Slashdot Mirror


Star Trek: Nemesis Trailer to Premiere Tonight

savagexp writes "Dark Horizons is reporting that the trailer for the next Star Trek movie will premiere tonight on Entertainment Tonight and via the official website tonight at 7:30 EST." Makes me wish I could stomach ET, or at least had some real bandwidth. Hopefully it'll get placed in front of some of the movies coming in the next few weeks (maybe MiB2?)

87 of 321 comments (clear)

  1. Hmm.. by ChrisMG999 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Maybe we'll get lucky and it'll be on apple's quicktime site. (http://www.apple.com/trailers/)

    1. Re:Hmm.. by Kwikymart · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or, maybe we will be even luckier and it wont even be released in quicktime at all!

      --

      Buying a Dell computer is equivalent to dropping the soap in a prison shower.
    2. Re:Hmm.. by koganuts · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Maybe we'll get lucky and it'll be on apple's quicktime site. (http://www.apple.com/trailers/)"

      Looks like it will: 'The "Star Trek: Nemesis' trailer will then launch online in conjunction with the official movie Web site. Both will go live at 7:30 p.m. PDT/10:30 p.m. EDT Wednesday, with the trailer in the QuickTime format (Courtesy of Apple -- please see link below [it just points to http://www.apple.com/quicktime/]). The trailer will be available in small, large and full-screen sizes (QuickTime Pro 5 required for full-screen viewing). Additional streaming formats will also be available soon. The movie Web site will be accessible via STARTREK.COM."

    3. Re:Hmm.. by quintessent · · Score: 2

      My thoughts exactly. QuickTime thinks it runs on my computer, but it doesn't. I hear everything as it plays, but nothing is displayed.

      QuickTime software sucks and hogs the processor and I don't like the nag screen.

      Ok. Now I can sleep again.

  2. Dang! I was hoping for a StarWars vs Startrek mooV by fishlet · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess I'll have to wait a while longer.
    Scene:

    Picard: Fire photon torpedo's
    Yoda: Diverts torpedo's with a wave of his paw.

  3. Not really a premier... by JonWan · · Score: 4, Informative

    The public premier was last weekend in Tulsa at the Sci-Fi Con. I've got a 3" DVD of it that was given away at Tulsa.

    1. Re:Not really a premier... by jonfromspace · · Score: 5, Funny

      So rip it and post it dude... Man... I have to think of everything...

      --
      I am become Troll, destroyer of threads
    2. Re:Not really a premier... by checkitout · · Score: 2

      Well the actual "press release" information about the trailer mentions that it was originally shown at the convention in Tulsa.

      http://www.startrek.com/news/news.asp?ID=124934

  4. I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 5, Funny
    On Earth Prime, it would be unthinkable, what I am thinking now: I have no interest in any of the Star Wars movies, and I'm looking forward to seeing Wesley Crusher in the new Star Trek movie.

    Now you'll have to excuse me, the perpetual motion machine is a little loud, and needs to be oiled.

    1. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2

      Like many others, I've grown into a real fan (in the lighter "I like what he's done with his public persona and I hope for his continued success," not the "I collect merchandise and have a signed photo" sense, which I reserve mostly for neuroscientists and Brazilian swimsuit models) of Wil Wheaton. I don't see any reference to his appearance in the movie preview, though - any news on that front?

    2. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by Skirwan · · Score: 5, Funny
      Now you'll have to excuse me, the perpetual motion machine is a little loud, and needs to be oiled.
      Young man, on this forum we obey the laws of thermodynamics!

      Oh, wait... this is Star Trek, not the Simpsons... Umm, Heisenberg compensators to full! Engage!

      --
      Damn the Emperor!
    3. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by zephc · · Score: 2

      sure he is, he's just using his stage name, 'Whoopi Goldberg'

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    4. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 5, Informative

      According to Wil himself, he will. Check his web page. Also IMDB has it listed. http://us.imdb.com/Trivia?0253754

    5. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      Well, if your parent poster is American, he can stick to the tried and true American rebuttal .. judging from his objective assesment of Wil Wheaton's site, I'm guessing it will be along the lines of "Because he's a fucking baby and deserves it."

      I, for one, want to see him in the movie. It was the TNG writers who were incapable of making Wil Wheaton look like anything above a Boy Scout who'd won the "Travel With the Enterprise" contest.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    6. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by balthan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yup. Only the 16 people listed on the IMDB page will be in the movie. No other cast members whatsoever.

    7. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by gorilla · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Credits on IMDB are often incomplete until the film actually shows. I guess it depends on how well the publicity dept is at talking to IMDB.

    8. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by Alsee · · Score: 2

      he's just using his stage name, 'Whoopi Goldberg'

      Let me guess - yet another transporter accident?

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    9. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by citizenc · · Score: 2

      An interesting side-bar to that quote is that a perpetual motion machine has NOTHING to do with thermodynamics... thermodynamics is, approximately, the study of the transfer of heat between mediums.

      Silly Simpsons writers! =)

    10. Re:I think I've fallen into Bizarro World. by maxume · · Score: 2

      well, see, a perpetual motion machine probably needs some energy, to be perpetually in motion and what not. Following from this, the energy must come from somewhere, right?

      So anyway, at this point in time, there aren't really any energy generating devices that don't essentially rely on **drumroll** "the transfer of heat between mediums."

      have a nice day.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  5. This would probably be ... by LordNimon · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... the first time I use my TiVo to fast forward through a show so I can watch the commercials.

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    1. Re:This would probably be ... by finny · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... the first time I use my TiVo to fast forward through a show so I can watch the commercials.

      Wow, so you actualy watched the Superbowl?

    2. Re:This would probably be ... by Alsee · · Score: 3, Funny

      use my TiVo to fast forward

      It's theft. Your contract with the network when you get the ads is you're going to watch the show. Otherwise you couldn't get the ads on a show-supported basis.

      I guess there's a certain amount of tolerance for going to the bathroom.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  6. Hmmm... by jonfromspace · · Score: 4, Funny
    From the site:
    The new "Star Trek: Nemesis" trailer runs 1:34 and will also play in theaters, starting with the July 4th weekend. The official "Star Trek: Nemesis" movie site will give fans plenty to whet their appetites, with stunning imagery from the film, a 360-degree IPIX view of the Romulan Senate set


    Wow... the IS a use for IPIX :)

    --
    I am become Troll, destroyer of threads
    1. Re:Hmmm... by Buran · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It certainly took them long enough to have the Rihannsu ... err, Romulans ... get a real role in one of the films. Too bad it never happened while I played one in an online RPG. But I still have an interest in them as a lingering result.

      If you want to learn more about them, find a copy of Diane Duane's novel The Romulan Way, preferably at a good used-book shop. It's not canon because it's just a novel, but it's damn good. It explains their form of government. (Incidentally, the "Senate" dates to ancient Roman times, I do believe. Many of the ranks the Romulans used, e.g. centurion, do as well.)

  7. to go... by zephc · · Score: 2

    ...where no one has gone before, getting fatter, balder along the way.

    --
    "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    1. Re:to go... by GungaDan · · Score: 3, Funny
      Exactly how will Picard become more bald?

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
  8. It will air in front of Men in Black II... by koganuts · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Hopefully it'll get placed in front of some of the movies coming in the next few weeks (maybe MiB2?)" According to this post, it will indeed air in front of Men in Black II. And there's already a shot-by-shot breakdown online.

  9. Re:Does Data die in the trailer? by SWTP · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hum...

    So they have the blue screen of death in the 24 century still?!!!!! Sheech.

    At least they wont need a planet this time to reactivate him!

  10. On Nemesis etymology by fruey · · Score: 2, Insightful
    nemesis Pronunciation Key (nm-ss) n. pl. nemeses (-sz)

    A source of harm or ruin: Uncritical trust is my nemesis.
    Sounds like the Slashdot effect

    Retributive justice in its execution or outcome: To follow the proposed course of action is to invite nemesis.
    i.e., clicking the link at the launch time is inviting Nemesis...

    An opponent that cannot be beaten or overcome.
    The unconscious attitude that rests, all the same, with Slashdot readers... that they will get to see the page even though thousands of others are all trying at the same time.

    One that inflicts retribution or vengeance.
    It will be in Quicktime no doubt and everyone will be seeking their Wine, so maybe that should be re-distribution (changing distro?) so that they have better Quicktime support in friendly RPM format (yes I'm getting tenuous now)

    Nemesis Greek Mythology. The goddess of retributive justice or vengeance.
    Godesses... Rather than cite any myself (OK, I always fancied a bit of Deanna Troi actually) I invite you to comment...

    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    1. Re:On Nemesis etymology by mbyte · · Score: 3, Funny

      you forgot one (from snatch ;)

      Do you know what "nemesis" means? A righteous infliction of retribution manifested by an appropriate agent. Personified in this instance by an 'orrible cunt... me!

  11. Uhh.. by legoboy · · Score: 5, Funny
    Makes me wish I could stomach ET

    Why does CmdrTaco want to eat a cute, cuddly alien?

    --
    If a tree falls on an anonymous coward yelling 'first post' in the forest, does anybody hear?
    1. Re:Uhh.. by Rupert · · Score: 2

      I think he means he can't stomach Eastern Time. That's got to be rough, living in Michigan. Perhaps he'd be better off if he moved across the lake to Chicago (Central Time).

      --

      --
      E_NOSIG
  12. Trailer screenshots already up... by koganuts · · Score: 3, Informative

    Forgot to add that trailer screenshots are already up right... here.

  13. Re:mpaa? by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've said it before, and I'll say it again:

    First, the site isn't anti-MPAA. Many of it's users are. The site is a news and discussion forum.

    Second, not all Slashdot readers are Anti-MPAA. Some don't give a rat's ass about the issue. Some, like me, realize the issues and have come to an internal compromise. Some users haven't bought a movie ticket or DVD in years. You have to realize that there are many thousands of posters, and not all have the same opinions about issues.

    Just remember, /. is a community, but few communities hold a single viewpont on any given issue.

  14. Movie Format by nullard · · Score: 5, Informative
    Or, maybe we will be even luckier and it wont even be released in quicktime at all!

    Or maybe we will be even luckier and group of /.ers who can't differentiate between a file format and a codec will get a clue and stop bashing QuickTime when they are pissed off at Sorrenson's licensing. QuickTime is the perfect format for distributing multimedia since it is the most widely supported format. Also: old applications that used to play QuickTime movies continue to work with the new versions perfectly. You can still use MoviePlayer 2.5 to watch QuickTime 5 movies. The whole framework was is elegantly designed and very expandable. If you don't like not being ablt to watch QuickTime movies on Linux, find a better, more free codec to use and convince the trailer makers to adopt it.

    In any case the original article says:
    The "Star Trek: Nemesis" trailer will then launch online ... in the QuickTime format ... additional streaming formats will also be available soon.
    --


    t'nera semordnilap
    1. Re:Movie Format by GlassUser · · Score: 2

      I perfectly understand the difference between a file format and a codec. But neither of the two that are related to QuickTime are published standards. Therefore, at least in my opinion, they suck. Both of them. THEREFORE, I can say that QuickTime files, as a whole, suck.

    2. Re:Movie Format by gbooker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I perfectly understand the difference between a file format and a codec. But neither of the two that are related to QuickTime are published standards. Therefore, at least in my opinion, they suck. Both of them. THEREFORE, I can say that QuickTime files, as a whole, suck.

      It is true that the codec is not a publish standard, but the file format is! I have read descriptions of the file format and C code that reads it, all from Apple's web site. Perhaps you should do some research before you go on an uninformed tirade.

      --
      You see? It's like I've always said. You can get more with a kind word and a 2x4 than you can with just a kind word.
    3. Re:Movie Format by GlassUser · · Score: 2

      I have been proven wrong. Thank you. I still hate the codec though. :) Any idea where I can get a F/free version of it for windows systems?

  15. EST eh? by saddino · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Dark Horizons is reporting that the trailer for the next Star Trek movie will premiere tonight on Entertainment Tonight and via the official website tonight at 7:30 EST."

    Data: Captain, although /. mentions EST, I find it 99.999% likely that the time is actually EDT, especially given that the US is on Daylight Savings time.
    Picard: Well put, Data. That is precisely why the Federation uses the Stardate time standard.
    Guinan: More oil, Data, honey.

  16. This calls for a Wil Wheaton post! by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wil? You there? Does your employment contract with Paramount allow you to geek out on this topic?

    1. Re:This calls for a Wil Wheaton post! by damiangerous · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't expect a comment from him. According to his website, he's on vacation right now. Well, not quite vacation, more like a working vacation. He's on a guest on CruiseTrek.

    2. Re:This calls for a Wil Wheaton post! by daeley · · Score: 2

      He's on a guest on CruiseTrek.

      Sshhh! Be careful, his wife Anne might find out. ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    3. Re:This calls for a Wil Wheaton post! by OneFix · · Score: 2

      It's doubtful that Wil would be able to post anyhow, I'm sure that his schedule will probably be pretty much full from now until opening day with special events, interviews, etc. I'm sure he will be able to say some stuff after the movie is opened. But, in general, actors can not talk about plot, other actors, or their role in the story.

      I'm pretty sure Paramount has made it even worse after the whole thing with the ending of Generations...

  17. Re:mpaa? by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We're anti-MPAA, not anti-interesting movies.

    If none of us liked movies, the MPAA couldn't piss us off.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  18. Screw Star Trek, the T3 teaser is coming by themexican · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to the offical T3 site the T3 teaser will be playing in front of Men in Black.

  19. Heh.. by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

    Great. They've been Slashdotted. I can just see Commander Data drumming his fingers on the console waiting for the hourglass to go away.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Heh.. by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "How did that get a +4, Funny?"

      That's a tough one. Some philosophers believe that the term 'funny' is used when one says something that makes another laugh. Others believe that the term 'funny' is used when a spoken sentence paints an image that illustrates broken logic.

      The answer to this question may come to you if you remove all conscience thought. If you need help doing that, ask yourself this question:

      "If a Linux user's computer breaks, does Slashdot make a sound?"

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  20. Re:2,4,6,8...? by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

    STIII:TSFS was highly underrated. It didn't blow.

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  21. Re:Please no Quicktime! by DrVxD · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can't we just have a whole pile of jpegs and flick through them by hand?

    --
    Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
  22. misunderstanding... by bje2 · · Score: 2

    i think what they're saying is that the trailer premiers on Entertainment tonight (whenever that is on for you)...on the east coast it's at 7:30 PM EDT, on the west coast 7:30 PM PDT...

    also (and here's where the confusion is), the trailer will premier on the internet at 7:30 PM PDT...in other words, you can watch it at 7:30 (local time) on ET...or wait till 7:30 PDT to see it on the internet...obviously, they can't release it on the internet in conjunction with the 7:30 PM EDT showing on ET, because then everyone on the west coast would just download it, and that would ruin the premier on ET on the west coase...

    well, anyway, that's the way i understood it from their web site...

    --

    "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
  23. Re:Check your times by bje2 · · Score: 2

    that's for the internet version...the ET version will be at 7:30 local time (whenever ET is on in your time zone)...

    --

    "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
  24. The Ribbon Returns! by embarcadero · · Score: 3, Funny

    Plot: The Ribbon comes swooping by early 21st Century San Francisco and deposits a young Wesley Crusher in the famous rainbow-striped shirt at the corner of Haight and Ashbury. The story unfolds as he battles depression, overcome that the once-hip intersection is now dominated by a huge Starbucks, serving only Earl Grey, hot, and Mint Tea, hot, with a Ben and Jerry's across the street. He retreats to a small internet cafe and spends the next twenty years working on his blog, and occasionally visiting Gracie the whale at the Monterey Bay Aquarium, which for some reason has been moved ninety miles to the City. At the age of 37, Wesley's snatched out of the oncoming path of a hurtling Suliban-driven MUNI bus by a Traveler from another time, who does some weird magic with his hands and looks despondent, and suddenly they're both in a huge City in the far-distant future, where everything is destruction and decay, and all the citizens are dead. "This wasn't supposed to happen," says the Traveler. Roll credits

  25. Re:Dang! I was hoping for a StarWars vs Startrek m by carlos_benj · · Score: 3, Funny

    Picard: Fire photon torpedo's

    Fire photon torpedo's what?

    Yoda: Diverts torpedo's with a wave of his paw.

    I think you've confused Yoda and Dogbert.

    --

    --

    As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

  26. MiB2?? by jerkychew · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Everywhere I turn, I hear about a different trailer being attached to Men In Black 2. First it was The Two Towers, then Terminator 3, and now this? Whatever happened to going to the movies to see the movie??

  27. Re:Dang! I was hoping for a StarWars vs Startrek m by jtseng · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually the Federation has already done a strategic analysis of the military-industrial complex of the Empire.

    --

    Sanity.html - Error 404 not found

  28. Jedi Trek Of The Rings by simetra · · Score: 4, Funny

    3 countem 3 boners in one!

    Synopsis: A band of gay space gnomes, aboard the U.S.S. Fellow Ship (get it, fellow, ship, heh heh) team up with the Lucasfilm Muppets(tm) to kill the one guy on the bridge of the Enterprise which nobody knows (and hence won't miss when he dies).

    A splendid time is guaranteed for all!

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
  29. I'm not excited by tomdarch · · Score: 2

    I wish I could remember the exact quote, but Tim of Spaced has some line about "death, taxes and the enevitability that the next Star Trek movie will suck." (if a true Spaced freak can help me out, it's in series one, episode 5 "Chaos" where Tim and his 'boss' are in the comic shop talking.)

  30. Re:Make it so...Please by iiii · · Score: 3, Informative

    No need to scrape the paint off. There are actual real nude pix of her out there.

    --
    Light cup, beer drink, thin so chain, neck turtle fat, man I won't say it again
  31. Re:mpaa? by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 2

    Indeed...I copy/pasted/adjusted this message from another post I made a few weeks back. Some people don't get that /. is a community of individuals, not one voice.

  32. Solaris Quicktime could have been gif by texchanchan · · Score: 2

    Solaris trailer: After waiting about 6 minutes to download the whole thing, in small format, I saw a few seconds of nebulous moving pictures that could have been sent as an animated GIF at a fraction of the nuisance value. Just because something CAN be done with a fancier technology, doesn't mean it OUGHTA be.

  33. Re:Don't bother -- it's an even numbered sequel. by LMCBoy · · Score: 2

    Legend has it that every even-numbered Star Trek sequel sucks.

    You got that backwards, surely.

    No one of sound mind could rank The Search for Spock above the much-beloved Wrath of Khan.
    Or the soul-shudderingly bad The Final Frontier above... well, anything on film, Star Trek or not!?!

    --
    Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
  34. I'm Trailer Trash by DeadBugs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It seems the Trailers are becoming more of interest than the movies. I make it a point to get to the movie on time so I don't miss the trailers. My girlfriend could not understand how I could like the "Hulk" trailer, that should next to nothing about a movie that will not be out for a year. I thought it was cool

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
  35. Odd or Even by philzama · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is it the Odd numbered ones that suck or even. I think it the Odd. =)

  36. Re:Make it so...Please by Erbo · · Score: 2
    Personally, I think Troi looked better when she started wearing a real uniform instead of the "boob uniform." Getting rid of the cheerleader curls also helped...

    For awhile there, I thought Star Trek was doing a good job in starting to portray its female characters more realistically, downplaying the "sex object" angle in favor of smart, tough female characters like Kira Nerys, Jadzia Dax, and Kathryn Janeway. Then I guess someone must have gotten scared that they were losing the 16-25 male demographic, because then we got Seven of Nine and her sprayed-on catsuit, and the "decontamination gel" shower scene on Enterprise. Oh well, win some, lose some...

    --
    Be who you are...and be it in style!
  37. Prophecy in the Digital Age by FreeUser · · Score: 2
    Earlier this morning, in a post that was was (amusingly enough) moderated both as interesting and as a troll, with respect to Lucas' onging fight against the freedom of information on the internet I commented:

    But a mental note to self that "Lucas sucks (even worse than his last two films)" when Slashdot starts promoting the low-rez sorinsen quicktime tailers for Episode III might be appropriate (in the next story, if /. remains true to form) and a personal boycott of his products (past, present, and future) even more so.

    As an aside, one has to wonder what sorts of payola scams exist here, for a site the promotes free software and open source as this one does to constantly be promoting the wares of the one industry that has launched successful attacks against free software and its developers

    OK, it wasn't a Lucas Star Wars movie trailer, but rather a Star Trek trailer. Nevertheless the point remains ... slashdot continues its shameless promotion of the product of an industry that has effectively declared war against the modern internet in general, on Free Software in particular, and has successfully attacked Free Software developers for deCSS and LiViD through letigious thuggary.

    I will continue to voice my irritation at this behavior so long as the slashdot editors continue to engage in the hypocracy of denouncing the behavior of these cartels with one breath, while promoting their products shamelessly with the next.

    No slight against Star Trek or Wil intended, rather an expression of distaste of a more generalized problem.
    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:Prophecy in the Digital Age by Keith+Russell · · Score: 2
      I will continue to voice my irritation at this behavior so long as the slashdot editors continue to engage in the hypocracy of denouncing the behavior of these cartels with one breath, while promoting their products shamelessly with the next.

      And I will continue to voice my irritation at people who pick two individuals out of a group, point out their differences of opinion, and call the group a bunch of hypocrites for disagreeing.

      If you ever see Michael or Timothy pimping a movie, feel free to come out swinging. They're the ones rallying the troops against Big Media, not Taco or Hemos.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    2. Re:Prophecy in the Digital Age by FreeUser · · Score: 2

      And I will continue to voice my irritation at people who pick two individuals out of a group, point out their differences of opinion, and call the group a bunch of hypocrites for disagreeing.

      If you ever see Michael or Timothy pimping a movie, feel free to come out swinging. They're the ones rallying the troops against Big Media


      You mean like THIS?

      I think my point stands rather clearly, as underscored by the actions of the very people you were defending (don't blame yourself, it is their fault for being hypocrits, not yours).

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  38. Re:Don't bother -- it's an even numbered sequel. by Erbo · · Score: 4, Insightful
    No, you've got it the wrong way round. Even-numbered Star Trek movies rock. Odd-numbered ones suck, or, at the very least, are kind of "ho hum."

    Let's look at the evidence:

    1. ST:TMP - Good to see the crew back again, after all these years, but a very slow movie and bo-ring in parts.
    2. The Wrath of Khan - Kick ass! Ricardo Montalban and his rich Corinthian leather, chewing the scenery and quoting Moby Dick. And tons of action.
    3. The Search for Spock - Ho hum. Nice flick, but couldn't measure up to the predecessor. And you kind of knew how it was going to turn out...
    4. The Voyage Home - Funnier than hell. They were clearly out to have fun with the whole "time travel to the present day" gag, and did. My wife likes this one the best.
    5. The Final Frontier - HEAVE! RETCH! What were they thinking? Were they thinking? Shatner couldn't direct his way out of a pay toilet, even if he had James Cameron in there to help him...
    6. The Undiscovered Country - Tight and action-filled, with lots of present-day allegory. Laid some nice groundwork for later Klingon history as depicted on TNG. And Sulu gets to be a captain; he rocks.
    7. Generations - Nice way to bridge the gap, but the story was nothing really spectacular. Gotta love the saucer-module crash scenes though.
    8. First Contact - Borg, Borg Queen, time travel, the first warp flight, "Let's rock and roll!" (Cue up "Magic Carpet Ride.") Plenty of action, plenty of good scenes. I've used this movie to test out DVD players...
    9. Insurrection - The best way I could describe this one is that it was basically like a 2-hour TNG episode. Other than that, it didn't stand out, really.
    10. Nemesis - If the pattern holds, this movie should rock. Gotta check the trailers later today and see what they look like.
    --
    Be who you are...and be it in style!
  39. Re:Wil Wheaton dead at 30 by FauxPasIII · · Score: 2

    Throw in the word "senseless".

    --
    25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
  40. Re:Dang! I was hoping for a StarWars vs Startrek m by Guppy06 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think what we're really all waiting for is the (anti-)climatic conflict between Storm Troopers (who can't shoot) and red shirts (who must die).

  41. Re:2,4,6,8...? by Saige · · Score: 3, Funny

    Generations - They could have done so much between the casts and didn't

    Screw that - what made Generations so bad was a plot hole big enough to fly the entire Federtion fleet through all at once.

    Let's see, distress call at station, Enterprise goes to help, bad guy abucts Geordi and blows up star, getting away. Eventually, they track him down, Picard goes to planet, fails to stop him, sucked into Nexus. While in Nexus, Picard can travel to ANY point in time? Does he go back to back in orbit, knowing where to use torpedos/phasers to destroy the launch site? Does he go back to just when the star explodes, so they can head STRAIGHT to the destination planet, beating the other ship? Or, even more intelligently, does he go back to when they first arrive at the station, so they can toss the bad guy in the brig, search the station, find the torpedo set to destroy the star, and prevent the whole thing?

    OF COURSE NOT. We go back to just a couple minutes ago, with an overweight, horrible actor playing a previous Enterprise captain, at a time when they still have a really tough time defeating the enemy - never mind that they could be totally aware that, should they screw up, they'd go back into the Nexus to try again, and again, and again.

    Why go back to that moment? It makes absolutely no sense, unless you're deliberately trying to make stopping the bad guy as DIFFICULT as possible.

    Oh, and BTW, First Contact's huge plot hole? The Borg could simply have sent the probe back in time at some other place in the galaxy, not having alerted the federation to their plans, therefore, not having had any challenge to their assimilation. But then again, adding time travel instantly makes it insanely difficult to prevent plot holes, due to the way things can work out.

    I thought Insurrection was the best of the three because of the comparative lack of plot holes.

    --
    "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
  42. Re:2,4,6,8...? by ShavenYak · · Score: 2

    While in Nexus, Picard can travel to ANY point in time? Does he go back to back in orbit, knowing where to use torpedos/phasers to destroy the launch site? Does he go back to just when the star explodes, so they can head STRAIGHT to the destination planet, beating the other ship? Or, even more intelligently, does he go back to when they first arrive at the station, so they can toss the bad guy in the brig, search the station, find the torpedo set to destroy the star, and prevent the whole thing?

    Perhaps he was afraid going back too far would cause problems in the timeline. Also, I'm wondering if there'd be an issue with two Picards and Kirk suddenly being aboard Enterprise. Although, I suppose the Picard returning from the Nexus must replace the already-existing Picard, since Kirk and he didn't run into himself on the planet's surface.

    I thought the entire concept was cheesy, though, so what am I doing trying to defend it?

    Oh, and BTW, First Contact's huge plot hole? The Borg could simply have sent the probe back in time at some other place in the galaxy, not having alerted the federation to their plans...

    I got the impression the Borg were just planning a full-scale assault on Earth, and the time-travel idea was hatched after they realized they were going to get blown up. Remember, Picard was supposed to be watching the neutral zone. Had he not defied Starfleet orders, the Borg cube would probably have wiped out the fleet in short order, and then begun the process of assimilating Earth.

    --

    Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  43. Re:2,4,6,8...? by gilroy · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Blockquoth the poster:

    First Contact - Time Travel... Gotta Love Time Travel.

    Oh, time travel is so hackneyed, especially in the Trekverse. But more importantly, First Contact ruined the Borg. Well, OK, "I, Hugh" began the degeneration, but First Contact was the final nail in the coffin.


    The original Borg was/were the only truly alien aliens in Trek. Their ships were ungraceful (for a reason). They violated bilateral symmetry. Their motives were so alien as to be impossible to even recognize as motives. They were implacable, nigh-omnipotent, and -- most important of all -- not like some subset of humanity with a bad nose. Indeed, they were a reasonable (sort of) extrapolation of Net technology, an honest answer to a what-if question, the best element of sci fi.


    What made them stand out was their communal decemtralized mind... a true unified consciousness, something emergent from the individual entities contained in the Borg net. What did First Contact do? It fell for the cliche "hive mind", took a weak metaphor (social insects) and expanded it, somehow, into a concept even weaker. A Borg Queen? Please! The true Borg would have no truck with a queen, a king, a president, or anything that makes one part more significant/important than another.


    Let's say it again, class: The true Borg are decentralized and distributed. A "Borg Queen" is the exact antithesis of what the Borg were.


    Arrgh. It bothers me every time I think about it. Grrr.

  44. Enterprise... by OneFix · · Score: 2

    Since Enterprise is on UPN tonight at 8:00 (only half-hour following the "premiere", I'ld expect to be able to catch it a few times tonight...

    So, you only need to catch it on ET if you absolutely must see it @7:30 rather than @8:00 or if you are one of those unlucky few without a UPN station.

    1. Re:Enterprise... by ShavenYak · · Score: 2

      So, you only need to catch it on ET if you absolutely must see it @7:30 rather than @8:00 or if you are one of those unlucky few without a UPN station.

      Or, if you don't want to watch the rerun of Enterprise. Unless it's one of the 2 or 3 I missed, I'm skipping it. Please, let the new season start soon!

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  45. Re:Bandwidth gotcha down? by FPhlyer · · Score: 2

    Erm... that's a quote from what savagexp wrote, not from what CmdrTaco wrote. Remember... the stuff in quotes and italics was written by the article submitter... not the Slashdot editorial staff.

    --
    Brought to you by Frobozz Magic Penguin Fodder.
  46. Re:mpaa? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    Heh. I love it when people make assumptions to the extreme.

    No I would definitely mind if it happened that way. I don't think it would, though. The cause of the SSSCA proposal was that people were trading movies. People weren't trading movies just for shits and giggles, they were doing it to acquire the movies. Hence, demand for movies because they're popular. Had the movies not been popular enough to trade, no SSSCA.

    :P

    I dunno why I wrote all that, I think you're just pulling my leg. Heh. Fun stuff. :)

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  47. Preview-itis by smagruder · · Score: 2

    Of course, we'll see 2/3 of the trailer in the multitude of peek-ahead snips that ET will show before actually showing 9/10 of the whole thing at the end of their show. This freaked-up show is so full of fluff, I have to wonder if they spend any more than 5 minutes preparing the actual content.

    --
    Steve Magruder, Metro Foodist
  48. Re:2,4,6,8...? by leperjuice · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have to agree with you mostly, but I can suggest a real-life computing situation where a "queen" is necessary for operation of the collective.

    Windows 2000 domains.

    Any flaming aside, Windows 2k has something called FSMO ("fizzmo") roles. Short for "Flexible Single Master Operation", the roles correspond to tasks that only one machine in the entire enterprise can do. This is to avoid any sort of duplication/collision of effort for certain important roles. Now, unless you actively do anything, the first box you bring up handles all the tasks (Schema Master, Domain Naming Master, PDC Emulator, RID Master, and Infrastructure Master if you're curious). Any machine can take over any or all of the roles, but there must be only one box handling a role. However, aside from the FSMO roles, all domain controllers are logically equivalent in terms of importance to the domain.

    So, how does this correlate to the Borg? Well, assuming that there are a number of roles to play that are essential to the operation of the collective and that destruction of the master would cause a disruption in the collective mind until regeneration (think of a lost token in tokenring) so you'd choose a protected unit. This would be the "queen". Ideally, however, the system would be such that any unit could take over any or all of the roles quickly in case of danger.

    Of course, why she'd be all slinky and with a removable head is beyond me.

    --

    -- "I am disrespectful to dirt. Can you not see that I am serious!"

  49. Oh well... by Kiaser+Zohsay · · Score: 2

    Here in the heart of East Coast USA, the Wednesday edition of ET has come and gone, and no sign of the trailer. I guess I'll just have to wait til tomorrow morning when I'm back at work with my big fat pipe....

    --
    I am not your blowing wind, I am the lightning.
  50. Trailer's up if you can't wait until 7:30 PM PT... by koganuts · · Score: 3, Informative

    Right... here.

  51. man this is sad by lingqi · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am staying in the office waiting for the Star Trek trailer, on the excuse that
    1) 7pm the carpool is lifted, and
    2) it's only a "half hour" wait, and
    3) office connection is about 1.8x that of the DSL at home.

    i am so glad there is no "pathetic loser" mod.

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

  52. Other site by Optikal · · Score: 2, Informative

    I get a 403 Forbidden when trying to get to nemesis.startrek.com (The official site). I'm sure I'm not the only one. The trailer wasn't officially up at Apple's QuickTime trailers site, but I did find it nonetheless with common sense.

    It can be found here http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount/star_trek_ nemesis/

  53. Doesn't allow saving? by gbooker · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, I got the full screen version, and it said that it doesn't allow saving. So... I did a get info on the movie, and lo and behold, there is an entry called source which is a URL. I typed this into wget, and it is downloading. For those who want to save it, here is the akamai URL:

    http://a1536.g.akamai.net/5/1536/51/979a9ce9df5cda / a1a1aaa2198c627970773d80669d84574a8d80d3cb12453c02 589f25382f668c9329e0375e81787e85abb28970c7aee1d900 465d736aa1c81ec4bb91e8bf063cc3f6ed037/star_trek_ne mesis_fs.l.mov.

    Enjoy. BTW, if this goes 404, just follow the procedure that I use listed above.

    --
    You see? It's like I've always said. You can get more with a kind word and a 2x4 than you can with just a kind word.
    1. Re:Doesn't allow saving? by gbooker · · Score: 2

      I am using QT 6 Public Preview. I just did a get info, and it showed the whole thing. I guess it is a QT6 thing then.

      --
      You see? It's like I've always said. You can get more with a kind word and a 2x4 than you can with just a kind word.
  54. Re:mpaa? by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 2

    No kidding. It's easy to hate M$ because Bill's evil AND they have shitty code. The MPAA may be clueless but the guys who actually make the movies really do seem to try to do a good job, even with a franchise as worn as Star Trek. Damn them for being so very excellent every now and then!

    --
    Dyolf Knip
  55. Re:Don't bother -- it's an even numbered sequel. by Erbo · · Score: 2
    "I like Insurrection because it is a 2 hour TNG episode."

    Well, darn it, I did, too. Since there haven't been any new TNG episodes in a while, anytime they crank out a new movie with Picard's crew, it's a Good Thing. It just wasn't as strong a movie as First Contact, IMHO, is all. There were TNG episodes I liked that weren't as strong as the strongest ones, yet they were still good episodes, just not as strong.

    There were problems with STV that started way before they went to the center of the galaxy. For instance, it looked like they were trying to shove Scotty and Uhura into a relationship, and that just doesn't make any sense to me. And don't get me started on Uhura's fandancing...

    All my opinion, of course.

    --
    Be who you are...and be it in style!