Slashdot Mirror


Deadly Perversions

twos writes "I just read the newly released novel Deadly Perversions, by 2002 ComputerWorld Top 100 IT Leader , well known computer columnist for eWeek, and now author Brett Arquette. The book really rocks with a real virus that's spread via hardware/software during 3D Cybersex encounters. Poof! Kills you in 72 hours." Read on for the rest of twos' review. Deadly Perversions author Brett Arquette pages 406 publisher Lighthouse Press, Inc. rating Excellent & Refreshing. Can't wait to read his next book reviewer twos ISBN 1932211004 summary Deadly virus is spread internationally via the use of Cybersex software/hardware.

This wild novel has a great caricature of Howard Stern and his crew. If you love Howard, he's in the book. If you hate him, Arquette kills him off in chapter 15 (and quite violently I may add). Lots of good computer stuff in it for bit-heads. Tons of Cybersex for chick-heads. It's written in a fascinating self-effacing style where there are just as many laughs to break up the tension as there are chills. I highly recommend this read for anyone under 40. Over that, (unless you're somewhat feral) I don't think you'll get it.

I can't think of a way to traditionally walk you through the book and summarize it, because there are simply too many subplots and wacky characters to do a scene-by-scene breakdown, so if that's what you're looking for it's best to read the back cover of the book.

I'd like to concentrate on Arquette's writing style, which is so unique that I feel there are many reasons this book will become a breakout cult classic bestseller.

First, the novel moves at the speed of light, short, quick, entertaining chapters that keeps you flipping pages trying to find a stopping point, but to no avail. I found I had read half of it before even realizing I had spent hours doing so.

Second - it's fun! How many books can you say were really fun to read, especially fiction thrillers that spend half the time describing characters that get violently killed off right after you get to know them. Arquette's book has zero fluff in it. He has traded in the violence for sex (one of the two are a must for any best selling novel), yet he wrote the book in a way where it doesn't take itself too seriously. I found myself laughing my ass off many times, wondering if this was a thriller or a comedy, but Arquette structured the chapters so the laughs come in just where they're needed, cutting some tension, allowing the reader to take a breath before being consumed in the plot, yet again.

Third - Arquette keeps you guessing. Just when you think you have it figured out, another twist pops up, another character is introduced, and another finding from the CDC comes out, which leads you off in another directly. If you've read the first 21 chapters off his website (for free) don't presume to think you've actually read any of the book or could guess the ending. Not possible unless you have a crystal ball running Linux.

Fourth - It's written in a style I've never read before. I can't compare Arquette to any other writer, which in itself is something of an accomplishment. There are so many authors whose work just blends in with others until their styles all seem the same. Arquette's style, however, is smart and blunt. Where other authors imply things, Arquette writes them in black and white. He takes on subject matter that other authors would just assume leave alone, yet does a wonderful job of spinning it so the characters actions seem perfect reasonable to the character himself.

And lastly, there is freshness in the author's soul, and he writes young, as if he's catering to an 18 through 39 demographic. Most best selling author's are over forty and really don't write their books for the 'instant gratification' world the younger generation is experiencing. For example, books such as Stephen King's bloated 900-page Dream Catcher would have been a tight and quick 400 page novel if Arquette had written it.

I also like Arquette's website and the fact that he's determined to let readers download and read roughly a third of each of his books, before you buy. Some authors let you read a few pages, maybe a few chapters, but Arquette believes if you are going to shell out $15 bucks for a book, you should be able to read enough of it to really know it's something you want to purchase. It will be interesting to see how long his editors let him get away with that, but I find it refreshing that he has that mindset.

You can purchase Deadly Perversions from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

195 comments

  1. killed by cybersex... by SledgeHBK · · Score: 3, Funny

    What?

    I thought hairy palms were the only risk I was taking.

  2. I can imagine my colleagues screaming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Oh no, my date was infected by Nimda!

  3. Sounds a bit like Palahniuk by trikberg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    > There are so many authors whose work just
    > blends in with others until their styles all
    > seem the same. Arquette's style, however, is
    > smart and blunt

    Smart and blunt? That how I would describe Chuck Palahniuk's (hope I didn't butcher that) style. If the name doesn't ring a bell, I have two words for you: Fight Club.

    --
    This post is free (as in cheese in a mousetrap).
    1. Re:Sounds a bit like Palahniuk by GMontag · · Score: 1

      I have two words for you: Fight Club

      Don't talk about that!

  4. Please don't take this the wrong way by ekrout · · Score: 1, Interesting

    But there's just something about people who write about computers, technology, etc. that makes me just not trust or respect them.

    I mean, if you love something so much and if you know a ton about something, why aren't you actually doing it rather than writing little editorial pieces here and there or spending years on full-blown books that won't even get read by many people.

    Maybe I just don't like the whole "critic" idea. But over the years I've found that you can't listen to critics because most of them don't even like themselves, so of course they won't like any work that you do, whether it's a new computer program, a movie, etc.

    --

    If you celebrate Xmas, befriend me (538
    1. Re:Please don't take this the wrong way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe, they're too busy to write a book that takes 5 years and only has poor examples that don't show you a damned thing about doing something in the real world. Perhaps small consice articles that only take maybe a day to write with some good information that is relavent is the only thing that they have time to write.

    2. Re:Please don't take this the wrong way by Nodatadj · · Score: 1

      "Regard all art critics as useless and dangerous"

    3. Re:Please don't take this the wrong way by G.+W.+Bush+Junior · · Score: 1

      I mean, if you love something so much and if you know a ton about something, why aren't you actually doing it rather than writing little editorial pieces here and there or spending years on full-blown books that won't even get read by many people.

      Yeah... If you're interested in computers you should sit in at home by your computer, or at work in your cubicle and work with it... Trying to share it with people you haven't met on slashdot just goes to show that you not REALLY interested in computer...

      That would really make you a loser...

      --
      "I don't know that Atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots." -George H.W. Bush
    4. Re:Please don't take this the wrong way by Kenneth+Stephen · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Thats ridiculous. Your argument could also be directed to science-fiction writers in general : "If you love science so much that you spend all day writing about it, why dont you do science?". Well, the answer is often that it is very rare that a good scientist can write about science well and it is also rare that a good writer can do good science. So why not have writers write about science?

      --

      There is no such thing as luck. Luck is nothing but an absence of bad luck.

    5. Re:Please don't take this the wrong way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now we sit back and wait for some of ekrouts friends to mod him up to +5, Interesting...

      Come on ekrout, where are the clever trolls? Simply relying on your fans to mod you up no matter what you write is a lazy way

    6. Re:Please don't take this the wrong way by Demerol · · Score: 1

      I agree, though for different reasons. I don't care what this guy does with his spare time...it's just that every single piece of fiction (book, movie, whatever) that I have read/seen that was based on computers and technology has always sucked. I find everything so horribly cheesy and exaggerated and make-believe. Knowing about the stuff makes it hard to enjoy seeing it done in a second-rate fashion.

      Examples: swordfish, takedown, the list goes on.I would be astonished (and pleased, don't get me wrong) to see a film based on computer technology that was accurate and didn't try to sell itself on some overused buzzwords (like "open source" in the film Anti-Trust)...

  5. Poof! Kills you in 72 hours by spakka · · Score: 0, Troll

    How long if you're hetero?

  6. This is such BS by TerryAtWork · · Score: 2

    The whole point of tinysex is that you can't catch anything from it.

    --
    It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
    1. Re:This is such BS by disappear · · Score: 2

      What do you expect in a sex-negative culture?

      I haven't read it, but based on this review, the guy obviously believes (probably on a subconscious level) that sex is icky and bad, not pleasurable and good. Or at the very least he's playing off of peoples' fears in that regard.

      Repeat after me: Sex is nice and pleasure is good for you.

      Which isn't to say be careful in real life. But there's a huge difference between being careful and being sex-negative.

    2. Re:This is such BS by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 2

      <sarcasm>

      You must be some kinda commie pinko satanic islamic atheist terorist, promoting a site like that.

      God didn't intend for anyone to have sex unless that sex is sanctioned by the Church and the State through the sanctity of a marriage contract. It says so in Exodus and Leviticus and in the Epistles. This is why we need to make sex outside of marriage a capital crime, punishable by firing squad.

      This is the new America under Christ and George W Bush. Get with the program.

      <\sarcasm>

    3. Re:This is such BS by GMontag · · Score: 2

      What do you expect in a sex-negative culture?

      Where are you? Afghanastan? Nigeria?

      Come on over here to the USA, plenty of sex in our culture! I LOVE IT!

    4. Re:This is such BS by Capt.+DrunkenBum · · Score: 3, Informative

      If sex isn't "icky" you are doing it wrong. ;)

      --

      Not everyone deserves a 320i

    5. Re:This is such BS by operagost · · Score: 2
      I know you're being sarcastic even without the tags. Still, I wanted to point out a few verses to help you prove the point against hyprocrisy that I hope you were making.

      Genesis 9:7 As for you, be fruitful and increase in number; multiply on the earth and increase upon it."
      Genesis 2:24 For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh.
      1 Corinthians 7 Now for the matters you wrote about: It is good for a man not to marry.But since there is so much immorality, each man should have his own wife, and each woman her own husband. The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband. The wife's body does not belong to her alone but also to her husband. In the same way, the husband's body does not belong to him alone but also to his wife. Do not deprive each other except by mutual consent and for a time, so that you may devote yourselves to prayer. Then come together again so that Satan will not tempt you because of your lack of self-control.
      Plus, the entire Song of Solomon.

      This reading has been brought to you by bible banging troll busters of America.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    6. Re:This is such BS by mpeeters · · Score: 1

      POKE 65495,0

      Urgh - I'd though I'd never see that again.
      My C64 is still in the cellar.

      I AM NOT PATHETIC.

      --
      Research is what I'm doing when I don't know what I'm doing.
    7. Re:This is such BS by crazyphilman · · Score: 2

      Boy, has it been a long time... But, it reminds me of what we used to do to display a colored pixel or sound in basic programs on the C-64... Am I close? This one looks like a beep... Is it?

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    8. Re:This is such BS by MAXOMENOS · · Score: 2
      Thanks :) I'm well aware that the Bible condones sexual activity under certain circumstances. My main concern is with the near-hysteria I'm finding surrounding the Sanctity of Marriage. The idea that a mere sheet of paper (the marriage license) somehow magically distinguishes between okay and not-okay sex is ridiculous on its face. The real marriage takes place long before then, and often in forms that we don't see right away.

      Of course, I'm looking at things from a slightly different viewpoint, perhaps, than Paul. "Love is the Law, Love under Will," and all that.

  7. linux perversions by ErikRed1488 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was just explaining to my co-irker how to mount a floppy drive in linux. Every time I said "mount" he laughed. He said I had "an unhealthy obsession with technology." Two minutes later I go to /. and find this article. This is some kind of strange cosmic coincidence right?

    --
    I was not touched there by an angel.
    1. Re:linux perversions by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

      this guy goes into a psychiatrists office and the doc shows him some ink blots (rorschach test) - the first one reminds him of sex, the next one reminds him of sex, etc. The doc finally say, "I zee you are obsessed with sex", and the guy says, "Me? You're the one with all the dirty pictures".

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    2. Re:linux perversions by aWalrus · · Score: 2
      I was just explaining to my co-irker

      How does that work? you two go around pissing people off? =)
      --

      --
      Overcaffeinated. Angry geeks.
    3. Re:linux perversions by Fizyx · · Score: 1

      Apparently in South Africa 3 1/2" disks were (are?) referred to as 'stiffies' to distinguish them from 5 1/4" 'floppies' (which are, in fact, floppier).

      Count yourself lucky that didn't have to show him how to mount a stiffy.

    4. Re:linux perversions by Ashyukun · · Score: 1

      I can sympatise with your co-worker problem... my wife cracks up laughing whenever she sees me type the command 'make'...

  8. Since you asked by Dick+Click · · Score: 1

    The reviewer asked "How many books can you say were really fun to read, especially fiction thrillers that spend half the time describing characters that get violently killed off right after you get to know them"

    I respond: almost all early Stephen King novels.

  9. Crystal Ball Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    Not possible unless you have a crystal ball running Linux.

    Dude, this is slashdot. We got people here running Beowulf clusters of Crystal Balls bootin' Linux.

    1. Re:Crystal Ball Linux? by MrScience · · Score: 2

      I've got big brass ones running Windows.

      --

      You quitting proves that the karma kap worked. The most annoying of the whores shut up. --CmdrTaco

    2. Re:Crystal Ball Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Uh, if you want to spend all day tuning your Psychic Project Matrix and editing Temporal Peer config files, go right ahead.

      Me, I've got an Apple iBall. Yeah yeah, 100-year projections are the norm these days and this one only goes to 50, but it just works out of the box and man, you should see the sweet stand it's sitting on!

    3. Re:Crystal Ball Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But their dirty secret, as revealed in a recent /. poll, is that their Crystal Balls dual-boot to Windows XP.

      Sadly, the XP foward-looking-oracle-program (AKA XP-FLOP) has a bad habit of predicting that Microsoft will own 2/3rds of the world within 4 years with Billy Gates continuing his role as MS puppetmaster by implanting Balmer with mind-control cybernetics, while still remaining seperate from operational control of the company.

  10. Good review by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

    I can't think of a way to traditionally walk you through the book and summarize it, because there are simply too many subplots and wacky characters to do a scene-by-scene breakdown, so if that's what you're looking for it's best to read the back cover of the book.

    I'd like to concentrate on Arquette's writing style, which is so unique that I feel there are many reasons this book will become a breakout cult classic bestseller.

    It's nice to read an actual book review instead of the book reports usually posted on fiction.

    1. Re:Good review by CaptainCap · · Score: 1

      I got a headache from the first paragraph of the review, even before any mention of a Howard Stern type of character or the expression "so unique"

  11. That's nothing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    There's this videotape out there that kills you seven days after you watch it!

  12. RIAA? by Lxy · · Score: 5, Funny

    real virus that's spread via hardware/ software... Poof! Kills you in 72 hours."

    Just Wait til the RIAA tries to implement this "copy protection scheme" MWHAHAHAHAHA....... :-)

    --

    There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
    :wq
    1. Re:RIAA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      real virus that's spread via hardware/ software... Poof! Kills you in 72 hours."

      in a world...
      one man...
      and his robot butler on the edge of space...

  13. Inefficient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A virus which kills after 72 hours and is only transmitted by cybersex is doomed. That timespan is too short for the infection to spread. The deadliest viruses are those which have long incubation times with no symptoms at all.

    1. Re:Inefficient by TracerJPN_USMC · · Score: 1

      Sure.. it would be too short for a *regular* virus. But if it could somehow be transmitted over the internet, it wouldn't need a long time to incubate. In real life.. most people don't have sex with diff partners in a 72hr period. But online? You could 'cyber' with 5 people at a time if you wanted to.. or so I've heard.

      --
      magnanomous.
    2. Re:Inefficient by Lally+Singh · · Score: 2

      Seriously. Why don't they just stop turn the system off for 72 hours? Let all the infected die, and everyone else is ok.

      --
      Care about electronic freedom? Consider donating to the EFF!
    3. Re:Inefficient by windex · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why does R.J. Reynolds continue to sell cigarettes?

  14. sounds trashy by tps12 · · Score: 1, Troll

    How many books can you say were really fun to read

    Um, why do you read them, then?

    Anyway, this book sounds awful.

    1. Write novel about sex and computers.
    2. Get it reviewed on Slashdot.
    3. ???
    4. PROFIT!!

    I have better things to spend my money on.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
  15. Re:That's the dumbest thing I ever heard! by c.derby · · Score: 0, Troll

    ..and then write a review... heheheh

    --
    -- derby
  16. Deadly Pervesions... by Isbiten · · Score: 1

    You mean like the one I got for /.? ;)

    --
    I fought the corporate America, and the corporate America bought the law.
    1. Re:Deadly Pervesions... by mmol_6453 · · Score: 2

      Naw...but when they keep pointing out I have feelings for CowboyNeal...

      --
      What's this Submit thingy do?
  17. where have I heard that before by night_flyer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    death after viewing something on the internet...

    hmmm...

    oh yeah... Fear Dot Com

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    1. Re:where have I heard that before by night_flyer · · Score: 2

      hmmm, link didnt work...

      www.feardotcom.com

      --


      Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
      Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    2. Re:where have I heard that before by xavii · · Score: 1

      actually before that it was called Snow Crash by Neal Stephenson. you might have heard of it. people on this site seem to like alot.

      i guarantee it is a better book than this one. i'll give you stock options in my dot-com if i am wrong.

    3. Re:where have I heard that before by runswithd6s · · Score: 5, Insightful
      hmmm... oh, yeah...
      Stephenson, Neal, "Snow Crash", Bantam Books, Inc. 2000, ISBN 0553380958.
      IMHO, a far better read than smut.
      --
      assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */
    4. Re:where have I heard that before by Nintendork · · Score: 2

      My thoughts exactly. This time it spreads through cybersex instead of a drug. woopie.

    5. Re:where have I heard that before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'll give you stock options in my dot-com if i am wrong.

      Are you being wagish? Thanks, but I have enough toilet paper already.

    6. Re:where have I heard that before by horcy · · Score: 1

      hehe true. I thought the same thing. Nobody can beat Master Stephenson.

      --
      Check my site: http://pixel.pagina.nl
    7. Re:where have I heard that before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so he was right the first time, FearDotCom is spread through a porn site...

    8. Re:where have I heard that before by plaidfishes · · Score: 1

      True Names by Vernor Vinge had the online video game that killed you. Included a sex function BTW. Published early in the 70's if I recall correctly.

  18. From the review ... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Insightful
    How many books can you say were really fun to read, especially fiction thrillers that spend half the time describing characters that get violently killed off right after you get to know them.

    Um ... most of the books I read? (In other words, things that aren't textbooks or technical references -- although even those can be fun to read if they're written by good enough authors, e.g. Elizabeth Castro or Theo Petersen.) I read a lot for fun, and many of the books I read are, in fact, violent science fiction thrillers. I'm sure the reviewer didn't mean to come off this way, but what the line I quoted says to me is, "I'm someone who hardly ever reads for fun, so you should take my fiction reviews reeeaaally seriously." Someone who doesn't realize that there are a whole lot of fun-to-read books out there is someone whose opinion I have a hard time respecting.
    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    1. Re:From the review ... by CaptainCap · · Score: 1

      It said the same thing to me. Sometimes I wonder if the slashdot editors have ANY standards for fiction book reviews, and I've always decided that they don't. It's really unfair to the reviewer, because they've read the book, thought about it, and taken time to put it in writing, but then are given no editorial feedback until the slashdot readers respond. I don't think the reviewer has a very informed point of view, but any editor could have seen that and asked for some rewrite (instead of wasting our time).

    2. Re:From the review ... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      Worst. Review. Ever.

      He says he can't describe the book, so he doesn't. He says he can't describe the style of writing, so he doesn't. About the only thing he did say was that you need to be "feral" to understand it. I suppose that's some use of the word I'm not familiar with.

      I'm still trying to figure out why he wrote a review, since he clearly couldn't be bothered with describing anything useful about the book.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  19. Masturbatory reading by I+Am+The+Owl · · Score: 2

    Man, I sure feel sorry for you modem users stuck with text these days. With cable and kazaa, I get all the porn flicks I want.

    --

    --sdem
    1. Re:Masturbatory reading by ekrout · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wow, you're lucky.

      I guess I went the wrong way in life. Maybe I'll trade in my engineering degree, $72,000 salary, 2003 sports car, Nautilus exercise equipment, and shore house for your elite P2P skillz.

      After all, girls much prefer dirty thieves over sexy geeks with money.

      Pfft.

      --

      If you celebrate Xmas, befriend me (538
    2. Re:Masturbatory reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they just prefer ones that don't have microscopic penises such as yours; you are so obviously compensating that it's pathetic and sad and disgusting and you shouldn't live.

    3. Re:Masturbatory reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought you were an engineering student? Or is it law student this week?

    4. Re:Masturbatory reading by Exmet+Paff+Daxx · · Score: 3, Funny
      After all, girls much prefer dirty thieves over sexy geeks with money.

      That's not true, girls love sexy geeks with money. They also love the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus.
      --
      If guns kill people, then CmdrTaco's keyboard misspells words.
    5. Re:Masturbatory reading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet, you didn't actually say you were getting any.

      Besides, it defies the laws of physics for anyone who averages ten trolls or karma grabs a day on Slashdot to have any semblance of success in life.

    6. Re:Masturbatory reading by tkdan29 · · Score: 1

      damn... you must have some serious credit card debt.

  20. I realize you're trolling... by ekrout · · Score: 0

    But what the hell, I'm still waiting for the coffee to finish brewing, so I'll bite.

    It's about information. I've learned so much stuff from just (and I'm not lying) reading and writing posts on this very site over the past four years.

    Reading is about usually strictly about information. Newspapers, science books on recent research, etc. are all clearly not intended to be fun, zany, and off-the-wall experiences. They're books, and they're often times damn good ones at that. But this doesn't mean that these types of writers want you to trade your Friday nights out with the guys in exchange for a quiet night at home on the reclines reading their work.

    --

    If you celebrate Xmas, befriend me (538
    1. Re:I realize you're trolling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s about information. I've learned so much stuff from just (and I'm not lying) reading and writing posts on this very site over the past four years.

      That's coz you're dumb. Smart people, like the parent poster, see this rubbish for what it is, and get modded down as "troll". This way dumbasses like you "learn more" every day, and the "trolls" grow more trollish every day.

      Shit. Troll my ass. Dissent == troll.

    2. Re:I realize you're trolling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I realize you're trolling...

      Takes a troll to know a troll. The only thing you ever learned on slashdot is how to manipulate the moderation system by stealing other people's posts.

  21. Poof! Kills you in 72 hours by iplayfast · · Score: 2
    And I have a hard time keeping it going past 7 minutes!

  22. A better story exploring these ideas.. by SiW · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ..would be Snow Crash. Alright, alright, so I haven't read Deadly Perversions, but doesn't it sound a bit cheesy? 3D cybersex gives you an STD? Whereas the Snow Crash virus tries to propogate through several means.

    Besides, Neal Stephenson is cool, we all know that.

    1. Re:A better story exploring these ideas.. by tekunokurato · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you're missing the point. Then again, I might be missingthe point, and I haven't read it, so I'm not sure.

      But really; don't you think the plot to a lot of great, famous books and movies is a tad absurd? Take Lord of the Rings, for examplen (yeah, just saw TTT, on the brain). It's something with unexplained, unfathomable events that we would never believe to be true. However, because of the brilliant execution, we accept the story and are dazzled by what happens.

      If you want something a little closer to reality, look at the Spiderman movie. This kid is bitten by a spider, gets super strong, and can shoot web from his WRISTS?? Why not from his ass, why not from is feet, or skull, or whatever? It doesn't make any sense! BUT, the execution is excellent, and it turns out to be a great story not because of the superpowers, but because of the characters and execution.

      So it doesn't matter if the premise is generally stupid, as long as we enjoy the book as a whole.

      And yes, Stephenson is the bomb.

    2. Re:A better story exploring these ideas.. by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > If you want something a little closer to reality, look at the Spiderman movie. This kid is bitten by a spider, gets super strong, and can shoot web from his WRISTS?? Why not from his ass,

      Because if the guy could shoot stuff out of his ass like that, he wouldn't be Spiderman, he'd be Goatseman, and... well, if he was Goatseman, do we really want to know Goatseman gets into anyone's ass? :)

  23. Done before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The idea of a computer virus being an actual virus and killing people has been thrown around so much in pulp novels and B-movies that it's become cliche already. Sounds like more of the same here. Strange how a nickname can spawn so many bad spins on the idea.

  24. So I'm creaky now?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I highly recommend this read for anyone under 40. Over that, (unless you're somewhat feral) I don't think you'll get it.

    'Scuse me? Is there some sort of auto-stupid gene that kicks in at that particular age? What difference one year can make...

    And I've wanted to off Howard since he got fired from a local D.C. radio station for asking Air Florida how much a ticket to the 14th St. Bridge cost. For Chapter 15 alone I'll get the book.

  25. Human Virus Over the Internet? by OOMatter · · Score: 1

    Sorry, no dice, can't get past the idiotic concept. Sounds like a fantasy book, where are the dragons and the hobbits?

    --
    Because OOMatter
  26. By the way, where the hell is Neal Stephenson? by Mothra+the+III · · Score: 1

    and William Gibson? These guys have a lot of nerve writing great books and then making you wait a couple of years for the next one. Is Cyberpunk really dead?

    --
    Worst. Sig. Ever.
    1. Re:By the way, where the hell is Neal Stephenson? by sparrow_hawk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I believe Stephenson is putting the finishing touches on Quicksilver, a sort-of prequel to Cryptonomicon.

      William Gibson has a new novel Pattern Recognition coming out Real Soon Now.

  27. Ooo, sure to win a Nebula by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Okay. This is the kind of shit that makes everyone laugh at scifi (and the 'dorks' who read it). Cybersex virus? Please. This is just the modern incarnation of atomic sex mutants, alien sex fiends, sex fiends in mirrorshades.....

    Too many repressed harmonal urges, not enough sexual encounters.
    That is this author, in a nutshell.

    1. Re:Ooo, sure to win a Nebula by j3ss · · Score: 1

      atomic sex mutants, alien sex fiends, sex fiends in mirrorshades.....

      Sounds very cool to me! What are some other pulp sci-fi books that you would recommend that are filled with radioactive sex vixen and the like?

  28. Snowcrash rip off by flinxmeister · · Score: 1

    The book really rocks with a real virus that's spread via hardware/software during 3D Cybersex encounters. Poof! Kills you in 72 hours

    Ummm....isn't this similar to Snowcrash?

  29. bad premise by g4dget · · Score: 2
    Sorry, but I find the premise of the book bad. If there is one thing good about cybersex it's that you can't catch viruses from that. Maybe your computer can, but you can't.

    If people acted out more perversions in cyberspace instead of the real world, we'd all be better off.

    1. Re:bad premise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe, it's imressive what some people are willing to believe.

      One of our technical support staff once helped out a user that had a virus.

      User: "What's wrong with the computer?"
      Tech: "Oh, it's got a virus, it's eating through your hard drive"
      User: "OH GOD! You mean it's actually eating it?"
      Tech: "Erhmm... yeah, the virus sends little machines that are eating up all the cirtcuits"
      User: "Can you fix it?!"
      Tech: "Yes, I'll run the Antivirus, what that does is send lots of little tiny robots to kill the virus, then your hard drive should be safe again"
      User: "Oh, thank you!"

  30. So, only people your age are cool? by SwedishChef · · Score: 2

    For every person who rants about someone dissing people under 30, there's a schmuck like this guy who says that "no one over forty will get it". People are all different and just because his parents were dull and stupid doesn't mean everyone over 40 is. I would never be so rude as to claim that someone is too young (or too old) to understand what I write about because I've encountered far too many of both sorts who are stimulating and interesting.

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
    1. Re:So, only people your age are cool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel my coolness slipping away!!

      Is it pudding time yet?

    2. Re:So, only people your age are cool? by kvn299 · · Score: 2

      As soon as he made that comment, his credibility was instantly damaged, in my opinion. Making broad generalizations like that does nothing but make you sound like you don't have much of a clue about anything.

  31. THE BOOK YOU WON'T SEE ON OPRAH by pulse2600 · · Score: 1

    Everyone has a secret... What's yours? Maybe it's a weird trivial fetish other people would find peculiar, even perverted. Look behind the closed doors of the boardrooms and bedrooms and observe all the libidinous shameful acts your doctor, neighbor, and boss may be hiding. It's the age of the high-speed Internet and a compamy called Talon has created some of the most sophisticated Cybersex software the world has ever see. Just pop on the 3-D glasses, log in, and immerse yourself in decadence. Have anonymous sex with anyone in the world, and if you don't like the way you look, change it. Choose a model off the Talon website and mask yourself. Be anyone you want to be, but be careful. There's something nasty out there, a disease that's spreading like wildfire. It stalks its host like a predator and kills so quickly that some are still smiling when they go down. How many more will die before the cause is discovered, turning what was once a naughty pleasurable pastime into a Deadly Perversion? Everyone has a secret...and those of you who say you don't probably have the most of all.

  32. Smaple chapter downloads by sh00z · · Score: 1

    I noticed that the review didn't include a link to the free sample chapters. I hope this helps...

  33. chick-heads? by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2

    What the hell kind of term is that? All heterosexual males are chick-heads? Are you implying that those of us who like women more than we care about the purity of sci-fi or whatever other geek-cred nonsense you want to apply to it are somehow flawed? if so, that's freakin' scary. Do you not like women? Are you asexual?

    Or if you're gay, forget I said anything.

    1. Re:chick-heads? by crazyphilman · · Score: 2

      Kin Korn Karn said: "Do you not like women? Are you asexual?" to another poster...

      Hey!

      What do you have against asexual people? I've been involuntarily asexual for almost two years now, and I like women just fine (they don't like me back, but that's ok). Sheesh. Let's not lump all of us unfortunate asexuals in with the "he-man women hater's club" types, people... Let's try to remember that even a poor, miserable asexual can like women just as much as the horniest jock.

      (this has been a public service announcement -- support your local asexual co-op! They need a break!)

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    2. Re:chick-heads? by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      asexual means without sexual desire, not without sex. I've been there, too.. it ends eventually

    3. Re:chick-heads? by crazyphilman · · Score: 2

      Kin Korn Karn said "asexual means without sexual desire, not without sex. I've been there, too.. it ends eventually"

      Ah, but you misapprehend my situation. My ex girlfriend was completely bent. Also, she had been a gymnast growing up, so she was very physically strong and was only an inch or so shorter than me. ALSO, she knew perfectly well that I'd never, ever hit her, even in retaliation, so that gave her a tactical advantage. Basically, if she ever got P.O.ed enough, she could have really opened up a can of whoop ass.

      I finally told her I didn't want to go out with her anymore, and wasn't going to have sex with her anymore, and by the way, she can sleep on the couch and I'll give her a lift in the morning. She LOST IT. Went completely ballistic. She leaped up and down, nearly caving in my living room, scared the piss out of me and then, broke my favorite art deco lamp. Just threw it on the ground and busted it.

      So, it's been nearly two years because although I find the CONCEPT of sex interesting, the actual IMPLEMENTATION is something I leave to others. I figure, who knows what kind of nut I'll end up with next? Look what happened to that poor Bobbitt guy. I find women kind of alarming these days.

      I think my problem is, I'm attracted to tall, physically tough women who could potentially kick my ass. However, I'm also concerned that they might actually DECIDE to kick my ass. Plus, actual sex seems like an awful lot of physical effort for not much of a payoff... I generally just watch it on video and drink a soda.

      So, am I asexual? Or just not getting laid?

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    4. Re:chick-heads? by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2


      I spent a year after a breakup without wanting to fool with the whole dating thing. I know where you're coming from. but dude.. not trying to be a smartass here but you need some therapy. That's some scary shit.

    5. Re:chick-heads? by crazyphilman · · Score: 2

      Kin_Korn_Karn said: "I spent a year after a breakup without wanting to fool with the whole dating thing. I know where you're coming from. but dude.. not trying to be a smartass here but you need some therapy. That's some scary shit."

      I get that a lot. ;)

      Actually, I've thought about therapy, but like sex, I find it better in concept than implementation. You know, psychologists have the ability to involuntarily commit you if they think you're crazy enough? It only takes a few sessions for them to build up a thick enough folder to send you to the Funny Farm (TM). Man, that'd be all I'd need. I mean, the electroshock looks interesting, and the drugs are free and legal, but having to wear pyjamas all day and no computer access? No, no no, that just won't work for me.

      Besides, being a little crazy is fun. I don't want some psyche mechanic stealing my crazy! I worked long and hard to construct my madness and they'll pry it from my cold, dead head before I give it up.

      Having said that, I think you might have a point; my ex was a little alarming, and my current dating situation could be viewed by an outsider as a little weird. But it's cool -- I've got a Playstation II and I'm getting an XBox for Christmas! With a setup like that, who needs sex? ;) :) :P

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
  34. Sounds like the end for Herb Zipper... by Sir+Network · · Score: 1

    http://www.herbzipper.com

    It's a miracle he made it this long.

    --
    Life is tough. It's tougher if you're stupid. --John Wayne
  35. Bitch-Slappin' Perversions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  36. this reminds me of that crappy 'tekwar' series by FreeUser · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "She was killed by that computer virus." Good god.

    The show sucked regardless (perhaps even more than this book apparently does), but with that line it surpassed my tolerance threshold and I summarilly shut it off (and have studiously avoided it since). What utter crap ... and now the same nonsensical garbage is being lauded in a book?

    Please.

    Its hard enough to educate people that computer viruses aren't real viruses, that memory (RAM) is volitile storage lost upon shutdown, while the hard drive ("memory" as it is called by some) is persistent, etc. etc.

    We are already dealing with an abysmal state of computer literacy ... and while science fiction and fantasy often takes liberties with the possible and probably, spewing utterly nonsensical tripe like that IMHO simply requires too much of a suspension of disbelief to even be worthwhile, while alas preying on the illiteracy of others and clouding their understanding of real technologies further.

    The very, very worst of what science fiction can be (in stark contrast to Greg Egan's works, which educate as well as entertain, and often expand your imagination in the process, and to plenty of other speculative works that don't educate, but do entertain and at least don't misinform and cloud real issues in the process).

    Thanks, but I'll give this one a miss.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    1. Re:this reminds me of that crappy 'tekwar' series by nentwined · · Score: 1

      tek* is actually a series of books. gotta love william shatner. :cough: however, I'd have to say that people dying from computer viruses is likely *not* the stupidest thing you've heard. admittedly, the technology of the books was difficult to accept -- if I remember right, they were basically goggles that "programmed" you optically. but say we jump the optical thing and plug straight into the neurons. computer viruses frying the hardware (wetware) in such a situation is a common thread.

      --
      heaven
  37. Come on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guy has a quote from Jack Handy in the book. How bad can it be?

  38. sorry by subgeek · · Score: 1

    couldn't stop myself from posting this.

    He takes on subject matter that other authors would just assume leave alone

    i think that should read, "just as soon leave alone."

    --
    you probably shouldn't have read this.
    1. Re:sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      i think that should read, "just as soon leave alone."
      You should of just ignored this errer.

      (Sorry, couldn't stop myself either.)

    2. Re:sorry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Error. Recurse.

    3. Re:sorry by subgeek · · Score: 1

      You should of just ignored this errer.

      should have

      --
      you probably shouldn't have read this.
  39. Re:Masturbatory reading (warning.. way off topic) by TracerJPN_USMC · · Score: 1

    hey there. i have you on my friends list.. but cmon now. why do you have to pull the money/success card?? there are plenty of people that work hard and are successfull that don't have all the things you just bragged about. I'm Marine, i work my ass off usualy 6 days per week, I haven't been home for the hollidays in 3 years. I made Cpl (E-4) in less than 2 years in service, and I'm due to pick up Sgt soon. Yet i have none of the things you list of a "successfull" person. But i have one thing, a sense of pride. I've done a lot of things that most people have nightmares about, but it is all part of the job. You may be working for personal gain, but others may choose a life of public servitude. and what is wrong with that? I sacrifice almost all my personal freedoms in order to protect people i have never met, and it honestly hurts my heart when i see people with a complete lack of ethics, but rich.

    --
    magnanomous.
  40. This isn't a believable virus by Ignorant+Aardvark · · Score: 1

    Viruses that kill in 72 hours are much too deadly to be a real problem, no matter how infectious they may be. Take Ebola, for instance. Very deadly and very infectious, but it kills so rapidly (in less that a week) that it hardly has any time to spread. We simply don't see large outbreaks of Ebola because it kills its hosts too quickly. Now, HIV on the other hand, can take up to 30 years to kill its host while being spread around to every sexual partner. HIV, while less "deadly", is much more effective at spreading because those infected literally have years instead of three days to pass it around further. That's why we have large outbreaks of HIV but not Ebola.

    Now, this virus in the book is way too deadly. Are we supposed to believe that a virus with a lethality rate of 3 days is going to be spread around the population like mad? Fat chance! People don't have sex that often in a 3 day time period (not even cybersex) so it wouldn't be able to spread effectively. And anyway, if somehow a large outbreak did manage to occur, everyone would just stop having sex for 3 days out of fear and then the virus would totally eliminate itself from the Earth.

    This concepts in this book aren't believable. I won't be buying it.

    1. Re:This isn't a believable virus by TracerJPN_USMC · · Score: 1

      Ebola had a hard time spreading because you have to be in direct contact to spread it. Imagine if ebola could spread via vapour (you cough??) Then it would definitely have the potentiol to cause serious damage. Virii that transfer via bodily fluids need a long incubation period to spread, because people don't have a lot of fluid - fluid interaction. But this book is about a virus replicating itself over cyberspace. For that.. 72 hours would be enough to cause considerable harm.

      --
      magnanomous.
    2. Re:This isn't a believable virus by hughk · · Score: 2
      FWIW, Ebola Reeston does, but although lethal to monkeys, it isn't to humans.

      I agree though that an electronically transmitted virus would spread very quickly, however only to people who indulge in cybrsex.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    3. Re:This isn't a believable virus by crazyphilman · · Score: 2

      Ok, people, repeat after me:

      "A biological virus can only be introduced to one's body via some sort of transmitting vector like a mosquito, a tiny droplet of inhaled liquid, or a pecker."

      "A biological virus can only be introduced to a human body if it is in a physical form capable of being introduced. This means an actual physical viral structure, in some form that can be insinutated into the body."

      "Because a biological virus must be insinuated into the body in physical form to infect it, the virus cannot be transmitted electronically. Electronic transmissions can only convey concepts, not physical things (like a virus). Even if you built a cybersex suit with vibrating attachments for tickling unmentionables, the only thing you could transmit would be the control instructions for the device." (Let's say this one twice.)

      FINALLY,

      "Even if you built a cybersex device which directly stimulated the brain, at best you would be stimulating the parts of the brain which correlate to sensual stimuli, like vision, smell, touch, taste and hearing. Thus, you could possibly use the imagery you're transmitting to SCARE someone to death, or freak them out, or even hypnotize them, but you could not give them a virus."

      Ok, gang? Let's all just swiiiiiiing our focus back to reality here. The premise of the book is dumb. I, for one, am pretty turned off every time I hear someone try to say you can catch a virus from your computer -- it makes me feel like I'm the only techie that took Biology in high school, which cannot be true (can it?). If modern American society is so techno-illiterate that they'll buy THIS kind of thing, we're fucking doomed.

      Say it ain't so!

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    4. Re:This isn't a believable virus by binford2k · · Score: 1

      Ok, people, repeat after me:

      The point of fiction is the suspension of reality, as in "imagine if you could catch a virus from your computer . . . ." What matters is how consistant it is internally. As I haven't read the book yet, I can't comment there.

    5. Re:This isn't a believable virus by MxTxL · · Score: 2

      imagine if you could catch a virus from your computer

      well, while we're suspending disbelief, then we might as well suspend disbelief in a variety of other things.... so the parent post is moot anyway... who cares if it would spread too fast? we're talking fiction here, anyway!

  41. Cybersex? by dohcvtec · · Score: 2

    Wait a minute - wasn't "cybersex" sort-of the envisioned killer app back around 1994 or 1995? Hasn't anyone figured out that it's not happening, or that it never really happened? It seems kind of pointless to write about it, and even more pointless to read about it. What's this guy's next book going to be about? The characters are surfing the web in 3-D and talking in 3-D chat rooms? These are the sorts of cliches that non-technical people scoop up, not the Slashdot crowd.

    --
    -- Never hit a man with glasses. Hit him with a baseball bat.
    1. Re:Cybersex? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously don't spend much time on IRC.

    2. Re:Cybersex? by dohcvtec · · Score: 1

      5orRY, n3V3R f0UND MUcH n33d +0 U53 irC. 4NyW4Y, unL3$5 m4jOr 4dV4NCE$ h4V3 833n M4de 1N cY83R53X, 15n'T 1+ ReAlLY tEH $4M3 tH1NG @5 pH0NE 5ex?

      --
      -- Never hit a man with glasses. Hit him with a baseball bat.
  42. OMG :: The Counter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The download counter as 006666 : i'm gonna get the disease now : gonnajerkoff to porn for 72 hours straight until i die... i know a lot fo you geeks live in porn, as for reasons of physical (fat+ugly) and social (geek + moma's boy) you can not get the real thing, and instead of finding yourself a nice girl and being the right way - you jerk off to porn and hire call-girls (the phone book in nyc is 1/2' thick of call girls, and well, someone is calling them - you).

  43. Remember. by Cheapoboy · · Score: 1

    When you cyber someone, you're cybering everyone that person has cyber'd and everyone that person has cyber'd, and every person that person has cyber'd.. and so on a PSA by cheapoboy.

    1. Re:Remember. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woohoo! And I only thought I got cybered once!!

  44. Re:Most Beloved Slashdot Members (The Super 7) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wil Wheaton is an activist? *cringes* Of what, I hate to ask...

  45. Re:Masturbatory reading (warning.. way off topic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it honestly hurts my heart when i see people with a complete lack of ethics, but rich.

    How do you think they managed to get rich?

  46. I need the eBook version! by GMontag · · Score: 2

    I highly recommend this read for anyone under 40. Over that, (unless you're somewhat feral) I don't think you'll get it.

    I will be too old to understand this book by the end of the week! Need to download and complete it quick ;-)

  47. Re:Masturbatory reading (warning.. way off topic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, but you're an idiot if you have ekrout on your friends list. He's a big fat stinky troll that just uses people like you to whore up his karma. He just makes ridiculous shit up to get flaming responses out of people. Come on, figure it out.

  48. 72hrs or 7 days. Your choice. by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

    "Poof! Kills you in 72 hours"

    Big deal. I know of a VHS tape that will kill you in 7 days :p

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  49. Uh-oh. by orthogonal · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Fourth - It's written in a style I've never read before. I can't compare Arquette to any other writer, which in itself is something of an accomplishment.... Where other authors imply things, Arquette writes them in black and white.

    Uh-oh. Either:

    the reviewer doesn't read a lot, or

    Arquette has figurted out something that Dante, Shakespeare, Milton, and Pynchon missed, or

    Arquette's writing is a bad attempt a creating a 'new style', apparently ("Where other authors imply things, Arquette writes them in black and white") short on subtlety and long on pure exposition: "See Dick. See Jane. See Dick run."

    1. Re:Uh-oh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See Jane's... Hey, wait a minute...

    2. Re:Uh-oh. by ottffssent · · Score: 3, Funny

      > "See Dick. See Jane. See Dick run."

      You did read the review, right? "See Dick. See Jane. See Jane fuck Dick. See Dick die three days later. Poor Dick."

    3. Re:Uh-oh. by JonnyElvis42 · · Score: 1

      "See Dick. See Jane. See Dick run."

      Hey now, leave poor Dick's personal problems out of this!

    4. Re:Uh-oh. by jorbettis · · Score: 2
      Arquette has figurted out something that Dante, Shakespeare, Milton, and Pynchon missed,

      Err, well, as far as I know, nether Dante, Shakespeare, nor Milton ever wrote a single line of prose in their lives, so I wouldn't expect them to figure out anything about novel writing.

      Plus, Dante wasn't even an english writer. Styles are a product of the language they're written in. On that vein, I remember a quote about Pope's translation of the Illiad (which is second only to Milton's poem as far as english epics go). Thomas Bentley said to him, "It's a very pretty poem, Mr. Pope, but you musn't call it Homer."

      I know I'm being a little pedantic, I think we all get your point. I do not doubt that this "Arquette" guy is a total dumbass, but you could have been more accurate by mentioning real english novelists, such as Melville, Dickens, Twain, Crane or, um ... I guess Pynchon ... sorta.

      --

      Jordan Bettis

      ``Wherever you go, there's another stupid sigfile quote.''
    5. Re:Uh-oh. by orthogonal · · Score: 2

      Err, well, as far as I know, nether Dante, Shakespeare, nor Milton ever wrote a single line of prose in their lives, so I wouldn't expect them to figure out anything about novel writing.

      Yeah, you're right, I'm a total dumbass rube. No doubt Dante, Shakespeare, and Milton would all be horrible at writing novels: they had no experience at all in exposition, character development, or plotting. They couldn't tell stories at all; all they did was, like, rhyme and stuff. Filthy hacks.

      And style never crosses language barriers, taht's why that Pole Conrad's stories all sucked in English. And I'd hate to have to read Dante, in like, translation or sum'thin'.

      Thanks for impressing us more with your erudition, and less with your ability to think an argument through.

  50. I am not a demographic by ENOENT · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To summarize the review:

    Like, dude, it's targeted at the 18-39 demographic! And it has, like, really short chapters! And all the sentences are short, too! None of the characters are around for longer than 6 pages! And, check this out, you don't have to look up any hard words in the dictionary! It's like MTV, only on paper! Not at all like books by inaccessibly cerebral authors like Dr. Seuss...

    Perhaps the reviewer doesn't realize that some people in the 18-39 demographic are still able to enjoy books that aren't written to the same spec as the latest mindless blow-em-up action flick. Some of us even read books that don't have pictures in them, on occasion. There are even a few of us who read books that have no lines matching "[Cc]yber" or "[Tt]echno".

    By the way, I get REALLY PISSED OFF when I'm reading a book and notice that the author is making an obvious overture to a particular demographic instead of following the internal logic of the book. So nyah.

    I'm not the only under-40 person who loves to read intelligent, well-written books, am I?

    --
    That's "Mr. Soulless Automaton" to you, Bub.
    1. Re:I am not a demographic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck no. I'm glad you mentioned it... Damn reviewer pissed me off too. I'd almost refuse to read the book based on his comments: 'it's targeted at the 18-39 demographic!' and ' I highly recommend this read for anyone under 40. Over that, (unless you're somewhat feral) I don't think you'll get it.'
      But the author shouldn't be held accountable for the asshole posting the review.
      The book looks interesting. I don't mind reading a book that re-covers similar territory (stephenson) if it looks like there's a new twist or even just another well written story on the same subject. There's alot of books out there, sometimes you have to read alot of books before you get to an original idea...

    2. Re:I am not a demographic by OldStash · · Score: 1

      Perhaps some Slashdot members don't understand sarcasm when they see it in black and white. Didn't the Dr. Seuss line give it away?

      *Sheesh*

    3. Re:I am not a demographic by starling · · Score: 2

      What I want to know is if I'm the only over-40 person to like reading trash.

      Guess that make me a feral...

    4. Re:I am not a demographic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So while you were reading alot of books, did you happen to notice that not alot of them treat 'alot' as one word?

    5. Re:I am not a demographic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the way, I get REALLY PISSED OFFwhen I'm reading a book and notice that the author is making an obvious overture to a particular demographic instead of following the internal logic of the book. So nyah.

      Wow, I must bow to your cultural eliteness... You find things in books to be pissed at! Analyzing every sentence looking for ways the author might be 'selling out' or 'bowing to a demographic'.

      I sure do wish I could waste my reading time with shit like that. I'm positive it would make me a better person.

  51. Perversions????? by TREETOP · · Score: 1

    jeez, havent read anything in print since Asimov died.... now I know why....

  52. Re:Masturbatory reading (warning.. way off topic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've done a lot of things that most people have nightmares about, but it is all part of the job.

    Isn't that what the NAZIs said?

  53. Sounds a little like Snow Crash by unconfused1 · · Score: 1

    This book sounds a little like Neal Stephenson's "Snow Crash", which is set in a dark future where corporations have mostly taken over governing. The main character finds himself in the middle of a corporate conspiracy involving a 'net virus called Snow Crash. My synopsis is so poor for such a great book.

    1. Re:Sounds a little like Snow Crash by Nyarly · · Score: 1
      There are two biggish problems with the otherwise amazing Snow Crash:

      1. The Exposition Chapter: in which the entire implausible premise of the snow crash virus is explained in a lengthy and mostly one sided expository conversation. The stronger version of the book would have found a way to spread the deep background around, or at least foreshadow it a little. Instead, the action grinds to an absolute halt while Profession Explainitory Tells All. It think this a grudge akin to my dislike of the 30 second static medium shot in the first 15 minutes of Reservoir Dogs - no one else seems to care, even though they'll rip you a new one if you misuse aprostrophe's.
      2. Like most of Stephenson's books, the ending of Snow Crash is abrupt and unsatisfying. Cryptonomicon has, perhaps, the best ending, but I suspect that my opinion was influenced by my expection of an hollow conclusion, but also that Stephenson wraps everything up before the last page, so the quick end doesn't equate to a letdown of the story.
      --
      IP is just rude.
      Is there any torture so subl
  54. "Most best selling author�s are over forty" by EnglishTim · · Score: 4, Funny

    Never use an apostrophe in front of an 's' when you are creating the plural of a singluar noun.

    1. Re:"Most best selling author�s are over forty" by Mike610544 · · Score: 1

      Never put the "l" before the "u" when attempting to spell "singular"

      --
      ... also, I can kill you with my brain.
  55. Thank God! by SensitiveMale · · Score: 2

    I first thought this story was about that fucked up cannabalistic pervert in Germany.

  56. You must be his mother or something by coinreturn · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I just downloaded his 21 chapters and abandoned reading the first. His style is absolutely amateurish and if he didn't have what they call a "platform" to sell from (his columns), he'd never have gotten this tripe published.

    Specifically, he has dire problems with POV (point of view). In the opening scene, the receptionist sees an incoming blonde as voluptuous and curvy - women DO NOT see other women this way! Only over-testosteroned males do. If you don't write believeable female characters you will only sell to teenage geeks/freaks.

    Second, the constant use of passive prose does not draw the reader in. In the opening scene he spends paragraphs describing a woman falling down in the lobby. Now this could possibly be successful if not for phrases like "the immutable laws of physics kept pulling her over", etc that make the prose so stilted and bland.

    This book is one step above comics.

  57. Re:Masturbatory reading (warning.. way off topic) by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2

    I've done a lot of things that most people have nightmares about, but it is all part of the job.

    Isn't that what the NAZIs said?

    no, the problem with the Nazis was that they didn't have nightmares about the things they did...

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  58. Wow... by jgerman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...just started reading the free sample that he gives out. Definitely not going to buy the book. I think I'd describe his style as... childish. Incredibly unrefined. His character development is really poor. It honestly reads like the first efforts of an eighteen year old. (That's not to say that an eighteen year old can't write extremely well, check out Confederacy of Dunces).

    --
    I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
    1. Re:Wow... by jgerman · · Score: 2

      Hmmmm, the further I get in this book the more I'm beginning to realize that this guy not only has probably never had sex, but is pretty clueless about technology as well.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
  59. Re:Masturbatory reading (warning.. way off topic) by BurKaZoiD · · Score: 1

    My hats off to you. I'm extremely grateful to the military professionals, for providing the rest of us the freedom to choose how we want to live our lives.

    Anyway, if Super Successful Guy (parent) needs such accolades (degree, salary, sports car) to get laid, then he must be one seriously messed up dude. I mean, get real! It doesn't take that much effort!

  60. Actually, this sounds... by BurKaZoiD · · Score: 1

    ...pretty uninteresting. I can say with relative certainty that I would rather eat dirt than read this book.

  61. His mom is cool by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    Lois Duncan edited this book - if you visit the author's website, you'll notice she's his mom. That's so sweet - mother/son bonding time with semi-pornographic novel editing. adorable.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  62. A quote: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A style unlike all others:
    Jack Roller (known to the local vendors as "Jack the Jacker" and/or "Jack Splash") relied heavily on the privacy of public restrooms. Through either a physiological burp or possibly an over abundance of some esoteric, neurological chemical, Jack felt the need to continually pleasure himself manually. It didn't matter whether he had just popped or not, Jack the Jacker was always ready and more than willing to take another ride on the pounding pony.

    I don't think I'll be buying this...

  63. And here I thought the book was about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Asphyxia sex games.... (I'd post links, but I'm at work. ;-)

  64. Get with the times, man! by freeweed · · Score: 2

    There's a website that does it now, too!

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  65. Re:Masturbatory reading (warning.. way off topic) by Danse · · Score: 1

    First of all, I just wanted to say thanks for doing what you do. I have a lot of respect for those in the military. I'm glad you feel the way you do about it. I may not always like how the government uses the military, but that doesn't diminish your service and dedication at all.

    Second, you shouldn't have that guy on your friends list. He lives only to troll on Slashdot.

    --
    It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  66. Stephen King's books are bloated for a reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In On Writing, Stephen King states (I paraphrase) that plotting is for sissies. In other words, create a bunch of weird characters and let them bounce around in your world. That's probably why King's novels tend go on and on. I think most author's works are short compared to King's. Except maybe Robert Jordan's books, which are big enough to put cover art on the binding.

  67. Wayback by AlphaSys · · Score: 1

    would keep it going.

    --
    Can I bum a sig? I left mine at the office.
  68. Hiro Protagonist must be rolling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hrm, I think I read this book already. . . I think it's called Snowcrash. I mean come on.

  69. Sci Fi Channel has already done a movie about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A computer virus that kills... Geez...

    Sci Fi channel had a horrible b-grade movie with exactly this same plot, except it wasn't cybersex that killed you, but exposure to any networked computer/item, like ATMs that were infected by the computer virus.

    The only cool thing about the movie was the people dissolving into random bits.

    Other than that, a computer virus capable of killing a human biologically is impossible. The author needs to get a firm understanding of science before writing utterly impossible garbage like this.

    They should call this Sci-Fantasy, or just plain fantasy. There is no science in it.

  70. Hmm, a little short on research by scruggs_style · · Score: 1

    "...Responsible for allowing 3 goals in the first quarter..."

    It's been awhile, but World Cup matches have quarters now. Fuck! I've been turning off the tube and hour and a half early...

    1. Re:Hmm, a little short on research by Tim+Browse · · Score: 2

      I'd quite like to know what the 'ball boy' does in a soccer match, too.

      Tim

  71. Read the Sample by RoloDMonkey · · Score: 1

    OK, I read the sample, or at least the first few chapters, and it is not starting out as great literature. Cookie-cutter characters, and contrived cliches. It does move along, and it does have enough perversion to keep one titillated. It is the kind of book I would read if I was trapped, waiting for an airplane, with nothing better to do. I definitely wouldn't go out of my way to find this book, or recommend it to my friends.

    --
    Long live the Speaker Bracelet
    Rolo D. Monkey
  72. I tried reading the free sample... by Tuidjy · · Score: 1

    I think the guy is not worth reading.

    He has no idea what he is talking about. His
    writing style is not too bad, but in no way
    unique. But I wonder whether he knows anything!

    Lessee... Women do not judge other women as
    beautiful or attractive. MIT does not have a
    dean list. Sleeping your way through college
    involves, in any high end institution, sleeping
    with someone ahead of you - a senior or a TA in
    the same department. People have instincts which
    would prevent them from falling on their chest
    unless they were someone encumbered or under the
    influence. A virus that kills the host in 72
    hours would have a hard time spreading, and in
    this particular case would be extinct exactly
    three days after its existance becomes common
    knowledge. The physics of the 'hamster shot out
    of the ass by igniting farts are all wrong', and
    even if they were not, the doctor would be hard at
    work trying to limit infection from the ruptured
    intestines, not messing around with a broken nose.
    And this is only on the first few pages.

    In a few words, the guy has no clue about anything.

    --
    No good deed goes unpunished...
    1. Re:I tried reading the free sample... by Tim+Browse · · Score: 2

      Plus, he spells severely 'severally'.

      It took me a few seconds to understand that sentence. What a wordsmith :)

      It reminded me of some particularly bad Half-Life fan fiction I read once, where the main character fell out of a window and fell several storys [sic] to the ground.

      It's not the storys that kill you - it's all the chapters on the ground! :-)

      Tim

  73. Um.... by Scholasticus · · Score: 1
    Tons of Cybersex for chick-heads.

    What is a chick-head? Is that supposed to be nerdish for a straight man or a gay woman?

  74. Snow SexCrash? by Pac · · Score: 2

    From the so-called review (actually, from the introductory text, the rest of it looks like a marketing text) I guess this is Snow Crash II, the CyberSex Wars.

    I think I prefer Stephenson.

  75. I win! by EnglishTim · · Score: 2

    It's always important for any Grammar Nazi post to have a subtle error in it.

  76. Reviewer = ID10t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >> The book really rocks with a real virus that's spread via hardware/software during 3D Cybersex encounters.

    Learn to ####ing write, ###hole. The only thing worse than a book written by a semi-illiterate ####weed, is a book review written by a semi-illiterate, ####-for-brains retard.

    Ah, my spleen feels much better now.

  77. Sounds like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This just sounds like a porno twist on "Snow Crash"

  78. Fallacious fellatio by topone · · Score: 2, Funny

    Excuse me, but has anyone bothered to read the book? As an author myself, I would not _dare_ publish a book with spelling mistakes and even completely wrong terms. Since when is a man capable of performing a fellatio on a woman? Perhaps the author would benefit from consulting a cunning linguist :-) Sorry, but this is really amateurish pulp. Not worth my $15. Good job the author allows you to download a sample!

    1. Re:Fallacious fellatio by jgerman · · Score: 2
      That's what I'm saying, not only the spelling errors but the fact that this *ahem* "novel" is simple minded crap would be enough to encourage me not to publish it. It reads like the Calvin and Hobbes Tracer Bullet strips (I've got three slugs in me two bourbon, one lead).


      His characters are truly paper thin and just really god awful. Did you notice how each character is introduced as the greatest this or the best that? I just can't help but get the impression that this guy is an idiot. Trying to produce a best selling book by mixing two things that are (sort of) popular right now. Techno books and biological catastrophes.


      It's truly, truly bad. The bum has a flaccid penis the thickness of a beer can? Come on, it's like some adolescent fantasy.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
  79. Smut by docbrown42 · · Score: 3, Funny

    IMHO, a far better read than smut.

    Have you seen some of the smut on the internet nowadays?

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
    1. Re:Smut by Dirtside · · Score: 2
      Have you seen some of the smut on the internet nowadays?
      Considering the number of popups I get, I think I've seen all of the smut on the Internet nowadays.
      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  80. aww I was gonna post that! by myowntrueself · · Score: 2

    Good book too, Snowcrash.

    Does this new variation have the crazy skateboards and the franchises?

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  81. touch that book and catch a virus. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And one more level: If you get the book maybe it has a deadly virus on it. . .
    I read a book once where the murder was accomplished by putting posion on the pages of a book. . .

    The book reviewed sounds like a waste of time.

  82. This is a classic in the making!!! by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 2
    And for those that finish it, and are looking for more classic bad sci-fi, you should check out some of the movies made by Ed Wood.

    You can probably find Plan 9 from Outer Space at your local video store. It involves aliens who resurrect our dead, and use the zombies to get our attention. You can find the DVD for $10 now at Amazon

    There's also Bride and the Beast. Here, a woman falls into a deadly perversion also - interest in her new husband's gorilla!!! Bwwaahaahaa!

    And to think, when I first saw this slashdot story, I thought it was a serious review!

    --
    Free unix account: freeshell.org
  83. mmm, harmonal urges by selfdiscipline · · Score: 1

    If I could be expressed as a wave, what would my
    my harmonic twins look like? Me, just smaller?
    Anyway, urges to conform are commonplace and not
    usually frowned apon.

    --


    -------
    Incite and flee.
  84. Re:Masturbatory reading (ot) by mekkab · · Score: 2

    No joke! And depending upon what the cost of living is, mid 70's ain't much in NY or DC or CA...

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  85. Snow Crash by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 1

    If this kind of situation turns you on (no pun intended), then I recommend Snow Crash. It contains a computer/psychovirus which manifests itself as a bitmap that bypasses critical thinking and renders whoever looks at it a babbling idiot. It seemed a bit far-fetched at the time, but these days we have goatse.

    There's a lot more stuff in this book that makes it a worthwhile read. I have yet to see a techno-thriller approach it in accuracy and fun, so I'm skeptical when a new one comes along.

    --
    N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
  86. self-effacial by salientpoints · · Score: 1

    It's written in a fascinating self-effacing style

    So the book is self-e-facial? nice

    yay my first post on /.

  87. My Review by Eponymous+Mallard · · Score: 1

    I highly recommend this book review for anyone with an IQ under 40. Over that, (unless you're somewhat feral) I don't think you'll get it.

    Eponymous Mallard

  88. stupid people + sick computer + guns = ...... by madmarcel · · Score: 1

    Its hard enough to educate people that computer viruses aren't real viruses, that memory (RAM) is volitile storage lost upon shutdown, while the hard drive ("memory" as it is called by some) is persistent, etc. etc.

    -----------

    That reminds me of a newspaper article about some guy who shot his computer because he thought it had a virus (or he thought he caught a virus FROM his computer) No hold on, there were two guys, they shot it (the computer) with shotguns and then set it on fire.

    And NO, surprise surprise...they were NOT American. Amazing ;^P

  89. Look at that Toupee! by Eponymous+Mallard · · Score: 1
    The book isn't half as funny as the author's toupee! Check it out! before after Don't know about that over 40 rule. He may be too old to "get" his own book!

    Epomymous Mallard

  90. Guess I'm Somwhat Feral ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. but I already knew that. Gee, I wish the younger /. readership would stop assuming that just because someone passes the age of 40, they suddenly get mentaly transported to 1950.

  91. Ivan Jerconov ... puhh-leaseee by Migraineman · · Score: 1

    No, I'm not kidding. We're introduced to the character "Ivan Jerconov" at the beginning of Chapter 9. At this point, I was completely convinced that this book was going to be a collection of puerile innuendos and gross-me-out descriptions of people puking up their intestinal contents. The target audience should be adjusted to "12-18 pre-pubescent males."

    I appreciate the author's attempt to embrace technology. Publishing the first chunk of the book on the web is a good thing. Too bad the book is a turd.

    1. Re:Ivan Jerconov ... puhh-leaseee by jgerman · · Score: 2

      Lol. It's so bad, it's actually funny. I imagine the author is someone who was told in the past that he was special and had talent... I've got news for him: he doesn't.

      --
      I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
  92. Anything killing Horace Storm can't be a bad thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how the reviewer REALLY feels about the author, or the book for that matter. The review is almost as bad as the book.

  93. Earlier by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 2

    death after viewing something on the internet

    Death after "viewing" sex tapes?

    Brainstorm (1983)

    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  94. Cultural Relativism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    If sex isn't "icky" you are doing it wrong.

    Salon article on the African "Dry sex" phenomenon. Please please click the link and stare blankly at their banner ad, as i quote the article herein and do not wish to feel guilty.
    Dry, abrasive vaginas are seen as desirable in sexual intercourse in the vast majority of southern African cultures, notes an article in Tuesday's Village Voice. Aversion to moisture in penetration has inflamed the HIV/AIDS epidemic in this region.

    Many men and women regard the smell of vaginal secretions as repulsive, the report says, plus they're embarrassed by the noise of wet sex. Dry vaginas that are swollen with friction are also tighter; this pleases the men because it makes them feel larger. One common belief holds that loose, slippery vaginas are evidence of infidelity.

    Dry sex promulgates HIV/AIDS in three ways: The lack of lubricant results in lacerations in the delicate membrane tissue, making it easier for the lethal virus to enter. In addition, the natural antiseptic lactobacilli that vaginal moisture contains aren't available to combat sexually transmitted diseases. Finally, condoms break far more easily due to the increased friction.

    Sub-Saharan women attain this dryness in various ways. Herbs from the mugugudhu tree are wrapped in a nylon stocking and inserted into the vagina for 10-15 minutes in a procedure that one woman described as "very painful." Mutendo wegudo (dry soil where a baboon has urinated) is a traditional Zimbabwean recipe. A crushed stone called "wankie" is also utilized, reports the Oct. 23, 1998, World African Network, as are potions called chimhandara ("like a virgin" in Shona) and zvanamina ("taste me only" in Ndebele). Shredded newspapers, cotton, salt and detergents are also used.

    Young, educated, urban lovers are slowly slipping away from dry sex, but even in the cities, the practice is retained by 50 percent who regard wet intercourse as a Western import that seeks to emasculate men. Overwhelmingly, dryness retains its deadly lock in rural areas, despite attempts by HIV/AIDS activists to save lives through education.
  95. Spelling checkers are evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They turn all the typos into words.

  96. Re:Masturbatory reading (warning.. way off topic) by kristjansson · · Score: 1

    You forgot a few things that you have earned through the Corps: a sense of purpose, sense of duty, self respect... I could go on. Your rate of promotion strongly suggests that you are not only proficient in your job, but successful in the completion of your assignments.

    I'm currently working to rectify my mistakes in my personal definition of success. I think I was a much more successful person while I was serving on active federal service, in spite of being salaried to a pay grade that virtually guaranteed that I'd never become a millionaire. At least I didn't feel that my motivations were completely absurd, which is how I feel about the rat race...

    That being said, I think I'll try to resist the urge to flame the bejeezus out of the AC who tried to draw a parallel between a United States Marine LCPL and Nazis, and instead file that comment away as proof that just because someone has the freedom of speech doesn't mean that they have anything meaningful to say...