Slashdot Mirror


ATi's All In Wonder Radeon 9700 Pro

FlippedBit writes "ATi has taken the wraps off their latest Swiss Army Knife 3D Graphics Card with TV Tuner and Remote Control capabilities, that rival most discrete solutions. The All In Wonder Radeon 9700Pro packs a ton of A/V features and is driven by their new R300 VPU. HotHardware has a look at this new beast and all its bells and whistles, right here."

92 of 250 comments (clear)

  1. So where's the Mac version? by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I hate to sound like a whiner, but this card would be perfect on my Mac. Between my game reviews, this would do it all - render by OS X games great, for my console reviews I could plug the svideo cables in for screenshot captures right to Quicktime/iMovie video.

    At the moment I ue a Formac Tevion, which works well through the Firewire, but as someone who believes that less hardware is better, ATI should really think about making a Mac version of this card. I can't imagine it would be all that hard - the hardware is AGP on both platforms, so it would just be someone at ATI writing some OS X drivers for this device.

    Not sure if anyone else cares about this, but I've been annoyed by ATI's lack of good video capture tools on the Mac since - well, since I started using Mac's in February of this year.

    1. Re:So where's the Mac version? by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      Your right, this card is Perfect for the MAC. ATI seems to write better MAC drivers than Windows. I'm seeing alot of bugs on websites for the 9700 and games. It looks like the new patches/files coming out, most are for the 9700.

      I was hoping ATI would get the drivers in order for the release. My friends who bought the 9700's, loved the speed with AA, but some games (UT2K3 Demo has problems, fixed with the newest patch..)

      But what I really want for video in, is a divx/mpg4 capture device (card or firewire).
      -

      Bernie Ebbers, the former chief executive of WorldCom, and four other telecoms executives who allegedly made a total of $28.2m (£18m) by "profiteering" in hot initial public offerings were sued last night by New York state.

    2. Re:So where's the Mac version? by benh57 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, you're in luck. (maybe). According to Think Secret, ATI is developing an All-In-Wonder card for the mac.

    3. Re:So where's the Mac version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I hate to sound like a whiner

      It's alright. Most Mac users are whiners.

    4. Re:So where's the Mac version? by Gizzmonic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What about flashing the ROM of a PC ATi Card? Does anyone know how to do this? It used to work on PC Voodoo cards...PCI versions would be especially cool. I'm looking for a second video card, natch...

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    5. Re:So where's the Mac version? by BitGeek · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Yeah, it had to be because steve jobs is a petulant child-- it couldn't be because NVIDIA wanted the business and made it worth Apple's while, or because NVIDIA is shipping better products (A lead that changes periodically,) or any other of a dozen business reasons. No, it couldn't have been that.

      It must be becuase steve jobs is a petulant child and was mad that ATI mentioned the iMac 1 day before it was released.

      Yeah, that must be it.

      Just because so many kiddies online are so emotional about things, steve jobs must be super sensitive as well. Yeah, thats it. Like he really cares about that kind of crap.

      What he DOES care about is quality products, and if anything, THAT was the reason Apple switched to NVIDIA.

      Sheesh. Why do people believe such rumors?

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    6. Re:So where's the Mac version? by BitGeek · · Score: 2



      Why don't you get a Firewire DV bridge? Granted they don't support HDTV, but the DV format represents SD rather well. The formac studio dv/tv has a tuner built in, and cheaper products take composite and SVideo.

      I have it on good authority that there will be a software PVR to make use of such devices soon enough....

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    7. Re:So where's the Mac version? by evilviper · · Score: 2

      You want to complain about lack of ATI tools on Mac??? Tell you what, come over to FreeBSD, and see the utter lack of a single option... See ATI video cards with TV/SVideo out capabilities that go totally unused...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    8. Re:So where's the Mac version? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 2, Funny

      no no, that's WINNERS

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    9. Re:So where's the Mac version? by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2

      Never mind the Mac version, where's the Linux version? The list of included software sounded suspiciously Windowsy. Will there be free drivers for this card?

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    10. Re:So where's the Mac version? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2

      I can't imagine it would be all that hard - the hardware is AGP on both platforms, so it would just be someone at ATI writing some OS X drivers for this device.

      HA HA HA HA HA HA!

      Oh, that's rich, suggesting that ATI would make an effort to provide drivers for anyone beyond the greatest common denominator!

    11. Re:So where's the Mac version? by BitGeek · · Score: 2


      Yeah that was flamebait. Why is it people think they can just make up whatever crap they want about apple and people will believe it?

      Oh yeah, because there's a lot of bigots out there who will.

      You cant even remember the show, and what steve said was "Mcirosoft, just doesn't have a sense of style" Nothing about him having en emotional problem.

      The G4 Cube had no quality problems that I've ever heard of-- in fact, people who have one love them. They're quite a following. Unforutnately it didn't sell well, but that says nothing about its quality, just its popularity.

      ARe you really so stupid you believe what you're shovelling?

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    12. Re:So where's the Mac version? by BitGeek · · Score: 2


      Damn, even your references suck. Both point to articls about Steve Jobs getting apple back on track financially. Nothing about being a petulant child at all.

      But then, something tells me you're of the group who will spend twice as much money on a machine that performs half as well as a macintosh and think that you got a better deal on a faster machine. You're irrational to begin with.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    13. Re:So where's the Mac version? by shepd · · Score: 2

      >Why is it people think they can just make up whatever crap they want about apple and people will believe it?

      I didn't author any of those links. Sorry you seem to think the entire world is against you (including PBS).

      >The G4 Cube had no quality problems that I've ever heard of

      Please search the web a little, and/or read more magazines, or talk to more people. Your choice.

      I'll provide you with some G4 Cube problem links:

      One
      Two
      Three - Admittance from Steve Jobs himself that G4 Cubes don't have the quality users expect from Apple
      Four
      Five

      And so on. It doesn't matter if they were cracks or mold lines -- either way they show a lack of quality assurance. If this were my car and Apple said "Oh, those ripples on the bodywork are just caused by the type of paint we used" I'd still say it stinks.

      >ARe you really so stupid you believe what you're shovelling?

      Are you so blinded by your mac fanatacism that you can't admit Apple could have made mistakes in its engineering of the G4 Cube?

      >You cant even remember the show, and what steve said was "Mcirosoft, just doesn't have a sense of style"

      You can't remember the part where he ignores Woz, his partner, for the company. A total lack of sympathy is an emotional problem, IMHO.

      Not to mention the Newton thing -- what's your excuse for that? Or did you skip over it because you have no answer and are again blinded by Mac zealotry?

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    14. Re:So where's the Mac version? by BitGeek · · Score: 2

      But the company ISN'T on track financially. They're on Microsoft (R) brand life support.


      You're such an idiot. apple is the only profitable computer company.

      It isn't on "life support" from Mcirosoft-- hell mcirosoft office isn't even selling well on the Mac. Not because there aren't Macs out there, but because people don't care about office anymore.

      Yes, actually, the iBook beats your celeron and costs less.

      Like I said, you're a bigot, you don't care about the facts, you're just going to rant and rave.

      You probably think Microsoft bougth a big chunk of apple with that "investment" of $150Million...

      Sheesh.

      I understand why slashdot readers are linux fans, but do they have to be so stupid? Where are the programmer,s the people who can recompile their kernel? The people with basic computer architecture knowledge? Buying a machine with a celeron is like buying a PowerPC 603-- EG: A Mac laptop of about 1996 vintage would beat your celeron in a laptop. PC laptops (non-transmeta anyway) are particularly hobbled due to the x86 really high power draw.

      You talk about truth and zeolotry? Get a fucking education first, man. When you understand the words I'm using, then you can talk about truth.

      --
      Yeah, and you guys panned the ipod too: http://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/23/ 1816257
    15. Re:So where's the Mac version? by shepd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You've made it clear you are illiterate, since you refuse to read my links.
      Therefore you aren't worth my time.
      Go back to highschool, illiterate Mac Zealot.
      Shame on you for using your lack of reading skills against me.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    16. Re:So where's the Mac version? by evilviper · · Score: 2

      Yeah, Windows is so great... I just love it when I plug my AGP video card into my AMD system, and bring Windows crashing down, permanently. Or there's that whole thing about the video capture being distorted, and there's nothing to be done about it. Or more fun is Windows spontaneously committing suicide and corrupting it's own system files for no reason.

      Besides, getting down and dirty is for Linux users. The BSDs actually work.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  2. Fantastic! by cybercomm · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is great progress for ATI, especially considering the weakness of it's main competitior in "home cinema" field...

    Now if they could just get some **decent** drivers to go with this card (catalyst is a great step towards the goal, dont get me wrong, but ATI has always been a little weak in driver field)

    --
    Live for the present, learn from the past, and dream of the future!
  3. Seems nice by skydude_20 · · Score: 2

    but its just hard to justify wanting this until Doom III is out and we all know exactly what works well with it.
    but then again, like they say
    If ATI were a Winston Cup NASCAR, we'd say that the company is efficiently firing on all eight cylinders.

    so it better work cuz this is good stuff...

    --
    Jesus saves souls and redeems them for valuable cash prizes
  4. more reviews here... by Maditude · · Score: 5, Informative

    Anandtech has a review and TechReport as well .

    1. Re:more reviews here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If people are going to start telling the truth around here, then I'm going to bed.

  5. Looks interesting by yobbo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The performance on these things is fantastic. Of course, being the cruel world it is, ATI's linux drivers prevent me from even considering purchasing a card. I'll wait for NV30, thank you.

    1. Re:Looks interesting by Accipiter · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's too bad, because I was looking for another 3D card to buy for my system.

      After asking around what options there were for good 3D support under Linux, I bought an nVidia GeForce 4. Problem is, I'm having some severe issues with it. Running anything OpenGL that has some intense rendering (Return to Castle Wolfenstein, for instance) will do one of two things: 1) cause X to lock up, flashing Scroll Lock and Caps Lock at me once every second, or 2) spontaneously reset my machine. Obviously, this is not a good thing, and I'm actually quite disappointed.

      It appears to be something deeper than a driver issue, though, as I get RTCW to crash under Windows in the exact same manner, and under the exact same conditions as under Linux. (Windows bluescreens, while X locks up.) I've tried Quake3, RTCW, and other simple OpenGL apps (glxgears, fsv, etc.), and all cause my machine to shit itself.

      It's not a problem with the card, either, as I bought two separate GeForce4 cards from two different manufacturers, and both had the exact same issues. Plus, my system doesn't contain any backwoods generic parts; Intel SE440BX-2 Motherboard, PIII Processor.

      I just don't get it. It's a shame, too, because my previous card (3dfx Voodoo3) was a pain in the ass to get working with 3D in Linux. I e-mailed nVidia and posted a message to their forums, both of which have gotten me no replies.

      I can't recommend nVidia at this time, and I've heard worse things about ATI's Linux support. Since Linux is my primary OS (I only installed Windows to test out the above scenario), I honestly don't know what to do.

      --

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
      (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

    2. Re:Looks interesting by Accipiter · · Score: 2

      The problem with that theory is that the FAQ answer is stating that if you're using a processor with a 133 MHz FSB, that's when your AGP speeds get out of whack and off-spec. My PIII is running at 100 MHz.

      In any event, this may be a problem anyway. The GeForce card I have is a 2x/4x AGP card, while the motherboard caps AGP at 2x. The card may simply be having trouble bussing down to 2x on this particular rig. Who knows.

      --

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
      (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

    3. Re:Looks interesting by Accipiter · · Score: 2

      1. I haven't tried that; it's a single slot board. I'll check it out.
      2. RTCW didn't crash at all with my Voodoo3.
      3. Thanks.

      --

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
      (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

    4. Re:Looks interesting by Accipiter · · Score: 2

      If your problem is occurring across os platforms, then it's probably not an os, driver, or software issue. Since it happens in other opengl games, it's not a particular game issue. Since it's more than one card, it's not a faulty card.

      These were my exact assumptions as well.

      Heat was considered and quickly dismissed, as my case has adequate cooling - dedicated processor fan, dedicated video card fan, and a large rear case fan. I did not, however, even consider the power issue. I recently bought a new case with a 300W power supply, so if all else fails, perhaps I'll check that route. Thanks.

      --

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
      (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

    5. Re:Looks interesting by Accipiter · · Score: 2

      My BIOS doesn't have these selections for AGP, but I did attempt to monkey with the AGP settings via the nVidia driver. Nothing helped, really.

      On top of everything, X takes 18 seconds to initialize video with this card. It's depressing.

      --

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
      (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

    6. Re:Looks interesting by cobar · · Score: 2

      Make sure the agp ratio is set to 2/3. You can probably choose to run at 2/3 or 1/1. If you're at 1/1 you're running the card at 100mhz instead of the spec'ed 66mhz and the card can't handle that.

      Other things to try which you may have done already:
      Set:
      Options NVAGP "0"
      to disable AGP.
      Run distributed.net or some other stress tester overnight (preferrably 2 copies at once to maximize context switching and cause OS crashes quickly) to ensure you aren't having some sort of cpu heat related issue. If it's not the video card, it has to be some other aspect of the setup. Your most likely culprit is heat, followed by a bad or inadequate power supply.

    7. Re:Looks interesting by Accipiter · · Score: 2

      Indeed, I've screwed with the NvAGP settings serveral times, all with no luck. Plus, I've had the distributed.net client running continuously on this box for about three years. Granted, it was a single copy, but CPU heat has never exceeded tolerence levels. (I have an external LCD screen with temperature monitoring. The CPU hovers at around 95-100 degrees Fahrenheit.)

      As I mentioned here, heat was briefly considered, but there is good cooling in my case. I also mentioned that I hadn't considered the power supply, and that could very well be the problem. That'll be my last attempt at a solution before I return the card.

      Thanks for the suggestions.

      --

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
      (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

    8. Re:Looks interesting by Accipiter · · Score: 2

      Forgive my ignorance, but where is the AGP ratio set?

      --

      -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
      (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

    9. Re:Looks interesting by dinivin · · Score: 2


      Too bad the nVidia's driver aren't stable under Linux on my machine.

      Dinivin

    10. Re:Looks interesting by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 2
      I did not, however, even consider the power issue. I recently bought a new case with a 300W power supply, so if all else fails, perhaps I'll check that route. Thanks.

      I had some real problems with my GeForce 2 MX card in an ASUS P5A motherboard until I reduced the power drain by unplugging some things (e.g. floppy, CD-R/W, etc.). That improved stability a lot.

      I just got a new 300W power supply last night. Once I get it installed, we'll see if I can both play games and burn CDs on the same machine...

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
  6. Warning to all males by Schik · · Score: 5, Funny

    Beware - owning this will be a DEAD giveaway that you have a very, very tiny penis.

    1. Re:Warning to all males by OrangeSpyderMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Too true, I've heard girls really go for infected penis.

      --
      Try NetBSD... safe,straightforward,useful.
    2. Re:Warning to all males by Cyno01 · · Score: 2

      AIW cards are hardly hidden, all these outputs they mention, aren't on the card, there are only like 2 or 3 outputs on the card iself and you plug some crazy cables into them

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    3. Re:Warning to all males by n3bulous · · Score: 2

      Actually, there is some kook psychologist. mentioned in my friend's textbook in college, who has a theory that all people who have fixations on technological whozawhatzits are necropheliacs...

      --
      "The area of penetration will no doubt be sensitive." ~ Spock
    4. Re:Warning to all males by tgd · · Score: 2

      So what does it mean if I'm still using an Mach32 card?

  7. Whoa... by fireboy1919 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Games. And TV.

    The latest All-in-Wonder Value edition has the thing they've been missing: beer. Yes, it actually has a small microbrewery/breakout box, so that your computer can be all that you need; it even does it by remote control.

    The full package includes an IV breakout box from which cola is fed interveinously (and blood removed), effectively eliminating any and all need to leave the computer for any reason whatsoever.

    The next edition is expected to be fully sentient, allowing those eccentric geeks who feel the need for friendship (for some strange reason). This new edition will be dubbed "All-in-Wonder: Heroin Edition," crediting the fact that heroin users want for nothing but the drug, just as All-in-Wonder users should want nothing else.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    1. Re:Whoa... by Zemran · · Score: 2

      I cannot find where to attach the catheter ???

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  8. Video Recorder by atrus · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I was struck by this phrase from the review:

    Should you be interested in a particular word or phrase from a captured show, you can search the close captioned database and playback will begin at the section of the stream.

    That feature makes my day :) Kudos to ATI for adding something useful to the video recorder program.

    1. Re:Video Recorder by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 2

      The Quicktime format has this ability as well. It takes a bit of tweaking, but it can be very effective for searching for certain terms inside an instructional video for instance.

  9. It's neat to have, but...... by FaasNat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a cool gadget to have on the computer with the instant replay/time shifting Tivo-like capabilities and it's there on my list of "toys" to have. However, I don't think sitting at a desk in front of a computer with a TV tuner card and a monitor will be able to replace the comfort and convenience of plopping down on the couch to watch TV.

    --
    There's never enough when you have too little
    1. Re:It's neat to have, but...... by Com2Kid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      However, I don't think sitting at a desk in front of a computer with a TV tuner card and a monitor will be able to replace the comfort and convenience of plopping down on the couch to watch TV.


      Then do what I did, get a large monitor (or a good quality TV), hook it up to secondary output , and shove a couch in your computer room.

    2. Re:It's neat to have, but...... by Osty · · Score: 2, Interesting

      However, I don't think sitting at a desk in front of a computer with a TV tuner card and a monitor will be able to replace the comfort and convenience of plopping down on the couch to watch TV.

      Agreed. And here's the answer: a VGA to Component transcoder. Use that HD-compatible TV as a monitor for your computer. Now the only issue is whether or not ATI has added better custom resolution support for the 9700. The 7500 AIW I have sucks quite hard, as I can't get a custom resolution that gets rid of excessive overscan. nVidia can do it, so why can't ATI?


      And as long as I'm making a wishlist, how about somebody make a VIVO card that accepts HD signals via YPrPb component input? I'd pay good money for that.

    3. Re:It's neat to have, but...... by broller · · Score: 2

      However, I don't think sitting at a desk in front of a computer with a TV tuner card and a monitor will be able to replace the comfort and convenience of plopping down on the couch to watch TV.

      Um, that's sort of the point of getting an All-In-Wonder over just a plain TV capture card. Since the card also has TV-OUT you can just run your cable to the room with the TV in front of the couch and watch there.

    4. Re:It's neat to have, but...... by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 2

      Actually the Radeon 9700 Pro comes with a standard set of component cables (feed off the TV-out) that can work at 480i/480p/720p/1040i on a TV capable of receiving HD resolutions.

      The overscan issue seems to have been from the cable conversion the AIW Radeon 8500's had & the fact your using a non-Ati device to do the same on a AIW Radeon 7500.

      Unfortunately thier is still no component in though... I could make use of that as well...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
  10. More powerfull than my graphics card by AstroMage · · Score: 2, Funny

    Gnashes his teeth and tears his hear out...
    Aaarrrggghhhh, only 3 months after I bought my latest and greatest GC, yet another one comes out which is better. I'm becoming obsolete... Sinking into oblivion... Nnnnnnnoooooo......!
    ;-)

    1. Re:More powerfull than my graphics card by larien · · Score: 2

      Wow, a whole 3 months before you became obsolete? Damn, you must have been ahead of the game when you got your last card!

    2. Re:More powerfull than my graphics card by NeuroManson · · Score: 2

      Dude, everyone knows the moment you cut the umbilical cord, you're three months obsolete!

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  11. Yep by bogie · · Score: 2

    you said it. If you need 3D ATI gets ruled out. Its too bad, since this weekend I could have bought a ATI 8500LE 128MB for only $99 at Compusa, but knowing that I'd like the option to be able to play UT2003 or Doom III when it comes out, I'm going to be spending $40 more and buying a GF4 4200.

    What ever happened to that project funded by the weather channel to make a DRI driver? When its done is anyone even going to be buying these cards anymore?

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    1. Re:Yep by chefren · · Score: 5, Informative

      The DRI-project have 3d-support available in CVS and binary snapshots with semi-friendly installers available. I'm using a snapshot now. Remember that this is not yet stable code (whatever that means). Look for 'r200' snapshots on their download page.

    2. Re:Yep by chefren · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, it means that if I leave an OpenGL screensaver running while going away for a few hours, I am greeted by the lilo boot menu (i have no timeout) when I come back. Nothing in the logs, the machine just reboots it seems. Also using Xv in mplayer results in a black box that won't go away until I start another Xv app, like xawtv which works well. If you just need Xv, go for the gatos project instead (better Xv, no 3d).

    3. Re:Yep by nihilogos · · Score: 3, Informative

      What ever happened to that project funded by the weather channel to make a DRI driver? When its done is anyone even going to be buying these cards anymore?

      You can download the source for a beta here. The cvs files are updates regularly. I think there is a binary somewhere on the Tungsten Graphics site.

      --
      :wq
  12. Two words... by Loki_1929 · · Score: 2

    Stable drivers?

    --
    -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
  13. huh...Is it an advert by tanveer1979 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "If ATI were a Winston Cup NASCAR, we'd say that the company is efficiently firing on all eight cylinders. The Mobility RADEON 9000 rules the mobile market, the well publicized RADEON 9700 Pro delivers the best performance to gaming enthusiasts, and the RADEON 9000 Pro is a solid mainstream card. Further, ATI's latest round of hardware has been complimented by relatively stable drivers - a first, as far as the gaming community is concerned."

    This is kind of irresponsible journalism, the reviewer has simply lost the objectiveness, and the article seems to be biased, infact heavily biased.I know many wouldnt agree and swear by ATi, its not about ATI being good or bad, its about over hyping a product.

    Infact while reveiw, the whole commentry is manufacturers spec sheet. Where are the facts buddy!!? No comparison, as if it were the only card in the market?

    I am sure it must be a good card but we need hard specs actual figures, not sensationalist journalism.

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
    1. Re:huh...Is it an advert by ottffssent · · Score: 2
      Infact while reveiw, the whole commentry is manufacturers spec sheet. Where are the facts buddy!!? No comparison, as if it were the only card in the market?


      It might as well be the only card on the market. Is there anything even *close* to the performance and featureset of the AIW 9700? Does any other company have the same reputation for quality in this segment that ATI has? As far as I have seen, the answer to both questions is a resounding no, yet one single company has managed to combine both into a storied series of outstanding products.

      I'm starting to sound like an ATI ad myself, but your objections seem totally out of line. You want specifications? Read the numerous Radeon 9700 - that part of the card is identical. And what specifications would satisfy you as regards the AIW features of the card? The review discusses both hardware and software in this area, and I expect the product will be as shiny and glowing as the review was. You want benchmarks or something? How would you propose benchmarking a TV card? You're pretty much stuck at 29.97 fields per second (or 25 for PAL), no matter what you do.
    2. Re:huh...Is it an advert by steveha · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It may be a little over the top, but he is correct.

      ATI's Radeon 9700 is faster than anything current from nVidia. (nVidia will ship something soon that takes first place back, probably, but right now ATI has the hottest board.)

      And that last part is almost damning with faint praise: "after years of sucking, the ATI drivers are less sucky than formerly." His actual words: "relatively stable". Compared to ATI's older drivers, "relatively stable" is high praise.

      So his point was simply that at the moment ATI has their ducks in a row. And they do. I hope they keep it up. (And I also hope nVidia keeps up what they are doing.)

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  14. don't forget firing squad. by leuk_he · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They also have a preview. (which is as good as most reviews)

    The conclusion, just point to any tech site and you will find a review.

  15. but you're not by Trepidity · · Score: 2, Funny

    You post on Slashdot, after all.

  16. Bad drivers.... BAAAAAD! by Zakabog · · Score: 5, Funny

    If ATI were a Winston Cup NASCAR, we'd say that the company is efficiently firing on all eight cylinders.

    Jeez, if the Radeon was a car, it'd beat all the other car's in 1/4 mile times and top speed, but in a 500 lap race, at lap 200, the paint would peal, the doors would fall off, and the engine would fall out.

    Further, ATI's latest round of hardware has been complimented by relatively stable drivers - a first, as far as the gaming community is concerned.

    I hope they mean a first, as in, first time ATI released relatively stable drivers. What bother's me though is "Relatively stable drivers." well, stable in relation to what? In relation to a blind man balancing a chair on his nose while juggling chainsaws?

    1. Re:Bad drivers.... BAAAAAD! by tunah · · Score: 2
      Jeez, if the Radeon was a car, it'd beat all the other car's in 1/4 mile times

      Nah, the drivers suck. It would probably crash.

      --
      Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
    2. Re:Bad drivers.... BAAAAAD! by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 2

      In relation to the crappy drivers Nvidia makes... I used to own Nvidia based cards exclusively and the have a number of problems just like Ati! What a shock! With all the fanboys claiming Ati's drivers suck and all you'd think they somehow had it better...

      But no, in reality neither card has perfect drivers (I mean come on how many driver revisions has Nvidia had in total?)... In fact I don't think perfect drivers will ever exist in the life of the product... Sure Nvidia's drivers do certain things better (OpenGL support for modeling apps comes to mind), but Ati's drivers do a range of things that Nvidia's cards don't (like just about every single card has TV-out, or how about more MPEG2 decoding capability)...

      Lets all face reality: no drivers for any video card company are perfect.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    3. Re:Bad drivers.... BAAAAAD! by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 2

      Could you be more wrong?

      It used to be maybe a little more complex than it is now, but All Radeon cards use the catalyst drivers (even the 9700 Pro). But even back a generation all Radeon's still used the same drivers (my Radeon 64MB VIVO & my Radeon 8500LE have always used the same drivers). This is more amazing than you seem to think since cards like the 9700 Pro aren't evolutionary, but rather revolutionary (the underlying architecture has changed rather than an update to certain components of the chips)... So far all chips by Nvidia have been evolutionary (arguably since the TNT, unarguably since the Geforce 256), yes it's amazingly hard to have a single drivers for related hardware using an almost identical architecture... Please...

      Again neither is perfect neither is horrible... Go take your fanboyness elsewhere...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
  17. The tuner is nice but.... by Technician · · Score: 2

    Will it do digital TV? HDTV over the air? Analog is scheduled to go off the air. What good is a tuner if there is nothing to receive?

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
    1. Re:The tuner is nice but.... by Technician · · Score: 2

      Nobody is throwing out the old gear because there is an extreme shortage of new gear. (Something with a DTV tuner) Everything not home theatre is analog only. I know. I've been looking. I have yet to find any store demonstrating DTV with a real over the air signal. All the display TV's are either Digital HDTV dish, or analog. They are never over the air DTV. How can they sell it if they don't demo it?

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  18. Re:So where's the Mac version? Just try ! by nick-less · · Score: 3, Informative

    Acording to this Site flashing a new BIOS to use PC cards in a Mac is mostly harmless (tried it myself with geforce)

  19. Think about it by swb · · Score: 2

    By the time Analog goes off the air, your grandpa won't want this card or the system it works in let alone you.

    1. Re:Think about it by Adnans · · Score: 2

      Don't you mean his grandchildren? :-)

      --
      "In short: just say NO TO DRUGS, and maybe you won't end up like the Hurd people." --Linus Torvalds
    2. Re:Think about it by Technician · · Score: 2

      I was thinking this might be a good PVR for DTV ahd HDTV. Alas, there is an analog only input for broadcast signals. If only it would input the same HDTV signals it can send to a HDTV monitor.

      I guess that old article was right. The studios are broadcasting DTV, but nobody is watching. Duh, nobody has a tuner and antenna!

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    3. Re:Think about it by swb · · Score: 2

      Heh, well, I was operating under the assumption that grandparents get by with what we all consider junk equipment (P166, Win95A, etc etc). I didn't think that the grandparents would be dead by the time analog went off the air....

  20. The big thing missing by swb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...is hardware MPEG capture. Decode they seem to have, capture would be ideal. The $149 Hauppage WinTV-PVRs have it.

    1. Re:The big thing missing by presearch · · Score: 2

      Hmmm.
      The Hauppage page says the $149 board uses a software decoder. The upcoming board (WinTV-PVR-250) does mpeg in hardware, it's $100 more.

  21. Re:Have you tried updating your BIOS? by Accipiter · · Score: 2

    This was one of my last-ditch efforts to fix the problem. While I now benefit from an updated BIOS, the problem still exists.

    Thanks anyway.

    --

    -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
    (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

  22. it rivals nothing... by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    that rival most discrete solutions
    Until they come out with HARDWARE MPEG encode and decode on the card it rivals nothing.

    My DV500 video capture card hardware encodes so my processor doesnt have to waste time doing it. My Hollywood+ and my DV500 card both hardware decode. (Cat a mpeg stream to the hollywood+ card and magically that mpeg 1 or 2 file is displayed.. the newer Hollywood cards do Divix (mpeg4) on the card. while the DV500 will do mpegs 1&2 DV and most AVI file types (Not mpeg4 without a firmware change)

    coupled with my Geforce3 I dont see it rivaling anything. ATI's offering is still just a toy, A video card with some neato-things added that are useless for any professional uses (if you want professional results.. I dont see anyone desiring to buy a capture device for anything onther than editing... except PVR.. and if their PVR software that comes with the card is anything like what they send with the last iteration of the all in wonder... it will fail again.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:it rivals nothing... by wunderhorn1 · · Score: 2
      The All-in-Wonder line has never been aimed at the professional user. That DV500 card probably set you back close to $500, and it didn't even come with the fastest 3D acceleration on the market.

      You can call it a toy, I call it fun to play around with in my spare time. And I don't know anyone who's called the AIW cards a failure.

      --
      Karma: Bored. (Thinking about resurrecting the "Anyone else is an imposter" joke.)
    2. Re:it rivals nothing... by Sentry21 · · Score: 2

      The card doesn't have hardware encode, that I know of, but it does have hardware decode (which it uses for DVD playback, among other things), and even the AIW128 had hardware overlay and scaling support for DVD, and even AVI/MPEG under XF4.x.

      The AIW isn't necessarily a capture device either, though it can serve that purpose. All I've used it for is watching TV and playing games (PS, etc) on my system. Then again, I've never had the HD space or processor to do anything else.

      --Dan

  23. Will there be a Radeon 9000 based version? by egghat · · Score: 2

    I don't need the latest DirectX-9 gimmicks and want a passively cooled, cheaper, but fast enough version.

    The Radeon 9000 graphic cards are wonderful. An All-In-Wonder-Card based on the Radeon 9000 would be wonderful for my quiet "home theatre - MP3 - DVD - digital videorecorder"-PC.

    But with the lack of resonable Linux driver support this won't happen anyway.

    Bye egghat.

    --
    -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
    1. Re:Will there be a Radeon 9000 based version? by Pulzar · · Score: 2

      Unless it's a typo, and they were talking about 9700, this yahoo news item talks about an AIW 9000.

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
  24. Re:No Firewire port, though by Cyno01 · · Score: 2

    thats kinda ironic, i sprung the extra $100 for the 8500 dv specifically because i wanted a firewire port and i was all outa pci slots

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  25. Driver problems are a given by matrim99 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Now if they could just get some **decent** drivers to go with this card (catalyst is a great step towards the goal, dont get me wrong, but ATI has always been a little weak in driver field)

    Some may call the above post Flamebait, but it is true. Jeesh, I remember this same complaint being lodged against ATI back in 1992. Apparently, they are doing something right to still be alive today, despite this constant driver criticism.
    I am not a hardware junkie, but I have been following recent "build your own home theater in a PC" sites, and the jury says: build your system around the limitations of your chosen graphics card. The ATI line of "do everything" cards offers unmatched versitility in the home theater PC market, yet you have to carefully match your requirements with your choice of hardware and software (and driver capabilities).
    IOW, do your homework, build for today, and don't expect your ATI card to do anything wonderful outside of the scope of your current DIY project.

    --
    Right. No, your other right. No, the other other right.
  26. does it work on Linux? by RelliK · · Score: 2

    What is the best video capture card for Linux, preferrably with a supported hardware MPEG2 encoder?

    --
    ___
    If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
  27. It has MPEG-2 encoding hardware by systemapex · · Score: 2

    Via the "Cobra" engine on the R300 chip itself, the AIW Radeon actually has MPEG-2 encoding hardware. It doesn't do the whole process in hardware, but enough to offset between 1/5 and 1/4 of the processing overhead from the CPU. This is typical ATI - their first DVD decoding hardware assistance in chips (I believe in the Rage Pro line circa 1997) had enough hardware to offset a chunk of the processing overhead from the CPU. In the following generation, the new chip had essentially full hardware decoding. Expect the next generation of AIW to follow suit.

    1. Re:It has MPEG-2 encoding hardware by swb · · Score: 2

      25% at best doesn't cut it, neither does expecting the next generation to do 50%.

      I'm not sure how you can use the engine on the Hauppage cards (if its just a direct pipe from the capture portion of the card or general purpose engine that can compress a stream sent from the CPU), but full hardware assist would rock for editing MPEG2 streams on the fly without decoding to AVI and then back to MPEG2.

      Doing MPEG2 totally (or even mostly) in software sucks on my dual PIII669 box, with the one advantage that you get total control over the encoding process. I'd kind of wonder how tweakable the MPEG2 output is from a $150 card.

  28. It has MPEG-2 hardware ENCODE and DECODE by systemapex · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Read Anand's review. The R300's "Cobra" engine provides hardware MPEG-2 encoding assistance. Not completely, but enough to offset 1/5 to 1/4 of the CPU overhead. As I understand, no consumer-level MPEG-2 encoding hardware does all the processing onboard but merely offsets some work from the CPU. Of course, ATI has had MPEG-2 decoding assistance for a LONG time - since 1997. In fact, I have a H+ too and the difference in CPU usage levels between the H+ and my AIW Radeon when watching DVDs is negligible. The Radeon provides superior monitor playback and the H+ provides superior TV playback which is why the two still co-exist. One thing many people overlook is the fact that since the AIW is on the AGP bus, you don't run the risk of overloading the PCI bus when doing video capture and the like. Their PVR software has come a LONG way too. When I first got my AIW Radeon I cursed my decision but since December of last year the software has been excellent. I just wish there was something on Linux to rival it. There isn't. Nothing comes close actually.

  29. GATOS and DRI by wowbagger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd advise against getting an All-In-Wonder card if you run Linux, since the GATOS team (the folks doing 2D video capture, tuner support, and TV out) and the DRI team (the folks doing OpenGL 3D support) have yet to sync their code so that the two play nicely together. Thus, you can have EITHER video capture and tuner support, XOR accelerated 3D support. You cannot have both.

    I could understand if this condition persisted for a few weeks - the teams are different groups with different goals. However, this has been the case for several MONTHS, and I see no motion towards resolving this.

    This is one of the places that the bazaar approach is weaker than the cathedral approach - independant teams don't co-ordinate very well in such matters.

    So, at this time if you want both tuner support AND accelerated 3D, I would suggest getting a seperate TV tuner card.

    (And I am viewing this very post on a AIW7500. I have a classic AIW in my server in the basement, and in the past I've had a Voodoo 3500TV. I have some experience in this matter.)

    (And I don't have time to fix this - I have to work on modifying the USB joystick drivers to report the hat as buttons so that I can use it under UT/US2003, getting ATA/133 & LBA48 working, getting video streaming working from my DTIVO, trying to find out why Wine has show regressions in the past week....)

    1. Re:GATOS and DRI by timeOday · · Score: 2

      Besides, the video capture is sorely lacking. The "video4linux" interface only implements a small handful (like 4) of the functions in the video4linux api, so most capture programs will NOT work with AIW cards.

  30. Re:better sight without glasses... by Derwen · · Score: 2
    oops - posted in wrong story ;-/

    --
    http://fsfeurope.org/
  31. Who else is including a TV tuner on their card? by tkrotchko · · Score: 2

    ATI has their share of problems, but the All-In-Wonder line is the only decent card to include a tuner.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
  32. Details? (Re:it rivals nothing...) by phorm · · Score: 2

    So how much does this DV500 card cost, and - if reasonable - where can one get it. Details, man, details! If it costs $300 then I think I'll just stick with my does-it-all cards or a good 3d card with a cheaper decoded that burns CPU.

  33. Don't rush out and buy one yet by Archfeld · · Score: 2

    ATI has yet to get the drivers right....The issue list is LONG and they've started out where they left off with the 8500 and some really lousy driver support. I like the card, but getting all the bells and whistles to work is nearly impossible. The capture drivers have issues, NWN has MAJOR issues with this card, but it is quick, and I keep hoping ATI will get thier act together driver wise...SOON PLS...

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  34. Already has it by moogla · · Score: 2

    It's had that for awhile. The crappy crash-a-minute Cinema package that comes with the ATI WinTV had it too.

    Another cool thing is "magazine mode" which records the closed captions and still pictures taken when the frame changes significantly to make a TV guide-like telecast.

    --
    Black holes are where the Matrix raised SIGFPE
  35. You're better off with a TV Wonder by Control-Z · · Score: 2, Informative


    I had the original AIW card. It was nice for a while, but when i upgraded to a GF4 4200 I had to give up my TV/PVR capabilities too. So I'd suggest getting an ATI TV Wonder so you can painlessly upgrade your video card later. I still haven't got around to buying a TV Wonder so I can start recording shows on my computer again.

    Oh, and don't get the TV Wonder VE unless you don't want stereo sound.