Slashdot Mirror


Chrysler Adopts Linux For Vehicle Simulations

eMilkshake writes "According to this ComputerWorld article, Chrysler is adopting Linux for vehicle crash testing. According to the article, 'the new system is expected to improve simulation performance by 20%, while saving about 40% in costs....'" Insert knee-jerk reaction joke about computers and crashing here.

255 comments

  1. Software? by The+Bungi · · Score: 0, Interesting

    The article doesn't mention the software used for the simulations themselves... anyone else curious as to what it is and who is writing it or providing it?

    1. Re:Software? by rhombic · · Score: 1, Informative

      Read the article? "The cluster is running modified LS-DYNA crash-testing software from Livermore Software Technology Group in Livermore, Calif." Now if we could just get moderators to read the article before going +1 informative....

      --
      1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.
    2. Re:Software? by rat7307 · · Score: 5, Funny

      kRash, the kAr kRash kOmputer package for KDE....

      --
      Burma?
    3. Re:Software? by The+Bungi · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Moderation Totals: Troll=1, Interesting=3, Informative=2, Overrated=5, Total=11.

      I must say, I find this oddly amusing. I mean, moderator points being "precious" and all that.

  2. dummies by dirvish · · Score: 4, Funny

    What OS will the crash test dummies run?

    1. Re:dummies by nurightshu · · Score: 1

      Is there one where the startup sound is a really fucking long and annoying song? Or just "mmmmm-mmmm-mmmm-mmm" over and over?

      Sorry, wrong Crash Test Dummies.

      --
      They that would sacrifice their .sig space for that cliched Franklin quote deserve neither.
    2. Re:dummies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give 'em Darwin, maybe they'll evolve.

      On second thought, probably not a great idea...

    3. Re:dummies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      AmigaDOS. It can do anything and comes back quickly after a crash.

  3. This is one application by DJ+FirBee · · Score: 2, Funny

    Better served by windows.

    1. Re:This is one application by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They want SIMULATED crashes, not REAL crashes!

  4. Why linux? by billd · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Seems the obvious choice. Otherwise you'd have to use Windows.

    --

    -----

    For great justice!

    1. Re:Why linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you prefer troll or flamebait?
      Either way it's -1 asshat.

    2. Re:Why linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, so true. Also, if it's running linux or windows, it'll probably have to run on a computer.

  5. RTFA! by scrod98 · · Score: 5, Informative
    "The cluster is running modified LS-DYNA crash-testing software from Livermore Software Technology Group in Livermore, Calif."

    It's like, right at the beginning.

    --
    LETS DECOMPOSE & ENJOY ASSEMBLING
    1. Re:RTFA! by The+Bungi · · Score: 0
      Ah, crap. I see it now. I glanced over the thing and missed it thinking it was part of the clustering solution itself (although LS-DYNA doesn't sound anything like 'Beowulf'...)

      You're, like, so right.

    2. Re:Re:RTFA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > What would slashdot be like without the opportunity to be a smartass once or twice an hour?

      A mere shadow of its former self, its corpse ready to be turned over to yet another charnel house.

    3. Re:RTFA! by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      >I glanced over the thing and missed it thinking it was part of the clustering solution itself

      Thats why its not Glance At The Fuckin Article (GATFA) ;) Couldn't resist .. I'm just joking, believe me I've done it a few times myself (and its sad that 'mysql' comes out everytime I try and type 'myself').

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
  6. Linux by molywi · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Hiring a couple *nix hackers/gurus is a lot more cost effective then spending millions on Windows licenses. The only obvious block in moving to Linux is if the particular software package was not available. I hope this makes cars cheaper as we wont have to support the high Windows license costs everytime we buy a car!

    1. Re:Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful? Total ficking dipshit is more like it. The purchase/development cost of the software and the hardware outweight the software lisence cost by factors of thousands.

      Doensn't sound like you'll ever have enough earning potential to buy a car, not even a POS "christler".

    2. Re:Linux by kbielefe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Good point except for those particular applications were running on Unix before, not Windows.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    3. Re:Linux by H310iSe · · Score: 1

      right, this is just another case of linux replacing unix, not windows. cost savings are vs the old unix boxes.

      --
      closed minded is as closed minded does
    4. Re:Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There seems to have been a CLOWN MODERATOR set loose today. Time to Meta Moderate!

    5. Re:Linux by Valar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, what accounts for about 50% of the cost of any given new car in America are the taxes. I was stunned to find this out.

    6. Re:Linux by Si_Cowboy_03 · · Score: 1

      What you have to worry about is the Windows CE that's embedded in your onboard computer(s). That's where perceptible Windows Liscenscing fees will show up, not so much in the overhead of production.

    7. Re:Linux by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 1, Flamebait
      Hiring a couple *nix hackers/gurus is a lot more cost effective then spending millions on Windows licenses.

      Yes, true. But *nix hackers/gurus/wizards require pizza and a constant flow of caffeine to survive, while an MCSE monkey can survive for weeks on it's own feces. And the MCSE monkeys are expendable, no one will notice if you lose one or if one gets fried while plugging a network cable in a power outlet.

    8. Re:Linux by oh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just following up on this and other replies. It has been said several times that the parent of the parent is incorrect, and several people have asked why it was modded up.

      I don't know why it was modded up, but I have moderator points, and I'm not going to mod it as overrated. I'm posting instead.

      Moderation shouldn't be about correct or incorrect. It should be about improving the discussion. Its better to leave the post alone and reply to it, that way both view points can be expressed.

      Leave the readers to make up their own minds, rather then censoring any views that you disagree with.

      --
      Democracy isn't about no one telling you what to do. It's about everyone telling you what to do.
    9. Re:Linux by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Care to point us to some place that can veryify that fact? I know when i buy a car here in pa, the tax will be 6%. I don't see where the other 44% is coming from.

    10. Re:Linux by molywi · · Score: 1

      When I talked about windows, I was talking about the whole company set-up in general, not just the app which is being moved from Unix to linux. You still have the averages joe accountant using Access to connect to a SQL database which then synchs with the mainframe every night.

      (To clear up any Overrated mods)

    11. Re:Linux by molywi · · Score: 1

      and at least people are wasting their points to mod down...

    12. Re:Linux by Drakonite · · Score: 1

      You aren't the only one who is paying taxes on that car. The raw materials used to build the parts had to have tax paid on them when they were bought. Many auto manufactures are actually assembly plants that buy the parts from the plants that make the parts. When they buy those parts they pay tax. The dealership paid tax on the vehicles when they bought them to sell to you. There are even more steps and places than that, but I hope by now you get the point that down the line there are many times that tax is paid on the car/parts and when you buy the car, you are paying for all the tax they had to pay to make that car as part of the price.

      --
      Shoot Pixels, Not People!
    13. Re:Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, I mean I didn't read the article, and was going for the easy karma of MS bashing.
      Oopsies when people noticed.

      Either way, you didn't contribute anything to the conversation by mindless MS hating.
      Yes, neither did this comment.

      EAD.

    14. Re:Linux by Aexia · · Score: 2

      That applies to any product, not just cars.

    15. Re:Linux by kbielefe · · Score: 1

      You make a good point. While the post was factually inconsistent with respect to this specific article, it does bring up a valid argument for switching to Linux in general. It probably shouldn't have been modded up in the first place, but that's what M2 is for. Bottom line to posters and moderators: Read the article first!

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    16. Re:Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post was clearly another unix win. Nice!!!

    17. Re:Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But they were looking to replace their Unix. One of their choices was Windows. Therefore, this was a pontenital sale that Windows lost.

    18. Re:Linux by Valar · · Score: 2

      As other have pointed out, the car is taxed at multiple stages of production (or rather the company that makes the car). Additionally, the 6% you quote is only the sales tax. There are luxury taxes (which suprisingly apply to many vehicles you wouldn't consider luxurious) and excise taxes. Additionally, you can expect, in many states to pay property taxes on the car. If someone buys a car for you, both you and them have to pay a gift tax (if the value is over $10,000 I believe).

    19. Re:Linux by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      All you say is true (although fortunatly were i live most cars are not subject to luxury tax, even BMWs).

      in many states to pay property taxes on the car.

      Really, which states? Most of the ones i know about (those around PA) charge property tax only on land ownership.

      At any rate, most of the taxes you describe do apply to alot of things, so i don't see why this is alarming.

      What is alarming is that even with all these taxes, the roads in this state still suck!

  7. Nice specs by Nintendork · · Score: 4, Funny

    Multiple Intel Xeons, a few terabytes of gigabit speed network storage. I wonder what FPS they get in Tux Racer. :)

    1. Re:Nice specs by damiam · · Score: 2, Funny

      Probably around 2 FPS, unless they've got a supported 3D card.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    2. Re:Nice specs by Dirtside · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nah, FPS isn't important. This is *crash* testing, remember; they want to see what happens to a penguin when it hits a snow drift at 6,000 miles per hour.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  8. Other references by mmol_6453 · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    What's this Submit thingy do?
    1. Re:Other references by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, we all know about News.Google.com.

      Karma Whore.

    2. Re:Other references by jamesl · · Score: 2, Funny

      The wonders of IBM's PR department.

    3. Re:Other references by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah...just trying to help. I submitted this article 9:00AM EST on Monday. These were the links I drummed up. I wish there was an option to waive karma, without trolling.

      See my journal.

  9. Good one... by andres32a · · Score: 5, Funny

    HelpLine: "General Motors HelpLine, how can I help you?"

    Customer: "I got in my car and closed the door and nothing happened!"

    HelpLine: "Did you put the key in the ignition slot and turn it?"

    Customer: "What's an ignition?"

    HelpLine: "It's a starter motor that draws current from your battery
    and turns over the engine."

    Customer: "Ignition?Motor?Battery?Engine?How come I have to
    know all these technical terms just to use my car?"

    1. Re:Good one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's the problem with you Linux folk... the customer wants you to speak English!

      Customer: "What's an ignition?"

      HelpLine: "It's what makes your car start running."

      Customer: "Oh! Okay."

    2. Re:Good one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you say that they'll just ask why you had to use a technical term like "ignition".

    3. Re:Good one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like...

      Customer: "What's an ignition?"

      HelpLine: RTFM!

    4. Re:Good one... by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      HelpLine: "General Motors HelpLine, how can I help you?"

      Customer: "I'm trying to turn my igniton, but it's stuck."

      HelpLine: "It's stuck. Hmm. Have you tried jiggling it?"

      Customer:"Yeah, it didn't work."

      HelpLine: "OK, try moving the steering wheel a little bit when you try the ignition. Maybe the steering wheel lock is jammed in a bad spot."

      Customer: tries... "no, that didn't work either"

      HelpLine: "What's the temprature in your area? Perhaps the mechanism is frozen."

      Customer: "I'm in Florida. It's 75 degrees".

      HelpLine: (to another tech) "Hey Mike, this client is trying to start his car. He's trying to turn the key but it won't budge."

      Customer: "Oh the key. Do I need that?"

      Helpline: (grumbles) "Let me guess, you're a voter down there......"

      --
      Huh?
    5. Re:Good one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh ho!
      Florida voting jokes.
      How clever and contemporary.

      What else you got for us?
      A macarena quip?

    6. Re:Good one... by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but if a customer ever asked that, I'm very sure that customer service rep would say something along the lines of, "Have you read the owners manual, sir?"

      Because.. quite frankly... it's in there, and simple :) It's like people not knowing what a right-click is and using the internet. (and not on a mac)

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  10. Well by Belisarivs · · Score: 1

    I was going to say that Microsoft could compliment it's "Switch to XP" ad campaign with "Linux Crashes", but that would be too easy.

    1. Re:Well by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "I was going to say that Microsoft could compliment it's "Switch to XP" ad campaign with "Linux Crashes", but that would be too easy."

      Seriously, they're not going to draw attention to their #1 competitor by smearing it, especially when most of their customer base has never even heard of it.

  11. Another Article by OrangeHairMan · · Score: 2
  12. Humus by EggplantMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    In the name of efficiency I've decided to combine all of these exceedingly clever jokes into one package!

    Cmdr_Taco: What happen?
    Mechanic: Somebody set us up the troll article.
    Operator: We get signal.
    Cmdr_Taco: What !
    Operator: Main screen turn on.
    Cmdr_Taco: It's you !!
    Katz: How are you gentlemen !!
    Katz: All your little boys are belong to us.
    Katz: You are on the way to your spelling sucks.
    Cmdr_Taco: What yuort say !!
    Katz: You have no chance to survive make your time.
    Katz: Ha Ha Ha Ha ... .
    Cmdr_Taco: 1. Take off every "sig."
    Cmdr_Taco: ...
    Cmdr_Taco: 3. Profit!

    --

    ?-|||-----x<*))))><
    1. Re:Humus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Watch them mod this down to -1 and then mod up something about microsoft windows having bugs.

    2. Re:Humus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wubdoz has bygz

    3. Re:Humus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were right, an earlier post about windows and crashing got modded funny and this got modded down.

    4. Re:Humus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moderators are even more predictable than the posts they moderate.

    5. Re:Humus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet less predictible than trolls

    6. Re:Humus by meadowsp · · Score: 1

      Idiot.

    7. Re:Humus by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

      Can you imagine a beowulf cluster of these?! /me ducks

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  13. Chrysler Adopts Linux For Vehicle Simulations by Bob+Vila's+Hammer · · Score: 2, Funny

    After running a simulation on windows to simulate a simulation crash of their testing simulations.

    --


    --"The perfect example of the man of action is the suicide." - William Carlos Williams
  14. Obligatory crashing reference by Zakabog · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Chrysler Group is using a new Linux cluster computer for crash simulation testing and analysis in an effort to make safer cars and trucks.

    Well I guess using Linux makes sense for crash simulation testing. While Linux can simulate a crash, Windows will ACTUALLY crash.

    1. Re: Obligatory crashing reference by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > Well I guess using Linux makes sense for crash simulation testing. While Linux can simulate a crash, Windows will ACTUALLY crash.

      Yeah, the hired help turned on the BSOD xscreensaver and thought they were testing a crash.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Obligatory crashing reference by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Dunno abotu you, but if I can pick between a simulation or the real thing, my mind is made up rather quickly....

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  15. Obligatory... by carlfish · · Score: 5, Funny

    Headline, six months from now:


    Chrysler abandons Linux crash-testing simulation. "We just couldn't get them to crash", says spokesman.
    --
    The more I learn about the Internet, the more amazed I am that it works at all.
    1. Re:Obligatory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, Linux won't likely crash. Now if the apps like the browsers could be fixed so they don't crash. Irritating.

  16. complement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sheesh, use a grammar checker

  17. If Operating Systems Were Cars... by andres32a · · Score: 5, Funny

    MS-DOS: You get in the car and try to remember where you put the keys.

    WINDOWS: You get in the car and drive to the store very slowly, because attached to the back of the car is a freight train.

    MAC SYSTEM 8: You get in the car to go to the store and the car drives you to church.

    UNIX: You get in the car and type GREP STORE. After reaching 2000 mph en route, you arrive at the barber's shop.

    WINDOWS NT: You get in the car and write a letter that says 'go to the store'. Then you get out of the car and nail the letter to the dashboard.

    TALIGENT/PINK: You walk to the store with Ricardo Montalban who tells you how wonderful it will be when he can fly you to the store in his Learjet.

    OS/2: After fuelling up with 6000 gallons of gas you get in the car and drive to the store with a motorcycle escort and a marching band in procession. Halfway there, the car blows up, killing everyone in town.

    S/36 SSP: You get in the car and drive to the store. Halfway there you run out of gas. While walking the rest of the way you are run over by kids on mopeds.

    AS/400: An attendant kicks you into the car and then drives you to the store where you watch everyone else buy filets mignon.

    BeOSYour car goes faster, looks better, draws amazed stares everywhere you go, and has amazing preformance. Yet, when you try to fill it up, you find that it is incompatable with almost all know gas products.

    1. Re:If Operating Systems Were Cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WINDOWS NT: You get in the car and write a letter that says 'go to the store'. Then you get out of the car and nail the letter to the dashboard.

      How can you nail a letter to a dashboard when you're not in the car?

    2. Re:If Operating Systems Were Cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      macoscar: BMW 325i. Looks cool as hell but it's still a piece of crap under the hood. Gets outrun by Volvo Wagons.

      nextcar: Electric car with a 20 watt motor and a 300 watt stereo. Ahead of it's time but used all its power in the wrong places.

      novellcar: Schoolbus. Gets alot of people where they're going, built pretty sturdy, but it's old and only goes where IT wants. Costs a ton, can be fuel efficient with lots of passengers, but for any other purpose it's laughable.

      os2car: Stanley Steamer. Efficient, great MPG, sets a landspeed reccord of 196mph in 1916 using a 2 cylinder engine, but most people have never heard
      of it.

      qnxcar: Police modified caprice. Responds to emergencies, doesn't cost much, but you don't want to trust it.

      scocar: Eagle Talon. Looks like it should go really fast, but has a little bitty engine.

      solariscar: Nascar. Used to be a normal car, but now modified to run like an indycar. See unixcar.

      unixcar: Indycar. Goes fast, uses tons of gas, and needs new tires every 100 laps. It can usually be fixed during the race, but costs so much you need
      sponsors.

      win31car: Pinto. Tap it gently in the wrong spot and it explodes. Any questions?

      win95car: Ford Taurus. Looks solid, supposedly a #1 seller, but every time you turn the ignition there's a chance it'll explode. Too bad MS isn't
      recalling 'em like Ford is.

      winntcar: Humvee. Good security, but 0-60 is 23.1 seconds and it gets 6mpg highway... and it STILL costs $60,000!

    3. Re:If Operating Systems Were Cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in the NTmobile the dash is on the outside, obviously, dont you know ANYTHING?

    4. Re:If Operating Systems Were Cars... by forevermore · · Score: 2, Interesting
      MAC SYSTEM 8: You get in the car to go to the store and the car drives you to church.

      I never quiet understood this reference. Wouldn't this behavior be more indicative of Windows XP? (like how the first time I tried to manually enter an IP, it too me 25 minutes to convince it that I really didn't want to sign up for MSN or have it auto-configure my cable/dsl connection for me)

      --
      Do you really need reason for beer? Wingman Brewers
    5. Re:If Operating Systems Were Cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      : (like how the first time I tried to manually enter an IP, it too me 25 minutes to convince it that I really didn't want to sign up for MSN or have it auto-configure my cable/dsl connection for me)

      You are not a smart person.

    6. Re:If Operating Systems Were Cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you call an Eagle Talon slow???? Have you ever heard of a DSM? (www.dsm.org) An Eagle Talon is the same car as a Mitsubishi Eclipse, and they both came in a turbo all wheel drive model. Those cars handle amazingly well to mods and have been known to run high 12 / low 13 second 1/4 miles for hardly no money at all.

      The world's fastest Unibody is a DSM (Eagle Talon) and runs an 8 second 1/4 mile at over 150mph. http://www.extrememotorsports.com

    7. Re:If Operating Systems Were Cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I have never encountered a BMW on that road that was not driven by an utter cunt of a driver.

      Actually, that's a lie, I saw one once, but I think it was being stolen.

    8. Re:If Operating Systems Were Cars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure that'd be *church* WinNT was driving you to... More likely, quite the opposite thereof...

      You know the 'answer' to "where do you want to go today?" don't you? :)

    9. Re:If Operating Systems Were Cars... by csguy314 · · Score: 1

      LINUX: your car gets great mileage and doesn't pollute too much. But it looks ugly, and the only people that appreciate it are others that drive cars that get great mileage and dont pollute.
      Oh, and there's always a guy running behind you yelling "GNU! GNU! GNU!"

      --
      This is left as an exercise for the reader.
    10. Re:If Operating Systems Were Cars... by gorilla · · Score: 2

      As you can see by the references to Mac 8, this list is about 5 years old, and things have changed since then.

  18. Crash Test Dummies? by cornjchob · · Score: 4, Funny

    Once
    There were these guys who
    Thought that using Linux would
    Improve their product's safety

    And when
    they fin'ly did it
    They found
    Gates had set fire to their work

    He said that it was because
    The Sherman act had smacked him
    sooooo hard

    mmmmm mmmm mmmm mmm
    mmmmm mmmm mmmm mmm

    Ah, the good ol' Crash Test Dummies...we hardly knew ye.

    --
    We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
    1. Re:Crash Test Dummies? by slashzero · · Score: 1

      Man, they've had like 4 albums since "God Shuffled his Feet", and each and every one of them were awesome.

  19. Yet another article by OrangeHairMan · · Score: 2

    There's yet another article at News.com.com.com: http://news.com.com/2100-1001-962661.html

  20. A new name for windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For all you windows pirates out there you can always say you are running FreeBSOD.

    1. Re:A new name for windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or if you're running the newer products it could be .NetBSOD... *sigh*

  21. I don't get it by vlad_petric · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The price tag for the deal isn't being released. Cost savings were a major motivator for the project, which was first considered about a year ago.

    And how precisely are they going to save money ? And save money relative to what ? The old system ? (I kind of doubt it) The same hardware system with a proprietay OS ? Maintenance costs ?

    This article has all the characteristics of a "negative" FUD.

    The Raven.

    --

    The Raven

    1. Re: I don't get it by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Insightful


      > And how precisely are they going to save money ? And save money relative to what ? The old system ? (I kind of doubt it) The same hardware system with a proprietay OS ? Maintenance costs ?

      See the links modded up to (5, informative) elsewhere. The general idea is that these days you buy a Linux CoW or Beowulf cluster instead of upgrading the ageing Cray. And for some reason it's still newsworthy, though people have been doing it for the better part of a decade now.

      Not that I mind the good PR for Linux, but it is a curious phenomenon that this kind of detail of a big corporation's IT affairs is considered newsworthy.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:I don't get it by rgmoore · · Score: 1
      And how precisely are they going to save money ? And save money relative to what ? The old system ?

      The savings are probably compared to buying a comprably powerful system running a proprietary Unix. I'd assume that the biggest chunk of the savings is that they can run on (comparatively) cheap commodity hardware. This seems to be a very common reason for moving to Linux: it lets you run your old Unix software on much cheaper boxes.

      --

      There's no point in questioning authority if you aren't going to listen to the answers.

    3. Re: I don't get it by Dirtside · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Not that I mind the good PR for Linux, but it is a curious phenomenon that this kind of detail of a big corporation's IT affairs is considered newsworthy.
      Keep in mind that the majority of the news sources (or "news sources" where appropriate) covering this story are, if not actual pro-Linux sources (like /.), at the very least computer news sources. Google News comes up with only about 10 hits for chrysler linux (compared to 726 for sniper arrests), so it's not like it's even been that widely covered so far; and this kind of business change actually is a newsworthy development in the computer industry.

      You'd see this as a news story from computer-themed news sources; it'd be a "feature" in mainstream or general news sources.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    4. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how precisely are they going to save money?

      Less crashes? *duck*

    5. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work at Chrysler, but not with this, but if it's the same project I'm thinking of, this used to be on Cray's and then Origins. More recently they were piloting a cluster of some 4-way HP boxes.

      IBM is a big supplier of ours. I'm guessing this is about moving away from Cray/SGI with some savings to boot (IT spending is tight these days, as it is many places).

      Chrysler does a fair amount of Linux stuff but it mostly happens in the fringe areas and I'm pretty sure IT management is mostly unaware of it. We do some embeded stuff for instance.

    6. Re:I don't get it by jamesl · · Score: 1

      this "article" is the result of IBM PR.

    7. Re:I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work in the Electronic Design Automation (EDA) industry, and I see a lot of companies switching to Linux boxes. Although everyone likes to say that MHz isn't everything, including me. No matter which way you slice it. A 2 GHz / 4 GB Ram, Xeon box running RedHat 7.2 will knock the sox off any comparably priced Ultra Sparc box when it comes to synthesizing a multi-million gate SoC. If anyone has compare a top of the line x86 box to a top of the line 32-bit Sun box using synthesis tools I'd like to hear what the performance is. x86 has the price/performance advantage, but I'd like to hear how it fairs on straight horsepower.

      Tools like matlab don't seem to show this performance difference. Maybe this is an integer vs. floating point issue, but I'm not sure.

      So, take the performance difference, throw in cheaper hardware costs, smaller software costs, and you've got yourself a better price/performance ratio.

      Administration costs on a cluster of identical machines are low, since they are managed together as a cluster.

      Combine all these factors and Linux on a cluster of x86 boxes makes a very cost effective compute farm.

    8. Re: I don't get it by ep32g79 · · Score: 1

      step 1: Adopt a linux cluster farm.
      step 2: ..........
      step 3: PROFIT!

    9. Re:I don't get it by Highly+Motivated+Ano · · Score: 1

      Most of the car manufacturers have been dumping Silicon Graphics hardware over the last year in favor of Linux and other cheaper solutions. The cost factor comes in to play on many levels. For one, there's the up front hardware cost. Second, support and maintenance of the system (either through in house employees drawing nice salaries, a really expensive maintenance contract, or a combination of both). Third, the software cost, which is either in house or a customized canned application written by a consulting company.

      Linux on Intel hardware can save a company lots of money simply because it's commodity hardware and doesn't require people in lab coats to operate.

      Now, go over to eBay and buy one of the many SGI Octane systems because SGI workstations are now affordable to us Linux users (thanks IBM!). :)

      -David

    10. Re:I don't get it by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Well, it's due time to upgrade, so ...
      royalties?

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    11. Re:I don't get it by fw3 · · Score: 2
      lets see,

      A decade ago RISC workstations (mostly running Unix, although NT started coming online soon after) had a far better price/performance on floating point compute cycles than Intel x86. If you needed to solve problems beyond the capacity of RISC processors (then 20-50Mflops) for $10-20K you needed to move to Cray (vector) processors (200+Mflops / CPU) with costs running in the range of a million $US per cpu.

      Unfortunately crush analysis (and structural FEA in general) doesn't scale all that well on multi cpu systems (at 8 CPUs you might see 4x speedup). Thus if you really needed run this sort of solution (in less than a couple of months compute time) it was worth the cost of the Cray.

      5 years ago while Xeon began to eclipse RISC in showing the best price / performance numbers, Unix/RISC (usually using super-scalar architectures) systems scaled to the point of replacing the vector based systems and proprietary Unix clustering has been solid and scalable to an order of magnitude beyond what you could think of doing with NT/W2k.

      Today the 'sweet spot' in price/performance is definitely intel Xeon and as most of this code has been developed on Unix, Linux is easy to do, and Linux clustering is certainly good enough to manage these tasks.

      Of course it could be run on win32 but why?

      Where you see FUD here is beyond me.

      --
      Linux is Linux, if One need clarify their dist: <Dist>/GNU Linux
      bsds are of course just BSD
  22. Re:Four easy steps by MagikSlinger · · Score: 2
    1. Make crappy cars that always have to be repaired
    2. Adopt Linux for your crash-simulation enviornment to save millions
    3. ????
    4. Profit!

    The technical name for Step #3 is "Insert Miracle Here".

    --
    The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
  23. they're replacing Unix by stevenj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    On the off chance that you actually read the article, you'll see that they're replacing Unix machines, not Windows, with Linux. This is a no-brainer, especially since their software is probably custom-developed and can easily be recompiled under GNU/Linux.

    --
    If a thing is not diminished by being shared, it is not rightly owned if it is only owned & not shared. S. Augustine
    1. Re:they're replacing Unix by mcrbids · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Somehow, there's this perception that if a business migrates from Unix to Linux, that it's not a victory, that it might as well not be reported.

      But, keep in mind, that very many of these Unix to Linux conversions may well have been, 5-7 years ago, Unix to NT conversions. Maybe more than half.

      What's happened in the past few years is that Linux has all but halted NT/2000/XP's growth in the server space. And, being a *nix advocate, I think that's good news.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  24. If people bought cars like computers... by andres32a · · Score: 5, Funny

    HelpLine: "General Motors HelpLine, how can I help you?"

    Customer: "My car ran fine for a week and now it won't go anywhere!"

    HelpLine: "Is the gas tank empty?"

    Customer: "Huh?How do I know?"

    HelpLine: "There's a little gauge on the front panel with a needle
    and markings from 'E' to 'F'.Where is the needle
    pointing?"

    Customer: "It's pointing to 'E'.What does that mean?"

    HelpLine: "It means you have to visit a gasoline vendor and purchase
    some more gasoline.You can install it yourself or pay
    the vendor to install it for you."

    Customer: "What?I paid ,000 for this car!Now you tell me that
    I have to keep buying more components?I want a car that
    comes with everything built in!"

    HelpLine: "General Motors HelpLine, how can I help you?"

    Customer: "Your cars suck!"

    HelpLine: "What's wrong?"

    Customer: "It crashed, that's what wrong!"

    HelpLine: "What were you doing?"

    Customer: "I wanted to run faster, so I pushed the accelerator pedal
    all the way to the floor.It worked for a while and then
    it crashed and it won't start now!

    HelpLine: "It's your responsibility if you misuse the product.What
    do you expect us to do about it?"

    Customer: "I want you to send me one of the latest version that
    doesn't crash any more!"

    HelpLine: "General Motors HelpLine, how can I help you?"

    Customer: "Hi, I just bought my first car, and I chose your car
    because it has automatic transmission, cruise control,
    power steering, power brakes, and power door locks."

    HelpLine: "Thanks for buying our car.How can I help you?"

    Customer: "How do I work it?"

    HelpLine: "Do you know how to drive?"

    Customer: "Do I know how to what?"

    HelpLine: "Do you know how to drive?"

    Customer: "I'm not a technical person.I just want to go places
    in my car!"

    1. Re:If people bought cars like computers... by El+Pollo+Loco · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Funny, I was just thinking about this. A reletive just lost a whole bunch of data, due to a in a software program. While cars require a bit of basic knowledge, and licensing, there is liability there. If ford builds Taurauses with defective ignition controle modules(true), and my cars stalls and gets hit in the middle of an accident, I can sue them. When my relative lost his data due to something that was not his fault, who's liable. No one.

    2. Re:If people bought cars like computers... by bugnuts · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's right, you can't sue them. And you don't want to. The car industry is horribly regulated, pretty much since the Ford Pinto. Typical markups on computers these days are about 10%, compared to a standard 100% markup for other products. Some products such as cables, enjoy a 12x increase.

      If you had to pay for insurance for a powersupply failing, you'd be spending $5000 for a $2000 computer, although it'd certainly be more reliable. Of course, it wouldn't run as fast, plus you'd then have to invest $1000 into an OS... even Linux most certainly wouldn't be free (as in beer) if liability was an issue.

    3. Re:If people bought cars like computers... by El+Pollo+Loco · · Score: 1

      The cost of the car might go up some. But you are incorrect about OS part. Even now, with the auto industry regulated like I say, there's nothing to stop me from putting on a different exhaust. In fact, they're nothing to stop me from putting an entire engine, and drivetrain that I built myself in, save for emissions. But if I do kill anyone, it is my fault. Similar to beta software, the developers don't know how it's going to react, so they say don't install unless you know what you are doing. Liability in the the software industry would be a great thing.

    4. Re:If people bought cars like computers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seriously need some perspective when you start comparing a faulty car (possible loss of life) with faulty software (possible loss of data)

      [Even more OT: you could probably stretch it to loss of life if you used one of the PSU's reviewed by THG, software error caused a need for some extra watts, that caused the PSU to burst into flames and you didn't manage to control the fire....but that is stretching it a bit far]

    5. Re:If people bought cars like computers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So software companies would be liable for their software, unless they say they're not. Is that what you're saying? How is that any different than what they say now? Every piece of software comes with such a disclaimer.

      And you can't do whatever you want for your car. Sure you can put a different engine in, or whatever, but they all have to follow the regulations. If you put nitros in your car and get caught, you could end up in a lot of trouble. I'd rather not see the same thing happen when I overclock my CPU or install SoftICE.

    6. Re:If people bought cars like computers... by theLOUDroom · · Score: 2

      Who's liable?
      She is.

      This is why any data you care about must be backed up. If she didn't take proper precautions with her data, that's her fault. Being a newbie doesn't change that.
      Think about it kinda the same way as wearing your seatbelt.
      I can only feel so bad for a person who dies in a car accident if they weren't wearing their seatbelt and it's the same for lost data.
      Hard drives are mechanical devices, as a result, their relibility is crap compared to just about everying else in your computer. Software isn't perfect, there are always a few bugs in some software package you could possibly install that will hose your system if you're not careful.

      It's easy to protect your data if you understand how to use a computer, and if you don't, you should expect sub-optimal results from your computer use until you learn.
      This doesn't mean I'm going to call the person an idiot for loosing the data. (Heck, it probably took most of us a disk crash or two before we realized just how important backups are.) I'll just tell them that there are various ways of protecting your data, so if they care about not losing it, they should learn how to back things up.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
  25. How much of that savings is about Linux? by jasonditz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It says the Linux solution saves 40% over the prior Unix solution, but it doesn't say what the prior solution is. Are the savings here really coming from using Linux, or just from using cheap commodity hardware clustered together?

    1. Re:How much of that savings is about Linux? by linuxislandsucks · · Score: 1

      ah now take a wild guess who are the biggest selelrs of UNix, IBM or SUn..

      --
      Don't Tread on OpenSource
    2. Re:How much of that savings is about Linux? by Dirtside · · Score: 2

      If the direct cause of the savings is the ability to use cheap commodity hardware, then the savings are still indirectly due to Linux -- since Linux is what allows them to use cheap hardware, instead of the big server iron required by the corporate Unix. (Theoretically, anyway; I don't know much about corporate Unices.)

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    3. Re:How much of that savings is about Linux? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2
      Check out the e-week article:
      This new Linux cluster, which IBM and the Chrysler Group will detail on Monday, is based on 108 IBM IntelliStation M Pro 6850 workstations powered by dual Intel Xeon processors operating at 2.2GHz each with enhanced 512KB L2 cache.
    4. Re:How much of that savings is about Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm, Compaq (pre merger) Alphaserver SC I believe...

    5. Re:How much of that savings is about Linux? by sad_ · · Score: 1

      Ofcourse the winnings are from running Linux on cheap intel hardware, which is not possible with any of the other commercial unix versions out there.

      --
      On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.
    6. Re:How much of that savings is about Linux? by jasonditz · · Score: 1

      There certainly are commercial unices that run on x86 hardware. Solaris x86, SCO, and I'm sure I'm missing a few others. One could also stick one of the BSDs on this hardware. I'm just curious if you could get the same results with one of those solutions, and if so is this really a great victory for Linux or is it just a great victory for clustering?

  26. Interesting choice... by TWX_the_Linux_Zealot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...especially for a public announcement. I remember a while ago Microsoft was touting their big thing with how their clustering was going to out-do anything opensource with a few months, yet more and more large corporations, and not simply startups or new, tech-savvy ones, are adopting Linux or some other form of open source instead. I hope this demonstrates a continuing shift away from poorly written server code to something more viable and of better spec.

    --

    IBM had PL/1, with syntax worse than JOSS,
    And everywhere the language went, it was a total loss...
    1. Re:Interesting choice... by marauder404 · · Score: 1

      Is that just your perception or are you basing that on actual data? Microsoft has tons of case studies where Windows 2000 was selected over the competition. I know what you're saying, but before you can really get a good handle on how many big businesses are selecting Linux vs Microsoft unless you have real data and not just your memory of headlines, as very few Microsoft installations are newsworthy. An increase of larger companies using Linux isn't necessarily a shift in the market toward Linux ... it could simply be from the growth of clustering.

      It seems that every car that cuts you off is another BMW, but we all know that's not really the case -- it's just perception. Be careful of drawing conclusions without real data.

    2. Re:Interesting choice... by phiwum · · Score: 1

      I don't think that this is a good example for your case (namely, that Linux clusters are being selected over MS clusters, presumably because of their inherent superiority).

      In this case, the corporation had previously used Unix, and so moving to Linux is much less painful than moving to MS. Even if MS was somewhat easier to cluster or gave better performance, one might prefer to move to Linux since porting the existing software would be so much simpler.

      So, is Linux better or more popular for clustering? I don't know, but this particular article doesn't give much evidence that it's better.

      (I tend to suppose that Linux is superior for clustering, just because of my personal biases. I would personally rather lick razor blades than use Windows, so perhaps I'm not the most impartial observer.)

      --
      Phiwum's law: anyone that names an obvious law after himself and then puts it in his own sig is just pathetic.
    3. Re:Interesting choice... by dicka_j · · Score: 1

      I hope this demonstrates a continuing shift away from poorly written server code to something more viable and of better spec

      I think you'll find that it is just a move to save money, and has little to do with the coding ability of MS. Just because linux is being adopted does not mean that the industry is being enlightened.

  27. Car Trouble by andres32a · · Score: 5, Funny

    Four men rode in a car, a mechnical engineer, an electrical engineer, a chemical engineer, and a computer engineer. The car stalled out.

    The mechnical engineer said it must be the pistons, let's repair them and we'll be okay.

    The electrical engineer said it has to be the spark plugs, we'll replace them and be ready to roll.

    The chemical engineer said it's got to be bad gas, we'll flush the system and be on our way.

    They turned to the computer engineer. What do you think we should do?

    Let's get out of the car and get back in.

    1. Re:Car Trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      i dont get it

    2. Re:Car Trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      nonono...



      Its supposed to be


      Computer engineer: Close all windows and restart the car...

    3. Re:Car Trouble by GI+Jones · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, it goes:

      Four men rode in a car, a mechnical engineer, an electrical engineer, a chemical engineer, and a Microsoft(R) software engineer. The car stalled out.

      The mechnical engineer said it must be the pistons, let's repair them and we'll be okay.

      The electrical engineer said it has to be the spark plugs, we'll replace them and be ready to roll.

      The chemical engineer said it's got to be bad gas, we'll flush the system and be on our way.

      They turned to the computer engineer. What do you think we should do?

      First close all the open windows then restart.

      --
      "Perhaps most amazingly, votaries of 'diversity' insist on absolute conformity." -- Tony Snow
    4. Re:Car Trouble by flacco · · Score: 5, Funny
      Four men rode in a car, a mechnical engineer, an electrical engineer, a chemical engineer, and a computer engineer.

      And, definitely, none of them got laid that night.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
    5. Re:Car Trouble by dollargonzo · · Score: 5, Funny

      i heard it quite differently, mostly starting with the fact they were going down an icy hill and eventually stopped the car at the bottom.

      [middle is the same]

      software engineer:

      let's go down once more, and see if the problem happens gain!

      --
      BSD is for people who love UNIX. Linux is for those who hate Microsoft.
    6. Re:Car Trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless the car was filled with four homosexual men.

    7. Re:Car Trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, Angelina Jolie is just such a sexy badass.

    8. Re:Car Trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      BSD is for people who love UNIX. Linux is for those who hate Microsoft.

      Got it. Thanks. I'll choose Linux, then.

    9. Re:Car Trouble by paradesign · · Score: 3, Funny
      three engineering students are all standing around the water cooler one day trying to figure out what kind of engineer God is.

      "well he must be a mechanical engineer" says the one, "have you looked at how complex the skeleton is, all those joints, man!"

      "no, no, no," says another, "have you seen the brain he MUST be an electrical engineer, well never even hope to understand its complexities."

      "you both have valid points," says the third "but i must contest that God is a civil engineer, i mean who else would run a hazardous waste line through a recreational area?"

      rimshot... ahem right, back to work.

      --
      I want 2D games back.
    10. Re:Car Trouble by flacco · · Score: 2
      Wow, Angelina Jolie is just such a sexy badass.

      No, that's goodass. She's a *GOODASS*.

      --
      pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  28. Daimler Chrysler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Isn't the full name Daimler Chrysler?

  29. Insert knee-jerk reaction joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Windows would crash before the car could!

    1. Re:Insert knee-jerk reaction joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hehe.. Imagine explaining the boss

      Eeh....well, just after the car took off we got this 'general protection error'...

  30. WHY!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Windows crashes pretty well....

  31. Not Linux vs. WIndows, Linux vs. Unix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article make no mention of a switch from Windows, it's a switch from Unix.

  32. -1 offtopic by rhombic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Nope, not karma-starved, just writing slowly while the previous RTFA'er submitted. Without using the +1 bonus. Take it easy, I just replied rather than using a mod point to drop your comment.

    Oh yeah, never have done crack. Quite happy with my fucking life, and the rest of my life is pretty good, too.

    --
    1984 was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.
    1. Re:-1 offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, thank the heavens for people like yourself. I mean, Slashdot would descend into a spiral of troll postings and uninformed comments like mine. Oh wait...

      And I repeat: you need a life.


      Okay, I can't help but jump in here. Anonymously, no doubt. ;)

      You're tying a good deal of your self esteem to what trolls on slashdot think. I know that because of the defensiveness of your post. Especially in this case - you really weren't being attacked.

      The point? Oh. You need the life. ;p

  33. Hrmm by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 2, Funny

    So this might explain why the SGI Octane I just bought off eBay had chrysler.com nameservers referenced in it. /me wonders

    --
    "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
  34. new car name required by erikdotla · · Score: 5, Funny

    Due to pressure from the FSF, since Linux was used as part of the car production process, GM will be forced to release the 2003 GNU/Taurus.

    --
    # Erik
    1. Re:new car name required by Osty · · Score: 1

      GM will be forced to release the 2003 GNU/Taurus

      Uh ...

      1. The Taurus is a Ford product. Ford and GM are competitors.
      2. The article was about Daimler-Chrysler, not GM.
      3. Chrysler doesn't make the Taurus, either.

      Perhaps you meant the 2003 GNU/Sebring? Or at least pick a car from the Daimler-Chrysler/Plymouth/Dodge/Mitsubishi stable, rather than a Ford car and attribute it to GM. Maybe I'm just being anal.
    2. Re:new car name required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe I'm just being anal.

      You probably are, but somebody had to say it.

      (posting this anonymously b/c moderators have been humorless lately. Thinking differently is not advised.)

    3. Re:new car name required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want a GNU/Viper!

    4. Re:new car name required by christopherfinke · · Score: 1
      1. The Taurus is a Ford product. Ford and GM are competitors.
      2. The article was about Daimler-Chrysler, not GM.
      3. Chrysler doesn't make the Taurus, either.

      4. Profit!
    5. Re:new car name required by smithmc · · Score: 1

      Too bad it wasn't VW, then they could release the GNU/Beetle.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    6. Re:new car name required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad Taurus is a Ford vehicle, dumbass.

    7. Re:new car name required by erikdotla · · Score: 1

      Wow, anal! It was a joke, relax.

      You know, you don't have to be developers ALL the time. Some of the time, you could try to act like normal people. I know it's hard, I'm one too, but really - resist the urge to be totally literal and precise 100% of your waking hours, and you might find you get laid more.

      --
      # Erik
  35. Almost makes me want to buy a Chrysler.... by slickwillie · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...just kidding.

    1. Re:Almost makes me want to buy a Chrysler.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you own a Mercedes, you did...

  36. Wait a minute by dh003i · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    So wait a minute, you save money by using Linux? Are you telling me that the folks at MS are lying and that the TCO for Winodws isn't lower?

    I thought that paying $200 for every copy of Windows and regular forced "update fees" would be cheaper than buying one Debian GNU/Linux CD and then updating using apt for free.

    Are you telling me that a product which costs less and functions equivalently will actually save you money? That doesn't make any sense. Microsoft says it doesn't.

    1. Re:Wait a minute by Osty · · Score: 4, Informative

      So wait a minute, you save money by using Linux? Are you telling me that the folks at MS are lying and that the TCO for Winodws isn't lower?

      Red herring. The article was about a migration to linux from a proprietary unix, not from Windows. Therefore, the only conclusion you can draw here is that linux saves you money over other unix operating systems. You can't make any conclusions about linux TCO vs. Windows TCO based on this article.


      Care to try again?

    2. Re:Wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you talking about MS when the product they replaced was UNIX? Try making your mindless zealous rants ON-topic.

    3. Re:Wait a minute by packeteer · · Score: 2

      Too bad they replaced expensive UNIX computers with Linux ones. Same ole' same ole' around business these days. Hardly news worthy. Maybe in the Wall Street Journal but not a news for nerds/stuff that matters.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    4. Re:Wait a minute by dh003i · · Score: 2

      This was -- hint, hint -- supposed to be funny, not insightful or inflammatory.

    5. Re:Wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it was, hint hint, pointless MS bashing by a zealot who didn't read the article.

      EAD.

    6. Re:Wait a minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You moderators are idiots. Explain as an A/C or whoever why he got modded 2 for that above.

    7. Re:Wait a minute by joib · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, if it was well-known that TCO for a windows cluster would be lower than for a linux cluster on the same hardware, then they would certainly have bought a windows cluster instead. I don't think portability is a big problem here. Most numerical code is quite portable.

      Looking at windowsclusters.org, it seems that most project there are using windows simply because MS agreed to supply both hardware and software, en exchange for using windows instead of linux.

    8. Re:Wait a minute by Osty · · Score: 2

      Well, if it was well-known that TCO for a windows cluster would be lower than for a linux cluster on the same hardware, then they would certainly have bought a windows cluster instead. I don't think portability is a big problem here. Most numerical code is quite portable.

      Unless the code for linux simply needed a recompile and maybe some touch-ups, while the code for windows would need a whole new interface. It's easier to switch from unix to linux, which would mean that the windows solution would have to have a much lower TCO, which probably isn't the case (whether or not Windows TCO is lower than Linux TCO is an argument for a different topic, and needs well-defined rules about what duties the target machine(s) would be fulfilling). I'd guess that the decrease in costs from a Unix to Linux switch would be sufficient enough that no investigation about a Windows switch would've been made unless a Microsoft account manager was working with them. Especially if porting the software was trivial when moving to Linux.


  37. linux by labratuk · · Score: 1

    Well of course they're going to use linux.
    Can you imagine the price of all those new Windows XP licences they would have to buy to replace all those damaged computers?

    --
    Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
  38. Don't tell the joke about the cars and OSes by Grd.+Adm.+Thrawn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It won't be funny, but watch, someone will do it anyway

    1. Re:Don't tell the joke about the cars and OSes by Usquebaugh · · Score: 2

      Too late and it was modded humorous +5

    2. Re:Don't tell the joke about the cars and OSes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean...

      Seg Fault
      Core Dump
      Kernel Panic
      Explode Auto

      P.

  39. Well... it's a good thing... by yamcha666 · · Score: 1

    Well, its a good thing they chose Linux instead of Windows.

    Now they won't have to worry about the system crashing before the car

    1. Re:Well... it's a good thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think that having 666 as part of your name is funny? Or new? It's not either, it's just stupid.

  40. this is wrong choice by Jacek+Poplawski · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Windows is much better in crashing.

  41. Imagine a... by Dthoma · · Score: 1

    ...nah, forget it.

    --

    Note to M1-ers: a curt but otherwise insightful message is not "Flamebait" or "Troll".

  42. No longer completely true by Goonie · · Score: 2
    In my experience, most people involved in business IT decision making have heard of Linux by now.

    That's not true for home users, though. That market will come eventually, but we'll see Linux on corporate desktops before it's widely used in the non-geek home market.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  43. This is so easy ;) by CaptTrips · · Score: 1

    This is the one time were Linux users are happy that their OS is crashing.

    --

    grep >= ! == $your
  44. Re:But Linux doesn't crash! by Anonymous+Cowrad · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    What sort of happy crappy candyland are you living in where linux doesn't crash?

    All operating systems crash, bub.

    Yes, even linux.

    Shocking, I know.

    --

    --
    pants ahoy
  45. Chrysler Linux boxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Imagine a Beowolf Cluster of THESE!!!

  46. STOP THESE FUCKING WINDOWS CRASHING JOKES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C'mon, people, you can think of better material than this.

    1. Re:STOP THESE FUCKING WINDOWS CRASHING JOKES by Darth+Pondo · · Score: 2, Funny

      How about: BillGates goes out and purchases a Chrysler Lebaron. He drives off the lot and the car automatically crashes into a tree. He goes back to the lot and tells them what happened and they give him another one. This time he drives off the lot and the car immediately runs into a wall. He goes back to the dealer and the dealer says "I am sorry Mr. Gates, I don't know what is wrong with these cars". Bill replies, "Wrong, I don't know what you are talking about. They are running just perfectly".

      --
      Worst. Sig. Ever!
  47. Hit Linus by gallir · · Score: 2
    Finally Bill Gates found the way to hit Linus with a bus. errr, no, literally, no... err, did you say Linux and crash? That's an oxymoron guy, surely, Billy is behind the scenes.

    Err... yes!, Linux?, crash?, Crysler?, Linus doesn't write in linux-kernel for a few days... Oh my god, it's true. They hit Linus!!!

    --
    sgis ddo ekil t'nod i
  48. nice post CWBYNL by JooBYE · · Score: 0
    • "Insert knee-jerk reaction joke about computers and crashing here."

    This comment alone attached to the end of the story just forced me to read that article.

    props to CowboyNeal!
  49. joke inserted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ~knee-jerk reaction joke about computers and crashing~

    Don't you mean WINDOWS and crashing? This despite the fact that neither 2000 nor XP has crashed on me in any significant way in three and a half years?

    Whereas every Linux box I try to set up doesn't even fucking recognize half the shit I plug into it?

    1. Re:joke inserted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      his despite the fact that neither 2000 nor XP has crashed on me in any significant way in three and a half years?

      Lucky bastard.

  50. Multiple Crashes. by hopbine · · Score: 1

    It said in the article that 18 simultaneous impacts can be conducted at once. Apart from emulating an autobahn pile-up, why do they want to do that ?

    --
    Semper ubi sub ubi
    1. Re:Multiple Crashes. by WhiteKnight07 · · Score: 1

      So you can have 18 different cars hit 18 different walls and then not have to keep the data from 17 of them in storage waiting for computing time. Considering the amount of data something like this can generate it probably saves a lot on storage space.

      --


      We're going to make information free Mr. Anderson, whether you like it, or not.
    2. Re:Multiple Crashes. by joib · · Score: 3, Informative

      Chrysler is a big company, so they certainly have many projects going on at the same time. By centralizing on one big cluster they can increase utilization compared to each department needing simulation capabilities having its own minicluster. So what the article probably means is that at the same time they can run 18 different simulations each using on average 12 cpus (108*2/18).

      It's the same on (almost) all supercomputers. They have lots of users, but most users don't use that many cpus for their jobs. Take me, for example. On the supercomputer where I have an account there are 512 power4 cpus. Usually I use 8 or 16 cpus for my simulations, and so do almost all the other people using the same machine. About the only time the entire supercomputer is reserved for one job is when they're benchmarking it, which as you certainly can imagine isn't done so often.

  51. In other news... by the_other_one · · Score: 3, Funny

    The next release of Tux Racer will have improved front and rear crumple zones, wing mounted side airbags, and will meet California emission standards.

    --
    134340: I am not a number. I am a free planet!
    1. Re:In other news... by red_dragon · · Score: 2

      How many MPH (miles per herring) will it get?

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Jesus asks: "What Would You Do?"
    2. Re:In other news... by the_other_one · · Score: 3, Funny

      The results of the fuel economy studies are under review

      It seems that something might have beem fishy.

      --
      134340: I am not a number. I am a free planet!
    3. Re:In other news... by chrisvdp74656 · · Score: 1

      I just had a mental image of Tux passing wind while hurtling down the "Who Said Penguins Can't Fly?" canyon.

      Chris

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  52. There's a reason why this doesn't happen for cars by Ghoser777 · · Score: 2

    Yeah, well most people grew up with a car so they had experiences with all those terms and ideas, so that generally doesn't happen. Plus, you have to take drivers education class in most places in the US, so people are informed. Kids now a days have computers everywhere - at home, at school, on tv, etc. In a decade or so, a majority of these semi-stupid complaints will probably be replaced by more intelligen ones... like why do I shutdown my computer from the start men? ;)

    [Yes, I realize this was for comic relief, but there was something else I thought was worth saying]

    Matt

    --
    James Tiberius Kirk: "Spock, the women on your planet are logical. No other planet in the galaxy can make that claim."
  53. Yet another car and OS joke... by FrankieBoy · · Score: 1

    Three developers were driving down the road when their car stops dead.

    They sit in the car and the Unix developer sayes "I think it's a problem with the core of the car, the engine. It can probably be fixed with a little bit of tinkering."

    The Apple developer sayes "No, I think that what ever is wrong must be a proprietary problem that we shouldn't mess with. Let's just have it towed to the manufacturer and wait until they fix it."

    Then the Windows developer spoke up and said "Wait...lets close all the windows, get out of the car, get back into the car and open the windows again, that'll fix it."

  54. Heterosexist! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, you also said they're engineers, but still...

  55. Re:Four easy steps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think you need a step three here.... step two just about says it all -- when you save millions, you automatically profit.

    here's how it should be:
    1. Make crappy cars that always have to be repaired
    2. Spend millions on upgrading your system to Linux (down time costs money)
    3. ???
    4. Profit!

  56. +1 FUNNY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, I'm sorry, I was in an alter-reality there for a moment when that unbelievably dumb joke you just shat up was funny. All apologies.

  57. Linux crashes cars? by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2

    I thought the advantage that Linux brought was that it crashed LESS than the "other" brand software...

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  58. Compliment (!=) complement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even when they might sound the same way...

  59. dude by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    You wern't actualy supposed to make the joke.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  60. at the school parking lot by ejaw5 · · Score: 1

    you can expect to see Soccer-Mom driven Town and Country Minivans with "Powered by Linux"
    stickers sported on the bumpers.

    --

    $cat /dev/random > Sig
  61. Look what they've done to my Operating System. by FrankieBoy · · Score: 2, Funny

    OK so they're using Linux to simulate car crashes, what will they use to simulate profits?

    I think Enron used Windows.

  62. Thanks, King Karma Whore. by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    You could just have provided a link, you know. As opposed to cut'n'pasting this outdated document.

    WINDOWS NT: You get in the car and write a letter that says 'go to the store'. Then you get out of the car and nail the letter to the dashboard.

    WTF?!

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  63. time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to not buy a Chrysler.

  64. Re:But Linux doesn't crash! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm

    My wife's linux box at home(38 days ago our house lost power)
    10:10pm up 38 days, 22:47, 5 users, load average: 2.13, 2.21, 2.57

    A linux firewall at work(we performed a failover test 116 days ago)
    21:45:39 up 116 days, 8:20, 4 users, load average: 0.03, 0.01, 0.00

    So i guess linux does crash when it loses power or when you purposely reboot it. :P

    Maybe you are doing something ratherstupid if your linux installations constantly crash.

  65. joke by cacheMan · · Score: 1

    What happens when your knee smashes into your computer?
    It crashes you Jerk

  66. Re:But Linux doesn't crash! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you wouldn't type "dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda bs=1024" just to see what it does, then maybe your machine wouldn't crash so much ;-)

  67. Re:This is one application -- You don't understand by Proudrooster · · Score: 5, Informative

    The application itself if not going to run on the cluster. The cluster is simply going to be used as a "compute farm" for solving the datasets and models produced by the application.

    This is similar to what is happening in the animation industry. The LINUX boxes are simply going to "crunch" the numbers and feed the results back to an application running under Windows or high end UNIX workstations.

    For a cheap "compute farm" cluster, you can't beat Red Hat Advanced Server with Xenon's.

    We are planning to build a 16 node cluster next year for the same purpose as Chrysler. Again, the apps aren't running here, LS-Dyna, DynaForm, Hypermesh, FEMB etc ... will still all run on a UNIX/Windows workstation, but the solving will be done (very quickly) on a Red Hat cluster.

    It just rocks!

  68. Re:Four easy steps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Make reasonably affordable american cars.
    2. Make rational IS decisions like adopting an inexpensive higher performing operating system on same hardware.
    3. Develop inhouse application on the new systems which are easier and cheaper to develop on.
    4. Benefit from incredibly higher uptimes which increase productivity and safety.
    5. Profit
    6. Repeat process throughout US.
    7. US GDP Increases
    8. Bill Gate's Accounting practices investigated by SEC.
    9. Everyone laughs :P

  69. how appropriate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    linux crashes so often for me and I've lost so many filesystems due to the unsafe ext2fs that I've switched to the rock solid FreeBSD and have been happy ever since. It is so fitting that chrysler chosed linux to do its crash testing, because crashing is what the unstable unsafe linux kernel is best at!

  70. Is this really news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can already see next week's slashdot story: "Bob, friend of cousin of CowboyNeal, adopts Linux for home use."

    1. Re:Is this really news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot: news, rumors, and misinformation for nerds (the male 15-19 year old without a girlfriend kind). stuff that may or may not matter.

  71. Re:But Linux doesn't crash! by Anonymous+Cowrad · · Score: 1

    I never said "constantly". Don't put words in my posts.

    If you believe that Linux does not crash, you are a fool, plain and simple. I'm not saying it crashes all the time, or even frequently, or even once a year, but it does happen.

    --

    --
    pants ahoy
  72. the savings are in the hardware by Raiford · · Score: 2
    Although the article doesn't really elaborate you can see that the savings are in the choice of hardware. The article did not reveal what previous hardware was used however the mention of unix implies that it was probably and SGI cluster. A quick little search on google revealed an article where Chrysler had previously using a SGI cluster consisting of a 126 node MIPS R14000 architecture running a 600 MHz. SGI is notoriously expensive and the custom hardware that is described in the article would represent a considerable cost savings.

    --
    "player 4 hit player 1 with 0 stroms"
  73. Re:This is one application -- You don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > For a cheap "compute farm" cluster, you can't beat Red Hat Advanced Server with Xenon's.

    Must...not...make...noble...gases...joke.

  74. Death and Taxes by zenyu · · Score: 2

    It depends very much on the car. A foreign SUV or light truck has a 33% tariff. And, there is a small luxury tax on something like a BMW. There are property taxes and sales tax on transportation.

    So it can add up, but that's if you're buying an imported BMW or Lexus SUV. If it's a small US car the taxes are minscule, even an American $50k SUV doesn't then it's only a few percent.

    There is also taxes on the workers income, and any profit, but that's going to depend a lot on the country it's made in and where it's made. I could believe the 50% figure on an SUV made in Germany, but not on a some car made in Mexico(no tariff) for a US company racking up losses not profits.

  75. Yet another SWITCH AD! by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 5, Funny

    Or maybe we'll see a Apple Switch Ad that features Crash Tests...

    I was testing a car crash on the PC and it was like beeeeep beep beep beep beep beeeep! And then like half of my crash test was gone, and I was like unnnhhh...? It devoured my crash test.

    It was a really good test. And then I had to test it again and I had to do it fast so it wasn't as good.

    It's kind of...

    a bummer.

    Note to moderators: It's Funny, not off-topic.

  76. Re:But Linux doesn't crash! by jrennie · · Score: 1

    Does it? I'm still waiting for this process to bomb:

    24345 jrennie 20 19 625M 625M 514M R N 0 98.8 41.4 62713m findFeatures.perl

    Jason

  77. Gotta have a journaling FS for fast recovery by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 2

    so pick Linux, does any OS have more choices (JFS, XFS, ext3, Reiser) ?

  78. Adopted? by KidSock · · Score: 2

    Aren't we past the point were Linux needs to be "adopted"? Is Linux an orphan that needs a home? Is Linux the red headed step child of operating systems? I think this shoud read "Linux Takes Over Chrysler (for vehicle simulations)".

    1. Re:Adopted? by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Linux isn't any kind of sentient entity. It can't "take over" anything. An appropriate title would be "Chrysler uses Linux for crash tesdt simulations".

  79. Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'nuff said

  80. Re:But Linux doesn't crash! by Anonymous+Cowrad · · Score: 1

    You know, it's a shite state of affairs when one can't make a statement like "linux crashes" without people coming out to debate it.

    You're not so seriously enamored and/or brainwashed that you think you have an uncrashable operating system in linux, are you?

    --

    --
    pants ahoy
  81. Re:This is one application -- You don't understand by afidel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For a cheap "compute farm" cluster, you can't beat Red Hat Advanced Server with Xenon's.

    Sure you can, how about redhat iso's running on Athlon MP's (or soon Opterons). Free software on better price/performance hardware.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  82. Re:Compliment (!=) complement by Belisarivs · · Score: 1

    What language is "(!=)"?

  83. ...with the Unix-based hardware used previously. by chaosAD · · Score: 1

    that's the part you missed,by mistake,of course from your cut/paste.I think you might have to w8 a while longer for the world domination.

  84. Re:But Linux doesn't crash! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wyndoz go krashey
    hahahhah

  85. in other news... by crayz · · Score: 1

    Dell is adopting Windows ME in crash testing. The new system is expected to "simulate" crashes up to 300% faster than Windows 98

  86. Re:This is one application -- You don't understand by Proudrooster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ok, you win.. that beats it :)

    However, I try to throw some cash Red Hat's way every now and then so they keep making distros.

    Assume your cluster costs $50,000 to build (including the Giga-bit ethernet gear), you are only going to pay $l000 or less for the O/S.

    That's a great deal and a half. Also, that paultry $1,000 investment keeps you in patches plus, gets your a year of email install/configuration tech support.

    But, your solution is definately cheaper !

  87. "Ins knee-jerk reaction about computers crashing" by Joey7F · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    [frink]So much for my plan of getting a +5 Funny comment based on my karma-whore joke generator...[/frink]

    --Joey

  88. As to your signature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  89. Tommy Boy by Bob+Vila's+Hammer · · Score: 1

    Linus: Thats why I'm here Bill. You see, back in Sandusky OH, there are 300 people working for Linux- we write the best open source software money can buy. And right now those people are in danger of cracking your windows. You're worried that some people are going to step up and help them. /.: Is that why you strapped a bomb to your body?

    Linus: Oh this isn't somebody set us up the bomb,
    these are rowad flares.

    $Bill: Road Flares? Did you live inside power lines as a kid?

    Linus: Hahaha. Why?

    So, do you think Microsoft can help these folks?

    $Bill: I'll be happy to swindle it-- err look into it.

    Linus: Hey, I'll tell you what. I can get a good look at a car crash by sticking my head in there, but wouldn't I rather take linux's word for it?

    Linus: $Bill, I'm not offering you a handout here, I'm offering you a great deal... This is an order for operation in analyzing car crash simulations to be controlled by Chrysler Group, organized by the open-source working man, for the open-source working man...

    $Bill: Well, absolutely! It would be my great pleasure, what have I got to lose.

    Slashdot Moderators: I don't believe it, Linus just sold the Chrysler Account!

    $Bill: What difference does it make, the Chrysler company is going to be mine in less than ten minutes anyways, right?

    Linus: Hehehhehee.

    Slashdot: For the moment it looks like a swindler has been swindled, and a company has been sacrficed for another company. For slashdot, this is Tommy Boy.

    --


    --"The perfect example of the man of action is the suicide." - William Carlos Williams
  90. Mod parent up!! by invalid_user · · Score: 1

    Best damned joke of the day!

  91. Why Linux a Chrysler? by tobo · · Score: 1

    If i could Linux I would simulate something like the Battle Tank or the Space Shuttle?

    Maybe Linux not simulate nothing but old Chrysler? No?

    Sorry, I very bad english? Linux banned here. Only Microsoft on the menu.

  92. Re:Why Linux a Chrysler? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What exactry does rinux being banned have to do with your bad Engrish?!?!?!?! Do yo feer more erette; how that you threw that in.

    MOM

  93. Daimler-Chrysler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad this is being done by a company that releases such shit unto the world. I sure hope they keep making uglier and uglier PT Cruisers!

  94. If GM made made cars like microsoft makes software by mmckinstUM · · Score: 1, Funny

    1. For no reason whatsoever, your car would crash twice a day.
    2. Every time they repainted the lines in the road, you would have to buy a new car.
    3. Occasionally your car would die on the freeway for no reason. You would have to pull over to the side of the road, close all of the windows, shut off the car, restart it, and reopen the windows before you could continue. For some reason you would simply accept this.
    4. Occasionally, executing maneuver such as a left turn would cause your car to shut down and refuse to restart,in which case you would have to reinstall the engine.
    5. Only one person at a time could use the car unless you bought "CarNT," but then you would have to buy more seats.
    6. Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, was reliable, five times as fast and twice as easy to drive - but it would only run on five percent of the roads.
    7. The oil, water temperature and alternator warning lights would all be replaced by a single "general protection fault" warning light.
    8. New seats would force everyone to have the same sized butt.
    9. The airbag system would ask "are you sure?" before deploying.
    10. Occasionally, for no reason whatsoever, you car would lock you out and refuse to let you in until you simultaneously lifted the door handle, turned the key and grabbed hold of the antenna.
    11. GM would require all car buyers to also purchase a deluxe set of Rand McNally road maps (now a GM subsidiary), even though they neither need nor want them. Attempting to delete this option would immediately cause the cars performance to diminish by 50 percent or more. Moreover, GM would become a target for investigation by the Justice Department.
    12. Every time GM introduced a new car, car buyers would have to learn to drive all over again because none of the controls would operate in the same manner as the old car.
    13. You'd have to press the "start" button to turn the engine off.

  95. German car makers by Thor_B · · Score: 1

    I know (no idea how official this is) that a few big European car makers (think southern Germany) are also using Linux clusters for these simulations.

    1. Re:German car makers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is the owner of Chrysler?
      Some south Germans?

    2. Re:German car makers by anno1602 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, for example Daimler (primary brand: Mercedes), which has bought(1) *surprise* Chrysler. They also use Linux to drive their dealer network.

      (1) Officially, it was a merger

  96. Sample Output by elixx · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Approaching moving pedestrian.....

    Kernel panic.
    System Halted.

    --
    No, Beowulf clusters can't imagine in Soviet Russia.
  97. ...what if they by newr00tic · · Score: 1

    used Windows, as it is more prone to crash?

    - Come to think of it; Good 'ol clippy could be their crash-test dummy.

    [clippy] (calm voice; he's used to crashes..)
    "It seems as if we're moving towards a brick wall at excessive speed. Do you want me to take credit for it, if we somehow prove stable, i.e. not crash?" (he always does if you write something novel-sized in Word, if it turns out to be a bestseller..)

    [clippy]
    "We have now rammed into that wall, and as usual we've come to a halt."
    - "Please re-boot.."


    --
    A horse can't be sick, you know, even if he wants to.
  98. Re:But Linux doesn't crash! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MY XP never Crashes!! Linux SUXXX

  99. Slashdot loves windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Windows OS was not mentioned once in the article, but the word windows appeared at least 26 times in people's posts! Here's a towel slashdot, wipe the sweat off.

  100. Linux in Manufacturing. by ip_free · · Score: 1

    We are a major supplier to Automotive industry. Linux has been part of our manufacturing process for a while now with great success. We got about 30 manufacturing machines running Linux, with more to follow. This allowed us to save substantial amount of money and do things that we could not do otherwise.

  101. Headline by Skjellifetti · · Score: 1

    I'm only just waking up and I don't have my glasses on so my brain processed the headline as:

    Chrysler Adopts Cowboy Neal for Vehicle Simulations

  102. Chrysler? GM? by torako · · Score: 1

    Why do all these General Motors references keep popping up in the comments, I wonder.. Doesn't anyone know that Chrysler is owned by Mercedes??

  103. Re:If GM made made cars like microsoft makes softw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Add


    14) Your car, whenever on the highway, can be hijacked by 12 year olds with radio control systems, at will. GM issues aluminum foil 'patches' once a month or so, which require you to be on the highway in order to receive.

    15) Replacing the car's tires, or radiator, or water pump requires you to ask GM to issue you new car keys since the old ones stop working.

    16) GM requires you to be on the highway in order to sign up for using entrances and exits it proscribes in order to access the highway system. Bandits grab control of these points within days of whatever access system GM sets up.

    17) GM talks fervently about the trusted driving experience to the media.

    18) Gas stations inspect your map collection and require you to accept their GM maps to the GM highway system whenever you fill up, or have your car serviced.

    19) Everytime you take your car in for service, they remove your personal changes to the car, and de-install any upgrades you've made, replacing them with ones approved by GM.

    20) Whenever you play a song on the radio, GM is notified, a fee transaction required, and only GM can update your radio. Only GM musicians can play music on your radio.

  104. gee, how original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think its funny that companies switch to Linux and think its so damned genius they just have to tell everyone. Whos cares. Also, none of these "switched to linux" articles ever concede that a large part of the savings is that they upgraded the hardware as well. I dig open source, but people give themselves a little too much credit for using it. Last time I checked its pretty popular.

  105. What, no sense of humor? by ngoy · · Score: 1

    I submitted the same story with the much catchier headline of "Linux helps Chrysler's crashing"

    2002-10-21 15:53:27 Linux helps Chrysler's crashing (articles,linux) (rejected)

    Or maybe his submission was earlier. But mine would have gotten more eyeballs!

    ngoy

    --
    --ngoy
  106. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    Several students were asked to prove that all odd integers are prime.
    The first student to try to do this was a math student. "Hmmm...
    Well, 1 is prime, 3 is prime, 5 is prime, and by induction, we have that all
    the odd integers are prime."
    The second student to try was a man of physics who commented, "I'm not
    sure of the validity of your proof, but I think I'll try to prove it by
    experiment." He continues, "Well, 1 is prime, 3 is prime, 5 is prime, 7 is
    prime, 9 is... uh, 9 is... uh, 9 is an experimental error, 11 is prime, 13
    is prime... Well, it seems that you're right."
    The third student to try it was the engineering student, who responded,
    "Well, to be honest, actually, I'm not sure of your answer either. Let's
    see... 1 is prime, 3 is prime, 5 is prime, 7 is prime, 9 is... uh, 9 is...
    well, if you approximate, 9 is prime, 11 is prime, 13 is prime... Well, it
    does seem right."
    Not to be outdone, the computer science student comes along and says
    "Well, you two sort've got the right idea, but you'll end up taking too long!
    I've just whipped up a program to REALLY go and prove it." He goes over to
    his terminal and runs his program. Reading the output on the screen he says,
    "1 is prime, 1 is prime, 1 is prime, 1 is prime..."

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...