Slashdot Mirror


The First Automotive Easter Egg?

automandc writes "The October dead-tree issue of Popular Science is reporting that the new BMW M3 contains what they are calling the "first automotive easter egg" in its transmission control software. Apparently, the proper combination of commands to the electronically controlled manual transmission will cause the car to rev up to 4000rpm and drop the clutch (premitting burnout, which is normally impossible). According to the article, use of the feature more than 15 times voids the warranty in Eurpoe. Other limitations of the "acceleration-assist" feature are discussed in this Car and Driver article. According to popsci, U.S. laws won't allow the warranty limitation, so the U.S. version of the software only revs to 1500rpm, but dealers will install the european software if you ask. The only other mention I could find on the web is here."

362 comments

  1. how many... by holysin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I have to wonder just how many slashdotters this will actually effect... very cool none the less... (wow, first! :) some advantage to being unemployed...)

    1. Re:how many... by holysin · · Score: 1

      I do however wonder wtf the advantage of reving to 1500 then dropping the clutch would be... in most modern cars this would be a rather slow stall-start..... hardly any advantage, but cool none the less :)

  2. Again....not new & you guys are easy to impres by djupedal · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ....it's was originally called the 'kamikazi dyno', where you trick out the software and the only place you can test it is out on the street.

    Messing with software to control a car is not new, and I can think of many 'features' that could qualify as easter eggs, such as holding the pedal down on 1985 Fords with EEC-IV would shut off the injectors, resulting in a no start.

  3. rental? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't wait to see these as rental cars

    1. Re:rental? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the rental market for them is going to be a bit short lived, (pun/double meaning intended).

  4. Omg this makes has much sense has this sentence. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    first time i heard this since apple put in raygun.

  5. Mortal Kombat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A B A C A B B, gore mode enabled

    1. Re:Mortal Kombat by crazyprogrammer · · Score: 3, Funny

      more on topic:

      Crusin' USA for N64

      Brake, Brake, Brake, Gas, Brake, Gas - Nitro boost

      if only that could be an easter egg in a car!

      --
      "the fax machine is nothing but a waffle iron with a phone attached to it." - Grandpa Simpson
    2. Re:Mortal Kombat by phillymjs · · Score: 2

      Brake, Brake, Brake, Gas, Brake, Gas - Nitro boost

      Has anyone ever tried this one in Simpsons Road Rage?:

      Gas, brake, honk. Gas, brake, honk. Honk, honk, punch. Gas, gas gas! (From "King Size Homer")

      ~Philly

  6. My cars easter egg! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    When i turn the key it turns on,then some pretty blue smoke comes out of the tail pipe.
    DOnt know why other people dont like it though?

    1. Re:My cars easter egg! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, pop the clutch? Or do they call it drop in an automatic? And clutch?

    2. Re:My cars easter egg! by yelligsc · · Score: 1

      Ive got a fun one in my car..

      You have to pressure the lever just perfectly to turn on the windshield wipers.

      Not fun when you're having a friend drive on the freeway and it starts pouring rain.

      Scott.

    3. Re:My cars easter egg! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my easter egg is that about every ten or so (becoming more frequent now)shutdowns of my car the engine still runs even with key out of the ignition i think it was installed by the same people who did the win98 se shutdown "problem"

  7. This is scary as hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So who else is anticipating the day some idiot tries rolling his own acceleration software and winds up killing a dozen people?

    1. Re:This is scary as hell by KarmaBitch · · Score: 5, Funny

      Make sure he enters A B A C A B B first :-).

    2. Re:This is scary as hell by TitaniumFox · · Score: 5, Funny

      So *that's* why mine wasn't working correctly.. I was doing the old Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A B A [Start] thing. I kept getting unlimited ammo instead of the 4k rpm drop.

      --
      -- I'd say your post was about 3 monkeys, 18 minutes.
    3. Re:This is scary as hell by Colin+Smith · · Score: 3, Funny

      I use a vehicle on a day to day basis that's capable of 0-60 in under 4 seconds. It can accelerate terrifyingly quickly, It's far far faster than a BMW M3, but I've been completely unable to kill a dozen people so far.

      No need to project your own limitations on to other people.

      HTH

      --
      Deleted
    4. Re:This is scary as hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unlimited ammo? i always wind up getting 30 extra lives when i put that one in

    5. Re:This is scary as hell by IPFreely · · Score: 1
      You just haven't turned on the easter egg for you "vehicle" yet.

      First, you set the elevator control to high.
      Then you set the attitude control to mighty.
      Then you ...

      --
      There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    6. Re:This is scary as hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, Gawd, another little boy all full of hisself.

      Dude, you are not cool. You are LAUGHABLE. Dig?

    7. Re:This is scary as hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that if you pull the gear level down for two seconds, then push it up and kick the accellerator, the car flips over and does a spinning bird kick.

      Incidently, I tried to do a spinning bird kick in real life once and fell down a flight of stairs (!). Be careful if you try it at home.

    8. Re:This is scary as hell by kpansky · · Score: 1

      No, yours wasn't working properly because, as everybody knows, the real sequence is Up Down Up Down Left Right Left Right B A B A [select] [start]. This will not only give you 4k rpm drop, but also 33 lives to try it out with!

      --

      --Kevin
    9. Re:This is scary as hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? A motorcycle?

    10. Re:This is scary as hell by SavingPrivateNawak · · Score: 1

      cool sig!

      (Why, fucking why, should it take 20 secs to write "cool sig!"??? Stupid /. filter)

    11. Re:This is scary as hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the even scaryier part, is how in the hell does everyone in the world remeber that cheat code to this game. That was the first and only cheat code I can remeber for a console system, and HOW long ago did it come out ?! :)

    12. Re:This is scary as hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kind of bike do you have?

    13. Re:This is scary as hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, contra lives!

      http://mame.org

    14. Re:This is scary as hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Partially, because it wasn't only the cheat code to Contra. While the poster below is correct in stating that the [select][start] sequence will get you 30 lives, there are other games that also only used the [start] sequence with [select][start] simply making the cheat code work for 2 players (because you entered it at the player select menu)...

      Some of us still have our old-school Nintendo decks... (you know.... blow, wipe, flip, flip, flip, blow, blow, flip, flip... yay, it works one more time...)

      Excitebike is still a fav of mine.

    15. Re:This is scary as hell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to correct a correction, but the Konomi Code is actually Up Up Down Down L R L R B A [Start]. There is only 1 "B A" sequence.

      Here is a list of games that adopted/altered that progression of keystrokes:

      http://www.world-of-nintendo.com/nintendo/contra .h tml

    16. Re:This is scary as hell by abradsn · · Score: 1

      All the games are not listed at that site, but I happen to remember almost all of the codes and their games, and I did not see a single incorrect cheat code listed in this post. 'course it's not really fair since I turned out to be a programmer. As soon as Xbox live hits the market you can bet I'll be owning one of those awesome additions.

  8. Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now for someone to find the easter egg that'll cause the car to skid out on the freeway, flip over the guardrail, and burst into flames.

    1. Re:Cool! by Cryptnotic · · Score: 5, Funny
      Now for someone to find the easter egg that'll cause the car to skid out on the freeway, flip over the guardrail, and burst into flames.

      1. Accelerate to at least 80 miles per hour (130km/h) while on a freeway.
      2. Wait for the freeway to change direction.
      3. Turn the wheel sharply to the left or right, then bring it back straight.
      4. At the same time, slam on your brakes, then release them.
      5. You will probably skid at first. After that, you will hit the center divider or another car.
      6. This is the point where you detonate the exlposives in the gas tank, causing the fuel to spray out into a cloud.
      7. Detonate the secondary incindiary device which causes the fuel to ignite. (This step is not necessary if the fuel is already ignited).

      Spectators are guaranteed to be awestruck. Emergency personnel will probably be confused, until they figure out the explosive devices and determine that the accident was actually an elaborate suicide.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    2. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      8.???
      9. Profit! Oh wait, you're dead...

    3. Re:Cool! by Gryftir · · Score: 1

      Personally the way to do it is
      1. Accelerate to at least 75 miles an hour
      2. Go through Gilroy on 101
      3. Wait till the speed limit drops to 55
      4. Make sure the road is wet
      5. Try desperately to make the turn after the ecalyptis
      5. Lose control and hit concrete divider
      6. crush lower vertebrae
      7. Have car skid along divider for 15 feet
      8. Have divider scrape open fuel line and create sparks
      9. Stagger out of burning car, taking laptop from passenger seat, and walk 20 feet forward before collapsing in agony
      10. Moan
      11. Moan
      12. then press 911 on your keypad

      Gryftir

      "I want to live forever, or die trying" Saint Yossarian

      --
      http://www.santacruzbynight.com/index.shtml Santa Cruz By Night Vampire Larp
  9. How To by KarmaBitch · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For everyone that has the $141,000 car (*cough*, umm, yeah I have 2) this is how you do it.

    1) Disable traction control
    2) Select Agressive Shifting mode
    3) Hold the shift lever forward for a few seconds
    4) Slam the pedal

    Your electronically limited to only 30 "acceleration assisted" burn-out's for the life of the clutch (torque converter) and only 1 per hour.

    Fun but, for $141,000 I want a damn 5-speed.

    1. Re:How To by Paul+Menage · · Score: 2, Informative
      Fun but, for $141,000 I want a damn 5-speed.

      Given that the site is fairfax.com.au, I guess that's probably Australian dollars - so more like $75,000 in US money. Still not cheap, but slightly more believable.

    2. Re:How To by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 1

      $141000? By my reckoning that makes it around £90000, so either you have an AWFUL lot of extras on top of the base price of £39340 or that's a bad mis-print.

      Or you're Canadian and STILL have a lot of extras. Besides, if you don't like the way your gearbox works, why didn't you get the standard (six speed) manual?

      Goblin

      --
      It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
    3. Re:How To by ssstraub · · Score: 0
      Fun but, for $141,000 I want a damn 5-speed.
      $141,000? That's not in AMERICAN DOLLARS.

      From CarAndDriver.com:
      BMW M3 SMG Vehicle type: front-engine, rear-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 2-door sedan
      Price as tested: $56,526 (base price: $47,771)
      And why wouldn't you want a *6-speed* for a sports car?
    4. Re:How To by non · · Score: 1

      the base price is US$47,771.

      the SMG (sequential manual gearbox) option costs US$ 2,472

      in car and driver's tests expert drivers outperformed the use of SGM autolaunch by 0.3 seconds to 60Mph.

      finally, the greabox itself is a getrag type-D 6-speed.

      --
      ...vividly encapsulates that post-Watergate/pre-punk/coked-up moment when you could trust no one, least of all yourself.
    5. Re:How To by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $141,500 is the base price in Australia.

      im still saving up for one. ive got $220 so far.

    6. Re:How To by aluminumcube · · Score: 5, Informative
      For everyone that has the $141,000 car

      It's a US$49,000 car with the SMG II transmission. You are, of course, forgiven if you are refering to other currency. In the US, while an M3 is expensive, most of the people I know who own them work very hard in fairly regular jobs and purchased their M3's as a sort of 'Attainable,' 'Practical,' 'Dream Car.' Performance/$$$, the M3 is a lot better then almost every other high performance sports car.

      life of the clutch (torque converter)

      The SMG has no torque converter. Like on F1 cars, the SMG is a stardard manual gearbox fitted with computer controled actuators that do the same work your hand and left foot would do in a standard manual transmission. The clutch part #s for the manual and SMG M3s are the same.

      Fun but, for $141,000 I want a damn 5-speed.

      The standard transmission version comes with a 6 speed. The M3 CSL version (which will cost around US$150K, if it's even offered in the US) is only equipped with an SMG however.

      Hey, you computer guys get to nit-pick technical details about obscure hardware, can't a car guy do the same?

    7. Re:How To by stuffman64 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I saw one (with SMG) for $53,000 yesterday at the local BMW dealer (fully loaded). I asked them about the launch assist, and they said they can get the euro software and install it for a fee.

      If only I could afford even a used car...

      --
      --- At my sig, unleash hell.
    8. Re:How To by blinx_ · · Score: 1

      Or he bought it in here in denmark - the cheapest I could find was USD 154982 with no extras.

      Yes - cars are insanely expencive here.

      --
      Resistance is not futile - www.gnu.org
    9. Re:How To by narkotix · · Score: 0

      my 65 falcon superpursuit coupe comes with a 30,000 dollar engine in it.....550hp(at the wheels) blown 347cu-in stroker mated to a t56 tremec...revs out past 7500rpm....when i drop the clutch on 15 inch wheels all i see is white smoke comin from the rubber!!!! oh and it beats any car $141,000 car and it looks better too!!!! (btw thats $30,000 aus....not us$ hehe)

      --
      We played dungeons and dragons for 3 hours.....then i was slain by an elf
    10. Re:How To by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And why wouldn't you want a *6-speed* for a sports car?

      most likely because some people don't know how to do a proper clutch drop and still want to be able to drag race (in the quiet country-club roads?) their birthday presents. =)

    11. Re:How To by Ibanez · · Score: 3, Informative

      Apparently you don't know much about these cars...

      They start at $50k and go up to about $58k, and that is with the SMG II transmission (the one referred to in this artilcle).

      Its called Launch Control. Its not an easter egg. Its designed into the transmission on purpose. Yes you are limited to 30 launches using launch control, but it is for the length of the warranty.

      There are NO torque converters in this transmission. It is not a transmission like on the Porsche, etc. It is a fully manual transmission with a hydraulic clutch. They are not burn-outs. They are actual launches. When launching a car, it is your goal to spin the tires. So the car spins the tires momentarily then gets traction back as soon as possible.

      Why would you want a five speed? F1 cars, the fastest, best handling race cars in the world, use the same type of transmission.

      Ferrari has a paddle shift transmission. It shifts gears in 60 ms (If I remember correctly) and the BMW SMG II transmission shifts in something like 30 ms (Don't remember the exact number). It is humanly impossible to shift that fast with a normal manual transmission. This is the greatest production transmission on the market.

      Keep your mouth shut unless you know what you are talking about.

    12. Re:How To by Zebbers · · Score: 1

      christ all this time I thought I *wanted* traction and zero tire-spin at the track. Maybe my ET will go up if I spin the tires momentarily, cause thats my goal ;P

    13. Re:How To by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this better than my old Firebird? I can "disable" traction control, it's always in agressive shift mode, rev it up, pop the clutch and burn rubber. What's the big deal? You fancy nerds and your expensives lame ass cars are amazed by something that's as old as the first 200HP engine. :-)

    14. Re:How To by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes yes so your dick is bigger than everyone else's and you tell that to yourself whenever you need an ego boost but why don't you just keep that to yourself and shut the fuck up, ok?

      thank you.

    15. Re:How To by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Converting to pounds? Like you, the poster is not in the USA, he is in Australia. Australia uses dollars, just like Canada and New Zealand and Singapore and many other places.

      Usually poms are not so quick to assume stupid things.

    16. Re:How To by operagost · · Score: 1

      I think it practical real-world conditions, you're best off doing a quick burnout before hooking up. This is because you're not at a bracket race, where you can do your puddle burnout before rolling up to the tree. In a 'street' situation, your tires are likely to be too cold, so you might as well burn out for a second or two to get them sticky and then hook up. Otherwise, you're going to have to keep your revs low and launch like a family sedan.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    17. Re:How To by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      how much does that hunk of crap weigh, then? I'd bet you a million of your AU$ (about 20quid?) that I could annihalate you in my RX-7.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    18. Re:How To by jbmadsen · · Score: 1

      Believable, sure...

      An M3 costs 1,165,000 dkr in Denmark which is roughly around 153,000 USD at todays exchange rates.

      But of course Denmark has insane taxes on cars...

    19. Re:How To by DJ+FirBee · · Score: 1

      ///////////
      The SMG has no torque converter. Like on F1 cars, the SMG is a stardard manual gearbox fitted with computer controled actuators that do the same work your hand and left foot would do in a standard manual transmission. The clutch part #s for the manual and SMG M3s are the same. ///////////

      No. The computer controlled acuators do not do the same thing as my hand and left foot would do. If I pay even 5k for an automobile, my hand and left foot would sometimes cause that automobile to burn serious rubber!

    20. Re:How To by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /* my hand and left foot would sometimes cause that automobile to burn serious rubber! */

      I dunno about you, but it's usually my right foot that's holding the gas pedal to the floor...

    21. Re:How To by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe he is referring to the clutch, and popping it.

    22. Re:How To by mobets · · Score: 1

      If you are burrning rubber, then you are wasting energy and have lost much of your traction. You will therefore not accellerate as fast as you should.

      --

      It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
    23. Re:How To by Dread_ed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "The computer controlled acuators do not do the same thing as my hand and left foot would do. "

      Right. The computer controlled actuators are much more precise that a human. The clutch engagement is constantly modulated by precise empirical inforamtion gained through sensors in the engine, transmission,and wheels. With these slip sensors, the car can react in milliseconds, most times even before the human in the seat even knows there is a problem. Furthermore, the SMG is designed to take into consideration the physics of the automobile in a way that no human could mimic without extensive experience behind the wheel of the exact same vehicle.

      Couple that with perfect shifts between gears, automatic double-clutching on downshifts, and less than 100 millisecond gear changes and you have an "F1 driver in a box", at least with regard to the function of shifting gears.

      Pretty damned cool!

      It is completely impossible to say anything intelligent or enlightening in a space this size, excep

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    24. Re:How To by revoemag · · Score: 1

      Sticker is $46,000 With SMG, NAV and a few other options and tax mine was $60,000 USD.

    25. Re:How To by revoemag · · Score: 1

      It does that too. You just press the DSC button on the dash and firmly press the gas pedal. Instant BURNOUT. In fact the M3's gas pedal is velocity sensitive, so slamming down the gas actually puts the computer into a performance mode which allows the engine to rev up before it drops the clutch allowing for a serious tire screaming burnout. I know, I've done it.

    26. Re:How To by BattyMan · · Score: 1
      No. The computer controlled acuators do not do the same thing as my hand and left foot would do. If I pay even 5k for an automobile, my hand and left foot would sometimes cause that automobile to burn serious rubber!

      The article states:

      "To engage S6 {sequential, high-performance, driver-controlled automated shifting}, you must first switch off the DSC {whatever the hell that is}. Shifts happen in the blink of an eye in this mode-the quickest take as little as 0.08 second.... The tires bark in second gear. They'll atomize in first."
      That oughta be good enough for you, unless you own a tire store.
      --
      Exceeding the recommended torque is not recommended.
    27. Re:How To by Ibanez · · Score: 1

      If you don't have a little spin out off the line, you're not going to be putting as much power down as possible. By spinning out and regaining traction as quickly as you can, you are keeping the car in the best part of the powerband.

      On most cars, if you fall below the powerband, you bog, causing your 60 ft time to fall significantly. I admit that with some cars, due to the large amount of low-end torque, its not as necessary to work to keep it in its powerband.

      So the ultimate goal is to get as little tire spin as possible, but to get a little since the max power you can put down is at the point right before the tires break loose.

      Blake

    28. Re:How To by narkotix · · Score: 0

      eh...it pulled 10.39 qrt mile 9 weeks ago....and it weighs 1400kg....and u probably could beat me in ur rx7....but then again it probably wont...as the sayings go...if it aint an 8....it aint great!! (cept for maybe the BA falcon which has a turbo 6 hehe)

      --
      We played dungeons and dragons for 3 hours.....then i was slain by an elf
  10. But I don't live in... by TheDanish · · Score: 1

    According to the article, use of the feature more than 15 times voids the warranty in Eurpoe.

    Good thing I don't live in Eurpoe.

    Seriously, though, that sounds kind of cool... except it doesn't apply to me. All I care about is getting to 65 by the time I reach the end of an onramp.

    --
    Danish != nationality
    1. Re:But I don't live in... by linatux · · Score: 0

      I prefer to aim for 100 (160km/h) before the end of the onramp. With our measly onramps (GNU Zealand) you need something with 2 wheels... and around 100 ponies between your thighs.

    2. Re:But I don't live in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100 strong, bucking stallions, no doubt

    3. Re:But I don't live in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I try and get to 75 by the time I get to the on-ramp.

    4. Re:But I don't live in... by Megahurts · · Score: 1

      well then skip the M3. Any old 4 banger can get you 0-60 on a typical onramp. If the M Coupe I tried out is any indication, the M3 should have no problem hitting 120 by the time you merge. It's just smooth, quick acceleration all the way up. That coupe was the best any car has ever felt straight off the lot.

    5. Re:But I don't live in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, though, that sounds kind of cool... except it doesn't apply to me. All I care about is getting to 65 by the time I reach the end of an onramp

      ...and it's usually a process hindered by the shitbox in front of you. It always seems to happen to me - the highway is clear and wide open up ahead. I look off to the left and notice cars approaching in the distance in the right lane of the highway, and sure enough, the vehicle in front of me has no capability of accelerating to 0-60 in the given stretch of onramp. Uggh. Since they apparantly realize this, they slow down and end up stopping at the end of the off ramp and WAIT, STOPPED while all the approaching cars zoom by at 80MPH. Only then do I need acceleration, because after checking it is clear, I stomp the gas on my car and merge two lanes over so I am not stuck behind MR. NO-GO all the way to my destination.

    6. Re:But I don't live in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I try and get to 75 by the time I get to the on-ramp.
      I used to try to do that as well until I learned the cops in a certain city where I get on like to setup their speed trap a little before the onramp. Obviously if they see some car speeding up the onramp you're finished. :-)

    7. Re:But I don't live in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and it's usually a process hindered by the shitbox in front of you. It always seems to happen to me - the highway is clear and wide open up ahead. I look off to the left and notice cars approaching in the distance in the right lane of the highway, and sure enough, the vehicle in front of me has no capability of accelerating to 0-60 in the given stretch of onramp.
      Oh come on now, this is the wrong forum for ragging on the ricemobiles and shitboxes. :-) I think the Slashbot view is that "efficient" cars are good and nobody needs more than 95 hp anyway. I specifically get powerful cars BECAUSE I used to be so afraid of getting on an onramp in my old piece of shit cars that had no power not because I particularly like to burn a lot of gas. It pays when you can be doing 75mph at the end of a short onramp that goes up a hill rather than hoping a semi-truck isn't coming to smash into you.

    8. Re:But I don't live in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think you need a 100 strong, thick, erect, long and thrusting phalli between your legs, no doubt.

    9. Re:But I don't live in... by phillyclaude · · Score: 1

      you evidently dont live in the philly area. I wish i had a m3 for some of the onramps around here

      --
      A computer without a Microsoft operating system is like a dog without bricks tied to its head
    10. Re:But I don't live in... by operagost · · Score: 1

      word to your mutha. Can you say Rt. 30 interchange on the Schuykill? I hate surviving the drive through the desolation of West Philly only to be blindsided by some SUV heading for the airport at 75 MPH.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    11. Re:But I don't live in... by ROBOKATZ · · Score: 1

      Usually it's a process hindered by the PERSON in front of you, not their car. I've been stuck behind many cars far faster than my own merging at 40, BRAKING, etc.

  11. Use of this 15 times? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean we already have the "black box"for cars?Can the dealer hook this up to see how fats you go etc etc?
    Now tell me the code for erasing the memory.Or will thta be ilegal much like turning back the odometor.

  12. Kordell is Ouuuuut! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi. I'd just like to point out that Kordell Stewart has been replaced by a guy picked up from the XFL. I almost feel sorry for ol' Kordell.

    Almost.

  13. Ford Easter Egg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    As I recall the Ford Windstar 2001 has an Easter Egg as well. Flick the windshield wiper on and off 20 times in quick succession and the wiper motor will burst into flames. Ah, those crazy minivan designers, with their silly little pranks.

    1. Re:Ford Easter Egg by balloonpup · · Score: 1

      ...and as I recall, my good ol' 1994 Ford Crown Vic had a wonderful cruise control "easter egg". It'd turn on cruise control and floor the gas at random times. It happened about twice a year. The last time it happened before I sold it, I was sitting at a stop light, paw fully on the brake. The gas pedal dropped to the floor, and I through it in neutral. I had to turn it off before it would let go. Beautiful thing, that...

      --
      I sing the doggie electric!
    2. Re:Ford Easter Egg by nlh · · Score: 2

      Ahhh I haven't laughed that hard from /. in a while. Bravo on good writing and good delivery!!

      nlh

  14. Same trick used by immature kids with their Hondas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...only it doesn't require any easter eggs. Basically, you put the automatic transmission in neutral, rev up the engine and then throw it in drive.

  15. manaul not by djupedal · · Score: 0, Troll

    Wanting a 5-speed sounds a bit like you're simply not up on recent (sic) automotive tech.

    Manual shift transmissions went out long ago on high end race machines, aka F-1, as an example. Why try to enjoy an ultimate powerplant by shifting for yourself, when you'll be ignoring all that wonderful hp the engineers worked so hard to optimize. You and a manual trans cannot begin to take advantage of a modern engine. You're too slow and not connected to the car's computer. 5-speeds are old school.

    1. Re:manaul not by tshak · · Score: 5, Interesting

      F1's are optimized for the track and even then the driver sometimes "hints" the transmission. There are also a couple of drivers who still prefer to use a manual. For consumer cars, a 5 or 6 speed is the way to go.

      The only thing in consumer cars that can come close to a manual is Audi's Multitronic. Although similar in some ways to belt driven variable shifters found in many hdro-electric cars, Audi's transmission is far more advanced and is designed for performance in mind. Although it gets virtually the same gas mileage and performance as a 5 speed, it's still a tad bid slower and it adds a bit more weight to the car. Audi's other incredible transmission, the Tiptronic, is also very good, but a good driver in a 5 speed will smoke it even in "sports mode".

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    2. Re:manaul not by servoled · · Score: 3, Informative

      Manual transmissions are more efficient in transfering power to the wheels than automatics. This is there main advantage. Because of this they will accelerate faster and usually get better gas mileage than automatics. Plus, manuals trannys are a hell of a lot more fun to drive. Give me an stick over and slush box any day.

      --
      "I have a porkchop, you have a porkchop. I have a veal, you have a veal".
    3. Re:manaul not by evil_roy · · Score: 2

      No current F1 cars have manual transmissions. Last year some (notably BAR) were using clutches for the start. With traction control now legal again in F1 nobody could afford to use a clutch - you'd never win a start.

    4. Re:manaul not by Konster · · Score: 2

      Hints the transmission how, exactly? F1 cars are electro-hydraulic, but that doesn't make them automatic in any way. Right paddle near the steering wheels shifts up, left shifts down.

      The transmissions are still very much manually actuated, as FIA rules currently ban the use of auto trannies.

    5. Re:manaul not by Konster · · Score: 2

      I meant to say the transmissions in the cars are electro-hydraulic, not the cars themselves.

      The rules:

      Only two wheels may be driven and automatic gearboxes are banned.
      Each individual gearchange must be initiated by the driver.
      The minimum number of forward gear ratios is 4 and the maximum is 7.
      All cars must have a reverse gear operable any time during the race when the car's engine is running.

    6. Re:manaul not by djupedal · · Score: 1
      So now we're debating the definition of an auto trans?
      • no clutch pedal
      • computer control
      An F-1 pilot picks a gear and presses a button to launch. If he stalls, they have to run out with a laptop to reset the launch sequence. Compared to a '60 falcon with a three speed, this in an automatic transmission, me thinks.
    7. Re:manaul not by Viol8 · · Score: 0

      We;re not talking about high end race machines , we're talking about road cars. The average road car auto box is a joke as far as performance is concerned. The only reason people want an auto is laziness or (in the case of americans) the fact that using a stick and clutch is too difficult for them.

    8. Re:manaul not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but running out with a laptop is a little easier than replacing that 60s Falcon's differential, which tended to eat itself during spirited launches.

    9. Re:manaul not by CaptnMArk · · Score: 1

      The automatic transmission based on the torque converter is one thing, a computer controlled electro-hydraulically operated manual or sequential gearbox is quite another. The second one should be able to beat a typical driver at least on average.

    10. Re:manaul not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually we're talking about manual trans with clutch pedal and no computer control vs. manual trans with no clutch pedal and computer control.The later is very common on the street today and you lose debate points by trying to start an argument by exclusionary relationship :)

    11. Re:manaul not by Viol8 · · Score: 0

      I know the article is about that but the thread wasn't. And computer controlled clutches are not that common since they're very expensive and frankly just not very good outside race conditions. SUre they can pop in and out in a nanosecond when upshifting but using them in stop start traffic apparently is a nightmare.

    12. Re:manaul not by cpt.haddock · · Score: 1

      The only thing in consumer cars that can come close to a manual is Audi's Multitronic.

      What about Continuous Variable Transmission (CVT)? It was invented decades ago by DAF, but a couple of years ago it was forbidden by the FIA, because McLaren proved that this system could win an extra 2 seconds per lap.

    13. Re:manaul not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only drivers who prefer to use a manual are fucking wankers who like to believe they shift better or make better decisions than BMW's system OR are the best of the best professional drivers. Audi Multitronic? Yes I'd buy one for tooling around the city but it's purely second rate, an economy-oriented compromise - NOBODY buys a M3 for fuel economy. You obviously haven't experienced the SMG so just shut your mouth.
      Tiptronic is Audi's automatic with optional manual shift. It has a torque converter instead of a clutch. Of course a manual is faster you dickhead. Thank you, Mr. Master of the Fucking Obvious.

    14. Re:manaul not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Audi Multitronic, same thing. Come on, KNOW something before wasting your time posting. It is available right now in the Honda Civic Hybrid.

    15. Re:manaul not by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      you OBVIOUSLY aren't a driver of any capability whatsoever. Torque-converter autos give you NO control over engine braking. Some autos are VERY sophisticated, but nothing like the human brain.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    16. Re:manaul not by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      yes they do, at least in the accepted sense. F1 cars use a manual box with an electro-hydraulic change, and a computer programmable or manual shift. Torque converters they AIN'T.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    17. Re:manaul not by (H)olyGeekboy · · Score: 1

      Give me an stick over and slush box any day. ...except the day that you're sitting in traffic, pumping your left leg up and down on the clutch wildly, throwing your right arm into spamic fits as you try to navigate stop and go traffic.

      Then multiply by 5 times a week. 50 weeks a year.

      I drive a slushbox for commute, stick for performance. So you're half right. :)

    18. Re:manaul not by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      On a straight road I'd go with the new automatics anyday. But seriously till the engines computer knows what curves are comming ahead in the road. I'll trust myself.

    19. Re:manaul not by shumacher · · Score: 2
      If he stalls, they have to run out with a laptop to reset the launch sequence.


      This is the most asinine thing I've heard in a while. Are you sure? They can't put a freaking button in the car, or maybe setup some WIFI or something? They have to have a geek run out on the course to reset the computer??
    20. Re:manaul not by Khazunga · · Score: 2
      An F-1 pilot picks a gear and presses a button to launch. If he stalls, they have to run out with a laptop to reset the launch sequence.
      No no no. This is not a space-shuttle. It's a gasoline engine, much like what Benz originally created 100yrs ago. If it turns fast enough and has fuel, it starts.

      It has nothing to do with the computer. F1 cars don't have an electrical starter. It'd be stupid, since they can use an external one to start the car. It would just be deadweight during the race. Even if nowadays they make the car lighter than regulations, it'd be stupid to add a starter because its a weight which they can't move to balance the car.

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you
    21. Re:manaul not by nelsonal · · Score: 2

      The biggest problem is most consumer price CVTs cant take much torque, the Audi model might be better at this, but the honda CVT is only available for smaller civics.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    22. Re:manaul not by bmajik · · Score: 2

      You are correct, however the BMW M3 doesn't have an automatic. It is a manual gearbox, with a proper cltuch, and normal gears.

      Except the clutch is opened/closed by computer, much faster than any human could do so.
      It is _exactly_ like the gearbox in a formula 1 car, it's most similar counterpart in production automobiles is in the ferrarri 360 and f355.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    23. Re:manaul not by bmajik · · Score: 2

      actually in current formula 1 cars the driver isn't even hitting the paddles anymore, the computer is selecting gears up and down at the appropriate times.

      indy car still has manual gear selection by the driver, afaik.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    24. Re:manaul not by tshak · · Score: 2

      Electro-Hydraulic transmissions are computer controlled. F1's are essentially automatic. If you watch F1 you'll notice that only one or two drivers use the paddles to shift. However, drivers can also change the characteristics of the shifting system using controls in the cockpit. This is what I ment by "hinting" the transmission.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    25. Re:manaul not by tshak · · Score: 2

      Audi's can easily handle the torque, and that's mainly because they aren't belt driven. Currently they are only available on the A4's (in the US), which boasts 221 lb/ft of torque in the 3.0litre V6 model. A belt driven CVT would definitely snap with this amount of power.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    26. Re:manaul not by revoemag · · Score: 1

      Not at all. The SMG is much smoother then a normal 6 speed manual. Even in stop and go traffic.

    27. Re:manaul not by seinman · · Score: 1

      There are CVT's that can survive in high-power applications. A race-prepped Nissan Skyline recently was tested with an "8-speed" CVT with preset gear ratios on the pulleys. For people who don't know cars (many of the people that read this site.), Nissan Skylines are probably the best sports car in Japan and are widely known for their great handling from 4-wheel steering and full-time all wheel drive, and the bulletproof drivetrain.

    28. Re:manaul not by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      I really want a Skyline or at least to drive one (Gran Turismo does not count). Nissan would have done quite well bringing them to the states, they seem like the ideal 3 series killer.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    29. Re:manaul not by dublin · · Score: 2

      A good modern automatic is as fast or faster than a manual, and one heck of a lot easier to drive in heavy traffic.

      I may not ever buy another car with a manual transmission, and as a Ferrari owner (308gt4 with a 5-speed, of course) I consider myself a pretty serious car guy. I have nothing against manuals (other than they're a pain in a daily driver), but I don't see anything mystical about them either.

      With today's tranny tech, there's really no reason to have to put up with the downsides of a manual slushbox anymore. Automatics (whether auto-shifted manuals, high-performance automatics, or CVT designs like Audi's new one that is finally able to take non-trivial torque) are faster, easier, and better in pretty much every respect. If they weren't superior, you wouldn't find people willing to pay a serious premium for them on new Ferraris, and wouldn't find them used on every competitive F1 car. The battle is over, and in the realm pf real performance, the manual tranny is history.

      I'm personally convinced that if the weenies at the car magazines quit acting like manuals are required on serious sports cars, they'd die out in a few years. I expect they'll be pretty dead in another decade, anyway, and people will wonder why anyone would want to shift those "old cars" just the same way as we look at old Model Ts and think what a pain it must have been to have to continually adjust the spark with that lever on the steering column.

      People lamented the passing of that anachronism, too, but not for long. It's time for the manual transmission to go.

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
    30. Re:manaul not by amper · · Score: 1

      That would have had a whole lot more effect if you understood that Audi's multitronic CVT is actually quicker than the manual transmission version. It' s not an economy-oriented compromise in any way.

      Of course, if you'd stopped running off your mouth to think about it for a second, you'd have realized that a CVT is quicker than a manual because it NEVER UNCOUPLES THE ENGINE from the output shaft, as you must when shifting a manual (even when you shift without (de)clutching, you still momentarily uncouple the transmission).

    31. Re:manaul not by amper · · Score: 1

      Umm, no, the multitronic is not slower. It's quicker than the manual transmission because you never uncouple to engine from the transmission to shift gears.

    32. Re:manaul not by tshak · · Score: 1

      Look at the stats. In some situations the multitronic can outshift a professional on a 5 speed, but this is generally not the case. It also get's slightly less mileage on certain engines.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    33. Re:manaul not by cpt.haddock · · Score: 1

      Come on, KNOW something before wasting your time posting.

      I asked a question, you insensitive *&%$# !!!
      Since when am I supposed to know the answer before I can ask a question?

    34. Re:manaul not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Audi's other incredible transmission, the Tiptronic, is also very good, but a good driver in a 5 speed will smoke it even in "sports mode". "

      Forget it, I have one with an only 150hp engine and it beats the socks from any mid-class driver encountered so far. Even a big M5 will loose any relatively short race, it is only going to very high speeds (100mph+) that those cars gain. I'll tell you for any urban driving that ain't practical and the tiptronic will give you the most comfortable ride. The fact that the gear does the the optimal shifting for you means that you get away twice as fast after a hard break and go scanario. Most considered good drivers don't fluently switch down trough 4 gears in 3 seconds.

    35. Re:manaul not by amper · · Score: 1

      Every review of the multitronic I've seen has the multitronic beating out the manual slightly...but hey, like so many other things, YMMV...

    36. Re:manaul not by tshak · · Score: 1

      but hey, like so many other things, YMMV

      In the most literal sense, yes :-).

      From Audi's 2002 A4 Brochure:

      A4 1.8T FrontTrak:
      Performance (0-60):
      -5 speed: 7.8sec
      -Multitronic: 7.8sec
      Economy (city/highway):
      -5 speed: 22/31
      -Multitronic: 20/29

      We can't compare it on the 3.0 engine because the manual transmission only comes with Quattro, and Multitronic only comes with the FrontTrak drive train. One other thing to note is that the multitronic adds a good 110 pounds to the cars curb weight. This all being said, this is just the first generation of multitronic. I have full confidence that Audi will blow the sox off of a manual by the second or third generation of this technology.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    37. Re:manaul not by Guy+Schalnat · · Score: 1

      It is so much easier to deal with a stick in traffic if you are willing to give a little space in front of you and just smoothly drive. Watch the truckers. It's also less stressful... Hmmm... -Guy

  16. This is classic by yobbo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Imagine all the CEO's who read this article and thought 'SWEET!' , ran into the car park, got in their beamers and drove out the back of the building to lay a fat one.

    1. Re:This is classic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CEO's read slashdot?? No wonder we're in a recession.

  17. Acceleration assist documented in manual by Jabes · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sorry to disappoint (and it would be a waste of a whole slashdot story), but the acceleration assist is documented in the manual.

    You need an M3, and you need SMG (the Sequential M Gearbox).

    Basically, you stop the car; turn off DSC, change the drive logic to (S6).

    Now, hold forward the gear selector, and floor it.

    When you release the gear selector you will launch. Get ready to change gear quickly, first gear doesn't last too long. The warm-up lights become "gear change indicators" and flash at you when its time to change gear.

    One thing that isn't mentioned in the manual is that if you press the accelerator quickly when setting this up, then it will do a "burn out" start, but if you press it more slowly then you will get a traction controlled start.

    Pretty awesome.

    And yes, I own an M3.

    1. Re:Acceleration assist documented in manual by fyonn · · Score: 1

      You need an M3, and you need SMG (the Sequential M Gearbox).

      Sequential Manual Gearbox as I understand it

      dave

    2. Re:Acceleration assist documented in manual by JjCale · · Score: 1

      Bastard.

    3. Re:Acceleration assist documented in manual by sjoperkin · · Score: 1

      Actually it is short for 'Sequentielles M Getriebe". Which by all means, is just that.

    4. Re:Acceleration assist documented in manual by nolife · · Score: 2

      Maybe I am missing the point of the story...
      Now, hold forward the gear selector, and floor it

      Floor it? Is the sole purpose of this to simply do a burnout or possibly a 360? This will not get the car out of the hole faster then a controlled start. With advice like that I can see why they electronically limited this.
      I have a measly ~250RWHP Mustang with a 2.73 differential. Dumping the clutch (or faster then normal release) at anything higher then 2000 rpms on street tires sends the car into almost an immediate sideways condition. At the track its worse, without a concrete launchpad its about 1500 rpm's and asphalt you can not avoid spin at any RPM.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    5. Re:Acceleration assist documented in manual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You drive a Mustang. Us European and Asian car drivers have known for awhile that it has shitty handling. Mabye you should try a car that dosen't suck and is well balanced, not built for 0-60 'my penis is small' speed. Try it, you'll see why we laugh at you when you tell us you drive a mustang.

    6. Re:Acceleration assist documented in manual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And yes, I own an M3.

      Even before I got to the last line of your post, i thought you were really cool...

    7. Re:Acceleration assist documented in manual by homb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Floor it? Is the sole purpose of this to simply do a burnout or possibly a 360? This will not get the car out of the hole faster then a controlled start. With advice like that I can see why they electronically limited this.

      No, the purpose of this is to launch the car with the engine already at an RPM level that is in the max torque range. Basically you trade off wasted rubber and a bad transmission experience for the 10th of a second or so that you would have wasted to bring the engine up to max power.
      Even though the 3.2 liter engine is awesome across the RPM band, it is clearly weaker under 4000 rpm. I know, my wife has one (an SMGII).

      I have a measly ~250RWHP Mustang with a 2.73 differential. Dumping the clutch (or faster then normal release) at anything higher then 2000 rpms on street tires sends the car into almost an immediate sideways condition. At the track its worse, without a concrete launchpad its about 1500 rpm's and asphalt you can not avoid spin at any RPM.

      That's weird. I have a '99 Mustange cobra, ~260RWHP, 2.73 gears. Maybe it's thanks to the independent rear suspension (IRS) that your model may not have, but the perfect launch in my cobra is at 2,400 RPM. There is very little no wheel spin, and the car is almost instantly at the sweet and sick power range starting at 4,000 rpm.

      At the track, if you warm your tires properly, you should be able to go even higher. In any case, with the proper 2,400 rpm launch you can easily smoke Carreras. The M3 though will eat your lunch, considering that it has more power on the low range (
      Which is why I totally disagree with the AU article posted to start this discussion: the guy correctly states that one could potentially shift like the SMG II, but he incorrectly assumes that one will do that not only consistently on the upshift, but will also never blow a heel & toe downshift. That's totally wrong.

      The only little gripe about the SMG II is that sometimes you wish it would start the downshift a little quicker. There is a split-second delay between your request for a downshift and the start of the neutral->throttle blip->downshift sequence.

    8. Re:Acceleration assist documented in manual by nolife · · Score: 1

      Did not mean to flame anyone or start a flame war. I am not bragging about anything here, I know a Mustang is a low budget car with piss poor handling from the factory. I knew this when I only paid $15k for it brand new. Just trying to make a point about flooring it when dumping the clutch
      Consider your statement.. You are telling me that I have a complex and I bought a Mustang to compensate for it and in the same paragraph telling me how much better the world thinks of your decision? I admire and am interested in the technology and the overall package the BWM's offer. I do not admire the owners that bought the offering and somehow connect themselves with the product like they were part of it. Your only connection with BMW is the paper work you signed at the dealer. Not much of an accomplishment on your part. That Mr AC, is someone trying to compensate for something.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    9. Re:Acceleration assist documented in manual by nolife · · Score: 1

      Actually the 99 Cobra has 3.27 gears stock. This coupled with the IRS (less wheel hop), my crappy street tires, and the torque band difference between the 4.6 and 5.0 make the difference. I use BFGoodrich Comp TA VR4's. Not a very good tire for performance because it is a harder compound, but the only tire I have ever had on the car that gets more then 40k miles. The problem with the lower numerical gears is that the car either bogs down or breaks and spins too much. With BFG drag radials I can get decent 60ft times launching at 4500 rpm's.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    10. Re:Acceleration assist documented in manual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not too smart, are you. Let's try this again. The european software normally revs to 4000rpm (actually I think it's only 2500rpm). When you enter in a sequence NOT documented in the manual, the revs go to 5000rpm.

    11. Re:Acceleration assist documented in manual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DUDE! Where's your car?

    12. Re:Acceleration assist documented in manual by homb · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, it was too early in the morning for me :-)
      You're correct of course, I have 3.27 gears. Also since the 4.6 is so crappy on the low end torque, it would certainly make a difference with your 5.0.

      Even though my stock tires still got decent grip upon launch at 2,400 rpm, I quickly switched to Potenza S02 Pole Position tires. The difference in cornering performance is staggering, but of course they're very expensive and don't last too long.

      With 12,000 miles and one heavy duty track day (over 100 miles at 110 degrees at Willow Springs), the tires are starting to break down.

  18. What fun...... by idiotnot · · Score: 1

    "Clutchless" manual transmission. No thanks, my left foot works just fine. What's even more irritating is that it looks like you can't even use the old automatic transmission trick of holding your left foot on the brake, and pushing the go pedal until you get the engine up to the torque converter's stall speed and lettting go.....

    Of course I'm biased.....I'm still suspicious of the hydraulic clutch in mine.

    1. Re:What fun...... by Jabes · · Score: 1

      Without wishing to sound like an advert for BMW, I once thought as you did.

      Then I took one on a test drive.

      I've always hated automatic boxes (and in the UK, they're in the minority, thank goodness). They take away all the fun from driving; they never seem to be in the right gear.

      But the SMG is very, very fun. It's not big or clever to be able to use a manual gearbox. Heck, every 17 year old over here can do it (we learn just about exclusively in manual cars).

      The SMG means you change gear when you want.. and it's quick. In top performance mode it'll change gear so fast it'll make your eyes water --80ms (yes - really!)

      It changes gear faster than I can, and also means I hold my hands on the steering wheel, much better for those twisty little country lanes.

      Zzzooooooommmm

    2. Re:What fun...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well put...

      Can you imagine someone saying "...those new speed dial phones are not for me...I like to punch in my own numbers!" :)

    3. Re:What fun...... by idiotnot · · Score: 3

      I've always hated automatic boxes (and in the UK, they're in the minority, thank goodness). They take away all the fun from driving; they never seem to be in the right gear.

      I think I read that something like 89% of new vehicles sold in the US now come with a slushbox. I have never owned one, nor do I want one. Especially in a car with no torque.

      But the SMG is very, very fun. It's not big or clever to be able to use a manual gearbox. Heck, every 17 year old over here can do it (we learn just about exclusively in manual cars).

      See above. I know far too many people who turn the color of an iMac when asked to drive a stick. It is disgusting, indeed.

      But being a "yank," and no disrespect to the Europeans, I like this better. And yeah, it's got a real clutch. :-D

    4. Re:What fun...... by G-funk · · Score: 2

      Yeah I'm with you. Auto and "clutchless manual" gearboxes suck.

      Not to mention all the "clutchless manual" boxes in Australian cars aren't at all, they're just a standard old slushbox with a selectable gear so long as the computer thinks you're doing the right thing...

      Give me a nice mechanical shifter and 3 pedals thank you very much. I like to be in control of my car, not giving hints to a computer and hoping for the best.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    5. Re:What fun...... by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      I've always hated automatic boxes (and in the UK, they're in the minority, thank goodness). They take away all the fun from driving; they never seem to be in the right gear.

      As an American (or USian, if you like that term better), I prefer my slushbox. Where I live in central Florida, there's two types of driving you do... Around the suburbs, it's stop and go. You get to a stoplight, go about 1/4 of a mile, get to another stoplight, etc. When the highways are crowded, you go a few feet, stop, go a few feet, stop, etc. If you've seen the beginning of Office Space, that's what it's REALLY like. The other type of driving is crusing... On the toll roads when there's little traffic or if you're lucky enough to be on the highway when it's not crowded, you can just lock in the cruise control and forget about it. It's too flat in Florida to worry about any hill climbing gear shifting problems - at highway speeds you're crusing in overdrive the whole way.

      I was forced into driving two manual transmission vehicles (A Toyota Tacoma pickup and a Chevy Camaro V6) and I didn't like it at all... The stop and go traffic was nerve wracking. Okay, we're stopping, put in the clutch, put it back into first. Give me a break - this sucks. Yea, it might be fun if my acceleration speed wasn't limited by the shitbox Ford Escort in front of me and I didn't have to stop 40 seconds from now at the next red light. If most Americans have to drive in suburban gridlock like me, I can clearly understand why the manual transmission is less popular.

      The car I drive is not fast. It's a utilitarian fuel efficient sedan... Yes, you can probably out accelerate me, but I'll see you at the next red light.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    6. Re:What fun...... by MadDog+Bob-2 · · Score: 1
      I think I read that something like 89% of new vehicles sold in the US now come with a slushbox. I have never owned one, nor do I want one. Especially in a car with no torque.

      For what it's worth, a torque converter can actually be helpful in a torque-challenged car, since the converter actually delivers more torque when the engine is moving faster than the tires. You begin to lose out when you get up to speed, but (at least as of mid-50s american steel), from a stop, you actually end up with twice the nominal torque at the back wheels. That's (one of) the reasons that, in this day and age of five-speed manuals everywhere, many automatics are still three-speed.

      Of course, manuals are just a lot more fun, but in an appropriately ponderous old american boat, a slushbox isn't entirely without merit :)

    7. Re:What fun...... by jedrek · · Score: 2

      But being a "yank," and no disrespect to the Europeans, I like this [dodge.com] better. And yeah, it's got a real clutch. :-D

      No disrespect to the Yanks, but I've noticed that europeans are much more likely to buy a car with a manual transmition. The top three reasons for this: price, fuel consumption and control. Cars are dirt cheap in the states, gas is next to free and... well... we like the control. ;) It might have something to do with the fact that distances in the USA are *huge* compared to the relatively compact cities of Europe.

      Or I could be talking out my ass.

    8. Re:What fun...... by vincent99 · · Score: 1

      Many [non-econobox] cars with sticks have cruise control too you know...

      --
      -- V
    9. Re:What fun...... by sg3000 · · Score: 2

      > It might have something to do with the fact that
      > distances in the USA are *huge* compared to the
      > relatively compact cities of Europe.

      Could also be the traffic. Since there are more cars in the U.S., and in most parts of the States, there isn't public transportation to speak of (not like the train systems in Europe). It's annoying to drive a manual in stop/go traffic every day.

      Plus, it's hard to shift when you're chomping down on a hamburger and drinking a soda while you're driving. And try talking on your cell phone while you're shifting in that traffic and eating your lunch.

      So, there are probably many factors why you don't see as many manual transmission cars in the U.S. any more.

      In my car (SLK320 with six-speed manual, BTW), the European version comes with sunglasses holders in the dash. In the U.S. version, they substitute a beverage holder. Figures.

      --
      Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    10. Re:What fun...... by spectrum- · · Score: 1

      Us Europeans favour manuals for many reason.

      1. Price - Manual is a lot cheaper
      2. Performance - Manual cars are faster*
      3. Economy - Manual is more economical
      4. Automatic has an image problem. In europe
      its seen as something for old people, disabled people and people who are not sufficently competent to use a manual.**

      *although some autos come close the reverse is never true

      ** In some countries if you pass your test on a manual you may then drive auto or manual. If you pass on an auto car you can only drive an auto.

    11. Re:What fun...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I read that something like 89% of new vehicles sold in the US now come with a slushbox.

      There seems to be a trend with American auto manfuacturers that they are getting rid of the manual transmission option altogether.

    12. Re:What fun...... by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      I saw one of the stats that only 8% of cars produced today are manual. I had to search pretty hard to find a nice manual transmission equiped car. I think its pretty amazing how many people don't know or want to learn how to drive a manual transmission.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    13. Re:What fun...... by sudog · · Score: 1

      Why waste your time with a Viper when you get get a Gozilla and smoke any M3, any Viper, and any WRX with a few simple engine mods? Why waste your time with RWD when you can have 600-700 HP at all four wheels?

    14. Re:What fun...... by jedrek · · Score: 2

      In some countries if you pass your test on a manual you may then drive auto or manual. If you pass on an auto car you can only drive an auto.

      In some countries (like Poland) you can't take the driving exam on a auto, only on manual.

    15. Re:What fun...... by Guy+Schalnat · · Score: 1

      But the real reason is so they can drive a very small engine (for really good gas milege) and still get the power to get out of corners and up hills. Manual transmissions allow you to use all the gas pedal without it kicking the revs up in the stratosphere. I drove a minivan in Italy for a week on a 2 liter engine, and it was fine with the stick, no matter how tight the corners were and how steep the hills were. America just doesn't have the same sort of roads that europe has (most of our roads are post horse and cart days), so we have different needs. I certainly would not drive more then 4 cylinders in a country where gas is $5 a gallon (!), and I wouldn't drive a heavy car with an automatic with less then 6 cylinders. Americans have good roads. Americans have really cheap gas (believe it or not). Americans have different priorities. Americans drive automatics. I finally tought my wife to drive a stick shift, and now she won't drive her car automatic car anymore. She keeps driving my cars. Of course, automatics do have their use. How else will you learn to left foot brake? -Guy

  19. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Comon... It's pretty damn funny....

    We can all appreciate Mortal Combat references every now and then....

  20. Re:Again....not new & you guys are easy to imp by smeg168 · · Score: 1

    ya see the difference is that this was intentional. and is (kinda) a feature. not something that is added or modded, or something that is just a defect in a shitty car

  21. Coming soon to a supermarket carpark near you :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Title says it all :-)

  22. I want one! by aluminumcube · · Score: 5, Informative


    As a hardcore BMW geek, I am really glad to see the M3 and it's very cool SMGII transmission make it to the front page of Slashdot. For more info, check out:

    BMW's Flash SMGII Transmission Presentation

    The Unofficial BMW E46 FAQ

    I wouldn't call Launch Control an easter egg however. If you explore the BMW Flash presentation, they mention it. While BMW North America said it would be disabled on US cars, as soon as the M3 SMG came over, the first (privilaged lucky bastard) owners tried it out and it worked.

    I have a new 325Ci (5 speed) and a previous genneration M3 race car that I built up from a crashed car and used parts. My only regret is that many people view Bimmers as yuppie mobiles, when in fact, they are amazing to drive, very technically advanced and probably the best overall vehicles on the road. Oh well... that feeling goes away when I am at the track or on an empty road.

    Freude am Fahren

    1. Re:I want one! by lingqi · · Score: 1
      ...many people view Bimmers as yuppie mobiles, when in fact, they are amazing to drive, very technically advanced and probably the best overall vehicles on the road.

      sad news bud... people don't view bimmers as yuppie mobiles because of the cars themselves, but rather by the people that buys them... think to yourself for a minute: whenever a shiny new model-year bimmer pulls up and it's a young-ish african american male (dressed *very* casually, let's say) pulls up next to you at a traffic light, do you think that -- oh wait -- it DOESN'T HAPPEN.

      • It's almost always
      • 7-series: rich lookin people (usually old) (usually white)
      • 5-series: rich looking people (usually not as old) (usually white) (who looks like they probabbly used to be yuppies)
      • 3-series: yuppies (asian, white, you name it)

      so yeah... yuppies cling themselves onto bimmers for some reason... and i've got to admit, they are nice cars to cling onto (wouldn't mind a M5 personally) (or the new Z4 looks mighty tempting) but people are saying bimmers are yuppie mobiles because... well, it's true.

      p.s. on the motorcycle side, however... i will take a suzuki any day.(or a ducati / aprilia if there are money to be spent)

      --

      My life in the land of the rising sun.

    2. Re:I want one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whatever mr heavy car. i hope you don't try to corner in that thing at high speed.
      bmws are for people who want to feel all important but can't afford a mclaren ,bugati or real performance car.
      they are definitely not the "best over all vehicles on the road" and don't even put out a real performance car.
      not to rain on your parade too much, but really...that was all crazy talk!
      -regards Chicken McDicNutz

    3. Re:I want one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aw, bull crap on your Beamer. My Saab 9000 Aero will eat your 325 for lunch, and can still carry home about 50 bags of groceries at the end of the day. And all that with a 12 year old engine and chassis - nevermind the upcoming 9-3SS!

    4. Re:I want one! by spectrum- · · Score: 1

      yea but Saab 9000 Aero is front wheel drive which means torque steer with that much power.
      Also Saab's are renound for being good in straight lines, less so when it comes to cornering finesse, body control and overall handling.

    5. Re:I want one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 9000 Aero - nothing to brag about! It took SAAB years to recover from that lemon.

    6. Re:I want one! by Superfreaker · · Score: 1

      You haven't been to NYC lately then. More Af-Am driving high end cars than WASPs

    7. Re:I want one! by rhost89 · · Score: 1

      Obviously the reason why Americans view the Bimmers as yuppie mobiles is the price, a 325ci costs anywhere from 35-45k while the m3 is in the 50's. If they were comperable say an accord or camery then that stigma would fade fast. On a side note, why would I pay 50k for a M3 when i can get a much faster/nicer car for the same price(Vetts, compleatly restored muscle cars, etc..) Dont get me wrong, I like the M3's and even though about purchasing one a year or so ago, but in the end I bought a Ford Lightning.

      --
      I will bend your mind with my spoon
    8. Re:I want one! by betaray · · Score: 1

      (Way off topic, but . . .)

      Straight lines, eh?

    9. Re:I want one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey dipshit. The European software normally does launch control at 3500rpm. Enter in the software sequence and it goes to 5000rpm.

    10. Re:I want one! by sudog · · Score: 0

      BMW has one of the crappiest price:performance ratios there is. When you buy a BMW, you don't pay for the engine, the traction control, nor the handling.. They have worse stopping distances, worse 0-60's, worse quarter miles, and worse stability than comparably priced alternatives.

      All you're paying for is the name, and the reason why people consider the BMW a yuppie car is because it is. Why else buy a vehicle that fares so poorly against the competition?

      Heck, you can pick up a Mercedes that has superior handling, superior comfort, superior power, and superior control for only slightly more--plus you get all the creature comforts that come with a Mercedes (like that cool sound system that cancels out the noise from punks who pull up next to you with their 600-watt stereos on full blast, or the windshield wipers that regulate themselves.) Unfortunately you also have to deal with the Mercedes dealers, who are notoriously difficult--try picking up your first Mercedes in white (oh sorry, "Ivory") when you're under 30, no matter how much money you make.

      No, if you want the best performance for your buck, pick up an APS-tuned RT-Spec WRX or a tricked out Nissan Skyline GTR (preferably the R33 v-spec.) You'll get a better ride, better road-handling, superior drivability, and if you're in Canada, you'll tear through snow and mountain passes better than any SUV on the highway, I promise.

      I and my (adult) friends have destroyed every BMW we met on the empty highway who's stepped up to the plate, and we've done it with vehicles ranging from Subaru WRXen to Mazda RX7s to Toyota Supras. While you're speeding around with your sooper-dooper BMW M3 (with SMG! yay!) I'll be blowing your doors off with an APS-Tuned WRX that cost me half what yours cost you. While you're typing your video-game code to get you to launch off the mark, I'll be already down the highway, waving bye-bye with my tail lights.

      So don't waste your time with BMW. Be a snob right back at them and show them that they can't impress you with their name alone.

      Just a quick note: BMW drivers themselves are damn nice and very honourable and this isn't a dig against you. You guys have been gold every time I share the road with you--unlike those damn VW drivers who try to run me into speed traps and cut me off and tromp your brakes at every goddamn opportunity--geez, if you can't take that my vehicle is better than yours, why are you trying to kill me? Why not just back off like I do when we come up to traffic? Why cut them off as well? They didn't do anything! Every friggin VW driver I've ever trolled has gone completely insane and done things like cut in between two-lane traffic, or pulled in front of me with only inches to spare, or what-have-you. VW people, GET HELP.

    11. Re:I want one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>

      HAHAHA.. thats the most rediculous statement I have ever heard. Mercedes vehicles handle horribly compared to almost any performance vehicle on the market. Even their C32 AMG is terribly sloppy on the road. Mercedes vehicles are all automatic. I personally hate the feel of a torque converter. I wont argue the ability to build a faster car then an M3, because that is obviously possible. (Although id build a 3-rotor rx-7 if I were going to build a fast cheap car instead of the wrx). You still cant mention that a mercedes is anywhere NEAR the performance, and handling of an M3, no matter what model you choose they are ALL inferior if the road has any curves in it.

      Although, the M3 is a sweet car to drive.. drifts wonderfully, great distribution, the power so evenly split along the power band. On top of that its all naturally aspirated! Wonderfull car. Just a big expensive for the performance. Yes I have driven an M3. If I had the money id buy it in a second. I think you have to drive it to apreciate the engine in the car. Its positive qualities far exceed the numbers, thats for sure.

      Final note, I dont think you can crack too much on its performance. 0-60 in 4.8 is right up there. In all honesty its really about the thrill you get from driving the car, and the M3 is a thrilling car to drive.

      just my 2 cents.

    12. Re:I want one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a typical, Ricer ignoranus.

    13. Re:I want one! by Caspuh · · Score: 1

      You don't drag race with a BMW, idiot. Try enlightening yourself by taking some turns. Your muscle car does turn, right?

    14. Re:I want one! by Guy+Schalnat · · Score: 1
      Those of us who actually compete in BMW's know how well they handle at the limit of traction. When an accident happens in front of me, I can drive around it. I hope you are wearing your seatbelt.

      There's more to life then straight roads, and even straight roads have a way of suddenly having obstacles in them.

      People buy BMW's because, when they really need to turn, they can, and no other 4 adult (or 5 adult) car can.

      How do we know? Do we race on highways? No. We race for real. We put a bunch of cones out on an airport and put timing lights out and see what car can go through the fastest. And we get the best together every year for a 1000 driver national shootout. If there is a chance that a particular car is best, someone finds out and brings it, and wins. Guess what? Nobody drives Mercedes. Muscle cars can't turn. Miata's can. Z06's are the best, but they can only carry two people. BMW's are the fastest sedans out there. Sorry, the facts prove it.

      Oh, and Turbo MR2's are really fast and really cheap. Probably the best performance/price deal running (that's road legal, a shifter cart is faster and cheaper of course).

      Check out your local SCCA group (www.scca.org) and find out how insane driving 60mph through a parking lot, sawing the wheel back and forth to miss traffic cones, really is (and find out what your car really does on the edge of traction).

      BMW's were designed to run in Europe. Europe has many turns in their roads, even at 120 mph. BMW's are designed to turn well at 120 mph, not necessarily to accelerate from 60 to 100 as fast as the cars you mentioned. They also turn well at 30 mph on the side of a mountain without falling off. American roads are rather different then the ones they test on, and that is why people don't understand what they are for. Until someone crashes in front of them.

      The best testing ground for road vehicles in the world is the 14 mile 150 turn Nurburgring. Anyone can drive it, just go up to the gate and pay the fee. Supercar territory is 8 minutes. Good luck. See how many BMW's you can beat THERE.

      See you at nationals autocrossing someday in your cars. See if you really have what it takes or not. I'll be driving the BMW. If you miss me, show up for the trophy presentations and I'll be walking across the stage for my trophy.

      -Guy

    15. Re:I want one! by sudog · · Score: 1

      Hey-- your rear-wheel drive hunk of junk BMW won't *ever* touch an AWD Japanese supercar like the v33 or v34 Skyline. No matter how much you tune it, no matter how much you mod it, it just won't happen.

      I'd eat my own boxers if I ever saw an M3 chasing down (and beating) the ungodly Godzilla.

      Even the WRX--tuned up (and using less money than the M3 costs)--will eat M3 for lunch. Stock, fine, doesn't touch it, but the car costs half as much--what do you expect? BMW releasing a vehicle that's 80K USD (or more) that can't even overtake a simple WRX? No, so they pump it up with horsepower and "gee whiz" SMG.

      A WRX isn't a riceboy car--it's quite expensive and comes with kick-ass performance stock. Riceboy means making your vehicle "LOOK FAST"--not "look good" nor "fast". Engine performance mods don't qualify as riceboy.

      Don't believe me? Go visit the Riceboy pages themselves:

      www.riceboypage.com

    16. Re:I want one! by sudog · · Score: 1

      That's great--but all of you BMW freaks are missing something: the M3 isn't AWD. It's RWD. That means in any rally, in any unstable conditions, and in any curves, the WRX limit of traction is superior to yours. There just isn't any arguing with that--an AWD vehicle has superior possible grip, superior possible handling, superior possible acceleration.. The amount of friction that an AWD can apply to forward motion is HIGHER. The fact that you're trying to argue that point just means you are just as clueless as I thought you were.

      While you're stuck in an oversteer slide, I get to hug the road, squat down and introduce you to the sweet smell of my exhaust.

      You aren't actually trying to tell me that you're going to be able to trash an AWD vehicle like the Skyline v33? Both on the straightaways and on any curve you can introduce me to, the Skyline will kick your ass up and down the road.

      There's only so much that computer-controlled suspension, shocks, brakes, etc can get you if you can't direct actual horsepower to the front wheels.

      Duh..

    17. Re:I want one! by sudog · · Score: 1

      Oh, and one more thing.. if you're actually trying to sit there and tell me that the rally-bred Evo VII, the rally-bred WRX, or the incredibly powerful Skyline series from Nissan won't be able to out-turn your pathetic RWD M3, you're smoking some really bad crack and should switch dealers.

      OoooOOoo.. 30 mph on the side of a mountain without falling off? Ignoring the obvious fallacy of your logic (what's the radius of the curve, what're the road conditions, what are the angles of inclination, etc) that's just a stupid statement to make. RWD vehicle gets stuck with a pile of oversteer--that's why on those M3 videos you see the wheels are cranked and the car is sliding sideways around the track's curves. It's called "I can't use torque to the front wheels to help me steer around this curve."

      So go ahead and think you can win your little autocross trophies--come visit me in the long-distance rallies, and bring your precious BMW.

      (And Skylines eat BMWs for breakfast at Burburgring everytime they compete.)

      And one more thing--if you're doing 120mph and someone crashes right in front of you, it's no longer a question of vehicle performance, it's a question of--were you too close to react or not? No car in the world makes you a better driver. Just some make your mistakes count less. And my AWD WRX with it's variable torque distribution is going to out-steer your M3 any day of the week.

    18. Re:I want one! by Guy+Schalnat · · Score: 1
      Ok, I guess we need to define our surface.

      Dirt: AWD wins. WRC cars are designed for dirt and gravel, because that is the typical surface. These surfaces don't give much traction, so there isn't much weight transfer, so you can effectively use all four wheels with power. Rain is a similar problem and solution.

      Dry asphalt: More weight transfer (especially with sticky tires), and you just can't use two of them. The advantage of RWD (using the trottle to "balance" the car) outshines the traction coming out of the corner. Fact is, in AWD, you get the understeer/oversteer of whatever your car is setup to do. With RWD, I don't. At the limit, the steering doesn't do much anyway (why? Because the front tires are already at the limit, so adding more steering doesn't do anything). Instead, with a RWD car, I can steer with the throttle. If I am pushing a bit, I just get off the throttle slightly, and the car tightens the line (and slows down a bit). If I am making the turn nicely, I get on the throttle more, and the arc widens (and the car speeds up). No car can be perfectly balanced all the way through a corner with different speed corners. The RWD allows me to dynamically balance the car.

      Whereas you are stuck with whatever oversteer/understeer condition you have dialed in.

      Oh, I'm lighter too (and have less friction losses)...

      Those BMW video's are designed to appeal to those who don't know how to drive BMW's at the limit. Michael Schumacher doesn't drive like that (nor does Juan Pablo Montoya), and neither should you drive an M3 like that. Too bad the correct way to drive RWD is boring looking.

      I reiterate. If you want to drive on asphalt, the BMW is faster. If you have gravel roads, then, no, BMW's were not made for that. I don't regularly drive on gravel (maybe twice a year). I drive BMW's. If I drove on gravel more often, then yes, I'd get a gravel car. But be aware that one car is not going to be best everywhere.

      So what is Burburgring? It's hard to get much rally info here in America. Most I get is the WRC and the American SCCA ProRally.

      Or were you talking Nurburgring? Do you have proof of that?

      Here's my proof of autocrossing.

      This is from this year's national championships in Autocross (SCCA Solo II). Over 1000 top drivers and their cars. Take Stock class (can only change a few things like shocks, so we don't argue over who modified their engine more).

      BMW 325 (note: not even an M3): 101.899 seconds.

      Top WRX: 103.415 seconds.

      Sorry. You loose. See http://www.scca.org/amateur/solo2/nationals/2002/r esults/ds.html for the gory details.

      Oh, and if you look at http://www.scca.org/amateur/solo2/nationals/2002/r esults/ss.html, you will see a 2002 M3 doing the course in 99.823. Of course, they didn't run at the same time as the WRX, so perhaps conditions were better. Or perhaps not.

      ;)

      So are we racing on asphalt or dirt? Of course, I don't drive an M3. I drive a $4,000 91 BMW 318is. The top 91 BMW 318is did the course in 103.061 seconds. That's faster then the top WRX. Of course, once again, perhaps the conditions were more favorable. I'd say they were. No way does a 140hp 318 beat a WRX. The WRX is faster. But not by much (enough that a small temperature difference makes the BMW faster), and not bad for an 11 year old car.

      Now, you can argue that the WRX's drivers aren't quite as good. I'd agree. The top drivers in GS don't drive WRX's. They drive BMW's or Acura Integra Type-R's, both of which are faster. In the Integra's case, because of weight. That thing is light and powerful (being FWD and supercharged), and thus gets around the course faster.

      In conclusion, on low traction surfaces, the WRX is a mighty good machine. On high traction surfaces, the BMW is faster. They are both good cars, they are just optimized differently. Which is fine.

      Just don't pretend that the WRX is faster then an M3 on all surfaces and you are fine. Because I haven't ever seen any proof that the WRX is faster on asphalt. Show me some, and I'll reconsider.

      Prove it.

      -Guy

    19. Re:I want one! by sudog · · Score: 1

      Okay, let's get a few responses:

      In an AWD WRX, it's simple to throw the vehicle into an inertial drift. But when I want to use torque to all four wheels to pull out of the drift, you can bet that my control is going to be superior to yours. It's a question of how much friction I can apply to my driving. And if I can't, it's purely a result of whatever sneaky technology BMW has tossed into their vehicle, and not because of what's actually physically possible. A good AWD car *should* *always* beat a good RWD car unless you start trying to tell me that engine power has to be the same, or you're allowed to spend $20,000 more than me, or what-have-you.

      Don't sit there and lie to the other readers that AWD cars can't oversteer, because they can and do. All the time. On dry asphalt or slippery gravel.

      Your "dynamic balancing" is buzzword wannabe balogna. All you're saying is you can swing your ass-end out so you don't have to worry so much about flipping the car over, and so you can use the now-spinning rear wheels to push you in towards the radial centre of the curve you're sliding through. My WRX can do precisely the same thing, but with all four tires.

      Your RWD just lets you be sloppier at it.

      Now pay attention here, because I don't want to have to repeat myself:

      You (and all the other M3 apologists) are trying to tell me that your RWD M3 can handle tighter corners, on steeper roads than a suitably equipped AWD vehicle can. Listen to yourself--you're missing an entire control variable because the best you can do with your front tires to control them is APPLY THE BRAKES, control shocks, etc. In an AWD, one can APPLY BRAKES, control shocks, AND APPLY TORQUE.

      I don't know why you don't think that's a no-brainer. Oh wait, yes I do. Because there are no AWD M3's. The moment you get it, you'll be crowing it all over the place and saying to people like me "In your face!" And I'll be grudgingly telling you you have a great car. Until then? Stop wasting our time by continuing this charade.

      And by Nurburgring, I was *NOT* comparing the WRX to your M3. The WRX has short gear ratios that are better suited for quick acceleration and twisted, rally-style roads. It's not a GT vehicle. I *WAS* comparing the M3 with the Nissan Skyline V33 GT-R or V34. The Skyline has longer gear ratios stock, a more powerful engine, and is built as a GT vehicle. It just happens to be AWD. And it would eat any BMW for breakfast. And it's cheaper to boot. And it's infinitely more reliable.

      I never said WRX was better at absolutely everything. I just said the WRX is better at everything that *counts*, and for LESS money can be made into a vastly superior vehicle than your M3 *all around*. Sure, stock WRX can't touch you in some things. Big deal. Add in $15,000 of parts (still.. what? $30,000 less than your M3, give or take?) and any decent driver will kick your M3's ass up and down any road you'd care to race him on.

      As a final, parting shot, in a high-traction road with deep curves in it, the WRX is superior. In a straight line, we can't beat your gear ratios without replacing our own. It's quite simple, really. I don't know why you're trying to tell our future readers something that defies simple physics.

  23. Daytona USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I only play arcade games, so I've no idea whether this works in any other version, but:

    In Daytona USA, if you hold down the start button whilst going through the automatic/manual transmission, etc, before 'Gentlemen, start your engines', you can disable all of the computer-driven cars :-). Impresses the bystanders in the arcade no end.

  24. Again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    For the BMW in question, this 'feature' is documented in the owner's manual....not hidden. Hardly an easter egg. But, I'm sure some marketing guy felt enough fools would buy into it if it appeared in print.

    And the injector shut-off on the Ford was on purpose, not a defect. The circa 80's XR4Ti had a turbo, and this feature was meant to allow the engine to be spun over after an oil change, so as to allow oil pressure to build in the turbo before actually firing the engine. Not documented and clearly factory designed. One of many, many unknown 'tricks' that exist in many makes of cars over the last +15 years. As an another example, the Corvette has had a very entertaining alarm system for some time now...

  25. Sweet!! by SuperDuG · · Score: 2

    I just was just about to go try this out, then I relized this doesn't work on my 15 year old minivan out back. For the price of this car, why don't you just go out and buy a real muscle car, with enough time you could probably write your name in the parking lot. Peeling out is cool, all you have to do is bald your tires!!

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    1. Re:Sweet!! by madsenj37 · · Score: 1

      A real muscle car? The m3 has 333 hp from a natural aspirated inline 6. This European trick of optimizing power while maintaing good fuel mileage has yet to show up in American technology.

      --
      Choosing the lesser of two evils is a choice for evil.
    2. Re:Sweet!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so it breathes naturally. Whats the big deal?

    3. Re:Sweet!! by operagost · · Score: 1

      The Dodge Intrepid's 3.5L V6 makes 244 HP and 18/26 MPG, as compared to the M3's 16/24. That's pretty damn close... and it costs less than $24K with that engine. If Dodge were to cheat and pop a turbo with intercooler on that engine, you'd lose another MPG but embarrass a lot of BMWs.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    4. Re:Sweet!! by Janne+Kyllio · · Score: 1

      European M3's have 350hp at 7900rpm, that's 106hp more than that Dodge engine can do. M3 engine is slightly smaller, only 3.2 litres, too. BTW, M3 CSL is at least 30 sec per lap faster than fastest Dodge, the Viper, in Nordschleife.

    5. Re:Sweet!! by operagost · · Score: 1
      European M3s are that fast because they still lag behind their American counterparts in safety features (okay, the stupid bumpers) and emissions control.

      Regardless, peak HP at 7900 RPM is a bit too high revving to be of any use to me.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  26. Not quite an easter egg. by occam · · Score: 3, Informative

    That's a real feature of the transmission.

    NB: the transmission in question is not a normal manual (i.e., with a foot clutch and stick). It's a hybrid auto-manual which has an electronically controlled clutch (i.e., there's no foot pedal since the computer controls the clutch entirely). The gearing is controlled by the computer or (as desired) by two paddles (+/-) along the steering wheel for up/down shift. BMW calls its version SMG (Sequential Manual Gearbox).

    Ferrari and F1 cars also have this feature (similar technologies).

    The acceleration assist is a genuine feature which basically tells the SMG to accelerate hard from a standstill as a special case (F1 cars also have launch control). It's a genuine feature, not an easter egg.

    Cool car, M3! :-)

  27. Cowboy Niels SpelCheker beta 1.1a by bushboy · · Score: 1

    This article was processed by Cowboy Niels amazing SpelCheker beta 1.1a.

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
  28. Easter Egg? No. by guttentag · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Self-Destruct Mechanisms" are not easter eggs.

    Computer: Thank you for pressing the self-destruct button.
    President Scroob: Hey Helmet! Check this out! I found an easter egg in the ship's computer.
    Computer: nine... eight... six...
    Helmet: And a pretty major bug. What happened to seven?
    President Scroob: No, Gates said that was a feature.
    Computer: Just kidding...

  29. older cars yes...today, no way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A manual trans simply causes less power lost by the time you get to the wheels (15hp in some cases). In terms of using one over the other in an otherwise similarly equipped, 10 year old car, this can be an advantage. But in a modern car (made in the last few years), that being the only advantage, a manual trans cannot compete with a computer controlled automatic or semi-automatic transmission. When the auto shifts in 80ms and you take 10 times longer, which is going to win?

    As for fun, try driving with one hand at speeds over 150 mph. You'll appreciate the control two hands provide when you don't have to let go of the wheel to drop down a gear.
    I'm afraid you're holding onto not only the gearshift, but the past as well.

    1. Re:older cars yes...today, no way by khuber · · Score: 2
      When the auto shifts in 80ms and you take 10 times longer, which is going to win?

      Apparently the human, Mr. Slushbox Fanboy.

      The Car and Driver article said they beat the SMG M3 by .3 seconds in a manual M3.

      There's more to a transmission than how quickly the gears change, sonny.

      -Kevin

    2. Re:older cars yes...today, no way by Viol8 · · Score: 0

      YOu obviously no squat about manual transmissions or you'd realise that its not how quick the transmission shifts but WHEN it shifts. Automatics have an annoying habit of shifting when you don't want them to , oh , like for instance like when going around a corner. And who the hell would be shifting transmission on a road car at 150mph? Even a ferrari would be in top gear by then and shifting down would blow the engine! I'm afraid that you're not holding onto a clue.

    3. Re:older cars yes...today, no way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but C&D also explained the reason it lost was the lousy 1st gear acceleration. After that it made up ground on the manual, just not enough to pull in a faster time.

      FWIW I drive a 5-speed stick and don't forsee a time in the near future where I'll be driving an automatic. But manumatic designs, like the SMG, have come a long way in a short time, so it's possible that they'll get a reliable 1st gear launch in at some point.

      However, being budget conscious, and my insistence on driving small, light cars, I don't think I'll be driving one even after that happens. Weight is the enemy. Automatic/Manumatics are extra weight.

    4. Re:older cars yes...today, no way by khuber · · Score: 1
      I have a 5 speed small car also.

      I think the idea of computerized manuals is interesting (weren't CVTs going to take over the world?), but it's just more complexity and cost too.

      There's something to be said for mechanical/electronic simplicity.

      -Kevin

    5. Re:older cars yes...today, no way by codingOgre · · Score: 1

      Umm, dude, C/D does clutchless shifts! This is fine for getting the fastest time 0-60, but I certainly wouldn't do it with my own car. If you don't believe me then read how the magazine obtains it numbers.

      --
      Space may be the final frontier, but it's made in a Hollywood basement. --Red Hot Chili Peppers, Californication
    6. Re:older cars yes...today, no way by bmajik · · Score: 3, Insightful

      First off, the SMG gearbox is NOT an automatic. It is an improvement upon a manual gearbox (the computer automatically double-clutches downshifts, etc etc)

      secondly, C&D is not known for spectacularly reproducible test conditions or scientific thoroughness.

      Finally, the only thing that would make a standard gearbox faster than this one would be less weight, or different gear ratios. I suspect the SMG box is slightly heavier, but do not know that to be the case.

      Lets put it this way. On the ferrari SMG gearbox, schumacher had a faster laptime than on the 6 speed in the exact same car. Schumacher is also about the only person who gets a better laptime with ferrari's traction control turned off.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    7. Re:older cars yes...today, no way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will casually mention that the M3 hits redline in 5th gear at about 170 mph. It has six gears.

  30. I hate Easter Eggs, and now they get dangerous by GrouchoMarx · · Score: 1, Troll

    Good. So now if someone trips an easter egg by accident, instead of crashing the boss's computer, they total the car in front of them. Can I sue the manufacturer for this little gem if that happens?

    Easter Eggs Bad, people. Easter Eggs major source of bugs. Easter Eggs source of strange, unexplained behavior. Easter Eggs source of the GDMF Doom clone in Excel. Sorry, I've got Doom alredy, I don't need another one taking up hard disk space.

    Delete the automotive easter egg and put in something useful. Preferably something that won't raise my insurance rates (anymore than driving a car like this already will).

    --

    --GrouchoMarx
    Card-carrying member of the EFF, FSF, and ACLU. Are you?

    1. Re:I hate Easter Eggs, and now they get dangerous by DrEldarion · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Way to understand how it works.

      Part of doing the easter egg is FLOORING THE PEDAL.

      Somehow I don't think this will be triggered by accident.

      -- Dr. Eldarion --

    2. Re:I hate Easter Eggs, and now they get dangerous by bmajik · · Score: 2

      If i had mod points today, i'd mod you down as "stupid, read the fucking article, and also, please get a fucking clue"

      It is a 100% perfectly documented beahvior of the car, extremely unlikely to be done "by accident", and the M3 is _not_ a normal BMW, it is street legal track car with a/c, leather, and a radio. People that buy these are hard core driving enthusiasts, or rich people that want to seem like driving enthusiasts.

      Here's a hint: to engage this, you need to leave the gas pedal floored for a few seconds, while doing a few other things simultaneously. Do you often just lleave the gas pedal floored at a standstill ?

      BTW, if you're already moving, i dont beleive this feature even works. It is ONLY for doing perfectly controlled maximum-acceleration launches. I.e. you want to drag race from a standing start.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    3. Re:I hate Easter Eggs, and now they get dangerous by REDNOROCK · · Score: 0

      Just curious, but did you mean to sound like a dumbass?

      --
      Even if I say something insightfull or inteligent, it doens't matter cause I'm an ass.
  31. Calling all hackers, calling all hackers! by Alsee · · Score: 5, Funny

    So where's the post detailing a hack to reset or eliminate the 30/lifetime and the 1/hour limits? Oh, and don't forget the 155 mph governor.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    1. Re:Calling all hackers, calling all hackers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      those limits aren't in the system, they are written into the warranty as this feature is DOCUMENTED in europe. There is a version on US cars that revs to about 1500rpms and there is no limit on that. As far as the speed goes, you can remove that by getting a chip from many different sources. It will reprogram your ECU giving slight HP gain, remove top speed governor and provide a couple hundred more RPM's of revving room.

    2. Re:Calling all hackers, calling all hackers! by ez76 · · Score: 2

      Like the poster said, these events are logged.

      Be aware that BMW is notorious for invoking its right to void your warranty based on what's recorded in the engine log: over-revs (on E36 M3's, this one was a killer in both the warranty and valvetrain sense), incorrect (overzealous) break-in period, etc.

    3. Re:Calling all hackers, calling all hackers! by evilmrhenry · · Score: 1
      So where's the post detailing a hack to reset or eliminate the 30/lifetime and the 1/hour limits? Oh, and don't forget the 155 mph governor.

      Quite simple. You need one lighted match, and as much gas as you can afford.

      Place the gas in stategic places around the car, and toss the lighted match towards the car. This will not only eliminate all computer-controled limits, but reduces maintaince costs to zero, and ensures that the car will never get in another acident.

  32. Easter Egg or Cheat Code? by Bakajin · · Score: 2, Informative

    Is this really an Easter Egg? It strikes me as more of a cheat code. Easter Eggs seem to be pretty but basically useless feature. They often times display the developer's names or give you some little extra bonus. But cheat codes are designed to unlock hidden potentials in the system, to circumvent rules, or basically... to cheat.

    1. Re:Easter Egg or Cheat Code? by spakka · · Score: 1
      They often times display the developer's names or give you some little extra bonus.

      Maybe the developers were called stuff like Joe Clutchfuck or Bob Killchild?

    2. Re:Easter Egg or Cheat Code? by Stavr0 · · Score: 1

      Sadly, no one has found the Invunerability, Unlimited mileage and Police Invisibility modes yet ...

  33. Not quite an Easter Egg, but... by IainHere · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine used to have a yellow Lada Samara estate (big horrible tank of a car). Someone broke into it to steal the radio (being worth more than the car), so he didn't replace it, and never locked his car again.

    However, the heater worked even without the key, so every Friday night people on their way back from the pub used to buy kebabs, jump in the car and turn the heater on for a comfortable snack.

  34. Neither by djupedal · · Score: 1

    ...it's a marketing ploy to gain buzz on their product. Too bad the average BMW owner is much smarter than the average marketing guy/girl. BMW's sell themselves, and this kind of thrill write can only serve to cheapen the image.

    1. Re:Neither by djupedal · · Score: 1

      ...and before someone argues, I mean that the reference to the altered launch sequence being an easter egg is a ploy...not the sequence itself.

  35. australian dollars. check url next time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    everyone makes mistakes. please learn from them, though

  36. NOT the first by a long way by mosschops · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't you all remember the Easter Egg in the De Lorian, triggered by reaching 88mph? I seem to remember that from about 1985.

    1. Re:NOT the first by a long way by mosschops · · Score: 2, Informative

      I seem to remember that from about 1985

      That said, part III was set in 1885, before there were any other cars to compete. :-D

    2. Re:NOT the first by a long way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah the cocain stashed in the car drops on the floorboards and the party gets started.

    3. Re:NOT the first by a long way by avoisin · · Score: 1

      Boy, you're late to the party. Heck, I remember seeing that trick in the De Lorian in _1885_, back before most cars were even around.

      </sheepish grin>

    4. Re:NOT the first by a long way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's only with the Flux Capacitor option, though.

  37. Its a feature you freakin' geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It is NOT an easter egg...not everything is about computers guys?

    This is a FEATURE called launch control. It was first used in Formula 1 (the definitive form of motor racing) where of course BMW run an engine with the Williams Team. It was only allowed for the first time last season. BMW are cashing in on their F1 success by adding 'launch control' to their sporty saloons.

    This is the sort of geek sensationalism that will get neat features banned from cars...this is the same country that nearly put Audi out of business cause yanks couldn't figure out cruise control in the mid 80's.

    and while I'm at it :-)

    how come geeks know so little about and have such bad taste in cars? Why do geeks think hondas are cool ? How come geeks talk about wanting an electic car but drive v8s? Frys in Silicon valley used to reserve the best parking spaces for electric vehicles now they're back to disabled spots because only professor Frink used them!

    for honda think zonda, for a car worthy of the geek moniker think Lotus Elise - revolutionary construction methods, unbelieveably performance and extraordinary fuel efficiency.

    1. Re:Its a feature you freakin' geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This is the sort of geek sensationalism that will get neat features banned from cars...this is the same country that nearly put Audi out of business cause yanks couldn't figure out cruise control in the mid 80's."

      Ya sure, isn't Eurail what you guys call cruise control?

      Take a bath Eurotrash.

    2. Re:Its a feature you freakin' geeks by Fiveeight · · Score: 1

      So getting 120bhp/litre and a 9000rpm redline out of a two litre four cylinder engine has no geek appeal? How about inventing variable valve timing?

    3. Re:Its a feature you freakin' geeks by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      "...was first used in Formula 1 (the definitive form of motor racing) where of course BMW run an engine with the Williams Team... BMW are cashing in on their F1 success by adding 'launch control' to their sporty saloons."

      It is not BMW cashing in, it is Williams F1 injecting race technology into a BMW production car. You see, Williams F1 designed and produced the SMG transmission for the M3.

      BTW, this is the whole idea of the M series of cars that BMW offers. M==Motorsport. Take racing technology developed from real track experience and translate it into a publicly consumable vehicle.

      It is completely impossible to say anything intelligent or enlightening in a space this size, excep

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    4. Re:Its a feature you freakin' geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny. Cruise control is not only an American invention but it first became common in cars in the 1960s. If anything blame us yanks for not taking responsiblity for our actions.

      Maybe you should do a bit of reading before you mouth off like you know what you're talking about. The easter egg is that the launch control rpm can be increased from 3500 to 5000 with a certain input sequence.

    5. Re:Its a feature you freakin' geeks by REDNOROCK · · Score: 0

      "Its a feature you freakin' geeks" followed by comments by ravenous and angry geeks. Who are freakin'. FREAKIN A! I'm not funny.

      --
      Even if I say something insightfull or inteligent, it doens't matter cause I'm an ass.
    6. Re:Its a feature you freakin' geeks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Ya sure, isn't Eurail what you guys call cruise control?

      Eurotrash here, I don't get this.... was that that humour? sorry humor? I actually don't know what you mean.

      > Take a bath Eurotrash.

      ya know americans bath more because they are fatter and unhealthier and therefore more prone to the smellies. After all the US is a country that invented sweat pants and sweat shirts - clothes designed to absorb sweat - lose a few pounds pizza boy!

      want to see just how fat you are? leave the country.

      hey wasn't this about cars?

      Calfornia introduces laws to clean up the emissions from combustible engines..resulting in cars developing less power per litre and gaining weight (kinda like americans) due to all the extra emission equipment on the cars...which resulted in BIGGER ENGINES to make up for the loss of power which resulted in HIGHER FUEL CONSUMPTION. 2 out 3 cars that go by on 101 are SUV types. Fat asses lose some weight, stop driving living rooms on wheels and get a small economical runnabout - oh and learn to drive a manual - they're also lighter and more fuel efficient (like eurotrash).

      If anyone wants to beat me up, don't worry Herr Bush will probably nuke the planet within his term - if he doesn't destroy the planet by rejecting the Kyoto protocol first. yeehaw!

  38. Another reason to avoid BMWs. by Observer · · Score: 1

    Used to be that BMWs were pretty cool machines (both the cars and the bikes). These days the company seem to be pandering more and more to the boy-racer brigade. That's their business, and they know it best, I suppose. What really hurts is knowing that the boy-racer brigade can afford to buy BMWs.

    --
    "My other car is also a Porsche" (Bumper sticker reported in the Hitchhiker tri5ogy).

    1. Re:Another reason to avoid BMWs. by REDNOROCK · · Score: 0

      "What really hurts is knowing that the boy-racer brigade can afford to buy BMWs."
      They can't. Thier parents can. My friend has (sorta) a BMW. Well at least thats what he tells his girlfriend. Really he has a Camry, but his mom lets him drive hers often.
      He's a good guy though, but there are lots of rich preppy fucks who get nice cars, and they're just 16.

      --
      Even if I say something insightfull or inteligent, it doens't matter cause I'm an ass.
  39. Dyno by Konster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    .....it's was originally called the 'kamikazi dyno', where you trick out the software and the only place you can test it is out on the street.....

    You need to hack the control unit in order to get an accurate dyno reading from an M3, since the front tires need to be spinning at the same rate as the rear wheels. If this isn't the case, the spark timing is retarded quite a bit, reducing horsepower (by quite a lot). The hack supplied by BMW also negates this. Remember to do this prior to putting your new M3 on a dyno.

    Also, make sure the dyno shop has a cooling tower. Running a stationary M3 at redline without the proper cooling also invokes the dreaded spark timing retarder. It also might invoke the dreaded Abuse clause in your warranty.

    1. Re:Dyno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by the 'only' place, I meant that since you sank all your money into the breakout box, you were left not being able to afford a proper dyno, and thus the only choice you could afford was the local boulevard :)

    2. Re:Dyno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're only talking about dyno's at race thresholds, right? Cal/Neva/Zona smog test
      places aren't killing cars with their dyno test,
      right?

    3. Re:Dyno by bmajik · · Score: 2

      Actually i think the spark-retard thing has to do more with air temperature. If you read what Dinan has to say about their tuning on the E39 M5 package, they found that alot of the power loss comes from intake air temperature. The the ECU takes intake air temp as one of its inputs, and it knows that as the temperature of the air rises, it cant be as aggressive with its timing, so it slwos down. The biggest changes dinan made to the E39 M5 were on the intake, to keep the air as cool as possible. This lets the factory programming make the most of things while still staying inside the safety envelope.

      Clearly running a car on the dyno thats _expecting_ 130mph of cool air coming at its radiator and intake is bad, and artificial air is a serious requirement.

      I'm surprised that you say that the ECU retards the timing based on wheel speed. Many BMWs of course have traction control (and even the 80s bmws had 4 channel ABS) and clearly that cares about wheel speed differences. The TCU needs to talk to the ECU to tell it to cut throttle when wheel(s) spin, but it wouldn't do that with spark retard. Do you have any pointers to a discussion of the front-wheels-stationary problem ?

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    4. Re:Dyno by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The throttle in all street cars is directly coupled to the pedal, with the only exception being cruse control. The only way to reduce speed, i.e. revlimiting, traction control, etc is via spark retard.

    5. Re:Dyno by bmajik · · Score: 2

      Bzzt.

      The throttle in the E39 M5 and E46 M3 is electronic. They are drive-by-wire. There is no direct mechanical linkages.

      Not that that matters. in my 88 BMW, i _do_ have a direct throttle cable (i've even replaced it), but i still don't need to retard timing to limit acceleration. The hard rev limiter is a fuel cut off. No timing modifications necessary. The momentary rev limit is a temporary fuel cut.

      Naturally fuel cutoffs are probably too jerky for traction control applications, but they're definitely used for rev limiting. Most TC systems that need to actuate a slow-down condition use the brakes more than ECU work, however.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
  40. Porsche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a Porsche 911 in the early 90's that would go into "Sport Driving" mode if you pumped the gas pedal to the floor 3X before you turned the ignition. I don't remember if it was the transmission, engine management or both. IIRC, this was an undocumented feature that was told to the magazine reviewers by Porsche.

    G

  41. i live in new jersey.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i see lots of young, *very* casually dressed black males driving bmw's around here. you're either wrong about your racial breakdown of BMW drivers, or something funny is going on here.

    1. Re:i live in new jersey.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      something funny is going on.. i.e grand theft auto!

    2. Re:i live in new jersey.. by elfkicker · · Score: 1

      He lives in Oregon. So you ask, "Do they have black people in Oregon?" Funny you ask... 1.6% of the poulation in Oregon is black, as opposed to New Jersey's 13.6. I bet this guy hasn't seen many black people driving anything.

      Still, if you're spending $30k+ on a car, you're a yuppie. I don't care what race you are.

  42. Torque multiplication by idiotnot · · Score: 2

    This is one of the things that the 4x4 guys argue about all the time. The thing about it is that the multiplication (in most cases) drops off pretty quickly as you move up the RPM band. As for the five speed thing....what I've found is that many cars with a decently-sized engine don't need that low first gear to get off the line. I rarely use first gear in mine, because it's got enough oomph (242 cid I-6) to get out of the hole okay.

    And I agree with the slushbox on a boat......one of the most fun cars I've ever driven was a Chevy Impala SS. *drool*

  43. The first time? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    People have been fucking with car software, since, well since there has been car software. I'm sure people have already crashed 'mod-chipped' cars.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:The first time? by Cadre · · Score: 2

      "You may not be able to drive like Michael Schumacher, but at least you can launch like him."

      -Some Roundel Journalist commenting on the launch control feature of SMG-II.

      --
      All editorial writers ever do is come down from the hill after the battle is over and shoot the wounded.
    2. Re:The first time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The journalist should be referring to Michael's brother Ralf who drives one of the Williams BMW cars (the other being Montoya) Michael has been killing everyone in that Ferrari of his.

      But the point stands that SMG-II is a decendant of the research from the F1 cars.

    3. Re:The first time? by d_jab · · Score: 1

      no... he should not be referring to Ralf or Montoya.

      Michael Schumacher is the top driver right now, the actual car he drives is insignificant in that quote.

  44. RTFM by JavaPriest · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So it is a documented feature according to some reactions. Here is somebody that didn't read the manual carefully. According to the accompanying text this driver stepped on the gas instead of the brakes, but my guess is she activated the easter egg.

    1. Re:RTFM by T-Punkt · · Score: 1

      I don't think so. You have to be in shifting prgram S6 and DSC (whatever that is) deactivated, push the shift lever forward and hold it, press the accelerator pedal (aka 'gas') down to the floor!! [you'll hear the engine rev' up] and then release the shift lever to activate the "race start" or "burnout" modes. This can't happen accidently - or in other words: The car doesn't behave in a way you wouldn't expect even if you don't know about these modes because you haven't read the manual.

      IMHO the actions to activate these modes are quite intuitive and very much like manually performed "race starts" - hold down clutch, shift in first gear, rev up engine (though you wouldn't put the pedal to the metal on a normal car of course), release clutch.

    2. Re:RTFM by JavaPriest · · Score: 1

      I was just kidding ;-)

  45. Re:manaul not (F1 is fully automatic now) by CaptnMArk · · Score: 1

    You are wrong. Since a few years ago (since Spain GP 2001), the cars are allowed to use full traction control, launch control and automatic gear changes).

    There is still an option of using manual controls, obviously. (Bad things can happen when you are in the middle of the corner and the computer thinks it would be a good idea to downshift).

    But I hope they ban these things again ASAP.

  46. Re:is this really a big deal? by devnullify · · Score: 1

    800ms to shift...jesus somebody has stick-envy. I drive the biggest piece of shit on the planet and I'm sure I can easily shift in under 200ms. Why someone would pay $3000 for this tranny, plus add the extra weight is beyond me. I'll stick to manuals.

  47. Real BMW easter egg by fstrauss · · Score: 4, Informative

    As many people have mentioned, the article here's easter egg is actually a documented feature. A real bmw easter egg however, is in the e36 models, hold 10 and 1000 buttons on the onboard computer in at the same time. You'll then be prompted for a test number. These 'tests' can display things like litres of fuel in your tank, current speed according to computer etc, which are not normally visible.
    check here for a list of what all the tests do.

    --

    ----
    Some people are good with words, others, .... erm..... ....
    1. Re:Real BMW easter egg by GoRK · · Score: 2

      There are similar features in all the OBC and OBC II BMW's.. Even my '85 735i has them. They all involve pressing some buttons at the same time and then getting some info of some sort. I use the feature that tells me the actual amount of gas in the tank all the time. It's a lot more useful than the 'range' feature. In the E23 it's not super accurate but the E36 gets it down to 1/10's of a liter.

  48. While You're Browsing . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Off topic, yes, but the other story on the Popular Science site -- about the development of nuclear bunker-busters -- is awfully interesting and awfully scary.

  49. HOW TO GET 30 MORE SHIFTS by CrazyJim0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Take the shift stick, and shift up,up, down, down, left right left right, brake, gas then turn the key.

    1. Re:HOW TO GET 30 MORE SHIFTS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how i wish i could mod this to 6

      well done

  50. Talking Montego/Maestro by Martin+S. · · Score: 4, Funny

    The talking dash version Austin Montego/Maestro had a 'Marvin Paranoid Android Mode' where it complained about the abuse it was receiving from the driver.

  51. Obligatory Microsoft Reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And now, a word from our sponsor. Remember, kids, Micro$oft is bad for you!

    I send this alasdkhsdf sdfhkjsadgh aslkfhdkljsdhaf aslkd aslkdkhsadg in order to khzshkashdf kjfskha asdhdfasjkl have your advice lkajsdkjaslkdasd love me love my goatse twin klasjdasd. I love you jonkatz ksldjflsdjg dfslkjsadjfl sldakjsladj i wish you could lakjsdkljasdj put on a show for me ksladsjdlfj with cmdrtaco and cowboyneal askljdasjdjadsl i am a lskjdfjldsj tacosnotting virgin kjdaklsjdakls please take pity on me lkjsdjalsjdlaskd.

    Received: from hotmail.com ([65.54.237.16]) by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600);
    Mon, 30 Sep 2002 02:52:11 -0700
    Received: from tomts10-srv.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.54]) by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600);
    Mon, 30 Sep 2002 01:09:24 -0700
    Received: from smtp10.on.aibn.com ([65.93.246.171])
    by tomts10-srv.bellnexxia.net
    (InterMail vM.5.01.04.19 201-253-122-122-119-20020516) with SMTP
    id ;
    Mon, 30 Sep 2002 04:13:25 -0400
    From: "Investor Notice"
    To: "News Alert"
    Subject: Obvious investment opportunity with Microsoft
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/html;
    charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    Message-Id:
    Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 04:13:27 -0400
    Return-Path: melissaxzvKD@hcei.tsc.ru
    X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Sep 2002 08:09:27.0417 (UTC) FILETIME=[B218B690:01C26858]

    INVESTMENT ALERT=

    URGENT INVESTOR NOTICE

    Microsoft recently in=
    vested =247 million dollars into
    a company called LiveMarket a=
    nd awarded them a 'Gold Partner Status'.PMIC (Nasdaq: PMI=
    C)
    recently purchased substantially all of LiveMarket'sassets= .PMIC recently attracted institutional investors with it's =24=
    70+ million dollars in revenue, over =243 million dollars cash in the ban=
    k and TWO completed acquisitions as of December 31, 2001.PMI=
    C has a VERY small share float; any significant increase in demand is li=
    kely to have a dramatic effect on share price ... NOW IS THE TIME TO =
    INVEST IN PMIC=21


    MORE Reasons to Consider PMIC:
    • D=
      ue to savvy management, 80% of PMIC's equity is from Operational profits= .
    • 34 consecutive quarters of profitability prior to tech downturn.
    • Established blue chip partners with many household names. Earned certi=
      fications from Microsoft, Cisco, Hewlett-Packard, AT&T, Intel, Novel=
      l, Nokia, Compaq and 3-COM.
    • Trades at Price/Sales ratio of just 0.15%=
      , compared to 6% for their peer group.
    • LiveMarket's software is based=
      on Microsoft's new .NET foundation.Microsoft is spending al=
      most =241 billion dollars on a =22brand awareness=22 campaign this year.
    • Recently beat a Fortune 100 company for a new long-term contract with O=
      shKosh B'Gosh.
    • Strategically located in the heart of Silicone Valley =
      in a 50,000 sq. ft. facility.


    PMIC operates in 4 different Business Division=
    s:
    1. PMIC's Computer Products Group op=
      erates through PMI and PMIGA.
    2. PMIC's E-Commerce Group Operates throug=
      h www.LiveWarehouse.com
    3. PMIC's IT Consulting and Corporate Information Systems Groups operate t=
      hrough Frontline Network Consulting, Inc.
    4. PMIC's Software Development=
      and Publishing Groups operate through Lea Publishing, Inc./DBA LiveMark=
      et.


    **READ THE RECENT PRESS REL=
    EASES ON PMIC**



    *******Important Notice and Disclaimer: Please Read*******
    Urgent Investor Notice (UIN) publishes reports providing informa=
    tion on selected companies that UIN believes has investment potential. U=
    IN is NOT a registered investment advisor or broker-dealer. This report =
    is provided as an information service only, and the statements and opini=
    ons in this report should not be construed as an offer or solicitation t=
    o buy or sell
    any security. UIN accepts no liability for any loss arising from an inv=
    estor's reliance on or use of this report. An investment in PMIC is cons=
    idered to be highly speculative and should not be considered unless a pe=
    rson can afford a complete loss of investment. UIN has not been hired by=
    Pacific Magtron International Corp. to do this profile and did not rece=
    ive any compensation, of any kind, from or on behalf of Pacific Magtron =
    International Corp. (PMIC) for this
    profile. UIN and/or its affiliates or agents have not discussed this pr=
    ofile with the management of PMIC. UIN received compensation of =248,000=
    , in cash, from a third party for the distribution of this advertisement=
    . Subsequently UIN may buy or sell shares of PMIC stock in the open mark=
    et. This report contains forward-looking statements, which involve risks=
    , and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially f=
    rom those set forth in the forward-looking statements. For further detai=
    ls concerning these risks and uncertainties, see the SEC filings of PMIC=
    including the company's most recent annual and quarterly reports.

    You ha=
    ve opted in to one or more of our affiliate sites requesting to be notif=
    ied of any special offers; this is NOT unsolicited email. If you wish to=
    unsubscribe, please send remove request to NoMoreNews=40list.ru



    **

  52. Errr by yatest5 · · Score: 1

    or you could buy a proper car, rev the engine to 8000 rpm and drop the clutch yourself.

    50 year old execs in their lame-ass pension-mobiles need not apply.

    My car, which cost 2.5k (english pounds) will nail the crap out of one of these. And I can burn rubber whenever I want :).

    --
    • Mod parent up! [a] by Anonymous Coward (Score:5) Thurs, June 31, @13:37
    1. Re:Errr by REDNOROCK · · Score: 0

      Yeah but, you drive on the wrong side of the road.

      --
      Even if I say something insightfull or inteligent, it doens't matter cause I'm an ass.
  53. pffft... holden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    suck! ford all tha way! :P BA Falcoon mate Xr6 turbo-age

  54. Here's the documentation... by mt-biker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    OK, so it's not an easter-egg, but it's still cool. Here's a description of the "racing start" and "burn-out" modes:

    http://forums.roadfly.org/bmw/forums/e46m3/forum.p hp?postid=525686&page=1

    I think this is what I like most about BMWs - they take something like a computer-controller clutch, and proceed to build in a bunch of neat features to make use of the new tech. Another example would be opening the windows and sunroof with the remote control. It's definitely a geek-thing. :)

    What I like least about BMWs? The effect that driving a BMW has on a person's road-manners.

  55. Re:"business men" only pretending anyway... by acidvoid · · Score: 1

    aaarrgghh....
    As a software engineer in Australia, this is just waaaaaaaaay out of my reach (and yes, the $141K is the australian base). Super performance with 4 seats, on a smallish wheelbase: perfect for a computer geek in Sydney. Oh to put one of these on the putty road or the old pacific highway...

  56. oops... by acidvoid · · Score: 1

    huh! funny! Netscape7 kindly remembered the old form data... heading was obviously wrong: should be something like "ooh, drool..."

  57. DeLorean Easter Egg! by jamesjw · · Score: 3, Funny


    I heard somewhere there was an easter egg hidden away in some GMC DeLoreans that enabled time travel, steps go something like:

    1. Ensure Mr. Fusion is fitted, if not source Plutonium (In order to supply 1.21 'Jigga'watts)
    2. When in front of steering wheel, enable time circuits on mid console... Be sure to check your destination date, year is correct on the dash..
    4. Check that Flux capacitor is 'Fluxing'
    5. Start driving, aparently when you hit 88 mph the easter egg will activate (indicated usually by a large flash of light) sending you back (or indeed forward) in time.

    Please note I have never done this, so i cannot verify its success. :-)

    Ok so its a lame post.. oh well..

    --
    -- If at first you don't succeed, lie!
    1. Re:DeLorean Easter Egg! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dumbass, giga should really be pronounce jiga..

  58. Not an easter egg - at least in Europe by MikeAR303 · · Score: 0

    This may be an easter egg in the US model, and I am very happy to hear that it is still possible even though BMW supposedly got rid of it in the US model. It is called "launch control" and is a feature of the SMGII transmission which is a $2500 option on the M3 starting in 2002. Basically what was said in the first article I read about it was that US drivers were too dumb to have it (and this is a very true statement). On another note, I think BMW just sold another car because of this "easter egg" - the fact that I couldn't have launch control was a main factor in me not purchasing the car when I first heard about SMGII. Very cool stuff.

    --
    This post will be modded down for no particular reason by a sweaty 14 year old who is not allowed out past dark.
  59. Maybe now there'll be some real competition by Quixote · · Score: 2

    The ``easter egg'' will be on the Bimmer's face when it tries to race against the real boys.

    1. Re:Maybe now there'll be some real competition by Guy+Schalnat · · Score: 1

      The M3 was designed for real roads. The best place to test for real roads is the Nurburgring in Germany. 14 miles, 150 turns, straights over a mile in length. 8 minutes is "supercar" territory. Bring it on. Let's see what happens when one of those so called "hot rods" has to deal with a turn. Yes, a Z06 can beat a M3. As long as you don't have more then one passenger. Otherwise, you get to go back and pick them up (and would that be a bad thing?). Ditto on the Viper. 911 Turbo? Only if the passenger is really small. Sure, BMW can make a faster car, if the didn't have to fit 4 adults in it with some reasonable trunkroom, and make it road legal, etc. But if you want to get 4 people and a trunkload of stuff from point A to point B the fastest, for only $55,000 or so, then the M3 is the only choice. -Guy

  60. Re:Again....not new & you guys are easy to imp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah well here at slashdot people think they know stuff......

    Clueless...........

  61. Re:manaul not (bad moderation) by MikeAR303 · · Score: 0

    While I can still see how people would want a 5-speed, I don't understand why the original post got troll moderation. The statement he made was both true and informative.

    --
    This post will be modded down for no particular reason by a sweaty 14 year old who is not allowed out past dark.
  62. What is this crap? by gotvim · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This is just plain stupid. Did I go to JOCKdot.org by accident?

    1500rpm will not increase the size of you pen!s'...

  63. Re:is this really a big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Test drive one (computerized manual trans aka modern automatic) and then comment. Most times when this type of tech is dismissed so quickly, the dis'er simply has a limited POV. It's known as bench racing...aka talking out yer ass and/or quoting someone else.

  64. So what? My Ford Ranger has this feature. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With my truck, this is the sequence I use to get the same effect. The sequence takes practice though.

    1) Hold clutch pedal down
    2) Put shifter into 1st
    3) Rev engine to 4000rpm
    4) Pop clutch
    5) ?????
    6) Profit

  65. Not the first! by march · · Score: 1

    BMW (if not others) have had easter eggs in their cars for some time now.

    One example is on my '99 MZ3: if you do the right things when turning on the car, you can get all the gages to move through their entire range of motion.

    Another is to play with the radio and modify internal settings. /greg

    1. Re:Not the first! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there a web site for those Z3 eggs?

  66. Dangerous by topham · · Score: 2

    These kinds of easter eggs are dangerous. I've inadvertantly triggered easter eggs in software, putting un-expected results in a car, especially this type of feature, is nuts.

  67. There was an easter egg in Ford vehicles by eXtro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's a fairly tame one, but my 1991 Ford F150 with the 6 speaker sound system had a minor easter egg in the radio. There were normally only 6 presets but if you mashed together a pair of presets at once you got access to additional presets. This always seemed to me like it had to be intentional. Whatever radio they built the plastics around had 8 memory locations, but the plastics only had room for 6 buttons. The engineers use combinations of buttons to access the additional presets rather than doing the typical thing which would priority encode them.

  68. Re:Again....not new & you guys are easy to imp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I get into my own jalopy and do a BACK/LEFT/FORWARDS/LEFT/LEFT/LEFT/RIGHT/HANDBRAKE, I assive at my local pub. Odes that count as an Easter Egg or should I try the route to the confectionery shop?

  69. A Good Reason Not To Buy A BMW by John+Hasler · · Score: 2

    Not that I could afford to anyway...

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  70. The first? by JooBYE · · Score: 0

    uh...
    Many manufactures have built cars beyond US emissions and had to "tone down" the performance. A simple ECU EPROM chip or different ECU code will remove the cap from these limits.

    I don't think the M3 is the first in this game.

  71. Re:Reptar LOVE Easter Eggs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All Hail Reptar!

    All Hail Lord Migor!!!!

  72. can't a car guy do the same?... by simpl3x · · Score: 1

    absolutely! but this is a feature! it's called flight control. how would using this feature void the warranty if it were unknown? it is hard on the transmission, which is why i am generally not fond of automatics. v8 m3, yummm!

  73. Old Mopar's by nolife · · Score: 2

    I don't think this qualifies as an easter egg or a design flaw but old Mopars (mid 60's to late 70's) had leakage through the heater blower motor that allowed you to listen to the radio without the keys.
    If you hit the brakes, turned on the turn signal, and had the heater motor on any position but off, the radio would work. My friends dad worked for a Dodge dealer in the mid 70's and we used to play around in the cars.

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    1. Re:Old Mopar's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I don't think this qualifies as an easter egg or a design flaw but old Mopars (mid 60's to late 70's) had leakage through the heater blower motor that allowed you to listen to the radio without the keys.

      Actually, it's called "American Quality of Production".

  74. fairfax article lacks details... by Gambit-x7x · · Score: 1

    it apperes to me that the article provided lacks details and recearch to support it... The M3 SMG II costs $141,500, with a manual gearbox. That's more than twice as much as the cheapest 3 Series coup well if you check out the www.kbb.com or www.bmw.com you will know that one might get coupe for $30,000 and that sound more resnoble... The engine is an in-line six of 3.2 litres capacity that puts out an almost unholy 252kW of power given there's no turbo or other signs of forced induction. got the units wrong here and M3 comes with tubrbo charger... the fact is that u can buy this car for 50,000...

    --
    Who controls the information, controls the world...
    1. Re:fairfax article lacks details... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anonymous Coward here (apparently).

      I would hazard an intelligent guess that the $141,000 dollars required to buy this car are AUSTRALIAN dollars. The fact is you can buy this car for much less than 50,000, if you're spending sterling of course!

      252 kW is a perfactly correct and accurate, if somewhat soulless and unemotional, method of measuring engine power. It is also 343 bhp (DIN), and 333 hp (SAE).

      And no M3 - not even those fancy-schmancy ones you probably get in Germany - has ever come with a turbocharger, god help us!

  75. consider by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course it depends on _why_ it stalls. The onboards can only take care of so much. The start sequence is preprogrammed for one shot, based on fuel, ambient air, position on the grid, just to mention a few. They may need to upload an altered sequence, only moments newer than the one originally intended for the start.

    There was a case last season, where this one team was tapping into the signal from the grid sensors...they shut down right when the lights go out, and one team figured out how to use this to trigger the launch control. Only problem was this was a backmarker team, and once the car got out front, it was quickly run down by the usual gang of hard chargers. This tactic was discovered by the officials and subsequently banned....nice idea, but the driver was along for the ride, and wasn't all that happy being in front of faster cars anyway.

  76. That's nothing... by IanO · · Score: 2

    The Ford Aerostar does this without any user input. I've personally witnessed three Flaming Aerostars that spontaneously combusted and I've heard of many more.

    --
    ------
    Objects in Mirror are Losing!
  77. Flood Clear feature by Yakko · · Score: 2, Informative

    The "floor the gas to turn off the fuel injectors" thing is by design. This feature is also in GM's cars (at least those which used TBI). This is known as the "flood clear" feature. Of course, if you do this while the engine isn't flooded, the car won't start.

    Apparently, when I was in USAF and the fleet had just started getting fuel-injected vehicles, airmen used to carbs were tripping this feature... so each "new" vehicle had something like "DO NOT FLOOR GAS PEDAL WHILE STARTING" on the dashboard.

    --

    --
    Me spell chucker work grate. Need grandma chicken.
  78. It's a SAD DAY by DJ+FirBee · · Score: 2, Funny

    When I need software to peel out in a BMW. WTF?

  79. Did the IQ's in the room just suddenly drop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't say he pushes a button to start the engine.

    He presses a button on the steering wheel that engages the launch sequence to start the race...the engine is already running, and he's already made a parade lap, heated the engine, etc. The laptop is to gain control over the event and update and/or download any telemetry related to the stall. If they think the launch sequence program is the culprit itself, they need the laptop to also upload a fresh copy to the car's main box on the grid...shit happens. Sheesh... everyone's an expert...no one's a pro.......get some sleep.

  80. "don't push me" by Frimlin · · Score: 1

    I'm glad James Bond isn't the only one who gets the cool car gadgets!

    But a real life "Chitty-Chitty Bang-Bang" style "don't push me" secret combination -- that ends up activating a powerful under-seat spring driven airbag -- could be the last mistake you make in a car like this... ;)

  81. Kanji (Japanese) display on Prius by mrv · · Score: 1

    If you know where the "hidden buttons" are on the LCD screen of 2001-2003 US Toyota Prius and hit them in the right combination, you can not only access an onboard diagnostic menu, but you can also change this display from the usual English into all Kanji (Japanese) characters.

    --
    -mrv
    1. Re:Kanji (Japanese) display on Prius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how how how? google turns up nothing!

    2. Re:Kanji (Japanese) display on Prius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prove it...

    3. Re:Kanji (Japanese) display on Prius by mrv · · Score: 1

      It's in the FAQ section of the toyota-prius AT yahoogroups.com list. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/toyota-prius/

      It's not all that easy to correctly hit the buttons every time, but it does work.

      The best description (with how-to and pictures) is available here: http://www.priuscar.com/diagnosis_menu_screens.htm

      Just be careful not to reset the stored error codes while you are there. The last button on the Japanese menu, if held long enough, will reset the system, so beware.

      --
      -mrv
  82. Re:Flood Clear feature...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But with properly operating injectors (TBI or common rail), you can't 'flood', so there is no flood to clear. Maybe the GM's were so poorly designed they flooded anyways?

  83. The question no one asked... by KC7GR · · Score: 2

    So what happens if you get the embedded-software equivalent of a BSOD in the transmission controller while trying this stunt?

    Hmmm... simultaneous launch of all four wheels in different directions, perhaps?

    Loud complaints and cuss-words from the onboard speech synthesizer?

    Noises that would make those in 'Chitty Chitty Bang Bang' seem reasonable?

    Oh, the possibilities! ;-)

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

  84. Why this happened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will cause the car to rev up to 4000rpm and drop the clutch (premitting burnout, which is normally impossible)

    They should never have used the word, impossible, in front of their software guys. For shame.

  85. WTF by flikx · · Score: 2

    Why should I pay $150k for a car to get the privilege to burn out??

    I've got two cars for under $5000 that can do the exact same thing any time I want. [Private/personal] cars have really went downhill in the past 30 years.

    --
    One future, two choices. Oppose them or let them destroy us.
    1. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cars have really went downhill in the past 30 years.

      So has grammar.....

  86. Its not an Easter egg by JJAnon · · Score: 0

    Its just a suggestion about how to emulate the effect of the clutch assist feature. The SMG is a pretty amazing piece of equipment, but this certainly does NOT qualify as an easter egg - its like saying jmp fff0:f000 was an easter egg in DOS.

    1. Re:Its not an Easter egg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Easter Egg is: You can increase the launch RPM from 3500rpm to 5000rpm in the European software. The US software is limited to 1500rpm.

      5000rpm v.s. 1500rpm is quite a difference.

  87. Hardly the first by tuxlove · · Score: 1

    There are lots of cars with "easter eggs". I can describe at least half a dozen with Audis that have been around for years. For example, holding down the "5" button on the stereo while turning it on reveals a hidden graphic equalizer (actually two - one for the front and one for the back).

    And so on. I'm sure easter eggs aren't limited only to Audis either.

  88. Where's 'Eurpoe'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For that matter, where's an editorial staff that knows how to spell-check? ;-)

  89. More cars have this feature than you may realize by Guppy06 · · Score: 2
    However, the procedure is a little different from the BMW.
    1. Rev engine to at least 4000 RPM
    2. Remove left foot from clutch pedal

    Viola!

    What was that? You only have an automatic transmission? You can't drive stick? Then you're up a creek where you belong. The more you let a machine control your car the less control you have and you deserve to be stuck with having to look for these silly Easter Eggs in order to wrest control from the machine to do what you want the car to do.
  90. Er... This is an Egg? by falloutboy · · Score: 2

    I used to work at a BMW dealership in the service department. When the first M3 with SMG arrived last winter, there was actually a button just aft of the shifter labelled "LAUNCH." How is this an Easter Egg?

    1. Re:Er... This is an Egg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You worked at a service department? Then you should know that the European version launches at 3500rpm. Right? Well you can enter a sequence of inputs and get the launch rpm to 5000. Yes, that is an Easter Egg.

    2. Re:Er... This is an Egg? by falloutboy · · Score: 2

      "You worked at a service department? Then you should know that the European version launches at 3500rpm. Right? Well you can enter a sequence of inputs and get the launch rpm to 5000. Yes, that is an Easter Egg."

      I worked at a service department in New York. Why would I know where the Euro version drops the clutch?

  91. You are wrong too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are right about the price details.

    But...

    The M3 is 333bhp and there is NO TURBO

  92. Yes! by ROBOKATZ · · Score: 1

    The AC-Delco radio in my 86 Nova (rebadged Corolla) had that too. I thought it was kind of weird, but couldn't figure out why they would build it to do that, because there was no way it didn't COST money to build it that way.

  93. THIS ISN'T AN EASTER EGG!!! by bmajik · · Score: 1, Redundant

    It is a well advertised, well documented feature of the SMG II transmission. It's called "launch control". It's not tricky to do, and it requires you to be in S6 mode to do it at all, afaik.

    --
    My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    1. Re:THIS ISN'T AN EASTER EGG!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is an easter egg when you can set the launch rpm from 3500 to 5000 with an UNDOCUMENTED input sequence. Remember the US version launches at 1500rpm. Just imagine 5000rpm.

  94. And more features when you got a VAG tool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, not really easter eggs but features that can be turned on/off.

    1. Re:And more features when you got a VAG tool! by tuxlove · · Score: 1

      Indeed. A friend has VAG COM installed on his laptop and he plugged it into the computer port under the steering wheel on my A4. You can monitor just about anything on the car in real time. You can also put the car through diagnostics, make the dials do weird things, etc. And, as you mentioned, you can turn on and off all sorts of features. He turned on a feature that makes the doors automatically lock when you go over 10 MPH, a feature which is normally only enabled on the higher end models. Really cool.

  95. Re:Ferrari by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ferrari has already been doing this with it's paddle shifters. The "easter egg" is available in the latest V-12 575 Maranello, and will be available in the newest Enzo(also known as the FX).

  96. No it isn't by macdaddy · · Score: 2

    I think the award for First Automotive Easter Egg definitely goes to Ford for the Pinto.

  97. Using the EE without hanging up the cell phone... by harper18 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey, any Easter egg where you don't have to use the verbal trigger "Go go Gadget Car!" is an improvement in the technology.

    --
    # Users are merely variables. I prefer to comment them out.
  98. Z3 owners don't fit the mold, thankfully by zrk · · Score: 2

    However, couples who have them tend to be emptynesters who dress alike, often color coordinated to match their car.

    Thankfully, most Z3 owners are not the uptight snobs like the rest of the bimmer drivers (trolling, flamebait, call it what you will )

    Do people consider themselves yuppies anymore? I thought that species died out right before the dotcom boom...

  99. Audi Multitronic is a CVT... by Kelmenson · · Score: 1

    However, unlike most CVTs, it is rated to handle over 200 HP... It is available coupled with the 3.0 liter engine (and the 1.8T) in the A4 and A6 (unfortunately, not coupled with quattro though. Front-drive only).

  100. Car recommendation? by SiliconEntity · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is OT but I'll ask it here because you guys seem to know a lot about cars.

    What would be a good car for a /.er who doesn't know much about cars and isn't interested in racing, but likes tech stuff? Something with a lot of cool accessories and automation? Let's say you could spend a lot, $40 or $50K. Thanks!

    1. Re:Car recommendation? by forkboy · · Score: 2

      A used Mercedes C class maybe? You can get a 2-3 year old one for about 30-40k, and they're awfully pimp. Mercedes engineers are brilliant, everything is well designed and high tech, and the car itself drives and handles well. And you can get em cheap and in good shape from all the techies who lost their jobs after getting a $600/month car payment and had to sell it.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    2. Re:Car recommendation? by Saaz · · Score: 1

      I'll second forkboy's recommendation. I've got a year-old C32 AMG (comparable to the M3 being discussed) that runs in the 50-60k USD range. I think you can get a brand new C320 for 40-45k or so, and it'll be quicker and handle better than the older model. Navigation system is pretty nifty (although I hear the Japanese ones are better), and I don't have the built-in phone and voice-recognition, but that looks pretty good if you want gadgets.

      A BMW would probably be a good choice too, I'm just a Mercedes fan.

    3. Re:Car recommendation? by OneFix · · Score: 2

      A 90's 300zx...ABS, climate control, Heated Power seats, T-Tops, Side Mirror Defrost. As a matter of fact, the reason the line was discontiuned from '97 - 2002 was because the car was no longer the "affordable sports car" it was supposed to be. But, for those that can do without ABS, the 80's 300ZX has the long hood like the earlier Z's, rather than the stubby nose that made it look like everything else on the road. Car & Driver once compared driving the Z31 (80's 300ZX) to driving a speedboat. Which is a pretty good comparison if you ask me.

      As a side note, the Z31 was designed to take ABS (There are actually connections for it), but it was removed before final production.

      The Z31 has Climate Control, Power Seats, T-Tops, etc...It's just a little older and has no ABS and no air-bags. Both the 80's and 90's Z are available in both NA and Turbo.

      For newer vehicles, the new Celica is a nice choice (go with the GT...the GTS's 6-speed has problems and the GTS Auto is slower than the 5-speed GT and superchargers/turbochargers are only available for the GT)...

      I actually sold my Z31 for a new 5-speed Celica GT...it came without a security system...I simply had a new Viper installed from a local dealer. I got a lifetime waranty (don't go to BBY or Circuit City) and I can add all kinds of components to the system if I want. Regardless of what they tell you, this does not void your warranty.

      And if you really want a speed demon, you can buy a rebuilt '90s porsche for ~20k.

      If you get leather seats, realize that you must care for them at least once a month if you want to keep them soft.

      Certainly get something with an open top (T-Tops, SunRoof, etc)...stay away from convertibles...no matter what anyone tells you, they still suck in the winter. Open tops are just fun.

    4. Re:Car recommendation? by forkboy · · Score: 2

      I think BMW lost a little class after every single dot-commer and his dog bought one. If you want to show off your money and be high tech, Mercedes all the way, with a Caddy being a distant second. (but please for the love of god, no more freakin Escalades)

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    5. Re:Car recommendation? by Guy+Schalnat · · Score: 1

      Depends on what you want. Most japanese and german cars have a huge tech following. Most of it is BS, but if you are careful, you can get some good stuff. The Focus is receiving some interesting attention also. High end cars can be more techy. Most cars have aftermarket toys that can be added on. If you want to spend $40 or $50K, then you are in BMW/Merc./Lexus/Infiniti/Acura range. First off, drive them and see what feels comfortable to you, then look on the net and see what toys you can find. Realize that you get what you pay for, and that German cars typically are more expensive and outlast their Japanese competition, if well taken care of. They are also more expensive to take care of. -Guy (2 BMW's and an Infiniti)

  101. DMC, not GMC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's DMC, not GMC. Sigh... I guess I should just be happy you spelled "delorean" correctly...

  102. Tiptronic incredible??? UGH! by Noer · · Score: 2

    I have an Audi S4, and I love it, but it's a great car with a mediocre tranny - and I have the 6-speed. The Tiptronic is still an automatic, and feels like it. It's much improved with a 'tip chip' that shortens the shift times and makes the shift points more aggressive, but it's still an automatic :/

    However, Audi's rumored to be working on a Multitronic-based "sequential manual" style tranny for the next RS4... possibly a 7-speed!

    --
    -- "Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything." -Joseph Stalin
    1. Re:Tiptronic incredible??? UGH! by tshak · · Score: 2

      Ahhh Yes, the S4... nice car but I can't afford the Insurnace/Gas/Upkeep. Of course, the RS4 or the RS6 Avant is my ultimate dream. A nice family stationwagon to a cop, yet it'll run with Porche's and Ferrari's.

      You have to admit that the Tiptronic is incredible for an automatic. Sure, 6 on the floor is always better, but for an automatic transmission it beats out many in it's class.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
  103. ummm... by Garridan · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't going "downhill" be beneficial to the speed of the cars??? *rimshot*

    *dodges tomatoes*

    seriously, though... Any "downward" movement in cars is a result of smaller, more efficient engines, thanks to governmental restrictions. The government doesn't demand a quality vehicle, it demands an efficient one. So now, cheap slow cars are all any domestic companies can make! You want speed, you go foreign. End of story.

    1. Re:ummm... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      "So now, cheap slow cars are all any domestic companies can make"
      are you a troll, or just ignorant?
      Viper
      or

      my favorite

      That just the 2 big ones off the top of my head.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  104. the REAL M3 easter egg! by webmike · · Score: 1

    for those of you with M3's:

    get in car
    hold down milage reset
    put key in ignition and turn to 2nd position (keep holding down milage reset)
    the display will change to test mode
    let off the milage reset button and hit it once, it will say 2 on the right side.
    let it sit for 2-3sec
    hit milage reset again.

    =^)... kind of neat. it wont blow up your car or anything lol.. its just kind of neat.

  105. We always enter the 70MPH freeway at about 45... by BattyMan · · Score: 1

    It's "safer" that way.

    Just like it's "safer" to walk yer bike across an intersection.

    /troll (for the humor-impaired)

    --
    Exceeding the recommended torque is not recommended.
  106. This may be due more to... by BattyMan · · Score: 1

    the fusible link in the middle of the main wiring harness, all taped together with the rest of the wires. I'm NOT kidding, I can show you where, both in the schamatics and in mine (there's a visible lump under the tape). This is a great way to burn up a van.

    --
    Exceeding the recommended torque is not recommended.
  107. Re:Coming soon to a supermarket carpark near you : by REDNOROCK · · Score: 0

    Where I live it's 10PM At the nearest Del taco (tak-ok-co). Watch out for those Irvine police! they've got nothing to do but catch abunch of teenage straightedge, hardcore, drunken, and stupid kids! All they want to do is race with reckless abandon! Danm the laws!

    --
    Even if I say something insightfull or inteligent, it doens't matter cause I'm an ass.
  108. Re:More cars have this feature than you may realiz by webmike · · Score: 1

    The launch control does not simply drop the clutch. Its a controlled slip to maximize acceleration. The launch control is simply put the fastest way to launch the m3. Because it slips the clutch to control wheelspin it does cause ALOT of wear and tear. Hence the limit on using it before your warranty is voided. The computer can more accurately control slippage and torque then any person could manually. While im a fan of using a stick, you still cant beat the computer. Having the computer do it for you isnt nearly as fun though.

  109. oOps! That should be "schematics" by BattyMan · · Score: 1

    Nothing more to see here, move along...

    --
    Exceeding the recommended torque is not recommended.
  110. Re:More cars have this feature than you may realiz by Garridan · · Score: 1

    Well, you really only have to change two things. Traction control, and the shift personality. If you don't kill the traction control (usually a good thing, IMO), it'll keep the wheels from burning out. You also have to tell the tranny to trust you, though it obviously shouldn't.

  111. If its Multitronic-based, its NOT a 7-speed... by Kelmenson · · Score: 0

    or ANY number of speeds. Multitronic is CVT. CVT is Continually Variable Transmission. If Audi is working on a sequential manual, it would not be based on the multitronic, because a sequential manual is totally different from a CVT. Also, considering that the multitronic only fits in front-drive cars, and that Audi only releases S (and RS) cars in quattro, and that the multitronic still can't handle the hp & torque of the 4.2 liter engine in the A6, there isn't much chance of the multitronic showing up in either the S4 or RS4. (However, a SMG is quite likely). And, as the owner of an S4 myself, I'd have to say the transmission is definitely better than mediocre, although definitely not perfect. The throws should be shorter, but that can easily be fixed with a shifter kit.

    1. Re:If its Multitronic-based, its NOT a 7-speed... by Noer · · Score: 2

      No. CVT is continuously variable, but typical CVT applications (multitronic included) include preset gear ratios to mimic a traditional automatic tranny - or, for that matter, a SMG. CVT can also do really cool things, like hold you at the horsepower peak (by continuously changing the gear ratio) for great acceleration.

      If Audi did an "SMG" it might actually be based on a CVT rather than a true sequential manual. They'll eventually beef up the multitronic's capabilities though.

      The S4's shifter is good once you replace it (I have a tanoga short-shift and a drivetrain stabilizer) but stock it's kinda lame.

      --
      -- "Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything." -Joseph Stalin
  112. first automotive easter egg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not exactly. It's been known for some time that with the right sequence of buttons, you can override the speed limiter in your audi. Of course, the audi engineers aren't spilling any details.

  113. This is why I drive stick exclusively by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will decide how high to rev my engine, what gear
    to use and how harshly to release the clutch, because I am the driver, not the computer.

    This is why I drive manual transmission vehicles exclusively.

    1. Re:This is why I drive stick exclusively by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear the buggy whip is making a comeback too!

  114. Re:Acceleration assist documented in manual X0X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you tell 'em boss!

  115. Undocumented features in BMWs by digitalcowboy · · Score: 2

    I sold BMWs for a few months back in the early nineties. (One of the coolest experiences of my life even though the dealership was going under and I nearly went bankrupt for the chance to play with such cool toys.) I got to be pretty good friends with the regional technical trainer (or whatever they called them) for our region. (He was a tech/engineering geek and I think he liked me because, unlike most of the salesmen, I wasn't there just to make a buck. I genuinely loved the cars and the technology and engineering that went into them.) With a name like Dietz Froelich, I figured he knew what he was talking about, too. ;-)

    Anyway, there was constant debate amongst the salesmen over whether it was fact or myth that in the 8 series, when you reached 110 mph, the windows and sunroof would close automatically (to prevent the horrendous wind buffeting in the cabin resulting from the small size and aerodynamic shape of the car's interior.) I searched all the tech documentation and found no mention so I asked Dietz to settle it for me. He merely smiled and said, "I wouldn't know. It's not documented and it's illegal to drive that fast in your country. Whenever I've driven an 8 series that fast on the Autobahn I was always smart enough to have the windows and sunroof already closed."

    So... we had an 850 on the lot that was over a year old and still never titled. (As I said, the dealership was going under.) It had to be driven every so often to keep the batteries (it has two) charged so that on the rare occasions someone was genuinely interested in it, it would start. One beautiful summer day I talked the sales manager into letting me take it to lunch. He reminded me that I would be working nearly two years at my current earnings level to pay for it and tossed me the key. (He was a pretty nervous guy by nature. I was shocked he actually let me take it.)

    Of course I immediately opened the windows and sunroof and headed out to a stretch of smooth, open country highway near the dealership.

    He nearly fainted when I came back in, threw the key on his desk and said casually over my shoulder, "The windows and sunroof thing is true."

    Man, those were the days.

    1. Re:Undocumented features in BMWs by Bill+Privatus · · Score: 1

      Sheesh, that was modded at "2"?

      I only have half a dozen stories in my life that are that good, and I'm happy to tell anyone, anywhere, any of those stories - even if they've heard it before :-)

      This is as on-topic, and as funny, as any post could be - the story was about a Beemer!

      It should have been at least a 4.

      That was a great story :-)

      I'm still smiling, thinking about moving that fast - I've done it, but a '69 Chevy Malibu was pure horse, no power windows (or power brakes or power steering or ...).

      --
      Redundancy is good; triple redundancy is twice as good! - Me.
    2. Re:Undocumented features in BMWs by digitalcowboy · · Score: 2

      Thanks for appreciating the story. That story is to me just like what you said -- one of the half dozen best stories in my life that I tell too many times and everyone's tired of hearing. Two or three of the rest of the half dozen come from that same period in my life.

      The BMW "Ride and Drive" for the salespeople when they introduced the V8 5 Series... on a closed track... with all the competitor's cars... and the guys from the Skip Barber Racing school... is probably at the top of that list.

      Another (speaking of driving fast) is the day that I drove a car as fast as I've ever been in a vehicle. I was on my way back from taking a brand new 540 (as in, "8 miles on it and the first one to hit our dealership" brand new) to show to a client that had been waiting to drive one before committing to buy. He didn't buy it, but on the way back I decided to see if I could hit the 147 mph electronic speed limiter.

      (I had already managed to hit the 128 mph speed limiter on the stock 325 of the day a couple of times. It's a weird feeling. Almost sounds and feels as if it has developed a miss as it slows the ignition firing.)

      I chickened out and never hit it, but I did almost touch 140 at 3:00 on a weekday afternoon on a (mostly vacant) urban freeway. Passing cars that are doing 60 when you are doing 135+ is surreal. I suspect it was for them as well.

      I would never do it now even given the chance, but I love the memory.

      BTW, that post was only a two because of karma -- it hasn't been moderated at all. But I don't really care about the mods or karma. I get a lot more satisfaction out of reminding you of your '69 Malibu than any karma.

      Reminiscing is one of the great pleasures in life.

      Thanks again for the great compliment.

  116. You're a retard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's see here, a 10% larger motor that makes 30% less horsepower, while getting 10% better mileage? Um... I'll still take the M3 because it also has real brakes, and real chassis and suspension tuning. It doesn't matter how much power you add to the Intrepid, it'll still handle like crap. Motor isn't the only ingredient in a great performance car. My ex girlfriend had a 2001 and it SUCKED. Lots of shop time under warranty, poor, no, BAD handling, and the motor sounds like a coffecan full of marbles. Puuuulease! This wasn't a thread about crappy cars. Leave it alone...

  117. Old news, still scary by QuantumWeasel · · Score: 1

    I don't even want to think about what a disgruntled programmer could do to my car. And just wait until all our cars are "wired" for 'net. Hacking really could become a matetr of life and death.

  118. Re:Australian Salaries by aebrain · · Score: 2

    As a software engineer in Australia, this is just waaaaaaaaay out of my reach
    Yes, but at least you have a job. OK, so it's at $50k US or less (probably a lot less, maybe $30k if you've less than 5 years of experience). But at least it means Australian Software Engineers are competitive price-wise with Sri Lanka and India. We're still undercut by Ukraine and China though.

    Like most Software people here in Oz, we could get 3x as much in the US or Europe. But that would mean leaving Australia - and I for one don't think it's worth it (having done 5 years in Germany, the US etc).

    --
    Zoe Brain - Rocket Scientist
  119. Unlimited Ammo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really? I thought it was IDDQD :)

  120. What you really need is... by kaladorn · · Score: 2

    ... the hack that clears the counter that tracks how many times you've done this. :)

    --
    -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
  121. Hallelujah by kaladorn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't have one of the rice-rockets or one of the various expensive eurosports coupes or sedans. Just a plain old Mustang with a 4.6 and a 5 speed (and only a mediocre rear end at 3.27) and no gotterdamerung ABS. But it's a hell of a lot of fun to drive hard and a bit of a challenge to handle winding down nice backwoods roads.

    Sure, I could have a faster gearbox, an OEM supercharger, a lower ratio rear end, a dropped and tunable suspension, etc. (And I suppose I'd enjoy the 5.4L engine...)

    But the fun of driving the car is in seeing what you can do with the hardware available. The skill of the driver isn't in having the most expensive hardware, its making the best use of the available hardware.
    And having fun!

    --
    -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
  122. Yeah, nice car but.... by kaladorn · · Score: 2

    But being a "yank," and no disrespect to the Europeans, I like this [link to viper] better. And yeah, it's got a real clutch. :-D

    Yeah, the Viper's kinda nice. A clutch, some serious rubber on the road, some cubes under the hood, and a roaring powerhouse of an engine.

    But having said all that, it *is* still a Dodge.....

    --
    -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
  123. Manaul? definitely not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering your clumsy typing of "manual", _and_ your incorrect use of the term "[sic]" which is meant only to denote an error in quoted material, I'd say that a stickshift is probably a little too difficult for you to handle. Stick to walking and chewing gum at the same time.

  124. i HATE my BMW Z3 by mbstone · · Score: 1

    Yeah, maybe a little offtopic but you need to be warned. My wife, bless her heart, bought me a Z3. I HATE, HATE, HATE the thing. The performance is OK but I get a terrible BACKACHE every time I occupy the car for more than 20 minutes or so. Who TF designed this piece of sludge. My legs, knees, and feet are butt up against hardwood. The seat doesn't go back. I would never tell my wife -- but Gawd I wish I hadn't let her talk me in to trading in my comfy (and 1/2 as expensive) '93 5.0 Mustang!!

    1. Re:i HATE my BMW Z3 by Guy+Schalnat · · Score: 1

      If you sit the back of the seat up a bit (more vertical), the seat will go back further (it goes DOWN too). Play around with the controls. Hardly anybody gets it right the first time, but you'll get it. Last time I sat in a Mustang, I could NOT get comfortable. Different cars for different drivers. I was actually going to buy a new Mustang, but I hated the seats. In particular the headrests. I like having my head rest against something in the back when I drive, and I could not get it to work on the Mustang. Who designed... No nevermind. Fact is, there is no way you can design one seat that fits everyone well for a reasonable price. BMW has their targets, Ford has theirs. Given a choice, I would have got the Mustang and replaced the seat, but I was planning on competing in it, and I wasn't allowed to do that under the rules. -Guy

  125. Re:More cars have this feature than you may realiz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Why does having an automatic transmission limit you? Just
    • 1.Rev engine to at least 4000 RPM
    • 2.Drop Transmission from Neutral to Drive
    • Viola!

    What was that?

    Unless you're now screaming down the road under full power, that sound is your transmission hitting the tarmac!-))

  126. Audi speed limiter can be disabled, but how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Modern Audis, like the A6, S6, and RS6, A4, S4, etc, have a feature that allows the driver to disable the upper speed limiter (typically 130 mph for an A6, higher for S6, and rediculously high for an RS6). I believe one uses the radio and/or the trip computer stalk.

    Does anyone know how?

  127. And Yes, he works for Microsoft by serutan · · Score: 2

    and got his first stock a month before Win3 was released.

  128. Re: Australian Salaries by acidvoid · · Score: 1

    Yes, we can always leave... I spent a SHORT time in the US, and on return I was praising Sydney's previously-too-humid air! :) I'm originally from Holland, and am now having a hard time thinking of living anywhwere else but Australia (in my case Sydney).
    Anyway, different topic... might be interesting.

  129. Re:Manaul? definitely not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's it....when you can only attack the person in order to make yourself stand out in a crowd, I'm sure we'll all react w/awe.

    Is that the best you can do? C'mon....try again...I can take it. Go ahead...take another shot.

  130. S2000 Easter Egg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    My Honda S2000 has an easter egg: In the US if you take it to the track several times and drive it at around 120+ mph, either the engine or the transmission will fail, because unlike in Europe, where Honda considers it normal to drive fast, in the US they have not issued the same recall to replace the oil banjo bolts and spicket/valve in the transmission. Sounds like Europeans bought a different car- one that you can drive like a sports car.

    Oh, and it has the disable ABS feature too like the Acura NSX (built in the same plant). Pull the emergency brake and rev the engine for a while to disable ABS.

  131. '86 Buick Riviera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A friend of mine has an '86 Buick Riviera. It has a CRT touch screen in the dash that controls the stereo, climate, extra gauges, trip computer, etc.

    It also has a hidden diagnostic mode accessed by pressing a combination of buttons when it's in climate control mode. It lets you access the engine and body control computers, where you can do things like look at trouble codes, the status of various sensors, etc. You can change the torque converter lockup strategy and some other powertrain behavior.

    One time he had trouble with the dome lights flickering, sure enough the body computer had stored a code for the dimmer switch in the dash working erratically. A few weeks ago he test-drove a similar car, which he knew to avoid because the diagnostics computer showed that the engine had overheated in the recent past.

    Pretty cool stuff, especially coming from GM over 15 years ago!

  132. Re:It's a HAPPY DAY by Guy+Schalnat · · Score: 1

    Ah. You need to turn OFF software to peel out in a BMW. Blame it on our Litigation happy world. On the other hand, if you want to launch to the best of the car's ability, faster then you could by yourself, then you need computers to help. The drag racers know that peeling out is the last think you need to do to launch quickly. Watch a drag race sometime. When they mess up, they "go up in smoke". When you see no tire smoke, they launch correctly. Now, BMW allows you to have one of those E-Ticket rides without the fancy drag tires. Just tell the computer to do it. A drag racer has to replace $5,000 worth of parts for one 5 second run. You get 15 or so starts before you need a new clutch. Computers sometimes are actually useful... -Guy

  133. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    When the Apple IIc was introduced, the informative copy led off with a couple
    of asterisked sentences:

    It weighs less than 8 pounds.*
    And costs less than $1,300.**

    In tiny type were these "fuller explanations":

    * Don't asterisks make you suspicious as all get out? Well, all
    this means is that the IIc alone weights 7.5 pounds. The power
    pack, monitor, an extra disk drive, a printer and several bricks
    will make the IIc weigh more. Our lawyers were concerned that you
    might not be able to figure this out for yourself.

    ** The FTC is concerned about price fixing. You can pay more if
    you really want to. Or less.
    -- Forbes

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...