Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Switcher Ads: Part 2

burgburgburg writes "We all recall Microsoft's last attempt to emulate the Apple Switch ads. Well, it seems they're at it again. MacNN reports that Microsoft has sent out emails to those who have recently registered MS products, looking for candidates for their 'Sensible Solutions' campaign, which will 'highlight computer professionals that have recently converted from Apple Computer products to Microsoft based systems.' Do you qualify? You must be 'a US resident with a minimum of 3 years experience as a computer professional. You must have used an Apple Computer product and a Microsoft based system as part of your work'. So when does it just stop being the sincerest form of flattery and just become utter, pathetic laziness?"

60 of 623 comments (clear)

  1. Mac User by AyeFly · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have been using computers since the late 80's. In fact, in the beginning we used AppleIIs, for artwork etc... now that im 17 years older, I have switched to Photoshop on a WinXP platform.

    would that count O:-)

    --
    Sig- http://www.dreamhost.com/rewards.cgi?ayefly
    1. Re:Mac User by pnot · · Score: 5, Informative

      Does someone want to modernize Logo for OS X? That would rock! ;)

      Ask, and ye shall receive:

      ACSLogo for Mac OS X

  2. More requirements by yuckf00 · · Score: 5, Funny

    You must also have a picture on a photo library CD.

  3. When does it start being pathetic? by Senjutsu · · Score: 5, Funny

    Right about ... now.

    1. Re:When does it start being pathetic? by schmink182 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Your explanation of that ad sounds eerily like how you see people try to get others to use Linux.

      Look, we have Open Office and Star Office; they're almost as good as Microsoft Office.

      Not confused enough by one desktop? Well we've got more!

  4. Hi, my name is Bob... by Sp00nMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    I recently switched to Windows XP, because my Mac Powerbook is broken. So while I wait for that to get fixed, I borrowed a PC from work. I can't wait to get my Mac back.. oh wait, was I not supposed to say that? Do I still get paid?!

    1. Re:Hi, my name is Bob... by kyrre · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I know this guy that actually did something like this. A webdesinger character. He has been the biggest Mac zealot since I first met him 6-7 years ago. Back then I hated the mac, the one button mouse and macos 6-8. I used GNU/Linux and was very happy with it. One year ago I got my first mac. An iBook. I love it. What happens then? His Powerbook breaksdown, and while waiting for it to return he start using XP. Now he say he is happy with it and probably will stay with XP. Now thats a path I won't follow him.

      Incidently this guys can't figure out os x.

    2. Re:Hi, my name is Bob... by qengho · · Score: 4, Interesting

      probably will stay with XP....Incidently this guys can't figure out os x.

      Without fail, the biggest whiners about OS X are those with the most Mac experience (hell, I used to be one of them). The biggest complaint seems to be "The key commands are different." I can't figure out why muscle memory is more important to these folks than rock-solid stability.

    3. Re:Hi, my name is Bob... by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well... do you mean to say that the only thing that makes OS X stable is a different set of keyboard shorcuts in the Finder?

      If not, then presumably, OS X _could have_ had the exact same user interface as MacOS did, while nevertheless being stable.

      Now, in truth, I don't believe that OS X could've had the MacOS UI precisely. Firstly, it would be a bad idea, since the MacOS UI has been needing to be replaced by something better since around 1990 or so when it got about as good as it was going to get. And secondly, because aspects of its shameful Unix past would show through anyway, e.g. with the file structure, or the security model.

      Personally, my problem is that the OS X UI is worse than the MacOS UI, which I had really wanted to be able to retire for over ten years anyway. Coupled with Apple's continuing craptastic hardware specs and prices compared with x86, and given that WinXP is about as crappy as OS X is, IMO, switching away wasn't that tough a thing to do.

      Hopefully, someday, something better will come along, and I'll finally be happy. Right now, I could be on pretty much any platform and the best I'd feel would be lousy.

      Of course, I do often find myself reaching for Cmd-N to make a new folder.... (If you think I'd get rid of my Extended II keyboard, you're nuts)

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  5. Maybe it just works by doomdog · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why insist on calling it laziness? Maybe the switcher ads just work -- and it's always good sense to copy what is known to work well...

    If Microsoft knows the ads are working for Apple, they'd be stupid not to use them themselves....

    1. Re:Maybe it just works by cposs · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It may "just work" for Apple, but if microsoft does it too then it's dilution of message. Anyone who's seen an apple add will probably discount it instantly, unless Microsoft finds some really good stories. Copying a proven design works for products, and sometimes in advertising, but not for competing products.

    2. Re:Maybe it just works by jericho4.0 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The switch adds work because the're true to how people (user types) feel about computers. I have a hard time imageining XP adds with the same appeal.

      People _feel_ about their Macs.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    3. Re:Maybe it just works by cHALiTO · · Score: 5, Funny

      OK, here's one:

      About a month ago I participated on a Microsoft contest here in Argentina to promote OfficeXP, in which one was supposed to download an .xls file and a .doc file, edit them (change font, add some numbers, stupid stuff like that) and upload them. I didn't get the first prize (a sony cybershot) but I won two 'microsoft officeXP' backpacks (I covered the logo, of course ;) which I must say, are really nice.

      The interesting part? the files I uploaded where edited with OpenOffice for Linux ;-)

      ahhh isn't irony just great?

      --
      "Luck is my middle name," said Rincewind, indistinctly. "Mind you, my first name is Bad." -- Terry Pratchett
  6. apple vs microsoft by gh0ul · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Microsoft is basically afraid because Apple has openly admitted their old OS wasn't so great, and the new MacOS has everyone switching to a Mac.. I used to hate mac's but now I use one for every day tasks, even work.. Microsoft may try a switch campaign, and they will get people to do it.. but for every switch ad microsoft makes, 500 more people just bought a mac and ditched their old PC's which can't run XP.

  7. Ellen "MS" Feiss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    What Microsoft needs is an Ellen Feiss equivalent. How are they going to get her if they ask for 3 years experience as a computer professional?

    1. Re:Ellen "MS" Feiss by Admiral+Burrito · · Score: 5, Funny
      What Microsoft needs is an Ellen Feiss equivalent. How are they going to get her if they ask for 3 years experience as a computer professional?

      "I was using a Mac but, like, my friend's pirated copy of MS Office wouldn't load on it, 'cuz it was the Windows version. And I couldn't get ActiveDirectory to work.
      I'm Bob, an MCSE."

  8. I actually met a reverse switcher today. by Hawthorne01 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Went to the local Apple store, and at the Genius Bar there was a man dejectedly putting a brand-new 15" TiBook back into his briefcase. The websites he visits are all optimized for Windows and the software he uses daily (he's a financial planner) comes in Windows-only (and yes, he tried Virtual PC, to no avail). He's selling his TiBook and going back to Windows. The lack of software I can almost understand, but companies that refuse to make their websites accessible and usable to anything other than WIndows IE are demonstrating either major ignorance on customer service, a blatant disregard for standards, or both.

    --
    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
    1. Re:I actually met a reverse switcher today. by KiahZero · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not so much blatent disregard of standards as believing that IE is the standard. Most people, if you point out that Mozilla or Opera or any other browser does not display a page properly, will ask what's wrong with the browser. After all, the browser that came with the system shows it just fine!

      What I'd really like to know is why Microsoft even bothers to spend money on advertising for their OSs. Seriously... they have a monopoly in the desktop market that they've effectively leveraged to ensure that it stays that way for the foreseeable future. So long as all the applications that Joe Everyman needs to run, as well as all the games his kids want to play, are Windows only, what are the odds that he's going to switch to any other OS?

      --
      I'm a lawyer, but not yours. I wouldn't represent someone who thinks taking legal advice from Slashdot is a good idea.
    2. Re:I actually met a reverse switcher today. by Dominic_Mazzoni · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The websites he visits are all optimized for Windows

      This is going to change fast, thanks to Safari. Whenever a page looks incorrect or doesn't function in Safari, click the little bug icon in the upper-right corner, and it pops up a dialog where you can send feedback directly to Apple's Safari team. It can optionally include a screenshot of the page.

      Trust me, if enough people report problems with the same site, Apple WILL figure out a way to fix it. Safari has already improved dramatically in the beta version from last month to the one released this week.

      Anyway, I too have been frustrated by web pages that are optimized for Windows, but thanks to Safari, and also thanks to standards-compliant browsers like Mozilla/Netscape 7, things are finally starting to change.

    3. Re:I actually met a reverse switcher today. by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      but companies that refuse to make their websites accessible and usable to anything other than WIndows IE are demonstrating either major ignorance on customer service, a blatant disregard for standards, or both

      The sad truth is that most companies don't design or implement their own websites -- they hire a web designer to do the job for them.

      Unfortuantely, a growing number of web designers are incompetent and/or just plain lazy when it comes to building sites that work with browsers other than IE.

      There is no excuse for building a site that won't at least provide basic navigation and information with even the simplest of browsers.

      I get real ticked off when I keep having to turn Javascript back on just so I can see some "clever" designer's pull-down menus, or have to fire up IE because a site is MS-specific.

      Even more annoying are those sites that use Active-X components so that if you're a *smart* websurfer who has disabled Active-X, you keep getting little dialog boxes and beeps advising you that the page may not display properly.

      Then there's those sites built almost entirely from Flash. The worst of these even force you to have Javascript enabled before the Flash code will load as well.

      Listen-up smarty-pants web designers. I don't want to be entertained, I don't want to be blown away by your fancy tricks -- I just want to be able to access the information and navigate without a whole lot of fuss, and without wearing the great big "kick me" sign that IE paints on your back when you're surfing unknown URLs.

    4. Re:I actually met a reverse switcher today. by Stu+May · · Score: 5, Funny

      Trust me, if enough people report problems with the same site, Apple WILL figure out a way to fix it.

      Am I the only one envisioning Apple doing a cost-benefit analysis of a code fix vs. sending hired goons to visit the offending website's developers?

    5. Re:I actually met a reverse switcher today. by Dominic_Mazzoni · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Does the dialog box also send a report to the relevant "bad-designer" party?

      It appears to me that this method only addresses the symptoms.


      What do you think carries more weight? Occasional random email complaints from Mac users, or a phone call from an Apple developer on behalf of 15,000 Mac users that reported the bug, along with detailed information on how it could be fixed?

    6. Re:I actually met a reverse switcher today. by money_shot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The TRUTH of the matter is that it is not worth the money to optimize or even take the Mac into account for the vast majority of software products or websites. So 5% of the potential viewers might not be able to view your site? So what. You may or may not want to spend money to get the 5% or make their experience better. That is a business decision, not a design decision.

      I know, slashdotters will say to make everything as compatible as possible. Do a spreadsheet once in awhile. Next time someone gives you $100,000, to build a commercial site for a market that is 95% PC based, you'll have to justify spending money for Mac/Linux users as opposed to maximizing the product for the 95% you know you will be compatible with.

    7. Re:I actually met a reverse switcher today. by HalfFlat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The money argument does not hold water, because the very things that typically tie a site to a single platform are those which are the most expensive to produce.

      Extensive javascript menus, elaborate flash 'navigators', exotic ActiveX controls -- all these things take time to produce, a lot more time in fact that the simple option which would have worked anywhere.

      The problem isn't money or market-share, it's that so-called web designers are pandering to ignorant clients who want something pretty on their personal desktop rather than a useful web presence. Two groups are at fault: web-designers with no pride in their profession, and clients who are much more interested in spending their company's money on attractive interactive wallpaper than on an effective web site.

      The 5% market share argument is an old canard parrotted by web quacks who won't learn new tricks.

    8. Re:I actually met a reverse switcher today. by WhiteBandit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Heh. What the hell is so wrong with building it in basic HTML? Using basic HTML and maybe even throw in a couple of CSS will make the website look nice. It's not even that hard.

      Hell, it seems to me like you'd have to specifically *TRY* to build it so it is incompatible with other browsers. That is harder than just freaking following regular HTML rules. Granted, I'm not specifically saying you should make it compatible no matter what, but the fact that making it compatible is just so damn easy, well...

      Maybe I'm ignorant, but I don't really see how javascript or even flash "enchances" the viewing experience over straight HTML and your bmps/gifs/pngs/jpegs.

    9. Re:I actually met a reverse switcher today. by Sauron23 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      What I'd really like to know is why Microsoft even bothers to spend money on advertising for their OSs. Seriously... they have a monopoly in the desktop market that they've effectively leveraged to ensure that it stays that way for the foreseeable future.
      Mindshare and retention. If your not actively pushing your brand, logo, product your dropping off the radar. Never, ever, stop selling the product

    10. Re:I actually met a reverse switcher today. by haeger · · Score: 5, Interesting
      This is going to change fast, thanks to Safari. Whenever a page looks incorrect or doesn't function in Safari, click the little bug icon in the upper-right corner, and it pops up a dialog where you can send feedback directly to Apple's Safari team. It can optionally include a screenshot of the page.

      Now this would be a killer app for Mozilla-like browsers. Whenever something doesn't look right, You can popup a dialog with a screenshot and some text explaining that the page is "broken" in some way.

      Not many people can be bothered to take a screenshot, start a mail-client, write a letter explaining what the problem is, mail the letter and screenshot to "www.broken-site.com".

      If 90% of this is already done and all the user had to do was to provide a name and where to send the complaint, I bet we'd see a lot of changes in the web-world.

      "Would You FIX the F*CKING page already? We get 500 screenshots a day and it's wrecking havoc in our mailserver"

      Problem moved from the person doing the browsing to the person writing bad html.

      .haeger

      --
      You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. -- Harlan Ellison
    11. Re:I actually met a reverse switcher today. by Vantage13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Web design is not being a code monkey and churning out a site that the client has designed.

      Web design is "design". That's why they hire you.

      You don't hire an interior designer and give them the design. You tell them the general idea of what you're looking for and they advise you on how to best acheive your goals.

      It's the same in web design. The customer shouldn't be saying, "I want this flashy animation here, and cool menus there", but instead, "we want to focus on this product and how to grab the customers attention...".

      After that it's up to the *designer* to use his/her *design* skills to successfully acheive that (subject to client approval of course).

      If the client is just looking for a code monkey to churn out their design they should hire some kid who doesn't know any better. cheaper and you get the design you want. of course odds are you won't get the results you want out of your site but i guess it's a matter of what's more important; your design or the results you get from it?

      Web design has a lot more to do with consultancy and design than with simply writing code

  9. Not a chance.... by jericho4.0 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I think there are lots of good reasons why proffesional types could choose Windows over Mac. Price/performance, availability of software, ease of interoperability, etc.

    But the adds will never have the pure appeal of the Mac switch adds. "TCO amoritized over the year saved us $$" is not "bleep, bleep, bleep, bleep, gone!"

    I have an expensive Mac. It strikes me as slow, sometimes. I get annoyed when software comes out for the PC first. But I'm not giving it up for anything.

    --
    "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  10. Which is lamer... by SchnauzerGuy · · Score: 5, Funny
    • Microsoft, for seeking people who register Microsoft software for their "switcher" ads.
    • People who actually register Microsoft software.
  11. Switch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When you control 95% of the OS and office-suite markets, who else do you have to convince?

    The remaining fringe is going to avoid MS no matter what.

    Are they just trying to save face against semi-influential Apple ads?

  12. Sure... by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Funny

    Depends how much MS will pay me.

    I've got a PC with XP sitting here, right next to my TiBook, 17" iMac, CRT iMac, G3 Powerbook, OS X Servers...

    I'm sensable, I use my PC for the same things my GameCube and PS2 are for...games.

  13. This is pretty sad by amigaluvr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think this is sad on Microsofts part. Their copying apple with a succesful campaign but coming too late to the party. A lot of it is in the timing and I think Apple's switch has done all it can in mindshare

    The biggest part of the apple campaign is that people have left the common world of windowsk, one that people dont think of leaving because they see nothing else but MS MS MS everywhere. Then to switch to Apple or indeed anything smaller is a big task and it can be seen as an active choice

    For a switch to windows sounds like 'I used to use X but then I joined the herd' and gave in to peer pressure. Its hardly the same thing

    note: the slashdot user 'danamania' is a transexual. beware

    1. Re:This is pretty sad by Malcontent · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Their copying apple with a succesful campaign but coming too late to the party. "

      Don't you know the meaning of "innovation"? it means "we copy other peoples stuff and put our own name on it". MS has a right to "innovate" you know.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

  14. I'm a switcher... by NetDrain · · Score: 3, Funny

    So like, I had this Mac. But I started hanging with this "other" crowd, and they were all PC users, so like, I am too now. It's been good. But now I have leprosy. Is that supposed to come with WinXP? Is it a feature or something? My name's night, and I'm a bell-jingling diseased rodent. : D /my Karma has just committed suicide.

  15. Cynical Reply by LongJohnStewartMill · · Score: 5, Funny
    They'll probably get some confession like,
    "Well, I've been using a Macintosh Plus for about 17 years now, and I decided it was high time I got an upgrade. One meg of RAM can only take you so far..."
  16. Switcher's Story Grammar File by robbyjo · · Score: 4, Funny

    I found out that the switcher's story is recursively enumerable. Below is the grammar. Feel free to use this for your application essay.

    Hi, my name is <IDENTIFIER>. I am (a|an) <IDENTIFIER> [from <IDENTIFIER>].

    I used (Apple|Macintosh) version <FLOAT_LITERAL> for <INTEGER_LITERAL> (years|months) doing (documents | spreadsheets | databases | video editing | MP3 listening | surfing the net | <OTHER_FUN_JOBS>)+. It was all (fun | very nice | pleasant experience) at the beginning.

    But, later on I discovered that (it has only one mouse button | some software I bought wasn't supported | their hardwares are so expensive | <REASON_WHY_IT_SUCKS>)+. Since I was only (a yet another broke graduate students | an unemployed bum | a clueless luser | <REASON_WHY_I_SUCKS>)+, I found out that their solution is [completely | absolutely] unviable.

    (Enter | Here comes) Microsoft. They provide me (MS Office | MS Windows | <OTHER_MS_SOFTWARE>)+. It is really (a panacea | working like magic | <REASON_WHY_ITS_GREAT>)+. Now I can (surfing a lot faster | do my spreadsheet even better | <OTHER_PRAISES>)+. Even more, I can get added bonus, like (the great blue screen | DRM constricted media player | compulsory activation | <OTHER_STUFF>)+, which makes my computer eXPerience even better.

    Now that I switched. How about you?

    --

    --
    Error 500: Internal sig error
    1. Re:Switcher's Story Grammar File by Senjutsu · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, this language is recursively enumerable. But you probably meant to say regular. Recursively enumerable languages are the languages that are decidable by some Turing Machine - that includes a lot of languages. Regular languages are those that correspond to deterministic finite automata, or regexps. There are less of these. (Every regular language is also recursively enumerable, of course.)

      Foghorn Leghorn says: Listen to me, I say, listen to me, son. It's, I say, It's a joke. Laugh.

  17. Re:So since Apple's market share is now below 3%.. by punkmanandy · · Score: 5, Funny

    well, if you were under 18 when Windows ME came out, then, yes, Gates did rape you as a child.

  18. I made the switch. by mikeophile · · Score: 5, Funny
    I'm a computer tech for a large office.

    When we were using Apple computers, my job was in serious danger of being downsized. They were easy to use and almost never crashed.

    Fortunately, due to Microsoft license incentives, my company switched to PC's running Windows.

    What a relief! The stress I was suffering over job security is gone! In fact, I just got a fat raise because the bosses have seen how hard I've been working.

    Sure, I'm busier now, and I may not have the spare time to check Slashdot incessantly, but that's why they call it work, right?

  19. Best of both worlds by thryllkill · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I currently have two operating computers. My desktop system is a painfully old PIII 800Mz running Win2k(it duel boots to SuSE 8 when I want to dabble and learn). But my laptop is an iBook 700mhz, and I love it.

    My reasons are: PIII)Want games, want to add hardware when I want from just about whatever source I want. The PIII is mostly a frankenstein of parts either bought or traded from friends. Unfortunatly I could not do this with a Mac.

    But...

    iBook) Want small, only 12.1 inch screen, the thing is tiny, fits in my backpack no prob. My friend's dell required him to buy a new "laptop" backpack. Want tough, magnesium caseing, rubber mounted hard drive, the thing is like a small tank in the laptop world. Want Unix, without all the trouble linux causes in laptops. Yeah I know it is very possible to have a very workable linux laptop, but I don't think it is possible to have a very workable linux laptop that works out the box, and I can send back to the company when the DVD-CDRW drive goes kaput.

    Would I own a Mac desktop, at the moment, hell no! They would need to be more competative in both the speed and the price arenas for me to even consider it.

    But my point is this, there are people out there who have weighed the differences and made the choice of both. OSX is easy, and fast, and pretty. Win2K (sorry don't know about XP) is where most of my professional experience lays so troubleshooting it easy, and it plays games, and it was hella cheap ($50 OEM version when I bought my HDD).

    --

    Note to self: No more arguing with the faithful.

  20. Re:Of course! by jericho4.0 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Ok, I'll bite.
    Yes. Macs are slow. The ads are meant to sell to user types. As far as crashing goes, yes they used to,or so I hear, but my G4 hasn't crashed in 8 months. Windows sucked just as bad back then too.

    You (and this is assuming you have the brains to make an informed, bias free decision), have the right to choose what's right for you. My choice of what's right ranges from Blade servers to Intel/Linux to Onyx's but the Mac is my workstation, and it's staying.

    --
    "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  21. mac "slowness" by green+pizza · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have an expensive Mac. It strikes me as slow, sometimes. I get annoyed when software comes out for the PC first. But I'm not giving it up for anything.
    I hear you about the performance issue. I've found the G4/MacOSX combo to have "baffling" performance. Many apps and many functions are zippy as can be, but yet there are still a few areas that can be slow. Resizing a window, for example, is pretty slow for all but the most lightweight applications. Apple's iCal calendar app also has a tendancy to chug pretty hard. Yet this very same machine is an absolute video monster. Final Cut Pro runs like a dream, I'm using "just" an 867 MHz machine, yet I couldn't really ask for any faster video editing performance. The app's gui is fast, scrubbing thru frames is fast, applying layers is fast. It's great! True, I don't do much compositing, so my render times are almost instant... but then, neither do most folks. (though I have heard that some folks are finding iMovie 3 to be somewhat slow) I've also found Photoshop to be extremely fast for the images I work with (never larger than 2048x2048). Others have reported zippy compile and run performance of command-line apps, though I haven't tried this out myself.

    Perhaps Apple is still in the early stages of tweaking Mac OS X... maybe they're working on the demanding areas first and will eventually touch up the more minor performance issues (window resize, for example).

  22. Re:I made the switch to Linux by xtremex · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm a computer tech for a large global enterprise.

    When we were using windows computers, my job was in serious danger of being downsized. They were easy to use and and everyone and their mother was an MCSE.

    Fortunately, due to Microsoft licenses, my company switched to PC's running Linux.
    What a relief! The stress I was suffering over job security is gone! In fact, I just got a fat raise because the bosses think that Linux is so difficult, yet I never work!

    I've learned needlepoint. And I knitted a blanket. Oh, I WISH these darn computers would CRASH already!!! I'm so bored!

    --
    If you're not a Liberal in your 20's, then you have no heart.If you're still a Liberal in your 30's you have no brain.
  23. erm, people register? by lingqi · · Score: 4, Funny
    those who have recently registered MS products

    seriously - I've been at the computer thing for a while now, I have not known a SINGLE person that registered their windows. I mean, heck man - does that email list have a whole 7 recipients?

    Of course, most of the replies otherwise would be like "I went from Apple to MS because I can pirate more software and play more games."

    though - sadly, there is a bunch of people who are forced to use mycrudsoft. When the IT dept tells some apple die-hards that they are getting PC laptops or nothing at all, because they want to have "one platform" - though the powerbooks would actually cost less (seriously), last longer on flights, and preserve their values better. Sigh... maybe MS can base their campain on that: Switch - because we make you.

    fuckers. (hmm... do I sound bitter?)

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

  24. My theory by inkswamp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think this campaign is not aimed at Mac users and convincing them to switch to Windows, but rather an attempt to stop the herd of Windows users out there from considering Macs. I bet these ads will be loaded with implied falsehoods (i.e., Word and Explorer doesn't run on Macs, can't network on Macs, etc.)

    --
    --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
  25. I don't really blame them by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Think about it - Microsoft is a monopoly, basically people have to buy their software. Yes, for geeks and highly non-demanding users stuff Windows lockin is less effective, but for the vast majority of people, they feel they have to use Windows.

    So.... what does that leave left to advertise? It must get pretty boring working in Microsofts adverts department. I expect they've got bored of spamming OSDN, that was a good wheeze for a while, but now they have to do something to make the long winter days go past right?

    Anyway, it's not like MS are actually threatened by Apple, anybody who runs the numbers can see that. It's just a side show, an entertaining game to try and give the surface appearance that there's actually competition in the markets.

  26. Re:Of course! by Vadim+the+Conqueror · · Score: 3, Insightful

    windows users are the only ones who dont have a strong connection to their operating system.

    there's linux users who tend to be very anti-microsoft, there's mac users who in my experiance are very fanatical. then there's windows users like me. i use windows, it works quite well for me, and i've been using it as long as i can remember, but i dont feel the need to be pushy or get on other people's cases about using a different os, and i dont feel any reluctance to learn other os's as well.

    i use windows, for no better reason than it's what's on my pc, and i dont like one button mice.

  27. Mother of God, NO! by migurski · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Apple should not "fix" sites that are optimized for IE - in the vaaaast majority of cases, such sites use ass-whacked HTML, your mother's activeX controls, and were built in FrontPage.

    Apple should stick to its guns, and continue to work on STANDARDS COMPLIANCE for Safari, so that sites will work correctly in Saf/Moz/Konq/Op/etc. This will put pressure on MS to fix IE (as they have already started to do, thanks to Tantek Celik's excellent Tasman rendering engine for IE5/mac, and the standards compliance mode triggered via the presence of a legit DOCTYPE at the head of the file).

    If you find a site that is *cough* "optimized" for MSIE, do the right thing, and notify the webmaster. I have done so on countless occasions with bank sites and the like, and often I get a response and eventual compliance in the long run.

    long live standards. good night.

  28. Hanging out the shop is closed sign by zogger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ---E commerce? "selling widgets and/or widget servicing"=sales. OK, question, are you in sales or are you an "IT" guy? Here's a hint, people showing up at a site running osx are usually *not poor*, their demographics are leaning a lot towards "we spend top money and are known for brand loyalty if we are treated right".

    Admit it-I got a point? Rhetorical question, I think I made it. Basic rule of thumb in sales 101, you have to get through the noes to get to the yesses. Part of any "yes" potential is , well, having da loot. The interest on the part of the surfer was there, you got the hit, they showed up at your URL, they are doing the customer's part. That's all they can do up to that point. The next step is up to you.

    good lucksi

  29. Hmmm, by PhilHibbs · · Score: 3, Insightful
    So when does it just stop being the sincerest form of flattery and just become utter, pathetic laziness?
    You could say the same about Linux GUI design, in fact, just about any Linux software design. I don't usually complain about MS bashing, in fact I usually join in, but this is just pathetic.
  30. Dude, he's getting arrested. by User+956 · · Score: 4, Funny

    What Microsoft needs is an Ellen Feiss equivalent.

    They had one, but he got arrested.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
  31. You need a HUG, mister by feldsteins · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While you're complaining about all the wild-eyed, touchy-feely Mac enthusiasts it occurs to me that you my friend - yes you, mister - need a hug!

    Seriously, I think there's a lot of Windows users who have entirely lost touch with the idea that one can like thier computer. I don't think there's anything wrong with doing so either; it's not like allowing such factors to influence our purchases and preferences is "stupid" or otherwise "uninformed." Hell, if it was we'd all be driving around in gray '87 Volvos or something.

    I actually the fact that we like our computers annoys non Mac users. "It's a tool" they tell us with visibly strained patience. Like we didn't understand that. We should "grow up" and realize that there should be no fun, pleasure, or delight in the use of such a utilitarian thing.

    It's a computer. Yes it's a tool and so is a furnace. But so is a Mini-Cooper. There's a difference. I don't work for Apple and I don't give a rats ass if you buy a Mac or not. But I do get tired of the "it's a tool" argument against computers with taste and style. Given the choice between owning something that feels utilitarian versus something that feels like someone put some love I'll take the love hands down. Ask any Harley-Davidson owner.

    --
    You like your Macintosh better than me, don't you Dave? Dave? Can you hear me Dave?
  32. Re:Wintel users are switching to OS X by afantee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I really doubt that MS can find a real story like this one. None of the Windows users I know prefer the platform for any reason - they either have no choice or simply are ignorant.

  33. Bad analogy by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 4, Funny

    You sound like you know a lot about screwdrivers, can you help me? My screwdriver suddenly started stripping my screws. I don't understand. Did I violate my license agreement? Or did I screw in too many screws?

    I asked my nephew about this, he's good with screwdrivers, and he says that it's because I'm using a cheap screwdriver and it's not compatible with my Philips screws.

    I've been told that I should abandon Philips and use Torx screws in my doorframe. But Torx screws and screwdrivers aren't very common.

    Help?

  34. I did the reverse switch, as did two of my friends by jgalun · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't see why almost everyone on Slashdot is making fun of the idea of switching from the Mac to PC. I was an Amiga (2000, upgraded with a Picasso II+ and a 68060 accelerator) owner, then an iMac owner, and now a Windows user.

    Two of my friends switched in the last two years from the Mac to the PC. Both of them were hard-core Mac zealots. One of them is married to a graphic designer, and he himself is a user interface designer, so he was naturally a Mac user for a long time. The other had been a Mac user since he was 10, and was a huge believer that Macs were superior to PCs in any and every way.

    Well, eventually MacOS X came out, and my friend the user interface designer basically made the switch to the PC. Why? Because Macs are too expensive, don't provide the benefits they used to (let's face it - there's no difference between using Photoshop and Quark on the Mac vs. the PC any more), and because Apple broke all of its own great user interface rules with MacOS X.

    My friend who had used Macs since he was 10 switched to the PC because Macs were just too fucking slow. He had a super-speedy Athlon for much less than a new Mac would cost him. He's a big geek, so he runs Linux most of the time, but he uses Windows for gaming.

    And me? I like the fact that Apple puts a lot of thought into how the software works, and how the system works as a whole. I like the fact that the computers are cool looking. But, that is not worth the premium of the MUCH higher cost of Macs (I'm sorry, for what I want to do with my computer Macs are way more expensive). Additionally, I was really, really disappointed by MacOS X's interface. The MacOS had such a great interface, and now it's as lame as Windows. So why pay a premium for it?

    On the other hand, a friend of mine who was a PC-zealot (he used to mock my iMac all the time, and thought Mac users were idiots) just visited an Apple Store and has become a total convert. It's fascinating.

    Anyway, I guess the point is, it's not ridiculous for people to switch from PCs to Macs, and it's not ridiculous to switch from Macs to PCs. Seriously, different platforms have different advantages. MS showing people who went from Mac to PC is no more ridiculous than showing people going from PC to Mac.

    (When I switched from Mac to PC, I found the PC annoying at first. But then I got used to it, and now I find the Mac annoying when I first start using it again. A lot of this is what you're used to.)

  35. Now that is something I haven't seen before... by tjwhaynes · · Score: 4, Funny

    A web de-singer character.

    Someone who is going out of their way to remove singing from the web. Does he work for RIAA? :-)

    Cheers,

    Toby Haynes

    --
    Anything I post is strictly my own thoughts and doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the opinions of IBM.
  36. Re:Why I switched: by annodomini · · Score: 4, Interesting
    In the old days:
    - Apple hardware cost more but it was very dependable.
    - Mac OS upgrades used to be free for minor updates and major releases (every 2 to 3 years) were resonably priced.
    - Lots of free stuff like hypercard and later iMovie and blah@mac.com accounts.

    Now:
    - Hardware is still ~40% more than similar PC stuff.
    - Dependablity has dropped to "white box" levels.
    - iMoive et all applications cost $100 per year (to stay up to date)
    - blah@mac.com accounts cost $130 per year PER ACCOUNT PER YEAR.
    - Software updates cost $130 per year.

    $360 per year for the feeding of a Mac is IMO too much. I resently bought a Toshiba 1115-S103 laptop (1.5Ghz Cel, 20G HD, 256M RAM, WinXP Home and a 14" screen) for $750 (new after $200 rebate). A similar iBook would be $1540 ($1050 + $130 + $360) over two years as opposed to my Toshiba for $900 ($750 + $150 for possible OS update costs).

    This is blatantly wrong. None of these prices are right, at least on the mac end, unless you are talking about something other than US$. iMovie et al. are free. The only one which is not freely available is iDVD, which is bundled with iLife for $50. Mac.com accounts are $100 per year, not $130, and you never included the price of a similar service with the Toshiba. Comparing Mac.com prices with other similar services (you have to add up a few, such as an imap mailbox, plus 100 MB WebDAV disk space, plus web space, plus a bunch of free software), you find that $100 a year is a fair price. Jaguar may have been $130, but as you said, before there were free incremental updates and reasonably priced major ones. This is still the case. $130 is a pretty damn reasonable price for Jaguar. And we haven't had long enough to see how often updates like this will come out.

    You still get tons of free stuff with MacOS. iTunes, iMovie, iCal, Mail, iPhoto, iSync, Safari, X11, a complete BSD distribution, Project Builder and related development tools, etc. Last time I checked Microsoft charged an awful lot for Visual Studio, not to mention anything equivalent to the rest of that (I don't pretend to be an expert on the exact product offerings and pricing of Microsoft software).

    So, if you want to compare prices between similar Macs/PC offerings, please at least quote the correct price and compare similar items.

  37. Re:Legit marketing by MS by Clock+Nova · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's not that they can't do it, its that they shouldn't do it. It's such a blatant rip off of the Apple ads that it makes them seem rather foolish and desperate.

    But then, they rip off so much from so many companies, that I think we've come to expect this sort of behavior from MS.

    --
    There they were, sitting in the van with all those dials, and the cat was dead. -V. Marchetti, CIA
  38. Our Marketing department swiched... by weave · · Score: 3, Interesting
    By corporate mandate, Marketing had to ditch their Macs and switch to Dells. We, the tech department, gleefully went down there one day and confiscated their G4 towers. We then hooked them up in our offices and started playing. I loved mine so much I bought an iMac for home last summer and just yesterday took delivery of my new 12" G4 PB.

    Meanwhile, Marketing's switch to dells and XP has left them miserable. Does that count? Sure was a sensible switch in my mind. Their loss, my gain! In fact I'm typing this in using Safari right now!