Slashdot Mirror


One Year After September 11

One year ago today, at 9:12 eastern, we posted World Trade Towers and Pentagon Attacked amidst the events of that day. Since Slashdot is really just a discussion site, I felt the most appropriate way to handle this anniversary is to simply do just that. I hadn't read those stories since the day it happened, and I really am at a loss for words. But I'm sure many of you won't be. And thanks to OSDN for turning banner ads off for the day.

94 of 1,374 comments (clear)

  1. Freedom after 9/11 by cantherius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As America Remembers 9/11/2001, we must remember that we live in a country based on freedom. Those freedoms are being threatened right now because of America's reaction to 9/11, and we have to be careful about that.

    So please, as you mourn, see your friends and family, or watch TV all day (which I hope you don't do), try to remember what it is that we're fighting for in the first place, ok?

    Without those freedoms in tact.. there's nothing left to fight for.

    I love you guys, tho, and I'm glad it wasn't any of you who were lost a year ago :-)

  2. Got me thinking... by headchimp · · Score: 5, Insightful
    What about all the other tragic events from the past that was forgotten.

    Feel free to mark your calendar for the other months besides September.

    January 28, (1986) The Challenger Accident

    February 13, (2001) San Salvador, El Salvador 6.1 Earthquake

    March 24, (1989) Exxon Valdez
    March 28, (1979) 3 Mile Island

    April 18, (1906) The San Francisco Earthquake
    April 19, (1995) The Oklahoma City Bombing
    April 14, (1912) The Titanic

    May 6th (1937) The Hindenburg Disaster

    June 6th, (1944) D-Day

    July 25, (1956) The Andrea Doria sinking.

    August 6, (1945) Hiroshima Bombed
    August 16 - 28 (1992) Hurricane Andrew

    October 8, 9, and 10, (1871) The Great Chicago Fire
    October 17, (1989) Loma Prieta earthquake
    October 23-29, (1929) Stock Market Crash

    November 17-18, (1978) Jonestown
    November 22, (1963) Kennedy Assaination

    December (1984) Union Carbide Bhopal Disaster
    December 7, (1941) Pearl Harbour
    December 21, (1988) Pan Am Flight 103 Lockerbie bombing

    1. Re:Got me thinking... by HomeGroove · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, I wonder where we'll be 90 years from now with Sept. 11. I look at your list and see Titanic. I took a kid to Chuck-E-Cheeses and there was a Titanic ticket game complete with a partially submerged ship in the center of it all. Often you'll see a submerged Titanic sticking up in the middle of some county fair. A giant slide. So kids can have fun on the ship that carried so many people to their deaths. Now I don't think anything like this will happen with 9/11. But you better believe we'll see a blockbuster movie. Count how many events above have been turned into multi-million dollar pictures.

      --

      ----
      Spam subject of the moment: Offshore account secrets -nashville disrupt

  3. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Since the first 3000 died, many more have died in other places such as Afghanistan. Some no doubt deserved it, but many others were innocent civillians caught in the wrong place at the wrong time.

    However I'm glad you raised the point about the freedoms that have been lost. The US has become a little more like the non-free countries it is fighting with the government exploiting the opportunity to help hide its own inadequacies.

  4. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by squaretorus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's the one-up-manship of the various channels that gets to me. I remember flicking to the BBC coverage just after the second plane hit and seeing the first of the 'backdrops' with the smoking towers and the 'Sept 11 2001: Attack on America' line and thinking "there we go - branding the story already - who will be first to use the towers as the number 11 I wonder??"

    I think it is the speedy turnaround of these 'visuals' that is disconcerting. I'd much rather just have the video feed, and a guy in a studio saying 'holey shit' than a million glossy flaping flags with the towers in the background.

    It really did feel a little too much like a Chris Morris stunt, a live edition of Brasseye.

    I think /. did a great job in just getting the news out there. None of the hype, the gloss, the panic to fly presenters to stand in front of the ruins. Just simple stories to keep everyone up to date.

  5. Re:.... [all's quiet] by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Um also those people who were killed in Afghanistan, not because they voted for or supported the regime, but because they were in the wrong place at the wrong time.

    Lets us also mourn the freedoms lost to the average law abiding citizen around the world.

  6. They're not making money today by wiredog · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Since they're not running any commercials.

    For that matter, they didn't run commercials for two or three days after the attacks.

    1. Re:They're not making money today by Coplan · · Score: 3, Insightful
      They would need an excuse. That's why they predict they'll only be able to do it for a month or so.

      On a normal day, in a normal year...if a newspaper said "we want X amount of money for a full page ad", a business would question the price. In fact, they probably still would. But this time the paper replies "Oh, we had to increase costs slightly for a while to cover the cost of the ad-free newspaper we published on 9/11/02". What's a company going to say to that? I'm sure some companies won't buy that. But many would probably simply eat the cost so long as there is a reason.

  7. Random thoughts that may "incite" discussion :) by Yakman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So, it's a year later and still we don't know where Osama bin Laden is, it seems we've forgotten about Afghanistan and now Bush is getting ready to pre-emptively attack Iraq. From what I've read about Saddam Hussein he doesn't just sit around in one place either, so what happens when they can't find him?

    What is it with all these stories coming out now about how Iraq could have nuclear weapons in like 30-40 seconds? Seriously though, a few months ago they were saying "2-3 years", now it's down to "6 months" or less. Are they making excuses to attack Iraq? Can't it be argued that the US is also a country with weapons of mass destruction and a warmongering leader?

    It is a shame that civilians died in the terrorist attacks, but what about the civilians the US has killed in Afghanistan, like that wedding - they excuse it by saying some collateral damage is to be expeced. Why do they say that the 'terrorist' attacks were "cowardly"? It'd take a fairly brave and strong willed person to willingly fly themselves into a building. If they were cowardly they'd just talk about how they were going to attack America but do nothing about it.

    What is it with removing all images of the WTC from movies etc in the last year?! It happened, we all know it happened. Removing the WTC from media I would think is an insult to the victims, it's as if they're saying that the buildings never existed.

    Enough typing for me, flame away :) And remember, opinions are like arseholes - we all are one. Err, have one ;)

  8. A few points by Mr_Silver · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Personally my heart goes out to those people who suffered losses and pain this time last year. I wish them all the very best.

    However, I do think it is worth as this point reflecting on the foreign policy of sucessive US governments, that is the governments that have helped create Saddam's milirary might, backed the Talibans rise to power, backed Israel and other Pro-American Arab reigems which suppress their own people and finally (especially for us Brits) helped fund the IRA - who have been systimatically blowing up and killing people in both the UK and Ireland for well over 20 years.

    George Bush stated that last year was when the world rose up to fight against terrorism. In fact, the world has been rising up and fighting terrorism for over 20 years and had it not been for September 11th, the US would still have not been involved.

    I'm not using these points as an excuse for what the Taliban did. Any group that carries out such a thing are despicable - but I believe that the US Goverment should stand back and reflect all the possible concequences of what their policy of meddling in (and funding of) hardline groups of individuals in other countries could bring about.

    I observed a minutes silence today, both for the innocent victims of September 11th and for the innocent victims of the future who will suffer when the US seeks to take revenge.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:A few points by Silverhammer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Blockquoth the poster:

      ...but I believe that the US Goverment should stand back and reflect all the possible concequences of what their policy of meddling in (and funding of) hardline groups of individuals in other countries could bring about.

      If we don't "meddle," we're called isolationists. If we do "meddle," we're called imperialists. Fuck it, we just can't win.

    2. Re:A few points by Dr.+Bent · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Any society that is not willing or able to go to war to protect it's citizens will eventually disappear from the earth. History has proven this time and again.

      To call this "revenge" is simply ignorant. All nations, including the big, bad United States, have inalienable right to self-defense. Yes, innocent people will die. Innocent people have already died. But if we don't take responsibility for our own safety, and do something about it now, many, many more innocent people will die. If Neville Chamberlain had accepted this responsibility, Hitler may very well have been stopped at the Polish border. If we had actually done something about Al Queda after the African embassy and U.S.S. Cole bombings, 9/11 might never have happened. If we don't do something about it now, we condem our own citizens to death.

    3. Re:A few points by xA40D · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fuck it, we just can't win.

      Yes you can win. You can admit that the fundamental rights that all American have are the same fundamendal rights ALL the people of the world can expect. And then try to help and support other contries - instead of bombing and invading.

      --
      Do you mind, your karma has just run over my dogma.
    4. Re:A few points by PhilHibbs · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Fuck it, we just can't win.
      Well spotted. That's the price of being the world's only superpower. We had our turn when we had the world's greatest empire, everyone blamed us for everything (not that they weren't sometimes right, of course).
    5. Re: A few points by ickle_matt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You bastards have been systematically killing, imprisoning, and torturing the Irish for centuries.

      Yes we did, in the past. Then we grew up and worked out that you can't just go around bombing the crap out of people who disagree with you or have resources you want.

      The only way to actually solve the problems that cause situations like NI, 911 and every other fsckup in the history of mankind is to find out what the problems really are, discuss them and reach a compromise which is agreeable to both parties. Most other civilised countries have worked this out too - why hasn't the US?

    6. Re:A few points by superyooser · · Score: 2, Insightful
      In fact, the world has been rising up and fighting terrorism for over 20 years and had it not been for September 11th, the US would still have not been involved.

      This is an excellent point. For those accusing the United States of "dragging the whole world into war," please take note. This is the way it always is. If there is a true accusation of evil against the U.S., it is that we have not acted swiftly and thoroughly enough in going to war against terrorists (i.e. Hitler, Hussein, bin Laden).

      War has been waged against us by stealth and deceit and murder. This nation is peaceful, but fierce when stirred to anger. This conflict was begun on the timing and terms of others. It will end in a way, and at an hour, of our choosing.

      President George W. Bush, The National Cathedral, Remarks at National Day of Prayer and Remembrance, September 14, 2001
      We are not war-mongers. We never enjoy the taking of life, but removing threatening, unbridled corruption from the earth is the sober duty of a moral people.
  9. Remember by His+Nastiness · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I just want to say that I know there are going to be stupid, childish, disrespectful comments here and everywhere else any of us decide to look today but I just want to remind every /. reader that it may infuriate, frustrate and maybe even hurt you to see these "Anonymous Coward"'s do this but remember that this is precisely what makes this country great. Better than to be in China where you can be sure that every post has been moderated by your government and that names are being taken down. The freedom to be an idiot and insensitive is just as integral to every other part of our freedoms. Dont' let it get you mad (as it did me at first) just be thankful that we can even have a /. to say all of this at. And corporate or not I appreciate OSDN's gesture today and personally think the coverage in other media is appropriate. WOuld they do this in other countries that aren't as free as ours? I not sure they would.

  10. Re:US Response by SweenyTod · · Score: 5, Insightful

    After the initial attack, I was quite afraid that the US would start carpet bombing everybody they didn't like. Their attack on Afganistan shows just how determined you guys are, to extract a measure of vengance, which honestly, I don't blame at all.

    One year on, I'm a bit less afraid, but not by a lot. I fear the US will drag the world into a big fucking war in the middle east we'll live to regret. The alternative I suppose is to not attack, and probably let some of these countries that sponser terrorism develop big arse weapons, which we'll regret too.

    I dunno - a tough call, but I can't believe going to war is the only answer. The trouble is I don't know what the right answer is.

    --
    Alas gallinaceas de urbe bovis volo
  11. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by retards · · Score: 2, Insightful

    OK, so don't ever watch any specials about Hiroshima or the Bombing of Dresden either (which both had a LOT more casualties, almost all civilian). Oh, but these were Americans that were killed, so this is different...

  12. time to stop killing by rmolehusband · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We're one year on from the indefensible murder of several thousand civilians in New York. No right minded person can have anything but condemnation for that act of pure evil.

    We should remember however, that the pain and sense of loss from the destruction of an innocent life is the same all over the world and for those of all religions.

    The lasting legacy of the WTC attack should not be war nor more death and suffering.

    --
    Reginald Molehusband. Edinburgh, Scotland
  13. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by xtheunknown · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The whole point of the matter is that no one deserves death, even those who take up arms against you.

    You may not want to mourn the deaths of those who make war, but you should mourn there decision to make war in the first place.

    It is the idea that people deserve death for there actions, no matter what those actions are, that has gotten us into this whole mess.

    Honor those who fell on 9/11/2001 by striving for peace and harmony. Don't wish death even on your enemies. Pity them for their mis-guided rage, but don't wish death on them.

    Whether you are christian, muslim, jew or otherwise, the common thread is that man does not determine who lives and dies, god does. Think about that.

    --

    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
  14. How we remember, and how we don't by Aero · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think that the most troubling thing coming into the first anniversary of the attack is some of the stuff purportedly being done in the names of those who died, and (just as importantly) what isn't being done.

    All the legislation passed supposedly to further the cause of the "war on terror", with the amount of true freedom that was taken away with it (or has the potential to be taken away)...the sheer audacity of our leaders sometimes reminds me of kids loose in a candy store (my best friend compares it to Lord of the Flies)...

    How soon we all went back to our divisive bickering over our differences, be the difference ethnicity or religion or income level...

    The outcry over attempts to educate our younger generation about the Muslim world...while I agree that such teachings should not be mandated without equal consideration being given to all sides (so, for example, a required reading assignment of a history of Muslim culture should be accompanied by texts on Christian-Muslim, Jewish-Muslim, and Christian-Jewish relations through history), the mere idea that this is pushing some sort of agenda is a telling indicator that many of us still don't have a clue...

    I will be respectful, I will honor the dead, but I won't do anything stupidly symbolic.

    I work for a major telecom company based in Washington. As I'm about to submit this, at this time last year, we were about 15 minutes away from evacuating our headquarters and moving our critical 24/7 operations to our backup facility. My biggest regret was not calling the one I loved most and telling her that I was okay, even if it was just a voice mail message -- she didn't hear from me for hours. For all she knew, I was hopelessly trapped in traffic or spun out in a ditch somewhere in my attempt to flee the District and get to the backup site.

    I sincerely honor the dead. It's too much to ask, but I wish the rest of us would do the same.

    --
    We can believe in you for 3 minutes, but beyond that, even the King of All Cosmos can't be expected to wait.
  15. ted hennessey by gonar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Edward (Ted) R. Hennessy Jr. 1966-2001

    belmont high class of 1984
    Harvard class of 88 (Cum Laude)
    Kellog School of Business 93 (MBA)(Computer Science award)
    Partner and Principal Consultant, Emergence Consulting, Lincoln Ma.
    Ted was a member of the Hasty Pudding and co-wrote "Whiskey
    Business", their show in 1989.
    He was the musical coordinator for the "Special-K Review" at Kellog during his
    time there.

    Wife Melanie (My Sister)
    Children Rachel, 6 and Matthew, almost 4
    Parents Edward and Geraldine (Big Ted and Gerry) Hennessy (Belmont)
    Sisters Sue and Kathy
    Nephews and Nieces Sharon, 10, Megan (my Daughter), 10, Jimmy, 8, Timmy, 4 and
    Patrick, 18 Mos.

    Ted was smart, funny, honest, friendly, bald and allergic to cats.

    Ted played Guitar (and bass and 12 string). he had a small home recording
    studio in his office where he would compose and record original music.

    At family get togethers, he would gather the kids and play "Wild Thing" while
    the kids sang along.

    His and My Sister's favorite movie to watch together was "The Princess Bride"

    He was a Geek. Just last week he setup DSL and 802.11b networking in his house.

    He travelled 3 days a week, and to compensate for being away so much he devoted
    all of his remaining time to his family.

    every friday was date night with my sister.
    every saturday was spent with the kids at a museum, aquarium, zoo or nature
    park.

    My Sister always dreamed of marrying Prince Charming and being a stay-at-home
    mommy.

    until one year ago today, all her dreams had come true.

    --
    The difference between Theory and Practice is greater in Practice than in Theory.
  16. Hats off to the U.S.A. by lamz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One year ago today the United States of America, or as we call it here in Canada, "The States," was attacked. The U.S. response was reasoned, intelligent, and graceful. Hats off to you.

    The U.S. is often likened to a schoolyard bully, and nobody likes a bully. But what kind of bully only acts when provoked? What kind of bully sits on an offender just long enough to make them say "Uncle Sam," then picks them up, dusts them off, wipes their noses, and sends them on their way with an admonition to "play nice from now on."

    No shoolyard bully that I know acts that way. That sounds more like a teacher.

    --

    Mike van Lammeren
    It will challenge your head, your brain, and your mind.

    1. Re:Hats off to the U.S.A. by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I always saw the bully analogy like this:

      The US is just the captain of the football team, the biggest, strongest, most popular guy in the schoolyard.

      I'm sure slashdotters can relate to how much they hated these people out of jealousy, not because they were cruel or picked on anyone. They'd never take the time to see the reason he was so well respected was because he was a nice guy.

      The U.S. gives more in foreign aid than the rest of the world combined. They still send cheques to France to rebuild post-WW2, for crying out loud. Is it enough? Is anything ever enough?

      It's a 'bad daddy' syndrome. Some countries just hate the US because they didn't buy them a car for their 16th birthday.. There's another response to your post, saying something moronic about 'forcing genetically modified food on Argentina'... Sheesh..

      They try to feed the hungry and get some bullshit back because they 'dont like the menu'.

      I guess people will always hate America and Americans. They can do so because the American way of life completely embraces their right to think, feel, say whatever they want.

      *sigh*

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Hats off to the U.S.A. by fonixmunkee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      coward, all today is about is the lives lost on 9/11. politics are not in the picture right now. that's it, so leave it at that.

    3. Re:Hats off to the U.S.A. by Fjord · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What kind of teacher extorts lunch money from all the kids in the school yard, while exerting small amounts of physical or psychological pressure on all the kids in the school yard, only to beat the crap out of a kid if they dare to try to throw a punch (and god help them if it lands one). What kind of teacher pays out money to another kid in the school yard who grabbed the personal belongings of another kid, and that kid also uses that money (directly or indirectly) to buy brass knuckles so that it can beat on said kid whenever it tries to get up to fight.

      What kind of teacher cuts off the ability of a kid to buy lunch to the point of sever mental weakness and then installs a mind control device that has the kid willingly giving up 40% of his property and income until the kid revolts against the device and gives the teacher a small flick. Then when another kid attacks the previously controlled kid because of his weakened state, what kind of teacher reacts to this situation by selling needed supplies and giving a credit card to the attacking kid while selling brass knuckles to the disoriented kid in an attempt to make the teacher like them.

      Really, this is a terrible analogy, but still no teacher I know acts this way. It sounds more like organized crime to me.

      --
      -no broken link
  17. Re:Puleeze! by dthable · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Like our buddy George W. is really looking out for the civil liberties of Americans. About a year ago, I got laid off and remember watching the CNN coverage as the second plane hit the WTC. The first thought that popped into my head was not about the horror of the event or even those who dies but rather a disturbed feeling that this is the start of a long erosion of everyone's rights.

    Today, we have secret courts used to judge people, the FBI/CIA is allowed to perform surveillance on anyone and everyone and the key to the equation...no one is liable or reporting to freedom's biggest driver - us. Before we start bashing a political party, just understand that the old and true parties need to take the blame for the lack of freedom today.

  18. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by Coplan · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I'm not watching TV either...but that's not why.

    I feel the need to do my normal routine today. Yes, it's the day we observe 9-11, but it should also be the day that we start to get back to normal lives. We're well on our way...but the economy is still affected, and the world is still mourning.

    I'm not watching TV because I don't feel the need to relive such events. I don't want to see those images again. I would rather see stories about the future. I would rather see a story about what's going to be built in its place. And I would like to see a story about what the businesses are doing, where they moved to, and how they're making out. But I can't expect that from the coverage. For the five minutes I watched...I saw images of the towers falling again, I saw a story of the sorrow a woman felt. I don't want to see that stuff...I've seen it, and while I can't forget it, I don't want to relive it.

    I'm sure that many people agree.

  19. A dad's view. by raque · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some of you may have noticed the satellite photos of the smoke and "other stuff" that streamed south from Ground Zero. I live in Brooklyn and was right under that cloud. There was a fine white-grey powder that fell for about 20 minutes. I'm a stay-at-home Dad. I How can I explain the feeling when my kids asked why it was snowing. They were upset that it wasn't real snow and I wouldn't let them outside to play as I swept up. I just told them that it was dirt that had blown down from Manhattan. My wife works a whole 3 blocks from Ground Zero but was home taking my school-age daughter to her first day a school. I'll go to my grave remembering the feeling that I was sweeping out a crematoria in front of my house.

  20. Re:The Real Effect of September 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful


    Terrorists can only take my life. Only my government can take my freedom

  21. Moment of silence from rhetoric by Brian_Ellenberger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >for the future iraq victims >for everyone that has ever died through the >hands of injustice, opression, agression and >that old capitalist tool: imperialism.

    Darnit, why does everyone on Slashdot feel like they always have to pile on the political rhetoric thick and high no matter what the occasion. Can't we just take one day to drop the Right vs. Left crap and mourn for the dead?

    I'm ashamed at this site sometimes, especially looking back at many of the high scoring posts from 9/11 that basically said we got what we deserved. Those women and men, mothers and fathers, sisters and brothers, just trying to mind their own business and go to work did not deserve to die a fiery death that day. Nor do they deserve to have their rememberance used as a launching point for cheap political attacks.

    Brian Ellenberger
    1. Re:Moment of silence from rhetoric by duck_prime · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why is America expected to equally mourn every slain person in the world, while other countries are allowed to prefer their own dead?

      Perhaps it is because I have overcome tribalism and petty nationalism. I read about the deaths of innocents, and it does not matter what their nationality was. These are innocent people who have died through no fault or cause of their own.
      Surely it is admirable to mourn innocent dead of whatever region, but that's not exactly what I'm trying to get at. There seems to be something significant about how it is the US that takes heat for not having (say) a Rwandan memorial. Nobody criticizes Canada or Mexico for not mourning Yugoslavian dead.

      It is almost as if there were an unspoken set of ideals that the US -- and nobody else -- is expected to live up to. The US -- and nobody else -- is supposed to be above nationalism. When France honors her dead, nobody pops up saying "but what about the Kurds!".

      I'm not saying there's any weird conspiracy out there, but there may be some unexamined attitudes.
  22. my suggestion for today by techstar25 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    After 9/11 last year I heard a lot of families all saying the same thing. They all wanted just one more day with their deceased family members so they can let them know how much they were loved. So, I came to a decision. I'm not going to be glued to the television to see any memorial services. In fact, I decided that today I will not turn on the television or radio at all. I will not be attending any local memorial services either. In what will become a family tradition, I am having my whole family over tonight, because I have the time now, the time that so many families would just love to have back. I am going to spend the day appreciating and thanking God for what I have, rather than lamenting over what "we" have lost. If you have kids, turn off the tv and spend some quality time with them (seeing planes flying into buildings isn't really helping them anyway).I think we all should take this day to get in touch with our loved ones and let them know how we feel right now, because, if nothing else, 9/11 taught us that we could lose everything we love in a single moment.

    I'm sure lots of people will do different things today as a reaction to what happened, but this is just my opinion. I'm not saying it's for everybody.

  23. Response the wrong focus... by Tyreth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As much as a terrible thing that 9/11 was, I can't help but be much more concerned for those 250 people that die each day because of Iraq sanctions, of the millions starving around the world because we rich people are too unwilling to solve it, because of the abusive and dominative policies we western nations place on other countries, and the many more greater evils that we are responsible for.

    The terrorist attacks on 9/11 seem to have been a response to many of these problems. They targeted pentagon - a symbol of military power, and the world trade center - a symbol of capitalism.

    Revenge seems unjustified to me unless those who were affected can look at themselves first and say "Is there anything that I am guilty of that would make it injust for me to seek revenge?" I think that unless the western nations look at their faults, which are much more grevious than what the terrorists have done, we are even more guilty than they.

    We need to look at ourselves and clean ourselves so that we are without excuse. Only then can we justly say "We did you no wrong, and this is how you repay us?"
    Right now many peoples and countries have the right to complain against western evils, and we are certainly far from being without fault.

    Mourn on this day, but don't look past the facts that the problem will not be solved by war - it will only be increased. Attacking Afghanistan has solved nothing, and attacking Iraq will solve nothing also.
    The solution is with ourselves - recognising and mourning all those evil qualities we all possess, and all those actions we are guilty of. Otherwise how can one murderer say to another "what you did was disgusting and you deserve to die" without saying the same thing to themself?
    It saddens me that 9/11 could have been used as a catalyst to produce lasting change in people's hearts. Instead, we are now on the road to war with Iraq which seems to be against the wishes of almost every nation, with worldwide warnings of disastrous consequences.

    The solution is at home.

  24. I don't know about you.. by motardo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    but I've had a rush of emotions daily ever since September 11th of last year, the images of the planes crashing into the towers, the billowing smoke of the pentagon, and the crater left in Pennsylvania have had a very lasting impression on me.

    One thing that I don't like which has come out of this is how President Bush is pushing his agenda on regime change in Iraq. He has not stepped forward with any kind of reassurance which will lead me to believe that a regime change should be possible. Is President Bush not worried about "blowback", which is what happened when we helped the mujahadeen in Afghanistan when they were fighting the Russian army. I can easily see some major "blowback" happening to the United States in the coming future if we are not careful and think ahead.

    Never Forget.

  25. The Primary Civil Right by snatchitup · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Life

    Don't forget this when you go out and cry, "My civil rights are diminished...."

    Life means, we have a right to be secure. It's the job of our govt. to enforce this right.

    Liberty is second to life but above all others. What kind of liberty does a dead-man enjoy?

    Happiness is third. I can't be that happy if I have to worry about terrorism killing a loved one and I'm not free (liberated).

    All the other Civil Rights pale in comparison Life, liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. They are merely derived from these three. They're hardly even honorable mentions compared to these three, but I'll mention some of them, (Privacy, Speech, Association, Expression, Religion).

    That's what I'm thinking about and I'm also reflecting on this question.

    What am I willing to die for?

    Not much as I'm a coward (though not anonymous).

    I think, however, I'm willing to die for my family. Hopefully, I'll never have the chance to prove this.

    With that said, I'm in awe at our armed servicemen. I find in inconceivable that they are willing to die for me. They deserve my greatest respect.

  26. Bleh. by Kredal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was at work, wondering when my boss would get to the punchline.. "A plane crashed into the WTC.." "And??"

    All of this memorial stuff is getting very overdone though...

    Where were you on Jan 26, 2001? Do you remember any news that happened that day at all?

    On that date, an earthquake hit India, leaving 13,000 people dead.

    thirteen thousand. More than four times the amount killed in the World Trade Center. Think about that for a minute. How much coverage of it did you see on CNN? Maybe a day?

    We've been hearing about this same story (Even giving it a catchy title) for an entire year now. How about a sense of perspective, folks?

    --
    Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    1. Re:Bleh. by 5KVGhost · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's a difference between people dying in a natural disaster and people being murdered as a deliberate act. You know that as well as I do, and pretending that you don't is dishonest.

  27. The U.S. Constitution is not a suicide pact. by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It may have escaped your notice, but we're at war.

    In such circumstances, the Constitution gets suspended so it can't be used against us.

    As soon as we've established freedom in the Arab world, we'll go back to where we were.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
    1. Re:The U.S. Constitution is not a suicide pact. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You are not at war.

      You are allowing your country to become a police state. You are allowing your leaders to commit warcrimes. You are allowing them for instance to keep hundreds of prisoners on guantanamo, without legal representation, without trial. Are they prisoners of war ? Why then, are the conventions regarding prisoners of war not being followed ? Are they criminals, or suspects ? Why then have they no legal counselling.

      What is happening right now, is that President Bush is using 9-11 to strengthen his own power.
      What is happening, is that the things that make your country great is disappearing.

      What is happening is, that you are letting the terrorists win. They killed thousands of Americans on 9-11, but worst of all: They made you afraid. They made you react violently.

      They terrorized you.

  28. Underestimated by The+Viking · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The history of the United States is punctuated by times when its people were underestimated:

    1. The American Revolution - England underestimates the ability of a rag-tag militia made up mostly of civilians to free the peoples of the colonies.

    2. WWII - Japan delivers what they thought would be a cripling blow (the bombing of Pearl Harbor), underestimating America's ability to recover and fight back.

    3. Desert Storm - Iraq underestimates America's ability to mobilize a world force to take back Kuwait.

    4. September 11, 2001 - Terrorists turn four commercial airliners into weapons, killing thousands. America unites and fights back.

    I think America is underestimated because outsiders view freedom of religion, freedom of speech, tolerance of different opinions, and open debate as a sign of disunity. Americans agree to disagree, and are passionate about defending the freedoms that allow such diversity.

    1. Re:Underestimated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You need to take a step back from your liberal lies and attempt to take an objective, factual view of the situation.

      8. 2002, America invades Afghanistan. Thousands of innocent civilians are killed, hundreds of foreign nationals are tortured and held without trial or rights, the very freedoms Americans are so passionate about defending get reduced and removed.

      An investigation into the total number of civilian deaths in Afghanistan estimated the number to be around 400 - 500. When we were still involved in our air campaign the Taliban was reporting casualities of their own troops as civilian casualities, and this is why euro liberal-socialists such as yourself cry human tragedy. Taliban troops taken out by some JDAMs != Afghan civilians.

      7. 1960s-70s, America overestimates its own ability to win a war without political backing in Asia. North Vietnamese inflict humiliation
      Again, your view upon the situation has caused a statement such as this. The US did not overestimate its ability to win a war without political backing. In fact, we could have easily won the war if we took the fight to the enemy, rather than just trying to protect the south. The command of the military wanted to do this, but the civilian government was against it. The Vietnam conflict could have ended quite quickly if it was not for this political weakness.

      10. 2002, America fails to invade Pakistan, India, South Africa, China, Russia, England, France and several other countries known to have weapons of mass destruction. Arab nations query why Iraq in particular are so special?

      You seem to be trying to create some sort of moral relativity, but that notion is misplaced if you try to understand the whole situation. First, we are targeting Iraq becuase they seem most likely to use their weapons against us. All of those other countries would not use their weapons against us for fear of a massive response by the US. Saddam, on the other hand, thinks differently. He might not overtly attack the US or US interests, but he seems interested in doing it covertly. You cannot say this about any of the other countries you mention, so your attempt at some sort of moral equavilence is misplaced.

      5. America tries to assassinate Fidel Castro. For no good reason. Several times. And fails.
      We have every right to take out Castro. He allowed the Soviets to station numberous nuclear weapons on his country, and therefore was a strategic threat to the US. This act alone demonstrated his hostility towards the US, so we responded. For example, if an unstable dictator came into power of Belgium and pointed nuclear and other dangerous weapons at France, I am sure the French would feel very threatened by this ruler and try to eliminate him.

      11. 2002, America continues to support Israel, despite many documented abuses of human rights, possession of weapons of mass destruction, continued oppression of their own people.
      Israel will not use its nuclear weapons unless attacked by some large force, so the posession of nuclear weapons is of no real threat to us since the only people it threatens are those who would have a war with Israel. Your attempt again at some sort of moral equivalence has again failed.

  29. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by cyranoVR · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. For even the very wise cannot see all ends.
    --Gandalf

  30. Lame Coverage by jav1231 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Did anyone see Jim McKay's "They don't want revenge, they wanna be loved" speech during Monday Night Football? Peter Jennings must have written this for him. I for one want revenge. It's the responsibility of the government to protect and distribute justice. They should pay with their lives and all who chanted in support of them should pay with them. They stand united, so should we. ABC TV would have us believe that we should "understand" them better to come to reason. They hate us, they attacked us, they should die. >

  31. Re:TV coverage feels wrong by Stween · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think in fairness the BBC did a very good job on september the 11th. So they have a consistent image, a certain on-screen look and layout they like to keep going most of the time, and there's nothing wrong with that. Its far from in-your-face, things are kept clear.

    They have the technology there to quickly come up with those screens and backdrops, its not like on a major event like that they'd forget everything and just repeat the few pieces of footage they had ad-finitum (although they did plenty of that too, because they didn't have much to go on to start with). So they put a banner up saying something like 'twin towers attack'. What else were they meant to do?

    Its a rarity that the BBC can be accused of hyping anything. If you want to be cynical about it, they don't hype much because they won't see the same financial gain from doing so as a commercial television operator.

  32. This must be posted as AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a Turkish citizen, the country which runs the peace force at Afghanistan now and the only true muslim (as I am not) ally doesn't play games with USA, I have saw those in 1 year, I was called those:

    a) Towelhead
    b) Go back to your cave, what you do on our (site,chat etc)
    c) Nuke the mideast
    d) You stink

    Also protecting my rights and trying to tell the truth, I got banned in favour of americans.

    any many more. As I don't consider myself muslim, and tell about my habits like beer drinking, bars etc... I really started to wonder what a "real" muslim would feel.

    Bin Laden's plot was exactly that. To make people discriminated, to start a civilization war...

    He... Susceeded...

    RIP to 3000 people who died in WTC. RIP to millions of them if this evil plan works good (!). Don't forget, the suckers who crashed planes into WTC&Pentagon were uneducated ones, they were brainwashed to ignore the most powerful insict even, life. Why act like them?

    1. Re:This must be posted as AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      First, I would like to apologize for the treatment you received on behalf of other Americans who did not react that way. I hope that you can realize that a lot of us were pretty pissed off (and still are). Unfortunately, nature tends to favor the easiest path and people are no exception. It is much easier to fall back to using racial slurs and stereotypes than trying to deal with people as individuals.

      I, personally, had a difficult time with the events of 9/11. I knew the pilot of Flight 11, the first plane to hit the North Tower of the WTC. When I saw his name on TV as one of the pilots of those aircraft, my heart sank. I felt... violated. Like some unseen hand reached into my life and stole something from me. It hurt and it was personal.

      On the other hand, my sister-in-law is Muslim. She and my brother got married in a mosque in NYC. She is a devout Muslim (as far as I know) and one of the sweetest and kindest people I've ever met. How could I hate someone like that? Simple: I can't. Those murderers who used our people as flying weapons to kill still more of our people were Muslim in name only. They were not Muslim in truth. I see it as the sham and facade that it really is.

      Osama bin Laden's plot was not to start a civilization war. It was to kill Americans, pure and simple. The reasons behind his declaration of jihad are irrelevant. What matters now is that al Quaeda is crushed, never to return.

    2. Re:This must be posted as AC by Jagasian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Obviously they weren't educated enough to know not to fly a plane into the WTC.

  33. Walter Cronkite Agrees by north.coaster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here's a quote from the transcript of the Larry King show on CNN:

    KING: Do you agree, though, with the all-day coverage? Every network seems to be doing...

    CRONKITE: No, I think we're going to get very weary, as tragic as are the stories, as heartrending as are the stories, as tear- jerking as are the stories, I think we're going to get very tired of hearing them over and over again over a period of two or three days or more. I think it's going to be overdone.

    I agree with Walter...

    /Don

  34. Re:No Offense by PhxBlue · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Dude, if you're sick of hearing it, turn off CNN.

    And just because you were in one of the towers doesn't mean you're the only one who has any right to grief. A lot of folks didn't make it out of the towers--or the Pentagon, for that matter. A lot of families will never be able to "move on."

    Reflect on the fact that you were lucky a year ago so that you could have your hissyfit today. Then STFU and let people grieve for the folks who weren't so lucky.

    --
    !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
  35. Re:OSDN by claude_juan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    some people were bitching about how osdn is using this "sacrifice" as a way to become a commercial hero. quite frankly, i think it is a nice gesture. what do people expect? them to save the world?

  36. At least... by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He didn't become a pot smoking (but not inhaling), draft dodging rapist who organized pro-communist teach-ins from the safety of Oxford.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  37. Dr. Seuss WTC poem by u8nogard · · Score: 2, Insightful


    I do believe if he was still around today, this is what he would say. The first time that I read it (one year ago), it brought a tear to the eye.

  38. Re:Bully or Teacher? by KalenDarrie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wrote a comment to this, but to save space on this server I will only post a link to it. I don't agree with the above poster. But I will let the details of this be presented by my diary entry. Comments welcome here or there.

    Bully or Teacher

    --
    Kalen D'arrie
  39. Wearing your tinfoil hat again? by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Destroying the environment? Pshaw... How many two mile thick clouds of smog that occlude 10% of the sun's light hang over the US? Oh that's right, it's over southeast asia, not the US...
    The US may of been guilty of environmental disasters in the past, but US industries are amongst the cleanest in the world. You can't even kill yourself in your garage w/ a car that meets CURRENT emission standards (not the insane ones that some people would like to impose)
    And what EXACTLY is wrong w/ genetically modified food? In the case of Argentina, it was a patent issue (which is the subject of a whole other argument and a whole other rant) and not the fact that it was genetically modified food...
    Oops, wait, I'm at work... shouldn't be ranting on /.

    --
    Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
    Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
  40. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not about death as revenge or justice as far as I'm concerned, it's about death because there's literaelly nothing else to do with these people. There's no way that human law can possibly carry out a "just" punishment against these people no matter what you do.

    We're talking about people who think it's OK to kill thousands of civillians and actively seek to do so. This isn't just "misguided," it's just plain wrong, but these people have all but been programmed to think this way.

    What would we do with them? Could we capture them and try to "de-program" them? Not very likely. When you're cheering the death of thousands of unwitting civillians, I'm tempted to say you're too far gone for rehabilitation.

    And what if it were possible? Would you enjoy living another 50-60 years knowing you did so utterly reprehensible and wrong? Normal people in the US prison system have to go through counseling when they take part in an execution, and that's just one person. How much counseling would you have to go through for 2000+?

    The only other "alternative" is to lock them up in a cell somewhere for the rest of their lives. And as far as I'm concerned, captial punishment is more humane than life in prison with no chance of parole. Nothing but you, the four walls around you, and your thoughts.

    These people are too far gone to even try to set straight. We'd be doing everybody a favor (including them) by killing them.

  41. 9/11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Of course we should mourn the deaths on Sept. 11.

    On that date in 1973 the democratically elected government of Chile was overthrown by the CIA-sponsored military, resulting in the deaths (ironically) of about 3000 people and bringing the dictatory Pinochet to power.

    I guess you're a terrorist only if you're on the other team. :-(

  42. The most important "news" is ignored! by dpt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Having sampled much of the "anniversary" rubbish currently being run instead of news in papers, on website and on television, I've noticed the most important *new* story has been missed.

    That is, the massive public backlash against this over-wrought, corporatized, media-hyped grieving period. Everyone I know, even people who usually suck at their various media feeds like a crack pipe, are one and all rejecting the media hype surrounding this "event", and doing their own thing to remember in a dignified fashion.

    I've never seen anything quite like it, such a broad rejection of mass-media values and corporate mandated "feelings time" - and of course there's not one mention of "people expressing disdain for media exploitation of grief" anywhere to be found on the "news" ...

  43. Sadness by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 4, Insightful
    That so much hatred could be directed toward what is undoubtedly the worlds freest country. I'm sick of all the anti-American sentiment I've heard in the last year. We are either blamed for not doing enough(East Timor is a really good example) or for doing too much(supporting Israel, etc.) We're just like the rest of the world, only more successful. The rest of world's problems are not our fault.

    That in over 50 years since Israel was founded, their enemies still don't recognize them enough to even put them on their maps.

    That Palestinian children are so brainwashed into hating Israel, scores of them have strapped bombs on themselves in order to blow themselves up as well as many Israeli citizens as they can take out.

    That Iraq is able to scoff at international law, kicking out the U.N inspectors and rebuilding their weapons of mass destruction while the rest of the world(except the U.S.) turns a blind eye.

    The really sad thing is that when all is said and done, Palestine will end up with no more than they were already promised before the start of the infitada. The Taliban is gone, Al-Qaeda has been scattered to the wind, and Iraq will undoubtedly see a regime change. All that vehement hatred directed toward the U.S. and Israel, and what is it going to get them? Nothing, if not less than what they had before.

    That is truly sad.

    --

    No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

    1. Re:Sadness by xenoweeno · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That Iraq is able to scoff at international law, kicking out the U.N inspectors and rebuilding their weapons of mass destruction [yahoo.com] while the rest of the world(except the U.S.) turns a blind eye.

      Now would be a good time to point out soem of the things that the report on Iraq's WMD status actually says:

      • Iraq does not possess facilities to produce fissile material in sufficient amounts for nuclear weapons.
      • It would require several years and extensive foreign assistance to build such fissile material production facilities.
      • It could divert domestic civil-use radioisotopes or seek to obtain foreign material for a crude radiological device.

      Of course, the only logicaly title for the article on Yahoo is "Iraq Could Make N-Bomb". The titles of articles that appeared in other publications were equally asinine--"British think tank warns of Iraqi threat" for example.

    2. Re:Sadness by akuzi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > That so much hatred could be directed toward > what is undoubtedly the worlds freest country. What makes you think that the US is any freer than Sweden, Holland, New Zealand, Canada etc etc? Americans are indoctrinated from childhood into believing they are the freest and most democratic country in the world, but never ask the question whether this is really true. If Americans have the right to free speech why is their no open debate in the mainstream media about the big questions like why the Govt seems to be completely controlled by big business and what can be done about it? Does the US really have the right to change the regimes of other countries as it sees fit? Why is criticising the Govt's foreign policy often said to be being 'un-American'? If America is truely the most democratic nation why is it that most the Govt is made up of wealthy middle aged white men serving the interests of big business? Part of why there is so much hatred towards America is that Americans themselves are seen to be so ignorant of what is going on in their own-country and in the rest of the world.

    3. Re:Sadness by Tonytheloony · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Would you mind explaining in what way you are so "undoubtedly" the freeest country in the world? Facts speak louder then your (brainwashed) opinion

      --
      The quickest way to become an atheist is to study the Bible thoroughly.
  44. LIKE HELL I CAN'T! by somethingwicked · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The whole point of the matter is that no one deserves death, even those who take up arms against you.

    It is so sad that you think this is true.

    There are VERY few people in this world that I wish death upon. They didn't accidentally have a stray bullet hit someone. .Someone that by choices TARGETS innocent civilians for mass murder *deserves* to die.

    If you wanted to debate WHO the actual killers were, fine. Maybe the mastermind is the only person left who should go down, some might say that anyone who EVER heard even a whisper of a possibility of the plot and did not act is subject to death as well.

    But to make a broad, generalizatation that NO ONE deserves death is just too much.

    I WILL WISH DEATH UPON THEM. I do NOT pity them beyond the sad choice that have made, and their crass indifference to the impact their childish rage has brought.

    --

    ---"What did I say that sounded like 'Tell me about your day?'"---

    1. Re:LIKE HELL I CAN'T! by Stonehand · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here are some statistics for you.

      Total imminent fatalties, Hiroshima:
      Est. 75,000.

      Total imminent fatalities, Nagasaki:
      Est. 40,000.

      Total imminent fatalities, US/UK Dresden firebombing:
      Est. 135,000.

      Total Chinese civillians killed in the Rape of Nanking:
      Est. 200-300K.
      Total number of rapes committed there by the Japanese occupation:
      Est. 20K.

      Total number of Chinese civillians killed by the Japanese, 1931-1945:
      Est. 30M.

      Total number of wars of aggression or war crimes that Japan has committed since 1945:
      Zero.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    2. Re:LIKE HELL I CAN'T! by letxa2000 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      If I remember correctly, they'd already pretty much surrendered when the bomb was being flown over. The military just wanted to test out their new shiny toy.

      No, actually, you remember incorrectly. They were not surrendering and a full-scale invasion of the Japanese mainland would have been necessary. We dropped the bomb to convince Japan to surrender to save countless Americans AND Japanese that would die in the invasion. Japan still wasn't going to surrender because they thought we only had one bomb... so we dropped a second bomb and that convinced him.

      Make no mistake, the Japanese were not going to surrender. If they were, they would have done so promptly in the three days following the Hiroshima bomb. But even that wasn't enough.

      Also, I beleive that America has bombed something like 35 countries killing 3 million people in it's history. That's quite a lot. That's as bad as Germany and the number of Jews they had killed.

      Well, I'm not going to investigate that right now. I don't doubt we've killed many people, that's a given. However, even 3 million would only be HALF as many as the number of Jews Hitler killed. As a result of Hitler's conquest, 19 million Soviet civilians were killed in addition to 6 million Jews. That's 25 million civilians not even counting the millions of military that died on both sides during WWII.

      So, considering Germany wasn't even a superpower and their ambition for conquest killed 25 million civilians in about 8 years, the fact that the U.S.--as a true world superpower, capable of defeating any country on the planet--has only killed 3 million people in the the last 220 years is not bad at all!

      The U.S. is not perfect, no. But there has never been a country so powerful that COULD take over the entire world that didn't try. Say what you want about the U.S., we could annex the entire world militarily if we wanted to--yet our territory hasn't expanded for more than 60 years.

  45. My take on this by Triv · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Alright, this might annoy some people, but I'll go for it because I'm frankly sick of all this.

    I live in New York. Last week I got an email from an old acquaintence ("Old aquaintance" translates to "sends me chain letters and won't stop") asking everyone on the list to pray for the dead and those who have lost. She also suggested that everyone drive with their headlights on today (Twin beams of light! Get it?!?). I normally ignore her, but on this one I snapped. Like a good portion of people in New York (I assume), the attacks affected me for two weeks. It was horrible to see the city shut down for a week - it seemed impossible. But life went on. I didn't lose anyone. I didn't didn't lose my job.

    But people refused to let go - the media and politicians, specifically, as well as Americans who now use this as a way of explaining who we are as a nation. It's not denial on my part or anything - the actual attacks haven't affected me in any way, emotional or otherwise, in a little under a year.

    The things that have affected me are things like the US PATRIOT act, Bush's rampant power-grab. So I emailed my friend back and told her to give $50 to the ACLU or the EFF. You want to help, fine, but prayer does absolutely nothing, and driving with your lights on is stupid. It's...painless. You're not pinching your budget, you're not donating time. Do something substantial.

    I think our attitude (ok, mine) is summed up perfectly as this: We don't ever want to forget, but we don't want to be constantly reminded either.

    It's not online yet but there's a wonderful article voicing this opinion much better than I can in this month's Harper's. I suggest you pick up a copy.

    Triv

  46. Re:No Offense by darkov2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can understand your sentiments, although I was a good 10,000 kms away from the towers. Tonight, here in Australia, the media frezy continues. Almost all the channels have live coverage from New York, you can't get away from it. It was a terrible thing, but I really don't want to dwell on all those poor people dying and the grief of their families and friends. Yesterday there was hours and hours of programs on it. They showed pictures of people jumping out of the towers and pictures of them after they hit the ground. It's all a bit grotesque and undignified.

  47. Just blabbering and mourning by MrRee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, it was bad. I mourn that day when so many died by so few who felt that was the only way to make a statement or exact revenge or push some political agenda or whatever.

    A life, any life, is a precious thing that once taken, can never be returned. How can we protect our lives? How can we be safe? Freedom is inherently unsafe. Yet, between safety and freedom, I'll always choose freedom.

    My hats off to the couragous crew and passengers of the 4th airliner. If there were a civilian version of the Medal of Honor and if anyone truely deserved it, the people of that 4th airliner certainly do. Good job, thank-you and God bless.

  48. Re:No Offense by octover · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I agree with you mostly. I understand the need for people to mourn those they lost. You bet if I lost someone I loved, today would be different. The fact is that I had NSA, and top secret government buildings all around me. One of the people I was with was afraid something would happen nearby, I knew that they were either the best targets to hit, or the worst cause anit-air wouldn't let it happen. Of course since they had already lost the element of suprise I knew I was safe. Which is exactly what most Americans were safe.

    9/11 has nothing on Pearl Harbor, the way I see it most of the country isn't going to be affected much by the war on terrorism. The show of pride in America seems to be a shallow gesture. Nobody is banding together, or making sacrafices for their country they weren't before, except of course the armed forces involved. Lots of people have pride in this country and being a citizen I am one of them, I just didn't rush out to show it. I would rather see Americans love their neighbors than flags everywhere.

  49. Re:Bully or Teacher? by lamz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wrote a comment to this, but to save space on this server I will only post a link to it. I don't agree with the above poster. But I will let the details of this be presented by my diary entry. Comments welcome here or there.

    I believe that your efforts to "save space" on this server are really just a ploy to profit from this tragedy by drumming up hits for your own site, so I choose not to follow your link. I might look tomorrow.

    --

    Mike van Lammeren
    It will challenge your head, your brain, and your mind.

  50. Re:OSDN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    halting commerce is not exactly a "good deed". the entire aim of the terrorism against this country was to halt commerce and bring down the economy (and therefore limit the amount of power the US government has). by not advertising on sept. 11, this sends the message that they won, even only if for a day.

    stopping progress to observe sept. 11 is ridiculous, almost as ridiculous as turning the entire WTC site into a memorial ground.

  51. The Events You Equate Were Fudamentally Different by FreeUser · · Score: 3, Insightful

    OK, so don't ever watch any specials about Hiroshima or the Bombing of Dresden either (which both had a LOT more casualties, almost all civilian). Oh, but these were Americans that were killed, so this is different...

    Yes it is different, but not for the asinine racist or bigoted reasons you so disingenuously imply.

    First, the insinuation that it is somehow common for Americans to value American lives over other lives is false and disingenuous. Media coverage does not equal people's attitudes. When I lived in Germany, the national news emphesized which Germans had been killed in such and such an event, just as American media emphesizes which Americans are killed in such and such an event. Ditto for the time I spent in Japan, in the UK, in Hong Kong, and in France. The Media always emphesizes the number of 'locals' killed in dramatic events, irrespective of whether those 'locals' are Americans, French, Germans, Chinese, or Japanese.

    However, none of the Germans I knew were any less horrified at the loss of non-German lives than they were with the German lives lost (remember the Concord?). Ditto for the UK, France, etc., and ditto for the United States

    Secondly, you are equating battles which took place against already belligerent enemies engaged in all out, no-holds barred world war, versus unprovoked attacks (by any reasonable definition, all "blame the victim" nonsense aside) during peacetime, such as Pearl Harbor and most especially the events of 9/11. This doesn't make the destruction of Heroshima, Nagasaki (forgot about them, didn't you?), and Dresden any less tragic or terrible, but it does mean they were fudamentally different in their nature and their context than the events of 9/11.

    So, while the civilian deaths of Heroshima and Dresden were terrible, that was war, waged against countries which were engaged in active hostilities against us and who, by the way, started the fucking thing to begin with. The World Trade Center, in contrast, was not. Equating the two, and drawing asinine conclusions like "Americans are bigots who care only for themselves" is fallicious both logically and ethically, and frankly you should be ashamed.

    The vast majority of us (aside from some fringe elements, of which every country has its fair share I might add) are horrified whenever we see death, be it American or otherwise. Why do you think we give so much of our money to try and alleviate famine, pestilence, and the ravages of wars we aren't even involved in in so many distant lands. Because, irrespective of our media or our government's behavior, we as a people do care about human life and are saddened by human suffering, irrespective of whether the people affected are American or not.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  52. Re:I honestly cant watch any of the footage by CoreWalker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, I can't really watch the coverage either.
    I didn't know anyone in the two towers personally. I had been to New York a few times and had seen the towers (never went in, though). I have a cousin who used to live in New York, and one of her friends was within a few blocks when it happened. That's probably my closest personal connection to the tragedy, but there is something about the whole thing that is so sad and pointless that I can't help but feel that same queasyness in the pit of my stomach.
    It's the little things that seem to be the hardest to deal with, though: I can generally avoid most of the coverage, but I will never be able to look at a skyscaper without being able to clearly picture an airplane flying into it, and I will never see an airplane flying overhead and not fear for who might be flying it and what their intentions may be.

    For better or worse, I lost my innocence on September 11, 2001.

  53. Re:Terrorism? by MoneyT · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Terrorism is any act designed to cause fear or terror in a given group of people. It doesn't even have to be a violent motion, the simple act of waving a grenade arround in a crowd is an act of terrorism.

    The WTC attacks were acts of terrorism. And unlike a single plane crashing in tokyo (which one would assume is not being piloted by terrorists) the WTC attacks involved 4 planes intentionaly flown off course.

    As for millitary vs terrorism, even if you buy your definitions, what about all the civilians on the planes themselves? Or the civilians in the streets below? Are those also legitamte military targets?

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  54. Protecting 'freedom' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    > I think America is underestimated because
    > outsiders view freedom of religion, freedom of
    > speech, tolerance of different opinions,
    > and open debate as a sign of disunity.
    > Americans agree to disagree, and are
    > passionate about defending the
    > freedoms that allow such diversity.

    As a New Zealander (an 'outsider') living in the US, two thoughts come to mind when I here patriotic rhetoric like this..

    The first is that Americans talk a lot about their supposed freedom and democracy, but to my experience I am no freer than back home or in most European countries, and the government is definitely less democratic.

    To me there is little 'open debate' in America on the issues that really matter. Like why in a supposed 'democracy' and such a multi-ethnic society most of the Govt is made up of rich middle aged to elderly white men. In other countries such as NZ the govt although dominated by the same but seems much more representative - our last two Prime Ministers have been women and we have had a Rastafarian and a transsexual as members of Parliament. In the US why is it that the government is so obviously controlled by big business, and noone is asking what can be done about it? What is wrong with the process that can result in an obvious simpleton like George Bush becoming President? Where is the 'open debate' you are talking about, it's certainly not in the mainstream press.

    One thing stifling open debate in American seems to be a very misguided sense of partriotism. Why is that people who question the Bush administration's foreign policy are often called
    'un-American' (or 'partisan'). Shouldn't criticism of the Government's policy be a *healthy* thing. I know that if you used the term 'anti-New Zealand' back at home to describe anyone people would just laugh at you. Back in Stalinist Russia being 'anti-Russian' was one of the worst crimes imaginable, but to my knowledge the concept doesn't exist in countries outside the US. Wouldn't a real patriot (a person who really loves America) want to fix the things that are wrong?

    (As an aside the level of blind patriotism in America is quite scary to an outsider like myself. Definitely a meme-set that is very much like religion, taught to children early (pledge of Allegence etc) and subtly enforced via the media).

    America seems do a lot of dubious things in the world in the name of protecting their freedom and democracy. How exactly was bombing Afganistan protecting America's freedom? You can do anything you want in the name of protecting your freedom!

    It is that outsiders unestimate American's desire to protect their freedom, or is that they underestimate the American people's ability to be fooled by their Govt into thinking that that is what they are doing?

  55. None taken, but.... by ArthurDent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I understand your point. I, too, think sometimes memorials can be overdone. There's one thing to remember here. Even though you were one of the ones most directly affected, you are not alone. Everyone in the country was affected by the loss of innocence that results from being attacked for the first time on the soil of the contiguous states. Thousands of people lost family members. Millions (probably) lost friends and neighbors and co-workers. That kind of pain does not go away lightly.

    There are always going to be jerks who try to profit off the emotions of others. Live with it. That doesn't mean that the memorials are worthless. It's a milestone for us to examine how the event changed us and decide if we like what we find.

    Ben

  56. What a dilemma... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Not so long ago I thought that I believed in the Death Sentence for appropriate offenders. Eventually I started to figure out that it is cheaper to put someone in prison for life, than to put them to death. So I changed my mind based on those thoughts.

    Then came Sept 11th, and with a numbness in my heart I watched the buildings burn and fall.

    I watched patriotism in our country be reborn anew...and also watched our country march off to war.

    We were angry, we were hurt, we were confused, and we were saddened. Things like this should not happen in anywhere. Ideally humans would rise above their petty differences based on race, religion, creedo, and fears. However we don't change that fast...and too many find it easy to follow charismatic leaders whom they feel give them a purpose in life, rather than seeking that purpose on their own.

    I don't like the fact that my country went out and bombed the ever living hell out of a mudhole of a country. The people there, most of whom are god (allah) fearing individuals, already endure much suffering due to civil war, and religious intolerance at the hand of a government.

    The people who attacked us are fanatics. Fanatics incapable of seeing past their own actions and the consequences that occur world wide. By their actions, they brought out some of the ugliness in people. Assaults on people who 'look' like muslims, defacing of holy places. It turned us into the muslim haters that they wanted us to be. Our media playing up on the attacks, and the displays of horror rather than the displays of goodness and kindness that came out of the rubble.

    Anymore I'm not sure what to think, other than our Government needs to do a better job with foreign relations and tolerance, and that us Americans need to learn a little humility.

    Living in a free country comes at the cost of security. The two do not mesh well together, and the knee-jerk public tends to think about the immediate concerns rather than how this will affect them in the future.

  57. Re:The Real Effect of September 11 by donutello · · Score: 3, Insightful

    * FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION: Government may monitor religious and political institutions without suspecting criminal activity to assist terror investigation.

    Seems like you don't understand the meaning of the words "Freedom of Association". You are still allowed to associate with whoever you want. There's nothing wrong with the government monitoring you while you're doing so - your freedom is not threatened.

    --
    Mmmm.. Donuts
  58. I agree completely.... and you are wrong by mirnav · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Look at the same point in context of WHO attacked who and your point suffers miserably...

    Very true. In the same light, let's look at the issue at hand - Bin Ladin and his pyromaniac fremen did not just decide to set alight the World Trade Centers, you know. We take your advice, look at the context, and see that the reason why they are attacking the US might have something to do with the fact that their whole lives and those of their friends, family and everyone they have ever met has been affected for the worse because of American policies in the region where they live.

    I look at the issue objectively, and this is what I see. Not that I care one bit for the Arabs and their "causes" to kill thousands of civilians. Neither do I care for Americans who had to kill thousands of Afghan civilians because they got hit by the terrorism they had been funding and lashing onto other nations for so long.

    Sorry if this is a little harsh on the day of remembering the people who perished. I feel for them as I feel for the people of Hiroshima and Bosnia, as I feel for those who died in Nazi concentration camps. Still, you guys need to wake up from this "they are evil, we are good" crap and realize that it's your state's own clumsy meddling in international politics that turned to bite you this time. Yes, I agree completely that things need to be seen in their context. And this is the context created by the USA, with its merits and its perils.

  59. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by re-Verse · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In my opinion, this is a bit myopic and shouldn't be given such a high score.

    We're talking about people who think it's OK to kill thousands of civilians and actively seek to do so. This isn't just "misguided," it's just plain wrong, but these people have all but been programmed to think this way.

    I'm not trying to start something nasty here, but there have been over a thousand Civilian deaths in Afganistan so far, and some reports say up to three thousand.

    You keep mentioning "these people" and how they all deserve death for "cheering" others death... Do you, in retrospect, also deserve death for cheering their death? One has to be very careful not to become just what they are fighting agasint.

    Not to mention, if the US armies sweep across the globe, killing all leaders that bush sees as "evil", we're going to make a lot more people hate us.. childen whos parents have died in anti-terrorist operations, civilians that got in the way.. etc. Its a perfect way to ensure future terrorists. Personally I'd like to know real reasons on why the USA is so hated by so many people across the globe, and don't tell me its becasue "they hate our freedom", its a wonder every time i see GWB say that with a straight face.

    I think this whole issue is a Lot more complex than having a simple "kill them all" solution. If we are supposed to be the most advanced and cultured society in the history of the earth, i'm sure we can do better than that.

    I may be modded down for this by some who think a second opinion is a bad thing, but i can't help but post this here. This is what i feel and i beleive its valid.

  60. Re:I agree completely.... No, you are wrong by chewmanfoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You think your "objectivity" grants you license to illuminate the real reasons for the attacks on Sept. 11. You suggest that American foreign policy is so nefarious, so wicked that two gigantic stuctures and thousands of innocent civilians should die as some sort of repayment.
    Remember that you're living in a nation run by imperfect humans who make diplomatic decisions every day. Where are you from anyway? Think about your largest city, and the two largest buildings in that city. Now, in your mind, bring those buildings down and crush the thousands working there, one by one, in the process. Think about all the funerals for the EMS workers, all the unknown heroes who will perish in that single act of "justice". Now, remember, you deserved it. Go down to ground zero wearing a plaquard reading "Our Own Foreign Policy Did This. It's Our Fault." I have no doubt your fellow countrymen would give you more than a black eye.
    Any suggestion that unknown or plainly obvious foreign policy decisions led to the 9/11 terrorist attacks, and that these attacks were somehow justified because of such corrupt foreign policy, is completely assanine.

  61. The post's point (Re:LIKE HELL I CAN'T!) by jackDuhRipper · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seems to be the point of the poster was that Japan had a long history of agressive & atrocious behavior which stopped soon after some very firm and significant pressure was applied in the form of several megatons of explosives.

    It's a good point to note: tit for tat leads to ongoing conflict, while massive retaliation generally gets the message across more succinctly and saves lives in the long run.

    Frightening, yes, but historically accurate.

  62. This is just sad. by juuri · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Please, stop telling that America is so great. America is every bit as stupid, selfish, jealous, paranoid and incompetant as any other country. And it's considerable more brutal, repressive and intolerant than many.

    I am so tired of this bullshit. The USA is by far the best behaved super power the world has ever known. Anyone who claims any different is blinding themselves to the real truths of history. You tell me one world power, who at their prime, was better behaved than the USA? Not one other country comes even remotely close. No it isn't a perfect country and yes many of its policies suck ass, but your claim is completely without merit.

    We has a world have come a long ways in the last 50 years... a long ways. We still have a long ways to go.

    --
    --- I do not moderate.
  63. Chile, etc. by nullard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    September 11 (1973) US-backed coup overturns democratically elected government in Chile, leading to thousands of deaths, tortures and "disappearances"

    My father was there. He was listening to the radio as democratically elected Aliende prepared to defend his country with his life. Even knowing that he had no chance, he armed himself and stood in front of the seat of the govenrment to fend off the coup with his own hands.

    Would Bush have done the same? Would any recent U.S.president?

    If some foreign force invaded DC, would any recent president -- knowing it would be certain death -- have the cojones to deffend his nation? Or would he run and hide?

    My parents were both in Brazil durring the U.S.-backed military dictatorship there. My father got a first-hand look at just how involved the U.S. was in that affair.

    My father and I now work to change U.S. policy so that maybe someday the rest of the world won't have a reason to hate us. Patriotism is loving your country enough to see its faults -- and try and fix them.

    --


    t'nera semordnilap
  64. Here's how it works: by skelf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    - "We" (the giant corporate military industrial complex of the "west",
    including the world bank, IMF, WTO, etc.) systematically oppress,
    murder and enslave entire countries full of innocent people.

    - We install our own dictatorships in these countries (e.g. Indonesia,
    Iraq, etc.) while parcelling up their resources among 1st-world
    megacorporations, many of which have larger operating budgets than
    entire countries.

    - We force these countries to accept "free trade", meaning we make
    them remove all import tarriffs, and then flood their economy with
    cheap products and staple foods. Just like when a Wal-Mart moves in
    next door, the local artisans/farmers cannot compete, and they and
    their children must give up the farm and move into the city to work
    for subsistence wages under inhumane conditions in factories for
    Gap, Nike, etc.

    - Anyone who tries to resist this is called a "communist" (or maybe
    now they'll be called an "Al Qaeda sympathizer") and is subject to
    imprisonment, torture, and murder. These are people who've somehow
    gotten the crazy idea that a country's natural resources might
    actually be used to benefit its *own* citizens. They don't realize
    that their lot in life is to shut up and be cheap labor.

    - We force these countries to take out massive loans to buy our
    imported goods--loans they will never be able to repay.

    - In addition to providing the capital for the loans, U.S. taxpayers
    money goes into "aid packages" for these now destitute countries.
    The aid packages are earmarked for buying food and goods from
    western megacorporations. This is another way in which the system
    works to channel our money to the corporations.

    - If anyone gets out of line, we don't have a problem using weapons of
    mass distruction against their citizens (a million people have died
    radiation-related deaths in Iraq since 1991 because we rained
    thousands of tons of depleted uranium bombs and shells over the
    whole southern half of the country). After all, making us
    taxpayers support a massive military system (of historically
    unprecented size) is another major way in which the system feeds our
    money to the industrial complex.

    - On 9/11, some assholes out there (we don't have the monopoly on
    evil) manage to succeed in attacking the monetary system that rules
    the world. Over 3000 "collateral" casualties also result.

    - The response? Use this as a great excuse to (a) remove some more
    civil liberties from us (an educated, free-thinking populace is the
    *real* enemy of tyranny), and also (b) channel more of our money
    into our military machine.

    - Anyone who tries to point out any of the above is basically called a
    traitor. After all, "you're either with us or against us". As if
    even trying to understand what's going on is treasonous!

    If you are intrigued by any of this and want to investigate for
    yourself (don't believe me--I'm just regurgitating this stuff), you
    might like to look at John Pilger's new book "The New Rulers of the
    World", or any of his earlier stuff. Also, the copious writings of
    Noam Chomsky, Howard Zinn, and even Gore Vidal are great places to
    start.

    If you are unwilling to open your eyes, you'll probably just call me a
    "communist" or an "Al Queda sympathizer" (I am neither). While it
    shouldn't be necessary, I nevertheless feel compelled to stress that I
    do not condone the 9/11 attacks, nor do I think the people killed on
    that day "deserved to die", or that the terrorists were justified in
    doing it. I also think that it was counterproductive to their cause,
    as all violence is. I just wish people would be willing to see that
    we ourselves have been, and are again contemplating, waging extended
    campaigns of violence in the world that dwarf the events of 9/11. We
    still have a chance to change our ways.

    1. Re:Here's how it works: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You Sir are a complete idiot. I just so happen to live in a country (Poland) which was ruled by communist just 13 years ago and its largly thanks to the US government that I can sit in front of my computer instead of a line for north korean rice.

    2. Re:Here's how it works: by geekee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Who modded this unsubstantiated bullshit up to a 5? I especially like the part about how we force countries to take our loans. That's pretty funny. I also like how he made up some crap about killing Irquis with radiation. When you realize capitalism works because it gives people the option to trade with each other freely, allowing buyers and sellers to come to an agreement about a product or service, and how it relates to the work they've done, you realize it's a lot more free system than a communist system, where your work is worth nothing and you have to beg the govt to recognise what you consider needs to survive.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
  65. Alas, you are both wrong. by IPFreely · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Mr. Hand has some nice statistics, but we know what they are worth.

    The reason Japan has not had any agression since WWII is not the pounding they got, it is because of the MARSHAL PLAN.

    Some history. After WWI, Germany was pounded into submission, millions killed, all infrastructure destroyed. Internaltional punishment was delt to them. They were oppressed. Germany was reviled, Their people hated world wide. Extremely horrible economic and emotional conditions.
    Question: Did that prevent them from starting another war?
    Answer: NO!

    After WWII, The Marshal plan was implemented in both Germany and Japan. This plan prevented either from building an Army. But it did help both rebuild their economies, their industries, their schools and hospitals. The US and allies spent millions of dollars rebuilding Germany and Japan into modern, capable and respected countries. No oppression. No punishment.

    Since then, neither has had any aggression of the type in WWII.

    So, by your logic, Germany should have been stopped after WWI. But they weren't, were they. The difference? Rebuild them, respect them. Don't give them an emotional reason to go to war.

    Now a question for you. If someone were to beat the crap out of you, a school yard bully (assuming you weren't the school yard bully). Would you sit and cower and pray he goes away, or would you plot vengence? Do you believe other people think any differently that you do on subjects like that?

    Learn some history. Learn some psychology. Become a better person.

    Peace be with you.

    --
    There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
  66. where I was last year by gandalf23atwork · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A year ago I was on a boat in the Al Jafad dry dock in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. We'd just gone up to the bridge to use the cell phone (better reception up there). One of the guys, Walt, was talking to his wife when she said that a plane had hit the world trade center. She had no other information, we just assumed some Cessna pilot got lost or flew too close, and we were not too worried. A few minutes later we went downstairs to the mess for dinner and turned on the TV. That's when we saw the second plane hit, and we knew we were in deep shit.

    Quite frankly I was very worried about our safety. We stayed on the boat for about two days. The US consulate was closed, so there was no where for us to go to if we got in trouble. We sat for hours in the mess watching CNN with the sound off. We later found out that the sound was off because the government of the UAE was censoring the broadcast. This was a new experience to me, but not to the guys on the boat. I was outraged, but they would say "Mr. Mike, they do this to protect us. Obviously the people are telling lies or speaking bad about Islam, otherwise they would be allowed to speak." And they were serious. Luckily CNN was running text along the bottom of the screen, so we were able to get a decent idea of what was going on.

    We saw on CNN the joyous celebrations all over the world, so when we did finally leave the boat I made sure I had a flare gun (I stole one from the bridge) and a 6 inch chefs knife from the kitchen with me, in addition to my usual pocketknives (a Bob Lum Spyderco and a Leatherman Side Clip). I also made sure that the other guys were armed with knives as well (mostly 4 inch Opinels). Non-citizens are not allowed to own/possess guns, stun guns, or pepper spray in the UAE, so knives were all we could carry legally to protect ourselves should the need arise.

    It felt odd when we'd go out. Even before the attacks we stood out as we were all taller than the vast majority of the population and we were obviously foreigners, both in dress and face. For two months after the attacks, up until the time we went into Afganistan, people would come up to me on the street and ask if I was an American. At first I did not know what to say, so that first day I said I was a Texan. Most people did not know what a Texan was, but assumed I was not American, so they would then go on about how terrible the attacks were and there was an urgency when they spoke when they'd tell me that Islam was not the cause, that the men who did this were madmen. One very nice older Arabic man had been to Texas, and when I told him I was Texan he hugged me and cried, it was very touching. He and most people I met were outraged at the attacks, furious that men did it in the name of Islam, and worried that the US would destroy the world in retribution. Everyone asked if I knew anyone lost in the attacks, and asked about my family.

    Of course, many people I met, including all of the Arabs on the boat with us, were convinced that it was an Israeli attack. As one crewman put it, "It is against Islam to murder innocents, therefore no Muslim could do this. It must be the Jews." I was shocked at this attitude but did not know how to respond to it. Later on when it became more clear that it was indeed Bin Laden's group, the same guys said, "It is too difficult, what they did. Only a nation could do this, not one man or a few men. It must have been Mossad or China, no Arab could plan this." This was kinda funny, because all the Arabs on the boat were lazy fucks, and I certainly could not see any of them planing a good meal let alone a simultaneous hijacking. However, this was not proof, yet they accepted it as such. They firmly believed that if they could not do it, then no other Arab could. This was an attitude that I would find not only on the boat but all over, and is one that still perplexes me.

    When US troops went into Afganistan, I became real worried. No longer did people smile and stop me on the street to express their condolences over the attacks. Instead I got angry glares and scowls. I went back to carrying the flare gun and chefs knife in my backpack we I went out. Several people spat at me. Luckily nothing happened, although I did have one Afghani challenge me to a duel. He had a sword, which he had drawn, but I had just purchased a very large Pakastani meat cleaver. It weighs about 10 pounds and is huge. (I figured it'd be good for dressing game) So I took the cleaver out of my pack and said, "Ok." His sword was a crappy one, like one of those you'd see in a sharper image catalog for $40, so I wasn't too worried. I figured I'd whack him upside the head with the flat of the blade and knock some sense into him. A large crowd had gathered, and luckily nothing happened. We agreed to be friends even though our countries might not be. I tried to explain, and I think I did get through to him, that the US was not pissed at Afghanis, that we were after Bin Laden and the Taliban was protecting him. If the Taliban gave him up we'd leave Afghanistan alone. He did not like the Taliban, that's why he was in Dubai and not Kabul, but he had family back home and was worried. The whole situation got better a few days later when it was announced that the US was dropping food and supplies all over Afghanistan, but still the scowls and frowns remained.

    After visiting the middle east, I realize how much better off most Americans are than the rest of the world. Especially in the stuff we take for granted, like freedom of religion and of the press. I was not allowed to hear certain things nor was I allowed to say anything bad or even remotely construed as being negative about the government in the UAE. Not just, "don't say that," but the police would come and take me away. The secret police are everywhere and you never know who is listening. My entertainment was censored. Books, newspapers, magazines, CDs, video games, and movies are all censored before they are allowed to be released (for example the whole subplot about the arab arms dealer in the brad Pit movie Spy Game was removed). I was not allowed to practice my religion. I was forbidden to bring a bible in to the country, or to wear a cross around my neck, and there are only about 4 or 5 churches in the entire country (and just try finding a taxi that'll drive you to one of them). I was not allowed to eat what I wanted, nor drink what I wanted. Not that I'm a big drinker or a big pork eater, but after a few months I really wanted to sit down, watch an American Football game, drink a beer, and eat a plate of bacon.

    Anyway, now here I am a year later, back in the states. Every flight I've taken since last September I've been searched by hand, my luggage has been searched by hand, and once in Amsterdam our flight was delayed while they pulled out my luggage and made me go through it while a bunch of nervous guys with MP5s and Glocks watched. I gotta tell you, though, that all that did not make me feel safer, in fact it made me feel less safe. I can't help but think that a semi-determined terrorist/hijacker could still very easily get a weapon on board, but I, and most of the other passengers, would be completely disarmed as we are law-abiding, and this would make it much more difficult to stop the hijacking. A sharpened piece of glass, plastic, or stone will not be detected by any metal detector, but it would be a very effective cutting instrument.

    So what am I doing a year later? Not much. I watched some of the ceremony in New York and Washington. Here at the office I've been listening to NPR all day. I took off early for lunch and went to a memorial service at my church. I'm usually not big on songs, mainly as my voice just sucks, but today we sang one I don't remember ever singing before. #437 in the Methodist hymnal, "This is My Song." I thought the words were very nice, and appropriate, and well, here they are.

    This is My Song
    Lyrics: Lloyd Stone
    Music: Jean Sibelius

    This is my song, O God of all the nations,
    a song of peace for lands afar and mine.
    This is my home, the country where my heart is;
    here are my hopes, my dreams my holy shrine;
    but other hearts in other lands are beating
    with hopes and dreams as true and high as mine.

    My country's skies are bluer than the ocean,
    and sunlight beams on cloverleaf and pine;
    but other lands have sunlight too, and clover,
    and skies are everywhere as blue as mine.
    O hear my song, thou God of all the Nations,
    a song of peace for their land and for mine.

    After work I plan on stopping by the indoor gun range and putting a lot of holes into a bin laden target (http://www.reloadbench.com/photo/obl8x11.jpg). I went to an outdoor range this past Saturday but didn't get to spend much time shooting. Then I'll go home, hug my family, call the ones I can't hug, maybe go get a beer with some friends.

    -Gandalf23

  67. I was fortunate.... by munition · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was fortunate.

    I did not live in New York.
    I did not live in D.C.
    I did not lose anyone that day.
    At least, anyone I personally knew.

    I did, however, lose many people that I did not know. These people were not just all Americans. They were from all over the world. These people represented different ethnicities, religions, regions, businesses, families, etc.

    I lost joy in seeing family member after family member holding pictures of their loved ones, wondering if anyone has seen them.

    I felt helpless seeing the building collapse, knowing that all I could do is whisper a simple prayer.

    I felt torn between my thought of religious tolerence and a new feeling of hatred towards the people who did this in the name of religion.

    Yes, I was fortunate.

    I married my wife two months and twenty-two days early because her father had been called to active duty. She wanted to make sure that Daddy could see her walk down the aisle.

    I help my wife night after night while she cried. We both worried together about my father-in-law. World events left us unsure about what he would really be doing on his mission.

    But I was fortunate.

    I remember sitting in my home office when an email came from my mother. Something terrible had happened. I rushed to the living room, turned on CNN, and watched as the world seemingly crumbled around us.

    I remember my class being cancelled by the professor. My friends and I headed for a dorm room to watch the unfolding events.

    I remember the moment of silence in my next class.

    I remember the solemn faces of my peers in my last class of the day.

    I remember the tribute our university band did for the fallen that next Saturday. I remember being a part of that ensemble.

    Yet, I was fortunate.

    I renewed my relationship to God. I put my family first. I no longer found material things worth my time. Instead, I found life and the lives of those around being worth my time. I found that love and being loved was the most wonderful feeling in the world. How easy it is to forget this when one is busy.

    Yes, I was fortunate. 9-11 opened my eyes, my heart, and my life. It changed me, forced me to do more, and made me be a better person.

    Mourning the loss of life,

    --
    MunITioN
    "A mind is a terrible thing to lose"
  68. Re:Thousands dead, freedom buried by Lars+Clausen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In short (too late!), American culture is taking over the world. We aren't forcing it, people choosed what they like. Other cultures are getting forced out and feel threatened. The resulting fear turns to hatred of America and Americans. We are a "corrupting" influence. And we do take for granted freedoms and benefits others can only dream of.


    We aren't forcing it at gunpoint, we're forcing it through much subtler means of economic pressure.

    Also, many European countries who consider American culture a corrupting influence have freedoms and benefits that Americans can only dream of: Freedom to drink at any ago, freedom for gays, universally available quality healthcare and education... US is not the only country with a powerful constitution, it's merely the most powerful country around.

    -Lars

  69. September 11th to me by Umanity · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am sorry if I can't be so beligerent as some people seem to be. Although I have political differences with the powers that be I must remember today as the day the terrorists killed my only brother. Jonathan J. Uman was only 34, recently married and just had his second child. He worked for eSpeed on the 105th floor of the 1st tower of the WTC. I live in the San Francisco bay area, and woke up to the news. My father called me to tell me my brother was confirmed to be in the building at the time of the impact. This news was devastating to both my mother and my father, and his wife and children.

    All contempt aside, this day is a day which our country, the United States has never seen the likes of before. This is an historic event, and when they read my brothers name at the cerimonies today I was reminded that me and my family will forever be reminded of his death, and his life. I look at those people who take this event and mock it, those who are 'tired' of the commercialization of the event. I am tired of that too, but there is more to this, a human quality which extends beyond that capitalistic desire. I am tired of all the flag waving, but 2,800 some odd people perished in a couple of moments.... That is quite tragic, and nothing they did would make them deserve the death they received. It was a horrible, horrible death... Burning and falling, screaming and being crushed. I have pictured the event over and over, and have to watch it over and over while watching the news.

    I believe in a future where mankind lives in peace and prosperity. In my speech for my brothers memorial I mentioned my desire to live like Roddenberry depicted in Star Trek, a world without hunger and a world where people strive to make things better. This is an optimistic goal, and one which I have begun to question as I believe that human nature is possibly more ugly than I wanted to admit.

    I don't want my brothers death to cause more unwarranted death in the world. I want to make things better by looking at the problems we have, analyzing them, and making educated decisions. I don't believe the administration is doing that at this time. But that is another story...

    Thank you,

    --

    Michael A. Uman
    Sr Software Engineer
    softwaremagic.net

  70. Sept. 11 = War? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's too bad that September 11 seems to be almost directly linked to war these days.

    I think this day should be set aside to reflect on the poor people who were killed and whose families now suffer the loss of their loved ones. We have 364 other days in the year to plot our revenge or whatever you want to call it.

    Listen to Bush... he can't talk more than 10 seconds about September 11 before he starts talking about the war and how we're going to kick their asses in. Now there's a role model for everyone!

    And now we have to _prevent_ terrorism, not simply react to it. That sounds rational. So why is it that law enforcement has always REacted to problems and not been proactive in preventing them? eg. you call the police to report a domestic disturbance. Unless someone has been beaten or killed, they'll ask you to call back later. Hmm.

    What makes the Taliban and maybe other countries hate the US so much? We should be asking ourselves that. Peace requires compromise. We may be able to sway people's opinions, but starting a war is not helping our int'l image.