Slashdot Mirror


What Software Do Cable Installers Place on Your PC?

{e}N0S asks: "The cable guy came over to install a cable modem at my Dad's house. As I watched him do his stuff I noticed he was installing something called Broadjump Client Foundation. I know you don't need software for a cable modem to work so I asked if it was necessary. He said he had to do his list of things, and we had to sign that he did his list of things, otherwise he couldn't leave it with us to use. Since I can always remove the software, I agreed, but I noticed while he was flipping through the install, he was clicking 'agree' on every EULA that came up. Doing a search on Google for 'Broadjump Client Foundation' comes up with some pretty scary stuff as far as what it does, like: 'Builds a database of subscriber demographics and buying behaviors to help evolve and refine marketing efforts.' Now, how does this affect us? Neither myself or anyone in my family agreed to the software; the cable guy did. And is there anyway to get cable companies to stop doing this as I can imagine since the cable company is a monopoly in this town, that the percentage of people who still have this software on their computers is pretty high."

125 of 944 comments (clear)

  1. he installed by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    nothing.

    he did nothing. i wouldnt let him. i just signed as if he did, to keep him outta shit.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:he installed by AlgUSF · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Even better yet, I have DSL. It came as an self-install kit.

      1) Plugged DSL modem into the telephone line

      2) Plugged DSL modem into network hub

      3) Connected filters to telephones

      4) Threw install CD in the trash

      --


      I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
    2. Re:he installed by madshot · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I would just thank him for giving me my modem and show him the door. If he doesn't like it he can call his manager and complain :)

      I NEVER let anyone install any software on my company computers or my home computers that deal with broadband. Next thing you know you'll have spy wear and you can't remove it.

      --
      Obama = Socialism.
    3. Re:he installed by s20451 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Next thing you know you'll have spy wear and you can't remove it.

      Yeah, like this.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    4. Re:he installed by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The way the guy explained it to me, there are dozens of people who dont want him touching their computer.

      Then they cant figure it out (yeah, I know it's just turning on DHCP), and have to call him back to set it up.

      If the original work order isn't signed - then there's no proof he ever showed up at all, and the cost of rolling the truck the second time comes outta his pay. If it is, then the customer pays for the second call like he should.

      He really didn't care one way or the other, so long as the work order was signed.

      No need to dump all the anti-corporate conspiracy theory bullshit on the poor joe who gets payed 10 bucks an hour to hookup peoples homes.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    5. Re:he installed by Kintanon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Just as a note, the cable installer guys get paid per customer, not per hour (based on questions I asked the installer when I had cable from Comcast in baltimore). So they love to get out of there quick.
      It means they made 17$ for 5-10 minutes of their time.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    6. Re:he installed by bheerssen · · Score: 5, Funny

      If he wants to install his software, I point to my mandrake box and say "sure have at it." Gets 'em every time.



      --
      (Score: -1, Stupid)
    7. Re:he installed by Capt.+DrunkenBum · · Score: 4, Funny

      I did the same thing, except I pointed at my ancient SparcStation 2, running Solaris 7..

      I thought he was going to rupture something. :)

      --

      Not everyone deserves a 320i

    8. Re:he installed by rw2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      If the original work order isn't signed - then there's no proof he ever showed up at all, and the cost of rolling the truck the second time comes outta his pay.

      That's a sexy, but untrue story. It's illegal to make him pay for that second truck roll.

      Now, will his bonus, likely correlated to percentage of second visits, be affected. Perhaps.

    9. Re:he installed by Reziac · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is also true for Verizon (the Verizon dude told me about this last time he was here). The reason being most of their field reps now are not really Verizon employees, but are on a sort of outside contract.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  2. Have a honeypot by samjam · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Have a bogus PC or bogus windows installation for him to install junk on, which you can leave "unused" till you need to call support when you can boot into that partition if needed.

    1. Re:Have a honeypot by dattaway · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I did this the first time I got cable. It was a 486 with Windows95 installed on it. Took the guy 30 minutes to install his warez on it. After he left, I got out my real computer and put the garage sale relic back in the attic.

    2. Re:Have a honeypot by Sancho · · Score: 3, Interesting

      More amusing would be a Linux machine. Let him try to figure it out. :)

    3. Re:Have a honeypot by meatspray · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They sent me two guys, one 'seasoned' one in training.

      I was running win2k before they supported it, to appease the installers i ran win98 system in a fullscreen VMware. You should have seen the look on their faces when the win2k desktop popped up for a second while the virtual machine rebooted.

      they installed all kinds of stuff, the IE on that image never worked the same again.

      All I had to do was take note of the IP and PC Name, (they were using some funky DHCP via NetBios carp) shut down the vm and cram the IP and Name into the 2k install. bam! instant access.

    4. Re:Have a honeypot by clickety6 · · Score: 5, Funny


      Good solution because all non-geeks have at least two or three old PCs just lying around the place for emergenices like this!

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    5. Re:Have a honeypot by Bobzibub · · Score: 5, Funny

      My installer (at&t cable) got confused at lilo.

      ; )

      -b

    6. Re:Have a honeypot by sckeener · · Score: 5, Funny

      More amusing would be a Linux machine. Let him try to figure it out. :)

      If the cable company is like my DSL support, then they wouldn't install it. Every time I have to call in problems with my DSL line, I have to lie and say I have a windows 98 pc. They usually then try to get me to do some basic networking troubleshooting. This can be hard to fake if you don't remember off the top of your head what the output is supposed to look like. If they catch me in the lie, I usually play the mad customer (which I usually am at this point) and demand they open a ticket for the issue. :)

      --
      "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
    7. Re:Have a honeypot by dattaway · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Time Warner people out here in Kansas City do not officially "support" Linux, but are in the LUG mailing list, have local usenet newsgroups for related issues, and the tech support people are very helpful. If only all ISPs were like this...

  3. Self Install Kits by Rayonic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is why I always opt for the self-install option with any ISP. I don't even like my wife messing with my computer, nevermind some complete stranger.

    (Side note: Yes, she does have her own computer. So there. :P)

    1. Re:Self Install Kits by warpSpeed · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I don't even like my wife messing with my computer, nevermind some complete stranger.

      My kids, my wife, and my mother do not have admin access on thier win2k machines (they each have thier own). If something breaks I have to fix it. Thats part of the deal for maintaining thier machines.... I aint got no time for no windoz viri, or spyware.

  4. Don't worry about it by tkrotchko · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do you want theoretical advice or practical?

    Theoretical:
    If you feel you can't live with the restrictions or you and your machine, then drop the service and use something else.

    Practical
    Just wipe the stuff off the machine after the guy leaves.

    You can only analyze this stuff so far.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    1. Re:Don't worry about it by windex · · Score: 5, Insightful

      On top of that, any cable company will let you demand to do a self install, and just drop off the cable modem or ship it UPS.

      The worst case scenerio is that you set it up before he gets there and go "I used to have it in my old apartment/house/whatever, it's already setup. Just plug it in and I'll sign your service order". No human cable technician is going to turn down getting out of doing work.

      Makes me wonder how old the submitter was to where he couldn't just say "No, thanks, I'll install it myself".

  5. Inquiring minds must know... by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What cable internet provider was this?

    1. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by jdreed1024 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      What cable internet provider was this?

      Dunno what this guy used, but certainly ATTBI/MediaOne/whatever does this.

      Broadjump is the biggest piece of shit software I've ever seen. It reboots your computer whenever possible (god forbid they should check to see if you're running on 2K/XP which doesn't need to be rebooted to renew DHCP). You also need that program to register your MAC address with them. I could have made a fuss, but it wasn't worth it. I installed, registered, and de-installed. No more problems.

      They certainly don't require that you leave it installed, except for Tech Support. Which so far has been easy, because if it's a problem with the line, you simply call and report that cable TV is out. Then they don't ask you to reboot your computer 500 times.

      --
      There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
    2. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by R.Caley · · Score: 5, Informative
      They certainly don't require that you leave it installed, except for Tech Support. Which so far has been easy, because if it's a problem with the line, you simply call and report that cable TV is out.

      I'd like to underline this. For anyone who hasn't learned by painful experience yet, never report anything to the interent suport people if you have TV from the same source.

      Anything which goes wrong is in one of two classes, things shared with the TV operation and things their tech support stands no chance of fixing. The TV operation will be far better resourced, and the support staff know that you may have 5 children demanding cartoon network at your end and so not fixing things may result in you being driven insane and turning up at their call center with a chainsaw. Nerds just don't carry that fear factor:-)

      Certainly when I had a problem which seemed to be at my end, my cable suppler (Telewest) quoted a couple of weeks for an engineer from the internet side and day and a half for a TV bod.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    3. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by jdreed1024 · · Score: 4, Informative
      ATTBI does NOIT need anything to register your MAC with them... they dont give arats ass about your MAC address..

      This is true NOW. It was not true in August of 2002. They only just switched their policy recently. NOW, they only care about your cable modem's MAC addr. As recently as two months ago, however, they cared very much about your computer's MAC addr.

      What used to happen, was you could get a broken DHCP lease, that only worked for registering with them. Connecting to anything else resulted in dropped connections. Oh, and the lease was only valid a short period of time.

      Of course, this is the case in the Boston Area. AT&T Broadband exists in other areas, and may have different policies elsewhere, but I don't care about that, since I don't live there.

      dont spread lies man.... it's not right.

      Don't spread ignorance, man, it's not right...

      --
      There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
  6. Comcast - Mac OS X by mcwop · · Score: 5, Informative

    I use Mac OS X. The software that Comcast has is incredibly buggy for Mac OS. I refused to install it. I just signed the docs for the cable guy (as if I even needed him to come do the installation in the first place).

    --

    "I don't think it's selfish, to eat defenseless shellfish." -NOFX

  7. Small Claims Court? by TheBillGates · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wonder if you could take them to small claims court to compensate you for the time you spent uninstalling the program?

    Sure, it wouldn't amount to much money, but taking them to court would get their attention that people don't want that spyware stuff on their machines.

    The nerve they have to install that spyware and not have the decency to even let their customer know. This is a severe abuse of your privacy.

    1. Re:Small Claims Court? by R.Caley · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I wonder if you could take them to small claims court to compensate you for the time you spent uninstalling the program?

      More significantly, isn't him clicking through the end user agreements a forgery of your agreement?

      On a practical level, I agree with someone above: have a sacrificial machine. I built a machine from my parts boxes for them to mess up. After all, all they want is a windows control panel to poke at, that it is on a P100 with almost no disk space and a slightly dodgy power supply doesn't matter.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    2. Re:Small Claims Court? by sqlrob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How do you know it will uninstall with that option?

      There are several programs (aka Gator) that don't

    3. Re:Small Claims Court? by Angram · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sorry, bub, but I'm a trained Small Claims Court Counsellor. You can't sue for emotional, time, or any other non-monetary kind of cost. If it can't be printed on a recipt, you can't sue. You can sue for time if it was part of an arrangement (i.e. plumber not getting paid for the job), but not for your time spent fixing this stuff. Unless he broke the machine and you had to have it serviced or replaced, there's nothing small claims court can do.

      --

      GL
  8. Nothing. by krugdm · · Score: 4, Informative

    Roadrunner let me pick up a self install kit, so no tech ever came to my house.

    And no software needed to be installed anyway. Screwed the cable line into the modem, turned it on, attached it to the Linksys router, turned it on, attached that to the LAN port on my Mac, turned that on, and presto! A working internet connection!

    1. Re:Nothing. by Skirwan · · Score: 5, Funny
      Screwed the cable line into the modem, turned it on, attached it to the Linksys router, turned it on, attached that to the LAN port on my Mac, turned that on, and presto! A working internet connection!
      Step three... There's no step three. There's no step three!

      :)

      --
      Damn the Emperor!
    2. Re:Nothing. by Hard_Code · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually I wasn't aware of that "self-install" was a seperate option, so two guys came by and unpacked and plugged in the cable modem. Then one guy hunted around a bit trying to test if the connection was working until I realized that I had the DHCP Client service turned off, at which point I turned it on, and then explained to him, after he asked, what I had just done. So I guess "props" to Road Runner (although I'm not sure I feel good about giving "props" to anything related to the AOL/TimeWarner/MechaGodzilla conglomerate).

      I think these guys get commission on the number of installations they do in a day, so they are glad to get out the door as soon as they can.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  9. I did cable modem installs by cybergeak · · Score: 3, Informative

    And if you really don't want something done, assure the installer you will sign off on whatever, so long as he does what you ask.

    All we care about is your autograph, if your happy and are willing to sign, im sure he wont have a problem.

    alex

  10. Mine didn't install anything, but by z_gringo · · Score: 4, Informative


    He stood me up the first time, then when he did arrive, he told me that I couldn't have a dedicated IP, despite them having promised me that I could have one. He did however configure my machine to use the cable company's proxy server, and use DHCP, etc... After he was done, I just reconfigured it and hard set the IP address. I haven't had a problem in the past couple of years. Except for when my machine was off for a couple of days, and I had to re-configure for DHCP,and "steal" another address, as my old one wasn't available any more...

    --
    -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
    1. Re:Mine didn't install anything, but by puto · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just wondering one thing. What is the 'hard set" ip thing you did? If you are on a network and you are under a DHCP scope(range) then you can't assign yourself a permanent IP. Unless you have access and control to the actual equipment of your ISP.

      Now if your isp sets its leases to change IP's ONLY when your broadband connection drops or your pc powers down, then you can have the appearance of having a static ip. But your ip was not static because when you rebooted you were assigned another one.

      So what you have done is used DHCP to get a DHCP assigned IP address. Then changed YOUR configuration to see it as static. This is still DHCP. It was assigned from a lease. You didn't assign it to yourself, and anyway as long as that box is on it would have used that IP until you shut down or they decided to yank it. Changing your nic config to show a fixed ip that you got from a DHCP server is not setting a fixed IP. Cause even you said it changed when the machine went down.

      Most broadband ISPS change leases when the connection drops. Just like dial up. OR assign it five days. Depends on who is running the shop. My Cox cable will keep the same ip for months unless I shut the box off, then it changes.

      Just my 2 cents.

      Puto

      --
      The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
  11. Nothing by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Just give me the network info. I'll do it. You have no business touching my machine"

    "but that's what my instructions say to do."

    "are you bonded?"

    "Whats that?"

    "It means are you insured in case I have to sue you personally for screwing something up"

    "oh.... Here's the info."

    Besides, I connect through a router. What possible good would THEIR software do me?

    --
    "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
  12. Didn't have this problem by TheRealFixer · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Time Warner/RoadRunner guy simply came in, installed a new NIC, installed the cable modem, set up the new email settings in Outlook, and changed the IE homepage to their portal. I scoured the system when I got home from work (my wife was the only one here when he did the install) and was quite relieved that he didn't install any software.

  13. They tried. by MKalus · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I moved lately I had a guy come out as they needed to "configure my pc".

    I showed him to my Linux firewall, he was surprised about the prompt but figured it was just DOS (ha).

    Put in the cd, realised it was not DOS, took the CD out, turned to me and said: "Well, I guess you know what you're doing." And left.

    Offically my Cable Provider (Rogers) is not supporting Linux / Unix but if you have a technical issue just bug the Second Line support and 99% of the time you get the Unix guy who answers your questions.

    --
    If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    1. Re:They tried. by slamb · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Offically my Cable Provider (Rogers) is not supporting Linux / Unix but if you have a technical issue just bug the Second Line support and 99% of the time you get the Unix guy who answers your questions.

      I've never even had to do that (MediaCom). When it was installed and when I've had problems with the service, they've told me they don't support Linux. I've just told that's fine and to tell me what they want done instead of how to accomplish it. They've been pretty good about that. I get instructions like "go to this URL to register your computer's MAC address with us" instead of "click on 'Start' in the lower left hand corner, ...".

  14. interesting by tps12 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well, as a very first step, I would recommend against posting this to Slashdot. Let me explain with a little thought experiment. Presumably you are trying to "get the word out" about the Evil Corporate Spyware installed by your cable provider. Suppose you were to succeed, and almost every cable customer were to remove said software from his or her PC. Their demographics database would start to be pretty thin, and suddenly they can no longer use that information to defray some of the costs of running a broadband outfit. Best case, you get a rate hike. Worst case, the cable company goes out of business, and you're back on dialup (which, if you wanted to vote with your wallet against this kind of practice to discourage it, you could have done anyway). A better course of action would be to quietly uninstall everything the cable guy installed and keep it all under your hat.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:interesting by Omnifarious · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If they can't stay in business honestly, they don't deserve to be in business.

      If they wish to collect demographic data on your purchases in return for a decrease in your bill, that's fine. But they should have a contract specificying how much that decrease will be, and exactly what the software will do. You can have it in your service contract all nice and above board, or choose NOT to have it and pay higher costs.

      Of course, since they're a monopoly, that will just lead to a $50/mo (or more) difference. But that's easier to point a finger at and complain bitterly about to your local regulator.

    2. Re:interesting by glh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think the public has a right to know about this sort of activity and I am glad slashdot posted it. Granted, it generates a certain amount of FUD but that is to be expected (it is slashdot).

      Why should the cable companies need to start doing this sort of thing in order to make money? I'm sure there are better ways. How about offering decent service and some other products (such as spam filters) that we can pay additional for? Why do they have to be so sneaky? I feel sorry for the poor AOL converts that have no clue about what is being installed on their system- they are just innocent victims. They may not even know how to uninstall something- so they have no choice.

      This kind of behavior is unethical, especially if the customer doesn't know what is going on. If privacy or high speed connection were mutually exclusive, I would choose privacy and I think a good percentage of others would also. It's bad enough with all the other crap that seems to fill up your hard drive when you're on the internet, we don't need the ISP doing it as well.

    3. Re:interesting by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "suddenly they can no longer use that information to defray some of the costs of running a broadband outfit."

      First off, I notice you're assuming that they need this money to defray the cost of providing broadband. I suggest that any business using this model doesn't deserve to stay in business long.

      Secondly, you seem to be someone who thinks we should all be very happy with the "opt-out list" mentality because we're somehow "saving money." Businesses need to be taught that abusing and not respecting their customers is a Bad Thing and I for one wouldn't mind paying a little more for a business that actually gives a damn about me (but I have yet to be forced into that decision... seems some enterprising business is always there to provide to us somewhere). And I have the feeling that I'm not alone in feeling this way.

      "A better course of action would be to quietly uninstall everything the cable guy installed and keep it all under your hat."

      You're part of the problem, then, not the solution. I'm simply not going to just sit there and take this sort of abuse from anybody.

    4. Re:interesting by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "Presumably you are trying to "get the word out" about the Evil Corporate Spyware installed by your cable provider. Suppose you were to succeed, and almost every cable customer were to remove said software from his or her PC. Their demographics database would start to be pretty thin, and suddenly they can no longer use that information to defray some of the costs of running a broadband outfit. Best case, you get a rate hike. Worst case, the cable company goes out of business..."

      Keep in mind that 99% of cable users don't read slashdot or tech forums in general. The posting here will only serve to inform those who can put the knowledge to good use and protect themselves. The resulting dent in the demographics databases as a result of this will be very small, and the cable companies probably will not bat an eye.

  15. investigate your cable connection by one_who_uses_unix · · Score: 5, Interesting
    To understand exactly what is happening with your broadband connection follow these steps:

    1.Connect PC, cable modem and a second PC (everyone has one :) ) to a simple hub ($20).
    2.Run a network capture tool (tcpdump, snoop, ethereal, etc.) on the 2nd PC.
    3.Boot your broadband PC.
    4.Look at the traffic.

    You should be able to recognize the DHCP negotiations and see whether anything unusual is going on. Odds are, all it needs to do is negotiate for an address, everything else is probably frill.

    The next step is to install a 2nd NIC in the 2nd PC, load linux, connect the cable modem to that and the other NIC to your little LAN and use IP tables to set up a firewall and NAT.

    --
    KK4SFV
  16. That's tough by ONOIML8 · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you're going to play with their toys the you have to play by their rules. If their contract/TOS/whatever says you have to agree to have all that software and agree with the licensing to all in order to use their service, then I guess that's what you gotta do. But it's their system, their toys, so if you don't like it then don't play.

    Now the installer was wrong. Very wrong. If you're gonna play by the rules then you should have read EVERY word of EVERY EULA and made the determination for each one. Since those are legal documents you would want to read carefully, perhaps consult with your lawyer on a few points. You could tie up that installer for a VERY long time. But for him to indicate that you accepted.....well, you might want to consult with your lawyer now.

    --
    . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
  17. Not a damn thing by Halo- · · Score: 4, Informative

    I suppose it depends on your provider, but to my knowledge, you shouldn't need a damn thing. Wanna test it easily?

    1) Borrow a laptop with an ethernet card, unplug the power from the cable modem (some of them will only give a DHCP address to one MAC address at a time, and need to "forget" what they have seen)

    2) Plug in the cable modem

    3) Attach the laptop

    Didja get an IP? If so, I'd say you can pretty safely whack the offending software. I seriously doubt it's needed. A lot of things (like a lot of those "connection sharing" firewall/router devices) would fail to work if it was.

  18. IANAL but... by reimero · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While I realize you and your family never agreed to the software, you did authorize the installation of the modem. At best, it's a very gray legal area. The ISP and software manufacturer can both claim the tech was acting as a duly authorized agent (which he was) and you can validly claim that this software was never mentioned as being necessary and that it was sprung on you without prior notice, which would undoubtedly have affected your decision to purchase.
    Unfortunately, he left with a valid signature, which legally means you have accepted the service as is, software and all. You may be able to remove the software, but at this point, all you can do is complain about it. But once you sign the sheet saying the work is done, you've essentially stated that the contract (or that portion thereof) has been fulfilled to your satisfaction. I know it's a hassle, but if you have serious misgivings about it, the proper procedure is to decline signature and say you never authorized this software installation, and allow the tech to remove the modem. Then deal with the sales department. If you paid by credit card, remember that you can put a hold on that payment until it is resolved to your satisfaction.

    --

    ----------

    Something clever
  19. What scares me just a little bit... by writermike · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... is how when you search for "Broadjump Client Foundation" in Google, the company's own homepage doesn't come up in the early listings.

    This says to me that either there are very few links to the company's homepage, or there is no company homepage.

    Heh. Conspiracy therories entered here. 10 cents.

    --
    If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
    1. Re:What scares me just a little bit... by adlai · · Score: 3, Funny
      Maybe they're being blocked by the French authorities?

      Damn French. :)

    2. Re:What scares me just a little bit... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 4, Informative
      "This says to me that either there are very few links to the company's homepage, or there is no company homepage."

      Please excuse any irregularities in the following post because I only got 3 hours of sleep lst night.

      Apparently it's the first case beacause the company homepage is here. They mention that they deal with Adelphia, AT&T, Bell Canada, Bellsouth, Charter Communications, RoadRunner, SBC, Sprint, Telus (Canada) and Time Warner among others.

      They seem to have their fingers deeply into this industry.

  20. Get the local news involved by Digital+Mage · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I say inform your local newspaper or television news station. As you say, since the cable company is almost a monopoly in the area, I'll bet a number of people would love to know about how their local ISP is "spying" on them without them knowing. Most local news outlets are always looking for juicy stories about companies screwing over consumers.

  21. Cablevision -- no problemo by nbvb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I switched from Speakeasy DSL to Optimum Online when I moved (No DSL in new neighborhood... d'oh!!)

    When the Speakeasy guy came out 2+ years ago, I had done all the "inside wiring" myself (this was back in the dedicated-line days ...) The guy just looked at it, and said, and I quote "Damn! You did a better job than I would have." The guy literally handed me the DSL bridge (It's NOT A MODEM DAMNIT!), we plugged it in, he saw the lights "go green" and said "good 'nuff for me."

    When the Optimum Online guy came out here (I needed someone to come out since I don't subscribe to cable ... DirecTV rocks), I had my Linksys router plugged into my iBook.

    First thing he did was go outside, climb the pole and turn the line on. when he did that, the cable bridge (IT'S NOT A MODEM DAMNIT!) "went green" and that was that.

    All he asked was to see me pull up a web page. That was good enough.

    Seriously, don't give the guy the old chip-on-the-shoulder attitude. Don't sound like a clueless yutz, either. Just explain to the guy that listen, it's my machine and I'll install all the software on it, thanks. It's already configured for the network -- I read the directions (on the web, in the box, etc.)

    The installers are usually _very_ cool about that stuff. In fact, the cable guy saw my Sun Microsystems jacket and started asking me some questions... we had a good long talk about IP networks and stuff, since he was looking to go to some Cisco courses and get outta the cable install business :)

    Best of luck with the installs! Remember, don't give them an attitude, just convince them that your machine is all ready to go. Remember, if they get out of there in 5 minutes instead of 2 hours, it means they get to take a long lunch ;)

    --NBVB

    1. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by radish · · Score: 5, Informative


      Why isn't a DSL "box" a modem? It modulates digital data into analogue and pipes that analogue signal out over a PSTN line. Which is exactly what a modem does, just at a much higher frequency. Given that it works in both directions I would say it qualifies as a MOdulator-DEModulator.

      I'm not flaming...just curious...it's perfectly possible you know something I don't ;)

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    2. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by matthew.thompson · · Score: 3, Informative

      ER - ADSL does use a modem. The signals transmitted are in the analogue domain and cross a number of frequencies - these have to be demultiplexed into a serial bitstream for use by your digital devices.

      Just incase you didn't realise the DEM in modem stands for Demultiplexor.

      When I was trialling DSL here in the UK I had a DSL router AND a DSL modem as seperate boxes. The DSL modem took the analogue signals and converted them into the ATM that they were a representation of. The router then translated the ATM into Ethernet for my local area network. Generally in the UK all ADSL is PPPoA.

      --
      Matt Thompson - Actuality - Insert product here.
    3. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by renehollan · · Score: 4, Interesting
      The guy just looked at it, and said, and I quote "Damn! You did a better job than I would have."

      Yeah, same here.

      I had Internet America install my DSL service. They have a self-install option, with micro-filters and all, but it was not available to me because I was so far from the C.O. (15.6 kft) that I needed a dedicated pair to get any decent bandwidth (I chose the 768kb/s down, 384 kb/s up option) -- They said I could probably get that, via ADSL if I opted to go with a dedicated pair, and, if it didn't work, all charges would be refunded. Rather cool, actually.

      Of course, the dedicated pair costs me some US$15 a month from the telco for a total of $81.18 a month, but the service has been great: static IP, no caps, I can run "small" servers and so on. And, while it's no doubt a bridged connection, I do see good download speeds. So I'm happy. None of this "ping is a hacker's tool, the use of which violates the AUP" crap.

      Anyway, I receive a Broadxtent bridge in the mail, and a note to schedule an appointment. I mount the bridge in my headend, check the demarc, and lo and behold!, I have two brand new pairs already pulled for the DSL service. So, I schedule the install for the next day. Meanwhile, I figure, "Heck, all I have to do is hook up that pair, cross-connect it to the bridge connection on the right 110 block, and configure my router, and I should be all set." Sure enuf, that's all it took.

      So, I call Internet America first thing the next day, and tell them to not bother sending the installer, it's alive, kicking, and showing decent up/down speeds. "But sir, we want to make sure it's installed correctly to avoid a service call." O.K., I can understand this. "Anyway, you paid the $150 installation fee (the telco pair drop portion was unavoidable anyway) -- might as well have the tech stop by." Well, O.K. then.

      Tech shows up, looks at my computer, working fine, with an RJ45 cable snaking off (I hadn't finished the drop to that room yet, so I just snaked a cable back to the headend), and asks, "Where's our modem?" "The headend," I reply, "I hadn't installed the drop to this room yet. Follow the ethernet cable."

      So, he does, and sure enough, I hear a "Damn! I wouldn'tve done as good a job!" He smiled, we talked shop for about 10 minutes, and that was it.

      To their credit, Internet America left my computer alone, gave me a static IP with no fuss, and have provided decent service since. The Broadxtent bridge locks up every few months, but a power-cycle fixes that.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    4. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by olethrosdc · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hm, the physical layer of the DSL line can just be described as a MODEM kind of thing. But there are other layers in the DSL box. That's why it is a bridge and not just a modem. DSL is supposed to be able to carry many different kinds of traffic and there are many different bridging protocls that you can use with it, depending on what you DSL box can actually do. Most of the bridging is related to EthernetATM stuff. Also, PPPoE in some cases. And if your box supports an ATM outlet as well (not a lotof chance, unless you're the ISP), you are going to have to call your box a switch B}

      --

      I miss my rubber keyboard.(Homepage)

  22. Just do the Common Sense thing... by RobertAG · · Score: 5, Informative

    On Windows,

    Press START, SETTINGS, Go into Control Panel, Select Add/Remove Software and remove the offending software.

    If they complain, invent a ficticious "Computer Guy" who told you it was the reason your system was locking up all the time.

    Mention that you have lots of games and Internet Explorer "add-ons" that you have downloaded and installed. Believe me, NO technician will want to muck about through a myriad of windows software installations to troubleshoot their spyware.

    They'll go away.

  23. The exact opposite by radish · · Score: 5, Interesting


    In the UK when a guy from BT cam around to install my DSL he did the exact opposite. They're specifically not allowed to touch my PC as they're not insured for any damage. So the engineer has a laptop, he plugs in the modem and proves the line works. Then I sign him off, he gives me the modem and a driver disc and it's up to me.

    Of course this was 2 years ago, these days the engineer doesn't even come over...

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  24. Charter did this during the switch over by zietlow · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Charter did this during the switch over from @home. They installed thier client and said you HAD to install this otherwise you could not get on the internet. It ripped out ALL your network settings and then replaced it with all thier and MS's "personalized" corporate feces.

    They also said they did not turn on the software, but after portscanning all of Charter's IP space that Arin said was allocated to them over 13,000 computers had this port listening out of over 25,000+ (4.5 Class C's) were actively listening for connections and would accept a connection if you telnetted to the port. Whereas scanning a non charter IP subnet there were less than 20 that accepted this (I don't have my numbers with me ATM).

    The wonderful fellows at Securepipe.com Looked into this and brought it up with the local "watch dog" columnist for one of the local papers who wrote an article about this. Charter was not happy. The guys at Securepipe also brought this up with the local cable commission. Who were semi interested in this issue. About a week later port filtering was in place, including port 641 (what the software runs on).

    They said the use was for the ability to remotely help users. Yes this is a nice function to have, but what if this fell into the wrong hands? The Broadjump software is based off of an older version of VNC that has some weak authentication issues. And also dealing with Charter and @home techs I wouldn't trust these people with my computer anyway. I don't trust my mother with my computer.

    This was back in Novemeber/December who knows what they could do now.

    wi2600.org You can read the threads here, many to list and you can see the research that we did to get into this. I do not know if an electronic copy of the mentioned newspaper article exists but if it does, I will try and get it posted.

    --
    Slashdot # 199661 the number that's the same upside down and right side up
    1. Re:Charter did this during the switch over by VP · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Charter (at least in July) lets you decline the installation of their software - they have a special check box on their form, where you can sign that you declined it.

  25. That's great for Slashdot geeks... by Hell+O'World · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But what about the mortals? 99% of this monopolistic company's customers have this crap installed on their computer, didn't ask for it, didn't agree to it, and don't even know it's there! Doesn't that strike you as wrong? Perhaps even evil? Laws are not keeping up with technology, and the inherent evil of capitalism is driving us into a dangerous situation. These companies justify their actions based just on maximizing profits for their shareholders. They don't care what petty moral problems this imposes.

    1. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by fialar · · Score: 3, Funny
      Please take a complimentary course on "social ethics and justice" and call ME in the morning.

      Capitalism is a short-sighted system that puts profits before people, dollars before the environment.

      Free your mind, read Z Mag

    2. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by (trb001) · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Timeout...this is not evil. Someone sniping 14 people 'just because' is evil. Someone attempting to wipe a race off the planet is evil. This may be slightly immoral, but the reason they have you sign is because they want to make sure you authorized the install. If you don't want it, tell him not to install the software. 99% of the people out there DON'T CARE that it's on there, and probably at least half of them don't care what it's doing with their data.

      Fact is, there is nothing illegal about them installing software on your computer with your consent. Their software isn't breaking the law and it isn't hurting your computer. You are requesting a service from them and, as part of that service, they are installing additional products as they see fit. Opt out, it's quite easy, I wouldn't let a cable installer within 10 feet of my computer ("Just hand me the cat-5 and nobody gets hurt...")

      I'm embarassed that the parent post got modded up as Insightful.

      --trb

    3. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by FatherOfONe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Capitalism is a short-sighted system that puts profits before people, dollars before the environment."

      I don't think that you understand what capitalism actually is. Since you recommend the person to take a cource in "social ethics and justice", I will also recommend that the person realize that well over 85% of teachers are die hard liberals and some consider themselves socialist. So please understand that before taking a course. But if we are recommending ways to learn on capitalism, then I would get

      http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/newt/tap es .html

      Sorry for not doing html tags! Just cut and paste.

      Now to get this thing back on topic...

      What the Cable company is doing is wrong. They will probably get sued over this. The person didn't agree to any EULA, AND probably more importantly the user didn't get the option to counter the contract. Specifically they didn't get an option to do a fair negotiation with the company. This cable company is foolish to do this and it will come back to haunt them. Not a very smart thing, but then they are a monopoly in that area... kinda like socialism...

      --
      The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
    4. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by TibbonZero · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Scott, your ISP is not quite evil enough. You're semi-evil. You're quasi-evil. You're the margarine of evil. You're the Diet Coke of evil, just one calorie, not evil enough."

      --
      Tibbon
      tibbon.com
    5. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by mvonballmo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You shouldn't be embarrased for that post, it actually is insightful compared to other posts here. Most of the previous posts were of this vein:

      I'm an amazingly cool and frood computer dood, so I told the cable company to fuck off and they had to, so there! L00zerz!

      Yeah, cool.

      The point the previous post made was that there are a lot of people getting this quasi-manipulative software installed on their machines - pretty much without their knowledge. You explain this with:

      "99% of the people out there DON'T CARE that it's on there"

      I disagree. I think if they knew what it was, they would care. If you told them -- hey, can I install software that will watch your browsing habits in order to better target junk mail to your email address? -- then they would have the chance to say 'fuck off' too.

      But the deck is massively stacked because:

      1) They don't even know it's going on there
      2) They trust their installer because ostensibly he/she should know more about computers than they
      3) Even if they installed it themselves, they would click yes because they just want broadband and aren't aware (as many here are) to what lengths corporations will go to take advantage of them for profit
      4) EULA language is relatively advanced lawyerese -- again, it's beyond the comprehension of most, so they just assume they aren't getting screwed.

      The answer is not scorn for their stupidity, nor "let the company do what it wants, people don't care"...the answer is to use your massive hax0r skills to educate these beknighted souls.

    6. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by wandernotlost · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Timeout...this is not evil. Someone sniping 14 people 'just because' is evil. Someone attempting to wipe a race off the planet is evil.

      Nice. Way to work that gratuitous sniper reference into a completely unrelated discussion. So what's you're criterion for being evil? Killing people? Killing people without justification? I think there's room for different levels of evil here. Score one for the pedants.

      Fact is, there is nothing illegal about them installing software on your computer with your consent.

      Telling someone that they need this software installed in order to use their cable modem and then installing spyware is not exactly with their consent. You might want to read the Constitution sometime. Start with the fourth amendment.

    7. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Fact is, there is nothing illegal about them installing software on your computer with your consent.

      HOWEVER.

      If we accept EULAs at face value, that clicking through a license agreement during an install process legally binds you to the terms of that license, then there's a big problem with the installer clicking through them for you (especially if you're not given the opportunity to read the license terms).

      Are you legally bound to the EULA terms if someone else agrees to them on your behalf? It's an interesting question.

  26. Re:Did you agree? Yeah, kinda. by John+Hasler · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Such an agreement would not be binding unless it included the texts of all the EULAs.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  27. They can turn you off if you uninstal! by olddoc · · Score: 5, Informative

    From this site: http://support.sbcglobal.net/legal/5071.shtml Is the following EULA language: # RIGHT TO TERMINATE NETWORK-BASED SERVICES: By using the Licensed Software, you acknowledge and agree that BroadJump and SBC Internet Services shall at all times retain the right to terminate any and all on-going network-based services that you receive pursuant to your use of the Licensed Software for any reason whatsoever, including without limitation your refusal to allow BroadJump and/or SBC Internet Services to install on your computer any upgrade or modification to the Licensed Software in the future. You better keep that 486 honeypot running with the Broadjump software!

    --
    Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
  28. Just say "NO" by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 5, Funny

    The cable guy came over to install a cable modem at my Dad's house. As I watched him do his stuff I noticed he was installing miniature cameras in my Dad's bedroom and bathroom. I know you don't need cameras for a cable modem to work so I asked if it was necessary. He said he had to do his list of things, and we had to sign that he did his list of things, otherwise he couldn't leave it with us to use. Since I can always remove the cameras, I agreed, but I noticed at the top of the camera was a small antenna. Doing a search on Google for 'Comcast minicam' comes up with some pretty scary stuff as far as what it does, like: 'Records toilet breaks and sexual escapades in order to enhance customer service' Now, how does this affect us? Neither myself or anyone in my family agreed to the cameras; the cable guy did. And is there anyway to get cable companies to stop doing this as I can imagine since the cable company is a monopoly in this town, that the percentage of people who still have these cameras in their bedrooms is pretty high.

  29. Cable Software by nittibang · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The true question is what RoadRunner installs on PC's that will not allow you to perform the standard install by yourself to save the fee.. I work for ISP and we have cable plant that works great. The average person can use our software to install our package and get up and running providing the cable techs have installed the right filters on the lines.. When I visit my aunt & uncles house to do their manual install of RoadRunner I am unable to resolve any DNS no matter what I do to the Win98SE machine... I do the normal kicking around of the computer and software and still nothing.. Hell I even tried getting my Linux Laptop to resolve DNS...... Nothing... I could ping by ip all day long just not get DNS... It was late I was tired so i told them to call RoadRunners techs... My cousin said the guy was there maybe 5 minutes and it was up and running...... He told my cousin that I must not have known what I was doing.... Hahah let me talk to RR's technicians who have been trying to force me a new ipaddress for the last year and a half.... :-) Anyways What software did that moron put on their computer that allowed them to work so fast?? Mind you they got charged something like $24.95 for the install..... has me boggled and mad :-)

  30. AdAware? by grub · · Score: 5, Informative


    Perhaps the good people at Lavasoft could add this kind of scumware to their list of Naughties?

    Just a thought.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  31. ATTBI en Mass by kalidasa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Guy just handed me a disk to install. Didn't work on XP Pro. Called up ATTBI, they had me register the cable modem via their web site and set up on their proxy (which proxy I promptly dumped when I got off the phone). Didn't install anything else. I probably didn't even have to worry about hiding my Linux boot disk.

  32. Some replies by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 5, Funny
    • Have a bogus bathroom for him to install his camera in, which you can leave "unused" 'til you need to call support when you can shit in that bathroom if needed.
      • More amusing would be sending him to your outhouse. Let him try to figure it out. :)
    • This is why I always opt for the self-install option with any ISP. I don't even like my wife watching me take a shit, nevermind some complete stranger. (Side note: Yes, she does have her own bathroom. So there. :P)
    • Take them to small claims court and sue them for the time you spent removing the cameras.
    • They use 802.11 to transmit their signal to the nearest spy truck. To find out exactly what they're doing hook up an 802.11 hub and analyse the traffic.
    • If you're going to use their product, then you have to play by their rules. Forget about the fact that the installation guy might not be following the rules, and that as a monopoly service they are highly regulated by the government. Just bend over (for the camera) and take it.
    • Tell them your policy does not allow anyone to install cameras in your house without passing an extensive personal background check, signing a non-disclosure agreement, and obtaining a million dollar bond payable to you upon breach of contract. Ask him for his personal address and phone number so that you can contact him when the background check is completed, and have him fill out a form giving you his social security number and permission to use it for the purposes of obtaining the background check.
  33. RR installed a virus on my co-workers PC! by Ken+Williams · · Score: 3, Interesting

    yep, thats right. when the cable guy came to install Road Runner at my co-workers house, he said he had to install some software. one of the things he installed was a very well-known virus (can't remember the name now) that destroyed everything on the hard drive. before nuking the HD, it also emailed copies of the virus to everybody in his address book - that doesn't look good when you are an infosec professional! my co-worker had to reinstall the OS, lost alot of data, and then realized after the reinstall that he didn't need any RR software anyway to use their cablemodem service. RR did nothing at all to compensate him.

    My experience with RR has been great on the other hand. I never let them touch a thing. And they are fine with that. They just want to get out of the house and on to the next call.

    --
    -- ken williams
  34. Yet another reason to use Linux. by MrEfficient · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The guy didn't install anything on my computer. He got as far as mousing over to the K menu and then stopped. I went ahead and told him it was Linux at that point and he let me take it from there :-)

    I gave him a couple of RedHat CDs and sent him on his way.

    --
    Check out AbiWord.
  35. Re:What happened to Ad-Aware's website? by CtrlPhreak · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Actual Website is www.lavasoft.de which is still up and running just fine.

    --
    WikiAfterDark.com It's a sex wiki, go now!
  36. Their techs appreciate techs by ronmon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The only time my DSL provider (Bellsouth) has had to send a tech out was to replace my fried Alcatel 1000 about a year and a half ago. I've handled my own installations of dialup and DSL with them for the last 4 years. They are quite Linux friendly though they do not support it.

    He was prepared to do a normal windows installation when I showed him my router and firewall setup. We plugged in a couple cables and bang, it was running. He was very happy to not have to deal with all the extra crap. "Wow, that's Linux? Cool.", he said. Probably his easiest call ever, total 15 minutes 10 of them me showning him how feature-rich Linux is.

  37. Bundeled DSL software (a la Verizon) by BobRooney · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Many DSL providers operate over the PPPoE protocol. Bundled with Verizon's was their crappy support software that I really didnt want or need.

    Typically, the implementation used by the DSL provider (my experience was with Verizon), is not nearly as good as other versions available.

    If you're a tweaker, bandwith whore or just generally care about your connection's performance I recommend heading over to DSL Reports.com and grabbing a copy of RASPPPoE and Dr. TCP. Packet size and receiving window settings can make a world of difference.

  38. What's scary is this article by waltc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Quote, unquote: "Since I can always remove the software, I agreed, but I noticed while he was flipping through the install, he was clicking 'agree' on every EULA that came up. ....Neither myself or anyone in my family agreed to the software; the cable guy did. And is there anyway to get cable companies to stop doing this as I can imagine since the cable company is a monopoly in this town, that the percentage of people who still have this software on their computers is pretty high."

    Ummmm...."clicking through the Eulas" is the only way to install the software. If he wants "cable companies to stop doing this" he could have cancelled the install and thrown the "cable guy" out. And, yes, as he observed the cable guy "clicking through the Eulas" and did not throw him out he *did* agree to them. However, this is a moot point because the software is easily uninstallable and is not required for the cable modem to function properly.

    Cable companies are frequently "monopolies" in towns because of the expense of laying new cable and maintaining it. You can't have 10 cable companies all laying 10 strands of cable on each telephone poll. Besides that, it isn't economical for a company to provide service in an area in which it cannot have a guaranteed customer base (not a guaranteed number of paying customers--that is entirely different), because of the expense involved in setting up the cabling to begin with. Towns frequently entertain "bids" by competing cable companies as to which company will provide the area with the best prices, service and choice prior to awarding the "contract" to a particular cable company. It's not a monopoly--it's a practicality.

    Frankly, I grow a bit weary hearing people complain about non-issues like this. Usually, these complaints are based on a wide degree of ignorance and fear, just like this one. It would be a different matter if you couldn't uninstall the software and still use the modem. But you can, and that fact alone makes this much ado about nothing.

  39. One time... by snowlick · · Score: 4, Funny

    The guy that came over to install my stuff was a total moron. When signing up for my cable modem service I decided to do the "honeypot" idea with my Windows machine, which I figured would be easiest (let them screw everything up, then pull out the info I need after they leave). There was a spot of trouble which I didn't forsee, however: I use Apple Studio Displays on all of my machines, and he couldn't get over the fact that they aren't iMacs. When he got there he was like, "Aa, iMacs? They're fancy. I don't know how to install this stuff on iMacs. Let me call my supervisor..."

    I had three clearly visible beige boxes under the table at this point, which obviously had the monitors connected to them, the keyboards, mouses, etc, etc.

    I tell him, "No, man, these are all PC's."
    "Yeah, cool. Hmmm..."
    *fiddles with one of them running Windows98, dials number on cellphone*
    "Yeah, what's up, man. Um, I got these iMacs here, and I was wondering what I should do..."
    I just about hit him over the head with my chair. After some pressuring I got to talk to the guy on the other end of the phone, who gave me everything I needed to know(IP, etc). When I gave the phone back I could hear him yelling at the "installer."

    "Oh, you mean that they aren't iMacs. That's crazy. They look just like em."

    What the FUCK...

    --
    Crystal Meth: Would you ingest somthing made from a poisonous gas and an explosive metal? You do it every day -- Salt!
  40. Broadjump Client Foundation information: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    The software:
    http://www.velocidadejusta.com.br/manua is/speedyPP POE/BroadJump/
    More information (search the page):
    http://www.pacs-portal.co.uk/startup_pages /startup _full.htm
    Broadjump's homepage:
    http://www.broadjump.com/
    Mention of Broadjump in Yahoo's EULA:
    http://support.sbcglobal.net/legal/5070.sht ml
    Information about the Broadjump Client (looks like it spys on whether you've overclocked your connection):
    http://osiris.978.org/~brianr/mirror s/www.iscentra l.org/%257Etcniso/main/cisp.htm
    Posting what will be a +5 informative as an Anonymous Coward:
    Priceless

  41. more info, mod this up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interes ting-people/200202/msg00164.html
    http://www.inter esting-people.org/archives/interes ting-people/200206/msg00132.html

  42. Oh Puh-lease!!! by ChaosMt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Freedom by obscurity?!? Ya that's the ticket, we'll all go underground and that way we can practice our freedoms in secret with out the problems for governments or corporate cheiftons. Great plan there Chester.

    Look, the cable companies enjoy their quasi-monopoly status and they seem quite happy to abuse their position, and with the law makers pockets lined well, they will have no worries. What worries me is the lack of FULL disclosure. If I'm going to be screwed in such a way, I think you should at LEAST know what's going on. I want a legal form that people read with glazed over eyes and initial parts to show them EXACTLY what information will be collected and used against them. However, as long as Michael "nepotisim" Powell is the chairman of the FCC to serve interests of the greatest donors and not the people, we might as well get used to saying, "Thank you sir! May I have another!"

  43. Easy Solution and Fun Too. by teamhasnoi · · Score: 3, Funny

    I keep all my cable installers and put them in a deep circular well in my basement. They scream and holler, especially when I tell them I'm going to make a fleshsuit out of their skin. I won't feed them until they put the lotion on. And I get all the channels for free!

  44. Boss's Reaction to Lilo by TibbonZero · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So a few years back I was working for the IT department in a county that I lived in doing Tier 2 networking support.
    It was kinda nice, being 17 and having my own parking space, office, nametag with picture, etc... and computer that they gave me...
    Now they were pretty strict about paperwork and licensing, being gov't and all, and at first my boss thought I wouldn't even need a computer of my own in the office at first, but then I needed to check my Groupware email so much, so I got a little crappy Pentium 3/300mhz that I found in the 'Old Computers, Destroy these, don't give them away' room.

    Anyway, I installed Windows 2000 (or 98) or it first, but I left 10Gb as an extra partition.
    I got bored one day and thought, well I am working in Unix stuff in the server room all the time, and this thing doesn't even have SSH built in, so let's install linux. I thought to consult my Boss, but then decieded not to bug him. I had the license, it was free! He said not to bring any software from home, because of pirating/licensing issues, but thought this would be fine.
    I loaded Linux, and it worked like a dream on the machine (this was before Redhat was BloatHat by default). So of course I use Lilo to switch between Windows for email (groupware...), and Linux. I was also testing out VMWare to try to get the Groupware going in Linux.
    Anyway, a few weeks later (being a lowly intern) I have to share my desk and computer with someone who is just starting, which was fine with me. It was a two person office anyway, and she was just using my computer until she got her own.
    One day, apparently she rebooted Windows for something, and I forgot to ever mention linux for more than a second. Lilo comes up, and she sits and thinks, so it goes to Linux. Then when it prompts her for a username/password, she goes to the Bossman :)

    Bossman says to me in his office later, "I need to talk to you, did you load Linux on your computer?". To make a long story long, I didn't get fired or anything but I did have to explain my way out of it (GNU, etc...)
    The next day he gave me a machine to work on in Linux and test VMWare on. It was a Dual Processor Box, with 1gb memory, and 4 harddrives all in Hardware raid!!! I had to load Oracle and VMWare on it... Oh, what a job !

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
    1. Re:Boss's Reaction to Lilo by enneff · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sounds like your boss is even more clueless than you.

  45. Re:DNS is down by bobv-pillars-net · · Score: 4, Insightful
    But you have to have something 'above' you in the DNS tree,

    Duh.

    They're called "Root nameservers."

    Here's a list (from my /etc/dnsroots.global file)

    • 198.41.0.4
    • 128.9.0.107
    • 192.33.4.12
    • 128.8.10.90
    • 192.203.230.10
    • 192.5.5.241
    • 192.112.36.4
    • 128.63.2.53
    • 192.36.148.17
    • 198.41.0.10
    • 193.0.14.129
    • 198.32.64.12
    • 202.12.27.33
    --
    The Web is like Usenet, but
    the elephants are untrained.
  46. Re:DNS is down by dattaway · · Score: 3, Informative

    And if you don't want to "nice" the root servers, put your local ISPs nameservers first in your /etc/resolv.conf file:

    nameserver 12.34.56.78 --your isp nameserver here
    nameserver 127.0.0.1 --this is bind on localhost

    The first nameserver will be the first on the list, and localhost is second, which will use bind to query the root servers.

  47. Broadjump is.... by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 4, Informative

    An Austin-based software company who targets their marketing to broadband ISPs. A friend of mine interned there last year while she was finishing out her journalism degree. Her job, if I recall correctly, was to write (like a journalism, not CS major would write) some of the webpage content and also press releases.

    Essentially, their purpose is sort of like the giant installer CD that comes with your sound/video card. See, broadband ISPs, particualarly cable-based ones, don't really have their own install techs. Their guys are sub-contracted. In fact, Roadrunner's guys will have their company name and a "licensed subcontracter for Time-Warner Cable" printed on the side of their van. At least around here, there is a reasonable lead time for install, about a week, although I'm sure RoadRunner would like to speed that up, as it just leads to faster revenue/happier customers.

    Anyway, it's like the Video/Sound card CDs in that it's a bunch of useless software in addition to an auto-install program that speeds up the tech's process. Rather than configure the windows PC to pull on DHCP via the NIC, and set the mail client and web browser up, the broadjump software does it for them. It also (like the vid/sound card disc) installs a bunch of other useless cruft. They allegedly had some sort of remote support program, and a MMORPG (Blood pledge, I think... It's really big in Korea) where if the customer signed up through the link on their desktop, the ISP got like a $3/month cut.

    So anyway, that's their software.

  48. Doesn't it matter who clickes "yes" on the EULA? by SwedishChef · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Our techs install software for clients on a daily basis and I've often wondered whether it makes some difference who actually clicks to accept the EULAs. In our case we are not employees of the companies which actually bought this software, but are paid to install it by the purchasers. So what is *their* legal liability to a EULA if *I* click on "ok" to some incredibly stupid EULA? Who exactly is being put to a liability here (assuming a EULA actually incurs some liability at all, that is)?

    I think that if a company needed to wriggle out from under an overly-restrictive EULA they could certainly use the defense: "None of our people clicked on that agreement... it was a contractor and he didn't have the authority to bind us to a legal contract."

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
  49. Re:Qwest doesn't get along with anyone except... by symbolic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...smaller companies they can easily push around. I thought about a DSL account, but Qwest, surprise, surprise, is 'incompatible' with Earthlink (at least last time I checked). I swear...it's no wonder that such a small percentage of users have broadband access- pick what you hate dealing with most: too expensive, too invasive, or too much of a hassle. It's all there.

  50. Don't tell the cable guy about the router by Otto · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'd recommend doing that anyway. Not because of them trying to extort more cash from you (although that's a damn good reason), but because a lot of the cable modem setups out there have the cable installer guy get the MAC address of your PC's network card to phone into the office. Why? So that not every jackass can hook up an off the shelf cable modem, fire up DHCP, get a lease, and run with it. The DHCP server only gives out an IP to the list of verified MAC addresses. Mine does this.

    So if the guy had used the MAC of the router, I'd be unable to connect without the router in the loop. As it stands now, I hid the router (avoiding any cable guy questions), he used the MAC of the PC, and then later I changed the router's WAN MAC to be the same as the PC's MAC. Thus, if the router kicks off one day, I can plug that PC in directly and still have some connectivity for getting technical help on fixing it. Most all SOHO NAT router devices let you change the MAC of the WAN side. Linksys calls it "MAC Cloning" I believe.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  51. That poor joe by ianscot · · Score: 3, Insightful
    No need to dump all the anti-corporate conspiracy theory bullshit on the poor joe who gets payed 10 bucks an hour to hookup peoples homes.

    I agree. We're always bitching at the poor telemarketing sales reps, when they're not the ones who set their hours, you know? It's not the installer's fault he's got this list from the main office.

    If you use a little common sense and explain yourself rather than going ballistic, the installer's going to maybe be won over and give other people options, too, rather than "just doing his job." Alienate him, and he'll start thinking of his customers as a bunch of hassles to be gotten through. That's no good for anyone.

    (Seems like cable installers really run a range of attitudes, though. Companies hire out during big install promotions, so you could be dealing with anyone.)

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    1. Re:That poor joe by UberOogie · · Score: 3, Interesting
      We're always bitching at the poor telemarketing sales reps, when they're not the ones who set their hours, you know?

      Not even close to a comparable situation. The cable installer is coming at our behest to provide us a service that we paid for. The telemarker is interrupting our lives to try and sell us a product that we asked for no information on after most likely receiving our contact information by the sale of our personal information without our conscent.

      I'm sorry, but get another job. If you know you are going to be inconveniencing people, you have to expect people to be rude right back to you.

      --
      "Enough of this wretched, whining monkey life." -- Marcus Aurelius, _Meditations_, Book 9, 37
  52. What broadjump does by Que_Ball · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well I work for an ISP that uses broadjump for our client install CD. Basically broadjump as a company specializes in making these CD's that automatically check the system and do any neccesary steps for getting your broadband connection working.

    In our case the CD will install a branded internet explorer/outlook express but it's just something they whiped up with the IEAK tools so nothing too special.

    The big step on our network is it will register the MAC address on our customer administration webpage. Broadjump basically builds the CD to the specifications the ISP asks for. They are simply an outsourcer that specializes in these things. On our CD there are basically 3 steps. First the CD checks the machine to make sure it meets the minimum requirements. So it checks the basics like CPU speed, free hard drive space and memory. It also verifies there is an Ethernet card and that it's bound to the TCP/IP protocol with the proper DHCP settings. If it finds any problems with these settings it will give the user the opportunity to automatically fix the error or a description of the problem so you can fix it yourself. The next step is it will install the internet explorer software. After this it does a dhcp release and renew to get an IP. It then contacts the customer administration website to register the MAC address so that the computer can get a valid IP. Up to this point the machine only has a 10.x.x.x IP address which only allows you to connect to the DHCP server, DNS server, and the online customer administration servers. After it successfully registers the MAC it does another release and renew which should give you a real IP address and it uploads a text file log of the whole process to an FTP site. The text file doesn't really contain anything terribly useful and nobody on the helpdesk ever bothers with the things. Nothing evil was included in our text file though I'm sure other ISP's may ask broadjump to include some system configuration details in their implementations. Like I said, for us it's just a log file of the steps the broadjump CD completed. If it got to the point where it succesfully uploaded the file then the connection is obviously working and at that point there isn't going to be much to say in the log file of interest.

    All the steps this CD takes can easily be duplicated manually. In fact most of the time if a user calls the helpdesk because they cannot get their new connection up and running we just register the MAC address manually on the website for them. Registering this address automatically is the main reason we include the CD in the self install packages. I do recommend people unfamilear with DHCP and mac addresses to use the CD on our system, there isn't anything terribly mysterious about our broadjump cd though who knows what other ISP's ask them to implement.

    In general there are only a few methods of broadband client access that users need to be familear with to get up and running manually without these CD's.
    1. Plain DHCP or Static address. Most cable modems work on simple DHCP addresses. Usually the cable ISP will hack their DHCP server to only allocate a certain number of unique IP's through a single cable modem. I know the cable ISP I used to work for did this. After the first 2 IP's included in a consumer package it would just keep sending a DHCP offer of the second IP address to any additional computer that sent a request from that cable modem. The system programmer there hacked a neat little system together using SNMP and DHCP. SNMP trap would be sent to the DHCP server with the sequence number of the DHCP request and serial number of the cable modem.
    2. DHCP with Mac address or hostname registration. The ISP I'm working for uses the MAC address to limit the number of IP's you can get. A web interface to register these MAC addresses is available and before you register you are assigned a private IP address in the 10.x.x.x range which only works inside a small internal network segment the DNS, DHCP, and registration server are on. I have also seen ISP's that use the hostname as a unique identifier. Usually this involves setting the name of the computer to be your ISP username to get a valid IP.
    3. PPPoE. An extention of the dialup authentication model to broadband connections. Usually you will need some form of client software for these though most routers have built a PPPoE clients into their firmware. MacosX also includes out of the box support for this protocol. You will need to use a username and password to authenticate with the network to allow traffic to pass to the internet. Seems to be most popular with DSL providers probably because of their dialup heritage.
    4. Custom client/logon. As seen in the roadrunner cable modem networks. A custom authentication method can be used that usually contacts a server to authenticate the user in a fashion similar in structure to PPPoE. In the case of roadrunner their client has been thouroghly reverse engineered so if you are running an alternate OS you should find a client available to keep you logged in. The proprietary method of authentication will probably become extinct as industry standard solutions are cheaper and easier for broadband providers to implement. If you are saddled by this method of authentication just check around for a third party client. It will probably provide some benefits over the standard client like automatic keep alives so your connection doesn't time out.

  53. rabid power-users by ducktape · · Score: 5, Informative

    as an employee of (cable company name removed) i can tell you exactly what it does. it isn't spyware or ad-ware. i predicted when we were first told about this new tool that this story would show up on slashdot. hence i had several questions when i first got it, and even went so far as to contact a member of the development team about it.

    the software has 2 major functions-

    a) -secure software that allows technical support to connect (by proxy) to a remote machine to perform a myriad of tasks. it can push urls, view TCP/IP related (only) connection info in cases of slow-speed troubleshooting, and even has a function to allow the technician to troubleshoot further by using a remote VNC-like application.

    this may sound scary, but read on. the software leaves no open ports, and cannot be remotely-accessed without the user activating the software (at a tech's request). the user must then manually connect to a closed server with an auth code that the tech gives. the tech connects to the server, and may be allowed any of the above tasks if authorized by the user. the customer is told clearly what will be done, and the tech explains what he/she is doing before proceeding. there are strict policies for the use of this software. the technician is not allowed to browse the hard-drive, download/install/troubleshoot any application that is not on the supported list, and is under no circumstances allowed to change anything on the user's computer without explicit permission. i can't stress this enough, in order for any kind of connection or action to take place the software will ask the user if it's ok to proceed with on-screen alerts! the user may break the connection at anytime during the process for any reason by clicking a button on the taskbar.

    since the connection takes place through a single closed, proprietary server there is virtually no chance of this application being used as a backdoor. the software is hardcoded with the URL of the server, and can connect ONLY to that server and nothing else. even if someone malicious were to get a hold of the client software, without (password protected) access to the server to generate a short-time auth code for the user to type in, it's useless.

    b) -a backup/restore application for tcp/ip and connection property settings. it's configured to save driver files for the NIC and USB modem devices, ip address/subnet mask and DNS property information (in cases where specified), and occasional pings and traces to the dhcp server, gateway, and dns servers along with netstat info. the software catalogues the information bi-weekly, and stores it on the hard-drive. none of this information (save the pings and traces) can be retrieved by anyone outside the system. it's mostly used for cases where the user breaks the connection by altering configuration. the backups allow the user to restore the connection settings to a previous known-working configuration.

    that all.

    this isn't a data-mining application. privacy was discussed in detail in software-training. i understand being cautious, (hell, i'll admit i was concerned as hell when it was first announced) but i can tell you in all honesty that the bundle on our 'easy installer' cd's contains no spyware. broadjump was contracted to write the software specifically for our use, and no 'add-on' click-tracking or cookie-scouring was allowed.

    the client software is ONLY in the hands of tier-2 and above, highly-skilled, highly trained and QA/policy monitored technicians. the broad-jump software is a means to an end for technical-support. if you've had any experience supporting win9x systems you know that windows can be downright retarded when it comes to connection management. it has been an invaluable tool when faced with users who doesn't know their right mouse-button from their left. thus far it's been a huge success, customers seem to love it, it allows us to do all the work, while they just watch and keep tabs or relax as they see fit.

    i knew there would be a few who flipped out over this application. but really, the only people who get up in arms about it are those who don't need it. if you're smart enough to understand what this software does, you should be smart enough to understand that there is a genuine need for it. it's the people who call tech support complaining about error 691's with their caps lock key on, or who've lost the address bar in IE who need it. if you're not comfortable with the application, uninstall it.

  54. Spyware by siskbc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You also have to remember, we (the ./ community) tend to be a lot less trusting and paranoid than the rest of the world (rightly or wrongly), and I really don't think most people care about spyware. Given that we're quite the minority, I don't necessarily think the company is so *evil.* If they won't let you have your modem install without the stuff, it's more likely due to inflexible bureaucrats than any conspiracy.

    That said, I hate telemarketers and do hold people responsible for the jobs that they hold. Are the Phillip Morris scientists not responsible for their lack of integrity just because "their boss told them so?" Arguements of "I was following orders" don't fly too well.

    I would have to be on the verge of death from starvation to work as a telemarketer. If then.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  55. Who cares about YOUR experience...? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I think most folk are missing the point here. No disrespect to those who posted their ways around the problem. Kudos to you for knowing how to set up IP.

    The point is that most internet users don't even know what an IP is. They don't care about linux, and they probably aren't even aware that there could be software doing "bad things" on their PC. These users are having spyware forced upon them in two ways:

    • The tech did the EULA for them without consulting them
    • The contract demands the software to be installed

    This is a serious problem. Let's actually discuss ways to resolve it for everyone, rather than trying to make ourselves look clever.

    1. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by scoove · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seriously, the only reasonable chance that I can think of ...involves getting the law changed.

      Aarrrrggg!

      We technical-aware people are our own worst enemy, and we ought to *know better*.

      This kind of advocacy only sets up false economies (read about rent control in NYC, please) which skew supply/demand to an extreme, and also subvert our rights to an administrative authority who has ulterior motives (e.g. king/emperor/dictator).

      There's a really simple model that is well communicated in Ed Yourdon's book, Deathmarch Projects, and the model works well for technical and nontechnical decisions - even deciding what to have for dinner.

      Here's a summary of the model (apologies to those that get this and find it redundant - you're not the ones I'm trying to help):

      RULE 1: You have three variables: Time, Money, Functionality.

      RULE 2: You can solve for one variable as your primary focus, and maybe a second one as a secondary emphasis.

      RULE 3: You cannot solve for all three.

      Examples:

      I've only got $3. I need my lunch in 5 minutes. (1-Money, 2-Time. Don't count on a 5-course meal prepared just for you.)

      I want $30 broadband. I want someone to deliver it to me and have it working quickly. (1-Money, 2-Time, prepare to sacrifice functionality)

      I need a T1 yesterday. It's gotta do all sorts of VPN, firewalling, filtering, etc. (1-Time, 2-Functionality, open your wallet up!)

      I need a very fancy house. I'm pretty short of money right now. (1-Functionality, 2-Money, better get your work clothes on...)

      So... what do you make of:

      I want cheap broadband. It should come in a convienent package and be installed this week. But it had better not have any spyware, had better work just the way I want, with my OS of choice, allow me to do whatever I want and have no limits.

      Solving for all three... if the last two are important to you, you can have it. But count on $75/hour or more...

      *scoove*

    2. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 3
      you get lots of angry customers to write to the regulatory authorities

      That's half the problem here; most people don't know there is a problem.

      My take on it is this; right now the internet is a novelty for most people. Once you get past the filth stage, you begin to use it more and more. I would now say I'm dependant on it, for example I haven't picked up a phone book in years. It's a change in behaviour for most people, I guess for a lot of us (especially those from an scientific/engineering background) the logic of looking up an answer is second-nature. As time goes by, Joe Sixpack will become more at ease with looking up information on the net, and it will become essentially an utility, like gas, the telephone and electricity.

      Contrast that with the modern media; all they care about is ratings. They don't report "the news" as such, what they really do is report on the topics that people are interested in. Guns, war, car crashes, death, sport, that sort of thing.

      My hope is that once the internet becomes more and more prevailent in our society (3G mobiles may be the catalyst), then the media will start to pick up on this sort of thing. Right now, stories about e-cards raping your address book and the every growing trend of spyware won't buy them ratings, so they don't care about it. When the internet hits a critical mass, then people will begin to care and the media will start to cover it.

      Right now, it's a very interesting time. The future of the internet is being determined today. The lawsuits are setting precidents that will shape the internet for years to come. Yet, with all this communication power, we still haven't found a way to organise the like-minded people.

      Slashdot comes close; it's a good way to see and debate differing opinions. However, it's like the rainforest scares of the last decade; people became aware of a problem, discussed it, decided something must be done. Then they lost interest, it became no longer a "sexy" subject to the media and was forgotten. But did anything change? The problem is still there. Focus shifted elsewhere while we got the heart-warming illusion of making the world a better place.

      We need to organise. It's been done before, for example here in the UK there was a bill proposed to allow everyman and his dog to have access to your phone/bank/net records. Overnight a grassroots organisate grew, started talking to their government representatives and essentially told them where to shove it.

      But, how? The above was a fluke really, it won't likely happen again, as least not as regularly as it should. We need a proper way to do this. We need to remind the governments of the so-called "free world" newspeak that we are supposed to be in a democracy, where the will of the people is supposed to shape the countries. The internet could be the best thing ever to happen to the idea of a democracy, but unless people take action instead of just passing motions to go and rescure Brian from the Romans, then we're not going anywhere.

  56. Alternative approach by scoove · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I NEVER let anyone install any software on my company computers or my home computers that deal with broadband.

    This approach may get you permanently relegated to the slow lane of the Internet, if that (hint: what do you think your AOL or Earthlink connection does, especially upstream? Do you think they ignore all that nifty consumer buyer profile data they see pass through web proxies and such?)

    As a Cox.net consumer and manager of a regional broadband service provider (not cox - we service flyover country:-) ), I'd suggest a better alternative:

    - supply a stock Wintel PC next to your cable modem/DSL/wireless DSL termination. Win2K or WinXP are probably necessary.
    - use the stock machine for the installer to load his garbage on
    - use the machine for customer support calls
    - let it crunch keys or run some other distributive application
    - replace it in the link for normal operation using your router/internet sharing device of choice (e.g. RouterOS, Linux dual-nic, Linksys firewall router, etc)

    Just make sure you get the details down of how your service provider authenticates you and let you on his network - PPPoE, DHCP, MAC-based authentication, etc. and make sure your router solution is configured to do the same.

    Yea, I hate spyware and won't use it on my network either...

    *scoove*

  57. Never have onsite problems by macdaddy · · Score: 5, Informative
    When I had cable installed, they had to come out and do the install. They didn't have the option. They did support Mac though. Yes, I'm a Mac, Linux, Sun guy. He walked in the to my second bedroom and his jaw dropped. He handed me the box of stuff and said that I probably wasn't going to need any assistance. He then went outside to do something to the cable box, came back in, I said I was on, and he left. Maybe it was the stack of Enterasys switches or the stack of Suns in the corner. Might even have been the Ciscos routers on the corner desk next to the laser printer. Of course I can't leave out the cluster of Mac towers running next to the door. Perhaps the general heat in the room made him weak in the knees. Needless to say I don't normally have trouble with the techs when they come onsite. :)

    Now techs on the phone is another problem. Back when I had cable, I quickly discovered that the national helpdesk for RR was staffed by a bunch of dicks. I called them to let them know about a case of router flap that had been going on for over a week. They started giving me the wrong around about my "Windows" box being misconfigured. I informed him that I own no Microsoft products. To that he replied that everyone runs Microsoft. I laughed and said that I was one person that didn't. He asked what I ran and I replied I used a Mac. He then said something to the effect, "don't you know? Microsoft owns Apple". He also said that he couldn't see why anyone would want to use such a worthless operating system. I was starting to get a little pissed at this point. I asked if he'd say the same about my Linux boxes or my Suns. He said Sun is dead. Microsoft was buying them out. He also said that Linux was a hacker's tool and that he could have me arrested for using it. .... Now being a Mac user, I know what it's like to have my OS insulted. You don't insult a Mac guru's OS. You don't insult a Linux guru's OS either. You damned sure don't insult both in the same paragraph. If he had been there in person I would have firmly planted a Sun keyboard in his ass sideways. Since he wasn't all I could do was cuss at him and demand to speak to his super. He refused and hung up on me.

    Well, I returned the favor. <g%gt; I always record my tech support calls. I dubbed a couple copies of the tape and certified USPSed them to Cox, RR, and my state AG. I also included a letter that indicated who all received a copy of the tape, summarized the coversation, gave a time and date for the call, back ground to counter the ill-informed knowledge, and finally notified them in writing of the router flap. About 4 days later, I noticed that the router flap had been fixed. A few days letter I received a letter from Cox apologizing for the problems and promising to investigate further. The next day I received a letter from RR apologizing for their employee's action and informing me that the tech was no longer with RR. Oh happy day. :-)

    I've found a couple tricks when calling a tech support line that might help you. Always start off the conversation in a calm voice. Don't act pissed. Stay calm and collected. Ideally you would do this even if you felt you needed to ask for the tech's super. State your name, where you're calling from, and on behalf of what company. This is a good thing to do even if it's for you home line. Pretend the loss of access if affecting you at work. "My name is John Wayne; I'm the Network God at Such n Such Unv in Smallville, St; I'm calling to inform of that you have a case of router flap that is causing us problems downstream.". Be concise and to the point. If you think you need to drop some techy stuff to make them feel you know what you're talking about, drop big things only. Don't jargon-drop little stuff. Spend more of your time keeping everything else you say technically accurate. Don't let yourself slip up. Stay calm. Always stay calm. Say "I'm calling to inform you of a DDoS attack coming from one of your customers" not "You're DDoSing us! We're gonna sue! Our routers are melting. We're melting. ARGH!". The latter makes a bad impression. Try to maintain control of the conversation. Don't let them BS you into doing weird shit. State the facts up front. Tell them exactly what you've done to diagnose the problem. This is how I get hard drives replaced without all the reformatting bullshit. When I know the HD is bad I call them and tell them I've low-leveled it, checked jumpers, tried it in another machine, and run two bad blocks checks on it; here at the results. I've covered all their bases with the facts. All they have to do next is RMA it. Good luck!

  58. They installed nothing but they still suck... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Only thing I have ever seen on the cluelesses machines with Roadrunner is their Road Runner Medic. They usually won't install it either unless they're asked. They push self installs for almost everything. Even cable convertor boxes.

    I have Road Runner and as soon as I can get DSL I am getting it. First off, I never cal tech support until I try everything I know. Then when I do call and first level says first delete your network connections and recreate them I say I already did that and if he says do it again I say let me talk to your manager. Now it seems they know me and they just send me to second level on the spot. Then whenever I detect a problem on their end (DHCP server not responding, random connection problems, thier cable modem "updates" not working(from the modems web page)), I have to practically jump up and down on one hand upside down to get their attention. One time I had a guy come and check my levels and he saw I had a splitter in the line between TV's and the cable modem. He insisted that you should not split a cable modem dedicated jack and I told him YOU GUYS DID IT! (it's true they did). I would love to rewire it myself with a DC6 and a dual jack with one for the TV's and one for the cable modem, but I can't find a DC6. Anyone know where I could find one? I would love to do it and see if he was right. My most favorite one though is when I broke down and called them to run a cable from my basement to where the cable modem is and they drilled a hole in my FLOOR! I ASKED and PAID for a WALL JACK. Funny thing is when they came to re-do it, they only had to drill the hole about 5 inches over from where they did drill it and it only took about a minute to fish the cable up thru the wall (internal wall, no insulation). They guy was in so much of a hurry, he could not do it right! All I say is fine. If you can't do it right, then you wil come back and do it right again. There's never time to do it right the first time but there's always time to do it after it was screwed up the first time.

    --

    Gorkman

  59. Forgot to add... by scoove · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you're concerned about spyware, be very careful about who's DNS server you list in your PC.

    Should your service provider wish, he can capture Ethernet traffic specific to DNS inquiries and compile some interesting information without even needing you to install and use his client software.

    We used this approach at my previous job (dealing with employee security and network use compliance... great job, eh? *sigh*) We had web proxy operating but had an occasional employee who bypassed the proxy and figured he could avoid detection as he surfed his favorite porn or gambling site. By tracking his DNS lookups (many of the sites had hidden references to sextracker.com which made it easy to spot), we'd take his URL of choice and map the DNS to monster.com or hotjobs.com - giving him the clue that continued use might be an opportunity to work elsewhere.

    Sniffed properly, your provider will obtain an IP address and the Internet address being looked up (e.g. sextracker.com). He can insert the sniffer in line with the DNS server(s) to simplify data capture (rather than have to deal with inspection on a bigger network).

    Should he limit DNS lookups on the same segment as his nameserver, you may be able to avoid this spying by operating your own DNS (e.g. on your dual-NIC Linux firewall) or by using an alternate DNS server.

    *scoove*

  60. As a Former AOL-TW HSD Installer... by ONU+CS+Geek · · Score: 5, Informative
    I know what actually happens when the cable guy comes out to install; as I was the one who was doing it. Here's the run-down:

    1.) The Installer checks your cable lines to see what the forward and return levels are, to see if they'll work with your exisiting drop at your house-box. If everything's ok, they'll run an extra outlet, take it to the house box, and split it off as the first splitter in your box. If it's not ok, they'll re-hang or re-bury the drop, then run your AO.

    2.) The Cable installer calls in the MAC address of your cable modem, so that DOCSIS can authorise your account.

    3.) We plug in the cable modem in, and make sure that the Cable Modem actually lights up. Once that Cable Modem is lit, you can get a DHCP address with any DHCP client.

    4.) We'd run the RoadRunner disk...it'd set up the IEAK Customizations, set up email addresses, and then do a series of tests to ensuer that everything was ok. This included a ping test, a DNS test, and tweak your TCP/IP settings for broadband.

    Basically, once they bring it in, DOCSIS provides the authentication (if you're on a system that uses DOCSIS). They shouldn't need to run any software on your computer that provides authentication--it's hardware based.

    --

    I disable sigs...do you?
  61. My Cable Install Experience by Alan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I moved about a month ago, and moved from DSL to cable, and thought I'd share my experience with people.

    The guy came over, hooked up the cable modem, and watched as I ran about 50 feet of cable from it, around the back of the apartment, and through the window of the office (the only cable jack was on the opposite side of the house to the computers). When I finished he asked which computer had to be set up. "That one" I said, pointing to a small box hidden under the desk. It is a p133 that has run my website on 48 megs of ram for the last 5 years. "But not really that one," I finished.

    See I have a nifty little firewall from netmaster (was merilus) which is a full computer on a pci card that uses the host computer only for power via the PCI bus. When I explained this to him he just kinda nodded.

    "Don't worry," I told him, "I'll take care of it all." "All I need from you is the end of a cat5 cable." He went back to the cable modem and did the initialization or whatever he needed to do, and I overheard him say to head office something about "no, this guys going to set it all up."

    I had already set up the card for DHCP, so it was a matter of replacing the DSL modem cat5 cable and putting in the new one from the cable modem. I borrowed a pen from the slightly stunned installer and reset the system, waited the 40 or 50 seconds for the system to come back up, and then pinged out from my linux workstation.

    I mentioned that I worked for the last few years with a networking company and he said "well, you know a lot more than me then." No shit was the un-stated response. He left after having touched nothing more than the cabel modem.

    Moral of the story: If you don't want them to touch anything (and any moderately competant geek shouldn't), don't let them! All that needs to be done on a cable modem install is to plug in the external cable into your firewall (you DO have a firewall right?) and for you to either reboot it or renew the DHCP lease. You can set up all the @HOME proxy info if you want, but it's not needed.

  62. How to explain this is a Bad Thing to non-geek by gsfprez · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Honda just started a thing where they put a GPS reciever/transmitter in your car. They track everywhere you go and how long you're there (when you're stopped).

    Say you stop at AM/PM, they know that you are a user of Arco gasoline. Say you stop at a Michales craft store, they know that you are into crafts. Perhapse you stop at Costco - they could surmise that you have a large family.

    This, along with the ability to record your conversations in the car are used to find out what your into, but its anonymous, of course. All that they use that information for is to customize advertisements on your car stereo just for you.

    They also track who is in the car with you, because they is useful demographic information to help them with their targeted advertizing.

    You don't have anything to hide, so that wouldn't bother you, would it?

    So - are you wondering when you can get one of these new Hondas?

    No?

    Aunt Mary, just replace Honda with Microsoft and/or your Internet service provider.

    You DO know that you've ALREADY agreed to this on your computer, right?"

    This has worked for me 100% of the time. They get creeped out every time.

    --
    guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.
  63. Missing the point? by scoove · · Score: 5, Informative

    The point is that most internet users don't even know what an IP is

    This is true, and I'll play devil's advocate a bit (since I don't see many arguing the service provider's view - even though I personally and professionally object to this level of intrusion, and also perceive an EULA to be rather unenforcable).

    They don't care about linux, and they probably aren't even aware that there could be software doing "bad things" on their PC

    Exactly. In fact, it gets much worse. They will demand you do things to them that are fundamentally bad... such as a medium-sized business we recently switched over that had been running a T1 with public addresses on every desktop, confidential filesharing servers (with public IPs) with IRC, RPC, NNTP, and thirty other services running, and absolutely *zero* firewalling/security/etc.

    They got replaced with a rackmount Mikrotik router system and were immediately firewalled, RFC 1918 standard private IP network, etc.

    Their response? Forget about thank you - nothing about complaints that they can't see things from home anymore (no, they won't buy VPN software - think cheap), can't run personal websites on desktops, open relaying on their Exchange server was "broken", etc. Oh, and to explain this to them? "We don't want to know about those details. We just want it to work the way it did before without spending more money."

    Users will insist on being stupid about IP, security, etc. (I only mention this because it is part of the mindset you need to understand to see where the service provider is going to come from).

    The tech did the EULA for them without consulting them

    Come on... do you expect these folks to be experts about business policy? We train our guys to provide option A or B - A = installed our way, B = no install, goodbye and good luck. 90% of the customers are never an issue, but the 10% "I design websites, so therefore I'm a networking expert" types micromanage everything and work hard to screw it all up.

    The contract demands the software to be installed. This is a serious problem.

    Yes, and back to my clueless business example, here's why they insist upon it:

    "Every time you users download something, reconfigure something, whatever, you dick up your IP settings and make me spend $50 per customer service telephone call to fix it."

    By loading this software, I ensure that my configuration will probably stay on top of all the nonsense you put in there, and I can actually have a clue what is going on when you manage to screw it up still.

    The alternative is $500/month broadband (minimum...), or zero support (which doesn't work, btw - people would still blame the service provider when a tornado obliterates their home, destroys their PC, and "their Internet doesn't work.")

    Let's actually discuss ways to resolve it for everyone, rather than trying to make ourselves look clever.

    It really comes down to one of two options:

    1. Do it yourself. Know how to do all of this stuff as good or better than the service provider (and fake like you're an idiot customer with the spare Wintel box next to your connection for when you have to demonstrate the service provider has a problem).

    2. Let your service provider do it all for you. Don't care to learn IP? Don't want to accept responsibility for screwing up your IP service when you load that stupid "dialup optimization" software you saw in a pop-up box, on top of a broadband PPPoE connection? (usually also spyware... ugh) Be my guest... but understand that decision comes with a price. And understand that price usually includes your service provider getting to capture all that data on you, in exchange for protecting you from your own stupidity.

    The only other solution I can see is a Spyware-Free certification standard for service providers and software vendors. Establish a neutral entity, develop criteria for membership and verification, and allow people to promote that their product/service is compliant and recognized by the organization. Sort of a BBB approach to the issue...

    *scoove*

    1. Re:Missing the point? by aborchers · · Score: 5, Informative

      Extremely insightful post. Thanks for providing a counterbalance to the self-congratulating, elitist zealotry that is rife on this board. As a software engineer and consultant, I am more than familiar with the classic "luser" phenomenon, and sadly we have to assume that 99% of our users are clueless at best, and likely flat out dangerous. On the other hand, as a consumer of technical services (e.g. my DSL line at home) I find that dealing with tech support is uniformly frustrating for the advanced user because the providers are so focused on the clueless.

      It would not cost them a $50 support call to answer direct technical questions from experienced users if they would route questions properly based on their content. For example, if a user calls up, explains that he has changed network cards and asks to have the MAC entry changed in their database, it is not effective customer service to work through a thirty minute script only to end with an escalation to second line support when a direct bump to second line could have finished the call in one minute! (Example from my experience, obviously)

      Basically, phone centers need to program their script bots with something akin to keyword matching to determine when the caller is not going to be served by a cookbook of click heres and tab theres. In my experience, it is luck of the draw whether you get a first line rep who knows their stuff or is just following the script, and there are a lot of gradations between first and second line that could be subdivided more efficiently. Can it really be that cost ineffective to provide decent, non-irritating support to all levels of users, as opposed to just the clueless ones?

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    2. Re:Missing the point? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 3, Insightful
      But that's not the problem! I have no issue with them installing support clients, configuration managers, service helpers, whatever. I apreciate that these things keep costs down, and I get to take advantage of some of those savings with smaller bills.

      The problem is the "other" stuff that is bundled along with it. When spyware started to become bundled along with free downloads, roughly the same time that download.com got crap, it was accepted that they needed to generate revenue somehow. Basically the same reasons we tolerate ads on the net, TV and radio.

      However, spyware has become endemic. Everything seems to have it. What I object to is the inclusion of spyware not for monetry reasons, like we are discussing here. What's more, putting aside the morality of hiding the spyware in the EULA (which is basically lying, your are trying to deceive someone), here we are talking about forced installations.

      Sure, you don't have to accept the deal, but you've waited weeks for the taxi to come and take you away from 56k land, and the last thing you are going to do is say, "sorry, I'll get the next one". That's even if you are one of the enlightened few who realise what's going on.

      If I download a free tool to do a specific task, I might get spywared. That's a part of the game. However, when an ISP starts using it, then it becomes worrying.

      I'm sure many companies don't understand the meaning of what they are doing. They see it as an opertunity to understand their customers better. They just can't seem to see through the end-users eyes and realise that what they are doing is wrong.

    3. Re:Missing the point? by Feanturi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Every time you users download something, reconfigure something, whatever, you dick up your IP settings and make me spend $50 per customer service telephone call to fix it."

      By loading this software, I ensure that my configuration will probably stay on top of all the nonsense you put in there, and I can actually have a clue what is going on when you manage to screw it up still.

      The alternative is $500/month broadband (minimum...), or zero support


      Umm, how does installing commonly-used software 'dick up IP settings'? Other than proxy settings, what are you protecting? Using software to insure that your settings stay on top is counter-competitive, as when/if the customer decides to switch to another provider, they may have a tough time of it. Think AOL, and how it keeps email and favorites separate from the system, so that when a user switches they have to figure out how to get their favorites that they made during AOL use to transfer across since those only show up if they've loaded the AOL software first. There's also a local phone company here that has a software disk which I loathe. Their software (which constantly resets "Always dial") will not uninstall unless the disk can be found and put in the drive, so it is not always possible to remove it since the disk has long since been lost. You can get around it if you know what to do, but that's the annoying part, you have to know what to do, and not simply do what should be obvious.

      I install cable internet in people's homes, and there are only certain bits of software that we might install depending on the situation: If their IE is only version 4, I upgrade them to 5.5 SP2 (I don't believe they benefit from having 6), and throw on the latest cumulative patch behind it. I am to ensure that they have a workable version of Realplayer and Quicktime. I say 'ugh' to Realplayer but it's not my fault that so many misguided web operators choose to put their content in that format. When I install RP I make sure to disable their stupid tray icon. If I notice that gohip, CommonName, Netsetter, or other beasties are present, I remove them, and explain to the customer why this is happening. I do some other extras that are not required of me, like checking out their system for scary open ports (like 27374, etc), showing them windowsupdate.com, helping them install Zone Alarm if they are concerned about having a firewall, etc..

      If I was required to install spyware/you're-staying-with-us-no-matter-whatware, I would disobey, or quit, or something. But that software would not get installed on any of my runs. We don't have such software, and do not seem to be in danger of having to charge $500/month. Plus our phone support is 24/7, hold times generally around 2 minutes. And each customer installed does not make the company any money till after about a month and a half of service because I get paid first.

    4. Re:Missing the point? by budgenator · · Score: 3, Funny

      something akin to keyword matching
      ME: Do you you block out-bound SMTP traffic
      AOL: Sir AOL doesn't block Email
      ME: Well I can send mail out through my personal ISP through the website, but can not when connected to the internet through AOL.
      AOL: Are you sure the website is configured properly, we aren't responsable for websites
      ME:yes the website is configured properly, I can send Email from my Linux computer to the site through My personal ISP, and I can send Email from this Windows machine to the site through My personal ISP, but I can not I can send Email from this Windows machine to the site through AOL.
      AOL: AOL doesn't suppport Linux
      ME: My boss just doesn't belive me when I told him that AOL probably blocks outbound email to external servers as a SPAM prevention measure. Do you or do you not block SMTP on port 25 from going to non-AOL mail servers?
      AOL: Yes sir, that is one of our Email abuse prevention measures.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    5. Re:Missing the point? by kettch · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I used to work for a large hospital system in the IT department. We bought a *lot* of pc's from dell because we needed simple no nonsense boxes and dells gx*** series business machines were decent.

      We had a special contract with dell that gave us the phone number that would take us directly to the top level of support. Basically we would call and say "I have a gx110 with a bad motherboard." then we give the tech the numbers off the back of the machine. Usually within 24 hrs (or as few as 16), i had a new part.

      I think it would be neat if the local offices for these broadband companies would do a 1 minute interview with the caller the first time they accessed tech support. If the caller matches certain criteria, and can prove himself to not be an idiot. Then he should be granted the ability to get past the front line techs.

      Not that this would ever happen, and its all full of possible problems, but a guy can dream right?

      --
      Opportunities multiply as they are seized. --Sun-Tzu
  64. Cable providers forced software. by JWSmythe · · Score: 3, Interesting


    TimeWarner/RoadRunner in Tampa Florida has software, but they're usually too lazy to install it, which is a good thing. They used to have the required authentication software, but that's a different animal.

    TimeWarner/AOLCable in the Tampa area is actually RoadRunner. You can switch providers, save $5/month, and use the AOL auth software. Unfortunately it's an obnoxious set of popups and banners that drives me absolutely nuts. From what I understand that's all they do.

    Charter Communications in the Los Angeles area *DOES* have a spyware package, which sounds like what you have.. My girlfriend was putting in the order for my cablemodem, and they asked her "What OS are you using." The phone was handed off to men, and I told them Linux. They aren't allowed to even install with a Linux machine.. I had used on e on their network 2 weeks prior, so I knew it wasn't a technical problem. I finally gave in, and told them Win98, and brought a workstation back to the house for them to see when they installed..

    The Charter installer went to put the CD in to start installing software, and I told him "NO!" Then I asked what it was. :) He only answered "SpyWare". He put the disk in the box, which I still have, and they had a long waiver form that I had to sign. Basically it was that I understood that I wasn't taking full advantage of my PC, and I fully acknoledge that I should install the software at a future date, so I can make the most of my experience..

    Funny thing, I guess I made it clear enough that I only want a connection. They never even gave me my Email account info. Not like it matters, I never checked my TimeWarner/RoadRunner Email in the years that I had it.

    Their spyware wouldn't have done much good. They would have put it on a freshly installed 98 box, which would have gotten formatted later. I took that machine down, and put up my Linux firewall, and reassembled my home network (3 machines, for 3 people. Imagine that. hehe)

    It is obnoxious that they feel it's ok to push their software on you, but it's just as obnoxious as buying a new laptop with their choice of OS and software packages, that you're good enough to pay for. Did I really want WinXP Home and MSOffice 6000? Nope. But I don't have a choice.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  65. Whose Eula is it anyway? by martintt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Depending on quite what you signed I'd say the Eula wasn't signed for you and didn't apply to you.

    Possibly the cable installer has actually broken the Eula by transfering the software to someone else.

    Eitherway you haven't agreed to not reverse-engineering the spyware. It would be nice then to keep sending them back reports on your computers activity that are completely bogus if enough people did this then all their data would be pretty worthless.

    I'm sure most people dmake up names etc when they are asked to give out personal information (income gender age job etc) to get a service.

    The general tactic is its even better to give wrong data than it is to refuse to give any at all. As this way you are invalidating anything other people are conned into giving.

  66. Re:PPPoE is a wasteful protocol by Mr.+Shiny+And+New · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's all about squeezing every last dime from the customers.

    Actually, It's about more than that. PPPoE adds support for things like authentication which makes it easier to support multiple ISPs on one physical network. That's the reason PPPoE was deployed in Ontario, Canada. The phone company was forced by the govt to resell its ADSL service to competitors at a bulk rate, to allow competition. This meant that there was now multiple providers on the same network, and the ADSL network behaves a lot like ethernet. Thus, to allow things like metering and authentication and lots of other things that ISPs might care about, a new protocol had to be deployed over the existing one. Hence, PPPoE.

    Yes, PPPoE is a pain in it's "dial-up" like nature. Yes, it does have some overhead over ethernet. However, it does allow for competition. Which is a good thing. As for the inability to keep an IP address, well, nothing says that you'll always get the same IP address using DHCP.

    Also, I bet that in certain areas of the world the Cable companies will also start using PPPoE once the regulators start making them resell bandwidth too. I hate the thought, since I also like DHCP better, but it's the way of the world: Physical networks are prohibitively expensive. So to enable competition, you have to share them.

  67. Automatic escalation by Old+Man+Kensey · · Score: 5, Insightful
    aborchers wrote:

    It would not cost them a $50 support call to answer direct technical questions from experienced users if they would route questions properly based on their content. For example, if a user calls up, explains that he has changed network cards and asks to have the MAC entry changed in their database, it is not effective customer service to work through a thirty minute script only to end with an escalation to second line support when a direct bump to second line could have finished the call in one minute! (Example from my experience, obviously)

    I once got in the middle of a thread on the MindSpring customer-service newsgroups and posted a suggestion that they institute an "experienced customer" line. The idea being you get certified through them that yes, you really know what you're doing (maybe by taking the same tests of proficiency that their employees take?) and after that you're given access to a support line staffed by people who don't insist on going through the "is it turned on?" parts of the script. Who talk to you as though you have a clue, in other words. Hell, they could not only make money on it by charging a token fee (maybe $5 per month), they could use it as a pool to recruit new tech folks.

    Basically, phone centers need to program their script bots with something akin to keyword matching to determine when the caller is not going to be served by a cookbook of click heres and tab theres. In my experience, it is luck of the draw whether you get a first line rep who knows their stuff or is just following the script, and there are a lot of gradations between first and second line that could be subdivided more efficiently. Can it really be that cost ineffective to provide decent, non-irritating support to all levels of users, as opposed to just the clueless ones?

    It's all about metrics. If you don't force the techs to follow the same script, you can't effectively compare their performance and weed out the ones that aren't making good numbers. (The fact that you can't do that short of actually listening in on a tech's calls from time to time, we'll ignore for now.) ISO 9000 can be a good thing in its place; likewise Six-Sigma. This kind of cookie-cutter tech support is the worst possible application of both, but management just sees a documented, reproducible process and finds it Good.

    --
    -- Old Man Kensey
    1. Re:Automatic escalation by scoove · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I find that dealing with tech support is uniformly frustrating for the advanced user because the providers are so focused on the clueless.

      Absolutely concur. I'm one of those half-suit/half-geek oddballs and I spend a good amount of time dealing with embedded system projects (miniturization of router systems we put in ugly places like water towers). I've gotten used to simply waiting for folks to go thru their routine - in fact, I usually either get some good reading material out, sort my files, etc. while dealing with the basic questions.

      But putting the service provider hat on, I'm not sure there is a good alternative (but I'm looking for one!!!). For instance, Old Man Kensey writes:

      institute an "experienced customer" line

      but acknowledges the issue with performance measurement. I'll stick to an even more basic concern: cost.

      I hate to say it, but most of the 80% category (clueless users) are pretty easy to help. Like my mother-in-law. They'll write down step-by-step instructions and never deviate. They correctly assume that it probably was something they did that made things wrong, and have a much better attitude to deal with.

      The 2% elite geeks never even call unless *we* have something wrong, so they're a breeze too (and have managed to evolve in a hostile world and are pretty savvy at handling their service provider).

      It's the 18% "sorta knowledgable" users that cost us bucks on support. You know the type, false high self-esteem, marginal competency. Can use Frontpage so they're a self-declared web guru. Knows how to ping, and thinks he's the inventor of IP. Constantly tinkers with his PC and screws it up, but is certain it was the service provider's doing (even though everything worked until that service pack was applied). They start the support call by yelling at people, send nasty emails demanding to receive a personal apology from the CEO and credit for a year's worth of service, etc.

      They'll monopolize the phone. Ask you a thousand questions unrelated to their most recent screwup. They'll suck you dry on support. When you finally figure out how they screwed it up (the one thing they are naturally good at), they assume the problem was secondary and the service provider is just covering up the problem. Then they'll break it again the next day.

      It would not cost them a $50 support call to answer direct technical questions from experienced users if they would route questions properly based on their content

      But how do I weed out the posers - They're 90% of the self-proclaimed experts, and would be nearly all of my calls.

      (Incidentally, we keep a record of the 2% on our network and watch for their communications. They also get bandwidth boosts, doubling their rate shaping limits, as a little thank you for being competent. They thank us back by letting us know when they see something we should know about)

      Perhaps the only solution is to charge for support like the phone company did - e.g. "if it's not our network, it's your bill."

      *scoove*

  68. POKE 65495,0? You ARE old! by Tsar · · Score: 3, Funny

    For those who really don't remember (or who followed a different track to geekdom), executing that line on your TRS-80 Color Computer would make ROM cartridge programs run twice as fast, and bump up your BASIC program speed by about 50%. Of course, you'd better POKE 65496,0 when you're done, so your 'half-fast' cassette recorder would work again.

    It wasn't all that noticeable with a single machine, but I once had a Beowulf cluster of these babies, and...

  69. Turning off non-paying customers, moving routers by billstewart · · Score: 3, Informative
    There's no good reason for DSL to use PPPoE - the underlying technology is usually ATM, which uses Permanent Virtual Circuits (ISO protocol layer 2 connections that let you multiplex multiple connections on a point-to-point wire), and they can use ATM switches to deliver either ATM or Frame Relay connections to the ISP. Works just fine, and you can do either static or dynamic routing with no problem, though it tends to use a bit more IP address space than bridging solutions.

    The two things that PPPoE seems to accomplish are to give the telcos (or other CLECs) and ISPs a bit more flexibility about where to put routers - it makes it easier to terminate the PVC on a shared router at the telco POP instead of requiring either an ATM connection to the ISP or an ISP-owned router at the POP. The authentication features also makes it a bit easier to turn off service to people if they haven't paid their bills, for the case where the telco/CLEC is providing a shared router at the POP. (If the ISP has a PVC all the way back to their router, they can do the same thing by disabling the PVC in their router.)

    Mostly it's ugly.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks