Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: Newton, Wal-Mart, Eats

Slashback tonight brings you quick updates on the stolen copy of Newton's Principia, Linux at Wal-Mart (dot com), Free software vs. free software in India, and food for the desperate computerist. Read on!

Honestly, where would they have unloaded that anyway? yorgasor writes "Yahoo reports that the stolen copies of Newton's Principia have been successfully recovered. The thieves are also suspected of other thefts from several Moscow and St Petersburg libraries."

They have everything. An anonymous reader writes "Looks like Lycoris joins Lindows and Mandrake in being preloaded for walmart.com: 'The new $199 Desktop/LX Certified MicroTel PCs include the Desktop/ LX operating system. Desktop/LX also includes the following incredible software features without any additional downloading:'"

Who needs a war? Krieger writes "I found this link to the definitive browser wars at HardOCP, where you get to play checkers to prove your browsers superiority. Taking the browser wars to a new high/low?"

Here's the hook, can you pass that sinker please ... JoeWalsh writes "According to this article, earlier this month RMS visited India and tried to convince them to use Free (as in freedom) Software. Then along comes Bill Gates this month, handing out free (as in beer) software, and suddenly India isn't interested in RMS's message. A choice quote: "We are a poor country. We cannot develop operating systems and platforms on our own." Did RMS tell them they couldn't use GNU/Linux, or is this more Microsoft propaganda at work?"

207 of 418 comments (clear)

  1. Phew... by YahoKa · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm very the stolen copies of Newton's Principia have been successfully recovered. I was having trouble around here without the laws of physics.

    1. Re:Phew... by Kafka_Canada · · Score: 5, Funny
      I'm very the stolen copies of Newton's Principia have been successfully recovered.

      Oops, you a verb.

      --
      Fuck it
    2. Re:Phew... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Pirates of Penzance, anyone?

      >I'm very the stolen copies of Newton's "Principia",
      (the only rhyming word of which I have found is "Bolivia")
      I was lifted from Petersburg's Russian National Library.
      I contain the formulations of the principles of gravity.
      My captors were a group of thieves from the town of Saratov
      The Russian police have solved the case like Rocky besting Badinov

      Someone else take it from here ...

    3. Re:Phew... by SEWilco · · Score: 3, Funny

      Someone else take it from here ... a long way.

    4. Re:Phew... by Sloppy · · Score: 2
      Oops, you a verb.
      No, you a verb. He an adjective.

      But he an adjective in a manner popularized and made funny by the movie "Heathers", whereas this .. a verb stuff is just awkward.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  2. Walmart "computers" by blate · · Score: 3, Informative

    What they don't tell you in the advertising is that many of these cheapie Walmart PC's run a processor from Cyrix that VASTLY underperforms Intel/AMD chips of the same speed. Another example of how MHz/GHz are not a good measure of system performance. Also, another example of how there's no such thing as a free lunch.

    1. Re:Walmart "computers" by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh, please. It's a CHEAP computer in every sense. It's mean to be sold to clueless masses with no cash and no skills, not somebody looking to replace their PIII with custom everything.
      It's gonna use the lowest cost stuff they can find and you know what? That's entirely appropriate. Get over it.
      Rustin

      --
      Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
    2. Re:Walmart "computers" by Micah · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The PR says it compares to an 800MHz Celeron. Whether it DOES or not, I dunno.

      It's not a super-powerful computer, of course, but for $199, it's certainly not a rip-off. I'd have no trouble recommending that to some people.

    3. Re:Walmart "computers" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But at $200, it makes it available to people who couldn't afford it before.

    4. Re:Walmart "computers" by kevcol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly.

      Not everyone needs a blazing fast machine when most home consumers just use the web, email and a word processor. I have a Pentium 233 that still performs these basic tasks quite adequately. For $200, that's not a bad deal.

    5. Re:Walmart "computers" by blate · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To whom? Grandma?

      Sure, as long as nothing goes wrong with the bos, you're fine.

      But, in my experience, with bottom-of-the-line cheapo components, your life can become a living hell in short order if something breaks. I guess as long as I don't have to help them nurse the box back to life, it's a good bargain. Otherwise, I'd recommend that they go with a major namebrand, pay a couple hundred more, and get bundled technical support.

      Personally, I think these boxes *are* well suited for newbie/seasoned linux guys who need a cheap starter box or a secondary/backup machine. I'd actually considered getting one myself, for that purpose.

    6. Re:Walmart "computers" by imr · · Score: 2

      What I'd like to know is if it's possible to have:
      Up to 8 MB shared video memory
      and
      Watch DivX, AVI, Mpeg, files and other supported formats full screen with dynamic sound
      in a confortable way?
      At least, they dont talk about 3D games.

    7. Re:Walmart "computers" by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 5, Informative
      umm... 8 mb is more than enough for divx, avi's, mpegs, ANY other full screen video you want to watch...


      1024*768=786432 (total pixels)
      786432*3 = 2359296 (we have 3 color per pixel)
      2359296 / 1024 = 2304 kilobytes (1 byte per color-pixel) (assumed 24 bit color, 16 million...)

      end result is 8 megs is more than enough for some very nice triple buffered video, and double the amount needed for double buffered.

    8. Re:Walmart "computers" by imr · · Score: 2

      Yes, but it's shared memory.
      I assumed it was one of those combo graphic chipset that take the memory from the ram.
      Was I wrong?
      From that point, I assumed further that the chipset wouldnt be doing a great job at delivering pictures, which would show even more in a mplayer situation where the cpu is already doing heavy stuff and using as much as it can of the ram already.
      Was I all wrong again?

    9. Re:Walmart "computers" by Master+Bait · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Sure, the 800mhz Via C3 does games slower than a 800mhz Celeron, but 2d applications are as just as fast. These machines would be great for a student, and will help computerize some homes that previously couldn't afford a computer.

      I realize this PC uses older technology, but it is still warranted for 1 year. I hope WallyWorld sells these machines in Mexico, and other countries wherever they happen to do business.

      --
      "Only in their dreams can men truly be free 'twas always thus, and always thus will be."
      --Tom Schulman
    10. Re:Walmart "computers" by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2

      Cyrix still makes processors??!

    11. Re:Walmart "computers" by Micah · · Score: 2

      To whom? Grandma?

      Sure. There's no reason in the world Grandma couldn't use Mozilla on Linux for e-mail and web surfing. And that hardware would suit her very well.

      And yes for Linux hobbyists too. And for families that want another computer for their kids.

      Does anyone have any anecdotal evidence on the reliability of Microtel stuff? Hard drives are getting pretty good these days, so I wouldn't expect too much trouble.

      I'd recommend that they go with a major namebrand, pay a couple hundred more, and get bundled technical support.

      Keep in mind that "a couple hundred more" doubles the price of it! If your $200 Microtel box breaks, you can buy another one and still come out even!

    12. Re:Walmart "computers" by Craig+Davison · · Score: 2

      Actually, you dedicate an amount of RAM to the video. So if there's 128 MB and you dedicate 8, you get 8 MB of (slow) video RAM, and 120 MB of general-purpose RAM.
      Also, allocating more RAM (which is an OS-level distinction) will not cause your CPU to use the RAM dedicated for video.

    13. Re:Walmart "computers" by tiny69 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I just received my $200 Walmart special yesterday. So far I'm more than happy with it. I had originally planed on installing Slackware as soon as I recieved it, but I decided to mess around with Lindows first. The default desktop is a heavily modified version of KDE that looks very similar to a Windows 2000 desktop. Microsoft Excel, PowerPoint, and Word Viewers are listed in the "Start" menu, but they don't seem to work (haven't looked into it yet). The mouse scroll wheel is configured to work by default. The default daemons listed by netstat as listening for new connections are smbd, cupsd, lisa, and dhclient. The thing I don't like so far is that the system auto logs into Xwindows as root!!

      The only thing that I'm worried about is the cheap components breaking. If they don't, then the sytem is more than worth it. I'm seriously thinking about buying another one to upgrade my Pentium 90 firewall.

      --
      Go not unto/. for advice, for you will be told both yea and nay (but have nothing to do with the question)
    14. Re:Walmart "computers" by imr · · Score: 2

      I didnt know the nforce was sharing ram. I'm amazed. thx for the tip.
      Usually, when i hear integrated sound or/and video, i run away screaming. (I had to help assemble and later on, help in trying to fix drivers issues on a lot of computers when those cheap integrated mobos appeared long ago, and dont want to hear about it anymore. trauma.)
      Anyway, a lot of people tell me it works better those days.
      I'm quite surprised anyway that a system with, say 128 megs, can "lose" 32 megs with no problems, and for video by the same account. Stunning news.

    15. Re:Walmart "computers" by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Informative
      I have one too. It's running Slack 8.1, and with the exception of the video chipset having a bug (put Option "SWcursor" in the Device section of your XF86Config file to avoid the pointer suddenly having an offset) I've found it completely trouble free.

      It's more than fast enough to run most Linux software. Only hi-res video (720x480 and better, ie it will not play DVDs) seems to be beyond it. VCDs and VCD-resolution DIVXs and such scale up and run smoothly using a video chipset for which XFree86 supports the XV extension. I recommend recent builds of MPlayer.

      It's also one of the quietest machines I've ever used. There's a faint hum, but it's quieter than my laptops. I have no problem tucking it away next to a bookshelf in the living room.

      I'm rather pleased with it. Best $200 I've spent in a while. The bizarre insults against potential owners in this thread seem to me to be misplaced snobbery - one might explain them by refering to the writings of certain, pillars, of 20th Century psychology, but I'd probably be seen as trolling.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    16. Re:Walmart "computers" by imr · · Score: 2

      That's what i remembered from some other mobos.
      So we have:
      128 Mo drops to 120 Mo = bad.
      Use of kde since desktop distro and desktop user with 120 = bad
      use of mplayer for full screen divx (as in the ads) = bad
      8 megs of video memory but 8 megs of slow memory = bad
      And the cpu is not a king of speed.
      I still wonder.

    17. Re:Walmart "computers" by kesuki · · Score: 5, Informative

      Granted, the graphic card has enough memory, But does the Processor have enough power? The Cyrix processor Lacks a FPU. Without FPU you're talking 1/3 the playback speed, on MMX Enhanced FPU requiring multi-media applications. That's right, this 800 MHz-1.0 GHz cyrix chip is going to run about as fast as a Celeron 333-450. Everything that doesn't need FPU integers is going to run as snappy as on a 1.0 ghz system, but video, audio, math intensive routines etc, are all goint to be hosed by the fact that they're not optimized for no-FPU cpus, and as such a FPU has to be Emulated to perform DivX playback.
      Now you're probably wondering "but my Pocket PC PDA can play DivX.." Which is true, up to a point, and that point is that at extremely low resolutions, an an extremely low resolution screen, DivX playback becomes possible. and the Windows Media PocketPC edition is designed to optimize for a no-fpu environment, so, even though a DivX codec might need to emulate FPU, nothing else on the system is, so you can get by.
      so forget 1024x768 resolution on the cyrix PCs for DivX playback, you'll have to full screen the movie, and decode at it's Native resolution, not at the current desktop resolution. avoiding the scaling should save enough cycles to allow clean playback. but, again, only because the DivX codec can turn off most features that enhance visual quality when playing back on a slower machine.
      Also, keep in mind that your calculations are only per-frame, and that can only hold true if the video memory can dump and rewrite the data at least 30 times per second. With shared memory, you might have problems, as you need to use 70MB/s of the memory thruput Just for the video card's usage... the decoder is also goine to use an identical amount of memory thruput, plus whatever memory thruput the OS and the codec need for themselves. True, even SDRAM should have enough thruput, but theory and practice aren't the same, playback is going to take more out of these systems, and stress it harder.
      Getting these cyrix $200 systems is almost like getting a 3 year old celeron box... for someone who has a three year old celeron, they might be looking at the current crop of computers with envy, but if they bought this bargain machine from wal-mart they'd be dissapointed.
      I really can only recommend this machine for people so financially strapped that it's the $200 linux box, or nothing. Or people willing to use it as a $200 all-in-one firewall/router/(possibly a personal ftp/webserver), and who don't have linux compatable hardware in thier old PC. (eg: a machine that would be a nightmare to try to get linux running on)

    18. Re:Walmart "computers" by evilviper · · Score: 2
      It's gonna use the lowest cost stuff they can find and you know what? That's entirely appropriate.

      And it's appropriate to claim that it performs as fast as a 800MHz Celeron despite really only being half as fast.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    19. Re:Walmart "computers" by evilviper · · Score: 2
      The PR says it compares to an 800MHz Celeron. Whether it DOES or not, I dunno.

      I can tell you that it doesn't. It performs about half that fast. Couldn't even play a DivX file.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    20. Re:Walmart "computers" by evilviper · · Score: 2

      As I've said elsewhere... It wouldn't even play a DivX file without skipping, which puts it around half the claimed speed. Sure, $200 is cheap, but for $100 more, you can get something that performs more than twice as fast.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    21. Re:Walmart "computers" by sfe_software · · Score: 3, Informative

      use of mplayer for full screen divx (as in the ads) = bad

      Losing 8 megs isn't really much. I run mplayer full screen on my "media box" all the time, which is an IBM Aptiva, PIII 450 with 96 megs of RAM, and it does so just fine. mplayer doesn't use *that* much memory.

      And I'm using a cheap video card (not shared memory though) using the vesa output (something that should work about the same on any modern video chip). Not to mention the other tasks that box is always doing (firewall/gateway, network file server, Apache/PHP/MySQL pretty much idling but still using RAM).

      There's a big difference between decoding and displaying MPEG video (Divx), and playing 3D games which require intense GPU processing. We had full-screen MPEG video back in the 486 days. Not as high quality, sure, but even the Weezer video on the Win95 CD wasn't all that bad, and worked nicely on a DX or, better yet, a Pentium system...

      I'm just rambling again...

      --
      NGWave - Fast Sound Editor for Windows
    22. Re:Walmart "computers" by NiceGeek · · Score: 2

      How on earth can it perform that badly? I've got an old AMD K6-2 500 that doesn't have any problems playing DivX.

    23. Re:Walmart "computers" by jeti · · Score: 2

      > The thing I don't like so far is that the system
      > auto logs into Xwindows as root!!

      A friend of mine edited a document with OpenOffice.
      When she tried to save it, the save panel gave her /opt
      instead of /home or /home/Desktop.

      She didn't have write access, lost her work. And she
      wouldn't have done if she were logged in as root.
      Stupid but true.

    24. Re:Walmart "computers" by pantherace · · Score: 2

      Not much is true, my Zaurus plays full screen (320x240) divx files with mp3 just fine thank you, and it only has 32MB usable RAM type memory (the other 32MB of ram is dedicated ((by default) to storage)

    25. Re:Walmart "computers" by evilviper · · Score: 2

      Tweak what??? You actually mean seriously drop the quality don't you?

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    26. Re:Walmart "computers" by evilviper · · Score: 2

      I've said, it performs about like a 400MHz. I've got a 750, and everything I did took around twice as long. Printing (the ghostscript filter), opening Mozilla, and playing multimedia files was, of course, not something you want to do...

      BTW, I bought 2 & returned them quickly. I'm screwed out of the postage & handing though.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    27. Re:Walmart "computers" by doug363 · · Score: 2

      DivX decoding is very floating-point intensive, moreso than MPEG 2 decoding for DVDs. This Via chip has a very slow FP unit. It probably would be slightly slower than a Celeron 800MHz on office apps, but much better than half the speed. FP is important if you're doing 3D gaming, lots of video encoding/decoding (watching DvDs or DivX), or scientific computations/simulations, but otherwise I doubt it would make a big difference. It's unlikely that a web browser would be significantly slower, for instance. So it really depends on what you're doing as to whether the extra $100 or whatever is worth it.

    28. Re:Walmart "computers" by evilviper · · Score: 2

      As I've said elsewhere in this story's discussion, I have seen the same results while starting up Mozilla, printing (ghostscript print filter) and it is FAR slower than even my 750MHz Athlon from years ago.

      I'll bet that you never bought one of these (or any of these VIA processors)... I have. Others have as well, and all have nearly identical opinions to mine.

      More than that, this purchase was the second time I've bought a Cyrix processor, and had TERRIBLE results the first time around. I thought this was worth a shot as I've heard reviews that this generation was so much better, and walmart claims it performs like an 800MHz Celeron... Needless to say, I was disappointed, and for a short time, I was considering a lawsuit for false advertising. I quickly decided against it, but I tell everyone, every chance I get that the systems are crap... Get the word out.

      You sure you're not a Walmart/VIA employee?

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    29. Re:Walmart "computers" by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      There's no reason in the world Grandma couldn't use Mozilla on Linux for e-mail and web surfing.

      Assuming you're ready to do lots and lots of stuff for Grandma, sure. But if you'd rather not spend your free time tinkering with her computer, or if she lives far away from you, I'd think twice. Unless you enjoy talking your grandmother through "rpm -U" over the phone.

      --

      I write in my journal
    30. Re:Walmart "computers" by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      I didnt know the nforce was sharing ram. I'm amazed. thx for the tip. Usually, when i hear integrated sound or/and video, i run away screaming.

      Just make sure you take advantage of the nForce's dual-channel memory controller if you use the onboard video...while an Athlon can't use the extra bandwidth of dual PC2100, the nForce's integrated graphics can. I have a couple of nForce systems at work, and they're as snappy as the rest of 'em. (Better than most of our boxen, actually...though given the large number of HP Pavilions with various Intel and VIA integrated-graphics chipsets we have, it doesn't take much to beat them. :-P)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    31. Re:Walmart "computers" by evilviper · · Score: 2
      However, odds are that slowness starting up mozilla is due to a slow/cheap hard disk, and not much RAM, and postscript print filters use floating point math.

      Well, the hard drive was the EXACT SAME ONE, so you can rule that out. As for memory, I added 512MB to the 128MB it came with... that puts it at 2.5X's the memory I had in my Athlon. Strike two. You're right, the floating point may have been a big factor, but whatever the cause, it's far too slow to be claimed equivalent of an 800MHz Celeron as Walmart does.

      But I know people who would put up with some things being slower (even significantly slower) if they could save a hundred bucks.

      Well, that doesn't mean it's alright for walmart/VIA to lie about the performance.

      When you are shopping for anything, you have to weigh the value verses the cost. When computer speed can be more than doubled for 50% more cost, I'd call it a no-brainer. For those that would save the $100, I would also call them 'no-brainers', since it's a clear case of being a far better value.

      I would never recomend that machine, or the VIA chip for practically any reason.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    32. Re:Walmart "computers" by clare-ents · · Score: 3, Informative

      My cacheless celeron 300 (o/c 375) could software decode DVD at 1024x768 only very rarely dropping frames so I imagine this would just about do.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. (Einstein)
    33. Re:Walmart "computers" by swv3752 · · Score: 2

      Why? For most people, they setup the computer once and add nothing for years. So you setup for "Grandma", show how to get online and print and you are good to go. Some a bit more tech savvy, say someone that can setup Dial-up networking on thier own, can probably use these machines without help.

      Printing with Cups has gotten pretty easy to configure. A few months back with MDK 8.1 I changed printers. I went into the Mandrake Control Center, fired up printer drake and and a few clicks later had the new HP printer setup. The computer recognized the printer, gave a recommended driver and some other ones that would work, and I just confirmed the Default printing resolution. As long as Walmart makes decent recommend hardware like buy this Epson or HP printer these things are great.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    34. Re:Walmart "computers" by Helter · · Score: 2

      Tweak the OS. These things almost always come with every possible service and option turned on and running at 100%.
      You can squeeze loads of power out of any factory/default install just by tweaking the settings properly.

    35. Re:Walmart "computers" by operagost · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your post is utter BS. All Cyrix processors since the M1 (6x86) have had FPUs. They are just really lousy FPUS, about on a par with Pentium MMX performance. And you suggest that SDRAM doesn't have enough throughput! Most systems now still use PC100 or PC133! Mpeg 4 and 2 playback is no problem! Finally, MMX is for _integer_ performance, not floating point!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    36. Re:Walmart "computers" by imr · · Score: 2

      You're right, of course.

    37. Re:Walmart "computers" by kesuki · · Score: 2

      Now on to the conclusion which ironically holds more truth than the rest of the post. Yes someone who bought a celeron 2 to 3 years ago wouldn't be getting a significant upgrade, but do you really think someone who bought a $600-700 dollar computer 3 years ago would be upgrading it with a $200 computer? I think not. This computer would make an excellent low end student computer or for a first time buyer. It really is a great deal for someone who wants to give their kid a computer do school work on, surf the inet, download mp3s, etc.
      As this was probably the only point my post was modded up for, I'd like to defend my argument a little further.


      Bare Bones Assembled &Tested with CPU Athlon XP 2000+ 1.67GHz, RETAIL BOX(3yr.war)NEW SOYO KT400 DRAGON Ultra,RAID,3xDDR/400/333,ATA/ 133,8xAGP,4chan.Snd,LAN,2.0USB,400w Mid Twr/2USB
      Price: $ 269 + Ship: $15.00 - 29.00 INSURED


      Very good board, in a stock case with a possibly dubious powersupply, but soyo boards aren't as picky as asus about a good powersupply. It probablly comes with an inadquate HSF, so I'll include a $30 copper one in the overall price.

      So far $330, and still no HD of cd, or graphic card, nor a keyboard/mouse, nor a modem, But remember, a MODEM is Extra on the $200 linux box.
      We've also, got a RAID controller, and 5.1 sound onboard, even.

      The onboard sound probably has bugs in it, if it's like most of the motherboard 5.1 sound I've tried using, so you're out a little bit more if you plan on doing anything like video capture, unless you're importing DV video, which would require a firewire card, or a USB 2.0 DV Studio product.

      Those are all pretty optional, the onboard sound usually only have bugs with capturing sound, not with playback. So optionally a better soundcard would start at $100. An 80 GB HD can be had for around $80 if you shop around a little. and a combo DVD-rom/CD-RW drive starts at $60, although the one I personally recomend is $70 (LG Electronics, not a big name, but excellent drive for what you pay, in My experience).
      A graphic card is a very important part of a computer, so the least card I can reccommend for a frugal budget is a Geforce4 440MX 128MB, the 128MB will become important later on, so even though an (old) Geforce3 card might bench higher without enough video ram eventually some games won't run on the geforce3 that would on the Geforce4 budget card. By then you'd probably need a new card to play anyways, but at least you'd get to play the game that runs too choppy to be playable, that makes you upgrade to a faster computer.
      I almost forgot, RAM Personally I recomend spending a little more on this item too, OCZ Ultra 256MB DDR Memory PC-2700 333Hz Rev. 3.2
      Model# OCZ333256R32. w/ copper heatspreader, 333Mhz CL 2.0, 252
      is about $90 but is guarenteed to run at CL 2.0 252 timings at DDR333 mode.
      So what's the damage? $645-$800 depending on if you go with the bare minimum, or get get a better sound and graphic card.
      Compared to the $200 wal-mart machine, you get something that easilly outclasses it by a factor of 4 (or better) and not exactly at 4x the price.
      I will admit that i neglected to consider certain advantages the $200 wal-mart PC has. For one, it doesn't require A/C or huge fans/water cooling to avoid premature thermal death in the summers...
      So if you live in a house without AC a hot CPU like the athlon might be a bad Idea.
      But for the 'value' you can do better. programs and applications with respond faster, you can save weeks just on Encoding of mp3s if you have a substantial CD library to convert.
      It does have a valid market segment, but you should really make sure that you don't recomend this box to people who will end up trashing it in a few years so it can contaminate chinese rivers with lead and toxic chemicals.
      If you're not planning on giving the wal-mart box a good home for at least 5 years, you're Not the right person to be buying it.
      And yes, I realize it is 'fast' enough for many people, but many people don't realize how much a computer can do...
      One more advantge to the Soyo, it comes with a nice compactflash/smartmedia reader/usb hub (at least a $30 value) so for anyone planning on getting a digital camera, the Soyo board is the way to go. And I do realize that's a minor perk, and that the camera itself should work fine with these linux walmart PCs, especially since they're mainly USB Mass Storarge Class devices. But you can save batteries (although likely not power.) and not time (like you would with a PC Card adapter, since the soyo adapter is USB 1.1)

    38. Re:Walmart "computers" by evilviper · · Score: 2

      I wasn't running the Lindows that came with it. I was running the same setup of FreeBSD that I had on my 750MHz Athlon. Practically nothing was running, and my window-manager was extremely lightweight. I have no idea how someone could get better performance out of it unless there are some specific ops for the Via C3 that need to be added too gcc.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  3. RMS vs. BJG by Sheetrock · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I recognize this goes against the grain here, but here goes:

    I think India's rationale for going with Bill Gates offering over Richard Stallman's offering is fairly simple to explain: Bill's offering a finished product, no polish necessary, at no cost. RMS is saying you can have the greatest software in the world if you put your mind to it and pointing to a bunch of half-written software.

    Which would you rather have? Just take a look at the statistics in the places where people can choose to pay for Windows or get Linux free to get an idea of why the opportunity is so tasty to India.

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    1. Re:RMS vs. BJG by PissingInTheWind · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think India's rationale for going with Bill Gates offering over Richard Stallman's offering is fairly simple to explain: Bill's offering a finished product, no polish necessary, at no cost.

      It is not because you /can't/ improve it yourself that it means it is a 'finished, polished' product.

      [...] pointing to a bunch of half-written software.

      Wow, can you imagine how big Emacs will be once they are done with it? ;-)

      --

      A message from the system administrator: 'I've upped my priority. Now up yours.'
    2. Re:RMS vs. BJG by grytpype · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If Microsoft is supporting India's many languages out of the box, I could understand the decision. If on the other hand the Indians have to compute in English anyway, it makes no sense. I suspect massive bribery was involved.

      --

      - Have a picture

    3. Re:RMS vs. BJG by imr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      during the peru thing, going along gates offer of money, was great pressure from the us government through its ambassador:
      http://www.wired.com/news/business/0, 1367,54141,00 .html
      New motto for the new millenium:
      Freedom? Yes!
      for us

    4. Re:RMS vs. BJG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      nothing is free.

      you pay now...or you REALLY pay later.

      linux...you pay some up front in time and effort.

      microsoft...you will pay later. period.

    5. Re:RMS vs. BJG by Ian+Bicking · · Score: 2

      Doesn't the Indian government use English for everything anyway (by law)?

    6. Re:RMS vs. BJG by rnturn · · Score: 2
      ``Bill's offering a finished product, no polish necessary...''

      Um, wouldn't you count service packs as additional polish? (I would)

      And just what additional `polish' is needed with Linux? An awful lot of people seem to find it quite polished right out of the box.

      ``RMS is saying you can have the greatest software in the world if you put your mind to it and pointing to a bunch of half-written software.''

      Heh. Are you referring to Hurd? :-)

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    7. Re:RMS vs. BJG by NineNine · · Score: 2

      Oh yeah. Wow. Geez, you really should have told the Indian government. You and your incredible brainpower blows away the leaders of one of the largest country in the world. They really should have consulted you for your deep, deep insight.

      Shit, don't you think they know that? Indians are not stupid people. Hell, in case you've forgotten, they're the ones that took the US IT job market. Of course they know they'll pay eventually. They still think that MS is cheaper in the long run, because they don't have the resources to train thousands and thousands of kernel hackers.

    8. Re:RMS vs. BJG by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wow, can you imagine how big Emacs will be once they are done with it? ;-)


      Probably around as big as Microsoft Word. :)
      --
      N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
    9. Re:RMS vs. BJG by leeward · · Score: 2

      ...Bill's offering a finished product...

      Hmm.. Win98, WinNT, WinME, Win2000, WinXP, and I think I saw a couple days ago mention of a completely new Win, that was going to leave a lot of compatibility behind (read break many apps). Oh, and Word95, Word98, Word2000, Word2002, Word whatever for the Mac. Somehow, I expect more to come here too.

      Finished you said?

    10. Re:RMS vs. BJG by Myco · · Score: 2

      So does the psychoanalist become Clippit?

    11. Re:RMS vs. BJG by fermion · · Score: 2
      This is a total quid pro quo deal.

      The only thing that RMS has to offer is a public code base that can customized to meet local needs and used without unexpected increases in licensing fees. India can use it's ample IT talent, something like half a million programmers, to create business plans and profit. On the other hand, India would primarily sell created product to India where the average salary is like $400 a year. They would probably have to do so with MS support.

      On the other hand, BJG offers cash money and monopoly power. There is the 100 million dollar bribe to the Indian Government. There is also MS PR campaign to help make India the offshore development center. Again, there are a half million Indian programmers and the easiest way to employ them is to move MS related development to India, where, again, the average salary is like $400 a year.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    12. Re:RMS vs. BJG by Vendekkai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Where do you guys get figures like this?

      I manage a team of developers in India. The average starting salary for developers is $400 a _month_. The highest paid guys on my team (~8 years experience) get paid $30,000 a year.

      Sure, salaries in India are low, but they aren't _that_ low. And you need to keep in mind that cost of living in India is very low too. A friend of mine works for a couple of months a year in the UK, and then bums around India for the rest of the year.

    13. Re:RMS vs. BJG by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      Microsoft has finished product? I've never seen a piece of microsoft "finished product" that wasn't released at sub beta quality.

      I suppose you can do better, then. Please provide us with information-- links will do, we're not picky-- describing any software project that you've completed that rivals the functionality or quality of, say, Microsoft Office XP.

      Ready... go.

      --

      I write in my journal
    14. Re:RMS vs. BJG by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      Yup. Every single one of those examples is a finished product. Well, except the "completely new Win" thing that you mentioned.

      --

      I write in my journal
    15. Re:RMS vs. BJG by Beliskner · · Score: 2
      Which would you rather have?
      Don't worry, when Micro$oft increases Indian licence prices and sets up BSA-India, then RMS can go there and preach to some illiterate starving villagers that they should switch to OSS, not before (I've been to India and my parents are Indian so I know what I'm talking about).

      If Micro$oft states it will never charge for Indian site licenses, etc. then I'll kick my own ass (somehow).

      Before that happens anyway all the development farms in India will shut down and move to China. Micro$oft has no loyalty here.

      --
      A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
    16. Re:RMS vs. BJG by Beliskner · · Score: 2
      I suspect massive bribery was involved
      In India, always. Even the compensation money from the Bhopal incident which killed thousands of Indians was embezzled by the local politician ? Singh. In India becoming a politician means you will become a millionaire, and 95% of the police are constantly openly bribed in the street - the plaintiff suddenly becomes a defendant. My Uncle was murdered by the Indian police. Indian culture doesn't change overnight.
      If Microsoft is supporting India's many languages out of the box, I could understand the decision. If on the other hand the Indians have to compute in English anyway, it makes no sense
      The majority of literate Indians speak English (at least a little) because of being a former British colony. The majority of Indians are farm laborers, the country exports massive amounts of tea and rice. There are roughly 50 million Indians that can speak English, are very intelligent and able to work white collar when I last checked a few years back. They are very hard workers (by culture - this can change) and so some US employers can actually be sued by forcing H-1Bs to work for low wages and 15 hour per day without overtime. The H-1Bs will not bite the hand that feeds them, neither will the Indians in India. The employment laws in India are nowhere near as strong as the employment laws in the United States, Indian employees in India can be forced to work like slaves.

      As a matter of fact in India women are bought and sold all the time (like in Afghanistan) in the poorer regions. But then hookers from the Projects in the United States and Western Europe perform similar actions so we're not any better. East European and former Russian colony immigrants often end up as prostitutes. I won't insult anybody's intelligence by suggesting that you're not clever enough to use Google to verify my facts.

      --
      A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
    17. Re:RMS vs. BJG by Beliskner · · Score: 2
      From the article,
      Free software enthusiasts termed Gates' visit an over-hyped nonevent. They say Microsoft's policy of regaling developing countries with millions of dollars worth of free software and training is blatantly self-serving and counterproductive if the stated goal is diminishing the digital divide
      Bwa ha ha! Monsanto is trying to do the same by planting GM seeds everywhere and then charging royalties, or forcing farmers to burn their crop. Eventually farmers will just pay the annual royalty, not wanting to see their crop destroyed. Micro$oft is using exactly the same tactic, and India's computers are fertile land for Micro$oft to spread its seed and then charge royalties for. Nothing that you say will make any difference for the next few decades, I know the Indian people. I can see what Micro$oft is doing, the Central Government is the only entity that can intervene, but being a poor country they have no choice - if they reject Micro$oft then all these workers will be forced either into call centres, or into harvesting crops. India has no social security system so the alternative is starvation. Imagine that, if fired Software Engineers in the United States HAD to find another job within 3 days in McDonalds/toilet cleaner or starve to death. Unemployment benefits are a luxury that we in the US and Western Europe enjoy.
      --
      A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
    18. Re:RMS vs. BJG by Beliskner · · Score: 2
      Sorry to any Indian readers but from what horror stories my subcontinental friends have given me it just seems the most likely reason they have for going M$
      It's OK, the truth wants to be free. There is a massive lack of documentation on these issues.
      Just take a look at past corruption allegations towards the Indian government and you will get an idea why the opportunity is so tasty to India
      Please provide references.
      --
      A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
    19. Re:RMS vs. BJG by mosch · · Score: 2
      If you need references to believe allegations of corruption in India, it's clear that you've never been to India. It's present in Indian society on all levels, and if you even try travelling through the country, you're guaranteed to experience it at least a little bit, in the form of various 'surcharges' which officials ask that you pay them in cash, on the spot.

      India is a massively poor country, it's a place where earning $5 a day puts you solidly in the middle class. Poverty breeds corruption.

    20. Re:RMS vs. BJG by Beliskner · · Score: 2
      If you need references to believe allegations of corruption in India, it's clear that you've never been to India. It's present in Indian society on all levels,
      I know corruption is epidemic there. The difference is the media in Europe and the US uncovers the large scale conspiracies, and the people listen. In India the media is ineffective - journalists that ask too many questions ARE shot and therefore news of corruption is spread via rumours and whispers like the Dark Ages. This makes the need for references vital, this is my point.

      To put out a fire you must first know where to start. Peronsally I've heard (these are rumours - I cannot provide references, which is my main point) I've heard of an Indian Federal active military Delta Force which is deployed by the Central Indian Government in areas with overly violent political corruption. This force murders politicians that are overly corrupt (tyrannical) or don't follow the party line.

      I had a personal friend in India who spoke out against the CPI local Government in Bengal, the next day a truck was charged directly at him in a busy market square, killing him and some others. Obviously this didn't appear in any newspaper. So hey all you have is my word. India is the perfect example of the results of the destruction of the fourth pillar of democracy. Any H-1Bs willing to speak up here? This is why Indians generally love talking about religion and politics, but they don't want to bring these issues out into the open.

      --
      A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
    21. Re:RMS vs. BJG by Alsee · · Score: 2

      and pointing to a bunch of half-written software.

      Why was he pointing at Windows?

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  4. tha webz by Slashdotess · · Score: 3, Funny

    play checkers to prove your browsers superiority.

    or post on /. and prove your webserver's superiority

  5. I would like to add by threedays · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would like to add that i see nothing here about food. move along.

    1. Re:I would like to add by Leven+Valera · · Score: 3, Funny

      Damn right. It's 9:35PM, I'm waiting on the build to finish, and I had half a tuna sandwich at lunch. At the very least you could have coughed up some burritos or something.

      LV

      --
      Woot w00t w007.
  6. Hilarious war ensues! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 5, Funny
    I just got back from the Browser War. It was worse than the opening 5 minutes of Medal of Honor! Blood and plugins everywhere! The exploitable holes! The hastily applied patches! An orgy of clicking and death!

    OH GOD, The Humanity!

  7. Poor as in "Poor Judgement" by Hi_2k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you are going to build a government office, which do you want to spend, $100 an hour for 2 days for a contractor who will set up a linux server and show you how to set up linux machines, or $300 for each of 200 copies of xp, plus a $150 an hour contractor to set up an insecure xp or maybe a novell sever, plus $90 * 200 for each copy of ofice, plus $god only knows * 200 for the administrative software? (this isnt all, but the rest will be shared no matter what OS)

    --
    When life gives you crap, Make Crapade.
    Sluggy Freelance.
    1. Re:Poor as in "Poor Judgement" by shaitand · · Score: 2, Informative

      Where did you find office for $90? last I looked you were looking at over $200 for the small buisness editions and more yet for professional.

    2. Re:Poor as in "Poor Judgement" by Iguanaphobic · · Score: 2

      I thought we were talking about India, not the USA... Oh wait.

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power.
    3. Re:Poor as in "Poor Judgement" by Iguanaphobic · · Score: 2

      China.

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power.
    4. Re:Poor as in "Poor Judgement" by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2
      Why is it everyone wants to replace Windows wth Linux as a Desktop OS?

      I think Linux belongs on the desktop - done RIGHT! This means thin installations to support local peripheral access, and a remote set of standard filesystems and applications under central management.

      Every moron shouting-down Linux TCO envisions Linux deployments forced to reproduce the design limitations of desktop Windows. Three good Unix admins could manage the application environment for a couple thousand end-users this way. And this is still cheaper than any Win2K terminal services setup - Software AND personnel costs.

      You centralize configuration management, security administration and log/audit, malware control, etc. Monolithic installs are for your laptop users.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    5. Re:Poor as in "Poor Judgement" by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2
      In fact...

      This is obviously what Sun wants to do - with the Sun Ray series, and the new Desktop Linux package they are rolling out.

      RedHat or SuSe could beat them at this - with a server-client pair that ships together for commodity hardware.

      The client shold have a small kernel that runs a little, almost embedded system - with local device support. This should support the grsecurity patches, etc. The desktop environment can be loaded as a User Mode Linux machine which can be tailored to suit the class of user. A developer's desktop could have TWO UML machines - one a "free-for-all" box which is connected only to an isolated dev backend, the other a typical office "lockdown", for doing ordinary the business of e-mail, office documents, etc.

      Bundle this with wizards for the LDAP and Kerb5 software, plus network security through K5 integration with IPSec AH something Win2K got right... They could make Terminal Services and Citrix Metaframe look like the high-price, feature-weak alternative.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  8. Illegal collections by Servo · · Score: 2

    Priceless art, texts, etc, aren't the sort of thing you'd unload onto Ebay, but there is still a market for them. I'm sure several rich private collectors would have loved to get their hands on it. Nobody would dare flaunt it in public.

    --
    A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
  9. I think that's pretty damned low, by TCaM · · Score: 2, Funny

    stealing something like that I hope they throw the book at them. Just not THAT book.

  10. You have to give Microsoft credit... by tony1c · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...I wish I could convince an entire country that not paying for software is just too damn expensive.

  11. Eats? where? by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't get it. Where are the "eats for the desperate computerist"?
    I thought that this was a comment on something like the Dilberito.

    Rustin

    --
    Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
  12. Some newfangled checkers? by Otto · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know, /. has gotten things wrong before, but mixing up Checkers with Connect Four is a first.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Some newfangled checkers? by WhaDaYaKnow · · Score: 2

      You know, /. has gotten things wrong before, but mixing up Checkers with Connect Four is a first.

      I bet the Connect Four page is only for IE because it crashed on the Checkers.

      I'm not trying to start a browser war here, but Mozilla is much better.

    2. Re:Some newfangled checkers? by Krieger · · Score: 2

      The worst part is that I double checked. I really thought that I had typed Connect Four. I think I was having one of those wonderful mental blocks... where I knew that it was Connect Four, but my brain kept saying... nah, that's checkers.

      Bah. At least it got posted... the browser wars site ate too much of my time.

  13. Walmart selling 300K Linux PCs / Month by bstadil · · Score: 5, Informative
    There is a story over at theInquirer today about a major win for Cyrix / Via from Walmart.

    They are having some server problems so I have included portions from the article here

    Via wins big Wal-Mart Linux PC order

    C3-Cyrix-Centaur selling 300,000 PCM?

    By Mike Magee: Tuesday 19 November 2002, 09:58

    TAIWANESE SEMI firm Via has secured an order from massive shop Wal-Mart for two of its C3-Cyrix-Centaur X86 based processors. The Economic News reports that Via and Wal-Mart will create two budget machines running flavours of the Linux OS. There's also a plan for the chip company to make low cost sub $300 machines running Windows Eyecandy. The article claims that Medion is also set to clinch a deal with Via, while Legend and the Founder Group also use some of the C3 processors.

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
  14. RMS's tactics vs. BG's by cmeans · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Money talks! In different languages!

    Maybe it's as simple as giving away disks with GNU/Linux already on them, verses just saying it can be downloaded. Having the disk that can be used (by anyone) to perform an install, is a lot different than having to first download a distros ISO, and burn it to a CD.

    I don't know what RMS did on his trip, he may have actually tried to give disks away...

    The problem is...it's probably easier to take the hand of someone offering what appears to be the quick fix, rather than reach for the life vest that someone else tossed you.

    1. Re:RMS's tactics vs. BG's by spectecjr · · Score: 2

      Money talks! In different languages!
      Maybe it's as simple as giving away disks with GNU/Linux already on them, verses just saying it can be downloaded. Having the disk that can be used (by anyone) to perform an install, is a lot different than having to first download a distros ISO, and burn it to a CD.

      I don't know what RMS did on his trip, he may have actually tried to give disks away...

      The problem is...it's probably easier to take the hand of someone offering what appears to be the quick fix, rather than reach for the life vest that someone else tossed you.


      The thing is, when you're neck deep in sewage, you don't care about a life vest. What you want is someone to pull you *out*.

      That's the difference between the two philosophies. Most of the world works on short-term timescales.

      Will anyone remember what you did, twenty years from now?

      Simon

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
  15. FUD R US by walt-sjc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In a quote from the article, Bill says:
    "We can save money in terms of speed of development or by being able to run on less expensive hardware."

    So I guess that's why WinCE handhelds are less expensive than Palm pilots. Oh, wait, they aren't less expensive. Oh but then there is desktops. Oh wait, what about the $199 walmart PC running linux being less expensive than the Windows counterpart... Considering that Linux runs on just about anything, the "less expensive hardware" just is totally untrue. Let's see Windows XP run on a 386 with 8M ram. Nice FUD Bill.

    1. Re:FUD R US by walt-sjc · · Score: 2

      While you wouldn't want to run KDE on that system, you CAN run Linux, which is the point. The FACTS remain that you can do more with less hardware with a linux based system than you can with a Windows based system. Period.

    2. Re:FUD R US by NineNine · · Score: 2

      While you wouldn't want to run KDE on that system, you CAN run Linux, which is the point. The FACTS remain that you can do more with less hardware with a linux based system than you can with a Windows based system. Period.

      For the same price? No way. Remove XWindows and you gotta spend thousands and thousands training each poor soul that sits down in front of a CMI. You can also make a Civic outrun a Ferrari, I'm sure, but to spend the money and time doing it would be ridiculous.

    3. Re:FUD R US by sawilson · · Score: 2

      Sorry about that last post. Asshole friend. left
      xlock off to take a piss. She could have at least
      posted anonymously. Like your porn site btw....

      ATTENTION MODERATORS: please mod the post above down, it wasn't mine.

    4. Re:FUD R US by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 2

      Yes and no.

      Compare the speed-functionality-$ ratio, and they're comparable (maybe not for Palm brand devices, but this is generally true for Palm OS devices).

      --
      Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
      www.fogbound.net
    5. Re:FUD R US by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 2

      I got Windows XP running fine on my 200Mhz Pentium Pro. Actually the Pentium Pro is better than the Pentium II for XP, I recall seeing an analysis of it on the internet some place. You can google.

    6. Re:FUD R US by NineNine · · Score: 2

      Well, my point was that you can do "more" (in terms of serving) with the same hardware with Linux if you're willing to invest a good bit of time (money). Or, you can just buy exactly what you want and have it work out of the box without any further investment. Pay a smidge for extra RAM, a bit for the license, and be done with it. In many companies that pay real wages, that's a hell of a lot more cheaper in the long run then paying an expert to tweak, tweak, and tweak.

    7. Re:FUD R US by buysse · · Score: 2

      X Windows != [KDE|GNOME]

      There are many, many fine options that are very lightweight by comparison to either of those bloated pigs (I prefer Gnome, generally, but I'm just as happy in WindowMaker or a slim FVWM2 config).

      Think before replying.

      --
      -30-
    8. Re:FUD R US by ninewands · · Score: 2
      Quoth the poster responding to:
      While you wouldn't want to run KDE on that system, you CAN run Linux, which is the point. The FACTS remain that you can do more with less hardware with a linux based system than you can with a Windows based system. Period.

      For the same price? No way. Remove XWindows and you gotta spend thousands and thousands training each poor soul that sits down in front of a CMI.

      The person to whom you were responding never suggested removing the X Window System (please ... let's get the terminology right here). He said that he "wouldn't want to run KDE on that system ...". There are MANY Window Managers for Linux and the VAST majority of them are considerably less resource-hungry than KDE and GNOME. Personally, I prefer WindowMaker to both of them because anything with a "panel" at the bottom of the screen is just too damned reminiscent of CDE for my taste.
    9. Re:FUD R US by walt-sjc · · Score: 2

      Um, where did I say "remove XWindows"? X is fairly light. Most Window managers can be configured light as well. You don't need gnome / kde. Hell, I've done this. 8M works rather well for siple things like web browsing, email, simple word processing, etc. Yeah, your not going to be running OO (bloatware) but abiword would work fine. You must also be really young and don't realize that there was a world before Windows. People ran things like: DOS. Apple ][. C64.

      The fucking point is that we are talking INDIA and other poor countries like it. It (like MANY other countries in the world) has a Very low GDP / capita. There are lots of older machines around, and people can't afford much. Hell, if they have a computer AT ALL they are lucky. The US ships lots of computer junk to china and other countries for disposal. Guess what? they don't just grind them up. They will pull out stuff that works and use them. That's if they even have electricity. It's also not gonna cost "thousands and thousands" for training. IT'S INDIA WE ARE TALKING ABOUT.

    10. Re:FUD R US by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      Let's see Windows XP run on a 386 with 8M ram.

      Let's see a comparable Linux installation run on the same setup (i.e. running X, KDE, Mozilla in memory). I mean, otherwise, with just a CLI version of Linux running, you might as well compare that to DOS in terms of resource usage.

      Nice FUD Bill.

      Nice FUD yourself.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
  16. Re:Browser wars? That's so three years ago by RatBastard · · Score: 2, Troll

    Instead Microsoft tried to cram everything but the kicthen sink into their bloated piece of shit, and then had it sink its cancerous roots into the entire OS while trying to circumvent the W3C by implementing their own psuedo HTML (and let's not even talk about the nightmare that is Active X).

    Netscape lost because they got fat and lazy while Bill sank millions and millions of dollars into the bottomless pit and waited for them to bleed to death first. Just like the USA did to the Soviet Union in the Cold War.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  17. this is all boring news, so I'll tell some jokes.. by mr_gerbik · · Score: 2

    Newton Joke:
    Damn.. why did we have to get the laws of physics back.. my wifes tits were starting to look mighty fine without gravity.

    Walmart Joke:
    Do we really want Linux to be associated with people who sport mullets?

  18. Where's the food reference? by grytpype · · Score: 4, Funny

    OK, I'll supply one. Remember when that guy who draws Dilbert was going to launch a line of prepared food products for geeks... like Dilburritos, or something like that?

    When things seem really bleak and hopeless, just think about what a total, colossal failure that must have been, and you'll be cheered up in no time!

    --

    - Have a picture

    1. Re:Where's the food reference? by Cyno01 · · Score: 2

      They have Dilbert mints, well, they're pretty much just Altoids with Dilbert characters on the tin.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    2. Re:Where's the food reference? by Ratbert42 · · Score: 4, Informative

      You mean the Dilberito.

  19. Correction: Via selling 300K Cyrix C3 chips / Mont by mbrubeck · · Score: 4, Informative

    That article doesn't say that Wal-Mart is selling 300,000 Linux PCs per month. It says that Via is selling 300,000 C3s per month to buyers including Wal-Mart.

  20. Well... by FrostedWheat · · Score: 4, Funny

    I hope those theves get there library cards taken of them and a 90p fine for each day they didn't return the book.

  21. Browser Wars! by Cyph · · Score: 2

    This is great! And remember, everyone, if you are getting your ass kicked by Galeon, I just might be doing the ass-kicking.

  22. Walmart is killing the Middle class by triumphDriver · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Walmart is the beginning of the end of American Middle Class. They kill a lot of small individually owned mom and pop stores when they move into a town. In the future we will all get to work for them at minimum wage and buy cheap crap from Asia. It is ironic that everyone is up in arms about M$'s behavior but is very passive about what is happening to small businesses. In my view both M$ and Walmart are predatory.

    --
    I grew up in the Fulda Gap, where did you?
    1. Re:Walmart is killing the Middle class by NineNine · · Score: 2

      MS isn't predatory. MS buys companies and people. They pay very well. They employ lots of well-paid people. Wal-Mart kills business and does nothing but create thousands of minimum wage, degrading, eat-your-own shit jobs.

    2. Re:Walmart is killing the Middle class by ComputerSlicer23 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      MS buys companies and people. They pay very well. They employ lots of well-paid people.
      It's my understanding from several people I know who either have worked for, or we're recurited by MS, that in fact they don't pay well. They compenstate well, but they don't pay well. In fact, people at MS right now are taking it the shorts because all the stock options are underwater. I believe they repriced a lot of stock options recently to help solve this problem. Any time a company reprices stock options, they aren't paying well. The last guy I talked to said that essentially he'd have to take a 35% pay cut to work for MS, then after 3-5 years when his stock options vested, he would be a multi-millionare. Of course I believe right now is when his options would have vested at roughly double the strike price, which means they are worthless...

      So in a very technical sense they don't pay well. If the MS stock stops going up, a big pile of people at MS are way underpaid, and way under compenstated. So it's relatively risky, it's got good upside, and bad downside. Not what I look for, if I wanted in on that, I'd go into business for myself. That's why people have said that the best product MS makes are MS Stock shares. In a lot of ways they are correct.

      Kirby

    3. Re:Walmart is killing the Middle class by jumpingfred · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course the mom and pop stores with poor selection at higher prices are a great boon to the people they serve.

    4. Re:Walmart is killing the Middle class by NineNine · · Score: 2

      From what I understood, I thought that most MS "employees" were actually contractors. Contractors generally get paid a hell of a lot more than "regular" employees, even when taking into account that they buy their own health insurance. On top of that, they get paid for every hour they work, the can sometimes avoid the beauracratic bullshit, they don't get penalized for "job hopping". From the few jobs I've interviewed for with them, and the people I've talked to, they pay their contractors very well. A hell of a lot better than most of the poor minimum wage slobs that Wal-Mart "employs".

    5. Re:Walmart is killing the Middle class by Jodka · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Walmart is the beginning of the end of American Middle Class. They kill a lot of small individually owned mom and pop stores when they move into a town. In the future we will all get to work for them at minimum wage and buy cheap crap from Asia. It is ironic that everyone is up in arms about M$'s behavior but is very passive about what is happening to small businesses. In my view both M$ and Walmart are predatory.

      That's a four-part statement, and each of those parts is horse shit.

      part 1> The job market is changing.

      Well job displacement is what happens when a more efficient system replaces an older and less efficient system. Carriage makers and stable boys were displaced by car manufacturers and mechanics. Legions of accountants and file clerks have been displaced by personal computers. In a society where people are free to buy and sell according to their own interests the purchasing trends of the public change with technology and fashion. What do you advocate ? a system where government officials dictate at what stores you can shop and what you purchase, all for the purpose of acheving a technologically stagnant society which perfectly preserves every job category and rate of compensation?

      part 2> If mom-and-pop stores die out, then middle-incomes salaries will cease to exist.

      Everyone in the US who earns near the mean income level works in mom-and-pop retail stores. If those stores disappear, the distribution of incomes in the US will become bimodal, with no salaries near the mean income level. Riiiight... Why don't you put down that crack pipe until your head clears and then think about this again. You could start by considering if maybe there are any jobs, other than some of those in mom-and-pop stores, which pay near the mean income level.

      part 3>Wal-Mart jobs pay less than jobs in Mom-and-Pop stores.

      Do you have any evidence fot that, or are you just making that up ? Until you provide links to income data, I think its safe to assume that you are full of shit.

      part 4> Because the number of jobs in Wal-mart stores is increasing and the number of jobs in mom-and-pop stores is in decline, then therefore those who would have worked in mom-and-pop stores are now working in Wal-mart.

      You do not know from where Wal-mart employees are drawn and you don't know where those who otherwise would have worked in mom-and-pop shops work instead. Just becasue one job category is growing and another is shrinking does NOT mean that employees are transfered between those categories. For all you know, those who are not managing small retail businesses today could be working for Microsoft, and the new Wal-mart employees have moved up to those jobs from something less rewarding.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature.
    6. Re:Walmart is killing the Middle class by ComputerSlicer23 · · Score: 2
      Hmmm, I'm not sure. I know a guy who currently is trying to get work w/ Microsoft for kind of contracting gig. It's good money, but the Federal self-employment taxes aren't light so keep that in mind, Uncle Sam's probably going to want an addition 15-20% more in taxes then what a regular employee is used to as an employee. So on a comparative scale an employee who makes 120K in contracting, probably has less discretionary money then a guy who makes 80K with full benefits, 401K, and all that. Granted being hourly's not a bad gig w/ the kinda hours a lot of programmers put in. I don't want to guess what I make an hour at my current job.

      Not sure how all that contractor bullshit worked out, after the perma-temp issues they had. Thought they had to get rid of a lot of the weird status, and treat people who acted like regular employees, like regular employees. I know the IRS explained it to a company that I contracted for that, I was an employee no matter what our mutual agreement was, and as such, they had to pay half of my Social Security taxes.

      Wal-Mart employs people for decent money, in small towns. Just remember, in a lot of small towns in Nebraska (the state I live in), you can buy a 3 bedroom, 2 bay garage home for under $40K. So making $8-10 an hour isn't such a bad deal. Groceries are more expensive, and other things about small towns would drive me nuts. (Like no decent book stores). However, you won't starve to death on what Wal-Mart pays you in small towns. When it's all said and done, Wal-mart makes a big pile of money they could be splitting more with the employee's, but then again MS, is sitting on $40Billion they could be sharing with employees and stock holders.

      Nope, I don't want to work there, no I don't want to live in a small town either, but it's not like trying to live in a major metropolitian area making $5.25 an hour or anything.

      Kirby

    7. Re:Walmart is killing the Middle class by Alan+Cox · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not Walmart - economics.

      People keep trying to avoid the fact that the innovators dilemma applies to nation states as well as to businesses. A long time ago this was mitigated by the fact that social standards influenced import rules. GATT buried that so now the west can't easily refuse goods created in dangerous circumstances by underpaid workers and child labour.

    8. Re:Walmart is killing the Middle class by NineNine · · Score: 2

      I've never worked in Wal-Mart, but I've read a bit about a decent book about a woman who *did* work there... here's an article about her experience. From everything I've read (and I wish I had time to read more), Wal-Mart pays less than is a livign wage in most places, but because they kill all surrounding retail businesses, employees have no choice but to work there.

      And, as your friend more about his job at MS. Generally "contracting" means working as a traditional W-2 employee through a head shop that does pay 1/2 taxes, just like a normal job. Only difference is that you're technically working for that head shop instead of the big company (like MS). I did that for 6 years and make a really nice chunk of change. Much more than the poor slobs who worked "permanent" jobs. And, like I said, life was much better for me... I left at 5:00PM on the dot, or I got paid more. I usually got to skip beauracratic meetings... those were left for the "permanent" people. And, I could switch jobs as often as I'd like because it was expecetd. If I were still in IT, I definitely wouldn't mind working for MS. The few jobs that I spoke to them about (as a contractor) paid quite well.

    9. Re:Walmart is killing the Middle class by Sloppy · · Score: 2
      MS produces very little value. Their contribution to the economy is almost nothing. Almost every dollar they pay to an employee or stockholder of an assimilated company, was taken from a customer who was either unhappy with their purchase, or more likely, unwitting in their purchase and wouldn't have gone with a Microsoft product if they had had to make a conscious choice. There was no exchange where both parties walked away thinking, "That was great, I came out ahead!"

      Microsoft's reliance on bundling, preloads, and proprietary lock-in show the essense of their business model: to avoid market forces. Any company whose revenue model depends on market avoidance, is a company that is not producing value and wealth. If you are producing value, you are not scared of the marketplace, and you don't have your employees writing the Halloween Memos.

      Wal-Mart efficiently distributes goods. And exactly unlike that other company, they win by being part of the market and getting customers to want to transact with them. Technically, they aren't really producing wealth, but rather, they are minimizing the loss of wealth caused by the inefficiencies of distribution, which is roughly/virtually equivalent to wealth creation. Customers don't walk out of a Wal-Mart thinking, "Damn, I got ripped off."

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    10. Re:Walmart is killing the Middle class by ComputerSlicer23 · · Score: 2
      I've known people who work at Wal-marts and Super Targets, and it's not as bad as she makes out (at least it isn't that bad everywhere). Part of her problem is that, she's trying to live in/near big cities on minium wage. Not a good idea. Second, shit even the HS grad who works at the local sandwich shop gets $9.00/hr, and gets paid overtime. I get a sandwich from him twice a week. Most complicated thing he does is run a meat slicer.

      I've worked at a corporate supermarket, and even they paid more then $6.25/hr once you'd worked there for a year as a part timer. Full timer's got real benefits, and paid 7-9/hr starting pay. That was almost 8 years ago. I imagine the pay rate has increased. Shit at the local McDonald's they pay $7.50-$9.00/hr starting pay. If you show up every day you get regular rasies. I know, two different guys I hang out with are former managers of those places, that's preciesly how those are run.

      So while I have some sympathy for the story on the link, I've got my own personal experience, and talk with family and friends who work basic unskilled labor jobs, and it doesn't match the reality I've seen. I've never lived in metro areas that large, so that might account for the difference, but that's mearly a sign it's time to move away to some place cheaper to live.

      Kirby

  23. Maybe because... by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Did RMS tell them they couldn't use GNU/Linux, or is this more Microsoft propaganda at work?"

    Maybe India just noticed how Bill doesn't get bent out of shape when you don't refer to it as Microsoft/Windows.

  24. Bill Gates a true benefactor. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    So Bill Gates is giving out software to India for free and that "Microsoft was willing to "dramatically lower" its price for socially relevant projects"? As a college student, I feel that as A SOCIALLY RELEVANT being, I am justified in giving myself a free copy of .NET.

  25. Speaking of Walmart... by josepha48 · · Score: 2

    Has anyone tried Lindows? How is it? Does it list what windows software is known to run under it??/

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!

  26. Intel and AMD also available by mbrubeck · · Score: 2

    Wal-Mart also ships both low-end and mid-range Intel and AMD systems, with Linux or no operating system installed

  27. Newton, Wal-Mart, Eats?! by Aktalmukanandros · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. Imagine a beowulf cluster of these.
    2. ???
    3. All your base are belong to us.

  28. It also has something to do with M$ by cybercomm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hiring (or promising) to hire a whole bunch of Indian programmers. Heck i would adopt windows on a couple of boxen if M$ decides to invest heavily in TI market..after all those people are not going to spend their whole lives working for MS...sooner or later they will move on, and presto! Inda has educated progammers with world class experience!

    --
    Live for the present, learn from the past, and dream of the future!
  29. There is a saying In India... by linuxislandsucks · · Score: 2, Funny

    that to choose awomen, you must see her without her makeup..

    Bill Gate looked better without makeup than RMS did :)

    --
    Don't Tread on OpenSource
  30. Clueless masses by nlinecomputers · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't understand how Walmart expects to sell this stuff. The price tag that is on this kind of computer will appeal to the Lowest Common Denominator customer. One that doesn't have money or the internet. So how are they supposed to buy it without internet access? And if they do buy one and when they can't run the lastest games(re:windows based games on it) they will return them. (Or pirate old copies of Windows 98 to run on them.)

    Most people "in the know" would avoid them would they not? Most Linux geeks that I know would want high end equipment not cheap junk. I've got an old celeron that has trouble running X. How the heck is this going to run Lindows, lycoris or Mandrake 9?

    So I can't figure out who this is marketed at? College students? First time "trailer home" computer buyers?

    Some one there made a bad business move IMHO.If you have stock in Walmart I'd sell.

    --
    Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
    1. Re:Clueless masses by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Most Linux geeks that I know would want high end equipment not cheap junk. I've got an old celeron that has trouble running X.

      Um, one of my machines here is a Pentium 130. I've run X on a 25MHz 486 box (NetBSD, not Linux, but still...) If you can't run X on a Celeron box, either XFree86 doesn't support your card (unlikely), or something is hideously misconfigured.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    2. Re:Clueless masses by sgtsanity · · Score: 3, Funny

      Some one there made a bad business move IMHO.If you have stock in Walmart I'd sell.

      Indeed. As we all know, one small misplaced cheap product can doom a multi-billion dollar empire.

    3. Re:Clueless masses by rattydukes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >I don't understand how Walmart expects to sell >this stuff. The price tag that is on this kind >of computer will appeal to the Lowest Common >Denominator customer.

      that is exactly how they will sell this stuff. Ask anyone in business and they can explain how walmart is king of this business model. This is how walmart became the worlds largest company. This has nothing to do with whether anyone here likes/dislikes walmart, its just a matter of their business model.

    4. Re:Clueless masses by usayit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Get off of it and realize that the vast majority of users, expert and novice, do not need the highest performing machine of the month. There are thousands of reasons why one might want to have $199 machine. Kids? Another for the family so I can play on my die-hard gaming machine uninterrupted?

      A smart computer user ( and consumer ) wouldn't spend several thousand on a computer that will do mostly internet browsing and word processing. What the heck... even software developers could accomplish lots on these low cost machines.

      Now if a playing the latest games is your goal. Don't let me stop you. Spend the big bucks on the best system out there. I too wouldn't recommend these machines for die-hard gamers. For all else... I think Walmart is on to something!

      I own pretty good and cheap home speakers... does that make me anyless of a music lover?

    5. Re:Clueless masses by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 5, Informative

      What a dumbass post. How will they buy them? See, there are these things called stores. Walmart has a few. In fact, Walmart has a lot. In fact, Walmart is the largest retail company in the world.

      Walmart sells a wide range of products to the 'lowest comment denominator' customers. They may not have the money to buy high end but they're not dumbasses; they know if they buy a computer for $200 while Dell advertises computers for $1000, their computer is not going to be the newest and fasters and it's not going to run everything.

      Leaving aside the traditional Walmart customer...
      Many Linux geeks I know run multiple boxes, often on old hardware. A cheap no-frills box you can pick up with a 20 minute trip and use for a mail server, firewall, database, etc isn't a bad deal.

    6. Re:Clueless masses by Patik · · Score: 3, Funny
      Some one there made a bad business move IMHO.If you have stock in Walmart I'd sell.
      Yeah, because selling a $199 PC is going to topple the US's richest company.
    7. Re:Clueless masses by cduffy · · Score: 2

      That would make sense -- a lot of sense -- if you could drive over to Wal Mart and pick these things up.

      However, they only sell them through their web site.

      Makes a bit less sense that way.

    8. Re:Clueless masses by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      Give it time. They really aren't ready for prime time yet.

    9. Re:Clueless masses by MacAndrew · · Score: 3, Funny

      Indeed. As we all know, one small misplaced cheap product can doom a multi-billion dollar empire.

      Correction: isn't the "small misplaced cheap product" the very cornerstone of this particular "multi-billion dollar empire"? :)

    10. Re:Clueless masses by Anonamused+Cow-herd · · Score: 2, Informative
      What a dumbass post. How will they buy them? See, there are these things called stores. Walmart has a few. In fact, Walmart has a lot. In fact, Walmart is the largest retail company in the world.

      Now, the dumbass post called the article: "This exciting new $199 Desktop/LX Certified MicroTel PC will be available for purchase exclusively from the WalMart Online Lycoris Catalog."

      So Joe Blow thinks : "I want to be able to access the internet. I will buy a computer. I will buy the $200 computer from Wal-Mart. This computer is only sold on the internet. I want to be able to access the internet. I will buy a computer."....

      Maybe the dumbass poster assumed that you would have read the article. I guess he didn't think you would be a dumbass.

      --
      -----[0_o]-----
      We are not amused.
    11. Re:Clueless masses by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 2

      Oops. That'd make me a dumbass, then. But I'd say the rest of it still figures. And, as someone else said, I'd be willing to bet it'll be rolled out in stores in the response to the web program is decent.

    12. Re:Clueless masses by Arker · · Score: 2

      If they took out the hard drive and all the multimedia crap and gave it a bank of nics instead it'd make a hell of a home router.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    13. Re:Clueless masses by Greedo · · Score: 2

      I don't understand how Walmart expects to sell this stuff. The price tag that is on this kind of computer will appeal to the Lowest Common Denominator customer.

      Have you been to a Walmart lately? It's a mecca for the Lowest Common Denominator.

      Most people "in the know" would avoid them would they not?

      Most people "in the know" won't go to Walmart to buy a new box. Or if they do, it wouldn't be this one.

      Most Linux geeks that I know would want high end equipment not cheap junk.

      Okay, I think that is blatently untrue. Most Linux geeks I know cherish the thought of getting Linux running on "cheap junk". My laptop is a Pentium 233 with Debian. X windows is a bit slow, but useable. My desktop is a Celeron 500. Heck, we've got a server in the office that's a 486, with a 1-year-plus uptime. I often scour flea markets, garage sales and the such for computers that people think are "out-of-date" and restore them, finding a use somewhere for it (firewall, low load server, etc.).

      A computer is never "out-of-date".

      So I can't figure out who this is marketed at? College students? First time "trailer home" computer buyers?

      Well, not you. And, really, unless you work for Walmart, that's all you need to know.

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
  31. Browser War is Rigged! by Kaz+Riprock · · Score: 5, Funny


    I went to that site to play a fair game of Connect Four in the hopes of getting a final answer as to which browser is truly better than the others. Unfortunately, hoodlums have logged in with multiple browsers to throw the game by playing poorly with one browser in the hopes of defeating a defenseless opponenent!

    I mean, truly, who plays checker 3 to slot 1 when the opponent has opened with a classical Harvey the Wonder Hamster attack in slots 4,5, and 6!!

    Outrageous! I see the only way this will ever be settled is through the time-honored (and FAR less unruly) game of Go Fish! Harumph, I'm taking my checkers and going home...

    --
    Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
    1. Re:Browser War is Rigged! by Otto · · Score: 2

      the opponent has opened with a classical Harvey the Wonder Hamster attack in slots 4,5, and 6!!

      Honestly, I'm not sure I want to know...

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  32. As they say.. by cybercomm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A diplomat [or insert any M$ name here] is a person who can tell you to go to hell [or buy their products...all the same] in such a way that you are actually looking forward to the trip!

    --
    Live for the present, learn from the past, and dream of the future!
  33. THIS sentence no verb, his had one by Ezubaric · · Score: 5, Funny


    I'm = I am

    The verb is present. The sentence is missing a predicate adjective/nominative. Not, as another Slashdot English whiz pointed out, an object. "To be" is not transitive (and thus taking an object).

    --

    ----------
    I am an expert in electricity. My father held the chair of applied electricity at the state prision.
    1. Re:THIS sentence no verb, his had one by ilyag · · Score: 5, Funny

      R U SUR??

  34. Very degrading... by bmetzler · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "We are a poor country. We cannot develop operating systems and platforms on our own," Kulkarni said.

    Whenever someone says something like that I hear: "We are a very poor country. We are all dunces. We can't raise our standard of living. Therefore we will eat at the crumbs and wallow in our own pity.

    It's a shame people don't respect themselves more. And it's not like php requires that much more development ability then ASP does.

    -Brent
    1. Re:Very degrading... by whereiswaldo · · Score: 2

      We are a poor country. We cannot develop operating systems and platforms on our own.

      What a load of crap. What on Earth do they mean by on our own? Linux is a collaborative effort by people all over the globe (except India???)

      I hardly believe this is the majority's sentiment there -- probably just another case of having their pockets stuffed with the evil green.

  35. Bill's offering a finished product by oliverthered · · Score: 2

    Do you know something we don't, is the wrting on the wall at Microsoft, are they stopping windows or something?

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  36. Walmart == clever by sterno · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sell a cheap machine and offer the possibility to several linux vendors to get their wares pre-installed. Let them compete with one another and get the best price for the software and the best software packages.

    I've gotta hand it to Walmart, they have really figured out how this game should work. I realize that right now, they are offering 3 distros, but ultimately I suspect that, for support purposes it will be easier to trim it down later on. They can just let these guys fight it out for a while to see which one gets the best response from the public.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  37. Nice Lycoris Press release by bogie · · Score: 2

    "With Desktop/LX, you get peak performance from your $199 Microtel PC the oment you power it up."

    http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=oment

    No entry found for oment.

    2 suggestions found:

    omen

    ament

    Can you say spellchecker?

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  38. Market Forces by bstadil · · Score: 2, Insightful
    They can just let these guys fight it out for a while to see which one gets the best response from the public.

    You sound as this is a bad thing, (Sorry if I misread your intent) isn't this exactly how a market economy is supposed to work.

    Free choice is a good thing and if they have to limit their offering at a later stage at least the "losers" had their chance.

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
  39. The MS TRAP by dh003i · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You've foolishly overlooked a few key important points.

    1. MS isn't going to offer this software to India for free forever. As soon as MS deems that they can suck India dry, they'll start charging. Now, they're simply trying to make India dependant on Microsoft, so that people there have to use MS Windows and MS Word. Later on, they'll start charging outrageous prices. Just like what drug dealers do: free to try, addictive, and then you get to pay through the wazoo.

    2. Substantial costs of using Windows such as security, downtime, etc have been ignored.

    3. The cost of dealing with the BSA and paying them off of they threaten to sue has been ignored.

    4. If India needs Windows to do something it doesn't do, they're screwed. If they use Linux, all they have to do is hire a few programmers.

    For what the government needs to do, Linux is fine -- perfect, in fact. It can install on many standard types of hardware, and it has some good GUI defaults (i.e., KDE/GNOME) along with good windowmanagers (i.e., WindowMaker). Office suites like OpenOffice are quite easy to use. If they really want MS Office, they can use CrossOver Office.

    The most important point here is #1. MS is like a drug-dealer. Sure, they'll give stuff to you for free in hope of making you dependant on it. Then once they're sure you're dependant on it (and they'll do things to make you dependant on it through their updates), they start charging. Sort of like the MP3 FRAUD: let them use MP3's for free, then when everyone's using it and it'll be difficult to switch to something else, suddenly introduce royalty payments. THESE FRAUDULENT FUCKS ARE NO BETTER THAN DRUG DEALERS.

    1. Re:The MS TRAP by mosch · · Score: 2
      Just like what drug dealers do: free to try, addictive, and then you get to pay through the wazoo.
      Can you tell me where I can find these mythical drug dealers? I'd really like to try a bar of hash right now.
    2. Re:The MS TRAP by dh003i · · Score: 2

      Um, I don't know, the inner city? Smart drug dealers offer great deals on drugs (or free) to new customers. Once they get addicted and have no choice but to use drugs, the prices skyrocket.

      Duh, its a pretty obvious business tactic.

  40. Punch and Pie by sfgoth · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cartman: Tell them we'll have punch and pie.

    Kyle: We're not gonna' have punch and pie!

    Cartman: More people will come if they think we have punch and pie!!

  41. Re:If I was the Indian goverment I would only acce by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Hey India wouldn't be a poor country if they didn't let religon rule there lives.

    America wouldn't be a poor country if we didn't let scissors rule our lives.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  42. Well... by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Do we really want Linux to be associated with people who sport mullets?

    Is that worse then being associated with smelly dorks who sit around playing D&D and obsess about star track and buffy all day?

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  43. Buy Stock. by kninja · · Score: 2, Insightful


    If Walmart or Microsoft is going to take over the world, don't moan about it, BUY THEIR STOCK! You'll OWN a piece of it, and probably MAKE SOME MONEY in the process. These corporations exist not for oppression, but rather to make money for their shareholders.

    I don't support Microsoft, and I think my money could be invested better in other places, but if I believed they were going to own India and China, I'd consider buying a piece of that pie.

    1. Re:Buy Stock. by Catiline · · Score: 2

      These corporations exist not for oppression, but rather to make money for their shareholders.

      To me, this reads like "The drug cartels exist to supply demand for certain products in other countries, not to kill & oppress the local people in Central America". Technically correct, but semantically null.

  44. An orgy of clicking and death! by qnonsense · · Score: 5, Funny
    • An orgy of clicking and death!
    That reminds me... My Girlfriend blessed Bill Gates last night. I asked her why, and she said that He was responsible for the ubiquity of the mouse wheel and therefore for the extreme dexterity of the middle finger of my right hand.

    Sorry, but it's a true story.

    Heh, scroll on my scrigidies. Goddamn Right.
    --
    There comes a time in every man's life when he must say, "No mother! I do not want any more Jell-O!"
    1. Re:An orgy of clicking and death! by gvonk · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      therefore for the extreme dexterity of the middle finger of my right hand. ...hmmm, this is Slashdot, so... I gotta assume you're giving your girlfriend the finger on a daily basis and her low self-esteem causes her to appreciate even this small, rude token of attention.

      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
    2. Re:An orgy of clicking and death! by orthogonal · · Score: 2

      mod parent up!

    3. Re:An orgy of clicking and death! by tswinzig · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't know what's funnier: a slashdotter with a girlfriend, or the fact that you use your middle finger for the wheel. (WHO DOES THAT?)

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    4. Re:An orgy of clicking and death! by qnonsense · · Score: 2
      • Bill Gates...was responsible for the ubiquity of the mouse wheel

        Um, shouldn't Logitech get a mention here? Just one more thing Microsoft undeservedly gets credit for.
      Notice the word ubiquity. MS didn't invent it, wasn't the first to use it, etc. By including it on virtually every mouse they put out, however, and they do own the lions share of the mouse market, they are soley responsible for the popularity of the wheel, and hence, my abilities with manual sex.
      --
      There comes a time in every man's life when he must say, "No mother! I do not want any more Jell-O!"
  45. Gates, Stallman, and Poltics by -tji · · Score: 2

    Another factor, that I am sure is not lost on the government leaders in Bangalore, is that Bill Gates is also using this trip to trumpet the Gates Foundation's donation of hundreds of millions of dollars to help the sick/poor of India. Regardless of the motive, Gates' philanthropic efforts are extraordinarily generous. I'm sure this contributes to them speaking up in Bill's defense.

    I wonder how Stallman was generally received in India. He has a reputation of being difficult to deal with, and aggressively confrontational on tangential issues (e.g. shouting matches about making sure the transcripts of his speech were freely available). This may be tolerated in the U.S. where his reputation and eccentricities are known. But, in a country less familiar with him, would he just be dismissed as a jackass?

    And lastly.. The attitude of the gov't representative in Bangalore is disappointing. India's intellectual wealth is probably it's greatest resource. Particularly in a high-tech center like Bangalore, they should be easily able to employ linux / free software experts. But, the Indian government has never been known as progressive, or embracing of change. Some well placed donations above board, and greased palms under the covers goes a long way.

  46. ..it's too bad by zogger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ..it's too bad walmart doesn't have these machines on the shelf, or at least one of them, one of the mid range models perhaps. The local walmart here you have a choice of one-an HP I believe-running xp. On the software shelf, xp. I don't see anything wrong with a low end budget computer. that's why these markets have terms like that, high end fulla blinkenlights and quad fans, down to these cheap systems. Something for everyone is a *good thing* methinks. Around here the few independent and white box shops offer almost the same low end config for around 600$ and up in a lot of cases and are getting it (when they sell them), mostly because people just don't know any better. Pickups they know, tractors they know, used or new 4 wheel buggys they know, computers, nope, microsoft=computer=it has to be expensive, and as such most people still don't have them. Just yesterday I saw one guy had a 486 bundle all used everything for 250$. I was incredulous, but I guess folks don't realize that out in the "heartland" there's not enough choice. That's the tradeoffs in a lot of matters. And it's hard to shop around and order online if you don't have a computer in the first place, yes?

    I don't necessarily approve of walmart,it's business model in general, not really, but at least there's finally some effort to break the stranglehold of microsoft-only and expensive-only for computing.

  47. Don't trust the Indian IT minister by subzero_ice · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Caution! Do not trust Indian ministers specially IT ministers. They barely know anything about Linux other than the name. If you ask them to name a operating system other than that by MS or Linux they wouldn't know. It is a matter of time before they will make the switch.

  48. Maybe You Should Tell That To These Twits by Myriad · · Score: 2
    Priceless art, texts, etc, aren't the sort of thing you'd unload onto Ebay, but there is still a market for them. I'm sure several rich private collectors would have loved to get their hands on it. Nobody would dare flaunt it in public.

    Really? Maybe you should explain that to these morons! :)

    --
    "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
    1. Re:Maybe You Should Tell That To These Twits by Servo · · Score: 2

      Hmmm... dopes.

      --
      A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
  49. Actual WalMart Computer Experience by Lord+Ender · · Score: 5, Informative

    My uncle wanted a computer as cheap as possible (as a 2nd PC in his house). I had him order a walmart PC with Mandrake. What he got was a decent PC with an AMD Athlon processor, 256MB Ram, 20GB hd and onboard video/sound, along with a PCI ethernet card and modem, all assembled. When I came over to help him set it up, I just plugged in the keyboard and mouse and monitor (which he already had). It was much easier than building him one, and it only cost $400. Then he said he wanted Win2k instead of Mandrake... well guess what. The walmart PC cam with a single CDROM that had drivers for all the hardware for every version of windows! So 40 minutes later, he had a full Athlon system. I didnt have to install any hardware or hunt down any drivers on the internet. Walmart is doing a good job with their PCs.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:Actual WalMart Computer Experience by El · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And, uh... where did you get that copy of Win2K to install on it? Remember, Big Bill and the BSA are watching you!

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  50. GoogleBot wins! by KPU · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anybody notice that googlebot won four games in browser wars? Wget won one so far. One has to wonder about the skills of the average IE user versus an automated bot.

  51. Well... by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    I don't know how much money M$ spent on IE, but whatever you say about them, it was well programed and stable. You're certanly right about Netscape being fat and lazy. People don't want a browser that's going to crash every five minutes. (nor do they want one that takes five minute to load, not that IE wouldn't if you loaded it seperately, I would guess).

    It's not like you can't compete against Microsoft, but you need to have a quality product if you want to.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  52. M$ investment was overlooked by drakos7 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Perhaps the fact that Gates announces $100-million support to fight AIDS in India has something to do with the change of tune. That and $12.5 million to improve immunisation services.
    At least all the money people sink into M$ is going somewhere good. Too bad we have less of our own money to give away ourselves.

  53. Talk comparision of RMS & Bill ... by kousik · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I attended both the talks they gave in Bangalore.

    The general feeling among the audience was never like that you said. But still, there are many FUDs around Linux (oops, GNU/Linux), which RMS didn't care to clarify. He was theoretically and politically correct, but failed to excite common user. They need more assurance, that GNU will serve all their needs, and they'll get support. Whereas, in Gate's talk, it was much more exciting for users to know they can get some freebies from M$.

    But, that's it. No body jumped ship as far as I have seen.

    Bill is getting more importance here because our politicians are interested in free beer.

    Kousik

  54. Phew... What a relief! by Tjp($)pjT · · Score: 2

    "We are a poor country. We cannot develop operating systems and platforms on our own."

    Well that's reassuring. For a moment I thought India was the country that was providing a significant lowering of jobs in the US for programmers due to outsourcing to "Team India" programmers who work for considerably reduced pay in comparison. Thank goodness I work in OS programming and "Platforms".

    --
    - Tjp

    I am in wallow with my inner money grubbing capitalistic pig. ... Oink!

  55. I've got a Compaq 750MHz computer... by mmol_6453 · · Score: 2

    I don't have to worry about TSRs...Linux runs fine on it.

    Linux supports all the onboard stuff. And if you'd rather use your new SoundBlaster Audigy instead of the AC97 onboard audio, don't load the module for AC97. Or do load it, but use it as a secondary device.

    However, it is sad when you learn much more about your machine with "cat /proc/cpu" than by looking at the CMOS. (I don't think Murphy himself could screw up what few BIOS settings are available.)

    --
    What's this Submit thingy do?
  56. Re:Security Through Obscurity by ninewands · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Quoth the poster:
    Most Linux geeks that I know would want high end equipment not cheap junk. I've got an old celeron that has trouble running X.

    My "old" Celeron 366s on an Abit BP-6 have NO problem running X and generating more than 1000 frames per second when running glxgears through my Voodoo4 4500.

    It's true that the Via C3 is not a modern processor design but it is PLENTY adequate for running Linux.

    As for the target market for these machines, well who knows ... the "no money/no internet access" crowd you speak of isn't going to be buying from Wal-Mart.com (See the notice? The one that says "not available in stores"?) That 2 GHz P4 for < $500 might make one HELL of a personal workstation on some slightly tech-savvy small business's LAN if you gave it a RAM upgrade ... especially if it was the Mandrake machine (which includes OpenOffice out of the box).

    My question is this ... does ANYone have any idea how many Linux boxes Wal-Mart.com is selling and what kind of customers they are selling them to?
  57. Demographics by mmol_6453 · · Score: 2

    I suspect that if you divided all computer users into students and non-students, you'd find that a greater percentage of students play 3D games than non-students. :)

    --
    What's this Submit thingy do?
  58. Re:Linux and India by TrebleJunkie · · Score: 2

    Chill, man, it's just a joke. Well, half a joke. The point was, they *do* have the talent to generate applications and platforms. Just as half-jokingly, and/or half seriously, I hope that doing so in their own country, for themselves, works better than trying to write it our code for us. Nothing xenophobic or stereotypical about that, I just happen to be familiar with several projects where the code was outsourced to India, and for whatever reason (language barrier, cultural barrier, whatever) the code was a mess, the projects were a disaster.

    Hell, look at the Simputer we've read so much about here on Slashdot -- there's even a review on it one article back on the front page here. An entire platform -- one that is getting rave reviews -- One that is inexpensive and innovative -- And one that -- get this -- was created in India! They can do it, and if they knew what's best, they wouldn't let Mr. Gates try to steer them away from that course of action.

    --

    Ed R.Zahurak

    You know, oblivion keeps looking better every day.

  59. Re:Security Through Obscurity by FuegoFuerte · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My question is this ... does ANYone have any idea how many Linux boxes Wal-Mart.com is selling and what kind of customers they are selling them to?

    Well, I have no idea how many they're selling, but I do know I'm a customer who's thinking of buying one.

    Application: router/VPN server for a small wireless network.

    Reasons: It's cheap, and it's *good enough*. This is what many don't understand. A lot of people now sneer at a Via C3 800Mhz... but think about it... for many applications that's MORE than adequate. As is the 128 MB of SDRAM and the 10GB HD. It has almost everything I need built in. All I'd have to add is one NIC (it already has one on-board). The proc can run in heatsink-only designs, so I should n't have to worry too much about leaving it in a closet somewhere. If the fan dies, the box will probably just keep chugging as if nothing happened.

    All I have to do when I get the box: Install another NIC. Wipe the hard drive, load slack. Configure firewall/routing rules. Set up VPN server. Set up anything else I may want, such as Apache, DNS, etc.

    Keep in mind there will only be a few users at a time on the box. Plenty of power left over. Seems like a good deal to me.

  60. RMS gave the wrong speech? by Ogerman · · Score: 2

    "We are a poor country. We cannot develop operating systems and platforms on our own," Kulkarni said.

    It sounds to me like RMS spent too much time explaining the virtues of the Open Source development model and not enough time explaining that virtually all of the Free Software that India will ever need is already written! Next time, RMS, brag about all the cool stuff they can have free right now and then explain how it came into existance!

    But then again, if they want to remain a 3rd world toilet by stuffing their monies into US corporate coffers, that's up to them.. can't say we didn't try to help.

  61. Rejected: Jon Katz's "hero" Jose Bove in Jail by Nova+Express · · Score: 2

    Here's a Slashback they just didn't think was important enough to post. Gee, you'd think a major follow-up to a person Katz posted an entire story on would make the cut...

    Remember Jose Bove, the anti-globalist French terrorist Jon Katz offered up fulsome praise to a few July 4ths ago? Well, France's highest court just ordered him to "serve 14 months in prison for destroying two fields of genetically modified crops." Yep, Katz picks his "heroes" with the same insight and forethought he brings to his "writing"...

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  62. SOLVED: Newton theft by MouseR · · Score: 2

    It's not hard to find out where the Newton went.

    Didn't MicroSoft just release their Tablet PC?

    They had to steal the idea from somewhere.

  63. RMS had his blinder on in India by ToasterTester · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Guess RMS didn't do his homework. MS actually got in trouble in India years ago for hiring so many Indian programmersand shipping them off to the states. India told MS their programmers are a natural resource and MS can't drain any more. So MS has built a large development facility in India. So RMS is asking India's developers to work for free, Gates is giving them paychecks.

  64. Principia Recovered! by bagsc · · Score: 3, Funny

    Good job! We've recovered the loot, and placed the henchmen behind bars. Now, it's time to go after Carmen Sandiego, Gumshoe!

    --
    http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  65. Been there, done that. by The+Cydonian · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You see, it was like this. RMS came to our (non-descript, but *very* highly funded) university a couple of months back, evangelising on copyright misuse. The lecture theater was full to the brim of course and the audience, mostly consisting of CS grads, were quite taken by his rather impressive beard and his persistent plucking of his nose. Not to debase his talent or vision, but he has some very interesting stage-habits.

    Fast forward to a couple of weeks back when Steve Ballmer made a stopover at our university. The theater, this time the largest available, was again filled to the brim. The university President shared the dais with him and we all had to register for the talk with our name and university IC No. The official reason for the registration is that seats are limited, which, in any case, was a sort of valid reason; seats were booked within two days of the announcement. Needless to say, everyone (that is, from all faculties) turned up to watch him speak.

    I wasn't down at Mr. Ballmer's talk, but friends tell me that it had very little to do with the stated topic "Innovation and Entreprenuership" and more to do with X-Boxes and Tablet PC's. Ballmer's shiny scalp was, I believe, impressive, but apparently the audience found the X-Boxes and Tablet PC's more interesting.

    Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if someone told me that Bill Gates made a better impression on India than RMS.

  66. WalMart is really pushing the Linux PC by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This is a major WalMart product now. Go to the main WalMart site. Click on "Computers and Printers" in the upper left. You're now on the page with Linux-based PCs. All the desktop machines on WalMart's main computer page run Linux. The notebook machines shown run Windows, but cost 5x as much. Windows XP Pro alone is shown as costing more than the entry-level Linux PC.

    Think about it. This is WalMart telling Joe Sixpack that Linux is the way to go. In their words "Desktop/LX is an exciting new Linux-based operating system (OS) that offers a user-friendly, powerful and open alternative to Microsoft Windows." Hundreds of thousands of kids are going to be doing their homework on those boxes.

    1. Re:WalMart is really pushing the Linux PC by Deven · · Score: 2

      This is a major WalMart product now.

      I'll consider it a major Wal-Mart product when they put it in all the retail stores.

      --

      Deven

      "Simple things should be simple, and complex things should be possible." - Alan Kay

  67. Lynx on Browser Wars by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cost of computer: $2500
    Operating System: $40 retail
    Broadband Internet: $50/mo

    Owning Graphical Browsers at Connect 4 using a Text Browser: Priceless

  68. cheapo walmart by mattr · · Score: 2

    only 10 gigs?? how much of this IRIS software and digital photography will fit on it?

  69. Re:this is all boring news, so I'll tell some joke by geekoid · · Score: 2

    if people who sport mullets can get, use and be happy with it, then yes. Of course I want nothing to do with firebirds or mullets, so I'll switch to BSD.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  70. Usable Age and Moore's Law by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 3, Insightful


    You, sir, have won an express ticket to my foes list. Sure I *could* run Slackware 3 with Linux kernel 2.0 with barely any drivers loaded and just running c-shell (really slowly I might add) on that hardware, but not much else.

    Of course you could just run DOS 6.22 on there as well.


    As dubious as the origional poster's claim is... he still has a somewhat valid point. It is possible to make older systems functional under linux that simply would not be at all useful under the latest windows. Of course - Linux "cheats" - it doesn't NEED a GUI to operate.

    I've given up on old 386 hardware, but I do have a 486 DX2-66 still running the latest Debian release (Unstable - currently with a Linux kernel 2.4.19). Its a very useful little machine for what I need it for. And the software is current - unlike the suggested DOS 6.22. Granted - this box could possibly handle Win95... but then, that is long past its EOL and is no longer developed. Unlike Linux.



    By the way, I can get XP running faster than you can ever get KDE3/GNOME2 running on an identical system. That's a fact, not uninformed FUD.


    Which brings up an interesting point. Its long been pointed out that Linux' GUI environment has had a bit of a disadvantage... XFree86. Granted, its a tradeoff. There are some advantages. But there has always been that hit on speed from a system like X Windows.

    But I wonder if its beginning to not matter anymore.

    As I traverse between my Linux and Windows workstations, I've always noted the performance hit for Linux. I'm a sucker for eye candy, so a great deal of that suffering is self-inflicted. But as my desktop hardware has become more powerful, and as the various cycle-sucking eye candy GUI components for Linux are improved, that difference is less and less noticeable.

    The GUI is not the only benefactor here. Emulators such as VMWare and "compatability layers" like WINE/Transgaming/Crossover also enjoy the available spare cycles. Even when there is not a native port for the desired software package, running it under Linux is more often a valid option.

    Sure, Microsoft has a well-deserved reputation for raising the minimal requirements for a desktop. And the mantra for Linux and its supporters has always been efficency. But in the end, it may be that Moore's Law is becoming more a friend to Linux than Microsoft.

    Effecient design and constant improvement should continue to be a part of Linux development. And native applications are better than emulated environments. But it is less likely to be noticed when, for one reason or another, one is forced to rely more available cycles than the perfect ideal.

    It should cause some gnashing of teeth in both the Windows and Linux camps. But the irony is that "good enough" has often been atributed to Microsoft's products. With more power in the avarage desktop, Linux may suddenly find itself the new "good enough".
    1. Re:Usable Age and Moore's Law by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2


      While Linus wrote Linux for a 386, that was kernel 0.0.1 way back in the early 90s. Things have changed, times have changed. And the grandparent post's supposedly levelheaded comparison of "just try running Windows XP on that machine" made me retch in disgust, as it was supposed to be a valid comparison? How about, "Let's see KDE3 run on a 386 with 8M ram." What an asshole. (I know someone will prove me wrong, but...) the only thing remotely useful that you could do on that machine is run vi.


      In a way, we're running in to some of the fundimental differences between Windows and Linux (or any Unix-like environment, for that matter). With Windows, the GUI is an intrical part of the system. With Linux, it is not. And if you do throw a GUI in to the Linux mix... exactly what is your recipe? What version of X? What window manager? But do you really NEED the GUI?

      I agree that the claims of Linux effeciency on antiquated hardware can be confusing. One is not going to have the latest desktop environment running on such minimal hardware (heck - most handhelds these days are more powerful). But on the other side of the argument, Linux is still useful even without its admittedly resource-heavy GUI environment(s).

      I have seen 386 machines run *BSD and Linux to become web servers, firewalls, email servers, etc. Granted - these machines were for small networks. But they performed admirably at their task. Considerably more useful than simply running vi. And they used up-to-date code.

      Whether India would find this a usefull point depends, of course. Pitty the poor sod who has to compile code on a scavenged 386 or 486. Unless, of course, the alternative would be nothing to compile code on at all.
  71. Re:Browser wars? That's so three years ago by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

    Because it's integrated into the OS, meaning that parts of it have already started before you run it. Comparing its speed to the speed of a browser that isn't integrated is comparing apples with oranges.

    Sounds like you're confused. You're talking about startup speed, as in the time required to open a new instance. We're talking about actual running speed, as in the time required to render a given web page. IE is faster than other browsers.

    Given the state of Mozilla/Phoenix nowadays, that's debatable.

    No, it isn't. Mozilla is still as slow, bloated, and bug-ridden as it was in the pre-1.0 days. In fact, I've just about come to the conclusion that the 1.0 release was just a big joke. They took a random nightly build and slapped the 1.0 label on it and sent out a press release.

    --

    I write in my journal
  72. Re:Browser wars? That's so three years ago by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

    IE won because it came with the OS. It's that simple.

    No, it isn't. Back before IE 4.0, Netscape was a far more popular browser, despite the fact that IE came bundled with whichever Windows version was shipping at that time. (I forget.)

    As IE got better and better, Netscape got worse and worse, and then stopped altogether. Whereas people had been downloading Netscape in ever-increasing numbers, they simply stopped when IE became a better alternative.

    IE won because Microsoft kept making it better, while Netscape kept making their browser worse.

    None of the rest of the stuff in your comment means anything because you prefaced it with, "I feel I have to badmouth them at every opportunity just to even the scales." I appreciate you throwing in that little remark, so I wouldn't waste any time reading the rest of your comment.

    --

    I write in my journal
  73. English seen as more valuable? by fantomas · · Score: 2

    My impression when I was in India was that English is seen as a language of prestige and there is an association of English with being well educated. It's used as a lingua franca and so I don't think the use of English with computers is *perceived* as a problem, far the opposite. Computer bookshops in Connaught Place, Delhi, are stuffed with locally licenced copies of O'Reilly books in English.


    Can any slashdot readers from India comment? I'd be interested to hear their opinion on the whole matter...


    I can't remember if English is an official language for business but it seems close to it. I've been to some pretty small places in India and there always seems to be a fair smattering of English. I think education is better valued there than in my home country, UK. I couldn't see you going to a small town in the UK and being confident the local ticket collectors on the train station will able to speak to you in a second or third language....

  74. MMX!=FP by turgid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    MMX is integer SIMD (Single Instruction Multiple Data). These Cyrix/VIA processors have 3DNow! which is Floating Point SIMD in addition to MMX so they are more than powerful enough for playing digital video. I'd say that for a low-cost machine, they are pretty darn good value for money. BTW the 3DNow! outperforms the legacy Floating Point by a significant margin. In some cases by 300%. And no, I didn't pull that number out of my butt: libSIMD

  75. India and Jobs by theolein · · Score: 2

    Disregarding that sentence from India's IT Minister, the fact is that India IS a poor country and in poor country the thing people think about most, much in common with rich countries in recession, is jobs and money. India defintely has the resources to develop their own OS (Linux) and sell it to the masses(Simputer PDA). The thing is that most people in India who work in IT do it for $$$(or Rupees) and most of them percieve MS software development as being more lucrative than Linux. And so they develop software for MS since the market for commercial Linux software is only beginning to take off (give us a Navision competitor on Linux!). If and when large commercial projects are done on Linux, the picture will change rapidly in India. And RMS going over to India probably does Linux more harm than good, since he hasn't yet noticed that people have to eat.

  76. Heh. by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2

    How proud are you that Linux sits proudly in Wal-mart next to quality merchandise such as Stanley tools, Apex electronics, Road Gear car stereos and President's Choice cola?

    Seriously, this is embarrassing shit -- that the only big commercial outlet for an OS "better than Windows" is people who don't know any better and think they're getting a bargain.

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
  77. bull, and a counter example by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2

    Walmart is the beginning of the end of American Middle Class.

    Bull*. The Meijer chain in Michigan and Ohio has been around (in that region at least) a lot longer than Wal-Mart. Until Wal-Mart started adding some food, Meijer was even more of the giant superstore where you could buy everything, usually for less than smaller stores, than Wal-Mart is. Actually, they still have Wal-Mart beat on selection (a real, complete, grocery store in addition to a full department store all in one building) though Wal-Mart beats them a little on price.

    Anyway, they've been around for many decades. We still have a middle class around here. Everything is fine. Get a grip.

  78. wacky wheel finger by Havokmon · · Score: 2
    I don't know what's funnier: a slashdotter with a girlfriend, or the fact that you use your middle finger for the wheel. (WHO DOES THAT?)

    I think it's the weird friend we all had who played 16 bit Nintendo games using his index and middle finger on the buttons (instead of his thumb like normal people).

    Wich would also explain why the girlfriend is most impressed with his finger :P

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  79. Why WalMart makes more money than you do by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2

    WalMart has become the largest retailer on the planet by having the lowest prices, even if they have to sell crap. For a lot of people crap is "good enough," and WalMart knows that many people will sacrifice quality if the price is right. WalMart doesn't get into a market unless they can undercut their competition, and in the computer market it is very difficult to undercut Dell, unless, of course, you don't include the price of Windows.

    As for this being a bad business move, I can't see how that could possibly be the case. WalMart isn't selling these at their stores (so they have no inventory problems), and they have outsourced both the construction and the support to Microtel (so they aren't likely to lose money there). So even if these machines don't sell WalMart has wasted little more than some space on their web site.

    As for a potential market, I personally have been looking at purchasing a WalMart Linux PC. I could really use a good source of cheap disposable X terminal machines with Linux compatible hardware, currently I use low end Pentiums, so these PCs ought to be more than good enough. It is also important to note is that WalMart doesn't care if their customers pirate Windows. Dell and HP have to care, but WalMart doesn't care what Microsoft says. That's why WalMart also sells OS-less PCs on their web site.

    In short, WalMart has very little to lose, and for those consumers that need a low end machine for casual use WalMart's prices can't be beat.

  80. I Like Walmart.. by Sloppy · · Score: 2
    (..although I would never buy a computer there. There is still enough variation in PC quality that they aren't really commodities yet, or at least not for my purposes.)

    There is a huge difference between Walmart and Microsoft. Walmart got big through the virtue of efficiency and scale. Microsoft got big through dirty tricks, dishonesty, fraud, and lock-in. No customer is ever locked-in to Walmart, and all a business has to do to compete against Walmart is .. well .. compete. If you can't compete on price, then compete by not selling the same bland commodities that Walmart sells.

    Example: I buy cat food at Walmart, because my cat hasn't expressed a preference (as far as I can tell) for one can of cat food over another. Friskies cans == commodity. But I wouldn't buy music CDs there, because .. well, they don't really have much, and they never will. Non-pop music CDs != commodity. If you sell something of real value, then Walmart is not a threat to you.

    When I see some "middle class" mom'n'pop complaining about Walmart, I just see slackers whining that their easy ride has come to an end. Why were you charging me 50 cents for a can of Friskies, hmm?

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  81. Ordering from Wal-Mart's website in their stores? by Deven · · Score: 2

    Too bad Wal-Mart doesn't have a PC or two in their stores that could access their website.

    That's a good idea, if they're going to have products that are available only online. Better yet, they could even accept cash payments at the register for an online order, for those without credit cards. They could either have a kiosk or simply a computer at the customer service counter where the CSR could place the order.

    Why don't you write to their corporate offices and suggest it? Maybe they'll recognize a good idea when they see it...

    --

    Deven

    "Simple things should be simple, and complex things should be possible." - Alan Kay

  82. Man I love this one... by oolon · · Score: 2

    "Gates, in a brief chat with reporters here, asserted that Microsoft Windows had saved more money for its users than open-source systems."

    Ok so I have product A am trying to break into a market so I only have 1 user, someone else has product B which has 100 users. Now my product offers 10 bucks a saving per user, product B offers 1 buck a saving per user.

    So clearly product A makes better savings, however if we go to absolute figures total savings for all users, my product save 10 bucks there one saved 100 bucks, so yes there total saving can be higher!

    James

  83. Simputers, Linux, Unix in India by billstewart · · Score: 2
    Just because there's a politician whose organization will be buying Microsoft products doesn't mean that he's making a decision for all of India, or even all of India's government, or banning the competition, or necessarily anything at all except that he's saying Thanks to Bill for recent donations.

    The statement that India is a poor country that can't afford to develop its own operating systems is laughable, especially given the timing of that speech and the Simputer deployment at the same time; the Simputer folks have done some really interesting user interface work for dealing with multiple languages and varying literacy levels.

    If a Finnish grad student can afford to develop an operating system, surely somebody in India can afford to do so as well, though the government may be far too disorganized and bureaucratic to do it well. But beyond that, India's had a long tradition of training university students in Unix operating systems, and with a few hundred million educated English-speaking Indians, many of whom know Unix, the assertion that India can't afford to develop its own software when it can have it for free is an insult to one of the country's big and growing industries. (It's been about 8 years since I've worked directly with Indian software companies, but at the time they knew SunOS / Solaris just as well as I did, and Sun's done a lot of development over in India since then.)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  84. Re:Some web sites require IE on Windows by Micah · · Score: 2

    My bank and investment site work just fine on Mozilla in Linux.

    And if her bank isn't supported, well, Grandma probably doesn't need or even WANT online banking.

    And frankly, anyone who designs a website that only works in IE should be [insert the most cruel torture immaginable here].

  85. We are a poor nation by Felinoid · · Score: 2

    We cam't afford to use free software have to pay thousands for defective software.

    How did India get the idea that Linux isn't free and worse that Windows was?

    I've always knew software piracy hurts free software and here's a good example. mayhap Microsoft is just letting software piracy slide in a nation that couldn't afford it in order to prevent Linux from gainning any footholds.
    For this reason mayhap it's time for the free software forces to ... ahem.. do Microsoft a favor.. and combat software priacy when Microsoft won't.

    --
    I don't actually exist.
  86. Re:Browser wars? That's so three years ago by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

    I've ranted about this before. De jure standards have marginal relevance at best. If your web page is designed for public consumption, like a company or personal web site or some such, the correct thing to do is design it so that it renders correctly in IE. If that page fails to render correctly in Mozilla, so what? With IE holding something like 95% of the browser market, the odds that a random visitor to your site is going to be running IE 5 or 6 are overwhelming. It makes little sense, then, to design your site to conform to de jure standards while rendering incorrectly for 95% of all visitors.

    This is, ultimately, why Mozilla is irrelevant. It's bloated, slow, enormous to download, amateurish, and ugly, but it would be possible to overcome all of those thing given sufficient time and effort. The problem, the last nail in the coffin if you will, is that Mozilla fails to render many web sites that IE renders perfectly. I'm sure the problem lies with the Mozilla DOM implementation, but the details aren't important. What's important is that it just doesn't work.

    When Mozilla is as fast as IE for Windows, when it has a native UI, and most importantly when it has 100% compatibility with IE 5 and 6, then and only then will it become a reasonable alternative. Until then, it'll never achieve any sort of widespread adoption because it will have nothing at all to offer over the de facto standard.

    --

    I write in my journal