Slashdot Mirror


Matrix Reloaded Filming Wants to Shut Sydney Down

ro_len writes "News.com.au is reporting the producers of the Matrix Realoaded are looking to shut down Sydney for the filming of the final scene which involves flying a helicopter across the city at less than 600 feet above ground. It is supposed to be the most complicated sequence ever filmed." Just plain nuts. Here is a previous story about the trailer, and another one announcing the film.

143 of 487 comments (clear)

  1. Shutdown ! by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 5, Funny

    What if it doesn't reboot? :O

    --
    ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
    1. Re:Shutdown ! by thomasj · · Score: 5, Funny
      What if it doesn't reboot? :O
      2002-06-11 13.30.05: [notice] Shutting down Sidney.australia.matrix
      2002-06-11 15.46.17: [notice] Rebooting Sidney.australia.matrix
      2002-06-11 15.46.32: [error] Sidney.australia.matrix bootstrapping failed
      2002-06-11 15.46.33: [panic] scp root@Sidney.australia.matrix:/home/{neo,morpheus,t rinity}/.profile .
      2002-06-11 15.46.36: [restore] Sidney.australia.matrix reloaded
      2002-06-11 15.46.37: [warning] Older version overwrite (Agent Smith 2.0 -> 1.0)
      --
      :-) = I am happy
      :^) = I am happy with my big nose
      C:\> = I am happy with my OS
  2. Why? by Throatwarbler+Mangro · · Score: 2, Funny
    Why bother emptying out the city? Surely if there's a horrible accident, they can simply reload Sydney from the backups...

    What? You mean we're not in the Matrix? And that red pill I took was only Nyquil?

    1. Re:Why? by blankmange · · Score: 3, Funny

      The red ones are DayQuil, but I suppose you could mix them with the green ones.....

      --
      ...we are from the government - we are here to help...
  3. at least it won't be CGI. by vidalsasoon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A cartoon draw-over would be original. Those matrix style movements are overused.

  4. Most complicated stunt ever? by tfreport · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Who decided that? The movie company that is making it?

    Sounds a lot like some PR mumbo jumbo to me.

    1. Re:Most complicated stunt ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      But what did you really think of The Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones

      Worst. Prequels. Ever. Rest assured that I was on the Internet within minutes sharing my disgust with the world.

    2. Re:Most complicated stunt ever? by Huge+Pi+Removal · · Score: 2, Informative

      Indeed. I'd have thought that the (20? 25 minute?) Mini car-chase sequence in The Italian Job might have rivalled that. Not because it was complicated as such, but because they deliberately screwed up all the traffic signals (without the authorities telling anyone), brought Turin to a halt, and then had to find a way of filming dramatic car-chase shots in the middle of a lot of annoyed Italians.

      Certainly one of the most entertaining sequences ever. And Turin didn't even get the payback they wanted: since the city was basically a Fiat factory (is that right? I get muddled when it comes to cars), they wanted the film to use Fiats, but Minis were just, well, cooler :)

      --
      - Oliver

      The right to bear arms is only slightly less stupid than the right to arm bears...
    3. Re:Most complicated stunt ever? by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Funny
      they deliberately screwed up all the traffic signals (without the authorities telling anyone), brought Turin to a halt, and then had to find a way of filming dramatic car-chase shots in the middle of a lot of annoyed Italians.

      My question is: How could they tell it from a normal traffic day in Turin?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    4. Re:Most complicated stunt ever? by dasheiff · · Score: 2
      But what did you really think of The Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones


      Worst. Prequels. Ever. Rest assured that I was on the Internet within minutes sharing my disgust with the world.


      I hear George Lucas actually shut down Tatooine for filming Star Wars.

    5. Re:Most complicated stunt ever? by morgajel · · Score: 2

      Devil's advocate had a similar scene where a large city(nyc? not sure which one) was abandoned. very cool.

      it also have reeves in it.
      maybe they'll use his bad acting as a way to scare people out of the city:)

      --
      Looking for Book Reviews? Check out Literary Escapism.
    6. Re:Most complicated stunt ever? by stylewagon · · Score: 2

      One of the funniest stories I've heard about filming 'The Italian Job' was the one where the producers asked the Torino authorities if they could place a piano (italian for camera - and car!) on the roof of the Turin Museum(?).

      Thinking the producers meant camera - the authorities allowed the shoot to go ahead - by the time they realised they were actually putting a couple of cars (3 minis + 1 fiat police car) on the roof, the scene was shot and over. Classic stuff.

      --

      *** I am the real stylewagon

  5. This vsCGI by viking099 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I always thought this was the kind of stuff that CG effects were supposed to replace.
    Personally, I like it, as I (and I'm sure many of not most people) can tell the difference between CG and real stuff.
    Plus, the adrenaline factor should be fairly high, because you KNOW that it was done in the "real world" (tm), and not on come computer screen somewhere.
    I can't wait to see it!

    1. Re:This vsCGI by paradesign · · Score: 4, Insightful

      this is the stuff that cgi cannot replace, the realism just wouldnt be there, now the fight scene at the subwaystation, thats what cgi is for.

      --
      I want 2D games back.
    2. Re:This vsCGI by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No this is the kind of stuff that MODEL MAKERS were supposed to replace. But then again they're a nearly extict breed these days due to over reliance on CG.

      I remember alot of great scenes that were done with model work. Including cockpit perspective fly-thrus.

    3. Re:This vsCGI by triaxcaribdis · · Score: 2, Funny

      CGI eh? Are they going to film it in PERL or C I wonder ;-)

    4. Re:This vsCGI by Maddog+Batty · · Score: 2

      How much of the fight scene at the subway station was CGI? I thought a lot of that was wire work, multiple cameras, blue screen and polystyrene walls etc. I didn't think that much was comp generated. Computer cleaned up and tweeked I'm sure but not computer generated.

      What info have you got on this scene?

      --
      wot no sig
    5. Re:This vsCGI by paradesign · · Score: 2
      the entire environment was cg i believe. they filmed on a stage with blue screen and foam and wires and such, but the set was built to match the computer model of the set. in the end the camera moves on set were inputed into the computer giving an exact motion match for the background, the two parts were then composited, digitaly i assume, together.

      so this may not have been the greatist example, but it is an excellent example of seamless cgi integration into a scene. Just because its cgi dosent mean that its entirely cgi.

      --
      I want 2D games back.
    6. Re:This vsCGI by Maddog+Batty · · Score: 2

      I guess it depends on what you define as CGI. Your view of how the scene was produced ties up with what I believe. However, very little of the scene was actually computer generated which is what I tend to think of as CGI. Modelled, put together and cleaned up on a computer. Generated, no.

      However, the scenes of the harvester and the racks of pods were all computer generated (and looked really good as well).

      Can't wait for Matrix 2 though....

      --
      wot no sig
    7. Re:This vsCGI by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2

      That's no moon...

      It's an Airfix Kit!

      graspee

  6. Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Coplan · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Abeit, I like a good action flick as good as the next guy. But shutting down a whole city? A pretty major one at that! If it were for scientific experimentation, then I could maybe be persuaded to support the concept. But for the sake of entertainment?

    How much money in the form of opportunity cost do you think the city might lose?

    1. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Dimensio · · Score: 2

      Hrmm...they might be able to work something out if they can find a typically very slow day during a very slow time.

      A smaller-scale shutdown of several New York city blocks was done on an early Sunday morning for The Devil's Advocate.

      Still, dunno how easy it would be for an entire city on any day of the week -- even during a holiday.

    2. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by jcoy42 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Abeit, I like a good action flick as good as the next guy. But shutting down a whole city?

      I couldn't agree more- I mean where does it end? What if MIB2 decideds they want to fly a mothership 600' over the planet?

      --
      Never trust an atom. They make up everything.
    3. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Croaker · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah. It's not unheard of, though. I remember hearing that the main eccentric guy in "Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil" got severely pissed about some network filming a civil war miniseries down south had all of the roads covered with dirt and other stuff... apparently, he took pains to piss movie people off. Something I'd be all for.

      I remember when they were filming some movie about the Brinks robbery in Boston, they forced people to take down TV antennas from their houses, so it would look more authentically 1930's (this was back in the 70's, before cable). Apparently strong-arm tatcics were used.

      Finally, I was watching a TV show about a famous local chef, who was contacted by movie people, who wanted to use his restuaunt as a setting in a movie. Great, he thought. The people came in, and completely changed over his place, making it look nothing like the original. He asked "uh, so why did you want to film here if you wanted to change everything about the place?" "Oh, because the *light* was just *perfect*."

      One wonders why they need to actually fly an helicopter over an actual city, resulting in the shutting down of said city. Even if computer graphics can't give them what they want as far as flying over the city, surely they could use one of those light-weight robotic camaeras on a radio-controlled helicopter to film the scene. That would be a lot less dangerous to the general populace, meaning it would be a lot less disruptive.

      Geez. It's all just freakin' entertainment. I'll be glad when it all goes virtual, and we won't have to deal with these people who think movies are more important than real life.

    4. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Coplan · · Score: 2
      That brings up another point...

      I'm assuming that 600' means 600' from the ground. I don't know Sydney that well...but I'm making a broad assumption that there are plenty of buildings over 6' in height (roughly 6 stories). Aside from pissing people off by shutting down a city...what's to say that the stunt will work perfectly? What's to say that they don't accidentally crash that sucker into one of these buildings? They'd end up with a crap load more pissed off people.

    5. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Warped-Reality · · Score: 2

      So according to your logic, one story is 100ft? Those aussies must be giants!

      --
      This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
    6. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Arcturax · · Score: 4, Funny

      'm assuming that 600' means 600' from the ground. I don't know Sydney that well...but I'm making a broad assumption that there are plenty of buildings over 6' in height (roughly 6 stories).

      Only 6' in height and 6 stories? Is this the building out of "Being John Malcovich" on crack?

      --

      --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
    7. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by DarkZero · · Score: 2

      Aside from pissing people off by shutting down a city...what's to say that the stunt will work perfectly? What's to say that they don't accidentally crash that sucker into one of these buildings? They'd end up with a crap load more pissed off people.

      They're asking for the city to be shut down because they're taking the possibility of an accident into account. If there's an accident while the city is shut down, they can just pay the huge amount of money for repairs. If there's an accident while the city ISN'T shut down, they would kill a lot of people and injure many others.

    8. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by sehryan · · Score: 2

      How much money in the form of opportunity cost do you think the city might lose?

      Probably about as much as they are charging WB to shut down "the city."

      And while we are addressing that, they are not shutting down the entire city, just a section of it.

      --
      The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
    9. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Brento · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah. It's not unheard of, though. I remember hearing that the main eccentric guy in "Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil" got severely pissed about some network filming a civil war miniseries down south had all of the roads covered with dirt and other stuff... apparently, he took pains to piss movie people off.

      When the crew filmed downtown, he hung Nazi flags from his balcony, ensuring that they wouldn't film his house. That one was priceless.

      --
      What's your damage, Heather?
    10. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by haa...jesus+christ · · Score: 3, Funny

      Abeit, I like a good action flick as good as the next guy. But shutting down a whole city? A pretty major one at that!

      There are major cities in Australia? Here we call them 'prisons'.

    11. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by gvonk · · Score: 3, Funny

      surely they could use one of those light-weight robotic camaeras on a radio-controlled helicopter to film the scene.

      Not to be pedantic, but the quality from the setup you described would be orders of magnitude too low for even an independent film.

      Hell, just let them take Polaroids and make them into a flipbook if that's the quality you're going for!

      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
    12. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by bourne · · Score: 2

      Consider the alternative... a few years ago they were making a film in Boston, and they blew something large up for the special effects. Several hundred windows and countless 911 calls later, the city decided maybe it should be a little more strict about how it allows filming to happen...

    13. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by nathanm · · Score: 2

      6' is the average height of a grown male. 600' would be roughly 45 stories.

      The WTC was 1360' and 100 stories. The Sears Tower is 1450' and 110 stories.

    14. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      When I was in college they wanted to use our campus to film something that I think ended up on PBS. It was a lolita kinda story where a professor was torn between his love for some poets work and one of his students.

      Some of the deans read the script and gave the approval to do the shoot - under the condition that you could not recognize the campus - something about the script being utter tripe.

      All I remember seeing them do was a) setup an awning and some tables outside one of the snack bars, and a camera on a crane to shoot into a classroom from outside.

    15. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by RedWizzard · · Score: 2
      But shutting down a whole city? A pretty major one at that!
      They're not shutting down the whole of greater Sydney. They're shutting down a few blocks in the CBD. The population of Sydney City (mostly the CBD) is less than 150,000.
    16. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by morcheeba · · Score: 2

      There was a guy in washington, DC. that tried to use a strobe light on his balcony so that filming couldn't occur outside (not on his property). He had no beef with anyone - he just wanted money; he also hung a "Remember the Valdez" sign on his balcony overlooking an Exxon - again, just to semi-extort money.

    17. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by megauni · · Score: 2, Funny

      I come from the land down under, where the men are tall and the women thunder..

    18. Re:Film Industry is Nuts!!! by RedWizzard · · Score: 2

      There's plenty of good areas to shop in Sydney though. And they did seem to be talking about Martin Place and north so it might not be that disruptive. It'll irritate the tourists more than anything.

  7. Seems a bit OTT by sheriff_p · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Surely computer graphics these days are advanced enough to eradicate the need for real filming? Maybe this is all just a giant publicity stunt?

    --
    Score:-1, Funny
    1. Re:Seems a bit OTT by Satai · · Score: 2

      To quote Corona quotion Joel Silver:

      Producer Joel Silver says one visual effect for a shot in one of the sequels took two-and-a-half years to create, and prepares for production on "a 14-minute sequence that is the most complicated sequence ever put on film. Silver talks about reaching the peak of visual effects in a recent story in The Sydney Morning Herald, and promises that The Matrix Reloaded and The Matrix Revolutions will provide more than just spectacular visuals. "It's about all that stuff that's going on in our lives that we can't really grab onto." he says, suggesting the films will continue to explore the deeper themes tapped in the first groundbreaking film. Our only question is, this complicated sequence doesn't involve any combination of Keanu and advanced problem-solving, does it?

    2. Re:Seems a bit OTT by dswensen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If they use computer graphics instead of actually filming it, not only will people be completely unimpressed, but they will bitch about how fake the CGI looks, regardless of how fake it actually looks, and talk about how much better it would have been if it had been made with stop-motion by Ray Harryhausen himself.

      I think they're going for "actually filming it" as a more impressive effect than using CG.

  8. Realize the truth by Out4Blood · · Score: 5, Funny

    There is no helicopter

    --
    - Consult the dictionary frequently to avoid mispelling
  9. Hmm.. by Diabolical · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the bottem of the article

    Part three The Matrix Revolutions is also in production and will be released in December 2000

    Sorry to have missed it...

  10. FX by xonos · · Score: 2, Interesting

    isn't that what special effects, green screens and CGIs are for? i would be so pissed if the closed down philladelphia for two days, so some hollywood producer can make some money.

  11. Stupid if you ask me. by hrieke · · Score: 2

    With the CGI ability that we have, they should just create the whole thing in a computer and film the action on a blue screen stage.
    Much safer, and you can do some impossible camera angles too.

    --
    III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
    1. Re:Stupid if you ask me. by Hollinger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Part of what makes CG look so, well, CG, is those unrealistic camera angles. There are some things that just don't work when you're point of view isn't governed by the laws of physics.

    2. Re:Stupid if you ask me. by Coplan · · Score: 2
      You bring up a good point. I wonder why they're not taking advantage of this technology. After all, wasn't the original taking advantage of some really cutting edge tech?

      As someone pointed out above, it's probably a lot of hype. Kinda like when "Fargo" came out -- supposidly it was based on a true story...and we found out AFTER they got their award that it was all hype.

    3. Re:Stupid if you ask me. by derrickh · · Score: 2

      CGI != Live Action. Maybe one day computer generated effects will be able to fool most people, but it's not there yet. It seems the makers of the Matrix realize that(at least for this sequence).

      D

    4. Re:Stupid if you ask me. by Eil · · Score: 2


      I think that depends largely on how well the CG is done. In The Matrix, I honestly had no friggen clue what was CG and what was a prop until I saw the Matrix: Revisited DVD. I mean, yeah, there are things that are quite obviously CG, (like the baby farm scene) but for the most part I thought much of it was modelled. On the other hand, I had no idea that the helicopter explosion was modelled rather than CG.

      It all depends on how well it's done. And with the Wachowski brothers in charge, I have no doubt that Reloaded will be done well.

  12. Renting the city? by chobee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How about making the film makers pay all the taxes for those two weekends? Since citizens won't have full use of the city why should they pay taxes?

  13. Shutdown for 2 days? by iceT · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They must just be talking about the flight path and some margin around it.....

    gee, I hope they talk to God and get a good weather day...

    --
    -- You can't idiot-proof anything, because they're always coming out with better idiots.
    1. Re:Shutdown for 2 days? by bakes · · Score: 2

      I hadn't thought of that. Remember that July is the middle of winter here in Oz.

      --
      Ho! Haha! Guard! Turn! Parry! Dodge! Spin! Ha! Thrust!
  14. Wow, Hollywood technology has really advanced..... by xtermz · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the bottom of the article :

    Part three The Matrix Revolutions is also in production and will be released in December 2000


    Not only are they filming the most complicated sequence ever, but they will be the first movie company to premiere a movie in the _past_. How they plan to manage the space/time disruption is apparently a closely guarded studio secret

    --


    I lost my concept of community when my community lost all concept of me.
  15. What I did for summer vacation by ObviousGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Isn't that what movie sets are for? Can't they rebuild a replica of the city they want on some backlot?

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:What I did for summer vacation by GlenRaphael · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Isn't that what movie sets are for? Can't they rebuild a replica of the city they want on some backlot?

      That's certainly what they did when they needed a freeeway. Whole cities are probably harder to build cheaply.

      (By the way, who the heck is this? She's cute.)

      --
      I play Nerd-Folk!
    2. Re:What I did for summer vacation by Mastoid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      (By the way, who the heck is this [thematrixonline.com]? She's cute.)

      This question is hilarious, considering how the rest of this forum is debating how realistic CGI is.

      (Dude, take a closer look.)

      --
      I had an argument...with the person here at the university that teaches OS design. I wonder when I'll learn --Linus
  16. This is Australia. by Lerc · · Score: 2, Funny

    All they need to do is wait for a big sports event and place a huge tv screen just out of town and supply a lot of beer.

    Supply enough beer and you've got all the time in the world. They won't be finding their way back in a hurry.

    --
    -- That which does not kill us has made its last mistake.
  17. Not so rare by YanceyAI · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's common practice for parts of Los Angeles to be closed for movie making, even if the sequence is not that dangerous. When I lived there, there were several times I was unable to get to work or park once I arrived. At least once that I can remember, they shut down all of downtown. It is extremely annoying to have your life interupted for the sake of entertainment. I might have been more forgiving, though, had they been working on the Matrix!

    --
    Can I bum a sig?
  18. most complicated != best stunt by f00zbll · · Score: 4, Interesting
    like the matrix and watched a dozen times, but shutting down a whole city does seem a bit extreme. It's good they are thinking about people's safety and also secrecy, but is it really necessary.

    I just hope the W brothers don't kill themselves in the process of trying to "out do" the original matrix. The two of them have already spent quite a few years to this effort. It's always tough when a director makes a really successful movie, because the expectation are set unrealitically high. If they manage to pull it off, they may become hollywood heavy weights. If they flop, it's going to be a costly blunder.

  19. Other ideas by Moita+Carrasco · · Score: 5, Funny

    Other "my whacky final scene is whackier than yours" ideas:

    - Close down New York to make a film about 9-11, idea: actually fly airplanes into stuff, randomly. Pilots and crew: CIA, FBI and American Government officials.

    - Close down Jerusalem to make the final scene of a movie about the Israeli+Palestinian conflict. Idea: a huge crane pounds Arafat and Sharon repeatedly against various religious monuments.

    - Close down Paris to make the final scene of a film about the world cup. Idea: a giant soccer ball rolling around the streets with "losers" painted on, squishing right-wing partidaries.

    - Close down a strip of territory in Kashmere to make the final scene of a film about the alleged India-Pakistan conflict. Idea: Nuclear warheads detonated on top of CNN reporters who claimed a nuclear war was about to happen, as if it was a light subject you can kid around with.

    Apologies: I apologize for this post if you don't like it. It will avoid me getting into discussions later. Thank you.

    Moita

    --
    MoitaCarrasco "Everyday I beat my own previous record for the number of consecutive days I've stayed alive." - CARLIN
  20. They're not shutting down the *city* by Zeddicus_Z · · Score: 5, Informative

    Guys... it's two too three streets being shut down, for a peroid no longer than two days. Buildings along George and Sussex streets are being evacuted for public safety reasons. Other than that, its business as usual in our fair city.

    I repeat. They are *not* shutting down all of sydney.

    --
    Janie took my gun...
  21. Not the entire city... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    Just the area around the helicopter's flight path will be shut down. Still, that's quite a good chunk of the city. :) But it's nowhere near close to everything.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  22. And the reason for it is? by MavEtJu · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it just me, but does the article give no reason at all why it has to be `shutdown'?

    But it will probably go something like this:
    Filmmaker: "We need all the people out of the city for two days."
    Mayor: "That's not possible. We can ban jetskies from the harbour if you like."
    Filmmaker: "No, we need the city, not the harbour. We are going to do some stunts there."
    Mayor: "Sounds impressive, but what if all the people start riding their jetskies in the harbour instead of going to the city? I don't like that, and I've made it illegal already."
    Filmmaker: "Please have a look at this script, it's specially printed for you on green paper with some transparent parts for the so called `special effects'".
    Mayor: "It's a deal, I'll just make being in the city on these days illegal, except for people with jetskies. After all, they might go ride them in the harbour if they're not allowed to put them in the city."

    People from Sydney should get the subtleties...

    --
    bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
    1. Re:And the reason for it is? by foobar104 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Filmmaker: "Please have a look at this script, it's specially printed for you on green paper with some transparent parts for the so called `special effects'".

      Okay, while Sydneysiders do seem to make up a disproportionate fraction of Slashdot readers, I'll go ahead and spell this one out for the rest of the planet.

      Aussie money is printed on plastic-coated paper in various colors. Each bank note has a little transparent plastic "window" in it as a counterfeit-countermeasure. (Heh.)

      So green pieces of paper with little transparent bits are Aussie $100 notes. So the joke is that the mayor is being bribed by the W brothers.

      Get it? Huh? Get it? Hah!

      (More info about Aussie money can be found here.

  23. Not a low as it sounds by deggy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I regularly fly around at 200 feet during the course of my job. 600ft is pretty high really, and certainly high enough for an above-average helecopter pilot to maintain control while flying down a wide city street.

    1. Re:Not a low as it sounds by SnapperHead · · Score: 2

      I am reminded about a sceen in Terminator 2 where they flew a helecopter underneath a bridge. I am not sure if that was really done, that was MAYBE 5' off the ground. Which leads me to belive it was an affect. I dunno, I am not a pilot. But, based on your post, your kind of hinting it. Care to shed some light on the subject for me ? :)

      --
      until (succeed) try { again(); }
    2. Re:Not a low as it sounds by gorilla · · Score: 3, Informative

      Helicopters, and to a lesser effect wing effect, find it easy to fly very near the ground. The airflow is disrupted by the ground, and this reduces the drag and increases the lift. This page and this page explain it well. This means that flying 5' off the ground is actually very easy, and as long as there is adequate room above the craft, it should be possible.

    3. Re:Not a low as it sounds by WeedMonkey · · Score: 2, Funny
      I regularly fly around at 200 feet during the course of my job

      Oh, it's not fair, I want to be an LSD tester as well :-(

    4. Re:Not a low as it sounds by IronChef · · Score: 2


      That scene wasn't faked, I remember hearing about it in the commentary.

    5. Re:Not a low as it sounds by SnapperHead · · Score: 2

      Actually, the 3rd hand was intended. I am a big terminator fan, the T-1000 was reload his gun while still flying the chopper. They also wanted to see how many people would notice :) Its still pretty funny either way.

      --
      until (succeed) try { again(); }
  24. Re:Matrix Reloaded by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "I'd rather be Tom Cruise - he gets all the chicks."

    Be careful what you wish for. Tom Cruise is stupid enough to fall for Scientology.

  25. Re:Matrix Reloaded by Gaijin42 · · Score: 2

    Actually, you are the stupid f*$#. He was talking about Angelina Jolie. There were rumors flying around a year or two ago that she might have a... less than appropriate relationship with her brother, after she kissed him (not a peck) at an awards show, and based on some stuff she said at an interview.

  26. Typo or conspiracy/glitch? by blankmange · · Score: 2
    Not to be confused with a "Me, too!" posting (never done on /.) but it would seem to be a typo as far as the 3rd part of the series being released in 12/2000....

    Of course, it could also be a bug in the Matrix that was not caught by an agent.... not deja-vous, but something else entirely... unless someone did see the 3rd edition in 12/2000.... oh, man, I need some coffee now....

    --
    ...we are from the government - we are here to help...
    1. Re:Typo or conspiracy/glitch? by (H)elix1 · · Score: 2

      Got to be a typo --- if it was a glitch, it would read December 19100 (grin)

  27. Re:I wonder. by linderdm · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Vanilla Sky shoot was actually done around 4 in the morning (or something pretty damn early) and Times Square WAS shut down and cleared of people for the shoot.

  28. Not the first time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the beginning of the film Vanilla Sky with Tom Cruise, he runs around an empty Times Square. Word has it that Hollywood paid $3 million to shut down the most active city in the world for a few early morning hours.

    1. Re:Not the first time by RazzleFrog · · Score: 3, Informative

      What is even more interesting is that Time Square is hardly all of New York City and you'd be suprised how quiet things are on an early Sunday morning in the summer. Very few people live in Times Square (unless they occupy a box). Either way, most residents are in the Hamptons, the Jersey Shore, or Connecticut and tourists are easily shepherded out of the way.

      They actually do a ton of filming in the city. There is a city agency dedicated to it - Mayor's office of Film, Theatre & Broadcasting.

  29. Re:If you thought hiring Sydney was expensive... by jtdubs · · Score: 2

    That's not going to happen. I'd remember it. :-)

    Justin Dubs

  30. Re:I wonder. by Dimensio · · Score: 2

    The scene in The Devil's Advocate was done on an early Sunday morning when that particular street isn't typically very busy anyway. Several streets were blocked off, though the distant scenery was added in (I'm not sure if it was digital or matted).

    It's mentioned in the director's commentary on the DVD (I've got a first-run, I've got a first-run!)

  31. cities as publicity stunts by squidinkcalligraphy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    There is another story about at The Age website. A funny quote was from the premier of NSW, saying "Sydneysiders had to put up with such disruptions ... if the city was to keep its reputation as a hot filmmaking destination." Funny, I thought that cities were for living in and business, etc, etc, not for rich-ass movie companies to play with. But again, we have dumb politicians bowing down to the almighty dollar. Hey, this just confirms in my mind that sydney is willing to prostitute itself out to feed an overwhelming addiction (but I'm from melbourne, so I spose I would say that)

    But at the end of the day, I reckon them filming it is just a publicity stunt - that way they'll at least the entire population of sydney to watch the movie ("see, honey - that's where I work"), buy the DVD, get the action figure doll. Sure, it'd prolly b cheaper to do it all on the computer, but u can't buy people's sentimentality.

    --
    "I think it would be a good idea" Gandhi, on Western Civilisation
    1. Re:cities as publicity stunts by Bonker · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Funny, I thought that cities were for living in and business, etc, etc, not for rich-ass movie companies to play with.

      You've just got no clue why cities want movies to be filmed in their jurisdictions

      Think about the budget for big-time blockbusters like Matrix 2 and 3, both of which are being filmed in and around Sydney. Together, they probably total around 300-500 million dollars. Much of that money will be spent on production. A significant portion of that money is spent on things adjacent to the filming process, like catering, for example.

      There are restaurants in Sydney that will be made for life with the massive amounts of catering required by such a huge production. Even if Carrie Ann Moss isn't allowed to have more than a celery stick for every meal so that she still looks good in skin-tight latex as Trinity, you can bet that Bubba the gaffer and Hank the electrician want steak and potatos for every meal. Both the Wachowski brothers are big guys. I bet they don't skimp on the catering either.

      Also, since the actors have been in Sydney for about a year, do you think they're living in trailers? Probably they're living in fancy hotel aparments for thousands of dollars a month.

      Money makes it worth it.

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    2. Re:cities as publicity stunts by GlenRaphael · · Score: 2
      There are restaurants in Sydney that will be made for life with the massive amounts of catering required by such a huge production. Even if Carrie Ann Moss isn't allowed to have more than a celery stick for every meal so that she still looks good in skin-tight latex as Trinity, you can bet that Bubba the gaffer and Hank the electrician want steak and potatos for every meal. Both the Wachowski brothers are big guys. I bet they don't skimp on the catering either.

      When I was driving on the fake freeway they had excellent meals prepared on-site including steak and lobster every Friday. So sure, there is probably an outfit or two somewhere that is making lots of money providing food, but I doubt feeding an extra couple hundred people for a year is going to have a significant impact on the Sydney restaurant industry.

      --
      I play Nerd-Folk!
    3. Re:cities as publicity stunts by ahde · · Score: 2

      Ooh...thousands of dollars a month!

  32. Can get the figures to balance by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Interesting
    • [Lord Mayor Frank Sartor] said under the council's Living City policy, the city cannot be empty on weekends, or business owners prevented from trading.

    ... unless sufficient amounts of cash are provided? Principles aside though, I simply can't see how paying a realistic amount to compensate each and every business and individual displaced by this activity could work out as less than doing a kick ass CGI version of it.

    Unless of course Sydney is working on the "First one is free" principle (or second one in this case), to make themselves look like a great (i.e. cheap, compliant) location for foreign film companies. Fair enough, but I'm kind of picturing how we might respond if (e.g.) a Bollywood company thought it could just breeze in and pay to have most of Detroit forcibly evacuated. "Get lost," springs to mind, along with stronger objections and possible a slew of litigation against the City.

    As I said, it's up to Sydney if they want to turn themselves into a giant movie location, but I'd be surprised if it does their reputation as a business location any good.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:Can get the figures to balance by gergi · · Score: 2

      I think most people in Detroit would love to get out of that city :-)

      --
      Nosce te Ipsum
    2. Re:Can get the figures to balance by ahde · · Score: 2

      The money cities make on "production costs" are fees, fines, insurance, etc., paid to the goverment. When politicians say a movie benefits "the economy" they mean it in the only way an economy can be accurately measured -- taxes.

  33. Something missing? by CraigoFL · · Score: 5, Funny
    The Daily Telegraph has learned the helicopter will include a camera mounted in the pilot's seat, giving the moviegoer a bird's-eye-view as the aircraft whizzes across the city.

    Personally, I'd prefer that a pilot would be mounted in the pilot's seat, considering how difficult the stunt is and all...

  34. Don�t you think they know this? by Conrad_Bombora · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is the matrix remember?
    You know the movie that knocked Hollywood on it's ass with bitching CGI, not lame CGI like phantom menace.
    Why where the FX better in the Matrix then in Phantom Menace?
    Answerer, the filmmakers of the matrix realize that not every thing can be done with computers. Some shoots just look better when filmed with real sets not CGI blue/green screen sets.

  35. Re:Matrix Reloaded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ok, I am a fan of CGI,computers, cyberspave, hell it is what I do and a great love of my life. But shut down a city for Keaanu Reeves. Come all this from the guy that did Pointbreak. And a 50 other bad flicks.

    Oh come on now, don't be so harsh on the fellow. It's not his fault he got a bad rap. When you actually go back and watch Point Break you'll notice it's actually quite intellectual. Are the surfer bank robbers really the bad guys or is it the corporate world who hordes all the money from the ordinary people? The bourgeoisie came to America and have crippled it with their new-aristocracy based on wealth instead of nobility. In the end we can only look to the true heroes of that film.. Patrick Swayze and his crazy bunch of presidential bank robbers.

    As far as Bill and Ted, don't even get me started on the wealth of historical information that movie conveys to the viewer. Freud was my favorite character. Who would have known he was such a prude? And Khan! What a badass. If the Matrix Reloaded is half as good as Bill and Ted's Bogus Journey we will be in for quite a treat.

  36. shutdowns by jhughes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hollywood does some strange things for movies. The movie Field of Dreams was filmed in my hometown of Dubuque Iowa, and the field is but 26 miles away.For teh final scene fo the movie they wanted to have a line of cars, at night with lights on, stretching as far as possible. So, for a few hours, they had shutdown a rural road (not a big deal), half of one highway and half of another highway.

    All for a snaking line of cars at dusk with headlights on.
    Tell me computers couldn't have done that:)

    1. Re:shutdowns by dman123 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Don't forget that we're talking about 1988 or 1989. CGI was not exactly as easy as it is today. The SFX in the movie were pretty low key and not supposed to get in the way of the story. I think it's a pretty safe bet that a few hours of filming and minor disruption in the middle of Iowa easily beat the expense of trying to go with a computer.

      The car scene was easily the most emotional one in the movie. A fake shot would have killed the mood. Ah shucks... you've made a geek get all teary.

      --

      --
      dman123 forever!
      Filtering out the -1s and 0s since 1999.
    2. Re:shutdowns by ahde · · Score: 2

      You know they did the light sabers in star wars without Computer Graphics (what is does the "I" stand for, again?)

  37. "Matrix Alley" by Howzer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For most of the last couple of years I worked on Clarence St right across from "Matrix Alley" as it has come to be called, just down the hill towards Darling Harbour from the QVB.

    They shut down this part of the city regularly during the filming of the first one and this latest one, and it caused few if any problems, although one bicycle in the immediate area did go under during that time it had nothing whatsoever to do with the filming.

    Of course it did wonders for productivity as we'ed crowd to the windows whenever some kind of limo/minivan would pull up to try and catch a glimpse of someone famous, all the while trying to be cool and say how we "weren't really that interested" and stuff. Heh.

    Now that the "Eastern Distributor" is finished it's actually pretty easy to divert traffic out of the center of the city, so I really think the byline of "Shut Down Sydney" is going a bit far.

    Sounds like a publicity machine in overdrive to me.

  38. Directoral pissing contest by Neuracnu+Coyote · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why not just shoot the thing at 5 in the morning and digitially chop out any people that may be hanging around the streets?

    Because Cameron Crowe got to shut down Times Square for a few minutes while making Vanilla Sky. The Wachowskis pissing match does not impress me.

    --
    --
    1. Re:Directoral pissing contest by hyoo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why not just shoot the thing at 5 in the morning and digitially chop out any people that may be hanging around the streets?

      What happens if there is an accident (these things do happen). Then they would have to digitally chop out the chopped up people. It's a matter of safety.

    2. Re:Directoral pissing contest by ashitaka · · Score: 2

      No kidding. Vic Morrow and two korean kids in "The Twilight Zone"

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    3. Re:Directoral pissing contest by isorox · · Score: 2

      Then they would have to digitally chop out the chopped up people.

      Its amazing what CGI can do

    4. Re:Directoral pissing contest by ignavus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why not just shoot the thing at 5 in the morning

      Too many people coming out of night clubs.

      Actually, the safest time to film in George Street Sydney is probably on the first Tuesday in November, around 3.15pm. A certain famous horse race would guarantee that the streets of Sydney are absolutely empty at that time - Sydney is practically a ghost town while everyone stays indoors to watch the race.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
  39. Furthermore... by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Isn't that what computers are for?

    Did the Star Wars crew not create entire cities?

    mark

    --

    If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    1. Re:Furthermore... by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 2
      Just because they can build a city on computer, it doesn't mean they should.

      How about: just because some people (like you) think a CGI city looks fake, doesn't mean these guys should instead shut down a major city.

      The movie industry people need to get over themselves. Besides, one big thing that shows creativity and talent is working with what you have to make something amazing. Not throwing enough money at people that you get to borrow a whole city.

      mark
      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
  40. Re:Philadelphia by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Try hanging out somewhere other than in crack houses.

    --
    Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
  41. Publicity Stunt by parad0x01 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is definetly a publicity stunt. The entire city of New york was CG'ed for Spiderman.

    --

    This .sig has been censored for your protection
    1. Re:Publicity Stunt by Kombat · · Score: 2
      Oh yeah, and that looked great, didn't it.

      Not. It looked pretty cool, but certainly not believable. It's not as if I were sitting there asking myself, "I wonder if they CG'd this scene, or if they somehow guided a camera down the street, just above the road?" It was very obviously CG'd. And the last bit, where he swings up to the flagpole? The momentum doesn't even look believable in that one. I mean, one second, he's screaming along at what looks like 600 mph, then as he approaches the flagpole, he appears to slow exponentially, for no reason at all, and gracefully land sideways on the pole. Last time I checked, gravity will slow you down vertically, but not when you're travelling horizontally.

      Terrible, terrible tripe. I for one and very glad that the Wachowskis still value substance (realistic effects) over style (the trendiness of CG effects nowadays, even if they look like garbage).

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
  42. Re:This vs Models vs CGI by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's all about costs. They *could* make a CGI or model version, but they probably thought a little palm grease would save them time and money.

    If they get blown off for being too wacky/arrogant, then they'll look at whether to do models, CGI or a mixture of both.

    Even with all the cash the Matrix made, they still need to avoid blowing the budget with this movie. I don't blame them for investegating this angle.

  43. Wow, what a schedule! by digitect · · Score: 2
    Part three "The Matrix Revolutions" is also in production and will be released in December 2000.

    They sure are taking this time phasing thing to a new level. Maybe Lucas could use this to finish Star Wars parts 7-9.

    --
    There is no need to use a SlashDot sig for SEO...
  44. Shut Sydney Down? by LittleGuy · · Score: 2

    Does Miss Parker and the Centre know about this?

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  45. It's not a control issue by Myriad · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I regularly fly around at 200 feet during the course of my job. 600ft is pretty high really, and certainly high enough for an above-average helicopter pilot to maintain control while flying down a wide city street.

    For a project I was working on I wanted to do some shooting over Toronto at a height that would have worked out to around 400ft. They wouldn't let me.

    The problem, as I discovered, is not an issue of whether it is safe to pilot at that altitude, but should some malfunction or other problem cause an emergency (or crash) landing. Legally (in Toronto anyway) the pilot must fly at a minimum of 1000ft in order to have enough altitude that (s)he can move the helicopter away from densely populated areas in the case of an emergency - rather than arbitrarily falling on top of whatever is directly below.

    Now, in the case of a Sea King (the helicopter of "choice" for the Canadian Navy) I wouldn't want one flying at *any* altitude over a populated region. Something about 30,000 parts flying in formation that makes me nervous.

    --
    "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
    1. Re:It's not a control issue by Kombat · · Score: 3, Informative
      Legally (in Toronto anyway) the pilot must fly
      at a minimum of 1000ft


      That's not entirely correct. First of all, it's a Canadian law, not a Toronto one. Second of all, it applies to all aircraft, not just helicopters. And finally, you must fly a minimum of 1000' above the highest object, not just AGL or ASL (ground/sea level). In Toronto, obviously, that's the CN tower. So you'd have to be pretty high up.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    2. Re:It's not a control issue by MKalus · · Score: 2

      Sure about this? I regularly see planes way lower when they come into the Toronto City Airport, they even fly quite a bit lower near my house.

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    3. Re:It's not a control issue by MKalus · · Score: 2

      Not sure about that, I had one flying by maybe 300 metres away from my building, I was on the balcony at that point (14th floor).

      Michael

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
  46. RTFA by Ian_Bailey · · Score: 3, Informative
    The article says that they are only going to shut down one long street (and area) on a Saturday morning. They are not shutting down the entire city, and the mayor (or whoever the guy was that was responsible) said that any local businesses would not be compromised and be forced to shut down.

    I repeat, RTFA

  47. Easy to do by rossz · · Score: 2

    Just put a huge supply of beer outside the city. The people will leave voluntarily and get too drunk to find their way back for several hours.

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
  48. Guys, this is Australia by Robber+Baron · · Score: 2

    All they need to do is put on a kegger at the beach. The city will empty itself!

    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

  49. Godzilla by Joao · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remember when they were filming Godzilla here in NYC. I was trying to get to work, and they had closed off 23rd street to shoot one of those "tons-O-fish falling from the sky" scenes. There were a bunch of us standing there for several minutes on rush hour, trying to get to work or school, and the one security guy holding us back. Then one guy decided to just keep going, and the whole crowd just marched ahead while the security guy kept trying to hold people back.

    I wonder how many security guards they're gonna need to hold back a city's entire population.

  50. Part 3 - December 2000 ??? by jehreg · · Score: 2
    Part three The Matrix Revolutions is also in production and will be released in December 2000

    Damn! I missed it!

  51. Re:What is the Matrix? by eam · · Score: 2, Informative

    But look how quickly they'll be getting part III out:

    From the article: "Part three The Matrix Revolutions is also in production and will be released in December 2000"

    Talk about fast. They can get part III released so fast that we'll see it before it was filmed!

  52. Re:Wow, Hollywood technology has really advanced.. by autocracy · · Score: 2

    Ummm, duh - they just change reality. Didn't you see the first one? Next time you get deja vu, run to the theaters so you can see the third part!

    --
    SIG: HUP
  53. Re:Matrix Reloaded by why-is-it · · Score: 2

    I'd rather be Tom Cruise - he gets all the chicks.

    Be careful dude: there are lots of rumours that although women really like Tom Cruise, he isn't all that interested in women... He might *actually* prefer CowboyNeal!

    --
    *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
  54. OF COURSE I'M A TROLL, YOU DUMBASS. READ MY NAME! by Subject+Line+Troll · · Score: 3, Funny
  55. How they will do it... by phillymjs · · Score: 2

    ...the producers of The Matrix will funnel cash through a front corporation to fund the re-emergence of Films88.com in Sydney, then tip off the MPAA. The MPAA will then shut Sydney down, and the camera crews will spring into action. :-)

    If that doesn't work, Plan B is to have the BSA tell Sydney to 'prepare to have your software licenses audited'-- as we all know, that can basically cripple whatever entity it's aimed at for a while.

    ~Philly

  56. Re:Yes, it was... by Peyna · · Score: 2

    Yeah, hell if it were that easy to do all CG we'd see more movies like Final Fantasy. It looks NICE but still not as good as the real thing. I prefer CG like you see in Shrek, where it's definetly a fantasy world; or to create scenes that don't exist, like in some sci-fi movie. But you don't need CG to recreate my living room if you can film there already.

    --
    What?
  57. I'm glad by SethJohnson · · Score: 2


    I'm pretty fed up with movie CGI stuff. I like older movies where even though you know stuff isn't real, it at least is physical. Like Yoda looked way better and seemed more huggable when he was a rubber puppet. CGI is a cheap way to lie to the audience. How about all those old epic films where they had REAL crowds in the Collesium? I find it rewarding to think that the filmmaker went to some amount of trouble to produce the illusion of the story.

    A lot of people are referencing the final police chase shot in Chicago for the Blues Brothers. How lame would it have been if those cars crashing were all CGI? Wouldn't it just be GTA3 on the big screen?
  58. most active city by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    Word has it that Hollywood paid $3 million to shut down the most active city in the world for a few early morning hours.

    They shut down Tokyo to shoot the Times Square sceene?

    1. Re:most active city by ahde · · Score: 2

      I was going to say something about that. I was in Shibuya district on an ordinary day (and night) and it made Time's square on New Years Eve look like a ghost town.

  59. Re:Wow, Hollywood technology has really advanced.. by Buck2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    > You know, I am going to have seen this already, and it is willian on-coming to have been AWESOME!!!

    Use of the transitive par-past-prefect in the first clause:

    I am going to have seen this already

    necessitates the usage of an entrance stative par-past-profect (note: profect!) when describing the status of the predicate, as in:

    and it is willian on-coming to have been AWESOME!!!

    should be changed to:

    and it is willain on-coming to have been AWESOME!!!

    I know it's subtle. And, it could have been a typo, but sometimes it makes all the difference in the world for intelligibility.

    --

    As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
  60. Canadian Money by citizenc · · Score: 2, Offtopic
    The Canadian government recently released new versions of our $5 and $10 bills, which contain three security features to combat counterfitting:
    1. Microtext (really really small writing that can't be photocopied and would be quite difficult to just "print out")
    2. Watermarking (if you hold one of the new $5s or $10s under a black light, you'll see a rather complex watermark on both sides of the bill)
    3. Brail (yes, brail -- the new Canadian bills are readable by the blind. I'm still not sure how the brail stays.. uh.. braily with all the handling that money receives, but it does.)
    1. Re:Canadian Money by MavEtJu · · Score: 2

      Brail

      Dutch money always (well, before 1975 which is "always" for somebody born in 1970) had these brail thingies.

      One circle (or none*) for the 5 guilder note.
      Two circles (or one*) for the 10 guilder note.
      Three circles (or two*) for the 25 guilder note.
      Four circles (or three*) for the 100 guilder note.
      Five circles (or four*) for the 1000 guilder note.

      After that the 50 and 250 guilder notes came and for the 50 they used a square IIRC, but for the 250 guilder one? I have no idea.

      Oh well, I haven't even seen a eurobill yet.

      *: I don't have them anymore and I can't recall the precise amount of them.

      --
      bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
  61. Re:Oh the irony... by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 2

    It is pretty funny. For The Matrix 2 they built a life-sized replica of a secion of freeway, including a bridge on a unused runway at an airport to get a realistic, precisely timed car chase scene.

    CGI still looks fake after all these years and it's tiring to look at. It's still in it's infancy both in terms of realistic lighing and in terms of directors not knowing what to do with it or how to use it right.

    Maybe by The Matrix XXV we'll have a movie about virtual space actually made in it and have it look REAL. :)

    --
    Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
  62. Re:That's interesting... but wrong by Joao · · Score: 2

    Anonymous Coward wrote:
    >
    > I really doubt you were there in the least. In
    > fact, the one time someone notably pushed the line,
    > they were arrested and held overnight for psych
    > evaluation at my request since our staff cordially
    > tried to stop their incursion first.

    Nope. Sorry, but I was there. A bunch of us crossed the line on 23rd and Park Ave. There was only one guy there, and no physical barrier other than him. We all walked right by, just across the street from the tarmac full of fish. That block is the only entrance to the 23rd street Lexington avenue subway stop, it was rush hour, and in NYC for crying out loud! How do you expect to stop the flood of people? A handful of plain clothes officers won't cut it. Besides, you can't arrest people for walking on the sidewalk when there is no *official* police barricade. And "your staff" was far from cordial. If I remember correctly, the guy was being plain rude to everyone, and that's why we decided to ignore him and walk on. I got to work late that day because of that, and so did a lot of other people. Good folks might have lost their job that day because of a silly shot in a mediocre movie.

  63. more field of dreams trivia by tswinzig · · Score: 2

    For teh final scene fo the movie they wanted to have a line of cars, at night with lights on, stretching as far as possible. So, for a few hours, they had shutdown a rural road (not a big deal), half of one highway and half of another highway.

    All for a snaking line of cars at dusk with headlights on. Tell me computers couldn't have done that:)


    Well I seriously doubt computer CGI effects done back when that movie was filmed would have been able to match up to the rest of the look of the film. It wasn't Star Wars, you know...

    But speaking of that scene, if you listen to the commentary on the DVD, the director tells how the cars weren't actually driving down the road. Because they couldn't coordinate that effectively, they just used the local radio station to tell everyone to start turning their lights on and off repeatedly. When viewed from far away, it had the effect of looking like the cars were slowly driving down the road.

    Also the "Field of Dreams" in the movie was actually mostly dead grass. While filming, they had to repeatedly spray paint it green...

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  64. Re:What is the Matrix? by NewOrder · · Score: 2, Funny

    Kinda like Space balls?

    --
    -- Jason...
  65. Not exactly by ahde · · Score: 2

    The Matrix Reloaded producers want to fly a helicopter at a death defying 600 feet off the ground! in Sydney and someone said "You'd have to shut down the whole city to do that.

    They did a lot more cooler stuff with a bus and a helicopter in Swordfish, in LA. Without shutting the city down.

  66. released date for 2000???? by JDizzy · · Score: 2

    The Matrix Reloaded will be released next May

    Part three The Matrix Revolutions is also in production and will be released in December 2000


    Wasn't the year 2000 like a few years ago?

    --
    It isn't a lie if you belive it.
  67. WIRES BELONG IN PETER PAN by ahde · · Score: 2

    not kung fu movies!

    We can make allowances for "chick" "kung fu" movies.

  68. Re:Wow, Hollywood technology has really advanced.. by KFury · · Score: 2

    Mod both those up. Obscure Douglas Adams references always win.

    (Profect or Prefect?)

  69. Re:What is the Matrix? by ebbomega · · Score: 2

    Um... well...

    It's taken Lucas about a year less to come out with Ep. 2, and we're probably not going to see 3 for at least another 2 years.

    We're getting Matrix 2 next summer, and then Matrix 3 next winter.

    Seriously, though... keep complaining if you want pay no attention to the fact that both the sequels were being made at the same time, and as such it takes a bit longer to make them...

    Why? Because the Watchowski brothers don't want to do the same thing that Lucas did that pissed off so many people: Release a cliffhanger and then not conclude it for another two years....

    --
    Karma: Non-Heinous
  70. Re:Final fantasy would have been much better... by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2

    Final Fantasy would have been much better....

    If it actually was Final Fantasy and not Aliens/Starship Troopers.

    Chocobos ? Black Mages ? Summons ? Ultima ?

    The only thing that made it "Final Fantasy" was that there was a character called Sid in it.

    graspee

  71. Re:That's interesting... but wrong by ahde · · Score: 2

    What is the world coming to when people think tripe like Mathew Broderick vs. the size-changing CGI script is even a "mediocre" movie.

  72. Re:What is the Matrix? by nanojath · · Score: 2
    How many years has it been since the first movie?


    Well, if you read the article you'll find...


    "Part three The Matrix Revolutions is also in production and will be released in December 2000"


    Damnit! They haven't even released the second one and I already missed the third!


    Anyway, look at how long we all waited for Star Wars Episode 1... A year or two extra for the Matrix sequels is nothin'.

    --

    It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

  73. Re:Wow, Hollywood technology has really advanced.. by dasheiff · · Score: 2

    This is of course to avoid it coming out on the internet before it comes to theaters.

  74. Sydney is *a big place* by Goonie · · Score: 2

    There's around 4 million people in greater Sydney. If it was in the States, it would be approximately the tenth biggest city. Not even the MPAA or the Wachowski brothers can shut down a city that size just for the hell of it :)

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  75. Re:Remember Vic Morrow by ashitaka · · Score: 2

    Hear, hear.

    If you don't know what we're talking about read this.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.