Slashdot Mirror


Shuttle SS51 Reviewed

hilldaddy writes "AnandTech has a review up of the new Shuttle SS51 XPC. Looks like they finally added an AGP slot. Read the review." We've done several previous stories on the Shuttle mini-PC systems.

201 comments

  1. The Shuttle by JPriest · · Score: 2, Informative

    I bought a shuttle bare bones system a while back for LAN gaming. I really like the system, it's quiet and about as large as my toaster, but I ended up replacing the C3 with something faster.

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
  2. This thinks only lacks a printer ports? by cryo9999 · · Score: 1

    Well to serial are good but what about dongle support

    1. Re:This thinks only lacks a printer ports? by Junta · · Score: 2

      This thing is clearly targetted at areas like Home Theater, where there aren't really relevant dongle-requiring apps.. If you are running something that requires a dongle, then you probably are at a business buying pre-built systems, not rolling their own..

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:This thinks only lacks a printer ports? by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      I spose they tested Max with a net dongle? I thought that used a parallel dongle.

      BTW - I wonder how the licensing is set up for the ProE tests - I used to be a developer for it at PTC - a long time ago now.

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
    3. Re:This thinks only lacks a printer ports? by Anonym1ty · · Score: 1

      If it weren't for applications like connecting this to your DSS low speed data port to control your satellite receiver or an LCD screen to show off MP3's in the car I doubt a serial ports would have made it on this thing either. I'm surprised there's more than one! Lets face it, it's getting harder to justify parallel or serial ports now that we have USB and FireWire.

    4. Re:This thinks only lacks a printer ports? by mccalli · · Score: 2
      If you are running something that requires a dongle, then you probably are at a business buying pre-built systems, not rolling their own..

      I understand your point, but I'm interested in running Cubase on this. I'm specifically interested in the box because it's very quiet, but Cubase requires a dongle which connects via the parallel port.

      The problem can be solved, I think, by getting a USB to parallel adaptor.

      Cheers,
      Ian

  3. "Cool" Cooling solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    One of the best things about this is the way the CPU is cooled.. I'd wish you could get something like this for your average mini tower.

  4. Ratter stupid name by MouseR · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    considering a very resembling STS-51 less successful one.

    1. Re:Ratter stupid name by plaa · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      considering a very resembling STS-51 less successful one.

      Agreed. I read the headline, skimmed the text and thought, "why the hell is there a news item about an AGP slot being added to a space shuttle?"

      Only after checking the article did it become clear...

      --

      I doubt, therefore I may be.
    2. Re:Ratter stupid name by dillon_rinker · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      That was my first thought, too, when I say the headline. I wonder if the company intended it as a tribute, albeit an arcane one. Regardless, it lends itself to all sorts of tasteless humor.

    3. Re:Ratter stupid name by Plutor · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      Actually, the Challenger mission was actually mission "51-L". STS-51 came 7 years later, and involved a four-times-aborted launch of the Discovery.

  5. not very appealing to the eyes. by Peyna · · Score: 2

    Anyone else find it not the greatest looking thing around? I guess it doesn't matter if you shove it under a desk, but I"m not sure it's something I'd want on top of my desk or sitting out in the open. The SS50 at least looked decent, but they added too much flashy stuff to it, and it looks silly.

    --
    What?
    1. Re:not very appealing to the eyes. by zaren · · Score: 2

      I dunno... it looks a lot nicer than a lot of other cases that I've seen, and a damn sight better looking than some "name brand" machines you could buy at a major retailer. It's a cute size, too...

      I've never built a machine from scratch before, being a Mac guy and all, but a compact, well-designed box like this might tempt me to build one someday.

      --
      Come to the University of Mars! Classes starting soon!
    2. Re:not very appealing to the eyes. by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Hmm some of those raffles are a decent deal, lots of them are complete rip offs. The imac raffles, total amount of money apple makes $4000 equipment they give away $2000. Not horrible, but still pathedic, then you get down to the cheap stuff raffeling a $300 ipod for with 200 tickets at $8.95 a piece
      thats $1790 ekk. Anyways, they seem to imply that the extra money goes to charity, but still steep.

  6. interesting by The+Rogue86 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Many mac people claim that they have the best computers because of their size and portablity. Perhaps Windows (or hopefully linux) will be able to show people that we to can make really weird looking small computers too. And this one even has a serial port as apposed to the mac.

    "Excellent" - Monty Burns

    --
    This is how you know you're a geek the power goes out and you are unemployed and unemployable. Yes I know I can't spell
    1. Re:interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, this box combined with the power of Windows XP Pro would make a very nice desktop. I've been looking at buying a Mac to play around with MacOS X but I can never seem to justify it when I can get a box like this AND a 17" LCD display for much less than the cheapest LCD iMac would run with a 15" screen. This thing running XP on a P4 would be over twice as fast as the iMac would be and probably just as quiet and portable. What advantage does the much more expensive Mac really give? MacOS X doesn't even support most scanners! I bought a scanner from Canon (D1230UF) 2 months ago and it's not supported. I thought Macs were supposed to be big for graphics and design, yet they don't support scanners?? iMovie can only handle clips in 2GB chunks which turns out to be about 9 minutes of video since they don't even use MPEG (nor could they since they're too slow to do on the fly compression!!). It takes 4 times as long to burn a movie DVD on a Mac than it does on a PC that costs half as much. Why is that? Hell, I think I made up my mind and I needed to voice it. Macs suck. I'm going to get one of these Shuttle SS51 boxes and run XP Pro on it... they have everything the Mac does and MORE including USB 2.0!!! Brand new macs still ship with USB 1.x!! LAME!

    2. Re:interesting by gosand · · Score: 3, Funny
      Many mac people claim that they have the best computers because of their size and portablity. Perhaps Windows (or hopefully linux) will be able to show people that we to can make really weird looking small computers too.

      Psst. Windows and Linux are operating systems, not computers.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    3. Re:interesting by The+Rogue86 · · Score: 1

      damn i wish i wasnt so dumb (The Rogue86 ran out of daily posts)

      --
      This is how you know you're a geek the power goes out and you are unemployed and unemployable. Yes I know I can't spell
    4. Re:interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, sir, are a clod.

      The scanner is even listed under the Made4Mac section of Apple's site.

      2GB chunks? In a free video editing package? The horror! The reason it's only 9 minutes is because it's uncompressed digital video. It's high-friggin-quality. And the tragedy of 9 minute clips of video. Show me a movie where there is a scene shot from a single perspective for NINE minutes.

      4 times as long to burn a DVD? Who's ass did you pull that bullshit out of? Especially a PC that costs half as much. WHERE THE FUCK ARE YOU GETTING A PC THAT BURNS DVDs @ 1/2 REALTIME FOR $900?! And in that $900 price tag, are you getting the software, or do you just download that? And the LCD screen, or did you download that, too?

      Over twice as fast as the iMac? Sure, maybe in MHz, but XP Pro is so bloated you need that to run well. As for quiet - sure. Portable, not quite. A Shuttle, A 17" LCD, 2 power cords, monitor cable, Keyboard & Mouse will be a bit hard to carry. With the iMac, you get CPU & screen in one hand, and Keyboard, Mouse & power cable in the other. Sure, it's not a huge difference, but it is a notable one.

      Oh, and USB 2.0? That's sad, man. USB 1.1 (there's no other damn 1.x - there's not even a 1.0) is fine for what it is. USB 2.0 is like a weak FireWire. 1/3 the power capabilities. Essentially identical transfer capabilities (try to get 480Mbps throughput, go ahead), direct device-to-device communication. Oh no! Only SIXTY-THREE devices?! But I have 20 printers, 20 scanners, 10 external hard drives, 10 CD-RWs, 2 MP3 players, A DVD-RW, AND a DV-Cam that I use all at the same time! What will I do?!

      --
      Stop. Think about what you want to say. Write it down. Now read it out loud. See how stupid you sound?

    5. Re:interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You miss one important point: Macs are still gay.

    6. Re:interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh heh heh, you said power of win xp pro. heh heh heh.

    7. Re:interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read some Dickens and Shakespeare. They could throw an insult.

      And you have such a poor grasp of English that you don't seem to know how to insult something. Yes, they are happy computers. They are happilly without the functional obfuscation of Windows XP. They do not sport 2 different interfaces out of fear. Have you ever switched between "Classic" and "XP" interfaces? Classic loads in no time, and XP is slow to load. This should be an indication that the pretty XP interface is a poor hack of the old interface.

      XP (and 2000 to some extent) is two-faced. Experience everything with simplicity, but, wait - don't go there. Are you sure you want this? This isn't someplace you should be. No, no, you wanted to be here. That's missing, would you like this instead? You need to change this setting, but you can't get to it from here, where the error is. You can run that, but it won't run properly. You can access that network location, but you have to go through 4 extra layers, unless you happen to remember it all. You don't need that menu option, you didn't use it last time? You don't need to access your hard drive, everything you should touch is already laid out for you. You don't need to edit the registry, we've made a utility that talks to a utility that edits the registy; but you don't have permissions to use it. Would you like to play a game?

      Sounds like my idea of a good time. I use Win2k. I tolerate the way it works. I used 3.11 - everything was fine. 95 took getting used to, but it was OK. 98 was another adjustment (I loathe "Web Content" folders, they represent all that is unweildly in file access). 2k was just slower and more stable, with a few goodies. XP is cherry-flavored medicine. Even though it seems good at first, you still have a bad taste in your mouth when it's over.

      --
      Patriotism is a Static Window Sticker.

  7. Upgradability goes further than just the mobo by BlackMesaResearchFac · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "Upgrading CPUs and graphics cards shouldn't be a problem but when it comes to motherboards, you're pretty much stuck with what you've got." Surely the reviewer realizes that motherboards have a socket type that only run a certain type of CPU. Obviously this isn't always an issue but depending on when a motherboard is made and where in the development cycle the chip maker is in and what processor one buys... The same could be said about the old AGP 2x to 4x conversion.

    --
    -- Scientist: You aren't going to leave me here, are you? Boagh! Thump...
    1. Re:Upgradability goes further than just the mobo by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is why this computer isn't for everyone. When you buy small, integrated systems, you instantly sacrifice some level of upgrades and expansion for the small box.

      Small, expandable, inexpensive. Pick two.

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
  8. Nice alternative to... by TibbonZero · · Score: 2

    Rack mounts, but costs aside...Wouldn't you rather have a 4 space ATA rack case with a 1u computer, a 1u UPS, 1u keyboard/LCD and a 1u 24port switch all within a nice carryable package that it doesn't hurt throw in the back of the car?

    These are really cool though for their small footprint, but personally I have been carrying around a Supermicro S-760 case for a few years now fully loaded, and its pretty heavy, but I really don't mind- it's strong enough to hold up one end of the table, or to be able to sit my UPS on top. These could be cool for LAN parties, but the exact reason I bought such a large case was for massive expandablity- multiple scsi drives, cdr, dvd, multiprocessor, etc...

    It really could be cool for Lans though, but that LianLi alumnium case also fixes weight problem too.

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
    1. Re:Nice alternative to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Racks for lans could be cool, because you wouldn't have to really plug in much to get it running, power cable, lan cable, and go. A wireless keyboard/mouse could make it easier to actually use, so you don't have to have your wrists all twisted up for days- and then you could just get a compaq rackmount flatscreen, instead of an expensive LCD/keyboard.
      If you used wireless actually, you don't even have to plug into the lan, just plug in power and go. And you might want to consider racking the networking stuff on the back, so you don't have other people's cable running out of the front of your gaming rack

    2. Re:Nice alternative to... by Espen · · Score: 1

      The only space efficiency in rack mount cases is usually in height. More often than not they're are hopelessly deep (at least 3 times deeper than any of the other kit you are listing), and 'portability' isn't what comes to mind. It is even more painful when you realise how much space is unused in a standard 1U rack case.

    3. Re:Nice alternative to... by spencerogden · · Score: 1

      How does a rack mount allow you to do this minimal connection stuff any easier than a tower? If anything you would have less expansion availible for things like wireless net.

    4. Re:Nice alternative to... by Jhan · · Score: 1

      1U LCD? Kind of hard to run QuakeX on, innit? OTOH, the marketroids will like that since it's HYPER wide-screen.

      --

      I choose to remain celibate, like my father and his father before him.

  9. one more step ... by timothy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was interested to see that Shuttle has a new case out with an AGP slot, but it's still one-off from what I'd like, because it doesn't take AMD chips, which I prefer.

    Does anyone know of a similar case for Durons / Athlons? I hope this is Shuttle's next move, because these cases are quite nice looking.

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    1. Re:one more step ... by H3XA · · Score: 3, Informative

      that would be the SS40G..... no AGP slot though - wait and there should be a AMD equivalent of the SS51 soon.

      http://www.tech-report.com/reviews/2002q3/shuttle- ss40g/index.x?pg=1

      - HeXa

    2. Re:one more step ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here is the hyper link

    3. Re:one more step ... by H3XA · · Score: 1

      someone please put me out of my misery and teach me how to make clickable links :(

      - HeXa

    4. Re:one more step ... by mccalli · · Score: 1
      Post in HTML (not plain text), and then use href tags: so.... instead of http://www.eruvia.org in the text, you'd add:
      <a href="http://www.eruvia.org">link text</a>. That would produce something like this.

      Hope that helps (the site is just my homepage by the way, nothing special).

      Cheers,
      Ian

    5. Re:one more step ... by H3XA · · Score: 1

      many thanks.... I thought Slashdot would use a custom way of doing links seeing how there is no mention of the ability in the "Allowed HTML"

      - HeXa

    6. Re:one more step ... by agallagh42 · · Score: 1

      The fourth option in the Allowed HTML list is "A", which is the tag used for hyperlinks.

      --
      Carpe Cerevisi - Seize the Beer
  10. Change in view? by taeric · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In times past (oh, you know, 2 years ago.), it seemed eveyone I knew wanted a full sized tower. At the least, a mid tower was preferred.

    Now, however, it seems things are hopefully turning around. It is quite encouraging to think that in the near future I can finally get rid of all of the crap that clutters my desk due to the computer. Pair this with a flat-panel monitor and you now have noticeably more room above and below your desk.

    Now, I just need to find a way to consolidate all of my power and accessory cables. Those are probably the largest hassle when cleaning for me.

    1. Re:Change in view? by paradesign · · Score: 2

      zip ties are you friend, remember that. if your setup is fairly static, just zip up everything in the back into one nice little bindle and only let cables out where they need to . i do this and it is a night and day difference in terms of noticable clutter. the down side is, what happens if you need to move your computer? or you buy a new monitor, you need to redo all of your hard work... but worth it in my opinion. oh yeah, velcro works to for a more temporary solution, they make it double sided so you can easily make rings with it.

      --
      I want 2D games back.
    2. Re:Change in view? by Junta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While an expensive solution, apple seems to have cable reduction high on their list. You have one cable between monitor and system driving power and signal, one cable to keyboard and mouse (since mouse plugs into keyboard, which makes a *hell* of a lot more sense than the traditional PC way, Sun and Apple have it right..). But if apple is unacceptable, their are keyboards and monitors with built in USB hubs, so you can have a more convenient spot to plug stuff in. Of course, if you have a monitor with speakers and a USB hub you want to use, you have speaker, display, usb, and power cable going to it... Nasty... Technically you can get away with 4 cables out of a mac, network, power, display, keyboard, but add one for sound for a decent rig... Hell, get an iMac and not worry about the display cable at all, just worry about not being modular and having something in need of repair or upgrade...

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    3. Re:Change in view? by Ignavus+Anonymous · · Score: 1

      I've got an old SparcStaion LX lying around that looks just similar, featuring LAN, sound, ISDN, a Sparc CPU and a woppin' 800 mb harddrive. Same case, though obviously a bit slower (and louder)

      This looks just like the right replacement :)

      --

      --

    4. Re:Change in view? by stinkydog · · Score: 3, Funny

      Cleaning?

      I think a have a Vic-20 composting at the bottom of my cable pile. Just plug antoher power strip in and add another hub and you are good to go. I figure in a couple of years the cable pile will be nice and fertile and I will be able to plant some optrons there.

      SD

      --
      âoeWho knew something as harmless as willful ignorance could end up having real consequences?â
    5. Re:Change in view? by H3XA · · Score: 1

      nah... strip the guts out of the Sparc box and convert it to the "dark side" of PC architecture.

      - HeXa

    6. Re:Change in view? by xeaxes · · Score: 1

      My roommate did a really cool thing to get rid of the wire mess..

      We ran to the hardware store and got some 1" or 1-1/2" thick clear tubing and cut about 6' long piece of it. We cut a length-wise cut in it and fed all the wires through there.

      It was extremely neat and clean and worked really well under the desk. For moving you just unplug either side and keep the wires together... It's nice. Plus, you can put Christmas lights in it if you are in the mood.

      --

      "BEHOLD, CORN!!" - Dr. Weird, ATHF

    7. Re:Change in view? by Dave9876 · · Score: 1

      Heathen bastard, did the devil put ye up to this?

    8. Re:Change in view? by lizrd · · Score: 1
      I hate the Apple way of tying the keyboard and mouse together. I really think that it's a terrible idea. I like to be able to pick up the keyboard and set it on my lap without the mouse dangling along with it.

      The solution of course it to get wireless input devices. I've switched over to using a wireless mouse and keyboard and find that it's much better.

      --
      I don't want free as in beer. I just want free beer.
    9. Re:Change in view? by Junta · · Score: 2

      Wireless is good, and I think the flaw in execution with the keyboard/mouse is not so much being plugged in, but the mouse cable tends to be too short, causing stuff like you describe... If you had a PC mouse plugged in, your cable would be so long that problem wouldn't happen... but then again you have too much ugly cable again... Perhaps more ubiquitous bluetooth might help..

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    10. Re:Change in view? by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      I once worked at a digital TV company that worked in exactly this way. Until one day, they added a new development kit- Digital TV Developer Box, Sun Ultra 5, Monitor, powered speakers etc and a new hub as well.....

      Then someone turned on the kettle and the whole power circuit for the building went out - all the PC's, all the lights, the kettles, the water coolers - everything. You couldnt use the loos- no backup lighting. It was gonna take a couple of hours for an electrician to fix it, so we had a pub break.

      For a couple of days there was no lights in two of the loos and we couldnt use the kettles or water coolers. At this point - MIS decided to rethink their cabling strategy - A) Fewer hubs with more ports, B) Get rid of powered speakers(in an open plan office only caused for music war chaos anyway) and C) Stop people plugging in mobiles to charge them at work(like that ever worked).

      They also thought it was a good idea to electrically isolate the kitchen from the PC's, as well as the lights and water coolers. In all it took about a couple of months to get everything back to what we called normal.

      I still remember having problems trying to work out wether that CAT5 was for a phone or the LAN - it took the tech guys 5 minutes a time of tugging cables - tracing it to the wall(easy if it went to a hub) then checking the numbered socket against the big loom cabinets in the corner.

      Oh yeah - and we did find a C64 buried under some cables one time. Still not sure whos it was now...

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
    11. Re:Change in view? by SnapShot · · Score: 1

      Aren't they just chaining USB devices. If you don't like your mouse dangling from your keyboard then plug it into the computer directly. The same thing would apply to a PC, right?

      --
      Waltz, nymph, for quick jigs vex Bud.
    12. Re:Change in view? by lizrd · · Score: 1

      This is true now, but the last Mac I owned was a beige G3 which had the ADB connector. The only place that the ADB mouse could be plugged in was the keyboard. I evenually fixed this 'problem' by getting a USB card and a USB mouse (with a scroll wheel no less).

      --
      I don't want free as in beer. I just want free beer.
    13. Re:Change in view? by shepd · · Score: 1

      Try this next time.

      Does a similar job, but its intended for the task, so it works even better. :-)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    14. Re:Change in view? by Abreu · · Score: 2

      But the question remains... Can you put christmas lights inside it?

      I dont think so!

      --
      No sig for the moment.
  11. Hexus .co.uk review...... by H3XA · · Score: 5, Informative

    in case you manage to /. Anand's servers.

    Hexus - http://www.hexus.co.uk/review.php?review=395

    - HeXa

  12. Need AMD version... by Junta · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyone in touch with people building system component by component realizes a great majority of these are AMD based, since they get to see the processor price difference and know the price/performance problems with P4 vs. Athlon. I personally have been eagerly awaiting a version with AGP for AMD, and then I might buy in... I want to have an All-in-Wonder in one of these babies to integrate into my entertainment system...

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    1. Re:Need AMD version... by H3XA · · Score: 2

      look up a few parent posts....

      - HeXa

  13. Where can you buy in Canada? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This looks very close to the exact type of computer I need considering I move every 4 months and I don't have much room to pack all the time.

    Does anyone know a good place to buy this in Canada?

  14. Bought an SV24 by carambola5 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Looks great with the aluminum casing. Was pretty cheap too at $300 for the case, proc, mb, power supply and RAM. Yes, no hdd, fd, or cdrom. This is going to be a diskless system, and I'd have to say that the SV24 fits the bill quite nicely. I'll put up a page when the project is finished.

    --
    IWARS.
    People, in general, disappoint me. Politicians even more so.
    1. Re:Bought an SV24 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get SV24's on closeout from Outpost.com for $229 right now. I bought one a year or so ago; hopefully they've swapped out the fans in the thing, because it's way, way too loud for my taste (it's so loud I don't use it very often; only when I need an extra machine for video rendering or something). And no, it's no the CPU fan or the HD that bother me..it's the PSU fan and the rear exhaust fan (and if you disable the rear exhaust fan to see if it quiets down, the resemblence to a toaster gets stronger)

    2. Re:Bought an SV24 by ManxStef · · Score: 1

      About the best use for an SV24 IMO.

      I've got one at home and it's very sweet looks wise (esp. when combined with a TFT and a wireless keyb. & mouse), but the internal design leaves a LOT to be desired.

      Basically the power supply is at the FRONT of the case, below where the floppy drive sits (if you put one in), and air is sucked in through the front (by a 6cm fan mounted at the back of the case towards the top), then goes through the power supply, into the flat IDE cables, past the HDD and then out the back at the top through a 6cm fan. The PSU itself has a tiny 4cm (very noisy) fan that is mounted on the left side, and blows STRAIGHT INTO THE SIDE OF THE CASE, instead of OUT.

      This is some of the worst airflow design I've ever seen, as it's basically heating up the air straight away (through the PSU), then flowing it over the HDD (extra-bad if you've got a 7200RPM disk in there), then out the back.

      So if you've got a dremel, do a bit of modding and cut a nice neat airhole in the left side next to the PSU fan [grin]

      Note that they've fixed this in the SS51, the PSU is now mounted at the back (where it should be), and its fan now blows out of the case through a grill. All in all a much better design.

      Cheers,

  15. oops... by H3XA · · Score: 4, Informative

    .... fogot the other two reviews...

    http://www.viahardware.com/ss51xpc_1.shtm
    http://www.ocworkbench.com/2002/shuttle/ss51/ss51g p1.htm

    - HeXa

    1. Re:oops... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have to be such a blatant karma-whore, at least get it right:

      http://www.viahardware.com/ss51xpc_1.shtm
      http://www.ocworkbench.com/2002/shuttle/ss51/ss51g p1.htm

    2. Re:oops... by H3XA · · Score: 2

      My karma is already excellent so why would I bother karma-whoring?

      Most people prefer a second (or third or fourth) opinion on a product before they consider a purchase.

      As for your bitch about not being a clickable link..... it would be clickable if I knew how - I haven't learnt the /. way to do it yet :(

      .... thanks anyway for making them clickable.....

      - HeXa

    3. Re:oops... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't learnt the /. way to do it yet

      It's called HTML, you fool.

    4. Re:oops... by H3XA · · Score: 1

      oh... got it now..... I was expecting a "customised" method of doing links as it wasn't listed in the "Allowed HTML"

      - HeXa

    5. Re:oops... by H3XA · · Score: 2

      sorry to be wasting your time Mr T. - please don't hit me with your gold chains.

      - HeXa

  16. ViaHardware Review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  17. I agree. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    A friend of mine is looking into upgrading his machine or simply getting a new one.

    I was thinking of reccommending the SS51 to him... Until I saw that it was a P4 machine.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:I agree. by Troller+Durden · · Score: 1

      Yeah, god forbid he gets a machine that runs faster, cooler, and more reliably than your fanboy-approved AMD system.

    2. Re:I agree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intel's chips aren't faster or any more reliable. You're 1 out of 3, Intel fanboy.

    3. Re:I agree. by nesthigh · · Score: 1
      Wait for the Shuttle SN40.. should be using the nforce2 chipset.

      next.

    4. Re:I agree. by Junta · · Score: 2

      ummm, still no confirmation of an agp slot there.... I don't care if it has the highest FPS in town, I want something as functional as an all-in-wonder... I know it says 'tv-encoder' but that often means encoding signal *to* tv, and even so, tv capture support under linux may not be possible... Of course with zoomplayer there is actually an acceptable Media player for windows for the role of a home theater pc...

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  18. NICE audio feature! by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Did anyone notice that the three audio ports can be remapped between input and output at the user's discretion? Want surround output, set them all to output. Want to record something? Switch a port to input. VERY nice - But is the audio quality up to snuff?

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:NICE audio feature! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can do with this with the AUX port on the SB Santa Cruz card.

    2. Re:NICE audio feature! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dolby 5.1 sound
      its based off a chipset, cant remeber which one though.

      so i would assume itd have to be certified at a certian level of quality

    3. Re:NICE audio feature! by Zathrus · · Score: 3, Informative

      No. There is no certification for Dolby Digital. All you have to do is match the spec, which is pretty broad.

      The only actual certification process out there is THX, and it's not as great as one might think. THX has bastardized itself into so many sub-varients that you can get crappy little computer speakers that are "THX certified" and still sound like junk. The THX certification process for speakers as a whole has been suspect for a long time now. THX certification for pre-amps, amps, and receivers is another matter, and some of the additional processing it requires (such as reduction of high frequencies) is very valuable (although often available even w/o the THX logo now -- getting that logo is expensive).

    4. Re:NICE audio feature! by Sir_Stinksalot · · Score: 1

      Dude with the optical spdif out use that as your output and hook it to your surround sound system in the living room. Thats what I would do then just leave them mapped to inputs. I am sure my reciever can decode the audio better (harmon kardon avr300). Anyone know if the digital audio is capable of streaming a DTS signal?

      --
      "We can no longer live as rats... we know too much." -Secret of NIMH
    5. Re:NICE audio feature! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THX is the three letter code word for a company who gave money to Lucasfilm so they could add another buzzword to their product's literature.

    6. Re:NICE audio feature! by Coplan · · Score: 3, Informative
      It's interesting that you bring up audio quality. My friend has one of the old Shuttle bare bones systems, and the sound quality is comparable to the average gaming platform sound card (SB). It's not bad, and it can play MP3s and the like pretty well. Problem is, it's a no-frills on-the-motherboard sound card. So you can't expect nice features like the SB Audigy.

      You especially can't expect anywhere close to the S/N ratios or the Response curves that you get with professional quality sound cards. FYI, The SB Audigy, even though SB would like you to believe so, IS NOT professional quality.

      Good for a hobiest or a gamer. But if you want to write music...the Shuttle small profile systems are not for you. For that matter, anything on the motherboard is often not good enough.

    7. Re:NICE audio feature! by Jhan · · Score: 1

      Did anyone notice that the three audio ports can be remapped between input and output at the user's discretion?

      Yes, I did. I also noted that this enabled them to drive 5.1 speaker systems. Could someone please explain to a confused Java programmer how you can feed 5/6 speakers with three analog signals?

      --

      I choose to remain celibate, like my father and his father before him.

  19. Waiting for a replacement? by media_Assassin · · Score: 1

    Not much of a review if they're going to wait for a replacement mobo to see if stability gets better.

    MA

  20. Just what the Dr. ordered by Sean+Clifford · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This is what I've been waiting for. Assuming the mobo problem was just a glitch, I'll be getting one of these shortly. I've got a bunch of 50's (the original version) for work and while they're not exactly stealth-quiet, they're great little machines and look quite nice. Space is a premium, since each desk has to have 2 computers (w/KVM switch).

    This is gonna be my main box at home and primary LAN party box. My old box is gonna be relegated to the role of an Apache server. I'll put up a review of how well the SS51 runs my favorite distro when I get the thing in.

  21. Gnah, almost but not quite. by h4mmer5tein · · Score: 1

    Now if this had AMD support I'd buy one in a flash. This plus a flat screen display would solve a lot of the space headaches I have ATM. (Full Tower case, 21" Monitor, scanner, printer, speakers etc).
    Anyone know why there is no AMD support? Heat problems? Problems getting the chipsets onto such a small form factor?

    1. Re:Gnah, almost but not quite. by 0biJon · · Score: 1

      I'm sure heat is one of the main factors prohibiting them from adding an AMD version. Intel CPUs run much cooler than their AMD counterparts [I tried finding a link to Tom's Hardware (www.tomsharware.com) video where he takes the heat sinks off and the AMD chips fry) so I imagine it would be much tougher to implement a cooling solution in such a small case.

      --
      ?Who controls the past now, controls the future.
      Who controls the present now controls the past.?
    2. Re:Gnah, almost but not quite. by ocbwilg · · Score: 2

      I'm sure heat is one of the main factors prohibiting them from adding an AMD version. Intel CPUs run much cooler than their AMD counterparts [I tried finding a link to Tom's Hardware (www.tomsharware.com) video where he takes the heat sinks off and the AMD chips fry) so I imagine it would be much tougher to implement a cooling solution in such a small case.

      That's not really it. Simply put, Shuttle hasn't put one together yet. The article states that they are working on an nForce2-based model on the SS51 for use with AMD CPUs. Since the nForce2 boards haven't hit the street yet then you won't see the AMD model for a little while.

      Shuttle does already make versions of their XPC that take AMD processors and they don't have any heat problems. The only difference is that their existing AMD and Intel lines (until the SS51) did not have an AGP slot.

    3. Re:Gnah, almost but not quite. by MentlFlos · · Score: 1
      I'm sure heat is one of the main factors prohibiting them from adding an AMD version. Intel CPUs run much cooler than their AMD counterparts [I tried finding a link to Tom's Hardware (www.tomsharware.com) video where he takes the heat sinks off and the AMD chips fry) so I imagine it would be much tougher to implement a cooling solution in such a small case.

      I fail to see how AMD's lack of sufficient thermal protection is holding shuttle back. They already have proven that they can get an AMD chip up and running just fine. (Not sure of the model #, but it does exist).

      Now before this erupts into some sort of holy war, I'm not saying you are incorrect in that AMD's produce more heat and that it isn't a problem. They are quite a toasty chip. I did read somewhere that the p4 chips do pull a fair amount of power and thusly produce lots of heat. Possibly moreso then Intel would like us to believe.

      Back on topic. My friend has the pIII flavor of this box, and it does get HOT (granted its the "stupid" version where the power supply vents into the case) If AMD did have better thermal throttling I would go for one of them, but in such a tight little case, the protection a p4 has is just too valuble (to me).

  22. Shuttlecom have a fascination with Javascript by wowbagger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Like so many sites, the folks who did the web pages for Shuttle Computer Group seem to think that nothing can be done without Javascript - you cannot even view their site with JS turned off. I do wish these so-called web designers would realize that some of us either cannot run JS, or choose not to.

    I went to the Shuttle site trying to see if they had non-P4 systems - I'd rather get a 1800MHz processor that runs like 2200MHz than a 2200MHz processor that runs like 1800MHz. Also, I'd like to know how compatible this system is with Linux.

    Lastly, while it has 2 optical SPDIF ports, I'd like to have a unit with a co-ax port. Why? My stereo has one optical and one co-ax input, and the optical is being used by my DirectTivo - I'd like to use the co-ax for my MP3 player.

    Of course, what I'd really like is a simple USB -> SPDIF converter - no other I/O, just USB in and SPDIF co-ax out.

    1. Re:Shuttlecom have a fascination with Javascript by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To use S/PDIF a company has to license it from sony and philips, probably not worth the money.

    2. Re:Shuttlecom have a fascination with Javascript by Your+Pal+Dave · · Score: 1
      Of course, what I'd really like is a simple USB -> SPDIF converter - no other I/O, just USB in and SPDIF co-ax out.
      Well, if you don't mind optical thrown in as well, how about the
      Edirol UA-1D?
    3. Re:Shuttlecom have a fascination with Javascript by wowbagger · · Score: 2

      Let's see - pay $110 for a device that is basically nothing more than a single-chip USB interface and a couple of optical drivers?

      That's my problem - I have a pretty good idea what the Bill Of Materials on something like this is, and the price is just too steep.

      I realize they aren't getting the volumes that, say, a joystick might get, but COME ON!

    4. Re:Shuttlecom have a fascination with Javascript by adolf · · Score: 2

      You must be looking very hard for the things you seem to want...

      RadioShack springs to mind as a place to pick up an optical switch for toslink, fairly cheaply. Whether it uses mirrors, or close-coupled light pipes, or whatever, it probably works justfine.

      Midiman sells a converter (called "CO2", IIRC) which converts between optical and coaxial SP/DIF. They pop up on Ebay from time to time, and work well for a variety of tasks (SCMS stripping, anyone?).

      The inexpensive Audio Alchemy DDE v1.1 that I use as a DAC for my computer has coaxial and optical inputs, as well as an isolated, re-clocked coax output which just mirrors whatever input is selected.

      Edirol has a product here which has five connections: USB, toslink in/out, and coaxial in/out.

      Finally, as configurable as the sound support is on the Shuttle board, I'd be very surprised if one couldn't turn one of its three multi-purpose jacks into a coax output using nothing but a software switch.

    5. Re:Shuttlecom have a fascination with Javascript by wowbagger · · Score: 2

      Acutally, I have looked long and hard for what I want:

      The Radio Shack solution isn't - I want to be able to switch under electronic control, not manual. If I have to run downstairs to the server room every time I want to change from video to MP3 I could just as easily pull cables by hand.

      The MidiMan CO-2 looks interesting, but I still would have to get SPDIF out on my sound server, which is currently running a SB64. If I have to buy a new card, I can buy one that has co-ax SPDIF on it, so the MidiMan doesn't solve my problem.

      The Audio Alchemy seems to run about $100 - once again, rather pricy considering the BOM in such a unit. Having quality DACs does drive the price up, but that is why I'd rather have a unit that just had digital output - it should be cheaper.

      The Edirol is also too expensive (see previous paragraph, as well as previous post in this thread).

      So far, I've not found anything that fits my needs. What is maddening to me is that a device that fits my needs needn't be expensive - a single chip solution is easily achievable. However, I guess there is just not the market to drive the development of such a device.

      Thanks for the leads, though - they were at least worth checking out.

    6. Re:Shuttlecom have a fascination with Javascript by adolf · · Score: 2

      You didn't mention you wanted it -cheap-. ;)

      If you can spare a PCI slot, buy a Zoltrix Nightingale and the toslink adapter for it. Should cost less than $25, shipped.

      The card is a bit limited in the scope of what it can do (for instance, it -only- supports 44.1 or 48KHz, has no internal synth or resampling or DSP or anything else), but is bit-perfect from end to end - a claim that no other consumer-oriented card I know of can make.

      The card+daughtercard combo I have of that gives me toslink I/O, coax out, and 4 (nearly worthless) channels of analog out. I've never used the coax out, but the toslink worked fine within its very predictable set of limitations.

      I find, however, that I'm happier with the SB Live 5.1 that I snagged for a $30-35, which includes a coax output. Every now and then, I want to play non-windows games, or do non-44.1/48k things, and the Zoltrix card was making that too hard. The Live 5.1 card makes it easy. *shrug* Some people complain that the coaxial output on it is completely devoid of any similarity to any written standard for SP/DIF, but it Works Fine (tm) with the aforementioned Audio Alchemy box which predates it by several years.

      Or, your Soundblaster 64's E8k chip has a coaxial SP/DIF output, already. The trick is to get MP3s to play using the synth chip instead of however it's normally done - I saw patches for this, ages ago... On my AWE 32s, there's a two-pin jumper next to a fat, square IC labeles Ensoniq which is the digital out, though I've never tried it myself.

    7. Re:Shuttlecom have a fascination with Javascript by wowbagger · · Score: 2

      I'd thought about the SPDIF hacks on the AWE64 (why the designers felt the wavetable deserved digital and the PCM didn't is beyond me...), but for some of the things I do, I want the device to act just like /dev/dsp...

      I guess when I rebuild the server next, I'll have to try to use a system that has built-in digital audio out... My server currently has three NICs, a SCSI, a second IDE card, and is FULL!

  23. will anybody ever figure it out??? by j1mmy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    they put a headphone jack, usb ports, and firewire up front, but the KEYBOARD AND MOUSE PORTS ARE STILL IN BACK. Are designers just dense? Many people actually use ps/2 mice and keyboards. If you're going to put ports up front, why not these too?

    1. Re:will anybody ever figure it out??? by Junta · · Score: 2

      Putting everything in front will look too crowded. If you are using ps/2 components, you probably are not hot-plugging them, so they can afford to be in back. If you want to have a nice setup coming out of the front with a decent reach, get a usb keyboard with integrated usb hub and plug a USB mouse into that keyboard. Why the hell would you want keyboard and mouse both to go all the way to the system when they just need a single connection...

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:will anybody ever figure it out??? by fyonn · · Score: 1

      actually think it's correct to put mouse and keyboard at the back. headphones, usb and firewire and all a) hotswap and b) likely to have things put in and taken out often. mouse and kayboard don't really follow the same ideal. when you put them in you're unlikely to want to remove them while the machine is on so you want to keep the untidy cables hidden away at the back.

      thats why I think they made that decision.

      dave

    3. Re:will anybody ever figure it out??? by zrodney · · Score: 3, Insightful

      buy yourself a new keyboard and mouse -- usb

    4. Re:will anybody ever figure it out??? by Webmonger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Only ports that people need frequent access to belong in the front. If you're constantly changing your keyboard and mouse, you should stop eating soup over your computer.

    5. Re:will anybody ever figure it out??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or do what I did, get a wireless keyb/mouse

  24. resellers? by doodzed · · Score: 1

    Anyone know any places to buy these things online. I have seen tons of reviews, but I can never find a reseller.

    --
    It's not the size of your stack that matters, it's how you push and pop
    1. Re:resellers? by Junta · · Score: 1

      http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduct.asp?submit=m anufactory&catalog=3&manufactory=1465&DEPA =1

      Thought this one is not there yet, you can bet it will appear there soon.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  25. That's not a stability issue... by Thag · · Score: 2
    ...For Shuttle, at least:
    We ran into a number of stability issues that could be attributed to the FS51; including a strange problem where a Word document became corrupt while it was open on the system.
    What's strange about that? Every version of Word after 95 spontaneously corrupts documents in a number of ways! Too bad OpenOffice isn't quite there yet...

    Jon Acheson
    --
    All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
  26. oops SV24 by Sean+Clifford · · Score: 2

    Rather, I have a bunch of SV24's, not 50's as I wrote before. We have about 10 or so of these and they're great little office boxen. Only had to RMA one bad power supply. Rest are hummin' (literally) along.

    1. Re:oops SV24 by TheAlmightyQ · · Score: 1

      Anyone know where you can buy just the flexATX power supplys that these little guys run on? The ps in my SV24 died and now I've got it hooked up to a standard ATX supply until I can get a replacement.

      (In case you're wondering, I can't RMA it because, well, I voided the warrenty by making some modifications. Modifications which would not have contributed to it failing of course, but warrenty voiding modifications no the less)

      --
      I hope you're not pretending to be evil while secretly being good. That would be dishonest.
  27. Portable Mini-Rig using Shuttle? by pogle · · Score: 2

    A friend and I have been tossing around the idea of a backpacked minirig system for some time now, making use of small scrap cases from HP or something and the smallest form factor parts we could find. We wanted to build the entire thing into a backpack, so we just unzip a pocket, pull out a power cord and cat-5, and plug them in to go. This would be for both LAN parties and just doing work on the fly, and much less expensive than a laptop; more upgradeable too.

    The Shuttle setups seem almost ideal to this, as they've already solved some of the cooling problems we were finding with our minirigs. I'm just waiting to see what a Shuttle w/nForce2 looks like, and maybe some AMD support instead of Intel.

    I noticed recently a new rollup keyboard on thinkgeek as well, which would be suited, so long as it works well; small factor mice are readily available for laptops, so those arent an issue.

    Have any other /.ers tried/accomplished anything like this? Also, for those of you who've used them, whats your personal opnions on Shuttles other models? I'm especially interested in the cooling issues, as building a computer into a backpack creates even more :)

    --
    http://thechubbyferret.net - Ferret pictures and informative links.
    1. Re:Portable Mini-Rig using Shuttle? by GoghUA · · Score: 1

      This is the best place to discuss something like you are talking about.

      http://forums.viahardware.com/categories.cfm?cat id =33

    2. Re:Portable Mini-Rig using Shuttle? by spencerogden · · Score: 1

      I used the keyboard shown on thinkgeek. They are pretty neat. The keys actually have lots of throw so accidental presses are not a problem. The only weird part is that resistance is equal all the way down until you hit the table underneath, a little jarring. As a plus they are also personally tested as waterproof. We used it for a navigation computer on a racing boat.

    3. Re:Portable Mini-Rig using Shuttle? by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 2

      A word of advice: don't tip the box.

      I just bought a SS40G, based on an Athlon XP chip. The heatpipe-based CPU cooler is nice, but its design seems to be based on the assumption that the box will be flat on the desktop, with the CPU fins/tubes flat, level and below the radiator fins/tubes. Not a bad assumption, I suppose, but the upshot is that if you tip it back (so the front is raised), then the heatpipes don't work properly, and the fan has to kick up to higher speeds = more noise. I suspect that if you tried to run it on its side, or upside down, you'd have some major cooling issues. YMMV.

      (Actually, I'm starting to wonder if mine is defective, because it seems to be running hotter than any of the reviews would suggest. The AnandTech review did mention QC problems...)

      --
      The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
    4. Re:Portable Mini-Rig using Shuttle? by pogle · · Score: 2

      I was actually wondering about this, thanks.

      I was thinking of building a frame into a backpack, and using straps to secure the chassis into the air in the middle of the frame. Add some flexible shock protection (elastic or something), and it would ensure a stable base when sitting still, and shock protection for transport. This would also keep the space free from all around the case for heat and airflow issues.

      --
      http://thechubbyferret.net - Ferret pictures and informative links.
    5. Re:Portable Mini-Rig using Shuttle? by pogle · · Score: 2

      So would you recommend this keyboard to someone lookng for both LAN party gaming and typing the occassion paper or coding? I'm preparing a rather large order from thinkgeek of some other stuff, and would like to include this if its a decent keyboard. Definitely seems the best for small space storage, anyways :)

      Thanks.

      --
      http://thechubbyferret.net - Ferret pictures and informative links.
    6. Re:Portable Mini-Rig using Shuttle? by spencerogden · · Score: 1

      I'd have to give that a maybe. I wouldn't want to do extended typing on it, and depending on how picky you are about your gaming keyboard, it might throw you off. Unless you need something roll up and water proof, you can do much better.

  28. Oh, THAT shuttle by ReelOddeeo · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Shuttle SS51 Reviewed

    My first thought was: isn't it a little bit late?

    Didn't they review this thing to death after shuttle 51 blew up 108 seconds after liftoff in 1986? Wasn't the shuttle fleet grounded for two years?

    --

    Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
    1. Re:Oh, THAT shuttle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      har har har

      fuck off you dumb karma whore, stupid lame jokes like this suck and so do you

      fucking dipshit

    2. Re:Oh, THAT shuttle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumb ass!!!

      It was 71 Seconds.

  29. Small But no Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was going to buy a couple of these, but it seem that to install Linux on these little wonders is a real headache. There are no Linux driver for the onbaord SIS graphics set.

  30. Let alone most printers are USB now. [nt] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nothing to see here

    1. Re:Let alone most printers are USB now. [nt] by O · · Score: 1

      Real printers have ethernet.

      --

      1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21 -- Mathematics is the Language of Nature.
  31. My plans for one of these..... by H3XA · · Score: 1

    Fastest P4 I can get to work in it plus a R9700 (unless I wait for the NV30), coupled with two high speed hard drives (one in HD bay and other in FD bay) with a RAID controller in the PCI slot and of course a DVD-R/RW drive.

    Cooling won't be a problem with a few case mods but my only concern is whether the powersupply can handle all the components.....

    - HeXa

    1. Re:My plans for one of these..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      be sure to wash your hands after masturbating to that thought.

  32. SV24 Power Supply by Sean+Clifford · · Score: 3, Informative
    I RMAed my power supply directly to shuttle and they sent it back. I duct-taped an ATX power supply to the SV24 until the new one came in, then just swapped them out. Contact them and see if they'll replace just the power supply. If not, ask them if you can just buy a power supply. They've been very accomodating with me so far and components do fail, so they should be more than willing to sell you one - even if they won't replace it.

    (note - I'm not affiliated with Shuttle in any way, shape, or form)

  33. I'm Waiting for the NForce2 Shuttle. by Deathlizard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Although this is a good P4 machine, I'm an AMD fan, so this machine really doesn't interest me too much.

    The one I'm waiting for is the Nforce2 Shuttle that will be released soon. It's for AMD, it's Onboard Video and Audio is very good so you wont need to replace it as soon unlike other onboard components, where it's almost necessary, and it's upgradeable just like the SS51 is.

    The Nforce2 Shuttle wil be a good LAN gaming machine out of the box, whereas the SS51 needs a Video and Possibly an audio card right off the bat

  34. Another review.. by rehabdoll · · Score: 4, Informative

    Firingsquad also has a review up.

    http://firingsquad.gamers.com/

  35. Parallel port.. by duckie13 · · Score: 1

    For some time now, I've been very interested in the Shuttle line of PCs, and if they'd just come out with an AMD version of the SS51, I'd most likely buy it (I know, it should happen as it has with the others, so I'll wait).

    My problem is I'd like to use it as an HTPC component. Right now though, it's just going to be just for (legal) emulation purposes. Every time I've gotten to the point of almost buying one, I've stopped because there's no parallel port, and I need one to plug my SNES pad into.

    The AGP port is a definite plus this time around, but there's still no parallel port. However, there's still the PCI slot, so what I'm wondering is has anyone used one of the PCI parallel port cards (and gotten it to work under Linux), and how well did it work?

    --
    "My days are less enjoyable because of people." ~ Johnny the Homicidal Maniac
    1. Re:Parallel port.. by spencerogden · · Score: 1

      Do you love the SNES pad so much that a usb gamepad won't do? I was about to build an adapter for a PS gamepad before I realised I could get a nearly identical usb pad.

    2. Re:Parallel port.. by mccalli · · Score: 2
      Every time I've gotten to the point of almost buying one, I've stopped because there's no parallel port, and I need one to plug my SNES pad into.

      Perhaps these USB to parallel adaptors would help. Bit pricy perhaps - ~$40 for the cheapest there.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    3. Re:Parallel port.. by duckie13 · · Score: 1

      Actually, yes, I do :D

      Nothing beats playing NES / SNES / GB games with an SNES pad. It's worked very smoothly in both Linux and Windows.

      I've tried using a Sidewinder and another gamepad before (I forget which), and neither was even close to working and feeling as nicely as the SNES pad.

      Maybe I'm just a purist.

      --
      "My days are less enjoyable because of people." ~ Johnny the Homicidal Maniac
    4. Re:Parallel port.. by duckie13 · · Score: 1

      Oh damn, I can't believe I didn't think of that..thanks!

      Yes, $40 is a little too pricy for me, but eBay has a ton of them for as low as $5. I just have to double check and see if it'll hook up correctly (I believe the adapter is a male - I can't remember now though). On top of that, it would get me 6 extra feet of controller wire length, which is a definite good thing.

      Thanks for the idea again :D

      --
      "My days are less enjoyable because of people." ~ Johnny the Homicidal Maniac
    5. Re:Parallel port.. by mccalli · · Score: 1
      Oh damn, I can't believe I didn't think of that..thanks!

      No problem - glad it helps. I'm interested too, because I'd need to run a parallel-port dongle off this box (for Cubase).

      Cheers,
      Ian

  36. Not all of us have a surround system. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    Over the years, my computer has replaced more and more of my media systems.

    Why not replace an expensive AC3 decoder with onboard decoding and some external cheap amps? (I'm not saying get a noname amp - I'm saying get a good name amp that is a decade or so old. Sound quality's the same, the only difference is all sorts of doodads you don't need.) Or one of the recent sets of PC speakers designed for use with surround-capable soundcards?

    But as I asked earlier, I wonder what the quality of the onboard audio is. The onboard audio on my Epox EP-8KHA (VIA chipset onboard) is just plain unacceptable for ANY use - HORRENDOUS feedback/squealing.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  37. Want to buy. UK source? by mccalli · · Score: 2
    Seriously, this machine is exactly what I'm looking for.

    Anyone know a UK source, or someone willing to import?

    Cheers,
    Ian

    1. Re:Want to buy. UK source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.overclockers.co.uk sells some of the shuttle models. They don't have this one yet but probably will soon

      http://www.overclockers.co.uk/acatalog/Online_Ca ta logue_Full_Systems_43.html

    2. Re:Want to buy. UK source? by JonS · · Score: 1

      You'll find that in the UK both CCL and Overclockers stock a selection of the current shuttle machines. I suspect they'll be getting this one soon.

  38. PC104 by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

    Anyone here ever heard of PC104(or better still PC104 Plus)? Its a small low power, minimal factor fully modular, fully upgradeable PC solution. Used in industry. But so far the devices onforming are a little too expensive and a little too low spec.

    Have a look at http://www.pc104.org/ or even try http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=PC104 .

    Were there to be sufficient demand, maybe more domestic manufacturers could put boards together with this capability with better specs and more reasonable prices.

    I was originally looking at this as a solution for an extremely high-power robot board.

    --
    OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
    1. Re:PC104 by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      Lets try that again shall we....

      pc104.org and Google PC104 results.

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
    2. Re:PC104 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, lets bring back ISA. Hey, fuckwad, ever hear of PCI Mezzanine?

    3. Re:PC104 by FIRESTORM_v1 · · Score: 1

      Sorry to burst your bubble, PC-104 is designed for embedded systems however the data width is 16 bit much like the ISA slot in older PCs. It is designed for what it is used for, basic bus for I/O controllers, etc. If you are looking for processing power there is a whole slew of embedded PCs that have up to a P-2 266 in them now. This company Advantech
      does a lot with embedded systems. They're a bit pricey, but they have great hardware.

      --
      Partnership for an idiot free America!
    4. Re:PC104 by ReverendRyan · · Score: 1

      If you want somthing higher power, try JDR.com. Their Industrial Components section contains several "One board computers" at speeds up to an 866 PIII and the backplanes to power them (I couldnt find them in the 15 seconds I was looking, but there there).

      PC104 is used in extremely embeded situations where the primary purpose is data relay, logging, etc. Actually, a PC104 stack might suit your needs exactally. Have you thought about writing the onboard control program under DOS? I know DOS is old and antiquated, but it is good for embeding in a low-power computer like the PC104.

      What kind of specs are you looking for? What is this robot going to be doing that requires a 1Ghz+ computer?

      ~Ryan

    5. Re:PC104 by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      PCI104 Plus has a much improved 32bit PCI based bus. architecture. The concept of stackable modules is more my point than the actual specification itself. The range of modules available for PC104 is fairly cool - but like you say it is backwards...

      There are modules which have onboard ATA-100 hdd controllers. Though powering a HDD on an embedded system is not really something I want to do. I would like to have WLAN and a few USB ports available.

      I am talking about creating a roving bot with stereoscopic cams(cheapo lo-res webcams are pretty good - lores is easier to process) to do visial cog stuff with. Hence why I may need 1Ghz+.

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
    6. Re:PC104 by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of using a standard micro atx baord with an inverter - but the power consumption would be a major problem. I have already been working on a linux build for it with USB support and the bare basics - no gui, basic network security(the bot will have the smallest WLAN acces point I can find). It will also require more than one processor board or a very high spec one.

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
  39. Rack Depth by TibbonZero · · Score: 1

    Yea, that's true, you can get small 4 space racks, that are mainly intended for music, that aren't too deep. Sometimes only 12-18 inches deep, which is really cool

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
  40. last page of the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At the very end of the article, it says that next they are producing an nForce2 based mini-system. It indicates that this will include an AGP slot as it mentions the home theatre possibilities of pairing it with an ATI 8500DV.

    1. Re:last page of the article by MsGeek · · Score: 2

      Woooo! That's going to be the ultimate Shuttle bitty box...nForce2-based. The first nForce already has very usable sound onboard and the first decent onboard video of any all-in-one kit.

      This is going to be the LAN party hot setup. Maybe Santa will leave one under the tree this Xmas. ;-)

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  41. Uh-huh, that's probably why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They announced the nForce2 based board they'll have out in a few months. AMD all the way there, with an integrated GeForce4MX

  42. Incomplete Review by Thenomain · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, I found the review a little lacking. It was informative with what was provided and what these things did, in the reasonable benchmark comparisons, but then in the last words mentioned problems with stability without actually mentioning what the problems actually were. Is this usual for their reviews or did I miss something?

    --
    This now concludes our broadcast day.
    1. Re:Incomplete Review by viking099 · · Score: 1

      check here.
      second paragraph from the bottom.
      It talks about some problems installing Win XP and it corrupting a MS Word document.

    2. Re:Incomplete Review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed something.

      You forgot to read the entire article.

      The article CLEARLY states the instability problems they found on their model.

  43. Cooling and Air Pressure by Glass+of+Water · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The single fan in the SS51 pulls air from the inside of the case and exhausts it through the rear vents. Holes in the sides of the case act as cool air intakes that are functional through the low pressure that's created on the inside of the case courtesy of the single exhaust fan.

    As an aside, wouldn't low pressure air absorb less heat? Wouldn't it be better to direct the airflow in, thus having the pressure be higher at the heat sink?

    Then, of course, you'd be blowing hot air around the inside of the computer case. Still... anyone have some actual knowledge to drop on this subject?

    -jim

    --
    There are no trolls. There are no trees out here.
  44. What's missing ... by Greedo · · Score: 1

    It looks like they've lost the onboard S-video output. That was a cool feature for anyone who wanted to turn one of these boxes into a PVR or something similar.

    Sure, you can get AGP cards with S-video, but if you're not doing for hardcore gaming, it looks like that's one more thing to have to buy now.

    Mapping the audio outputs is nice though.

    Also, it looks (from the photos on their site) like the case is getting slightly bigger in the newer models. Soon we'll have a (gasp) mini-tower again!

    --
    "There has grown in the minds of certain groups in this country the idea that just because a man or corporation has made a profit out of the public for a number of years, the government and the courts are charged with guaranteeing such profit in the future, even in the face of changing circumstances and contrary to public interest. This strange doctrine is supported by neither statue or common law. Neither corporations or individuals have the right to come into court and ask that the clock of history be stopped, or turned back."

    - Robert Heinlein, Life Line, 1939

    --
    Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    1. Re:What's missing ... by ocbwilg · · Score: 2

      Also, it looks (from the photos on their site) like the case is getting slightly bigger in the newer models. Soon we'll have a (gasp) mini-tower again!

      It isn't really bigger than the old ones. From the article:

      The chassis is about 8" wide, 5" tall and 11.5" deep (20.32 x 12.7 x 29.21 cm), making it around the size of a toaster but not quite as small as Apple's PowerMac G4 Cube.

      There is a small photo at the top left of each page of the review that makes it look like it's much taller than it really is, but that's only because for some reason they stretched the image vertically.

  45. Different review... slashdot em to death by theendlessnow · · Score: 1

    bye, bye viahardware.com
    Hope they're not running on an SS51!

  46. Graphics for the Shuttle SS50? by OmniGeek · · Score: 2

    I bought a Shuttle SS50 this month (gee, if I'd waited, I could have gotten an AGP slot...). Nice system, runs a bit hot, I wonder if the SS51 heat pipe can be retrofitted.

    However, I would like to put a PCI graphics accelerator in it for LAN gaming. Question is, what's a good midrange PCI 3D card for this purpose? GeForce cards are out of the picture 'cause the reviewers point out that this chipset is too data-transfer-intensive to work well over a PCI bus. Suggestions, anyone? JPriest, what card did you use, and how much did it improve things? (Seems to me the internal on-board video's faster data path might reduce its slowness relative to a PCI plugin card, but I might be wrong...)

    --

    "My strength is as the strength of ten men, for I am wired to the eyeballs on espresso."
    1. Re:Graphics for the Shuttle SS50? by soupforare · · Score: 1

      It really depends on what you're playing and how much you're willing to tinker
      I *still* use a Matrox G400 in my main machine. I love the image quality, and with the newest drivers and some overclocking I get good framerates.
      IIRC, the SS50 uses a Savage4. This is a great chipset that has horrible drivers. If your running win9*, you can get it to work nice. Especially in UT with MeTaL and the S3TC textures. It works well in HL games, too.
      If you're running 2k or xp, gods help you because when I had a savage the drivers for them were really really poor.

      --
      --- Do you believe in the day?
    2. Re:Graphics for the Shuttle SS50? by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1
      GeForce cards are out of the picture 'cause the reviewers point out that this chipset is too data-transfer-intensive to work well over a PCI bus.

      I know that there were PCI GeForce2 MX versions. I have seen some in shops, unfortunately they are virtually unfindable nowadays. I'd really like to have one to put it in one of my workstations that has no AGP slot.
      Besides: good luck finding *any* PCI graphics card these days.

    3. Re:Graphics for the Shuttle SS50? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have seen Visiontek GF4MX PCI cards at Best Buy. A PCI MX card isn't uncommon but I doubt you'll find a PCI Ti4xxx card.

    4. Re:Graphics for the Shuttle SS50? by repetty · · Score: 1

      A this moment, there's a good selection of PCI video cards to choose from. Go to Fry's.

  47. Wanted - by bryanp · · Score: 1

    A case that looks like it belongs in an entertainment center. Preferably with standard ports in the back and extra port connections for firewire & USB 2 behind flip covers on the front.

    Case should be able to accept most any motherboard and give me vertical slots in the back.

    Minimum of 2 5.25" bays up front. No 3.5" needed.

    Should be able to accept large PSU's.

    Try to engineer the case to be as quiet as possible.

    No stupid bright LED's on the front. If I'm going to use it to play games or watch movies & play MP3's I don't want the lights to distract me when I turn off the overheads.

    --
    "An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." Col. Jeff Cooper
    1. Re:Wanted - by lostindenver · · Score: 1

      Rack mounted 2-4u case works for me.

    2. Re:Wanted - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Wanted - by NachtVorst · · Score: 1

      Seems you're looking for this

      It's Cooler Master's ATC-600, pretty expensive, but it looks neat, though I would prefer a black one (some paint will do I guess..). On the same page is a link to a similar case by Lian Li, which is cheaper.

      NachtVorst

  48. USB Printers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think their idea is to get away from larger connectors and become more slim line. If you can afford to get a beefy SFF box then I think you can afford a USB printer.

  49. Pressure difference is insignificant by OmniGeek · · Score: 2

    The difference in density of the cooling air due to the pressure rise or drop across the fan is utterly negligible in terms of heat capacity per unit volume, and may well be swamped by the results of heating of the air by the CPU heatsink (in those cases where the air path goes that way; the SS51 doesn't do that.)

    The pressure across the fan is way less than 0.1 PSI, compared to 14 PSI ambient pressure at sea level, so a crude analysis would say the effect is way less than 0.5%, most likely hundreds of times less.

    If you pass the air across the CPU first and then through the power supply as in the SS50, you likely get hotter PS temperatures 'cause the temp difference is lower, reducing the amount of heat transfer until the PS heats up more.)

    --

    "My strength is as the strength of ten men, for I am wired to the eyeballs on espresso."
  50. And I couldn't care less about it by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

    I mean, Printer port? Gimmie a break. They should have just gone ahead and lost the PS/2's for the mouse AND the Serial ports while they were at it. For that matter I'd like to see one of these without the plate for a floppy and with a cover for the CDROM bay that kept the front panel looking nice. Kind of like the CDROM drive door on the PowerMac. That would have been really nice.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  51. Nifty design, but not that quiet by koreth · · Score: 4, Informative
    Three cheers to Shuttle for taking noise into account in their design, but I hardly think it's reasonable to describe 51dB as "near-silent" like the review does. With careful selection of components and some custom tweaks (replacing power supply fans, etc.) it's not too outrageously difficult to get a reasonably powered PC in the mid-30dB range. My desktop PC is about 35dB and it's still louder than I'd like.

    If you're willing to go with water cooling or something like the CALM System's evaporative cooling, you can get even quieter than that. Or you can do what I did and run cables under the floor so you can put the thing in a closet and shut the door.

    Yahoo's Silent-PC list and AVS Forum have lots of good info on building PCs a lot quieter than the new Shuttle.

    But not as tiny!

  52. Total power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The 200W power supply delivers 10A on the +12V and 20A on the +5V rails."

    10A * 12V + 20A * 5V = 220W

    Can someone explain?

  53. Is the SS51 The Next Big Thing ?? by green+pizza · · Score: 2

    All of my coworkers are excited about the SS51, I have a feeling it's going to be a huge seller... perhaps even one of the best selling pieces of PC kit this year. I wouldn't be too surprised if, over the next six months or so, we start seeing this little wonder popping up all over the place... offices, retail point-of-sale, on sitcom sets, etc.

    In a related note, I'm curious about the "optional parallel port"... is it nothing more than a USB adapter? I would love a real parallel port as I perfer parallel for printers.

  54. Yup, the SS50 does look cool. by OmniGeek · · Score: 2

    IMHO, better'n the SS51. A brushed aluminum cube looks spiffier to me than the same with a clear plastic faceplate tacked on.

    --

    "My strength is as the strength of ten men, for I am wired to the eyeballs on espresso."
  55. Thanks. Good to know by OmniGeek · · Score: 2

    I run Win98 SE on mine (amazingly, I was still able to buy a copy), Win2K is a bit more resource-hungry IIRC, and XP is *not* to come into my house or it'll get shot on sight. If this weren't a LAN-party box, I'd have it dual-booting Mandrake. HL/CS, Operation Flashpoint (great game, BTW) and StarCraft are the major uses for it, and it seems to do all right in terms of frame rate, though testing is still in progress...

    73 de N1XNX

    --

    "My strength is as the strength of ten men, for I am wired to the eyeballs on espresso."
  56. This is a legit question! Not troll! by FIRESTORM_v1 · · Score: 1

    Why is this a troll? I am legitimately interested in this device's operations under Linux. As such this is a legitimate question. Although I didn't post this question I am considering getting one in my Linux-only shop and since I don't have any windows software in my house this is a significant concern.

    --
    Partnership for an idiot free America!
    1. Re:This is a legit question! Not troll! by Matt_Bennett · · Score: 2

      I'm running a SS50 right now, and it runs Linux fine- The biggest problem is the video is an SIS part that is not fully supported under linux- they won't release their IP. There is one page that has some details on what it takes to get it going (code and so-forth) but it's not simple- it takes a bit of work.

      I like my ss50 a lot- a little pricey for a barebones system, but it is relatively quiet, and has been running without a hitch for a couple weeks now. The only thing I'm really missing at this point is a decent way to monitor the temperature sensors and fan speed under linux- I haven't had much luck with the lm-sensors package.

  57. Differing definitions of "good" by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Thanks for your input. If it's comparable to any SB, then it's pretty good for an onboard sound chipset. Not that I'm saying SB is better than most - Even super-cheapie Yamaha chipset cards are "acceptable", i.e. I can't tell the difference for gaming/home multimedia use.

    My definition of "bad" is the onboard audio on VIA KT266 chipsets, such as my Epox EP-8KHA. It SUCKS. It has this obscenely loud high-pitched squealing that gives you a splitting headache on 1-2 minutes flat. Needless to say, I'm now VERY wary of onboard audio solutions.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  58. This is an advertisement not a review by wormbin · · Score: 1

    When an author who works for a company describes the features of a product from that company it's called an advertisement not a review.

    Yes, still think the product is damn cool.

  59. Quit whining about the Parallel port by melstav · · Score: 1

    Look at the photo of the backside in the review. See the removable plate just above the main system fan that looks like it'd accomodate a DB-25 connector quite nicely?

    And if you look closely at the picture of the motherboard (or look at the specs on shuttle's website) you'll find that SURPRISE! the header for the parallel port is still on the board.

    If it's that important to you to have a parallel port then, by all means, spend the $5 to buy an add-on parallel port with a cable long enough to reach. The case is only 5 inches tall, and the cutout is directly above the header.

    I mean, really, if you're going to pay ~$300 for the case and motherboard combo, plus the cost of everything you're planning on putting on the board or in the drive bays, what's an extra $5??

    Sheesh.

  60. How so? by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

    I fail to see the reason Macs are gay. Now granted the "Flower Power" model was less masculine than one would want but overall I find my Quicksilver to be pretty much inconsequential to my sexual preferences.

    Could be you are meaning that the Mac itself is gay. I have seen no proof of this to date. Not once in the year I have owned the Mac have I come into my computer room to find my Quicksilver mounting my Beige G3 in sweaty, hairy arousal.

    On the other hand my wife has a Toshiba laptop that came with XP on it and I'm pretty sure it smokes ass when no one is around.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    1. Re:How so? by The+Rogue86 · · Score: 0

      not to be a nitpicky asshole but ummm where do i say mac's are gay? i only see the "small and weirdlooking" comment.....

      --
      This is how you know you're a geek the power goes out and you are unemployed and unemployable. Yes I know I can't spell
    2. Re:How so? by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      Oh you weren't being a nitpicking asshole at all. I was replying to one of the replies to your post. The one who stated that Macs were gay.

      Simple miscommunication. Imagine that happening on Slashdot? Who would have thunk it could happen?

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  61. Re:Need AMD version... it's coming! by frankie · · Score: 2
    awaiting a version with AGP for AMD

    Wait another couple months. The SN40 is coming. It's based on the nForce2 chipset, but otherwise expect similar specs to the SS51.

    SN40 is probably the machine that will get me to switch my home computer from PPC to x86.
  62. How's this for confirmation? by nesthigh · · Score: 1
    I was primarily mentioning the SN40 as a P4 alternative, but here in the last paragraph.

    "With an AGP slot, this is the perfect small LAN box, and the onboard video looks to be shaping up well too."

    Also, FWIW, I've read that a shuttlegroup employee said that the SS40g was their last SFF box without AGP.

    next

  63. Another review... by Polo · · Score: 2

    Here is another review by Thresh's Firingsquad.

  64. Need at least 2 5.25" bays by GodWasAnAlien · · Score: 1

    The case is big enough to put in 2 bays.
    I have not owned a floppy drive or floppy in years. But I do have several DVD/CDRW/DVD+RW drives.

    Please, all that I really need is a VCR sized case with two 5.25 bays.

    1. Re:Need at least 2 5.25" bays by Emil+Brink · · Score: 2

      One thing: Lian Li PC-9300, perhaps? No idea about availability, I sure haven't seen it around these parts yet, but... Check out the other similar case mentioned in the review, too, perhaps. And start reading Dan's stuff, and give him plenty of donations so I don't have to. Thank you. ;^)

      --
      main(O){10<putchar(4^--O?77-(15&5128 >>4*O):10)&&main(2+O);}
  65. USB Dongles by Thag · · Score: 2

    Hardware keys are available in USB flavors too.

    Jon Acheson

    --
    All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
  66. INTERESTING READ: by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    all the comments of the crew before and during launch:

    http://spacelink.nasa.gov/NASA.Projects/Human.Ex pl oration.and.Development.of.Space/Human.Space.Fligh t/Shuttle/Shuttle.Missions/Flight.025.STS-51-L/STS -51-L.Transcript.and.History

    last comments:

    T+1:10............CDR Roger, go at throttle up.
    (NASA: SSME at 104 percent.

    T+1:13............PLT Uhoh.

    T+1:13.......................LOSS OF ALL DATA.

  67. Small form factor PC sans the bells and whistles? by KmArT · · Score: 1

    I've looked at small form factor PC's like this before and while it might be great that they added an AGP slot for those that use these machines for LAN parties or as their primary desktop, I'd actually like something similar, sans all the bells and whistles. Basically, I'm looking for something that has two PCI slots so I can install a quad-port ethernet card and a wireless card and run OpenBSD on it and use it as a firewall. Methinks the console is going to look that same, whether the bus is 4X AGP or even a serial console for that matter :)

    So all I really need is mouse/keyboard + ethernet + serial + 2 PCI slots. I could actually get away with only the serial port and 2 PCI slots, using that as a console and using the quad-port card for network connections but I like to have a physically separate network jack that sort of matches the logical layout of the network so I'd like onboard ethernet.

    Does anyone have any recommendations for a PC like this? A Pentium running at a decent speed would work fine for a firewall - the problem is no one was making small form factor PCs like this when the Pentium was around. Maybe I need to look at embedded solutions as well - it just pains me to have a big clunky Dell Optiplex as my firewall when I could get away with a quarter of the shelf space but it also pains me to have to buy a machine with an AGP slot, when all I want is 80x24 text graphics...

  68. 3x2=6 by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    Simlple - Each port has 2 channels (Stereo)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:3x2=6 by Jhan · · Score: 1

      Doh. I'm an idiot. (+1 Insightful)

      --

      I choose to remain celibate, like my father and his father before him.

  69. it exists - ss40G by levl289 · · Score: 1

    Shuttle's XPC for AMD

    --

    Q: What do you think about American Culture?
    A: I think it's a good idea.
    (adapted from Gandhi)

    1. Re:it exists - ss40G by Junta · · Score: 2

      No AGP slot though, which is what I need for my ideal system. It is in the works, however, as other posts have pointed out...

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  70. Read the entire article (Re:Need AMD version...) by bryanp · · Score: 1
    From the very end of the review -

    What's up next from Shuttle? An nForce2 based XPC; if paired up with a All-in-Wonder Radeon 8500DV (or maybe even the R300 version) we'd have one killer Home Theater PC on our hands with that one...

    --
    "An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." Col. Jeff Cooper
  71. Re:Small form factor PC sans the bells and whistle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They make one that uses AMD Athlon processors and has two PCI slots. There's a review at Tom's Hardware.
    http://www.tomshardware.com/howto/02q3/ 020710/inde x.html

  72. Do-it-yourself for the rest of us? by hoggoth · · Score: 2

    I want a Shuttle SS51. It's exactly what I need for my "living room" PC. (I like the P4 > AMD for it's better heat handling)

    But unlike many Slashdot readers I have no clue what parts to get to flesh out a barebones system.

    If I ordered the SS51, what do I do next?
    Are there some good FAQs for building your own system?

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  73. this one is 17" deep. Too much for avg entert. ctr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If putting a case in an entertainment center, tailer is ok, but deeper than 15" r so is too much.

  74. Re:Small form factor PC sans the bells and whistle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should have a look at http://www.shuttleonline.com, ths ss51 is their first mini case with AGP, the previous all have 2 PCI -- just what you asked for, and cheap (you can even get a PIII case).

    Hope this helps.