Slashdot Mirror


Hot-Rod Your CD-RW Drive

Anonymous Coward writes: "Currently almost everyone with a computer has a CD-ROM drive and also a big part of them have a CD-RW drive. But what if you want to spend less time on writing a CD-R ? You have to buy a new one, or, if you are a real geek, you just overclock it! Seems to be to good to be true ? It's not! Currently a lot of cheap manufacturers of CD-RW drives are using the same parts in their 32x,40x, and 48x drives and start to sell them at 32x, later to 40x and in end as 48x. and with a little upgrading of the firmware (totally legal) you will have a faster drive, because you remove its limits! It currently works on drives from Lite-On (who also makes drives for Memorex, TDK, Iomega, Cendyne, TraxData and Pacific digital all overclockable) And the list goes on as there are also overclock tricks for LG (32x -> 40x) and Sony drives (32x -> 48x). If you don't believe it, read all the reactions and the postings on the forums mentioned above!"

285 comments

  1. Plextor? by Luke-Jr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't suppose this goes for old Plextor writers does it?

    --
    Luke-Jr
    1. Re:Plextor? by Ziviyr · · Score: 3, Informative

      From what I read all you can do is rename/upgrade firmware on rebadged Plextor drives. (they don't seem to play the underclocking game much)

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    2. Re:Plextor? by Luke-Jr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If they don't play underclocking much, then how would rename/upgrading of firmware make it any faster?

      --
      Luke-Jr
    3. Re:Plextor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      dude, my plextor 2x is now burning at 32x, ra!

    4. Re:Plextor? by Resist148 · · Score: 1

      my plextor 4/2/24 scsi screws up while writing about half the time, and my computer is ridiculously fast, I wouldn't overclock if I could...hell, my buffer never ever leaves 100%, yet it still has buffer underruns....ahh well...

    5. Re:Plextor? by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

      How'd you accomplish that?

      --
      Luke-Jr
    6. Re:Plextor? by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

      Possibly the hard drive access time... I've found some of my files are too fragmented for 8x burning with a 14400 RPM partition (RAID-0)... or you could always cache the disc in RAM if you have enough...

      --
      Luke-Jr
    7. Re:Plextor? by CTho9305 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't. It lets sanyo, plextor, iomega all use the same drive and put their own names on it.

    8. Re:Plextor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something is REALLY wrong in your case. I burn 8x over NFS links with scsi 2 drives - with no problem.

    9. Re:Plextor? by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

      Perhaps... the only things wrong with my PC is that it has overclocked RAM (100 MHz running at 133 >_) and it runs Windoze... the second of which won't be true very much longer.

      --
      Luke-Jr
    10. Re:Plextor? by nil_null · · Score: 1

      I write at 32X using IDE drives on a ridiculously slow PC, while running other stuff in the background that uses the harddrive and maybe doing a little web browsing. Haven't burned a bad disk yet. My CD-Writer (Samsung) has an 8MB buffer, though.

      Sounds like you got a bad drive, though. My old HP 2x writer started burning bad disks half the time before it finally died.

    11. Re:Plextor? by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

      Only bad discs I have are ones that have cracked because I squeezed too many together once... The burner's probably got some issue though as it can't read any CD-RWs... though it can burn them just fine. (and because it can't read it, it disallows erasing them too :/)

      --
      Luke-Jr
    12. Re:Plextor? by hydra-monkey · · Score: 1

      Hiya,

      I have a Plextor IDE 16/12/10A drive. I'd get all sorts of writing errors until I turned on Burn-Proof on the drive. I had to dig around the cdrecord mailing list to find the flag. Here's the command I use:
      cdrecord -vvvv -dev=0,0,0 driveropts=burnproof speed=16 $@

      Once I've switched to this command, things work flawlessly. I don't always burn at 16x (it varies depending on the source -- either my nfs mount or my local drive or even a dynamically created isofs.

      I doubt your older drive has Burn-Proof. But in the rare case it does, here's the flag that may just save you a few coasters.

      (go ahead and mark this offtopic, I don't believe in overclocking anyway).

    13. Re:Plextor? by smallblackdog · · Score: 0

      express delivery from his local computer hardware store.

      --
      Mod me down, fine with me, it's my real karma I try to keep up.
    14. Re:Plextor? by Ziviyr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In this case the firmware part could add support for CD formats, make burning marginally more reliable and so forth.

      I really think stories have to tone themselves down nowadays. Too many readers are getting wrong ideas and cranking up the slashdot effect.

      Well, I can't say this isn't a subscription service anymore, but really.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    15. Re:Plextor? by uglyduckling · · Score: 2

      By being 1337 hax0r

    16. Re:Plextor? by rikkards · · Score: 1

      Try cleaning the lens (carefully though). I had that happen with an old 4416 yamaha.

    17. Re:Plextor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had the same issue with my burner. If you have an IDE hard drive, doublecheck that DMA is enabled on it (device manager in win, hdparm in linux). Another possibility could be an IRQ conflict. If you have a fast system, there is no reason that the Plextor should behave this way--especially if the buffer never leaves 100%. I'd say there's something at the system level that's interrupting your cpu while it's pushing data to the burner. At just about any model, Plextor is still the BMW of burners. You should be able to build a setup where you can burn with no worries. Just my $0.02.

    18. Re:Plextor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you use an Adaptec SCSI adapter? There are some issues with WinXP and Adaptec.

    19. Re:Plextor? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

      knock your bus down to 100 if you can, so you're not pushing the RAM so hard. I take it you're putting some sort of Unix on, to replace Windows? If so, you'll need reliable RAM - a machine that runs Windows but is a bit crashy, intermittently, kernel panics like a bastard running Linux.

      Might be an idea to get one of those single-floppy memory testers and try it out, too.

    20. Re:Plextor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You aren't using an ISA SCSI card, are you?

  2. Too good to be true? by stevenbdjr · · Score: 5, Funny

    And if you act now, we'll send you two kits for the price of one. That's the two CD-RW hot-rod kits, plus the terry cloth bath robe, absolutley FREE!

    1. Re:Too good to be true? by prof187 · · Score: 4, Funny

      But does it also chop jullienne fries?

      --

      My other sig is an import.
    2. Re:Too good to be true? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe. If only I could remember some of the lyrics to Weird Al's "Mr. Popeil".

    3. Re:Too good to be true? by cHiphead · · Score: 0

      sold

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    4. Re:Too good to be true? by drix · · Score: 2

      My inner chef geek has to correct you: "julienne" is a verb. "Julienned" fries, maybe.

      --

      I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
    5. Re:Too good to be true? by prof187 · · Score: 1

      Can I claim ignorance and pretend I was trying to use it as a gerund converted into an adjective?

      --

      My other sig is an import.
  3. either you see it or you don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone seen the humour in "hot-rodding" a CD burner?

  4. YAY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Woohooo! Another device I need a liquid cooling system for.

  5. Gee... by tinrobot · · Score: 1

    Can I also play my audio CDs at 48x? My dog seems to love those high pitches...

  6. old news...... by H3XA · · Score: 5, Informative

    another source of info

    http://www.cdrinfo.com/Sections/Articles/Specific. asp?ArticleHeadline=Overclocking&Series=0

    with mods for -
    AOPEN
    HP
    Iomega
    LG
    Lite-On
    Plextor
    Ricoh
    Sony
    TraxData

    - HeXa

    1. Re:old news...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm too cool to submit articles to slashdot... and complaining about slashdot makes me uber-cool."

  7. Added Bonus by jigokukoinu · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Does this come with instructions on how to use your computer as central heating? Just think: No more cold winters! Actually, My 8-10 running computers *DO* heat my apartment completely during the winter. ;)

    1. Re:Added Bonus by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

      Who needs directions. 4 computers and 4 large monitors in a studio apartment and I already don't need heating. It's actually 5 deg warmer sitting at my desk than at any other place in the room.

      --
      I do security
    2. Re:Added Bonus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's fine for winters, but what about the summers? It's hard to code when it's 105 degrees and you keep dripping sweat on the keyboard.

  8. this rules by cisco_k1d · · Score: 1

    hahahahhaha man i feel like a dork buying a 40x now :P

  9. Firmware by zapfie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Upgradinging of the firmware, totally legal? Ackk. You can do whatever you want with your CD-R drive and it would be totally legal- you have first sale rights. I will be scared if we live in a country where people even have to wonder if modifying their own hardware is "totally legal" or not.

    --
    slashdot!=valid HTML
    1. Re:Firmware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Not a long ago I went shopping for a new DVD player and asked a salesman in one of the shops if I could make a particular player region code free. He got really upset and explained to me that tampering with the hardware in that way would not only void the warranty but would also be illegal and that as authorized dealers for S*ny (manufacturer's name obfuscated to protect the innocent) they certainly wouldn't give any information about how to free the region code in the player.

    2. Re:Firmware by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is not *technically* just a firmware upgrade. This is circumventing/reverse engineering of their intellectual property, and in violation of the DMCA.

      Imagine what would happen to the world markets if you were to do this. Just sit back and watch all that nothing spread like wildfire!

      AWG

      Just like my opinion, my sarcasm's free! Just remember: You get what you pay for!

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    3. Re:Firmware by alienw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The DMCA prohibits systems that break COPY PROTECTION. I don't know what planet you live on, but on this one CDR drives don't have copy protection yet. What the fuck does the dmca have to do with them?

    4. Re:Firmware by repsychler · · Score: 1

      He was referring to DVD players, not CDRs.

      --
      Duffman can never die! Only the actors who play him!
    5. Re:Firmware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't, he was explaining this to someone who was told not to region free a dvd drive

    6. Re:Firmware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      CDs do not technically have explicit copy protections but more often than not the drives have been crippled from writing in raw mode. This is done to prevent perfect copies of certain types of cds. Sony and Toshiba often do this on their low level consumer drives. Sometimes, these firmware upgrades remove this limitation. This could violate the DMCA, as most judges do not seem to understand fair use and/or legitament purpose. Look ant DeCSS it is a regional protection, it does nothing to stop copying at all. If you have a US DVD drive and US os, for instance, you can copy the tracks all you want. Try it with the ATI file player. Copy a track and play it on the hard drive. It works fine.

    7. Re:Firmware by djiin · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately we are moving towards a world where this is the case. Even where an action is completely within the law, should a company decide they want the law changed they first sow doubt over the legality of that action. By changing the public perception to reflect what they want, they can more easily have the law changed to reflect that. After all, by this point the law would only be changed to bring it into line with the publics perception of that law. Witness this happening now with the (now questionable) legality over backing up music cd's, or reverse engineering, or tivo.

    8. Re:Firmware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh. . .

      If you have a DVD-R (like that wonderful DVR-A04, now available for less that $250 w/shipping) and you update it with a firmware that allows you to copy comercial DVDs you have just circumvented a copy-protection device and, if i understand the law correctly, you promptly be castrated followed by a sharp poke in the eye.

    9. Re:Firmware by Beliskner · · Score: 2
      will be scared if we live in a country where people even have to wonder if modifying their own hardware is "totally legal" or not.
      Well get scared, if you chip your Playstation to play international games you can get screwed
      --
      A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
    10. Re:Firmware by be-fan · · Score: 2

      How if breaking regional lock-ins a violation of intellectual property? If patents can make customers do whatever the manufacturer wants, I think I'll patent something and require all to get body-tattoos in order to use it.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    11. Re:Firmware by treat · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      I will be scared if we live in a country where people even have to wonder if modifying their own hardware is "totally legal" or not.

      The strangest thing about the US is that people live in a fantasy world, believing that the government really is protecting their rights, instead of the "rights" of corporations to make a profit. It is illegal to modify your cable modem to increase your bandwidth. It is illegal to modify your cable box, or put anything in line with it, to descramble channels. It is illegal to modify a DVD player to remove the region restrictions. It is illegal to modify a scanner to listen to certain frequencies. It is illegal to modify a semiautomatic firearm to be fully automatic.

    12. Re:Firmware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What firmware would that be...?

      Is it one for the DVR-A04 or is it from one of their high-end drives???

    13. Re:Firmware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get screwed how? If you 'chip' your PS2 the cops show up and beat you up? Your dog runs away? Your wife leaves you?

    14. Re:Firmware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You should've asked him if it is illegal to kick him in the nuts.

    15. Re:Firmware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you 'chip' your PS2 ... Your wife leaves you?

      If only it were that easy..

    16. Re:Firmware by _ben · · Score: 1

      Then I hope you don't live in the United States where its illegal to make certain modifications to your hardware!

      Ever try tinting your car windows? Or changing the exhaust system?

    17. Re:Firmware by Mooset · · Score: 1

      Of course upgrading your firmware isn't illegal. However it is illegal to sell or distribute "hacked" firmware just as it would be to redistribute any other piece of software. In the past many firmware hacks have been illegal because they are alterations of the original copyrighted firmware.

      I can't read the article because it is currently slashdotted but my guess would be that they found some way to patch the firmware without distributing any code owned by the manufacturer.

      In this case it is the hack itself which is "totally legal", not the act of updating firmware.

    18. Re:Firmware by Eupolis · · Score: 1

      Upgradinging of the firmware, totally legal? Ackk. You can do whatever you want with your CD-R drive and it would be totally legal- you have first sale rights. I will be scared if we live in a country where people even have to wonder if modifying their own hardware is "totally legal" or not.

      Don't count on it. The hardware itself isn't protected by copyright law, and you can rearrange circuitry and tweak resistors all you want. Firmware code, however, is software (installed on the chips of the drive) and is probably licensed just like all other software, under a contract that supplants the user's first sale rights. I'm willing to bet that at least some of those companies have click-through licenses telling you what drives you can and can't install the firmware on.

      I haven't investigated the sites mentioned in the post, as I'm completely satisfied with my CD-RW. But if that firmware is distributed under a restrictive license, the submitting AC's "totally legal" is totally false. Check the licenses.

      As a practical matter, I doubt there's a way they can tell. But the fact that it'd be awfully hard to get caught doesn't make it legal.

      On a non-legal note, it strikes me as a little economically weird for hardware companies to try to fool with firmware and equipment prices this way. If the drives indeed all use identical equipment, why not just sell them all as high-speed drives for an average price, underpricing the competition on the high-speed drives? Is this a form of price discrimination? On the other hand, maybe there are slight differences in the equipment (in which case it might be described as "overclocking" rather than a mere "firmware update"), suggesting that updaters risk burning something out.

      That's more than enough thoughts for one post.

    19. Re:Firmware by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

      Your last example is of course, crap. Automatic weapons are federally regulated, and corporate profits have nothing at all to do with that.

    20. Re:Firmware by Beetjebrak · · Score: 1

      Aren't CPU's marketed in the same way? I recall this from the i386-era when i read in some magazine (PC Format if I'm not mistaken) about how these chips were all produced identically by Intel but differentiated during testing.
      The testing was said to start at 33MHz. and stepped down to 25, 20 and 16MHz. depending on the reliability. As soon as the chip endured one of the tests properly it would get labeled and sold at the tested clock rate.
      I don't know how much of this is true, if any, but it wouldnt seem too unlikely to me. If you could still sell hardware that can't reach its full potential but is well reliable at half its spec, I'd think most manufacturers would.

      --
      Learn from the mistakes of others. There isn't enough time to make them all yourself.
    21. Re:Firmware by GrenDel+Fuego · · Score: 1

      There's a slight difference between your example and the cd burner modification.

      There are regulations on tinting for windows. There is regulations on exhaust systems. You're modifying your car to be outside of the regulations, which is illegal.

      In this article, it talks about modifying your cd burner to be faster. Faster cd burners are not illegal. Excessive tinting is.

    22. Re:Firmware by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny
      You can do whatever you want with your CD-R drive and it would be totally legal- you have first sale rights.

      You don't have a right to be an "X" thief. These companies are selling you Xs. You paid for 32 Xs. By modifying the drive, you stole up to 16 extra Xs from the manufacturer.

      If you bought a 6-cylinder Ford, would it be OK to break into the dealership and steal two more cylinders so you could have a V8? Of course not.

      Xs don't just grow on trees. Stop stealing them.

      If you really feel you need a bunch of Xs, you can get them in bulk from Microsoft, who sells them by the box. It really doesn't cost that much per X to stay legit.

    23. Re:Firmware by mosch · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's also illegal to modify ATM machines to give you money without deducting an appropriate amount from your bank account. The nerve of the government, always keeping the thieves^Wpeople down!

    24. Re:Firmware by Wordplay · · Score: 1

      Upgrading the firmware is totally legal. However, the firmware itself is generally illegal for you to grab and use. By and large, the CDROM manufacturers don't give out the updated firmware. They usually come from someone who has a current rev of the drive and who scans and uploads their firmware to drive-hacking sites. That's a clear copyright violation.

    25. Re:Firmware by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 2

      Well considering that you don't own the ATM at all, you'd be damaging someone else's property.

      And for the parent post, if you are modifying a cable box or modem that you don't own, but are leasing I can see how that should be illegal also. But firearms, DVD players, videogame consoles, or anything else you own out right, I say go for it.

    26. Re:Firmware by baxshep · · Score: 1

      This is more comparable to modifying your V6 to get more performance out of it. You're trolling, right?

    27. Re:Firmware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      --the united states IS a for-profit corporation, who exerts an unfair advantage using threats of violence and actual violence in order to maintain their monopoly. The second amendment is clearly written, the federal restrictions and licensing is patently illegal, unconstitutional, despite what the miller decison says.

      The constitution is only a document that spells out limits on organized federal government, it does NOT grant any rights. By default, citizens have all the rights. government has a very limited amount of regulatory power, but restrictions on arms aren't listed, in fact, they are ordered in explicit and simple english language that they have NO rights or authroity over firearms, "keeping and bearing". "Arms", in fact, are the ONLY named product specifically listed in the constitution as a product that the government may NOT interfere with as to citizens. The ONLY one, the founders considered it so important that they specified it. It's written in english, not lawyergoonspeak. Webster wrote his first dictionary on purpose to insure that for all time the original meanings of the words would stand, and "arms" means ARMS. They didn't say SOME arms, they didn't say over here it's cool over there it isn't, they didn't say the government could tax or regulate them, nada, zip, nothing. Government was ordered to NOT infringe on the keeping and bearing part. This is just SO dog squat simple to understand, too, it really is. Just because they do restrict now is from people getting scared and buffaloed and weenieing out way back in the 30's when they should have revolted over that issue.

      Our secession from england happened precisely from the current government of that era-the english so called "royal" government- insisting that they had the right to restrict firearm ownership, the colonists rebelled, ie, concord, "the shot heard round the world".

      Personal soverign rights are automatic, born-with, and exist irregardless of the constitution. The government does not "grant" them, despite what clinton said, or despite what any other statist dictators say including the current goon dictatorship of lying weasels. Yes, the batf goons will kill you, that makes them traitors, dolts, and ignorant goons, it doesn't make them lawful or correct. And the so called "supreme" court, traditionaly not capital "s", can be just as wrong as anyone, and it frequently is, being composed of paid off and bribed political appointee lackeys of one of two outright criminal gangs called "parties" that have hijacked the legitimate government "of the people" for their own profit and power aggrandizement.

    28. Re:Firmware by FueledByRamen · · Score: 1

      You can tint your windows and modify your exhaust system all you want, as long as you use the car on your own property. To use it on a PUBLIC road, there are regulations. These don't stop you from doing it, only from using the roads if your car doesn't meet specs for tint and exhaust systems.

      --
      Every cloud has a silver lining (except for the mushroom shaped ones, which have a lining of Iridium & Strontium 90)
    29. Re:Firmware by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2

      One one of my off days I would have asked if the guy works on commission, and if so, please go get another salesperson for me to talk to. ;)

    30. Re:Firmware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the Red Hot Chili Peppers once said...

      "If you have to ask
      You'll never know"

      YHBTYHLHAND

    31. Re:Firmware by zapfie · · Score: 1

      Haha.. you just brightened up my otherwise completely crappy day. Thanks. ;)

      --
      slashdot!=valid HTML
    32. Re:Firmware by Turbyne · · Score: 1

      Ahem... DMCA?

      --
      ~A'Ëq'i4d)^'$ÊSÈòB
    33. Re:Firmware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >As the Red Hot Chili Peppers once said...
      >
      >"If you have to ask
      >You'll never know"

      Bitch that was Louie Armstrong

    34. Re:Firmware by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      And why do they want to protect copies that you're not even allowed to make? And what's the connection with pirates? Do these things get used on ships?

      It used to be that if you got VD, you went to the doctor and got a shot. Nobody wanted to copy it. Now with this Digital VD people are trying to copy it 48x faster than yesterday and pirates can't wait to steal it. Haven't they got enough enough problems already with their hook hands, wooden legs and eye patches?

    35. Re:Firmware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An "X Thief"...? How utterly silly and ridiculous. There is nothing AT ALL comparable between modifying an optical drive and "breaking into a dealership and stealing more cylinders"...if the drive is capable of it, then the "X"'s are there already...and since you paid for the drive, they're yours. Maybe companies should think about not selling consumers the same crap in different boxes as different quality products...so long as they continue to swindle, we should continue to swindle.

    36. Re:Firmware by SB5 · · Score: 1

      The word for today is... SARCASM...

      Look it up in the dictionary...

      --
      If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
      it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
    37. Re:Firmware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually they do have copy protection, however, if it's a computer being used you're able to skip this thanks to some previous other law.

      if you buy a commercial Audio CD Copier, all data can't be directly copied. they pipe the audio out across an analog line which the other drive receives and records resulting in a slightly less perfect copy that will degrade with more copies. these units also may only record on the higher priced Audio-CDRs, which can be identified as such

      i'm not sure of the reason but with computer's you're allowed to circumvent this, probably because computer's aren't specific devices for copying. however, there is copy protection data stored on the CD. it's just much easier to get around than DVD copy protection (ie it's just one bit that's easily ignored)

    38. Re:Firmware by alehmann · · Score: 1

      The DMCA prohibits systems that break COPY PROTECTION. I don't know what planet you live on, but on this one CDR drives don't have copy protection yet. What the fuck does the dmca have to do with them?

      Uh... CD-R speed is the most effective copy protection I know. It keeps me from churning out thousands of CDs full of oggs and divxs and vcds per day!

    39. Re:Firmware by Niddix · · Score: 1

      Oh your right. I just went outside and noticed that my new V6 Mustang really has a V8 and 2 of the cylinders are shut off. Now all I need is to just to overclock it to a V8 and I'm all set.

    40. Re:Firmware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sad thing is even a mustang with 8 cylinders gets its ass kicked by a nissan with 6...

  10. I can see it now... by papasui · · Score: 5, Funny

    LIVE AT 10.
    An area man inadvertently set fire to his dwelling while attempting to burn Jenna's Built for Speed with his self modified CDRW drive. When asked why he modified his CD recording device he stated. "My wife was coming home...."

  11. ahh crap by null-sRc · · Score: 1

    just when i go and pay an extra 80 bux for the boost from 40x to 48x #@$%@%

    --
    -judging another only defines yourself
    1. Re:ahh crap by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 1

      I'll buy your old one for $20 bucks...

      As long as it made the list

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    2. Re:ahh crap by brsmith4 · · Score: 1

      Why would you do that? Christ A, like 40x isn't fast enough... man, I got a 16x burner and it still does the job.

    3. Re:ahh crap by jonnythan · · Score: 5, Informative

      You paid $80 to save about 20 seconds recording a cd? Is your time really worth $14,400/hr?

    4. Re:ahh crap by EvilFrog · · Score: 1

      You paid $80 to save about 20 seconds recording a cd? Is your time really worth $14,400/hr?

      Whoa... you might want to rethink that logic.

      Unless where you're from CR-Rs are single-use disposable devices...

    5. Re:ahh crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's just compensating for his small penis. That's all.

    6. Re:ahh crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have something you would like to share with us?

    7. Re:ahh crap by jonnythan · · Score: 2

      I don't get what you're saying.
      My logic was as follows:

      If he pays $80 to free 20 seconds worth of his life, his living time must be worth $14,400/hr.

    8. Re:ahh crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Is your time really worth $14,400/hr?"
      Yes.

    9. Re:ahh crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um... again, your logic is fouled.

      he pays $80 to free 20 seconds worth of his life "every time" he burns a cd. So if he burns 100 cds, he saves a little over 1/2 an hour... unless, of course, he only burns a single disc on his new cd-recorder before replacing it with a new one.

    10. Re:ahh crap by l-ascorbic · · Score: 2

      He saves 20 seconds every time he uses it. I'm not saying it's worth paying $80 for such a small gain, but your logic is flawed. Your numbers only add up if he only uses the drive once.

    11. Re:ahh crap by be-fan · · Score: 2

      Unless where you're from CR-Rs are single-use disposable devices...
      >>>>
      CD-R's *are* single-used devices. You mean CD-R drives do you not?

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    12. Re:ahh crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      That was somewhat silly. Are you even going to be able to tell the difference between a 40x and a 48x drive more than 1% of the time that you use it? Thi s is why I still have my 32x drive; it's fast enough . I'll replace it when it breaks (since it's a Sony, that will probably be several years from now), or when the time comes to go to DVD+RW. There is no way I'd waste my money on a slightly faster CD-RW when I already have one that works just fine.

    13. Re:ahh crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the amount paid does not change with respect to the number of CDs burned - it remains constant. the only thing that changes is the amount of time saved, TTS. so the perceived "time value," TV, can only decrease with time.

      if he burns one (1) CD, he saves TTS=20 seconds.
      $80/20sec = $14,400/hr.
      if he burns two (2) CDs, though, he saves 40 seconds.
      $80/40sec = $ 7,200/hr.
      if he burns ten (10) CDs, he saves 200 seconds.
      $80/200sec = $ 1,440/hr.
      if he burns one hundred (100) CDs, he saves 2000 seconds.
      $80/2000sec = $ 144/hr.

      it's a simple 1/x curve, approaching 0.

    14. Re:ahh crap by EvilFrog · · Score: 1

      Yeah... I kind of figure that was obvious with the use of the word "devices"...

    15. Re:ahh crap by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 2

      You paid $80 to save about 20 seconds recording a cd? Is your time really worth $14,400/hr?

      Well, what if his office catches fire and he needs to back-up his data quickly? :)

      Seriously, though, think about it:

      If he burns one CD a day, then in a year that $80 has saved him a couple of hours of work...

      If he burns 100 CDs a day (his job is to back up eBay, or perhaps a large computer lab) then it's really, really worth it...

      And if he backs up one CD at the end of the day and gets off work 20 seconds quicker because of it... that is absolutely priceless.

    16. Re:ahh crap by The+Dobber · · Score: 1

      He only gains if he can put that time saved to a productive use, that is recieve monotary compensation for it.

      Otherwise, he's just a guy with a really fast burner.

    17. Re:ahh crap by null-sRc · · Score: 1

      well that was $80 canadian.. so that's what, $2 US? besides.. i had to get a faster one than my arch nemesis (he has a 40x)

      --
      -judging another only defines yourself
    18. Re:ahh crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $80 extra? I just ordered a 40/12/48 for $84. Man I wish I could find a Sanyo produced CDRW for $4 (they make the Plextor and Teac drives).

    19. Re:ahh crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If he burns 100 CDs a day (his job is to back up eBay,

      If his job is to back-up eBay and he's doing it with his shiny-new 48x cd-burner and not a real backup system, he probably deserves to be fired.

  12. Firmware? Illegal? by MrHat · · Score: 1

    Why would upgrading the firmware on a product you own not be "completely legal"?

    What strange DMCA-ridden world is this that I've suddenly fallen in to? It's dark in here.

    1. Re:Firmware? Illegal? by brsmith4 · · Score: 1

      What strange DMCA-ridden world is this that I've suddenly fallen in to? It's dark in here.

      I find it good just to feign ignorance on the part of DMCA law. I have probably broken it many times since its inception (remember probably, cuz i don't really know. but, its more than likely), however, I really don't pay attention nor do I care to. If it were up to them, none of us would have 'puters or any sort of hardware in the first place. Some shit about national security...

    2. Re:Firmware? Illegal? by MrHat · · Score: 1

      Here's my break:
      https://www.codewhore.org/node.php?id=1042

      I don't like feigning ignorance. I prefer to violate stupid and nearly unenforcable corporate laws, and to do so with malice.

    3. Re:Firmware? Illegal? by brsmith4 · · Score: 1

      "I don't like feigning ignorance. I prefer to violate stupid and nearly unenforcable corporate laws, and to do so with malice."

      Here here! I used to do it like that. Everytime I burned a CD, I put a wicked grin on my face and thought "I love breaking stupid ass laws". But now, with all of these 'informants' springing up because of that stupid citizen's corps, i wouldn't be suprised if we did start getting busted for shit like that.

  13. It wasn't new by jsse · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I worked at IBM an engineer told me the million dollars 'mainframe upgrade' was actually removing a jummper from the motherboard. So I started to remove one jumper at a time from my IBM PC to see if it'd run faster. (the answer is no)

    1. Re:It wasn't new by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And there's a good reason why the mainframe had a jumper, but the PC doesn't. IBM wants to sell you a future upgrade for the mainframe. They had no after-sale incentive for the PC, since they're just going to try selling you a new PC.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    2. Re:It wasn't new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how on earth is this a troll post?

      Peale (posting anonymously to preserve what little karma he has left)

    3. Re:It wasn't new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually the old mainframe upgrades for processing speed was simply re-writing the microcode core. Took about 4 mins to put it on the programmer and upload the new core. DEC did the same tactics till about a year before they were bought out. The same is true with CPU Mhz variance till the pentium 3 came out. My P2 300 and 333 are identical hardware wise, the only difference is the microcode (Do not confuse with Machine Code!)

    4. Re:It wasn't new by jhines · · Score: 2

      No, it now performs NOPs at an infinite rate, thus the null loop is over, and it has nothing to do.

    5. Re:It wasn't new by vuke69 · · Score: 1

      Actually they still do this with their low and mid range servers. They will just slap say 16 processors in the box, and only enable the ones you want to pay for. Then you can just call in when you want to upgrade. I guess its cheeper that way.

      --
      Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. ~ Douglas Adams
  14. How come? by LordoftheFrings · · Score: 1

    Why would hardware manufacturers sell products that can be much faster and therefore better, and then continually "upgrade" them and sell them again? It seems like one big scam, to try to get the population to keep on upgrading. Rediculous.

    1. Re:How come? by EvilFrog · · Score: 1

      What, you think that products are priced proportionally to how much they cost to make? They're priced by how much someone wants them, not how much it costs the company.

      Take music for example. CDs cost more than cassette tapes in stores, yet cost the labels significantly less to make. It all has to do with demand- who would buy something less convenient, lower quality, and more expensive?

      Welcome to capitalism my friend.

    2. Re:How come? by NegativeK · · Score: 1

      Markets are weird that way. You want to sell the fastest for the most money (duh). But.. Some people aren't going to pay that much, so you sell some at a lower speed, for a lower price. And because it's cheaper to make the same product repeatedly as opposed to two different products, the company will just make the best, and mark it down. I'm not sure if it's still common, but CPU makers used to do this frequently. The older Celerons, for isntance.

      --
      This statement is false.
    3. Re:How come? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, first of all, it's spelled RIDICULOUS.

      Second of all, the engineer is NOT A KING. He is at best a pawn in a corporation.

      Market studies will show what the market will bear. If you are making a new laser printer, let's say, and it will have 1200x1200 DPI with 32M on board, but it will cost 900$, only so many people will buy it. With me so far?

      OK, so your sales dept tells you that people would spend 500$ on a product with 600x600 and 16M, let's say.

      What do you do? Hire twice as many engineers from the diploma mill to design two products?

      NO! You build *ONE* set of parts that can be configured for many "models". Almost *everything* is built like that today. If it weren't, things would be very expensive.

      You should be happy things are like that.

    4. Re:How come? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i have owned, and i am sure others have had more, at least 5(1200, 2400, 28k, 33k, 56k) different speeds of modems throughout the years. you really think that was necessary? i dont but it made someone some extra money

    5. Re:How come? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's rather simple economics. Referred to as "Economies of Scale", which means the more your produce of a given unit the lower each unit's production price will be (ie. it's cheaper to produce 50 CDRW's at a single speed than to product 10 at 5 different speeds).

    6. Re:How come? by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      It seems like one big scam, to try to get the population to keep on upgrading.
      You answered your own question. They convince us to keep upgrading, they get more money.
      What we want is irrelevant. (insert borg-ism here)

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    7. Re:How come? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Pooof* I think the light just came on. This is what Microsloth has been doing for years.

    8. Re:How come? by IndigoPhox · · Score: 1

      *cough*AMD*cough*morgan*cough*tbird*cough*smoke*co ugh*cough*cough*woops*canIstillwarrantythischip?*

  15. The faster you go... by EvilFrog · · Score: 1

    Remember when 4x was fast? At least then you could buy a CD-Rom drive that didn't sound like the neighbors are mowing their lawn...

    Who needs force feedback controllers? I've got a laptop with a high speed CD-Rom drive... good for simulating such vibrations as a car engine or a small earthquake!

    1. Re:The faster you go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is there any such thing as a quiet 32-40x CD-RW? are there brands that are known to be quieter than others? i have a 32x TDK and it literally sounds like a jet engine

    2. Re:The faster you go... by Chasing+Amy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > Remember when 4x was fast?

      Yup. I'm still using my Creative 4-2-24 CD-RW drive to this day. :-) Since I've never had the need to get CDs burnt as fast as technologically possible, I've never felt like upgrading it. It's followed me from my old K6-2 to my Duron to my Athlon.

      Unfortunately, after 5 years or so of faithful service it's been slowly dying for the last few months. First it stopped reading past 650MB on 700MB CDs. Weird, but I figured the thing's just so old... And then, it started burning coasters about 10% of the time even though I use good Taiyo Yuden media. Then it gradually climbed up until now a CD gets burnt properly about 1 in 10 tries. Sometimes the CDs would come out completely unwritten, and sometimes the data would only be very lightly burnt in, making it obvious the writing laser wasn't working reliably anymore.

      So, it's time to finally put the old girl out to pasture and get one of those newer, faster, more versatile models. Plextor or Asus, I guess, from what I've read about various models. But I'll kinda miss the old CD burner, the only part of my first desktop PC that's still being used in my newest desktop PC...

      Sad when old hardware finally bites the dust. :-)

      --

      Chasing Amy
      (We all chase Amy...)
      "The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws"-Tacitus
    3. Re:The faster you go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of dust have you tried cleaning it? Dust on the lense might be part of the problem...Just a thought

    4. Re:The faster you go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll second that opinion.

    5. Re:The faster you go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've got a laptop with a high speed CD-Rom drive... good for simulating such vibrations

      A device capable of displaying erotic pictures while vibrating on your lap? One word: Pron-o-mania!

  16. Big deal by asavage · · Score: 5, Informative

    The difference between burning at 40 to 48 speeds is about 20 seconds. Some of us still have to use crappy 4 speed burners. Also a lot of CD media isn't even compatable at those speeds anyway.

    1. Re:Big deal by LogicX · · Score: 1

      Who cares -- that whole media rating is all marketing. You can use 4x Media in a 40x burner; I do it all the time.

      --
      May this post be indexed by spiders, and archived for all to see as my Internet epitaph.
    2. Re:Big deal by stuuf · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of wasting money on Memorex's 'Music' CD-R's. they're not specially optimised for music, they just cost more for a liscence that enables the stand-alone recorders.
      I think I would have to overclock my CPU to run an overclocked CD RW without buffer underruns.

      --

      Everyone is born right-handed; only the greatest overcome it

    3. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4 speed! whew... some of us still have 2x!!!

    4. Re:Big deal by Speed+Racer · · Score: 1

      One day, I'm gonna compile a /. speak dictionary.

      What, interpreted languages aren't good enough for you?

      --
      Free Mac Mini. Yes, I'm
    5. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what I have. An HP 7500 series, 2x CD-R burn speed. I downloaded and installed the 8100 series firmware upgrade a couple of months ago and sure enough, it now burns at 4x. It also enabled me to write to 700 MB media. Without that hack, I would have had to buy a new CD writer. I can only burn at 4x, but that's twice the speed it used to do, at zero cost.

    6. Re:Big deal by Znork · · Score: 2

      I agree. I rarely burn above 12-16x since the media seems to start going corrupt above that. Not very often, and not very much, but often enough to make any savings on burntime go up in smoke due to re-burn time. One broken mp3 might not really matter, but one broken rpm package is really really annoying.

  17. Profit Margins ? by PureCreditor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Let's see....so they less money on the 32x drives, since they're using the same components on the 48x that yield much higher margins. So....if we all buy their lowest rating drives, would they dip into red? =)

    1. Re:Profit Margins ? by Klerck · · Score: 0

      Not really, since they already lost the money by making them. If you buy the drive, you help them make the money back.

      Is that really such a difficult concept for people? If they've already manufactured the drive, they've already lost the money it took to make it.

      It's not like manufacturers will produce something on promise of payment.

    2. Re:Profit Margins ? by xWeston · · Score: 1

      As far as i knew, this isnt really the way that it was working. The reason that the upgrading firmware can make the drives faster, is because of changes they have made technologically since the other drive came out. Since about 24x, not much has changed as far as the actually hardware goes. However, the burning methods, as well as firmware stuff, has changed. One of the big changes in burning modes was going from ZLV (Zone linear velocity) to CAV or more commonly P-CAV (partial constant angular velocity). By doing this, and not changing the actual speed of the drive, the maximum speed reached as well as the average speed ended up being higher. It is just like when a video card manufacturer releases drivers that increase performance. However, in this realm they do not want everybody getting a 48x cdrw for "free" so they dont release the firmware across the board.
      If it were the case that all of the drives were the same, they would've been selling 48x drives long ago, instead of doing 24, 32, 40, 48.
      Side note: supposedly lite-on has a 52x drive now. I have a lite-on 48x, maybe i can upgrade!

  18. Well.... is it really worth it? by hashinclude · · Score: 5, Informative
    These are the stats I have on my machine (p3-733, 512MB ram, IDE-100)

    1x - 1 hr 10 mins (total, yes I have had one)
    2x - 40 mins (actually something like 38)
    4x - 19-20 mins
    12x - 7 mins
    24x - 5 mins
    32x - 4:30 mins
    40x - ? (haven't upgraded my drive yet :P )

    My point being that as things are right now, IDE hard drives are not quite fast enough even with an 8MB buffer to keep up with the data transfer required (and yes, I am running my 7200 Maxtor 27GB as Primary master, and LG 32X CD-RW as Secondary Master on an Intel 815EEA2 board)

    How does overclocking (and possibly destroying the drive mechanism, though rare) really help me burn CD faster? Current software / hardware configs give me no better than 4:30 mins .. (while the 24x gives ~5:20)

    I think this is something like the 52x and 60x and 72x CDROM, where the number behind the X stands for MAX ... meaning that with optimal (ideal?) parameters, the drive gives 72x (1x = 150kbps)

    I'd much rather stick with my * unmodified * 32x drive, thanks.

    --
    US is now divided as the "Red" and "blue" states. Red States = communist countries. Coincidence? I think not
    1. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1x - 1 hr 10 mins (total, yes I have had one)
      2x - 40 mins (actually something like 38)
      4x - 19-20 mins
      12x - 7 mins
      24x - 5 mins
      32x - 4:30 mins
      40x - ? (haven't upgraded my drive yet :P )

      Well On my 1.3 G Athlon with a Lite-On Burner, 512MB of Ram and 20 GB 7200 WD HD

      16x - 4.30 for 80mins of audio

      also i had a 6x acer burner before that did 80mins in 20minutes

      seen a 32x burner do 80 mins audio on a Athlon XP 1600 system in 3min flat (512mb ram)

    2. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the speed test in Nero Burning Rom says i'm good up to 120x or some insane number. Consider that 48x burners in fact write 7,200kb/sec and hard drives transfer at 20,000kb/sec+ - there's plunty of bandwidth. Also now there's wonderful technologies like burnproof(or knockoffs) that allows the buffer on the cd burner to go empty and yet they don't burn coasters.

      I won't even go into DVD formats.

    3. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, it isn't worth it in any logical way. For the same reason as people build hotrods, overclocking is about doing it, not about results.

    4. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by code0 · · Score: 1

      Well... Since both your hard drive and CD-RW are on the same bus, that can cause a problem (with IDE that is, not SCSI). Try moving your CD-RW as a secondary master and keeping your hard drive as the primary master. IDE drives can only handle one transaction at once per bus.

      --
      ---------- I laugh at a dumb SysAdmin.
    5. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Gossy · · Score: 1

      "I am running my 7200 Maxtor 27GB as Primary master, and LG 32X CD-RW as Secondary Master on an Intel 815EEA2 board"

      And then..

      "Try moving your CD-RW as a secondary master and keeping your hard drive as the primary master."

      I think that was a bit redundant ;)

    6. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      read the post again.

      A dumb sysadmin laughs at you----

    7. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kill yourself. Just kill yourself and end the misery.

    8. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by jhines · · Score: 2

      I seem to remember a story about how the speed is relative to the track being read, depending on being the inside or outside of the disk.

      In that the disc itself can't handle being spun at more than a certain RPM before it comes apart.

      If the speed issue is that big of a deal for you, a stand alone burning machine is probably for you. In that you can use your other machine while it burns away. Drives are cheap enough these days.

    9. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by dd301 · · Score: 1
      I seem to remember a story about how the speed is relative to the track being read, depending on being the inside or outside of the disk.

      This depends on the drive of course (constant angular velocity vs. speed)

      In that the disc itself can't handle being spun at more than a certain RPM before it comes apart.

      This is most likely an urban legend.

    10. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by jbridge21 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, the 52X and 72X CD-ROMs were a special deal made by Kenwood, I've got their 72X one sitting right here. And it was labelled True-X, meaning it actually gets that speed. The trick it used was splitting the laser beam into seven parts, to read different parts of the track? disc? simultaneously. I clocked this thing once by reading the entire contents of a 650MB CD to /dev/null, it AVERAGED 9 MB/s across the entire surface!

    11. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      That's true, the speed is relative to the track being burned. On my 16x burner, if I burn an iso using webmin I notice it starts out at 12x and eventually, about halfway through the burn, it'll jump up to 16x or a little faster. I think this is due to the location on the disc it's burning (distance from the center).

    12. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Something strange with your setup, then... on my P3-550/1gb RAM, UDMA33, 5400RPM W.D. HD, Win98.. my 24x IDE Plextor burns a full CD in 4 minutes flat, using either PlexTools, Nero5, or EZCD5 (which has a ton of overhead). You've got 20% more drag than me even tho your system is roughly 50% faster!

      I did discover that IE5.5 FUBARs CD burning, tho -- causes constant buffer problems, regardless of what software is used, and REALLY slows things down.

      BTW per tests someone did (story posted here a while back), 52x or so is the practical top limit due to CD media shrapneling itself at around 56x.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    13. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by jhines · · Score: 2

      no the web site had the results posted. They also glued kelvar threads like spokes. It was an effort to find out the max speed.

      I think it was on /. as well, I don't know how to search for old articles.

    14. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by jhines · · Score: 2

      I do now Thread

    15. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by The_Shadows · · Score: 2

      I think this is something like the 52x and 60x and 72x CDROM, where the number behind the X stands for MAX ... meaning that with optimal (ideal?) parameters, the drive gives 72x (1x = 150kbps)

      Actually, for the 72x CD-ROMs, IIRC, 72x was the average speed. They're fast and they're just about silent. They used 7 lasers to read from all parts of the disc at once. Kenwood made them two-three years ago and now they're out of production. You can't find them new, only on e-bay. However, for non-Kenwood drives, you're right in that those are the maximum speeds under ideal conditions.

    16. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      read the post AGAIN. - 10 for reading comprehension.

    17. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by dioxide · · Score: 1

      In that the disc itself can't handle being spun at more than a certain RPM before it comes apart.

      This is most likely an urban legend.


      i've seen, in the last two years at this shop, at least 5 discs (given, crappy) explode in cdroms (also crappy drives.)

      but it does happen.

    18. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by juhaz · · Score: 1

      1x != 150kbps, 1x == 150kB/s. CD-ROM disks clearly have the capasity of 650 megabytes, not megabits, and reading them at 150kbps would take almost ten hours instead of 74 mins.

      40x is about 6MB/s. As things are right now, new IDE hard drives are very well capable of transferring data at 20-50M/s depending on drive and position of data on it. More than fast enough to keep up with 100x, or maybe even 200x or faster ...

      Problem with cdr* is not speed of ide bus, nor is it hard drives, but required huge spin speeds of cdr drives themselves, which causes inferior burn quality, and vibration.

      "Overclocking" is obviously wrong term and causes wrong conception, it's as mentioned in the article - drive mechanism is same in all those drive models, and thus destroying it is not really likely, they are only limited with firmware for reason that making one high-end drive is cheaper than designing n different models. Doesn't really make burning any faster, though. At 32x the burning time for 700M disk would theoretically be only about 2:50, but writing lead in/out does take those additional two minutes... and that probably doesn't change very much, so 40x drive would take maybe 4:00, and 48x about 3:40. What good does few minutes do unless burning thousands of disks?

      Personally, I don't kive a damn about burn speed as long as it does its job under ten minutes.

    19. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      As things are right now, new IDE hard drives are very well capable of transferring data at 20- 50M/s depending on drive and position of data on it.

      As much as I advocate ATA disks even for most servers, this isn't really realistic.

      You have to use sustained speed for something like a 650M transfer, and even the 7200 RPM drives max out around 20M/s, and even that is a stretch.

      RAID0,3,5 of course can get your ATA read speed up very high, I can easily max out the PCI bus with 8 5400 RPM ATA drives and a 3ware card (130M/s or so).

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    20. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Well, it depends. If I've got image, on partition with relatively low fragmentation, maximum speed could maybe be achieved as sustained.

      Or course things are different if there are lots of different files from around the disk, or even few, but heavily fragmented.

      Doesn't really matter though, the point stays that hard drives are not the limiting factor, that stretched 20M would still be enough for said 100x+ cd-writing.

    21. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 3, Interesting
      "I did discover that IE5.5 FUBARs CD burning, tho -- causes constant buffer problems, regardless of what software is used, and REALLY slows things down."

      Strange ... I have had problems with Roxio EasyCD 5 (*) where the only way to get the software to WORK was to reinstall IE5.5.

      (*) I personally have ditched EasyCD because I bought(**) Nero several weeks ago which is worlds better and have never had any buffer problems. These roxio problems were on a client's machine.

      (**) Yes, I actually spent money on Nero and did not find a pirated serial somewhere. This program is worth the money and it is not overpriced, therefore I pay for it.

      "BTW per tests someone did (story posted here a while back), 52x or so is the practical top limit due to CD media shrapneling itself at around 56x."

      Limitations will be overcome by sidestepping the problem. Every now and then we also see an article about how the physical limits of magnets have been reached but HDD mfgrs keep coming out with bigger drives. Sooner or later some manufacturer will use more lasers or spin the laser in the opposite direction of the disc to obtain a higher speed. (***) They could even allow people with hordes of RAM to cache the disc image on a RAM disk thus eliminating any IDE related problems.

      (***) Yes, I did come up with this idea as I was typing this post. I did not copy it from somewhere.

    22. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've got a True62X. The thing installs software like a dream. It's amazingly fast. It also has lots of trouble reading CD-Rs, so I never use it. I keep it in the closet.

      -1 Offtopic = Anonymous Coward

    23. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd turn in that LG 32X if I were you, because I can burn a full CD in 2:26 & mine is an LG 24X

    24. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by ottffssent · · Score: 2

      The audio CD standard specifies CLV (constant linear velocity) reading, so the data rate is the same at all points on the disc. At higher speeds, this method requires a very powerful motor to spin up the disc to read the inner tracks. Past a certain point, the inner tracks cannot be spun fast enough without the disc deforming to maintain the CLV method, so CAV (constant angular velocity) began to be used. This requires a smaller drive motor, as it only needs enough power to maintain rotation and a burst of power for spin-up, and is more stable, since there is no straining motor introducing vibration to the disc.

      The True-X drives are P-CAV (partial constant angular velocity) drives, meaning the transfer rate ramps up from the center of the CD and more quickly reaches its maximum, where it stays throughout the majority of the disc. For more, visit storagereview.

    25. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      *Buying* Nero? How embarrassing :)

      My Plextor came with Nero 5.5x, which despite its feature set, is too disorganised by my lights -- I don't like it at all. So I went back to EZCD5 (I prefer v3.5 which came with my late-and-never-again Yahama, but it doesn't know the Plextor). Tho I like InCD better than DirectCD. And I really like Plextools.

      I'd been having ZERO problems and uniformly swift writes with all the above, with buffer always pegged at 98% full -- UNTIL TurboTax forcibly installed IE5.5 (which also FUBAR'd DUN). Uninstalled TTax, and might have left IE5.5 in place since it's not that much different from 5.0 (last version I consider tolerabely well-behaved -- tho I dislike IE and *never* use it online, only for checking local web pages) ...but...

      First thing I noticed was that I can no longer do a CD copy with PlexTools; next noticed that I was getting *severe* buffer-chugging in both Nero and EZCD (dangling down near zero all the time -- even with burnproof it was taking a good 10-15 minutes to burn a 24x CD, vs the previous 4 minutes). TTax did uninstall cleanly, so it wasn't the problem. But we all know how invasive IE can be, and 5.5 had also put a lot of new lag in my desktop.

      And then when I got DUN fixed and went online, in 10 seconds flat I had a ding on my firewall from a M$-owned IP address (apparently IE5.5 is ET-ware, even when it's not per-se running!!) Okay, enough of this crap.. IE5.5 would not uninstall cleanly, had to forcibly remove it with IEradicator (which also got my desktop slickness back) then reinstall my well-mannered IE5.0.some-internal-build.

      The CDRW's performance is not entirely back to normal even now (doubtless there is IE5.5 detritus somewhere yet) but is definitely much better than it was when IE5.5 was installed. I severely resist reinstalling Windows (like, never if I can help it) but this, alas, may ultimately require it. :( And Intuit lost a good customer that day, probably forever.

      As to your ideas for how to speed up CD R/W without blowing up the media like a grenade -- that's a darned good thought -- either multiple laser heads operating simultaneously (may well be the most practical approach since the required innovation would be more in data flow control than in mechanical invention), or spinning the laser the opposite direction (would doubtless work but be a bitch to calibrate, especially for multiple small reads/writes, but likely not impossible).

      Maybe you should patent it ;)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    26. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by hklingon · · Score: 1

      ...My point being that as things are right now, IDE hard drives are not quite fast enough even with an 8MB buffer to keep up with the data transfer required (and yes, I am running my 7200 Maxtor 27GB as Primary master, and LG 32X CD-RW as Secondary Master on an Intel 815EEA2 board) ...

      uhh... what? Maxtor D740X transfer rates (uncached) -> min/avg/max 27282kb/38572kb/41123kb per second. Seagate ATA IV 10 gb -> 21800kb/26280kb/29980kb per second. (128mb test file size)

      one X is 150k/s.. 32x is 4.8 mb/sec. one CD is say, 650mb. Burn time is therefor a minimum of 2:25. TOC and leadout tracks add time, though. 40x is 6000 kb/sec. Right, however, is The difference in 32x and 40x "feels" negligible.

      There is something horribly wrong with your setup if you can't manage 6+ mb/sec from your maxtor hard drive. I think I managed 9 or 10 mb/sec from my old quantum fireball udma/33 drive way back on my Pentium 233.

    27. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Perdo · · Score: 2

      Hey Dude...

      1x = 150 KB/s = .15 MB/s

      40x = 6000 KB/s = 6 MB/s

      ATA66 Spec = 66 MB/s

      ATA100 Spec = 100 MB/s

      ATA133 Spec = 133 MB/s

      Serial ATA Spec = 150 MB/s

      SCSI 160 Spec = 150 MB/s

      SCSI 320 Spec = 320 MB/s

      33mhz/32bit PCI bus = 133 MB/s

      66mhz/64bit PCI bus = 533 MB/s You can support up to 4 gigabit ethernet channels.

      33/64 or 66/32 = 266 MB/s

      PCI/X (133mhz/64bit)= 1066 MB/s

      10baseT = 10 Mb/s = 1.25 MB/s max Faster than an 8X cd drive

      10/100 = 100 Mb/s = 12.5 MB/s You can burn across this network if the network is unloaded

      Gigabit Ethernet 1000 Mb/s or 125 MB/s or just under the top speed of 33/32 PCI bus

      Firewire = 400 Mb/s or 50 MB/s, Slower than the fastest IDE hard drives

      USB 2.0 = 480 Mb/s or 60 MB/s, Faster than the fastest IDE hard drives

      Western Digital wd1200JB 120GB w/8MB buffer Peaks at 100 MB/s with 52 MB/s continuous throughput.

      Meaning You could use a 346x drive burner with a WD1200JB except your CD disk would have to spin at 70,000 rpm -or- be in a drive with 8 write heads and spinning at a more moderate 8750 rpm -or- Send data to 8 40x CD Burners simultaniously

      52x = 10500 rpm @ 7.8 MB/s

      Everything can keep up with the data transfer speeds of a 40x drive

      --

      If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    28. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by hklingon · · Score: 1


      20m/s was perhaps true several years ago, but I promise this is no longer the case. Buggy, crappy file systems may cause slower speed, but if you're serious about these sorts of things.. make a 1 gb partition and copy the cd image to the FS or directly to a CD image. This drive *should* be seperate from the Host OS but, as long as the host OS supports a proper program scheduler and the CD burning software sets itsself up with higher than normal priority, this isn't a problem. A commodity $99 Maxtor D740X can and does sustain 40 mbyte/sec on 80% of the drive. In fact, this drive is based directly on designs from Quantum's enterprise A/V rated SCSI line, with an IDE interface board. Its *minimum* sequentail read speed toward the end of the disk is 28+ mbyte/sec. With an 8 mbyte buffer on the 40x CD-R drive, and a burst read on the IDE, the ide drive doesn't have to respond for (about) a full three quarters of a second to prevent buffer underrun.

      Also, only striping raid works as you think. Reliability aside, RAID(and most raid in general) is only good for dealing with multiple concurrent processes reading/writing* to disks. Not a single process using all the disk bandwidth. This makes sense, if you consiter that you don't want one rogue process consuming all the i/o bandwidth to the disk. Its technoligically easier (in say, raid 1, raid 5) to implement this. (consider the queueing algorithm for raid 1:::

      support two concurrent read ops (one for each drive, independently with raid vs. serializing multi-reads across drives to get the data efficiently/rounding up all those parity stripes) The 3ware cards of which you speak, in fact, do this exactly. Try hdparm sometime.. it uses a single I/O thread for reading/writing.. and your raid will appear painfully slow. But other benchmarking apps, like bonnie, will show it fast fast fast. I have personally maxed out the PCI bus with a 3 ware card and 3 Maxtor D740X drives on raid 5 using Bonnie.

      *Well not so much writing, unless you have those nice raid cards with the battery-backed ram that delays writes/parity updates until the buffer fills or there is a window of no activity on the drive needing updating.

    29. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Perdo · · Score: 2

      I have a dead 50x sitting on my workbench that I pulled out of a client's machine..

      Inside is a telefragged copy of printshop.

      The disk disentigrated at 10,000 rpm.

      The Printshop disk is naturally out of balance because the labels are printed off center.

      Not an urban legend.

      look what happens to your car engine at 10,000 rpm if it is out of balance. Engines are made of steel. Disks are made of cheap plastic.

      --

      If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    30. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Alsee · · Score: 2

      I clocked this thing once by reading the entire contents of a 650MB CD to /dev/null, it AVERAGED 9 MB/s

      I copied the entire internet to /dev/null at over 512 GB/s! :)

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    31. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Mike1024 · · Score: 2

      Hey,

      40x - ? (haven't upgraded my drive yet :P )

      I graphed your data with a power-type line of best fit. The relationship is approximately:

      [Time] = 66.569 * [X Speed]^-0.8206

      Upgrading from 32x to 40x would allow you to burn a CD in approximately 0.6 minutes less.

      Upgrading from 32x to 48x could offer a benefit as big as 1 minute per CD.

      To be honest, I don't think it's worth the bother.

      Michael

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
    32. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I had that problem too.
      I overclocked my CD burner to 150x.

      Unfortunately, I must have damaged the mechanism, because the CD was still spinning when I ejected it. The damn thing flew out of the tray, straight into my head, and severed my frontal lobe.
      At least I can see the RIAA's point of view on piracy now.

      Also, I've resolved not to do any more cool mods on my CD collection, such as cutting sharp serrated edges on the CDs (they don't play at all, but they look great!).

      Also, I'd like some feedback on whether /. readers think it would be wrong to mod my dog by putting a transparent window on one side, and fitting some cold cathode lighting so everyone can see inside his stomach, and realise how kewl I am.

    33. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "My Plextor came with Nero 5.5x, which despite its feature set, is too disorganised by my lights -- I don't like it at all. So I went back to EZCD5 (I prefer v3.5 which came with my late-and-never-again Yahama, but it doesn't know the Plextor). Tho I like InCD better than DirectCD. And I really like Plextools."

      So you are in Europe then? My plextor 40/12/40 from North America came with EasyCD5 but honestly I can't stand that program. I want finer and more granular control as to the adherance to ISO specifications and error correction features. Plus Nero has better multisession CD features.

      As I understand it, the European Plextor drives all come with Nero while the North American ones come with EasyCD.

      I have had countless problems with EasyCD regarding VXD and DLL files missing or the wrong version, strange crashes, strange lockups on a variety of computers running Win9x, NT, 2k all with different hardware and software setups from EasyCD 3.5 to 5.0. I can't stand it and find that Nero is much more smooth and fast and it's never choked on me.

      Still, I do not know for certain why an IE install would have killed your burning performance. You might want to go make sure your ASPI layer install is not messed up because that can really mess up your burning performance.

      "And then when I got DUN fixed and went online, in 10 seconds flat I had a ding on my firewall from a M$-owned IP address (apparently IE5.5 is ET-ware, even when it's not per-se running!!) Okay, enough of this crap.. IE5.5 would not uninstall cleanly, had to forcibly remove it with IEradicator (which also got my desktop slickness back) then reinstall my well-mannered IE5.0.some-internal-build."

      I know what you mean ... whenever I install IE or just set up a machine with a clean windows install, I *never* give it network access (i.e. the cat5 stays unplugged) until IE is properly locked out of certain MSFT IP's via Tiny Personal Firewall.

    34. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      I'm in California. My Plextor 24x is (like much of even the retail boxed merchandise at computer shows) grey market, which explains the Nero bundling. I just don't like how Nero is put together -- the program seems to work fine (tho I've heard widespread reports that it has an occasional problem with writing corrupted data) but I swear everything is in the last place I'd look for it -- it reminds me of M$Word :) I don't do multisession as I need CDs readable on ALL machines and in DOS.

      You don't happen to run mostly on AMD with VIA chipsets? I wonder if the VIA latency problem might get into it with EZCD's relatively high overhead. I've never had a bit of problem with EZCD 3.5 or 5.0, but I'm a pure Intel shop (at least for the systems I built on purpose -- some of the Borg Collective have whatever components came along for free). OTOH, EZCD 4.0 wouldn't run for me at all -- zeroed out the buffer before it even got around to writing any data. Oddly enough, when it uninstalled it left behind something that fixed some trivial glitches in v3.5 (tho by now I don't recall what).

      That's a good thought about the ASPI layer, thanks for the link. I'll try reinstalling that, since gods know what IE5.5 messed up that it has no business touching. Whoever first got the clever notion of tying browser to desktop needs a severe beating with a clue-by-four!!

      I've been going to try Tiny Personal Firewall but the last several times I've looked, their download links were all dead. I do run ZoneAlarm but have caught IE5.5 and FrontPage98 going around it without a whisper from ZA, so methinks a 2nd firewall is in order.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    35. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am running my 7200 Maxtor 27GB as Primary master, and LG 32X CD-RW as Secondary Master

      i think it has something to do with the cd burner... i have an LG 12x8x32, and i get buffer underruns whenever i burn at more than 4x... even when running no other programs, and windows 2000, with my samsung 40gig 7200rpm ata-100 hard drive... hard drive and cd burner on opposite IDEs... 256 megs ram... duron 1000... seems i should be burning a hell of a lot faster... if anyone can figure out why, please tell me too...

    36. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "You don't happen to run mostly on AMD with VIA chipsets? I wonder if the VIA latency problem might get into it with EZCD's relatively high overhead. I've never had a bit of problem with EZCD 3.5 or 5.0, but I'm a pure Intel shop (at least for the systems I built on purpose -- some of the Borg Collective have whatever components came along for free)."

      Actually yes, my current box is an Athlon XP 1700 on an ASUS A7V133-C (VIA 133 chipset). There is a win2k patch for the via latency problem that I applied ages ago. But still, when I ran EasyCD5 (after I applied the latency patch but before I got nero) the program worked fine - I just found it was too 'idiot proof' and that I could not finely tune everything enough, and that I had had great experiences in the past with nero demos.

      "That's a good thought about the ASPI layer, thanks for the link. I'll try reinstalling that, since gods know what IE5.5 messed up that it has no business touching."

      Remember that that link is for Win9x only. There is a different aspi layer patch for WinNT/2k/xp which is also on the Adaptec site.

      "I've been going to try Tiny Personal Firewall but the last several times I've looked, their download links were all dead. I do run ZoneAlarm but have caught IE5.5 and FrontPage98 going around it without a whisper from ZA, so methinks a 2nd firewall is in order. "

      Yeah I have been having problems with the tiny PFW site as well - they say they 'improved' it to make it easier to use, but I prefer the old verison. Tiny PFW is definitely more of a gear-head oriented firewall because you can control things on the level of packet types and port numbers, although I think the interface could be more refined. (Hm, it seems I prefer Tiny PFW over ZA for the same reasons you prefer EasyCD over Nero.)

    37. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by BroccoliGod · · Score: 1

      Are you using Tiny Personal Firewall or Kerio Personal Firewall? The Personal Firewall forked at version 2 (IIRC).

      I used Tiny for a version before the fork, but now use Kerio ('cause the Kerio team is the old Tiny team- Tiny hired new coders). Anyway, I use Kerio on a couple of machines- it works good enough for me to pay for it. It has an option to treat windows networking separately from other connection types- still not sure I like it, but it is only an option.

      BroccoliGod

    38. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "Are you using Tiny Personal Firewall or Kerio Personal Firewall? The Personal Firewall forked at version 2 (IIRC)."

      Thanks for the heads up on that -- I still use Tiny PFW 2.0.14 if I recall correctly. (I am not on my home machine right now.) Actually I have not heard of 'Kerio' right now but I will look it up.

    39. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Hmm. I wonder if there may be some conflict between AMD and EZCD, too. Cuz when I think about it, seems Nero/AMD/VIA are on one side of the user fence, and EZCD/Intel are on the other. Sometimes when you boil off all the complaints, you find there's a compatibility issue at the root of such splits in user preferences.

      I did notice that the ASPI layer link was for Win9*, thanks. There's another link on the same page for 2K/XP. Already have the XP ASPI layer on a CD. Come to think of it, I need to reinstall it on the XP box (HD failed, so XP got reinstalled... and this time XP grabbed *DOS* settings from the WinME partition. Say what??!)

      Ever notice that most "improved" web sites are anything but?! More like the webmaster needed to do *something* to justify their paycheck. My main site has been the same for 4 years and tho I'm thoroughly tired of how the entry page looks, it WORKS, so there's no real reason to change it.

      I like ZA partly because it's set-and-forget. But there are times when fine control is good too. If I were doing anything beyond basic net use, I'd want the port control etc. -- Is there any direct dl link for TinyPFW??

      XP is another beast I'd not let out of the kennel without a shock collar, I mean a firewall present ;)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    40. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "Hmm. I wonder if there may be some conflict between AMD and EZCD, too. Cuz when I think about it, seems Nero/AMD/VIA are on one side of the user fence, and EZCD/Intel are on the other. Sometimes when you boil off all the complaints, you find there's a compatibility issue at the root of such splits in user preferences."

      I wouldn't discount such a conflict, although EZCD5 did not actually crash or burn on my personal AMD box. I just don't like the way it works. Still, I would not be surprised if it was easier to mess up an EZCD install on an Athlon -- the application has that 'wintel dynasty' feel.

      "Come to think of it, I need to reinstall it on the XP box (HD failed, so XP got reinstalled... and this time XP grabbed *DOS* settings from the WinME partition. Say what??!)"

      I thinks you're a winme home user upgrading who expects their desktop and applications to look and work all the same after installing the new OS, thus it grabbed the settings. Win95 does this to Win3.1 configs.

      "I like ZA partly because it's set-and-forget. But there are times when fine control is good too. If I were doing anything beyond basic net use, I'd want the port control etc. -- Is there any direct dl link for TinyPFW??"

      You might want to check oldversion.com for an old TFPW version - I am not going to search around for it now due to being on an office computer. Also look at the other responses in this thread - someone mentioned a very good freeware firewall made by the original TPFW crew but it was under a different name. Maybe that is what is best for you.

    41. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      You're right, EZCD feels Wintelish, while Nero has that opensource look and feel.. not exactly a compliment, since IMO most opensource falls down to some degree in the UI dept.

      Er, no, I'm not a "winme home user upgrading who expects their desktop and applications to look and work all the same after installing the new OS, thus it grabbed the settings". The machine in question is a test box. It's had WinME (and loads of other crap) for about two years, and once beaten into submission, WinME has never crashed once (surprise!) WinME does a forced DOS boot via the MFD patch, and has the usual old-fashioned config.sys and autoexec.bat, with path, prompt, TSRs, and other settings.

      XP was installed as a dual boot on its own partition (WinME is on C:, XP is on F:) First time, the installer behaved in the expected way and pretended WinME wasn't there (except to take over WinME's recycle bins, which was a good thing because XP got rid of files that WinME couldn't). Then the brand new HD took a crap. Got the replacement, ghosted WinME to it, but the first XP install got mangled by the HD crash, so I reinstalled it. THIS time, XP (still on its own partition) for some unknown reason read all the info from WinME's DOS config files and is using them instead of config.nt and autoexec.nt, which it now blithely ignores.. say what??!

      The upshot is that in an XP console window, I have all the same paths, TSRs, etc. as I do in pure DOS or a WinME DOS window. Furthermore, this time XP accepted some settings that it had ignored when I'd added them to the first install's *.nt files. Makes you wonder!!

      I've installed XP 3 times and all three behaved totally different. The first (the initial install above) was "normal" and only installed 711 mb of files. The 2nd (an NTFS test install on the exact same box but with a blank HD) was "normal" but installed 1.3 gigs of files (over 1000 more files in \system than the first time, why I don't know since otherwise it acted identical). The 3rd (the resintall above) installed the same files as the 2nd time, dropped pagefiles on every partition (old Win2K bug) instead of just on one partition like the first time did, and as noted glommed onto WinME's settings too, which it had no business going near in the first place. (And why didn't it do this the first time??)

      I began to see why installing XP as an *upgrade* is such an iffy proposition, with about a 50% failure rate (severely unstable results) -- if the installer is this inconsistent starting from scratch, gods know what it does when run as an upgrade. This is why I strongly recommend that XP only be installed clean, never as an upgrade.

      I'll check out oldversion.com, thanks. Sounds like the kind of place I'd get a lot of use from! Will have to look around on this thread for the other firewall you mention; out of self-preservation, I normally only read at +3.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    42. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "Er, no, I'm not a "winme home user upgrading who expects their desktop and applications to look and work all the same after installing the new OS, thus it grabbed the settings"."

      I am not saying that you are this type of user. You have previously made this clear. I am saying thought that the XP installer thinks you are this type of user. As to why the XP install latched on to the ME settings after you installed XP on its own partition ... as you say ... say WHAT?!?

      "I began to see why installing XP as an *upgrade* is such an iffy proposition, with about a 50% failure rate (severely unstable results) -- if the installer is this inconsistent starting from scratch, gods know what it does when run as an upgrade. This is why I strongly recommend that XP only be installed clean, never as an upgrade."

      Yes, I also only install OSs clean or in situations where they cannot read the other OS's partition. It's the only way I can get consistency and some reliability in the installs.

    43. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      BTW this was XP Pro... not that I'm complaining since the miscegenation made my life easier (if you don't mind that a console box has a prompt proclaiming the OS is WinME!) but yeah, I'm still scratching my head over this one. Kinda like the old tagline: "What are you looking HERE for? The message is up above!!"

      I've heard of a few cases where Win9x/ME did better installed as an upgrade due to driver issues (could grab old driver from old registry setting, but refused to install it from scratch) but yeah, my experience has been it's better to not let 'em play in the same sandbox.

      Tho I did find that Win95 and Win2K can peacefully coexist as separate installs on the same partition, with no problems at all, probably due to the lack of crossover in default directory names and the like.

      And I've heard of someone who got Win3.1 to run in a DOS box on Win9*. Some people have too much free time :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    44. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "Tho I did find that Win95 and Win2K can peacefully coexist as separate installs on the same partition, with no problems at all, probably due to the lack of crossover in default directory names and the like."

      Now THAT's a strange one ... I used to have Win98se, Win2k and Linux-Mandrake all on my machine on different partitions, but really. I think there is too much potential for an eventual conflict between win95 and Win2k for me to feel comfortable with them on the same partition. But if it works ... well some people are only happy living on the edge.

      I would still have win98se on a partition right now if the install did not fail on my new box ... it complains about the video card even if I put my old matrox mystique in which ran Win98 faithfuly for me for years.

    45. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      I'm told Win95 and Win2K on same partition setup should not have worked, but it did, with each OS totally ignoring the other one. (It was actually a 3-way boot, with DRDOS 7.03 as the boot manager.) Could be simply the lack of any directories in common, so there was nothing to generate conflicts.

      This setup led to a silly: Default boot, DRDOS, which brings up the multiboot manager. To get to Win95, select Win2K boot, then from W2K's boot manager, select Win95. Then have Win95 boot to M$DOS. Talk about the long way around... :)

      I've got a pair of Tyan S1830S motherboards that did not like Win95 (my preferred Win32 for everyday use). It installed fine but croaked itself first time it ran. These boards get along fine with every other species of Win32, and with BSD in its Darwin incarnation. But they don't like DRDOS either. :(

      Don't have a Mystique, but I've got a collexion of Millennium G200 -- I like that card's stability. Tho I'd really like M$ to explain why Win2K's native G200 driver is so wonderful and flexible, yet XP's native G200 driver is so limited??!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    46. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "Don't have a Mystique, but I've got a collexion of Millennium G200 -- I like that card's stability."

      I used to run one of these as well and it was great in terms of image quality. Unfortunately it did not have the 3D speed I wanted and it was eventually supplemeted by a Voodoo2.

    47. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I've tested the G200 and turns out it is speed-matched to about a PII-450; it lags slightly behind the rest of the PIII-550 (currently my fastest box). Only by about 3%, but that does define the upper limit of its usefulness. When I build something faster, I'll have to break down and find a new favourite video card. :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    48. Re:Well.... is it really worth it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how the site in question is still offline for fear of the Slashdot Effect, even three months afterwards.

  19. Don't go too fast by naoursla · · Score: 3, Redundant

    Unfortunately, CDs explode into bits of metal and plastic shrapnal if spun too fast. This isn't like burning out a CPU from over clocking. /. had an article a while back about a guy testing the spin limits of CDs.

    1. Re:Don't go too fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, CDs explode into bits of metal and plastic shrapnal if spun too fast.

      That's only if you try to read 56X off the inside track dummy. Why do you think EVERY manufacturer on earth implements hybrid CLV/CAV in the drives?

      IHBT. IHL. It sure is a nice day today...

    2. Re:Don't go too fast by 1000101 · · Score: 1
      ".....56X off the inside track dummy"

      If you're going to call people names, why don't you use your real nickname instead of Anonymous Coward you fucking pussy.

    3. Re:Don't go too fast by petril · · Score: 0

      Here's a link to that spin limit test:

      Exploding CD's

      Interesting to read. I certainly won't buy an 64x cdrom drive now when I know this :D

      --
      "Never give up, never surrender!"
    4. Re:Don't go too fast by 1000101 · · Score: 1

      I didn't address that because it is completely irrelevant to the fact that you shouldn't call people names while using Anonymous Coward. Are you that small of a man that you can't call someone a name without hiding behind a bogus nickname? Look at you; even in your reply you're hiding. I would have so much fun kicking your pansy ass.

    5. Re:Don't go too fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt you would kick anyone's ass let alone mine. I eat scrawy Linux nerds who live in their mothers basements like you for breakfast.

    6. Re:Don't go too fast by Dominic_Mazzoni · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, CDs explode into bits of metal and plastic shrapnal if spun too fast. This isn't like burning out a CPU from over clocking. /. had an article a while back about a guy testing the spin limits of CDs.

      Has anyone ever tried to keep the CD stationary and spin the laser instead?

    7. Re:Don't go too fast by naoursla · · Score: 2

      Intersting. It might be possible using MEMS mirrors.

    8. Re:Don't go too fast by MarkCollette · · Score: 1

      "I eat shit like you for breakfast!"

      "You eat shit?"

    9. Re:Don't go too fast by shepd · · Score: 1

      >You still havent addressed the fact that he is a dummy,

      Ok shithead.

      He's not a dummy because CDs are burned at CAV rather than CLV.

      I will not explain those terms to you since you think you're such a fucking high and mighty man you should have already known it. Now take that penis out of your own ass, freak.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  20. Clickable for everyone as lazy as me :) by aed · · Score: 1, Informative
  21. thank goodness! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with a little upgrading of the firmware (totally legal)

    So the police won't knock on my door if I take apart my CD-ROM? Whew, now I can come out of hiding!

  22. Google Cache Link by Kaypro · · Score: 2
    Looks like for the Lite-On's at least, it'll only work for 32x+. So I'm guessing my 24X Lite-On won't take the upgrade.

    Cached Link

    1. Re:Google Cache Link by xTK-421x · · Score: 2

      - How to convert a LiteOn LTR-24103 to LTR-32123S

      The process is very simple. Just download this firmware upgrade. It should prompt to flash the firmware. Note: There are no test results from this upgrade and no way to go back to the original drive state (if you know of a procedure let us know..)

      --
      "TK-421, why aren't you at your post?"
  23. How about the CD-R blanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got some older CD-R blanks which are marked
    16x, 20x, 32x, etc. - do these have any problems
    working at higher speeds than they are marked?
    The marked speeds were near top-of-the-line
    speeds when they were bought.

    1. Re:How about the CD-R blanks by LogicX · · Score: 1

      Those ratings are just marketing. You'll have no problem using the same media at any faster speed.

      --
      May this post be indexed by spiders, and archived for all to see as my Internet epitaph.
  24. Silly by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I HIGHLY doubt that the exact same TESTED components are used in both drives. It is much more likely that a 40x drive is simply a drive that passed the 40x tests, but not the 48x tests, just like how processors are graded.

    It would be kind of stupid to stamp 40x on a box just to sell it for a lower price. Why not sell a 48x for the lower price and intice the customer further?

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    1. Re:Silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It would be kind of stupid to stamp 40x on a box just to sell it for a lower price. Why not sell a 48x for the lower price and intice the customer further?"

      What? You mean like what they do with processors?

    2. Re:Silly by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      You mean like what they do with processors?

      Except they don't with processors. When you overclock your processor, you are putting it up to a clock speed that didn't pass the tests for that clock speed. Just because it seems to work doesn't mean it's always going to work. Ask any game support crew how many times they have to tell some l33t overclocker to put the clock speed back to normal when it causes their game to fail ("but it works everywhere else!! it must be your fault, man!").

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    3. Re:Silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's called price discrimination, a basic economic principle.

      It's the same principle behind having different prices for adult and children movie tickets, or differing airfare depending on how far in advance the ticket is bought by.

      Selling everything one fixed price reduces total revenue. By having price discrimination, you can charge more to people that are willing to pay more, and charge less to people who normally wouldn't have bought your product had it been at a higher price.

    4. Re:Silly by Flu · · Score: 1
      It would be kind of stupid to stamp 40x on a box just to sell it for a lower price. Why not sell a 48x for the lower price and intice the customer further?

      Why? Not all can (or want to) pay the price for a 48X drive. The cost of manufacturing is probably something like 10-20% of the sales price, and the difference in component cost is most likely just 5% - of the few components that actually would need a change.

      It's not at all unlikely that it's actually cheaper to manufacture several similiar boards with just a firmware difference than administrating several different modules.

      So, they would just set a price for the max version thus gaining as much revenue as possible, and and another price for a crippled version, and sell that as well, for the people that won't pay the higher price.

      /Flu

    5. Re:Silly by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

      "It is much more likely that a 40x drive is simply a drive that passed the 40x tests, but not the 48x tests, just like how processors are graded."

      In that case, I wouldn't be at all supprised to find most are overclockable. In processors, it is a very common practise to mark processors slower than their true maximum capability. Intel has been doing this forever. They have great fabs that get good yeilds. Well there is a demand for slower, cheaper processors. So they have two options:

      1) Drop the price of the faster processors.

      2) Remark faster processors as slower ones.

      Well, for the reasons of making the most money, they pick options 2. They lock the multiplier on a processor and then sell it at a given speed, However often in reality the processor is capable of more.

    6. Re:Silly by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Actually, processors were and are commonly remarked as slower speeds to fill the stronger demand in the lower-priced market.

      Back in the early Pentium era, the majority of "P75" CPUs were really remarked P90 and P100 chips. And it recently came to light (this was mentioned on one of the major hardware review sites) that those highly-overclockable Celerons are ALL remarks; the ones that won't overclock are marked with their REAL rating in the first place.

      So it wouldn't surprise me if CDRW mfgrs are doing the same thing. If all of a given product line cost the same to make, but you can sell a million of the "slower" ones at a slightly reduced price, that's still more profit than selling 1000 of the "faster" ones at the current premium price.

      That said, the problem you may run into is that if you overclock it, they're not obligated to honour the warranty -- because you *were* running it out of spec, even if the spec was artificially low.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    7. Re:Silly by ocelotbob · · Score: 1
      This kind of stuff is not unheard of in the computer industry. When Intel came out with the 486SX, many of those chips were merely 486DXes with the coprocessor disabled, due to the fact that demand for these less expensive chips was so high. Then of course there are also the early USR sportsters which were very little more than rebadged couriers with the HST functions disabled.

      As you said, the difference between the products is often what they spec at, and ocassionally, a product that is speced higher will be sold as the lower speed because demand for the less expensive product is higher. Rather than having shortages of a popular product, and gluts of a less popular product, they decide to meet the demand, and ensure another iteration of the upgrade cycle at the same time.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    8. Re:Silly by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      I would highly doubt if they DIDN'T test them all. Having separate tests for each caliber of drive would make manufacturing even more expensive.

      We aren't talking processors here.. it's not hard to manufacture thousands of drives with the same characteristics and tolerances.

      It's pure marketing.

    9. Re:Silly by ottffssent · · Score: 2

      Reality master, eh? Not the reality the rest of us share.

      A company which only makes 48X burners misses out on the market for 24-40X burners. A company which makes 24X, 32X, 40X and 48X burners spends an awful lot of R&D effort designing 4 separate products. A company which makes a 48X burner, bin-splits the drives that can't quite make 48X and changes a few bits in the firmware to compete in 4 separate markets spends less money on R&D, less money on manufacturing, and can compete in more markets than a manufacturer which makes separate parts for each product.

      You apparently don't know it, but the reason certain Intel CPUs always overclocked extremely well was that their manufacturing process had gotten so good there weren't enough CPUs that maxed out at the lower speeds, so they sold chips capable of 20-50% higher clock speed as lower-clocked chips in order to compete in that market. Remember that making a CPU costs a few bucks - it's the R&D and fab upgrades that cost an arm and a leg and losing marketshare to AMD is incredibly costlier than selling what might have been a $300 CPU for $85 is.

      Remember those square-hole-punch devices that would "magically" turn a 720K floppy into a 1.44M floppy? They worked because it's cheaper to make 1.44M-capable media and stick it in everything than to make 1.44M and 720K media and keep them separate at the factory. The only difference between the higher and lower-capacity media WAS the hole in one corner.

      I could come up with more examples, but it boils down to you being wrong. Some 32X burners won't hit 40X; some 40X burners won't hit 48X, but the hardware's the same (in some cases, in some product lines, after manufacturing tolerances outpace the market, and such provisos) in most of them.

  25. Nothing new here... by athakur999 · · Score: 3

    Upgrading your CD writer drive via firmware is nothing new, it's been going on for quite a while.

    Coincidentally enough, just last night I upgraded a 6x burner I bought for $10 to an 8x using the tricks on this page. There's info there for several older model drives.

    --
    "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    1. Re:Nothing new here... by tcc · · Score: 2

      Sweet, just tested it with my Ricoh MP7040A, updated it to 7060A (4x to 6x)

      While I don't see the use of going from 32x to 40-48X (you'll get into buffer problems, cd compatibility, and all this to save 30 seconds) going from 4x to 6 or 8x to 12 is a nice speed increase, in my case I'll save quite a few minutes so this is a welcomed move :)

      Yes i've tested it before writing this, and it does work and the copied CD works just fine... while it's not a 12x CD-R, it's still faster than 4X :) for free :)

      --
      --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
  26. Re:Corps is your father, corps is your mother by repsychler · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or are the Citizen Corps reminiscent of the visitors youth brigade (whatever it was called) in the old miniseries V?

    --
    Duffman can never die! Only the actors who play him!
  27. no can do mister! by the_mind_ · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...the firmware (totally legal) you will have...

    I have a small sticky label over one of my screws on my CDRW drive that says "Do not remove". Doing so will be against the DMCA(?)

    Damn it! (yeah so what: mod me down for being offtopic)

    --
    You feel sleepy. Close your eyes. The opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever felt otherwise.
    1. Re:no can do mister! by natophonic · · Score: 2, Funny
      I have a small sticky label over one of my screws on my CDRW drive that says "Do not remove". Doing so will be against the DMCA(?)
      Washington, D.C. (AP) -- Attorney General John Ashcroft announced today that the mandate of the FBI's Upholstry Mutilation Prevention division would be expanded to cover personal computer peripherals and other consumer electronic products. "For decades this Department has stood by the notion that pillows, mattresses, couches, and other upholstered items should not have to worry that their care and composition labels might be removed by those who would flaunt the laws of this great nation of ours. It is time now to extend the same protections to comsumer electronic devices," Ashcroft said in a prepared statement. He noted in particular that CD-RW drives are a new and tempting target for abuse. "Our young men need to spend less time figuring out how to copy pornography and hardcore rap 'artists' material faster, and more time working at their jobs and praying to Jesus our Lord and Savior," he said. Asked why funiture items carry tags that read, "Do not remove under penalty of law," Ashcroft said, "I was raised to not ask questions about why our laws are they was they are. Unless you want to have the full weight of an FBI investigation on your hands, I'd suggest you do the same."

    2. Re:no can do mister! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes Mr. Ashcroft!
      Right away Mr. Ashcroft!
      I would never question authority Mr. Ashcroft!

      By the way Mr Ashcroft, are you familiar with this?

      "In America, no other distinction between man and man had ever been known but that of persons in office exercising powers by authority of the laws, and private individuals. Among these last, the poorest laborer stood on equal ground with the wealthiest millionaire, and generally on a more favored one whenever their rights seem to jar." --Thomas Jefferson

    3. Re:no can do mister! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ashcroft doesn`t got his act together so please don`t think because he`s a jerk anyone else who believe`s in Jesus is like him. sadly, i have to admit thier are a lot though....

  28. What are you thinking? by fmaxwell · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How do you know that it "works" once you are done? Would you just assume that the ability to burn a CD and then read it proves that everything is fine? Has anyone looked into the error rates of hot-rodded drives vs. those drives sold to operate at the higher speeds? Has anyone examined the long-term data retention of CDs burned at 48X in what was a 32X burner?

    This is simply foolish. Unless you work for the factory, you simply don't know if there are hardware or performance differences between the 32X, 40X, and 48X drives. For all you know, they each have a different laser diode. So you're going to burn hundreds of CDs, maybe backing up valuable data and software, without knowing if they can be read a year from now? Great idea.

    If your time is so valuable that you need to upgrade from 32X to 48X burning, you can afford a new CD writer.

    1. Re:What are you thinking? by dd301 · · Score: 1

      Has anyone examined the long-term data retention of CDs burned at 48X in what was a 32X burner?

      I suppose this will have to do with the media properties rather than the drive.

      Has anyone looked into the error rates of hot-rodded drives vs. those drives sold to operate at the higher speeds?

      It would be a simple matter to check the md5sums. dd if=/dev/cdrom | md5sum -

      If your time is so valuable that you need to upgrade from 32X to 48X burning, you can afford a new CD writer.

      So you think not so wealthy should be stuck in boring repetitive tasks? :-D

    2. Re:What are you thinking? by Reziac · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Even tho as noted above, that 32x may really be a remarked 48x -- you can't know for sure. It may well be a for-really 32x, and tho you can get it to run at 48x, data integrity is now compromised.
      So I agree, the risk is not worth the gain, especially when the price difference is trivial (LiteOn 32x, $65; LiteOn 48x, $80 -- that's the typical local clone dealer price). CDRWs write enough iffy disks that don't store well as it is -- why compound the problem?? It ain't worth saving 15 bucks.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:What are you thinking? by jjshoe · · Score: 1

      your absolutely right

      if you want the quality of a 10 cent pencil dont buy the 5 cent pencil. however overclocking is a hobby for many, and as long as they arnt out killing neighborhood dogs or breaking the law let them have their fun even if it damages things they own.

      --
      -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
    4. Re:What are you thinking? by kylemad · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry but I've actually done this (the guide is months old) and it works fine - decreased my burning time by 30-40s (40x - 48x on 80min cdr). Works on the cheapest media i could find at the time 15p/cd so why not. And the error rates are similar burning at 40x... my cdrw is fast f00l!

    5. Re:What are you thinking? by fmaxwell · · Score: 4, Informative

      I suppose this will have to do with the media properties rather than the drive.

      It has to do with how well the drive burns the media. To oversimplify, how do you know that the 32X drive has adequate power at the laser when overclocked to 48X?

      It would be a simple matter to check the md5sums. dd if=/dev/cdrom | md5sum -

      That doesn't show error rates. That shows if there were one or more unrecoverable errors. If you get a CD with a lot of raw errors that are recovered, the CD will be much less tolerant of damage, degradation, etc., before it develops unreverable errors. It's also less likely to work as reliably when you read it in multiple drives.

    6. Re:What are you thinking? by mchappee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >Would you just assume that the ability to burn
      >a CD and then read it proves that everything is
      >fine? Has anyone looked into the
      >error rates of hot-rodded drives vs. those
      >drives sold to operate at the higher speeds?
      >Has anyone examined the long-term data
      >retention of CDs burned at 48X in what was a
      >32X burner?

      Geeze dude, who do you think you are, Ralph Nader? It's just a flippin' CDRW, not a seat belt mod or DIY nuclear reactor. Take a pill. If things don't work out just get another. What do you think is going to happen here? Is a disk going spin up so fast that the inertia rips it from the drive, decapitating the user?

      32x Lite-On CD-RW is $52.00 on Pricewatch. Not a biggie. Besides, it sounds pretty cool.

      Matthew

      --
      /. finds me to be 20% Troll, 80% Funny
    7. Re:What are you thinking? by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry but I've actually done this (the guide is months old) and it works fine

      And how did you verify that it "works fine"? Did you test BLER (Block Error Rate), BERL (Burst Error Length), (BEGL) Burst Errors Greater than Limit, Cyclic Redundancy Check for subcode Q-channel, etc. using something like an AudioDev CATS SA-3 or SA-300? Did you use an electron microscope to examine the quality and uniformity of the pits?

      You see, there is more to assessing the quality of the recording of digital data onto an optical media than simply counting "coasters."

      And the error rates are similar burning at 40x.

      So you measured the BLER, BERL, BEGL, etc.? Or did you not know that CD-ROM drives do error correction?

    8. Re:What are you thinking? by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      It's just a flippin' CDRW, not a seat belt mod or DIY nuclear reactor.

      Obviously the data you burn has little value to you. Some of us record important data onto CD/R media. I would not want to save 30 seconds on the recording process only to learn that the software, source code, proposal, etc., that I shipped overnight was unreadable.

      32x Lite-On CD-RW is $52.00 on Pricewatch.

      And a 48x Lite-On CD burner is $75.00 on Pricewatch. My peace of mind and the integrity of my data is worth $23.

    9. Re:What are you thinking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know much about CD-R tolerances but I personally prefer to record at 6x when I am writing anything important.
      My idea is that these drives are now marketed more towards people interested in copying audio CDs, rather than archival storage. I just hope recording at what is now a low speed doesn't cause any problems in these new drives.

    10. Re:What are you thinking? by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      My idea is that these drives are now marketed more towards people interested in copying audio CDs, rather than archival storage. I just hope recording at what is now a low speed doesn't cause any problems in these new drives.

      I tend to look for something in the mid-range of the drive and media. Like a 12X cut in a 24X drive/media. I, too, worry about cutting at a radically different speed than the drives were designed for.

      What we really should have had years ago is an archival format for CDRs that gave up about 10-20% of the storage in order to build in better error detection and correction.

    11. Re:What are you thinking? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      An early symptom from when my Yamaha CDRW went south was not discovered until about 6 months later: this particular CD read fine right after being written, but a few months later I wanted to use the disk -- and found it had all sorts of nasty data errors and was basically a coaster.

      Now, not to say that an overstressed/overclocked CDRW will behave the same as one that's starting to go tits-up, but it does go to demonstrate how just because the data looked okay at first doesn't mean it'll stay that way, especially if it wasn't written 100% correctly in the first place.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  29. "overclocking is about _doing it_, not about..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Nope, it isn't worth it in any logical way. For the same reason as people build hotrods, overclocking is about doing it, not about results.

    Thanks; that went in my quote file.

  30. Re:Corps is your father, corps is your mother by brsmith4 · · Score: 1

    This whole citizen corps thing is reminding me of the informants of nazi-germany. its frightening.

  31. Free Enterprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its called Free Enterprise my friend. Get used to it, its only been around for thousands of years.

  32. Technically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because *technically* its not overclocking. So you cant "possibly [destroy] the drive mechanism" any more than you can possibly do it thru normal usage.

    If you run your mobo/video card/whatever at a higher rate than it is *mechanically* specified for, that is overclocking. Changing the FSB speed from 66mhz to an unsupported 100mhz is overclocking.

    Taking a device that is *mechanically* specified to run at a higher speed, but is being throttled by its firmware, is NOT overclocking. Im sure someone could come up with a proper term for it, like "Liberating" it or some other such sanctimonious term.

  33. more demand for drive => more supply by yerricde · · Score: 1

    If they've already manufactured the drive, they've already lost the money it took to make it.

    But if you buy the drive, you run up the sales figures for that drive, and the part of the company that chooses which product to make will choose to make more of that drive.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  34. It happened to my neighbor by yerricde · · Score: 1

    [CDs shattering in a CD-ROM drive once they spin up] is most likely an urban legend.

    No. It happened to my neighbor. He had to go out and buy a new burner and a new copy of the CD. It was especially tough for him because he wasn't even old enough to have a real job; child labor laws.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  35. $14,400 / hr by feldkamp · · Score: 2, Funny

    $14,400/hr ???

    At that rate, the only person this guy could be is my lawyer.

  36. You young'uns might think this is new by trenton · · Score: 3, Informative
    Anyone remember using hot glue guns to melt the 1.44mb hole in your 720kb 3.5" disks? Those disks used the same media, but in a different physical case. So, if you made the 720kb disks look like 1.44s, they'd work.

    Or, better yet, cutting an additional notch in your 5.25" floppys, so they could be read, upside down, in single sided drives? Ah, my old Apple 2 days.

    --
    Too big to fail? Does that make me to small to succeed?
    1. Re:You young'uns might think this is new by TaliesinWI · · Score: 1

      I would then proceeded to _format_ that 720K diskette that I converted to 1.44M, and got 10%-20% error rates, and when I _did_ manage to save data to the diskette, it wouldn't always read 100% correctly in other floppy drives.
      Same with the hole punch trick on the 5 1/4" floppies - I had a TI and an Atari, but the principle was the same. It would hold you for the short term if you needed double the space RIGHT NOW, but don't put important backups on the "other side" of the disk.

      Go root around in your disk collection and _find_ a 720K floppy and a 1.44M floppy. Pull back the metal slider and look at a light source thru the actual disk media. Notice that you can _see_ the light source thru the 1.44M media, but the 720K is almost completely opaque. Now tell me again how the media is the "same".

      There was a _reason_ the higher density/double sided floppies cost more - they were _rated_ for that kind of use. Different media, denser magnetics, whatever.

    2. Re:You young'uns might think this is new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hot glue? I just used a piece of scotch tape to cover the hole on both sides (placed over the top of the disk, not over the side, so it wouldn't be too wide)

    3. Re:You young'uns might think this is new by funky+womble · · Score: 1

      Or the first side, on 5 1/4s, the dust collecting inside the disk would often get knocked out when it's spinning the eother way...

    4. Re:You young'uns might think this is new by sentenza · · Score: 1

      hot glue? Sure not doing well as scissors! You just point the scissors, turn until you got a perfect hole.

    5. Re:You young'uns might think this is new by kevquinn · · Score: 1
      We used to take 100K 5.25" floppies (so yeah, old-ish but not paper-tape old :) ), cut a mirror-image notch in the other side of the disc case, then flip them up-side down to get double-sided disk capacity out of a single-sided disk drive.

      When the teacher caught us at it, he threw a fit. It turned out the cloth on the inside of the floppy case (which really was floppy) was a kind of 'j' cloth, designed to offer minimal resistance when the platter was spun in one direction. By doing what we did, we simply over-stressed the spindle motor as spinning the disk the opposite way to that designed had more friction. Mostly this would reduce the life of the disk drive, more than anything else.

      It may have had other effects, possibly on the stability of the platter when spinning - I think at that stage the heads were actually in contact with the platter; certainly they were close enough to collect contamination. So if the platter is spinning with more vibration due to the friction effects, it might also reduce the life of the heads, or at least meant they needed cleaning more often. And as I recall, cleaning the heads was a controversial business anyway; some would claim that the cleaners actually did damage to the drive.

      The point, as has been made by others already, that 'overclocking' your CD burner is short-sighted - presumably like other hardware the badge is the result of testing, MTBF predictions and the like, not the list of components that go into the drive.

  37. I tried... by Chasing+Amy · · Score: 2

    I tried cleaning, but to no avail. When conventional methods didn't work I even tried using a compressed air canister to blow the area out, figuring it doesn't matter if I damage anything since it isn't working well anymore in the first place. :-)

    But, alas, I think the laser is just semi-dead... Not that I can blame it--getting five useful years out of a PC part isn't as common as it used to be. :-)

    --

    Chasing Amy
    (We all chase Amy...)
    "The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws"-Tacitus
    1. Re:I tried... by cobar · · Score: 2

      I'm still using the trusty old Sound Blaster 16 (non -PnP) that I bought back in '93 in my Windows PC. When I bought a new box without PCI slots I just kept it in the older PC. I figure it's still got a number of years left in it.

      I've also got an old external 1x SCSI cdrom that I trot out from time to time. Works fine as an extra mp3 drive so I don't have to swap disks as often.

    2. Re:I tried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, stuff with moving parts generally doesn't last as long as solid state stuff. Especially when they're made to the low "if it costs $5 less, who cares if it fails in a year or two" quality that is commonplace today. Just stating the obvious here. :)

      BTW I assume you meant ISA slots not PCI. I'd be suprised if you could find a PC on the market without any PCI slots *or* onboard sound.

  38. USB bandwidth limit :( by iso9660 · · Score: 0

    I have a 4x iomega burner with an usb connection. I'd happily overclock it if it weren't for the speed limit of the usb port - usb burners are just incapable of burning faster than 4x afaik.

    But I'm pretty sure it would work apart from that, usb-storage always identifies the burner as a 6x burner,so there would be at least some speed to gain...

    Should have bought a firewire unit instead.

    --

    I wish that my brain could do SMP...

  39. Why NOT To Do This by Caraig · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most high-speed drives seem to not take into account the stresses placed upon CDs. A 56x drive imposes a HUGE amount of momentum on the disc. This is something to be of concern about. Even more so, when you consider the amount of HEAT being generated. Not only by the laser, but by the drive's motor itself.

    The situation is worsened when you consider the write-laser, which imparts much more heat onto the disc than the read-laser. Be very aware of this! The faster the drive, the more heat and stress being put onto the disk. Bad Things Can Happen.

    I had the displeasure of having a disc EXPLODE in my CD-ROM drive last week, because of heat and stress placed upon it. I'm lucky I didn't have the thing at neck-level since pieces of disk flew across the room.

    --
    "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
    1. Re:Why NOT To Do This by Basje · · Score: 1

      I think this has more to do with cheap or faulty media, than with the drive itself.

      Compare the thickness of an aol cd with that of a high quality cdr, and you'll find that the thickness of the disk is less. Cheaper cdr media is probably thinner and not as sturdy as quality media.

      --
      the pun is mightier than the sword
    2. Re:Why NOT To Do This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm, interesting idea for a CD-ROM bomb

  40. A disturbing trend by Majik+Sznak · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Here goes my Karma of 1...

    I hate this stupid-ass development: people are calling DVD players "DVDs." eg. "Hey: do you have a DVD? I can lend you some movies." What the Hell?

    People should ask for permission to be stupid. They should ask me.

    I'd say, "no."

    --
    Karma: Chameleon (Mostly affected by the 1980s)
    1. Re:A disturbing trend by The+Dobber · · Score: 1

      Fine with me, but only if you get permission to be a pompous windbag.

      I suppose you ask for a bowl of Gelatin and render hide trimmings, rather than Jello.

  41. I love. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    how the concept of modifying the programming in hardware you own has already been villified so successfully by the industry that people put in qualifiers like (and legal!) in statements like this.

    It should NEVER BE A QUESTION.

    If you own it, you can do what you want with it. Any law that says otherwise is morally wrong.

  42. Solutions by jigokukoinu · · Score: 1

    Air conditioning is your friend. I know it is my friend.

  43. Just put on a decal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just put a Type-R sticker on my CD-RW drive. I haven't tested it yet, but all of my friends say that it adds at least 5-10X to my drive's performance!

    1. Re:Just put on a decal! by Dahan · · Score: 2

      That ain't nothin man, this guy's got a Type-R American Standard!

  44. how to upgrade firmware in linux? by 7-Vodka · · Score: 2

    I have a teac 56s-600. They only provide self extracting windows and mac binaries. How does one flash a cdr firmware when one is using linux?

    --

    Liberty.

  45. your numbers don't add up.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somehow your numbers don't add up. If you're using a 74 minute CD, somehow you got:
    1x - burnt in 70 minutes
    2x - burnt in 40 minutes = 80 minutes if drive was set to 1x?
    4x - burnt 19-20 = 76-80 if 1x
    12x - burnt in 7 min = 84 minutes? to burn a 74 min CD?
    24x - burnt in 5 min = 120 minutes if 1x???

    I find it hard to believe you when from 12x to 24x and only saved 2 minutes. Some of the newer "48x" drives start at like 24x, and only at the very end does it really reach 48x, so unless your 24x starts at 12x, then at the very end gets to 24x, then something is very, very wrong.

    Test it with CD Speed.

    Most new drives come with something called "burnproof", which can actually stop cd recording in the middle of the cd if there's a problem with data access, making it nearly impossible to screw-up the cd. Review sites have run quake3 demos on slower, 500mhz systems while burning a cd using a drive with burnproof, and they were not able to screw up the cd recording process.

    1. Re:your numbers don't add up.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TOC, lead-in and lead-out are often not written at full speed since poorly-writing those parts of the CD results in more serious errors than poorly-writing regular data, hence the time variance.

  46. sorry, but you're stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you would have read the linked article and what several other people have said you would have discovered that they're not really "overclocking" the cd-rw, they're just changing the firmware.

    The drives are exactly the same except for the fireware, there isn't some special 48x drives with cpus set to a higher speed to allow for faster recording speeds, just change the fireware of your 32x to a 48x and ta-da, you're burning at 48x.... at least for the last 5 seconds of the burn process you are....

    sometimes the firewares are incompatible, which explains why not every drive can be upgraded to a faster drive, and the older drives probably don't even have capability of spinning the cd fast enough to obtain 48x speeds.

  47. Drives are binned at production for Quality by jerry924 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What these companies are doing after manufacture is binning the parts to how well they test. If they test poorly, they sell them as slower drives - it the test s have better results, they sell these as faster drives. Taking a slower drive and just speeding it up will work, but some things will fail - you just won't know what since you are doing an exhaustive QA testing on the device after you clock it. What happens when you overclock but then the temperature of the drive rises, then the quality drops!

  48. Re:Corps is your father, corps is your mother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    --what was that foxy head alien babe's name? I remember one episode where she opens WIDE and scarfs down a guinea pig in one bite. Hate to say it, but I thought her "potential" was simply awesome.....

    Oh ya, creating the junior nark league. Yep, we got the best fascist government that fiat currency can buy now. throw in sophisticated madison avenue propoganda spreading and indoctrination in the publik skules, dash in a smidgen of paranoia induced by government, shake up the economy, scary the peepuls, wham bam thankee ma'am, ya got your fourth reich.

    Go ahead and kill em boys, they are just dumb injuns, filthy redskins, johnny rebs, stupid niggers, filthy huns, gooks, slopes, ragheads, gun owners, jews, camel jockeys, beaners, christians, "terrorists".

    It don't matter, every large government when it flips to being fascist-they all do eventually- always needs to create sub humans to demonize to take the heat off their own crimes and incompetence. This generation is only different by the level of technology they will throw at it. It's no accident they created an official military "kill the sub human enemies" video game, and it's no wonder they created the junior nark league. Everything is right on historical despotic schedule, right down the line. Wanna know the fascist goons new buzzword that is this generation's and societie's replacement/analogy for "sieg heil"? It's "let's roll".

  49. We are gonna give you one more chance by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    to order. And as a special bonus, we'll have the terry cloth bath robe autographed by our former CEO. That's right, you get two hot-rod kits, and an autographed terry cloth bath robe! For FREE, that's right, no charge. You will then recieve a new kit every month for a mere pittance of $1!

    Total cost is $0 plus $100 "super deal" tax, and $29.99 shpping and handling per kit, plus $200 "last minute" tax and $100 "autographed" tax and $29.99 shipping and handling.


    (This would've been funnier if the <sub> tag was allowed. HINT HINT /. manager/coder people!)

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  50. Where's the 48x media though? by inkfox · · Score: 2
    I've had tremendous problems with media any time I burn over 12x. I've tried half a dozen brands which were rated for 24x or better, and even at 16x, they all have errors on about one disc in ten.

    What kind of media do you use if you're shooting up to a 48x burn speed?

    --
    Says the RIAA: When you EQ, you're stealing bass!
    1. Re:Where's the 48x media though? by Shanep · · Score: 2

      I've had tremendous problems with media any time I burn over 12x. I've tried half a dozen brands which were rated for 24x or better, and even at 16x, they all have errors on about one disc in ten.

      Do you have an IDE or SCSI drive?

      I have seen IDE HDD -> SCSI CDRW always work perfectly, SCSI CDROM -> SCSI CDRW always work perfectly but IDE CDROM (48x) -> SCSI CDRW often fail and anything with IDE CDRW often fail.

      I'm just curious if your problem is in fact the media or whether you are seeing increasing reliability problems as burn speed increases with an IDE CDRW drive. I'd like to know because I have an 8x SCSI CDRW drive and I'm about to buy a new CDRW drive for a friend. If the culprit is IDE I will buy him a 24x SCSI drive, if it really is the media I will buy him a 12x SCSI drive.

      Thanks.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    2. Re:Where's the 48x media though? by inkfox · · Score: 1
      I've had tremendous problems with media any time I burn over 12x. I've tried half a dozen brands which were rated for 24x or better, and even at 16x, they all have errors on about one disc in ten.
      Do you have an IDE or SCSI drive?

      I have seen IDE HDD -> SCSI CDRW always work perfectly, SCSI CDROM -> SCSI CDRW always work perfectly but IDE CDROM (48x) -> SCSI CDRW often fail and anything with IDE CDRW often fail.

      I'm just curious if your problem is in fact the media or whether you are seeing increasing reliability problems as burn speed increases with an IDE CDRW drive. I'd like to know because I have an 8x SCSI CDRW drive and I'm about to buy a new CDRW drive for a friend. If the culprit is IDE I will buy him a 24x SCSI drive, if it really is the media I will buy him a 12x SCSI drive.

      It's IDE, however I watch and the buffer never falls below 95% full for the duration of the burn, so it's never being starved.

      I do also have a SCSI burner, which has the same problems at its max burn speed (16x).

      --
      Says the RIAA: When you EQ, you're stealing bass!
  51. Discussion on overclockers.com by parkanoid · · Score: 1

    This has been discussed a while ago on oc.com forums: http://forum.oc-forums.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&th readid=60158&highlight=burner (Thanks to bender for the link).

  52. Price discrimination by Sangui5 · · Score: 2

    The reason they do this is to discriminate between people who just want a CD drive, and the person who wants the best possible. (More technically, they want to charge people with a low elasticity of demand more, and still sell to people witha high elasticity of demand).

    If they produced just 1 model drive, then they can reasonably expect to sell it at 1 price. Let's suppose they can sell it for $50. Now, there are some people who must have the fastest drive, damn the price. These people will (obviously), buy it for $50. There are also some people who are willing to pay $50 for the drive, but not necessarily too much more. They will also buy. There is a 3rd class of people who would like a drive, but don't want to buy at $50. They don't buy.

    Now lets introduce another, slower model. We can raise the price of the fast drive, say to $75. The performance freaks will all still fork out for it. If we price the slow drive at say, $40, we will still sell a drive to all the people who bought at $50 (but don't want to pay $75). We will also sell a bunch of drives to people who never did want to pay $50, but will fork out $40.

    The end result is that we can extract more money out of the high end ($75 drive buyers) and the low end (people who buy at $40 but not at $50). We lose out some in the middle (people who are now paying $40 but would have paid $50), but if you balance the prices right, you can end up ahead.

    Intel did the same thing with the 486SX. The earlier manufactured SXs were just the DX with the floating point co-processor disabled. They were actually more expensive to make, but they sold for less. Some people had to/really wanted to buy the DX, and paid the high price. Intel gained a large low-end market with the cheaper SX chip, and overall ended up ahead. Even the speed-ratings of their processors was price-discrimination. Intel's fabrication technology turned out very few parts that couldn't pass the high-clockrate tests. But if they sold them as high-clockrate parts, they'd glut the highend market, and drive the prices down. By labelling them slower, they can still charge a premium for the faster parts, while maintaining low-end marketshare.

    Airplane tickets--same deal. It doesn't cost the airline more to sell you a ticket that doesn't include a weekend stay. They just want to charge the business traveller more. Business travellers have a low elasticity of demand -- they *must* fly. They are willing to pay a lot more. The tourist has a high elasticity of demand -- flying is totally optional. By including a weekend stay requirement for cheap fares, they can get more money overall.

    Student/senior discounts for movie tickets. Cheaper meals during lunch than dinner at restaraunts. It's a very common practice in business.

  53. Underclock my drive to burn CDR99 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I read on tom's hardware that burning 99 minute CDs reqiures a slow burning speed. unfortunately, my LG 24x10x40x seems to have a minimum burning speed of 8 (i.e., "cdrecord dev=0,0,0 speed=x blah.iso" where x less than 8 still burns at 8x) again, according to tom's, these three drives support burning to the end of a 99 min cd:
    • LG GCW 8160B
    • LG CGRW-8084
    • Mitsumi CR-4805 TE
    the sites mentioned above are slashdotted but maybe i'll be able to *slow* my drive down to 2x!
  54. Heh. by Call+it+a+n1ght · · Score: 1

    Wait until everyone figures out that all the new IDE hard disks are 160GB and just need a firmware update to turn a 20GB drive into a 160GB one!

  55. Been doing this for a while now... by Thai-Pan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember when my HP8100 4x2x24x burner was a rippin' little machine and I got it at a steal for only $450 Canadian. When I got it home, I found it could only burn up to 74 minutes on a CD, where a friend of mine could burn right up to 83 minutes! I was frustrated with my purchase and started digging around on the internet. It turns out that the limit was a firmware thing and not hardware at all; some nice fella out there even put up a modded firmware for me, so I could get those extra few minutes onto a CD-R. I flashed my burner's firmware, and voila! I can now fully utilize 80 minute discs.

    I now have a 40x Liteon I got for barely more than $100 Canadian, and I've been running it at 48x for a while now. Not only is it marginally faster, but my burner now supports Mt. Rainier, and the burn quality is significantly better! Before discs from this burner done at higher than 16x skipped in my car, now I can write them right up to 48x and they work great.

    There's also a lot of CD-R media out there that's rebadged falsely. There's got to be hundreds of brands of CD-Rs out there, but there aren't nearly that many factories producing CD-Rs. It's not the case so much anymore, but 80 minute discs and discs rated past 4x used to cost quite a lot more than other ones, but if you knew what no-name brands to buy, you'd end up with identical discs to the more expensive ones.

    Rebadging takes place everywhere in the computer market, so keep your eyes peeled. Now and again, Dell sells refurbished monitors at REALLY good prices. I mean $300 Canadian for a 21" monitor. A friend of mine grabbed two of them a while ago, and he popped it open to check the manufacture date. Not only were the monitors only a couple of months old, there were giant Sony stickers inside. It's no secret that Dell monitors are usually remarked Sonys, but these were barely used, high end Sony monitors selling dirt cheap.

  56. legalities by pruss · · Score: 1

    Isn't there a possible copyright problem? To update with a different firmware version requires one to make two copies of a program (the firmware) one probably doesn't own a copy of. The first is the copy made when one downloads it and the second is the copy made in the flash memory of the drive.

    This might count as fair use if one owns a drive with the updated firmware, as long as one doesn't have the two drives on at the same time or something like that. But failing that, it seems to be the sort of copying that requires a license (IANAL, though).

    It is true that the company many put the firmware on the web, and one might argue that that involves an implicit download and flash-to-device license grant. But I think this would be shaky if the download were marked as "Firmware update for Widget CD-RW Model 3491". Then it seems reasonable to suppose that the implied license applied to Widget CD-RW Model 3491 owners, and not to Widget CD-RW Model 3391 owners.

    So there could be legal problems. Of course if one can just patch the old firmware with one's own code to generate the new firmware, then it might be less problematic.

    The firmware download site might also have an explicit click-through license.

    But IANAL.

    ARP

  57. listing error rates by dfries · · Score: 1

    I've had problems in the past and I was wondering
    if there are any cd burners/roms out there that
    could actually tell the OS how many errors there
    were on the cd? I would be interested in checking
    out the number of errors of any system backups I
    made so I could duplicate the ones that didn't
    come out so good.

  58. MSI 1's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anybody know if this work for MSI burners?
    i've got a 32/12/40 burner from msi and i would like 2 know if this works for my burner

  59. Q: LG DVD combo drives? by nocent · · Score: 1

    Anyone know if LG DVD/CDR/RW combo drives can be overclocked using the same techniques?

  60. Rico Suave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I did this with my old Ricoh 7040S with the 7060S BIOS.

    http://www.cdmediaworld.com/hardware/cdrom/cd_mo di fications_ricoh_7060.shtml

  61. Hard drives too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually you can do similar things to hard drives as well. By small firmware or hardware (small! one chip etc) modifications you can make them spin faster. Or make a simple raid-0 thing internally. I have wondered for a LONG time why no one is doing it. Getting a fast drive worth 2000USD for just like 50USD sounds attractive at least to me...

  62. Re:512 GB/s by bobv-pillars-net · · Score: 1

    Prove it! Show me your bandwidth bill!

    --
    The Web is like Usenet, but
    the elephants are untrained.