Slashdot Mirror


DVD Region Encoding on Verge of Collapse?

Spudley writes "It seems like the infamous Region Encoding system used by DVD manufacturers to prevent us buying disks from overseas is about to collapse - due to widespread flaunting of the system. This article on the BBC doesn't go into much technical detail, but does include an interview with a company that manufactures DVD players ("You can find codes for more or less all brands of DVD player including ours") and some speculation on the future." It always seemed like an idea destined to fail.

192 of 550 comments (clear)

  1. why? by CrazyDwarf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've never understood the reason behind region encoding. I know sometimes they release movies with different endings in Europe than they do in the US, and I would like to think I should be able to purchase a copy of the movie from there with the other ending (provided they don't already include in on the US version of the DVD.)

    --
    It's easy to stand out when the general level of competence is so low.
    1. Re:why? by trajano · · Score: 4, Informative

      Its usually because of the licensing and copyright restrictions by the artists and manufacturing companies.

      When someone wants to put a soundtrack or put an actor on a movie, they have to specify who they are distributing it to in the contract.

      So usually they sometimes go this anime sound track can only be distributed in Japan. No where else.

      Or this European actor can only be shown in theaters playing in Russia.

      --
      Archie - CIO-for-hire :-)
    2. Re:why? by dsfox · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The basic reason was to control release dates, and
      to mollify countries like China who would like to
      prevent people from seeing a lot of films. Censorship.
      I'm not sure its an idea that was destined to fail,
      but I'd sure be glad if it did.

    3. Re:why? by Caballero · · Score: 5, Informative


      Strictly economics. The studio wants to control the spread of the movie to maximize profit.

      Movies often open in the US 6-9 months before they show in Europe. In many cases, the US DVD is out before the move has opened in Europe. With region codes they make it hard for Europeans to buy the DVD instead of going out to the theater.

    4. Re:why? by gallen1234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Movies often open in the US 6-9 months before they show in Europe.

      But this begs the question: What's the business justification for releasing a movie in Europe 6-9 months after it's released in the U.S.?

    5. Re:why? by bjorklid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As an European, I can verify this. We have small "underground" shops which shell other-than-R2 DVDs, which cannot be found as R2, mostly because they're not released here officially yet. They also do modifications for some DVD-players that are not "crackable" thru remote control.

    6. Re:why? by Pascal+Sartoretti · · Score: 3, Informative

      Movies often open in the US 6-9 months before they show in Europe.

      Not true anymore. The delta between US and Europe has shrunk to a few weeks, thus reducing the need for DVD zoning. That's the reason.

    7. Re:why? by andyring · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While I don't know for sure, I'd suspect it's to stretch out the revenue stream. They sell it in the US for half a year, then when sales slow because everyone who wants it has it, they release it elsewhere so they can keep raking in more money, as opposed to having it all come in basically in one chunk.

    8. Re:why? by comcn · · Score: 3, Informative

      ...and some "overground" ones, too. One of the best places I've found to buy DVDs from is CD WOW!, http://www.cd-wow.co.uk/. Most DVDs there are less than £15, but can be any region (they tell you what region it is). They are also good in that you pay what you see: no VAT or postage to add on top.

    9. Re:why? by hobbes75 · · Score: 2

      The official reason for this is the translation that takes quite a lot of time.

    10. Re:why? by tftp · · Score: 5, Informative
      The business justification is simple. Advertisement of a movie in one country costs N million dollars; if you do it in M countries you must have N*M million dollars. But this is expensive, and where the money would come from? Especially right after the movie is done and all the investment/loan money already spent?

      The easy way out is to start in few countries, collect money, recoup your advertising expenses, and reinvest into advertising in another country or group of countries. This way you only need N million dollars regardless of how many countries you sell the movie to. This, of course, takes time, and that's where the delay comes from.

    11. Re:why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Undergound shops? Yeah, these little shops are well underground In fact, you have to go DEEP underground to find a shop that would sell region free players!

      O.K, I guess it depends on exactly where you are in this big place called "Europe", but hey, I've got stacks of R1 disks...

    12. Re:why? by rekoil · · Score: 5, Funny

      To translate a film from American English to U.K English? What do they do, overdub "F*cking" with "bloddy" every time it's uttered?

    13. Re:why? by vidarh · · Score: 3, Interesting
      There are several reasons for this. One is marketing costs - it may be easier to sustain a high marketing effort if you can focus on market by market. For smaller studios especially, which have limited cash flow, this can certainly be an issue.

      Another is the cost of making prints. Making and distributing prints of a movie is not a cheap process, and if you'd have to make separate prints for all the movie theathers - including small theaters that would only show the movie a couple of times, would be cost prohibitive. So they get around it by staggering the release and redistributing prints as and when the movie is taken off somewhere.

      The latter may dramatically change with fully digital movies, when there's suddenly a lot of alternatives to cutting cost in the distribution...

    14. Re:why? by AntiNorm · · Score: 2

      The studio wants to control the spread of the movie to maximize profit.

      Then why are so many DVDs region coded that are not of current movies? I've seen old, old movies on DVDs with region coding. Heck, I've even seen seasons of TV shows on DVDs that were region coded. The region coding of these DVDs instantly defeats the argument you present (which is the one the MPAA gives); if the studios were motivated by what they *say* they are motivated by, these DVDs would not be region coded.

      --

      I pledge allegiance to the flag...
      of the Corporate States of America...
    15. Re:why? by Gossy · · Score: 2

      I was under the impression reels of film degraded in quality after many runs - this was the advantage touted of digital film distribution. I find it hard to believe that other countries get the poor quality leftovers after the US has finished with them.

    16. Re:why? by Gossy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not true - For example, The Sum of All Fears STILL isn't out over here, it comes out in September last I heard. In the USA it has been out for months. 6-9 months is a little over the top, but we're certainly still waiting quite a while.

      I've seen many films available for DVD release in America that are only recent cinema releases here.

    17. Re:why? by cei · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The UK DVD of Star Wars Ep II will be missing the 26 frames of head-butt in the fight sequence between Jango Fett & Obi-Wan, for ratings reasons...

      Likewise, the UK version of Disney's Lilo & Stitch has Lilo climbing into a cabinet with a pizza box lid for a door, while in the US version she climbs into a clothes drier. The UK ratings board had issues with that...

      --
      This sig intentionally left justified.
    18. Re:why? by Ravenn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Because the film-makers are assuming that American audiences are stupid, and won't equate "philosopher" with a wizard-like feel, but will think along the lines of "a guy who talks too much".

      There are other examples of this in the same movie/book. Words like cardigan swapped to sweater, etc. I'm sure that even the American education system can handle synonyms, but the film-makers seem to disagree there.

      Most of the rest of the world would understand the situation when you mention George III, but again the film-makers want to ensure you can only think one way. Their way.

      In short: those that control the way you percieve the world, are ensuring that you percieve only what is approved by them. Sorry.

      Ravenn

      --
      Of all the things you can accomplish by screwing up your face and swearing into a dark room, sleep is not one of them.
    19. Re:why? by DerFeuervogel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fine. They want to sell different versions in different countries, I don't
      see a problem with that. But the lock that prevents cross-usage is still
      no justified by a ratings difference. Sorry.

    20. Re:why? by _xeno_ · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Because it was changed when the American publishers got the hang of it and the American publishers thought that it would sell better as "the Sorcerer's Stone" than "the Philsopher's Stone." Hence, when it was made into a movie, the producers didn't want to confuse American audiences by changing the name of the movie back to the original - so they shot two versions of every scene that mentions the stone.

      I must, unfortunately, agree with the publishers that calling it "Sorcerer's Stone" would probably be better for an American audience. I had never managed to run into the term "philosopher's stone" before hearing the original title. If the book was not the first in the series, it probably would have been left untouched. But since it was the first in the series, people wouldn't immediately associate "Harry Potter" and "wizard." So by changing it to Sorcerer's Stone they ensured that people would know that it was about magic.

      Since, obviously, us Yanks and our image-driven culture are definately going to notice the title first and ignore the cover art consisting of a boy and his various magic artifacts. Whatever.

      - Mr. Potter, son of James Potter. No, I'm not kidding.
      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    21. Re:why? by steve_l · · Score: 2

      That is what they say, but it does not explain why dvds of movies made in the seventies, say Cheech and Chong go to Mexico, are released with region encoding. That thing went through the theatres 30 years ago, yet they still region encode them.

      The fundamental reason is to enable price differentiation, "charging what the market will bear". They can charge more in europe so they do so, and want to stop US content getting in.

      They have to charge less in Asia, so they charge less there, and want to use region encoding to stop asian content getting into the US.

      If you go to the dvd forum and download the compliance specs for manufactuers (I forget the url, but rememeber that I had to look at some form's source to bypass the registration process and go to the redirect), you will see it is full of stuff about region encoding. They even have some formal review committee to deal with reported encoding hacks, some board of peers who enforce the region rules. They care seriously about maximising profit against all odds.

      But lets be fair: you can often get DVDs for less than the sound tracks to go with them, so in rip-off terms, the MPAA arent *quite* as bad as the RIAA. Though I hear that pricing is being done to undermine the near-monopolies of Blockbuster and Hollywood in the rental industry, who have too much control of the aftermarket for the movie industry's liking.

    22. Re:why? by Grit · · Score: 2

      In some cases the studio also has existing agreements with distributors, which prevent them from releasing the DVD while the distributor still has rights to the theatrical release in the region. No doubt they would have liked to have the same feature in videotapes. I can't see how selling a DVD in North America would get you sued for violating a contract in Europe, but that's movie industry logic for you...

    23. Re:why? by haggar · · Score: 2

      Yeah, that's surely the reason behind DVD region coding. BTW, I have "Nosferatu" (1922) as a Region 2 DVD. Since it's a European movie, I wonder if you guys in US have seen it already.....

      --
      Sigged!
    24. Re:why? by Baikala · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have a multiregion DVD player by Sony. The Multiregion feature wasn't depicted in the box nor the manual but it was advertised as multiregion by the store.

      It worked rigth out the box (no hidden menu nor remote control code), at least for region 1 and region 4 DVD's, I don't have DVD's from other regions to test it.(I live in Mexico)

      --
      16,777,216 comments ought to be enough for any forum!
    25. Re:why? by alext · · Score: 2

      That so? Makes sense now that promotion is so international.

      Traditionally there were two reasons for a gap:

      1) Cinema chains would gauge demand in the US first so they could plan the best distribution strategy in the others

      2) The UK would get the same physical prints used in the US. This is why Germany, France etc. would sometimes beat the UK to release - they had their own.

    26. Re:why? by rodgerd · · Score: 3, Informative

      One reason is prints. Movie prints are mondo expensive to manufacture, so Hollywood studios may make enough for the opening in the US (a few thousand for a big release) and then ship them overseas, rather than making tens of thousands of prints for worldwide releases.

      The revenue stream is another, since staggered releases provide the peak of a new release when business tails off in another market.

      Local market variations may be a factor, too - school holidays are at different times in different countries, which is when studios like to have kids' films in the theatres.

      It's fucking annoying, though, when you live outside the States, because it's all but impossible to avoid picking up more information than you wanted about things before they arrive here.

    27. Re:why? by Catbeller · · Score: 2

      If you've never seen the high quality prints (for the sake of argument) how could you perceive a difference between what we see and what you see? Do you compare the quality to your domestic releases?

      I go to a lot of second-run or third run cheapie theaters here in the U.S., and I never noticed the nasty image quality until someone pointed it out to me.

    28. Re:why? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2

      That is what they say, but it does not explain why dvds of movies made in the seventies, say Cheech and Chong go to Mexico, are released with region encoding. That thing went through the theatres 30 years ago, yet they still region encode them.

      Perhaps so that they can sell at different price points? The same move may cost $40 in Japan, #25 in the US, and $8 in India. Without region coding, the distributors might just buy a lot of retail stock from Hyderabad for sale in Tokyo.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    29. Re:why? by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 3, Informative
      See, this is one of my pet peeves. (The irritation, not the poltergeist.) The American publishers should have come up with an entirely different title -- if it was indeed necessary to retitle the book -- rather than change the name of the artifact in question. There's no such thing as a Sorcerer's Stone. OK, there's no such thing as a Philosopher's Stone either, but the point is that medieval alchemists thought there was, and that is in fact the name of the object they were trying to create. Nicholas Flamel is a genuine historical figure, a bookseller, scribe and alchemist of the 14th century, and one of the few who was reputed to have been successful.

      The irony is that the American publisher of the Harry Potter series, Scholastic Books, mainly publishes educational books. Yet they miss out on this genuine bit of medieval history in the most popular children's series of all time.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    30. Re:why? by steve_l · · Score: 2

      I believe you are completely correct -differential pricing is "the explanation that dare not speak its name", when it comes to region encoding.

      The companies just cite piracy as an excuse, when legal grey-markets are the real threat to their margins.

      Whatever happened to that EU investigation on region encoding?

    31. Re:why? by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The only reason I know anything about Philosopher's Stones is thanks to a computer game from Microprose called Darklands, which seemed to try to be as faithful to German history as possible. There was a whole alchemy portion of the game where you could mix potions using fairly authentic-sounding ingredients. Of course the game assumed that all the legends and stuff was all true. You also had to take down Robber-barons and other things of the region/period. You can find it for download on some abandonware sites, like maybe the-underdogs.org

      Anyway, sure it's obscure, but there's no reason to change stuff like "Philosopher's Stone," especially if it has SOME basis in old legends. Maybe people would learn something! I like learning things...

      -If

      --
      Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
    32. Re:why? by vidarh · · Score: 2
      Staggered releases wouldn't help you if you have to re cut the movie for all markets, true. But that is assuming that you can't make a set of cuts that work for a large cross section of markets. Most of Western Europe have pretty similar restrictions on what can and cannot be shown to various audiences, for instance.

      That said, I think that movie releases will come closer and closer worldwide. First there is digital distribution. Secondly, more and more of the marketing channels reach worldwide audiences, for instance over the internet, either directly or via word of mouth.

  2. Dude, wrong word. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    s/flaunting/flouting/

    1. Re:Dude, wrong word. by limber · · Score: 2

      guess I better not rent any music DVDs about professional flautists...

  3. It was a bad idea to begin with... by Viewsonic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can understand that people want to tailor their specific videos/software per region because of language barriers and such, so it'll be easier to track and distribute... But.. DVD is a medium that was MEANT to be an "all inclusive" format.. Meaning you can have Japanese, Spanish, whatever languages, subtitles, etc all on the same disc, or discs. Often in these region mixups, different people got to work on the movies and decided to add uncut footage that the other regions didn't get so it pissed everyone off .. Now everyone can be the same. Finally.

    1. Re:It was a bad idea to begin with... by jmu1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Added to that, there are multinational/multilengual people that wouldn't get the chance to see something from their homeland unless they bought _another_ player.

    2. Re:It was a bad idea to begin with... by Bobzibub · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't small movie producers will have higher costs b/c they cannot simply produce one dvd for all markets? Does this not favor large (aka Hollywood) producers of movies?

      Cheers,
      -b

    3. Re:It was a bad idea to begin with... by jmu1 · · Score: 2

      This too is true. Small time movie production units wouldn't be able to region encode... they may not even release on DVD due to that limitation. I'm sure they have enough problems working out PAL/NTSC issues. Time is money, and so is the fee for encoding things... ;)

    4. Re:It was a bad idea to begin with... by argStyopa · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "...people want to tailor their specific videos/software per region because of language barriers and such..."

      You don't really mean that do you? I mean seriously, does ANYONE see DVD region-encoding as ANYTHING but a ludicrously obvious effort by producing companies to introduce market control and artificial scarcity, thus allowing inflated pricing?

      You are a company, you have a right to try to sell your products for as high a price as the market will bear. The market, on the other hand has a right (yes, a right) to try to force your prices as low as it can. If the perceived total net cost of piracy is less than your selling price, you lose. You can (as the RIAA, BSA, etc) try to raise the perceived cost of piracy, at the cost of goodwill.

      The internet killed region-encoding, plain and simple. It'll kill any similar effort at market control such as inflated digital media pricing (note to RIAA: piracy will dissolve if you reduced your prices to something commensurate with the music's value....), and even the stupid German book price-fixing laws.

      Good riddance to blatantly greedy marketing schemes. Go start a chain-letter or something.

      --
      -Styopa
    5. Re:It was a bad idea to begin with... by Zathrus · · Score: 3, Informative

      I mean seriously, does ANYONE see DVD region-encoding as ANYTHING but a ludicrously obvious effort by producing companies to introduce market control and artificial scarcity, thus allowing inflated pricing?

      Well, if you're totally ignorant about the entire industry I suppose you could see it as that alone.

      The reality, however, is that one company often doesn't own the distribution rights worldwide... or in all formats. This is less common now (for movies, for TV syndication it's still very common), but it still impacts modern day reality because of old distribution agreements.

      Paramount may have produced the movie. Domestic (US) home viewing rights may have been sold to Warner Bros (now AOL/Time-Warner). European distribution rights may be owned by Universal. Distribution in Asia or Africa may be owned by more regional companies.

      And while this mostly affects older movies and (new or old) TV shows, it does have impact on new movies. A movie produced in the US may not hit foreign markets for 2-4 months, during which dubbing and other region-specific changes are made. By the time the movie premieres in Asia it may be coming out on DVD in the US. Having it available worldwide would cause some obvious problems.

      Is region encoding used for artificial scarcity? Sure. Especially in Australia, and in some cases the US (mostly for TV shows, where syndication rights have royally screwed up ownership legalities). But you can bet that similar technology will be included in every digital medium for the forseeable future -- the industry is built around the concepts, and there's legacy titles that have rather nasty ownership issues that dictate this be a necessity. Will there be some people who hack the technology away? Sure. But it's going to be a small minority of people, particularly in the cash cow countries like the US.

    6. Re:It was a bad idea to begin with... by jmu1 · · Score: 2

      I stand corrected. :) I did not know that it did have those features.

    7. Re:It was a bad idea to begin with... by Zathrus · · Score: 2

      You hit the nail on the head - VHS tapes were produced in either NTSC or PAL formats. There were very few VCR's sold that could play back both (or translate between the two to the output device), so there was an effective barrier between markets.

      DVD doesn't have this same issue, so there would be no barrier whatsoever.

      As for US/Japan - I don't know. I know that friends of mine that were into Anime had a hell of a time getting tapes here in the US, but I have no idea how hard it was for Japan to get US videos.

  4. OMG!! by bsDaemon · · Score: 2

    Someone came to the USA from the UK to buy a DVD!! How dare they support severl layers of economy like that!! The bastard!! Seriously, who gives a damn about where the DVD gets watched as long as they bought it. The manufacurers still get cash.

    1. Re:OMG!! by Tet · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Seriously, who gives a damn about where the DVD gets watched as long as they bought it. The manufacurers still get cash.

      The manufacturers give a damn, because they get more cash if they can time the releases with suitable promotional visits from the film's stars, etc. If the DVD is released into a global market, they can't stagger releases to allow them to concentrate on one market at a time. After all, there's only one Tom Cruise, and he can't be publicising his latest film in the USA, Europe and the Far East all at the same time. I personally don't think that maximizing an already huge amount of profit is sufficient reason for them to stomp all over my rights as a consumer, but that's their reasoning behind it.

      --
      "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    2. Re:OMG!! by Gossy · · Score: 2
      The manufacurers still get cash.


      Not as much as they would though if you bought the DVD in the UK. DVDs (and music) are more expensive here, so I wouldn't be surprised if they gave a damn.
  5. Um, no, it works just fine by gerf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It always seemed like an idea destined to fail

    No, i think it did its job spledidly. It prevented the general populace from spreading movies where they don't want, and it still does. How many people do you think buy a Gateway Computer, with DVD, tech support, ect., and don't know jack about Regional encoding. Trust me, they've done what they wanted to do, and it will still work, to a surprising degree, well into the future.

    Just think how many people still can't program the time on a VCR. Do you seriously think they're going to find a go-around to Regional encoding when they're barely competent enough to wipe their own arse?

    1. Re:Um, no, it works just fine by Dacobi · · Score: 2, Informative

      > Just think how many people still can't program the time on a
      > VCR. Do you seriously think they're going to find a go-around
      > to Regional encoding when they're barely competent enough
      > to wipe their own arse?

      Well in Denmark (and I guess many places in Europe) most cheep DVD players are region free, and the more expencive ones can be modified as an option often proposed by the salesman. So Joe Sixpack doesn't really have to think that hard to get around regional encoding.

      --
      .NOT
    2. Re:Um, no, it works just fine by Ldir · · Score: 4, Informative
      No, i think it did its job spledidly. It prevented the general populace from spreading movies where they don't want, and it still does . How many people do you think buy a Gateway Computer, with DVD, tech support, ect., and don't know jack about Regional encoding.

      I think that's a U.S.-centric view of the situation. Region-free and region-selectable DVD players aren't that widespread in the U.S. simply because there's little incentive to do the mods here. We already get the widest selection of titles at the lowest prices. There are exceptions, of course, like Japanese anime lovers and film buffs looking for a certain, often uncut version of a film, but they're a small portion of the overall U.S. market.

      The rest of the world is in a different boat. When you read about region-coding hacks, you are almost invariably reading about someone who wants to play Region 1 discs. This article is a case in point.

      If you do a Google search for "region-free", most of the sites you find will be overseas. The retailers who sell region-free players and mods are everywhere but the U.S. When I ordered a mod board for my Pioneer, I ordered it from a European site and paid in Euros, even though the company shipped the product from an office in the U.S. Their major focus is Europe; they don't do much business here in the USA.

      Having said that, I will be astonished if Hollywood really gives up on region-coding. They are the ultimate control freaks; it's hard to imagine they'll suddenly start selling what the customer wants instead of what Hollywood wants.

    3. Re:Um, no, it works just fine by petis · · Score: 2

      Judging from the recent poll, you could add "and washing their hands after [and the part about the arse here]". ;)

    4. Re:Um, no, it works just fine by Kphrak · · Score: 2

      Programming the time on a VCR is a bit different. People always use that as an example, but read The Design of Everyday Things for why so many VCRs are hard to program. It's not because the average user is stupid, it's because of horrible design on the part of the manufacturer. The average user (my wife, for example) can easily program a VCR using a simple on-screen menu; it's when the programming involves a few (or too many) buttons, no output, etc that all hell breaks loose.

      In addition, one should never cite ignorance as a barrier to convenience. If the thing is felt to be necessary (and "Joe Sixpack" usually considers free music and cheap DVDs necessary) outweighs the lack of knowledge, a user will learn; that's basic psychology. The thousands of people who used to only play Solitaire, but heard they could get free music on the Internet, learned how to use Napster.

      As I see it, however, regional encoding will probably stay, even though it sucks, just because Americans aren't going to complain. The average person won't be buying from Japan, since DVDs have been kept at an exceptionally cheap rate; almost cheaper than a CD. Hell, look at Lord of the Rings; they're selling the DVD for $15 at Fry's Electronics. The average DVD sells for about $25. I'm expecting any day to get DVDs free in boxes of cereal...and to throw them away!

      Under this scheme, Europe gets shafted worst; it pays the highest and often gets a censored copy. The Asian countries barely even use DVD...maybe Japan (no experience here), but certainly not anything south of that; that's what VCDs are for. So I see no public outcry building.

      --

      There's no sig like this sig anywhere near this sig, so this must be the sig.
    5. Re:Um, no, it works just fine by mpe · · Score: 2

      Region-free and region-selectable DVD players aren't that widespread in the U.S. simply because there's little incentive to do the mods here. We already get the widest selection of titles at the lowest prices. There are exceptions, of course, like Japanese anime lovers and film buffs looking for a certain, often uncut version of a film, but they're a small portion of the overall U.S. market.

      What isn't a small group are fans of US produced TV series. These put people in the US in the same boat as the rest of the world.

  6. Re:Why do they even bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Region Encoding is a joke. In fact, about the only place these days which still "enforces" Region Coding is....the USA! The rest of the world treats it like the joke it is. You can walk into a Supermarket and a buy a DVD player which is advertised as Region Free in Europe.

    The only people who pay any attention to Region Coding is the DVD-CCA. The player manufacturers couldn't give a crap; why do you think all these players have a "hiden" menu in them that can disable it? Ooops, someone accidently "leaked" the instructions on how to access it...oh dear...

  7. More links by countach · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here is the press release from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission's investigation into the legality of Sony's region encoding. Here is Sony's response. Here is more info about the ACCC's stance. And Here's what aussies think of it all.

  8. Macrovision by thryllkill · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They should ditch the macrovision crap too. It really sucks for those of us with cheap TVs, you can either watch it with that brilliant surround sound, but the picture wavers from crap to worse, or use a co-ax connector and lose all that great sound. Hmmm, who the fsck would record a dvd to vhs anyways.

    Get a better TV you say??? I'd love too, but I am still working my way through college. Wanna donate a k-rad HDTV??? My email is at the top...

    --

    Note to self: No more arguing with the faithful.

    1. Re:Macrovision by (startx) · · Score: 2

      grab the $65 apex player from walmart, it'll play everything I've thrown at it, and can be flashed to be macrovision free. it really does kick ass.

    2. Re:Macrovision by geekoid · · Score: 2

      "Hmmm, who the fsck would record a dvd to vhs anyways."
      anybody with small children.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  9. Apex by Apreche · · Score: 4, Informative

    is a particularly cool company. If you haven't heard of them they make very very cheap DVD players. Like 60 bucks for some of the models. As far as I know they were the first to have "cheat codes" to unlock regions. And some people are paying hundreds for region free players! The really cool thing about Apex players is that some of the models have PAL converters in them. So you will really have no problem watching DVDs from England or anywhere else.
    Be warned though. Apex's players are 60 bucks for a reason. They are made of cheap parts and cheap plastic. Basically they are pieces of crap, and the region changing/pal converting is the only feature they have. I don't even think they all have optical audio out. Yeah, so check them out, it's the cheapest solution I've found.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    1. Re:Apex by (startx) · · Score: 4, Interesting

      it's not the ONLY feature they have. my $68 apex player from wal-mart will play any region dvd, any vcd, svcd, mp3 cd, kodak picture cd, audio cd, and even raw mpeg burned to a cdr! oh, and it's got component output and I've flashed the rom to be macro-vision free too! It really is a neat little peice of hardware, and perfect for tossing into a dorm room, because if someone breaks it it's relatively cheap to replace :-)

    2. Re:Apex by Longstaff · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, I have, on a friend's old first-gen Sony DVD player. Worked perfectly. Disc was a DVD-R burnt from an Apple SuperDrive (Pioneer drive).

      The first-gen sony's actually were more compatible w/ burned media than the second-gen. In a strugle to reduce the price and gain market penetration, they used cheaper laser assemblies.

      My second-gen sony will *not* play *any* burned media.

    3. Re:Apex by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 2
      I have the 660. I had to re-chip mine to remove region encoding because it was an early model with and EPROM instead of Flash ROM. The Flash ROM models could be reprogrammed with a CD! And if you're not afraid to resolder a jumper or two on the main board -- it's SMT, which makes it a bit more difficult than usual -- it's possible to convert an EPROM model to a Flash ROM. But unless there's a bug in the software for the mod, there's not much reason to bother.

      This model is highly modular. The drive itself is nothing but a standard PC DVD drive connected to the board with an IDE cable. The drive itself can be flashed if necessary by hooking it up to your PC. Should it go south, you can just chuck a new drive in there. It also can handle either PAL or NTSC without any trouble. I bought it by accident -- that is, not for these features but because it was cheap -- and I've never had any reason to be displeased with it.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    4. Re:Apex by Dahan · · Score: 2
      They are made of cheap parts and cheap plastic.

      I have an AD-600A, and while the design of the thing isn't particularly pretty, the construction seems OK to me. Only problem I've had is that the S/PDIF output jack got yanked on too hard, and it lifted the PCB trace. A bit of solder and jumper wire fixed that up though.

      I don't even think they all have optical audio out.

      Why would you want optical outputs anyways? I've always found that optical stuff annoying; give me RCA jacks and 75 ohm coax instead. (Which is what the Apex AD-600A has for its digital audio out).

    5. Re:Apex by Dahan · · Score: 2
      ...but I can also turn off DCSS and Macrovision.

      Sure, you can turn off CSS, but what good does that do? It makes the player unable to play any discs that do use CSS (which is most of them). I think the goal is to maximize the number of discs you can play, not minimize.

      The loopholes menu is more of a debug menu--just because you can change something in there doesn't mean that it's actually a good idea to do so.

      Anyways, I have the same player too... got it at Circuit City a few years back, after it was mentioned here.

  10. Not just release scheduling by crow · · Score: 5, Informative

    If it were just a matter of scheduling releases (which is the most often cited reason for the coding), then they wouldn't include region coding except on recent movies. But look at DVDs of classic movies; they're all region coded.

    Why?

    They want to maximize profit by charging different prices in different markets. They know that if they set the price 50% or 100% higher in some region, then people will import from the cheaper region. Region coding is supposed to stop that. In practice, this is the main reason that people want to bypass region coding--cheaper discs from other regions.

    1. Re:Not just release scheduling by Fat+Casper · · Score: 4, Insightful
      They want to maximize profit by charging different prices in different markets.

      And now they're starting to realise that if you only have one product to sell, then you only have one market. I love it: This was such a grass-roots effort that it wasn't organized at all- just people everywhere voting with their wallets.
      Meanwhile, back at the Capitol, the MPAA is pouring in money trying to stop history.

      --
      I spent a year in Iraq looking for WMD and all I found was this lousy sig.
    2. Re:Not just release scheduling by hysterion · · Score: 2
      look at DVDs of classic movies; they're all region coded.

      Not all of them. Just yesterday my spouse picked up a bunch of classics at $5 a piece -- The 39 Steps, another Hitchcock, an Orson Welles, a Boris Karloff flick and a few Bela Lugosi. (All from "Alpha Video", all carrying a pointer to www.oldies.com.) I was struck because none of them carry the usual "Region 1" in the logo -- quite the opposite, the small print says "This DVD is formatted for worldwide distribution." Right there I wondered if we might, indeed, be seeing the end of this system.

      As to "why", an element I don't see mentioned much is protectionism, pure and simple. France, for instance, is one of the last European countries with a movie industry that hasn't been completely killed by Hollywood -- yet. (Italian, Spanish, Polish directors are still making movies but in recent years, a large part were produced by the French. Cinecittà is all but gone.)

      No matter how hard they try (they used to try and promote them every year with a festival in Sarasota that I bet almost nobody ever heard of outside of France -- it was thoroughly ignored by the U.S. media), these movies never make it into the North American distribution.

      Now with DVD, they might have had a way in, right? English subtitles or overdubbing can be (often are) included, and anyone could buy that from Amazon.fr. Oops, that won't work, because people here have region 1 players, and for some reason these films are region 2. Who ordered that? Who benefits from that?

    3. Re:Not just release scheduling by JonahLee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They want to maximize profit by charging different prices in different markets.

      He is absolutely correct! Have any of you seen the prices on Japanese DVD's? The prices are unbelievable. From $40-$80 for many films! While the Region 3 (Japan is region 2) versions released for Hong Kong and Korea can be bought for usually under $20 American. This was also the reason that the orginal Criterion DVD of THE SEVEN SAMURAI was pulled, because it had removable subtitles and was sugnificantly less expensive than the Japanese release. So it was pulled and given unremovable subtitles so it would be less enticing to those in Japan with all region players.

    4. Re:Not just release scheduling by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 2

      One of the other problems with Japanese DVDs is that the region coding on some of them makes no sense.

      I'm a big fan of Japanese pop music, yet when I buy a DVD of it, it's nearly always coded region 2 only.

      I can understand them coding animated series region 2 only because they want north american studios to license/release them.

      Since there's next to no reason to release japanese music in north america, you'd think they could add region 1 as well and maybe get a few more international sales.

      I suppose it doesn't really matter in the longrun though, as people like me own region-free players anyway, but it would be nice if they clued-in.

      As for the price, it's more a product of what the market is used to as opposed to the cost or worth of the product.

      Consumers in Japan are used to paying high prices for new releases - until some studio breaks down and starts selling the DVDs for $15 each for a new release (unlikely to happen - nobody wants to depress the market like that), prices will stay high.

      It's not unusual for a box-set of animation DVDs to cost the equivilent of $400 US in Japan. When those same titles are released in the US, the box is usually under $100 because there's no way most US fans would even think about paying $400 for 4 or 5 DVDs.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    5. Re:Not just release scheduling by squiggleslash · · Score: 2
      Oldies are becoming my favourate DVD distributor: Here's something else to try with the DVDs - put them in your DVD drive in your PC, and take a look at the MPEGs (the dot-vobs in the video_ts directory)...

      ...no CSS! NO CSS!

      They're not the only people. Basically I'm finding that 99% of the "budget" DVDs coming out right now - the $5-8 DVDs with cheapo horror, B-movies, and very old classics - are region free and CSS free. Convert them to VCDs for viewing on your laptop, or to .rm/mpeg4 to view on your handheld. Watch them under Linux. Woohoo!

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  11. Simple solution by rhadamanthus · · Score: 5, Insightful
    APEX AD-3201. At K-mart for about 100 bucks. Open the tray, press 8-4-2-1, and turn off region encoding and macrovision. Wonderful. Some people say the quality of the player is questionable--but it works fine for myself, and so does the one I got my dad...

    this will probably be modded as offtopic--which only makes my sig more ironic than usual...

    ---rhad

    --
    Slashdot needs to interview Natalie Portman.
    1. Re:Simple solution by pogle · · Score: 2

      Anyone got something similar for the Panasonic RV-31 DVD player?

      Googled it, but only found a page selling modkits.

      --
      http://thechubbyferret.net - Ferret pictures and informative links.
    2. Re:Simple solution by pogle · · Score: 2

      I dont suppose theres a way to remove the Macrovision support too?

      Thanks for this, tho :)

      --
      http://thechubbyferret.net - Ferret pictures and informative links.
  12. They still don't get it by niall2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The idea here was to keep people in regions where a film had not been released from getting the film ahead of time. Once again the MPAA has the kneejerk reaction of stopping the flow of things. Just like when the VCR came out...how to keep people from reprodicing movies.

    I go to movies in the theater not because its the only place to see a film. I can wait for most films to be released on DVD before I truge off to the theater to stand in line and pay too much for popcorn. No I go to the theater to got the theater...to see Spiderman on a 36 YARD diagonal screen. Film is much more engrosing not having a pause button.

    This is also obvious when you see how rare the MPAA rereleases great films. How many out there who own 2001 on DVD would pay to see it on the big screen. I'm sure we could come up with a list of hundreds of films they could put back out and have people flock to see them (think about how much better the summer would be if you knew there were going to be some good films that you could look forward to in addition to the list of ones you hope will be good like MIBII).

    I think overall the real problem with the MPAA and the RIAA for that matter is they are in it for the money...not for the art. Yes the money may currently be in getting the 13-21 year olds into the seats, but if they tried to focus on the art rather than the product they might just be able to get the rest of us in there a little more often (and we'd still buy the DVD).

    --
    Today is a gift. Save the receipt.
    1. Re:They still don't get it by AftanGustur · · Score: 2
      The idea here was to keep people in regions where a film had not been released from getting the film ahead of time.

      Well, that's what was *said*
      And yet, all the goldies (1980's films and older) are region coded ..

      I seriously doubt that there were ever any noble plans for the region coding.

      --
      echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln80~Psnlbx]16isb572CCB9AE9DB03273snlbxq' |dc
    2. Re:They still don't get it by naoursla · · Score: 2

      That is not why they have region coding.

      Region coding was used to preserve the business model of selling distribution rights to different markets. When a movie is distributed internationally, different companies pay money for the rights to sell the movie in different counties. They pay millions of dollars for these rights and it is a huge part of the income for a movie. Of course, these companies want guarantees that sales from other distribution regions won't overlap the areas they were given. The distribution companies also set the prices according the what their markets will bear. There is often a disparity of pricing between marketing regions. Without region encoding the whole thing falls apart. International distributors aren't willing to pay for the rights so the movie, so the movies don't make it to internation markets. The studios aren't making as much money from selling the international distribution rights, so they charge even more for movies locally. Everybody loses.

    3. Re:They still don't get it by mpe · · Score: 2

      The idea here was to keep people in regions where a film had not been released from getting the film ahead of time.

      Except region coding also appears on old movies and those which are released only on video tape/DVD.
      Differential pricing appears to be a big part of the motive. In addition to having the status quo of staggered movie relases and the US specific "syndication" model of TV repeats.

      This is also obvious when you see how rare the MPAA rereleases great films. How many out there who own 2001 on DVD would pay to see it on the big screen. I'm sure we could come up with a list of hundreds of films they could put back out and have people flock to see them (think about how much better the summer would be if you knew there were going to be some good films that you could look forward to in addition to the list of ones you hope will be good like MIBII).

      There appears to be some aspect of not wanting "old" content to appear to be competing with the new. Another possibly little tapped possible business model would be to show films and their pre/sequel(s) back to back.

  13. Solution by Mr_Silver · · Score: 2
    Wouldn't a simpler solution be to release a film on the same day in every region? I'm sure at the beginning it might be a bit of a logistical nightmare (what with a year of stuff to catch up on plus the whole global release thing) but over time (say 6 months) it wouldn't be much of a problem.

    It would also go some ways to curb the film downloading from the net. For example us Brits can actually go and see a film that's being shown in the US rather than having to wait just under a year for it to come out and (for some) be tempted to download it in that time.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:Solution by hyphz · · Score: 2

      There's a simple reason for this: there are a HUGE number of cinemas in the US. If the movie studios had to make tapes for all the cinemas in the world, it would cost them a load of money; so instead, they make tapes for the cinemas in the US, run the film until its run ends, get the tapes back, clean them up, and send them to other countries. The number of tapes used in the US is enough to cover several smaller countries.

    2. Re:Solution by matt_wilts · · Score: 2

      >Wouldn't a simpler solution be to release a film on the same day in every region?

      They did this for Austin Powers, I believe, and also the latest Star Wars?
      Matt

    3. Re:Solution by warmcat · · Score: 2

      Yes. It would.

      Another more interesting question is why don't they give the consumer what they want and issue the film on DVD at a higher price simultaneous with the cinema release.

      Think about it... what's actually the problem?

    4. Re:Solution by budgenator · · Score: 2

      I disagree the real reason is because the foreign distributers or even consummers have NOT filed a class-action suit against the MPAA for damages caused by the unfair trade practice of early releases in particular markets.

      Used to be that a release had a A circuit, B circuit, then C Ciruit (mostly millitary and foriegn theaters).Then went to tape, VCR rentals and cable networks killed most of that getting distribution started to mean big money so the big rental chains started to negotiate early releases hurting the smaller MOM & POP rentals operations. This was decided to be an Un-fair trade practice because the small guys couldn't compete, so now everybody gets a pre-shipment and a release date, on that date it hits the selves for everybody. Get could cheating and you don't get the pre-shipment and have to hope that the shipment gets to you on the correct date and if you lose sales its because you were stupid.

      Same principal would apply early release to region 1, but not region 2 in our global economy.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  14. Would be nice for Europe, but....... by Emerson1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Unlike Europe, in the US most TV's aren't capable of displaying PAL AND NTSC signals, only NTSC. Unless DVD player manufacturers start shipping their players with PAL->NTSC converters, I don't see that the loss off regional encoding will make much difference. We still won't be able to watch imports from europe.

    1. Re:Would be nice for Europe, but....... by kevin+lyda · · Score: 2

      uh, i think you're on crack. afaik the movies are digitally encoded and then converted on the fly to pal, ntsc or a window on your computer monitor.

      --
      US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
  15. Why are the hacking codes there? by Hanno · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While I also made my Samsung 811 player region-free using a simple button sequenceon the remote control, I never quite understood why these codes were _there_ and so _easy_ to find.

    Sure, DVD players are an international product and the region is selected after manufacturing a player.

    But those in the business who actually wanted the region protection to succeed could have easily forced the manufacturers to make region-hacks more difficult. Manufacturers could have been forced to actually lock the region-code some way or the other.

    E.g. the Pioneer 444 requires changing its firmware and it doesn't use firmware-upgrades through CDs as many of the Asian DVD players do, so making it region-free requires a lot more effort and cost. It's been hacked, as well, but it's pricy.

    So all in all, it seems almost as if the DVD player manufacturers did not want the movie industry's plan to succeed...

    --

    ------------------
    You may like my a cappella music
    1. Re:Why are the hacking codes there? by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 2
      So all in all, it seems almost as if the DVD player manufacturers did not want the movie industry's plan to succeed...


      Close - but more like the DVD manufacturers want to make money with "exclusive" features.

      If it comes down to a choice between a) a DVD player for $99, or b) a DVD player that costs $99, but you've read about the "cheat codes", the manufacturer is hoping you'll vote for B.

      Manufacturers, to a large extent, care more about their customers than the movie industry. (I know that's not universal, and there's give and take. Last time I checked, though, I give more money directly to Apex than a movie studio does.)
    2. Re:Why are the hacking codes there? by hyphz · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They didn't. In the early days of DVD, the 'cheat codes' were always there because the DVD manufacturers knew it would put people off buying the disks. They only put the region coding in in the first place because it was mentioned in the license. The 'cheat codes' were a dodge around the license; the license presumably says that users shouldn't be able to turn the coding off, so they claim that the 'cheat codes' are maintenance access codes for callout engineers (which many appliances have), and aren't for users to use. But then there's no law restraining them from being distributed as long as the DVD company themselves didn't encourage it too blatantly.

      This kind of thing isn't uncommon; the early portable MiniDesc recorders from Sony could have their 'one-generation-only' copy protection turned off by entering a code on the front panel buttons.

      I don't think this is illegal even in the USA. In the UK and probably Europe it's directly plain; you can get multi-region DVD players in a supermarket (because they are cheap units from Asia which were region free in the first place), and there are commercial firms devoted to chipping players, which have gotten to seriously sophisticated levels now (change between regionless, auto adjusted locking, or locked to any region you choose; no macrovision; user prohibition override (ie, you can skip opening ads or studio screens); chip placed on a plug-in daughterboard so if the player breaks, you just pull the daughterboard then send it to Pioneer or whoever and there's no problem) and there's nothing illegal in it.

    3. Re:Why are the hacking codes there? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      because the manufacturers of DVD players understand there customers better then the MPAA does.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Why are the hacking codes there? by mpe · · Score: 2

      They didn't. In the early days of DVD, the 'cheat codes' were always there because the DVD manufacturers knew it would put people off buying the disks. They only put the region coding in in the first place because it was mentioned in the license.

      Also putting the region code bit into changable sortware means that they can manufacture one board, rather than 8.

    5. Re:Why are the hacking codes there? by mpe · · Score: 2

      My Daewoo dvg-4000s could be sold anywhere on the planet with just a new box and manual. Well pretty much. It has a built in electrical adapter so that you could use it anywhere (with a plug adapter of course).

      For the manufacturer the easiest option is to have a universal power supply in the unit, fitted with an IEC or telefuken plug. Then supply different power leads, even have the retailer supply a power lead at the point of sale.

  16. Industry's 2 "real" reasons for region coding by lordpixel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you ignore the possibility that they won't fit in the available MB because of the extra 30 minutes of outakes and inane commentaries, then the original idea was that DVDs could be sold with multiple soundtracks & subtitles thus reducing costs.

    In reality, 2 reasons are cited in defense of region coding:

    * fees for extras (commentaries, FOX tv "making-of" specials) are often negotiated per region. It would cost the studios some effort and $ to get permission for all of the pieces in every market, so they make a European version without all that stuff [1]

    * Censorship. Most European countries have their own version on the MPAA rating scheme. What's OK in the UK might not be in France, and vice versa. So there end up being a dozen different little cuts that have to be made to get the rating [2]

    My personal feeling is it exists to maintain the old price differentials. DVDs are more expensive outside of the UK. Most of the studios have a European distributor who fiddles with the artwork, replaces the [R] rating with a (18) logo etc. If you could just use the region 1 disk, all of the "value" these people add wouldn't be needed anymore. The middleman would have to adapt - and we know that unfortunately people often try to use a technical fix to prop up their existing revenue model.

    For a reverse example, the BBC usually region codes its TV shows. This is, I've heard, because it has a US distributor (Warner Home Video) who is supposed to get first refusal for all US releases - and they would feel threatened if people could just import what they wanted to watch when its released in the UK. So they mandate region coding. Not sure what would be in it for the BBC otherwise - its certainly a Hollywood studio thing.

    [1] the smart reader will have figured out you can do this whether you region code the disk or not.
    [2] once again the smart reader will be wondering how the hell this sort of granstanding by a few un-elected arbiters of taste is supposed to be beneficial in any way.

    --

    Lord Pixel - The cat who walks through walls
    A little bigger on the inside than out

    1. Re:Industry's 2 "real" reasons for region coding by Hanno · · Score: 2

      Censorship. Most European countries have their own version on the MPAA rating scheme. What's OK in the UK might not be in France, and vice versa. So there end up being a dozen different little cuts that have to be made to get the rating

      Wrong example. UK and France share the same region code 2 and both use the PAL system, so any French DVD will play just fine in the UK and vice versa.

      --

      ------------------
      You may like my a cappella music
    2. Re:Industry's 2 "real" reasons for region coding by iainl · · Score: 2

      Actually, while PAL and Secam are slightly different standards, the player is converting the native 720x576 at 50Hz interlaced image to whichever TV standard its asked to - a French disc will play correctly on a UK tv and vice versa after all.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    3. Re:Industry's 2 "real" reasons for region coding by JanneM · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'll add another reason: movies are frequently released quite a bit later in Europe than in the US. The reasons are somewhat obscure, but part of the explanation (as I've understood it) is because of the need to subtitle or dub them. Another reason could be different seasonal patterns for movie releases. On the other hand, it's more and more important to get the DVD version out in stores soon after the movie ends its run, so people will have the title fresh and will want to buy it. Having region encoding means people can't just buy a release before it's even appeared in local movie houses.

      Yet another reason is that DVD:s are a lot cheaper in the US than in Europe. They also tend to have better picture quality. With the ease of buying stuff from overseas, they'll kill the ability to markup their product in these markets.

      One final reason is to stop 'grey imports' of stuff from one market to another, which would erode the market dominance of the distributors.

      In Europe (or at least in Sweden) this is moot; I don't think I've even seen a region-locked DVD player for sale in the last year. /Janne

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    4. Re:Industry's 2 "real" reasons for region coding by avdp · · Score: 2

      The release are staggered for promotional purpose as well. It's a bit hard to get the movie stars to go out to "permiere" and do interviews in the whole world at the same time.

      Last but not least, a movie that completely flops in the US may in fact never make it abroad.

    5. Re:Industry's 2 "real" reasons for region coding by Phillip2 · · Score: 2

      "Most European countries have their own version on the MPAA rating scheme."

      Which relates to films which are purchased in these countries, or displayed in a public forum. This clearly does not cover those films bought, for instance, in the US, then imported back to the UK.

      The only reason that DVD's have region encoding, is that the companies wanted to ensure that the inflated costs of media in europe stayed the same. Many people already buy CD's abroad and import them back, which costs them CD companies a lot of cash. They do not do so with videos because the different TV standards prevent it. With DVD's they wented to arbitrarily enforce this situation.

      The free market is fine when it makes people big business rich. When it does not, clearly, they want to stop it.

      Phil

    6. Re:Industry's 2 "real" reasons for region coding by mpe · · Score: 2

      The reasons are somewhat obscure, but part of the explanation (as I've understood it) is because of the need to subtitle or dub them.

      US movies released in the UK are not subtitled or dubbed. Or have popups to explain lesser known bits of US culture. Region 1 is the US and Canada. Where Spanish and French are also common languages. Most of Europe will understand at least one out of English, Spanish and French. Indeed there are quite possibly more English speakers in Europe than in the US.
      If it was simply about language then the regions would be defined by language. It makes no sense to put Japan in the same region as Europe and to put English speaking Australia and New Zealand in a different region from either the US or the UK.

    7. Re:Industry's 2 "real" reasons for region coding by forged · · Score: 2
      • DVD:s are a lot cheaper in the US than in Europe. They also tend to have better picture quality.

      I agree with the cheap part, however I believe that DVD's from various regions are encoded differently (either in PAL or in NTSC) depending which standard is in your region.

      Getting a Region 1 DVD to play on a PAL system gives you a NTSC-to-PAL signal degradation, so you actually get reduced quality: NTSC's poor image resolution to start with, combined with PAL's lower frame rate.

      Likewise, people playing a R2 DVD on a NTSC system get a degraded PAL to NTSC picture with missing frames.

      Bottom line: try to get a DVD in your local region when possible, or at least make sure you get a NTSC/NTSC or PAL/PAL combination for optimal picture quality.

    8. Re:Industry's 2 "real" reasons for region coding by mpe · · Score: 2

      The only european countries that you could release american prints for would be GB and Ireland.

      Plenty of English speakers throughout Europe. Anyway you probably can't simply use US prints. At minimum frames showing the classification would need changing.

    9. Re:Industry's 2 "real" reasons for region coding by mpe · · Score: 2

      The French actually use SECAM (System Essentially Contrary to American Method), which is nothing but PAL with a fancy FM colour sub-carrier.

      Actually PAL is effectivly NTSC version 2. Both schemes use similar methods for colour sub carrier, quite a few chipsets support both. SECAM uses a different approach, hence the "Sytem Essentially Contrary to American Method" joke.

  17. Price Controls by Ezubaric · · Score: 3, Informative

    If region encoding fails, it's going to hurt people in poorer countries far more than it will us. Although it still will, if you import movies.

    Region encoding allows the studios to time the release of movies, sure. But it also allows them to sell the DVDs at different prices around the world. I just bought Der Herr der Ringe in Berlin for far less than I could in the US. People in Africa, Russia, and China get even better discounts.

    So while the US is used to paying $20 for a new DVD, if the region system breaks down . . .

    Everybody will have to pay the same equivalent amount of money. It probably won't affect the prices of Anime, though. A global economy, eh?

    --

    ----------
    I am an expert in electricity. My father held the chair of applied electricity at the state prision.
    1. Re:Price Controls by Odinson · · Score: 3, Funny
      " If region encoding fails, it's going to hurt people in poorer countries far more than it will us."

      Yea, if you really consider not being able to afford the Britney Spears Live video being hurt.

    2. Re:Price Controls by droleary · · Score: 2

      So while the US is used to paying $20 for a new DVD, if the region system breaks down . . .

      . . . the free market kicks in to stablize prices. Money starts going to those who offer the DVD for $10, and that demand causes a price increase while the people charging $20 have to lower their prices to compete. In the end, everyone pays the same $15 (or whatever), with the net result being that the poor countries are making $5 more from the sales than they had previously. A far cry from your claims that they'll suffer; you sound like little more than an MPAA shill.

    3. Re:Price Controls by Ezubaric · · Score: 2

      compete. In the end, everyone pays the same $15 (or whatever), with the net result being that the poor countries are making $5 more from the sales than they had previously. A far cry from your claims that they'll suffer; you sound like little more than an MPAA shill.

      The free market only works when it is free. The same entity is ultimately selling the DVDs. They only sell cheap $10 DVDs becaues those willing to pay $20 cannot buy them. If those willing to pay $20 can use the $10 ones, do you think that they'll keep selling them for $10? Those that were buying them for $10 will have to shell out the extra dough.

      --

      ----------
      I am an expert in electricity. My father held the chair of applied electricity at the state prision.
    4. Re:Price Controls by colmore · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Legit DVDs are dirt cheap in some countries to fight piracy. Even the MPAA knows that if a DVD costs more than the average worker's weeks' wage, then piracy is going to be rampant. Even if region encoding breaks down, they can't sell $20 DVDs in Russia.

      Prices might go up a bit in these countries, but a much more likely effect will be prices dropping in the US. Which sounds great to me. Ask yourself this: since DVDs cost about as much to license + manufacture as CDs, how can they justify selling them at double the cost? Especially considering that most movies have allready made enough in theater profits to completely cover the cost of manufacturing and promoting the DVD 100 times over.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    5. Re:Price Controls by loopkin · · Score: 2

      LOL ! I bet you've never been in such countries...
      DVDs and CDs cost practically nothing, simply because they are copied locally, illegally as you may guess... this is in fact the #1 source for the "Big Piracy", that MPAA/RIAA/others want to fight against with taxes on blank CDs and so on.

      believe me, a CD in some market around Moscow costs nothing ($1 or $2), and has been illegally copied in some more-or less hidden small factory not very far from there.

      copyright is a luxury in such countries, and nobody gives a damn about MPAA/RIAA fantasies. Region coding is only a problem from people from EU, USA and Australia, and maybe Japan, that's all.

    6. Re:Price Controls by mttlg · · Score: 2
      So while the US is used to paying $20 for a new DVD, if the region system breaks down . . . Everybody will have to pay the same equivalent amount of money. It probably won't affect the prices of Anime, though.

      You seem to have countered your own argument there. Prices will equalize for everything but anime? Anime DVDs (and related products - toys, models, etc.) tend to cost more in the US because either:

      • The item is a Japanese release that has been imported into the US, adding additional cost.
      • The item is an American release based on the Japanese release, with additional dubbing, marketing, etc., adding additional cost.
      Even if the products are identical except for the intended distribution, the "local" version can be marked up by as much as it would cost to obtain a non-local version, without significantly hurting sales. It just has to be more convenient to buy the version they want you to buy.

      Now let's say a movie studio wants to release a movie for distribution in a country with rampant poverty, such as India, Russia, etc., without region codes. They already have the audio and video tracks from the original release, so they can just recycle those and maybe add some more subtitles. They can leave out any special features, commentary tracks, deleted scenes, etc. that they don't feel will help sales in that market and might increase the price. They then use whatever production and distribution channels in that market that keep costs down to an acceptable level so that the final price is at a level that the market can bear. Now you have, for example, an Indian release of Titanic for the equivalent of $5.

      So now I'm looking for a Titanic DVD (hypothetically of course, I will admit that I did buy a copy of it when I saw it for $10 or so during the .com boom), and I'm pissed off that it costs $20 in the US. I look around and see it on an Indian retailer's site for $5. Then I notice that it has no extra features, the picture quality is horrible due to the cheap quality of the production equipment, and it will cost $20 to have it shipped by any method that isn't likely to involve it being intercepted by pirates (the real kind, not copyright infringers) during a three month voyage to the US. The $20 US release doesn't look so bad by comparison.

      Maybe an enterprising US retailer can purchase these cheaper DVDs in quantity and sell them in the US market. Well, shady outfits already do this with electronics, and they are universally hated for this. DVDs don't have warranties, so there may be more success with that particular product, but the methods used to cut costs on these releases will still be evident in the quality of the gray market product. Since raising prices in poorer countries would effectively kill sales there, the most effective way to maximize profits would be to lower the price of the US version to a price that would make selling a gray market copy unattractive.

      The other side of region coding is preventing people in other countries from getting the US release of movies that are released in the US first or are never released in other countries. Without region coding, they would have to rely on silly laws banning the import of such movies. Of course, since region-free DVD players are common outside of the US, region coding probably has less of an impact on sales than the cost to import, so there shouldn't be much of an impact here.

      The bottom line is that region coding isn't about cost, it's about control. It's about segmented distribution and making sure that everyone is buying the right version for their location at the right time to coincide with theatrical releases. However, the popularity of region-free players and the abundance of hacks to make players region-free have demonstrated that when confronted with a region issue, people will simply bypass it rather than do what the movie studios want them to do. Eliminating region codes would remove complication and costs in DVD production by removing the need to produce a different DVD for each region. This would result in a greater range of choices in many regions that don't have a large enough market to justify a separate release of less popular movies.

      Of course, I could be completely wrong about everything above, since I'm no expert in matters like these. The fact is though that region coding only works when it is forced on everyone's hardware, and that clearly has not happened. Geographical barriers are still significant enough to maintain price differences between physically distant markets, so there should be little or no negative impact if region coding were to disappear.

    7. Re:Price Controls by Gaccm · · Score: 2

      Lets look at a similar scenario. When NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) was created America was able to get tons of stuff from mexico for far cheaper prices. As an example, avacados dropped over a $1/each in price. The problem is that the avacado sellers know they can get (to them) a lot of money in U.S. so they jacked up the price in Mexico. IIRC mexicans paid 2x the cost for an avacado compared to americans (when you take in the effect of average salery).

      So, yes, we will get cheaper prices, but other countries wont just go up a bit, they will go up a lot in all other countries. Compare how much easier it is to buy DVDs from around the world than avacados.

      --

      Only dead fish swim with the stream...
    8. Re:Price Controls by droleary · · Score: 2

      If those willing to pay $20 can use the $10 ones, do you think that they'll keep selling them for $10? Those that were buying them for $10 will have to shell out the extra dough.

      Way to completely miss the reasoned conclusion. They'll have that extra dough (and then some!) because they have that trade imbalance to exploit. Every $10 DVD they ship off for, say, $15 pumps $5 into the local economy. The only reason they can't do this is because of price fixing (via region codes) by the MPAA. If the content is the same, there should just be one price and let the distribution market freely sort out the differences in getting that content to the customers that want it at a price they're willing to pay.

  18. Great Graphic by twoshortplanks · · Score: 3, Funny
    The BBC have a history of having "wonderful" graphics to go with their stories. In this case there's a picture of a Sky Digital (satalite) remote control, which I doubt very much could be used to reprogram a DVD player, and a grinning moron (no offence) with a N64 controller...

    At least it's not as bad as some bad examples. (links stolen from ntk

    --
    -- Sorry, I can't think of anything funny to say here.
  19. Region Encoding == Censureship by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 2

    Why, yes, that IS quite a leap of logic, but stay focused for a few minutes while I explain.

    A movie is released in the US, that is VERY controversial, but it's legal due to the 1st amendment. It's released through one of the bigger film companies, and they always stick with CSS, so they want to release it to Europe and Japan. But the governments of Germany, France, England and Japan have decided to outlaw the movie, because it's so controversial (think up a stupid reason, and it'll probably hold true), so the studio doesn't want to release it in Region 2 anyway, because it's simply not worth the effort with four of the largest countries and markets in the region outlawing it.

    So now the rest of the countries where censureship is expressly forbidden (like Denmark) are now effectively under censureship - from other countries no less; all because some schmuck in Hollywood wants to rule the world.

    Region Encoding is censureship and the powers that be knows it and loves it for that.

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    1. Re:Region Encoding == Censureship by lovebyte · · Score: 2

      Very funny! Europe (with a couple of exceptions like the UK and Ireland) have much less censorchip of movies than the US! Many French or German movies contain very explicite sex scenes and don't get a porn rating.

      --

      I'll do it for cheesy poofs.

    2. Re:Region Encoding == Censureship by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 2

      Actually it probably wouldn't be that hard to get a movie banned in Europe, it just wouldn't be because of the visual content but because of the message of the movie. Just look at the reception of a game like Grand Theft Auto III has received in Europe. Off hand I can count no less than four countries that considdered banning it:
      UK, Germany, France and Norway(!!!)
      And that's just in the EU.

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    3. Re:Region Encoding == Censureship by lovebyte · · Score: 2

      I live in France now and I can tell you that banning or censoring a movie in France is close to impossible. I have lived in the UK and the law is very different there, movies can easily be banned and are often censored to get a better rating. I think in Europe every country is different and has a different view of these things. Video games are seen as being only for kids (and they are not obviously) and there restrictions are seen as normal. You can also look at songs. AFAIK no song has ever been banned from broadcasting in France whereas it is very common in the UK.

      Anyway, I don't think censorchip is a primary reason of DVD region coding. It's all about money. What would you expect from Hollywood?

      --

      I'll do it for cheesy poofs.

    4. Re:Region Encoding == Censureship by Hanno · · Score: 4, Informative

      Europe have much less censorchip of movies than the US!

      Nope. Europe has a very different censorship than the US.

      We in Europe don't mind nudity or sexuality on screen - as long as it serves the story. (Porn is usually defined as nudity/sexuality without a plot. The French take this very literally - there are movies that show explicit sexual intercourse but that are not rated "porn" in France.)

      However, our censors get all giddy-up with violent / numb action movies.

      The US seems to be the other way round. Violence is ok, even in kid's movies, while a nipple can already be enough to qualify for an R rating. Eddie Murphy's "Boomerang" made a nice parody on this where an advertisement featured all sorts of atrocities, but a woman's breast was too much for the target audience...

      --

      ------------------
      You may like my a cappella music
    5. Re:Region Encoding == Censureship by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 2
      You are full of unrefined manure.

      No, I'm just full of shit. There is a difference you know.

      Yes, Finland and basically every country in scandinavia are very lax when it comes to censoring. Living in Denmark myself I often wince when watching outtakes from British or American movies, where the actors screw up a line and goes "aw f*bleep* I s*bleep* up my f*bleep* line".

      It's okay to watch a man be slaughtered on TV, as long as noone uses bad words.

      Yes, you can bring a CD-collection back and forth between the US and the EU, but are you sure you can do that, when the EUCD (European Unions Copyright Directive is in place. Have a look at Chapter III, article 6. It's on page 8.

      When that is put into effect, it will probably be illegal to move from the States to the EU and bring your dvd-collection with you, because that would be circumventing the copy-protection on them (it certainly signals intent).

      So it's not censorship in the precise meaning of the word, but when I cannot get to watch my favorite new movie, because I'm not allowed to import it (it's another region) and it's not being made for my region because of the economics involved, it might as well be censorship.
      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  20. The questionable legality of regional coding by altgrr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If such a scheme had been introduced within the EU on such a device, such that say you couldn't play CDs purchased in France on a British CD player, this would be in breach of European trading laws.

    Why can't this be the same in the case of DVDs across the world? Because Hollywood thinks it has the right to delay release of films in different countries, to the extent that some UK-produced films are released in the US first.

    It's time to stop the media attempts at controlling the world, and start thinking around the problem - many people order DVDs direct from the US, but there aren't many companies that specialise in importing such DVDs and selling region-free players.

    --


    Like car accidents, most hardware problems are due to driver error.
    1. Re:The questionable legality of regional coding by geekoid · · Score: 2

      "Because Hollywood thinks it has the right to delay release of films in different countries"

      if its there movie, they do. Unfortuanatly for them, good for us, DVDs are making that an impossibility.
      so they will have to stop relesing movies on DVD until it has been released in all countries, or live with the fact that once its on DVD anybody can watch it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  21. Use your powers for good instead of evil by MrR0p3r · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sometimes region encoding is a useful tool. I've seen a couple posts elude to the fact that it's good for subtitles, but if you're not going to fill the dvd with a full length movie and other extraneous junk, region encoding can be very valuable. We've just started authoring dvd's here at the office and I've recently found out that I can set different parts of the dvd to different region codes. Basically what this means is that if we build content for spain and we encode it for the spaniards' region, so they only see the spanish content, and we can also have a sperately encoded section (completely different content) for the USA in all english. This also enables us to specify content for different cultures, cause some people aren't down with the american way of life. It's a money saver, let me tell you. Sure dvd's aren't that expensive, but when you get into mass production costs, it saves alot in the long run to be able to encode the data all on one dvd instead of seperate ones for english/spanish/blah blah blah.

    --
    Whatever man, I spelled it write!
    1. Re:Use your powers for good instead of evil by IIH · · Score: 2

      We've just started authoring dvd's here at the office and I've recently found out that I can set different parts of the dvd to different region codes. Basically what this means is that if we build content for spain and we encode it for the spaniards' region, so they only see the spanish content, and we can also have a sperately encoded section (completely different content) for the USA in all english.

      That's a bit of a pain for those Spanish people in the US, and those living in Spain who speak perfect english, isn't it?

      This also enables us to specify content for different cultures, cause some people aren't down with the american way of life

      And if you happen to be interested in a culture that's different to the one you're living in, you're out of luck, eh? Isn't learning about new cultures a good thing to do? Here's an idea: What about having all the content available to all regions, and let the user choose? Bit too radical, eh?

      --
      Exigo spamos et dona ferentes
    2. Re:Use your powers for good instead of evil by zsazsa · · Score: 2

      What you describe shouldn't be a function of the region lockout - it's a function of the language preference of the user's DVD player (which can be set by the user on all players that I have used.) The nice thing about language defaults is that it doesn't keep me from playing a German-only disc in my player with English set as the default language.

      DVD regions aren't fine grained enough for this, and they absolutely prohibit playing of out-of-region content.

  22. Unfortnately 'multi-region' players wont work soon by rjw57 · · Score: 4, Informative
    Region codes on a player are actually stored as a bit-field where having bit 'n' set means the player can play region 'n+1' disks. So-called 'multi-region' players allow the user to set this bit-field to 0xff and hence 'play all regions' [Note this means that 'Region 0' plyers are better termed 'Region 255' :)].

    Some of the bigger studios (notably Fox) are starting to use something called 'Region Code Extension' (RCE) on their disk. With this the first commands the DVD player find on the disc are (in pseudo code):

    let r = Region Code;
    if(r == 1)
    jump to movie
    else
    jump to naughty person page
    endif

    Where 'jump to naughty person page' jumps to a still-frame saying somthing like 'You can't play this disk in this region'. A multi-region player can't cope with this since it reports its region mask as 0xff so will still jump to the still-frame.

    Only a plyer set to play region 1, and only region 1 can play the disk. Hence to play it you need a DVD player which allows you to reset the region an arbitary number of times (rarer) rather than a 'multi-region' one (more common).

    Of course some Linux DVD players simply have a 'region' field in their config file which defeats this :)

    --
    Rich
  23. NTSC/PAL by mattyohe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why not instead of region encoding they just stay with their current use of PAL encoding in the UK... i think its easier to break a region code than change to a different standard completely.

    --
    - what is the definition of simultanagnosia?! I've been meaning to look it up!
  24. Control by Restil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Region coding is about movie industry control. There simply is no other way to put it. They can scream bloody murder about decss being used to make pirated copies of their movies, and at least that has some small infitesimal nugget of truth to it.
    Region coding however, is not to prevent someone from using the product in an illegal manner, but to prevent someone from using a product in a legal, and more importantly PREFERED manner.

    People in other regions would prefer to purchase a DVD at a cheaper rate, and they could, but the cost has been artificially set such that it can't compete with other regions. Movies show later in countries outside of the US and the industry doesn't want to lose money on the theatre sales if the movie is already available on DVD.

    But unlike the descrambling issue, they can't scream bloody murder about piracy. Anyone and everyone that attempts to bypass region coding bought the movie. And if one DVD player comes out that is multiregion, once the price on it comes in line with other players, and it will, those other players will be unable to compete, especially in markets where the desire for a multi-region player is high. The other manufacturers WILL go multi-region as well, or they won't be able to compete. The DVD consortium won't like it, but they'll have to find a battlecry other than piracy to rally people to their cause.

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
    1. Re:Control by mpe · · Score: 2

      Movies show later in countries outside of the US and the industry doesn't want to lose money on the theatre sales if the movie is already available on DVD.

      On the other hand US customers get screwed on TV series DVD releases.

      And if one DVD player comes out that is multiregion, once the price on it comes in line with other players, and it will, those other players will be unable to compete, especially in markets where the desire for a multi-region player is high.

      In many parts of the world retailers would have a hard time selling single region players, even if they were cheaper.

  25. Good article by Featureless · · Score: 5, Informative

    This covers the subject pretty well, discussing the economics, sizes of markets, theoretical justification for region subdivisions, etc.

    DVD Region Coding

    Region coding is a perfect example of how the content production trusts abuse their special status. You see, our government, in its infinite corruptibility, has granted legal sanctity to the IP producer's content control systems. But the MPAA isn't just trying to use this new favor to prevent theft. They really see themselves as the natural owners of the whole transport layer and presentation medium, and they exploit it in any way possible - including with region coding, which (I suspect) allows them to sidestep the perils of free trade to further control prices.

    What gets me is that I don't even see region codes as a big loss for the MPAA; I'm curious about the substance of the price differences across region boundaries that this allows them to create. I understand that the movie industry is in the habit of doing theatrical releases months apart on different continents, and that this allows them to make sure that the American DVD does reach Australia before the movie hits theaters, but really, how often is that in danger of happening? I suppose there are cases where they decide some time after a release in one country to go for a release in another (probably based on sales figures)... But how much hardship are we really talking about, I wonder?

  26. dis-Agreed by oliverthered · · Score: 2

    It looks like a spelling error or misunderstanding ,flaunting and flouting are pronounced differently. or at least where I come from they are.
    flouting being like OUTing
    and
    flaunting being like haunting.

    flaunting could even be the correct word if they mean 'wide-spread showing off and telling everyone that it can be done'
    not
    'wide-spread breaking of the rules'

    I'm going with
    flounting as a compromise between the two.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  27. Re:Something the Military taught me by Fat+Casper · · Score: 2
    If it can't be circumvented you can overpower or undermine it.

    Circumventing and overpowering are, alas, illegal now. All we're left with is undermining.

    --
    I spent a year in Iraq looking for WMD and all I found was this lousy sig.
  28. The economics of region encoding by jcam2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The real reason behind region encoding is not
    to delay releases between different countries,
    but to maximise income. Movies (and many other
    kinds of intellectual property) sell at different
    prices in different countries, due to differences
    in purchasing power.

    A particular movie might make the most money
    when sold at $20 in the USA, but in Australia
    $10 might be the best price point. However,
    without region encoding there would be nothing
    to stop someone in the USA importing and
    re-selling movies from Australia. The end
    result would be that prices would be roughly
    the same in all countries.

    So if you live in a rich country, region
    encoding is a bad thing. But for citizens of
    poorer countries, it means that they are
    getting DVDs at cheaper prices than would
    prevail under total 'free trade'.

    So maybe the breakdown of region encoding
    isn't as good for consumers as you might
    first think ..

    1. Re:The economics of region encoding by agdv · · Score: 2

      Quite true, but you forgot a small point: if the DVDs sold for $10 in the poor countries without region encoding are only released in the local language (I assume most of them have their own language, and that most poor countries have mostly people who don't speak other languages), you won't be seeing it in rich countries anytime soon. I mean, would an American buy LOTR in Swahili just to save a couple of bucks?

    2. Re:The economics of region encoding by droleary · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Movies (and many other kinds of intellectual property) sell at different prices in different countries, due to differences in purchasing power.

      Translation: The MPAA uses their monopoly powers to engage in price fixing.

      However, without region encoding there would be nothing to stop someone in the USA importing and re-selling movies from Australia. The end result would be that prices would be roughly the same in all countries.

      Yes; it's called a free market. In the process of prices becoming stable, money would flow into Australia to put them on equal economic footing with the countries they trade with. In short, the region encoding hurts Australia to benefit the MPAA.

      So maybe the breakdown of region encoding isn't as good for consumers as you might first think ..

      Keep thinking. Region codes aren't in place for the good of anyone but those that put them in place: the movie studios. Yet, as history has shown (e.g. the VCR) those same people are absolutely clueless when it comes to understand what business methods can help or harm them. The consumers actually do know better, and breaking region codes will likely end up benefiting the MPAA greatly, but I doubt they'll ever be thanking us.

    3. Re:The economics of region encoding by haggar · · Score: 2

      R2 movies have been usually more expensive than R1 titles. Does that mean that the citizens of:
      Albania
      Bulgaria
      Chech Republic
      Croatia
      Hungary
      Romania
      Slovenia
      Ser bia
      etc.*
      have better buying power than the citizens of Canada and USA?

      Or do you think that in these countries people earn the same as in UK, France or Belgium? And yet, they are all together in Region 2.

      Or, let's see region 3: we have, lumped together, Taiwan, Korea, the Philippines, Indonesia and Hong Kong. Do you really think an average Taiwanese or a Honk-Kongian earn the same as an Indonesian or Filipino?

      Region 4 is even funnier: together we have the whole of South America, Central America and mexico AND New Zealand and Australia.

      Therefore, your argument seems to be flawed.

      --
      Sigged!
    4. Re:The economics of region encoding by Panaflex · · Score: 2

      So much for a "Free Market Economy" that all the talking heads say the world needs.

      Ohh yeah.. except for movies.

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    5. Re:The economics of region encoding by spencerogden · · Score: 2

      I believe this is also refered to as discriminatory pricing, which in most situations is illegal.

    6. Re:The economics of region encoding by mpe · · Score: 2

      For example, some tv shows (like Buffy the Vampire Slayer) are released on dvd later in the US, because the studio has lucrative syndication agreements based on keeping it out of home video. In the UK, where there are no syndication agreements, they release the season dvds earlier.

      "Syndication" appears to be something created by the US system of loosely coupled TV networks. Which makes it very much a unique American thing. Even worst from the position of US viewers is that syndication showings can be trimmed to allow even more commercials to be stuffed in.

    7. Re:The economics of region encoding by mabinogi · · Score: 2

      > $10 might be the best price point.

      heh....I wish...
      DVDs in Australia usualy go for $AU35+
      There are places you can get them for less, but that's the standard retail price.

      Depending on the exchange rate, that's probably fairly close to $US20, but I think that comparitive affordability between the two countries is much closer to $AU = $1US than the exchange rate (usualy around $1AU = $US0.55), so the idea that they'd make them cheaper in places than can afford them less doesn't seem to fit here.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
  29. The technical protection may fail by codexus · · Score: 2

    but what about the legal one?
    In Switzerland, it's now illegal to distribute (as in selling, *not* copying) a movie without the explicit consent of the copyright holder for Switzerland. It seems we no longer have the right to choose what movie we want to see but we'll have to accept the small selection that are officially distributed here.

    --
    True warriors use the Klingon Google
  30. read the article... by mirko · · Score: 2

    They don't give any evidence of the forthcoming "collapse", they just consider it's getting closer but don't add much element.
    Looks like hype to me even though the generalisation of the DVD-unlocks are a good but still unofficial.
    Alsoi, since Aug 1st, it has become forbidden (in Swiss) to import Zone [^2] DVDs, so, I'd say that such collapse might be postponed.

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  31. On Verge of Collapse? I don't think so. by frozenray · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wholesale import of non-RC2 DVDs is forbidden by law in Germany and, since 1 August 2002, in Switzerland. I don't know about other countries, but the outlook for the EU is not good.

    I can still legally import RC1 DVDs from the US as a private person here in Switzerland, but this takes time and is rather expensive because of overseas shipping and customs expenses. Stores such as MediaMarkt used to have a good assortment of RC1 DVDs at reasonable prices, but this is now illegal. Since the primary reason to switch to DVD for me was the possibility to see a movie in English with English subtitles, I have practically stopped buying DVDs locally (the RC2 versions are often missing features from the US releases, and the English language audio track has permanent German subtitles).

    Bottom line: Thanks to the industry's ridiculous policies, the money they get from me is down to about 1/3 of what it used to be. Maybe I'm the only one, but if not, they'll sure find a way to blame the slump in sales to "piracy" instead of acknowledging that they're shooting themselves in the foot.

    And, by the way: How is this compatible with the "free trade" idea so cherished by many politicians today? Does "free trade" really mean "free trade as long as we can profit from it"?

    --
    "There are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare." - Blair Houghton
    1. Re:On Verge of Collapse? I don't think so. by Fluffy+the+Cat · · Score: 2

      the outlook for the EU is not good

      This isn't obvious. The EUCD forbids copyright circumvention devices, but it's not obvious that region encoding is a techical protection mechanism. You can copy a DVD without cracking the region encoding, providing you have a drive of the correct region. CSS, on the other hand, plainly is - DeCSS is likely to be illegal under EUCD implementations as long as it's held to be an effective technical protection mechanism (which again isn't inherently obvious, but is probably the case)

      On the other hand, it's not obvious that importing DVDs from other regions is legal in the UK. The UK Copyright, Designs and Patents act (1988) doesn't give you an intrinsic right to make transient copies of material even if that's incidental to viewing them, so you're breaching copyright just by having a couple of frames of MPEG stream in the RAM of your DVD player while watching it. It's assumed that you're implicitly licensed to do so by the publisher so things are ok, but this is only true of DVDs that have been sold in this country. There's no reason to assume that the publisher of a region 1 DVD is licensing you to watch it in the UK.

      Of course, the EUCD doesn't actually apply to individual member states. Instead, each state is obliged to implement something functionally equivilent to it before December 21st (at least, I believe that to be the date in question). Member states may impose more draconian laws than are required by it.

  32. summer vs. winter by imperator_mundi · · Score: 2, Informative

    Traditionally movies are released in summer in US and in fall/winter in Europe.

    Maybe at the beginning there was some translation issues, but now that movies movies are released in english (at least in north europe) I think that's because now people are are accustomed to see major releases in winter (in particular in the pre Christmas period).

  33. Great for students by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What really sucks is that as a student of the Italian language, I cannot get a copy of the Wizard of Oz in Italian. I can get a region 1 English/French/Spanish version because that's the makeup of the continent (note that Portuguese is missing). If I want a DVD in a foreign language, I HAVE to bypass region coding. And the manufacturers will not even provide me DVDs in another language that are legally region 1 coded. So I say screw them.

  34. Get the Daewoo... by SparkyUK · · Score: 2, Informative

    I got my region-free, 110/220volt, NTSC/PAL/SECAM/everything DVD player from :

    www.110220volts.com

    Plays my UK PAL DVD's on my NTSC TV with zero hassle.

    The build quality isn't excellent but its not crap and for the money (about $120 as I recall) if it breaks I'll just buy another one.

    For me at least, region coding is already over.

    1. Re:Get the Daewoo... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      except there is a difference between region-free and play any region.

      region free bit is set to 255, and that can be detected. so

      if region free bit = 255
      display "you can't watch this."
      end if

      you will need one where you can change the bit to 1,2,3,4,5,6 when ever you need to to really be 'region free'

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  35. YOU DONT NEED CSS FOR THAT by Srin+Tuar · · Score: 2


    In reality, 2 reasons are cited in defense of region coding:

    * fees for extras

    * Censorship.


    CSS cannot be a technical solution to a social problem: Its not the MPAA's job to control import/export regulations. If they only offer locally legal discs in every region they will succeed at 99.9% of the above. If some country want to prevent a more graphical version of a movie from entering their country then they will shutdown any massive importer. I really dont think these are very valid excuses for CSS.


    The real reason is obvious: CSS is a tool for extracting the consumer surplus and nothing else

    1. Re:YOU DONT NEED CSS FOR THAT by GroovBird · · Score: 2

      I guess you miss the point. The parent poster is not talking about CSS, but about region coding, which are two different things.

      Dave

  36. Hollywood is evil.. by AftanGustur · · Score: 3, Funny


    Those of you who haven't yet figured out just how evil hollywood is, absolutely have to read this !

    Makes you wonder what this world is coming to !

    --
    echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln80~Psnlbx]16isb572CCB9AE9DB03273snlbxq' |dc
  37. Re:Solution (push for digital cinema) by Ldir · · Score: 2
    This is reportedly one of the reasons Hollywood is pushing for digital cinema instead of film. Aside from the extra control they gain, it also allows the studios to readily open a movie world-wide. They can get out of the expensive business of duplicating, shipping, and handling stacks of reels of film.

    The down side is that each theater must invest a small fortune in very expensive digital projection equipment. This is a big reason why there has not been much progress on converting to digital cinema; most theaters run on pretty slim margins. And, like any digital storage medium, some people fear that a switch to digital movies will ultimately lead to the loss of those movies as technology changes. Will future generations be able to read the data from a movie saved today?

  38. NASA is in violation of the DMCA!!! by MsGeek · · Score: 2

    I find this to be SOOOOOO funny! A US agency is technically in violation of the DMCA because they want to make sure that astronauts who bring DVDs aboard the space station can play them.

    Region encoding and CSS encryption is ABSURD.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    1. Re:NASA is in violation of the DMCA!!! by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2

      " A US agency is technically in violation of the DMCA because they want to make sure that astronauts who bring DVDs aboard the space station can play them."

      Yes, but what region is space ? I would think it would be region 0 - aka region-free.

      graspee

  39. The effect also happens in reverse... by Demon-Xanth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm into anime a bit, and there's a LOT of anime that just never makes it to the US because it wouldn't be profitable. Some of it is quite good, others make it over only to get hacked to pieces by americanization.

    One upcoming example is a show called ".hack//SIGN" (pronounced .hack). It is an excellent show in Japan that will be released in the US by Bandai, the main character has already been renamed from "Tsukasa" to "Kite". And Bandai has made an OVA, which from what I hear is nothing short of a train wreck. Now remember that this is a show that's already on TV in Japan. Not a theatrical release.

    An example of a show that will NEVER make it to the US is "Puni Puni Poemi". If you wanna know what it's about just use your favorite search engine. Due to various themes that range from sexual to silly it just doesn't fit into any of the main stream US "catagories". "People" want either pr0n or silliness. "They" don't want both. Personally I found the show to be downright hilarious. Even though I wouldn't show it to any kids :)

    --
    If you think education is expensive, you should try ignorance -- Derek Bok, president of Harvard
  40. What did you think i meant? by Srin+Tuar · · Score: 2
    Cascading style sheets?


    Why dont I give you a link:clue;

    1. Re:What did you think i meant? by Fluffy+the+Cat · · Score: 2

      CSS is entirely independent of region encoding. Region encoding allows you to read the DVD in the first place (the drive is responsible for enforcing this - it happens below the OS level), while CSS is then used to scramble the data on the DVD to make it impossible to copy it without having a valid decryption key. There are regionless DVDs that have CSS, and there are region locked DVDs without CSS.

  41. Volksempf�nger of the 90's by rainer_d · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I always considered (and still do) this region-encoding similar to the Volksempfänger we (Germany, then "Deutsches Reich", for the interested student) had from c.a. 1933 to 1945.
    These where radios that were only able to receive German radio-stations. No shortwave, no BBC nothing else.

    Granted, this was for obvious political reasons (and there were cinema-"commercials" educating the people not to listen to foreign radio-stations), but the possibility is there, still today.

    When will they limit the distribution of books ?
    When will a German book-shop be raided because he sells a US-bestseller not yet translated into German ?
    Think this is "impossible" ? Then think of Harry Potter and all the craze it created.

    --
    Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
  42. Used To Happen With LaserDisc by EXTomar · · Score: 2

    A DVD will return the same mpeg stream reguardless of what region it is. It is up to other hardware to produce the NTSC or PAL or HDTV or etc etc etc.

    Laserdiscs since they aren't digital had to encode the video format into the media. A NTSC LD will only produce a NTSC video signal.

    The NTSC vs PAL thing was a stronger region locking mechanism than the current DVD region coding. To play an old NTSC LD on PAL equipment required buying an intermediate hardware (like a VCR that could produce either). With DVDs it often just requires messing with your old hardware to get access to the bits.

    Such is the march of technology. :-)

  43. the grammar nazi says: flaunt != flout by Preposterous+Coward · · Score: 2
    due to widespread flaunting of the system.

    To flaunt means to exhibit ostentaiously. It's something Slashdot geeks might do with a hot new cell phone, or with their knowledge of grep syntax.

    The correct word here would be flout, to scorn, to treat with contempuous disregard.

    --

    "Biped! Good cranial development. Evidently considerable human ancestry."
  44. Small children by yerricde · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hmmm, who the fsck would record a dvd to vhs anyways.

    Parents of small children would, to avoid damaging their copy of "Adventures of Pinocchio" that the kids watch every night. Keep the purchased DVD copy as a backup and let the kids dest^H^H^H^Hwatch a copy on a $2 VHS tape. The Supreme Court has maintained that this is a fair use.

    That is, until Congress enacted a bill that created 17 USC 1201, which gives publishers the right to outlaw fair use.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  45. Region Encoding by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First, I think region codes are a bad idea (from the standpoint of the consumer), anything that prevents me from seeing, buying, enjoying something legal is bad.

    With that said, the part of me with the 2 business degrees understands why the region codes exist: max profit. Make no mistake, every "good" (define that how you like) business decision was made to improve the bottom line, not for "art," "the cause," or what-have-you. As a result the region free DVD players are a godsend. But you might want to see if buying one in your area is illegal. If not: then get 2, they're cheap and small, and you can always use the backup ("cheap" means "cheap," people. Substandard parts used in exchange for the functionality you desire--it's a tradeoff....)

  46. Get a *good* Multi-Region player cheap! (Sampo!) by Aquaman616 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I found out about Sampo players thanks to a post in another story and I have to pass on the love...

    I've used Apex players and frankly, they are trash. Spend a bit more and get an easily hacked player that has a lot more features and is a *lot* better built... a Sampo!

    All the info you need is at Area 450

    There is one particularly cool player they seem to like there that has a CF slot in it - and you can swap out that slot for a IDE hard drive if you'd like (to play back MPEGs, MP3s or JPEGS!) I didn't need that so I got the DVE661 for all of $160 pre-moded! (Gene Callahan rules! - see the pricing page on Area 450s site, he premod's players and sends them to you quite cheap!)

    --
    A|Q|U|A
  47. Where to get cheat codes by conduit4 · · Score: 2

    I know this has probaly been answered somewhere in here but where is a good place to look up cheat codes by make and model. I can sort of see the point of regional encoding for dvds that are available worldwide. But what about the ones only available in a certain region. For instance, the Family Guy Seson 1 dvd came out in the UK and only the UK. How am I supposed to get my Family Guy Fix when the US cancelled it and has no plans for making a Dvd??

  48. There are ways around modded DVD players by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most people seem to think that a DVD is strictly a movie format like a VHS tape or an MPEG file. It is MUCH more than that, there is a full, albeit limited, language there, and you can do some interesting tricks with it. Warner tested a system where the dvd would load a program, check whatever region system it needed, and crash if it didn't get the response it wanted. It never checked the region in the official way, but it had the same effect. The program went something like this:

    I am supposed to be region x
    Try a region other than x
    If it works, crash/display screen other than movie

    Simple and effective. It didn't make it very far, so I guess there were compatibility issues. but if the system collapses, look for this, or worse schemes to resurface. Just because it makes you buy a new player every month to keep up isn't the studio's problem now is it? *You* are the 'thief' here.

    -Charlie

  49. No, region 8 by yerricde · · Score: 2

    Yes, but what region is space ? I would think it would be region 0 - aka region-free.

    Special international venues such as air and space are region 8.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  50. What about audio cd's by alphaseven · · Score: 2

    Audio cd's don't have region encoding, and the price of them hasn't stabilized, going between $12 US in Canada to $24 US in Japan.

    Also, DVD manufacturers can probably get around people ordering DVD's from foreign countries by putting less/different features on the Russian/Chinese releases of DVD's (omitting directors commentaries, creating menus incomprehensible to English speakers.)

    Even with a global economy there still can exist variety in pricing.

  51. when technology fails... by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...legislation can't be far behind.

    keep an eye out for legislation making encoding mandatory, and backdoors for devices that are designed to primarily play dvds illegal.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  52. As a reply to you (and all other fellow Europeans) by haggar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There is always a way:

    www.play.com free shipping in all European countries, and an absolutely fantastic selection of both R1 and R2 titles. And what's more important, since they are in Europe (Jersey Islands), you avoid the customs.

    Then there is dvdboxoffice.com which also has free shipping, this one WORLDWIDE, but I suspect that larger shipments (4 or more DVDs in a package) might attract the custom's attention. Expecially since DVDboxoffice.com are based in Canada. I use them if play.com doesn't have the title I am looking for.

    These two sites have been tried multiple times, never had one single complaint (and I have bought in excess of 200 titles).

    --
    Sigged!
  53. The worst thing about region hacking? by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's that because RC1 discs come out first, and are cheap, and have the most features, then they get bought by people outside RC1.

    Why is that bad?

    Because it artificially inflates the RC1 sales figures, which makes RC1 look even more important to the distributors, which makes them focus on it and keep pumping the cheap, early, heavily featured discs into it, while screaming that they have to protect markets ("won't somebody think of the artists

    Don't get me wrong, my UK based DVD player is pretty much set on region 1 (rather than 0, because of RCE) and most of my DVD collection is RC1, so I'm contributing to this. I'm just aware of it, and I hate that I'm helping to make it worse for everyone in future. :(

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:The worst thing about region hacking? by Have+Blue · · Score: 2

      This might not be a bad thing... If every market in the world is buying only R1 DVD players and disks, region coding has already been defeated.

  54. Doesn't explain it still... by JM_the_Great · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But say they focused their advertising in America, spending N million dollars, and some guy from England buys a copy and has it shipped to him. The producers still get their money, just as if an American were buying the DVD and they can still reinvest this into marketing in the UK later.

    Basically, even if they adopted a region by region advertising system, it doesn't hurt them if somebody in a region not-yet-advertisted-in buys the DVD. They get the money just the same, so your point still stands as to why they might spend their time marketing a DVD in various regions, but not why they would need a whole system to keep you from buying and playing DVDs from another region.

    --

    --Justin Mitchell
    "2nd Place is a fancy word for losing" --Bender (Futurama)
    1. Re:Doesn't explain it still... by Baikala · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And if someone boughts not one but 200 or 2000 copies of that new/hype/cool movie and "floods" the market? When the movie finally arrives to theaters it would't be perceived as new/hype/cool by anybody, not even the ones that hasn't seen it. It's something old and then the studios don't make as much as they would have done. I don't support this, I'm only statingwhy they invented the region scheme (one of the reasons at least)

      --
      16,777,216 comments ought to be enough for any forum!
  55. but WILL it fail, not it has gone away by geekoid · · Score: 2

    well, you got 2 kinds of people:
    people who want to watch movies from different regions
    peple who just want to watch what they pick up at the locoal dvd store.
    The first group will figure out how to get around it, because there desire to figure it out motivates them. This is the group the mpaa wants to get money from for each region.

    the second group could care less, therefor encoding doesn't apply to them, because they will never buy outside the region.

    If the cost of encoding is more then any revenue it genertates, they will stop using it. At that point there will be a slew of firmware upgrades available.
    It has been my experience that anybody who really needs there VCR programmed, somehow manages to get it programmed.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  56. UK DVD consumers are shafted compared to US by rklrkl · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It must be fun to live in the US and be a DVD consumer:

    • Cheaper DVDs.
    • Released 3-6 months before the rest of the world.
    • Less censorship (UK has a habit both for theatrical and DVD releases of censoring movies to lower their rating and hence sell to a wider audience).
    • Often more/better features than other DVD regions.

    Luckily, thanks to the Internet and most DVD player manufacturers, savvy UK customers can:

    • Unlock a particular region (or make it "any" region) via a remote control hack - see somewhere like DVD Reviewer.
    • Buy US or Canadian DVDs on the Internet. I recommend DVD Pricecheck - select regions 1 and 2 [sometimes it is actually cheaper to buy region 2 !], type in the title and search for it. CD WOW! has most new DVDs at 14.99 pounds or less and play.com has a wider selection, although prices aren't quite as good as CD WOW!
    • Boycott UK stores that sell new releases for 18-20 pounds...

    One thing that's interesting is that UK stores such as HMV, W.H Smith, Virgin etc. do not stock Region 1 disks in their UK outlets. No doubt it's because they would be released earlier, cost less, have better content. etc. etc.

    BTW, I've never been charged VAT or import duty on any Region 1 DVDs I've bought online and had shipped to the UK - heck, I've just pre-ordered Monsters Inc. 2-disc set from Canada via DVD Soon at a silly price of something around 11 pounds (including postage) - any bets that will be retailing at 20-22 pounds in UK stores ?

  57. Re:PAL vs NTSC by gaudior · · Score: 2

    I believe most BBC DVD's are available in NTSC, Region 1, as the US has long been a great consumer of BBC properties, largely though PBS and some of the earlier cable programmers, like A&E.

  58. mising the point :) by Srin+Tuar · · Score: 2


    the drive is responsible for enforcing this - it happens below the OS level


    Well, thats just about as effective as CSS, a few bits that say "Please dont play this!".


    They amount to be effectively identical, which is why they get lumped together. Also, the Key distribution of CSS *is* region specific, so its not possible to be region free and CSS'd, because not all dvd players have all decrytion keys, they only have the ones for their region. (This is more based upon the implementation rather than the algorithm of css)

  59. Homer says hack your dvd player by hrm · · Score: 3, Informative
    For people who are wondering about the picture of Homer Simpson with the caption "controversial advocate of dvd hacking" in the BBC article, read this article.

    Basically, the UK fox site had a DVD faq section where Homer answers the question "what is regional coding?" with "I have no idea whatsoever what regional coding means, but it is essential that you buy a multi-region player. Do it now."

    Nowadays, Fox's UK Simpsons site, here, has Homer saying "I have no idea what regional coding means. But if you find out, let me know. Don't worry, I'll still be waiting here when you get back."

  60. everything said... by Tom · · Score: 2

    almost everything said here about price fixing, market delays and other reasons for region coding has already been said last year. I've collected most of it on my DeCSS page.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  61. Re:Head Butt? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 4, Informative
    "They removed a head-butt? Why?"

    The head-butt was removed from Episode 2 because, according to the UK ratings board, was violence that was easily replicable by children.

    They don't mind light sabers because kids can't replicate that and hurt each other. But a head butt could easily be imitated.

  62. Region Hacking in Space... by Catmeat · · Score: 2, Informative
    According to this, two portable DVD players (Sony FX1's) sent to the Internation Space Station so astronauts could watch movies in their time off, where region hacked by a British company.

    The station has an international crew, NASA just wanted them to be able to see movies in their native languages if they wanted. Doing it Holywood's way would have meant shipping up 5 identical machines.

  63. Depends on What You Want from Your Player by Chibi · · Score: 2

    And some people are paying hundreds for region free players!

    I just purchased my 2nd region-free DVD player last night. It cost me $230 with shipping from the Netherlands. Definitely more than the Apex you are mentioning, but I'll also be getting a lot of nice extras that make a difference for me (Component Video, DTS Decoding). Different strokes for different folks. :-)

    --
    If all you have are silver bullets, everything looks like a werewolf.
  64. Re:Why do they even bother? by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
    "Region Encoding is a joke. In fact, about the only place these days which still "enforces" Region Coding is....the USA! The rest of the world treats it like the joke it is."

    More correctly ... the only place that region codes are not a joke is in Region 1. I am in Canada and they are not a joke here. Of course if you know where to look, (usually the malls in Asian communities) you can get the region free players very easily, as well as plenty of imported japanese notebook computers and 31337 GSM cell phones with colour screens and bluetooth. (Technically illegal imports, of course.) And oh, the manga ... /me drools

    But seriously, I am ashambed to say that most people in Canada and the US don't know what DVD region encoding is because most movies appear here first.

  65. Re:Why do they even bother? by geekoid · · Score: 2

    not in germany and switzerland. it is illegal in those countries to sell dvds that are not encodeed with the proper region for its location.
    The UK is crrently considering doing the same thing.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  66. people move by kevin+lyda · · Score: 2

    here's a concept: people move. i moved from the us to europe and i'm not alone. likewise people move from europe to america. what happens to our dvd collections? are we just supposed to buy our collection again? and if we are supposed to do that, what do we do with our old dvd's? i thought they didn't want people selling used cd's - they're ok with us selling our old dvd's?

    --
    US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
  67. Good... Or bad, who knows... by sheldon · · Score: 2

    On the one hand this is good, because it forces people to realize that we are becoming a more global society. Release the movies to the whole world all at once! This would make the new digital movie format all the more attractive.

    On the other hand, I suppose it's bad because it forces the world to be more global. That is, you can't have a different version of the movie in Japan than in Germany or the US. If the Germans don't like some scene in the film... well too bad, they get it anyway.

    This globalization forces all cultures to merge. This is either good or bad, depending on how you look at it.

  68. Helps recruit pirates by alext · · Score: 2

    What gets me is that I don't even see region codes as a big loss for the MPAA

    Worse, by imposing this constraint they have encouraged a truly vast number of normally ethical customers to align themselves with "pirates" and "crackers".

    Region coding is very irritating - it's hard to convey to a general US audience just how annoying lame vendor tricks like the region change count in the Windows registry are. Cracks that fix this nonsense are a life-line, and now we've joined this jolly helpful community we're going to stay in touch.

    1. Re:Helps recruit pirates by Featureless · · Score: 2

      Excellent point. Very well put.

  69. Re:Head Butt? by Ollierose · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yeah... it was the difference between a 12 and 15 rating, I believe. Almighty $ comes into play again, except in pounds sterling. There was a headbutt in Lord of the Rings which was screened in the UK, but that was deemed to be less violent due to the non-human characters taking part

  70. Bullshit. by vadim_t · · Score: 2

    I'm a Russian, live in Spain and understand English pretty well. Forcing me to watch content in Spanish you aren't going to match my culture, neither my preferences. I prefer watching the original version. If it's in English then I want English subtitles too, otherwise it does't matter.

    Most importantly, I don't want ANYBODY to decide what should I watch. It's not your damn business if I want to watch it in japanese, okay?

  71. Re:Head Butt? by rodgerd · · Score: 2

    Many European peoples are more concerned by depictions of violence than of people naked (never mind having sex). Germany is probably the premier example of this.

  72. Re:Why do they even bother? by mpe · · Score: 2

    Region Encoding is a joke. In fact, about the only place these days which still "enforces" Region Coding is....the USA! The rest of the world treats it like the joke it is.

    The people in the US didn't see it as a problem with movies. But now there are lots of seriously annoyed Buffy/Angel/X-Files/Futurama/Enterprise/etc fans.

    The player manufacturers couldn't give a crap; why do you think all these players have a "hiden" menu in them that can disable it?

    It's cheaper for the manufacturers to make one model, which can have the appropriate code put in when it is tested on the assembly line just before it goes in the box.

  73. Re:Head Butt? by Ronin+SpoilSpot · · Score: 2, Funny

    Funny, actually. I usually hear it as:
    Many Americans are more concerned by depictions of naked people or sex than by violence. /RS - European

  74. A pearl of enlightenment by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 2

    Does "free trade" really mean "free trade as long as we can profit from it"?

    Why, yes, yes it does.
    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

  75. Flouting, even. (NT) by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 2

    en tee

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

  76. Re:Unfortnately 'multi-region' players wont work s by ronfar · · Score: 2
    Interesting, Sony's movie division (Columbia/Tri-Star) is following the same pattern as their games division. They did something similar with their Playstation with games when they came out with a new format that wouldn't play in modified Playstations.

    Sony, can't live with 'em, can't legally coat their executives with napalm and set 'em ablaze...

    --
    All the creatures will die, And all the things will be broken. That's the law of samurai. (Jubai, 1605)
  77. It gets worse! by fm6 · · Score: 2
    This is also obvious when you see how rare the MPAA rereleases great films. How many out there who own 2001 on DVD would pay to see it on the big screen.
    Well, me for one. Actually, I'd settle for one of those $10,000 hires umpteen inch TV sets (plus a DVD player with digital output, of course). Which I'd never consider worth the cost, even if I had that kind of money to throw around. Just as good would be a place that rented time on such a system. Even if it were expensive, it'd be something you could chip in on with friends, and it'd be a fun social evening.

    Except. People have already tried to set up such operations. Well, when I read about it, it was projection analog TVs and VCRs, which might or might not have succeeded financially. But they had no chance to find out -- they were soon confronted with studio lawyers, pointing at the "no public performance" fine print on the tape boxes.

    Damn it, IP hoarding is a pain.