was one of his favorites. One interview I read had him stating that was one of the first places he ran to, since it was so easy to setup there, and get what he wanted done.

      This guy doesn't have to know Kevin, because Kevin hs told this story to anyone who would listen. All he has to do is know someone who reads, and they read Mitnik say that he liked cracking Vegas phones system, and WHAM, instant subpoena.

  38. Contrast by Snafoo · · Score: 3, Funny

    In Las Vegas, you might wait for an indefinite amount of time, but you will eventually be able to tell if the person you are calling is home or not.

    In Monte Carlo, you can make the connection immediately, but you might get a spurrious busy signal a certain percent of the time.

    --
    - undoware.ca
  39. At the risk of repeating myself... by verch · · Score: 1

    All Of Your Hookers Are Belong To Us

  40. good ol kevin && kevin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh,
    i read the story of kevin poulsen "The Watchman" by john littman. I've also read 2 accounts of kevin mitnick ((cyberpunk (john markoff)) && (takedown) (markoff/tsumomira))...

    I realise that these folks had been in trouble years ago, have been caught and paid the price, but i've got to hand it to them to be able to be active in the `security consulting' biz nowadays.

    all three of those books a great read, btw.

    1. Re:good ol kevin && kevin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh yeah, it's me again... btw, i got all into the books i've read and i forgot to mention..

      for a time there i did work for Sprint Telecom and handled a lot of the Vegas territory. All i can say is what a fscking mess. me being somewhat read on the subject of phone muddling and phreaking and whatnot, i was a bit more alert to attempts at social engineering and general security practices than 99% of my coworkers. I must say, if everyone else was getting the same kinds of calls i was, and they were clueless as hell, Sprint LTD Nevada is most certainly 0wned.

      -comet

  41. sorry to be redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh,
    i read the story of kevin poulsen "The Watchman" by john littman. I've also read 2 accounts of kevin mitnick ((cyberpunk (john markoff)) && (takedown) (markoff/tsumomira))...

    I realise that these folks had been in trouble years ago, have been caught and paid the price, but i've got to hand it to them to be able to be active in the `security consulting' biz nowadays.

    all three of those books a great read, btw.

    oh yeah, btw, i got all into the books i've read and i forgot to mention..

    for a time there (recently) i did work for Sprint Telecom and handled a lot of the Vegas territory. All i can say is what a fscking mess. me being somewhat read on the subject of phone muddling and phreaking and whatnot, i was a bit more alert to attempts at social engineering, manipulative attempts and general security practices than 99% of my coworkers. I must say, if everyone else was getting the same kinds of calls and contacts as i was, and they were clueless as hell, Sprint LTD Nevada is most certainly 0wned.

    sorry for posting this twice, but i wanted to be sure that it was seen, as it is relevant and interesting (i think). dual posts == poor planning on my part.
    -comet

  42. Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't a bit ironic to have Dark Dante as the author of this story?

  43. huh Sprint claims no hacks in LasVegas? by linuxislandsucks · · Score: 1

    Correct me if I am wrong..

    Didn't Kevin Poulsen orginally get charged with hacking into teleco switches in LasVegas and breakins to telco centers searching for phone manuals?

    and Didn't also several other teleco phone hackers breakin over the past ten years , so much so that every defcon conf in Lasvegas always has teleco cops, fbi, cai, and treausury officials in attendance?

    --
    Don't Tread on OpenSource
  44. uber-hackers? by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    uh... no more like uber-sopranos. there have been many stories about this in the past - basically the mob has their people in the phone co - and they hijack calls to businesses (mostly call girls) from the hotels. then re-route the calls to their own call girls and take the business.

    sometimes they dont even hijack the call they just tap it - then when the call girl shows up its too late and the "john" is already being serviced....

    when the people who were losing out in this deal bitched to the fcc? the investigation showed that not a single call was lost. (basically the staff in the phone co were alerted to the investigation and stopped their hijacking while it was going on)

    the thing was that the FCC gave the telco a WEEKS notice that they were going to investigate this... so the word got out and the mob held back.

    this is BS and pisses me off. I would like to take a base-ball bat to the kneecaps of the idiots that gave the telco "notice of impending investigation"

  45. Overly verbose news reporters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does it irk anyone else whent hey hit a news site, or pick up a paper, and a news story reads like Radar O'Reilly's homework assignments for his creative writing correspondance course.

    Or is everyone on here two young to remember MASH tv show?

    Or a John Katz fan?

    The first paragraph of the linked article reads like a pulp mystery fiction. I expected him to light up a cigarette, while the prosecutor with the shapely gams started to bust his chops.

    1. Re:Overly verbose news reporters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the hell is John Katz?

  46. Old, old news by L.+VeGas · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've lived in Vegas for 38 years off and on (mostly on). I grew up with people that now work for Sprint, and have seen first-hand how the adult industry operates here.

    point 1 - Everyone in the outcall/adult business lies. A lot. About everything. The guy (don't know him) probably snorted all his cash, flaked out, and now wants to blame someone else.

    point 2 - They systems guys at Sprint could easily redirect calls. They have access, and the office people / management don't know the difference. Nobody is paying attention.

    point 3 - uberhackers? get real.

    Could someone have phreaked the phones? -- Of course.

    Did they? -- Who cares?

  47. CALEA by Louie-the-geek · · Score: 1

    I work for SBC......
    CALEA - www.calea.org - is a federal mandate
    that allows law enforcement to tap phone lines
    remotely. Big Brother is listening in Vagas!!!

  48. were they hacked? check the article author by supahdren · · Score: 1

    I saw a few posts talking about Keven Poulsen, and I saw a few posts talking about how certain calls can go through from certain types of phones (ie payphones vs hotel phones vs residential phones report differently through the telco switches - see the post modded 5 near the top), but I haven't seen any posts pointing out the fact that Kevin Poulsen WROTE that article. Take a look at the bottom byline. That, at least for me, lends a little credibility to the idea that it could be a hack-for-hire type operation. Ok later.
    David

  49. This says it all! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    callers from outside Vegas, or from payphones and cell phones, get through, he says, but hotel callers frequently get false busy signals, or reach silence, driving them into the arms of competing services.

    Duh! They're hacking the hotels' PBXs, not the phone company! They're barking up the wrong tree here, they should be bringing the hotel owners into court -- but then, the hotels are owned by mobsters, and you don't want to piss THEM off!

  50. Stolen 5ESS Switch by Motheius · · Score: 1

    I remember reading a story in 1998 or 1999 about a 5ESS switch that was stolen from a Vegas wearhouse. I can't find an article backing up my memory so it could be just that.....