Slashdot Mirror


TheKompany Releases DivX Software For Zaurus

An anonymous reader writes: "InfoSync has an article on DivX for the Zaurus. Finally, you can watch movies on the go!" Between this and theKompany's ogg player, the Zaurus looks cool. It's a little chunkier perhaps, but another reader points out that Archos is now taking pre-orders for its do-everything Jukebox Multimedia device, which might be another option for those seeking a portable anything box.

148 comments

  1. good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lord

  2. Of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, you can only see TRAILERS for movies with this thing because of the size (regardless of being in DiVX compression). Any what kind of FPS and resolution do these things have?

    Just because I have linux installed on my toilet and can run movies does NOT make it newsworthy!!!

    1. Re:Of course... by wastedbrains · · Score: 1

      A compact flash card on a zarous could hold about 2 full movies with good compression. I have a 320 mb card and could easily fit 2 movies. Hence not just for trailers who woould watch trailers. GRRRRRRRR i dislike you evil man.

      --
      Dan Mayer: my blog, essays, art, etc
    2. Re:Of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What brand card? I'd like to get one of those...

    3. Re:Of course... by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

      You can find them in Circuit City. They're those $120 ones everyone can afford. You know, unless they've got this thing about spending $120 on something that holds less than .3% of what the larger versions of storage will hold for the same price.

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    4. Re:Of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can watch movies from a file server over samba over 802.11.

    5. Re:Of course... by DaWorm · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't even pay for it for $15 no matter how many features it has. I'd wait for the new Opie player. tkc apps are nice, but some of them, I believe are overpriced.

      --
      Alea jacta est!
  3. A Little More About the Zaurus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HAABA HAABA HOO!

  4. link for archos mulitmedia gadget preorder.... by remou · · Score: 1
  5. OpenDivX for Zaurus by red_gnom · · Score: 1, Informative
    1. Re:OpenDivX for Zaurus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Quit modding this up...it's just a link to a board that talks about getting together to start programming a player. Nobody is interested in it and then they post to the link that's mentioned in the Slashdot story...dumb moderators...

    2. Re:OpenDivX for Zaurus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you are not interested in such a development. I would bet there are some Slashdot readers who might, so the forum exists. There may be some small change to OpenDivX required to make it happened.

  6. Hrm by psypete · · Score: 1

    i never did get why a divx player wasnt ported from any other linux project. i don't know much about the Zaurus, but it should be able to handle a standard X app, shouldn't it? If not, it uses java, right? Wouldn't it be technically possible to write a divx player in java? Either way, we shouldn't be charging for this shit. Just look to DCDivX for an example of an embedded dreamcast player.

    1. Re:Hrm by psypete · · Score: 1

      Agh. DivX player, not dreamcast. DCDivX = divx player for dreamcast. that coupled with the dreamcast story recently got me confused. plus i'm a moron.

    2. Re:Hrm by NorthDude · · Score: 2

      The Zaurus run Linux and java...
      Heres's a spec pages:
      Zaurus
      Also, the "dev" version have only 32meg of ram instead of 64

      --


      I'd rather be sailing...
    3. Re:Hrm by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 1

      Either way, we shouldn't be charging for this shit.

      Why not? Software coders are not worth paying? Good projects not worth supporting? When you say 'we shouldn't be charging..." DO you imply that you were a contributing developer or a user who somehow feels you should decide the business model?

    4. Re:Hrm by pantherace · · Score: 1
      I have ported mplayer (mostly a recompile with some mucking around, I didn't do much hard work.) admittedly not everything worked out and I am still working on a nice little qt gui

      The reason most won't work is because the Z uses a framebuffer and Qtopia (Qt embedded).

    5. Re:Hrm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Users DO determine business models. If the business model sucks, the users don't pay and the company dies. If you don't like that, move back to your parents' basement.

    6. Re:Hrm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why not just use the existing mplayer -gui ? but no!, thats not qt, fucken qt purist.

    7. Re:Hrm by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 1

      Well, I hate MS's business model but I have an MCSE because it fills my wallet nicely. Users have an impact on business models to be sure, you make a valid point. However, corporate boards, stockholders, project leaders or managers, owners etc... determine the business model. My point is that to gripe that someone charges money for there lifes labor is a bit unappreciative (read that majorly). We can't all be Stallman (who thinks he makes no money BTW?)

      move back to your parents' basement

      Wouldn't that make you homeless

    8. Re:Hrm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the Zaurus does run Java Personal Edition, but not X (at least not out of the box). It runs Qtopia's QPE environment, so it's not necessarily trivial to port X11 apps over

    9. Re:Hrm by pantherace · · Score: 1
      prob a waste of time, as likely no one will read this, but...

      the reason the current gui wouldn't be practical (ignoring screen size etc) is that it requires GTK. the windowing system on the zaurus is based on Qt/framebuffer, and even if GTK would work (I believe it could be kludged into working), it would use a significant amount of space for the libraries. it isn't practical unless you are an uber-geek who wants to for the sake of it.

  7. next up... by taernim · · Score: 1

    Kazaa for PDAs?
    Only problem is HD size.. if a DIVX movie is huge, seems like you can't fit very much on one small PDA...

    --
    "PC Load Letter? What the $@#% does that mean?!"
    1. Re:next up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wi-fi card then a NFS mount.

    2. Re:next up... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "If a DIVX movie is huge, seems like you can't fit very much on one small PDA..."

      Point taken. But there was a time when you couldn't copy a CD onto a hard drive...

    3. Re:next up... by taernim · · Score: 1

      I suppose so, but my comment was pointing out that the usefulness of DiVX usability on a PDA will only truly become worthwhile when you CAN fit more than 1 movie on it.

      After all, would you buy an mp3 player that only held 2 songs?

      --
      "PC Load Letter? What the $@#% does that mean?!"
    4. Re:next up... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      Well, just to play Devil's Advocate, what about wireless?

      I set up a 'media server' at home which is essentially a Windows 2000 box converted into a TiVo. It captures TV at 330kbits to Windows Media 8 format that PC's, PocketPC's, and Macs can support. Eventually I'll set up a wireless network so that I can roam around with the laptop and watch video straight off that machine.

      Concievably, a PocketPC would be able to do it via 802.11 as well. Unfortunately, I need a titch more processing power. A 206mhz iPaq can handle the video at 15 FPS, but not at 30. When the XScale PocketPc's come out (if they haven't already), I should be able to do just that.

      Okay, I won't be watching a movie/TV at a restaruant, but any computer in my apartment would be have video on demand. I'm about $200 away from getting that working right now.

  8. Chunkier? by dmorin · · Score: 3, Informative

    Ummm...let's not forget that it has a builtin compact flash and SD slot in that footprint, shall we? How big do the other guys get when you add the special sleeves and adapters to do that? Not to mention the integrated keyboard.

    1. Re:Chunkier? by nuzoo · · Score: 1

      Actually, the "chunkier" was referring to the Archos box, not the Zaurus.

  9. Playlist in picture by scott1853 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I saw bourne-identity listed in the playlist on the picture. Has this movie been released on DVD yet?

    1. Re:Playlist in picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trailer of course ;)

    2. Re:Playlist in picture by JabberWokky · · Score: 5, Funny
      All it is is a camcorder pointed at a bash prompt and a guy typing "who am i". Bourne Identity.

      --
      Evan "A bun is the lowest form of bread, and a pun is the lowest form of humor"

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    3. Re:Playlist in picture by ywwg · · Score: 2

      I think they are all trailers

  10. Someone needs to think of the long-term effects by krog · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It seems like everyone in the world, particularly the US and Japan, is looking towards more and more sensory overload for happiness. I mean, seriously, do we need a cell phone, PDA, pager, and a DivX player all vying for our attention every moment of our day? Will this make us any happier, or will it push us further into becoming the attention-less, cynical pricks we silently feel ourselves becoming?

    All these stimuli are really going to do a number on us in the long run, mark my words. I fear for two generations from now, who will grow up in a world of stimulation we can't even currently dream of.

    1. Re:Someone needs to think of the long-term effects by maxume · · Score: 1

      I'm may be becoming a attention-less cynical prick, but I plan on screaming every step of the way. That way, some other people may be able to save themselves from the tragedy of my fate...

      But then, I have less and less interest in shiny things, so maybe I'm not becoming attention-less. I am certainly a cynical prick(or worse), but then, I don't like that, so I tend to try to do things that go against that trend.

      And about stimulation 'we can't even dream of' -- Dreams are usually a pretty stimulating experience for me. Seriously.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Someone needs to think of the long-term effects by Matey-O · · Score: 2
      or will it push us further into becoming the attention-less, cynical pricks we silently feel ourselves becoming?
      I am NOT a prick, you dickhead! :P

      It just means there will be more and more features the buying public won't use.

      The wife's got the same uber cool J2ME LG flipphone I've got, with the web browsing and the funky ringtones.

      Short of changing the ringtone to Monty Python, she barely knows (or cares) how to more than answer and call-out.

      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    3. Re:Someone needs to think of the long-term effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Sensory overload: sex with three supermodels while on LSD with the London Philharmonic playing "Favorite Selections from Brahms" while watching a 3D screening of StarWars episode VIII in full sensurround THX sound on a computer controlled hydraulically actuated platform.

      Actually the ultimate experience was prefigured in the "total perspective vortex", which few survived with intact sanity, altho it's better than CNN.

    4. Re:Someone needs to think of the long-term effects by DdJ · · Score: 1
      Will this make us any happier, or will it push us further into becoming the attention-less, cynical pricks we silently feel ourselves becoming?
      You talk like those are mutually exclusive...
    5. Re:Someone needs to think of the long-term effects by rw2 · · Score: 2

      All these stimuli are really going to do a number on us in the long run, mark my words.

      Pffft!

      That's what the luddites used to say about radio too.

    6. Re:Someone needs to think of the long-term effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It seems like everyone in the world, particularly the US and Japan, is looking towards more and more sensory overload for happiness. I mean, seriously, do we need a cell phone, PDA, pager, and a DivX player all vying for our attention every moment of our day? Will this make us any happier, or will it push us further into becoming the attention-less, cynical pricks we silently feel ourselves becoming?

      All these stimuli are really going to do a number on us in the long run, mark my words. I fear for two generations from now, who will grow up in a world of stimulation we can't even currently dream of.

      I think you're absolutely right. We're using more and more technology to busy our minds so we don't have to dwell on the gnawing emptiness in our souls. All these electronic gadgets playing their video and music drowns out the voice of God who is calling to each one of us to accept his gift of salv-- ooh! The Lord of the Rings DVD is out! Right on!!!

  11. The Kompany? by jsonmez · · Score: 0, Troll

    Anyone who names thier company The Kompany should be dragged out into the street and shot.

    1. Re:The Kompany? by Rhombus · · Score: 1

      Anyone who misspells 'their' should be dragged out into the street and shot.

    2. Re:The Kompany? by eyepeepackets · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      Anyone who thinks people should be dragged out into the street and shot should be dragged out into the street and shot.

      Yikes, that's me too! Let me rephrase that....

      --
      Everything in the Universe sucks: It's the law!
    3. Re:The Kompany? by jsonmez · · Score: 1

      I spelled it correctly, then changed it back to the way I like to spell it, because I realized, that I don't need to conform to the traditional spellings of the work thier. But yes, I agree I should be dragged out into the street and shot.

    4. Re:The Kompany? by Jippy_ · · Score: 1
      What's the deal with purposeful misspellings of tech companies lately? Just a few days ago was that story of that Canadian dude getting busted modding PS2's whose company name was "Kustum Komputers".

      Shudder.. I hope this is not a trend..

      =-Jippy

    5. Re:The Kompany? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it looks "classy"!

      Spelling c-words with a "k" is always a sign of quality, and calling your company "kompany" is also very clever!

    6. Re:The Kompany? by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      What's the deal with purposeful misspellings of tech companies lately?

      I didn't realize that Krispy Kreme was a tech company.

      But then, I eat at Tim Horton's.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    7. Re:The Kompany? by AKA+da+JET · · Score: 1

      It's been a trend for awhile. Remember "Mortal Kombat? Around where I live there are a bunch of "Kwik Kar Wash"es. Then again, thats nothing compared to the "1337 H4x0rZ" out there. :P

    8. Re:The Kompany? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how's this showing up as a troll and given a score of 2???

    9. Re:The Kompany? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. Amusing moderations on that one.

      Of the three, I'm most inclined to agree with "Insightful"

      To those who don't understand why his comment was insightful - There was this group in the Southern United States back in the '50s and '60s that really liked to replace the C at the beginning of every word starting with a C with a K... They also liked to burn churches and beat people simply because they were black. So a name like "The Kompany" has VERY negative connotations with those who know American history.

    10. Re:The Kompany? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't need to conform to the traditional spellings of the work thier.

      You misspelled "tier".

    11. Re:The Kompany? by ivan256 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't know about The Kompany in particular, but usually it has to do with guaranteeing trademarkability of your name. Anything that is sufficiently arbitrary is trademarkable, so the idea is to come up with something that is arbitrary enough to be undisputably trademarkeable, and at the same time try to create an association with something specific in the mind of the person reading it.

      I took some intellectual property law classes when I was still in school in hopes that it would help me know what to steer clear of when working with open source, and software in general. One week our homework every night was to come up with 10 company or product names that were sufficiently arbitrary to be trademarkeable, yet still understandable. We then spent the class time that week trying to "overturn" the other student's trademarks. $1900 in credits well spent. (Well, it was better then the environmental law class. I don't know what I was thinking taking that one.)

    12. Re:The Kompany? by jsonmez · · Score: 1

      Actually I mispelled the word "word" as "work"

    13. Re:The Kompany? by edwdig · · Score: 2

      It could be worse. There used to be a software company called The Company. Imagine what legal contracts with them looked like.

    14. Re:The Kompany? by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 1

      Spelling c-words with a "k" is always a sign of quality, and calling your company "kompany" is also very clever!

      Don't you mean Klassy and Klever? What about Kwality?

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    15. Re:The Kompany? by gehrehmee · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Get a grip man!

      Death to all extremists!

      --
      "You know, Hobbes, some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help" -- Calvin
    16. Re:The Kompany? by Bill+Kendrick · · Score: 2

      Uh... didn't The Kompany really start out focusing on KDE? Hence the _K_? :^P

    17. Re:The Kompany? by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      There used to be a software company called The Company. Imagine what legal contracts with them looked like.

      Something like this:

      Groucho: Now pay particular attention to this first clause, because it's most important. There's the party of the first part shall be known in this contract as the party of the first part. How do you like that, that's pretty neat eh?

      Chico: No, that's no good.

      Groucho: What's the matter with it?

      Chico: I don't know, let's hear it again.

      Groucho: So the party of the first part shall be known in this contract as the party of the first part.

      Chico: Well it sounds a little better this time.

      Groucho: Well, it grows on you. Would you like to hear it once more?

      Chico: Just the first part.

      Groucho: What do you mean, the party of the first part?

      Chico: No, the first part of the party of the first part.

      Groucho: All right. It says the first part of the party of the first part shall be known in this contract as the first part of the party of the first part, shall be known in this contract - look, why should we quarrel about a thing like this, we'll take it right out, eh? [rip]

      Chico: Yes, it's too long anyhow. Now what have we got left?

      Groucho: Well I've got about a foot and a half.

      Groucho: Now what's the matter?

      Chico: I don't like the second part either. Hey look, why can't the first part of the second party be the second part of the first party, then you've got something.

      Groucho: Well look, rather than go through all that again, what do you say?

      Chico: Fine. [rip]

      Groucho: Now I've got something here you're bound to like, you'll be crazy about it.

      Chico: No, I don't like it.

      Groucho: You don't like what?

      Chico: Whatever it is, I don't like it.

      Groucho: Well don't let's break up an old friendship over a thing like that. Ready?

      Chico: OK. [rip] Now the next part I don't think you're going to like.

      Groucho: Well your word's good enough for me. [rip] Now then, is my word good enough for you?

      Chico: I should say not.

      Groucho: Well I'll take out two more clauses. [rip][rip] Now the party of the eighth part --

      Chico: No, that's no good, no.

      Groucho: [rip]The party of the ninth part --

      Chico: No, that's no good too. Hey, how is it my contract is skinnier than yours?

      Groucho: Well, I don't know, you must have been out on a tail last night. But anyhow, we're all set now, are we? Now just you put your name right down there, then the deal is legal.

      Chico: I forgot to tell you, I can't write.

      Groucho: Well that's all right, there's no ink in the pen anyhow. But listen, it's a contract isn't it? We've got a contract, no matter how small it is.

      Chico: Oh sure. You bet.

    18. Re:The Kompany? by big+tex · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they did.
      Actually, it makes sense for them (a bunch of KDE developers) to write stuff for the Zarus, since it runs QT/Embedded.
      Easy way to branch into a new market, it seems.

      --
      I think I need a new sig here.
    19. Re:The Kompany? by GoRK · · Score: 2

      Yes. And writing apps for QT/E is very similar to writing apps for KDE. Same widgets, same languages, etc.

      ~GoRK

  12. Saleman by Zapdos · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is just the thing for a small portable sales demo tool. It has one of the best screens.

  13. Storage ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Let's see - the Zaurus offers 32megs of storage. Extend that to 256 if you buy an expensive CF card. That's nothing compared to the 700 megs of a typical DivX movie.

    Now, if you really want to watch movies on your Zaurus during a flight, you'll have to export nfs shares from your laptop, and have the zaurus connect to it (everything on top of 802.11b, that's cooler that way).

    Apart from watching pr0n during a meeting/flight, what is the point ?

    1. Re:Storage ? by tube013 · · Score: 2

      if you you use DivX (mpeg4) like it is supposed to and drop the bit rate down, and incode it for the size of the zaurus's screen you should be able to fit about an hour of video onto a 128mb card.

    2. Re:Storage ? by march · · Score: 1

      The Zaurus offers 32megs of storage

      SL-5000D (developer's version) was 32mb.

      The commercial version, the SL-5500 is 64mb.

    3. Re:Storage ? by docbrown42 · · Score: 1

      Apart from watching pr0n during a meeting/flight, what is the point ?

      Do you really need another reason? :)

      -Ed

      docbrown.net
      Graphic Design, Web Design, Role-Playing Games...all the good stuff

      --
      Ed Wedig
      Graphic design services
      docbrown.net
    4. Re:Storage ? by Loligo · · Score: 2

      >Extend that to 256 if you buy an expensive CF
      >card.

      $100 is "an expensive CF card"?

      I guess when you consider the Zaurus itself is $400ish, it could be considered expensive, but...

      -l

    5. Re:Storage ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it is 32mb of storage. 32 mb of that 64mb goes towards running your apps. The SL-5000D is something like 6mb for storage

    6. Re:Storage ? by sracer · · Score: 1
      Just to clarify a few points:

      256MB CF cards can be purchased online for $80 USD (that includes shipping). Not expensive at all.

      Although typical DivX movies are 700MB, those are formatted for desktop PC use. If they are reformatted for a PDA screen, those 700MB films will easily fit in 100MB. ( I know, because I regularly re-encode my films for viewing on my Casio BE-300, and a 2 hour film is only 90MB)

      As for uses, it is like any other media. If reading an eBook or listening to an MP3 is "useful", then so will watching video.

    7. Re:Storage ? by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 1

      Apart from watching pr0n during a meeting/flight, what is the point ?

      pr0n was one of the big driving forces of the internet IMHO. So, what more justification could you need? :-)

    8. Re:Storage ? by march · · Score: 1

      Well, true, in the "default" configuration and with your definition of "storage". But it is linux... My 5000D has 32mb of storage (like 28 or so in reality).

    9. Re:Storage ? by bobKali · · Score: 1

      Actually I've seen 1GB CF cards on the market - pleanty of room for a divx movie.

      Course they're running about $600-$700 from what I remember.

    10. Re:Storage ? by noda132 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, but nowadays they're most likely to be Microdrives, which actually have platters and spin and suck your battery's life out. It'd be a race between which is finished first, the movie or the battery.

      256 is *plenty* for a divx movie. Converting 640x480 to 320x240 already knocks a 700MB movie down to 175MB, no more compression required.

    11. Re:Storage ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what 802.11b and network mounted drives are for :-)

    12. Re:Storage ? by TummyX · · Score: 1

      Um. The typical 700MB DivX movie has a higher resolution than the handhelds (around 570x280). Compressing the movie to 200x100 (or thereabouts) would result in a much smaller file that wouldn't look any worse on a tiny screen.

  14. that screen is a joke by remou · · Score: 1

    mmmhhhh, just checked out the
    specs a bit and this thing
    features a ridiculous 1.5"
    237 x 234 pixels screen....

    that thing should have a
    800x600 minimum resolution
    screen taking up the whole
    back, so it could be used
    as a portable picture book
    as well...

    chees 1.5", my digicam has a
    bigger one....

  15. YHBT (n/t) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t = no text.

  16. My sincere thoughts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No to troll, but isn't theKompany offering commercial closed-source solutions as well? Every fucker goes and support their OSS movement, like you, the luser (Linux user, not offending). I'm sure they have been funding the OSS movement big time, just their funding is internal only...

    Ha, what you expect though, a luser will always be a Linux user...

  17. Why no demos from these people? by dmorin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've noticed that theKompany's got the best Zaurus software, but they don't offer demos on anything. Does anybody know why? Particularly on a device like the Z, where there is effectively no commercial competition, I'd like to be able to evaluate their software before I buy it. After all, it could stink, who would know? Not saying it does, just saying that unlike in the Palm world, for instance, theKompany doesn't have 10 competitors breathing down its neck and making sure the quality stays high.

    1. Re:Why no demos from these people? by Dead+Chicken · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's like $10 - $20 for one thing. You shelled out $400 ish for the device what is $10 or $20 on a piece of bad software?

      Ah just my $.02

      --
      "A fool finds no pleasure in understanding but delights in airing his own opinions." Proverbs 18 : 2
    2. Re:Why no demos from these people? by dmorin · · Score: 1
      Well, I suppose laziness on my part is one thing. It's not so much the $$ as it is the effort to register, break out the credit card, blah blah blah.

      Besides, my company paid for the Zaurus, but I have to pay for the software. :D

    3. Re:Why no demos from these people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      it's always just been a matter of time and resources, we do have a demo for tkcRekall, and at some point things will slow down and we'll find a reasonable way to do demo's for the other apps.

      Shawn Gordon
      President
      theKompany.com

    4. Re:Why no demos from these people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      'cuz all they program is filled with memory leaks and are pretty candy, but rot your teeth.

      theKompany customer

    5. Re:Why no demos from these people? by prunesqualour · · Score: 1
      Never mind the demo. Why is there no product? Their Python/QT IDE, blackadder, has been "in Beta" since February 2001, when I paid $50 for a copy. Since then there has been one further beta release, in about June 2001; there has been a book published about how to use it. But there is no sign on their website or elsewhere that any actual product will ever be released.

      It may be a hassle over licensing QT3. I don't know. But the least they could do is say so and if the product is dead, admit it.

      --
      OOo word count at http://www.darwinwars.com/lunatic/bugs/oo_macros.h tml
  18. Cool, how about battery time? by peterdaly · · Score: 2

    What better use could a device like this provide than streaming video over it's 802.11b connection? Not sure why I would want they but it sounds like a good idea.

    Anyone have expierience with battery time using a 802.11b connection for something like that? I keep getting more and more reasons I want one of those SL-5500 things. I would probably only use it for each of those reasons once though...

    What's the killer "keep using it" app for these?

    -Pete

    1. Re:Cool, how about battery time? by SuperCal · · Score: 2

      I get about 2 hours with my brand new battery. Thats general web browsing, I haven't had it long enough to tell how much a constant download will hurt battery life. I know 2 hours doesn't sound like much compaired to palms that claim weeks, but my samsung I300 only gets maybe 2 hours as well while on the internet (14.4 wireless modem). All in all its an amazing little machine. I like it so much I bought a book on C so I can learn to develope for it. I'm starting to go off on a tangent so...
      ............,Cal

      --
      Business News and Resources: www.usasource.net
    2. Re:Cool, how about battery time? by still_nfi · · Score: 1

      It sucks it dry in about 1 hour of continuous use...maybe less. The battery on the Z is probably it's biggest weakness.

      --
      "I have been around the world and found that only stupid people are breeding" -- Harvey Danger
    3. Re:Cool, how about battery time? by shadow303 · · Score: 1

      I doubt that the palm claim factors in wireless access. The programming literature says to keep the IR port turned off when not in use otherwise it drains the batteries too much. Browsing is bound to be worse than that.

      --
      I've got a mind like a steel trap - it's got an animal's foot stuck in it.
    4. Re:Cool, how about battery time? by jandrese · · Score: 2

      I've got a Palm VIIx (probably the most power hungry Palm ever--I got it from work), and a pair of NiMH AAAs last me about 2-3 weeks of normal use. I only use up about 50kb of data traffic a month though (I'm grandfathered on the $10/month plan). I know I'm not getting the optimal life from my batteries though. I charge up the batteries right after I swap them (Two sets of batteries, one set is always charged and ready to go), so the batteries sit around on the shelf for a couple of weeks discharging into the air waiting to be swapped back in.

      Of course I'm not watching movies on my Palm either...

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    5. Re:Cool, how about battery time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, mine lasts several hours. Try letting yours drain completely (backup important data first!) and recharge fully - sounds like you may have battery-memory effects...

  19. Chicken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to see a picture of a dancing chicken on that.

  20. Mplayer ( %100 GPL ) already runs on Zaurus by unixmaster · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    Never learn by your mistakes, if you do you may never dare to try again
    1. Re:Mplayer ( %100 GPL ) already runs on Zaurus by SuperCal · · Score: 2

      Wow, thats great. I've been messing with that for a while and finally got it to work useing that link. thanks.

      --
      Business News and Resources: www.usasource.net
    2. Re:Mplayer ( %100 GPL ) already runs on Zaurus by narfbot · · Score: 2, Informative

      ahh you beat me =)

      The nice thing about Mplayer, it's the fastest player, and probably the smallest (All good for a PDA). The mplayer binary on my k6-3 is only 1.5 Mb and thats with a bunch of extra junk.

    3. Re:Mplayer ( %100 GPL ) already runs on Zaurus by pantherace · · Score: 1
      I am the person who wrote that howto and got it running somewhat.

      The one on the Zaurus is 2.2 MB. I think some of the reason is that I have to have it link with -Lpthread (nothing else works, and the test had to be disabled in the configure script) Trying to cross-compile worked, but it has to link the same way. This is dispite everything needed being on the Zaurus.

      There are issues with screen refreshes because it bypasses qtopia, and writes directly to framebuffer, so I am working on a psudo-gui to clean up after it as well as easily configurable settings.

    4. Re:Mplayer ( %100 GPL ) already runs on Zaurus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't speak that name around me!

      mplayer is an abomination!
      I can't even get that thing to compile and run on my desktop system, so you if you think I'm going to waste my time trying to get it to work on my Zaurus....

  21. Heh.. School could be fun again by Jippy_ · · Score: 1
    "Mr. Johnson, would you come up to the front and answer this question on the blackboard?"

    "One second. Friends is almost over."

    =-Jippy

    1. Re:Heh.. School could be fun again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr. Johnson: "Okay, you're expelled. Bye."

  22. pfffft by peterprior · · Score: 1

    being playing divx on my ipaq for ages..

    take a look at BBPlay.

    Open source divx player :)

    Works fine for me and should work on the zaurus (same cpu)

    1. Re:pfffft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MSIE should work on your my box (same cpu).

  23. What about TV on the go? by Anonymous+Bullard · · Score: 1

    If the colour LCD screens are now good enough to handle "movies", these PDAs would make a handy portable TV receiver too. That would also open up a whole new market segment for these currently "geeky" gadgets: the consumers.

    PDA-with-TV&Tivo-in-your-pocket?

    What pieces are still missing until that can happen?

    --

    Should invading one's peaceful neighbours be opposed, or rewarded with trade deals?

  24. Summary by qwerpoiu · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    theKompany [sic] has released a program for the Zaurus, a DivX player called tkcVideo.

    The program supports video in:

    • MPEG 1
    • MPEG 2
    • MPEG 4 (DivX)
    • MJPEG
    • AVI files

    And audio in:

    • mp1
    • mp2
    • mp3

    It seems to be proprietary, it costs $14.95, and there is no demo available.

    IMHO, I don't think yet another piece of proprietary software like this is newsworthy. Maybe if it were open source...

    1. Re:Summary by g4dget · · Score: 2
      Wait - it plays all this and makes your PDA a mini-entertainment center, and youre not willing to pay as much as a tank of gas? Give me a fucking break - some people take this open source thing way too far.

      The question is not who is willing to pay for it, the question is why this matters to anybody on Slashdot. There are plenty of proprietary DivX players around. What difference does one more make? Why is this news?

      Maybe Slashdot should let people filter out announcements of non-free software--I'm really not interested.

  25. The player by red_gnom · · Score: 1

    You can look at it here

  26. Now to make some movies! by IceFox · · Score: 4, Informative
    To go with this I have put up a howto for making videos that can play on the Zaurus.

    mpeg_encoding_howto

    Enjoy

    Benjamin Meyer

    --
    Do you changes clothes while making the "chee-chee-cha-cha-choh" transformation sound?
  27. Re:And Ce-neh-duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And if you say it enough, you might even start to believe it!

    The problem with you guys in Canada is not that we don't care about you, but a lot of the time we forget you aren't just part of the US. You are so much like us that you have Canadian cultural laws in order to keep from just being the US. We have to wait until we hear the word "aboot" and then we know if someone is Canadian on TV... but we have no other way of even knowing. And we don't even have to dial a country code to call someone in Canada.

    So stop crying already... you get all the benefits of being the USA without any of the crappy stuff, like having everyone hate you and being right in the middle of everyone's business, and stuff like that.

  28. Now, if only I could use it as a PDA . . . by myawn · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Stuff like this for the Zaurus is neat (I have one), but if the Zaurus is going to be successful there are more important things that have to happen:

    Battery life has to improve drastically (currently about 2 hours in developer's model)

    Standard apps (calendar/address book) need to be as good as the standard ones available on Palm

    Without those basics, the 'Wow' applications make neat demos, but won't win market share.

    --
    Subscribers can see articles in the future? So what? Everyone gets to see them in the future.
    1. Re:Now, if only I could use it as a PDA . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep: and it needs to be more idiot proof. It is rather easy to totally hose the Zaurus and have to hard reset it, and installing replacement apps over the standard apps, then uninstalling the replacement can leave you with nothing (without rebuilding some symlinks).

      The Zaurus is cute, and powerful, but it really needs better apps and a more robust UI.

    2. Re:Now, if only I could use it as a PDA . . . by CommandNotFound · · Score: 1

      Battery life has to improve drastically (currently about 2 hours in developer's model)

      I have the 5000D model, too. Turn the backlight down to 50% and the battery will last a lot longer; of course, you have to get used to the lower light conditions.

      Supposedly, this is only a problem with the 5000D. The 5500 fully charges the battery, whereas the 5000D only gets to about 50%. I read this on one of the zaurus sites... don't ask me for the URL, tho... it's long gone. :)

  29. Who's WE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the only people that should use the word we are people with multiple personalities and tape worms.

    maybe you are just cynical, but i enjoy seeing new products, even if i wouldnt get one.

    because guess what, this leads closer and closer to all in one devices that i will want

  30. Mplayer was ALREADY ported, and plays divx. by pantherace · · Score: 2, Informative
    Ok, so I beat them by a couple of days or so. I am working on a nice little gui for it.

    url: http://kirk.math.twsu.edu/family/james/mplayer.htm l

  31. TiVo, Zaurus, ... by Jagasian · · Score: 2

    While consumer-level services that use Linux on the backend are well established, with examples such as Google and Amazon, consumer products are just now showing their colors.

    Everyone loves their TiVo, a device that makes TV worth watching, and the Zaurus has reached a critical mass where there is enough mindshare to facilitate the development of tons of great custom software for the Linux based PDA. So what will we see next? I think that it would be nice to see the Zaurus technology used in a mobile phone.

    For many, PDAs are great, but for most, PDAs take a backseat to their mobile phone. Why not cut the chase and combine the two?

    1. Re:TiVo, Zaurus, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm actually quite suprised to see the Zaurus has such a strong following, considering every review I ever saw of it called it a flaming hunk of shit.

    2. Re:TiVo, Zaurus, ... by rseuhs · · Score: 2

      Exactly, my next PDA will have to combine cell phone functionality, otherwise I will stay at my Psion.

    3. Re:TiVo, Zaurus, ... by edoug · · Score: 1

      It's definately not as polished as the others (at least with the default apps) but it appeals just the same...worst part imho is that synchronization really does suck.

      TheKompany's apps help much...now if I could just find the "global search" tool

      --
      meh.
    4. Re:TiVo, Zaurus, ... by number6 · · Score: 1

      Well, if you get a P800, you can combine PDA and cell phone, while still staying at your Psion (well, Symbian at any rate).

      It's just a real shame the P800 uses Sony memory sticks rather than the more standard CF cards.

      --
      I'm a number, not a free man!
  32. Re:And Ce-neh-duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So typical of you arrogant Capitalistic American Pigs. You're all so full of yourselves all the time. You all think that the US is the most important or most advanced country on the planet.

    This is why you deserved everything you got dealt last sept.

  33. Idea! by Erwos · · Score: 1

    Interesting idea: combine open 802.11b network with local hard drive full of multimedia content connected to it.

    Imagine having a spare hour to kill waiting for class. You walk on over to the nearest dorm, boot up your slick PDA / laptop and check the ether for some movies to keep you busy. Seems like it would have some potential.

    -Erwos

    --
    Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
  34. Re:And this is news, how? by bflong · · Score: 3, Informative

    >So, a company releases a proprietary DivX player
    -Yes... tckPlayer is propriatary

    >for a proprietary window system
    -Nope... The windowing system and toolkit are GPL. For an entirely GPLed enviroment that will still run standard Zaurus apps (minus Java for now, sorry) see Opie which is the UI for OpenZaurus. We're building a player for all these formats as I type this.

    >running on hardware that's mostly used in Japan
    -Nope again. The Zaurus 5500 is a US/EU product.

    --
    Why is it so hot? Where am I going? What am I doing in this handbasket?
  35. Re:[YourMissionForToday] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No you are not, you are beating it to the GoatSe guy. Why can't you trolls be honest about it?

  36. Re:And Ce-neh-duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well said. Canada could be a really nice neighbor if we could all just get along

  37. Re:And this is news, how? by g4dget · · Score: 0, Troll
    The windowing system and toolkit are GPL.

    The window system is also released under the GPL, but it is still proprietary, in that its development is currently driven by a commercial company.

    Nope again. The Zaurus 5500 is a US/EU product.

    The Linux-based Zaurus line is primarily used in Asia; US and European usage is miniscule.

    My point remains: the release of a proprietary app for a proprietary handheld is of little interest to me or other people in the open source community.

    Of course, the usual KDE and Zaurus zealots will also mod this message down to oblivion. Go ahead, live out your little power trips. I have lots of karma.

  38. strikingly similiar to ffmpeg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Funny how the codecs used in tkcVideo are the very same, listed in the same order as ffmpeg which is lgpl'd. Take a look for yourself.

    They even have RealVideo version 1 and mjpeg. Who even uses realvideo version 1, unless you encode it with ffmpeg?

    I think this is more than a conincidence. I also heard the author of ffmpeg got an email that the many error codes in tkcVideo are very similiar to ffmpeg...

    and there is no WAY they could have written those codecs by themselves in the short amount of time. No fuckin way...

    1. Re:strikingly similiar to ffmpeg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The author of ffmpeg opted in on this sort of thing when he LGPL'd it.

  39. Archos has it! It has tv-out.7 houre battery.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah a 1,5 inch screen is very small, but it gives you over 5 houres of battery life for video playback and 10 houres if you only use the player for playing back mp3s and navigating.

    Such screen is enough for navigating through files, then for watching the DivX video you use the integrated tv-output to watch on your big-screen TV, or you use a pair of video-glasses from olympus.

    DivX on PDAs is not a new thing, and you can't use the whole PDA screens to display video. The video resolution on those PDAs also Yaurus is limited to 320x240 pixels, the Archos MultiMedia will support maybe even full resolution at full framerate!! (for now it's only 352x288 resolution Mpeg4 simple profile, but DivXNetworks are developping a firmware upgrade for the thing to playback DivX at full resolution using this Texxas INstruments DSC25 processor which is inside the Archos MultiMedia.)

    Also the Archos MultiMedia will be able to record DivX video in real-time to CIF resolution using a tv-in connection or the camera module (with mp3 audio)!! (camera which can be used as still digital camera with 1,3 Megapixels with 2x digital zoom and flash)

  40. Training Video by CMiYC · · Score: 2

    At first I thought "what a complete waste. Cool, but useless." Then I realized, it has a very good practical use. It would be ideal for viewing training videos. The test equipment I work with is pretty complex. It'd be nice to have a small display that you could easily move around while you're watching. If your computer (laptop or desktop) is on your desk, and your equipment is in a lab, this would be much easier to move around. Just a thought before everyone says "stupid idea." (makes you wonder... posting a message saying "lame" or doing something cool but preceived as lame. I wonder which is actually useless.)

  41. Not as long as we have slashdot to fill our time! by croftj · · Score: 0, Troll

    Who needs the PDA, Cell phone etc when there is slashdot???

    --
    -- Many men would appreciate a woman's mind more if they could fondle it
  42. Archos has 20gb harddrive memory.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh yeah, this Archos MultiMedia can store over 100 houres of video at low bitrate, or 50 houres of video at high bitrate meaning approx 800kbit/S, and this high quality video being 25 700mb movies in FULL RESOLUTION.. also if you want you can upgrade you can upgrade with a 40gb or even 60gb or larger harddrive (when they will be available in the adequate laptop pc drive size that fits in the Archos MultiMedia)

    Also it has firewire anbd USB2 connection to your PC.

    Damn I think the Archos MultiMedia is amayzing, I hope slashdot are writing about it as it deserves to be written about..

  43. Zaurus interface to USB hard drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know of a USB hard drive that can interface with the Zaurus?

    It would be REALLY cool if I could put my DivX movies on my Archos 20 gig USB drive and connect it to the Zaurus, via USB, which would act as the DivX player. I could have a collection of 20 movies or so to watch on the airplane without having to lug around a whole laptop!

    If this hasn't already been done I can see a valid business plan for building one, I just wish I had the time/funding to play around with the idea myself!

    1. Re:Zaurus interface to USB hard drive by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

      The Zaurus has no built-in USB port. This is possibly the one and only reason that the Zaurus is a peice of crap, but there you have it.
      *goes back to trying to get linux to even /talk/ to the thing*

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    2. Re:Zaurus interface to USB hard drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a good guide to connecting the Zaurus over USB here. Very easy if you've got Mandrake 8.2

  44. Do-Everything by Sloppy · · Score: 2
    Heh. A "do-everything" box that can't even play Vorbis.

    That sounds about as useful as a Swiss army knife that has a screwdriver, tweezers, scissors, etc. but -- oops -- doesn't have a knife blade.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    1. Re:Do-Everything by bobstay · · Score: 1

      Wrong, sir. theKompany's audio player plays vorbis. I've been using it for the past 6 months to listen to oggs on the move.

  45. GARPLY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FOOBAZ

  46. I've been able to do this on by iPAQ for ages... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... using PocketDivx.

    Note this is the latest version, not a mirror of the ancient one at ProjectMayo. Oh, and this one even has OGG support, and a nice graphic EQ (which only works with MP3s for the moment.

    It's FREE with SOURCE, but I'd highly recommend you DONATE for continued development of the project.

    As for all the stupid "but it won't play a 700MB DivX movie" comments, well no shit! Considering most PDAs have screen res.'s of 320x240 and crap audio capabilities, what's the point in playing a DVD-quality encoded movie? You have to RE-ENCODE IT!

    Advisable settings for re-encoding for PocketPC (and probably other PDAs) - using VirtualDub:
    Resize to 320x240 (bicubic) and decimate the framerate by 2 (so if your source was 30FPS it'll now be 15FPS). By all means try at 25FPS though, it may work, but if not and you want to keep the framerate then make the video smaller, eg. 160x120
    Sharpen moderately (to counteract the softening effect of the resize)
    Use 2-pass encoding, and aim for around 192-256KBPS bit-rate.
    Encode audio using a decent MP3 codec NOT the default DivX codec (well certainly not DivX 4's audio codec, as it used WMA and will eat the PPC's CPU). Personally I'd just go for 16 bit mono 22KHz at 24kbps, but if you want stereo then experiment a bit to see what works best.

    Remember when you're encoding that you're trading off one thing for another, ie. video size vs. video FPS vs. video bitrate vs. audio stereo/mono vs. audio bitrate, so experiment until you find a combination that works for you.

    Personally I've got a high-quality 2hr movie onto a 256MB CF card no problems, at 320x240 25fps with audio, so it's definitely possible.

    PocketDivX kicks ass!

  47. Indeed... but? by marm · · Score: 2

    I think this is more than a conincidence. I also heard the author of ffmpeg got an email that the many error codes in tkcVideo are very similiar to ffmpeg...

    Ok, yes, you're probably right, it probably does use ffmpeg. What's the big deal? As you point out, ffmpeg is LGPL'ed, which allows proprietary applications to link to it. Any modifications they make to ffmpeg would have to be released, but I'm betting they had to make zero, zilch, none. A Zaurus is just a fairly typical ARM Linux system. As long as they're using a standard shared library version of ffmpeg, supply a copy of the LGPL somewhere, and give credits to ffmpeg in the about box and a pointer to where the LGPL is, they are in the clear. That's not really asking a lot. If they do this, they don't even have to provide ffmpeg source. At least, this is how I and quite a few people read the LGPL.

    The LGPL is quite a different beast to the GPL, and that's by design.

  48. Re: Hrm... Java? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Technically sure it is possible to write a divx player in Java. But what you would expect? 3-5 fps? I'm afraid no one is willing to use it even it is free.

  49. I have the software. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just got it yesterday to try out. It's pretty sweet. The sound could be a lot better though (but then I have loads of servers running on my SL-5000).

    It doesn't like secure digital cards and I couldn't even install the software to the SD card, I had to install it to RAM to get it to work.

    Certainly worth $15.

  50. Re: Hrm... Java? by croanon · · Score: 1

    Do you know anything about Java 2D? Java 3D?
    What you Anti-Java people know is "Java is slow."
    When did you last visited Sun's site and learned about the latest improvements in JIT compilers etc?
    Do you have a Zaurus and tested Java on Zaurus?
    Stop showing degree of your idiocy and spreading Java FUD.
    Idiot.

    --
    Dear Bill, do you have a .net tatoo on your ass for marketing?
  51. Playback Performance? by DamnYouIAmALion · · Score: 1

    Does anybody have any details of the levels of performance (frame rate, etc.) of this player on the Zaurus? I've seen DivX players for other PDAs that play at 6fps, which means you only get to see 1/4 of a film!

  52. Re: Hrm... Java? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sorry, I am not anti-java. just consider a right tool for a right job.

    if you played DivX movie on low-end machine before, you will understand why I consider about the speed.

    what's hell with those java evangelists nowadays? it will only make more ppl switch to M$ .NET.

    okay, I go agree that thing coded in Java must faster than coded in the all other languages(with some optimization, a better JIT, bah bah bah...). plz forgive a little idiot like me.