Net Traffic Shocks Mimic Earthquakes
belphegor writes "Technology Research News is running an article describing research linking the similarties between Earthquakes and Internet traffic. By pinging hosts across the network, researchers 'were able to measure frequent changes in Internet congestion...results showed that the Internet, like the earth's network of faults, exhibits criticality -- a condition of sudden and drastic change. "Sudden drastic congestion leads to a large value of the round trip time of the ping signal, which is identified with a main shock," said Abe. The researchers referred to these sudden, drastic traffic changes as Internetquakes.' They also saw 'aftershocks' that can be mathematically described in a similar manner to the seismic ones more familiar to many Californians."
maybe we'll get lucky and if we ping the .NET side enough it will fall into the ocean! :)
Insert tastelass Slashdot-effect joke here.
Is your browser retarded?
The Slashdot Effect.
I'm surprised that it isn't mentioned in the article. They are probably trying to patent it, I'm sure.
-S
We Apprentice Developers and Designers
So what does a Slashdotting rank on the Richter Scale?
Spencer Ogden
The gas in my bowels emulates earthquakes and volcanoes. That doesn't mean it should be studied.
someone give these scientists something important to study and waste grant money on!
Slashdot Effect = San Andreas Fault?
It's interesting, I'm glad to see the article ties it in with other complex systems as well.
SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
Seems like /. has been responsible for many a 'netquake. Now /. will crash your web servers FOR SCIENCE!
NO front page postings during the world series this year!
MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
Causing plate shift all over the internet :) :P
sorry, it was just too easy to let go by
apparently Technology Research News will be the next website to feal this 'internet earthquake'...
maybe with followup stories it can have some 'aftershocks'...
Runnin' On Empty
I've lived in So Cali for two years, and have not felt one earthquake. I didn't move here specifically to be in earthquakes, but still I feel cheated :(
Our company's webmaster has managed to exactly duplicate the San Andreas fault then. That box is shakier than California... oops, here comes another tremor now. Yup, reduced to rubble one more time.
One of these days I'll find some way to get the URL posted to Slashdot and I can see if computers really do burst into flame and shoot out showers of sparks like on the old Star Trek....
I wonder what a good Slashdotting would look like? Probably 11 on the Richter scale.
So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
This pattern of behavior (where two completelly different things show the same underlying behavior and/or explanation) is exactly one of the things that Stephen Wolfran is trying to explain in his book A New Kind of Science (see amazon link and reviews here)
Basically, everything in the universe can be explained as a huge network of nodes, where all these node do is computations following very simple rules. From such simple rules we get all the laws of physics, human behavior, chaotic behavior, and in this case the behavior of an earthquake and Internet traffic.
I like to think of the net as a non-linear resonant
circuit. The correct starting conditions give
you very large responses to "small" inputs.
It's resonant so you see "ringing" in the response.
Seems to me that you can definitely look at the
earth's crust in a similar manner.
Absolute statements are never true
already! Damn!
Don't wait for your neighbor,
Green Eggs and Ham!
Doin' the netquake!!
You know what I'm talkin' about?
post a stupid slashdot effect joke, looks like about 20 people beat me to it, dammit! Oh well here is a different stupid joke:
Q: What has 4 legs and smells like fish?
A: Bill Clinton's desk
... I don't think earthquakes are an entirely appropriate metaphor. I'd think of it as more like dropping flaming bombs. Then, like in Populus, a flaming dude goes running back home only to set it on fire. Then people run out of it into neighboring homes and set them on fire. And then..
Well shoot now I wanna go play Populus. I don't feel like fleshing out my point.
People get money from the government to research this kind of stuff? I want a government grant. I want to compare the internet to the growth of fungus on oranges.
I've always referred to earthquakes as a "geological slashdotting". I think that this backs up my theory.
Life is the leading cause of death in America.
discovers something known about the internet, changes the terms to fit there thought models, and claims its a discovery.
The Kruger Dunning explains most post on
...shocking.
I'm not really a web designer, I just play one on the Internet.
Gamers have known about the Quake(s) and (low) ping time relationship for years...
"Good things don't end with eum, they end with mania or teria." - H. Simpson
This would, of course, make /. the san andreas fault of the internet world. Causing havoc and destruction to small, unprepared villages up along the faultline.
"Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
...the Slashdot effect.
I'm not surprised about this behavior: after all, the Net has been mostly created in California, so there must have been some subconscious influences on its design so that it mimics the quakes that plague the area. :)
I see a movie coming out of this.
-- Knuckle Blood : Official Lube of Team Rusty Nuts.
Now all of the money the government has spent on the detection of earthquales can actually help ME. Advance knowledge of net connection would make my life much easier.
Heck, VOIP might even actually be commercially feasable.
___ I don't respond to Anonymous Cowards, and I Never Mod them UP.
Is it just me or is this crap really stretching it. I think with 10 years and a good budget, I could write a convincing enough paper describing how cow feces is similar to chocolate.
You can only be young once, but you can be immature forever.
Boy, this must have really made those guys leap out of bed in the morning, eager to get to work!
So what you are saying, is that when there is traffic, things slow down??? and i thought that it was cause someone [insert funny analogy here]
www.oobersworld.com - For those that ride.
I just got a slow ping. I am now typing this while huddled under my keyboard drawer in order to avoid injury from the netquake.
does that mean that instead of saying:
;-P
"in 1996, kobe, japan had a terrible earthquake"
we should say:
"in 1996, kobe, japan got earth slashdotted" ?
or "for san francisco in 1906, the fire after the earth slashdot effect was more damaging than the orignal earth slashdot itself."
or "accompanying large earth slashdottings, there often follows many smaller earth afterslashdots."
are we to replace the richter scale with cowboy neal poll results as well?
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
Oh dear lord, please help this troll heal from his wretched heart burn. Make sure he remains asleep, but not in nightmare and he sleeps off his atrocious indigestion.
We pray to you, in jesus' name.
Amen.
and the obligitory Windows Joke(tm)....
I guess that means all the WinNT servers represent the fault lines?
This signature is a waste of 42 characters
Quake is responsible for all the slow-down on the Internet?!? For some reason, i thought that Counter Strike was more popular...
20 mil and I will! Learn Esperanto with 20M others.
When ever a new pentium 4 CPU is released Germany experiences sudden lag.
When ever new office toys are sent out for review Australia takes a hit
and when ever some idiot with a backhoe digs up a backbone line, well hell, the entire USA goes ploink.
Need help treating your acne? Come here!
Needless to say, 90% of all these Internet quakes are the result of a link on Slashdot. (And 95% of all statistics are made up.)
The first ever Ultimate Frisbee video game: here (now
How much of that criticality is due to the Slashdot Effect?
.
Why? We've been calling it the Slashdot Effect for years. :-)
--GrouchoMarx
Card-carrying member of the EFF, FSF, and ACLU. Are you?
"linking the similarties between Earthquakes and Internet traffic..."
I thought that there was nothing else they could call "like a <insert something to do with technology>", but there they go one-upping me again. So our brains are like computers, our genes are like source code, and our networks are like geology. Perhaps we really are in a matrix? Or perhaps all those similies in school are finally showing their ugly far-reaching effects on society.
We should commission a study, but then, somebody probably already has and I'll read about it on slashdot next week.
My $0.02 will always be worth more than your â0.02, so
I see the /. effect more like a tornado than an earthquake. An impenetrable wall of traffic is created around the site which sit in the calm "eye" of total disconnection.
it's amazing how these scientists still have the balls to go and feed press with research results like this. You know, in certain situations you could find empirical proof to link for example your toilet visit to network congestion.
windows ehh...
Error - Host not found.
C:\
www.oobersworld.com - For those that ride.
Seemingly irrelevant car fires occurringly safely off the side of the highway back up traffic for miles as traffic around the incident slows to a crawl. This behavior mimics that of seismic activity and internet traffic slowdowns.
Internet experts now warn you in the event of a car fire, to stand in a doorway or underneath another heavy structure.
Hot Damn! It's the Soggy Bottom Boys!
...like a lot of work to do to come up with what basically appears to be not much more than a metaphor.
Roving Web-Teleoperated Robot
DUH!
Stuff breaks and because it's a network other stuff breaks too.
wow.
--Dave
You think you has it good, but all we needs is a few WorldComs to twitch the switch and ya'll be right back there in '93. Yep.
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
Internet, Aug. 27, 2002 - The Technology Research News (www.trnmag.com), which recently wrote an article on how Net Traffic mimics earthquakes, experienced an earthquake that shattered their networks, and brought down their servers. The earthquake measure 8.4 on the CmdrTaco TEBCF scale (time elapsed before complete failure).
News Correspondent Kimberly Patch had this to say via her cell phone connection: "one minute we're up and working, next thing you know everything just went crazy. People were screaming and running out of the building. I tried to keep calm, but at one point, knowing the magnitude of things, I paniced and ran out of the building screaming bloody murder!"
A representative from OSDN was quoted as saying: "heh.. heh.. umm.. heh heh.. nice huh?".
Calls to slashdot.org were not immediately returned.
---
(Score: +1 Funny, +1 Interesting, +1 Too Much Time on Hands)
I wonder what percentage of the traffic in the networks they were "monitoring" was the actual pings? "Dang. Seems to happen every time we do this experiment!" Just curious...
After pinging (naughty me) www.trnmag.com I have found a strong resilience to strong seismic activity such as the slashdot effect. Though there seems to have been a quake near the end. And some gaps may have appeared since there was a 5% packet loss.
// small leading quake // main quake // after shakings
PING www.trnmag.com (209.238.138.241): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=0 ttl=231 time=268.2 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=1 ttl=231 time=266.4 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=2 ttl=231 time=267.6 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=3 ttl=231 time=266.0 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=4 ttl=231 time=267.2 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=5 ttl=231 time=262.1 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=6 ttl=231 time=263.4 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=7 ttl=231 time=264.7 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=8 ttl=231 time=265.9 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=9 ttl=231 time=266.7 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=10 ttl=231 time=268.0 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=11 ttl=231 time=267.4 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=12 ttl=231 time=265.7 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=13 ttl=231 time=265.7 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=14 ttl=231 time=267.5 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=15 ttl=231 time=265.0 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=16 ttl=231 time=263.3 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=17 ttl=231 time=268.2 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=18 ttl=231 time=265.7 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=19 ttl=231 time=267.0 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=20 ttl=231 time=265.1 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=21 ttl=231 time=262.2 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=22 ttl=231 time=530.4 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=23 ttl=231 time=1168.9 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=24 ttl=231 time=266.6 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=25 ttl=231 time=267.8 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=26 ttl=231 time=266.7 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=27 ttl=231 time=264.4 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=28 ttl=231 time=265.8 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=29 ttl=231 time=709.7 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=30 ttl=231 time=450.5 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=31 ttl=231 time=462.5 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=32 ttl=231 time=542.6 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=33 ttl=231 time=888.5 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=34 ttl=231 time=263.9 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=35 ttl=231 time=268.2 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=37 ttl=231 time=267.1 ms
64 bytes from 209.238.138.241: icmp_seq=38 ttl=231 time=262.4 ms
--- www.trnmag.com ping statistics ---
40 packets transmitted, 38 packets received, 5% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max = 262.1/341.9/1168.9 ms
Look a monkey!
They're trying to take The SlashDot Effect(tm) out of our vernacular!
On the flip side, once that happens we can start talking frankly about P2P.
The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
Let's say that the Internet IS like Terra's fault network. Then this means the "Ring of Fire" would look something like this:
/. is in AC posts.
Washington, USA: Duh. Though I know it's overstated, it has to be Microsoft. If you equate them to Mount St. Helens, though, it's not really that bad. Occasional hiccups, not too terrible.
Japan: Either Mt. Fuji is the tons of crazy pr0n, both human and Anime, or the congestion that the Sony PS2 and Nintendo GameCube will cause when MMO gaming hits consoles full force.
The Philipines: Don't even get me started. If I had a nickle for every time I say the words "pinoy" and "pinay" on IRC, I'd be rolling in cash like
Hawaii, USA: We consider it something of an expensive paradise, right? Compare that, and the archipilego's many volcanic spots, to the P2P MP3 revolution. While it gurgles, it never really erupts (RIAA and MPAA). The sons of Napster are living it up while they can.
California, USA: One word, three times: Pr0n, pr0n, pr0n! Where is most of your congestion? Why, in the state that's doomed to fall off the continent and into the vast warm waters of the Pacific, of course! How much of it is made there? It's Hollywood, after all. That place gives a whole new meaning to the word "fault," eh?
Booby Prize Winner - Russia: While not really a big part of the "Ring of Fire," Russia has it's own explosive history, that being the Tunguska Blast in the early 20th Century. Open Source anyone? It's not so much congestion (though this is where "/.ings" come in) as it is the explosion that OSS has enjoyed as of late.
And they got government money to do this sort of crap? No study...
Blog Prophyts - Right On, Man
perhaps a large upswing in the volume of people sending out useless ICMP traffic to measure this "phenomenon"? ;^)
Does that make AOL the equivalent of the San Andreas fault?
it's an allegorical thing ;-)
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
So now when we hit a roadblock on the Information Superhighway and have to sit through buffer to buffer traffic, it's due to an Internetquake?
Operator, give me the number for 911!
Just get a site on the front page of /. and wait 20 mins. Using the same analogy, that'd be what? 8-9 on the Richter scale?
So these server items Host only web pages, and all the traffic on the internet is web traffic, which moves from link to link by a "router". This is very upsetting that college educations and many many years of research show something that could be acomplished in 20 mintues with a SDSL line, a p0rn site on a connection faster then the SDSL line, and finally root@box'#ping xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
I wounder if they have their MCSE?
www.oobersworld.com - For those that ride.
Where is the Slashdot effect?
There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
Max V.
NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
Hmmm... I like the idea of an Internet that "rings". But isn't it the "ringing" that we would like to get rid of from the net, in the same way we might wish the earth didn't "ring" so well during earthquakes?
What is the opposite of this model? Something like a marshmallow or ball of silly putty, that deforms to store energy and allows that energy to be released over time? I know that might affect the individual round-trip times, but it might improve efficiency on a larger scale.
I'm not sure what the rules for the nodes would be, but obviously there would have to be a way to balance "slack" and "stress" at different scales simultaneously, in order to avoid criticality. Anyone know about any models that have this kind of behaviour?
I've got a bad attitude and karma to burn. Go ahead. Mod me down.
Well what about the problem in this self organizing system, that you probably change the inherent nature of the system by observing it?
"...The simple ping signals were emitted every second and traveled through 10 different routers before the signals eventually reached the destination computer. The researchers were able to measure frequent changes in Internet congestion by measuring the time it took a series of signals to complete a round trip..."
How much bandwidth will these test pings take up inorder to have enough data to construct a model of current conditions that's good enough to predict bandwidth changes far enough ahead to make smart routers that can work around the congestion prior to it's existance? It would be kinda neat to have an internet that routes around inorder to prevent predicted congestion.
See the Pictures of the Flood of '08
I can't help but wonder about how many of these events were due to employees in a NOC somewhere downloading all the pr0n they could eat over an OC-48? :-)
Right here
:)
Although it's pretty vague like many Wired non-technical articles.
But i find it amusing to see a person spend 10 years on such idea while running a company.
Also talks about his life, pretty interesting
I always wondered how long it would be before someone tried to give a "weather report" for the Internet. I imagined that some day the daily Internet traffic report would appear right alongside Reporter Bob up in TrafficCopter 7 reporting on the condition of Highway 69 at 8am.
/dev/null. However, I would think it'd be tough to always keep up on what everyone has for capacity unless the backbone providers regularly publish these stats, as well as the stats on current traffic.
"Well, Joan, it looks like Slashdot it at it again. You'll want to keep clear of Alter.net this morning as it appears to be having congestion problems around the Midwest. Communications to anything near a corn field is likely to be slow to smack-me-dead stupid through the 9 o'clock hour. Queue up those emails, folks."
One has to wonder if it's even possible to predict and gauge incoming traffic problems. I guess you would have to know the effective capacity of the Internet, and sub-portions of it, at all times. I can see how a router's effective capacity could be measured by its effective throughput and cache. Your "sentinal level" would occur when the cache is full and bandwidth is maxed and the packets start to get a one-way trip to
I don't know if it would be helpful or not. One one hand, it'd be handy to know that the reason I'm getting 1900ms ping time to SF this morning is because some dumbass tripped on a power cord, but on the other hand, if I really care that much, I can probably figure it out using traceroute et al.
Maybe it's a solution to keep everyone and their dog from flooding the 'net each time a router bites the big one and makes a suburb blink out of existence for a few hours. Other than that, it just sounds like a good excuse to draw pretty graphs.
Blog,Twitter
look for yourself
-- www.globaltics.net
Political discussion for a new world
(please don't bother the folks at san-andreas.com, who for some reason are in New Jersey
Bill Stewart
New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
Surfquakes.
example.org - powered by Linux!
Now we all know the truth-- earthquakes are simply a manifestation of a net-quake in the matrix.
. . . .the Slashdot Effect is just a virtual Flash Crowd. . .
I guess that would make all those 'Secure' Microsoft IIS servers out there the Internet equivalent of - El - Nino...
Does this mean we can start measuring the slashdot effect on the richter scale?
taxpayer money, probably in the millions, has been spent learning that when you ping or run a traceroute to another computer, you can tell how fast or slow the connection's running? Maybe I can get a government grant too..I have a new mathematical model demonstrating that 2+2=4, but it needs further development.
They also saw 'aftershocks' that can be mathematically described in a similar manner to the seismic ones more familiar to many Californians."
Or, more simply described as Slashbacks.
The "big one" will be caused by a site called -
"Nude Brittney Spears advocates Linux, Star Trek, over Windows, Star Wars."
the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
Holy fuck what a piece of shit post. I mean really. What the fuck is your point? That people shouldn't explore similarities between different scientific problems? Yeah, sure, if it was some random "gee, i never really thought about it bob, but ya know, internet traffic and earthquakes are related!" bumfuck musings, i'd agree with its uselessness. But the fact is, you fucking retard, that seeing connections like this can have real, and meaningful influences on both fields, possibly leading to better seismological prediction, or internet load-handling techniques, or seismological load handling, or internet traffic prediction. So the next time your iota of a brain is feeling frustrated that you can't reach some spiffy site /. linked to because of bandwidth issues, or you're being crushed by the building that just collapsed from an unforseen 7.3 quake, you'll think "gee, maybe i shouldn't have been such a dimwitted, ignorant luggite who spat in the face of scientific discovery". And then hopefully you'll go fuck yourself.
Mod me down, and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
In both the internet and the network of earth faults, there are interactions between elements on multiple scales in time and space. That analogy is not hard to guess, but these physicists seems to have contributed a systematic measurement and modeling study. Fine.
So far, just from the reading the press article, my doubts about their work are twofold:
1. their ping frequency is one ping per second. This is a poor sampling of the time series of packet delays. Specifically poor sampling could lead to a false alarm or a miss. False alarm meaning that the sudden drastic 'congestion' could very well be an isolated event suffered by the ping packet or its adjoining ones; the rest of the packet delays in the one-second interval may be small. 'Miss' meaning you didnt catch the congestion due to the poor sampling. The ping packet got through quickly but there were congestion delays suffered by the rest of the packets in its one-second interval.
In short, ping times are a poor indication of the true traffic status of an IP network. One ping per second is especially pathetic if one of the bottleneck links in your route is a high-speed OC-3 or higher link. For example, at 155 Mbps (OC-3), there can be upto 13,000 typical IP data packets through the router in one second. Only one of these is the ping packet!
2. Their flawed analogy between fault energy and congestion level. Fault energy builds up slowly over years and is then released suddenly in an earthquake. They compare to this user sessions running over hours and then suddenly contributing to short periods of drastic congestion. So are they saying that congestion builds up slowly over hours at a router or server as more and more packets are processed? Ha! I am still ROFLing on this one!
There research will vastly improve if they collaborate with internet researchers and engineers who have a working knowledge of the internet's routing and flow control protocols, instead of approaching it from a purely black-box modelling point of view.
Slashdot-Principle: As one attempts to measure the effect of a ping or multiple pings on a network, they inturn effect the measurement being taken. Vicious Cycle of Pings.
TIME is the Aether...
http://www.internettrafficreport.com/ Strange.
"exhibits criticality"
Is as much a mimickry of earthquakes as it is of farts, naps, and almost running into that hot chick in the hall.
--Blair
Remember 'Helicopter? Now that was a good method of interpreting internet activity.
...who's actually paying these people to come up with this kind of useless crap.
Not that I'm blaming them for it - hell, if someone would pay me to drink coffee all day and come up with useless analogies I'd be as happy as a goldfish in a keg.
This kind of reminds me of a quote from Ghostbusters... "I've been in the real world Peter. They actually want RESULTS."
Does this mean that if we fix the Internet, we will stop earthquakes?
These people should be in rocketry.
Maybe the state's highest function is to grind out insoluble problems. (Zelazny, Hall of Mirrors)
So THAT'S where Quake got it's name!
:-b
"No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
ok. this is probably an incredibly old article at the time i'm posting here, but has anyone thought that the internet really could gain conciousness like wintermute/neuromancer? you know, like william gibson fortold in his books?