One Million AOL discs to be returned to AOL

nicedream writes "Two guys from California are trying to give AOL a taste of its own medicine. They're asking people to send them AOL discs, and they're going to drop them off at the company's doorstep once they collect 1 million discs. My favorite quote: "We're going to AOL and say, 'You've got mail"." seems like a better taste would be to dial out and use all 1000 free hours. A million people do *that* and I bet they'd stop filling our mailboxes with the landfill of tomorrow.

Comments

Old?

[no_nicks_available]

I remember this from a year ago....

Re:Old?

[igottheloot]

in a related story, all your base are still belong to us.

Re:Old?

[TheEnglishPatient]

Must be the weather . . . .

BBC Radio 4 put out a very old story about Micro$oft on the news this morning. You can read about here
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/27688.htm l
(the Register)

N

Re:Old?

[destinyland]

CNN is owned by AOL.

Think about it....

---
Destiny-land.
The happiest blog on earth.

Humanitarian aid

[bytesmythe]

It seems like if they're going to go through that much effort, they should send them to countries where there is a desperate shortage of drink coasters.

Re:Humanitarian aid

[ReverendRyan]

Or they could sell them to the military... If you throw a cd at someone, it can hurt. And if it hits a wall, it shatters and sends shrapnel everywhere... Imagine if you designed some sort of rubberband-based launcher for it ;)

Re:Humanitarian aid

[dirtkilla]

I find that CD's really don't make good coasters. That little hole in the middle allows moisture to reach the surface of whatever it's sitting on. Let's rename them from "Coasters" to "Wow put it in the microwave for 5 seconds".

Re:Humanitarian aid

[co_fisha]

I put tape over the little hole. Works great.

Re:Humanitarian aid

[clem]

CDs can be deadly weapons! Remember Hellraiser III?

Regrettably, yes.

Re:Humanitarian aid

[Snowdog668]

Obligatory User Friendly link:

http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=2000101 5

Hey, *I* think it's funny...

Re:Humanitarian aid

[bytesmythe]

Yes, I have. In fact, I think of that movie every time I consider using a CD as a frisbee.

"I come in peace."
"You go in pieces."

Ahhh... classic scriptwriting.

Re:Humanitarian aid

[Pig Hogger]

CDs can be deadly weapons! Remember Hellraiser III?

That's nothing next to Neil Diamond!!!

Re:Humanitarian aid

[iceT]

Not to mention that the sweat from the glass just puddles up on the CD, and then drips on you when you drink from the glass/can/bottle.

Now, if we could find a surplus of clock mechanisms, we could send clocks to those poor nations...

Re:Humanitarian aid

[Surak]

Maybe there's enough metal in the pressed CDs.

Consider the metal pressed into CDs is aluminum, and therefore not affected by magnets, um, no.

Re:Humanitarian aid

[Blkdeath]

That's nothing next to Neil Diamond!!!

Or Celine Dion.

Once again, on behalf of all of Canada, I am sorry.

AOL's ad campaigns save you money

[Anonymous Coward]

They pay a lot of money to the post office, and this money helps keep the cost of regular mail, that you and I send, cheaper. If AOL stops, and other companies stop, we'll all end up paying more for our mail. So, I say, keep sending the discs!

Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money

[Anonymous Coward]

But what about what it costs tax payers for landfills? It's a "pay me now or pay me later" situation. And I, for one, would rather pay a little more postage than the alternative.

Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money

[AngryPuppy]

I can't say definitively that you are wrong, but I don't think the postal service is a greatly profitable industry. I don't think there is a considerable profit margin for waht they mail. AOL ships these things bulk rate which is a reduction from standard mailing. The labor cost to process all these has to eat up a large portion of what they charge. i don't know... I'm not confident is helps the rest of the US population with postal costs. It does keep more postal workers in jobs, however.

Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money

[pcardoso]

but how much more expensive will it get? how often do you use regular mail anyway to offset the inconvenience of having your mailbox full of marketing crap?

in my country we have some special spam-filter stickers provided by the mail service saying "no unsolicited bulk mail" and it is against the law to drop anything not directly mailed to the mail box recipient. In my building most of the mail boxes have these stickers. Some smartasses still leave something there once in a while, but the amount of trash drops to almost nothing. When I go and check the mail I either have something for me or I don't. No more sorting out useless crap.

And as mentioned in another post, most of these cds will be buried in a landfill or incinerated. Help the environment, help reduce useless crap.

Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money

[_ph1ux_]

Thats BS.

Mail was never much more expensive *before* AOL CDs started soming in. If anything it causes more overhead. An increase in volume through the mail system with mail that very vey few people would actually want.

There would be less overhead if AOL would stop sending out so many CDs. The post office would have that much less to worry about.

You know what I do everytime I go to the mailbox and there is spam mail in my slot - I stick it in the Outgoing mail slot.

One time I walked up to the mailbox when the mailman was busy stuffing it full of crap. I asked him if he would please just not put that stuff in my mail box. He said that there is only one way for him to stop putting such mail that is addressed to "So & So OR Current Resident" and other spammings such as the coupon newspapers and pizza offers - get a P.O. Box.

PMBs are apparently the only thing where there is regulation limiting the unsolicited mailings that are allowed.

Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money

[Anonvmous Coward]

"Postal have gone up more rapidly since AOL started sending these disks out than any other period in time?"

The scientific process in action, folks.

Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money

[crawling_chaos]

It depends on how much of the Post Office is tied up in fixed costs. Unfortunately, much of the Post Office's expenses are fixed. Carriers can only cover so much distance, and a small post office still needs to be staffed, even if the mail volume drops by 50%.

The orignal poster is correct. Bulk mail is about the only thing keeping the price of a First Class stamp under $2.00.

Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money

[suss]

Yeah... you wouldn't want to pay a few cents more for your mail to get rid of all this garbage.
After all, there's probably a spot somewhere that isnt a landfill yet.

How long does it take for a cd to dissolve anyway?

Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money

[KurdtX]

Actually, the reason postage is getting more expensive is email. Spammers who used to be dumping millions in to smail can now do so far cheaper over email, so they can send you mail every day for a year for less than it would have cost to send you one smail.

If you actually think about for a sec before using your gut-level reaction to AOL spam, you would realize that it costs the same amount of money to send a postman to every house no matter how much mail he is carrying (yes, I know...). Without spam, they wouldn't have a reason to come to your house every day, and would likely cut back to say, once a week or whatever depending on how many people are actually sending you stuff. Then if something got in a few minutes after he left, you'd have to wait a full week to get it (would you want to wait that long for your Maxim?) because no one is paying him to come by every day. Honestly, the only time I send stuff in the mail is the holidays (1/year), or to backwater places that don't do electronic commerce (rare), or when my physical signature is required.

And really, is paying an extra ~20c killing you that much?

Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money

[Guppy06]

"I don't think there is a considerable profit margin for waht they mail. AOL ships these things bulk rate which is a reduction from standard mailing."

The more proper term for "bulk rate" nowadays is "presorted," which is why their postage is cheaper than our one-piece first class mailings (they sort so the USPS doesn't have to).

That's the only break they get (unless they do drop shipments, which involves mailing them from post offices close to the destination). It's the same break you and I could get if we went to our local post offices and paid $150 for a presorted mail permit.

"The labor cost to process all these has to eat up a large portion of what they charge."

AOL is doing a good deal of the Postal Service's labor themselves by presorting it. It's called work sharing, which I've heard (but can't confirm) is something unique to the USPS as compared to other post offices.

"i don't know... I'm not confident is helps the rest of the US population with postal costs."

The larger the volume of mail to be moved, the more justification the USPS has for faster but more expensive sorting and delivery equipment. The occasional birthday card to your grandmother is not justification for the USPS to invest in high-speed OCR machines, barcode printers, 18-wheel trucks, airplanes, ships, etc. AOL CDs are.

And as for postage rates, we live in the third largest country in the world and yet we have amongst the lowest postage rates among industrialized nations. Most Europeans, for example, have to pay the equivalent of $0.50 or $0.60 to mail what what we pay $0.37 for. And that $0.37 will get your letter from Puerto Rico to Guam.

No, I'm not a postal worker, I've just been learning way too much information as I prepare to print up several thousand letters to voters in my district.

Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money

[ezraj]

Our town recycles CDs, and you can, too, through greendisk.com.

Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money

[Guppy06]

"Mail was never much more expensive *before* AOL CDs started soming in."

Perhaps, but I doubt you can argue against the idea that AOL CDs help keep postage rates low. Why else are we able to send an ounce at $0.37 when the average European has to pay closer to $0.60? For mail within a country not much larger than a typical US state?

Economy of scale is a wonderful thing.

"If anything it causes more overhead."

A million AOL CDs mailed at once causes less overhead than a million people sending a greeting card. In order for AOL to take advantage of presorted mail rates, they have to presort their mail. Part of the $0.37 we pay for a first class mail stamp pays for sorting and barcoding as well as delivery, while AOL does most their own sorting and barcoding, mailing the CDs already sorted in their own trays.

A single CD mailed at first class rates:
$0.37

A single CD mailed at presorted rate (which doesn't automatically include features built into first class like "return to sender" or "forward to new address" and doesn't require the stamps to be cancelled as with first class), presorted by area distribution center (pretty much the first two digits of the ZIP code):
$0.268

Same as above, only sorted by first three digits of ZIP code:
$0.248

Sorted by area distribution center, pre-barcoded and address electronically verified:
$0.219

And the prices keep on dropping as AOL does more and more of the labor themselves, all the way down to $0.12 if AOL

1. sorts by carrier route (ZIP+4, more or less)
2. verifies the existence of all addresses electronically
3. barcodes the addresses themselves
4. mails a copy of the mailing to each and every address on the carrier routes ("postal patron" means they don't have to figure out which boxes get one and which don't)
5. inserts the CDs into the mail stream at the destination post offices themselves

Now, then, who has more overhead?

"An increase in volume through the mail system with mail that very vey few people would actually want."

An increase that justifies the USPS paying for faster (but more expensive) sorting and delivery equipment. If the only people sending mail were the average person sending a single letter or card a week, there wouldn't be any reason (or money) for the USPS to do anything but manual sorting.

"I asked him if he would please just not put that stuff in my mail box. He said... get a PO Box"

What were you expecting? Guess what: the cost of delivering advertising to your mailbox is 100% paid for (by law) by the sender. This isn't e-mail we're talking about here. If the disagreement is between you and the sender, and the sender is the only paying customer between the both of you, why should any business listen to anybody but the person paying them money?

No, I'm not a postal employee, I'm just learning this as I prepare to send out 11,400+ letters to some of the voters in my district.

Re:AOL's ad campaigns save you money

[delphi125]

the average European has to pay closer to $0.60

Where on earth do you get your information? The Euro is close to the dollar (1 USD = 1.02933 EUR), and in Holland stamps cost 0.39; virtually the same as in the USA. A sample from http://www.atms.ch/rates/: GB 27p (about 43 cents), Ireland 0.41, Belgium 0.42, Greece 0.45, France 0.46, Germany 0.56, Italy 0.62 (but 0.41 available), Spain 0.25, Portugal 0.27 normal (but 0.43 available, Azul is express I expect).

I called them

[Therlin]

I called AOL and asked them to take me off their mailing list. They thought it was an odd request, and the agent didn't know what to do at first. After being put on hold for a couple of minutes they got down my information and told me that they'd take me off their list.

To this day I have yet to receive an AOL CD in my mailbox.

Re:I called them

[mgessner]

On a somewhat related note, my Dad simply writes on the outside of the AOL disk mailer:

"REFUSED DELIVERY - PLEASE REMOVE FROM MAILING LIST"

AFAIK he has yet to receive another disk from AOL (he was getting several a *month* at one time).

He's also dramatically cut down on the number of amount of other junk mail he gets.

Re:I called them

[Zathrus]

Better than that - "cannot deliver - recipient deceased".

A friend of mine in college wrote that on a letter he got from a pseudo-ex-girlfriend (pseudo because she was never actually dating him - just playing mind games).

Re:I called them

[Maxwell_E]

*koff* Tom Lehrer *koff*rippoff*koff*.

Re:I called them

[portnoy]

You know, if you're going to quote Tom Lehrer, you can at least say you're quoting Tom Lehrer.

Re:I called them

[mandelbaum]

AOL CD's are sent presort standard and if you write refused/deceased/etc. on it and put it back in your mailbox, it will get recycled by the post office. I'm a letter carrier. No junk mail ever gets returned to the sender. See:

http://pe.usps.gov/text/qsg/q015.htm

Unless it has an endorsement, it's getting tossed.

-aaron

Re:I called them

[Denial of Cervix]

AOL CD's are sent presort standard and if you write refused/deceased/etc. on it and put it back in your mailbox, it will get recycled by the post office. I'm a letter carrier.

I'm a recovering letter carrier... I recall seeing clerks at the carrier station spending hours recycling undeliverable AOL disks. Because the USPS has mandatory recycling for all UBBM (Undeliverable Bulk Business Mail - junk mail to endusers), someone gets to make $17/hour tearing the plastic shrinkwrap open, recycling the paper and discarding the disk and shrinkwrap. I swear the USPS must lose money on handling these things, especially as they're not easily automatable, unlike letter mail, which is sorted - with OCR - at 40-60,000 pieces per hour in one machine.

DoC
In almost seven years as a carrier, I wasn't bitten once. By a dog, anyway.

How about just sending them back?

[Junks Jerzey]

Drop off a million discs in a truckload, and they'll just have someone on the maintenance staff cart them off. End of problem. But if you just mail each disc *back* to AOL, then they'll have to continually weed out all of the discs they get, possibly for years.

Re:How about just sending them back?

[yycs]

Any by doing this, you help keep down the cost of future postage as you just gave the US Post Office $370,000.

Re:How about just sending them back?

[akb]

In general this is a good strategy for dealing with junk mail. Individual returns usually get you taken off the mailing list. It costs the post office more to send it back, if a large enough percentage of junk mail gets returned they'll raise the bulk rate for the junkers. And dealing with the returned mail costs the junkers as well. Just throwing junk out keeps their costs down.

Re:How about just sending them back?

[alcohollins]

Drop off a million discs in a truckload, and they'll just have someone on the maintenance staff cart them off. End of problem. But if you just mail each disc *back* to AOL, then they'll have to continually weed out all of the discs they get, possibly for years.

Read their FAQ. Here's why:

4. Why don't we just send our CDs right back to AOL ourselves?

Quite frankly, AOL is unlikely to change their behavior without a large public demonstration of dissatisfaction. Getting some of their junk mail back each day will have little if any effect. However, receiving several truckloads of their CDs, all at once in broad daylight, with the media in full attendance, will have a larger impact. Note that AOL sends this stuff out as bulk mail - there's no return postage paid, so writing "Return To Sender" and throwing it back in the mail just makes more work for the Post Office (they have to pick them up and sort them out, then toss 'em in the garbage. AOL will not see that CD or pay any additional postage).

Re:How about just sending them back?

[Sylver Dragon]

I've been doing this for awhile myself. Every time I get some sort of junk mail, I rip it up and put it in the pre-paid return envelope. It may not do much, but its still a few cents more in costs for these companies. Now if I could just get enough people to follow suit...
Unfortunatly, it seems to be too much of a hassle for most people. Come on, people, its a minute or two of your life, and if there are enough of us doing it, it might actually make a dent.

Re:How about just sending them back?

[afidel]

Watch out one fine soul in Long Island was recently arrested for inciting panick for sending a brown envelope with newspaper ad clippings for the long island power authority along with his bill. Some idi^h^h^h person in their mail room thought it was an anthrax attack because he put lipa sucks on the outside. He was actually arrested and now has to pay a lawyer to defend himself. Not only that but when he went in to pick up his court summons they threw him in jail overnight on a 23 year old walking a dog without a leash violation!!!!! For more info see this article.

Re:How about just sending them back?

[doobie]

I do this all the time. I give them a note to please recycle it due to the fact my apartment complex does not have a recycling system. I used to fill the envelope with cheese that is just starting to mold, but due to Sept. 11th I decided to stop. In a few years I'll start doing that again. Chase Bank was the worst. They sent me a new thing every week for like a year. I even started putting rocks in it to increase the weight (and hopefully the cost to them). I was thinking glueing the envelope to a brick, but never tried it.

I miss the floppies

[Ainu]

At least the floppies you could use them for something else.. how about a law that says that they can not use cd-r, only allow them to use cd-rw? Free cd-rw for us all!

Here's some links

[qurob]

Various links for Slashdotites pleasure

Haikus

No More AOL CD's.com

Fun things to do with AOL CD's

1 billion hours free.

[Anonymous Coward]

1 million disks * 1000 hours each = 1 billion hours free.

Thats about 10 minutes for everybody on earth.

Re:1 billion hours free.

[docbrown42]

1 million disks * 1000 hours each = 1 billion hours free.

Thats about 10 minutes for everybody on earth.

It should be just enough time to close all the pop-up ads.

Re:1 billion hours free.

[Terralthra]

Well, such a calculation is difficult to make without making some assumptions, but here's a try....let's see here.

They intend to bring 1,000,000 (1x10^6) AOL CDs from El Cerrito, CA, to AOL Corporate HQ in Dulles, Virginia. While the exact location in either city can not be determined, we'll do our best with just the cities. There are 2 El Cerritos in CA, one in Contra Costa County, one in Riverside County. We'll use the one in Contra Costa, just for fun.

That's a distance of 2790.02 miles. Now, each AOL CD has a maximum data capacity of approximately 650 MB. Even if the CD is not "full", the whole CD is still being transferred and thus the whole data capacity counts.

So, 650 MB X 1x10^6 = 6.5x10^8 MB. Let's do this in the standard kilobits/sec that most ISPs measure their bandwidth in, so 6.5x10^8 x 1024 to get KB, then x 8 to get Kb. 5.3248 x 10^12 Kb are being transferred.

Now, I live in Northern California, where freeway speeds usually run about 85 mph, but for the sake of national averages, let's say they make an average of 65 mph. 65 mph over their 2790.02 mile trip is 42.92 hours.

Dividing the total Kb by the hours, we get 1.2406 x 10^11 (rounded) Kb/hr. Divided by 60 minutes per hour, that's 2.0677 x 10^9 Kb/minute, once more for the seconds/minute, and we get 3.4462 x 10^7 Kb/sec.

That's approximately 23,000 times as fast as my 1.5/384 DSL connection.

No good to use hours

[Kphrak]

I don't know if this is still true (the last time I used AOL was about '94), but once you started using the free hours, AOL needed a credit card number. Just in case you, uh, go over the limit. What they didn't tell you is that if you did go over the limit, you wouldn't be notified; they just quietly started billing you. Then it was the devil's own work to try and get them to stop, and especially to get your CC out of their database.

If this is all still the case, using your "free" hours is shooting yourself in the foot.

Re:No good to use hours

[Myco]

If you continue to use the credit card with a company after listing that company as unauthorized to bill the card, I'm pretty sure that qualifies as fraud.

Strangely, some collect AOL discs like comic books

[loggia]

On the flip side, there are some strange people who collect the various thousands of different AOL discs, like people collect baseball cards or comic books.

http://www.kcstar.com/item/pages/local.pat,local /3 accd753.723,.html

Here is the link to these guy's site

[Drestin]

Why don't articles actually post the URL to the site?!

http://www.nomoreaolcds.com/

Re:Here is the link to these guy's site

[floydigus]

Or put the url in an anchor () tag?

The Address

[FreshMeat-BWG]

Mail all your unwanted AOL CDs to: No More AOL CDs! 1601 Navellier St. El Cerrito CA, 94530 U.S.A.

I just use them as a free source of CD cases

[starseeker]

Or DVD on the better ones. My physics professor got a bunch of these for some reason, so I just scrape off or cover the annoying stickers and have a high quality cd case. I really think they must be getting the cases from the same place as the DVD people. They're even better than music cd style jewel cases since they don't crack as easily, and they're a heck of a lot better than those thin ones.

If they really want to make a splash, why not collect the cases, devise some easy and cheap way to get the stickers off, and resell them by the crate? Making a profit off of junk mail - now THAT would be a story :-)

What a thoughtless waste...

[stienman]

Look, they are asking 1 million people to spend upwards of 40 cents each to send a useless CD to them, then they are going to spend how much to deliver the truckload to AOL?

Think about it, that's at least $400,000 dollars down the drain! Why not ask people to contribute $0.40 towards infrastructure costs in their area for public 802.11b hotspots. Tell them to mark any and all AOL mail "RETURN TO SENDER" and AOL will bear even greater costs, at no cost to the consumer.

Egad, people, use your brains.

Besides, AOL is going down the toilet anyway. Their shiny discs aren't going to be very useful to them after a few years as dialup dwindles, especially since broadband doesn't net them nearly as much profit as dialup once did. They're going to change their business model significantly over the next few years - it'll be interesting.

But seriously, put your effort into providing free net access for everyone.

-Adam

Re:What a thoughtless waste...

[adamjone]

Tell them to mark any and all AOL mail "RETURN TO SENDER" and AOL will bear even greater costs, at no cost to the consumer.

Actually, that won't work. The CD's are shipped 4th class mail. If you mark it return to sender, the post office will return it to the earth. They even mention it in the FAQ

Re:What a thoughtless waste...

[f97tosc]

Why not ask people to contribute $0.40 towards infrastructure costs in their area for public 802.11b hotspots.

This sort of posts comes up pretty much every time somebody does something creative, funny and totally useless.

It is entertainment. People like to spend some of their money on having fun, and this is such an example. Yes, it would be great if people stopped spending any money on pleasures and put it all into charities and infrastructure improvements ... or would it?

I like the 'return to sender' idea, though. It is easier and quicker to do than finding a stamp and the address of these jokers.

Tor

Re:What a thoughtless waste...

[stienman]

I realize that. However, if one million people did this the USPS would be none too pleased, and may require AOL to either pay for the additional trash, or use a different rate. It will cost the post office time, money, and space, and they will pass that back to AOL.

Either way, it would be more trouble and more costly to AOL than delivering a million CDs on convenient string spindles to their doorstep. Chances are they'd mount them somewhere as a tribute to their fans who'd go to so much trouble.

Now, if they were going to make art out of this then I'd understand, but I still think the same objectives could be accomplished more efficiently and more pointedly through other means.

-Adam

AOL Construction Kit

[shoemakc]

Turn those disks into something useful; Purchase the AOL Construction Kit?

-Chris

Re:RTS them

[RaboKrabekian]

AOl sends their CDs 4th class bulk, meaning that if you try to return to sender the post office just throws them away. AOL won't pay a dime.

It's a scam!

[grub]

WAKE UP PEOPLE!
They are going to use those one thousand free hours from 1 million discs to get themselves 1,000,000,000 free hours of AOL!

Free AOL for them, their kids, grandkids and great-grandkids.

I'm on to you bastards...

I Miss the floppys..

[thumbtack]

At least I could get some practical use out of them. A quick reformat and I was set. Ever since they started sending out shiny plastic discs, I have to actually buy a pack of floppys from time to time. (not that use that many). Maybe if they would send the CDs out on CD-RW.........

Stack 1,000,000 AOL CD's

[qurob]

1,000,000 AOL CD's would be a measely 50,000 feet.

Just think, if they collected 302,860,800,000 AOL CD's they could stack them and it'd touch the moon!

put it on CD-RWs and win the hearts of millions

[mbourgon]

...of geeks. I really wish AOL had put these on CD-Rs or CD-RWs... I think that if you make a buttload of them, it's probably doable. If, everytime you got an AOL disk, you knew you could put another 650 meg on it, would you throw it away? (Maybe). But you'd probably keep them around as spares.

1000 Hours

[Crazy Man on Fire]

My favorite part of the 1000 free hours campaign was when they were offering 1000 free hours (to be used in one month).

Hmmm... 31 x 24 = 744

Wasn't long before they changed to 1000 free hours (to be used in 45 days).

I guess MA101 isn't required for a Marketing major

what I did

[GoatPigSheep]

I covered 55 aol disks with fondu fuel and burned them into one mass of metal. I know use it as a paperweight.

Re:what I did

[LinuxGeek]

Ok, I modded you up, but when I post this it will take away the point. Now, where can we find a pic of your sister?? :)

Me too

[Reziac]

Back in the floppy era (when diskettes cost a buck apiece), whenever we ran out of good reliable disks, we'd call AOL and ask them to send us a set of install disks. Over the next year they'd send us a good double handful of Officially Blank disks. AOL's diskettes were always top quality!

Now, whenever we run out of nifty DVD cases ... heh heh heh.

Oh, and the CDs work great to chase away starlings and gophers -- just hang 'em where they'll twirl in the wind. Nice of AOL to print 'em in all those pretty colours.

Do the same thing with junk snail mail

[a_timid_mouse]

I saw an interesting e-mail the other day that proposed a solution to junk snail mail. Lots of companies send you junk mail with a postage-paid reply envelope, right? If you take that envelope and stuff it with unrelated junk mail from a different company, seal it up and send it on it's merry way, the junk mailer pays the postage TWICE (once to you, and again back to them), you force them to sort through their mailbox just like you do, and you help out the cash-strapped U.S. Postal Service at the same time.

Million Modem march

[bubblegoose]

"seems like a better taste would be to dial out and use all 1000 free hours. A million people do *that* and I bet they'd stop filling our mailboxes with the landfill of tomorrow."

How about we follow through on that idea? How about Monday October 28th at 8PM we dial in using the free hours and start downloading huge files, for as long as you can stand tying up your phone line. We can continue every night at 8 PM for the next 2 weeks.

Do that for two weeks...what do you think that will do to the already floundering AOL?

I know you must provide a CC # to sign up, we'll just have to ensure that we all cancel service within the first month. Anyone had experience cancelling AOL service? Is it hard?

I'm sure most of us could find an old machine to do this on.

AOL SPAM IS

[_ph1ux_]

Supported by the USPO. My friend just changed his address, and in changing his address the Post Office sends you a "Welcome to your new Address" package thing. Inside of it was an AOL 1000 free hours disk - with "welcome to your new address" or some such slogan printed on it.

Lame. I dont need the post office advertising my new address to companies (dont knwo if it actually does that though)

But what if you changed email addresses or ISPs and the new ISP or email provider would then send you a welcome email, and you would also receive a bunch of other spam emails from spammers saying "Welcome to your new Email account. Get a bigger penis free by clicking here"

I hope AOL eats it.

Re:AOL SPAM IS

[retro128]

Here is a good article about that.
Anyone who's planning on moving soon (like me) could most definitely use some of this info.

But will it matter?

[wls]

As a dumpster diver, let me say that when AOL used to send out floppy diskettes, that when they did a software update they just threw the old labeled and unlabeled media out by the thousands. I have boxes and boxes of rescued AOL floppies that I reformat when I need to pass out a small file over old media.

Given that they treated reusable media with such discontempt, it only makes sense that they are already accustomed to disposing large quantities of non-reusable media.

Will this action even be a blip on their radar? Probablly not, unless environmentalists and the media are dragged into the lot.

Re:more effective

[adamjone]

No, it would be just the same as if you threw it in the trash. AOL ships the CDs 4th class mail, which means that if you mark it return to sender, the USPS returns it to the earth.

floppies

[intermodal]

I liked it when they sent me free floppies...those i could use for something more than my can of coke

Paging Craig Shergold

[camusflage]

Craig Shergold is seven years old and suffering from terminal cancer. It is his ambition to be included in the Guinness Book of Records for the largest number of AOL CD's ever collected by one person.
Craig would be grateful if you could send all of your AOL CD's to the address below and also send the enclosed pages, including one of your own, to another ten companies.
Obviously, speed is of the essence....
Craig Shergold
c/o Steve Case
22000 AOL Way
Dulles, VA 20166

The flip side

[tswinzig]

So what you're saying is, we could stop receiving spam in our mailbox forever if we would just pay more for a stamp?

I'M SOLD!

The URL?

[colerit]

Does anyone else think it's funny that this article (published by a subsidiary of AOL) doesn't give the URL of the website that they specifically mentioned?
Well, I found it - http://www.nomoreaolcds.com

so there =P

Re:The URL?

[Kalgash]

Did you happen to see the link in the little "Related" box on the bottom right hand side of the article? CNN.com's new style guide places all links for the story outside the main body text as they feel different coloured links distract from readability.

"one million" is a big number.

[NFW]

If they want to get this done in ten years, they will need to collect over 270 CDs per day, every day, for the next ten years. AOL may send out far more than that, but they will have a hard time getting that many people to play this game.

I'll wager AOL gives up the CD campaign before they reach their mark, leaving these guys with a really big pile of CDs, and no campaign to protest.

Don't get me wrong, I do think it's a neat idea, I just think they set their sights a couple orders of magnitude higher than is practical.

You, sir, are under arrest

[nahdude812]

It is illegal to publish plans for making weapons of mass destruction under the US Patriot Act. Please report to your local police station for incarceration.

Re:You, sir, are under arrest

[Puk]

>>>It is illegal to publish plans for making weapons of mass destruction under the US Patriot Act. Please report to your local police station for incarceration.>>> don't you mean incineration?

The moderation system needs a "+1 Scarily Appropriate".

-Puk

Tough bananas! Why do people hate AOL?

[GuyMannDude]

I don't know if this is still true (the last time I used AOL was about '94), but once you started using the free hours, AOL needed a credit card number. Just in case you, uh, go over the limit. What they didn't tell you is that if you did go over the limit, you wouldn't be notified; they just quietly started billing you.

Ah, gees, I feel so sorry for you. C'mon! This company is giving you free internet access and now you expect/demand them to send you a curtousy message when you're approaching the magic 1000 hours? I don't see why they are under any obligation to provide this warning service to you. Sure, it would be awfully sweet of them to do so. But, seriously, you should be able to determine after A FEW HOURS if you like the service or not! If you're trying to play some kind of game of getting as close to 1000 hours without going over then I would argue you're really taking advantage of them. Go ahead and do that if you want to 'stick it to the man' but don't be upset when the company doesn't provide warning services to allow you to screw them over more effectively. Gees, how hard is it to write down a log of how many hours on a piece of paper by the computer so you can keep track of this yourself? Accept some responsibility for your actions.

Looking through the comments here I see a lot of "heh-heh, let's stick it to AOL" messages. Why do people hate AOL? Does anyone have a LEGITIMATE REASON for hating them? And I mean something more important than "I don't like getting those disks in the mail". There are lots of evil entities out there in the tech world. Does AOL really deserve to be place side by side with Microsoft et. al in the Technology Hall of Shame? AOL has been responsible for helping millions of people discover the internet.

GMD

Re:Wonderful

[EvanED]

Not to mention, if you read the article, they scratch all the CDs so they can't be sent out.

Seriously, AOL CDs/Disks are sometimes useful

[phorm]

The CD's make decent coasters. If you have some acrylic paint you can paint 'em and they actually look quite cool. Getting a whole crapload of these in a month is annoying though. However, on to use #2

My last AOL CD came with a rather nice thick plastic black case. This case is similar to the ones used with most DVD's. I wish they'd send me more CD's with these cases, as I tend to have a case shortage (buy my CD-R's in 50-packs) quite often. Take off the logo'ed AOL paper and these are great for putting discs in when I lend them to friends etc.

AOL disks. The most useful things that AOL used to send. While I rarely use disks anymore, I used to have a small stack of post-AOL formatted diskettes.

Can anyone tell me where I sign up for more free coasters/cases/disks, I'm running low again?

p.s. AOL CD-holders were also nice for storing disks that you don't want people to pick up, few people open an AOL CD-case.

Collect BFAs

[anthony_dipierro]

How can I go about collecting Big Fucking Slashdot Ads so I can return a million of them to the advertisers?

Re:Tough bananas! Why do people hate AOL?

[Scratch-O-Matic]

AOL has been responsible for helping millions of people discover the internet.

Just like Microsoft was responsible for helping millions of people discover PCs. In my opinion, AOL's product sucks, and those millions of people are dumber because of it. There are some good things about their service, but overall I think the internet as a community would be better off if AOL was simply an ISP rather than a content/software/advertising provider.

Logistics

[ackthpt]

CD mass = ~15g.
1,000,000 x 15g = 15,000 Kg
15,000 Kg = ~ 16.5 Tons

CD thickness = ~1mm, width = ~120mm
1 stack = 1Km high.
Stacked 3m high = 334 stacks (one with remainer), ~2m to a side

Assuming I've done my math right, that's not going to fit any mailbox I've ever seen.

Use the 1000 free hours

[MongooseCN]

seems like a better taste would be to dial out and use all 1000 free hours.

Make a perl script that takes in the account number from the cd and automatically creates an account on AOL and logs in. Then the script should goto Google, search for the letter 'e' and then wget -r the Internet. You might want to send the output to /dev/null

Re:Use the 1000 free hours

[fritter]

You might want to send the output to /dev/null

Or stevecase@aol.com

twice

Math (was Re:Logistics)

[Saib0t]

15,000 Kg = ~ 16.5 Tons

15 000Kg = 15 tons by definition. If you're talking metrics, talk metrics all the way...

Re:Math (was Re:Logistics)

[Snafoo]

No, 15,000kg = 15 Tonnes = ~16.5Tons.

If you're going to bitch about metricity, the least you can do is not to confuse the two systems.

Re:Math (was Re:Logistics)

[Saib0t]

i always thought a ton was 2000 lbs. does that mean a kilogram is exactly 2 lbs?

And right you are, but we're not talking about the same ton. There are (at least) 3 tons. The metric, the US and the english one.

The metric ton (also called tonne) is 1000 Kg (2204.623 pounds)
The english ton (also refered to as the long ton) is 2240 pounds (1016.047 Kg)
The US ton (also refered to as the short ton) is 2000 pounds (907.185 Kg)

So no, the ton that is 2000 lb is not equal to 1000Kg, you thus can't say that 1Kg = 2lbs.

Re:Math (was Re:Logistics)

[Saib0t]

No, 15,000kg = 15 Tonnes = ~16.5Tons.
If you're going to bitch about metricity, the least you can do is not to confuse the two systems.

The metric ton is also refered to as tonne, you're right, but it is also a ton. The ton you are refering to is called the british ton or the long ton and is equal to 1016.047 Kg as opposed to the US ton or short ton which is 907.185 Kg. the metric ton (still called ton or tonne) is 1000Kg. the three are right.

CNN

[cr@ckwhore]

Does anybody besides me find it odd that this story is being carrried by CNN? Who's going to be there to cover the story when the CDs are delivered? CNN?

Something smells fishy about this...

Please save them

[SomeOtherGuy]

What if when the smoke clears from the annihilation of life as we know it: the half cockroach/half human forms that rise from the ashes decide to use these AOL CD's as the basis for their new form of currency? That is why I am hoarding my precious few -- and will be laughing at you all on my way to the post apocolypic exchange center of the future.

Homeowner Retalliation

[ReadParse]

I keep considering getting the people who live in our subdivision to do the same thing. All these clowns who think it's effective marketing (it ain't) to put a flier and some little rocks (for weight) in a baggy and throw it in my lawn, just ANYWHERE in my lawn, have another thing coming.

I think it would be really cool to have everybody in my subdivision (96 houses) to contribute these offerings, and we can make weekend trips to the "advertisers" and throw them onto their property.

RP

Re:Why stop at CDs?

[Kredal]

why send the envelopes back empty? Stuff them with other junk mail or candy wrappers or whatever... make them pay even more.

Here's the question

[BreakWindows]

1,000,000 CD's is such an abundance that it will really piss off the multinational corporation...but this jackass has a nice, convenient place to store them in the meantime? Does he realize he has to have the million CD's sitting around annoying him, before giving them back to the company who is going to send them back out to us?

Jackass..

a much more interesting use

[bcboy]

Seen at the Seventh Sense Fashion Show in Santa Cruz last year:

http://www.sosaywe.com/cdgirls.htm

natural apartment lighting

[Urox]

I've had no previous problem with using the cds as coasters (condensation only happened on the outside of the ring for me). However, that is not my main usage.

I have, in fact, walked off with hundreds of them carefully swiped into a bag from various movie theatres, pharmacies, and book stores (the place where I usually see them in massive cartons full).

Then I proceed to clear-tape them all together and reflect light into my apartment. My apartment gets light only from a single window and sliding glass door on one short side of the rectangle of the apartment. Since it faces south-east, it works rather well to reflect lots of light in.

I'd actually like to do up the whole patio outside the sliding glass door (I've got about a third of it done) but that would involve swiping more handfuls of cds.

There's nothing like a good ISP...

[dark&stormynight]

...and AOL is NOTHING LIKE a good ISP!

Bizarre packaging

[fanatic]

I got my latest AOL coaster (CD) yesterday. It acually came in a metal container. Think of the tins that mints (such as penguin mints or Altoids) come in, but CD sized. I'm not an AOL user. Never have been. Why would they use such a wasteful container? It had to cost 3 times what the CD did - probably more.

Re:Bizarre packaging

[inKubus]

Because you can put your weed in it.

Pottery Barn

[lostchicken]

Reminds me of the time on Seinfeld that Kramer dumped a pile of Pottery Barn catalogs in front of the door to the store so that no one could get in.
(I couldn't think of a Simpsons reference for /., so this had to do.)

If AOL were smart (but they're not)...

[NewtonsLaw]

If AOL really wanted to have people waiting in eager anticipation of the mailman's arrival then they'd use CDRW media instead of stamped disks.

This way, we'd all be getting something for our efforts -- even if we didn't want to join AOL.

That's why I used to like it when they sent floppy disks instead of CDs.