Slashdot Mirror


2003: Year of Linux in Asia?

Anonymous Coward writes "The Register has a story about traveling to a magical country where seeing Linux laptops displayed in stores is perfectly normal. The author then goes on to predict that this year will see much more desktop action coming not from Red Hat or Euro-Distros, but from China and India. Makes sense to me."

263 comments

  1. Year of Linux? by Exiler · · Score: 4, Funny

    I feel so sorry for the newborns this year...
    "I'm was born in the year of the dragon!"
    "I was born in the year of the bull!"
    "... Iwas born during the year of the geeks..."

    --
    Banaaaana!
    1. Re:Year of Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      All of those are better than being born in "Year of the Cock". :-(

    2. Re:Year of Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I was born in the year of the Kernel Panic

    3. Re:Year of Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that cock as in penis or cock as in rooster?

  2. Obligatory article repost before /.-ing by Rat+Tank · · Score: 3, Informative

    2003: the year of Asian Linux
    By Robin Miller, NewsForge.com
    Posted: 27/12/2002 at 10:56 GMT

    As most regular NewsForge readers know, I recently traveled to Arabeyes Project, was a small, independent computer store located in a back alley in one of Amman's many modest commercial districts.

    There is a sameness to this kind of store the world over. I shop at one much like it in Sarasota, Florida, and another similar one in Greenbelt, Maryland.

    The reason we were in this store was to find and buy a Linux-compatible PCMCIA modem. The salespeople in this store were just as clueless as the salespeople in equivalent U.S. stores, and there were the same know-it-all geek customers hanging around who offered us advice ranging from smart to useless. But there was one difference. When we wanted to test a modem for Linux compatibility, we found -- courtesy of one of the geek hangers-on -- a laptop running Linux on display, right up front.

    As it turned out, we didn't need the physical test, and the modem ran just fine in the Red Hat-loaded laptop where it was destined to live, but the note that stuck with me was the fact that there was a laptop on display in a computer store, right up front, proudly running Linux, and people treated it as something normal, not as an oddity.

    It wasn't Red Hat, either, but ThizLinux, a distribution from Hong Kong, which is appropriate since the laptop was a Hong Kong brand I've never seen in the U.S. before.

    To top it off, the office suite CDs on display next to the laptop weren't from Microsoft or StarOffice or WordPerfect, but Hancom Office, out of South Korea. And it was an Arabic version, too, something neither StarOffice nor OpenOffice quite have ready.

    Hancom makes major promo hay out of their support for many languages in their $59.95 (boxed edition) office suite. Their Web page says, "Chinese (simplified and traditional), Japanese, Arabic, Korean editions and Unicode support mean that Hancom Office is the best solution for companies with offices on multiple continents."

    Asia is the next Linux hotbed

    Linux, as we know it today, is an essentially European phenomenon. It started in Finland. KDE is centered in Germany and has close ties to Norwegian TrollTech. Mandrake is French, SuSE is German, and European governments have moved toward and supported Linux -- and Open Source in general -- faster than most governments elsewhere. The U.S. is the center of commercial Linux activity primarily because Red Hat and several other major distributions are based here, but most surveys show a higher percentage of European than U.S. developers writing Open Source software.

    But a growing number of "next generation" Linux development is taking place in Asian countries, ranging from South Korea at one end of the continent to India diagonally across the continent's map, with China rising hugely -- in the Linux sense -- right in the middle of it all.

    Africa and the Middle East are discovering Linux in a big way, but don't have nearly as much computer/IT infrastructure or as much computer-oriented education available as (some parts of) China or India -- or South Korea or Vietnam or Malaysia. Or Japan, where it looks like Linux will soon be adopted as a preload operating system by computer manufacturers on all kinds of gear, not just on the server and workstation levels as we see 99% of the time in the U.S. and Europe.

    I see an increasing amount of Linux development and related Open Source activity coming out of Asia, almost all of it in Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and other Asian languages.

    I also see an increasing amount of Linux activity coming out of India, most of which is in English rather than in one of the many local Indian languages.

    2003: the year of Asian Linux

    I rarely make predictions. Heck, I am not all that sure I'll wake up tomorrow morning, let alone that the sun will come out from behind the clouds, assuming we have a cloudy sky tomorrow. But once in a while I let myself go and prognosticate. And this is my one and only NewsForge prognostication about Linux and Open Source in 2003: That some of the biggest advances we're going to see in the next year will come from Asia, not Europe or North America.

    Whether we'll recognize how important these advances are (whatever they turn out to be) is another matter entirely. Maybe we will, maybe we won't. But that's a column I need to write at the end of 2003, not today.

    1. Re:Obligatory article repost before /.-ing by BuhSnarf · · Score: 1

      Ummm, does El'Reg usually get /.'ed?

      It is a fairly popular site on it's own, y'know?

    2. Re:Obligatory article repost before /.-ing by PFAK · · Score: 1

      Somehow I don't think TheRegister is going to get /.'ed, it gets enough hits from slashdot as it is. Alot of articles are posted from there, it has way sufficent bandwidth.

      --

      Free means no restrictions, ironic the FSF's GPL forces restrictions, isn't it? What's your definition of free?
    3. Re:Obligatory article repost before /.-ing by ninewands · · Score: 2

      Talk about karma whoring ... slashdot the Register? Come ON now ...

    4. Re:Obligatory article repost before /.-ing by asteinberg · · Score: 1
      Strange thing is, almost all of this guy's old comments are score 0 except for this repost and a repost of a Washington Post article. Umm...wtf?

      (Sorry for OT, posted without bonus for obvious reasons.)

      --
      The first ever Ultimate Frisbee video game: here (now
    5. Re:Obligatory article repost before /.-ing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nothing strange there. presumably the moderators have a difference of opinion to him (see the slightly harsh use of 'troll' and 'flaimbait') and hes whoring to repair the damage.

  3. Sheesh, not again by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 0, Insightful

    What part of "applications" doesn't the press (or many on Slashdot) understand? Are there magically going to appear applications that will compete with the commercial ones? If all you do is browse the web or get e-mail, then yes, Linux is viable. But that is a much smaller market than most advocates want to admit. And even if someone thinks that's all they want, most are not going to go the "oddball" route "just in case".

    Once again: people use applications, not operating systems. When Linux gets decent user applications, then it will be viable on the desktop.

    P.S. I'm talking about user, desktop application. Please save your comments about server apps or programming languages.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    1. Re:Sheesh, not again by BuhSnarf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's not that bad for the average office user under Linux, there's OO which serves nice as a Office replacement.

      However, when you move to standard home user then yeh, it sucks because he can't play the games all his friends are, or he can't view the latest web pages (I know Moz is standards compliant, but a lot of sites aren't.) or he can't open the attatchment sent by his brother of some pointless sort because he doesn't have the viewer. etc.

      I see your point, I really do. But, then again, I don't think Linux should become mainstream.

    2. Re:Sheesh, not again by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      " If all you do is browse the web or get e-mail, then yes, Linux is viable. But that is a much smaller market than most advocates want to admit. And even if someone thinks that's all they want, most are not going to go the "oddball" route "just in case"."

      It's refreshing to see one other person on Slashdot that understands this concept. What's keeping my tied to Windows isn't going to be solved by a kernel update to Linux. What's keeping me using Windows has nothing to do with MS's monopoly or that I'm an idiot or any of those other stupid rationalizations I hear all the time. Linux is free so I should have no problem using it right? Wrong.

      I use Outlook 2000 (no, not express, so spare me the virus bs.) because I choose to. It's the best for what I use it for. (Calendar, To do list, Spam filtering, synchronization with my PocketPC and Phone, etc...) There are probably clones of it out there, but so what? I already have my solution. I use Lightwave. I could switch to Maya or something, but I've already spent the money so where's the value? I use Photoshop. I could use Gimp, but Photoshop is what everybody uses. I like to play games, dare I even touch on that?

      I have no incentive to switch to Linux. My computer works, it's quite stable (despite the FUD spread around here about Windows 2000 or XP), and it more than suits my needs. At some point Linux is going to have to stop playing catch-up to MS and start being better if they want me to jump ship.

      Funny thing is, I'm not even pro-Microsoft. But I'm not interested in dropping everything just to enter the "I'm cool because I use Linux" popularity contest. A switch to Linux costs me a great deal, it doesn't buy me anything today.

      With that said, more needs to be done to make Linux an attractive platform for companies like Adobe to port over to it. The opportunity is there. Movie Studios are starting to pick up Linux as a workstation. It ain't going to completely replace Microsoft or Apple until an artist such as myself is presented with an interface I can pick up and use. I have to be able to maintain my machine. I have to be able to install and run apps. I have to be able to communicate with people who don't run Linux (i.e. good Office port...). All of this completely fails if I have to memorize a bunch of text commands in order to configure my machine.

      Solve the interface issues with Linux, and you'll see support from companies like Adobe. When we see support from these places, the interesting apps will appear.

    3. Re:Sheesh, not again by ziggles · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I also have no reason to switch to Linux. However I get the feeling that Microsoft is going to screw themselves over sooner than later (DRM), and I'll feel like I have no choice but to get off Windows if I want to have privacy and control over my computer. Linux doesn't have to do anything but wait for MS to screw up.

    4. Re:Sheesh, not again by Dunark · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's refreshing to see one other person on Slashdot that understands this concept.

      Microsoft understands this concept all too well; That's why their knickers are in such a twist over India.
      The last thing M$ wants to see is a large population of Unix desktops available for app developers to sell products to.

    5. Re:Sheesh, not again by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "I also have no reason to switch to Linux. However I get the feeling that Microsoft is going to screw themselves over sooner than later (DRM), and I'll feel like I have no choice but to get off Windows if I want to have privacy and control over my computer. Linux doesn't have to do anything but wait for MS to screw up."

      You touched on an interesting point there. Everybody on /. gets their panties in a bunch every time there's a story about MS. What's funny is that every time MS makes a misstep, the Linux community has an opportunity to take advantage of it. /. should be thrilled when there's a new IE exploit and Mozilla gets it fixed first. DRM? Not to worry, Linux is DRM free.

      But this only goes so far. At some point, Linux has to do something better than Windows. A checklist of "we don't have MS's problems" isn't enough. I mean seriously, who's going to go to Gateway and not buy Windows because of DRM? They won't even know how it affects them until it bites them in the ass long after they've bought it. Why not make a distro of Linux catered to small group of people?

      Make an artist distro where Film Gimp, Gimp, Killustrator, and a few other things have their icons on the desktop or on the toolbar or something. Make the other stuff available, but make the important stuff come out first. Make a PVR distro where right away you have the functionality you need to get the PVR going. Maybe distro is the wrong word.. configuration? Hell I don't know. I love the idea of installing Linux and as soon as it comes up it's all ready to go with compositing tools ready to launch.

      Now that I think about it, one of Linux's biggest failings is that it tries to do a little too much. The Linux Community is all about choices. Some like Mozilla, some like Netscape, some like Opera, so let's put them all in there. Right? Bad idea. The first time I fired up Linux I was met with a number of programs all beginning in K. Who was the dumbass that came up with that naming convention? I mean it's Kcute and all, but Kwhen Kall Kprograms Kbegin Kwith Kk, Kthen Kit Kis Khard Kto Kfind Kthe Kprogram Kyou're Klooking Kfor since the list is sorted Kalphabetically. If they wanted to keep me as a Linux user, they would have slimmed down the choices a bit. I mean face reality here, I'll have to use any given program a while before I understand why this other choice is of interest.

      Okay, I rambled a bit. I hope somebody out there involved in developing for Linux read this and got a little bit of insight into why I'm not a Linux user now. I'm all for ditching MS for something that is.. well. democratic like Linux is. (I'd like to see somebody try to force DRM support in Linux, heh...) but I just can't do it yet. Unless Linux gives me something I don't have in Windows, then I just don't have the time to muck with it.

    6. Re:Sheesh, not again by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 5, Insightful
      he can't view the latest web pages (I know Moz is standards compliant, but a lot of sites aren't.)


      You know, I hear that a lot, but I never see it. I've been running Chimera (and before that, Mozilla) for quite a while and I can't remember hitting a site I couldn't view. Some banks require user-agent spoofing* to work properly, but once I've got my foot in the door, everything seems to work great.

      Got any examples of sort-of-high-traffic sites that just plain don't work in Mozilla based browsers?

      *See this for more on that.
      --

      --
      the strongest word is still the word "free"
    7. Re:Sheesh, not again by Gyan · · Score: 1

      " use Lightwave. I could switch to Maya or something, but I've already spent the money so where's the value ?"

      Maybe, if you wanted more character modelling/animating tools. Maya has a slightly different focus (as can be seen in its advertising) than Max or LW or even XSI. You comment would be be more truer if you compared LW to Max.

    8. Re:Sheesh, not again by Lochin+Rabbar · · Score: 1

      I use Outlook 2000 (no, not express, so spare me the virus bs.)

      I'm afraid it is you that is spreading FUD and b.s. - Outlook is at least as prone to viruses as is Outlook Express. Here is a list of viruses that you thought you were immune from.

    9. Re:Sheesh, not again by WetCat · · Score: 0

      Outlook 2000,Lightwave, Photoshop,
      How much did you pay for that?
      Do you realize that this stuff is NOT free?
      Even if you are a student you pay for that
      by increased tuition fees.
      "Solve the interface issues with Linux, and you'll see support from companies like Adobe"
      I have Corel PhotoPaint on Linux since 1999.
      and happy with that.
      In Mandrake 9.0 there is no real interface issues. Try it!
      In fact unexperienced users find it much more intuitive than Win2000, for example.

    10. Re:Sheesh, not again by dalangalma · · Score: 1

      I think you missed his point. The cost of software isn't the issue. He already bought all those applications. What is his incentive to throw them away? And comparing PhotoPaint to Photoshop isn't very fair. It's nowhere near as capable.

    11. Re:Sheesh, not again by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "Maya has a slightly different focus (as can be seen in its advertising) than Max or LW or even XSI. You comment would be be more truer if you compared LW to Max."

      There are reasons I didn't say MAX.

      a.) It doesn't work on Linux. It doesn't work on anything BUT Windows. That's the big reason.

      b.) It's very expensive, close to 4k. LW is 1.6k

      c.) Most Lightwave users would consider MAX a downgrade. Heh.

      As for Maya, though I agree with your point, Maya is a tradeoff and not an upgrade. I'll get more sophisticated modelling and character animating tools, I would get an inferior renderer. I wouldn't find myself able to do significantly more. I would just have shakeup in the pros and cons department. :)

    12. Re:Sheesh, not again by Metrol · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unless Linux gives me something I don't have in Windows, then I just don't have the time to muck with it.

      It sounds like what you're looking for is the hard sales pitch. Not sure if you're going to find that in Free software land.

      You will find desktop environments that allow for seemless use of multiple desktops, server class networking, and front line applications that do a pretty fine job rivaling their rather expensive counterparts. All without having to troll the WareZ groups for hours on end.

      The advantages of a Unix desktop aren't immediate though. You won't have a paper clip come flying out to show you around. It takes some time and curiosity to see for yourself why there are those of us who left Windows behind. The really rough part here is that it's not something I can describe adequately to you here. Oh, I could probably list off a stack of features that Windows simply can't do, but it wouldn't mean anything to you. It only has value or meaning when you get there yourself.

      All that's assuming you can get past the app naming conventions. You can, can't you?

      --
      The line must be drawn here. This far. No further.
    13. Re:Sheesh, not again by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "I'm afraid it is you that is spreading FUD and b.s. - Outlook is at least as prone to viruses as is Outlook Express."

      If that were true, then I would have been hit by one in the last 5 years that I've used it. (Well, 5 years ago I was using OL 97.)

      I'm not some bizarre statistic either. My entire company uses Outlook 2000. It's my job to fix their machines if they get hit by a virus. I've only had to help one person with a virus, and Outlook wasn't the vulnerability. It was one of those viruses that tricks you into running an executable. It would have worked with any mail prog he used because it had just the right context to make him open it.

      I'm not claiming that OL 2k is rock solid, but it has been quite reliable. Accuse me of spreading fud if you like, I have nothing to gain here but the affection of AC trolls by saying anything even remotely positive about a Microsoft product.

    14. Re:Sheesh, not again by Jason+Earl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Linuxers understand that it is all about the applications. In fact, applications are precisely the reason that Linux is eventually going to win out. Hardware is getting ridiculously inexpensive, but commercial software remains very expensive. You might be happy to pay thousands of dollars for Lightwave, MS Office, Photoshop, and whatever else you run on your machine, but lots of people would rather use Blender, OpenOffice, The Gimp, and the wealth of free tools that come with Linux. Interestingly enough, the hardware companies would especially like to see software become less expensive because that would leave consumers with more money for hardware.

      Sure, the Linux tools might not be quite as powerful, and they might lack the polish of the commercial applications, but they are a heck of a lot cheaper, and they are actually pretty darn good. This is especially true in countries where the average computer user gets paid less than those of us in the first world. If it weren't for the fact that most commercial software is easy to pirate Free Software would already be the rule in the poorer areas of the world. The harder the commercial software companies try to stamp out piracy, the more prevalent Free Software is likely to become.

      Even in the United States the only people that actually pay for applications like Photoshop are those folks that use it professionally. Most people use whatever photo editor came with their digital camera or scanner. The Gimp almost certainly kicks that software right in the head. Which is why, in the long run it is almost certain to gain wider use and acceptance, especially now that the Gimp runs on Windows.

      Adobe isn't going to port to Linux, because they know that if their customers start experimenting with Linux they are very likely to start experimenting with other Free Software that comes included in most Linux distributions. Direct competition with Free Software would make it that much harder for Adobe to sell their commercial applications.

      In the end Linux will continue its inexorable march towards ubiquity not because it is especially good, but because it is "good enough" at the right price. There are plenty of folks that would like to use their computers to do the things that you do with your computer, but that can't afford to purchase thousands of dollars worth of software. These people have no (legal) choice but to dig in and invest some of their time learning Linux.

    15. Re:Sheesh, not again by litui · · Score: 1

      well said!

      --
      I send you this message in order to have your advice.
    16. Re:Sheesh, not again by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "How much did you pay for that?"

      -Outlook came with my PocketPC.

      -Photoshop was... I think $600, and has more than paid for itself. If Gimp is a perfect clone of Photoshop then I might have been able to save that money, but even in that situation I have absolutely no regrets. Photoshop is the de-facto standard there. Knowing Photoshop means quite a bit on my resume. Gimp isn't there. (yet)

      - Lightwave was $1,600. And I'm sorry, but there is NO free app that even touches it. Argue with me if you want, but I'm making a living here.

      "Do you realize that this stuff is NOT free?"

      Do you realize that cost isn't everything? Why would I buy these apps if they didn't provide some sort of return for my investment? Ever think of that? You're providing me with alternatives, but you're not providing me with replacements. Corel PhotoPaint may be 'fine for you', but what makes you think it'll satisfy somebody like me who knows every little detail about how PS works? You'll notice that companies looking for texture artists aren't saying "Must know Corel PhotoPaint".

      "In fact unexperienced users find it much more intuitive than Win2000, for example."

      I doubt it'll be more intuitive for me. I know Windows 2000 like the back of my hand. I've already paid for it, so there's no point in my trying out Mandrake.

      Did you get my original point at all?

    17. Re:Sheesh, not again by Gyan · · Score: 1

      "c.) Most Lightwave users would consider MAX a downgrade. Heh"

      After many years of knowing LW users, they would consider ANYthing other than LW a downgrade.

      "I would get an inferior renderer"

      *cough*mental ray*cough*

    18. Re:Sheesh, not again by iksowrak · · Score: 1

      I think he may have been getting at some of the plugin issues with Mozilla. Sure you can get Flash, Java, etc. for Moz on Linux (and things are improving) but not everything works right out of the box. A standard user isn't likely to know how to fix the problem when he can't play the latest 'Throw pies at Osama' web game or view the embedded 'Dancing Clone Baby' video.

    19. Re:Sheesh, not again by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      " Oh, I could probably list off a stack of features that Windows simply can't do, but it wouldn't mean anything to you. It only has value or meaning when you get there yourself."

      That's a good point. What use are those features to me if I'm not looking for them now? I use my computer to work. I don't have a lot of time to explore and fool around. I could adopt Linux, and at some point it might even be able to make myself more productive with it than I could with Windows. But, if my biggest bottlenecks right now are with the apps I use and not the OS, then Linux does me absolutely no good.

      "All that's assuming you can get past the app naming conventions. You can, can't you?"

      No need to be insulting. That's a legitimate crticism of Linux. (or more specifically, KDE) The main reason Windows is a success is that people can use it. People are willing to forgive instablility when at least their computer is useful to them. Think back to the days of Windows 95 when computers with confusing CLI's were a recent memory. Windows was a relief! But if Windows loaded with confusing buttons (i.e. applications on the task bar that all begin with K), then it'd be a hinderance to using the computer.

      This has nothing to do with my lack of intelligence or deductive reasoning, it has everything to do with bad UI design.

    20. Re:Sheesh, not again by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      " After many years of knowing LW users, they would consider ANYthing other than LW a downgrade."

      There's a good reason for that. Ever wonder why Mac users like Macs so much? It's because despite it's percieved limitations, the engrossed user can make their Mac do anything a 'Pee Cee' can do. They feel they've achieved a level of competance that even those who feel superior have not reached. Lightwave is the same way. There's lots of things other apps have that LW users are envious of. So what happens? The users adapt. "Well, I can do the same thing if I go through this convulted set of steps to arrive at that goal."

      Linux is really the same way. Windows has advantages that Linux doesn't necessarily have right a way, but that doesn't mean the Linux users are incapable. They know Linux well enough that they can make it work anyway. And that's good for them, but bad for new users. They don't feel that they need to catch up to Windows. That's fine and all, but what happens when you sit Linux down in front of one newb, and Windows down in front of another newb? It all boils down to the taste of the end-user.

      " *cough*mental ray*cough*"

      *cough*didn't ship with Maya until like this month.*cough*

    21. Re:Sheesh, not again by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "You might be happy to pay thousands of dollars for Lightwave, MS Office, Photoshop, and whatever else you run on your machine, but lots of people would rather use Blender, OpenOffice, The Gimp, and the wealth of free tools that come with Linux."

      You're talking about individuals, I'm talking about businesses here. In the case of businesses, the cost of software is measured by how much it brings in, not how big a check they have to write initially. Blender is inferior to Lightwave. If you're an FX studio who wants to get a million dollar contract to make a commercial, but you lost to the guy who invested in Lightwave, then your copy of Blender cost you
      $998,400.

      I have no doubt that lots of people will download Blender and not want to pay $1,600 for Lightwave, but nobody's going to make a free 3D prog better than Lightwave if they can't make money off it. If they do, then Newtek will work that much harder to justify that cost.

      "Adobe isn't going to port to Linux, because they know that if their customers start experimenting with Linux they are very likely to start experimenting with other Free Software that comes included in most Linux distributions. Direct competition with Free Software would make it that much harder for Adobe to sell their commercial applications. "

      That argument doesn't hold as much water as you might think. The reason that Adobe isn't porting to Linux is that PC is in such the vast majority that it isn't worth their time and resources to to do it. That's it. That's all. It has nothing to do with free software. If anything, free software on Linux is incentive for Adobe to get into that market for fear that their customers will switch to Linux and not be able to use their products anymore. Linux is not a threat to Adobe right now, so they're not reacting to it.

      "In the end Linux will continue its inexorable march towards ubiquity not because it is especially good, but because it is "good enough" at the right price."

      As I said, you have to understand the full concept of price. People have no problem buying software if it pays for itself. I paid $1,600 for Lightwave when I could have downloaded Blender for free. I have 0 regrets about that because Lightwave has proven its worth to me. That alone should give you a hint that money isn't the central issue here. It's value.

    22. Re:Sheesh, not again by gslj · · Score: 1

      You know, I've been reading various comments about when Linux will be ready for broad use. At first it was "when the installer is fixed." From the sound of recent reviews and reports, it is. Then there was "when the interface is usable and consistent." It sounds as though major progress was made with that in the past year. Then there was "When there's an Outlook equivalent." Or "Microsoft Office equivalent." Done and done. Now it's "When there's an Outlook Server equivalent," and there are a few bright johnnies who are right on that job. The roadblocks and bottlenecks are getting fewer and more picayune.

      You can say that particular programs are missing (Photoshop) but I can't think of any categories of program that are missing. The important thing is whether a job can get done on your computer and operating system, not whether it gets done with a particular tool.

      -Gareth

    23. Re:Sheesh, not again by Metrol · · Score: 2

      I use my computer to work. I don't have a lot of time to explore and fool around.

      You could say the same of any tool used to complete a task. Any new tool requires time to work through how to make the most of it. It's not fooling around, it's learning.

      But, if my biggest bottlenecks right now are with the apps I use and not the OS, then Linux does me absolutely no good.

      Greatly depends on the apps in question. As I found over time, there's apps out there that really do replace their Window's equivalent quite nicely, but they aren't always obvious as to which apps they are. Some time spent on Freshmeat, IRC, or even browsing through mailing lists can sometimes clue you into the apps you never knew existed. One of the downsides of not being inundated with marketing.

      No need to be insulting.

      Duely retracted, and my apologies given. In reading my post over again that did come off worse than I had intended.

      But if Windows loaded with confusing buttons...

      Windows Explorer. Object Packager. Hyperterminal. Just a couple of names off the top of my head that related to functionality not described by their name. I distinctly recall looking all over the place for File Manager after upgrading to 95. Today we sort of take these things for granted, because we learned what in the heck they were.

      Since most the of distros seem to dink up KDE's default presentation, it's hard to say what you saw the first time in. By default, KDE places a plain description next to the cute KName of all the applications within the KMenu.

      Most things are still pretty obvious as to what they do. KCalc for example. Others are so far gone as to be silly. Who would ever guess that Korn was a mail checker? Overall, I would agree with the naming convention being a long term problem. I have a couple of posts up in the KDE Usability mailing list nagging on this very thing.

      If your distro up and turned off the descriptive text in the KMenu, you can get all that back on with...

      Control Center > Look & Feel > Panel > Menus

      In there you'll see a checkbox for "Detailed menu entries". At least this is true in 3.0.5 of KDE.

      --
      The line must be drawn here. This far. No further.
    24. Re:Sheesh, not again by Proc6 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Not a troll, just an honest challenge.

      You will find desktop environments that allow for seemless use of multiple desktops...

      What is WITH that? Why does EVERY Linux distro Ive seen always have the multiple desktop shit turned on. That is so totally a geek thing. Half the people I know using Windows are barely managing minimize/restore/maximize, I just dont see my mom keeping track of 4 different desktops. That shit has always bothered me. Make it available, fine. But a pre-installed, pre-turned on, huge portion of the taskbar, in an OS that wants to garner normal PC users? Anyway...

      server class networking...

      Um. Im not sure what that means exactly. If youre referring to hardware, I think they make gigabit cards for pretty much every OS. If youre referring to the TCP/IP stack, isnt windows's the same as BSD since Win2k?

      and front line applications that do a pretty fine job rivaling their rather expensive counterparts.

      Here's the challenge part. Show me front line Linux applications that rival (or even come close to matching)...

      • Quickbooks
      • Macromedia Director
      • Quark Xpress
      • Painter
      • Dragon Dictate
      • Chief Architect
      • Hallmark Greeting Card Maker
      • Streets and Trips
      • Encarta
      • AfterFX
      • Learn to Speak Spanish
      And the list goes on. Maybe someone could offer a couple "possible" matches on the Linux side for one or two of these. But even that's doubtful. Im not trying to be fecetious (too lazy to look up the proper spelling), I'm trying to make a point. Linux is void of the vast majority of apps people really buy. Go look at the store shelves at Best Buy, and point me to Linux equivalents of most of them. Sure, Open Office is awsome, I use it. MySQL is arguably decent. So you have an office app and a database. Well hooorayyyy!!! What about the shit people REALLY buy all the time?
      --

      I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

    25. Re:Sheesh, not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Listen, you damn Linux idiots - it's not Outlook that's virus prone - it's users who execute .exe and .vbs files e-mailed to them. Just like Linux idiots could open a shell script if it were e-mailed to them. Except that nobody would bother to e-mail a virus to the 3 people in this world using this stupid-ass OS that makes you hand-edit hunderds of idiotic configuration files before you can do anything remotly productive.

    26. Re:Sheesh, not again by Lochin+Rabbar · · Score: 1

      If that were true, then I would have been hit by one in the last 5 years that I've used it.

      Not necessarily, it depends on how clued in you and those that send you email are. I'm guessing that you and your coworkers are reasonably savvy and that you run virus scanners. If you check the link I gave in my last post you'll find a link to advice on securing Outlook.

      Accuse me of spreading fud if you like,

      I'm not accusing you of being an astroturfer. What I am saying is that Outlook is at least as dangerous as its cut down brother, and that anyone who thinks they get better security by using the more expensive product is mistaken. What they buy is more functionality and not better engineering. You used the terms b.s. and FUD, I repeated them to indicate that I thought you were presenting misinformation, albeit unwittingly. We all repeat falsehoods sometimes.

      I have nothing to gain here but the affection of AC trolls by saying anything even remotely positive about a Microsoft product.

      I have absolutely no doubt that you are sincere, just that you are mistaken on one point.

    27. Re:Sheesh, not again by rseuhs · · Score: 2
      I have no incentive to switch to Linux. My computer works, it's quite stable [..]

      and

      At some point Linux is going to have to stop playing catch-up to MS and start being better if they want me to jump ship.

      So when Linux starts being better - will your computer stop working? Will it cease to be "quite stable"?

      In my very subjective opinion, KDE/Linux is already a lot better than any version of the Windows-GUI. Multiple desktops, real 3-button support, Unix-style copy-paste, etc. etc.

      But of course you will never know because "computer works, it's quite stable" and the 30 minutes you maybe tried some outdated, server-centric distro are not long enough to get to know of the advanced features.

      You will use and love Linux when it comes preinstalled and not a day sooner, no matter how great Linux is.

      However, Microsoft is taking a bigger and bigger percentage of PC-revenues each year (lower hardware prices, higher license costs) and it's really just a matter of time until computer will come preinstalled with Linux.

      Solve the interface issues

      What interface issues? If you think you have to memorize text commands you are wrong. EVERYTHING can be done with the GUI - and better than in Windows. In Windows the control center is just a folder with helper apps randomly thrown in. In KDE/Linux, the control center is structured tree-like and for example SuSE also incorporates *ALL* non-KDE settings, so you have a control center where you can do everything graphically. Having to edit text files is like messing with the registry: It may be necessary when something breaks or you want to do something very unusual, but in the normal run of things it just isn't necessary. (Oh and did I mention that editing text is much easier and straightforward than figuring out registry keys?)

      And I'm sure Adobe will port their apps to Linux within the next 2 years - if they plan to sell to Asia or film-studios.

    28. Re:Sheesh, not again by rseuhs · · Score: 2
      That's a legitimate crticism of Linux. (or more specifically, KDE) The main reason Windows is a success is that people can use it. People are willing to forgive instablility when at least their computer is useful to them.

      So Macs are unusable because of iTunes, iPhoto and iWhatever? So Windows is unusable because of Winzip, Winword, WinWhatever?

      But if Windows loaded with confusing buttons (i.e. applications on the task bar that all begin with K), then it'd be a hinderance to using the computer.

      That's bullshit.

      An app that starts with a "K" is a KDE-app. That's very useful because you know before you try it. Just like you know that a "Win*" app is a Windows app.

    29. Re:Sheesh, not again by defile · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Most people switch to Linux because they're fed up with dealing with Windows. Some people switch because they want to see what all of the noise is about.

      *I* switched because I found Windows to be an awful development environment and was welcomed with open arms by Linux. Today I find it extremely difficult to use Windows in any context other than to play an occasional game (and even that is pretty frustrating).

      But you sound pretty happy with your setup. IMO, you have no reason to switch. Are people really demanding that you stop using Windows?

      You did however make a good point in that you already know Windows and can use it to get your work done, and thusly don't need to learn Linux. What I find interesting about it is that people will try Linux, remark about how hard it is to use, and then go back to Windows. In my experience, they are not really complaining that Linux is hard to use, rather they are complaining that Linux is nothing like Windows which they have taken the time to learn (and logged the requisite thousands of hours fucking with it to become familiar with it and get it to work right)

      Four cases in point, one of which may interest you professionally:

      • A good colleague of mine used nothing but Linux for like 10 years. Never touched anything else. One day we sat him in front of a Windows box and he was completely helpless. He's been exposed to it regularly now but he still finds it alien and unworkable.

      • My wife didn't use computers much at all before she met/married me. Of course my household predominantly runs Linux, but has the occasional Windows machine which she sometimes finds herself in front of. She always whines when she has to use the Windows machine because, well, she's not at all computer literate, so it's hard for her to explain, but here's what she said: "It sucks -- it just, it's hard to explain it. Let me find the words. OK, it's like, if Windows were a circle, Linux would be a sphere. If Windows and Linux were chefs, Windows would be an average chef at an average restaurant. Not good, not bad, just go to any diner and order a burger. Ho hum. A Linux chef could be anybody, any top restaurant, any dive, it's whatever the user makes of it. Which for me isn't much, but I can use it under any circumstance that my husband puts it through". A very unscientific explanation, but I thought it was interesting, as it really shocked me one day to hear her say that she preferred Linux when I had made it a point to install Windows on a machine just for her.

      • This same wife and I tried an unscientific experiment. I'd wipe a computer, hand her Red Hat Linux 7.1 and Windows ME. It was her job to install one as far as possible, I'd wipe the machine, and then she'd try again with the other. No help from me. The results were again shocking. She finished the Red Hat installation with no sweat, but got stuck with Windows ME (it took her about 5 times as long and she eventually pleaded with me if she could stop now since she was getting frustrated). I will repeat again that my wife is as computer illiterate as they come. The most advanced topic she understands I think is that computers store things in files and folders, and that she can navigate this as a tree.

      • At a Linux user group meet I recently met a user who was in the market you claim Linux is totally unable to address, an artist. I spoke with him for awhile about why he used Linux (he actually gave a presentation on the topic). Originally he had been using Macs for years to create his work, and as such, over time (about 8 years or so), he built up a large library of material. One day he decided to go through it all and found that the software which he used to create all of this work didn't exist anymore, and that they were in file formats that nothing on Macs today could understand. The vendors were dead, the software didn't run on current hardware/OS, and there were no business interests in providing compatibility today. This terrified him, as he was in danger of losing some of his greatest pieces. It was then that he understood what all of those open source zealots were screaming about. He decided to switch to Linux, and is comfortable knowing that open source software never dies, and that all of his work now will last indefinitely (or at least much longer). Once he got past the initial culture shock, he said it's been a better platform for him overall and regrets not switching sooner.

    30. Re:Sheesh, not again by WetCat · · Score: 1

      Ahem... I see... I tend to agree.
      BTW, there is not a lot of free applications
      for Linux/UNIX-like
      for
      1) heterogenous network backup (windows/Linux)
      2) good wysiwig HTML editors...
      Freshmeat checked, thanks...

    31. Re:Sheesh, not again by overbored · · Score: 1

      What's keeping me using Windows has nothing to do with MS's monopoly

      Actually, it has quite a bit to do with MS's monopoly. It is because of this monopoly that people and companies are much more willing to spend resources on Windows applications than on Linux ones, since they know the former is where they'll find the crowd. This neglect effectively hinders the progress of alternative software - most noticeably in the user-friendliness area.

      (Funny thing is, a lot of folks consider me PMS. =)

    32. Re:Sheesh, not again by shaitand · · Score: 2

      Outlook IS virus prone, it has insecure scripting capabilities that allow virus to execute without a user opening anything but an email! And yes a user can open a shell script on linux, but neither him nor his processes have acess to much unless that user happens to be root. Editor configuration files??? Have you used linux in the past 2yrs??? I can do anything I can in a windows gui without ever touching a command line, yes if I actually want to take true advantage of the fact that I have a completely configurable highly customizable *nix system then the configuration files are there. Now if something goes wrong, that's when you are likely to need the command line as well. But if you can't handle a command line, you have no buisness attempting to resolve things going wrong, you most likely are the cause. Call a computer technician to come take a look at it for you. Most actual computer techs PREFER a command line because a command line is inherently more powerful at most tasks than a gui. Hell most windows power users can tell you the dos command line is infinately more powerful than the gui? now would you like to try to claim the dos command line can compare with the linux command line?

    33. Re:Sheesh, not again by shaitand · · Score: 2

      good html editor, vi

      good backup, personally I like bash scripting combined with bzip2 or gzip.

      Backup solutions are the domain of actual technicians, if you claim to be an actual technician but want all gui apps without any basic scripting you should find another field that requires less study.

    34. Re:Sheesh, not again by shaitand · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, some applications aren't available on linux, and a very large number of apps aren't available on windows either. Granted the numbers probably aren't in proportion since open source is well... open source and the code is there for people to port to windows. Some things are gimped in windows though, such as apache, the windows version is not the current version. Windows is always trying to play catch up with *nix *sighs* they finally adopted the BSD tcp/ip stack and admitted that they couldn't figure out how to do tcp/ip. But how about other protocols? How about a reasonably compatible sql program? a decent LDAP implementation? nfs? complex routing tables? scalability to supercomputer architectures? diskless booting? completely scriptable command line? decent spam filtering for gods sake! An complete OS that is actually compiled to match my modern architecture and to take advantage of my chip? Reliable clustering? Or even the relatively minor stuff like the ability to utilize my half gig of ram before fiddling with HDD swapping and gimping my system to the speed of one of the slowest and least reliable components in the system? Last I checked I can't compile naitive appletalk support into the windows kernel... Just a few annoyances, now if you'd like a few examples of things windows does wrong... Lack of the powerful command line, no source to compile customized and optimized versions of software for my architecture and processor. Wizards that do not offer very little or no customization. A big damn repetative database they call the registry. Lack of a decent backup procedure causing most people to not back up the system settings or the system but rather just their data. No respectable network boot procedures. Extremely intrusive and restrictive licensing. Defaults users to administrative privlages on install. No true seperate memory space for applications so it can make people think "programs start faster" but does so at the expense of apps being able to crash the system. Weak user login scripting. ActiveX. Visual Basic being advertised as anything but a modeling language. .net. Proprietary "embrace and extend" interfaces, protocols, language supports, etc. Oh hell this list goes on and on and on...

    35. Re:Sheesh, not again by Lochin+Rabbar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      WYSIWIG HTML editor is an oxymoron. Since it is the browser and not the editor that determines how html is presented, and browsers vary no editor can preview how a document will look.

    36. Re:Sheesh, not again by Metrol · · Score: 3, Informative

      That is so totally a geek thing.

      My personal experience with non-geek types has been just the opposite. In fact, I believe it's actually easier for folks to grasp multiple desktops than the whole minimize thing. Well, from what I've seen of users anyway. YMMV.

      Um. Im not sure what that means exactly.

      What I mean by server class networking is that it doesn't come brain damaged by default. Every workstation class OS from MS (9x, NTWS, XP, 2kPro) will refuse any more than 10 connections. Many network services are not possible to install at all without a server version. Linux and the BSD's come with no such restrictions to their capabilities.

      Here's the challenge part. Show me front line Linux applications that rival...

      Let's see what I can do with your list here.

      QuarkXpress: As I recall there was a project that was attempting to address this. Heck, I bet OSX users would love to have Quark going too! :) The sad fact is, the professional print market is too much of a niche for a lot of interest in the Free software community to get hopping on. I'm not saying it won't happen, it's just not as high a priority as a functional office suite was. Adobe is the one company that could turn the tide here.

      Macromedia Director: Proprietary editor for a proprietary file format that utilizes a proprietary plug-in. I wouldn't hold my breath on this one.

      Painter: Gimp is more than a match for this one. Maybe if you were talking Photoshop 7.0 a better argument could be made.

      Quickbooks: There are a number of accounting packages up on Freshmeat, as well as professional packages built for Unix. I would agree that none of these really address the core market that Quickbooks is hitting. I highly suspect that financial software is going to be a very high focus in the next year or so.

      Chief Architect: There's a stack of CAD apps for Unix. So far as any that do the bulk of the work for you, not too many out there. Probably the most notable of the free CAD apps is QCad.

      Dragon Dictate: Never seen this work right in Windows. It sortta works, so long as you don't start into a conversational tone of voice. Voice recognition has a long way to go on every platform.

      Hallmark Greeting Card Maker: You won't see fun little grandma made a XMas card kinda things for a while yet I suspect. Like with Windows, the corporate desktop needs to be won over first.

      Streets and Trips & Encarta: Of course you won't see this hitting the Free software arena. The information gathering and subsequent publishing involves bucks. Both of these kinds of apps can be got on the web, either for free or via a subscription. Encarta is available to you now if you wish to subscribe.

      AfterFX: Film Gimp. Used at the professional level today. Heck, developed by studio folks!

      Learn to Speak Spanish: KDE has been working on a KDE Education package now for a little while. Today it includes a fair stack of items, such as a typing tutor, star chart, a French spelling helper, as well as other stuff. It doesn't yet include any foriegn language tutorials, but there is work moving in that direction.

      Personally, I haven't really ever had a need for any of the applications mentioned on your list. At the office, only Quark is used, and it's run on Macs.

      The one app that really needs to get addressed this year is Quickbooks though. This is a critical one for small businesses, which should be a target desktop market for Linux at this point. There's a LOT of folks who put this to use to keep track of their business.

      If we see an effort put forth like what was generated for Mozilla or OpenOffice on this, I believe a lot of the rest of your list starts to fall in place. We have to have market share before vendors will start porting!

      --
      The line must be drawn here. This far. No further.
    37. Re:Sheesh, not again by Eric+Damron · · Score: 2

      Well, I'm glad Microsoft based products are working for you. However, the point of the main story is that Linux is becoming very popular in other parts of the world.

      It is my hope that if Linux becomes very popular that it will become a viable platform for proprietary products to be developed. One can only hope that the advancements in Linux that the article was talking about will allow this.

      As far as Photoshop vs gimp goes, I have heard that gimp is as or nearly as powerful as Photoshop. I don't really know. I'm the only one out of my entire family that has no artistic ability. I'm kind of the black sheep of the family in that regard. :-)

      I wouldn't be anti-Microsoft except that they continually piss me off by interfering with the growth of Linux and other non-Microsoft products. And what pisses me off the most is that they use their Monopoly power in illegal way to do so. I agree that products running on the Microsoft platform can be very powerful and if that's right for you then more power to you. It's just that I feel that Linux is the best platform for many reasons, some technical and some not.

      --
      The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
    38. Re:Sheesh, not again by shaitand · · Score: 2

      linux and *nix systems in general do ALOT of things better than windows already, they do those things perfectly. It is windows that plays catch up. It played catchup on a gui, multi-tasking, protected memory space (actually it's not there yet, mostly because they want to share certain parts of programs so they appear to open faster).

      Your right, There are ton of free software alternatives and few replacements. That those alternatives are usually functionally superior and do more I guess is irrelevant. That there is a far larger list of programs in the *nix world that there is alternative for in the windows world is another issue again

      Yes those alternatives and in general other ways of accomplishing a task are going to give immediate return. The investment (time, not money, actually if you conisder that fact you have to upgrade those programs you named and pay for new licenses you save money on that alone) like 99% of investments out there takes time to bear fruit. Those in for the quick buck are going to lose their money or at the very least not going to make as much as those who actually go with a long term investment plan. Windows is your quick buck, linux and *nix systems are your long term investment plan. Only a fool goes for the quick buck.

    39. Re:Sheesh, not again by swillden · · Score: 2

      You're talking about individuals, I'm talking about businesses here.

      Same thing, in the long run, particularly in the less wealthy parts of the world. How do businesses decide what software to buy? They buy what their employees tell them to buy (after some formalities). What do employees want the company to buy? The software they are already familiar with. What software are they familiar with? The software they used in school, use at home, etc. What software did they use at school and at home? Whatever they could get cheap.

      Some software companies have achieved market dominance precisely because they understood this relationship between what people steal for home use and what their companies buy for the office. But free software changes this equation, because if your computer can come with the GIMP pre-installed, for nothing more than the price of the hardware, there's little incentive to bother stealing Photoshop -- after learning the GIMP, PS will seem weird, counter-intuitive and hard to use, simply because it's unfamiliar. (Actually, from my point of view as a person with advanced, but non-professional, skills with both, I think the GIMP is better than PS, unless you need CMYK. I can go into why I think it's better, if you like).

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    40. Re:Sheesh, not again by donglekey · · Score: 2

      This post shows a lot of ignorance about graphics. It is hard to understand without actually doing CG professionally, but it doesn't make it right.

      GIMP is not comparable to photoshop, and it is not comparable to painter. They are three separate programs, with photoshop being the fastest and most robust, and painter being used to simulate traditional mediums like paints, and pencils. You can have paper texture and do rubbings, you can watercolor and watch it drip down, you can mix red and yellow to make orange on your canvas.

      Film Gimp is a image manipulation program that works with images beyond 8 bits per channel. After Effects is a compositor. They are not even shooting at the same targets by any stretch of the imagination.

      I know you didn't mention it, but I will say it anyway, Blender is not comparable to any commercial 3D software that costs more than $200, let alone Maya, Lightwave, 3D Studio or Softimage XSI, it doesn't come close, so if anyone out there is thinking that Blender could ever replace them, just get it out of your head right now.

      Linux is making inroads in graphics very quickly, but it depends on commercial support first and foremost and this will continue. Adobe will port photoshop when another image manipulation program that is comparable comes to Linux, enabling people to switch and use that program instead of photoshop. This will probably be Amazon paint, but if Softimage wises up quick, it could be Matador.

    41. Re:Sheesh, not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean seriously, who's going to go to Gateway and not buy Windows because of DRM? They won't even know how it affects them until it bites them in the ass long after they've bought it.

      Most people will never be bitten in the ass by DRM. Most people are law-abiding citizens. Some people will try to do something illegal, like copying a friend's music collection, and be denied by DRM, but those people will merely be reminded of what they already knew: that you shouldn't steal.

      The only people who will be hurt by DRM are people who should know better, but don't.

    42. Re:Sheesh, not again by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      An app that starts with a "K" is a KDE-app. That's very useful because you know before you try it. Just like you know that a "Win*" app is a Windows app.

      Why should I, a user, care if an application is a KDE application or not? If I want to use it, I'll want to use it for my own reasons, reasons that will have nothing at all to do with KDE.

      And the "Win-" thing? Dumb. Every application on a Windows computer is a Windows application; they require no naming convention to identify them.

      --

      I write in my journal
    43. Re:Sheesh, not again by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2
      Here's the challenge part. Show me front line Linux applications that rival (or even come close to matching)...

      Can I add a few non-Windows-specific items to your list? Let me just peruse my applications folder here...
      • Illustrator
      • InDesign (which is the same as Quark, for purposes of this discussion)
      • Photoshop
      • FaxSTF
      • FileMaker Pro
      • iCal
      • iChat
      • iDVD
      • iMovie
      • iPhoto
      • iTunes
      • Microsoft PowerPoint
      • NetNewsWire
      • OmniGraffle
      • OmniOutliner
      • Palm Desktop
      • Quicken
      • Sherlock
      • Snapz Pro
      • StuffIt Deluxe
      • Watson
      These programs all have counterparts-- some perfect, some okay, some not so okay-- for Windows. None of them, to my knowledge, have counterparts for Linux.
      --

      I write in my journal
    44. Re:Sheesh, not again by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What I mean by server class networking is that it doesn't come brain damaged by default. Every workstation class OS from MS (9x, NTWS, XP, 2kPro) will refuse any more than 10 connections. Many network services are not possible to install at all without a server version.

      Microsoft distinguishes between the server and the workstation versions of Windows in order to sell the workstation version at a lower price. If you're not happy with the limitations of the workstation version, you're free to buy the server version instead. So saying that Linux has better networking than Windows is really just a price argument, which (1) Linux already wins, and (2) is obviously irrelevant.

      The one app that really needs to get addressed this year is Quickbooks though.

      I can't see how this could be done. I ran my last (failed, dammit) business venture on QuickBooks. The level of support you get from Intuit is amazing. No free solution could ever hope to match that level of service.

      --

      I write in my journal
    45. Re:Sheesh, not again by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      I have nothing to gain here but the affection of AC trolls by saying anything even remotely positive about a Microsoft product.

      You're gaining more than you may realize, A.C. You're on my "friends" list, and the lists of several people whom I respect a lot.

      --

      I write in my journal
    46. Re:Sheesh, not again by ortholattice · · Score: 2
      Got any examples of sort-of-high-traffic sites that just plain don't work in Mozilla based browsers?

      Well, I don't know if you consider the Dow Chemical Company in this category, but virtually every page is broken in Mozilla with Javascript code strewn across the screen; search forms, etc. don't work as a result.

      The problem is that their HTML comments are screwed up with the wrong number of double-hyphen pairs. Mozilla parses them correctly per the SGML standard, the result being not what Dow intended; but IE parses them incorrectly, and IE's bug cancels out Dow's bug. Curiously Dow's own internal search engine does parse the comments per the standard, so you often see garbage JavaScript fragments (even in IE) - the same ones you see in Mozilla - where the summary for the search result page should go.

    47. Re:Sheesh, not again by migurski · · Score: 1
      Some banks require user-agent spoofing* to work properly, but once I've got my foot in the door, everything seems to work great.

      ...

      Well, I don't know if you consider the Dow Chemical Company [dow.com] in this category, but virtually every page is broken in Mozilla with Javascript code strewn across the screen; search forms, etc. don't work as a result.

      You know, the simple way to help here is not to complain to /., it's to tell the people who work at the offending sites. Capital One blocked Mozilla for ages, and I made sure to complain - eventually they changed the policy, and when I was able to get into their site using Chimera I made sure to send a nice thank-you note and received a personal reply. There's actual human beings working on those things - word will get around if someone sends them a screen shot or quick explanation of the problem. This is especially true in the case of banks or other businesses, where your message is treated very seriously as a customer complaint. The only way to change policies that allow for shit sites like the Dow one to get built is to ensure that word gets to the superiors of the people building them. I'm a web developer in a corporate environment myself, and I know exactly how it goes when the client receives word that something doesn't work - we hear about bugs immediately.

    48. Re:Sheesh, not again by GlassHeart · · Score: 2
      Even in the United States the only people that actually pay for applications like Photoshop are those folks that use it professionally.

      You are terribly mistaken. Photoshop Elements 2.0 is the number one selling software package at Amazon. Fact is, Adobe is keenly aware of this market segment, and its price - $40 after rebates - is low enough that people don't feel it is worth their time to dig around for a free alternative.

      Free is not everything. Netscape was free, but Microsoft proved that having to download it was already too much trouble for most users. Note also that Netscape was far more popular than Gimp is today, and even had many websites using Netscape-only features!

      Adobe isn't going to port to Linux, because they know that if their customers start experimenting with Linux they are very likely to start experimenting with other Free Software

      Huh? As you mentioned, Gimp runs on Windows, yet Photoshop Elements is still a bestseller. If having Gimp for Windows isn't enough of an incentive to try it, why would Photoshop for Linux make them reinstall their OS?

    49. Re:Sheesh, not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux sucks. Normal, computer illiterate people will put up with a few crashes or even bad security, but they won't put up with broken GUIs, no commercial apps, and no accountable developers.

      And who fucking cares about the OS install? Most people don't even have to do that once. But they do have to use the computer day after day, and they usually expect windows to close, move, resize when they ask them to.

      Your artist example is obviously fabricated. I challenge you to describe the "obsolete" file formats from the Macs of yesteryear. There's not a damn format that either Quicktime, Photoshop, or Illustrator can't handle.

      PS I pity your wife...

    50. Re:Sheesh, not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linuxers understand that it is all about the applications. In fact, applications are precisely out.

      And you are thinking of "applications" in terms of shinkwrap, and not in terms of mission-critical process apps.

      Free clue: the reason most people are stuck on Windows has nothing to do with software you can buy. It's because they have 10 years of internal and vertical market applicaitons written for Windows.

      Until Linux can seemlessly run all of this crap, Linuxers don't understand it in the slightest. You will figure this out after you open soresies clone MSOffice, Photoshop, and everything else and still only have <1% marketshare.

    51. Re:Sheesh, not again by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2

      Outlook IS virus prone, it has insecure scripting capabilities that allow virus to execute without a user opening anything but an email!

      Some Outlook viruses weren't even attachments. Since OutLook shows HTML email with IE components, it inherited some insecurities, including some powerful OCX components that were marked "safe for scripting" that could actually do some damage. Just reading an email that used those components could cause damage to your system.

    52. Re:Sheesh, not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux is to computing what All you can Eat Chinese buffet is to fine cuisine.

      i.e. they both come out cold and tasteless.

    53. Re:Sheesh, not again by pavera · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Um,
      Java doesn't work out of the box in IE either, you have to download the pluggin...
      Same with Flash,
      the installations in linux are a little more involved, but there are simple instructions laid out, the flash installation is particularly easy, for the last 6 months + whenever I try to go to a site that uses flash on a box that doesn't have it, I click the link, it takes me to the right page, I download the file, and copy it to the directory it says to copy it to on the macromedia site.

    54. Re:Sheesh, not again by Puu · · Score: 1

      Any new tool requires time to work through how to make the most of it. It's not fooling around, it's learning.

      But if you get a hammer you'll want to learn how to hit with it, not metallurgy! The guy meant that he hasn't got time to explore and fool around the OS when he needs to (learn and) use an app for work.

      (However, for the rest of your insightful post, I do agree. -- And why is Preview after Submit?)

    55. Re:Sheesh, not again by Puu · · Score: 1

      The important thing is whether a job can get done on your computer and operating system, not whether it gets done with a particular tool.

      No, not so in the business world. The important thing is what your money-paying client uses.

      If your client uses application X (perhaps with a proprietary file format) but you won't, the "whoosh" you just heard was the sound of them taking their business elsewhere.

    56. Re:Sheesh, not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hum.
      I believe nobody is gonna take time to respond you... because there are counterparts for Linux, but you don't want to be convinced.

      So keep on with windows. We 'll keep on with Linux.

      Happy new year

    57. Re:Sheesh, not again by Jason+O'Neil · · Score: 1
      At some point Linux is going to have to stop playing catch-up to MS and start being better if they want me to jump ship.

      Mozilla has done this, the Desktop Environments have done this, it's just that users aren't shown how to take advantages of the changes.

      For example, tabbed browsing. After raving to my friend about it, and then showing him, he seemed pretty disapointed. It wasn't till I showed him a practical use (A forum he visits) that he would understand. Now he complains every time he has to use IE. Same with virtual desktops. These are incredible, they save me a huge amount of time, and make my computing experience more organised. What's the problem? I had to learn how to use it by myself, there was no tutorial showing me what to do, or how it works. Now I can't stand using Windows or Macs.

      I hope you're getting my point. Linux already has many features that are unseen in the Microsoft World, it's just that many don't understand them. You probably won't listen to me rave about virtual desktops, you'll think "I'm fine, and I don't use them", but when you do use them, and understand them, you don't want to go back.

      What needs to happen, is for those who don't use these features to be educated. They need to be shown how to use it, how using it makes work easier/faster/better and they need to understand the concepts involved.

      Features already exist, but I'm just trying to impress on you the fact that they go largely unused by those who are afraid to try on their own.

    58. Re:Sheesh, not again by Mattsson · · Score: 1

      I use linux on my fileserver because I can do things I wouldn't be able to do with a MS system, like having a webinterface for my burner and getting good performance out of my old pentium.

      I have swithed to linux on my workstation 3 or 4 times, with a dual boot into windows for things that just won't work otherwise.
      Every time I've ended up using windows 99.9% of the time.
      Why?
      I *can't* sync my calendar and adressbook from my phone in *any* other way than using Windows and Outlook.
      I *can't* use the software for my synths in any other OS.
      I probably can run my sequencer in Linux using Wine, but that would require me to do some serious configuring. (No, I do *not* want to use another sequencer. It's an interface issue. I like my sequencer. I hate the interface of Jazz++)
      And Linux doesn't have drivers for my MIDI interfaces. I've checked around. Nothing.

      Since I usually do some sequencing, then surf the web for a bit, then do some administration of some server, continue on my song, check my mail, create some new patches for my synths, yadda yadda, I would have to spend hours every day just booting up OS's if I were to reboot into linux for the stuff that I can do in both OS's.
      For the time being, there isn't anyting I'm doing on my workstation that I can do in linux but can't do in windows.
      After a few months of never using my linux installation, I usually remove it due to lack of diskspace.

      I agree with you that you *can* do a lot of things on a Gnu/Linux/XWindows system that you can't do on MS. The catch is that the same is true the other way around.
      And usually you have to be a Linux wizard with plenty of time on your hands to be able to set it up.
      Most people aren't, so they'll stick to MS or Mac where they can install the os, then their apps and then start to work.
      Yes, you may have to reinstall the whole system once or twice every year to keep it running but that's acceptable if I can run the apps I want.

      Features are useless if it's not the features I want.

      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
    59. Re:Sheesh, not again by BuhSnarf · · Score: 1

      Java with IE worked out of the box for me, as did Flash (but then again it did also under *nix ;)) it also worked out of the box with Opera (my browser of choice under both OS's.)

      I'm talking about plugins where they *only* have an IE version, MSN Chat etc..

      Techie's may not use them, but normal people do.

    60. Re:Sheesh, not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This same wife and I tried an unscientific experiment. I'd wipe a computer, hand her Red Hat Linux 7.1 and Windows ME. It was her job to install one as far as possible, I'd wipe the machine, and then she'd try again with the other.

      The long winter evenings must simply fly by at your place.

    61. Re:Sheesh, not again by aes12 · · Score: 1
      EVERYTHING can be done with the GUI - and better than in Windows.

      Then perhaps you can help me out... I've been looking for a good GUI to configure iptables. I use a linux box as a router for my home network, and have been having a hell of a time with the configuration tools I've found. They've either not worked at all, or the resulting configurations have had odd quirks, like 'forgetting' which ports were supposed to be left open and not functioning when used with dhcp. I've resorted to using a floppy distro (Coyote) becuase I've been able to get things working properly with it.

      The problem has been that I can't set up Apache, MySQL, or sendmail from a floppy, all of which I'd like to try. I too am using windows as my primary computing environment, but I'm using linux as a firewall/router, to try to avoid the worms that are out there. I'd also like to route all of my mail through linux, so that I can pre-filter the spam. I see this as using the two OS's for thier strengths. Windows is typically easier to use, from day to day, whereas linux, once properly configured, is a wonderful tool for all sorts of slightly esoteric crap.

    62. Re:Sheesh, not again by jjares · · Score: 1

      Try UOL-Sinectis... It's a major portal here in Argentina. I never convinced the designers that It didn't work in Mozilla (they claimed it works under netscape, but I don't have, and never will, a Netscape to prove it)

    63. Re:Sheesh, not again by rseuhs · · Score: 2
      Then perhaps you can help me out... I've been looking for a good GUI to configure iptables.

      SuSE comes with a graphical firewall/routing tool. - Even that is graphical, (it's not even desktop centric)

    64. Re:Sheesh, not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I'm not mistaken codeweavers are working on quickbooks support, and will have it available in their crossover product line soon.

    65. Re:Sheesh, not again by jonbelson · · Score: 1

      A lot of these vulnerabilities were fixed a long time ago, the biggest problem is that people don't upgrade their software or apply patches. Windows Update makes it a lot easier to keep up with security patches as they are released.

      The general attitude seems to be:

      If a linux user gets caught out by a security bug, it's his fault.
      If a Windows user gets caught by a security bug, it's Microsoft's fault.

      --Jon

    66. Re:Sheesh, not again by jonbelson · · Score: 1

      >And yes a user can open a shell script on linux, but neither him nor his processes have acess to much unless that user happens to be root.

      So you're saying that a script which recursively deletes your home directory isn't a problem?

      --Jon

    67. Re:Sheesh, not again by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2

      I understand that oftentimes software is worth what you pay for it, especially if you have invested a great deal of time learning a particular program. However, the reason that you know Lightwave and not some other program has far more to do with economics than the quality of Lightwave as a program. Chances are good that when you first started using Lightwave professionals in the studios were using some ridiculously expensive package that ran on even more ridiculously expensive UNIX workstations. If you would have had unlimited amounts of money you probably would have opted for the more expensive package, but you didn't, and so you learned Lightwave, which was good enough at a much lower price. Now employers who are looking for artistic talent know that there is a fairly large pool of artists that know Lightwave, and so that's what they use.

      Free Software, Blender in this case, changes the equation in two distinct ways. The first is that it lowers the bar significantly for people who are interested in learning 3D modelling. If you have $400 for a PC you can start learning. The second major change is that any programmer that is interested in creating new "features" for a 3D modeler can now start with the existing code available in Blender. For some types of software this makes a big difference, it will be interesting to see how this effects 3D modelling.

      In short, I realize that Lightwave is worth the price for existing Lightwave users. The real question is whether or not that will continue to be the case for new users. At the very least Free Software makes that question more interesting. If Blender didn't exist then there would be no question that Lightwave would continue to dominate the low-end of 3D modelling, but Blender at least adds the potential for a sea change. Just because Lightwave is worth the price to you does not mean that it is worth its price to everyone that wants a 3D modeller.

    68. Re:Sheesh, not again by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2

      The results were again shocking. She finished the Red Hat installation with no sweat, but got stuck with Windows ME

      OK, I'm going to call bullshit here, if not f'ing bullshit. I want details if I'm going to believe this. You're trying to tell me that the five or so clicks of installing Windows was more confusing that having to go through the partition setup in Linux that it makes you go through? Maybe she just clicked "do the default", but she obviously had no clue what she was clicking, versus Windows which just does it invisibly.

      So explain what was so frustrating about Windows. Clicking the timezone was too complicated?

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    69. Re:Sheesh, not again by shaitand · · Score: 2

      not to the system at large no, this is hardly comparable to a windows virus which has no barriers to completely destroying the system.

    70. Re:Sheesh, not again by shaitand · · Score: 2

      Who persay would you blame for a linux vulnerability? There is no vendor guaranteeing anything, those who actually code the software owe you nothing they are giving you the software for free. The only thing you have to do in exchange is take responsibility for you own actions or damages.
      If a windows user gets caught by a security bug, the EULA says it's their fault even though the user paid for the software, microsoft takes no responsibility.
      So whats the difference? The difference is that if you discover there is a weakness or getted attacked in a new way with open source software, you can actually get off your lazy rear and do something about it. Hell that's the one thing holding linux back the most, people like the security of knowing they can't do anything about the vulnerabilities.
      " A lot of these vulnerabilities were fixed a long time ago, the biggest problem is that people don't upgrade their software or apply patches."
      And most of them were not, this is because the problem is not patchable. It's the inherient design of outlook entirely and express to a large degree.

    71. Re:Sheesh, not again by Jeedo · · Score: 1

      windowsupdate.microsoft.com pretty mutch doesnt work

    72. Re:Sheesh, not again by jonbelson · · Score: 1

      If the system files are lost, I can easily restore them, eg. make installworld

      If all my personal files are lost, I've got a big problem if they've changed since my last backup.

      --Jon

    73. Re:Sheesh, not again by jonbelson · · Score: 1

      >And most of them were not, this is because the problem is not patchable. It's the inherient design of outlook entirely and express to a large degree.

      Care to give some examples of non-patchable exploits? The exploit which Code Red used was fixed before the trojan actually appeared. The same for Klez. The automatic execution bug which allowed a virus to be triggered just by previewing it was fixed a *long* time ago. The main problem with Klez was that it spoofed From: e-mail addresses, which made it hard to figure out where it had come from.

      --Jon

    74. Re:Sheesh, not again by shaitand · · Score: 2

      Surely you jest? Your right personal files should be backed up, as well as the system. Are you saying complete system loss (including your personal files and everybody elses) is preferable to just losing YOUR personal files? Yes if your stupid enough to download a virus (don't forget you have to download and execute the virus yourself, there is no outlook plague on linux) then your personal files are forfeit. Windows will always be more prone to these things since essentially you start with an administrator and layers of crude security are lain on top to restrict that user. In linux this is not the case, the security is built into the OS itself (the OS is the kernel, not your login, the filesystem, the shell or anything else). An individual user getting wiped out because he was stupid enough to download and execute a virus nothing compared with every user, and the OS getting wiped out.

    75. Re:Sheesh, not again by shaitand · · Score: 2

      We aren't talking about bugs here, we are talking about the "legitimate" scripting capabilities of Outlook. I can still use vbscript within an email and outlook will execute it when I open the mail. I have a large group of friends who come up with various scripts for fun and have more than 16 ways to do this or otherwise achieve automatic execution with outlook. Do you really think your bug tracking list is comprehensive? Most of the features of vbscript are security holes in and of themselves without any mistake in the code. The answer isn't to try to patch vbscript, it's to scratch vbscript entirely.

    76. Re:Sheesh, not again by defile · · Score: 2

      So explain what was so frustrating about Windows. Clicking the timezone was too complicated?

      She kept reaching dead-ends which required a reboot to start over, had to partition the disk, needed to resort to third party driver disks, couldn't figure out what exactly Windows was looking for on those disks, etc.

      Sure, this is easy stuff if you're already familar with Windows, but if you're completely computer illiterate it's a major timesink.

      Red Hat happened to support our hardware configuration right out of the box and didn't ask her to do much of anything (pick keymap, timezone, autopartition, "workstation", and watch the install). Whenever something odd came up she read the instructions sidebar and picked the best option she could think of. I guess she was lucky that I shopped for sensible hardware.

      Now before you fly off your troll-handle, I will reiterate that this was a completely unscientific experiment that can't conclusively prove anything, but remains an amusing anecdote.

      Now please stick to sucking dicks.

    77. Re:Sheesh, not again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use Outlook 2000 (no, not express, so spare me the virus bs.)

      I hate to burst your bubble, but Outlook's always been vulnerable to the same "outlook express virus bs", as well as some of its very own.

      There are probably clones of it out there, but so what? I already have my solution. At some point Linux is going to have to stop playing catch-up to MS and start being better if they want me to jump ship.

      Linux isn't any particular organization with a marketing plan. "They" are people using and developing Linux becuase they want to. They don't want you to do anything in particular, nor do they care.
      Some groups are being very silly and trying to copycat seemingly useless things, but that's their perrogative and I won't fault them for it. Other groups have accomplished far better than Microsoft could ever hope to achieve, but the focus of their efforts isn't to provide some apathetic, lazy ass with an exact copy of Outlook 2k with a couple new features for free.

      Nobody cares wether or not you have an incentive to switch to Linux. What does irritate people (like me since I haven't had my coffee yet) is the fact that you're so loudly arrogant in your belief that anyone gives a shit about you.

      Unless you're contributing to make what you want happen, you don't exist.

    78. Re:Sheesh, not again by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "Duely retracted, and my apologies given. In reading my post over again that did come off worse than I had intended."

      Appreciated. :)

      Thanks for the KDE tips.

      Sorry, I'm sick now and don't have much fight left in me. Take care man.

    79. Re:Sheesh, not again by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "You're gaining more than you may realize, A.C. You're on my "friends" list, and the lists of several people whom I respect a lot."

      Are you serious? Heh I'm sick today so my sarcasm meter is off-line.

    80. Re:Sheesh, not again by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "In short, I realize that Lightwave is worth the price for existing Lightwave users. The real question is whether or not that will continue to be the case for new users. At the very least Free Software makes that question more interesting. If Blender didn't exist then there would be no question that Lightwave would continue to dominate the low-end of 3D modelling, but Blender at least adds the potential for a sea change. Just because Lightwave is worth the price to you does not mean that it is worth its price to everyone that wants a 3D modeller."

      Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you're saying, but it reads a little like you're implying that I feel that free software is bad. That isn't even close to true.

      Blender could turn out to be a wonderful thing for the industry. Right now, there are so many people out there who want to do 3D. They don't have >$500 to put into a program just to see if they can use it. Demo versions just aren't good enough. Fortunately, the 3D companies out there tend to look the other way when you .. uh.. *cough* obtain the software. But that's not really enough.

      I totally agree, Blender would be a big help to those people. My point was simply that the cost of the program isn't the focus of a decision like that. Those studios that were using the UNIX stations that you mentioned were using those because they knew they could make money with them. Free would have been a great price to them.

      I mentioned something earlier in another post that you may find a little more appealing. I think charging for documentation is stupid and ethically wrong. That defeats the purpose of free software. If they really want to make money on it, why not provide it for free and then charge for commercial use? The advantage here is that people can evaluate this software before they drop money into it.

      Bam. Simple. Been done for years. I'm happy to send Blender $500 if it gets me a $5,000 project, but sending $50 to them just to find out what those little icons are is ridiculous. What if I don't like the software?

      I think my PoV's been twisted around a bit in this thread. Heh. I'm not some evil "Open Source is bad!" zealot. I've used enough free apps (like Virtual Dub) to know that documentation is valuable. The idea of making me pay for it is ridiculous.

    81. Re:Sheesh, not again by jonbelson · · Score: 1

      >Are you saying complete system loss (including your personal files and everybody elses) is preferable to just losing YOUR personal files?

      I'm making an counter example of your trivialising of losing personal files (ie. ones which are writable to you).

      >Yes if your stupid enough to download a virus (don't forget you have to download and execute the virus yourself, there is no outlook plague on linux)

      >An individual user getting wiped out because he was stupid enough to download and execute a virus nothing compared with every user, and the OS getting wiped out.

      'Nothing' you say? Okay, type this:

      rm -rf ~

      It will do nothing :-)

      --Jon

    82. Re:Sheesh, not again by jonbelson · · Score: 1

      > We aren't talking about bugs here, we are talking about the "legitimate" scripting capabilities of Outlook. I can still use vbscript within an email and outlook will execute it when I open the mail.

      Executing of arbitrary programs? That's interesting - do you have to turn off all Outlook security settings for them to work? Do you have any examples I can look at?

      >Most of the features of vbscript are security holes in and of themselves without any mistake in the code

      I feel this is a slight exaggeration.

      --Jon

    83. Re:Sheesh, not again by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      I'm completely 100% serious. You kick ass, dude.

      --

      I write in my journal
    84. Re:Sheesh, not again by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Thanks man. CHeers. :)

    85. Re:Sheesh, not again by Lochin+Rabbar · · Score: 1

      If the system files are lost, I can easily restore them, eg. make installworld

      Spoken like a true geek, my hat's of to you sir.

      If all my personal files are lost, I've got a big problem if they've changed since my last backup.

      That's the trouble with geeks, they forget about the real world. You and I may have several machines each, but in more typical workplaces and homes it is several users per machine. It may be of little comfort to the person that just lost their files by running a malicious script, that they have not brought down the entire system. However those that share the system with them will be glad of the separation between accounts.

    86. Re:Sheesh, not again by pavera · · Score: 2

      The original post mentioned flash and java, that is what I replied to. and Java does not work in IE out of the box as of IE6/WinXP. WinXP has no java installed by default because MS was denied the ability to distribute Java, unless they license directly from Sun and they chose not to, causing all of their customers to do a 10MB+ download to get java working in IE.

  4. Re:osx by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 1

    They'd have to start buying Macs first, and (excluding Japan) that just isn't happening.

    --

    --
    the strongest word is still the word "free"
  5. Obligatory Soviet Russia joke by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    In soview Russia, websites slashdot YOU

    1. Re:Obligatory Soviet Russia joke by Rat+Tank · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      In Soviet Russia, people who keep on making Soviet Russia jokes are SHOT! ;-)

  6. Yup, right by Spackler · · Score: 4, Funny

    1995^H^H^H^H

    1996^H^H^H^H

    1997^H^H^H^H

    1998^H^H^H^H

    1999^H^H^H^H

    2000^H^H^H^H

    2001^H^H^H^H

    2002^H^H^H^H

    2003 The Year that Linux takes over the desktop!

    Where have I heard this??

    1. Re:Yup, right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where have I heard this??

      Well, if you remember, I was gently whispering it in your ear last night, right after we finished our .. well, you know.

      *giggle*

    2. Re:Yup, right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Dunno where you heard it, but you never heard it from any linux vendor. Linus Torvalds himself estimated a few years ago that it would take about 10 years for linux to gain a appreciable share of the desktop market - (never any mention of "taking over")

      In any event, linux is not about "taking over the desktop" to use your lame little phrase. It's about empowering users, giving them control of their own data and their own computers, basically giving them a choice. I chose to run linux years ago, and have been quite happy as an IS professional without microsoft. Some, like yourself, who are afraid of change, will cling to microsoft even as they bleed you harder. But feel free to stick with win doze, if that's what turns you on.

      No, linux is not about taking away your lil win doze pee cee, never fear - it was never about that. Only microsoft has goals of elminating all competition.

      Hope this clears things up!

    3. Re:Yup, right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2004^H^H^H^H
      2005^H^H^H^H
      2006^H^H^H^H
      2007^H^H ^H^H
      2008^H^H^H^H
      2009^H^H^H^H
      2010^H^H^H^H
      20 11^H^H^H^H ...

    4. Re:Yup, right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um, no.

      You are confused...

      That was year windows nt was finally going to become "a better unix than unix" - or was it the year that "windows nt is going to kill unix"? Well, it was something along those lines...

    5. Re:Yup, right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You should learn to use ^W. It deletes entire words at a time, much more efficient than typing all those ^Hes.

  7. Re:where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Africa and the Middle East are discovering Linux in a big way...

    are they discovering suicide bombers with linux laptops now? fuck those middle eastern psychos, ragheads and jews alike!

  8. Linux IS GOOD by kg6kma · · Score: 0, Troll

    Although linux is a good operating system i dont think people in that country can jut leave microsoft. I think microsoft has too much of an economic and political and will do there hardest to keep linux down.

  9. Not in India atleast by Gyan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    disclaimer : I'm an Indian from Bombay.

    I don't see Linux making any significant inroads in the mass computer culture of India.

    Most savvy users in India will only pick up a tool if it can be an instrument for economic gain. This is why ofcourse, computer programming and learning it is a big thing in India. Because that's what the 20-something thinks. Learn coding and the world is open to you. The Indian mindset is not exactly open to adopting a culture where the software is free (beer) and support (LOL) is the source of revenue. Which in other words means there is no (or hardly any) revenue !

    If someone in India trys out Linux, its because of the geekish 'chic' factor. To expect a group of Indian coders to sit and down and code say, an IDE, give it away for free is fantasy*

    *Unless that group is currently in an academic or research institution where they have a stipend or other sources of income.

    Note 2: If you're going to counteract that they can sell the product as a shrinkwrap too, then you don't know the Indian software retail market :-)

    1. Re:Not in India atleast by papasui · · Score: 2

      I tend to agree with this stance, I think free software is great and I certainly appreciate those that spend the time making it and donating there work. However, many people simply don't have the time to work on huge projects in there spare time for no compensation.

    2. Re:Not in India atleast by Binarybrain · · Score: 1

      You didn't make your point.

      You stated that you didn't "see Linux making any significant inroads...."

      Then you said because "....writting free software means no revenue".

      You can write proprietary software in Linux. Lots of companies do.

    3. Re:Not in India atleast by Gyan · · Score: 1

      "You can write proprietary software in Linux. Lots of companies do."

      Well, no one in India will. Atleast not primarily aimed for the Indian market until Linux makes significant inroads.

    4. Re:Not in India atleast by Metrol · · Score: 2

      ...then you don't know the Indian software retail market

      Perhaps I don't. It was my understanding that a great deal of the programming business going to India was for custom applications for specific clients and consultants. If that is the case, I would think that a world wide move to Linux would be a huge boom market for India.

      On the other hand, if the bulk of the product is in shrink wrap sales, then in the immediate future this wouldn't be as profitable. Even still, a Free operating system does not mean all Free software. It is still quite possible to make a buck selling closed source apps for Linux, FreeBSD, or any other flavor of Unix.

      A software company looking to work on a Unix product need not follow the exact business model of a Linux distro. An application based company has a different set of goals and would require a different business model.

      --
      The line must be drawn here. This far. No further.
    5. Re:Not in India atleast by bmukund · · Score: 1

      The argument should run more like:

      * Nobody in India writes software unless paid for already (Indians dont understand software products, they understand software services)
      * People in India will gladly use Linux and its lower usability if there is fear of the software audits because the cost of lower productivity is not great
      * Therefore, the year of Linux use in India atleast is dependent on the number of software audits, the contribution from India is likely to be negligible unless paid for by an American company (Sun - Wipro for Gnome??)

    6. Re:Not in India atleast by Gyan · · Score: 1


      Your understanding of software business in India is correct.

      Thing is India already has a huge (pirated) Windows userbase. Someone would have to go out on a limb and write proprietary s/w for a retail market that doesn't exist. So you can't build Linux momentum that way. Only way you can, is by having free s/w on Linux that substitutes an equivalent s/w on Windows. And like I said, the Indian linux developers just ain't there for that.

    7. Re:Not in India atleast by sleepophile · · Score: 3, Informative

      well....there is some nice work being done out here in India....Elxlinux being one...all of the beta testing was done in our college lab in JNTU, hyderabad... and a lot of the guys in our college....have started using and coding for Linux..."inspired" by this......so 2003 may well turn out to be the year of the Lnux...

    8. Re:Not in India atleast by Metrol · · Score: 2

      Someone would have to go out on a limb and write proprietary s/w for a retail market that doesn't exist. So you can't build Linux momentum that way.

      You can if the software is run from the server.

      Aside from the OS side of things, there's a lot of momentum also building around the Free database apps. Those databases are going to need the business logic worked into them, and preferrably all at the server side of things. This is the kind of thing that businesses would pay serious cash for, and still be off cheaper than an MS solution.

      Mind you, I'm thinking US customers with Indian vendors. The interesting tid bit here is the ability to drive thin clients so effectively. Nothing else does this as well as Unix OS's. US companies are hitting a point where they're sick of both dealing with MS and upgrading indvidual PC's. If this does prove to be a way out from both of these traps, these folks are going to need customized stuff.

      Granted, there won't be a switch flipped to suddenly make this happen. It's slowly working its way forward, like a train coming out of the station. When that train gets up to speed, the programming market in India will take notice. It won't matter how many pirated Windows apps litter the streets. Demand is the only thing that can cause the shift.

      --
      The line must be drawn here. This far. No further.
    9. Re:Not in India atleast by nathanh · · Score: 2
      Most savvy users in India will only pick up a tool if it can be an instrument for economic gain. This is why ofcourse, computer programming and learning it is a big thing in India. Because that's what the 20-something thinks. Learn coding and the world is open to you. The Indian mindset is not exactly open to adopting a culture where the software is free (beer) and support (LOL) is the source of revenue.

      And (LOL) how much money do you make by purchasing Microsoft Windows?

      Answer: none. Your argument is bogus. You don't make any money by using Windows. You only make money by selling services and products for Windows. You could make similar money by selling services and products for Linux.

      To expect a group of Indian coders to sit and down and code say, an IDE, give it away for free is fantasy

      Using Linux doesn't force you into a pact where all your own software has to be free as well. Oracle and Borland are two largish companies with closed-source non-free products for Linux . You could join that market as well.

      But in any event, the free IDE from India has already been done. Check out Anjuta.

    10. Re:Not in India atleast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > To expect a group of Indian coders to
      > sit and down and code say, an IDE, give it away > for free is fantasy*

      have you heard of anjuta ? (www.anjuta.org)
      two of the developers are indian, none from
      academia.

      > The Indian mindset is not exactly open to
      > adopting a culture where the software is free
      > (beer)

      the indian culture is already used to software
      that is free as in beer - the vast majority
      is pirated!

      let me ask you something ?
      what do you think the current software export market in india is based on ?
      shrink-wrapped software ? did'nt think so.
      almost all of it is contract programming
      or legacy software porting or maintenence.

      do you ever think india will make it big
      selling shrink-wrapped software ?
      whether the world adopts a proprietary platform
      or free platform is irrelevant to the kind of
      software that india currently makes money on,
      which is software on top of a platform.

      i don't quite see your reasoning.

      - another indian from bombay

    11. Re:Not in India atleast by shishu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      disclaimer: I'm Indian too and have worked as a SW developer in Delhi and Bangalore

      1. Yes GNU/Linux is yet to make serious inroads for the home user.
      2. No, GNU/Linux IS a huge deal in most universities and large companies.
      3. I went to IIT Delhi and we had more than a couple of labs running purely GNU/Linux and that was not because we couldn't afford Windows etc. (Actually IBM/Intel had provided machines with NT installed - we took it all out :-) and I hear things have taken off in the last 4 years since I left and there are more and more labs on campus that run GNU/Linux
      4. I worked for one of the (then) largest SW subsidiary of an American company in India and guess what !! We had a choice of desktops - NT or GNU/Linux (IT staff supported both)... and a lot of us chose GNU/Linux ... and it had nothing to do with saving money - since we had a site license for Windows NT ___ it had to do with the tools we needed and were comfortable with.
      5. GNU/Linux is trickling to the home user in India ... last time I was visiting my parents ... my Dad (who paid someone to show him how to use email/web browsers) complained about his machine being really slow and unstable (its an old Pentium 100 from my college days) ... I installed GNU/Linux for him on it and he didn't even notice any difference, he just sat back and went back to reading his email on Yahoo.
      6. Someone pointed out that Indians will only follow something that makes monetary sense. Well Indians also hate to buy a new computer every 3 years and throw old equipment out ... a lot of them are happy to recycle old PC's and install GNU/Linux on them to use for email/web surfing/chatting.
      7. A lot of development being done in India (for overseas clients ) is web applications and many people already are building these on top of Apache, Tomcat, JBoss etc. This (I hope) will eventually influence the client's decision when they think of deploying these applications. So you should see more and more applications being deployed on Open Source/Free Software at the companies which outsource development to India.

    12. Re:Not in India atleast by Gyan · · Score: 1

      OK.. Let's start from scratch again

      The article talks about Linux activity and India being a hotbed for this in ->2003<-

      My argument again :

      1) WIndows is free(pirated) for most Indians. Only the "no fear of audits" and "moral high ground"(for using s/w legally) are pro-Linux points in this regard.

      2) Read what I said. "...users in India will only pick up a tool if it can be an instrument for economic gain.". You're taking this _literally_ What I meant was a prospectve coder will only start using Linux and linux based tools if he/she sees a potentially feasible job market for his/her skills. Windows is rampant. You would need establishments make a proactive change to Linux, before your 20-yr old installs Linux on his comp to get the hang of QT, MySQL ...etc

      3) The whole point of Indians embracing Linux is economic. (The open source aspect is an added bonus.) If you had to sell proprietary software, one might just as well stay with Windows which is "free" and already established.

      4) If you had free(beer) or very very cheap quality software on Linux, _that_ and pt 1) in conjunction might tempt a change. But like I said, Indians don't think that way.

      Did you eve read the Authors section of Anjuta. Of the 11 developers incl. founder, only 2 hail from India. The lead guy hails from Manipur which is the home of Manipur Inst. of technology. Now, read the footnote of my original post again.

    13. Re:Not in India atleast by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2

      No one is going to make money selling software in the Indian desktop market. It doesn't matter who writes the software, the folks in India aren't going to pay for it. Microsoft has a huge user base in India, but they aren't going to make any money from this user base until they are able to successfully charge money for their software. The harder Microsoft pushes to collect the more Indians are going to realize that Free Software isn't all that bad. Even if Microsoft slashed their prices for their software you can bet that many Indians with computers would rather learn Linux and OpenOffice than shell out $150 for software. I imagine that there are some software firms in India that target the local market, but my guess is that most firms target the international market, for this very reason. After all, if Microsoft can't collect what it is due then what are the chances that a small Indian development firm is going to be able to combat piracy effectively. In other words the fact that Indians tend to run Windows on their home and business computers is completely irrelevant. Indians aren't buying your software.

      Software developers, whether they are Indian or American, or whatever, target folks that pay money. Which means that if you create a custom application that relies on Oracle you are essentially adding Oracle software licensing to the cost of your application. If you based your application on PostgreSQL instead, you could easily lower the total price of your application while still delivering higher gross margins. Now clearly this wouldn't work for all types of software or for all clients, but if you aren't pushing Free Software in those situations where it fits, then I can guarantee you that you are losing business and profits. After all, why line the pockets of the commercial software vendors when you can put their licensing fees in your own pocket.

      Sure, learning PostgreSQL (or whatever) takes some time, but it is an investment that would quickly pay for itself with probably a single PostgreSQL installation.

    14. Re:Not in India atleast by nathanh · · Score: 3, Interesting
      My argument again :

      Blah blah blah. You're back pedalling so quickly you could set an olympic record for the 1km sprint. Your original argument was "(LOL) how can I make money giving away my products for free!". Now your argument is "Windows is just as free as Linux because I steal it anyway". I'm unimpressed by your insincerity.

      Did you eve read the Authors section of Anjuta.

      Of course I did. You said that nobody from India would write an IDE and give it away for free. You were wrong. Your footnote didn't apply because Naba wasn't paid by Manipur Tech to write Anjuta. In fact, it's totally disgusting of you to cast mud upon Naba's generous donation by even implying such things.

    15. Re:Not in India atleast by Gyan · · Score: 1

      We're talking about the potential increase in "Linux activity and usage" in India in 2003 i.e. the next year.

      The _reality_ is Windows is rampantly pirated in India. This is not a matter of debate, but ground reality, so face it. Linux being free beer or free speech is irrelevant. What matters is software for the platform.

      Now, the Indian developer won't develop non-free Indian-specific software for Linux since there aren't any decent number of potential buyers.
      If they do have to make non-free, might as well make it for Windows. 90%+ of desktops are Windows(mostly pirated)

      So, what about free software ? Indian coders won't do that. Why ? Yup, because no revenue. Hardly any from support of Indian users. The main groups who will participate in such ventures are those affliated (studying, teaching or research) with institutions. Naba fits that category. Show me any one even half-finished project (late-alpha or advanced) written principally by an Indian team and who don't generally comprise of students or academia/research. You won't. Definitely not in 2003.

    16. Re:Not in India atleast by psycho · · Score: 1

      You're being foolish, in addition to being a jerk; let
      me paraphrase in (virtually) words of one syllable:

      1) Linux is not attractive to most Indian users, since rampant software piracy in India has reduced the street price of Windows to that of Linux: basically the price of the media.

      2) Linux is not attractive to many Indian developers
      from a career point-of-view,because Windows and Windows-based software is already so well-entrenched.

      Both seem to be empirically true. However, (2) is being eroded to some extent because of the rapid spread of Linux in the server market in India (ofcourse, cost had very little to do with it). However, I suspect greater expertise is in Installation/Maintanence/trouble-shooting rather than
      in hardcore programming.

    17. Re:Not in India atleast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to understand that no Indian company is going to convince anyone to use Postgres or any other product.

      These guys are the caboose on the train, not the engine. You have to target the decision makers in the first world, and the Indian devs, being smart guys, will follow.

    18. Re:Not in India atleast by nathanh · · Score: 2
      Now, the Indian developer won't develop non-free Indian-specific software for Linux since there aren't any decent number of potential buyers.

      By the same bogus argument nobody would build spare parts for BMWs because "there aren't any decent number of potential buyers" what with 90% of the population driving Ford, Toyota or GMH. I'll be very blunt: you still don't have a convincing argument.

      The main groups who will participate in such ventures are those affliated (studying, teaching or research) with institutions. Naba fits that category.

      This is a different claim than you made before. Earlier you said that nobody would write free software unless they were being paid a "stipend" by a research institution to do so. Naba wrote Anjuta on his own time and for his own reasons. It's an insult to Naba for you to claim that his donation was anything other than his to give.

      If you want to argue that academics are more interested in free-software than other IT people then I won't disagree. But this is a new claim you are making and it has no bearing on your earlier incorrect claim.

    19. Re:Not in India atleast by nathanh · · Score: 3
      You're being foolish, in addition to being a jerk; let me paraphrase in (virtually) words of one syllable:

      Well this "foolish" "jerk" couldn't read the rest of your well-delivered insult because, unfortunately, you used several words with more than one syllable.

      Fortunately I hailed a passing person with strong skills in English and they translated your poly-syllabic post into grunt words that I can understand. Basically you're repeating Gyan's lame argument because you seem to think I can't read 100 words without losing my train of thought. Here's a clue: I didn't argue against his lame argument then, and I'm not going to argue against it now. There's no need to repeat the argument to me if I'm not arguing against it, twerp.

    20. Re:Not in India atleast by torpor · · Score: 2

      In fact, it's totally disgusting of you to cast mud upon...

      Is it just me, or are Indian techie bitchslaps just far more impressive, linguistically...

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    21. Re:Not in India atleast by theprancinghorse · · Score: 1

      I am an Indian student studying computer engineering in Bombay. Most of my classmates are not interested in using/developing free software and as you say, they seem to be more inclined to learn tools that will fetch them competent jobs.

      However, haven't you noticed the recent flurry of ads in the leading newspapers advertising Compaq Precarios selling for Rs.33,990 and running Linux out of the box? The same computer can be bought from Compaq with Windows XP preinstalled, but for Rs 4000 extra.

      Now, throw in the office suite the linux machine comes bunfled with, which way do you think the highly price concious first time customer will go? Given the number of homes yet to buy a computer in India, such cheap computers that come with support and warranry and a brand name must seem very attractive. Especially given the FUD most of them experience when buying from local assemblers. I emphasize first time customers because they do not have to relearn anything or get used to anything new. A linux box will work for them out of the box just like a windows box would.

      There certainly is a chance for 2003 to become the year of linux in India. I think you are being a bit too pessimistic.

    22. Re:Not in India atleast by Gyan · · Score: 1

      Before I respond to you in specifics, YOU still haven't provided any counterargument other than simply asserting that mine is incorrect.

      "By the same bogus argument nobody would build spare parts for BMWs because "there aren't any decent number of potential buyers" what with 90% of the population driving Ford, Toyota or GMH."

      But there are a decent number of potential _buyers_ for BMWs. But like you said, a lot more GMs.Ford ..etc So, the ratio of spare parts for GMs ..etc to that for BMWs will be more or less commensurate. They don't manufacture 10 million spare parts for 5000 BMWs, do they ? It's based on the market.

      Why would a Indian coding team want to spend R&D budget and their time writing a non-free s/w for which a substantial market doesn't exist. If they find 40% of buyers ready to legally buy the s/w on Linux and 10% on Windows, wouldn't they go for windows given that Windows has something like 95% share among home abd general office userbase in India. Also, word-of-mouth promotion of a Windows app is likelier to garner a few more paying customers than a Linux version since your Linux expansion is limited to the 5% userbase. YYou have to convince some ppl from the other 95% to migrate to Linux if you want them to use your product.

      "Earlier you said that nobody would write free software unless they were being paid a "stipend" by a research institution to do so"

      If you read the complete footnote, you'll see that I meant differently.

      I didn't mean that the stipend is for writing the software. Simply that people who participate in these GPL projects don't DEPEND on writing code for Linux professionally as their means of subsistenec (in India). So, in that sense, ppl who tend to participate (in India) are generally academics or students or researchers on a stipend or other sources of income. Their _principal occupation and source of bread_ isn't writing code unlike the 31 year old who's set up his own software house in Bangalore. That guy wants paying clients or revenue-generating products. His paid team is not going to write GPLed code or non-free Linux stuff until there's a market for it in India (assuming that's his primary market). In that context, its the academics on stipend or other source of income with an interest in Linux who are the likely contributers to projects like the ones on SourceForge.

    23. Re:Not in India atleast by Khalid · · Score: 2

      Don't be so affirmative and general http://anjuta.sourceforge.net/ (a very nice Gnome IE) is the perfect counter example of what you are saying it has been initiated buy Naba Kumar Singh who I am pretty sure, at least at that time leaved in India.

    24. Re:Not in India atleast by nathanh · · Score: 2
      Before I respond to you in specifics, YOU still haven't provided any counterargument other than simply asserting that mine is incorrect.

      Sure I have. I gave Borland and Oracle as two counterexamples when you claimed that developing for Linux means "software is free (beer) and support (LOL) is the source of revenue". I gave Anjuta when you claimed "To expect a group of Indian coders to sit and down and code say, an IDE, give it away for free is fantasy". I pointed out your mistake when you then claimed that Naba must have been paid by Manipur to write Anjuta (Manipur has no claim on Anjuta). I caught you when you changed your argument from "software is free (beer) and support (LOL) is the source of revenue" to the rather lame argument that you steal Windows so it's effectively free... a completely new argument that you threw in to obscure your original argument because it had no merit. I showed you the BMW/Ford analogy when you claimed "the Indian developer won't develop non-free Indian-specific software for Linux since there aren't any decent number of potential buyers" to demonstrate that a small market share is not the same thing as no market share.

      But there are a decent number of potential _buyers_ for BMWs. But like you said, a lot more GMs.Ford ..etc So, the ratio of spare parts for GMs ..etc to that for BMWs will be more or less commensurate. They don't manufacture 10 million spare parts for 5000 BMWs, do they ? It's based on the market.

      And there a decent number of buyers for Linux software too. Otherwise there wouldn't be a Linux market in the first place. Sure it might be a small market, but by the same token you don't have to compete on the scale of McDonalds to run a successful restaurant.

      His paid team is not going to write GPLed code or non-free Linux stuff until there's a market for it in India (assuming that's his primary market).

      And I refuted this tired chestnut the first time. You don't have to write GPL code. Oracle and Borland were the two counter-examples I gave. It's not that there aren't any counter-arguments here... you are purposefully ignoring them.

    25. Re:Not in India atleast by unconick · · Score: 1

      I completely agree with your logic, except that I have worked with, and befriended many indian friends who know quite a lot about Linux and UNIX programming.

      I have never worked in an environment where Linux has been a "desktop" etc, except for the few of us who were able to use a system that had both windows and linux installed, but most of what they got paid for was for commandline code, perl and so on.

      You can make money with Linux when your company's game plan involves leveraging Linux openness towards it's buisness goals.

    26. Re:Not in India atleast by ninewands · · Score: 2
      Quoth the poster:
      Sure, learning PostgreSQL (or whatever) takes some time ...

      Having written a couple of GUI-based postgres clients in C++, let me assure you that it would take an experienced Oracle developer a significant amount of time ... say about 1.5 hours ... to be capable of developing for postgres. The API for opening the database, manipulating the tables and retrieving the results of your query is extremely simple ... the hardest part for me (never having coded for an server-based SQL database manager before) was learning the syntax for the SQL statements that the client sends to the server.
    27. Re:Not in India atleast by Gyan · · Score: 1

      First, I'm guessing you didn't read my whole post before you started typing your reply. One suggestion, read this to the end before replying.

      -> "I gave Borland and Oracle as two counterexamples when you claimed that developing for Linux means "software is free (beer) and support (LOL) is the source of revenue"."

      Hello ! Porting one of the most popular databases (Oracle) to another OS by one of the world biggest companies is not the same as a software house in India run by a 30 year old developing their own say, non-free IDE for an operating system that isn't widespread in India. The very fact you're using two world software powerhouses to justify your stance discredits it.

      -> "I gave Anjuta when you claimed "To expect a group of Indian coders to sit and down and code say, an IDE, give it away for free is fantasy""

      Again Hello ! Since when does 1 founder and co-developer out of a total of 11 make it an Indian project ? !! Even the 2 listed as lead-developers are both not Indians.

      -> "I pointed out your mistake when you then claimed that Naba must have been paid by Manipur to write Anjuta"

      Didn't you read my rejoinder about this ? I never claimed that Manipur paid Naba TO WRITE anything. Just that Naba probably doesn't depend on writing and selling software as his main or any source of income. He probably recieves a stipend or some other source of income for his OTHER FORMAL research/teaching duties at Manipur Tech. I covered this in the reply you just responded to.

      -> " I caught you when you changed your argument from "software is free (beer) and support (LOL) is the source of revenue" to the rather lame argument that you steal Windows so it's effectively free"

      Huh ! You lost me there. The two arguments aren't contradictory or related. But they do complement each other in my basic argument.

      1) If you write GPLed stuff, only revenue is support, which I said is non-existent (in India)
      So, no one writes GPL stuff except students/academics/researchers who don't depend on it for income anyway.

      2) If you write non-free stuff, Indian coders will stick to Windows, not Linux, due to market share.

      3)Furthermore, home users have no incentive to switch over to Linux since they can easily steal Windows. Hence Linux (lack of)cost is not a driving force. Applications are.

      Points 2 and 3 just form a vicious circle.

      "to demonstrate that a small market share is not the same thing as no market share"

      Actually, with the Indian mentality, they're pretty much the same. All the best Indian coders (among those still in India) by virtue of the Indian mindset won't want to aim for anything 'small' (even if that's how their product might eventually end up) This is a cultural thing, but it does come into the picture.

      Trends (Economics, political or cultural) in a certain region don't always translate themselves to other regions, irrespective of or unmodified by local ethos. I think that's the mistake you're making when you try to refute my argument and try to prove your point by example.

    28. Re:Not in India atleast by anandsr2 · · Score: 1

      Well I am from india as well. Although I would agree with the current scenario as you have detailed but I don't agree with the reason. They don't use linux because they don't know the reasons for using linux and I guess you don't too. So read on.

      I work for a software company Hughes Software Systems, and we do fair amount of work on Linux. We are MVP (Monta Vista Partner) which produces Monta Vista Linux a Linux for Real Time and Embedded applications. I am sure other software companies like Infosys and Wipro will also be doing some work for linux.

      I think people think that only companies like Microsoft exist, which make software and sell software to make a living. But if they see around them they will find that most money is made by providing software as a service. And this is especially true for Indian companies most do offshore or on shore development for their clients. Very few Indian companies make products that they sell.

      If these people will think deeply, its not selling of the software that wins the bread at the end of the day. Its the providing of a service. It could be in the form of a product, but it could also be in the form of writing a piece of code that your client needs. It could be in the form of helping a client setup their machines network systems. It could be in the form of just giving training to the customer. If you think that you will only be creating products and selling them then you are restricting yourself to a very small niche. Creating products and selling it is a very risky and mostly a losing proposition, more so if you come in the line of a monopolist.

      I hope that Indian Software Engineers will see the light and understand that products is not the be all and end all of software development. I am not saying that they should be coding and giving their code away with no expectation in return. I think that is a stupid concept if people code for the sake of giving it away. I think the reason why people should code for Linux is when they are still learning or when they need to in their jobs. I think Linux is the best place to learn, because it doesn't hide concepts from the user. If the OS is hiding from you what really is happenning how will you learn. The other thing you need to do while learning is create some test code, undertake some project, to test your learning. Without testing your learning you do not know whether you know what you have learnt. If you do coding you could put it up on the internet and make your project live forever, and maybe make yourself a name and reputation like so many Linux developers have. Maybe that will help you in searching for a job. Enlightened self interest is the only way to a good life. I think Linux is getting so popular because people are finding it useful in their day to day work not because of some free software BS.

      There are some people who take software development as altruistic endeavor, they are also a vocal group because that is what they see as the product (that they will be praised for their work). But they are a very small group.

      -anand

    29. Re:Not in India atleast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea, I've seen the code you damn indian coders write. Most of it is a complete mess, like you learned the language while writing the program. Then you don't write any documentation and you don't comment the code. So, you are right. You are only in it for the money and you could care less once you get your check. You deserve Microsoft.

    30. Re:Not in India atleast by nathanh · · Score: 2
      First, I'm guessing you didn't read my whole post before you started typing your reply.

      Blah blah blah. That's the fifth time you've done that. I would say something witty about glass houses but I simply couldn't be bothered. You want this way more than I do. Congratulations, you win by attrition. But just before I sign off...

      This is a cultural thing, but it does come into the picture. Trends (Economics, political or cultural) in a certain region don't always translate themselves to other regions, irrespective of or unmodified by local ethos. I think that's the mistake you're making ...

      That's why (LOL) about a half dozen people born and living in India have responded to this thread and said you were wrong. You have the most selective reading skills I have ever seen!

      Enjoy your "economic gain" while it lasts. Windows is dead, it just doesn't know it yet, and your head is so deeply buried in the sand that you won't even hear the Linux steamroller before it flattens you.

    31. Re:Not in India atleast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      India is full of weirdos, who sit in temples all day for decades unti their nails grow 10 feet long.

      They *define* geeks.

      There should be a cool 10 million people there who would be willing to learn linux just to meditate on it.

      Indians dont all do stuff for profit...some people do it for efficiency. In India efficiency is not how few people you can do something with, but how little resources or energy you can do something with.

      So dont cast the indians in the merchant role. There are plenty of mystics and weirdos there....many cults, many people who dont have a reason for why they do things. expanding into linux is just another for that ever outgoing blob called india.

    32. Re:Not in India atleast by indiancowboy · · Score: 1

      Guyz, I think we'er all missing the point here. What do mean by "year of linux" ? Magically linux will gain a 30% or even 20 or even 10% or even 5% share in the OS market? Well ofcourse we all know that is'nt happening!
      Linux is being used as a server option and that market is steadily growing (and it will remain stedy with no amazing jump in the coming year). But this is a very small segment in terms of numbers in comparison to the desktop segment. Linux, i'm afraid is far far away from being really popular on desktops. Savvy India IT guyz and mebbe(as someone pointed) even parents of IT guyz might use it. But for it to penetrate on the Home Computing scene, is gonna take much much more than the year 2003.
      What however could make 2003 : Year of Linux, is the latest development in the Indian IT political circles. The government recently announced that Linux is what it is going in for. (Opening source for windows supposedly did'nt help MS much). This may ussher in a new era for Linux. Imagine lacs of tobe governments desktops would be running linux and thousands and thousands of students in the colleges and universities would be learning and working on Linux. It will be an entire generating growing up on Linux. Unlike the previous one which grew up from the days of MS Dos2.0 all the way till 6.22 and windows XX.
      Things will change. But just slowly and steadily. Sorry to disappoint you, but nothing drastic is going to happen in the next year alone.
      - D.O.D.D.

    33. Re:Not in India atleast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You Know its quite funny..because when we talk about the egyptian market...they don't buy more than they share pirated stuff(movies, appz, gamez, mp3z)..and when we talk about price..sure even if vendors do make a cutdown..you'll have people buying the software, as well as companies (with VERY LARGE BUDGETS)striving tobe the most updated, and have VERY large libraries containing everything...while most users or developers are sharing with each other pirated software..and no...they won't shift to open source...

      what im saying is:
      whil many people think that people shift to open source..because its free..in Egypt its different..everything IS FREE..it doesn't matter the price..but instead it matters the knowledge...and i come to my next point...not many people..know about open source...and when they do..they fear the change that it might not work with their requirments...and we come to the other rule...if its doing its job, why pay for a change?

      And then last but not least..to kill piracy in Egypt you have to enter the people's homes, advertising is not working, using brute force is a failure...i beleiive that the only way to clear piracy in Egypt is to increase the amount of punishment you get if your cought using pirated software.

      Just the govnmt solved the problem with seatbelts..

      heres what they did, they imposed a ticket that if your caught not wearing a seatbelt you pay a fine of $200, and they released police officers all over the city...within a year or two..whenever you enter a car you are reminded to 'wear the belt or you handle the ticket!!'

    34. Re:Not in India atleast by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2

      I suppose that it is possible that Egypt (and other countries where software piracy is rampant) will pass and enforce strong intellectual property laws. I don't see why they would do this, as software piracy is in the best interest of their local economy, but who knows what those crazy foreigners will do :).

      Personally I am against having the authorities raid individual homes looking for pirated software. Especially in countries like Egypt where everyone with a computer is likely to be using pirated software. I lived in Peru for several years, and I saw too many laws that were only enforced when the people in power wanted to punish an individual. They had certain laws that nearly everyone broke, and so when some petty bureaucrat wanted to ruin someone's life, they simply sent in their thugs.

      In the end there is more to Free Software than low prices. If Egypt wants to remain dependent on the U.S. for their software then pirating their software is almost certainly the way to accomplish that. Eventually Microsoft and friends are either going to find out a way to make Egyptians pay for software or they are going to stop developing software for the Egyptian market.

    35. Re:Not in India atleast by indiancowboy · · Score: 1

      U guyz,
      I was so tempted to reply to you guyz somewhere in between the thread, but resisted. But your last sentence here was too much of a tempt to not reply to.
      "Windows is dead" Ohh comeon man! I'm a linux fan too and a MS-hater(not for them being so rich, i actully lookup to them for being so rich. But i hate them cuz of the quality of their stupid products!). Anwyas, i'm a MS hater too, but windows aint anywhere in the remotest vicinity of being dead. :) that requires a bigtime reality check!

    36. Re:Not in India atleast by Gyan · · Score: 1

      "I would say something witty about glass houses but I simply couldn't be bothered."

      Well, by saying _that_ , you did. Only you didn't actually mention it.

      "You have the most selective reading skills I have ever seen! "

      Ever seen we had this thing started, I haven't revisited my parent comment and its parent replies.

      Very interesting to note, now that I did reply to your latest post, you choose to respond by "Blah, Blah, Blah". How convienient. Why don't you actually respond to my post ? Maybe you can't and your stock "Blah Blah" response gives you the delusion tht you successfully did.

      "Congratulations, you win by attrition. But just before I sign off... "

      Those two sentences just further confirms my last sentence above.

    37. Re:Not in India atleast by nathanh · · Score: 2
      I was so tempted to reply to you guyz somewhere in between the thread, but resisted. But your last sentence here was too much of a tempt to not reply to.

      Happy to be of service :-)

      "Windows is dead" Ohh comeon man! I'm a linux fan too and a MS-hater(not for them being so rich, i actully lookup to them for being so rich. But i hate them cuz of the quality of their stupid products!). Anwyas, i'm a MS hater too, but windows aint anywhere in the remotest vicinity of being dead. :) that requires a bigtime reality check!

      I'm not a Microsoft hater (well, maybe I am, but I don't admit it in public) but I'm fairly convinced Windows as we know it is dead. There are two reasons.

      The first reason is cost. Linux is replacing servers and corporate desktops all over the world. It has nothing to do with Linux being better (because that is debatable) but everything to do with Linux being free. Companies are not run by CEOs or CTOs. They are run by bean-counters in search of the almighty dollar. The bean-counters are eventually going to say "why are we paying for this Windows product when we can get Linux for free". This isn't a fantasy or a theory: you can already see this happening. There's this mistaken belief that people pick the best tool for the job. Bullshit. People buy the cheapest tool that does the job. Linux does the job. It is the cheapest. Bean counters don't look at TCO - that's next year's budget and somebody elses problem - so the TCO arguments are misguided. Linux will eventually dominate both server and desktop.

      The second reason is that Windows is primarily a PC desktop and the PC isn't long for this world. Microsoft is branching quickly into other platforms because they have also realised that the PC won't be king for long. People don't want their data tied to a desktop computer sitting on a desk. They want their data in their pocket, on the plane, at their meetings, on their couches, in their televisions, etc. The PC can't provide that sort of service and so the PC is dead. I strongly believe that different form factors (PDA, tablet, embedded, household, mobile phone) are going to dominate the landscape soon. It's already happening. The writing is on the wall. It might take a few decades but it's inevitable.

      Bear in mind that I certainly don't think Microsoft is dead! We're going to be stuck with them for at least a few more decades.

    38. Re:Not in India atleast by psycho · · Score: 1

      the key word i used is "virtually". look it up in a dictionary. you know, the big book that lists words and their meanings. good luck.

  10. correction on the new year by MoceanWorker · · Score: 4, Funny



    last I checked.. 2003 is going to be the Year of the Goat

    since when was linux an animal?

    --


    "The ones who dont do anything are always the ones who try to pull you down" -- Henry Rollins
    1. Re:correction on the new year by blackwizard · · Score: 2

      Tux will be very unhappy to learn that his Chinese counterpart will be some kind of horrific goat/penguin hybrid. Oh, the humanity!

    2. Re:correction on the new year by jellybear · · Score: 2

      He shouldn't have knocked her up, then.

    3. Re:correction on the new year by MoceanWorker · · Score: 2

      well if GNU stood for Goats Not Unix.. well then.. we'd be humming a different tune :-)

      --


      "The ones who dont do anything are always the ones who try to pull you down" -- Henry Rollins
    4. Re:correction on the new year by commodoresloat · · Score: 2

      Year of the goat? Does that mean the goatse guy is going to do the "switch" commercials for linux in asia?

    5. Re:correction on the new year by moosesocks · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, no no....

      2003 will be the year of the Gnu/Penguin (goats and Gnus are interchangable anyway...)

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    6. Re:correction on the new year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      since when was linux an animal?
      Well, I've seen it do some pretty beastly things under high load. ;-) [this is not a linux flame, just a joke, move along...]
    7. Re:correction on the new year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Year of the goat? Does that mean the goatse guy is going to do the "switch" commercials for linux in asia?"

      [cue "Switch" music]

      So I wanted to, like, run this website thingy and upload pictures to the web, but IIS and Windows 2000 couldn't handle the thousands of unsuspecting Slashdot viewers who innocently clicked on some random link only to gouge their own eyeballs out in sheer horror. That's why I switched to Linux. Now my website runs, like, really well while my loser Windows-using friends still puke all over their keyboards every time they visit my site.

      My name is The Giver and I switched to Linux.

  11. In Red China.... by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    Redmond is losing power over the Reds!

    I see this as a good thing, so long as we can reincorporate the code. How is C programming done in other languages? Are foreign languages/characters supported?

    This is an honest question, please don't reply to the Red China comment; it was just a joke, not flamebait.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
    1. Re:In Red China.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take pretty much any X-based Linux desktop and ask the question of whether it supports R-L reading order and international Unicode code pages and the answer will be "Real computer users don't care about that kind of crap - ASCII and ANSI are the only true character sets."

      Meanwhile, Xu Ming Li in Shanghai is happily clicking around Windows' superb Chinese support.

    2. Re:In Red China.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, take pretty much an Pango/GTK+ application, and it would support those features. Pango makes it very easy.

      Qt is probably the same way, but I honestly don't know.

  12. Some comment from an 'insider' by MoThugz · · Score: 5, Interesting
    ...by saying insider, I'm saying that I am Asian, or more specifically a Malaysian who is working in Singapore.

    While the article would seem like a happy fairy tale for Linux supporters, the cold, hard reality is that Linux is not even known by the large majority of computer users in most parts of Asia... AND this includes the so-called high-potential areas such as China and India.

    While companies prefer to stay legit and actually buy licenses for their software (and even this is fairly recent, thanks to the BSA), a large majority of home-based consumers run pirated versions of Windows, and a bunch of pirated application which can be bought at less than US$2 per CD. This is the cold hard truth.

    And many Western media report blames the Govt for not doing anything when the fact is that they can't actually properly enforce the rules. The pirates here are true gangsters in the sense of the word... not some pimply faced kid with cable connection and terrabytes of storage like the typical image of software pirate many of you think.

    They are backed by armed thugs, scouts that check on police/IP-enforcers, and possibly insiders from the police or even the local BSA branch... yes, really!

    And to top it off, they keep the customers happy... Yes, they really do. I find these pirates more approachable than your average MS or Adobe salesperson.

    CD not working? No problem, we'll replace it for you... No questions asked.

    Two weeks guarantee on any purchased CD.

    Recommendation on a better substitute of the app you wanted to buy

    With that kind of service it's no wonder people here flock to pirated CD shops than to the legit vendors. Price is one thing, but if you are going to be severely restricted by EULAs and other licensing terms, might as well buy a pirated copy for 1/200 of the price and be happy about it.

    From a typical Asian point-of-view, there is no value-added incentive to purchase original CDs.

    Back to the topic, while companies (especially SMEs) will embrace Linux because of the money they can save from software licenses. But even so, many of the established businesses will stick to propietry software because it is what they are used to. And these are decided by the bigwigs which have no desire at all to embrace new technologies eventhough it might save them a huge pile of cash. It is in the mindset... not the software itself.

    Linux can move forward by becoming more Desktop-centric not just for home users but for corporate users. And it does not need to be free (as in beer)... most companies will invest a suitable amount of cash to improve productivity.

    Sorry for the long rant, hope u get my point.

    1. Re:Some comment from an 'insider' by Animats · · Score: 2
      From a typical Asian point-of-view, there is no value-added incentive to purchase original CDs.

      What about XP, with "Windows Activation"?

    2. Re:Some comment from an 'insider' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They sell cracked versions of Windows XP here in Asia ...

    3. Re:Some comment from an 'insider' by MoThugz · · Score: 2

      Windows Activation is a joke... it was cracked since RC builds. Then MS releases SP1 which won't run on installations using known pirated keys.

      The pirates then sells XP with integrated SP1. Pirates ??? - MS 0.

  13. Linux is not going to get users to "move" ..... by SwedishChef · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A plethora of users have demonstrated here that they aren't interested in adopting Linux. They are comfy with what works for them. And since they started out with MS and Windows applications, that's what they like.

    The key phrase here is "started out with MS and Windows".

    There are literally BILLIONS of potential users who have never become used to Photoshop or Outlook Express or MSIE. This untapped userbase is ripe for the picking and if Linux is there early with an OS that is cheap and applications in their languages then Linux could have a large proportion of those users.

    Imagine Asia and Africa populated with computer users who can't see any reason to switch to Microsoft because they are used to what they have; Linux.

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
    1. Re:Linux is not going to get users to "move" ..... by HillBilly · · Score: 1, Troll

      Those potential users would love fresh water, sewer and electricity connected to the their residence before they could even care about computers, email or any other luxeries.

      --
      "Go into the hall of mirrors and have a bloody hard look at yourself" - HG Nelson
    2. Re:Linux is not going to get users to "move" ..... by Dalcius · · Score: 1

      To echo the other reply to your post, my parents* always told me that Windows was what they wanted. They were happy with it. They made sure I knew it when I brought up Linux.

      *: semi computer literate; can email, use word, internet, _very_ basic use.

      They're running RH 7.3 + Ximian now. They're about to be put on Gentoo (by myself), since it's easier to admin and faster.

      They love it. They don't want to go back.

      I felt the same way after I switched. You wonder why you were happy with what you had when there is something out there so much better.

      Linux is not for everyone. But some folks really don't look into it enough to realize that it is for them.

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    3. Re:Linux is not going to get users to "move" ..... by Dalcius · · Score: 1

      "To echo the other reply to your post"

      Er... I feel dumb.

      Disregard that statement.

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
  14. Thailand and Linux by Daengbo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Anyone who has been here for a long time has seen my posts about Thailand, but I'll summarize what's happening here, and it's big.
    You see linux desktops and laptops in almost every computer store. All top five domestic brands, including Belta Liberta and Laser ( I can't find a link), use it for their lower models. It is always the same, the National Electronics and Computer Technology (NECTEC) organization of Thailand's own Linux TLE, a Red Hat based distibution that has had Thai language support and translations added to virtually every application.
    Since November,the new releases come with version 4.1R2, which is touted as "Professional," and includes OfficeTLE, an OO.o variant which includes such difficult to program features as a Thai word parser, because Thai uses no spaces between words. It, in my opinion, outshines Sun's Pladao Office, which translates as "Starfish." The menus for Pladao are all in Thai, but the OfficeTLE menus are in English. Books for both litter the bookstore shelves in prominant places.
    NECTEC also has a venerable serverdistribution, SIS (can't find the link), which stands for School Internet Server, and connects primary, secondary, and tertiary(?) schools to their SchoolNet, a free internet and information sharing operation.
    Free Software is kicking here in Thailand.
    For other perks, see my sig.

    1. Re:Thailand and Linux by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Oh, yeah, and sorry for "prominant" and "serverdistro." Preview, huh? ...

  15. Oh boy, more fuel for the homeland security fire. by cybereal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Let's watch all the idiotic redneck fools who glance briefly at the media provided propoganda. We'll see them noticing China, thinking 'red', then seeing Linux, and thinking 'red'... Ignorance is the biggest obstacle for free software these days. I hope the morons in office don't try to exploit this in a negative manner. As usual, it will probably go unnoticed, and end up meaning absolutely nothing, but, I can't help imagining what horrors could come of it. (I'll let you imagine the good stuff, it's easier)

    --
    I read the script, and I think it would help my character's motivation if he was on fire. -Bender
  16. New idiotic yearly ritual: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    proclaiming "2xxx is the year of linux!"

  17. Re:osx by The+Phantom+Buffalo · · Score: 0

    The cult just isn't big enough yet?

    osx post... check
    gentoo post... It'll be here

  18. A brief history of Chinese OS by jsse · · Score: 5, Interesting

    with China rising hugely -- in the Linux sense -- right in the middle of it all.

    Right on. Look at RedFlag Linux. It's backed by China Government, RedHat-based Linux distro.

    In my opinion, China Government is no much an Open Source advocate, instead, MS forced them to take this path. I got some underground news when I worked for IBM around 94, when we completed each other developing a Chinese OS for Mainland China. The progress of the development our Chinese OS/2 was not as fast as Windows 95 because they outsourced their work to Taiwan and we've put comparatively too much effort on testing(I were one of the full-time tester in Asian region).

    That was the biggest mistake MS has ever made.

    As usual, MS pushed their first release of Simplified Chinese version of Win95 before thorough testing. To China Government dismay, they found that whenever they type the word 'Kung'(the first word of Communism in Chinese), the association helper immediate popup the word 'bandit' after it. 'Communist Bandit' is how Taiwanese called Communist party in Mainland China.

    That was a really good prank the Taiwanese Developers made for China Government. :)

    I've also been told that there's still a couple of nasty easter eggs hidden in this first release of OS(or Word/Excel?) that made fun of some lead people in communist party, that pissed them very much. Although MS had done everything to 'repair' the damage, but as a common practise of them "this shall not be forgiven."

    RedFlag Linux may be the first major getback on MS. :)

    1. Re:A brief history of Chinese OS by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2

      I seem to recall a big problem with Windows in India. Some OS applet, date/time I think, showed Pakistan with the bulk of Kashmir. As we all know, that's a fairly sensitive issue around those parts, and there was even talk about an Indian boycott of Windows. Can anyone add more info on this?

    2. Re:A brief history of Chinese OS by jsse · · Score: 1

      Hmm, not that I heard of, but there's a case Microsoft was accused for suggesting in its Encarta 96 Encyclopedia that part of ancient Korea was ruled by Japan, and for a Spanish- language thesaurus that offered "savage" and "man-eater" as synonyms for the word "Indian."

  19. Smart Move For Asia if it Happens by aerojad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It unties the potentially tied-behind-back hands of Asian countries who have rampant pirating issues of Microsoft products. If free OSes become a hit in Asia, Gates can not eventually have Asia in his back pocket when he comes calling for Licensing Fees, and Asia gets to save tons of money with not having to pay for Windows & Upgrades, which eventually puts them on an equal footing with Western countries, so more competition, so on so on.... advantage? Everyone.

    --

    SecondPageMedia - Wha
  20. Axis of evil by George+Walker+Bush · · Score: 3, Funny

    Many of these Asian countries are part of the axis of evil, and will stop at nothing to destroy everything good the West stands for. I urge all geeks to be responsible and not let their efforts unwittingly aid terrorism or the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Thank you.

    --
    George W. Bush
    President, United States of America
    1. Re:Axis of evil by aerojad · · Score: 1

      Mr. Bush, did the Secret Service tell you how to use the Internet without AOL yet? It's okay, you don't have to use it just because it has "America" in the name and it talks to you when you have mail. Come, George. Let me tell you how Al Gore created the internet....

      --

      SecondPageMedia - Wha
  21. Welcome to the new world order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I rarely make predictions. Heck, I am not all that sure I'll wake up tomorrow morning,

    Spoke like a true white guy running around the streets of Jordan.

  22. Penguin by Catskul · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since years are normally named after a species of animal (normaly excluding humans) perhaps it would be more appropriatly named:
    "The Year of the Penguin"

    --

    Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
    1. Re:Penguin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but too bad 2003 is ALREADY designated as the year of the sheep, you god damn cocksucking motherfucking moron.

    2. Re:Penguin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See, people (and I use the term loosely) like you are the reason one of my New Year's resolutions is to only surf Slashdot at +4 and above.

      *Sigh.* If only the Trolls around here were more imaginative. . .

    3. Re:Penguin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Imaginative? I'll give you imaginative, you ungrateful so-n-so...)

      1 There was a man in the land of Slashdot, whose name was Anonymous Coward; and that man was perfect and upright, and one that feared CmdrTaco, and eschewed evil.

      2 And there were born unto him seven sons and three daughters.

      3 His substance also was seven thousand posts, and three thousand journal entries, and five hundred fans, and five hundred friends, and excellent karma, and a very low user ID; so that this man was the greatest of all the men in Slashdot.

      4And his sons went and posted in their accounts, every one his day; and sent and called for their three sisters to post and to reply with them.

      5And it was so, when the days of their posting were gone about, that Anonymous Coward sent and sanctified them, and rose up early in the morning, and offered burnt offerings according to the number of them all: for Anonymous Coward said, It may be that my sons have sinned, and cursed CmdrTaco in their hearts. Thus did Anonymous Coward continually.

      6Now there was a day when the sons of CmdrTaco came to present themselves before Him, and the King of the Trolls came also among them.

      7And CmdrTaco said unto the King of the Trolls, Whence comest thou? Then the King of the Trolls answered CmdrTaco, and said, From going to and fro in Slashdot, and from walking up and down in it.

      8And CmdrTaco said unto the King of the Trolls, Hast thou considered my servant Anonymous Coward, that there is none like him in Slashdot, a perfect and an upright man, one that feareth CmdrTaco, and escheweth evil?

      9Then the King of the Trolls answered CmdrTaco, and said, Doth Anonymous Coward fear CmdrTaco for nought?

      10Hast not thou made an hedge about him, and about his posts, and about all that he hath on every side? Thou hast blessed the work of his keyboard, and his substance is increased in the moderating.

      11But put forth thine hand now, and touch all that he hath, and he will curse thee to thy face.

      12And CmdrTaco said unto the King of the Trolls, Behold, all that he hath is in thy power; only upon himself put not forth thine hand. So the King of the Trolls went forth from the presence of CmdrTaco.

      13And there was a day when his sons and his daughters were posting and replying in their eldest brother's account:

      14And there came a messenger unto Anonymous Coward, and said, The posts were on-topic, and the fans moderating them up beside them:

      15And the Trolls fell upon them, and took them away; yea, they have hijacked the thread with the edge of the sword; and I only am escaped alone to tell thee.

      16While he was yet speaking, there came also another, and said, The fire of CmdrTaco is fallen from heaven, and hath burned up the fans, and the friends, and consumed them; and I only am escaped alone to tell thee.

      17While he was yet speaking, there came also another, and said, The Trolls made out three bands, and fell upon the journal entries, and have carried them away, yea, and hijacked the discussions with the edge of the sword; and I only am escaped alone to tell thee.

      18While he was yet speaking, there came also another, and said, Thy sons and thy daughters were posting and replying in their eldest brother's account:

      19And, behold, there came a great Troll from the wilderness, and smote the four corners of the account, and the karma fell upon the young men, and they are dead; and I only am escaped alone to tell thee.

      20Then Anonymous Coward arose, and rent his mantle, and shaved his head, and fell down upon the ground, and worshipped,

      21And said, Naked came I out of my mother's womb, and naked shall I return thither: CmdrTaco gave, and CmdrTaco hath taken away; blessed be the name of CmdrTaco.

      22In all this Anonymous Coward sinned not, nor charged CmdrTaco foolishly.

    4. Re:Penguin by kasperd · · Score: 1

      only surf Slashdot at +4 and above.

      In fact +1 and above is good enough to avoid such rude comments.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
  23. An idea that's run through my mind... by TheZapman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Intels/Microsofts suicide is going to come through Asia. Here is the scenario as I see it. M$ is going to try to push Palladium, along with Intel's secure initiatives, etc, etc. The American bullsh^H^H^H^H^H^Hcontent industry is going to back them all the way to protect their formerly very protected market. So then with the Dragon whatever chip and Linux, China is going to pump out machines that don't screw up if you change your video card, screw up your screen captures, require you to call if you re-install XP on your test system every GOD DAMN TIME, (Yes, I need to clone a HD, just haven't had time and keep shuffling machines around, and etc, etc...), and so on, as any secure initiative will do. So they will be producing these cheap, commodified PCs that will ship over here, therefore killing the American software industry. Yeah China. The other alternative I see is Apple, who has been very successful at telling the content industry to bugger off, and is large enough to back it. They could become the competetor to Linux through all this mess. I don't know why I'm posting on /. so much today. Hell, I guess the ideas whispered to me by my imaginary penguin have some merit. Just wish he'd stop nibbling on my toes.

  24. they probably know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sure the truly clueful hackers in China already know and use BSD, just like here. Chinux will function as a grease trap to keep zitpoppers and political protesters from getting in the way... just like here.

    PS Ignore Neal Stephenson; there ARE Chinese hackers. He leaves a trail of greatly amused people everywhere he does research. "One day on site and he knew everything and was ready to move on. I hear he wrote a program once."

  25. Somebody MOD DAT SUMBITCH UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    informative, man!!!!

  26. Troll? by commodoresloat · · Score: 2

    Why is it so hard to believe that the President reads slashdot? He does read, you know. He read, ummm, Nichomachean Ethics once.

  27. I have to wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    ...how much longer it will be before the world divides into USA: Windows and English measurements; Everyone else: Linux and metric measurements.

    I'm quite serious about this, and there's actually a link: It's easier to adopt a better system (OS or measurement units) when you don't have to incurr horrifically high conversion costs.

    As much as I'd like to see Linux grab 30 or 40% of the US desktop marketshare, it just won't happen. The open/free software crowd won't (not can't, but won't) do the things necessary to overcome those high conversion costs for users deeply entrenched in Windows.

    For a much more detailed version, see
    this.

  28. The The Peter Principle of Economics by jlrowe · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It looks like to me that the USA and other regions that insist on not choosing the best methods may have to look for hard times.

    I say that not just because of pricing themselves out of the labor market, with Asian and other labor forces offering cheaper labor. The truth also includes cheaper *methods* which Linux is a part of, long term. Higher costs imposed my closed source and proprietary (read: Microsoft) operating systems and application software will cause higher prices for those who choose them. This making Asian markets that choose Linux even *more* competitive down the road.

    1. Re:The The Peter Principle of Economics by rmayes100 · · Score: 1

      Interesting that some of the most successful companies in the US use cheaper/better solutions. Take a look at companies like Google, Yahoo, IBM, Oracle, Sun. These are all companies that have seen the value that Linux and the *BSDs can provide and have based their businesses on them (some more than others). While Asia still has an advantage as far as labor costs are concerned I think more and more American companies will come around to looking at Linux and other open source products to save money. Especially with the US economy in the state it's in now and most companies looking for anyway they can to cut costs (including outsourcing overseas).

  29. Sorry about the links by Daengbo · · Score: 1

    Faux pas for replying to myself, but I want to apologize that there are really no English web pages to read, and that all the links were in Thai, but, hey, This is Thailand (TIT), and the English here is really poor, which is what keeps me in business. :) If you get really tired of having (or not having) a job in IT, and can differentiate there and their, look us up over here.

  30. 2003 will be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the year of Linux in Chechnya maybe, but I think the Chechens also value money and property more than the Linux heads

  31. Not again... by tres · · Score: 1

    Oh come on, it's okay if you want to use Windows; that's your choice. But at least be honest about why you want to use it.

    I'm just tired of the herd telling the rest of us what we have to do to get them to "buy" (i.e. download i.e freeload) Linux. It's bullshit excuses coming from people who just don't want to change, no matter what alternative they're presented with.

    It's okay, I understand that it's a hard thing to change your OS. I mean, the buttons work differently and hell, there's not even a "Start" button to tell you where to start.

    Really, these are the same kind of lame excuses that are presented every time someone talks about switching to a Mac ("oh, it only got one mouse button!!!!" or, "I can not run all my game on it!!!!" and my personal favorite, "it 2 expensive!!!!"). If you ever talk to one of these people, you'll hear all the same, stupid arguments that have been refuted a thousand times before. You might as well talk to a tape-recorder.

    It doesn't matter what you say to these people, what kind of reasons you can give for switching, they will use some kind of see-through excuse for not doing it. And in the end, you know it's just because they're too lazy or too scared to try something different.

    I'll put my money on *nix systems pervasive on business desktop systems by the end of the decade. I'll buy you a beer if Microsoft doesn't hold a place somewhat similar to Novell (hell, I'll buy a round for everyone if they do). We'll all remember Microsoft simply as another legacy of bad long-term business decisions made for the sake of short-term growth.

    After the herd starts using it at work, becomes comfortable with it, and develops a *nix habit will regular people start seeking out *nix systems for home use.

    --
    Notes From Under *nix: blas.phemo.us
    1. Re:Not again... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      Nice troll, but I'll bite...

      "If you ever talk to one of these people, you'll hear all the same, stupid arguments that have been refuted a thousand times before."

      What's stupid about saying "If I do that, my computer won't do what I bought it to do."? That's like saying it's stupid when somebody says "If I convert my SUV to a pickup, I won't be able drive my family anywhere!"

      "It's okay, I understand that it's a hard thing to change your OS. I mean, the buttons work differently and hell, there's not even a "Start" button to tell you where to start."

      You're right. It's hard to change your OS for another one that doesn't provide benefits right away. You said yourself that people will have to 'develop a habit' in order to find it interesting.

      "I'll put my money on *nix systems pervasive on business desktop systems by the end of the decade."

      I'll join you in that bet. I think that will happen.

      "After the herd starts using it at work, becomes comfortable with it, and develops a *nix habit will regular people start seeking out *nix systems for home use."

      Um, that works to a degree. There's still work that needs to be done to reach that point. The good news is, there's lots of people doing that and it may very well happen.

    2. Re:Not again... by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Sorry, my customers dictate what CAD package I use for their drawings. Until AutoDesk decides to start making a linux version of their software, there isn't any way I could switch. Ironically, AutoDesk used to make a version of AutoCad for UNIX, either it was so "popular" it was dropped of MS got a hold of them. Or both.

      And before you try to bring up an arguement for IntelliCad, it's very nice software, but it doesn't do *everything* I need it to do.

      Honestly, I really wish I that BeOS could have gotten off the ground.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    3. Re:Not again... by tres · · Score: 1

      Troll, eh?

      Well that's a first.

      You're right, going from Windows to Linux is making a hard change. I like your automobile metaphor, but I think it's more like going from an SUV to public transit. You can get anywhere on public transit that you can in your car. In many instances it may take you longer to get there, but in many other instances, public transit will provide a more reliable way of getting to your destination in a timely fashion.

      An SUV will provide more convenience, but in the end, it is more expensive, more hazardous, ultimately harms us all much more than a full bus does.

      An SUV is a depreciating investment that only has a scant few years of use before it must be replaced once again. In the end, and it depends upon a dealer to provide parts, service and to recall and repair parts when there are defects. The dealer will only provide these things as long as it is financially beneficial to them.

      With public transit, you've got a fleet of mechanics constantly servicing the machines you depend on. It doesn't cost you any more to have your bus repaired than the daily fare you pay.

      An SUV requires a constant and vigilant upkeep by each operator, no matter how ignorant or undeserving of the SUV they may be; each and every other driver on the road depends upon them to take care of their SUV and to drive it safely.

      Of course, the public transit metaphor only goes so far. In many ways, using Linux is more like driving a Range Rover or Land Cruiser--going anywhere you want anytime you want--and using Windows is more like riding on a bus with a crazed driver forcing you to sign a forty page agreement before you get on the bus, then telling you to pay at every stop, and threatening you with a gun if you don't.

      Anyway, back to the point--the stupid arguments are simply the ones that have already been refuted, and seem to be used over and over again anyway. It's not that there's no reason to use Windows, or that everyone should be using Linux. The thing I think is stupid is when people try aruging that there is no alternative because there's no other platform that provides everything that Windows provides. At that point, it becomes simply a matter of whether you are willing how to do it a different way (which, granted, is an extremely important to people with little spare time).

      I think with the event of OS X, the convenience issue has become moot. With Codeweavers doing such a great job of simulating the Windows DLLs, the application issue is becoming moot.

      --
      Notes From Under *nix: blas.phemo.us
    4. Re:Not again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Decent post up to the paragraph that begins "Of course, the public transit metaphor only goes so far.", at which point the fan-boy flag was set.

    5. Re:Not again... by tres · · Score: 1

      Good point, I guess I should have better explained what I was trying to say.

      Simply, I meant Linux to be more like a Range Rover in that one can actually look at the code, that one can take that code "off road" if they've got the skills and the desire. With Windows, you're stuck with the path the driver wants to take you on--whether you wanted to go that way or not.

      It's something like "The Road Ahead," and someone else is going to take you to their vision of the future.

      --
      Notes From Under *nix: blas.phemo.us
  32. Linux salesmanship in a nutshell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The really rough part here is that it's not something I can describe adequately to you here. Oh, I could probably list off a stack of features that Windows simply can't do, but it wouldn't mean anything to you. It only has value or meaning when you get there yourself.

    All that's assuming you can get past the app naming conventions. You can, can't you?


    "I can't give you any good reasons to switch, but I can certainly belittle your reasons for not having done so already."

    Tonight Microsoft stock is safer than U.S. currency. Keep it up.

    1. Re:Linux salesmanship in a nutshell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a bitch for it to be valued in US currency then, huh?

  33. that's oh ess ten by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bub.

    It's written OS X.

    1. Re:that's oh ess ten by The+Phantom+Buffalo · · Score: 0

      Really? Then why is it OS X 10.whatever? You are saying oh ess ten ten point two point three. Shouldn't it be oh ess ten point two point three, for example, written OS X.2.3? That is prbably wrong on more than one level. OS 10.2.3 seems more correct. I never see it written that way, though. Now, I haven't used an apple since the IIe, so I'm out of the loop.

    2. Re:that's oh ess ten by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      Man, where have you been for the past two years or so?

      The name of the operating system is "Mac OS X." That's pronounced "Mac Oh Ess Ten," because "X" is a Roman numeral.

      The most recent version of the operating system is 10.2.3. That's pronounced... oh, you know. The usual way.

      So the full and complete name of the most recent version of the operating system is "Mac OS X 10.2.3." Spoken aloud, that sounds like this.

      If this causes a cognitive dissonance response in you, then just sit down calmly, take a stress pill, and think things over.

      --

      I write in my journal
    3. Re:that's oh ess ten by The+Phantom+Buffalo · · Score: 0

      So, It is mac oh ess ten ten point two point three.
      That wasn't hard, was it?

      "Where have I been the last couple of years?"

      Excuse me for not keeping up with every trivial operating system out there.

    4. Re:that's oh ess ten by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      Excuse me for not keeping up with every trivial operating system out there.

      I will happily excuse you for that. It's going to take a bit more, though, to live down making a giant stink about something that hasn't even been a topic of conversation since about 1999.

      --

      I write in my journal
    5. Re:that's oh ess ten by The+Phantom+Buffalo · · Score: 0

      As someone who has no exposure to the mac world, other than what I read here, it has never been a topic of conversation. It was not my intention to make a big deal of it. The fact that someone felt it was that important to correct the use of osx amazed me. Lazy typing, that's all. I knew it was OS X before it was pointed out. Was I trolling? probably. Did I really know whether the X was an x or a 10? No . Is knowing going to have a dramatic effect on my life? No. I hope this help clear things up a bit.

      Have a good day, or night.

    6. Re:that's oh ess ten by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

      Ignore this fucker. Add him to your foes list or defriend him. He really needs a dressing down. His ego is bigger than the US national debt and growing by the second.

  34. it's GNU/Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just ask RMS.

    bd6.

  35. Fuck Jesus! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "about traveling to a magical country where seeing Linux laptops displayed
    in stores is perfectly normal."

    or dead lizards, or chicken heads, and lets not forget centipieds

  36. IBM, HP (Compaq) Selling Linux PCs in India ;-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IBM will soon join HP(Compaq) in selling Linux pre-loaded PCs in India.
    For details, read the story on ZDNetIndia IBM mulls Linux for its PCs

    and before I forget, I had a dream last night. I talked to Bill Gates and he said "I am getting really tired of these antitrust cases. I am moving to India to become a monk"....

  37. I've got your incentive right here bub! by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 2
    Seriously, one of the things that coerced me to switch; pretty soon you'll be needing to "upgrade" a lot of that software, which means spending a lot of green.

    With Linux, when there's a new version of The Gimp, I go download it, for free. When there's a new version of Blender out, I go download it, for free. When there's a new major kernel version or X Free86 version, I go download it, for free.

    Or, if you're lazy like most people, you can buy the latest version of your distro of choice for roughly $50($5 from cheapbytes, free from linuxiso.org) and you can upgrade all your software in one shot.

    Compare that to windows or mac os, where you would be spending several thousand dollars for what is essentially incremental upgrades for all the software products you mentioned.

    And then there is also licensing issues, the BSA, builtin backdoors, software shipped containing viruses(has happened several times in major proprietary software), etc.

    There are downsides though. The Gimp is inferior to Photoshop in some areas(although far fewer than many assume), free *nices lack decent WYSIWYG DTP software(this is getting closer...), etc.

    Whatever the pros and cons, there is already plenty of "interesting" software for GNU/Linux/BSD, you just need to educate yourself. There are also quite a few games available for Linux now, and some windows games run flawlessly in wine(x)(all politics aside). 2 years ago I installed win95(2k? forget...) to play some games, but ended up not even needing it at all.

    All that said, you seem pretty content with your rig, so I see no reason for you to switch at this point. Myself, I will continue to enjoy my savings and freedom.

    Cheers.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    1. Re:I've got your incentive right here bub! by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      Seriously, one of the things that coerced me to switch; pretty soon you'll be needing to "upgrade" a lot of that software, which means spending a lot of green. With Linux, when there's a new version of The Gimp, I go download it, for free.

      I think you might have missed an important point. If Gimp is an unacceptable substitute for Photoshop 7, why would it be an acceptable substitute for Photoshop 8? Until Gimp gets to the point where it can be used instead of Photoshop, cost just doesn't figure in to the equation.

      Compare that to windows or mac os, where you would be spending several thousand dollars for what is essentially incremental upgrades for all the software products you mentioned.

      Yes, but the point is that the Windows or Mac solution works, while the Linux one, at present, does not. Which is why, in a lot of cases, you literally can't give Linux away.

      And then there is also licensing issues, the BSA, builtin backdoors, software shipped containing viruses(has happened several times in major proprietary software), etc.

      Smells like FUD to me. I don't know what you mean by "licensing issues." The BSA is of no concern to companies that actually pay for all of their software. The danger of a back-door in open source software is the same as in closed source software; re-read "Reflections on Trusting Trust." And as far as viruses goes, if you're running Windows without some form of virus protection, you deserve everything you get. To Mac users, the whole virus question is largely irrelevant.

      --

      I write in my journal
    2. Re:I've got your incentive right here bub! by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Actually, BSA audits are a concern. I've heard of companies (wink, wink, nudge, nudge) who have some manner of MS license for every machine in the company save two. Those two machines have Linux on them. So do several other machines that previously had Windows OSes. Problem is, when various bits of hardware crapped out, some drives were Ghosted onto new drives. In effect, two licenses numbers are simultaneously in use. But this is against the rules! Even though one license is no longer used, it doesn't matter. That's problem one (and the company isn't big enough to waste time/money with a site license).

      Problem two is that the records are... less than perfect. The company that my friend works for (wink, wink) has ~50 machines, so it's trivial to know who does what to which ones. It's trivial to know that all of the Windows machines have legit licenses. But in the 'guilty until proven innocent' eyes of the BSA, this is not sufficient. No, they'd probably have to come up with some probable cause to suspect this in court, but what about a 'confidential report'? Even if it turns out to be nothing, the staff time wasted in addressing a BSA audit is not insignificant. Nor is the probable attorney's fees.

      I've heard of companies where the official, unwritten policy is "stonewall BSA. We know we're in compliance, but the cost of proving it would kill us. When they show up at the door with warrants and the sherrif, call and arrange for a bankruptcy filing".

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    3. Re:I've got your incentive right here bub! by sheldon · · Score: 2

      All that said, you seem pretty content with your rig, so I see no reason for you to switch at this point.

      It's nice to think we all have your approval.

      I think perhaps what turned me off most from the Open Source crowd is their arrogance and inability to understand customer needs. This is but one example. :(

    4. Re:I've got your incentive right here bub! by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      I've heard of companies where the official, unwritten policy is "stonewall BSA. We know we're in compliance, but the cost of proving it would kill us.

      You don't have to prove anything to the BSA. They can ask you to provide proof, but they can't compel you to do anything.

      That said, though, there's really not excuse for not being in compliance with the records to prove it. It's a simple matter, one that every company should already be doing in the normal course of business.

      --

      I write in my journal
    5. Re:I've got your incentive right here bub! by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "With Linux, when there's a new version of The Gimp, I go download it, for free. When there's a new version of Blender out, I go download it, for free. When there's a new major kernel version or X Free86 version, I go download it, for free."

      That's fine if you're not trying to make any money. I, however, an making a living here. I'm not using Lightwave over Blender because I enjoy spending $1,600, it's because Lightwave gives me the results that Blender cannot. If I get a $5,000 project and I have to buy Lightwave (once, I might add) to get that project done, then I made $3,400. If I use Blender, but the results aren't satisfactory, then it wasn't free. It cost me $5,000.

      Now I'm not taking pokes at Blender. I'm sure it's fine. But there's a reason it's not being widely adopted by studios. I'm not sure it's being used professionally anywhere. Who knows, maybe one day it will, but not today.

      The price tag is not the whole picture. It is not the central focus of why one uses an app. And I'm certainly not using a free app if the dumbshits who designed it can't throw in a little "here's how it works" documentation with it.

  38. Giving back by mikefoley · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It'll be interesting to see how much the Asian community gives back. I'm betting on a "Use someone elses work and make money" policy.

    --
    What's my Karma Mr. Burns? "Excellent"
    1. Re:Giving back by JohnnyBigodes · · Score: 1

      It's not like it isn't like that already...

      After all, it could only get better if they all used some sort of Linux instead of Windows/proprietary software. The community "back here" wouldn't gain much by means of development or direct contribution, but the movement in general would gain a pretty hefty momentum.

      Remember simple math: take a million people, say 90% pirate a $100 piece of software. That leaves 100000 people buying $10 million worth of bytes. Pretty much enough for profit. Get those 10% desktops all running Linux, and see if the commercial application companies won't be running like the wind converting their software. Who wants to lose out on an opportunity to make money?

  39. From ZDNetIndia and my dream last night by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IBM will soon join HP(Compaq) in selling Linux pre-loaded PCs in India.
    For details, read the story on ZDNetIndia IBM mulls Linux for its PCs

    and before I forget, I had a dream last night. I talked to Bill Gates and he said "I am getting really tired of these antitrust cases. I am moving to India to become a monk!"....
    Later in conversation, Bill Gates seemed concerned with Indians hitting /. He said "Slashdot is now really beginning to corrupt the mindsets of Indian techies. They are now swamping slastdot website like Americans do at 6-9am Thanksgiving sales!!"

    1. Re:From ZDNetIndia and my dream last night by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      slashdot* I meant

  40. and quite simply by vena · · Score: 1

    i feel this is the #1 reason why the linux desktop has to be a true alternative, not simply an attempt at carbon copying windows.

  41. The immorality of Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having read the article thoroughly, this startling news shows the flaws in the brewing Open Source Zeitgeist that is gripping the software community. Have you considered that providing software for free to countries such as China is essentially tacit support for oppressive regimes?

    Far-fetched? Think about it: With MySQL, the People's Army will now be able to do multiple queries on their tables of democratic activists in Olog(n) time instead of lengthy searches in card catalogs. The bureaucratic overhead previously allowed activists enough time to flee the country. How about building cheap firewalls so the people can't get the unbiased reporting that CNN provides? Or using Apache to publish lists of Falun Gong people to their police forces instantly? I doubt that never crossed your minds when you were coding away in your parents' basements. Consider putting that little thought in your mental resolv.conf file.

    If that does not concern you ( which it probably doesn't, since the slashdot.org paradigm is publishing articles about how not to pay for things ), consider something else. When China eventually goes to war with Taiwan, we want to be able turn their command and control facilities into the computing equivalent of a train-wreck. One of the advantages of Windows never mentioned in the article is the ability of Microsoft to remotely deactivate Windows XP in the case of a national emergency. Thanks to GNU/Lunix, Taiwan will be on a collision course with the mainland in the near future.

    Which throws into question Mr. Stallman's motives. A known proponent of socialism, the Chinese government and RMS are natural allies. Could it be a back door to Stallman's dream of an über-Socialist United States? We may never know for sure. Next time you consider contributing to an open source project, ask yourself this question: don't you want to make sure your work isn't used for nefarious purposes? Will you risk having blood on your hands?

    1. Re:The immorality of Open Source by jimmy_dean · · Score: 1

      This is highly far-fetched. You are a paranoid individual and the tone of your article makes me fear for my own country...not because of some socialist government takeover, but because of your naivete as to how things work. There is a lot of good free software available in Windows too which would "enable" the Chinese governments to accomplish the sames things you mention. You need to wake up and have a reality check.

      --
      -> Sometimes, you just gotta break free from the shackles of proprietary code.
  42. Year of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to sound like a troll, but 1985 -> 2003 == The year of Windows in more than one country. nice try, linux.

  43. Framebuffer Console for Windows? by fishbowl · · Score: 2

    I'm a user of many systems, and I refuse to get into the holy war territory.

    However, there is one thing that bugs me, that I can do with Linux, but not with Windows.

    I would like the Framebuffer console; let's say, the 160x64 console, and let's say, maybe 5 or 8 virtual consoles, maybe running screen with cygwin bash. This is my standard terminal, it is my *favorite* video mode among all the options available to me, and it appears to be altogether IMPOSSIBLE in windows.

    Don't talk to me about fonts and terminal windows in win2k; it is not the same. You can get some nice things there, but, I cannot get the equivalent of the linux console. And I really want this.

    It doesn't have to be the framebuffer device, per se, but it definitely needs the same font options, and absolutely needs to equal or exceed the speed of the native console. NO WIN2K TERMINAL COMES CLOSE to the speed of the linux console.

    This is the first item on the list of things that keeps me running linux on my main computer, as a matter of fact. It's my first requirement!

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    1. Re:Framebuffer Console for Windows? by NineNine · · Score: 1

      I would like the Framebuffer console; let's say, the 160x64 console, and let's say, maybe 5 or 8 virtual consoles, maybe running screen with cygwin bash. This is my standard terminal, it is my *favorite* video mode among all the options available to me, and it appears to be altogether IMPOSSIBLE in windows.


      What in the hell are you talking about, exactly?

    2. Re:Framebuffer Console for Windows? by fishbowl · · Score: 2

      "What in the hell are you talking about, exactly?"

      Console mode. Linux allows you to put consoles on the SVGA framebuffer device. I think these consoles are nice. The best possible interface for me. The hardware can do it. Windows, apparently, cannot.

      This is among the very few things that I can do in Linux that I cannot do in Windows. I would LIKE to have it in Windows. But I can't. So I run linux.

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  44. Why not just be satisfied... by ndogg · · Score: 2

    Why can't we be satisfied with being a niche market where Linux's main purpose is the server, embedded, and renderfarm markets? Why must we be so intent on taking over the desktop market? I really don't mind being one of only 20 million people using for their desktop, really. It really doesn't bother me, as I'm sure it doesn't bother other people either. Sure, Microsoft can be evil, but their hold on the desktop market isn't necessarily a bad thing. We should put our strength into defending the markets we know we can hold (namely the ones I've mentioned), and defend those furiously. No empire lasts forever, neither shall Microsoft's. They will make a mistake big enough for everyone to switch. We just need to be patient. There is no need to rush foolhardy into bringing them down.

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    1. Re:Why not just be satisfied... by Second_Derivative · · Score: 1

      Because Microsoft does not like the fact that you have the very option of running Linux. Microsoft does not like the fact that Linux is legal. Microsoft doesn't like the fact that there are servers in the world that run anything other than Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server Edition.

      If you are satisfied with Linux having its market and Microsoft Windows having its market, that is all well and good. Unfortunately Microsoft Corporation does not share your sense of altruism. They have attempted to make Linux unuseable via the use of Palladium and they have attempted to make any practical use of Linux potentially illegal with the SSSCA and to an increasing extent via the DMCA, and continue to lobby towards such measures. The policy of Microsoft Corporation is "It's you or us, this town isn't big enough for the two of us", same as with every other platform they've destroyed in the past. Sorry but I don't find the prospect of running Microsoft Windows XP on my system particularly appealing (not that I particularly want Microsoft to be destroyed either. I just want to be in a position where they know not to trample on other people's business).

    2. Re:Why not just be satisfied... by ndogg · · Score: 2

      I didn't say anything about Microsoft being altruistic. I was arguing that we need to defend the markets we know we can dominate in. That's where we should put our energy. We shouldn't be trying to take over other markets, particularly the dekstop market, because they are going to require motivational resources that we don't have right now.

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
  45. Vector Illustration by theolein · · Score: 2

    In Linux everywhere, to keep this on topic, there is one application that I truly miss: 2D Vector Illustration like Adobe Illustrator or Macromedia freehand. I find it funny that everyone always talks about Photoshop vs. GIMP where most illustrators use Photoshop AND and illustration programme.

    I've used the GIMP and I know that in a pinch I could very well manage with it and use other tools to convert to CMYK for printing. The lack of bicubic extrapolation in the GIMP does force one to be more careful in image scaling though. But what about illustration?

    I've seen some efforts on Freshmeat and Sourceforge involving SVG, but none of these provide decent anti-aliasing of vector lines which has become pretty much of a must these days. It's also kind of ironic that Adobe is the only one which provides a useful SVG viewer.

    Itis a niche market but attention to details like this in the GIMP and a vector illustration programme would move some more people into considering Linux or OSS.

  46. If I had modpoints I would mod you down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You seem to be confused between the two issues of:

    - People using Linux and

    - People deveoping for Linux

    None of your points about profiting by doing something hold good when it comes to _using_ Linux. Once Microsoft starts cracking down on piracy, people are going to move largescale to linux. Remember that the unbranded PC market is still much larger (as it should be) than the sales of compaq and IBM. And Microsoft cant preload their OSes on those.

    In my experience it's college freshers and people from a totally different industry altogether who make such blanket statements like "Linux will never take off in India". Get a clue. It's bigger than you think.

  47. The year of the penguin by locutus2k · · Score: 1

    I was reading something on the rumour mill saying that Macromedia will have a Lonux port of their next release of their design studio. It will be nice to see more commercial software being released, thus bring ing about the year of the penguin. :) Although all of this stuff if coming down the pike, it's not here yet, and it's my opinion (ya opinions are like @$$holes) that when it does, Linux will finally make it to the desktops of more than just the geeks/nerds.

    I can't wait for that day to come :)

    Happy New Year

    1. Re:The year of the penguin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry Macromedia is going to be gobbled up by MS this year. I guess that squashes any linux ports.

    2. Re:The year of the penguin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      another rumor i heard, MS will buy Macromedia.

      Only one of the rumors can be true, i hope it's your rumor :D

  48. Sodipodi by hanwen · · Score: 2

    Have you tried Sodipodi? It's vector drawing program that reads and writes an SVG dialect. I'm pretty sure it uses an AA canvas. It's also under active development.

    --

    Han-Wen Nienhuys -- LilyPond

    1. Re:Sodipodi by theolein · · Score: 2

      Thanks. I think I looked at this a while back when it was still in alpha. It looks very good now, and I'll give it a shot.

  49. wtf? by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 2
    "All that said, you seem pretty content with your rig, so I see no reason for you to switch at this point."

    It's nice to think we all have your approval.

    You're intentionally misconstruing my words to appear condescending. I was in no way giving "approval"; that's fucking ridiculous...

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  50. GGGGRRRRRRR!!!! by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 2
    I think you might have missed an important point. If Gimp is an unacceptable substitute for Photoshop 7, why would it be an acceptable substitute for Photoshop 8?

    Where the fuck did I say it was "unacceptable"? It's no such thing; it's completely dependent on the person using it, their style, and technique. For me, it's far superior to Photoshop.

    Smells like FUD to me. I don't know what you mean by "licensing issues." The BSA is of no concern to companies that actually pay for all of their software.

    $#@#$%#%!!! Have you not read anything about the BSA? Have you not seen examples where they have extorted millions upon millions of dollars for extremely simple unintentional infringements?

    You sir, are the one full of FUD. The only way to be safe from the BSA is to have full site licenses of all the software used in your organization, because software licensing can become extremely complicated and difficult to administer in practice that it becomes absolutely impossible to handle on a large scale.

    Currently the BSA is harrassing the company I work for, even though we have absolutely no software contracts that give them any right to audit us. They keep trying to get non-technical persons in the company to install auditing software on the network!

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    1. Re:GGGGRRRRRRR!!!! by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2
      Where the fuck did I say it was "unacceptable"?

      You didn't; this guy did:
      When Linux gets decent user applications, then it will be viable on the desktop.
      The idea, of course, is that the applications currently available for Linux aren't acceptable alternatives to the applications available for Windows or the Mac. So-- and this was my point-- given the opinion that Gimp is not an acceptable alternative, the fact that you can get it for free is not relevant.

      Have you not read anything about the BSA?

      Read anything? I've been contacted by the BSA no fewer than four times over the past few years. Their letters basically consist of an offer of an audit to ensure license compliance. A quick form letter thanking them for their offer but reassuring them that our license compliance is not in doubt is all it takes.

      The key, of course, is to actually comply with the licenses, instead of just throwing them away with the box the software came in. Complying with licenses is the easiest thing in the world-- there's so little you're allowed to do, after all ;-) -- and the BSA has no authority to threaten or extort anything. They can merely warn and offer, warn and offer. Which is fine by me.

      You sir, are the one full of FUD.

      I see another trip to the dictionary is in order. FUD: Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt. Since what I'm saying is that you have nothing to Fear from the BSA, that you can be Certain that they can't hurt you, and that there's no reason to Doubt your position, seems like I'm expressing the exact opposite of FUD.

      You, on the other hand... well, your last two posts speak for themselves, in my opinion.

      The only way to be safe from the BSA is to have full site licenses of all the software used in your organization...

      Evidently not. But if your company is big enough, you can save considerable money by buying site licenses instead of per-seat licenses. So that's an option, too.

      Currently the BSA is harrassing the company I work for, even though we have absolutely no software contracts that give them any right to audit us.

      Harassing? That's funny. In my experience, if you tell them "no" politely they just go away. What do you mean by "harassing?" Has your experience been different from mine?
      --

      I write in my journal
  51. 'support (LOL) is the source of revenue' by oliverthered · · Score: 2

    Well, how does IBM, SUN &co make there money, I don't think it's through direct sales of hardware and software, more like support.
    Which is probably why Sun and IBM are starting to cuddle upto OSS, they never made much money from software in the first place.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  52. Re:Sheesh, not again QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because there are counterparts for Linux, but you don't want to be convinced.

    Yeah, like 'vi' is a counterpart for "Word".

    A crappy, poor counterpart does not count as a counterpart. I'm willing to be convinced, but people like you are convinced that since you are satisfied a poor implementation of something, then no one needs a fully-featured one. When you're willing to take the blinders off, maybe there is a discussion to be had.

  53. I seriously doubt.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That Linux is going to make any headway because it's going to be adopted by India. Why? More and more US companies are moving operations to India and these companies run what on the desktop? That's right Windows.

  54. K12LTSP in Pakkret, Thailand SCHOOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pakkret, Thailand has a school using Linux and the case study is found here:
    http://k12ltsp.org/casestudy.html
    If K12Ltsp.org concept takes off in the schools then you will see it happen (as it all starts with the young mind that takes home the new knowledge)!

  55. oh blah blah bla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux this linux that, you don't have linux, you have that other demon doom demon thing. WTF?

    BSD is better than linux in all the areas that count I point you to exibit a:MacOS, exibit c-e ___ BSD,F BSDI,G Sun(Nuf said), Yahoo, Microsoft, Pixar

    Hello, Just cause the purty girls dig it does not make it better...

  56. you're not worth arguing with by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 2
    You sir, are... !@#%@##&^%#*#@^!!!!!!!

    By harassing, I mean they are trying to get non-technical employees to audit our fucking network without the permission of the technical staff, the management, etc. They blatantly lie in their form letters about the "dangers" of pirated software, and they attempt to trick people into believing that they are some kind of authority and are authorized to audit whoever they choose whenever they want, even when there is no contract that gives them any rights at all. They show up at businesses and talk employees into letting them in the door, even attempting to fool said employees about who they are. If you do not absolutely hate them; you most likely have not seen their "evil" side, as most persons, organizations, and governments who ever have to deal with them end up despising them. There are numerous stories on /. and other sites regarding dubious behavior from the BSA, why do you choose to ignore it? Because they have caused _you_ no harm?

    There have been countless examples of this type of bullshit, but you choose to ignore it. The Gimp is better than Photoshop for _me_, but you choose to ignore that. You are simply an anti-linux biggot; you are no different the the Linux biggots you seem to despise. You seem to believe that everyone who chooses Linux is some type of zealot, but that is patently false. Most companies and persons who switched to Linux do so for entirely pragmatic reasons! IBM, SFX studios, many governments, etc. These organizations are _purely_ pragmatic, yet they chose Linux.

    As for myself, I dislike Microsoft because of their business practices, their stranglehold on many separate markets, and their dealings with publicly funded schools and universities that are of dubious legality; I am open and up-front about that. I *love* Mac OSX, because it is a good OS, althought I do dislike the company and the personalities behind the company. But for me, Linux is better, technically, and I have the freedom I need to use it as I wish. I am no zealot, I simply _choose_ Linux, because it has many good uses which are of use to myself and many others. But while it's the best choice for me, OS X was the best choice for my brother, which I let him decide after showing him Windows PCs, Linux, and iMacs. I didn't try to push him to use Linux, because it would not have suited him, and I wanted him to choose for himself. But, I was very pleased that he chose a system that was technically superior to Windows in many ways...

    You continue to pretend that you are fair and some type of voice of reason, but you continually show your own biases. You ignore any argument you can't refute, and shift argumentation to minor details that you are comfortable arguing over. You pretend that Linux users are some type of mass blob all with the same agenda, and with the same arguments and same opinions; hence your fucking retarded argument that, "You didn't; this guy did". THAT GUY IS NOT ME!! The Gimp is not an inferior product, it is simply a different product, in _my_ opinion, yet you use someone else's opinion against me, WHAT THE FUCK? It is at least worth looking at for most people who use Photoshop. But you ignore that and simply argue that Linux is inferior, without any real reasoning behind it.

    You constantly use stawmen in your argumentation; I noted several in our last discourse, but I gave up arguing with you because you kept shifting the argument to points that you were comfortable arguing, even if they were totally orthogonal!

    Ok, whew! I am calming down now ;-) I am through with arguing with you for now, but I would like you to note just a few things.

    1. I have marked you as a "foe", this is not because I personally dislike you, it is simply because you are a political adversary. I think your politics are extremely dangerous for the future of society, especially in this new-fangled information age.

    2. I do not personally dislike you. IRL, I would most likely get along with you fine. I really like your taste in entertainment; particularly, I think Firefly is the best new show in years, and you seemed to be a big fan yourself. While many /.ers were saying the Firefly was "boring" and "slow", you thought it was at least interesting. So I can assume at least that you are not just another MTV-ified A.D.D. moron.

    3. So please, do not take anything I say _too_ personally. My ranting and raving is entirely the result of anger and frustration.

    Now, dropping this whole argument, I would like to ask you a question. Do you know if Firefly has been cancelled? It appears to be off the air for now, do you know what is up? My wife and I enjoy the show, it's something good to watch when we've got nothing else to do on a Friday night, which has been too often of late.

    Cheers.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    1. Re:you're not worth arguing with by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      There are numerous stories on /. and other sites regarding dubious behavior from the BSA, why do you choose to ignore it? Because they have caused _you_ no harm?

      Well, yes. I don't give the BSA a moment's thought, usually, because I've never seen anything even remotely like what you describe. It's hard to imagine that what you say is true-- representatives lying about who they are?-- but I'll take your word that this has happened to you. Wow. You have my sympathy. Have you tried a cease-and-desist from your attorney? It might not work, but you never know.

      The Gimp is better than Photoshop for _me_, but you choose to ignore that.

      I'm not ignoring it, dude. I was just saying that the point that Gimp is cheap doesn't trump the point that Gimp isn't acceptable. If it is acceptable in a given situation, then bully for you. I don't see why you're making such a big deal out of this.

      You are simply an anti-linux biggot; you are no different the the Linux biggots you seem to despise.

      Oh, come on. If you're going to flame me, at least flame me for what I am: an anti-FSF zealot. ;-) I don't have a particularly strong opinion about Linux, except that I don't care for it myself. If you like it, knock yourself out. The whole GPL aspect of it means that I'm unlikely to ever approach it again, but that's my problem, and I don't make a big deal out of it.

      I will argue with you all day and all night about the FSF, though. But that's a different conversation, one that I don't think we really need to get into.

      You continue to pretend that you are fair and some type of voice of reason, but you continually show your own biases.

      I don't even try to hide my own biases. I've been using computers for a long time, for a while professionally but recently just as a user. I've developed a lot of strong opinions during that time. I am biased as hell, and I will admit it to anybody who asks.

      Are you upset because I criticize Linux? I won't apologize for that, but I do regret making you angry. I criticize Linux honestly: I say just what I think, and I invite people to prove me wrong. Most of the time my criticisms are irrelevant-- some people continue to use Linux no matter how awful the user experience is-- but I voice them anyway, because I'm an opinionated prick with a Slashdot account.

      But at least I'm honest about it. I don't spread FUD, I don't troll, I don't lie, and I don't-- deliberately-- contradict myself. (Nobody's perfect.)

      It [Gimp] is at least worth looking at for most people who use Photoshop.

      Most people who use Photoshop work in the CMYK color space. So Gimp is completely unacceptable to a lot of people before they've even looked at it. I'm not saying that Gimp isn't okay for you, I'm just throwing a little perspective on your fire.

      I think your politics are extremely dangerous for the future of society, especially in this new-fangled information age.

      That's okay. I think the "new-fangled information age" is a myth, and people who believe that they're living in a different world than their fathers did are fools. I also believe that a leopard can't change his stripes; human nature is fixed and immovable, and anybody who thinks they can deny it and achieve a stable society is naive.

      Do you know if Firefly has been cancelled?

      Yes. Fox made it clear a couple of weeks ago that they weren't going to be ordering any new shows. There are a couple of shows finished and shelved that Fox may or may not decide to air in the future. Based on their past performance, I'd say probably not.

      Joss and Tim are currently actively looking for someone else (coughUPNcough) to pick up the show, but the odds aren't good. The cast and crew have all been released, so even if somebody were to buy more episodes of the series, getting the entire team back together would be very tough.

      --

      I write in my journal
  57. Slashdot is now mainstream news source. by jrivar59 · · Score: 1
    Google News

    Apparently, google thinks that Slashdot is now a legitimate source of news. Scarry.

    I wonder if Google will start mis-spelling and dupe posting now?

  58. Re:Sheesh, not again QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    vi, no. Maybe emacs, though. Hell, emacs is a counterpart for a whole OS when it's got enough plugins installed. It has a GUI interface if you really must have all your clickey buttons, too. I've also used Hancom Office, Star Office and Open Office. All of these had all the features I needed. Does that make them fully-featured?

    If not, what makes something fully-featured? When it has all the features of Corel WordPerfect? That would make MS Word less than fully-featured. Is it when something has all the features of MS Word? That would make Corel WordPerfect less than fully-featured. ...or is it when something has all the exact same features of what YOU have grown accustomed to, right down to the same button locations and keyboard shortcuts?

    A crappy, poor counterpart does not count as a counterpart. When you're willing to take the blinders off, maybe there is a discussion to be had.

    I don't know how you can live in a glass house like that. It'd drive me nuts not being able to draw some shades and sleep 'till noon on a Saturday.

  59. got it by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 2
    I can perfectly understand your feelings with regards to the FSF, I used to share them somewhat, and possibly still do just a bit. Of course, Linux, XFree86, KDE, and quite a large amount of Linux related software has nothing to do with the FSF.

    That's quite a shame about Firefly, but unsurprising given Fox's record of killing good shows. I don't watch much T.V., but that was a good show. Thanks for giving me the bad news...

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
  60. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    > > Other than the fact Linux has a cool name, could someone explain why I
    > > should use Linux over BSD?
    >
    > No. That's it. The cool name, that is. We worked very hard on
    > creating a name that would appeal to the majority of people, and it
    > certainly paid off: thousands of people are using linux just to be able
    > to say "OS/2? Hah. I've got Linux. What a cool name". 386BSD made the
    > mistake of putting a lot of numbers and weird abbreviations into the
    > name, and is scaring away a lot of people just because it sounds too
    > technical.
    -- Linus Torvalds' follow-up to a question about Linux

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...