Slashdot Mirror


Real PDA Wristwatch

Larry Groebe writes "Just before COMDEX, Fossil announced a new PDA in a wristwatch. Based on the Palm OS, this is nothing less than a complete Palm Pilot on your wrist. See here for features and a picture. This is completely UNLIKE Fossil's *first* attempt at a wrist PDA, which was a hopeless view-only gadget. This new model allows regular Graffiti input and appears to run all Palm programs! At $149, I may be the first in line when it comes out next spring."

50 of 309 comments (clear)

  1. Time Travel Possible??? by Dugsmyname · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought the Google headline was a little deceiving...

    "Fossil unveils wrist-worn Palm OS PDA"

    It made me think of Back to the Future and all of the time travel Star Trek episodes!

    1. Re:Time Travel Possible??? by scubacuda · · Score: 4, Funny
      When I saw that headline, I expected to see Bob Dole doing some promo with them...

  2. Linux watch by tsa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Cool. This brings to mind the Linux watch IBM made some time ago. Does anyone know what's become of that? Is it still in development or was it just a showpiece?

    --

    -- Cheers!

    1. Re:Linux watch by GoRK · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It was a research project.

      The interesting thing about this watch, though, is that the dragonball ports of ucLinux run on palm already, so this watch with it's (likely dragonball ez) cpu will run linux out of the box.

    2. Re:Linux watch by spotter · · Score: 5, Informative

      I worked on it 2 summers ago at IBM Research (get paid well to work on cool things, who can ask more).

      It was never meant to be an IBM product (at least from my understanding). It was meant to be a sort of cool "testbed" for all these mini technologies. Such as OLEDs (at the time we had the highest density OLED displays in production on our prototypes), mini linux on the software side and similiarly on the hardware side.

      We were also trying to figure out what cool things we could do with it, such as we had a bluetooth module for it, so we initally had a demo of that that one could switch ones slides via the watch's thumbwheel, (so one's giving a talk, and walking around and just tap the watch to switch slides back and forth). But we were experimenting with different things as well, such as imagine sticking a GPS receiver in your backpack while you are hiking and just use the watch as a display for the GPS, it stores the data in the backpack. Since the OLED display was 640x480 (1bpp) it was fairly detailed.

      doing this also involved getting things like PPP working on the watch (which since I had gcc working on our testbed's that had ethernet (nfs mount w/ nfs swap), meant we could get gcc working on the watch, though wouldn't have been so much fun as testbench was 70-80mhz, while watch ran at something like 17mhz (these numbers might be off)

      We were also doing work on getting the system even smaller than it was (glibc's a hog, a simple fix was getting uClibc working on it, I was then able to take this know how to make a bootable linux floppy that boots directly into a windows terminal services server full screen (basically kernel, X, dhcp, rdesktop all on a single bootable floppy) for a school project).

      That summer there was interest from citizen (They actually made some PR announcmenets) in making a product out of it, but dont know whats happened since in regards to that.

      people in charge of IBM Research wanted to put funding behind the watch to give out samples to U's involved in pervasive devices (I believe CMU and Georgia Tech are big into it) to basically have them see what they can do with these pieces of tech, but dont know what's happened on that either.

    3. Re:Linux watch by axxackall · · Score: 3, Funny
      Cool. This brings to mind the Linux watch IBM made some time ago. Does anyone know what's become of that? Is it still in development or was it just a showpiece?

      The project scope has been temporary moved to Beowulf cluster of such watches - required for military special force teams.

      --

      Less is more !
  3. Too small... by gazuga · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't even use a PDA, but looking at that picture, it strikes me that maybe this thing is *too* small. How can you input anything? You'd better be good with a stylus...

    --Gaz

    --
    "I turn away with fright and horror from the lamentable evil of functions which do not have derivatives."
    1. Re:Too small... by GreyPoopon · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Most of us can remember 'meeting at 4' without a little beeping mini-computer in our pocket.

      If all you've got is one meeting per day, I want your job. Most of the time I have to juggle six or seven meetings per day on completely different topics, and I still have to manage to get 8 hours of programming in per day. While I don't take my iPaq with me (because I don't trust it), I frequently carry my laptop because I need to refer to information on it during the meeting. A Palm or any other PDA serves the same purpose. My manager probably has twice the meeting load that I do, and I honestly don't think he could live without his. The only executives in our company who don't use one have permanent staff members assigned to assist them.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    2. Re:Too small... by 0x0d0a · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wait a minute. Your idea of an entry level Palm isn't even a Palm (which *do* go down to $100)?

      Hell, you'd have to get an m515 to get up to even $350 (acc. to Palm's online store).

  4. /.'d by cjustus · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if Fossil's website is powered by one of their watches?

  5. I was "THAT guy" by anonymousman77 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was the dorky guy in your school who had the calculator wristwatch.

    Should I try that again with this thing? After the beatings and the finger pointing? I think not!

    1. Re:I was "THAT guy" by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey man, this is Slashdot. We were all THAT guy :)

      One of my good friends even added some small solar panels to his watch, so it would charge the batteries in the sunlight...

      Of course, the batteries burst and burned a hole in his shirt. But still, very geeky...

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    2. Re:I was "THAT guy" by happystink · · Score: 4, Funny

      If he was truly hardcore, he never would have been able to test it, you need to go outside to see sunlight.

      --

      sig:
      See the "..for smart people" banners Wired runs here? Look elsewhere guys.

    3. Re:I was "THAT guy" by crapulent · · Score: 3, Informative

      For your viewing please, the Nerd Watch Museum. On that same site you may also want to check out the Walkman Museum, the Boombox Mueeum, and the miscellaneous gadgets of the 70s and 80s.

  6. Redundant by gadgetboy1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While it looks cool and all, it may have hit the market be too late. Cell phones and PDA look to be heading for convergence and almost everyone I know carries a cell phone. Does my watch with its much smaller screen really need to be a (Palm) PDA too? Isn't that why its called a "Palm" and "PocketPC" device?

    --
    The day you realize Anonymous Coward isn't the name of a really prolific user, then its time to create your own
  7. More news at infoSync by GrouchoMarx · · Score: 5, Informative

    They've got more news on the new watch, as well as some nice pictures.

    --

    --GrouchoMarx
    Card-carrying member of the EFF, FSF, and ACLU. Are you?

  8. still fails.. by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    and like all the other pda/pc watches it's missing one crucial feature...

    WATERPROOF!

    Why cant they throw in that small and desperately needed thing? It must be waterproof... so I can wear it swimming,snorkling,in the shower... how about just in the shower/tub without fear of it getting killed?

    why cant they do that?

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:still fails.. by unicron · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most people don't recognize the difference between "water-resistant" and "water-proof" when they buy a watch. Water-resistant means that it can survive the shower. If your watch is truly water-proof, then odds are it's a dive watch, and you're going to be spending some bucks.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    2. Re:still fails.. by shadow303 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why do you wear a watch in the shower? Unless you are timing your spank time, I fail to see why you should be wearing it.

      --
      I've got a mind like a steel trap - it's got an animal's foot stuck in it.
    3. Re:still fails.. by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, I believe no modern watch claims to be "waterproof", it's always "water resistant to xx meters". This is certainly more accurate, since nothing is truly "waterproof" given enough pressure.

      I am curious, though: Does anyone have a watch purchased in the last 15-20 years that claims to be "waterproof"?

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    4. Re:still fails.. by unicron · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because it looks nice written on the packaging.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
  9. Why they chose Palm OS by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 5, Funny

    They decided to go with Palm OS because there was no way they could fit Windows CE's EULA into something that small.

    RMN
    ~~~

  10. Batteries... by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 3, Funny

    And type quickly before the batteries run out :)

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  11. Re:Does? by scubacuda · · Score: 3, Funny
    Perhaps if you use the vibrating stylus jussssst right......

  12. Re:Almost there... by kingkade · · Score: 3, Funny

    Get me one of these that is Zaurus-like (based on linux) and is also a cell-phone and also has voice-recognition software that works [...] THEN I'll really be excited...

    Yeah, can't wait to sit next to you on the train home after a long day...

  13. Re:Now... by Sir+Homer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Pocket PC? All I need is another thing to be able to BSOD on me... Chick: What time is it? Me: It's *bsod* 4B:1A5EDB1

  14. silly little stylus by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Would anyone seriously use the dinky little stylus that's part of the band? Talk about an ergonomic nightmare (and a choking hazard). Why not just include a selectable-point pen with every watch, that will let you switch between blue/black/red ink and a stylus? That seems to make much more sense from an actual functionality standpoint than that tiny stylus, letting you use the PDA concurrently and seamlessly with more traditional dead-tree technology.

    --
    The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
    1. Re:silly little stylus by spotter · · Score: 4, Interesting

      on the IBM linux watch our experiments seemed to imply that using a wheel that you could scroll around (selecting things) and also "click" was a good comprimise, however, one cant do everything that one would do with a palm w/ a device like that.

      It's like a tradeoff b/w those REX pcmcia devices and a full fledged palm. Do you want something that you aren't going to do full fledged input on (but can input things into), but is mostly for info retrieval, or something that you actually want to do lots of input into.

    2. Re:silly little stylus by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Talk about an ergonomic nightmare (and a choking hazard).

      I don't think you're supposed to hold it in your teeth. I would imagine your fingers would work better.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  15. Problems by silvakow · · Score: 3, Informative

    There are some inherent problems with this solution. Screen size is an issue, ie. is there even enough space to display a full name on one line? How about their address and phone number?

    Also, you had better hope there's a smart keylock implemented so you aren't walking around erasing all of your files without realizing it (damn, sure is crowded on these New York subways ...)

    --
    In the long run, we're all dead.
  16. Re:Too small by zapfie · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ssh, don't be logical! You are ignoring the infamous Inverse Law of Computer Size.. that is, the smaller a computer is, the more you are supposed to mindlessly want one.

    --
    slashdot!=valid HTML
  17. Ubergeeky ubertiny uber not for me. by tinrobot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Never went in for calculators on my hips or wrists - this seems like the logical extension of that sort of geekwear. Not the kind of fashion statement I want to make.

    Plus - it's sooooo tiny, don't think I could read it anyways.

    Next!

  18. That's nice and all, but... by falser · · Score: 3, Funny

    When can I have my Dick Tracy phone-watch?

    It's only been, what, 60 years since everyone has been waiting for it. We finally get something, and all it can do is graffiti? Sigh, the pace of evolution is slowing to a crawl...

  19. Extending the lifespan of the 68000 by dsandler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's underpowered, sure, but the 68k architecture has been around long enough that, by now, it's a straightforward proposition to manufacture cores at low cost. Device makers are still trying to figure out how to put together ARM devices that land in impulse-buy territory, but Fossil can pack a totally functional 68k PDA into a $150 wristwatch. Nifty.

    1. Re:Extending the lifespan of the 68000 by silvakow · · Score: 4, Funny

      ARM? I thought it was a WRIST architecture!

      --
      In the long run, we're all dead.
  20. Lefties? by bziman · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Waterproof is important... but for something like this, it would also be nice to have a left-handed model -- or a reversible model. I'm sure their engineers could do that. It would suck to have to use the rocker-control with my left thumb instead of my index finger, like designed.

    And what's with the two hour battery life?

    Otherwise, very very cool.

  21. an aggressive strike by Gizzmonic · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Although Fossil brought Palm to the table for this one, does anyone else get the distinct impression that they might be making an end-run into the PDA market?

    Fossil is a hugely popular brand (they even have Fossil stores in airports!) and with the low margins on watches, they might be looking for a new market. I mean, right now, any Taiwanese sweatshop can put together a POS digital watch, hell, some kid in his garage could do that.

    Remember when watches only had an hour and a minute hand? And then all of a sudden, they had a second hand, and now the date, several time zones, "chrono" mode and other stuff.

    The PDA is the next step in complexity and "needed" features for a wristwatch. If Fossil were to come out with its own Palmtop OS, or maybe even take Opie or something, they could ink a deal with a few fortune 500 companies just with the force of their name.

    And what happens at "What's up Wednesday" when your technology-fetishizing boss passes out a gaggle of huge PDA-watches to all the gals in accounting? I think you may have to start firing up the copy machine to print out resumes!

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
  22. Re:screen size... Questions answered. by Frobnicator · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The cnet link answered the questions.

    It does have the regular screen, but they modified the default apps to have bigger icons. Even so, it would have about .2 mm pixels; way to small to be useful. With even the .5 mm mechanical pencils you would end up always hitting multiple pixels on the digitizer.

    --
    //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
  23. A likely absence of features by fireboy1919 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is not the first wrist-pda made by fossil, just the first Palm based one.

    They've been advertising their products as something that could interface with a PDA. In other words, they expect you to already have a PDA when you use it. The process of inputting data into it is something like this:
    1) Buy a PDA
    2) Put your data on your PDA
    3) Beam your data from your PDA to your fossil.

    I don't really like that too much. What's the point of the middle man? I want a pda for two reason, and two only:
    1) Addressbook
    2) Expenses data entry (not NEARLY as important).

    I need to be able to get data to my PC and from my PC, and I don't need another PDA. And for what I need, I don't need a touch screen, really. I'd rather have a more rugged watch than a touch screen.

    I expect that I am not alone in this assessment. I wonder when fossil will get the idea; reviewers have been talking about the serious shortcoming in their product (that they can't interface directly with PCs) for quite some time.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  24. Against God by L.+VeGas · · Score: 5, Funny

    A palm on the back of your wrist! You know what's next. We'll be eating with our butts and walking on our hands.

  25. Important Safety Tip by serutan · · Score: 3, Funny

    WARNING: Using this product to view pr0n on your wrist can cause eyestrain and motion sickness.

  26. Ah yes, but Nokia have a Videphone watch coming by Wonderkid · · Score: 3, Interesting
    And that's from someone I know who works at the firm.

    In addition, I was on a train from Paddington Station in London, England this week, and got to see an actual 3G phone working. An employee was testing it (yes, there is a nearly complete 3G network in the UK). The phone was from a Japanese manufacturer, had twin cameras and a very high quality feel. But what blew me away, and this will mean the death of ALL OTHER phones the moment this puppy is launched in the UK in a few months is the fact that it has a PIP (Picture In Picture) feature thanks to the two cameras. The other person sees your face in a window in front of the view you can see, or the other way around. The video quality was at least 10 fps, and the killer app will be shopping. "Dahling, is this the wine you wanted me to get?" And of course, there will be the drunk twit who forgets he has a videophone and while at the bar with a cute chic in view calls his wife to say he will be home late because he's working late at the office. (What he meant to say was orifice.)

    (All the above is true. I am not revealing my sources, but within 3 months, everything is going to change. Goodbye privacy. Everyone will be in view of someone's video phone at some point every week. Get out the lipstick baby!)

    --

    O'WONDERWe're working on it.

  27. Re:i'm avoiding it by stienman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well DUH. Read the headline, this is a wrist device.

    Sheesh. Talk about not reading the article, now they're not reading the headline before posting!

    -Adam

  28. Misleading... by WeirWolf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Shouldn't they call this a wrist pilot?

    -Chris

  29. Extra Bonus! by edremy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Doubles as a birth control device! Wear one of these puppies and watch the women cross the street to avoid you!

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  30. waterproof by sg3000 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    > Actually, I believe no modern watch claims to be
    >"waterproof", it's always "water resistant to xx meters"

    Rolex Oyster Perpetual watches are designated as "waterproof": From their website: "An Officially Certified Swiss Chronometer, the Rolex Oyster Perpetual is equipped with a waterproof case, a sapphire crystal and a self-winding movement." Sorry, their site is too annoying to navigate, so I can't give an actual link.

    Urban legend used to say that this was because Rolex trademarked the phrase "waterproof", so everyone else had to use "water resistant." I'm not sure if this is the case (I've never seen them stick TM at the end of the phrase in their literature), but the reason could be that Rolex watches are made a little differently than a regular watch.

    Rolex Oyster watches are cast all in one piece or slug, rather than assembled from multiple pieces. As a result, when the watch is put together, it is basically sealed. The result is rather heavy -- to give you an idea, take off your shoe, attach that to your wrist, and then walk around for a while -- but they're built to last.

    --
    Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
    1. Re:waterproof by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Interestingly, one of the Oyster watches (I didn't take note of which one, you're right that site is very annoying): "Waterproof to 100 metres/330 feet, all models are fitted with a crystal crafted from a solid block of synthetic sapphire that is virtually scratchproof."

      100 meters is no better than a decent quality casio.

      On the other hand, the "Submariner" is "waterproof" to 300 meters or 1000 feet. That's more impressive. That's a lot pressure.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    2. Re:waterproof by Andy_R · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you are 100 metres deep, you are either going to be:

      a) already dead, or about to die from decompression sickness
      b) a highly experienced scuba diver (in which case you will have a dive computer strapped where your watch would be) or
      c) in a pressurised submarine

      You are unlikely to return alive and well from 50m unless you really know what you are doing, get anywhere near 100m and your watch will be the least of your worries.

      --
      A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
  31. timex datalink by asv108 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyone remember the Timex Datalink?. It wasn't a full fledged PDA, but it was really cool back in 1996. The watch would read bars on the monitor to dowload information from the PC. It was a nice way to keep track of phone numbers and Appointments.

  32. Any mention of aa left-handed version? by marhar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most watches aren't too bad worn on the right wrist, but this one looks like it's going to be really inconvenient for lefties... :-/