Slashdot Mirror


Build Your Own Submarine

Nerobro writes "There's a group of geeks out there who are bound and determined to build their own submarines. In fact, there's a large group who have been successful. The most interesting is Cartsen Standfuss's CSSX-1. There is a mailing list, owners group and sizeable archive of information at psubs.org."

170 comments

  1. They better be careful by TerryAtWork · · Score: 3, Insightful

    they don't build their own coffins too.

    This is more dangerous than home built aircraft.

    --
    It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
    1. Re:They better be careful by 0x0d0a · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is more dangerous than home built aircraft.

      Seriously, if your life insurance company finds out that you're making and sailing homemade submarines, you're going to get dropped like a hot potato.

    2. Re:They better be careful by KillerLoop · · Score: 2, Insightful

      no, you won't, this is germany after all.

    3. Re:They better be careful by niclas_b · · Score: 1

      I don't see how this can be more dangerous than building your own airplane. There seem to be a lot of things that can lead to a disaster in an airplane. If you have a well-tested system on the submarine, that would enable you to float to the surface, you are reasonable safe. You don't have to worry about stall speed, instability recovery from spin, landing behaviour, etc.

    4. Re:They better be careful by donscarletti · · Score: 5, Funny
      When I was 8 or so I had this great idea to build a submarine out of oil drums. I obsessed over it and spent Way more time than is healthy drawing up plans in coloured pencils... A cute little stick figure inside two oil-drums welded together and two little drums on the side of it which were ballast tanks. It even had a modified toster underneath it to work as a steam jet (like the one on slashdot a couple of weeks ago but wouldn't have worked, however it was Australian designed).

      I can't help thinking that if I was one of those "active kids" you know the ones... the ones that leave the house more than just to go to primary school, I would have either electrocuted myself with a toaster or drowned....

      Basically I owe my life to my lazyness... sitting around karma whoring and trolling is the least thing I can do to repay my sense of idolness, god bless slashdot!

      --
      When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    5. Re:They better be careful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buoyancy is the problem. You need to carry enough weight onboard to submerge. But this means you're not going to just float back up without a means to float again (usually compressed air). If anything happens to that system, then you go down like a rock.

      With that said, the safest way to test a sub is to drive it somewhere shallow enough that you can swim to the surface in an emergency.

    6. Re:They better be careful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If something goes wrong deep underwater, it is very difficult to get back up in one piece.

      If something goes wrong high up in the air, you have a long fall during which to get yourself away from the plane and deploy a parachute.

      Parachutes are much more widely available than any kind of underwater escape pods.

      Now flying at a low altitude is probably more dangerous than subbing at a shallow depth.

    7. Re:They better be careful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought after WWII the Germans weren't allowed to build submarines anymore!

    8. Re:They better be careful by taliver · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, just remember:

      There are more planes in the sea than subs in the sky.

      --

      I demand a million helicopters and a DOLLAR!

    9. Re:They better be careful by CleverNickedName · · Score: 1

      Sound and sensible advice. Where were you when the Write brothers started messing around in Kitty Hawk?

      --


      Unfortunately, I am not Wil Wheaton
    10. Re:They better be careful by Confused · · Score: 1

      Considering that Carsten Standfuß is a maritime engineer by training, the insurance shouldn't be too worried.

    11. Re:They better be careful by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      He was wispering in their ear enough to get them to abandon their newly developed airplane. However when the Wright brothers showed up an hour later, he had gone home.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    12. Re:They better be careful by 0x0d0a · · Score: 0

      One of them also died in a crash of one of their machines. :-)

    13. Re:They better be careful by Charlton+Heston · · Score: 1

      Wilbur died from typhoid, Orville died from a heart attack.

      I apologise for the interjection of fact into this forum.

      --
      Get your stinking paws off me you damn dirty ape
    14. Re:They better be careful by BLAG-blast · · Score: 2, Informative
      Buoyancy is the problem. You need to carry enough weight onboard to submerge. But this means you're not going to just float back up without a means to float again (usually compressed air). If anything happens to that system, then you go down like a rock.

      Submarines will normally have atleast 3 or 4 ways of surfacing. Primary and secondary main balast tanks, either of which could surface the submarine alone, variable balast tank (sometimes using a pump rather than compressed air) and a lead drop weight which can be drop via a lever from inside the sub. They are normally two seperate high pressure air systems as well.

      --
      M0571y H@rml355.
    15. Re:They better be careful by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

      Back in the day, the kid across the street from me tried to build a sub out of 2 55 gallon drums as well. He got them joined (he didn't weld so he crimped the metal at the joint) and cut a hole for a conning tower. At that point he quit. His work was not for naught, though, as we used to crawl inside and take turns rolling each other down the street. I have never been so dizzy in my life...

    16. Re:They better be careful by The_K4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, the way the subs work (most modern anyway) is that they pump WATER into the air tanks, compressing the air and creatting a pressure (and making the tank HEAVIER). When they want to surface they let the air PUSH the water out. If you sub is well designed you only need to OPEN the drain to let the water be pushed out. Most subs DO have compressors to add more air pressure (and there for empty the tanks faster and more completly) however they can surface with out these (in the case of a major power failure). Whenyou were to compress the air in your tanks you don't change your boyency (because the air comes from somewhere so your totall MASS is the same. They way you change your bouency is to ADD something (usually the most avaliable thing is water). Also most modern subs have a way to drop excess weight, like propellors and engine parts via explosive bolts (again for emergency procedures). I'm sorry, i hate to inject some REAL knowledge about subs.

    17. Re:They better be careful by CanadaDave · · Score: 1

      I saw on a documentary show called Wings Over Canada a plane that was made from a kit from Murphy Air. It took them a long time to build (I think 3 years) and several thousand hours. But I don't think it was any less safe than a factory built airplane. Many of the key components, engine, wings, prop are usually pre-made, so it's not like your making it truly from scratch. Besides, who's better at making something? Yourself? or some guys at a factory? I think you'd do a more careful job at making a homemade submarine or airplane because if you're going to use it, you'll probably make damn sure it's safe. But some guys in a factory, what do they care, really?

    18. Re:They better be careful by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Actually, the way the subs work (most modern anyway) is that they pump WATER into the air tanks, compressing the air and creatting a pressure (and making the tank HEAVIER).

      I've never heard of this before, and I think there are a couple of reasons why. If you tanks contain air on the surface and you pump water into the tanks compressing the air. Then your sub dives to 33 feet, you open the valve to let the water out, but because of the external water pressure only half the water get pushed out, you would have to pressurise the tanks on the surface for you system to work, but that means you need to do a lot of work pumping water in just to sink (now try that at 1000feet or deeper).

      They are two types of balast tanks, hard and soft. The main balast tanks that keep the sub floating on the surface are normally "soft", they do not hold pressure and are normally open at the bottom (it's the same pressure inside and outside of the tank). When a sub is near the surface compressed air is injected into these tanks forcing the water out of the botton.

      Hard tanks are normally inside the sub and are at 1ATM pressure. These are smaller and used to fine tune the submarines bouancey by pumping water in or out using an electric pump (the air in the tank doesn't push the water out). If there was a power failure the hard tanks could be emptied using high pressure air

      Most subs DO have compressors to add more air pressure (and there for empty the tanks faster and more completly) however they can surface with out these (in the case of a major power failure).

      The compressor is only for filling the high pressure air tanks while on the surface. And in the event of a major power failure, high pressure air still works fine (you just turn a valve and the air will flow).

      Also most modern subs have a way to drop excess weight, like propellors and engine parts via explosive bolts (again for emergency procedures).

      This true, but because a submarine need to weight the same as the water it displaces and the submarine is mainly air they all need heavy lead weights to allow them to sink. These weight are normally attached using explosive (which aren't very reliable) or some sort of lever to release them.

      I'm sorry, i hate to inject some REAL knowledge about subs.

      Don't worry too much about that....;-)

      --
      M0571y H@rml355.
    19. Re:They better be careful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Colombian drug cartels have contracted a few subs to be custom built. I think some Russian shipbuilders were "shipped" in to Colombia where they covertly built some submarines.

      If you don't know why Colombians cartels might be interested in un-armed submarines, well... it's not worth the bother explaining.

      There is also a company that makes mini-subs. The US Marshalls were selling one of their models at bid4assets.com. hehehe i can only laugh when I imagine the circumstances by which they got that sub. Some idiot.

    20. Re:They better be careful by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually in 688-class and EVERY OTHER SUB I HAVE EVER SEEN, The water is simply allowed in by letting air out through a valve on the topside of the ballast tank. there is an open hole on the bottom side to allow the water in while you bubble the air out. That is also why subs don't do well inverted. If you invert a sub (difficult with ballast and batteries on the bottom), it will never surface again. Can't get the air to stay in ballast that way. I've never heard of your system. Oh, and you can't just dump your screw- that would leave an 18-inch hole in the hull where the propshaft bearing is situated. It just so happens one or more subs sank while in reverse thrust. a retainer of some sort failed and the prop pulled itself out of the boat. Bad. What is your experience with submarines?

    21. Re:They better be careful by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was wondering where I can get some 7000lb air at 1200 feet. You see, I have turned on my compressor and now it's getting a little hard to breathe in here- could someone assist me in filling my air tanks underwater? Having difficulty unless I'm at snorkeling depth. Can't figure out why. geetttinnng dddroowsssssy.

    22. Re:They better be careful by ChaoticLimbs · · Score: 1

      Don't worry about the compressor guy. I heard he was a diver and someone accidentally dropped the TDU while he was inspecting the hull. got him right in the head.

    23. Re:They better be careful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or build ones that you don't actually go inside. This site is kind of cool for autonomous, computer-controlled submarines.
      http://www.huv.com

    24. Re:They better be careful by CleverNickedName · · Score: 1

      Well said. :)

      --


      Unfortunately, I am not Wil Wheaton
  2. old-hat by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The back of Popular Science has had Advertisments for plans for your own submarine,helicopter,airplane,etc... for decades. My neighbor growing up made the mini-sub in his garage.

    No not a wear a wetsuit and you get an air-bubble type a full dry submarine capable of diving I believe he took it down to 60 feet... didn't have the guts to go lower than what you can safely escape from..

    Nothing new here.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:old-hat by nanoakron · · Score: 1

      And the quistion on everyone's mind is: Just how much cocaine can you pack into one of these things?

      -Nano.

    2. Re:old-hat by romango · · Score: 1

      I built a submarine from plans I bought from a guy featured in Popular Mexhanics. It was a bubble type where you're dry from the waist up. It had 2 fishing trolling motors and 3 car batteries and was pretty fast. I had a blast with it and some close calls. I only used it a few times where I could actually see where I was going. Upstate NY lakes are kind of murkey. I usually navigated by compass, depth gaguge and dragging my foot along the bottom. I could also drag other divers that hung on and was able to park and get out. :)

    3. Re:old-hat by Alkaiser · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know. Chris Elliott's character on "Get a Life" built one in his bathtub a wayyyy long time ago.

      --
      Netjak.com independent reviews of domestic & import video ga
  3. I want the Microsoft version by jkrise · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm travelling to the US. This should make me feel 'secure'.

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
  4. Any colour you like.. by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 5, Funny

    ..as long as it's yellow

    1. Re:Any colour you like.. by Jenova · · Score: 2, Funny

      (after too much beer) ...We all live in a yellow submarine.. *yick* yellow submarine..*yick* ...

  5. If columbian drug lords can manage it by t0qer · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nerds should have this thing flying, uhh I mean floatin, errr boyancy? through the water.

    http://www.hispanicvista.com/html/000908am.html

  6. the joke... by riotstarter · · Score: 5, Funny

    so they can say what's long, hard, and full of nerd seamen? our submarine.

    1. Re:the joke... by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 1

      Not for long, if you look at this hot chick (bottom of the page).

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    2. Re:the joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look! The seaman's coming out!

    3. Re:the joke... by rampant+mac · · Score: 1
      Actually, this is a alpha release...

      It's more like "What's long, hard, and full of nerd seamen? our su... *glub* *glub* *glub*

      Here's 1.0.1a...

      --
      I like big butts and I cannot lie.
    4. Re:the joke... by zambotsu · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is a alpha release...

      It's more like "What's long, hard, and full of nerd seamen? our su... *glub* *glub* *glub*


      So the alpha release sucks, and swallows too by the sound of it.

    5. Re:the joke... by ryanvm · · Score: 1

      Ugh. That's one thing I hope I never hear at Subway.

    6. Re:the joke... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I vote this the ./ joke of the year!

  7. HOWTO: build a personal submarine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    MS version: Get SubXP from the store. DOWNGRADE (we're talking submarines, remember) it with SP2. BSD : (Berkley Submarine Divn) Assemble the parts under water. Linux version : AskSlashdot.

  8. I dream of making a submarine by The_Mutato · · Score: 4, Funny

    I dream of making a miniature remote controlled submarine. I have dreamed of putting torpedoes on it, too. It's a whole new way of fishing! Torpedo-Fried Algae/Fish/Dirt/Water/etc!

    1. Re:I dream of making a submarine by JonWan · · Score: 2, Funny

      It would be fun to put a shark fin on it and cruise thru the swimming area at a beach.

      Now that would be trolling. ;-)

    2. Re:I dream of making a submarine by xtermz · · Score: 1

      And it would be funnier to see the nerd who does this being chased by myself and about 20 other angry surfers when they find out it was a false alarm.....

      can geeks run that fast?

      --


      I lost my concept of community when my community lost all concept of me.
    3. Re:I dream of making a submarine by Brainboy · · Score: 1

      Fear of getting their ass beat makes anyone run fast.

      --
      Just a guy with an opinion
    4. Re:I dream of making a submarine by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 1

      I dream of making a miniature remote controlled submarine.

      A lot of other people do too.

  9. Seriously irritating site warning by panurge · · Score: 4, Funny
    Let's hope the controls on the German thing don't come up with annoying dropdown ads every time they are accessed

    Surface, surface!

    Sorry, Captain, the trim panel is trying to lend me money and the buoyancy controls are telling me where to buy a firewall.....thunk

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  10. But where are my flying cars? by Bazzargh · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nice project. I'd like to see more of the Deep Flight type submersibles though, rather than these ballast-based beasts.

  11. The funny thing is... by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...who will they tell it to?

  12. Hobbyist submarine accident by infolib · · Score: 4, Informative

    Peter Madsen successfully operated his homegrown 1-man submarine in the harbour of Copenhagen last fall. It has been submerged for 1½ hour, and gone to a depth of 10 m.

    That came on the heels of an accident where his submarine was heavily damaged by crashing into a bridge. Don't blame Peter though - it was carried on a truck! (danish)

    During the test this fall the only problem was paranoid police boarding the sub (danish) to assure that Peter was not an activist intending to disrupt the EU summit.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
    1. Re:Hobbyist submarine accident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I can go sit at 10 meters for 1 1/2 hours naked with a hose and an air compressor. What's the big deal about doing it in a tin can?

  13. purchasing one by solidox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    you can purchase your very own working second-hand submarine for a mere £40,000. aphex twin (music artist) has one.
    "1,000 miles on the clock. only one careful owner, an old ladie who used it to pop down to the shops to pick up her groceries"

    --
    1. Re:purchasing one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aphex twin (music artist) has one

      His name is Richard D. James, moron.

  14. German site by Zayin · · Score: 4, Funny

    The most interesting is Cartsen Standfuss's CSSX-1.

    Translation from Babelfish:

    Hello of people, we look forward much you to our homepage to welcome to be allowed. Since, as can see it, our project takes slowly forms, we did not want to withhold it from anybody and you here on these sides from now on up to date will hold. Much fun... the Euronauten

    The small cruiser is awake sank 1901 due to a Kollison during a fleet maneuver. Those is awake on request national office for soil care of monuments of the Mecklenburg Vorpommern only once with the data base was theoretically determined. Then regained by that private Wracksuchkutter Viney Peglar 1996 by means of Sidescan sonar before ruegen in the Baltic Sea only few hundred meters apart from the calculated position. The trunk of the Wrackes is not still very well received - superstructures. (source of photo: Kroschel Evers the German fleet 1848-1945)

    Yes, hello of people. We also try to keep our data base theoretically determined. And we really appreciate that you look forward to welcome to allow us to your homepage. Much fun!

    --
    "I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full frontal lobotomy"
    1. Re:German site by PHP+$tud · · Score: 0, Redundant

      aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ALL YOUR (SUBMARINE) BASES ARE BELONG TO US! aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

    2. Re:German site by sczimme · · Score: 1


      Yes, hello of people. We also try to keep our data base theoretically determined. And we really appreciate that you look forward to welcome to allow us to your homepage. Much fun!

      I am disrespectful to dirt! Do you see that I am serious??

      --
      I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
  15. Leif Eriksson by flokemon · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one here who is reminded of Hagbard Celine's Leif Eriksson submarine from Robert Anton Wilson's novels? :)

    Now if those guys could build that...

    1. Re:Leif Eriksson by The+Grassy+Knoll · · Score: 1

      >Am I the only one here who is reminded of Hagbard Celine's Leif Eriksson submarine from Robert Anton Wilson's novels

      Yup, I think you might be.

      --
      They will never know the simple pleasure of a monkey knife fight
    2. Re:Leif Eriksson by baldass_newbie · · Score: 1

      No, you're not. I thought of Hagbard as soon as I saw the title.

      Trust not a man who's rich in flax.
      His morals may be sadly lax.

      --
      The opposite of progress is congress
  16. Better take down that website by TopShelf · · Score: 1

    After all, we can't have that information falling into the wrong hands...

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    1. Re:Better take down that website by kcelery · · Score: 1

      The wrong hands have already had all the informations they needed. With brief google search, you can find subs in south america that can carry a payload of over 2 tons.

    2. Re:Better take down that website by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sorry, should have included the &ltFACETIOUS&gt tags, apparently!

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  17. If the nerds are building submarines by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 4, Funny

    The jocks will be building ASDIC and depth charges. Prepare to experience the true meaning of "ping".

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    1. Re:If the nerds are building submarines by panurge · · Score: 1
      Come now. Jocks designing ASDIC? Two tin cans on the ends of a piece of string, possibly.

      But then, as our English teacher remarked on seeing the football coach wearing an academic gown, "You don't often see a chimpanzee in a black nightshirt"

      --
      Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  18. H�kan Lans - Doppingen by alfadir · · Score: 1
    Håkan Lans the swedish inventor, built together with a friend and some advice from different people his own submarine "Doppingen" in High School.

    Håkan Lans standing in front of his submarine, that is now placed in Swedens Technical Museum

    1. Re:H�kan Lans - Doppingen by alfadir · · Score: 1

      This was in the 1970:ies..

      Here is another picture of the sub and one of Håkans
      partners in building it.

  19. Yay by Cyno01 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like the next round of Darwin Awards should be intetresting.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  20. After even more beer.. by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 4, Funny

    We are *hic*....sailing *hic*, We are saaaaiillling!!La la laaaa la...something...ner ner.. *BLEEEEUUUGH

  21. first test by lposeidon · · Score: 1, Funny

    can't wait to see the first test. it will go down, but will it come back up??

    --
    Lizard "Never let them set limits on your mind!"
    1. Re:first test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out this article on their Open Source Submersible:

      http://www.thegreenbayweb.com/hobbyshop/hobbysho p. html

    2. Re:first test by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Funny

      all boats are submarines.... once.

      It's coming back up that is the hard part.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:first test by lposeidon · · Score: 1

      cars too. depending on who is driving.

      --
      Lizard "Never let them set limits on your mind!"
    4. Re:first test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I forgot about that.... Ted Kennedy was one of the Car-submarine pioneers...

      Mmmm, an opportunity to chuck fecies at the Kennedy name... Gotta love that!

  22. Prices (from the FAQ) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are two basic design approaches to submarines. Ambient pressure designs and 1 atmosphere designs. They both have advantages and disadvantages and selecting the proper type depends on your criteria. Primarily the deciding criteria is cost and depth:

    Ambient
    Cost: $1,000 - $20,000
    Max Depth: 0-160 feet

    1 Atmosphere
    Cost: $10,000 - $500,000
    Max Depth: 0-1000+ feet

    http://www.psubs.org/faq.html

  23. Hmmm... by kevinatilusa · · Score: 1

    Why do I have such a sinking feeling about their endeavour?

    1. Re:Hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they are buiding submarines, and they go underwater. And if there is an accident, they will sink. That could be the cause of your sinking feeling. Did I get it right? Puns are funny.

  24. Drug submarine found in Colombia by shird · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Theres a niche, but probably lucrative market for these things if they know where to look.

    --
    I.O.U One Sig.
  25. We all live in a yellow submarine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a yellow submarine, a yellow submarine,
    we all live in a yellow submarine,
    and it's G-P-L'd.

  26. War material ! by eurostar · · Score: 5, Funny

    This has to be stopped !
    terrorists could capture one and...and...

    think of the children !

    1. Re:War material ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a submarine can be used to smuggle weapons of mass destruction into the united states and detonate that weapon on one of the many cities on the coast. This could spell a mass catastrophe - and that is why we should station troops and occupy the far side of the moon.

  27. Nomination ? by AftanGustur · · Score: 4, Funny


    Should we nominate them as a group or each individual independently?

    --
    echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln80~Psnlbx]16isb572CCB9AE9DB03273snlbxq' |dc
    1. Re:Nomination ? by gurps_npc · · Score: 1

      Just because you personally are not knowledgable enough to do it does not neccesarily mean they are too stupid to build a submarine. You do realize that there ARE people in the world that can build a safe submarine? For all you know, the majority of the members may have jobs in navy ship yards during the week, and just want to build one for themselves instead of for their country.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  28. Open Source Submarines by oever · · Score: 5, Funny

    Without being disrespectful to the Free Submarines Foundation, I would like to mention the existence of this Open Source Submarines webpage.

    Apparently, the Open Source developmentmodel is very suitable for building submarines. I cheer at this development. However, I still prefer free as in Willy submarines.

    --
    DNA is the ultimate spaghetti code.
    1. Re:Open Source Submarines by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

      Surely that deserved a +1 funny moderation for the "free as in Willy" line alone. Well done sir!

      --
      Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  29. I dream of making a submarine killer by donscarletti · · Score: 1

    I would much rather make a model destroyer, or anti-sub sea-king chopper... depth charges have been used for fishing for years because of their disrupting effects on fish's swim bladders (i.e. expanding bait, fishing with grenades), I could shoot more fish then you, and blow the crap out of your pathetic shitty submarine! What do you say about that smart guy?

    --
    When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
    1. Re:I dream of making a submarine killer by ThatMadeNoSense · · Score: 1

      I could shoot more fish then you

      That made no sense.

    2. Re:I dream of making a submarine killer by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 1

      What we need is a set of remote control devices, so you can set up a fleet...

      A few destroyers, a few subs, and an aircraft carrier....

      With the carrier you could launch remote control helicopters, and possibly even a plane.

      Who wants to set up the launch ramp, and, more importantly, the tail-hook mechanism for catching model planes without tearing them apart?

      Of course, an aircraft carrier would need to be the size of a desk at minimum, but at that size, you could have all kinds of fun. Get some micro RC cars and mod 'em to look like Jeeps to drive around on the deck...

      You could even have a transport ship and carry a few of the Mini-Rovers set up as tanks...

      Maybe I'm going too far...

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    3. Re:I dream of making a submarine killer by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 1

      I don't know about aircraft carriers, but people do build battleships.

  30. %$!@@#$ ADS! by FroMan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ack! What the hell is with those stoopid ads? They are worse then pop ups (well on par with them, much worse since mozilla blocks them for me). I feel like ripping the nuts of the bastard that made them and shoving them down the throats of the idiots that uses the hosting service that puts them on their pages.

    Other than that, the concept looks pretty cool, since I can't read german.

    --
    Norris/Palin 2012
    Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    1. Re:%$!@@#$ ADS! by ThatMadeNoSense · · Score: 1

      They are worse then pop ups

      That made no sense.

    2. Re:%$!@@#$ ADS! by FroMan · · Score: 1

      Huh? Since you are a freak of my anyways, not a big deal.

      Go here and then try the link Der Bau. You will see this ugly as sin ad roll down your screen covering content of the page. Then after like 20 seconds or so it will roll away. Granted, that might mean you need to actually read one of the links.

      Okey, with that frame of reference. Re-read my post, I've even included it here for you to save you time.

      Ack! What the hell is with those stoopid ads? They are worse then pop ups (well on par with them, much worse since mozilla blocks them for me). I feel like ripping the nuts of the bastard that made them and shoving them down the throats of the idiots that uses the hosting service that puts them on their pages.

      Other than that, the concept looks pretty cool, since I can't read german.


      Now, if you "get it" you can stop reading. If you don't "get it", let me explain, using very small words.

      Ack!: exclaimation of distaste.

      What the hell is with those stoopid ads?: Here I questions the taste of the ads and personally decide that they are quite stupid (stupid == stoopid, its an old warcraft joke some friends and I have).

      They are worse then pop ups (well on par with them, much worse since mozilla blocks them for me).: Here's the tricky part that seemed to throw you for a loop. The ads on the above page are worse than pop ups (ads). You see pop up ads open a seperate window that can be closed (or if you are using Mozilla be blocked all together). This form of ad actaully blocks you from reading parts of the page. See, that isn't so tough, or maybe your handle should be changed to "ThatMadeNoSenseCauseIHaveASingleDigitIQ".

      I feel like ripping the nuts of the bastard that made them and shoving them down the throats of the idiots that uses the hosting service that puts them on their pages.: Here I exaggerate my distaste for the ads. I could have thrown in any random stuff here, but decided this should cover my feelings of the ads more than enough.

      Other than that, the concept looks pretty cool, since I can't read german.: Here I comment on the idea and the pictures of the sub shown on this page. Since I cannot read german (sort of like you and english) I mention in this sentence that I cannot read german.

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    3. Re:%$!@@#$ ADS! by ThatMadeNoSense · · Score: 1

      They are worse then pop ups
      That still makes no sense.

  31. I once built a submarine by vrassoc · · Score: 1

    Okay, it was just a small one. And it didn't go very deep. And it wasn't supposed to sink. YES, OKAY, DAMNIT I built a ROWING BOAT and it SANK on its MAIDEN VOYAGE!!!! ARE YOU HAPPY NOW!!???

  32. German Link... by Tranvisor · · Score: 1

    Um, can we have some warning when a link is posted to a non-english site? It might sound annoyingly american or whatever but I'm sure it catches Koreans, etc. by surprise and annoys them to....

    Just a "(German site)" is all I'm asking for next to the link.

    1. Re:German Link... by nomadic · · Score: 1

      We wouldn't have a problem if those barbarians would just speak English like a civilized person.

  33. Re:Hey Michael... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +1 Redundant

  34. Jules Verne by hey! · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Impressive as the linked submarine is, it's just like a military boat: a steel cylinder. As useful as such a thing may be as a weapons platform, I can't imagine anybody riding in the thing for pleasure.

    My own fantasy of a personal submarine comes from the Nautilus in 20000 Leagues Under the Sea. The most important feature: a glassed in drawing room, furnished with overstuffed chairs and oriental rugs, from which I can survey the unfolding panorama of the sea as I smoke seaweed cigars and sup on lobster tails whilst I plot my revenge on humanity.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:Jules Verne by paulgrant · · Score: 1

      >My own fantasy of a personal submarine comes from the Nautilus in 20000 Leagues Under the Sea. The most important feature: a glassed in drawing room, furnished with overstuffed chairs and oriental rugs, from which I can survey the unfolding panorama of the sea as I smoke seaweed cigars and sup on lobster tails whilst I plot my revenge on humanity.

      ------

      Yea BABY!!!! WOOOHOOOO :)

      I never saw/read 20 thousand leagues under the sea, but man, captain Nemo had it right :) Hilarious description btw :) very on-target :)

      Anyway :)

    2. Re:Jules Verne by paulgrant · · Score: 1

      >I never saw/read 20 thousand leagues under the sea
      -- ... until recently;
      damn, I should have used the preview button :)
      HAHAHAHAHHAHAA

  35. Get a Life by dmomo · · Score: 0

    Two Words: Chris Elliot

    1. Re:Get a Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the first thing I thought of too when I read the title of this story!

  36. Re:After even more beer, watching Southpark. by taliver · · Score: 1

    I'msailingawaySetanopencourseforthevirginseas.
    An dI'vegottobefree,freetofacetheworldthatsaheadofm e.
    OnboardI'mthecaptain,soclimbaboard.
    Wecansear chfortomorrow,oneveryshore.
    Butwe'lltry,ohlordwe' lltry,tocarryon.
    Ilooktothesea,Reflectionsinthewa vesstartamemory.
    Somehappy,somesad,Ithinkofchildh oodfriendsandthedr eams wehad.
    We'lllivehappyandforever,sothestorygoes.
    Butsomehow,wemissedout,onthepotofgold.
    andwe'lltr y,ashardaswecan,tocarryon.
    andwe'lltry,ashardaswe can,tocarryon.

    --

    I demand a million helicopters and a DOLLAR!

  37. The Homemade Submarine (read his story) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FYI - deeperblue.net

    Done Slashdotting? Check out the hot or not chics at pajonet.com

  38. In other news by Gryftir · · Score: 4, Funny

    In other news today, Microsoft has already announced an ultra realistic sim version of building your own submarine, which allows you to actually take your craft into the water and suffocate OR drown to death.

    Gryftir

    --
    http://www.santacruzbynight.com/index.shtml Santa Cruz By Night Vampire Larp
  39. Plush Submarines by dpilot · · Score: 1

    OK, so we need another pointer to http://www.ussubs.com/lead.html if you want to see a "plush sub". Plus they even offer underwater habitats, and cite a submarine as the safest place to be in these days of international terrorism. But I can't see much evidence of their actually having sold any of these neat selling points.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  40. President Bush declares them Terrorist.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Building a personal submarine?? Obviously attempting to deliver some sort of payload. They must be terrorist!

    In America, everyone's a terrorist til proven otherwise :)

    Now then, if someone would be so kind as to post their GPS coordinates we can begin our plans of dropping smart bombs!

  41. Ya'll need to get out more by AppyPappy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Universities like Virginia Tech have been building these things for years.

    --

    If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

  42. Wild Stuff... by TygerFish · · Score: 1

    With that many people working on submarine projects, two things come to mind immediately: how many of these guys really understand what they're doing? And... where on god's green earth do they get their money???

    I can easily understand building a better bicycle frame, but a pressure hull? I don't *think* so...

    --
    To mail me, remove the 'mailno' from my email addy.
    "Yeah. It smells, too..."
    1. Re:Wild Stuff... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two of the guys have university degrees in mechanical engineering, one in shipbuilding, the others apparently have a solid background in scuba diving. Apparently they build it is as platform for diving. Seems they know their shit.

  43. Geeks and submarines by Highwayman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Geeks already built a submarine, the dot com business model. Oh yeah, it wouldn't resurface.

  44. His home page by vrassoc · · Score: 1

    The web site of the guy in the article is at http://www.stanleysubmarines.com. It's worth a look. His sub costs virtually nothing to operate and it has done a dive to over 700 feet! It also doesn't need any special licensing or qualifications to operate.

    Now that's cool

  45. I built my own submarine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I built my own submarine. It was great - one that Jared would even be proud of. It was huge. A somewhat hard, by pliable exterior, with plenty of cool stuff on the inside.

    Now though, I just have the submarines built for me. I even save those little stamps and get my ninth sub free.

  46. Build Your Own Submarine ... by SuperDuG · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ... or your own underwater coffin, your choice on the title.

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
  47. All this work by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

    And the ex-soviet empire is dying to sell their old diesel subs for almost nil.

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
  48. Fear.. by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


    If the Germans figure out how to attach their potato bazookas to their home made subs we're all screwed.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  49. No, you just have to worry about nastier things! by reality-bytes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Structural failure leading to implosion!

    Even at just 100 meters depth, you don't get much warning of a hull failure. One buckled plate becomes a total breach in about 1 second.

    Deeper than 100 meters, I'm told that the water entering a breached hull hits you rather like a steam-hammer with most unpleasant results.

    These things are great so long as you keep positive pressure (the difference between tin-can and crushed tin-can). However, keeping that pressure is probably defined as a 'blood-difficult' thing.
    An automatic buyancy system is a great thing to have in an emergency unless the only thing it drags back to the surface is submariner soup

    Fair play to this guy for having a go; he's definately got guts. I seem to remember that Germans used to be rather good at building these things.

    As for homebuilt aircraft, barring structural failure, in an emergency you tend to have one major thing on your side: Time

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
  50. Spent a few years on Fast Attack subs by bubblegoose · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I spent 6 years on or working on fast attack subs. We had controls called Subsafe. This meant every part contributing to water tight integrity was tracked from the start of manufacture to installation.

    Subsafe parts were quite expensive...but you were 100% pretty confident you weren't getting some cheap Taiwanese knockoff parts.

    Where are these guys getting their stuff, the hardware store down the street? Enough said. Would I even think of going down in one of these boats? No...not ever.

    Look at the lessons the Navy learned, Scorpion, Thresher. How are these things powered...batteries? Have you ever heard of the Bonefish

    --
    I hope that someday we will be able to put away our fears and prejudices and just laugh at people. - Jack Handey
    1. Re:Spent a few years on Fast Attack subs by Mr.Phil · · Score: 1
      Look at the lessons the Navy learned, Scorpion [lostsubs.com], Thresher [lostsubs.com]. How are these things powered...batteries? Have you ever heard of the Bonefish [lostsubs.com]

      That is just so begging for a " hehe hehe he said "bonefish" comment.

    2. Re:Spent a few years on Fast Attack subs by hughk · · Score: 1
      The idea is that you buy parts that are designed to handle the pressure. This isn't difficult and it is quite easy to find good industrial compoinents in germany (may be expensive though). Although sub engineering sounds difficult, remember, in reality we are talking about pressure vessels and their associated bits - not much different to the chemical industry.

      Also remember that Germans built rather a lot of diesel-electric subs over the years. Probably more than anyone else, so there is a lot of knowhow around. So what if they use lead-acid battries, many hundreds have done so before.

      I guess the constructors know a lot about subs. Having hand-built the thing, they probably have a better idea than most about the construction quality. It is one thing to depend on a weld that the lowest bidder did, it is another to depend on one that you did yourself.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    3. Re:Spent a few years on Fast Attack subs by uradu · · Score: 1

      > Also remember that Germans built rather a lot
      > of diesel-electric subs over the years

      True, but Germans, like most other humans, aren't a hive collective. Which means that the knowledge and skills accumulated by members of a defense contractor don't automatically transfer to the population at large. This is not to say that these guys aren't skilled, because judging from the construction details it certainly seems they know what they're doing. They also have a fair share of engineers amongst themselves.

      > It is one thing to depend on a weld that the
      > lowest bidder did, it is another to depend on
      > one that you did yourself.

      They had the pressure hull robot welded and X-ray inspected, resulting in perfect welds, according to their construction info. That's probably better that most homegrown sub efforts. I do wonder just how much money these guys have, though, and whether there's more where that came from.

    4. Re:Spent a few years on Fast Attack subs by hughk · · Score: 1
      You are right in that it isn't a hive collective, but you would be suprised how much knowhow spreads around a large industy. Ok, U-boats haven't been made in bulk in 50 years, but pressure vessels are - Germany still has a reputation for chemical engineering, which means designing for huge pressures. If you are in the right place, picking up knowhow is relatively easy (it isn't as though this is secret stuff).

      They have also been very conservative with their design (almost dissappointly so). I didn't catch the bit about the robot welder, but the tubular constrction would make this easier.

      Yes, I agree with you about the resources. These guys must have access to a lot of cash and/or equipment.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    5. Re:Spent a few years on Fast Attack subs by uradu · · Score: 1

      > They have also been very conservative with their design (almost dissappointly so).

      Well, their goal seems to be to create a wreck diving platform, not to break new records in sub design. If you have a clearly defined and reachable goal, you tend to go about reaching it by the most conservative and reliable means possible in order to minimize financial and safety risks and maximize chances of success. If you want to see a counter-example to conservative design, check out CargoLifter. I used to follow their progress religiously until they went under. Theirs is a case study of heaping speculation and untested technology upon all other kinds of money squandering.

    6. Re:Spent a few years on Fast Attack subs by hughk · · Score: 1
      Actually, I know Cargolifter very well. They may end up with their assets being taken over by someone else so the project may not totally die.

      Their idea wasn't so revolutionary but they seemed to be doiing somethings in a very interesting way. The company was split into two, one half for finance and one for production. When the company listed, it went onto the "Geregelt Markt", which is technically an exchange based OTC with minimal listing requirements. If they had gone to the "Neuer Markt", they would have had to produce US-GAAP or IAS accounts. As their producion facility sat in the fomer East-Germany, they had a lot of state help. Unfortunately the old skills were on the Boden See (Lake Constance) where the Zeppelins were built (and some newer blimps in recent times).

      I understand through my own connections that there was some wauestionable goings on in Cargo-Lifter Finance AG, so only part of the money ended up in Cargo Lifter AG's production facility. They did lead their shareholders on somewhat, but they could have had production by next year and profitability a couple of years after that. Their product was unique and absolutely ideal for some specific purposes where there is little or no infrastructure (I suppose thats why a US company is interested in picking up the pieces).

      Mind you all of this was gleaned after some beers with various market people (and one of their senior management) so is probably totally unreliable. The take-over isn't and was reported in the German edition of the financial times this week.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  51. Get a Life! by wcbrown · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of that Get a Life! episode except that these seem way more expensive than $19.99.

  52. Don't Build, Buy! by Kaz+Riprock · · Score: 1

    If you've got $78 million, you can get this fancy number.

    If you only have a measly $682,000, then maybe this guy is more your speed...and you can attach him to your yacht for greater range from shore to explore!

    And for you Geo Metro fans, there's the el cheapo compacto.

    --
    Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
  53. ambient pressure? by ColGraff · · Score: 1

    If you built it with an ambient-pressure based life support system (that is, air pressure in the cabin increases to match pressure outside the hull), that might work- the glass wouldn't have to withstand a pressure differential. You'd be limited to a bit over a hundred feet dive, though, and just as with SCUBA, you'd have to be careful coming up. See the Psubs site for more info.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  54. this is risky business: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Who's the U-boat captain?" Always careful to keep my Porsche off of week piers.

  55. Posted on the outside of the workshop: by CommieLib · · Score: 3, Funny

    ACHTUNG! ALLES LOOKENSPEEPERS!

    Das unterseeboat ist nicht fuer gefingerpoken und mittengrabben. Ist easy schnappen der springenwerk, blowenfusen und poppencorken mit spitzensparken. Ist nicht fuer gewerken bei das dumpkopfen. Das rubbernecken sichtseeren keepen das cotten-pickenen hans in das pockets muss; relaxen und watchen das blinkenlichten.

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
  56. Periscope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone know a source for a used 45 foot periscope?

  57. Someone must put a stop to this by racerx509 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This must be stopped! The terrorist could build their own sub and with some estes rockets, they could have a water going launching platform for weapons of mass destruction. We must stop this now! Will somebody please think of the unborn baby whales

    --
    13 year old white supremacists are shitty web designers.
    1. Re:Someone must put a stop to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good God, have you bothered to look at all the other comments saying the exact same thing you have? Do you realize how you aren't original in any way - that your bad joke has been thought of by several others?

  58. Glass? by phorm · · Score: 1

    Why would they use glass instead of something like "lexan." Lexan is somewhat of a clear plastic-type material, often used as "bulletproof glass." I've heard that local lumber yards also use them as shields, since a 2-3" piece can stop a speeding log from caving in one's head. Should be able to survive water pressure,etc as well?

    1. Re:Glass? by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1
      Why would they use glass instead of something like "lexan." Lexan is somewhat of a clear plastic-type material, often used as "bulletproof glass." I've heard that local lumber yards also use them as shields, since a 2-3" piece can stop a speeding log from caving in one's head. Should be able to survive water pressure,etc as well?

      Actually, most submarines use Acrylic for the windows. It's normal pretty thick (1 inch and more depending on the depth you are going to). The windows or viewports tend to be the more pricy bits. Acrylic has an interesting property that lexan doesn't. When lexan fails, it just fails, but Acrylic with turn a milky color long (hours) before it fails, give you ample time to get to the surface.

      --
      M0571y H@rml355.
  59. Concrete Subs - the other end of the spectrum! by buffy_fan · · Score: 1
  60. this isnt so crazy. by Suppafly · · Score: 2, Informative

    This isn't so crazy, on the discovery channel or tlc a while back they had a special about a group of people who were recreating one of the early wooden subs that managed to stay submerged for several hours and sink some other ships or something.

    IIRC, the group managed to get the thing built right at the deadline, the were racing against the clock for some reason such as the weather or because of their permit or something like that. And they got all the leaks fixed at the last minute or so, but then they discovered that the amount of carbon dioxide from exhaling quickly poisened the air in the ship for the one guy that was rowing.

  61. Re:No, you just have to worry about nastier things by markom · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Please note that 100 meters is roughly 300 ft or so. These depths were "challenge" even for WWII submersibles, and those beast were after all advanced.

    If I'm not much mistaken, German type VII (the thing that Joe Sixpack associates with u-boat) u-boats were rated up to 90 meters. After that, it wass "off the warranty".

    I would think twice before going below 10 meters (30 ft), for escape could get very tricky, if not impossible.

  62. there is nothing magical here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You talk like building a pressure hull is like levitation. All it really needs is to be air-tight, and strong enough for the pressures involved. Pick strong materials, do proper welds, design a hatch that seals when pushed on from the outside, thats it. No magic here.

  63. Ho to build a submarine: by beef3k · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. Make sure you're one of those people who seem to have just a little _too_ much spare time on your hands.
    2. Call up the bank just to say "Hi" and ask them if there's a few million bucks to spare on your savings account.
    3. Did you write your will yet?
    4. Get "Submarines for Dummies" and the highly acclaimed SAMS "Build your own submarine in 24 hours".
    5. Buy a nice tube and tons of electronics which you may get a need for.
    6. Start building!

    1. Re:Ho to build a submarine: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot:..

      7. ???
      8. Profit!

  64. Most insane person on earth? by beef3k · · Score: 1

    Nick H., webmaster and spokesperson, at the very bottom is according to the text "certainly one of the most insane people on earth".
    They say looks can deceive, but _come on_! :)

  65. i'm doing it the old fashioned way by dougnaka · · Score: 1
    i've been asking for donations for my submarinefund since March 2000. The plan is to sit on my arse until I get a few million from suckers like you and then buy a real sub...
    I wonder if the russians would paint it for me.. or put a big window on the side.. maybe a sliding glass door...

    Please read the first line before you donate, you will NOT get a free ride just because you donated $100,000.

    hey, at least it's not for fake boobs...

    ....although..... nah...

    I run linux on my HP laptop

    --
    My Linux Command of the Day site : LCOD
  66. Re:No, you just have to worry about nastier things by BLAG-blast · · Score: 2, Informative
    Structural failure leading to implosion! Even at just 100 meters depth, you don't get much warning of a hull failure. One buckled plate becomes a total breach in about 1 second.

    That is why all submarines are designed with large safety factors. A submarine with an operational limit of 100 meters will be tested to 300 meter and have calculated crush depth of ~600meters or more.

    Viewports are normally the weakest part of a submarines pressure barrier. But they just burst open, they will turn a milky color, the start to star crack, then after about six hour they will burst. OF course you notice the viewport (window) turning a milky color and return to the surface ASAP.

    --
    M0571y H@rml355.
  67. Re:No, you just have to worry about nastier things by BLAG-blast · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Please note that 100 meters is roughly 300 ft or so. These depths were "challenge" even for WWII submersibles, and those beast were after all advanced.


    Two points here: 1) the diameter of the cylinder dramatically effects the crush depth. 2) They have been vast improvements in steel working, producing steel that is many many many times strong that steel in 1945.


    I would think twice before going below 10 meters (30 ft), for escape could get very tricky, if not impossible.


    Small subs carry bail out gas, if the people in the sub have to leave the vessel they will pressurize the sub so it the same pressure as the outside water, then they can easily open the hatch and return to the surface. Some submarines allow you to do this and go scuba diving (up to a certain depth) then return to the submarine (of course it's flooded so you've gotta have some way of emptying it, either high pressure air or a pump).

    --
    M0571y H@rml355.
  68. Very Suspect! - Have a look (quite funny) ;) by reality-bytes · · Score: 1

    It appears that nauticalniche.com are selling underwater Gulfstream IV aircraft!

    I looked at the interior shots of the integrity60 submarine and thought to myslef "Gosh, this submarine interior looks just like a Gulfstream business jet!" Not to mention the "Exit" sign above the near left window :p

    Here are some more Gulfstream links for comparison :)

    Gulfstream IV
    Gulfstream IVSP

    Notice the location of the interior fittings such as lights/window surrounds.

    Another thing with small-submarines is that as you descend, vast ammounts of condensation form inside the hull as underwater air-conditioners/scrubbers are a little too large for something this size. Wouldn't this make the nice shag-pile carpet a little soggy?

    I wonder if the rest of the sub is for real or just a ruse?

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    1. Re:Very Suspect! - Have a look (quite funny) ;) by Kaz+Riprock · · Score: 1

      If you look at the Integrity's exterior, this would make sense. It looks like a plane cabin with all the sub necessities above and behind it.

      I'd imagine there's no reason not to do this to a plane body to build a sub. The plane is already going to be constructed for high pressure differential and circulating air systems. I guess they've figured out how to handicap the scrubbers/AC to fit the size though...or they recommend you always wear flippers when you walk on your shag underwater. :)

      --
      Mordor...a magical, mythical land where women are more rare than dragons--but where every man would rather find a dragon
    2. Re:Very Suspect! - Have a look (quite funny) ;) by reality-bytes · · Score: 1

      Granted its the same size/shape but what I was actually getting at is that the pictures really are of a Gulfstream interior (I recognised them because I must have cleaned/vacuumed a good 100 to date) :)

      Just a point: Aircraft hulls are designed to resist pressure from within and sub hulls are designed to resist pressure from outside.

      If they really were to start building subs with gulfstream hulls, they may want to remove the emergency escape hatches from the 7-8 bulkhead windows (wouldn't do to have a nervous passenger try to get out).

      --
      Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
  69. Just WHO is wearing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WHO is wearing parachutes in aircraft these days?

    I'm 48, and I know lots of pilots, none of them wear parachutes while flying their aircraft.

    I've never seen the passangers or crew of commercial aircraft wear parachutes.

    And I don't recall any news stories of any non-military pilots ever using a parachute in an emergency.

    So, just who is wearing parachutes in aircraft?

  70. Pressurise to escape?? by reality-bytes · · Score: 1

    "If the people in the sub have to leave the vessel they will pressurize the sub so it the same pressure as the outside water, then they can easily open the hatch and return to the surface."

    The technique for escaping a submarine in an emergency is to flood the compartment you are in so that you can open the hatch and swim out (breathing out to the surface to avoid lung-rupture).

    For safety, submarine hatches (much like ship deck-hatches) are outward openers to avoid accidental flooding (water-pressure holds them shut). Thats why on a military submarine they are so fanatical about torpedo-loading with repeated tube-cock checks etc.
    To pressurize a sub to match water pressure with air would be extremely dangerous if done in a hurry and the air would become poisonous; to breathe under pressure at depth (Deephabs) you have to be slowly pressurised with exotic gases. Note that regular submarines only increase pressure a little when submerged.

    Lets say for the sake of argument that the submarine is pressurised to match outside pressure 1/1 with exotic gases and you and some others open the *bottom* hatch at 200meters to excape....

    Immediately you let go of the sub you find yourself ascending at an incredible rate, gas rushing from your mouth, nose ears and eye sockets and your lungs searing. Finally you arrive at the surface travelling at such a rate that you are thrown several feet in the air. Somehow your lungs/arteries didn't rupture during the ascent but you now die in 20-30seconds from the massive nitrogen boil-off in your veins as you suffer from an incredible case of 'bends'

    No two ways about it, submarines are still extremely dangerous.

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    1. Re:Pressurise to escape?? by BLAG-blast · · Score: 2, Informative
      I agree with most of what you say, but you seem to imply that I am wrong about the bail out h.p. air. In subs you always need more than one way of doing things, and if you are a safe subman, you will have bail out air on your boat.

      Read The American Bureau of Shipping's: Rules for building and classiing underwater vehicles, systems and hyperbaric facilities. OR Busby's Manned Submersibles for more information.

      To pressurize a sub to match water pressure with air would be extremely dangerous if done in a hurry and the air would become poisonous; to breathe under pressure at depth (Deephabs) you have to be slowly pressurised with exotic gases. Note that regular submarines only increase pressure a little when submerged.

      There is no way you are going to beable to open the hatch if the outside pressure is greater than the internal pressure. Flooding the sub is diffinately an option, but depending on the sub, this can take time (most people put large enough bailout valves to do this in a reasonable amount of time), also if you sub is damaged or disabled you might not beable to flood it. Even with the sub flooded, you still want a small bubble of air to work in while you release the hatch (although you can use scuba gear, but the bends might be more of an issue).

      Some psubs allow you to flood them so you can go for a swim and then return.

      Immediately you let go of the sub you find yourself ascending at an incredible rate, gas rushing from your mouth, nose ears and eye sockets and your lungs searing. Finally you arrive at the surface travelling at such a rate that you are thrown several feet in the air. Somehow your lungs/arteries didn't rupture during the ascent but you now die in 20-30seconds from the massive nitrogen boil-off in your veins as you suffer from an incredible case of 'bends'

      Yell all the way up. The bends won't normally be a problem since you are not spending enough time under pressure to become saturated (of course, if you had to spend a lot of time trapped in you sub while under pressure this would be an issue).

      No two ways about it, submarines are still extremely dangerous.

      Hehe, agreed, but everything is dangerous if you are stupid enough.

      --
      M0571y H@rml355.
  71. Re:No, you just have to worry about nastier things by The_K4 · · Score: 1

    They also have a process where the pressuruise the WHOLE sub (or sections of it) then open a hatch on the bottom. Since the pressure is the same and the air won't go down, the water won't flood in. I know movies are usually "bad science' but they used something like this in "The Abyss" and "Deep Blue Sea". It's also done in real life.

  72. they have to be careful, but it's good to do. by Erris · · Score: 1
    Where are these guys getting their stuff, the hardware store down the street? Enough said. Would I even think of going down in one of these boats? No...not ever.

    Good parts are nice to have. When you can't afford them, it IS possible to inspect and prove the parts yourself and make them redundant. The lessons you cite are useful to anyone that wants to look. One of those lessons might be that procedures and regulations are no substitute for free enterprise and competition. If that were true, there would have been no Soviet accidents, but it's not and their service was more dangerous than ours.

    It bothers me to see Americans with a "no can do" attitude. This country was founded by people who needed little more than an axe and a rifle. Taken to it's extreem, this attitude would lead to stringent requirements for everything that only one or two companies could meet. The result would look more like the former Soviet Union than the USA.

    People out there building their own submarines and other stuff for themselves are the people that make this country work. They consider the problem and build experience to solve other problems that come up. We should be ashamed an worried when these nuts quit what they do.

    Do you drive to work? It might just kill you.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  73. I built one when I was a kid... by karlandtanya · · Score: 1
    It had a viewing port in the side and everything.

    'Course it was only big enough to carry one passenger.

    I don't think the hamster even bothered to look out.

    And, yes, he was nice and dry when the sub resurfaced. Probably didn't even notice what was going on. He did poop in it, though.

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  74. Buy Me A Submarine! by EverStoned · · Score: 1

    Have a lovely song and animation about submarines, and how you should buy me one.

  75. Yeah, but... by ColGraff · · Score: 1

    I get the impression that with submarines, the closer you can get to one big hunk of metal for your hull, the better.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  76. Re:No, you just have to worry about nastier things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But if you practice in a lake that's only 30' deep, and you have an openable hatch...

  77. So THAT'S why I went to military camp by SoVi3t · · Score: 1

    I guess all those movies they showed me on semaphore will finally come in handy! And to think, I never thought I would be able to start a war :P

    --
    Defender of Microsoft and Communism!!!
  78. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    I do hate sums. There is no greater mistake than to call arithmetic an
    exact science. There are permutations and aberrations discernible to minds
    entirely noble like mine; subtle variations which ordinary accountants fail
    to discover; hidden laws of number which it requires a mind like mine to
    perceive. For instance, if you add a sum from the bottom up, and then again
    from the top down, the result is always different.
    -- Mrs. La Touche

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...