Slashdot Mirror


What Software Do Cable Installers Place on Your PC?

{e}N0S asks: "The cable guy came over to install a cable modem at my Dad's house. As I watched him do his stuff I noticed he was installing something called Broadjump Client Foundation. I know you don't need software for a cable modem to work so I asked if it was necessary. He said he had to do his list of things, and we had to sign that he did his list of things, otherwise he couldn't leave it with us to use. Since I can always remove the software, I agreed, but I noticed while he was flipping through the install, he was clicking 'agree' on every EULA that came up. Doing a search on Google for 'Broadjump Client Foundation' comes up with some pretty scary stuff as far as what it does, like: 'Builds a database of subscriber demographics and buying behaviors to help evolve and refine marketing efforts.' Now, how does this affect us? Neither myself or anyone in my family agreed to the software; the cable guy did. And is there anyway to get cable companies to stop doing this as I can imagine since the cable company is a monopoly in this town, that the percentage of people who still have this software on their computers is pretty high."

406 of 944 comments (clear)

  1. he installed by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Interesting

    nothing.

    he did nothing. i wouldnt let him. i just signed as if he did, to keep him outta shit.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:he installed by AlgUSF · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Even better yet, I have DSL. It came as an self-install kit.

      1) Plugged DSL modem into the telephone line

      2) Plugged DSL modem into network hub

      3) Connected filters to telephones

      4) Threw install CD in the trash

      --


      I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
    2. Re:he installed by madshot · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I would just thank him for giving me my modem and show him the door. If he doesn't like it he can call his manager and complain :)

      I NEVER let anyone install any software on my company computers or my home computers that deal with broadband. Next thing you know you'll have spy wear and you can't remove it.

      --
      Obama = Socialism.
    3. Re:he installed by s20451 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Next thing you know you'll have spy wear and you can't remove it.

      Yeah, like this.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    4. Re:he installed by _|()|\| · · Score: 2
      2) Plugged DSL modem into network hub

      I hope you mean a router, because a hub is less secure, and can cause you to take more than one IP address.

    5. Re:he installed by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The way the guy explained it to me, there are dozens of people who dont want him touching their computer.

      Then they cant figure it out (yeah, I know it's just turning on DHCP), and have to call him back to set it up.

      If the original work order isn't signed - then there's no proof he ever showed up at all, and the cost of rolling the truck the second time comes outta his pay. If it is, then the customer pays for the second call like he should.

      He really didn't care one way or the other, so long as the work order was signed.

      No need to dump all the anti-corporate conspiracy theory bullshit on the poor joe who gets payed 10 bucks an hour to hookup peoples homes.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    6. Re:he installed by Kintanon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Just as a note, the cable installer guys get paid per customer, not per hour (based on questions I asked the installer when I had cable from Comcast in baltimore). So they love to get out of there quick.
      It means they made 17$ for 5-10 minutes of their time.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    7. Re:he installed by bheerssen · · Score: 5, Funny

      If he wants to install his software, I point to my mandrake box and say "sure have at it." Gets 'em every time.



      --
      (Score: -1, Stupid)
    8. Re:he installed by Capt.+DrunkenBum · · Score: 4, Funny

      I did the same thing, except I pointed at my ancient SparcStation 2, running Solaris 7..

      I thought he was going to rupture something. :)

      --

      Not everyone deserves a 320i

    9. Re:he installed by rw2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      If the original work order isn't signed - then there's no proof he ever showed up at all, and the cost of rolling the truck the second time comes outta his pay.

      That's a sexy, but untrue story. It's illegal to make him pay for that second truck roll.

      Now, will his bonus, likely correlated to percentage of second visits, be affected. Perhaps.

    10. Re:he installed by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As a Mac user, he recognised what my machine was but had no software that he could install on it. What a shame. He then hung around asking me questions about OSX while I made sure I could get to my email servers, various websites, ftp servers and while I pinged a few game servers. Security through obscurity wins again!

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    11. Re:he installed by Reziac · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is also true for Verizon (the Verizon dude told me about this last time he was here). The reason being most of their field reps now are not really Verizon employees, but are on a sort of outside contract.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    12. Re:he installed by gi-tux · · Score: 2

      I guess that I am lucky then. Knology doesn't (or hasn't with me at least) ever installed any software. Their field guys even know a little about Linux, enough to get around and debug problems at least. As a matter of fact, the last install tech that came to replace a bad modem actually preferred to use by SuSE linux box to my kids windows box for checking things out.

      On a side note, the POKE is the double speed on a Tandy Color Computer, I believe.

      --
      I have no sig, does anyone have one to spare?
    13. Re:he installed by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 2


      That strategy usually works with Macs, too, btw. While smaller base of applications for a platform is usually a bad thing, when it comes to viruses and spyware it often works to my advantage.

      --

      --
      $tar -xvf .sig.tar
    14. Re:he installed by rabidfox · · Score: 2, Informative

      with some ISP's the install cd is their way of provisioning the modem so their dhcp servers will give you an IP, or let you route outside of the modem. Other ISP's just register the MAC of your modem and let the first 1 to 3 MAC's pull an IP. Sometimes it's called in by the field tech, other times it's registered with the cd

    15. Re:he installed by svirre · · Score: 2

      Some DSL modems have integrated routers. (Like my ISPs Cisco 677i)

    16. Re:he installed by DrFrob · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had him trying to get it to work on my linux box and he told me that he wasn't supposed to even touch linux. Needless to say, he didn't install any software.

    17. Re:he installed by mobets · · Score: 2, Informative

      My DSL box is a router :) It didn't come with a CD and my ISP supports linux. Ain't competition grand?

      --

      It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
  2. Have a honeypot by samjam · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Have a bogus PC or bogus windows installation for him to install junk on, which you can leave "unused" till you need to call support when you can boot into that partition if needed.

    1. Re:Have a honeypot by dattaway · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I did this the first time I got cable. It was a 486 with Windows95 installed on it. Took the guy 30 minutes to install his warez on it. After he left, I got out my real computer and put the garage sale relic back in the attic.

    2. Re:Have a honeypot by Sancho · · Score: 3, Interesting

      More amusing would be a Linux machine. Let him try to figure it out. :)

    3. Re:Have a honeypot by meatspray · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They sent me two guys, one 'seasoned' one in training.

      I was running win2k before they supported it, to appease the installers i ran win98 system in a fullscreen VMware. You should have seen the look on their faces when the win2k desktop popped up for a second while the virtual machine rebooted.

      they installed all kinds of stuff, the IE on that image never worked the same again.

      All I had to do was take note of the IP and PC Name, (they were using some funky DHCP via NetBios carp) shut down the vm and cram the IP and Name into the 2k install. bam! instant access.

    4. Re:Have a honeypot by IceFox · · Score: 2

      When the cable guys came to my house they were brought to our 2nd room which has two computers. The first one being my high end one with a Sony 24" widescreeen and Kinesis keyboard. The other one being a Pentium 100 with a 15" monitor. Guess which one they had to install the cable modem too and which one they were not allowed to touch.

      --
      Do you changes clothes while making the "chee-chee-cha-cha-choh" transformation sound?
    5. Re:Have a honeypot by clustersnarf · · Score: 2, Funny

      I had a linux box as my "computer" when the cable guy came out a couple years back. It had Redhat 6.2 or 7 on it. I think it was running the FVWM295 stuff so it LOOKED like windows 95... they guy sat down at it after plugging things in and hit the "start" menu. He looked all over for about a minute till he kinda sheepishly looked at me... I said, It's linux, I better drive. Fired up a terminal, ran dhcpcd and grabbed an address. Sent him on his way. It was kinda funny to mess with his head like that though.

    6. Re:Have a honeypot by ViXX0r · · Score: 2, Funny

      I did this because at the time I first got DSL, they didn't support Linux at ALL. So I stuck an old 200MB drive in the machine, and put Win95 on it, let him do his thing, then quickly removed the drive and sterlized it by fire :P

      --
      University - a box of academia nuts.
    7. Re:Have a honeypot by clickety6 · · Score: 5, Funny


      Good solution because all non-geeks have at least two or three old PCs just lying around the place for emergenices like this!

      --
      ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    8. Re:Have a honeypot by Bobzibub · · Score: 5, Funny

      My installer (at&t cable) got confused at lilo.

      ; )

      -b

    9. Re:Have a honeypot by sckeener · · Score: 5, Funny

      More amusing would be a Linux machine. Let him try to figure it out. :)

      If the cable company is like my DSL support, then they wouldn't install it. Every time I have to call in problems with my DSL line, I have to lie and say I have a windows 98 pc. They usually then try to get me to do some basic networking troubleshooting. This can be hard to fake if you don't remember off the top of your head what the output is supposed to look like. If they catch me in the lie, I usually play the mad customer (which I usually am at this point) and demand they open a ticket for the issue. :)

      --
      "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
    10. Re:Have a honeypot by dattaway · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Time Warner people out here in Kansas City do not officially "support" Linux, but are in the LUG mailing list, have local usenet newsgroups for related issues, and the tech support people are very helpful. If only all ISPs were like this...

    11. Re:Have a honeypot by Theatetus · · Score: 2, Informative

      they installed all kinds of stuff, the IE on that image never worked the same again.

      I've had that problem with DSL and cable. The stupid client software they force on you installs its own IE. Worse yet, the cable software uninstalled IE6 to install IE5.5

      Apparantly Windows 2000 doesn't like having its IE6 taken away from it, because *nothing* worked after that... Windows Scripting Host was fux0rzd, Explorer was flakey, etc... Oh well... it was one of the last straws that switched me to Linux (which takes the cable without any problems or software -- eat *that*, Comcast), so I suppose I should be grateful.

      --
      All's true that is mistrusted
    12. Re:Have a honeypot by 13Echo · · Score: 2

      Originally, when my service was installed, I was running Win2k. I've had to make a service call or two because the morons didn't properly label my connection out in the box, so they kept disconnecting my cable. When I make a service call and they ask which OS I use, I just say "Windows 2000". The tech came out and reconnected my line. I fired up Slackware 8.1 and asked him if it would be a problem. He said that it wasn't a big deal as long as we could test that it was active. Everything seemed fine, and he went on his merry way, seeming to be actually be kinda impressed with my Linux setup.

      It's good to have a crappy old drive laying around with a Windows installation on it just in case. I mentioned to the installer that if Linux was a problem, then I could swap it out. Generally though, they don't want to wait, so they deal with it so that they can get on with their service calls.

    13. Re:Have a honeypot by Ratbert42 · · Score: 2

      VMWare

    14. Re:Have a honeypot by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have Wide Open West (WOW) cable internet, they are very Linux friendly and know how to do it right. BTW, the right way is "Oh you use Linux, I am just supposed to leave the modem here after I run the cable".

    15. Re:Have a honeypot by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 2

      True, at my first college apartment, the Time Warner guy came over to install our cable tv. He told us that the installation would cost X dollars, and if we just gave him X, he would install our cable but, to the company, he'd pretend we'd changed our mind (so no billing). We told him that we were getting Road Runner installed next week and we weren't sure how well that idea would fly.

      When the Road Runner guy came, we had half a dozen computers networked together. It was clear we intended to split the connection with NAT, something which was against the terms of service at the time. The tech they sent out couldn't have cared less.

    16. Re:Have a honeypot by matt-fu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I live in KC and have Time Warner. Every time I call in I start out by saying that I have a Unix box connected and they go into this spiel about how they don't support it and thanks for calling. I can usually catch them in time to say "oh wait, I have a Windows box too.." and then after they walk me through "reinstalling the TCP stack" I eventually get to talk to a real tech (generally 45 minutes to an hour later). They may be on the LUG list and all, but you'd never see evidence pointing to that based on their piss poor tech support.

    17. Re:Have a honeypot by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2

      Same here. The guy that did mine even let me borrow his drill to make some holes for routing cat-5. Damn those 100 year old tenament buildings, the walls are over a foot and a half thick! Much easier when you have the correct tools...

    18. Re:Have a honeypot by shanebush · · Score: 2, Funny

      Same fer me, but by a different method... The cable installer guy insisted he setup the machine, so I let him...

      However, I had installed win98 in a VMWare virtual machine and had that running full screen when he did the setup... I patiently watched him setup the virtual windows and when he was through, signed off on it. Then I took my seat back, dropped the windows virtual machine back to a window and closed it. He had this strange look on his face when he realized what happened.

      Oh well, he did his job.

    19. Re:Have a honeypot by upper · · Score: 2

      I did exactly that. The techs couldn't get it to see either the network card I had in it (which worked fine under linux) or the network card they brought. I didn't care, so eventually they gave up and recorded their work as a "self install".

    20. Re:Have a honeypot by Tim+Browse · · Score: 2
      You aren't honestly trying to attribute the quote in your sig to yourself, are you?

      No, he's not. His signature is "Justen Stepka", nothing more.

      To avoid making this mistake again, go to your slashdot Preferences:Comments page, and turn on signature dash (according to the page: Prefix everyone's signature with "--" to make it blazingly obvious where comment ends and sig begins).

      HTH

      Tim

    21. Re:Have a honeypot by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "Every time I call in I start out by saying that I have a Unix box connected and they go into this spiel about how they don't support it and thanks for calling. I can usually catch them in time to say "oh wait, I have a Windows box too.." and then after they walk me through "reinstalling the TCP stack" I eventually get to talk to a real tech (generally 45 minutes to an hour later)."

      I do believe that you are taking a backwards approach to getting your problems solved. Your goal is to get past the first line support monkeys who can only read from a script. You can accomplish this by lying.

      This means that you have a Compaq Presario with Windows ME. You run Interent Explorer to browse and Outhouse Express to e-mail. The DSL bridge is plugged directly into the NIC. You don't know what linux is. You have never heard of linux. You need to be told that Control Panel is under start > settings. Just follow their lead and fit the mold of a clueless luser. This will allow them to get through their script as fast as possible and pass you along to the more senior techs who have a clue.

    22. Re:Have a honeypot by Felinoid · · Score: 2

      I have Win 95 on a spare HD in my computer just for the cable company.

      But I'm lucky becouse they are cool about me using Linux as long as they don't need to support my os and I use Windows for tech support calls.
      "You make it work on Winows I'll make it work on Linux"

      --
      I don't actually exist.
  3. Self Install Kits by Rayonic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is why I always opt for the self-install option with any ISP. I don't even like my wife messing with my computer, nevermind some complete stranger.

    (Side note: Yes, she does have her own computer. So there. :P)

    1. Re:Self Install Kits by pantropik · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Also in Tallahassee, FL. When I first got cable I just went out, picked up a free self-install kit, came home and had it up and running in a few minutes. All it took was a phone call to give them the MAC address and modem serial number. The modem is a Toshiba with USB and Ethernet, which is great.

      I've had the cable guy over here a few times to check my lines (once when the idiot landscapers chopped the cable to bits at the box outside). I told tech support and the cable guys that I use Linux. Best I can tell, they don't particularly care, especially since my machines are behind a router anyway. One of the cable guys might even be using Linux now. He was so impressed with my setup I let him play around with it a few minutes.

      Anyway, were those the United States he was talking about? I don't think so. Comcast would rather you self-install, at least here ... the service techs seem to be seriously overextended as it is. If they had to do all the installations the waiting list would be huge (already takes ~1 week to get a tech out if something goes wrong).

      Back to the actual topic: the Comcast CD in the self-install kit is crap. Pretty much wrecked my roommate's XP box with its custom IE install. I didn't notice any spyware, but I was deleting everything and starting over, so I didn't really pay attention. When I showed him he didn't need it in the first place (despite what the kit says) he wasn't very happy.

    2. Re:Self Install Kits by enneff · · Score: 2

      Exactly where does he say he's not taking care of her security?

      He just said he doesn't like anyone (including his wife) messing around with his computer.

    3. Re:Self Install Kits by catfood · · Score: 2

      And who said she was non-technical?

    4. Re:Self Install Kits by warpSpeed · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I don't even like my wife messing with my computer, nevermind some complete stranger.

      My kids, my wife, and my mother do not have admin access on thier win2k machines (they each have thier own). If something breaks I have to fix it. Thats part of the deal for maintaining thier machines.... I aint got no time for no windoz viri, or spyware.

  4. Don't worry about it by tkrotchko · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do you want theoretical advice or practical?

    Theoretical:
    If you feel you can't live with the restrictions or you and your machine, then drop the service and use something else.

    Practical
    Just wipe the stuff off the machine after the guy leaves.

    You can only analyze this stuff so far.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    1. Re:Don't worry about it by windex · · Score: 5, Insightful

      On top of that, any cable company will let you demand to do a self install, and just drop off the cable modem or ship it UPS.

      The worst case scenerio is that you set it up before he gets there and go "I used to have it in my old apartment/house/whatever, it's already setup. Just plug it in and I'll sign your service order". No human cable technician is going to turn down getting out of doing work.

      Makes me wonder how old the submitter was to where he couldn't just say "No, thanks, I'll install it myself".

    2. Re:Don't worry about it by Syncdata · · Score: 2

      I just finally got hooked up with a cable connection recently, I just called the installer "dude" a lot, and when it came to the installation of software, I just signed off on everything having been installed. He gets the job done quickly, gets a good performance evaluation, I don't have to worry about ad/spyware. Win/Win.

      --
      "Inattention makes clowns of us all" -Bean
  5. Inquiring minds must know... by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What cable internet provider was this?

    1. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by jdreed1024 · · Score: 5, Interesting
      What cable internet provider was this?

      Dunno what this guy used, but certainly ATTBI/MediaOne/whatever does this.

      Broadjump is the biggest piece of shit software I've ever seen. It reboots your computer whenever possible (god forbid they should check to see if you're running on 2K/XP which doesn't need to be rebooted to renew DHCP). You also need that program to register your MAC address with them. I could have made a fuss, but it wasn't worth it. I installed, registered, and de-installed. No more problems.

      They certainly don't require that you leave it installed, except for Tech Support. Which so far has been easy, because if it's a problem with the line, you simply call and report that cable TV is out. Then they don't ask you to reboot your computer 500 times.

      --
      There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
    2. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by nege · · Score: 2

      and power cycle your modem! I had to power cycle the modem 3 times, and reboot the PC 3 times while getting my cable installed this weekend.

    3. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by operagost · · Score: 2, Informative

      Windows 9x doesn't need to be rebooted either.
      Run "winipcfg", select the ethernet adapter, click Release, then Renew.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    4. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by R.Caley · · Score: 5, Informative
      They certainly don't require that you leave it installed, except for Tech Support. Which so far has been easy, because if it's a problem with the line, you simply call and report that cable TV is out.

      I'd like to underline this. For anyone who hasn't learned by painful experience yet, never report anything to the interent suport people if you have TV from the same source.

      Anything which goes wrong is in one of two classes, things shared with the TV operation and things their tech support stands no chance of fixing. The TV operation will be far better resourced, and the support staff know that you may have 5 children demanding cartoon network at your end and so not fixing things may result in you being driven insane and turning up at their call center with a chainsaw. Nerds just don't carry that fear factor:-)

      Certainly when I had a problem which seemed to be at my end, my cable suppler (Telewest) quoted a couple of weeks for an engineer from the internet side and day and a half for a TV bod.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    5. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      are you on drugs?

      ATTBI does NOIT need anything to register your MAC with them... they dont give arats ass about your MAC address..

      I have changed the nic card in my pc at least 15 times and finally slapped in a SMC firewall on the cable modem... it never stopped working or has any trouble that the MAC address changed at least 10 times...

      ATTBI does not care about your MAC address on your PC. and your cable modem (if you got it from them) is pre-configured and tested before it comes to your home.

      dont spread lies man.... it's not right.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      Some cable providers do check your mac-addie, of course you can just press the little reset button on the cablemodem every time you switch pcs/nics and it works just fine....

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    7. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by jdreed1024 · · Score: 4, Informative
      ATTBI does NOIT need anything to register your MAC with them... they dont give arats ass about your MAC address..

      This is true NOW. It was not true in August of 2002. They only just switched their policy recently. NOW, they only care about your cable modem's MAC addr. As recently as two months ago, however, they cared very much about your computer's MAC addr.

      What used to happen, was you could get a broken DHCP lease, that only worked for registering with them. Connecting to anything else resulted in dropped connections. Oh, and the lease was only valid a short period of time.

      Of course, this is the case in the Boston Area. AT&T Broadband exists in other areas, and may have different policies elsewhere, but I don't care about that, since I don't live there.

      dont spread lies man.... it's not right.

      Don't spread ignorance, man, it's not right...

      --
      There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
    8. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by R.Caley · · Score: 2
      Then again, most of the places I've been have the TV installed on a completely seperate line. There's got to be a really big problem for both to go down.

      Maybe it's different in other places but here (UK) the reason the cable companies can provide broadband and telephones is that they already have the network in place. So most failures turn out to be network related and affect TV too. In fact my TV box is more sensitive to noise than the cable modem, so a coupe of times I have had TV jitters etc. but the internet was fine.

      AIUI the other main UK cable company (NTL) doesn't provide a separate cable modem at all, just uses an outlet on the TV box.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    9. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by R.Caley · · Score: 2
      Here (in the US) the networks coincide in a lot of places, but they (at least used to) run a seperate cable to the house for the cable modem.

      Not here, but then I can't say it would make a difference. I've never had a problem with the line to my home (even when, at my previous flat, the installers complained that the box they had to connect me to was flooded and he was working up to his elbow in water).

      OTOH, just after I got cable They (another They, not the cable people) started all of the water mains in this part of the city, and water company machinery seems to be magnetically attracted to cable company cable runs... so maybe I have over-experienced network breakdowns.

      (and needless to say, they resurfaced the main road into town a week or two before they dug it all up for the water mains... not that this is /. material, but sometimes you just have to winge... must shut up, starting to treat /. as usenet...)

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    10. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by AntiNorm · · Score: 2

      The 'BJ' software

      Does that work with Fufme units?

      --

      I pledge allegiance to the flag...
      of the Corporate States of America...
    11. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2

      Nah, they still are integrated in all the franchises. Both run off the same cable into your house and go into a y-piece splitter. The cable TV box itself runs on IP (you can find it's address in the service menu). If the problem lies beyond your front door, chances are that both TV and internet will have problems.

    12. Re:Inquiring minds must know... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      sorry but even in the @home days they didn't care...

      I know been working there for 3 years.. and a MAC address on the true ATTBI network was never needed or even wanted.

      any installer telling you otherwise is making things up... and that doesnt suprise me as the installers are not rocket scientists..

      the MAC address of the modem is needed for provisioning, but it instantly reports upon turn-on. and if you buy one yourself they ask for the MAC number on the phone wne they set up the account.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  6. Comcast - Mac OS X by mcwop · · Score: 5, Informative

    I use Mac OS X. The software that Comcast has is incredibly buggy for Mac OS. I refused to install it. I just signed the docs for the cable guy (as if I even needed him to come do the installation in the first place).

    --

    "I don't think it's selfish, to eat defenseless shellfish." -NOFX

    1. Re:Comcast - Mac OS X by ruzel · · Score: 2, Troll


      When the Comcast guys came over to my place to install the cable, there happened to be two of them -- one of them in training. The guy saw my TiBook and turning to the trainee said, "These are nice. With these kind, you just have to plug the modem in and plug it into the computer."
      Trainee: "That's it?"
      Cable Guy: "Yup. That's it."
      Macs are not only great for the install, but they're obscure enough that there isn't any crappy marketroid software written for them!
      </typical macintosh rant>
      _________________

  7. Small Claims Court? by TheBillGates · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wonder if you could take them to small claims court to compensate you for the time you spent uninstalling the program?

    Sure, it wouldn't amount to much money, but taking them to court would get their attention that people don't want that spyware stuff on their machines.

    The nerve they have to install that spyware and not have the decency to even let their customer know. This is a severe abuse of your privacy.

    1. Re:Small Claims Court? by R.Caley · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I wonder if you could take them to small claims court to compensate you for the time you spent uninstalling the program?

      More significantly, isn't him clicking through the end user agreements a forgery of your agreement?

      On a practical level, I agree with someone above: have a sacrificial machine. I built a machine from my parts boxes for them to mess up. After all, all they want is a windows control panel to poke at, that it is on a P100 with almost no disk space and a slightly dodgy power supply doesn't matter.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    2. Re:Small Claims Court? by sqlrob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How do you know it will uninstall with that option?

      There are several programs (aka Gator) that don't

    3. Re:Small Claims Court? by Angram · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sorry, bub, but I'm a trained Small Claims Court Counsellor. You can't sue for emotional, time, or any other non-monetary kind of cost. If it can't be printed on a recipt, you can't sue. You can sue for time if it was part of an arrangement (i.e. plumber not getting paid for the job), but not for your time spent fixing this stuff. Unless he broke the machine and you had to have it serviced or replaced, there's nothing small claims court can do.

      --

      GL
    4. Re:Small Claims Court? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So hire someone else to uninstall it (and perform a security analysis) and have them give you a receipt. Of course, you should only do this if you didn't sign a contract with Comcast allowing them to install the software.

    5. Re:Small Claims Court? by docwhat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So if I'm a professional and I charge $100/hour and it takes me 3 hours to do the work, I can't take them to court?

      But, if I hire out my friend to do the work at $100/hour then I can?

      Seems weird, since if I'm a pro, and I end up doing "professional" work because someone messing something up....

      I mean, if someone smashes into my house, and I'm a contractor and I fix it, I couldn't take them to small claims for the work I did?

      Ciao!

      --
      The Doctor What (KF6VNC)
    6. Re:Small Claims Court? by GlassUser · · Score: 2

      "Thank you for using PC-Geeks-For-Rent OS reinstallation service. Two hours for a reinstallation and data migration, at $100 per hour is $200 total."

    7. Re:Small Claims Court? by Doktor+Memory · · Score: 2

      More significantly, isn't him clicking through the end user agreements a forgery of your agreement?

      100% odds that the EULA that you do sign with the cable company gives them a limited power of attorney to "pass on" your assent for the license of any software they want to foist on you.

      Whether that would actually stand up in court is anyone's guess.

      --

      News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.

    8. Re:Small Claims Court? by karlm · · Score: 2
      Hmm.. you intentionallylet them play with a computer with a dodgey power supply? if I were truly evil... which I am from time to time... I'd be tempted to put a timed water dipensation device in the bottom of the case, with the restart button on the case rewired to the timer...

      Install droid shows up... hit rest button before answering the door. 15 minutes into the install, water starts leaking rapidly out the bottom of your computer. "Oh, don't worry, it does that from time to time." 2 minutes later a firecracker goes off inside the case. "Yeah.. that happens about once a week. My brother thinks I need to reinstall windows."

      Too bad thos installation guys are just underappreciated drones, or I'd have a lot of fun.

      --
      Copyright Violation:"theft, piracy"::Anti-Trust Violation:"thermonuclear price terrorism"<-Overly dramatic language.
  8. Nothing. by krugdm · · Score: 4, Informative

    Roadrunner let me pick up a self install kit, so no tech ever came to my house.

    And no software needed to be installed anyway. Screwed the cable line into the modem, turned it on, attached it to the Linksys router, turned it on, attached that to the LAN port on my Mac, turned that on, and presto! A working internet connection!

    1. Re:Nothing. by Skirwan · · Score: 5, Funny
      Screwed the cable line into the modem, turned it on, attached it to the Linksys router, turned it on, attached that to the LAN port on my Mac, turned that on, and presto! A working internet connection!
      Step three... There's no step three. There's no step three!

      :)

      --
      Damn the Emperor!
    2. Re:Nothing. by Hard_Code · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually I wasn't aware of that "self-install" was a seperate option, so two guys came by and unpacked and plugged in the cable modem. Then one guy hunted around a bit trying to test if the connection was working until I realized that I had the DHCP Client service turned off, at which point I turned it on, and then explained to him, after he asked, what I had just done. So I guess "props" to Road Runner (although I'm not sure I feel good about giving "props" to anything related to the AOL/TimeWarner/MechaGodzilla conglomerate).

      I think these guys get commission on the number of installations they do in a day, so they are glad to get out the door as soon as they can.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  9. I did cable modem installs by cybergeak · · Score: 3, Informative

    And if you really don't want something done, assure the installer you will sign off on whatever, so long as he does what you ask.

    All we care about is your autograph, if your happy and are willing to sign, im sure he wont have a problem.

    alex

  10. Mine didn't install anything, but by z_gringo · · Score: 4, Informative


    He stood me up the first time, then when he did arrive, he told me that I couldn't have a dedicated IP, despite them having promised me that I could have one. He did however configure my machine to use the cable company's proxy server, and use DHCP, etc... After he was done, I just reconfigured it and hard set the IP address. I haven't had a problem in the past couple of years. Except for when my machine was off for a couple of days, and I had to re-configure for DHCP,and "steal" another address, as my old one wasn't available any more...

    --
    -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
    1. Re:Mine didn't install anything, but by puto · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just wondering one thing. What is the 'hard set" ip thing you did? If you are on a network and you are under a DHCP scope(range) then you can't assign yourself a permanent IP. Unless you have access and control to the actual equipment of your ISP.

      Now if your isp sets its leases to change IP's ONLY when your broadband connection drops or your pc powers down, then you can have the appearance of having a static ip. But your ip was not static because when you rebooted you were assigned another one.

      So what you have done is used DHCP to get a DHCP assigned IP address. Then changed YOUR configuration to see it as static. This is still DHCP. It was assigned from a lease. You didn't assign it to yourself, and anyway as long as that box is on it would have used that IP until you shut down or they decided to yank it. Changing your nic config to show a fixed ip that you got from a DHCP server is not setting a fixed IP. Cause even you said it changed when the machine went down.

      Most broadband ISPS change leases when the connection drops. Just like dial up. OR assign it five days. Depends on who is running the shop. My Cox cable will keep the same ip for months unless I shut the box off, then it changes.

      Just my 2 cents.

      Puto

      --
      The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
    2. Re:Mine didn't install anything, but by z_gringo · · Score: 2

      Correct..

      Just get DHCP to assign one, and then set it as a static IP. You are correct that they could decide to yank it most any time, but most ISP's don't do that. Additionally, depending on the DHCP server, most DHCP scopes won't assign an IP that is already in use even if it is within th scope and not assigned by the server, so you are pretty safe. Obviosly, this isn't something you would want to do with a production server, but for home use it works ok, as long as you recognise that they could shut you down if they decide to. I've done this with two different providers, and have had no real problems.

      Regards,

      --
      -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
    3. Re:Mine didn't install anything, but by adolf · · Score: 2

      Obviously, it "works ok." But when it doesn't work, you'll be without connectivity for appearently unknown reasons until you lease and use a new IP.

      Isn't it easier to just leave dhcpd running, automatically grabbing a new address for that once-in-a-blue-moon occasion when they need to assign a different one for you to use?

      I set up dhcpd on my FreeBSD router several providers ago, and haven't had to touch it again since.

      Back on topic: When the cable guy showed up here this past summer to install RoadRunner, the whole thing went pretty quick. It consisted of me setting the modem on the shelf and plugging it in, while he made a couple of RG-6 patch cords and put a splitter in-line with the TV. A couple of taps to kick dhcpd in the ass, and I was online.

      He seemed pleased that he got to take lunch early, and I still have no idea what software is on the CD that came with the modem.

  11. Nothing by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Just give me the network info. I'll do it. You have no business touching my machine"

    "but that's what my instructions say to do."

    "are you bonded?"

    "Whats that?"

    "It means are you insured in case I have to sue you personally for screwing something up"

    "oh.... Here's the info."

    Besides, I connect through a router. What possible good would THEIR software do me?

    --
    "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    1. Re:Nothing by Sancho · · Score: 2

      An excellent response.

      I'd be interested to know more about this particular situation, too. Did the customer sign an agreement saying they'd allow this software to be installed? If not, the cable company itself could be liable for damages, including "loss of privacy", etc.

      I still think the best solution is to have a Linux machine there during the install. Or if you don't want to see frustration on the installer's face, just a spare PC or maybe a VMWare session in fullscreen.

    2. Re:Nothing by looseBits · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I tried that with AT&T and they said "Oh a router, huh? Well we need to charge you for extra computers on the connection." I checked their FAQ and he won, they do charge for extra computers on the connection so after he left, I removedd all of the crap and hooked up my router. Every call to tech support I make when it's down, I just fake my way though the "Okay, type winipcfg" crap (I know it's not on my end, if it were, I would have fixed it myself).

      --
      Lord, bless my users that they may stop being such fucking idiots!!
    3. Re:Nothing by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 2, Interesting

      From what I understand, Roadrunner isn't doing that (charging for multiple PCs) yet. I refer to it as a firewall when I have to interact with them.

      I was originally going to get DSL, but I am (was, I'm told its improved) too far from the CO to get ADSL. At the time they offered me SDSL through a contractor, but the contractor wanted to charge business rates, and claimed to be able to "check" for routers. I told them to get stuffed, since cable was available.

      Now the contractor (can't remember who they were, but they were a major DSL player) is out of business, and Sprint keeps calling asking me to sign up for their "improved" service.

      If RR doesn't do something about the customer at 65.35.62.22 thats spewing port scans and probing for Netbus, et al, I'll have to take a look at Sprint. The scanner is no real threat, but since I've notified security several times and the same address is scanning more and more frequently, I'm losing what little confidence I had in them... Service has been rock solid though.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    4. Re:Nothing by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 2

      From what I understand, Roadrunner isn't doing that (charging for multiple PCs) yet.

      I had RR in Columbus off and on for two years back in 99/2000. While they appear to have changed their practices, they originally did not permit splitting a conenction. Instead they tried to sell you additional IP addresses at $10 a pop. Later, if you wanted to do NAT, they sold home networking kits that were enormously over priced and charged you some kind of generic extra computers premium.

      At one point, they even started sending out threatening emails. They claimed that NAT users were stealing the bandwidth of honest users. They also made a few threats about being able to detect the use of NAT, termination of service, unlimitted rice pudding and so on.

      I think they've mellowed out a little now. These days so many people have more than one computer that it is more difficult to get away with lies about stealing bandwidth and such. Of course, even back then, we never had a single problem with our unauthorized NAT.

    5. Re:Nothing by Doppler00 · · Score: 2

      I think their use policy is a bit vague though. How do you define a LAN? What if I'm the only person using 10 different applications on 10 different computers? Would this be any different from me using ten different applications on one computer? No, it would use the same bandwidth and ATT probably couldn't tell the difference between the connections. I think it's fair enough to charge for additional IP addresses because there are certain advantages to having seperate addresses.

  12. Didn't have this problem by TheRealFixer · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Time Warner/RoadRunner guy simply came in, installed a new NIC, installed the cable modem, set up the new email settings in Outlook, and changed the IE homepage to their portal. I scoured the system when I got home from work (my wife was the only one here when he did the install) and was quite relieved that he didn't install any software.

  13. Reinstall the software and read EULAs by goldspider · · Score: 2, Informative

    It shouldn't be that hard, really. If there are anything in those EULAs you object to or don't feel comfortable with, cancel the service.

    In that case, I hope your father didn't agree to some sort of contract.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  14. At home by Apreche · · Score: 2

    my parents have DSL from the phone company. What they do is plug it in, then give you a CD and tell you to install it yourself. If you aren't careful it does some pretty crazy stuff. Your computer will turn into a giant ad for the phone company if you don't play it smart. There is one program you need to install though, its the one that lets you log into the DSL network. I don't know if it does underhanded things, and I forget what it's called. But the DSL is crazy fast, so I'm not going to complain.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
  15. They tried. by MKalus · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I moved lately I had a guy come out as they needed to "configure my pc".

    I showed him to my Linux firewall, he was surprised about the prompt but figured it was just DOS (ha).

    Put in the cd, realised it was not DOS, took the CD out, turned to me and said: "Well, I guess you know what you're doing." And left.

    Offically my Cable Provider (Rogers) is not supporting Linux / Unix but if you have a technical issue just bug the Second Line support and 99% of the time you get the Unix guy who answers your questions.

    --
    If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    1. Re:They tried. by slamb · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Offically my Cable Provider (Rogers) is not supporting Linux / Unix but if you have a technical issue just bug the Second Line support and 99% of the time you get the Unix guy who answers your questions.

      I've never even had to do that (MediaCom). When it was installed and when I've had problems with the service, they've told me they don't support Linux. I've just told that's fine and to tell me what they want done instead of how to accomplish it. They've been pretty good about that. I get instructions like "go to this URL to register your computer's MAC address with us" instead of "click on 'Start' in the lower left hand corner, ...".

    2. Re:They tried. by slide-rule · · Score: 2, Funny

      That gives me an idea: make a "D:" script that echos out a big series of cryptic warnings, errors, etc. about invalid path, DLL and/or VxD warnings, a few bells, and a half-complete panic message about the file system now being corrupt with enough sleep statements between the echo's to make it all "look good". Man... seeing a tech's face (or heck, even just family company) get all sweaty for thinking he just hosed someones system might make it worth it.

    3. Re:They tried. by Density_Altitude · · Score: 2, Funny

      I had the cable guy come to my house to install the NIC/junkware too. When he arrived, I shut my linux firewall down, open the case, he gives me the network card that I put in and boot. Then he gives me his drivers floppy, asking me which OS I ran. I tell him I run linux and I don't need the drivers. The card is an old SMC 10mbit so I just compiled the ne2k-pci module, insmodded it and ifuped eth1 which I configured to use dhcp.
      The best part was the look on his face when he saw the internet connection working right away without rebooting. (At the time they were supporting only win9x machines)

      --
      delete free(system.gc);
    4. Re:They tried. by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

      I had a problem with PacHell (SBC). For some reason I couldn't auth. Because I use a Linksys, I ran a sanity check by calling the dialup. No joy.

      I called their tech support, and got someone who didn't freak out when I told them I was on a router. I told them I understood I wasn't a supported config, and explained that it was dialup as well as DSL (so the router wasn't at fault). She said that she really couldn't support me, but did what she could with that config (namely reset my PW).

      For some reason, my password entry got corrupted in their DB, and the password reset worked. I thanked her and went on my way.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    5. Re:They tried. by Mnemia · · Score: 2

      I always just lie. I've used Windows enough that I can imagine what they are trying to do in my head, so I just fake that I'm doing it while actually doing the equivalent in Linux. e.g. "Go to Start, click Run, type w-i-n-i-p-c-f-g, hit OK, select the Ethernet adaptor from the pulldown list, and read me the MAC address" == "type ifconfig in bash". Works pretty well and so far none of them have ever figured out that I wasn't using Windows.

    6. Re:They tried. by MajroMax · · Score: 2
      lie. I've used Windows enough that I can imagine what they are trying to do in my head, so I just fake that I'm doing it while actually doing the equivalent in Linux.

      I've been in a similar situation, right up until the point where they asked me exactly what the error message on their special PPPoE software said -- being unable to fake that [although the error was a generalized 'no connect', it obviously wasn't specific enough to fool them], I faked a catastrophic system crash and called back later after digging up a Windows system for the support.

      --
      "Evil company X is threatening to restrict our rights! Let's all get together to stop--OOOH! SHINEY!!!" -- AC
  16. interesting by tps12 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Well, as a very first step, I would recommend against posting this to Slashdot. Let me explain with a little thought experiment. Presumably you are trying to "get the word out" about the Evil Corporate Spyware installed by your cable provider. Suppose you were to succeed, and almost every cable customer were to remove said software from his or her PC. Their demographics database would start to be pretty thin, and suddenly they can no longer use that information to defray some of the costs of running a broadband outfit. Best case, you get a rate hike. Worst case, the cable company goes out of business, and you're back on dialup (which, if you wanted to vote with your wallet against this kind of practice to discourage it, you could have done anyway). A better course of action would be to quietly uninstall everything the cable guy installed and keep it all under your hat.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:interesting by Omnifarious · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If they can't stay in business honestly, they don't deserve to be in business.

      If they wish to collect demographic data on your purchases in return for a decrease in your bill, that's fine. But they should have a contract specificying how much that decrease will be, and exactly what the software will do. You can have it in your service contract all nice and above board, or choose NOT to have it and pay higher costs.

      Of course, since they're a monopoly, that will just lead to a $50/mo (or more) difference. But that's easier to point a finger at and complain bitterly about to your local regulator.

    2. Re:interesting by glh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think the public has a right to know about this sort of activity and I am glad slashdot posted it. Granted, it generates a certain amount of FUD but that is to be expected (it is slashdot).

      Why should the cable companies need to start doing this sort of thing in order to make money? I'm sure there are better ways. How about offering decent service and some other products (such as spam filters) that we can pay additional for? Why do they have to be so sneaky? I feel sorry for the poor AOL converts that have no clue about what is being installed on their system- they are just innocent victims. They may not even know how to uninstall something- so they have no choice.

      This kind of behavior is unethical, especially if the customer doesn't know what is going on. If privacy or high speed connection were mutually exclusive, I would choose privacy and I think a good percentage of others would also. It's bad enough with all the other crap that seems to fill up your hard drive when you're on the internet, we don't need the ISP doing it as well.

    3. Re:interesting by InodoroPereyra · · Score: 2
      A better course of action would be to quietly uninstall everything the cable guy installed and keep it all under your hat.

      This is fine if you only care about yourself. If you care about others, you do spread the word out, because other people's privacy is at stake, and because this cable provider is doing something dirty to say the least. Know what ? Some people do care about other people. Thanks to {e}NOS and Cliff for the story.

    4. Re:interesting by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "suddenly they can no longer use that information to defray some of the costs of running a broadband outfit."

      First off, I notice you're assuming that they need this money to defray the cost of providing broadband. I suggest that any business using this model doesn't deserve to stay in business long.

      Secondly, you seem to be someone who thinks we should all be very happy with the "opt-out list" mentality because we're somehow "saving money." Businesses need to be taught that abusing and not respecting their customers is a Bad Thing and I for one wouldn't mind paying a little more for a business that actually gives a damn about me (but I have yet to be forced into that decision... seems some enterprising business is always there to provide to us somewhere). And I have the feeling that I'm not alone in feeling this way.

      "A better course of action would be to quietly uninstall everything the cable guy installed and keep it all under your hat."

      You're part of the problem, then, not the solution. I'm simply not going to just sit there and take this sort of abuse from anybody.

    5. Re:interesting by hosebee · · Score: 2, Funny
      Karma: I invented putting my Karma: in my sig.
      Yes, but I believe CmdrTaco holds the relevant patents. It's only a matter of time before you're PanIPed.
    6. Re:interesting by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "Presumably you are trying to "get the word out" about the Evil Corporate Spyware installed by your cable provider. Suppose you were to succeed, and almost every cable customer were to remove said software from his or her PC. Their demographics database would start to be pretty thin, and suddenly they can no longer use that information to defray some of the costs of running a broadband outfit. Best case, you get a rate hike. Worst case, the cable company goes out of business..."

      Keep in mind that 99% of cable users don't read slashdot or tech forums in general. The posting here will only serve to inform those who can put the knowledge to good use and protect themselves. The resulting dent in the demographics databases as a result of this will be very small, and the cable companies probably will not bat an eye.

  17. investigate your cable connection by one_who_uses_unix · · Score: 5, Interesting
    To understand exactly what is happening with your broadband connection follow these steps:

    1.Connect PC, cable modem and a second PC (everyone has one :) ) to a simple hub ($20).
    2.Run a network capture tool (tcpdump, snoop, ethereal, etc.) on the 2nd PC.
    3.Boot your broadband PC.
    4.Look at the traffic.

    You should be able to recognize the DHCP negotiations and see whether anything unusual is going on. Odds are, all it needs to do is negotiate for an address, everything else is probably frill.

    The next step is to install a 2nd NIC in the 2nd PC, load linux, connect the cable modem to that and the other NIC to your little LAN and use IP tables to set up a firewall and NAT.

    --
    KK4SFV
    1. Re:investigate your cable connection by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 2, Funny
      Um... okay. I think I got it.

      One question: my computer is the purple kind. Will that change anything?

      sorry, couldn't resist.

      --
      If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  18. That's tough by ONOIML8 · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you're going to play with their toys the you have to play by their rules. If their contract/TOS/whatever says you have to agree to have all that software and agree with the licensing to all in order to use their service, then I guess that's what you gotta do. But it's their system, their toys, so if you don't like it then don't play.

    Now the installer was wrong. Very wrong. If you're gonna play by the rules then you should have read EVERY word of EVERY EULA and made the determination for each one. Since those are legal documents you would want to read carefully, perhaps consult with your lawyer on a few points. You could tie up that installer for a VERY long time. But for him to indicate that you accepted.....well, you might want to consult with your lawyer now.

    --
    . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
    1. Re:That's tough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe he agreed to it in the contract he signed, thus giving the installer permission to install every piece of software?

      Maybe he wasn't necessary for the EULA's of this Broadjump kit.

    2. Re:That's tough by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      "you might want to consult with your lawyer now."

      Might be kinda interesting. It may leave you free to blatently and publicly violate the EULA on the software? "But I never agreed to anything. Sue the cable company!"

    3. Re:That's tough by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 2

      Perhaps that is why the Cable Company hires contractors to do the installs.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  19. Not a damn thing by Halo- · · Score: 4, Informative

    I suppose it depends on your provider, but to my knowledge, you shouldn't need a damn thing. Wanna test it easily?

    1) Borrow a laptop with an ethernet card, unplug the power from the cable modem (some of them will only give a DHCP address to one MAC address at a time, and need to "forget" what they have seen)

    2) Plug in the cable modem

    3) Attach the laptop

    Didja get an IP? If so, I'd say you can pretty safely whack the offending software. I seriously doubt it's needed. A lot of things (like a lot of those "connection sharing" firewall/router devices) would fail to work if it was.

  20. Just like with drugs... by rocket_w · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...just say no. They do not need to install anything, I would tell the cable installer that if he/she has to install the software, then you do not want the service. Cable companies want your business more than they want to sell your info. This is another fine example of people infringing on your privacy without you knowing.

    --
    ----- "It's all fun and games 'til somebody puts an eye out, then it's just funny."
    1. Re:Just like with drugs... by SecurityGuy · · Score: 2
      This is only true in aggregate. Companies, at least those of sufficient size, couldn't care less whether they have your business. Mine was adamant that they had to have my SSN, and were perfectly content to NOT have my business if I wouldn't divulge it. Only by trying to sign up repeatedly and declining to provide it did I eventually find someone who didn't care enough about corporate policy to refuse service. Some were even outraged that I didn't want to provide it. "Would you refuse to give your SSN to $TELCO?!?" Me: "Damn right, unless they're cutting my Social Insecurity checks in a few decades!" Bastards. Like it's so hard to create a unique customer ID. In fact, after getting service sans SSN, I found that they created a unique account number anyway .


      This is one good reason to patronize small businesses. You're a bigger chunk of their revenue stream, and there's a correspondingly larger chance that they want you, personally, to be happy, rather than just upping the magic "customer satisfaction" number.

  21. IANAL but... by reimero · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While I realize you and your family never agreed to the software, you did authorize the installation of the modem. At best, it's a very gray legal area. The ISP and software manufacturer can both claim the tech was acting as a duly authorized agent (which he was) and you can validly claim that this software was never mentioned as being necessary and that it was sprung on you without prior notice, which would undoubtedly have affected your decision to purchase.
    Unfortunately, he left with a valid signature, which legally means you have accepted the service as is, software and all. You may be able to remove the software, but at this point, all you can do is complain about it. But once you sign the sheet saying the work is done, you've essentially stated that the contract (or that portion thereof) has been fulfilled to your satisfaction. I know it's a hassle, but if you have serious misgivings about it, the proper procedure is to decline signature and say you never authorized this software installation, and allow the tech to remove the modem. Then deal with the sales department. If you paid by credit card, remember that you can put a hold on that payment until it is resolved to your satisfaction.

    --

    ----------

    Something clever
  22. I got lucky. by Whispers_in_the_dark · · Score: 2

    The guy who came by when I got Road Runner (they didn't have self-install at the time) used his Linux box as his firewall too, so no guff about installation software.

  23. As for AT&T Broadband by Bobartig · · Score: 2

    At least in my case, the guy didn't even _try_ to install anything. I was impressed that he even knew how to set up an iMac from the TCP/IP control panel (I've had horrid experience trying to convince broadband technical support to even talk to me if they know I have a mac). The only thing he tried to do was set the default homepage of IE to some broadband portal, and I was like "Uh, this is my girlfriend's machine, and you _really_ don't want to do that."

    Then when he left, I whipped out the router and got everybody else on-line ;)

    --
    This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
  24. What scares me just a little bit... by writermike · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... is how when you search for "Broadjump Client Foundation" in Google, the company's own homepage doesn't come up in the early listings.

    This says to me that either there are very few links to the company's homepage, or there is no company homepage.

    Heh. Conspiracy therories entered here. 10 cents.

    --
    If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
    1. Re:What scares me just a little bit... by iapetus · · Score: 2

      What scares me just a little bit is that you didn't think to try http://www.broadjump.com/. ;)

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
    2. Re:What scares me just a little bit... by adlai · · Score: 3, Funny
      Maybe they're being blocked by the French authorities?

      Damn French. :)

    3. Re:What scares me just a little bit... by writermike · · Score: 2

      Heh.

      I am pretty scared I didn't try that. :-D

      Sorry. Monday morning.

      --
      If Nalgene water bottles are outlawed, only outlaws will have Nalgene water bottles.
    4. Re:What scares me just a little bit... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 4, Informative
      "This says to me that either there are very few links to the company's homepage, or there is no company homepage."

      Please excuse any irregularities in the following post because I only got 3 hours of sleep lst night.

      Apparently it's the first case beacause the company homepage is here. They mention that they deal with Adelphia, AT&T, Bell Canada, Bellsouth, Charter Communications, RoadRunner, SBC, Sprint, Telus (Canada) and Time Warner among others.

      They seem to have their fingers deeply into this industry.

    5. Re:What scares me just a little bit... by RollingThunder · · Score: 2
      They seem to have their fingers deeply into this industry.
      Rather apropos, since broadband is great for pulling down loads of porn. ;)
  25. Get the local news involved by Digital+Mage · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I say inform your local newspaper or television news station. As you say, since the cable company is almost a monopoly in the area, I'll bet a number of people would love to know about how their local ISP is "spying" on them without them knowing. Most local news outlets are always looking for juicy stories about companies screwing over consumers.

    1. Re:Get the local news involved by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
      In a small town, the local newspaper wouldn't write a story badmouthing a local business - that's ad dollars down the drain, as well as a potential lawsuit for the guy that owns the paper. Cable companies have far deeper pockets than newspapers; unfortunately it shows.

      My local paper runs insipid stories about small town life: recipies, who got married, divorced, arrested, what's going on with local politics (nothing) and classified ads for old Walmart purchases.

    2. Re:Get the local news involved by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2

      lol - just saw a giant pumpkin story this weekend! Google news is my new (non-nerd news) best friend...

  26. Practical Solution. by serial+frame · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Treat your computer like your property! Personally, I would remind the man that he is dealing with MY property, that EULA's are made to be disagreed with, and that I would no longer allow him to touch my property if he continues to install software without me agreeing.

    This makes perfect sense to me, as there are great differences between my house and my computer. Fine, he can run a cable line through my wall; I don't necessarily feel like doing that part myself. But, nobody touches my computers.

    Of course, the easiest way around this is just to be running some variant of Unix at the time. I think I scared (or baffled?) the poor man with my NeXTcube. He backed off and let me do the rest of the installation myself.

    --

    -
    And the Angel said unto me, "These are the cries of the carrots! The cries of the carrots!"
  27. I think you could argue.. by jcr · · Score: 2

    .. That you didn't agree to any of the EULA's since it was the installer monkey who did the clicking on the "agree" buttons.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  28. ATT in richmond by freeefalln · · Score: 2, Insightful

    AT&T Broadband in Richmond, VA installed that same shit on my computer. The tech was an asshole and I told him that I did not need software on my computer to connect through their lines, he got irate and told me that if i wanted to get online i had to have this software. I said kiss my ass, signed the papers and he left. I called AT&T and got a free month of service.

    Just about all of my friends have that broadjump shit on their computer and willingly dont mind. Thats how the American public is, they dont care about privacy, all they want is thier cnn.com and marthastewart.com. They think that loss of privacy is what you give up when you go online.
    Look at the millions of AOL users, who PAY, i repeat PAY, to be advertised to. They see like TV, the Ad's come with the territory.

    1. Re:ATT in richmond by Sheridan · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Just about all of my friends have that broadjump shit on their computer and willingly dont mind. Thats how the American public is, they dont care about privacy, all they want is thier cnn.com and marthastewart.com.

      Somebody, (I'm 99% sure that this was Bruce Schneier) summed this up by saying that if McDonalds offered a free Big Mac in return for a DNA sample, then there would be queues round the block.

    2. Re:ATT in richmond by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2

      Now if they would only stop giving me burgers with the DNA sample under the bun...

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  29. Cable Agreement by LoudMusic · · Score: 2

    Neither myself or anyone in my family agreed to the software; the cable guy did.

    Yeah, but you made some agreement with the Cable company and I'm sure their stupid software was included in that agreement.

    I suppose an easy way of getting around this is to just tell the guy you'll sign his piece of paper if and only if he doesn't install the software.

    And it's not wholey true that cable modems don't require software. There are some companies using point to point protocal to increase security or whatever. So some software may actually be required. My recomendation there is to have a Linksys router on hand. If the cable company doesn't allow them, wait for the cable guy to leave and then set it up.

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
  30. Similar experience by Gruturo · · Score: 2

    Recently they brought fiber to my house, with a little permanent gateway which gives me 3 10Mbps ports plus a POTS for voip.

    The guy insisted on having me insert the CD into the drive, which will then auto-run and open a welcome window with everything I need to know. For the first 45 seconds I tried telling him that being a Linux box (and without a graphic card at all!) I was very very skeptic about the procedure :-)

    Then, since it was pointless to try and introduce him to the unix world in 10 minutes, I just tried a "dhcpcd eth1" and voila!, I signed the acceptance form as if he did everything and sent him away.

    But if he would prove to be really really stubborn I would have just let him install whatever he wanted on a spare PC just to reghost it 2 minutes later :-)

    --

    Vacuum cleaners suck. Kings rule.
  31. RoadRunner by IwannaCoke · · Score: 2, Informative

    I wasn't asked if I wanted a self install kit, so a tech came out. I was watching over his shoulder the entire time. The only things he did were reconfigure outlook, and change my home page to rr.com.

    I asked him about the home page switch and all he said was that it was policy and I that I could change later.

  32. Been there by Malicious · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Having been a cable guy, all i can tell you is, we don't know what we're installing either. The cable company asks us to install the software on their disc, as part of the custom install. We don't ask questions. Most people who have the custom install are apes. Total green horns. They prefer to have all kinds of extra stuff to signify their connection to the internet, as opposed to it 'just working'

    Chances are, if you ask your cable guy not to install it, he'll be more than happy not to, because he can get you to sign, and move onto the next house ASAP.

    --
    01101001001000000110000101101101001000000110001001 10000101110100011011010110000101101110
    1. Re:Been there by moogla · · Score: 2

      ::nods in agreement::

      I can understand the mindset behind wanting the extra stuff. For example, you can blame it when your connection goes out. Then you can spend an hour installing and uninstalling it, while at the same time the techs have rebooted the head-end router and your connection magically comes back. The confused user pats himself on the back thinking his twiddling fixed it.

      It makes you feel like you're getting more, because you're jealous of all those coddled AOL users. Most people don't know what to do with an open-ended net connection. If they didn't have a gaudy portal/start page with links, they'd probably never use it at all!

      --
      Black holes are where the Matrix raised SIGFPE
  33. Cablevision -- no problemo by nbvb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I switched from Speakeasy DSL to Optimum Online when I moved (No DSL in new neighborhood... d'oh!!)

    When the Speakeasy guy came out 2+ years ago, I had done all the "inside wiring" myself (this was back in the dedicated-line days ...) The guy just looked at it, and said, and I quote "Damn! You did a better job than I would have." The guy literally handed me the DSL bridge (It's NOT A MODEM DAMNIT!), we plugged it in, he saw the lights "go green" and said "good 'nuff for me."

    When the Optimum Online guy came out here (I needed someone to come out since I don't subscribe to cable ... DirecTV rocks), I had my Linksys router plugged into my iBook.

    First thing he did was go outside, climb the pole and turn the line on. when he did that, the cable bridge (IT'S NOT A MODEM DAMNIT!) "went green" and that was that.

    All he asked was to see me pull up a web page. That was good enough.

    Seriously, don't give the guy the old chip-on-the-shoulder attitude. Don't sound like a clueless yutz, either. Just explain to the guy that listen, it's my machine and I'll install all the software on it, thanks. It's already configured for the network -- I read the directions (on the web, in the box, etc.)

    The installers are usually _very_ cool about that stuff. In fact, the cable guy saw my Sun Microsystems jacket and started asking me some questions... we had a good long talk about IP networks and stuff, since he was looking to go to some Cisco courses and get outta the cable install business :)

    Best of luck with the installs! Remember, don't give them an attitude, just convince them that your machine is all ready to go. Remember, if they get out of there in 5 minutes instead of 2 hours, it means they get to take a long lunch ;)

    --NBVB

    1. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by radish · · Score: 5, Informative


      Why isn't a DSL "box" a modem? It modulates digital data into analogue and pipes that analogue signal out over a PSTN line. Which is exactly what a modem does, just at a much higher frequency. Given that it works in both directions I would say it qualifies as a MOdulator-DEModulator.

      I'm not flaming...just curious...it's perfectly possible you know something I don't ;)

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    2. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by PhoenxHwk · · Score: 2

      You're right, DirecTV DSL does rock. I use it and love it. A little more bandwidth would be nice, but I really like all the other features they have.

    3. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by matthew.thompson · · Score: 3, Informative

      ER - ADSL does use a modem. The signals transmitted are in the analogue domain and cross a number of frequencies - these have to be demultiplexed into a serial bitstream for use by your digital devices.

      Just incase you didn't realise the DEM in modem stands for Demultiplexor.

      When I was trialling DSL here in the UK I had a DSL router AND a DSL modem as seperate boxes. The DSL modem took the analogue signals and converted them into the ATM that they were a representation of. The router then translated the ATM into Ethernet for my local area network. Generally in the UK all ADSL is PPPoA.

      --
      Matt Thompson - Actuality - Insert product here.
    4. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by renehollan · · Score: 4, Interesting
      The guy just looked at it, and said, and I quote "Damn! You did a better job than I would have."

      Yeah, same here.

      I had Internet America install my DSL service. They have a self-install option, with micro-filters and all, but it was not available to me because I was so far from the C.O. (15.6 kft) that I needed a dedicated pair to get any decent bandwidth (I chose the 768kb/s down, 384 kb/s up option) -- They said I could probably get that, via ADSL if I opted to go with a dedicated pair, and, if it didn't work, all charges would be refunded. Rather cool, actually.

      Of course, the dedicated pair costs me some US$15 a month from the telco for a total of $81.18 a month, but the service has been great: static IP, no caps, I can run "small" servers and so on. And, while it's no doubt a bridged connection, I do see good download speeds. So I'm happy. None of this "ping is a hacker's tool, the use of which violates the AUP" crap.

      Anyway, I receive a Broadxtent bridge in the mail, and a note to schedule an appointment. I mount the bridge in my headend, check the demarc, and lo and behold!, I have two brand new pairs already pulled for the DSL service. So, I schedule the install for the next day. Meanwhile, I figure, "Heck, all I have to do is hook up that pair, cross-connect it to the bridge connection on the right 110 block, and configure my router, and I should be all set." Sure enuf, that's all it took.

      So, I call Internet America first thing the next day, and tell them to not bother sending the installer, it's alive, kicking, and showing decent up/down speeds. "But sir, we want to make sure it's installed correctly to avoid a service call." O.K., I can understand this. "Anyway, you paid the $150 installation fee (the telco pair drop portion was unavoidable anyway) -- might as well have the tech stop by." Well, O.K. then.

      Tech shows up, looks at my computer, working fine, with an RJ45 cable snaking off (I hadn't finished the drop to that room yet, so I just snaked a cable back to the headend), and asks, "Where's our modem?" "The headend," I reply, "I hadn't installed the drop to this room yet. Follow the ethernet cable."

      So, he does, and sure enough, I hear a "Damn! I wouldn'tve done as good a job!" He smiled, we talked shop for about 10 minutes, and that was it.

      To their credit, Internet America left my computer alone, gave me a static IP with no fuss, and have provided decent service since. The Broadxtent bridge locks up every few months, but a power-cycle fixes that.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    5. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by nbvb · · Score: 2

      Anything that speaks ATM to me isn't a modem ;)

      A modem, IMNSHO, indicates connection to a circuit-switched network.

      My understanding was that the signal was digital ATM back to the CO. But I'm not 100% sure of that. Especially now in the era of shared-line signals ...

      I could be wrong. It's been a while since I looked at the DSL specs. ;)

      --NBVB

    6. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by alexburke · · Score: 2

      cross-connect it to the bridge connection on the right 110 block

      Ewwww!

      BIX rocks. The official Nortel tool costs a fortune (like C$80), but is basically unbreakable. Also, no need to ever change "blades" like with 110.

      Once you've worked with it, there's no going back.

    7. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by olethrosdc · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hm, the physical layer of the DSL line can just be described as a MODEM kind of thing. But there are other layers in the DSL box. That's why it is a bridge and not just a modem. DSL is supposed to be able to carry many different kinds of traffic and there are many different bridging protocls that you can use with it, depending on what you DSL box can actually do. Most of the bridging is related to EthernetATM stuff. Also, PPPoE in some cases. And if your box supports an ATM outlet as well (not a lotof chance, unless you're the ISP), you are going to have to call your box a switch B}

      --

      I miss my rubber keyboard.(Homepage)

    8. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by renehollan · · Score: 2
      I dunno, I didn't find it a hassle, or expensive. I was already using 110 blocks for telco lines, so it made sense.

      Oh, and it should be obvious, but my original post should have noted "two wires" and not "two pairs" with regard to the DSL line at the demark. Silly me.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    9. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by bobv-pillars-net · · Score: 2
      Same experience here. The install tech said that he needed to install some software. I told him,

      Well, I run Linux. If you really need me to, I can repartition the hard drive, install Windows 98, let you install your stuff, and delete it later, but you'll have to wait awhile.

      So he says,

      Well, I gotta install this stuff or I don't get paid. How about I just say that I installed it and you just sign here saying that I installed it.
      --
      The Web is like Usenet, but
      the elephants are untrained.
    10. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

      It's a router. Just as a Cisco 1600 that happens to have an ISDN card in it isn't a modem, neither is a DSL router.

    11. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by radish · · Score: 2

      Mine certainly is not a router, being as it's a USB device. I'd accept "DSL Modem with bridging" or something like that, as it does the whole pppoa thing, but a router it ain't.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    12. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

      Some are bridges too, though most are routers. The Cisco 600 and 800 series that are so popular are actually brouters, the'll do either depending on what you want. If your service is PPPoA then your device is a router. Routers don't ahve to be external and don't ahve to have an eithernet jack. you can have a router inside your computer (your computer can be a router for that matter). all router means is that the device operates at Layer-3. Bridges are Layer-2 devices.

    13. Re:Cablevision -- no problemo by Phroggy · · Score: 2

      The official technical term is "CPE", "Customer Premise Equipment".

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  34. Stupid installers by pirodude · · Score: 2

    My cable installer tried dropping the cd in my linux box and wondered why it wasn't auto running. The he explained that you couldn't get online without their software. I proceeded to restart the network and grab an ip and up popped /.. That shut him up.

  35. a way around it by eagl · · Score: 2

    I keep an old PC around for experimentation and I had the cable guy install everything to that PC. When he was gone. I re-ran the cable to my firewall.

    Consumers won't get a foothold with complaints because 99% of custmers (myself included) are happy enough with finally having high speed internet that they aren't willing to rock the boat.

  36. Just do the Common Sense thing... by RobertAG · · Score: 5, Informative

    On Windows,

    Press START, SETTINGS, Go into Control Panel, Select Add/Remove Software and remove the offending software.

    If they complain, invent a ficticious "Computer Guy" who told you it was the reason your system was locking up all the time.

    Mention that you have lots of games and Internet Explorer "add-ons" that you have downloaded and installed. Believe me, NO technician will want to muck about through a myriad of windows software installations to troubleshoot their spyware.

    They'll go away.

    1. Re:Just do the Common Sense thing... by Skapare · · Score: 2

      I mostly use Linux, but occaisionally I need to use Windows for something. One of my peecees is designated for that, but it also does other stuff at other times. What I did was installed a clean copy of Windows with all the apps I might need (e.g. Office, Visio, etc). I separated My Documents over to D: (both C: and D: are 2GB each), verified I could get a couple of clean reboots after customizing everything, then shut down Windows and booted Linux from a CD I made. From there I made separate compressed backups of the first few sectors of the HD (up to the first partition), and the C: and D: partitions as raw block sector files. Gzip got my 2GB Windows install down to 700MB. I burned a couple CDs with it for backup and keep the compressed images on a couple Linux boxes. Whenever I need to run Windows, I boot Linux from that CD again, and download the image back to the HD. Voila, fresh unadulterated Windows (which happens to now days think it hasn't been booted for a couple years because I don't bother to back-set the CPU clock).

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    2. Re:Just do the Common Sense thing... by axlrosen · · Score: 2

      Sometimes these things don't show up in Add/Remove. When I got AT&T/MediaOne, it installed SAUpdate.exe and CFD.exe, and they're not in Add/Remove. See http://www.pacs-portal.co.uk/startup_pages/startup _full.htm.

    3. Re:Just do the Common Sense thing... by penpen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was a little bit curious as to how many people have actually written an installer. It appears to me that most people believe that if you magically go to control panel and add/remove that the program will be removed.

      You can easily write an installer that will leave files behind. The best places are usually places like winnt/system32. After all that's were all the upgraded system dll's are placed, and since there's so many files there people don't seem to look that hard. Personally I'd be looking through other things most notably though would be windows nt services to see if they plugged in anything spicy there.

      Just remember just because you "uninstall" something doesn't mean it still isn't there.

  37. Re:.... that isn't really the biggest issue imo. by goldspider · · Score: 2

    "there's things seriously wrong with the cable company installing stuff on peoples computers (without asking)"

    IANAL but I believe that signing that paper that the technician brought is legally all the consent they need to do whatever they want regarding their service. But will say it was not right of the technician to click through those EULAs like that.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  38. Missing the point by drafalski · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am sure most any Slashdot reader could remove the software or just go with a self-install kit. My parents, or a lot of my friends, could not. I think the issue here is that these people - ones who probably didn't watch/notice all the EULAs being clicked for them - are being monitored/tracked/whatever as if they had given their consent.

    The installer has acted as their representative without their knowledge or consent. While the EULA would easily get tossed out if they wanted to fight it, they wouldn't know there was anything to fight and they would have already been monitores/etc already.

    And yes, I know the ISP monitors traffic anyway, but it is different when they are installing software on your computer and agreeing to a EULA for you.

  39. The exact opposite by radish · · Score: 5, Interesting


    In the UK when a guy from BT cam around to install my DSL he did the exact opposite. They're specifically not allowed to touch my PC as they're not insured for any damage. So the engineer has a laptop, he plugs in the modem and proves the line works. Then I sign him off, he gives me the modem and a driver disc and it's up to me.

    Of course this was 2 years ago, these days the engineer doesn't even come over...

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  40. Charter did this during the switch over by zietlow · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Charter did this during the switch over from @home. They installed thier client and said you HAD to install this otherwise you could not get on the internet. It ripped out ALL your network settings and then replaced it with all thier and MS's "personalized" corporate feces.

    They also said they did not turn on the software, but after portscanning all of Charter's IP space that Arin said was allocated to them over 13,000 computers had this port listening out of over 25,000+ (4.5 Class C's) were actively listening for connections and would accept a connection if you telnetted to the port. Whereas scanning a non charter IP subnet there were less than 20 that accepted this (I don't have my numbers with me ATM).

    The wonderful fellows at Securepipe.com Looked into this and brought it up with the local "watch dog" columnist for one of the local papers who wrote an article about this. Charter was not happy. The guys at Securepipe also brought this up with the local cable commission. Who were semi interested in this issue. About a week later port filtering was in place, including port 641 (what the software runs on).

    They said the use was for the ability to remotely help users. Yes this is a nice function to have, but what if this fell into the wrong hands? The Broadjump software is based off of an older version of VNC that has some weak authentication issues. And also dealing with Charter and @home techs I wouldn't trust these people with my computer anyway. I don't trust my mother with my computer.

    This was back in Novemeber/December who knows what they could do now.

    wi2600.org You can read the threads here, many to list and you can see the research that we did to get into this. I do not know if an electronic copy of the mentioned newspaper article exists but if it does, I will try and get it posted.

    --
    Slashdot # 199661 the number that's the same upside down and right side up
    1. Re:Charter did this during the switch over by VP · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Charter (at least in July) lets you decline the installation of their software - they have a special check box on their form, where you can sign that you declined it.

  41. Tell them you're running Linux by srussell · · Score: 2

    That's what I did. They didn't even look at my computer. Of course, I wasn't lying, but that's not relevant.

  42. Comcast - Linux by wiredog · · Score: 2

    Ditto on signing the docs. And then I just enabled dhcpd in the appropriate rc script. Works fine.

  43. That's great for Slashdot geeks... by Hell+O'World · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But what about the mortals? 99% of this monopolistic company's customers have this crap installed on their computer, didn't ask for it, didn't agree to it, and don't even know it's there! Doesn't that strike you as wrong? Perhaps even evil? Laws are not keeping up with technology, and the inherent evil of capitalism is driving us into a dangerous situation. These companies justify their actions based just on maximizing profits for their shareholders. They don't care what petty moral problems this imposes.

    1. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by MindStalker · · Score: 2

      "evil of capitalism"

      Please take this complementary economics course and call me in the morning.

    2. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by fialar · · Score: 3, Funny
      Please take a complimentary course on "social ethics and justice" and call ME in the morning.

      Capitalism is a short-sighted system that puts profits before people, dollars before the environment.

      Free your mind, read Z Mag

    3. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by (trb001) · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Timeout...this is not evil. Someone sniping 14 people 'just because' is evil. Someone attempting to wipe a race off the planet is evil. This may be slightly immoral, but the reason they have you sign is because they want to make sure you authorized the install. If you don't want it, tell him not to install the software. 99% of the people out there DON'T CARE that it's on there, and probably at least half of them don't care what it's doing with their data.

      Fact is, there is nothing illegal about them installing software on your computer with your consent. Their software isn't breaking the law and it isn't hurting your computer. You are requesting a service from them and, as part of that service, they are installing additional products as they see fit. Opt out, it's quite easy, I wouldn't let a cable installer within 10 feet of my computer ("Just hand me the cat-5 and nobody gets hurt...")

      I'm embarassed that the parent post got modded up as Insightful.

      --trb

    4. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by FatherOfONe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Capitalism is a short-sighted system that puts profits before people, dollars before the environment."

      I don't think that you understand what capitalism actually is. Since you recommend the person to take a cource in "social ethics and justice", I will also recommend that the person realize that well over 85% of teachers are die hard liberals and some consider themselves socialist. So please understand that before taking a course. But if we are recommending ways to learn on capitalism, then I would get

      http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/newt/tap es .html

      Sorry for not doing html tags! Just cut and paste.

      Now to get this thing back on topic...

      What the Cable company is doing is wrong. They will probably get sued over this. The person didn't agree to any EULA, AND probably more importantly the user didn't get the option to counter the contract. Specifically they didn't get an option to do a fair negotiation with the company. This cable company is foolish to do this and it will come back to haunt them. Not a very smart thing, but then they are a monopoly in that area... kinda like socialism...

      --
      The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
    5. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by TFloore · · Score: 2
      Blockquoteth the poster:
      But what about the mortals? 99% of this monopolistic company's customers have this crap installed on their computer, didn't ask for it, didn't agree to it, and don't even know it's there! Doesn't that strike you as wrong?

      Okay, so go talk to a lawyer.

      You say you have a company installing what you seem to think is monitoring and surveillance technology in your private residence without your informed consent.

      If this is realy the case, it is probably illegal. Now, more than likely, you signed the little paper giving them blanket permission to do anything they wanted to your machine, and this is another case of "read the contract before you sign it" so you probably will just be wasting your $150 talking with the lawyer.

      But hey, maybe they missed something in the contract because the tech people at the cable company didn't talk to the lawyers at the cable company, and you can get something out of it. Maybe a "no extra software" install option, or maybe more complete informed consent.

      Assuming you want to go to that much trouble.

      But, really, you just wanted to complain to the crowd here, right?
      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is... Oops. Frank, I've got your sig again! Where's mine?
    6. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by Sinistar2k · · Score: 2

      Evil? Wow, that's going a bit far for some cable guy installing software.

      I can just picture him leaving the house chuckling under his breath... "Stupid mortals. They know not what I have done!! BWAHAHAHAHA!!!"

      When the cable guy came to my house, I told him I didn't want all that stuff on my machine and he said he could record it as a self-install, which actually knocked money off the cost of installation.

    7. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by thales · · Score: 2
      " Please take a complimentary course on "social ethics and justice" and call ME in the morning."


      ROFLMAO
      Only a rabid leftist would dream of naming a course "social ethics and justice"! "Socalist Ethics" would be a better description of what to expect in that class, even tho' the term "Socalist Ethics" is an oxymoron.


      Expect a drawn rant of hatred directed at anyone who has more than the neurotic teaching the course, along with his wish that armed force be used to enforce his will on the population. That seems to be the norm for what is laughably called "social ethics and justice"

      --
      Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est
    8. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by TibbonZero · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Scott, your ISP is not quite evil enough. You're semi-evil. You're quasi-evil. You're the margarine of evil. You're the Diet Coke of evil, just one calorie, not evil enough."

      --
      Tibbon
      tibbon.com
    9. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by bwalling · · Score: 2

      This kind of crap is exactly what would NOT happen in a true capitalist system.

      The flaw in your logic is assuming that consumers have any idea that this is happening and that they would therefore choose a competitor that was not doing this. The reality is that even if there was competition, all of the companies would be doing this because less than 1% of people would care if they did.

    10. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by mvonballmo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You shouldn't be embarrased for that post, it actually is insightful compared to other posts here. Most of the previous posts were of this vein:

      I'm an amazingly cool and frood computer dood, so I told the cable company to fuck off and they had to, so there! L00zerz!

      Yeah, cool.

      The point the previous post made was that there are a lot of people getting this quasi-manipulative software installed on their machines - pretty much without their knowledge. You explain this with:

      "99% of the people out there DON'T CARE that it's on there"

      I disagree. I think if they knew what it was, they would care. If you told them -- hey, can I install software that will watch your browsing habits in order to better target junk mail to your email address? -- then they would have the chance to say 'fuck off' too.

      But the deck is massively stacked because:

      1) They don't even know it's going on there
      2) They trust their installer because ostensibly he/she should know more about computers than they
      3) Even if they installed it themselves, they would click yes because they just want broadband and aren't aware (as many here are) to what lengths corporations will go to take advantage of them for profit
      4) EULA language is relatively advanced lawyerese -- again, it's beyond the comprehension of most, so they just assume they aren't getting screwed.

      The answer is not scorn for their stupidity, nor "let the company do what it wants, people don't care"...the answer is to use your massive hax0r skills to educate these beknighted souls.

    11. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by wandernotlost · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Timeout...this is not evil. Someone sniping 14 people 'just because' is evil. Someone attempting to wipe a race off the planet is evil.

      Nice. Way to work that gratuitous sniper reference into a completely unrelated discussion. So what's you're criterion for being evil? Killing people? Killing people without justification? I think there's room for different levels of evil here. Score one for the pedants.

      Fact is, there is nothing illegal about them installing software on your computer with your consent.

      Telling someone that they need this software installed in order to use their cable modem and then installing spyware is not exactly with their consent. You might want to read the Constitution sometime. Start with the fourth amendment.

    12. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by Sir+Holo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think if they knew what it was, they would care. If you told them -- hey, can I install software that will watch your browsing habits in order to better target junk mail to your email address? -- then they would have the chance to say 'fuck off' too.

      Doesn't this give them the opportunity to watch your browsing habits to better target junk/spam also to your physical address and phone number, through correlation with your modem's EA/MAC address? Yikes!

      Are there prohibitions on them doing this? How about prohibitions on the third-party spyware doing this? All it would need is the number.

    13. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by FatherOfONe · · Score: 2

      That is kinda funny about them teaching social ethics and justice...

      However my point is that a person should be careful or at least take the teachings of these professors with a grain of salt. Most make their living off of the private sectors taxes. Yet have never worked in it. Over the years they have hired and promoted "like minded" teachers and have all but eliminated other points of view. This is kinda weird since most promote "open debates". This has lead to their holier than though attitudes and since most have tenyear (mis-spelled), they don't have to worry about loosing their job.

      Does all this invalidate their opinions? Yes and no. Let me turn it around for you. Would you trust Adolf Hitler teaching a class on diversity? Now what if he hired and promoted most of the fellow teachers... Kinda reminds me of Sam Kinnison teaching that class on Vietnamn...

      --
      The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
    14. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by (trb001) · · Score: 2

      Telling someone that they need this software installed in order to use their cable modem and then installing spyware is not exactly with their consent. You might want to read the Constitution sometime. Start with the fourth amendment.

      I really fail to see how you're bringing up unlawful searches and seizures into this. At a base level, the 4th amendment protects people from coming into your home and searching your belongings without a warrant. You can say 'No' to them installing software as easily as you can say 'No' to the police when they come to your door without a warrant. Would anyone out there, if a policeman came to the door and asked to search their home, allow them? Yeah, probably, a few would. The rest of us would really question why it was necessary and what they were looking for. They'd better have a warrant in order to search my home, even though I don't have, to the best of my knowledge, anything illegal that they could arrest me for. The grand thing about softare installation is that there's no warrant.

      I think there's room for different levels of evil here.

      I'll give you that, there is. However, I don't think evil is the word we should be using to describe this 'act'. Immoral would be about as far as I would go, and who are we laying the blame on? Cable companies, for all I know, have had requests to put software on customers' computers by the customers. In my experience with the non-techy folks (family, mostly), they aren't happy with a new installation of ANYTHING unless they can see some physical evidence on the computer...an icon on the desktop/taskbar/start menu, for instance. This software probably gives them that.

      So what's you're criterion for being evil? Killing people?

      Honestly, yeah. I think you'd be hard pressed to convince a jury that anything short of killing someone in cold blood or molesting children was evil. Misappropriating hundreds of thousands of your employees pensions? Horribly immoral and wrong, but not even that would I call 'evil'. Evil is a word that really describes the root of your personality, whether or not you do things to screw people over royally for fun. A cable company that provides a service and happens to make additional profit by recording your web activity anonymously (yes, most are anonymous) is surely not evil, they're still looking to give the customer what they wanted.

      --trb

    15. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by MindStalker · · Score: 2

      Yes, because capitolism can occur naturally in a system of people if left to their own devices. Communism takes a bit of effort (unless in very very small groups and capitolistic trading almost always still needs to occur between groups) to occur and weither true marxism is even possible is highly debatable as it doesn't take in humans natural tendencies while capitolism does.

    16. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by scoove · · Score: 2

      Though I concur with FatherOfONe's perspective on capitalism, I think he's heading down the wrong tracks on the view of the cable company:

      What the Cable company is doing is wrong.

      Not if the consumer signed up for it and bought it. Sure, you can skip the fine print, but you're still agreeing to it.

      They will probably get sued over this.

      Only by an inept attorney who disregards the "binding arbitration" clause of the service agreement. And then after it gets thrown out, the provider may wish to seek recovery for legal costs (which is in my service agreement).

      The person didn't agree to any EULA, AND probably more importantly the user didn't get the option to counter the contract.

      Sure they did (though I'm not a EULA fan; the service agreement we require people sign to order service does the job just fine). Counter the contract? Hahahaha... yea, I'm going to spend $2,000 in legal fees to get your $30/month business... not.

      Specifically they didn't get an option to do a fair negotiation with the company.

      There's the menu: which one would you like? Go negotiate with McDonalds over that Big Mac - they'll show you the door.

      Seriously, think it's unfair? Then go elsewhere... you're ignoring that at $5 for the combo meal, there is no margin for legal fees, negotiation, sales people, etc.

      This cable company is foolish to do this and it will come back to haunt them.

      Actually, they're just filtering out the loser customers they don't want. You've heard it before, but ~20% of your customers will cost you most of your expense. Fire them and focus on helping those you can help.

      but then they are a monopoly in that area... kinda like socialism...

      Then buy elsewhere. Or start one up yourself and take all of those 20% pain in the ass customers. It would only be socialism if someone held a gun to my head and made me provide service to the clueless 20% for the same price as the 80%.

      *scoove*

    17. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by MrResistor · · Score: 2

      Capitalism isn't short-sighted, Capitalists are. Capitalism is no worse than any other system, and certainly better than most.

      I think the problem is basic human greed, which is only reinforced by modern business schools, whose teachings seem to boil down to "Remember, always pillage before you burn, but rape is more romantic by firelight!" The focus on making things look attractive to people who essentially know nothing about the actual business (aka "stockholders") pretty much covers the rest of the problems.

      Here's my personal example: The company I currently work at is in the process of outsourcing customer service repair for some of our products. The outsourced work has a burden rate of around $120/hour and a 1 week average turn-around time. The internal customer service repair center has a burden rate of $82/hour and a 1 day average turn-around time. Clearly internal customer service repair is a lot cheaper and more efficient, and any true Capitalist would see that this is clearly the better solution. So, why is customer service repair being outsourced? Because reduced headcount looks better to stockholders, even though it carries a 50 percent price premium and dramatically reduces customer satisfaction.

      I hope that illustrates my point that what we Americans commonly mistake for Capitalism doesn't really put profits before people, but actually puts stock price before anything else.

      As for dollars before the environment, I think that is largely due to a failure on the part of the envirnmentalists. Clearly, there is value in preserving the environment, and the environmental movement has completely failed to present that value in anyhting other than esoteric terms. What is a more compelling arguement? "We must work to preserve these magnificent creatures", or "Conducting your business in an environmentally responsible way could be worth big money to you, here's how..."? Some of the most interesting work in environmental science is focusing on the later, but that's a very recent change.

      I'm no Capitalism cheerleader, nor am I even a Capitalism appologist, as I think my .sig clearly demonstrates. I do think, though, that it is much more useful to look at the details and determine the underlying cause and effect relationships than to simply spout anti-Capitalism rhetoric.

      I'm a big fan of social ethics and justice, but it's pretty useless if you can't present it as something that is of value to someone who doesn't believe in it.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    18. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Fact is, there is nothing illegal about them installing software on your computer with your consent.

      HOWEVER.

      If we accept EULAs at face value, that clicking through a license agreement during an install process legally binds you to the terms of that license, then there's a big problem with the installer clicking through them for you (especially if you're not given the opportunity to read the license terms).

      Are you legally bound to the EULA terms if someone else agrees to them on your behalf? It's an interesting question.

    19. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by Nyarly · · Score: 2
      Capitalism isn't short-sighted, Capitalists are. Capitalism is no worse than any other system, and certainly better than most.

      I'm not sure I entirely agree with this. I think Capitalism is no worse than any other economic system, and its chief virtue is that it doesn't aspire to be anything more than it is. As a system, it's too simple to be short or long sighted, but the successful strategies do tend to be short-sighted - maximize your profit and get out. There's a lot to say for capitalism, though, when compared to communism, where the ideals are so high, and the result is so disappointing.

      I tend to see the stock market as a natural and inevitable product of a capitalism, and that the fact that once a stock market arises, the greatest source of profit is stock price variance, means that "stock price before people" is in no substantial way different from profits before people. The benefit cycles in a capitalistic system work so hard againsts the general benefit, it's kind of scary.

      And as far as environmentalism being profitible, "Conducting your business in an environmentally responsible way could be worth big money to you, here's how..." How? "Here's how..." without a follow up is a pretty weak argument, in my opinion. The environmentalist urge is by nature a faithful and long-view one, and one which runs very counter to the mindset that adopts the capitolism-rewarded strategies, which are pragmatic and immediate. Honestly, there's less cost involved with ignoring the environment (without government intervention) and there's no immediately appreciable benefit to attending to it. So, why bother? Why care? Aren't the dollars that might go to cleaning wastes before dumping, or into extra tankers to allow for greater margins of error better invested into a "People Do." ad campaign to convince the public that you really are environmentally responsible? Maybe if the penalties were derived from the same risk equations that get used to make those decisions, then there might be changes. But that's hardly the capitalistic ideal of "Lassie Fair," eh?

      No, there really isn't anything better, that I know of. But what we've blows goats anyway. Better to be clear on that, for everyone to agree that, yes, our current economic system is rotten, and maybe some brilliance will find something better, than to defend the way things are.

      --
      IP is just rude.
      Is there any torture so subl
    20. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 2
      I don't think that you understand what capitalism actually is.

      Calling pure capitalism short-sighted isn't a bad assesment IMO.

      If capitalism is so great, why do all our technological advances come from government spending?

      If capitalism provides the fairest return for our dollars and our labor, then how do you explain this? Am I somehow implicitly giving my OK for $BIG_CORP to spend millions of dollars on PACs?

      Nope, the parent poster is right. Capitalism is deeply flawed, luckily we have a system in the U.S. that allows government to correct these flaws, and if more people would get out and vote we could have better control over these corrections.

      I place my trust in democracy far more so than capitalism. For instance the PAC's. On a democratic level we can tell our government to stop playing favorites to rich contributors. But can we, through our "spending power" tell the corporations to stop spending money on PACs? Not a chance.

      --

      No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

    21. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by cioxx · · Score: 2
      You might want to read the Constitution sometime. Start with the fourth amendment.

      The right to bear arms?
    22. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by FatherOfONe · · Score: 2

      I am glad that we somewhat agree, but on the issue of the cable company getting sued. It will happen. Look at the number of people that have bought things that they "knew" where dangerous and then sued later because it wasn't spelled out enough for them. I am also willing to bet that the cable company didn't display that they were going to load spyware software on the persons pc in the initial contract.

      --
      The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
    23. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by afidel · · Score: 2

      4) EULA language is relatively advanced lawyerese -- again, it's beyond the comprehension of most, so they just assume they aren't getting screwed.

      Whenever I see Lawyerese I assume I AM getting screwed, otherwise why bother with lawyers?

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    24. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by cioxx · · Score: 2

      It was a humorous comment (as in "right to bear arms to kill the EULA abuser a.k.a. the ISP dude")

      I know my Constitution, thank you.

    25. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by MrResistor · · Score: 2

      the successful strategies do tend to be short-sighted - maximize your profit and get out.

      Enron is an excellent example of why that is false. I would hardly call that a successful strategy, considering how much more money could have been made in the long term by operating in a sane manner, with the added bonus of avoiding the angry mobs.

      And as far as environmentalism being profitible, "Conducting your business in an environmentally responsible way could be worth big money to you, here's how..." How? "Here's how..." without a follow up is a pretty weak argument, in my opinion.

      Obviously there is a follow-up, that's why I put in the ellipses. However, it's different for every business. If you really want an example, check out the article on fish farms in one of the recent Discover issues. I'm not an environmental scientist, and I have no desire to be one, so it's not my place to make the actual detailed arguements. There are people who are doing it, though, and they are able to make compelling arguements without having to resort to fines or other penalties.

      If you think about it, though, it makes sense. Producing waste costs money. Waste represents inefficiency, which increases overhead, which reduces margins. A big part of being environmentally responsible, for many industries, is simply producing less waste.

      I think it's likely that as we examine things more closely we will find that the idea that it is more profitable to ignore the environment is just as flawed as the outsourcing example I gave in my earlier post.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    26. Re:That's great for Slashdot geeks... by MrResistor · · Score: 2

      Undoubtably there are more Enrons out there, and we have heard about a few, though nothing of that magnitude, certainly. But I still disagree that the strategy of the Enron execs was successful (I'm ignoring the "getting caught" part, since the White House seems to be making sure they get away with it).

      I'm coming to this conclusion based on these assumptions: (1) The goal of Capitalism is to amass Capital, (2) The one who amasses the most Capital wins. Based on these assumptions, we can define a winning strategy as the one that amasses the most capital.

      Donald Trump is a fine example of modern, misguided (IMHO) Capitalism. There is no doubt that his slash-and-burn strategy amassed a great deal of capital.

      An excellent counter-example is Bill Gates, who, though I loathe him personally, I consider to be a true Capitalist. He has stuck with his company, building it up to what it is today.

      Trump exemplifies short-term strategy; Gates, long-term. Whose strategy has been more successful? I think that's pretty obvious.

      Now, looking at Enron, I strongly believe that they would have made much more money, likely at least an order of magnitude more, by choosing a more long-term strategy. It's not as if Americans are going to suddenly stop using electricity, or even start using less overall, so I hardly think my belief is unfounded.

      "It's not my place" is kind of disingenious

      I don't think that's the case at all. Fist of all, I was presenting a highly generalized, hypothetical situation. It should be quite clear that when speaking to a Capitalist "save these magnificent creatures" is much a less effective arguement than "You can make more money by not destroying the environment". That was my entire point, and I never pretended that it was anything more.

      Indeed, it would have been far more disingenuous to try and present specific examples, since, as I have already stated, IANAES. However, I do know that there are environmental scientists who are doing the studies and proving that it is more profitable for certain industries to behave in a manner which also happens to have less environmental impact, and that many of these strategies revolve around reducing waste.

      I even pointed you towards a specific example. What more do you want?

      Petroleum distilation, or aluminum production, for example, both produce wastes that have no value.

      It's only a matter of time until a use is found for those wastes. In the mean time, though, it still makes sense to reduce the amount of waste produced. Waste still represents cost, especially if the waste has no value. Any way you look at it, that waste represents raw materials which can no longer be used. Waste doesn't just magically appear from nowhere, and the raw materials/catalysts/whatever that are now unusable waste cost something to obtain. Additionally, disposal costs money, even if you're just dumping it in the creek.

      Suggesting that we just need to look closer at the environmentalism issue without actually being able to address the problems it raises is so much handwaving.

      I may be waving my hands, but I'm at least trying to wave them in the direction of people who are actually finding solutions that are both effective and profitable. Don't take my word for it, check it out for yourself. It is being done!

      As far as how flawed your outsource example is - when the best route to personal gain is increase in stock price, spending 50% more on tech support to make yoour stockholders happy is an excellent decision, in the context it appears to have been made.

      I'm not so sure. The stockholders are still bearing that 50% extra cost, it's just hidden under the blanket of "Expenses". As a stockholder I would be much more impressed if they chose the strategy that costs less, since they would be demonstrating that they are being mindful of my money.

      I'm not sure why reducing headcount is so attractive to investors, anyway. Layoffs and outsourcing have always seemed like the thrashing of incompetent management trying to dig themselves out of the hole they dug, at least judging from the evidence of the 10-15 years I've been aware of such things. To me, that seems like a signal to sell, not to buy.

      Oh well, those who can, do. Those who can't major in Business.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  44. Absolutely nothing by ColdGrits · · Score: 2

    When I signed up with my cable supplier, NTL here in teh UK, they arranged for the engineer to fit cable to my house. They asked if I wanted the enginer to install the modem or if I was happy to do it myself. I said I'd do it myself, they said "fine" and that was that.

    No software they tried to install, no software they tried to get me to install.

    but then again, given the cable modem simply plugs into an ethernet port, why shoudl there be any software required anyway?

    --
    People should not be afraid of their governments - Governments should be afraid of their people.
  45. Re:Did you agree? Yeah, kinda. by John+Hasler · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Such an agreement would not be binding unless it included the texts of all the EULAs.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  46. as much as I hate at&t by AssFace · · Score: 2

    in my area (cambridge MA), there are two options. you can either have a cable modem, or not. but if you do, it is through media one - which is now AT&T.
    I can't stand them, but they are getting better after many a lawsuit against them (not that I'm suing them, but it is nice to see other people are).
    At least on the good side, when they come to install the crap, if you just tell the person you know what you are doing, then they will just leave all of the stuff and let you sign something to show that they were there and left the stuff.
    The rest you can do yourself, call in and get the hardware activated, and you are good to go.

    I've had DSL in the past here and it was like that too, although went on to die and I quit the service because the customer service was soooo bad.

    and there is no way I will ever ever ever go back to dial up at my home. no way. ever ever ever.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  47. Cox has offical DIY install by CustomDesigned · · Score: 2, Informative
    When I signed up for Cox cable, they had a choice of "Full Service" install and "Self Install". For the full service option, the technician installs all the spyware and adware for you, and configures your PC for the cable modem - with no firewall protection. The full service install is available for Windows only.

    Since I run Linux, I picked self install. It is $75 cheaper than full install, and the technician came out, refurbished all the cable connectors, turned me on at the hub, and checked the signal level at the cable modem. He then let me configure Linux and check that I could ping various places.

    You really can't argue with this policy. Some customers (most?) need the full service install. My only complaint with Cox is that they keep increasing the price (from $40/mo to $50/mo) and decreasing the upload cap (from 500Kbits to 200Kbits). The download cap is 1.4Mbits - T1 performance for a fraction of the cost.

  48. fake it by photon317 · · Score: 2


    If they are going to absolutely insist on touching your machines, just set up a partition with a fresh copy of Win95 or something, let them mess about there, and then destroy it when they leave. Or if you weren't pre-prepared for that, just let them isntall and then re-install your OS after they're gone. If you're running a Winbloze variant, you should be re-installing your OS every 2-3 months anyways just to clear the cruft.

    --
    11*43+456^2
  49. Re:Cable Moron by RadioactivePorpoise · · Score: 2, Informative

    I worked in the cable industry for 5 years as an internal systems administrator at a Systems design contractor. Most of those techs are trained on hardware that'd liquify your brains - installing software for some clueless customer is a very small part of their responsibilities.

    Some of you people just need to get over yourselves!

  50. The techs advised me NOT to by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2

    2 cable installs (Cox and RoadRunner) and both times, the tech said "We're supposed to install this stuff, but you really don't want it". (I didn't anyway)

    They merely set up the protocols enough to get a signal, opened a browser and got to a random webpage. "OK...thats it. Here's the CD if you want to install it later."

  51. I've seen this by billmaly · · Score: 2

    When I had my first cable modem, it came with a CD that I was supposed to install, I never did. Naturally, the modem worked fine. Since then, I've had no software installed for a cable modem (NIC driver doesn't count). Recommend you get a HARDWARE firewall, and put it between the PC and the modem....I don't know that this will stop the tracking/reporting, but it won't hurt. And uninstall that dog ASAP!!!

    1. Re:I've seen this by PunchMonkey · · Score: 2

      Recommend you get a HARDWARE firewall, and put it between the PC and the modem....I don't know that this will stop the tracking/reporting, but it won't hurt. And uninstall that dog ASAP!!!

      Actually, it probably won't. Most people will probably just leave the firewall with it's default settings, which is great for blocking incoming traffic, but not outgoing.

      Oddly enough, Windows users are probably better off *with* a software firewall like Norton's. With Norton's, anytime a program attempts to access the net, it pops up a window asking you if you want that program to have net access or not. I don't think any hardware firewall out there has (or can have) this level of control.

      --
      I'll have something intelligent to add one of these days...
  52. cable modem service and EULA agreements by jorr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Besides just uninstalling that software, there are some things you could and should do. Check to see if your local city government has a liasion with the cable company. If so, my first step would be to let them know about what you experienced. As someone else mentioned, check the service contract to see what it mentions about allowing the cable company to make you a party to other agreements (EULA). Though it could happen, I doubt a court would allow it to stand if you were unaware of what the agreements were about. It would be the same as assigning the power of attorney. The idea of needing a demographic database to offset costs could be true but should have been stated. Companies should offer the customer a choice: pay x amount for the product or pay a smaller fee but allow them to gather and use marketing info.

  53. They can turn you off if you uninstal! by olddoc · · Score: 5, Informative

    From this site: http://support.sbcglobal.net/legal/5071.shtml Is the following EULA language: # RIGHT TO TERMINATE NETWORK-BASED SERVICES: By using the Licensed Software, you acknowledge and agree that BroadJump and SBC Internet Services shall at all times retain the right to terminate any and all on-going network-based services that you receive pursuant to your use of the Licensed Software for any reason whatsoever, including without limitation your refusal to allow BroadJump and/or SBC Internet Services to install on your computer any upgrade or modification to the Licensed Software in the future. You better keep that 486 honeypot running with the Broadjump software!

    --
    Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
    1. Re:They can turn you off if you uninstal! by gorilla · · Score: 2

      He didn't refuse to have it installed. He simply removed it afterwards.

    2. Re:They can turn you off if you uninstal! by rebbie · · Score: 2, Insightful
      So, don't use any of their software and then you have nothing to worry about. Look what it says: "By using the Licensed Software..." If they had instead said "By using the network connection..." things would be a bit different.

      --
      On a clear disk you can seek forever
    3. Re:They can turn you off if you uninstal! by edhall · · Score: 2

      Actually, if you read Section 4 of that part of the agreement ("# COLLECTED INFORMATION AND MODIFICATION OF SETTINGS") carefully you'll see that it is pretty specific as to what information is collected and uploaded -- just information relevant to the installation and network configuration. Nothing about whre you browse or other such information.

      As other postings here make clear, Broadjump is essentially an installer, and could be used to install just about any software as well as setting up your connection. So you should read the rest of the agreement carefully to see what the rest of its software load does. (I skimmed through it and couldn't find anything particularly suspicious, but you should check for yousrself.) It certainly would be a handy way to place spyware on your system, but as near as I can tell it isn't itself spyware.

      -Ed
  54. Cable Installer by Rushmore · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I first got cable about 4 years ago the guy came over with his laptop and got everything working. Then I told him to leave the PC alone and I would take care of everything else. He said ok, I signed and he left. Easy as pie.

  55. Just say "NO" by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 5, Funny

    The cable guy came over to install a cable modem at my Dad's house. As I watched him do his stuff I noticed he was installing miniature cameras in my Dad's bedroom and bathroom. I know you don't need cameras for a cable modem to work so I asked if it was necessary. He said he had to do his list of things, and we had to sign that he did his list of things, otherwise he couldn't leave it with us to use. Since I can always remove the cameras, I agreed, but I noticed at the top of the camera was a small antenna. Doing a search on Google for 'Comcast minicam' comes up with some pretty scary stuff as far as what it does, like: 'Records toilet breaks and sexual escapades in order to enhance customer service' Now, how does this affect us? Neither myself or anyone in my family agreed to the cameras; the cable guy did. And is there anyway to get cable companies to stop doing this as I can imagine since the cable company is a monopoly in this town, that the percentage of people who still have these cameras in their bedrooms is pretty high.

  56. Cable Software by nittibang · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The true question is what RoadRunner installs on PC's that will not allow you to perform the standard install by yourself to save the fee.. I work for ISP and we have cable plant that works great. The average person can use our software to install our package and get up and running providing the cable techs have installed the right filters on the lines.. When I visit my aunt & uncles house to do their manual install of RoadRunner I am unable to resolve any DNS no matter what I do to the Win98SE machine... I do the normal kicking around of the computer and software and still nothing.. Hell I even tried getting my Linux Laptop to resolve DNS...... Nothing... I could ping by ip all day long just not get DNS... It was late I was tired so i told them to call RoadRunners techs... My cousin said the guy was there maybe 5 minutes and it was up and running...... He told my cousin that I must not have known what I was doing.... Hahah let me talk to RR's technicians who have been trying to force me a new ipaddress for the last year and a half.... :-) Anyways What software did that moron put on their computer that allowed them to work so fast?? Mind you they got charged something like $24.95 for the install..... has me boggled and mad :-)

  57. verizon DSL by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    With Verizon DSL, i can either connect with my gateway/router with PPPoE, or through a standard WinXP network connection. They sent a CD to use for setup, but I uninstalled their software and it works great otherwise.

    Don't give these techs a hard time, they have to assume that you're a beginner and they probably need to install certain software by contract with some other software company (as a previous post supposed). We've all been support techs at some time in our lives. Just tell him you'd be happy to sign the agreement without him installing the software, and that way you both win as he can lower his average time-spent-per-incident rating.

  58. Just another reason why I use DSL by DeadBugs · · Score: 2

    Now I know it's not available in all areas but...

    The company I am currently using (Directv). Has a FAQ where they encourage things like using Linux, using a router and setting up your own website. They also provide a static IP address at no additional charge.

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
  59. What if you weren't running Windows? by Rushmore · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What would he do then? I would tell him to hook up the cable, let me sign and then he can leave.

    Maybe what you were signing said that you agreed to all of those EULA's that has clicked on your behalf?

  60. I guess this is a lesson to be learned... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 2

    Firstly, this is extremely sneaky way of generating lots of market information about your customer base... (now we see one of the many ways that cable companies plan on making back their money for shelling out billions to deliver broad band...)

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  61. Some are good, some not. by topham · · Score: 2

    Just had shaw install cable modem service this weekend.

    It went great, they saw my spraling collection of computers and decided they didn't want to install software. :)

    We made sure everything worked before they left though. (Although, I didn't show them my wireless network up and running, that was 2 minutes after they left. :)

  62. Not an Issue by Marcus+Erroneous · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I just had Charter Pipleline service installed and spent the weekend reconfiguring the network and setting up the router. The guy that came out was very cool about it and very knowledgeable. The only thing he needed to do to the machine was reconfigure the network settings so that they would work with the cable modem. Other than doing what he needed to, he didn't try anything funny or out of line. Some cable modems hook directly into the pc and may require a driver for the usb connection. Some providers want to put their browser on and/or reconfigure yours so that their page is your default home page.
    Charter, while not everyone's favorite service, has been very cool about helping me reset my hosts file on the cable modem and trying to see my router to help me trouble shoot the system. Their official policy is that they don't support networks which makes you on your own if you have trouble. In practice I've found that if you know what you're doing and the techs aren't swamped at the time, they'll work with you and tell you what they're seeing from their end and give you some pointers. Just don't expect them to walk you through it.
    Bottom line is that there really is no need to install anything other than maybe a driver for a usb connection to the cable modem. I'm not impressed that people that don't know any better are being taken advantage of by people like your provider. I can only hope that someone does that to their mom, dad, brother or sister sometime.

    --
    You must be the change you wish to see in the world - Ghandi
  63. What about Satellite modems? by Gorm+the+DBA · · Score: 2
    While we're on the subject...

    What about Satellite modems? Direcway's two way system has this "Direcway client" software that appears to be necessary for the two way connection to work at all (ie if it's disabled or turned off, the net connection goes down). And since the connections from the satellite modem is a USB, there doesn't seem to be any way to use the Linksys router (that we bought before the installation intending to use as a firewall and to network the two PC's) as anything more than a glorified hub.

    Am I wrong? Is there a way to do this? Anybody got any thoughts>?

    1. Re:What about Satellite modems? by Gorm+the+DBA · · Score: 2
      I agree that it sucks, but if the alternative out in "27500 feet from the CO, and a signal splitter in the wire, so DSL is right out" world that is so rural that the cable companies won't even touch it for tv service, never mind cable modems, is a 28.8 dialup that never gets above 16,6 (courtesy of the before mentioned signal splitters)...whatcha gonna do?

      Thusfar the service isn't hideous...a little slow to start getting the file, but once it gets going...ZOOM! (Latest full version of netscape in a hair under a minute). I'm just curious if I could get rid of that annoying blue box on the taskbar...apparently not.

  64. Do what I did! Run OS X... by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 2
    is there anyway to get cable companies to stop doing this as I can imagine since the cable company is a monopoly in this town, that the percentage of people who still have this software on their computers is pretty high."

    You could buy a PowerBook G4 like I have...The kid was so amazed that I Didn't have a Windows PC, he actually asked me if my Mac was compatible with TCP/IP! His Macintosh knowledge was SO out of date he thought it was only capable of Appletalk...

    Anyway, I gave him a crash course in networking macs via TCP/IP, and at the end I had made another convert...

    Me: "Okay, so you go into System Preferences, click this drop-down menu, select "Ethernet adapter", click DHCP, and click Apply Now. That's it."
    Him: "Don't you have to restart the machine?"
    Me: "Nope."
    Him: "Wow, that's 100 times easier than what I have to do for a PC!"

    Gotta' love that...
    --
    Who did what now?
    1. Re:Do what I did! Run OS X... by Creepy · · Score: 2

      geez - that tech was ignorant - Win2K and XP (and usually NT) don't require reboots either.

      I had OS X and SUSE PPC linux dualboot (actually also 7,8,and 9, but I rarely use those) running on the machine I wanted to use ('cause it had a free PCI slot for my extra ethernet card [firewall]), and neither was supported by AT&T @Home, only Win95,98,2K and Mac OS 8-9. The tech (who actually was a Linux guy himself) set the machine up using MacOS 9 (he was required to do so to "authenticate" the ethernet card), and then let me strip all the relevant information and converted it to linux/OS X, deleting all the crap he installed. I'm now breaking a small chunk of the contract, though - No servers - bah! No NAT'd LAN? bah!

  65. reboot to get new IP? by gosand · · Score: 2
    (god forbid they should check to see if you're running on 2K/XP which doesn't need to be rebooted to renew DHCP)

    Dude, Win98 doesn't even need to be rebooted to renew DHCP. Winipcfg resides in the c:\windows directory, and you can release and renew your IP using it.

    I have Earthlink DSL, and I got the self install kit. Once I used their software to connect and activate my account, I had my Linux firewall up in about a day and haven't used their software since.

    People laugh at me when they find out I have Win98, but it is stable enough for me to boot it up and play games on, which is all that machine gets used for nowadays. If you upgraded to Win2k or WinXP, why am I the idiot?

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:reboot to get new IP? by gorilla · · Score: 2

      winipcfg even existed for win95, and could do the same.

  66. So this is the where I get to brag about my WISP by lww · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Every time I hear another Cable/DSL horror story, I thank the Rebel Alliance for mesanetworks.net, my WISP. 1mbps up/down, do whatever you want as long as you don't exceed your 10GB/month limit (or pay extra per mb). Static ip's, 30ms ping to their dns, life is _good_

    Okay, before you flame me being lucky by owning a home in the right place, a decent ISP was one of the criteria I had in buying our new house...

  67. Re:Did you agree? Yeah, kinda. by phil+reed · · Score: 2
    Such an agreement would not be binding unless it included the texts of all the EULAs.


    Not really. There are lots of contracts that refer to other contracts and "incorporate" their terms "by refrence". Those other contracts have to be available to you as well, somehow. And they were in this case - the original submitter said that he saw them on the screen as the cable guy was clicking on them.


    I agree with the premise, however. It's a scummy business practice illustrated here, but it's not surprising.

    --

    ...phil
    "For a list of the ways which technology has failed to improve our quality of life, press 3."
  68. They left with beer! by smnolde · · Score: 2

    I had scheduled for the cable modem install the day before I was to leave town for a business trip. They called the afternoon of the install and tried to back out... the next install date they had open was something like a week later when I was gonna be out and I wasn't about to let anyone install anything on my computers.

    So I begged and pleaded and threatened (in no particular order) and they agreed to come out the next day.

    The next day arrived, and one guy was there to climb the pole and the other was there to do the networking stuff. Immediately they notice I had the wrong cable in my house and rewired it. They did it fast and cleanly, too. Nice job.

    I gave the keyboard jockey my temporary win95 partition to play on, he did his thing, rebooted, verified access and was pleased. So was I.

    As a gesture of gratitude I offered them a beer. The keyboard jockey agreed and all was well. The pole climber politely declined. Both were good guys and professional.

    After they left, I rebooted in linux and set up lunix. Ran great. Now I run FreeBSD. Runs better.

  69. AdAware? by grub · · Score: 5, Informative


    Perhaps the good people at Lavasoft could add this kind of scumware to their list of Naughties?

    Just a thought.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  70. Re:Did you agree? Yeah, kinda. by mgblst · · Score: 2

    If you read this message, then you agree to hand over all worldly positions to the poster.

    Click Cancel if you are not prepared for this.

  71. ATTBI en Mass by kalidasa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Guy just handed me a disk to install. Didn't work on XP Pro. Called up ATTBI, they had me register the cable modem via their web site and set up on their proxy (which proxy I promptly dumped when I got off the phone). Didn't install anything else. I probably didn't even have to worry about hiding my Linux boot disk.

    1. Re:ATTBI en Mass by garcia · · Score: 2

      you have to dump the proxy. It's only for registration purposes. Otherwise you will get the error "you are being blocked by the SAS proxy".

      They have NO proxies, in fact, they prefer that you don't use any at all (even your own).

  72. Some replies by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 5, Funny
    • Have a bogus bathroom for him to install his camera in, which you can leave "unused" 'til you need to call support when you can shit in that bathroom if needed.
      • More amusing would be sending him to your outhouse. Let him try to figure it out. :)
    • This is why I always opt for the self-install option with any ISP. I don't even like my wife watching me take a shit, nevermind some complete stranger. (Side note: Yes, she does have her own bathroom. So there. :P)
    • Take them to small claims court and sue them for the time you spent removing the cameras.
    • They use 802.11 to transmit their signal to the nearest spy truck. To find out exactly what they're doing hook up an 802.11 hub and analyse the traffic.
    • If you're going to use their product, then you have to play by their rules. Forget about the fact that the installation guy might not be following the rules, and that as a monopoly service they are highly regulated by the government. Just bend over (for the camera) and take it.
    • Tell them your policy does not allow anyone to install cameras in your house without passing an extensive personal background check, signing a non-disclosure agreement, and obtaining a million dollar bond payable to you upon breach of contract. Ask him for his personal address and phone number so that you can contact him when the background check is completed, and have him fill out a form giving you his social security number and permission to use it for the purposes of obtaining the background check.
  73. What happened to Ad-Aware's website? by emil · · Score: 2

    I would say that the first place to start is Ad Aware to remove the spyware, but www.lavasoft.nu seems to be down. I haven't been able to get a refupdate in quite awhile.

    1. Re:What happened to Ad-Aware's website? by CtrlPhreak · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Actual Website is www.lavasoft.de which is still up and running just fine.

      --
      WikiAfterDark.com It's a sex wiki, go now!
    2. Re:What happened to Ad-Aware's website? by Zocalo · · Score: 2
      www.lavasoft.nu seems to be down

      Try http://www.lavasoftusa.com/ instead. I'd have to agree on the spyware detectors though, run your favorite after any software installs that you don't trust implicitly. And that's all of 'em expect for those you coded yourself, right? I also run it once a month or so in case anything slipped through the net.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  74. RR installed a virus on my co-workers PC! by Ken+Williams · · Score: 3, Interesting

    yep, thats right. when the cable guy came to install Road Runner at my co-workers house, he said he had to install some software. one of the things he installed was a very well-known virus (can't remember the name now) that destroyed everything on the hard drive. before nuking the HD, it also emailed copies of the virus to everybody in his address book - that doesn't look good when you are an infosec professional! my co-worker had to reinstall the OS, lost alot of data, and then realized after the reinstall that he didn't need any RR software anyway to use their cablemodem service. RR did nothing at all to compensate him.

    My experience with RR has been great on the other hand. I never let them touch a thing. And they are fine with that. They just want to get out of the house and on to the next call.

    --
    -- ken williams
  75. Yet another reason to use Linux. by MrEfficient · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The guy didn't install anything on my computer. He got as far as mousing over to the K menu and then stopped. I went ahead and told him it was Linux at that point and he let me take it from there :-)

    I gave him a couple of RedHat CDs and sent him on his way.

    --
    Check out AbiWord.
  76. Kick him out of the house next time! by grantedparole · · Score: 2, Funny
    I noticed he was installing something called Broadjump Client Foundation. I know you don't need software for a cable modem to work so I asked if it was necessary. He said he had to do his list of things, and we had to sign that he did his list of things, otherwise he couldn't leave it with us to use.

    This would have prompted me to kick him out of the house and demand that they give me a self starter kit.

    G.

  77. no software install here by (startx) · · Score: 2

    The more of these horror stories I here, the more I like fidelity. I read the entire AUP, and there's prohibiting servers, I don't have any ports blocked, and they didn't install any software. The "tech" hooked up the modem to the wall and my ethernet card, I showed him how to start mozilla from the kpanel, and he was happy to see my homepage popup. 3 cheers to fidelity for not trying to restrict me in any visible way.

  78. Re:Cable Moron by jon+doh! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    just because a cable installer knows "A", doesn't mean he's familiar with "B".

    i used to work at a phone company and the product managers there could talk to death about frame relay lines, phone switching equipment, etc, and they really knew what they were talking about. but they couldn't figure out how to log into their machines or how to change their password.

  79. Broadjump home by Mac+Beckett · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's Broadjump. I found it through Hotjobs' listings for Canada, but it's just www.broadjump.com.

    Mac
  80. Their techs appreciate techs by ronmon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The only time my DSL provider (Bellsouth) has had to send a tech out was to replace my fried Alcatel 1000 about a year and a half ago. I've handled my own installations of dialup and DSL with them for the last 4 years. They are quite Linux friendly though they do not support it.

    He was prepared to do a normal windows installation when I showed him my router and firewall setup. We plugged in a couple cables and bang, it was running. He was very happy to not have to deal with all the extra crap. "Wow, that's Linux? Cool.", he said. Probably his easiest call ever, total 15 minutes 10 of them me showning him how feature-rich Linux is.

  81. They just need the MAC address of your modem by Kent_Franken · · Score: 2

    I have AT&T Broadband. The only real thing that their software does is register your modem's MAC address. (The rest of the software they install is not necessary).

    Until the MAC address is registered, the only place your browser can go is their Modem MAC address registration page (so you could bypass the software installation and just go there and register the MAC manually if you knew what to do).

    I had a spare PC and let them do whatever they wanted to it. After they left, I reformatted the hard disk and put that PC back in storage. Then I simply installed my Linksys wireless router and everyone was happy.

  82. yet another reason not to be as the others by BroadbandBradley · · Score: 2

    those poor M$ Windows users, chasing virus, hiding from spyware, trying to hard not to crash.
    People, computing doesn't have to be that way.

    Folks who don't know Linux think Linux is so hard, but it's not as hard as preserving your windows install. Really.

    This message brought to you by those of us who are not as others, and have an esier time using our computers than you do.

    Microserfs, Please remove Bill Gates's dick from your mouth and join the rebel alliance. It's really much nicer over here, and you're all making people think that computers are hard to use.

    1. Re:yet another reason not to be as the others by The+Bungi · · Score: 2
      That's nice, but you also can't spell worth a shit.

      So please remove that penguin from your ass and try to post again. This time, boot into your pirated copy of Windows 3.1 and use Word's spell checker, fer fucks sake.

  83. Bundeled DSL software (a la Verizon) by BobRooney · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Many DSL providers operate over the PPPoE protocol. Bundled with Verizon's was their crappy support software that I really didnt want or need.

    Typically, the implementation used by the DSL provider (my experience was with Verizon), is not nearly as good as other versions available.

    If you're a tweaker, bandwith whore or just generally care about your connection's performance I recommend heading over to DSL Reports.com and grabbing a copy of RASPPPoE and Dr. TCP. Packet size and receiving window settings can make a world of difference.

  84. What's scary is this article by waltc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Quote, unquote: "Since I can always remove the software, I agreed, but I noticed while he was flipping through the install, he was clicking 'agree' on every EULA that came up. ....Neither myself or anyone in my family agreed to the software; the cable guy did. And is there anyway to get cable companies to stop doing this as I can imagine since the cable company is a monopoly in this town, that the percentage of people who still have this software on their computers is pretty high."

    Ummmm...."clicking through the Eulas" is the only way to install the software. If he wants "cable companies to stop doing this" he could have cancelled the install and thrown the "cable guy" out. And, yes, as he observed the cable guy "clicking through the Eulas" and did not throw him out he *did* agree to them. However, this is a moot point because the software is easily uninstallable and is not required for the cable modem to function properly.

    Cable companies are frequently "monopolies" in towns because of the expense of laying new cable and maintaining it. You can't have 10 cable companies all laying 10 strands of cable on each telephone poll. Besides that, it isn't economical for a company to provide service in an area in which it cannot have a guaranteed customer base (not a guaranteed number of paying customers--that is entirely different), because of the expense involved in setting up the cabling to begin with. Towns frequently entertain "bids" by competing cable companies as to which company will provide the area with the best prices, service and choice prior to awarding the "contract" to a particular cable company. It's not a monopoly--it's a practicality.

    Frankly, I grow a bit weary hearing people complain about non-issues like this. Usually, these complaints are based on a wide degree of ignorance and fear, just like this one. It would be a different matter if you couldn't uninstall the software and still use the modem. But you can, and that fact alone makes this much ado about nothing.

  85. One time... by snowlick · · Score: 4, Funny

    The guy that came over to install my stuff was a total moron. When signing up for my cable modem service I decided to do the "honeypot" idea with my Windows machine, which I figured would be easiest (let them screw everything up, then pull out the info I need after they leave). There was a spot of trouble which I didn't forsee, however: I use Apple Studio Displays on all of my machines, and he couldn't get over the fact that they aren't iMacs. When he got there he was like, "Aa, iMacs? They're fancy. I don't know how to install this stuff on iMacs. Let me call my supervisor..."

    I had three clearly visible beige boxes under the table at this point, which obviously had the monitors connected to them, the keyboards, mouses, etc, etc.

    I tell him, "No, man, these are all PC's."
    "Yeah, cool. Hmmm..."
    *fiddles with one of them running Windows98, dials number on cellphone*
    "Yeah, what's up, man. Um, I got these iMacs here, and I was wondering what I should do..."
    I just about hit him over the head with my chair. After some pressuring I got to talk to the guy on the other end of the phone, who gave me everything I needed to know(IP, etc). When I gave the phone back I could hear him yelling at the "installer."

    "Oh, you mean that they aren't iMacs. That's crazy. They look just like em."

    What the FUCK...

    --
    Crystal Meth: Would you ingest somthing made from a poisonous gas and an explosive metal? You do it every day -- Salt!
  86. No software needed? by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hi,

    I work for a Dutch cable provider that *does* need software installed, as they use PPPoE for subscriber access. Windows XP is a godsend, in that regard, since it has PPPoE built-in, but all other versions of Windows require PPPoE software to be installed.

    Also supplied on the CD are a mac version of the software, and also the source package of Roaring Penguin's PPPoE client for linux, although for linux I'd recommend just downloading the latest version. And, of course, there are no spyware things on the CD, though it does rather sneakily lock the MSIE Homepage setting in Windows XP's registry.

    You don't get full installation unless you pay extra for it. If you don't, you just get the modem, a generic signal amplifier for TV signal, and a length of UTP cable. If you do, you get a network card too, and an incompetent lout to install it all for you.

    And company that doesn't offer it in this manner should be avoided, if possible.

  87. ntl did nothing by Fweeky · · Score: 2

    At the time I was using a little 486 with Slackware and a pair of NE2000 NIC's as a gateway (which up to that point had been running dialup).

    I had SLIP connecting it to my Amiga, Ethernet to my Dual Celeron, two monitors, three keyboards, two mice, and a worrying amount of cable.

    The engineer took one look at it, put on a slightly exasperated expression, plugged/drilled/screwed everything in, and said "I'm sure you know what to do" before leaving.

    I plugged in the CM to the other NIC, started dhcpcd, tweaked my firewall to point to the new interface, and that was that.

  88. This is probably subsidising the costs by Zocalo · · Score: 2
    I wouldn't be the slightest bit surprised if "CableCo Inc." wasn't getting paid upfront by "Annoying Pop-Unders Inc." to collect data for them. The money earned by CableCo would then be used to fund price reductions for the customers with any left over going straight onto the bottom line.

    If you are smart, then you will naturally uninstall/use a dummy PC/self-install/whatever to avoid this, but what about the average, non technical user who has bought into the hype? I'd be very interested to see how much of this is mentioned in the T&C of the agreement. I'll bet it doesn't lay too great a point on the fact that your taste in pr0n will be given to another company. There's a class action or three in there sooner or later, I'm sure...

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  89. The cable guy himself told me not to install it... by pvera · · Score: 2

    I got mine while it was still @home. The technician told me not to install any of the software that @home sent me. I had their service until their demise and I am now on Comcast. Comcast does not force me to install anything but they force you to install an activex control if you want to use their support website.

    --
    Pedro
    ----
    The Insomniac Coder
  90. Where are my mod points by moogla · · Score: 2

    I'd give you a big-mac an and egg-mc-muffin-cellent karma rating.

    --
    Black holes are where the Matrix raised SIGFPE
  91. DNS is down by oliverthered · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can easly run your own DNS under linux.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:DNS is down by bobv-pillars-net · · Score: 4, Insightful
      But you have to have something 'above' you in the DNS tree,

      Duh.

      They're called "Root nameservers."

      Here's a list (from my /etc/dnsroots.global file)

      • 198.41.0.4
      • 128.9.0.107
      • 192.33.4.12
      • 128.8.10.90
      • 192.203.230.10
      • 192.5.5.241
      • 192.112.36.4
      • 128.63.2.53
      • 192.36.148.17
      • 198.41.0.10
      • 193.0.14.129
      • 198.32.64.12
      • 202.12.27.33
      --
      The Web is like Usenet, but
      the elephants are untrained.
    2. Re:DNS is down by dattaway · · Score: 3, Informative

      And if you don't want to "nice" the root servers, put your local ISPs nameservers first in your /etc/resolv.conf file:

      nameserver 12.34.56.78 --your isp nameserver here
      nameserver 127.0.0.1 --this is bind on localhost

      The first nameserver will be the first on the list, and localhost is second, which will use bind to query the root servers.

    3. Re:DNS is down by Just+Another+Perl+Ha · · Score: 2, Informative
      Ummm... all you'd need is a root.cache file which can be created with one simple command:
      • dig @a.root-servers.net . NS
      That's all the above you anyone would ever need.
  92. Spyware, Trojans, Virii... by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 2

    This makes me happy I'm running OpenBSD. I don't think there is much chance they could install all this crap on that. Heck, all you need to get it working is dhclient or ifconfig. It all comes with the system. If I need anything else, their setup is non-standard and I don't want it. (OK, there's PPPoE, but I don't have experience with it. I guess PPPoE a Good Thing). Besides, I don't need a cable guy. I can plug the cables myself.

    Unfortunately, this is not the case for most people. Those people will pay for broadband, and get it, plus a load of software that clutters if not breaks their systems. Then they have to call tech support and have it fixed. All the complexity will deter them even more from computers, and bring them further from getting to learn how they work. This will make them more dependent on the companies they get tech support from.

    1. Offer a good service
    2. Mess people's systems
    3. PROFIT!!!

    ---
    DRM: short for Digital Rights Manglement. Any method to restrict users' rights to do whatever they want with their property, often in name of security.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  93. Broadjump Client Foundation information: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    The software:
    http://www.velocidadejusta.com.br/manua is/speedyPP POE/BroadJump/
    More information (search the page):
    http://www.pacs-portal.co.uk/startup_pages /startup _full.htm
    Broadjump's homepage:
    http://www.broadjump.com/
    Mention of Broadjump in Yahoo's EULA:
    http://support.sbcglobal.net/legal/5070.sht ml
    Information about the Broadjump Client (looks like it spys on whether you've overclocked your connection):
    http://osiris.978.org/~brianr/mirror s/www.iscentra l.org/%257Etcniso/main/cisp.htm
    Posting what will be a +5 informative as an Anonymous Coward:
    Priceless

  94. Use a junk PC by smoon · · Score: 2

    When I had roadrunner installed (a long time ago) I just put a junk hard drive in my PC with windows 95 (they didn't support Linux).

    When the tech came I let them do whatever they were going to do. When they left I checked the relevant settings and the pulled the hard drive out, and put my primary drive back in.

    --
    "But actually trying to use m4 as a general-purpose langage would be deeply perverse" --ESR
  95. Make sure you read the EULAs by Vic · · Score: 2

    If they insist that you install their software, make sure you insist that you read every last word of every EULA for every piece of software they install. If even one or two people do this in a day, it will throw their installation schedule right off and make it not worth doing.

    If these installers are putting software on customers' computers, it should be the customers that click through the EULAs.

    Cheers,
    Vic

  96. Eh? by dacarr · · Score: 2
    OK, this one's interesting. A few years ago, @home did not support Linux. SO imagine some tech's surprise when he got to this Linux-only family I know.

    WHat this guy did was spend 30 minutes while the patriarch of said family explained to him 1) why you can't install Windows software on a Linux system and 2) that he could set up the system himself if teh tech would just give him the appropriate information. Finally the tech conceded.

    Moral of the story: if you can bullshit your way out of it, you don't *have* to install the tracker software.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  97. unix software by JDizzy · · Score: 2

    I fail to see how this is an issue when you use a non-Microsoft environment. Will the field service-dude know how to install this software under wine's emulation? Will he even know what wine is? Do I even have Wine installed? Is there a MAC or Unix version of these software tools? What about the possibility to format Windows imediatly after the service-man leaves the room?

    Is this a notion of you must submit to the service man installing software before he leaves, or is this a notion of you must run this software to use the network? I think the later is highly unlikely, and the former to be part of the burocratic tangle inside the network companies.

    Every time I call the cable company, I have to explain to them that my computer is a FreeBSD box with an AMD 100Mhz 486 chip with 64Mb of memory. Then they explain to me that they only support XYZ setup, and I have to explain to them that I'm talking about my router, and I have XYZ behind it. I thne have to explain to them the way DHCP works, and how that is all that they actually require. Once your have them spell bound with ignorant IP terminology, they tend to shutup and go away. I figure the same jedi mind trick can be done with the field service people. ;)

    --
    It isn't a lie if you belive it.
  98. more info, mod this up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interes ting-people/200202/msg00164.html
    http://www.inter esting-people.org/archives/interes ting-people/200206/msg00132.html

  99. Standard Op Procedure for Cable Modem installs by jmlyle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, according to "policy," the installer can't do anything unless you are running a supported OS that boots with no errors. He is supposed to install the ISP's marketing software, change the homepage to the ISP's advertising portal, yada yada yada.

    BUT there is very little standardization among installers. The quality is EXTREMELY low. I worked for a company that specialized in Cable Modem installations for broadband providers, and still the majority of the contractors were just Cable TV techs. I started out as a Tech, having not worked for about a year. Of course, I was promoted to Regional Training Supervisor within a few weeks. I wrote a Standard Operating Procedure Manual for doing Cable Modem installs that was used by 150 or so techs in Atlanta. After that company was bankrupted (by the owner stealing money, equipment, and blatant discrimination against white people and women (Thanks again, James Clavon!)), I saw that my manual was being taken by the techs to other companies, and those other companies promptly made it their official document.

    Anyway, when I wrote it, I had to take into account the demands of the ISP's that contracted us to do the installs, but I took advantage of every loophole that I could to have the install done the way that I would want it done on MY machine.

    Specifically, there was software provided by the ISP which was SUPPOSED to make all of the modifications to the system required, but it crapped out a lot of the time. At the time (about two years ago) the software did JUST make the TCP/IP changes, add an email account (to Outlook Express), change the home page, and send a machine description (hardware stats) to the ISP. I encouraged techs to avoid using this software and do the entire process manually.

    Yada yada, more random info:
    As a supervisor, I had to tell techs to bail on the install if the machine didn't fit the ISP's minimum reqs (like supported OS), but if I was doing an install, or was nearby when a tech radioed me with a problem, I would get the install done for anyone who wanted the service. I could judge the customers pretty well, in that if they were self-sufficient computer users, I would just give them the TCP/IP connection, because that's all they needed. If they needed tech support in the future, they'd have to deal with either putting up a temporary supported OS, removing their firewall (unsupported), or (my preferred method) just lying to tech support, giving the answers that will lead them down their trouble shooting checklist towards getting the damned connection fixed.

    Anyway.... I don't know about thew state of affairs today. Now I'm more on the CMTS end in that field. I wouldn't be suprised if the software had spyware components. When I was getting out of that area, they were introducing a "ToolKit" application which WAS somewhat useful in that it would check the status of connections to email, news, & DNS servers, etc. They wanted it to run in the systray and I think it did report back some traffic and usage info to the ISP. But when I had a connection problem, it was easy to start that app and confirm they were having email issues. Now, they probably have much more Orwellian things in the works....

    jmlyle

    --
    I have misplaced my pants.
  100. Oh Puh-lease!!! by ChaosMt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Freedom by obscurity?!? Ya that's the ticket, we'll all go underground and that way we can practice our freedoms in secret with out the problems for governments or corporate cheiftons. Great plan there Chester.

    Look, the cable companies enjoy their quasi-monopoly status and they seem quite happy to abuse their position, and with the law makers pockets lined well, they will have no worries. What worries me is the lack of FULL disclosure. If I'm going to be screwed in such a way, I think you should at LEAST know what's going on. I want a legal form that people read with glazed over eyes and initial parts to show them EXACTLY what information will be collected and used against them. However, as long as Michael "nepotisim" Powell is the chairman of the FCC to serve interests of the greatest donors and not the people, we might as well get used to saying, "Thank you sir! May I have another!"

  101. Easy Solution and Fun Too. by teamhasnoi · · Score: 3, Funny

    I keep all my cable installers and put them in a deep circular well in my basement. They scream and holler, especially when I tell them I'm going to make a fleshsuit out of their skin. I won't feed them until they put the lotion on. And I get all the channels for free!

  102. Better yet.... by mblase · · Score: 2

    ...tell him your OS isn't supported. I'd like to see them try and get anything like that running on my OS X box, or on a Linux partition. :)

  103. Boss's Reaction to Lilo by TibbonZero · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So a few years back I was working for the IT department in a county that I lived in doing Tier 2 networking support.
    It was kinda nice, being 17 and having my own parking space, office, nametag with picture, etc... and computer that they gave me...
    Now they were pretty strict about paperwork and licensing, being gov't and all, and at first my boss thought I wouldn't even need a computer of my own in the office at first, but then I needed to check my Groupware email so much, so I got a little crappy Pentium 3/300mhz that I found in the 'Old Computers, Destroy these, don't give them away' room.

    Anyway, I installed Windows 2000 (or 98) or it first, but I left 10Gb as an extra partition.
    I got bored one day and thought, well I am working in Unix stuff in the server room all the time, and this thing doesn't even have SSH built in, so let's install linux. I thought to consult my Boss, but then decieded not to bug him. I had the license, it was free! He said not to bring any software from home, because of pirating/licensing issues, but thought this would be fine.
    I loaded Linux, and it worked like a dream on the machine (this was before Redhat was BloatHat by default). So of course I use Lilo to switch between Windows for email (groupware...), and Linux. I was also testing out VMWare to try to get the Groupware going in Linux.
    Anyway, a few weeks later (being a lowly intern) I have to share my desk and computer with someone who is just starting, which was fine with me. It was a two person office anyway, and she was just using my computer until she got her own.
    One day, apparently she rebooted Windows for something, and I forgot to ever mention linux for more than a second. Lilo comes up, and she sits and thinks, so it goes to Linux. Then when it prompts her for a username/password, she goes to the Bossman :)

    Bossman says to me in his office later, "I need to talk to you, did you load Linux on your computer?". To make a long story long, I didn't get fired or anything but I did have to explain my way out of it (GNU, etc...)
    The next day he gave me a machine to work on in Linux and test VMWare on. It was a Dual Processor Box, with 1gb memory, and 4 harddrives all in Hardware raid!!! I had to load Oracle and VMWare on it... Oh, what a job !

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
    1. Re:Boss's Reaction to Lilo by enneff · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sounds like your boss is even more clueless than you.

    2. Re:Boss's Reaction to Lilo by c13v3rm0nk3y · · Score: 2

      Things would have been far far worse if he'd seen grub.

      Bosses hate grub.

      --
      -- clvrmnky
  104. Re:Have a honeypot - an old MAC by twoslice · · Score: 2, Informative

    A friend once had an old MAC that did not support DHCP which he used to loan to friends before the cable guy installed anything. The cable guy always said the same thing - Geez there are a shitload of these old MAC's around but I guess I have to give you a static IP address because these things don't support DHCP (Yippee!).

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
  105. Thankyou... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 2

    ...that's the funniest post I've read in months. I could picture the idiots in front of VMWare. hehe.... lol...

  106. Re:it wouldn't work by Choco-man · · Score: 2, Informative

    My wife is a producer for the largest NBC affiliate in the nation (and has worked for a variety of other affiliate outlets). Advertising is THE reason networks exist, and your local media outlet will NEVER run a story that may adversely affect the possibility of them generating advertising revenue. If they run a story that says company X is bad, company X will never advertise with them - hence negative story on company X will never run.

    Now, your national outlets are a different story - Dateline or national news types will respond differently.

  107. I had that shit installed on my laptop by rr by LWolenczak · · Score: 2

    The guy installed it not knowing he was using a computer in vmware... when he rebooted it... he freaked realising he was really in linux... he got his things then left quickly... from what I found, the stuff was complete spyware. Not Cool. I called up road runner to complain, but they hung up on me six times.

  108. LEGAL IMPLICATIONS? SUE? by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 2
    I hate lawyers, and lawsuits, but this is one of the few times it seems legit. No one has answered, "What are the legal implications of SOMEONE ELSE clicking of YOUR end user licence aggreement?"

    I would get a free consult and see what's what. Sounds to me like he, LITTERALY, hacked your system. Even if you signed a form or contract, YOU must click YES to make those aggreements valid. He did that on your behalf. Fraud? Tort? Misrepresentation? It could be a number of things!

    Good luck!

  109. Can you Quote all the EULAs you agreed to? by TibbonZero · · Score: 2

    Really, though, I mean the cable guy doesn't wanna sit there while you call a lawyer (hey, if everyone could understand the law and it was simple enough, we wouldn't need lawyers) and go through the contract before signing it? I guess you could make him, but it's just poor form.

    There really isn't much in the average Time Warner contract that is odd. When I was working at Time Warner in the Business Division, we would even get contract back and the boss would kinda 'haggle' with them and our lawyers on points in the contract. It's not out of the question to ammend the contract. And for the most part every part of the contract was good to start with. Us as employees (and the bosses) really didn't like the idea of screwing people over, all we intended to do with contracts was protect ourselves from retarded lawsuits.
    In fact though, when I worked for the Business Division of Road Runner, I never installed ANY software on a person's computer. Most of the time we did just throw them the Cat 5 cable and left. We would hook up 1 computer, or hook it up to their network (but they would have to configure their network). No Spyware, no install CDs, etc... We even carried our own laptops to test everything on, instead of thinking that it was just 'their computer'. Anyway, it's hard to move their computer over to the rack to plug the serial port into the Cisco UBRs...

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
  110. I installed a DSL connection at a client's site... by SwedishChef · · Score: 2

    with a Linux box acting as the router/NAT gateway (as usual). When nothing worked we made the call to the "help desk".

    Phone tech: "Go to 'start/settings...".

    Me (interrupting): "Whoa there... we are using a Linux computer as the router."

    Long pause. I told him that his DSL modem didn't indicate that there was a connection.

    Long pause, then "I don't think the modem works with any operating system other than Windows. Don't you have a computer with Windows there you can connect to the modem?"

    Me: "Don't you have a real system administrator there somewhere I can talk to?"

    Phone tech in a bright voice: "Yes we do.. just a minute."

    He connected me to a clueful admin and we had the system up and running 5 minutes later.

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
  111. Broadjump is.... by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 4, Informative

    An Austin-based software company who targets their marketing to broadband ISPs. A friend of mine interned there last year while she was finishing out her journalism degree. Her job, if I recall correctly, was to write (like a journalism, not CS major would write) some of the webpage content and also press releases.

    Essentially, their purpose is sort of like the giant installer CD that comes with your sound/video card. See, broadband ISPs, particualarly cable-based ones, don't really have their own install techs. Their guys are sub-contracted. In fact, Roadrunner's guys will have their company name and a "licensed subcontracter for Time-Warner Cable" printed on the side of their van. At least around here, there is a reasonable lead time for install, about a week, although I'm sure RoadRunner would like to speed that up, as it just leads to faster revenue/happier customers.

    Anyway, it's like the Video/Sound card CDs in that it's a bunch of useless software in addition to an auto-install program that speeds up the tech's process. Rather than configure the windows PC to pull on DHCP via the NIC, and set the mail client and web browser up, the broadjump software does it for them. It also (like the vid/sound card disc) installs a bunch of other useless cruft. They allegedly had some sort of remote support program, and a MMORPG (Blood pledge, I think... It's really big in Korea) where if the customer signed up through the link on their desktop, the ISP got like a $3/month cut.

    So anyway, that's their software.

  112. There is a DANGER in NOT reporting this by Skapare · · Score: 2

    There is a DANGER in NOT reporting this. This might be only the first step. The next step might be that they change the protocols and instead of using some kind of encapsulated ethernet, they layer the IP in something else that only their software can figure out (and they might encrypt it to be sure of this). I don't expect that to happen tomorrow, but if they don't see at least some resistance to taking over people's peecees now, they will keep moving to more control. They will try to find the point where they can get away with as much as possible because the more they can get away with, the more money they can get out of it. So when they they have IP encapsulated like that, you won't be able to access anything except from that one Windows machine. This would not be hard do. And as soon as they have the market softened up enough to believe they have to install all the software on your Windows computer, they will go for it. Then your Linux/BSD box won't have access anymore.

    They might do this for many reasons, all related to them making more money at our expense (in some form). Possible reasons include:

    • Force more people to use the spyware platform. This ensures the maximum number of hits from their spy affiliates.
    • Restrict your use of certain communications such as a tunnel to work, or encrypted file trading that they can't spy on.
    • Prevent you from accessing from more than one computer (even if you only do it from one at a time). Cable companies already have long established pricing tiers for getting more money out of people with more TVs, so don't think they won't try it for more computers.

    This is why we must:

    • Resist letting them install whatever they want. Use the self-install methods as much as possible. And have an "indemnity against damages contract" for the cable guy to sign if he wants to touch your peecee (just to scare him off of it).
    • Make sure the public is aware of the risks of invasion or privacy. They will get more spam and other forms of marketing, or worse. Imagine being turned down for health insurance because you visited certain sections of health websites about fatal diseases.
    • Make sure the public is aware of the risks of security. How do you know this software doesn't have tons of backdoors, known or even unknown (yet)?
    • Promote more widespread adoption of Linux/BSD/Unix as home desktop/workstation computers. The more presence Linux/BSD/Unix has in society, the more business has to acknowledge it and deal with it.

    They didn't need to rewire the insides of my TV to hook up cable. Why the hell should they have to "rewire" my computer's software just to get internet connectivity?

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  113. My experience by erik_fredricks · · Score: 2

    I have AT&T broadband. When the guy arrived, I told him I'd be happy installing it myself. He started into how he couldn't take responsibility, etc. I then told him I was installing it on a Linux system. He got an odd look and then got a form out of his truck that said something to the effect of "I absolve so and so of any responsibility..."

    All I had to get from him was the name server address. Funny thing is, he told me at first (just being nice) that he wasn't sure it would work, since the dialing software he had to install was proprietary. He even stuck around just to make sure it'd work.

    Of course, it did, but the moral is that the installers are sent out to do a specific job a specific way.

    --

    THE GOOD HUMOR MAN CAN ONLY BE PUSHED SO FAR
    Bart Simpson on chalkboard in episode 2F18

  114. Doesn't it matter who clickes "yes" on the EULA? by SwedishChef · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Our techs install software for clients on a daily basis and I've often wondered whether it makes some difference who actually clicks to accept the EULAs. In our case we are not employees of the companies which actually bought this software, but are paid to install it by the purchasers. So what is *their* legal liability to a EULA if *I* click on "ok" to some incredibly stupid EULA? Who exactly is being put to a liability here (assuming a EULA actually incurs some liability at all, that is)?

    I think that if a company needed to wriggle out from under an overly-restrictive EULA they could certainly use the defense: "None of our people clicked on that agreement... it was a contractor and he didn't have the authority to bind us to a legal contract."

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
  115. Parent comment is NOT flamebait. by Skapare · · Score: 2

    So far there are 2 moderations to the parent comment as flamebait (and 1 for insightful and 2 for interesting). The poster does have a valid point. He just happens to be wrong. Being wrong isn't flamebait.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  116. I considered setting up a Linux router by Royster · · Score: 2

    Eventually, I decided it was more cost effective to just *buy* a Linksys rather than spend 8 or more hours getting the things set up correctly plus the case for the extra NICs.

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous sig, unfortunately the sig limit is too small to contain i
    1. Re:I considered setting up a Linux router by Selanit · · Score: 2

      Little dedicated routers are cool, but if you need to do it on the cheap, Linux is the way to go.

      It's not necessarily hard, either: Try IPCop. It's a specialized distro that doesn't do anything but be a firewall/router. Web-based administration, similar to what you'd find in a Linksys or Netgear router. Average setup time is about 15 minutes. Runs great on older hardware.

    2. Re:I considered setting up a Linux router by Royster · · Score: 2

      buy second ethernet card
      install into unused 486
      install linux
      do {
      read firewall HOWTO
      make ipchains rules
      reboot and test
      } until works

      My estimate: 8 hours.

      --
      I have discovered a truly marvelous sig, unfortunately the sig limit is too small to contain i
    3. Re:I considered setting up a Linux router by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2

      No offense, but unless you have a spare box sitting around, $60 is hard to beat.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
  117. Re:Qwest doesn't get along with anyone except... by symbolic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...smaller companies they can easily push around. I thought about a DSL account, but Qwest, surprise, surprise, is 'incompatible' with Earthlink (at least last time I checked). I swear...it's no wonder that such a small percentage of users have broadband access- pick what you hate dealing with most: too expensive, too invasive, or too much of a hassle. It's all there.

  118. speakeasy.net is linux friendly by e40 · · Score: 2

    they never said a word when I said I was running linux.

    Also, I chose the self install. I can't even remember if it came with a windoze cd-rom. Even if I was running windoze, I would never have installed it. What's the point?

  119. What the software could actually do by Permission+Denied · · Score: 2
    There are basically two categories of software that you may need to run to get your broadband going:
    1. Software to register an account
    2. PPPoE software

    The first software would be run only the first time you get your broadband installed. It would go through the steps of creating an account with a username/password etc. and it may automatically create an email account for you. It would also probably change a few settings (email/DNS server and whatnot) and it may install a "branded" version of IE. This software may also record your MAC address, which is not very nice (this would mean that the service is restricted to the machine with which you run the stupid little program). This is, of course, some stupid Windows program, but you may actually need an account before being able to use the service.

    Hint: sometimes this software is just a little wrapper that invokes IE as a COM object and simply displays web pages. I know that SBC does this. To see if that's the case, right-click in the program and see if you get IE's popup menu. You can then bookmark the page to figure out the URL and you can complete the registration from any web browser instead of using the software.

    Any software used to initially register the service can of course be removed after registering the service.

    The second class of software it might install is PPPoE software (PPP over ethernet). ISPs are increasingly using this to provide DSL and cable service. I don't like this one bit, and I still can't figure out what possible advantage running PPPoE would have at their end except that they may be able to use some older software designed primarily for PPP (eg, RADIUS, mrtg on the PPP server software, etc).

    If your ISP uses PPPoE, you'll need PPPoE software, depending on what OS you run. I believe Windows XP comes with a built-in PPPoE client, I know MacOS X 10.2 does, and I know Windows 9x and MacOS 8-9 definitely do not come with PPPoE software. FreeBSD comes with its own PPPoE client, but Linux usually does not (for Linux, you may have to download "Roaring Penguin PPPoE" - hit google).

    So, the procedure would be: have a Windows box handy when you get your broadband. Since the software might register your MAC, make sure the Windows box has the same MAC address as your eventual NAT box (eg, swap out the NICs if necessary). Install the software and then figure out what it does. You might be able to use the account-creation stuff without their software like I did, but it's probably no big deal to go through their stupid little wizard. Then you figure out what kind of network setup they're using (whether or not it's PPPoE), configure your NAT appropriately, and drop their software.

    If you're new to this, you should know a couple other things: first, you'll want NAT if you have more than one machine. NAT allows you to put all your machines behind your NAT router and your provider only "sees" your NAT box (I'm aware of how ISPs can attempt to detect NAT and how "stealth NAT" can defeat that, so there's no need to go into that here). FreeBSD makes an excellent NAT server that can run on really old hardware (you'll of course need two NICs, but there's no hardware requirements other than that) - the FreeBSD handbook has a section especially on this, and setting up NAT involves simply editing a few lines in /etc/rc.conf (and you'll probably want to install a DHCP server on the inside side of your NAT, and that's only a port install away). It litteraly takes two minutes to set up a FreeBSD NAT box from a default FreeBSD install. There are also several Linux floppy-based distributions that are designed specifically to run NAT.

    The second thing you should know is that some ISPs discourage running servers by make your DHCP-assigned IP "very dynamic" (eg, it changes every few days no matter what). If you still want to be able to ssh into your box, you could use something like dyndns.org, or you could simply write a little script that "publishes" your IP on a web site or something whenever your IP changes.

  120. Legally speaking... by Royster · · Score: 2

    ...yes, you agreed to all those EULAs.

    I'm suprised no one addressed the real legal question here: can he be held to have agreed to the EULAs that the installer clicked "Yes" on.

    The installer was acting as your agent as you allowed him access to your machine for the purpose of installing the software. Any EULA agreement he agreed binds you as well.

    This is why the old canard about getting a minor to instll software so that the EULAs are not enforcable against you is just an Internet hoax. As soon as you authorize someone to do something, they become your agent.

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous sig, unfortunately the sig limit is too small to contain i
  121. Re:I Had to Help The Roadrunner Tech by Junta · · Score: 2

    What, you got roadrunner service and paid for them to do their 'installation'. All I ever did (3 times), is have them come, hook up the cable, call in the mac address, and watch the lights go solid. Then they leave, without ever touching the computer. Cheaper and more useful, no spyware.... Self installation only requires that you set up your computer to get an IP through DHCP, that's it..

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  122. Time-Warner do it yourself kits by migstradamus · · Score: 2

    I picked up a kit from Time-Warner cable here in Manhattan and set it up myself. I never took the included "Road-Runner" CD out of the envelope and I installed nothing. Plus, I run it through a router and firewall. No desire to risk their security sharing my files with a few thousand fellow subscribers.

  123. Don't tell the cable guy about the router by Otto · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'd recommend doing that anyway. Not because of them trying to extort more cash from you (although that's a damn good reason), but because a lot of the cable modem setups out there have the cable installer guy get the MAC address of your PC's network card to phone into the office. Why? So that not every jackass can hook up an off the shelf cable modem, fire up DHCP, get a lease, and run with it. The DHCP server only gives out an IP to the list of verified MAC addresses. Mine does this.

    So if the guy had used the MAC of the router, I'd be unable to connect without the router in the loop. As it stands now, I hid the router (avoiding any cable guy questions), he used the MAC of the PC, and then later I changed the router's WAN MAC to be the same as the PC's MAC. Thus, if the router kicks off one day, I can plug that PC in directly and still have some connectivity for getting technical help on fixing it. Most all SOHO NAT router devices let you change the MAC of the WAN side. Linksys calls it "MAC Cloning" I believe.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  124. You're right! by FreeLinux · · Score: 2

    Wow.. ignorance runs rampant..

    You are so right, Poster boy....

  125. Uhhh, yeah by wiredog · · Score: 2

    that's what I meant. I keep forgetting the second 'c'. Always fun when debugging.

  126. consumer advocacy by akb · · Score: 2

    Hopefully the consumer watchdog groups around will pick up on this. Groups like Consumer Federation of America and Consumer's Union (publisher of Consumer Reports do some good work. They are a little slow and behind the times in some ways but they are some of the few groups that confront the cable industry, mostly over the issue of rates. They've been involved in the open access issue which has been important.

    You could also organize your community to be your own consumer advocates, rather than hope these organizations will do it for you. Since its an Internet related issue you'll have a much easier time organizing because the people you want to reach are mainly online. Get in touch with the public utility commission, city council, the local news media and the cable company itself. Usually these people here nothing at all from the public on issues like this, if they get 10 calls they'll piss in their pants. Mail the local Linux Users Group, Internet Society Chapter, and other computer related fora and suggest people do the same.

  127. That poor joe by ianscot · · Score: 3, Insightful
    No need to dump all the anti-corporate conspiracy theory bullshit on the poor joe who gets payed 10 bucks an hour to hookup peoples homes.

    I agree. We're always bitching at the poor telemarketing sales reps, when they're not the ones who set their hours, you know? It's not the installer's fault he's got this list from the main office.

    If you use a little common sense and explain yourself rather than going ballistic, the installer's going to maybe be won over and give other people options, too, rather than "just doing his job." Alienate him, and he'll start thinking of his customers as a bunch of hassles to be gotten through. That's no good for anyone.

    (Seems like cable installers really run a range of attitudes, though. Companies hire out during big install promotions, so you could be dealing with anyone.)

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    1. Re:That poor joe by UberOogie · · Score: 3, Interesting
      We're always bitching at the poor telemarketing sales reps, when they're not the ones who set their hours, you know?

      Not even close to a comparable situation. The cable installer is coming at our behest to provide us a service that we paid for. The telemarker is interrupting our lives to try and sell us a product that we asked for no information on after most likely receiving our contact information by the sale of our personal information without our conscent.

      I'm sorry, but get another job. If you know you are going to be inconveniencing people, you have to expect people to be rude right back to you.

      --
      "Enough of this wretched, whining monkey life." -- Marcus Aurelius, _Meditations_, Book 9, 37
    2. Re:That poor joe by ianscot · · Score: 2
      Not even close to a comparable situation.
      ...I'm sorry, but get another job.

      The difference you're talking about has to do with the company behind the situation, not the person making the call or installing the cable. They're a working stiff, they got a canned list of stuff from the mothership. Similar deal, from their POV, which you don't seem to care much about.

      There are lots of better ways to discourage telemarketing companies than being bitter toward the callers. What's your solution to road rage -- cussing at the other drivers to use their signals? That's about as effective as being rude to 21-year-old working mothers with crap jobs.

      Telling them to "get another job" is really heartfelt advice, clearly. They know that, they're trying to get by. Who is it you think works those jobs, Enron CEOs trying to pay their debts to society?

      --
      "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
    3. Re:That poor joe by UberOogie · · Score: 2
      They're a working stiff, they got a canned list of stuff from the mothership. Similar deal, from their POV, which you don't seem to care much about.

      Damn straight I don't care. My capacity for caring ends when I am interrupted for an advertising pitch.

      There are lots of better ways to discourage telemarketing companies than being bitter toward the callers. What's your solution to road rage -- cussing at the other drivers to use their signals?

      Wow, it is just bad analogy day. The original poster said that telemarketers interrupting our lives and cable installers should expect the same level of politeness. I say that is not the case, because the cable installer is providing a service we asked for and the telemarketer is basically a salesperson invading your home. I'm not saying people should be rude to them, but given their profession is, by its nature, rude, they shouldn't be surprised if people are.

      Telling them to "get another job" is really heartfelt advice, clearly. They know that, they're trying to get by.

      Nice try at sarcasm, chief. Come back when they teach you fractions. If they know they are going to perform an intrusive annoyance to people, they can't expect that people won't be rude to them. If their feelings are so fragile, they should get a job in the service industry, which are just as shitty, but at least they are on the right side of the line.

      --
      "Enough of this wretched, whining monkey life." -- Marcus Aurelius, _Meditations_, Book 9, 37
    4. Re:That poor joe by mr_exit · · Score: 2

      I live in New Zealand so your mileage may vary...

      When I got hooked up with DSL we were recommended a certain installer (his name was jeff or garry or something), So when we rung up to make an appointment it was a simple case of asking for him... the operator on the other end thought it crazy that anyone would wait a week to get a specific installer (the average was 2 days, yes drool if you want)

      So this guy rolls up, notices KDE on the desktop... says that linux is an unsupported operating system etc but he has to check that it works.... so after installing it all And doing a beautiful job with the wireing and installation into the wall, he whips out his notebook and lo and behold... its running linux. He plugs into our connection, runs the router config script he had, then to check, he opens up the slashdot homepage!....

      He then closes his notebook, hands us a piece of paper that he had prepared with all the numbers we need, and some handy links about setting up pinholes with the supplied router, then goes on his way....

      so the moral of the story???? ask your friends if they had a good experience.... get someone who knows what they are doing

      --

      -------
      Drink Coffee - Do Stupid Things Faster And With More Energy!
  128. What broadjump does by Que_Ball · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well I work for an ISP that uses broadjump for our client install CD. Basically broadjump as a company specializes in making these CD's that automatically check the system and do any neccesary steps for getting your broadband connection working.

    In our case the CD will install a branded internet explorer/outlook express but it's just something they whiped up with the IEAK tools so nothing too special.

    The big step on our network is it will register the MAC address on our customer administration webpage. Broadjump basically builds the CD to the specifications the ISP asks for. They are simply an outsourcer that specializes in these things. On our CD there are basically 3 steps. First the CD checks the machine to make sure it meets the minimum requirements. So it checks the basics like CPU speed, free hard drive space and memory. It also verifies there is an Ethernet card and that it's bound to the TCP/IP protocol with the proper DHCP settings. If it finds any problems with these settings it will give the user the opportunity to automatically fix the error or a description of the problem so you can fix it yourself. The next step is it will install the internet explorer software. After this it does a dhcp release and renew to get an IP. It then contacts the customer administration website to register the MAC address so that the computer can get a valid IP. Up to this point the machine only has a 10.x.x.x IP address which only allows you to connect to the DHCP server, DNS server, and the online customer administration servers. After it successfully registers the MAC it does another release and renew which should give you a real IP address and it uploads a text file log of the whole process to an FTP site. The text file doesn't really contain anything terribly useful and nobody on the helpdesk ever bothers with the things. Nothing evil was included in our text file though I'm sure other ISP's may ask broadjump to include some system configuration details in their implementations. Like I said, for us it's just a log file of the steps the broadjump CD completed. If it got to the point where it succesfully uploaded the file then the connection is obviously working and at that point there isn't going to be much to say in the log file of interest.

    All the steps this CD takes can easily be duplicated manually. In fact most of the time if a user calls the helpdesk because they cannot get their new connection up and running we just register the MAC address manually on the website for them. Registering this address automatically is the main reason we include the CD in the self install packages. I do recommend people unfamilear with DHCP and mac addresses to use the CD on our system, there isn't anything terribly mysterious about our broadjump cd though who knows what other ISP's ask them to implement.

    In general there are only a few methods of broadband client access that users need to be familear with to get up and running manually without these CD's.
    1. Plain DHCP or Static address. Most cable modems work on simple DHCP addresses. Usually the cable ISP will hack their DHCP server to only allocate a certain number of unique IP's through a single cable modem. I know the cable ISP I used to work for did this. After the first 2 IP's included in a consumer package it would just keep sending a DHCP offer of the second IP address to any additional computer that sent a request from that cable modem. The system programmer there hacked a neat little system together using SNMP and DHCP. SNMP trap would be sent to the DHCP server with the sequence number of the DHCP request and serial number of the cable modem.
    2. DHCP with Mac address or hostname registration. The ISP I'm working for uses the MAC address to limit the number of IP's you can get. A web interface to register these MAC addresses is available and before you register you are assigned a private IP address in the 10.x.x.x range which only works inside a small internal network segment the DNS, DHCP, and registration server are on. I have also seen ISP's that use the hostname as a unique identifier. Usually this involves setting the name of the computer to be your ISP username to get a valid IP.
    3. PPPoE. An extention of the dialup authentication model to broadband connections. Usually you will need some form of client software for these though most routers have built a PPPoE clients into their firmware. MacosX also includes out of the box support for this protocol. You will need to use a username and password to authenticate with the network to allow traffic to pass to the internet. Seems to be most popular with DSL providers probably because of their dialup heritage.
    4. Custom client/logon. As seen in the roadrunner cable modem networks. A custom authentication method can be used that usually contacts a server to authenticate the user in a fashion similar in structure to PPPoE. In the case of roadrunner their client has been thouroghly reverse engineered so if you are running an alternate OS you should find a client available to keep you logged in. The proprietary method of authentication will probably become extinct as industry standard solutions are cheaper and easier for broadband providers to implement. If you are saddled by this method of authentication just check around for a third party client. It will probably provide some benefits over the standard client like automatic keep alives so your connection doesn't time out.

    1. Re:What broadjump does by Phil+Karn · · Score: 2

      Roadrunner dumped their proprietary login client years ago. At least they did here in San Diego, and I'm pretty sure it was done nationally.

  129. Re: router MACs by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 2

    ditto. One more comment though. Our network guy told me (and I'm wondering if anyone else has input here) that a router has a MAC in a different range, so the cable company would "know" it was a router, so you are better off cloning your PC's MAC even if you can get an IP.

  130. Well, it's more like by devphil · · Score: 2


    3.5) Booted into Windows long enough to run install CD -- because that activates my account, and lets me set a username/password for the stupid PPPoE software they're running.

    4) [as before]

    5) Uninstall crap from Windows box, reboot into Linux.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:Well, it's more like by devphil · · Score: 2


      That's what I have (Linksys). But the account still has to be turned on, and the PPPoE password set, and both of those can only be done through their crappy windows software.

      After that's done, I tell the router the PPPoE username and password (otherwise nothing works), and now both Linux and Windows simply speak to the local net. Yay Linksys.

      --
      You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  131. rabid power-users by ducktape · · Score: 5, Informative

    as an employee of (cable company name removed) i can tell you exactly what it does. it isn't spyware or ad-ware. i predicted when we were first told about this new tool that this story would show up on slashdot. hence i had several questions when i first got it, and even went so far as to contact a member of the development team about it.

    the software has 2 major functions-

    a) -secure software that allows technical support to connect (by proxy) to a remote machine to perform a myriad of tasks. it can push urls, view TCP/IP related (only) connection info in cases of slow-speed troubleshooting, and even has a function to allow the technician to troubleshoot further by using a remote VNC-like application.

    this may sound scary, but read on. the software leaves no open ports, and cannot be remotely-accessed without the user activating the software (at a tech's request). the user must then manually connect to a closed server with an auth code that the tech gives. the tech connects to the server, and may be allowed any of the above tasks if authorized by the user. the customer is told clearly what will be done, and the tech explains what he/she is doing before proceeding. there are strict policies for the use of this software. the technician is not allowed to browse the hard-drive, download/install/troubleshoot any application that is not on the supported list, and is under no circumstances allowed to change anything on the user's computer without explicit permission. i can't stress this enough, in order for any kind of connection or action to take place the software will ask the user if it's ok to proceed with on-screen alerts! the user may break the connection at anytime during the process for any reason by clicking a button on the taskbar.

    since the connection takes place through a single closed, proprietary server there is virtually no chance of this application being used as a backdoor. the software is hardcoded with the URL of the server, and can connect ONLY to that server and nothing else. even if someone malicious were to get a hold of the client software, without (password protected) access to the server to generate a short-time auth code for the user to type in, it's useless.

    b) -a backup/restore application for tcp/ip and connection property settings. it's configured to save driver files for the NIC and USB modem devices, ip address/subnet mask and DNS property information (in cases where specified), and occasional pings and traces to the dhcp server, gateway, and dns servers along with netstat info. the software catalogues the information bi-weekly, and stores it on the hard-drive. none of this information (save the pings and traces) can be retrieved by anyone outside the system. it's mostly used for cases where the user breaks the connection by altering configuration. the backups allow the user to restore the connection settings to a previous known-working configuration.

    that all.

    this isn't a data-mining application. privacy was discussed in detail in software-training. i understand being cautious, (hell, i'll admit i was concerned as hell when it was first announced) but i can tell you in all honesty that the bundle on our 'easy installer' cd's contains no spyware. broadjump was contracted to write the software specifically for our use, and no 'add-on' click-tracking or cookie-scouring was allowed.

    the client software is ONLY in the hands of tier-2 and above, highly-skilled, highly trained and QA/policy monitored technicians. the broad-jump software is a means to an end for technical-support. if you've had any experience supporting win9x systems you know that windows can be downright retarded when it comes to connection management. it has been an invaluable tool when faced with users who doesn't know their right mouse-button from their left. thus far it's been a huge success, customers seem to love it, it allows us to do all the work, while they just watch and keep tabs or relax as they see fit.

    i knew there would be a few who flipped out over this application. but really, the only people who get up in arms about it are those who don't need it. if you're smart enough to understand what this software does, you should be smart enough to understand that there is a genuine need for it. it's the people who call tech support complaining about error 691's with their caps lock key on, or who've lost the address bar in IE who need it. if you're not comfortable with the application, uninstall it.

  132. Re: router MACs by aridhol · · Score: 2
    a router has a MAC in a different range
    IIRC, the range of your MAC address is determined by the manufacturer of your ethernet chip. There is a list of assigned ethernet addresses.

    So yes, your router may have a MAC in a different range from your NIC, as will your neighbour's NIC (unless you use the ISP-provided NIC). Of course, if your NIC and router are both made by the same company (LinkSys, maybe?), they could have MACs in the same range.

    --
    I can't say that I don't give a fuck. I've just run out of fuck to give.
  133. Spyware by siskbc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You also have to remember, we (the ./ community) tend to be a lot less trusting and paranoid than the rest of the world (rightly or wrongly), and I really don't think most people care about spyware. Given that we're quite the minority, I don't necessarily think the company is so *evil.* If they won't let you have your modem install without the stuff, it's more likely due to inflexible bureaucrats than any conspiracy.

    That said, I hate telemarketers and do hold people responsible for the jobs that they hold. Are the Phillip Morris scientists not responsible for their lack of integrity just because "their boss told them so?" Arguements of "I was following orders" don't fly too well.

    I would have to be on the verge of death from starvation to work as a telemarketer. If then.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:Spyware by HiThere · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      How do you distinguish between inflexible bureaucrats and a conspiracy?

      I know the typical image of a conspiracy is a *small* bunch of people of people gathered together in a darkened room... but that's just drama. People only hide their identity as conspiracy members if they think someone is out to get them for it. If you're part of a powerful one, like a corporation, then you don't need to bother with that.

      What? You don't think that a corporation is inherently a conspiracy? Then what do you think a conspiracy is? Unions, corporations, businessmen's clubs, gardening clubs, are all coeteries of people gathered together to enforce their vision upon a resisting world. They are all people "breathing together" in meetings (which is what the word means, if you follow it's roots).

      Now if you want to justify some more restricted definition (reasonable, as the contexts in which it is used seem to imply that some more restrictive meaning is needed), then you need to specify what the definition should be. But just looking at the physical observables, it seems to me that telecom corporations count as conspiracies. (Any you've got to include the employees. You don't have a conspiracy without followers as well as leaders.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  134. My cable rocks. by miffo.swe · · Score: 2

    I like it really much because its provided by my landlord. We are roughly about 150 households that shares a 2/mbit line and since not everyone uses the internet its pretty fast. I get typically around 500kbit/s so i dont complain. Best of all it doesnt have anything between me and the internet. It had a proxy/firewall at first but all the complaints about closed ports made them take the unbelievable sane decision of completely removing the firewall. All i have to have is an os with a DHCP client and ethernet. This enables almost every existing OS today and doesnt exclude anything.

    Im all satisfied but im lucky, most people here in sweden use Telia and they suck hard.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
  135. well you could always do this by argStyopa · · Score: 2

    Zonealarm:
    Broadjump Client Foundation: access internet: never.

    Done.

    --
    -Styopa
  136. PPPoE is a wasteful protocol by StupidKatz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As explained to me, PPPoE requires more "overhead" per packet than plain Ethernet. That, in addition to the dial-up-like delay and inability to keep an IP address causes me to go right to the "little guy" ISP if at all possible. I frankly would prefer cable over DSL with PPPoE... It's all about squeezing every last dime from the customers.

    1. Re:PPPoE is a wasteful protocol by Mr.+Shiny+And+New · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's all about squeezing every last dime from the customers.

      Actually, It's about more than that. PPPoE adds support for things like authentication which makes it easier to support multiple ISPs on one physical network. That's the reason PPPoE was deployed in Ontario, Canada. The phone company was forced by the govt to resell its ADSL service to competitors at a bulk rate, to allow competition. This meant that there was now multiple providers on the same network, and the ADSL network behaves a lot like ethernet. Thus, to allow things like metering and authentication and lots of other things that ISPs might care about, a new protocol had to be deployed over the existing one. Hence, PPPoE.

      Yes, PPPoE is a pain in it's "dial-up" like nature. Yes, it does have some overhead over ethernet. However, it does allow for competition. Which is a good thing. As for the inability to keep an IP address, well, nothing says that you'll always get the same IP address using DHCP.

      Also, I bet that in certain areas of the world the Cable companies will also start using PPPoE once the regulators start making them resell bandwidth too. I hate the thought, since I also like DHCP better, but it's the way of the world: Physical networks are prohibitively expensive. So to enable competition, you have to share them.

  137. Couldn't say. by demon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't even have a bootable Windows install on my box at home. When I called up to order cable service, I told them "I'm running Linux." The reply? "We can't support that, you'll have to support yourself." "That's fine, I know what I'm doing." Tech shows up, and his form says "Windows XP". So I told him no, not XP, Linux. He was like, ok, I want to learn about this Linux thing. I typed in EXACTLY ONE COMMAND: "dhclient eth0". It proceeded to get an IP address and work without a hitch. (This was with TW RoadRunner service.)

    At least they allow the support yourself option, unlike the early days I heard about from other people I knew, where they had to plug in a Windows box just for the install, otherwise the installer will say "no, we can't do that!" The spyware they could've gotten away with (and probably did) then... geez, it's pretty sad.

    --

    Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
    Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
  138. Who cares about YOUR experience...? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I think most folk are missing the point here. No disrespect to those who posted their ways around the problem. Kudos to you for knowing how to set up IP.

    The point is that most internet users don't even know what an IP is. They don't care about linux, and they probably aren't even aware that there could be software doing "bad things" on their PC. These users are having spyware forced upon them in two ways:

    • The tech did the EULA for them without consulting them
    • The contract demands the software to be installed

    This is a serious problem. Let's actually discuss ways to resolve it for everyone, rather than trying to make ourselves look clever.

    1. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by scoove · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seriously, the only reasonable chance that I can think of ...involves getting the law changed.

      Aarrrrggg!

      We technical-aware people are our own worst enemy, and we ought to *know better*.

      This kind of advocacy only sets up false economies (read about rent control in NYC, please) which skew supply/demand to an extreme, and also subvert our rights to an administrative authority who has ulterior motives (e.g. king/emperor/dictator).

      There's a really simple model that is well communicated in Ed Yourdon's book, Deathmarch Projects, and the model works well for technical and nontechnical decisions - even deciding what to have for dinner.

      Here's a summary of the model (apologies to those that get this and find it redundant - you're not the ones I'm trying to help):

      RULE 1: You have three variables: Time, Money, Functionality.

      RULE 2: You can solve for one variable as your primary focus, and maybe a second one as a secondary emphasis.

      RULE 3: You cannot solve for all three.

      Examples:

      I've only got $3. I need my lunch in 5 minutes. (1-Money, 2-Time. Don't count on a 5-course meal prepared just for you.)

      I want $30 broadband. I want someone to deliver it to me and have it working quickly. (1-Money, 2-Time, prepare to sacrifice functionality)

      I need a T1 yesterday. It's gotta do all sorts of VPN, firewalling, filtering, etc. (1-Time, 2-Functionality, open your wallet up!)

      I need a very fancy house. I'm pretty short of money right now. (1-Functionality, 2-Money, better get your work clothes on...)

      So... what do you make of:

      I want cheap broadband. It should come in a convienent package and be installed this week. But it had better not have any spyware, had better work just the way I want, with my OS of choice, allow me to do whatever I want and have no limits.

      Solving for all three... if the last two are important to you, you can have it. But count on $75/hour or more...

      *scoove*

    2. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      Let's actually discuss ways to resolve it for everyone, rather than trying to make ourselves look clever.

      If indeed the contract demands the software to be installed (and it wasn't just the tech making that up to make his job easier), then the resolution is really simple, you get lots of angry customers to write to the regulatory authorities and force the company to change its contract.

    3. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 3
      you get lots of angry customers to write to the regulatory authorities

      That's half the problem here; most people don't know there is a problem.

      My take on it is this; right now the internet is a novelty for most people. Once you get past the filth stage, you begin to use it more and more. I would now say I'm dependant on it, for example I haven't picked up a phone book in years. It's a change in behaviour for most people, I guess for a lot of us (especially those from an scientific/engineering background) the logic of looking up an answer is second-nature. As time goes by, Joe Sixpack will become more at ease with looking up information on the net, and it will become essentially an utility, like gas, the telephone and electricity.

      Contrast that with the modern media; all they care about is ratings. They don't report "the news" as such, what they really do is report on the topics that people are interested in. Guns, war, car crashes, death, sport, that sort of thing.

      My hope is that once the internet becomes more and more prevailent in our society (3G mobiles may be the catalyst), then the media will start to pick up on this sort of thing. Right now, stories about e-cards raping your address book and the every growing trend of spyware won't buy them ratings, so they don't care about it. When the internet hits a critical mass, then people will begin to care and the media will start to cover it.

      Right now, it's a very interesting time. The future of the internet is being determined today. The lawsuits are setting precidents that will shape the internet for years to come. Yet, with all this communication power, we still haven't found a way to organise the like-minded people.

      Slashdot comes close; it's a good way to see and debate differing opinions. However, it's like the rainforest scares of the last decade; people became aware of a problem, discussed it, decided something must be done. Then they lost interest, it became no longer a "sexy" subject to the media and was forgotten. But did anything change? The problem is still there. Focus shifted elsewhere while we got the heart-warming illusion of making the world a better place.

      We need to organise. It's been done before, for example here in the UK there was a bill proposed to allow everyman and his dog to have access to your phone/bank/net records. Overnight a grassroots organisate grew, started talking to their government representatives and essentially told them where to shove it.

      But, how? The above was a fluke really, it won't likely happen again, as least not as regularly as it should. We need a proper way to do this. We need to remind the governments of the so-called "free world" newspeak that we are supposed to be in a democracy, where the will of the people is supposed to shape the countries. The internet could be the best thing ever to happen to the idea of a democracy, but unless people take action instead of just passing motions to go and rescure Brian from the Romans, then we're not going anywhere.

    4. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by afidel · · Score: 2

      The government has already gone to the extreme of setting up a regulated monopoly, now we just need to use the public utilities commision to ensure that the public good is balanced with the monopoly power bestowed upon the utility. If the utility requires privacy invading software as a condition of service then this should either be allowed or disallowed by the utility commision, not left to the whim of the corporation. Here in Ohio for instance they PUCO has gone to the extreme of forcing the ILEC's to restore service with a minimum payment, even if the customer will likely never repay the back fees owed in full. It was seen as a public good that the ILEC be forced to eat some losses to ensure that poor people were able to get back on their feet.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    5. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      I would now say I'm dependant on [the internet], for example I haven't picked up a phone book in years.

      As an aside, I once had someone complain to me on IM for a half hour that they couldn't find the number for Sprint's technical support on the Sprint webpage. I finally got sick of listening to him, and sent him an IM with the phone number. He asked me where I found it, and I told him - the phone book. He looked down to notice that his foot was resting on a phone book the whole time.

      So I guess it is safe to throw away your phone books, but only if you have me on your buddy list :).

      Back to the on-topic discussion, yes, most people don't realize that they're being spied on. But ultimately the only real solution to the problem is education. If you think it's a big enough problem that it's worth solving, buy some ads pointing out the problems and sell consulting services fixing it. Personally I don't think it's a big enough deal to most people to bother, though. So what if your cable company knows what type of computers you're using to access the internet?

    6. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by balloonhead · · Score: 2
      Don't most of you guys live in the US?

      can't you sue for a load of money for this?

      It would certainly be a lot less frivolous than most of the crap that picks up a huge payola in your courts.

      --
      This idea was invented by Shampoo.
    7. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
      But for most people, is there really any harm from all that spyware?

      Of course there is harm...everything they do is logged and sent to the owner of the spyware. How would you feel if your TV watching habits were being tracked? Or every book, magazine and newspaper, with records down to the detail about what articles you read and for how long? Or, by looking at your e-mail, they find the e-mail addresses of your friends and family and start to bother them?

      Then all this information is sold to anyone with a wallet and used to target you for mass marketing schemes. That's bad. I like my privacy, thank you very much.

      Give people some credit: many of these problems lose their appeal because they either get solved or more important problems arise

      So, the rainforests are doing just fine now? Third-world countries are no longer in huge debt to the west, with their population starving and fighting over the last scraps, meanwhile enduring an aids epidemic, while the pharmacutical companies lap up the profits...?

      These things were public scares, just off the top of my head. Nothing changed and we just forgot about them. Yet we have some sort of delusional satisfaction that we learned about the problem and are somehow a better people for it?

    8. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
      So what if your cable company knows what type of computers you're using to access the internet?

      That's not what they are tracking though, some are also recording your web usage and that is a major no-no in my book...

    9. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
      Don't most of you guys live in the US?

      Personally, no...

      can't you sue for a load of money for this?

      For what? They didn't break any existing laws and you agreed to it (in the small print) in your contract. Technically they haven't done anything wrong...

    10. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
      True, but how long will it be before viruses and spyware start to appear on linux? There is no technical reason why either can't happen (especially amoungst non-techy users). The open source aspect is important, true, but once pre-compiled binaries become popular, then the problem returns.

      We need laws to regulate privacy, not just from the authorities, but also from these third-parties.

    11. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      That's not what they are tracking though, some are also recording your web usage and that is a major no-no in my book...

      But that's information they already have since you're connecting to those websites through them anyway.

    12. Re:Who cares about YOUR experience...? by balloonhead · · Score: 2
      Yeah, sure it's in the contract, but have you seen some of the stuff that gets through the courts over there?

      --
      This idea was invented by Shampoo.
  139. This stopped them ... by johnlcallaway · · Score: 2

    TW Cable guy came to install broadband on my hex-wife's computer. It was an older box I put together, and the floppy drive and CD wouldn't read his installer. I tried to talk him through some things over the phone, but as with most of these installers, he just followed his list. I convinced him to leave the NIC installed and I would install the software later that night.

    I showed up later and cleaned the CD-ROM, but the floppy was toast (drivers were on a floppy). So, following normal geek instinct, I accessed the web using the existing dial up, downloaded just the drivers for the NIC, fired everything up, and my daughter was jumping for joy within 5 minutes. I never did install the CD software.

    So the next time the cable guy shows up to install something, disable the CD and floppy and do it yourself later.

    --
    I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
  140. Alternative approach by scoove · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I NEVER let anyone install any software on my company computers or my home computers that deal with broadband.

    This approach may get you permanently relegated to the slow lane of the Internet, if that (hint: what do you think your AOL or Earthlink connection does, especially upstream? Do you think they ignore all that nifty consumer buyer profile data they see pass through web proxies and such?)

    As a Cox.net consumer and manager of a regional broadband service provider (not cox - we service flyover country:-) ), I'd suggest a better alternative:

    - supply a stock Wintel PC next to your cable modem/DSL/wireless DSL termination. Win2K or WinXP are probably necessary.
    - use the stock machine for the installer to load his garbage on
    - use the machine for customer support calls
    - let it crunch keys or run some other distributive application
    - replace it in the link for normal operation using your router/internet sharing device of choice (e.g. RouterOS, Linux dual-nic, Linksys firewall router, etc)

    Just make sure you get the details down of how your service provider authenticates you and let you on his network - PPPoE, DHCP, MAC-based authentication, etc. and make sure your router solution is configured to do the same.

    Yea, I hate spyware and won't use it on my network either...

    *scoove*

    1. Re:Alternative approach by valmont · · Score: 2


      would you mind backing-up your allegations about EarthLink with more substantive meat? i am curious.

  141. Contact your local news media by Ogerman · · Score: 2

    Neither myself or anyone in my family agreed to the software; the cable guy did. And is there anyway to get cable companies to stop doing this as I can imagine since the cable company is a monopoly in this town, that the percentage of people who still have this software on their computers is pretty high.

    If this is a local provider, break the story to the local news media (tv/newspaper/radio.. whoever will listen). Do some research as to how this garbage spyware will invade customers' privacy. And let the media know that this software can be removed easily. Maybe that'll get the word out.

  142. Why did you let him in your house? by stonewolf · · Score: 2

    There is no technical reason to send an installer to install either DSL or a cable modem. It costs the cable company between $200 and $500 to send a truck to your house. Therefore, you have to conclude that the ONLY reason they sent him was so that he would install that software on your computer.

    Most cable and DSL companies are doing everything they can to keep from having to roll a truck to do an install. So, you must conclude that getting that software on your machine is worth at least $300 a year to your cable company.

    You have to assume that it is spyware of the worst sort.

    Stonewolf

  143. SBC gearing up for a forced "upgrade" by Animats · · Score: 2
    From SBC:
    • A Note to Current SBC Pacific Bell DSL Internet Access Service Customers:

      Keep an eye on your inbox and mailbox this winter for information about your SBC Yahoo! DSL upgrade software.

      Upgrading is easy and improves your service without interfering with four important aspects of your membership. Your email address, your price, your billing method, and the speed of your DSL Internet connection all stay the same as they are now while you get all the great benefits of SBC Yahoo! DSL.

    So it looks like SBC is preparing to shove the Broadjump spyware/adware down the throats of their existing customers. SBC customers may want to look into switching to Covad
  144. Re:Have a honeypot - an old MAC by twoslice · · Score: 2

    We'll that could very well be true since I am not a MAC fanatic.

    But Apparently it worked, because neither his friends, nor the cable guy knew anything about MAC's either - so the myth would have propagated.

    (shhh don't tell anyone...)

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
  145. Never have onsite problems by macdaddy · · Score: 5, Informative
    When I had cable installed, they had to come out and do the install. They didn't have the option. They did support Mac though. Yes, I'm a Mac, Linux, Sun guy. He walked in the to my second bedroom and his jaw dropped. He handed me the box of stuff and said that I probably wasn't going to need any assistance. He then went outside to do something to the cable box, came back in, I said I was on, and he left. Maybe it was the stack of Enterasys switches or the stack of Suns in the corner. Might even have been the Ciscos routers on the corner desk next to the laser printer. Of course I can't leave out the cluster of Mac towers running next to the door. Perhaps the general heat in the room made him weak in the knees. Needless to say I don't normally have trouble with the techs when they come onsite. :)

    Now techs on the phone is another problem. Back when I had cable, I quickly discovered that the national helpdesk for RR was staffed by a bunch of dicks. I called them to let them know about a case of router flap that had been going on for over a week. They started giving me the wrong around about my "Windows" box being misconfigured. I informed him that I own no Microsoft products. To that he replied that everyone runs Microsoft. I laughed and said that I was one person that didn't. He asked what I ran and I replied I used a Mac. He then said something to the effect, "don't you know? Microsoft owns Apple". He also said that he couldn't see why anyone would want to use such a worthless operating system. I was starting to get a little pissed at this point. I asked if he'd say the same about my Linux boxes or my Suns. He said Sun is dead. Microsoft was buying them out. He also said that Linux was a hacker's tool and that he could have me arrested for using it. .... Now being a Mac user, I know what it's like to have my OS insulted. You don't insult a Mac guru's OS. You don't insult a Linux guru's OS either. You damned sure don't insult both in the same paragraph. If he had been there in person I would have firmly planted a Sun keyboard in his ass sideways. Since he wasn't all I could do was cuss at him and demand to speak to his super. He refused and hung up on me.

    Well, I returned the favor. <g%gt; I always record my tech support calls. I dubbed a couple copies of the tape and certified USPSed them to Cox, RR, and my state AG. I also included a letter that indicated who all received a copy of the tape, summarized the coversation, gave a time and date for the call, back ground to counter the ill-informed knowledge, and finally notified them in writing of the router flap. About 4 days later, I noticed that the router flap had been fixed. A few days letter I received a letter from Cox apologizing for the problems and promising to investigate further. The next day I received a letter from RR apologizing for their employee's action and informing me that the tech was no longer with RR. Oh happy day. :-)

    I've found a couple tricks when calling a tech support line that might help you. Always start off the conversation in a calm voice. Don't act pissed. Stay calm and collected. Ideally you would do this even if you felt you needed to ask for the tech's super. State your name, where you're calling from, and on behalf of what company. This is a good thing to do even if it's for you home line. Pretend the loss of access if affecting you at work. "My name is John Wayne; I'm the Network God at Such n Such Unv in Smallville, St; I'm calling to inform of that you have a case of router flap that is causing us problems downstream.". Be concise and to the point. If you think you need to drop some techy stuff to make them feel you know what you're talking about, drop big things only. Don't jargon-drop little stuff. Spend more of your time keeping everything else you say technically accurate. Don't let yourself slip up. Stay calm. Always stay calm. Say "I'm calling to inform you of a DDoS attack coming from one of your customers" not "You're DDoSing us! We're gonna sue! Our routers are melting. We're melting. ARGH!". The latter makes a bad impression. Try to maintain control of the conversation. Don't let them BS you into doing weird shit. State the facts up front. Tell them exactly what you've done to diagnose the problem. This is how I get hard drives replaced without all the reformatting bullshit. When I know the HD is bad I call them and tell them I've low-leveled it, checked jumpers, tried it in another machine, and run two bad blocks checks on it; here at the results. I've covered all their bases with the facts. All they have to do next is RMA it. Good luck!

    1. Re:Never have onsite problems by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2
      You realize that recording telephone calls without the other party's consent is wiretapping? If you don't have the other party's consent, there must be an audible beep every 15 seconds in the conversation.

      That's okay, though...you probably made up the whole conversation.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:Never have onsite problems by macdaddy · · Score: 2
      Actually I don't have to tell them I'm recording the conversation. I don't have to tell them squat. I can't use the tape in court because it would be inadmissable but I can use the tape any other way I wish. Just because it can't be used in court doesn't mean it's illegal. Now on the other hand RR couldn't use the tape in court if the guy wanted to sue them because again it's not admissable. However they could just as easily say that I've filed a formal complaint against the person. If they've documented problems with that person previously, they could then safely can him.

      And yes, the conversation did take place.

  146. Command Line by intermodal · · Score: 2

    Even better: Use a minimal base install of linux with no X.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  147. Re:New nic, heh by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2

    Well, my cable modem says on the box that it has a max speed of 38 Mbit, well over the 10 Mbit NICs capability. Not very forward thinking...but hey, 640K ought be be enough for anybody! ;-)

  148. They installed nothing but they still suck... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Only thing I have ever seen on the cluelesses machines with Roadrunner is their Road Runner Medic. They usually won't install it either unless they're asked. They push self installs for almost everything. Even cable convertor boxes.

    I have Road Runner and as soon as I can get DSL I am getting it. First off, I never cal tech support until I try everything I know. Then when I do call and first level says first delete your network connections and recreate them I say I already did that and if he says do it again I say let me talk to your manager. Now it seems they know me and they just send me to second level on the spot. Then whenever I detect a problem on their end (DHCP server not responding, random connection problems, thier cable modem "updates" not working(from the modems web page)), I have to practically jump up and down on one hand upside down to get their attention. One time I had a guy come and check my levels and he saw I had a splitter in the line between TV's and the cable modem. He insisted that you should not split a cable modem dedicated jack and I told him YOU GUYS DID IT! (it's true they did). I would love to rewire it myself with a DC6 and a dual jack with one for the TV's and one for the cable modem, but I can't find a DC6. Anyone know where I could find one? I would love to do it and see if he was right. My most favorite one though is when I broke down and called them to run a cable from my basement to where the cable modem is and they drilled a hole in my FLOOR! I ASKED and PAID for a WALL JACK. Funny thing is when they came to re-do it, they only had to drill the hole about 5 inches over from where they did drill it and it only took about a minute to fish the cable up thru the wall (internal wall, no insulation). They guy was in so much of a hurry, he could not do it right! All I say is fine. If you can't do it right, then you wil come back and do it right again. There's never time to do it right the first time but there's always time to do it after it was screwed up the first time.

    --

    Gorkman

    1. Re:They installed nothing but they still suck... by kettch · · Score: 2

      I'm on dialup (i live too far away)*sobs* and i still have lots of trouble with my provider. One time they decided to rebuild their proxy server (i used the proxy because we use filtered services to keep my brother away from porn) and they didn't bother telling anybody they were going to do it. So one day my connection dies, and i tried everything i knew and nothing worked. When i turned off the proxy server it worked. I was too tired and lazy to call tech support so i went to bed.

      For about a week didn't even use my connection at home. I did stuff from school that i needed. About a week after the first time the connection died i tried to get online with the proxy off, no dice.

      So i called techsupport and let the tech babble. I eventually go him to tell me that they were rebuilding the proxy server. When he said that, i almost blew my top. I just said "ok" and hung up. I still had to use the proxyless connection for a few more days before they got it back up.

      I almost called tech support and asked them if they needed any help.

      Curse my rural location!!!!!!

      --
      Opportunities multiply as they are seized. --Sun-Tzu
  149. Forgot to add... by scoove · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you're concerned about spyware, be very careful about who's DNS server you list in your PC.

    Should your service provider wish, he can capture Ethernet traffic specific to DNS inquiries and compile some interesting information without even needing you to install and use his client software.

    We used this approach at my previous job (dealing with employee security and network use compliance... great job, eh? *sigh*) We had web proxy operating but had an occasional employee who bypassed the proxy and figured he could avoid detection as he surfed his favorite porn or gambling site. By tracking his DNS lookups (many of the sites had hidden references to sextracker.com which made it easy to spot), we'd take his URL of choice and map the DNS to monster.com or hotjobs.com - giving him the clue that continued use might be an opportunity to work elsewhere.

    Sniffed properly, your provider will obtain an IP address and the Internet address being looked up (e.g. sextracker.com). He can insert the sniffer in line with the DNS server(s) to simplify data capture (rather than have to deal with inspection on a bigger network).

    Should he limit DNS lookups on the same segment as his nameserver, you may be able to avoid this spying by operating your own DNS (e.g. on your dual-NIC Linux firewall) or by using an alternate DNS server.

    *scoove*

    1. Re:Forgot to add... by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      If you're concerned about spyware, be very careful about who's DNS server you list in your PC.

      Mine all use 192.168.100.1...anything that's not locally cached gets looked up at the root servers, IIRC. Once it's cached, a website comes up much more rapidly than if it had to be looked up through the ISP's nameserver.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    2. Re:Forgot to add... by afidel · · Score: 2

      Don't think that this will disuade them from watching your traffic. They can and will use things like transparant proxies to keep a log of the websites you visit if they so wish. This is why I use a local ISP who's policies are clearly stated and who provides an anonymous caching server with the caveat that if it is abused they will find who did it and that they will comply with a legal warant. I get a personally acceptable level of privacy and the knowledge that as long as I do not involve law enforcement I will never have any problems.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:Forgot to add... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "If you're concerned about spyware, be very careful about who's DNS server you list in your PC...We used this approach at my previous job (dealing with employee security and network use compliance... great job, eh? *sigh*)"

      Just another reason to list slashdot in your hosts file, along with a 127.0.0.1 for all the adult sites which can easily be found in a nice pre-formatted hosts file right here.

  150. As a Former AOL-TW HSD Installer... by ONU+CS+Geek · · Score: 5, Informative
    I know what actually happens when the cable guy comes out to install; as I was the one who was doing it. Here's the run-down:

    1.) The Installer checks your cable lines to see what the forward and return levels are, to see if they'll work with your exisiting drop at your house-box. If everything's ok, they'll run an extra outlet, take it to the house box, and split it off as the first splitter in your box. If it's not ok, they'll re-hang or re-bury the drop, then run your AO.

    2.) The Cable installer calls in the MAC address of your cable modem, so that DOCSIS can authorise your account.

    3.) We plug in the cable modem in, and make sure that the Cable Modem actually lights up. Once that Cable Modem is lit, you can get a DHCP address with any DHCP client.

    4.) We'd run the RoadRunner disk...it'd set up the IEAK Customizations, set up email addresses, and then do a series of tests to ensuer that everything was ok. This included a ping test, a DNS test, and tweak your TCP/IP settings for broadband.

    Basically, once they bring it in, DOCSIS provides the authentication (if you're on a system that uses DOCSIS). They shouldn't need to run any software on your computer that provides authentication--it's hardware based.

    --

    I disable sigs...do you?
  151. No software here... by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
    When the cable company sent the installer out, the most he might've done was tweak the network settings on my (at the time) Win98 box...and maybe not even that. Once he was gone, I put it back to its private IP address and configured my Linux router to start using the cable modem instead of demand-dialed PPP. (Even with DHCP, the cable-modem connection ended up being much easier to set up than a dial-up connection. Now the router's on a static IP address, which makes things easier still.)

    I can see spyware getting loaded up on your computer if you're stuck getting your broadband from these clowns, but overall I've had very little hassle dealing with Cox.

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  152. ISP probably IS your newspaper and TV station. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2

    I say inform your local newspaper or television news station.

    Your ISP and local TV station are very likely owned either by the same media conglomerate as your ISP, or another that is pulling the same stunt. If you live in anything larger than a village, the same is probably true of your local newspaper.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  153. My Cable Install Experience by Alan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I moved about a month ago, and moved from DSL to cable, and thought I'd share my experience with people.

    The guy came over, hooked up the cable modem, and watched as I ran about 50 feet of cable from it, around the back of the apartment, and through the window of the office (the only cable jack was on the opposite side of the house to the computers). When I finished he asked which computer had to be set up. "That one" I said, pointing to a small box hidden under the desk. It is a p133 that has run my website on 48 megs of ram for the last 5 years. "But not really that one," I finished.

    See I have a nifty little firewall from netmaster (was merilus) which is a full computer on a pci card that uses the host computer only for power via the PCI bus. When I explained this to him he just kinda nodded.

    "Don't worry," I told him, "I'll take care of it all." "All I need from you is the end of a cat5 cable." He went back to the cable modem and did the initialization or whatever he needed to do, and I overheard him say to head office something about "no, this guys going to set it all up."

    I had already set up the card for DHCP, so it was a matter of replacing the DSL modem cat5 cable and putting in the new one from the cable modem. I borrowed a pen from the slightly stunned installer and reset the system, waited the 40 or 50 seconds for the system to come back up, and then pinged out from my linux workstation.

    I mentioned that I worked for the last few years with a networking company and he said "well, you know a lot more than me then." No shit was the un-stated response. He left after having touched nothing more than the cabel modem.

    Moral of the story: If you don't want them to touch anything (and any moderately competant geek shouldn't), don't let them! All that needs to be done on a cable modem install is to plug in the external cable into your firewall (you DO have a firewall right?) and for you to either reboot it or renew the DHCP lease. You can set up all the @HOME proxy info if you want, but it's not needed.

  154. How to explain this is a Bad Thing to non-geek by gsfprez · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Honda just started a thing where they put a GPS reciever/transmitter in your car. They track everywhere you go and how long you're there (when you're stopped).

    Say you stop at AM/PM, they know that you are a user of Arco gasoline. Say you stop at a Michales craft store, they know that you are into crafts. Perhapse you stop at Costco - they could surmise that you have a large family.

    This, along with the ability to record your conversations in the car are used to find out what your into, but its anonymous, of course. All that they use that information for is to customize advertisements on your car stereo just for you.

    They also track who is in the car with you, because they is useful demographic information to help them with their targeted advertizing.

    You don't have anything to hide, so that wouldn't bother you, would it?

    So - are you wondering when you can get one of these new Hondas?

    No?

    Aunt Mary, just replace Honda with Microsoft and/or your Internet service provider.

    You DO know that you've ALREADY agreed to this on your computer, right?"

    This has worked for me 100% of the time. They get creeped out every time.

    --
    guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.
  155. Right - INCLUDES a MODEM. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2

    Hm, the physical layer of the DSL line can just be described as a MODEM kind of thing. But there are other layers in the DSL box.

    Right. It includes a MODEM, and other stuff. The Alcatel ANTs, for instance, support packet-over-ATM with up to 8 virtual circuits, so there's an ATM layer. Then there's an Ethernet layer. And it has a whole internet stack and an HTML server to provide a virtual console for configuration.

    That's a bit more than your typical MODEM, even in these days of peripherals smarter than the mainframes of a decade ago.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  156. Re:Glad I have a Mac by phillymjs · · Score: 2

    I second that. I got cable from Comcast in '97. Back then, they sent out a hardware team to run the coax and set up the modem, and then a software guy showed up a little later to set up the computer.

    The software guy didn't even get one foot in the door. I told him, "Gimme the config sheet and be on your way." I changed my TCP/IP settings in the Control Panels and the server addresses in Claris Emailer, and I was in business. No spyware, no stupid Comcast-branded, older-than-current version of IE to contend with.

    I dropped Comcast about a year ago when I became dissatisfied with the increasing restrictions on their service. I replaced them with DSL from Speakeasy, and had just as painless a transition without installing a byte of their software, either (I'm not even sure a CD came in the box with the DSL modem).

    ~Philly

  157. Missing the point? by scoove · · Score: 5, Informative

    The point is that most internet users don't even know what an IP is

    This is true, and I'll play devil's advocate a bit (since I don't see many arguing the service provider's view - even though I personally and professionally object to this level of intrusion, and also perceive an EULA to be rather unenforcable).

    They don't care about linux, and they probably aren't even aware that there could be software doing "bad things" on their PC

    Exactly. In fact, it gets much worse. They will demand you do things to them that are fundamentally bad... such as a medium-sized business we recently switched over that had been running a T1 with public addresses on every desktop, confidential filesharing servers (with public IPs) with IRC, RPC, NNTP, and thirty other services running, and absolutely *zero* firewalling/security/etc.

    They got replaced with a rackmount Mikrotik router system and were immediately firewalled, RFC 1918 standard private IP network, etc.

    Their response? Forget about thank you - nothing about complaints that they can't see things from home anymore (no, they won't buy VPN software - think cheap), can't run personal websites on desktops, open relaying on their Exchange server was "broken", etc. Oh, and to explain this to them? "We don't want to know about those details. We just want it to work the way it did before without spending more money."

    Users will insist on being stupid about IP, security, etc. (I only mention this because it is part of the mindset you need to understand to see where the service provider is going to come from).

    The tech did the EULA for them without consulting them

    Come on... do you expect these folks to be experts about business policy? We train our guys to provide option A or B - A = installed our way, B = no install, goodbye and good luck. 90% of the customers are never an issue, but the 10% "I design websites, so therefore I'm a networking expert" types micromanage everything and work hard to screw it all up.

    The contract demands the software to be installed. This is a serious problem.

    Yes, and back to my clueless business example, here's why they insist upon it:

    "Every time you users download something, reconfigure something, whatever, you dick up your IP settings and make me spend $50 per customer service telephone call to fix it."

    By loading this software, I ensure that my configuration will probably stay on top of all the nonsense you put in there, and I can actually have a clue what is going on when you manage to screw it up still.

    The alternative is $500/month broadband (minimum...), or zero support (which doesn't work, btw - people would still blame the service provider when a tornado obliterates their home, destroys their PC, and "their Internet doesn't work.")

    Let's actually discuss ways to resolve it for everyone, rather than trying to make ourselves look clever.

    It really comes down to one of two options:

    1. Do it yourself. Know how to do all of this stuff as good or better than the service provider (and fake like you're an idiot customer with the spare Wintel box next to your connection for when you have to demonstrate the service provider has a problem).

    2. Let your service provider do it all for you. Don't care to learn IP? Don't want to accept responsibility for screwing up your IP service when you load that stupid "dialup optimization" software you saw in a pop-up box, on top of a broadband PPPoE connection? (usually also spyware... ugh) Be my guest... but understand that decision comes with a price. And understand that price usually includes your service provider getting to capture all that data on you, in exchange for protecting you from your own stupidity.

    The only other solution I can see is a Spyware-Free certification standard for service providers and software vendors. Establish a neutral entity, develop criteria for membership and verification, and allow people to promote that their product/service is compliant and recognized by the organization. Sort of a BBB approach to the issue...

    *scoove*

    1. Re:Missing the point? by rilian4 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "1. Do it yourself. Know how to do all of this stuff as good or better than the service provider (and fake like you're an idiot customer with the spare Wintel box next to your connection for when you have to demonstrate the service provider has a problem)." I like this option. I uninstalled the software that was installed on my PC by the installer guy. Oh yeah, the guy installing my software refused to setup(nor new how to setup) email on anything other than Outlook Express(Which I refuse to use!). I let him do it and then copied the settings to my own email software after he left.

      --

      ...quicker, easier, more seductive the darkside is...but more powerful, it is not.
    2. Re:Missing the point? by aborchers · · Score: 5, Informative

      Extremely insightful post. Thanks for providing a counterbalance to the self-congratulating, elitist zealotry that is rife on this board. As a software engineer and consultant, I am more than familiar with the classic "luser" phenomenon, and sadly we have to assume that 99% of our users are clueless at best, and likely flat out dangerous. On the other hand, as a consumer of technical services (e.g. my DSL line at home) I find that dealing with tech support is uniformly frustrating for the advanced user because the providers are so focused on the clueless.

      It would not cost them a $50 support call to answer direct technical questions from experienced users if they would route questions properly based on their content. For example, if a user calls up, explains that he has changed network cards and asks to have the MAC entry changed in their database, it is not effective customer service to work through a thirty minute script only to end with an escalation to second line support when a direct bump to second line could have finished the call in one minute! (Example from my experience, obviously)

      Basically, phone centers need to program their script bots with something akin to keyword matching to determine when the caller is not going to be served by a cookbook of click heres and tab theres. In my experience, it is luck of the draw whether you get a first line rep who knows their stuff or is just following the script, and there are a lot of gradations between first and second line that could be subdivided more efficiently. Can it really be that cost ineffective to provide decent, non-irritating support to all levels of users, as opposed to just the clueless ones?

      --
      Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    3. Re:Missing the point? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 3, Insightful
      But that's not the problem! I have no issue with them installing support clients, configuration managers, service helpers, whatever. I apreciate that these things keep costs down, and I get to take advantage of some of those savings with smaller bills.

      The problem is the "other" stuff that is bundled along with it. When spyware started to become bundled along with free downloads, roughly the same time that download.com got crap, it was accepted that they needed to generate revenue somehow. Basically the same reasons we tolerate ads on the net, TV and radio.

      However, spyware has become endemic. Everything seems to have it. What I object to is the inclusion of spyware not for monetry reasons, like we are discussing here. What's more, putting aside the morality of hiding the spyware in the EULA (which is basically lying, your are trying to deceive someone), here we are talking about forced installations.

      Sure, you don't have to accept the deal, but you've waited weeks for the taxi to come and take you away from 56k land, and the last thing you are going to do is say, "sorry, I'll get the next one". That's even if you are one of the enlightened few who realise what's going on.

      If I download a free tool to do a specific task, I might get spywared. That's a part of the game. However, when an ISP starts using it, then it becomes worrying.

      I'm sure many companies don't understand the meaning of what they are doing. They see it as an opertunity to understand their customers better. They just can't seem to see through the end-users eyes and realise that what they are doing is wrong.

    4. Re:Missing the point? by Feanturi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Every time you users download something, reconfigure something, whatever, you dick up your IP settings and make me spend $50 per customer service telephone call to fix it."

      By loading this software, I ensure that my configuration will probably stay on top of all the nonsense you put in there, and I can actually have a clue what is going on when you manage to screw it up still.

      The alternative is $500/month broadband (minimum...), or zero support


      Umm, how does installing commonly-used software 'dick up IP settings'? Other than proxy settings, what are you protecting? Using software to insure that your settings stay on top is counter-competitive, as when/if the customer decides to switch to another provider, they may have a tough time of it. Think AOL, and how it keeps email and favorites separate from the system, so that when a user switches they have to figure out how to get their favorites that they made during AOL use to transfer across since those only show up if they've loaded the AOL software first. There's also a local phone company here that has a software disk which I loathe. Their software (which constantly resets "Always dial") will not uninstall unless the disk can be found and put in the drive, so it is not always possible to remove it since the disk has long since been lost. You can get around it if you know what to do, but that's the annoying part, you have to know what to do, and not simply do what should be obvious.

      I install cable internet in people's homes, and there are only certain bits of software that we might install depending on the situation: If their IE is only version 4, I upgrade them to 5.5 SP2 (I don't believe they benefit from having 6), and throw on the latest cumulative patch behind it. I am to ensure that they have a workable version of Realplayer and Quicktime. I say 'ugh' to Realplayer but it's not my fault that so many misguided web operators choose to put their content in that format. When I install RP I make sure to disable their stupid tray icon. If I notice that gohip, CommonName, Netsetter, or other beasties are present, I remove them, and explain to the customer why this is happening. I do some other extras that are not required of me, like checking out their system for scary open ports (like 27374, etc), showing them windowsupdate.com, helping them install Zone Alarm if they are concerned about having a firewall, etc..

      If I was required to install spyware/you're-staying-with-us-no-matter-whatware, I would disobey, or quit, or something. But that software would not get installed on any of my runs. We don't have such software, and do not seem to be in danger of having to charge $500/month. Plus our phone support is 24/7, hold times generally around 2 minutes. And each customer installed does not make the company any money till after about a month and a half of service because I get paid first.

    5. Re:Missing the point? by sbwoodside · · Score: 2, Informative

      "On the other hand, as a consumer of technical services (e.g. my DSL line at home) I find that dealing with tech support is uniformly frustrating for the advanced user because the providers are so focused on the clueless."

      Oh man does that ever remind of what happened about a month ago. Here I am calling Bell Sympatico (the big DSL in canada) because I can't send emails with attachments, in fact most emails wont go out, they sit around for a few hours and then finally get accepted by the SMTP server. And so I talk to this guy for like half an hour, going back and forth trying stuff, "proving" that it doesn't work by saying "OK I'll try to send it again ... nope, it didn't go" and then finally he finds out I'm using a Yahoo account. So he says, no, we don't support Yahoo accounts on our SMTP server, it's their fault, you have to call them.

      OK fine I'm sick of talking to him anyway. So I hang up. Obviously he's wrong, their SMTP server is the ONE server in the world that SHOULD be taking all my email. But no.

      So I flip around idly for a while and find that Yahoo's help has a page that specifically contradicts this guy. Oh, goody, an authoritative answer! So I call back, and get some different guy (and this time I get his name). Me and him talk argue for a while about whether or not they're supposed to support Yahoo and finally I ask for the supervisor.

      First I tell him that his support person lied to me about Yahoo, he agrees, whoops, Sorry. He says he'll talk to them about that. OK, so what do they support? Outlook. OK, how about Entourage (the OS X version of outlook) -- he's never heard of that, no go. Alright, I say, you wait on the line and I'll download Outlook for Classic. Finally I get that loaded, and ... it works!

      Damn.

      Oh yeah ... in all this, I claim my computer's directly attached to the internet because they don't support home networks.

      OK, so after an hour on the phone with sympatico chasing ghosts, I go on the Apple support boards. There's a tip there that says that I need to change the MTU (whatever that is) on my linksys router because of an incompatibility with rendezvous zeroconfig. OK, so I change the MTU to 1049 or seomthing like that and *poof* everything starts to work.

      Moral of the story? Go online to the support boards and don't bother with the tech support droids.

    6. Re:Missing the point? by budgenator · · Score: 3, Funny

      something akin to keyword matching
      ME: Do you you block out-bound SMTP traffic
      AOL: Sir AOL doesn't block Email
      ME: Well I can send mail out through my personal ISP through the website, but can not when connected to the internet through AOL.
      AOL: Are you sure the website is configured properly, we aren't responsable for websites
      ME:yes the website is configured properly, I can send Email from my Linux computer to the site through My personal ISP, and I can send Email from this Windows machine to the site through My personal ISP, but I can not I can send Email from this Windows machine to the site through AOL.
      AOL: AOL doesn't suppport Linux
      ME: My boss just doesn't belive me when I told him that AOL probably blocks outbound email to external servers as a SPAM prevention measure. Do you or do you not block SMTP on port 25 from going to non-AOL mail servers?
      AOL: Yes sir, that is one of our Email abuse prevention measures.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    7. Re:Missing the point? by kettch · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I used to work for a large hospital system in the IT department. We bought a *lot* of pc's from dell because we needed simple no nonsense boxes and dells gx*** series business machines were decent.

      We had a special contract with dell that gave us the phone number that would take us directly to the top level of support. Basically we would call and say "I have a gx110 with a bad motherboard." then we give the tech the numbers off the back of the machine. Usually within 24 hrs (or as few as 16), i had a new part.

      I think it would be neat if the local offices for these broadband companies would do a 1 minute interview with the caller the first time they accessed tech support. If the caller matches certain criteria, and can prove himself to not be an idiot. Then he should be granted the ability to get past the front line techs.

      Not that this would ever happen, and its all full of possible problems, but a guy can dream right?

      --
      Opportunities multiply as they are seized. --Sun-Tzu
  158. Re:Makes no sense by MindStalker · · Score: 2

    What he means is capitalism is really what naturally happends when you give people things to trade with.

    As yes while all of us can remember some time in their lives when they made a short-sighted decision when it came to trading. It really isn't the trading itself that is short-sighted. Like would be kinda like saying breathing is short-sighted. You can't argue it either way, execpt to say umm uhhh hu what?

  159. Uninstall by ucblockhead · · Score: 2

    Just be aware that all the "Add/Remove Software" thing does is call uninstall program the program registered. There is no guarantee that a particular program a) registers an uninstall program when it installs and b) actually removes all components when it uninstalls.

    --
    The cake is a pie
  160. Cable providers forced software. by JWSmythe · · Score: 3, Interesting


    TimeWarner/RoadRunner in Tampa Florida has software, but they're usually too lazy to install it, which is a good thing. They used to have the required authentication software, but that's a different animal.

    TimeWarner/AOLCable in the Tampa area is actually RoadRunner. You can switch providers, save $5/month, and use the AOL auth software. Unfortunately it's an obnoxious set of popups and banners that drives me absolutely nuts. From what I understand that's all they do.

    Charter Communications in the Los Angeles area *DOES* have a spyware package, which sounds like what you have.. My girlfriend was putting in the order for my cablemodem, and they asked her "What OS are you using." The phone was handed off to men, and I told them Linux. They aren't allowed to even install with a Linux machine.. I had used on e on their network 2 weeks prior, so I knew it wasn't a technical problem. I finally gave in, and told them Win98, and brought a workstation back to the house for them to see when they installed..

    The Charter installer went to put the CD in to start installing software, and I told him "NO!" Then I asked what it was. :) He only answered "SpyWare". He put the disk in the box, which I still have, and they had a long waiver form that I had to sign. Basically it was that I understood that I wasn't taking full advantage of my PC, and I fully acknoledge that I should install the software at a future date, so I can make the most of my experience..

    Funny thing, I guess I made it clear enough that I only want a connection. They never even gave me my Email account info. Not like it matters, I never checked my TimeWarner/RoadRunner Email in the years that I had it.

    Their spyware wouldn't have done much good. They would have put it on a freshly installed 98 box, which would have gotten formatted later. I took that machine down, and put up my Linux firewall, and reassembled my home network (3 machines, for 3 people. Imagine that. hehe)

    It is obnoxious that they feel it's ok to push their software on you, but it's just as obnoxious as buying a new laptop with their choice of OS and software packages, that you're good enough to pay for. Did I really want WinXP Home and MSOffice 6000? Nope. But I don't have a choice.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    1. Re:Cable providers forced software. by libertynews · · Score: 2

      I've got Charter here in Washington State, and when I told them Linux they didn't even blink. They wired the house, left the modem for me. I plugged it in, quickly learned how to use dhcpcd, called their tech support to activate it and presto, it was working.

      Well, there was 1 small hitch, he had to configure it using a mode that doesn't grab the MAC of the ethernet card in the PC. The tech knew what he was doing and I haven't had any problems in the month or so i've been using it.

      --
      Remember Lexington Green!
    2. Re:Cable providers forced software. by SagSaw · · Score: 2

      We signed up for charter cable internet service about six months ago (S.W. Michigan area), the enterire process went like this:

      1. Drive down to local service center to get modem and sign up for service.
      2. Drive down to Best Buy and pick up router/firewall.
      3. Drive home, connect cables, and surf away.

      Notice, there was no software that needed to be installed, no activiation, etc. Now if you want to hear about my experiance with Ameritech DSL... (grr)

      --
      Come test your mettle in the world of Alter Aeon!
    3. Re:Cable providers forced software. by adolf · · Score: 2

      I've had nothing but joy with Ameritech DSL. The installers I've dealt with have all been either clued or nonexistant. Even the troublesome ADSL drop I used at the studio had its problems met by semi-clued support people with actual thinking skills.

      As for installations:

      At my sister's connection, Ameritech just sent her a dumb DSL modem via UPS. I used an extra Pentium machine they had as a PPPOE-talking Linux-based router, and things were golden from then on, without the slightest hint of instability on any level.

      That used to be my idea of a perfect install - give me the hardware, and leave me the fuck alone. But the next experience changed that attitude:

      At my mom's office, the installer showed up and saw that a small network was already in-place, but that all ports on the existing hub were in use. When he called me at home, I immediately felt all the usual anxiety about clueless nits destroying my work. He carefully asked if it would be OK to plug one machine into the 4-port hub of the Speedstream router they provided, in order to free up a port. I directed him to move a specific, seldom-used PC over to one of the router's ports. He traced the cable quickly and without complaint.

      After that, he correctly noted that the network was set up using static 10.x.x.x addressing, and explained that he was going to configure the Speedstream box to accomidate this instead of its default 192.168.x.x DHCP. I asked him to leave a note on the router indicating its new IP, and had him change the password to something other than "admin".

      He asked if it would be OK for him to change the default gateway and DNS settings for each machine on the network. I told him to go ahead.

      We thanked eachother for the help, and I hung up knowing that things were installed exactly how I would've done it myself.

      This, to me, is an ideal example of how all installations should happen. Whether it's a home security system done by a team of clean-cut pros, or a car stereo by a teenager at the local Best Buy.

      I wish it were a more common tale, however...

  161. In Canada, you can challenge this... by RhetoricalQuestion · · Score: 2

    ... under PIPEDA. (http://www.privcom.gc.ca/).

    By law, federal companies have to make you aware and get your consent in order to obtain any personal information from you that is not required for the business transaction. (Provincial companies will have to start doing this as of 2004.) They must also tell you what they are using the information for, tell you exactly what information they have on you, and allow you to revoke consent at any time. There is still some fuzziness around whether this must be opt-in or opt-out, but they do need to make their privacy policies clear up front, as well as give you contact information for their privacy officer so that you can report abuse. (And they must look into all reports in a timely manner.)

    You probably will not get money for this, but you could effect change in their practices to make them comply. (The privacy commissioner invokes legal action as a last resort.)

    Of course, that's just in Canada.

    --

    I can spell. I just can't type.

  162. Re:New nic, heh by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
    So if they gave you a 100 Mbit NIC, I guess you'd complain that the 38 Mbit cable modem was "not very forward thinking.

    Not really. The 38 Mbit limit is based on the laws of physics and the last-mile wiring, and will cost a fortune to break that barrier. Chosing a 10 Mbit card over a 100 Mbit card will save a few dollars.

    unless your cable Internet connection is saturating them. And it isn't.

    True, it isn't. Not yet.

  163. Whose Eula is it anyway? by martintt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Depending on quite what you signed I'd say the Eula wasn't signed for you and didn't apply to you.

    Possibly the cable installer has actually broken the Eula by transfering the software to someone else.

    Eitherway you haven't agreed to not reverse-engineering the spyware. It would be nice then to keep sending them back reports on your computers activity that are completely bogus if enough people did this then all their data would be pretty worthless.

    I'm sure most people dmake up names etc when they are asked to give out personal information (income gender age job etc) to get a service.

    The general tactic is its even better to give wrong data than it is to refuse to give any at all. As this way you are invalidating anything other people are conned into giving.

  164. Charter Cable Contract guys were pretty cool... by dochood · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When the Charter Cable guys came over to install the new cable modem (they gave me a self-install kit when I changed from PCI-Card Cable Modem [win98 only] to external), the pulled out a laptop with Windows 2000 Pro on it to log in and run a quick test. When they were done, they asked me to boot up my Windows machine and I just smiled, shook my head and said, "Nope. Debian." They responded, "Cool! Do you know what you're doing?" When I responded in the affirmative, they moved out of the way, and ooohed and aaaahed over my shoulder when I had it set up in 2 minutes flat and explained to them all of the cool stuff (MIME defanging, spam-filtering, etc) that I was doing on it.

    They told me I could run any service I wanted on my box (upstream is throttled to 128k anyway), as long as I wasn't competing with Charter and running an ISP out of my basement!

    My buddy, who lives 20 miles away, on the other hand has to suffer with AT&T. They installed 50 MB of who-knows-what on his system, and made him sign an agreement that basically said he's not allowed to run anything "cool" on his system: he can browse, ftp, and e-mail, and that's about it!

    Earthlink, who handles support for my Charter account, even has some limited Linux support, though I've yet to find them terribly helpful, or even very necessary.

    Other people I know who have ISPs that do portscans looking for services merely block the portscanner with their firewall, and they run what they want.

    dochood

  165. One party state? by cr0sh · · Score: 2

    He doesn't say, but it might be the case that he is in a "one-party state" - ie, a state which has laws that only one party to the conversation needs to be aware that the communications are being recorded, and in most cases, that only means the party doing the recording...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  166. Re:IF they're like mine. . by Bastian · · Score: 2

    They'll tell you in the pamphlets their service works with Linux. When you call tech support, you find out none of the tech support staff has even heard of Linux and refuse to even talk to you.

  167. Automatic escalation by Old+Man+Kensey · · Score: 5, Insightful
    aborchers wrote:

    It would not cost them a $50 support call to answer direct technical questions from experienced users if they would route questions properly based on their content. For example, if a user calls up, explains that he has changed network cards and asks to have the MAC entry changed in their database, it is not effective customer service to work through a thirty minute script only to end with an escalation to second line support when a direct bump to second line could have finished the call in one minute! (Example from my experience, obviously)

    I once got in the middle of a thread on the MindSpring customer-service newsgroups and posted a suggestion that they institute an "experienced customer" line. The idea being you get certified through them that yes, you really know what you're doing (maybe by taking the same tests of proficiency that their employees take?) and after that you're given access to a support line staffed by people who don't insist on going through the "is it turned on?" parts of the script. Who talk to you as though you have a clue, in other words. Hell, they could not only make money on it by charging a token fee (maybe $5 per month), they could use it as a pool to recruit new tech folks.

    Basically, phone centers need to program their script bots with something akin to keyword matching to determine when the caller is not going to be served by a cookbook of click heres and tab theres. In my experience, it is luck of the draw whether you get a first line rep who knows their stuff or is just following the script, and there are a lot of gradations between first and second line that could be subdivided more efficiently. Can it really be that cost ineffective to provide decent, non-irritating support to all levels of users, as opposed to just the clueless ones?

    It's all about metrics. If you don't force the techs to follow the same script, you can't effectively compare their performance and weed out the ones that aren't making good numbers. (The fact that you can't do that short of actually listening in on a tech's calls from time to time, we'll ignore for now.) ISO 9000 can be a good thing in its place; likewise Six-Sigma. This kind of cookie-cutter tech support is the worst possible application of both, but management just sees a documented, reproducible process and finds it Good.

    --
    -- Old Man Kensey
    1. Re:Automatic escalation by scoove · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I find that dealing with tech support is uniformly frustrating for the advanced user because the providers are so focused on the clueless.

      Absolutely concur. I'm one of those half-suit/half-geek oddballs and I spend a good amount of time dealing with embedded system projects (miniturization of router systems we put in ugly places like water towers). I've gotten used to simply waiting for folks to go thru their routine - in fact, I usually either get some good reading material out, sort my files, etc. while dealing with the basic questions.

      But putting the service provider hat on, I'm not sure there is a good alternative (but I'm looking for one!!!). For instance, Old Man Kensey writes:

      institute an "experienced customer" line

      but acknowledges the issue with performance measurement. I'll stick to an even more basic concern: cost.

      I hate to say it, but most of the 80% category (clueless users) are pretty easy to help. Like my mother-in-law. They'll write down step-by-step instructions and never deviate. They correctly assume that it probably was something they did that made things wrong, and have a much better attitude to deal with.

      The 2% elite geeks never even call unless *we* have something wrong, so they're a breeze too (and have managed to evolve in a hostile world and are pretty savvy at handling their service provider).

      It's the 18% "sorta knowledgable" users that cost us bucks on support. You know the type, false high self-esteem, marginal competency. Can use Frontpage so they're a self-declared web guru. Knows how to ping, and thinks he's the inventor of IP. Constantly tinkers with his PC and screws it up, but is certain it was the service provider's doing (even though everything worked until that service pack was applied). They start the support call by yelling at people, send nasty emails demanding to receive a personal apology from the CEO and credit for a year's worth of service, etc.

      They'll monopolize the phone. Ask you a thousand questions unrelated to their most recent screwup. They'll suck you dry on support. When you finally figure out how they screwed it up (the one thing they are naturally good at), they assume the problem was secondary and the service provider is just covering up the problem. Then they'll break it again the next day.

      It would not cost them a $50 support call to answer direct technical questions from experienced users if they would route questions properly based on their content

      But how do I weed out the posers - They're 90% of the self-proclaimed experts, and would be nearly all of my calls.

      (Incidentally, we keep a record of the 2% on our network and watch for their communications. They also get bandwidth boosts, doubling their rate shaping limits, as a little thank you for being competent. They thank us back by letting us know when they see something we should know about)

      Perhaps the only solution is to charge for support like the phone company did - e.g. "if it's not our network, it's your bill."

      *scoove*

    2. Re:Automatic escalation by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2

      It's all about metrics. If you don't force the techs to follow the same script, you can't effectively compare their performance and weed out the ones that aren't making good numbers.

      What, you mean like when they fire the experienced techs that actually solve the customer's problem the first time because he takes too long?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    3. Re:Automatic escalation by MikeFM · · Score: 2

      The best method in my experience is to just hang on the line until you finally get someone at the top that actually knows what they are doiaisn't just reading a script. Get their name and extension. Be nice with them. Be brief. Write a letter to the company saying how helpful that person has been and is personally responsible for the extra money your spending on their companies services etc. This is a good way to have this person become your personal tech support guy for all future needs. It's even my experience that when that guy (or gal) leaves the company will try to find someone of equal skill to help you.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    4. Re:Automatic escalation by _typo · · Score: 2
      The 2% elite geeks never even call unless *we* have something wrong, so they're a breeze too (and have managed to evolve in a hostile world and are pretty savvy at handling their service provider).

      I guess your isp works alot better than mine then. I had a latency problem in my connection a few days ago where the jump from one router to the next would cost ~200ms at peek hours, but the transfer rate would be great anyway. I tried to get this solved for a week but the "helldesk" people wouldn't let me through to a real tech. Even though I pinpointed the problem, giving them the IP's to the relevant routers.

      After a while they fixed it (a ten minute telnet to the relevant router I'd guess) and not even once awnsered the e-mails the people at the helpdesk told me to write. All this while being very friendly to talk to.

      --

      Pedro Côrte-Real.

  168. another scary thought by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2

    Okay, forget about the EULAs - you didn't agree to it, so no biggie, but what about this - did any of those submit buttons he hit send your new email address into the wonderful world of spam-lists? I bet it did. Eeek.

  169. Re:Did you agree? Yeah, kinda. by John+Hasler · · Score: 2

    > Not really. There are lots of contracts that
    > refer to other contracts and "incorporate" their
    > terms "by refrence".

    I don't believe that this works for a contract of adhesion.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  170. Another solution by telstar · · Score: 2

    Tell them you're getting your PC next week, and thank him at the door.

  171. Sheesh by Punchcard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    RANT MODE!

    I worked a short stint installing hsi back in the day, and I had to deal with smug pricks like the lot of you every goddamn day. Here's a few tips:

    1. The installer doesn't give a fuck about how many computers you have.
    2. The installer could care less about your 31337 Sun cluster or god damn Univac in the garage.
    3. The installer gets really annoyed when self-righteous geek zealots make their jobs difficult.

    "Hey, lets all guffaw at the college kid who can't figure out my ereet customized csh shell on my fucking VAX". Oh, wait, what's that? You want broadband? You're tired of dialup? Well then leave me alone and let me do my job, or next time do a self-install. Don't need a NIC? Tell me. Would rather configure the system yourself? Fine, tell me. I'm not out to cripple your machine, I am trying to get you connected to teh intarweb. The faster I get the hell out of your house, the faster I can get to the next unfortunate ex-AOL schmuck running WinME on an E-Machine whose hand I'll need to hold for three freaking hours because they can't figure out god damn Outlook Express.

    Don't try to impress me with your gigabit switches or Cisco PIXes. I've seen it all and could care less. If I could have tied a cable modem to a brick with a length of cat5 and hurled it through some of your living room windows with a note reading "Self Install Kit", I would have.

    Oh! Guess what else??

    I'm a geek too. I run fourteen machines in my bedroom. Five FreeBSD servers, two Windows 2000 servers, two OpenBSD firewalls, a Sun box, and an array of Linux, W2K, and BSD workstations. I loved turning the tables on Slashdot-esque geeks who thought they could get a kick out of playing 'confuse the installer'. Some of my peers were even geekier, and have since moved on to real jobs maintaining the fat pipes companies like Comcast, AT&T, etc. rely on to move their bits.

    Moral? Give the installers a break.

    END RANT MODE

    1. Re:Sheesh by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

      I hate to point this out to you back, but I'm sick of calling cable installers and telling them to give me the modem, wait for the sync and leave; I can do my _own_ wiring and I can do my _own_ computer configuration. The only part I want from them is the service to be functional at all -- they can take their software _and_ their attitude and shove it.

      The attitude should be "you're the customer", not "leave me alone".

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    2. Re:Sheesh by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

      In fact, my 9-5 job is being the C.T.O. of an Internet hosting company and I spend a lot of time on the phone with cable companies getting high-speed Internet access for my customers.

      Having to spend your day dealing with cable tech support is probably worse than being a cable installer; I used to have a 9-5 job installing dial-up Internet access on Windows 3.1 machines, so I have a fairly good handle on the frustrations involved.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  172. Re:Did you agree? Yeah, kinda. by John+Hasler · · Score: 2

    And even if it did, the contract you agreed to when you arranged to have the cable service installed would have to provide actual references for the included EULAs telling you where you could get copies. "Anything we feel like sticking on the install CD is hereby included by reference" won't work.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  173. That's not considered best practice by Royster · · Score: 2

    The point of a firewall to to stand between your PC and the Internet to stop undesired connections from the outside world onto your local network. You haven't stopped that at all unless you make all packets go in one NIC and out another before getting to your local network.

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous sig, unfortunately the sig limit is too small to contain i
  174. Acceptable overhead by Royster · · Score: 2

    There's always some overhead in filtering packets. I don't get unacceptable download times. All of the speed tests I've run have been acceptable.

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous sig, unfortunately the sig limit is too small to contain i
  175. If possible, transfer services. I use Speakeasy by zipwow · · Score: 2, Informative

    Speakeasy DSL, if its available, is a good provider. They "allow" and support Linux boxes, and even provide their own gaming servers.

    I haven't checked on their P2P policies, but I'd be suprised if they're draconian.

    No OS or software requirements, self-install is an option, and the tech people have been very friendly, available, and intelligent.

    And, currently, they're giving away an XBOX or PS2 with new accounts. Granted, you have to buy the DSL bridge for about the same amount, so its more or less a rebate, but still.

    If you sign up, tell 'em Kevin Klinemeier (userid Klinemeiers) in Seattle sent you.

    -Zipwow

    And to clarify: NO I am NOT a Speakeasy rep. I just like their services.

    --
    I don't know which is more depressing, that 2/3 didn't care enough to vote, or that 1/2 of those that did are crazy.
  176. Of course this is evil.... by coyote-san · · Score: 2

    Of course this is evil. It is a company doing something that it damn well knows will be offensive to the other party, but trying to sneak it through by willfully keeping that other party in the dark (by having their agent click through the EULAs) or intimidation once discovered.

    Think about it this way: if they truly had nothing to hide, they wouldn't hide. The company wouldn't hesitate to admit the fact that it's collecting data, and what data it is collecting, up front. Just like a Nielson ratings household. The mere fact that they go to such lengths to hide the presence of this software screams to a "guilty mind."

    As for your analogy to the sniper, that's obscene. I'm horny, where's your sister (or underage daughter), I want to fuck her. She may call it rape, but hey it's not like I shot 14 people, killing 10, so she can't complain. I mean, it's not like I KILLED her and 9 of her friends, now is it?....

    Shocked? Good, now maybe you'll understand that ethical behavior is absolute, not relative. In fact, in this specific case the data collection may be more evil than the cold-blooded murder of 10 people since the information collected could potentially be used to identify suitable victims of a serial rapist/murder. It would not be the first time that databases have been used in this way, and in fact any ethical database designer knows this and will go to some effort to prevent "find me a victim" type queries.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    1. Re:Of course this is evil.... by (trb001) · · Score: 2

      As for your analogy to the sniper, that's obscene.

      Actually, I was contrasting them to show just how large a margin there is between an evil act and an immoral one. Had I been comparing their similarities, then you could have justified taking me out behind the woodshed and beating me to death.

      Good, now maybe you'll understand that ethical behavior is absolute, not relative.

      I'll give you that ethical behavior is absolute, but this did not cross the line between evil and immoral. IMHO, it's not even jumping on top of the line or anywhere in sight of the line. It's clearly on the immoral side, since nobody is getting hurt physically/emotionally/financially.

      I'm horny, where's your sister (or underage daughter), I want to fuck her. She may call it rape, but hey it's not like I shot 14 people, killing 10, so she can't complain. I mean, it's not like I KILLED her and 9 of her friends, now is it?....

      This is just assanine...I didn't think I would have to go into specifics (though, I did in a follow up post) about molestation being included as an evil act. I was giving examples that came to mind, extreme examples, and raping my sister wasn't one that came to mind (having no sister, mind you). Ofcourse this is an evil act, but you disprove your own point...how much ethical room is inbetween installing spyware and raping teenage girls? A lot.

      --trb

  177. Re:Have a honeypot - an old MAC by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

    Sorry matey, MacTCP on System 7 didn't.

    In fact, I'm not so sure that MacTCP had DHCP *at all*. I never ever got it working, even when it said it was set to get an address automatically. Perhaps it was BOOTP?

  178. Er... someone "tested" the uninstaller right? by Sleepy · · Score: 2

    Uninstallers don't HAVE to uninstall anything. Uninstalling various spyware-infested Windows apps, often leave the spyware behind (duh...).

    I wonder if Ad Aware detects this app?

  179. OptOnline by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

    You go to the store where they give you a box with software and a cable modem. You install it yourself.

    EXCELLENT!

  180. POKE 65495,0? You ARE old! by Tsar · · Score: 3, Funny

    For those who really don't remember (or who followed a different track to geekdom), executing that line on your TRS-80 Color Computer would make ROM cartridge programs run twice as fast, and bump up your BASIC program speed by about 50%. Of course, you'd better POKE 65496,0 when you're done, so your 'half-fast' cassette recorder would work again.

    It wasn't all that noticeable with a single machine, but I once had a Beowulf cluster of these babies, and...

  181. Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 by madhattr · · Score: 2, Informative

    We have been reading and discussing privacy in class at Portland State University. I ran across this and might give you an idea of what you as a cable subscriber could do to try to keep some privacy.

    Check out
    The Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984.
    My book explains it this way; "A cable subscriber must be informed of any personal data collected (and when), and the use and availability there will be of such information."

    I am no lawyer, but there might be something to this.. Since it is on the books.

  182. my installation by v1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When the cable installers (there were two, one was in training) showed up, I took the offensive and was showing them how the installation was going to go. Their original plan had them using the ~20 year old existing coax, drilling a hole in my floor and yanking the coax up through that. No. You'll be running fresh coax (and my wirecutters proved the point) and be pulling it up through the wall. We argued about that for a bit, as they insisted it was impossible to pull through the wall. I pointed to the network cables going up through the wall, and they changed their mind.

    Then they were just going to drill a hole in the wall and pull the cable through. No. Wall plate. So they go out and get a wall plate from the truck. (they have this stuff, they just don't want to USE it!) So he makes a hole in the plate and is preceeding to pull the coax THROUGH the plate. No. "Have you EVER done this before? Get a feed-through connector!" I could see in his eyes, "crap... that's TWO more connections I'm going to have to crimp..." And so we finally have a good hardware installation, and they cut me a nice 5ft length of coax to jump between the wall and the modem. The guy has a nic card in his hand and starts trying to find the computer. Heh, laptop, fewl. He gets out his magic CD and I simply say "No." He realized long before this that I wasn't worth fighting with and just had me initial that I had refused their software install.

    I can't claim total victory though. They assured me the modem would take a few hours to sync up, and that they couldn't stay to make sure it was working, so I let them leave. Half an hour later I got impatient and called the service number, and they assured me they were required to stay until the sync light was on. Owell. A few minutes into the call the sync came on and all was well anyway.

    Since then I have talked with numerous people that have allowed the techs to install the software, and it's really annoying. I don't know what all covert things it is capable of, but it has the obvious effect of messing with your browser by changing the animation icon to an animation of the company's logo, and of course changes your home page.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  183. BIND by jmorris42 · · Score: 2

    Maybe I just haven't bothered to look hard enough, but I didn't know there were any other Open Source name servers out there. djbdns doesn't count and we both already know that so don't bother with beating that dead horse.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
    1. Re:BIND by bobv-pillars-net · · Score: 2
      Maybe I just haven't bothered to look hard enough,

      Like maybe an actual search?


      but I didn't know there were any other Open Source name servers out there.

      You mean, like these?

      djbdns doesn't count and we both already know that

      Ah, I see. It's not "Open Source" software because it isn't published under an "Open Source" license, right? (sigh) Dan Bernstein is a total security freak. He doesn't trust ANYBODY. He especially doesn't trust anybody to distribute modified, binary versions of his software, ruining his reputation when one of their "enhancements" results in a security hole. This already happened once when a Qmail add-on was discovered to have a security problem, and thereby tarnished Qmail's otherwise perfect security record.

      So he ONLY authorizies distribution of his ORIGINAL source code. No modifications allowed, except as diffs to the originals. And if you apply those diffs and something breaks, don't blame him; blame the author of the diff.

      You might disagree with Dan; he's a hard-nosed, inflexible so-and-so. But he's got style, and his programs are a beautiful model of efficiency.

      The Open Source community could use a few more people like Dan.

      and we both already know that so don't bother with beating that dead horse.

      Such Style! Such Wit! Such Argument! Such Rhetoric! Such Unquestionable Authority!

      Such a sterling example of my sigfile:

      --
      The Web is like Usenet, but
      the elephants are untrained.
  184. my cable internet installer told me what it was by Bad_CRC · · Score: 2
    he showed up 20 minutes late, then had to run 200 feet of cable through my back yard, then through my garage into my office, so by the time he got to my pc it was after 7pm. And he was pissed at working so late. He told me I should sign a disclaimer so he didnt have to screw with installing the client software for charter. I asked him wtf the software was that I was signing a paper saying I refused to have it installed on my PC, and he told me that it was a backdoor for them to access my PC for helpdesk calls and such... but said that I didnt hear it from him.

    So, I didnt end up with that software, which is good, but in the process I also didnt get a username or login for email or web space.

    Course, I didnt get a copy of the sheet I signed stating that I refused the software, so I dont knwo if it was the truth or not.

  185. Turning off non-paying customers, moving routers by billstewart · · Score: 3, Informative
    There's no good reason for DSL to use PPPoE - the underlying technology is usually ATM, which uses Permanent Virtual Circuits (ISO protocol layer 2 connections that let you multiplex multiple connections on a point-to-point wire), and they can use ATM switches to deliver either ATM or Frame Relay connections to the ISP. Works just fine, and you can do either static or dynamic routing with no problem, though it tends to use a bit more IP address space than bridging solutions.

    The two things that PPPoE seems to accomplish are to give the telcos (or other CLECs) and ISPs a bit more flexibility about where to put routers - it makes it easier to terminate the PVC on a shared router at the telco POP instead of requiring either an ATM connection to the ISP or an ISP-owned router at the POP. The authentication features also makes it a bit easier to turn off service to people if they haven't paid their bills, for the case where the telco/CLEC is providing a shared router at the POP. (If the ISP has a PVC all the way back to their router, they can do the same thing by disabling the PVC in their router.)

    Mostly it's ugly.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  186. Win98 may require release/renew. 2kpro doesn't by billstewart · · Score: 2
    We're running Win2000 Pro, and it seems to figure out that whenever you unplug / replug the cable it should renew or replace its dhcp lease. MS may still be clueless about how networking should work, but the stuff really is getting friendlier.


    With Win98 and its relatives like Win98 SE, if your TCP/IP is set for DHCP (as opposed to having a static address), and you've got a DHCP lease that hasn't expired, you need to use the WinIPcfg tool to release the DHCP lease and renew it. If your PC is a laptop that you carry between two offices and your home LAN, you end up doing this a lot.... If one of your operating modes is to set the PC for static addressing (as opposed to using DHCP where your DSL router's dhcpd always gives you the same address), then of course you've got to go through the Control Panel, change the settings, reboot, yadda yadda.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  187. Routers/Bridges/PPPoA/etc. by billstewart · · Score: 2
    A USB device can perfectly well be a router - the issue is whether the IP addresses on the two sides of the device are the same (in which case it's bridging) or different (in which case it's routing). The addresses may be on physical interfaces, or they may be on virtual interfaces of some sort.

    If you're running PPPoA, your box is probably doing som e variation on bridging - taking your Layer 2 packets and shoving them over the PVC, which is a perfectly silly thing to do with an ATM connection. The alternative would be to terminate the Layer 2 connection and route the packets over the ATM PVC, saving a layer of protocol wrapper overhead and making the whole thing a lot simpler.

    [Lots of disclaimers about this being my own opinions, not AT&T's...] AT&T's business DSL service does routing. Some of the services are static address, some are dynamic address, and it's possible we've introduced something else recently that does bridging, but for a while it's been routing. (Cable modem is an entirely different game, and depending on your local distributor, it's often an ugly and stupid game as well....)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  188. Wrong. by Fastball · · Score: 2
    inherent evil of capitalism

    I appreciate your idealism. I really do, but I'm not going to give you a free pass to call capitalism inherently evil. Capitalism goes a long way towards stimulating invention and progress. Broadband internet access is one such example. Yeah, the world could be better, but we aren't going to see it by growing dredlocks and setting the Space Needle on fire.

  189. Relax by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

    such as a medium-sized business we recently switched over that had been running a T1 with public addresses on every desktop

    Big deal. The only justifiable reason for using NAT is saving money on address space. Treating it as a "security" measure does nothing other than give you a false sense of security. IT types that insist on using non-routable IPs for "security" reasons piss me off, particularly since I usually spend a ridiculous amount of time working around whatever idiotic restrictions they put in place.

    confidential filesharing servers (with public IPs) with IRC, RPC, NNTP, and thirty other services running

    This public IP hangup is crazy. And if they happen to be running all those services...so? Nothing inherently wrong, as long as they're aware of what they're doing. You can certainly run a secure system with a bunch of servers (though I probably wouldn't...). You might want to chroot a few things, but it's not the end of the world.

    and absolutely *zero* firewalling/security/etc.

    I'm going to be a bit unfair to you here and not give you the advantage of the doubt. By "zero firewalling/security/etc", what you *really* mean is "zero firewalling", right?

    Firewalls are the most oversold, least useful security technique on the market. IT types get off on them because they represent only a single system to poke at, instead of company-wide changes on each client. You can also get a great support contract with your firewall, so you don't have to know the first damn thing about networking, and still have a firewall.

    I *hate* firewalls. Stuff is exposed to the Internet for a reason -- because you want to access the damn service. If I want to put up an FTP server, I should be able to put up an ftp server. Nothing -- with the possible exception of transparent proxies -- is more annoying to the end user. Blocking outgoing DNS requests. Blocking outbound email. Blocking incoming ssh. Argh.

    You know what happens after you put your stupid firewall up? It gets VPNed by the first user who gets pissed off enough at you, everything gets tunneled through some port you left open, and you have the same degree of security that you did in the *first* place, but have a more complicated, fragile network.

    "The Internet treats censorship as damage and routes around it."

    They got replaced with a rackmount Mikrotik router system and were immediately firewalled, RFC 1918 standard private IP network, etc.

    So you made it a fricking pain for them to set up services to be accessed from the outside. No kidding, they were pissed off.

    Their response? Forget about thank you

    Surprise, surprise.

    no, they won't buy VPN software - think cheap

    Wow. I'd *hate* you if you were running my network. I have an SSH server that I use to grab files from to do occasional work at home. You take away my IP. I get upset, ask why it doesn't work, and you tell me to purchase some VPN software, because you're living high on your pet configuration? You expect users to be happy? Are you mad?

    can't run personal websites on desktops

    I don't have a problem with this at all. I'm running Apache on my desktop at this very minute. Blocking it would piss me off to no end.

    open relaying on their Exchange server was "broken"

    I think it's kind of sad that open relaying can't be used any more, and I've certainly been frusterated with mail admins before. I *do* think that no one should ever have a less lenient policy than:

    * local IPs get automatic relaying wherever
    * anyone that auths themselves via *any* (i.e. don't just support MD5 or something annoying like that) SMTP auth mechanism to be a valid local user gets relaying wherever
    * any remote IP can send to any local email addresses. I bitterly hate things like the DUL. I have a mail server on my computer. It's convenient, and I don't have to remember to change my "mail server" in all my mail clients when I move from place to place. The DUL is a ridiculously overagressive anti-spam measure, which basically makes life miserable for anyone who wants to run a simple, convenient mail server like this.

    "We don't want to know about those details. We just want it to work the way it did before without spending more money."

    And that's your job, pretty much. Make the functionality they need available to them with as little impact on them as possible. yours is a support role -- you should be keeping them purring along, never impacting work efficiency. If you have some brilliant scheme to improve security, fine, but make it convenient for them and make it *not* cut into any functionality that they're wanting to use.

    Users will insist on being stupid about IP, security, etc. (I only mention this because it is part of the mindset you need to understand to see where the service provider is going to come from).

    Yup. And network admins will insist on caring about their own "pet" security/network models over user convenience. Same thing always happens. If the guy's a Kerb fan, the network's going to be running Kerberos. If the guy is into SSH, telnet's going to be banned and everyone *will* use SSH. If the guy is operating under a "public IPs are bad" mindset, he's going to take away everyone's IPs.

    Come on... do you expect these folks to be experts about business policy? We train our guys to provide option A or B - A = installed our way, B = no install, goodbye and good luck. 90% of the customers are never an issue, but the 10% "I design websites, so therefore I'm a networking expert" types micromanage everything and work hard to screw it all up.

    Now *this* I like. A lot. I wish everyone had your good attitude here. Nothing pisses one off like a lack of your option B. Some ISPs think they *must* force everyone to undergo the installation procedure. Quite a turnoff.

    By loading this software, I ensure that my configuration will probably stay on top of all the nonsense you put in there, and I can actually have a clue what is going on when you manage to screw it up still.

    And of course, whatever shitty VB-programmer written crap is getting tossed into their system is probably immature and flaky, and probably has half-assed or *no* diagnostic features. I have a really low opinion of home-brew software from ISPs.

    1. Re:Relax by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

      Okay, that's true. I'm not saying that I expect it to be perfect, though. Just not something thrown together by a half-assed programmer that all the users then have to suffer through.

  190. BIND Replacements by jmorris42 · · Score: 2

    > You mean, like these?

    Had heard of a couple of those. Most aren't replacements for BIND though. I counted:

    2 Written in JAVA. i.e. toys. Would never survive a real load without excessive hardware. (I.e. big ass Xeons like MCSE's put NT on)

    2 Packages still in beta

    3 stub DNS proxies intended for home LAN users

    And finally two more interesting entries. MyDNS was obviously aimed at large hosting farms with it's DB based backend and MaraDNS was actually kinda interesting. Have to read that site in more detail since it might actually qualify as a general purpose BIND replacement.

    > > and we both already know that so don't
    > > bother with beating that dead horse.

    > Such Style! Such Wit! Such Argument! Such
    > Rhetoric! Such Unquestionable Authority!

    Hmm. Looks like we do both agree djbdnd is NOT Open Source or Free Software. Obviously this does not bother you, but I will not use closed software when a viable Free equivelent is available. Neither is going to change the mind of the other so why are we beating this dead horse?

    > The Open Source community could use a few
    > more people like Dan.

    Why? Has he EVER released an Open Source or Free Software program? Until he does he is only slightly more useful than Microsoft/SUN/Oracle/J. Random Shareware author. He releases unfree software with licenses that allow free redistribution of unmodified copies. Hell, I could redistribute IE under those terms with only a small amount of hoop jumping. That doesn't make Microsoft a member of the Open Source community.

    You djb fanboys are almost as rabid as Amigans. Both of groups need to face reality. The Amiga is DEAD and djbdns will never see widespread use. Both failed in the marketplace due to self inflicted wounds. Nobody questions the technical
    quality of djbdns, but that still won't get it shipped in any OS because of the wierd non-free license is was released under.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
  191. Re:Cogeco Cable by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

    I use Cogeco cable service in Ontario, Canada and they'll let you go without the software install or anything although they won't guarantee it'll work (standard disclaimer). Rogers, OTOH, also in the area, installs software that uses a modified Internet Explorer for Windows (glad I don't use Windows) which can't have the auto-proxy config removed easily.

    --
    - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  192. Idiots at the Gate by bjb · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This reminds me of when I got my @Home cable modem installed in 1998. I told @Home that I was running Windows NT, made sure that the operator knew that, and then scheduled my installation.

    Guy comes over, wants to install NIC (but I insisted that I do it myself), and then he turns on the computer waiting for the Plug and Play dialog on Windows. I told him there was no Plug and Play on Windows NT (and if you argue otherwise, yes there /is/, but you've never enabled it and found WHY it isn't enabled by default!). The installer had NO idea about ANYTHING with WinNT.

    Needless to say, he left without installing any software (thankfully, since I never installed Internet Explorer on that machine), but he had no idea of the network settings because he assumed DHCP would do all of it (another thing in NT that didn't quite work right in the early days of NT 4.0).

    My advice: if you know half your ass about computers, you probably know more about what you're doing than most of the people that install DSL or cable modems for residential consumers. Yes, there ARE smart people out there, but they're usually reserved for the customers that didn't get successful installations the first time around.

    --
    Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
  193. Re:Have a honeypot - an old MAC by JLester · · Score: 2

    MacTCP supported BOOTP, but not DHCP, you didn't get it until OpenTransport came out. I know it well, we used to support several hundred of them :)

    Jason

    --
    "FORMAT C:" - Kills bugs dead!
  194. Re:Have a honeypot - an old MAC by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

    That's what I thought. I was pretty sure OT had it. Thanks for clearing that up.

  195. Re:Qwest doesn't get along with anyone except... by symbolic · · Score: 2

    Hmmmm...Qwest lists a number of DSL "partners" in nt area, and they're all smaller ISPs, often with even higher prices than the bigger guys. Earthlink isn't mentioned. The sad part is that no matter which point of access I choose (non-cable), Qwest will be involved at some point.