Slashdot Mirror


Tom's Hardware Review of Yamaha CRW F1

Tremblay99 writes "Tom's Hardware has a review of the Yamaha CRW F1 CD burner. Not interested, you say? Well, it can burn images on the media side of a CD. While it's not the fastest burner around, it can do CD-RWs at 24x. Not bad at all."

124 comments

  1. Lovely. by BeNJ-GoS · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What will i do with a printed image on the media side?!? stick my CD KEY's on it???

    1. Re:Lovely. by HeavensTrash · · Score: 1

      Actually, that sounds like a really good use of this technology. Good idea, Ben!

    2. Re:Lovely. by Crazieeman · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up! Thats pure genius =)

    3. Re:Lovely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, by burning thumnails you can make your pr0n backups easy to identify on the outside.

    4. Re:Lovely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit, that's a pretty good idea actually.

    5. Re:Lovely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The plural of key is keys, not key's

    6. Re:Lovely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pure genius? ever hear of a marker? whoever invented that must be next to einstein in your book.

    7. Re:Lovely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Peo'ple w'ho p'ut c'omma's every'where shoul'd wr'ite li'ke th'is f'or a f'ew d'ays. Th'at'll t'each th'em!'!'!'!'!

    8. Re:Lovely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure that you mean apostrophes.

  2. Hm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ...too bad Tom's Hardware is still one of the most biased, misleading, and falsified tech sites out there.

    Try a few others instead:

    http://www.cdrlabs.com/reviews/index.php?reviewi d= 135

    http://www.cdrinfo.com/Sections/Articles/Specifi c. asp?ArticleHeadline=YAMAHA+CRW-F1DX+CD-RW&Series=0

    1. Re:Hm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I would have followed your links if you had bothered to make them clickable.

      But I guess your dick was dripping with the anticipation of some easy karma and you got ahead of yourself...

    2. Re:Hm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, nothing like one AC accusing another of being a karma whore. =P

    3. Re:Hm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, or an AC accusing another AC of being a karma whore accusing another AC of being a karma whore.

      wahoo!

    4. Re:Hm... by Blkdeath · · Score: 2
      Out of curiosity, Mr. C, what makes you say that?

      I've read a few reviews from Tom's Hardware Guide and haven't (personally) found anything that stands out as being flawed, per se. Do you have any links (clickable this time, if you would. ;> ), or a basic explanation?

      (Disclaimer: I'm actually genuinely curious here)

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

  3. Life of CDRs by rastachops · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Looks like this may extend the useful life of CDRs! Sounds all good to me.... Even though DVD writables are coming down in price they still cant match CDRs for compatibilty (as they are still arguing over the format for DVDs) and price.

  4. Suppose DRM only limited SPEED... by dpbsmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I realize that neither side of the controversy is interested in a moderate or centrist view... but it does seem to me that IF you had digital restrictions management that allowed bit-for-bit digital copies and imposed no restrictions at all on what you could copy... but restricted copying SPEED to about 2X realtime... you'd have something very reasonable.

    (The point is to duplicate the sort of porous protection copyrights have always had, in which fair-use and casual personal copying is easy, but large-scale commercial piracy is difficult--and is based, not on technical mechanisms, but on the relationship between the value of the unauthorized copies and the cost and practicality of enforcement).

    Yes, yes, yes, I know, the DRM opponents (the side I'm on, mostly. I'm an EFF member, BTW. Are you?) would never trust that a DRM scheme, once in place, would ever be limited to ANYTHING reasonable. And I can think of various ways of evading the intent of the speed restriction.

    Just a thought.

    1. Re:Suppose DRM only limited SPEED... by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      Uh...so you've restricted burn speed...so what? What deterent is that to people who would want to copy stuff physically? How does it help? Not to mention that that only covers physical burning (which I don't even really get how that would help/deter...please explain), and doesn't cover data on a HD. To me, what you're talking about isn't DRM, it's just...pestering *shrug*.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    2. Re:Suppose DRM only limited SPEED... by Reziac · · Score: 2

      How would that do anything but annoy the home user?

      A commercial pirate would simply take the hour (at 2x speed) to make his own master from the original, then do his high-speed duplication from that master.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:Suppose DRM only limited SPEED... by Abreu · · Score: 2

      Large scale Pirates would laugh at your proposal... many of them here in Mexico (ok, maybe not the #1 pirate haven, but maybe #3) are still using 2x or 4x scsi burners...
      They just have loads of them working simultaneously

      You have a band and want to make a couple of hundred CDs for selling at your gigs?
      Here in Mexico City's "Computer Plaza" you can purchase a ready-made scsi tower of 4-12 burners that connects to your scsi-equipped pc for about 1000-2500 USD, depending on how many burners you want... The salesman will probably give you some 200 blank CD-Rs as a gift if you buy from him instead of the competitor across the corridor

      --
      No sig for the moment.
  5. New feature! by psavo · · Score: 2

    We'll get to burn 3.09GB on the disk!

    --
    fucktard is a tenderhearted description
  6. Images by SmlFreshwaterBuffalo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unless I've completely confused myself, media images wouldn't be very useful on discs which are nearly, or completely, full of data, as the images themselves must come after the TOC.

    I rarely find myself burning a CD if it's only going to be a small amount of data, so that normally wouldn't leave much room left for the pretty pictures.

    But I guess it may be common to burn a few megs on a CD for some people.

    1. Re:Images by Technician · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you made coasters out of some CD's and don't have the heart to toss them, you could always put numbers along the edge and make inexpensive CD clocks for your friends and family ;-)

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    2. Re:Images by Locutus · · Score: 2

      now there's a frivilous(sp?) project. I don't think we'd need a special CD burner to do this since most all cd's today have 1 bit color resolution. We just need the software to put the text down on the cd so it looks like text....or whatever( a clock ).

      I can see it now, the Gugenheim doing an art show called: "A Bit of CD Art". tm-LoB ;)

      There goes the blank cd supply out the window. Just like when AOL blankeded the earth with floppy disk in the mid 90's. It would be fun though.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    3. Re:Images by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article only states that you have to burn images after you have burned TOC. 'After' means time, not space. You can burn as much as ou want, you just cannot modify data after you have the image burned.

      I think the feature is rather cool.

  7. Obvious pr0n reference. by DarkHelmet · · Score: 3, Funny
    Wow, graphical images depicting my archives of porn backups ON the CD itself.

    Either the industry has hit a new low, or I'm the only one planning to do this... That is until I posted it here on "perv"dot and all you people plan to follow suit.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:Obvious pr0n reference. by SmlFreshwaterBuffalo · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I guess I don't even need to mention the hole in the middle of the CD and for what it could be used...

    2. Re:Obvious pr0n reference. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're the only one here with a dick that small.

    3. Re:Obvious pr0n reference. by Richard+Weber · · Score: 1

      You must be new to Slashdot. Welcome on board!

  8. Oh by Talisman · · Score: 5, Funny

    "What will i do with a printed image on the media side?!?"

    You must be new here.

    The answer is: pr0n

    Talisman

    --

    "Study your math, kids. Key to the universe." -The Archangel Gabriel
  9. Double sided CDs by Ed+Avis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why have a 'media side' at all? Why not have data on both sides of a CD?

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    1. Re:Double sided CDs by SmlFreshwaterBuffalo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not sure if it would be physically possible or not, but I'm fairly certain it would at least require the disk to be twice as thick, and would make the manufacturing process somewhat more difficult.

      Other than that, it makes sense to me, as long as they include a small label in the center saying which side is which.

    2. Re:Double sided CDs by prestomation · · Score: 1
      but I'm fairly certain it would at least require the disk to be twice as thick, and would make the manufacturing process somewhat more difficult.

      Why would that be the case?

      Double-sided DVD's aren't any thicker then "regular" DVD's, are they?

    3. Re:Double sided CDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      CD drives are designed to focus through a certain thickness of material. DVD's were designed for half that thickness, so in some sence they are "double thick", just double something half as big.

      Maybe someone could find a material with the right index of refraction to allow a CD to be half as think, so you could make a double sided one, but I doubt such a material would be as strong as polycarbinate if it even exists.

      Anonymous, because this is very off topic.

    4. Re:Double sided CDs by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      But CDs are much thinner now than they used to be... flimsy little things, not chunky like in the good old days. So if they doubled the thickness it'd still be within the CD specifications, I expect.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    5. Re:Double sided CDs by entrigant · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hmm.. I decided to reply instead of mod you down, but the media side IS the data side in this context.

    6. Re:Double sided CDs by Blkdeath · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why have a 'media side' at all? Why not have data on both sides of a CD?
      Personally, I doubt I'd go for this completely, but in some cases I can see it being handy (just not on a large-scale basis). ie; I can't forsee something like that replacing single-sided discs.

      Double sided DVDs are great, sure, but consider quantity. How many DVDs does the average person have compared to the number of CDRs? With spindles of 50 selling for as low as $18, these things are as prolific as black ants at a barbecue. Personally, I've only got one spindle on the go (only had my burner for a few short months) and a small spattering of CD-RWs for backups, but I know people who have significantly less HDD space than I do (or more, but are more media-happy) who have everything conceivable on CD. Audio CDs, MP3 CDs, movies, games, files of varying sorts ...

      Long story short - collections of hundreds of generic CDR discs require some sort of organization. Since spindles don't come with jewel cases (duh!) you need a label, even if it's just with a Sharpie.

      So with double-sided discs, yeah, I can write twice the data, but how on Earth am I ever going to find it again? The eyestrain of reading labels written on the little bit of media that surrounds the hole would kill me (being the fine looking four-eyes that I am).

      Nope. Can't see them becoming mainstream unless we can come up with a label that's legible, long-lasting, and that standard CD-ROM lasers can penetrate.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    7. Re:Double sided CDs by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of CD boxed sets (especially places like Cheap Bytes). Any reduction in the price and shipping costs is worthwhile. I was pissed off that my Mandrake CDs didn't come in a nice holder, but maybe they had an excuse in that holders for eight or so CDs are hard to get hold of. It would have been handier and less bulky to ship four double-sided CDs.

      For your own burning... maybe you wouldn't want different things on both sides because of the labelling difficulties. But still, you could use part of the disk - say a 1cm band around the edge on one side - for labelling, and still have well over a gigabyte of storage per disk.

      IMO, anything that could have reduced the number of CDs currently stored in drawers and boxes is a good thing. And unlike switching to DVD, it doesn't require any new hardware (unless you count the five fingers used to pick up the disk and turn it over).

      Maybe you could also label the damn things just by having 'dead patches' on the CD where the ink goes. One byte of text on the label costs you 500 kilobytes in lost storage capacity :-).

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    8. Re:Double sided CDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, isnt the article about a way to mark the MEDIA side of a disk? I think that is the answer to your problem right there.

    9. Re:Double sided CDs by Abreu · · Score: 2

      Really? I dont have any CDs from the late 80's anymore, but it would be interesting to find out if this is true

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    10. Re:Double sided CDs by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      Actually I was just comparing with my InfoMagic Linux CDs from 1995 and 1996. They are so heavy and chunky compared with later discs. Also they don't bend alarmingly when you try to pull them out of the holder.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    11. Re:Double sided CDs by Abreu · · Score: 2

      Mhmm maybe they were made of a denser plastic... I too have broken a CDr easily with one hand (like an egg)... but i didnt feel they were thicker before, so thats why I was asking

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    12. Re:Double sided CDs by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      I think they are actually thicker, laying one side by side with a new thin CD. But I'll have to check.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    13. Re:Double sided CDs by AntiTuX · · Score: 2

      I'm posting anonymously because of your .sig.
      SQL: Redwood City, CA

      I swear to god :)

    14. Re:Double sided CDs by SuperDuG · · Score: 3
      well aren't you just the humanitarian

      Look mr. authority on everything that is multimedia. A double sided CD-R is very possible. The media side is not the data side of the cd. The Media side is where the label or tag of the CD goes, the data side is where the information is held, and reflected off of the media side. I hope to metamod your ass some day. In closing, if there's a double sided DVD then it's more than possible to have a double sided CD-R. Ass.

      --
      Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
  10. Yamaha R1? by gTsiros · · Score: 2

    Damn...

    Hey, the Yamaha R1 is very fast...why not review that? I'm sure you speed freaks you're gonna love a 170kg 1000cc bike

    --
    Looking for people to chat about multicopters, coding, music. skype: gtsiros
    1. Re:Yamaha R1? by richie2000 · · Score: 2

      Personally I prefer a 250 kg, 1100 cc bike. It doesn't burn CDs, but it's known to have left a few black marks on the road. :-)

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    2. Re:Yamaha R1? by Telecommando · · Score: 1

      And, if you wipe out on gravel, you'll get your own permanant T@2 as well!

      --
      Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
    3. Re:Yamaha R1? by Blkdeath · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Hey, the Yamaha R1 is very fast...why not review that? I'm sure you speed freaks you're gonna love a 170kg 1000cc bike
      I'm becomming rather partial to the 1979 Yamaha XS11. Held the speed record until '84, or thereabouts, and it still soars past most moving objects on the road today.

      According to the owner (a friend of mine) when you're going about 150 in 5th, you can still give your wrist a twist and take off. Just be careful that she doesn't throw ya, 'cause she will. ;)

      </OFFTOPIC>

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

  11. Problems by Zara2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am very suprised that this is not mentioned in the article but this technology is almost completely useless. The Disk T@2 can only be put on a area with no data. So maybe if you are copying 100MB of mp3's to a cd you could add a bit of text but if you burn more than 300MB or so there is not enough room to put the image. Personally I can't remember the last time I burned a disk with under 500mb on it so this is really a pretty useless feature, however cool I thought it would be at first before I did some research.

    --

    Pithy, yet ultimately meaningless, phrase expressed with gusto!

    1. Re:Problems by Zara2 · · Score: 1
      While I usually dont respond to flamebait I would like to point a few things out so that hopefully we could have a better and more fulfilling discussion in the future. My point was not agianst the article and I am not agianst the technology. As soon as I saw this particular technology I got a stiffie thinking about the possibilities. I was imagining something like the Aphex Twin CD where there is a face in the data. However, this device does not do that. It only will Tattoo the data unto a non-used portion of the disk. Due to this limitation the device, while still possesing a high geek factor, is actually useless for most applications of it that I can think of. Things such as labeling the CD or putting a image in it for a pr0n cd. Even putting in a game manufactures logo in the data would be nigh impossible. I felt that this information needed to be discussed as it greatly cripples what would otherwise be a very cool device and changes it from a "must have" item into a cool geeky technical anomolie. I mentioned the article because I thought that this sort of information should be in the blurb. So in the future, even as a flamebaiting troll post, please do not say that information like this is useless and causing /. to go to hell just because I give a personal bad review to a product.

      Additionally I think my hardware nerdness is a bit above question. I have been involved in the PC hardware scene since about 1994. Since about 1996 I have been a professional personal PC technician and have done a fairly good job of making a living out of it. I did my first case mod in 1998 by taking my PC case out and painting the thing black and red cause I thought it was cool. While I am not a linux zealot or anything I do know a thing or two about pc hardware. So while I may not be the biggest alpha geek in /. by any stretch of the imagination I think my record speaks for itself.

      Note to moderators. THis is published without the +1 bonus. Please do not moderate this post as it is a reply to flamebait and trolling. Heck I'm at work and have nothing better to do.

      --

      Pithy, yet ultimately meaningless, phrase expressed with gusto!

    2. Re:Problems by Captain+Chad · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Aside from the already-stated DRM and pr0n possibilities, I can see a use for this with promotional items. CD business cards, trial/AOL software, and (if you can do it on an audio disc) music singles.

      --
      Check out Chad's News
    3. Re:Problems by mmoncur · · Score: 2, Interesting

      500 MB? Really? Virtually every disc I burn has 100MB or less on it. They're so cheap you can waste the space, and what better way to waste a bit of space than with a cute picture.

      More importantly, you would only lose 100-200MB to print a line of text around the border. A permanent label that identifies the contents of the CD at a glance and can't be changed. I can find uses for that.

      Most importantly of all, you could buy a pack of 25-cent generic CDRs, print little pine trees and snowmen on them, and use them as Xmas ornaments. Now *that's* a useful technology.

      --

      It's Slashdot's evil twin... SlashNOT
    4. Re:Problems by TheRealBlueEAGLE · · Score: 1

      It is my impression that anything done in larger volume is stamped rather than burned. Thus would the technology be useless for singles (other than demos perhaps) and pr0n because the producers would like a large circulation.

      --
      If pro and con are opposites, what is the opposite of progress?
    5. Re:Problems by Blkdeath · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      500 MB? Really? Virtually every disc I burn has 100MB or less on it. They're so cheap you can waste the space, and what better way to waste a bit of space than with a cute picture.
      That's something I've never been able to do, myself. Yes, they're cheap, but they're also a PITA to the environment and the last thing we need is ways to generate more landfill at a faster rate than we already are. (Don't even suggest recycling programs - governments are pathetic when it comes to that sort of thing, including allowing a corporation to go curb to curb collecting..).

      The primary reason I've only gone halfway through my first (and only) spindle is because I force myself to justify the creation of a CD before I burn it. I bought a 5-pack of high speed CD-RWs for the times when I want to throw a couple hundred MBs or less of data onto a disc - because that, IMHO, is expendable.

      Heck, I'm even ashamed of myself for burning two Gentoo ISOs when I could have done perfectly well extracting them to my HDD and using a Linux boot disk instead.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    6. Re:Problems by Dudio · · Score: 1

      It's not so much a question of cost as it is one of manageability. If you're burning something to give to a friend or to transfer between non-networked computers it isn't a big deal, but when burning for archival purposes, 100 MB CDs mean that you'll have 6-7 times as many discs to keep track of than you would if you consolidated your data into 600+ MB collections.

    7. Re:Problems by CTho9305 · · Score: 1

      I dunno.... I burned the memtest86 ISO - a whopping 2MB. A pic on the rest of the disc (or maybe even just text) would have been pretty cool :)

    8. Re:Problems by Zara2 · · Score: 2
      500 MB? Really? Virtually every disc I burn has 100MB or less on it. They're so cheap you can waste the space, and what better way to waste a bit of space than with a cute picture.

      Well, they may be useful for you then. Most of the time I am burning a music CD (before you complain its live and legal), a Game CD (for LAN parties ect.) or, most of the time, a system image or back-up of downloaded files. All of the above applications for cd's will use more space then I could and still get a decent image. Now I am mostly going by the feature in Maximum PC magazine but they did some extensive tests on it and stated that to get a readable font on the cd you could put a maximum of about 400MB on a CD just to do labeling, let alone a full picture.

      Now the idea of the XMAS ornaments (alternately coasters or car mirror danglies) I really do like. Not sure if I could justify buying one of these for that purpose but when I shope for a burner the next time I might think about it.

      --

      Pithy, yet ultimately meaningless, phrase expressed with gusto!

    9. Re:Problems by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      Thanks. You just saved me $150.

      I sorta suspected it.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    10. Re:Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, this could prove useful. I'm sure you all have at least a dozen coaster cd's around that you haven't yet thrown away. Now you can put pictures on them and use them to protect your valuable cd's.

    11. Re:Problems by ruiner13 · · Score: 2
      Actually, if you read the article, it gave a few uses of it, suck as putting a serial number imprinted directly on the CD media iteself instead of worring about the ink on the label fading (some ink-jet inks fade BADLY). It is very rare that recording artists fill up an entire 74 minute CD with music, so I can see them being very interested in playing with the T@2 feature to personalize their stuff. If you are an artist trying to get started, it may be something that will catch people's eye, as it is very unique and I'm sure many people have not seen anything like that before. Music artists LOVE to push the limits of art and technology. Hell, the first hybrid cd-rom I ever had was a Primus album (tales from the punchbowl) that had a data session with a macromedia director made application.

      My question is, if you gave a CD with this on it to a fabrication facility for distrobution, would they be able to reproduce that with the stamping hardware?

      --

      today is spelling optional day.

    12. Re:Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're stupid. Have you burried your car yet or cut your electricity lines?

    13. Re:Problems by damiam · · Score: 1
      you could buy a pack of 25-cent generic CDRs, print little pine trees and snowmen on them, and use them as Xmas ornaments.

      You could also buy a pack of 1-cent generic sheets of paper, print little pine trees and snowmen on them, and use them as Xmas ornaments.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    14. Re:Problems by quecojones · · Score: 1

      CD business cards

      Now that's an idea... IIRC the sides of those CD business cards (I'm talking about the extreme edges of the, more or less, rectangular shape of them) end up empty anyway, so why not use it for a company logo or something?

      --
      "PROFANITY is the inevitable literary crutch of the inarticulate MOTHER FUCKER." -- some PC user
    15. Re:Problems by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2

      My question is, if you gave a CD with this on it to a fabrication facility for distrobution, would they be able to reproduce that with the stamping hardware?

      I am pretty sure they can, if they can make the glass master or whatever they use to press the pits into the CD.

    16. Re:Problems by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2

      "you could buy a pack of 25-cent generic CDRs, print little pine trees and snowmen on them, and use them as Xmas ornaments."

      'You could also buy a pack of 1-cent generic sheets of paper, print little pine trees and snowmen on them, and use them as Xmas ornaments.'

      But it wouldn't be sparkly or cool! Given the common $0.99 deals for 100 generic CDs, I think it might be cheaper than prints.

    17. Re:Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . . . cause the current writers have to use a continuous strip (i.e. circle) to burn to. that's the reason why, in the first place, there is so much unsused space.
      now, it would be great if the cd players could read non-standard shaped discs (i.g. stars or squares, or . . .)

    18. Re:Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get really cool sparkly origami paper. Even if you can't fold the stuff you can cut things out.

    19. Re:Problems by Zara2 · · Score: 2
      Well, agian, if you have disks that don't use up the full space, more power too you. Enjoy your T@2 feature and have fun. For me, and for a lot of the rest of the burning community, being limited to even 500MB on a disk is unnacceptable when most stuff you download is 700MB.

      My question is, if you gave a CD with this on it to a fabrication facility for distrobution, would they be able to reproduce that with the stamping hardware?

      No you cannot. A CD-R uses a dye sublimation process to fake the cd drive into thinking that the pits are there. There is other technology out there to create a picture in a disk. My personal favorite example (and what I was hoping the T@2 technology could do) is the latest Aphex Twin album where the data side has a face in it. The actual data has a picture in it. Now that is cool. I believe there was a /. article about it a few months ago.

      --

      Pithy, yet ultimately meaningless, phrase expressed with gusto!

    20. Re:Problems by Blkdeath · · Score: 1
      I know how pasee it is to respond to an obvious troll, but primarily since I was moderated as "Flamebait" (Probably because of the AC who responded in flames..), I'd like to respond.

      I drive conservatively. I stretch the gas I buy to last as long as possible, and only drive when neccesary. Heck, half the time I walk to the grocery store (I'm able to carry three bags in each hand the few blocks it is from the store with only mild strain). I use electricity conservatively. I use minimal amounts of light, I only leave lights on in the area in which I'm working, and I use dim lighting while watching television. I buy and use energy saving light bulbs, I use power saving features on my computers, and I use a low power setting on my dryer so as not to suck the wattage (I'd prefer my clothes to be slightly damp when the cycle is done, rather than scorched).

      This, of course, is beside the point. My post was about sending waste to the scrap heap, which burning 25MB to a CDR tends to do. My car doesn't send anything (Except an oil filter every few thousand KMs) to the scrap heap on a regular basis, and besides, it is a neccesity of modern life. I'm not a tree-hugger extremist by any means. Incidentally, the last demonstration of tree-huggers I saw was one against sour oil wells being dug in (I believe) Alaska. The T.H.s arrived in a large yellow Diesel school bus and the remaining few showed up in mini-vans. My car tested extremely well on the emissions test taken no more than six months ago. I think I'm doing better for emissions than these people, thankyouverymuch.

      As to what I send to the scrapheap, very little at best. It generally takes us two weeks to fill a garbage bag, and we always have a slew of recyclable materials. Garden waste is composted in a shared composter behind our unit, and our dog's droppings are buried (away from where the children play) rather than thrown in the garbage or flushed down the toilet.

      Since I burn very little to CDRs, and ensure that I either need, or really, REALLY want something burned to them, and coupled with the fact that I generally fill them to the brim, I've thrown out very, VERY few discs. (More coasters than anything, while I was initially testing my CDRW drive, and even that was only 2-3).

      My comment was reflective of the people who've basically decided that floppy, ZIP, and other small-media drives are a waste of time and who share everything on CDRs, even if it's only a 2MB driver file, or a copy of their resumee (even worse, at under 1MB). I know (or know through friends/aquaintances) several of these people, and they probably throw out more CDR discs in a week than I buy in six months.

      Now, to the topic at hand - this technology of burning a label into a CDR disc implies that you will only burn it into the space not used by actual data. As some posters have pointed out, burning into the outer rim and only wasting 100-200MB of space on a modern 700-800MB disc isn't terribly wasteful, and would be, IMHO, acceptable practise. Would it be enough justification for me to rush out and purchase one of these drives for this privilege? Of course not.

      To sumarize, my post ("Flamebait", apparently) was about wanton waste in this technological age. While paperless office isn't a reality, we don't have to double our waste just because paper and CDRs are cheap.

      </RANT>

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

  12. nifty! by G.+W.+Bush+Junior · · Score: 4, Funny

    For all I care the burner could suck... now you can make better looking coasters!

    --
    "I don't know that Atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots." -George H.W. Bush
    1. Re:nifty! by CaptainSuperBoy · · Score: 2

      George W. Bush didn't say that, Dan Quayle did.

  13. Faster than you thought by paz5 · · Score: 1

    No body else seems to have mentioned that if you go to the info page once main link loads... you will see that is does cd RW ar 24X but does normal cd's at 40X... When i was looking at it and thought it was 24X12X40 or something like the 24's often are i thought it was quite cool but impractical.. However with a 40x24x?? it may be well worth theat extra feature... The real question is if it doest the image printing as it burns or after it burns. I remember reading when it first came out that it burnt between the tracks of the data to make the image does this mean that it takes as long extra as it would to burn the amount of data in that space??? Bascily what will the final burn time be after the 40x + image?

    1. Re:Faster than you thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it's 48x24x48 ... so it's a quick little puppy. I'm planning to get one, as it comes in a Firewire/USB2 external model, a heap of software and I like the idea of labelling data backups ... and despite what a previous poster said, internal DV-R's and RW's suffer from a serious speed deficiency when it comes to burning CD's. I think the CD burner will be with us for some time as long as they can maintain the speed differential and CD's are viable.

    2. Re:Faster than you thought by phorm · · Score: 2

      Make sure you find writable media rated at this speed though. One of my family members got a new Dell with a 24x burner, they thought it sucked because they kept making coasters every now and then. Turns out the media was rated for 12x/16x. A lot of the CD's came out fine, but burning at 40/48x on a 16x writable will probably make you a CD that holds your coffee cup better than your data.

      101 uses for a misburned CD... is there a book? - phorm

  14. useful for *gasp* copy protection schemes? by lophophore · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can imagine some creative vendor using this technology to burn bar codes (or other non-standard data) of crypt keys on CDs. The software would then verify the key data existed and allow the protected content to be accessed.

    --
    there are 3 kinds of people:
    * those who can count
    * those who can't
    1. Re:useful for *gasp* copy protection schemes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah? And how does the software read that back? It has to readable by a normal drive. If it is readable, then it can be written to a new disc. I don't see any digitial restriction management potential here. Besides, commercial software is not distributed on CD-Rs.

    2. Re:useful for *gasp* copy protection schemes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Besides, commercial software is not distributed on CD-Rs.

      Sometimes it is, but yeah, generally I use ftp or something.
  15. just got one by squarefish · · Score: 2, Informative

    Last week and it's awesome. no buffer underrun errors or other problems and it's superfast. My last one was a budget burner and died after a little over a year. I went with the scsi version.
    Highly recommended!

    --
    Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
  16. Serial solution by really_blurry · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Finally, a permanent place to write down the serial!

    --
    > You've gotta sin to get saved.
  17. DiscT@2 by Captain+Chad · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who took several minutes to figure out that "DiscT@2" is "Disc Tattoo"?

    Guess my age is showing.

    --
    Check out Chad's News
    1. Re:DiscT@2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's going to market itself really well in non-English speaking countries, isn't it?

      In Japan, it would read DiscTatni, for example. Makes a lot of sense. Not.

    2. Re:DiscT@2 by Soporific · · Score: 1

      "Am I the only one who took several minutes to figure out that "DiscT@2" is "Disc Tattoo"?"

      No, I just figured it out also after coming back to the article 2 hours later.

      ~S

    3. Re:DiscT@2 by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who took several minutes to figure out that "DiscT@2" is "Disc Tattoo"?

      Nope, I didn't figure that out until you said it, and I saw it on Slashdot some time back as well.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    4. Re:DiscT@2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares about the Japanese market anyway? They spend all their time lusting after tentacle pron and schoolgirls.

    5. Re:DiscT@2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG, T@2 = tattoo! Y4m4h4 are so L33T!!!1 LOL! :-) :-) :-) :-)

  18. Useful use of this technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If it allows you to burn pits and lands arbitarily, surely you could write data in analogue laserdisc format to CD-R?

    Think how useful it would be - commercials for local TV stations could be put on CD-R. I know you can do that with recordable DVD, or just using an MPEG stream on CD-R, but this would be cheap and cost effective, assuming that the local TV station had a laserdisc player.

    Admittedly you would only get about 10 minutes of laserdisc video on a standard CD-R, but it would be really cool :-).

    1. Re:Useful use of this technology by CuriousKangaroo · · Score: 1

      If you want to store video on a CD-R, what about VCD, or for that matter, MiniDVD? These are at least digital formats!

    2. Re:Useful use of this technology by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      But thats not a fun hack, thats using formats on the medium they were designed for. Writing analog laserdisc data to a CD-R is just cool.

      --
      Why not fork?
    3. Re:Useful use of this technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus it's probably not patent-encumbered like MPEG ;-)

  19. Making such images with a regular CD burner by CuriousKangaroo · · Score: 1

    So if I understand correctly, it can only use unused space on the disk to write this information, and it isn't included in the TOC. If I read the CD bit-by-bit, does this show up as garbage data? It sounds like this isn't a special laser or anything, just burning bits on the CD in specific spots.

    So if I do a bit-by-bit copy of a CD burned with an image on another computer using a CD burner with no such capability to create images on its own, will it also copy the image?

    Or am I completely wrong here? If I'm correct, it sounds like with the properly written drivers (or possibly firmware), you might be able to make other burners do this...

    1. Re:Making such images with a regular CD burner by kmellis · · Score: 2

      If you read Tom's article, you'll see that Yamaha's using special hardware to accomplish more gradations in albedo.

    2. Re:Making such images with a regular CD burner by CuriousKangaroo · · Score: 1

      So what would a bit-by-bit copied disc look like? Would the images be distorted, but recognizable?

      If a regular CD burner could only do a single level of albedo, it seems to me you could still write a driver or firmware to do this, as long as the image used something like half-toning.

    3. Re:Making such images with a regular CD burner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks strangely similar to every other cd in the world.

    4. Re:Making such images with a regular CD burner by squarefish · · Score: 1

      the software requires you to finalized the disc prior to burning images on the remaining space of the cd. while finalizing the disc the table of contents is last thing written. When you copy a cd it only copies where you have actual content- this information is provided by the table of contents. When you copy 300 mgs it's faster then when you copy an entire disc, even if you do a disc copy- the software knows there is only 300 mgs of data and copys only that. So, no the image will not be duplicated.

      --
      Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
    5. Re:Making such images with a regular CD burner by CuriousKangaroo · · Score: 1

      Hm, ok. Then my next question is: if all you were interested in was the picture on the CD, and no data at all (say for a really cool coaster), could you write firmware for a regular CD-R burner that did something similar?

  20. CDR technology has a regression... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    My chief problem with CDRs is that you can't use a hole punch to make the disk double-sided.

    1. Re:CDR technology has a regression... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need to use a hole punch, the disc is double-sided to begin with.

      Oh, right, you meant recordable on both sides :-).

  21. Yeah yeah ... by dsb3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wake me up when I can burn data on the image side.

    --

    Slashdot? Oh, I just read it for the articles.
  22. 12 minutes is a long time by jmichaelg · · Score: 2

    If you're burning a batch of CD's, 12 minutes to burn the image is a lot to add just to put a picture on the cd. Had I put together a birthday CD last weekend and had I burned 30 copies for the guests and had I used the image burner, it would have added six hours to the task. Seems a lot of time just to put a label on a CD.

  23. My impressions by dnight · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I just installed one of these drives last night.

    It's pretty fast, and the disk tattoo feature is really neat. I paid $180 at CDW for it. The grey(blue/whatever)scale gradients are sufficient to get a lot of detail. The Nero software will automatically thottle down the speed if the media can't handle the burn rate you select. Useful feature, imo.

    And yes, you can burn porn images. I have one disc burned with 7 boob pix around it that I plan to give to a friend and tell him it's a CD full of porn. ;)

    1. Re:My impressions by TheTomcat · · Score: 2, Funny

      And yes, you can burn porn images

      REALLY?
      You mean there's no special software that detects them and refuses the burn? hmm strange.

      </sarcasm>

      S

    2. Re:My impressions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Nero software will automatically thottle down the speed if the media can't handle the burn rate you select.

      cdrecord does this as well.

      I don't understand why you need a special drive to do this 'Tattoo' thing. I've seen a web page where someone else has already done this (maybe it was on /.).

  24. Nifty! But it's just a better coach whip. by Whumpsnatz · · Score: 1

    I don't even use my CD burner anymore. I only ever used it for music, and all that just goes on my iPod now.

  25. Tom's Hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    Is the review like similar reviews from Tom's?

    Is Tom's still using Sysmark?

    I figured out something was going on over there when Tom's remained silent on the IBM GXP hard drive issue. After that, on visits to the site, something about the reviews just didn't seem right. Now, my suspicions have been confirmed.

    Go to AMDZone, click on Search, then use search term "Van" for third hand information on Tom's methods.

  26. sigh... by MegaFur · · Score: 1

    Next time you post an article like this, you needs must have a clarification of the word "image". At first I was thinkin', `Okay, so it can burn .iso images to the media side of a CD... So? Isn't this what CD burner software generally does? Isn't this the whole point? Perhaps this is some strange usage of the word "media".'

    But it turned out to be an ambiguous usage of "image" as I have indicated. This isn't the first time we've had this problem here.

    --
    Furry cows moo and decompress.
  27. More than meets the eye by DeadBugs · · Score: 5, Informative

    True the image writing on the CD is mainly eye candy. But the other features that the CRW-F1 support are the reason I purchased one.

    * CAV 44X max CD-R recording
    * CAV* Ultra Speed 24X max CD-RW recording
    * CAV 44X CD reading
    * 44X max digital audio extraction
    * IDE interface
    * 8MB buffer memory
    * Safe Burn technology
    * Optimum Write Speed Control technology
    * New YDC132-V controller
    * Supports overburn
    * Supports blank CDs of 80, 90 and 99 minutes
    * Supports the DAO RAW mode
    * Mount Rainier-compatible
    * Advanced Audio Master Quality Recording technology
    * DiscT@2 technology
    * CD-RW Audio Track Edit
    * Ahead Nero Burning Rom 5.5 and InCD software
    Oh...And a cool blue LED

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
    1. Re:More than meets the eye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative



      You forgot the most important feature, drm!

    2. Re:More than meets the eye by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since one of the feature you baught this cd for happens to be DiscT@2 (besides the image writing -- which you equate to being eye candy), could you tell us why this feature (DiscT@2) is so important? I'm sure you are very happy with your new Yamaha cdwriter. Ofcourse the earlier model was called Yamaha Karama. OH the models @bestbuy have just green leds ;(

  28. But no deep blue CDs available... by dramsey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've got a CRW-F1. Yes, the included software-- a version of Nero 5 which, incidentally, is too stupid to match the curvature of your text to the CD (you have to adjust it manually)-- does burn text and images to the unused portion of a CDR. Too bad that on most CDs the difference between the burned and unburned portion is so slight you'll have to hold the CD up to bright light at an angle to see anything. Yamaha includes a single CD-R with a deep blue dye layer that shows off the effect very well...but so far hasn't made these special CD-Rs available for purchase.

    1. Re:But no deep blue CDs available... by bluetoad · · Score: 1

      Just record some Muddy Waters on there and it'll turn a shade of deep blue.

  29. *hum* printed image you said... by danalien · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It just accured to me that these "printed images" on the rest of the free space could be used to copyprotect a cd; (now avalible ) for us plain-users *that is*.

    The images gets burned outside the TOC, so when you read (copy) the cd all other info outside the TOC gets left out.

    Add a little "protection app" to the cd, make the cd-rom[s] execute the app. Where the apps look "in a certian place" for the right bit burnt in the right places. [Don't forget that you most likely have to encode the data of the cd; so, that only the little app that gets executed upon insertion can read&decode the contet (only IF! it finds the right bits&bytes on the cd)].

    And Voul'a a copy protected cd.


    *hum* upon more thought, You could do this with a regular cdburner too *you just need someone (or yourself) to code the right app for this certian scheme :)*. Maybe someone will start a new opensource project *hehe*

    --
    I don't claim I know more than I know, and if you know you know more than I know, then by all means, let me know.
  30. Not the fastest? by Lester67 · · Score: 2

    There is a consumer model that burns faster than 44x?

    I've installed several of these in external cases at work, and they are awesome little drives. (Although the Yamaha site says nothing about a SCSI version, there is one, sort of. It is an IDE drive with a SCSI converter that plugs into the IDE connector). Works like a champ, and other than DiscT@2, it can burn a CD pretty damn quick.

  31. yo *nix hippies by zdzichu · · Score: 3, Informative

    cdrecord already supports this technology - browse documentation and search for discopts=, imagefile=. Be sure to prepare 3000x40 image first :)

    --
    :wq
  32. Plextor Rulez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yamaha sux

  33. You crazy kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in my day we had to use a marker to write the keys on the CD's and we couldn't do it on the media side.

  34. Rebate available by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a $20.00 rebate available through 3-31-03 at http://yamaha.com/specials.htm.

  35. Performance specs by grantsellis · · Score: 1

    CNET has performance specs another review, and more specs. This has been out for a while. :)

  36. Re: Airport codes by Abreu · · Score: 2

    yup... According to IATA:

    SQL : San Carlos, CA

    I guess that's probably near Redwood City... Too bad I can't add it to the sig, I already had to trim it down due to /. policies

    --
    No sig for the moment.
  37. oh, thanks... by G.+W.+Bush+Junior · · Score: 1

    /me looks around for another quote...

    I've got a feeling bush has said something just as intelligent... :)

    --
    "I don't know that Atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots." -George H.W. Bush
  38. Re: Airport codes by AntiTuX · · Score: 2

    Yah, they're right next to each other :)

  39. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    "Has anyone had problems with the computer accounts?"
    "Yes, I don't have one."
    "Okay, you can send mail to one of the tutors ..."
    -- E. D'Azevedo, Computer Science 372

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...