Slashdot Mirror


Venezuela Falling Behind

Christopher Frank writes "Seems Venezuela's lack of power has finally caught up with them! MSNBC has the story: 'If you thought Venezuela's political crisis seemed to be dragging for an impossibly long time -- you were right. In a bizarre mass-malfunction, Venezuela's clocks are ticking too slowly due to a power shortage weakening the electric current nationwide. By the end of each day, the sluggish time pieces still have another 150 seconds to tick before they catch up to midnight.'"

332 comments

  1. It's so dreamy by xombo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Oh fantasy free me! And nothing can ever be the same. With the vis of a mind flip. You're into the time slip!!!! LETS DO THE TIME WARP AGAIN! -Rocky Horror Picture Show

  2. Fountain of youth? by coday · · Score: 0, Funny

    Well at least you can technically put off getting older.

  3. I know far less than I should. by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 1, Interesting
    I am an ignorant American. Can someone tell me the gist of the whole deal down there? There's an eerie silence in the American media, but this story seems huge! A coup? Tacit American approval? A general strike in one of the world's biggest oil exporters?

    Can someone please point me to a good synopsis of the last year in the country?

    --

    Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    1. Re:I know far less than I should. by tha_mink · · Score: 4, Funny

      1) Have 90% of your economy in one industry. 2) When you don't like the present administration...go on strike. 3) ??? 4) Profit!

      --
      You'll have that sometimes...
    2. Re:I know far less than I should. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The leader of the country, Cesar Chavez I believe, wants to turn the country into another Cuba. He is really communist and was elected to a six year term by 80% of the population.

      The economy collapsed and now the business, political elite, Army, Navy, and Unions want him gone.

      He was couped against for two days last year and he was put back into power by his allies. But they can't get rid of him till August, so they are holding a national strike every couple of months to get rid of him with varying success.

      It's the main reason gasoline is so expensive and oil is now $40 a barrel, not Iraq. It accounts for %15 of our supply.

      It's not cocaine to the lower posters, that is columbia. Chavez does host some of the rebels, supposedly, but he doesn't really care one way or the other.

    3. Re:I know far less than I should. by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you think the American media has been silent, then you need to listen a little closer.

      Do a 90 day search for Venezuela crisis in New York Times and you get 1102 hits.

      It's mentioned in almost every financial article there is about the price of oil and oil production.

      Typing "Venezuela crisis" in Google news brings up recent articles in...
      Washington Times
      Boston Globe
      Austin American Statesman
      Miami Herald
      South Bend Tribune
      Forbes
      Troy Daily News
      BusinessWeek
      Daily Oklahoman
      Corpus Christi Caller Times

      They mention it here in Portland on the local news everytime they do a piece about the rising gas prices.

      If you have missed the coverage, it's not because the US media is ignoring it.

    4. Re:I know far less than I should. by blurfus · · Score: 3, Informative
      You can do some good reading:
      • here [counterspin.tv] (You will recognize the format)
      • here [yahoo groups] (In Spanish with articles in English)
      • here [yahoo groups](In Spanish and English)

      Unfortunately, I can't seem to find (quickly) my links to the forums or best analysis I have read about the situation there

      Maybe tomorrow I will send you more links (this should keep you busy for a litte bit anyway) ;o)

      --
      will work for Karma
    5. Re:I know far less than I should. by gmajor · · Score: 5, Informative

      Cesar Chavez was a Mexican union activist in the 1960's. Hugo Chavez is the man you want, a man who attempted his own coup in 1992. When that didn't work, he ran for el Presidente. And won.

      About 70% of the population is in poverty, the base from which Chavez draws his support. The middle class (and upper class) seemingly hate him, which is why his communist ideas resonate with most poverty-stricken Venezuelans.

    6. Re: I know far less than I should. by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Funny


      > Daily Oklahoman

      As an ignorant Venezuelan I have to ask... where the hell is Oklahoma?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    7. Re:I know far less than I should. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I knew I had his first name wrong but I didn't know why. Thanks for pointing that out.

      Unfortunatly for Hugo, he only has a %30 approval rating, that means at least half of the lower class hates his guts. It's rare in any country for Unions and businesses to agree on anything, so when they do, you know something's wrong!

    8. Re: I know far less than I should. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The middle of purgatory.

    9. Re:I know far less than I should. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://biz.yahoo.com/ifc/ve/ seems interestng

    10. Re:I know far less than I should. by blurfus · · Score: 3, Informative
      Not to be nitpicky but
      was elected to a six year term by 80% of the population.
      should read
      was elected to a six year term by 80% of the votes.
      Take into account that only 40% of the voting population actually casted ballots and you realize that apathy actually got him the chair.
      [ I am not sure about the numbers (80% or 40%) but it's roughly within the ball-park figures ]
      --
      will work for Karma
    11. Re:I know far less than I should. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 4, Informative
      Before oil was discovered, Venezuela had a thriving middle class, the second highest standard of living in South America, and a fairly even distribution of wealth. After oil was discovered, and the economy taken over by foreign oil interests, 80 percent of its population fell into poverty, which is why Chavez keeps getting elected: he is the first leader since the oil boom who has improved the standard of living for the majority of people living there, expanding the public health infrastructure, starting housing projects, and engaging in land reform. He's been "undemocratic" as far as the sector of the population that has been benefitting from the oil boom is concerned, but even many of them realize that they are reaping what they have sown.

      Consider an economic model of massively concentrated wealth based on control of a single natural resource, and the distorting effects on markets of land, labor, and goods created by a small cash-rich sector, and you'll understand what happened. More or less a classic race-to-the-bottom scenario.

    12. Re:I know far less than I should. by blurfus · · Score: 4, Informative
      I am sorry but I am going to have to call this statement:
      he is the first leader since the oil boom who has improved the standard of living for the majority of people living there, expanding the public health infrastructure, starting housing projects, and engaging in land reform.
      complete bullshit!!!

      I do not where you get your information but I get it straight from the horse's mouth as my family lives there.

      I lived there for 20 years and, as I said, my family still lives there. We have never been well-to-do. If anything, we have always been very-low-middle class (because I could not consider myself poor when I had food on my table -sometimes just two meals a day- and a roof on my head).

      My family's situation has not improved! Nobody's standard of living has improved. THEY ARE ONLY GETTING WORSE

      When you lose any ability to educate yourself, freedom of expression, your job, social security, inflation and unemployment doubles and the right to use your own money (albeit in foreign currency, but still yours);
      how can your claims be believed or even substantiated?

      Please educate yourself in the matter before you make such *outrageous claims*

      P.S. Let me know if you need actual examples of how things are getting worse over there (In fact the article that started the threat is one of many)
      --
      will work for Karma
    13. Re:I know far less than I should. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 4, Insightful
      As you know, Venezuela's overall standard of living has been on steady decline since the mid-80's. That decline has continued under Chavez in toto, but he has spread the consequences of that decline upstream. If your family got hit that bad, though, then it may be because it's higher up the slope than you thought it was (did you go to college? Then you aren't in that 80% which was under the poverty line.) I wouldn't say that Venezuela is in better shape overall than it used to be, just that the misery is being spread around a bit. What is needed is an end to "curse of oil," with the effects that it has on currency in international markets, how it discourages other industries from developing, and is too easy to simply be taken out of country without leaving much behind.

      My family is Peruvian, so I know plenty about hyperinflation and unemployment and what it's like: and how it hits the middle class. Peru has the same problem: a history of reliance on the export of raw materials for its economic backbone, and the consequent failure to create a strong, broad economic foundation in other sectors.

    14. Re: I know far less than I should. by richie2000 · · Score: 4, Funny
      where the hell is Oklahoma?

      I don't know where it is right now, but it used to be on Broadway. *badda-bing*

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    15. Re:I know far less than I should. by ravydavygravy · · Score: 2, Informative



      There was a really good documentary about the 48-hour Coup on Irish TV the other night. These two film makers basically got caught up in the coup against Chavez and so we saw the whole thing play out from inside Chavezs place. I unfortunatly only caught part of it, but heres the jist of it (as told by people who actually saw it :)

      Chavez wanted (wants) to share the money generated by the countries oil reserves with all the nations people, not just the few rich oil barons (as was (is) the situation). In order to prevent this from happening, the rich people bought the support of the armed forces and private national TV stations to convince the people that Chavez was the bad guy. They even tried to insinuate that he had a sexual fixation with Fidel Castro :)

      With 7 of the 8 national stations broadcasting anti-chavez propaganda, the coup started (with the unofficial support of the US Government might i add!). Chavez used the one remaining government station to try and tell the people what was happening.

      Unfortunatly, I didn't hear how it ended :-( If anyone saw the end, I'd love to hear how it played out...

      A quick search on Google reveals that the same show will premiere in the states in March - find a description here

    16. Re:I know far less than I should. by dr.tek · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can find an excellent article here. Although there has actually been a fair amount of coverage in the media, it doesn't stay in the news long, and most of it does not cover what I would think would be the most important issue to Americans, which is the possible American involvement in the April 11, 2002 coup, and the continual "tacit approval" by both the Bush adminstration and a lot of Western media of the current _management_ led strike and the opposition politics it represents. If you try Googling for information, most of the articles seem to accuse Chavez of mismanaging the economy. I don't know enough about his policies to say anything, but the country has been in steady decline for 20 years, and the seemingly constant political turmoil is probably a big part of that. He certainly is not a communist, marxist, or even a socialist. The economy is very much capitalist, and very much a democracy. In fact, his reaction to these protests seems a lot more measured than what it would be in the US.

      Actually, it so happens one of my good friends emigrated from Venezulea in the early 90s. He's pretty proud of his heritage, and a strong supporter of Chavez. Anecdotal evidence might not be scientific, but it still does a lot for me.

    17. Re:I know far less than I should. by Timmeh · · Score: 1

      I've been listening, and I do read Google news enough to know more or less the situation in Venezuela, but seriously, the majority of times this is covered on "mainstream" news sources (11 o'clock/10 o'clock local news, CBS/NBC/ABC national news, what have you) it is in relation to oil prices. "Oil prices have been up, because of Venezuelan strike, blah, blah, blah." So yeah, I can see how if you have a limited source of news (only TV, usually only local) (as the majority of USians do), then you probably have very limited knowledge of the crisis in Venezuela

    18. Re:I know far less than I should. by Afty0r · · Score: 1

      The economy collapsed and now the business, political elite ... Unions want him gone.

      If a president attracts the hatred of the top businessmen, political rivals and union (leaders! important distinction) then he must be doing something right for the people.

    19. Re:I know far less than I should. by Dusabre · · Score: 1

      Improved the standard of living?

      Expanded the health infrastructure?

      Started housing projects?

      Engaged in land reform?

      ROFTL

      And in other news from Moscow Soviet Radio, illustrious leader Mugabe has cured the Zimbabwe economy, brought food to the starving, improved health standards and engaged in land reform.

      Most of the citizens of these poor countries want these two jackasses out.

    20. Re:I know far less than I should. by Dusabre · · Score: 1

      Iraq and Venezuela combined are the reason oil prices have risen. The markets are expecting Iraq to stop production and oilfields around Iraq to be affected by war AND Venezuelan production has been devastated. Either could have been compensated for by increased production in other countries but both is just too much.

      Don't fall into the trap of thinking that gasoline is expensive in the US because a major US supplier is affected. Oil prices aggregrate out around the world. If a normal US supplier can't supply oil to the US, then another will step in to take his place, oil is a commodity that trades pretty freely.

    21. Re:I know far less than I should. by L0k11 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Take into account that only 40% of the voting population actually casted ballots and you realize that apathy actually got him the chair.
      That sounds very similar to what happened with the Republicans last election :P
      --
      "Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything" -- Josef Stalin
    22. Re:I know far less than I should. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's not cocaine to the lower posters, that is columbia.


      FYI, it Colombia, not Columbia. And if you think Colombia is only about drugs and violence, then your subject of "I know far less than I should" applies here as well. The "Co" in Colombia does NOT stand for cocaine.
    23. Re:I know far less than I should. by Johnny5000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Take into account that only 40% of the voting population actually casted ballots and you realize that apathy actually got him the chair. "

      Now where have I seen a similar situation, maybe somewhere closer to home?

      --
      The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
    24. Re:I know far less than I should. by f0dder · · Score: 1

      All the liberals got cute and split the vote between gore and nader... BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Too bad.. i dislike bush, i dont think of him as a smart guy. but for some odd reason.. i am with him on taking out Saddam and his policy on the Middle East. I don't understand how people can support a totalitarian regime that's expected to get billions of dollars a year that is hell bent on developing WMD. Totalitarian regime by definition don't dissapear on there own. Look at Cuba, North Korea & Iran. It's sad that as evil as everyone make US to be. The Middle east immigrants here don't want to be deported back home. That kind of says something about the Middle east. In a perverse way I think Bush is gonna try to give Afganistan and possibly Iraq the same chance that we did to Japan and Germany. Hell they are now our biggest trading partners and both countries have unprecedented conditions of living (if you ignore the current recession :) It's up to the people we "regime change" to take that opportunity. Sadly it'll be some crazy mullah calling for his jihad that sets everyone in Afganistan and Iraq back to the dark ages. It's all part of Bush's faith based foreign policy. Thank God for the US constitution and separation of church and state.

    25. Re:I know far less than I should. by wahay · · Score: 1

      it hasn't ended yet....but you can read the news on narconews.com looks like the Bush people are getting routed and chavez is going to maintain power.

    26. Re:I know far less than I should. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, There are no bush people in Venezuela, you must be thinking of Africa.

    27. Re:I know far less than I should. by csguy314 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He's been "undemocratic" as far as the sector of the population that has been benefitting from the oil boom is concerned, but even many of them realize that they are reaping what they have sown.

      What's more, the US gov't praised his overthrow for a day, only to be embarassed by his return. What kind of gov't praises the overthrow of a democratically elected leader?

      Same gov't that overthrew Chile's Allende, Iraq's Kassem, Iran's Mossadegh...

      Oh...

      --
      This is left as an exercise for the reader.
    28. Re:I know far less than I should. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Peru has the same problem: a history of reliance on the export of raw materials for its economic backbone, and the consequent failure to create a strong, broad economic foundation in other sectors.

      I am an ignorant American but it seems to me that a better cure would be to place steep taxes on the oil industry, and use the proceeds to fund alternative economic development (realistically, factories).

      Whereas the current program has been characterized to me as something more akin to gradual nationalization of the oil industry. Maybe Chavez was forced into this by the strike, but it is not a good development regardless.

    29. Re:I know far less than I should. by vsync64 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      As you know, Venezuela's overall standard of living has been on steady decline since the mid-80's. That decline has continued under Chavez in toto, but he has spread the consequences of that decline upstream. If your family got hit that bad, though, then it may be because it's higher up the slope than you thought it was (did you go to college? Then you aren't in that 80% which was under the poverty line.)

      Wow, you manage to blend begging the question and an ad hominem attack into a single cruel classist insult.

      1. Hugo Chavez is a great leader.
      2. The only people being hurt by his policies are the rich, who deserve it.
      3. Your family is being hurt, therefore your family is rich.
      4. Your family deserves what Hugo Chavez does to them, proving that Hugo Chavez is a great leader.
      I don't know enough about the Venezuela situation to be any kind of an expert on it, but my inclination is to be mistrustful of Chavez, simply because the only people defending him are whining leftists. "It's okay, the only ones who don't like him are rich people."

      And has anyone noticed that if poor people ("poor" like those $100K/yr longshoremen) go on strike, it means they're striking a blow for freedom against the vile oppressors, but if rich people go on sttrike, it means they are the vile oppressors?

      --
      TO BUY A NEW CAR WOULD MAKE YOU SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE.
    30. Re:I know far less than I should. by slavetrade55 · · Score: 2, Informative

      So it was the business people who started rewriting the constitution, enacted 40 economic 'decrees' to basically put economic control entirely into Chavez's hot little hands, subsequently sending inflation up to ~30% and unemployment up passed 20%, and it's them who are building their own extra-legal army just in case the real one turns on him (you say they bribed the military--it looks like they did a bad job)?

      And I suppose they have a Hugo Chavez body double who they can put on camera saying "Saddam Hussein is a brother". Yep.

      Hurray for populist socialism!

      --RMT

    31. Re:I know far less than I should. by L0k11 · · Score: 1
      Hey I wasn't trying to start a debate on Iraq... or liberals or American politics (much). I just found it interesting that blurfus blames 'apathy' (ie the poor votor turnout) for Hugo gaining power in Venezuela and that these so called 'Liberals' blamed apathy for the Republicans winning control of congress in the last US elections.

      Sure I may have been trying to imply some sort of irony or something... shhhhh

      Another interesting fact (this is mostly for f0dder) is that in Australia the Liberal party is conservative (And more like Republicans). I actually voted for them last elections (voting is compulsary for everyone over the age of 18) but I dont think I will again. Our prime minister seems a little too eager to follow Bush into a war with Iraq without UN support... And he hasn't really convinced Australia as to whether or not we should. It doesn't seem like you guys would care much if we sent over one of our SAS regiments... I think it just makes our prime minister feel better that he is contributing and he can be one of dubyas mates...

      I find your theory on faith based foreign policy interesting. Do you think Bush is ignoring Korea (which has declared it is developing nukes) in preference to bombing the f*ck out of Iraqi children (when inspectors have been there for months and not found any solid evidence of an active weapons program) because Iraq is kind of religious compared to communist Korea?

      --
      "Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything" -- Josef Stalin
    32. Re:I know far less than I should. by Adelvillar · · Score: 1

      "he is the first leader since the oil boom who has improved the standard of living for the majority of people living there, expanding the public health infrastructure, starting housing projects, and engaging in land reform."

      Being a Venezuela currently living in Venezuela I must say that you are so full of crap that you better start reading or shut up.

      Economy is at its biggest recession ever with a GDP that is -9% of the previous. Unemployment is at 75%, crime 35% higher than 2002. Inflation 35% for 2002 and an estimated 65% for this year.

      The Attorney General is a close friend of him and is also his former Vice-president, so you can forget about fair justice. And a vast amount of judges where removed and replaced using members of his political party. Supreme court was "elected" by a congress that used all sort of tricks to get 19 out of 20 from Chavez party.

      Whit this scenario none of the 14 law suits resting in the Supreme Court are going to end up anywhere.

      The economic outlook is more devastating as 35 billion US$ has left the country during his government due to his chronic incapability and his choosing of military people with questionably background to head high profile offices.

      Corruption is at an all time high and good portion of the military are receiving money for "development plans" that they are not accountable for. So you end up with Generals buying 4 million US$ houses and 150 thousand US$ Mercedes.

      Health is not even worth mentioning.

      Urban militias have been armed and trained by Colombia's Guerrilla forces with support from the government and that is how you get the embassy bombings.

      The only good thing that they are trying but is doomed to failure due to incompetence is that they are planning to host all government systems on Linux.

      So my advice read and then talk about a topic.

      --
      "In God we trust, all others must bring data" - W. Edwards Deming
    33. Re:I know far less than I should. by invenustus · · Score: 1

      Grandparent: That sounds very similar to what happened with the Republicans last election :P

      Parent: All the liberals got cute and split the vote between gore and nader... BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      For what office were Gore and Nader running in the last election?

      --
      grep -ri 'should work' /usr/src/linux | wc -l
    34. Re:I know far less than I should. by PicoTera · · Score: 1

      test

      --
      Carbon Unit # 149-34-xxxx
    35. Re:I know far less than I should. by Ikoma+Andy · · Score: 1

      Actually, the army *wanted* him gone with the coup attempt in 2002 after Chavez's supporters opened fire on anti-Chavez protestors. He was removed from power, which the US governement applauded because he is a right bastard. However, after a day or two, elements in the army restored him to power. At which point, he spent the next year purging the military of those he felt were disloyal to him. He's disarming opposition police forces. Now he's rounding up and murdering political enemies, truck bombing countries who criticize him, and cozying up to other dictators.

      Plenty of damning evidence against Chavez, these links are just the first I found while searching.

    36. Re:I know far less than I should. by PicoTera · · Score: 1

      While there may appear to be may sources reporting, check the byline and you will often find that most are just rehashing the AP or Reuters feed. There is very little independent international journalism, even on "national" newspapers.

      --
      Carbon Unit # 149-34-xxxx
    37. Re:I know far less than I should. by Dusabre · · Score: 1

      Very measured responses...

      He sent the army to take over the police despite the Supreme Court ordering him not to do so.

      He sent commando teams to take over oil-carriers.

      He organised mass rallies with bullying and bribing to counter the mass-rallies his opponents (most of the country) were organising.

      Show me an example of such behaviour by a US President in the US since the Whiskey Wars.

      He is a populist crackpot with ideas that Castro, Mugabe and the rest of the "I'm a Big Man" idiots would hold in high esteem. He has completely destroyed his country's economy during his short undemocratic reign. He may be elected but most of the country wants him out.

    38. Re:I know far less than I should. by Ikoma+Andy · · Score: 1

      I think you're largely correct, other than I don't think markets are worried about Iraq stopping production. Iraq currently provides so little of the world's oil (about 2%) that it could stop all production and oil prices would hardly bat an eye. I think markets are more worried about worst case scenarios regarding the looming war, largely that it could devolve into a regional conflict, stopping production in other countries, or that the Arabs could try to use oil as a weapon again.

    39. Re:I know far less than I should. by joshsisk · · Score: 1

      And has anyone noticed that if poor people ("poor" like those $100K/yr longshoremen)

      To be fair, the longshoremen (at least the ones I heard about) weren't going on strike just because they wanted to get paid more, they wanted to go back to their normal volume and reduce workplace danger- I remeber hearing figures being bandied about in the news like workplace fatalaties were up by 300% since they had started having to do a higher volume than in previous years. Managers were encouraging the workers to skip over certain procedures and rushing them, and this was causing some danger as well...

    40. Re:I know far less than I should. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, im in venezuela, and i am a every day slashdot reader...

      The situation in venezueal its critical, the goverment got more than 80% off the population against him.. how do i know... you may ask, and i am going to tell you, a month ago, WE the Venezuelan People without international intervention recolected more than 4millions of Firms of people who vote!, to ask chavez for his resignation, another 4millions asking for elections NOW and so on, we sing 11 diferents petitions, But for chavez this is a manipulation of the "Terrorist opossition"".

      You will have to be here to see the things clerer, what chavez call Terrorist Oposition, its really pacifist people, with venezuelan flags and Beautifull womens (as allways has been; i love this country!!! ;)

      And what chavez call "el Pueblo" "The people" or ther followers, just this morning tried to robe a Brinks Money Car (excuse i forgot that word), and got automatic weapons!

    41. Re:I know far less than I should. by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Replace the words rich people in your post by the words the upper less than 20 percent who have for the past 25 years lived off the rest of the populations well-being and suddenly it makes sense why some people conclude in your point number one.

      Me, I don't know. I don't know enough about the situation to have an own opinion on it. But you certainly put words into Lemmy Caution's mouth that didn't belong their quite that way.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    42. Re:I know far less than I should. by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      First of all, it's Hugo Chavez, second, the military forces are neutral (if they were against him he would be gone)

    43. Re:I know far less than I should. by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      "The leader of the country, Cesar Chavez I believe, wants to turn the country into another Cuba."

      Make sense. Because Cuba has so much going for it right now.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    44. Re:I know far less than I should. by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      Except that now there are more people in poverty than before, nearly 20% of the population is in unemployement and 60% on informal economy , and the dollar->bolivar exchange rate has tripled

    45. Re:I know far less than I should. by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      You don't have to be rich to go to college here. In fact, public colleges are better than the private ones (in academic terms) and they cost 0.75$ each semester

    46. Re:I know far less than I should. by Espectr0 · · Score: 1

      Venezuela has about 11 million people eligible to vote.

      Both of the times Chavez has won, he won with 3.7 millon votes.

      Of those 11 million, 5 didn't vote

      About 2.3 million votes remaining went to the opposition.

      Now, we have about 4.4 million votes that want an amendment to the constitution, shorting his term from 6 years to 4. But there is currently no electoral power to take this into measure.

      We also have 4 million votes to void his presidency, but it must be after half his period (this august)

    47. Re:I know far less than I should. by revbob · · Score: 1
      Cesar Chavez was a Mexican union activist in the 1960's.

      My son speaks at several educational technology conferences every year, and one of his current presentations mentions Cesar Chavez and the farm workers in some context. He decided to illustrate that point with a picture of former welterweight champion Julio Cesar Chavez, just to see how long it would take the educators in his audience to point out the error.

      Afaik, he's still waiting.

    48. Re:I know far less than I should. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1
      I don't think Hugo Chavez is a great leader. I don't think he has an effective economic policy, I think he's exploiting a bad situation in a way that will make it worse in the long run.

      I do think that the situation was the making of the oil interests that's been running the country for much of the past 81 years that concentrated the wealth so deeply in the hands of a few, I think that Chavez's demagoguery is the results of decades of indifference to their well-being, I know that Chavez has managed to maintain support by making improvements in the society that benefit that base of support after years of neglect by previous administrations (in, unfortunately, an unsustainable way.) And even the wealthy, whose interests Chavez is really attacking

      As far as the ad hominem you're citing, I just don't see it. The parent poster was citing his own family's situation in reference to the observations I was making. Since those observations were relevant to different strata of society, I was observing that he may not have been in the strata I was talking about. The poverty situation in Venezuela is such that, in 2001, 67% were what has been described as "extreme poverty" (according to the data of the Economic Research Department of the Bank of Venezuela) - without adequate income to pay for basic food needs. 85% of the population is beneath the general poverty line, with the difference between those two accounting for those who have only enough income to pay for food. It doesn't take a lot for them to feel that they've been recieving more services than before.

      The middle class, which is neither in that 80+% nor necessarily the "rich" don't deserve what's going on, either: obviously, it's going to be that class that would stabilize and expand any growth. And at this point, even the middle class is going to feel pretty poor in comparison to how things were before. The original poster probably accurately describes himself as lower middle class in origins, which would put him a skosh above the poverty line - which puts him above 80% of the population. Nothing ad-hominem about it.

    49. Re:I know far less than I should. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1
      Obviously, that's the first temptation: to take that oil money and move it around to something productive. But the oil industry in Venezuela is already state-owned. While it is owned by the Venezuela state, it is managed more or less by the oil services industry, largely foreign, and the collusion of their interests with those of the managers of the state oil company have created much of the situation there. Leading to exactly what you would expect: a bureaucracy whose interests become parasitically attached to those of the oil economies, and a huge cash cow for corrupt leaders to skim off of. What Chavez is doing is little better: he's had a pretty effective anti-corruption campaign, but he's just taking the treasury and wasting it on often ineffective and unsustainable programs which do marginally improve the standards of living of the bulk in poverty, but don't create jobs or build the economy in any way (more or less hand-outs, but in a public works sense.)

      What might have worked best? Perhaps breaking apart the oil industry and selling oil rights only to businesses run by Venezuelan nationals; perhaps a program of microloans to seed small and medium-sized business development. It's obvious that there's no easy and straightforward answer.

    50. Re:I know far less than I should. by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1

      and Clinton in 92 (in which he got a minority if the minority), in in 96 when he got just 50% of the minority. Dont talk like it does not cut both ways..

      --
    51. Re:I know far less than I should. by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1

      to most americans only pres elction years count, and most vote a party line...

      --
    52. Re:I know far less than I should. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1
      You know, I agree with pretty much all of the things you say. Except that it doesn't contradict what I said: for the poorest sector of Venezuelan society, which is the majority of the country, Chavez was able to win their support by building public works (housing projects, neighborhood clinics) which improved the quality of life for them. Land reform is a reality: it also is a short-term fix that often makes things worse, as the beneficiaries of the land have little idea how to make it productive. It's also true that this is unsustainable, that the economy is collapsing, that ultimately he relies of demogoguery to maintain his political power. And that the ranks of the poor are growing.

      As far as corruption goes, though, that's absolutely nothing new to that, and the justice system in Venezuela used to be worse. Chavez bought off some generals because he knows they could unseat him, too.

    53. Re:I know far less than I should. by blurfus · · Score: 1

      It's not just that my family got hit bad by the changes. (They are are worse than before, that's for sure)
      It's not that they are higher up the slope than I think (Yes, I did go to University, it's free!!!)

      Define "your" poverty line and I will tell you if that makes my family fitting of that category; They are definitely not in the 20% percent of the "higher economic class" that's for sure. So by definition, that puts them in the remaining 80%.(and I am not trying to sound pessimistic)

      If you believe that by spreading around the misery you are going to solve any problems, then I guess you have the rights to your own opinions but, with all due respect, I will again strongly disagree.

      The problems are not solved by turning poor against rich, encouraging hate, and even racism (if you are of a fairer skin tone, you must be rich and you must be pestered, assaulted, even killed!!!) which is what he is doing. He is promoting hate as means to gain popularity.

      What you call the "curse of oil" is what helped making free education (including post-secondary) and healthcare possible albeit not perfect. Oil brought in additional money and investors that was to be used to "grow" the country in all areas. Guess where the money went. The real problem there (and in many other countries) is corruption. It's that simple.

      Chavez was supposed to eradicate corruption from the government and this is the main reason people trusted him (they were tired of the previous -and highly corrupt- "democratic" presidents). It turns out that his office is the most corrupt yet.

      On top of this, his office has violated the most human rights in a presidential term since the toppled dictatorship in '58. His office has also had the benefits of higher Oil prices (compared to the '80s and '90s) and yet there is very little done with the extra incoming revenue.

      Sure, he built a school here and fixed a road there (whooptee-doo!!!)

      --
      will work for Karma
    54. Re:I know far less than I should. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, I think we should put Ralph Nader and Harry Brown in Office, CO-Presidente style.
      As foor the cabinet, Im still trying to work out the details, but I think ressurecting the dead may just be the answer.

    55. Re:I know far less than I should. by DroppedPacket · · Score: 1
      bombing the f*ck out of Iraqi children (when inspectors have been there for months and not found any solid evidence of an active weapons program)

      TWEET! L0k11, out of the gene pool for excessive stupidity.

      You may not have heard about a bunch of missles which are Iraq has illegally. They were found by the "weapons inspectors." Saddam denied they existed. But he might just destroy them he said today. But they don't really exist.

      You really are stupid... (oh, and you might have also missed hearing about chemical warhead shells that were found that didn't exist, too.)

      Please note: This is not an ad hominum attack. It is a statement of fact.

      --
      I am not a resource! I am a free man!
    56. Re:I know far less than I should. by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

      However, the Saudis have promised to boost their oil production to make up for the loss of Iraqi oil. On the other hand, Islamic leaders have suggested using oil to dissuade the US from attacking Iraq.

    57. Re:I know far less than I should. by earache30 · · Score: 1

      this is the best article that i read about venezuela - my in-laws are living there - its a disaster whats going on there: http://www.heritage.org/Research/LatinAmerica/bg16 23.cfm

    58. Re:I know far less than I should. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, hello? That constitution was voted on by the people. It came out of a years-long, broad-based process. And practically everyone in the country has a copy and debates the implications and talk about their new rights and stuff. This is better than I can say as a Canadian for our constitution--how about you?
      Meanwhile, my goodness--the man enacts economic decrees! Oh dear! Can't have governments passing legislation relating to economic issues! There's a parliament dude. You know, elected representatives? They vote on all that stuff. It isn't by fiat of the big man. Now, I don't know the content of those decrees except for some stuff about land reform and closing tax loopholes, but I don't think you do either. Describe me a specific 'economic decree' that puts power into Chavez' hands and I might start to buy it.
      But since the 'extra-legal army' stuff is pure fiction, I suspect you can give no such description. But I will say this--the opposition did do a bad job. These guys have money, they have corruption, they have ruthlessness, in a small way they even have American help--but competence they don't seem to have big doses of.
      Lucky for democracy in Venezuela.

      Rufus Polson

    59. Re:I know far less than I should. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "On top of this, his office has violated the most human rights in a presidential term since the toppled dictatorship in '58."

      Sorry, I don't care where you live, I just have to call you on that. This is utter nonsense and threatens to destroy your credibility on everything else you say. The media's been broadcasting calls for his overthrow for more than a year and he's just now responding by *taking them to court*. Various opposition leaders who have been calling for his violent overthrow for about the same amount of time are still walking around; *one* has been arrested and charged with crimes. Where is this man? Has he been disappeared? No, he's under house arrest. Scary stuff. Various generals involved in the coup against him were (dum da dum dum!) forced to retire! Oh, the humanity! And there's been the occasional bit of pushing and shoving at demonstrations, some by pro-Chavez military, some by anti-Chavez police, none nearly as nasty as what went on at the WTO protests in Quebec City. Actual killings, though, almost all seem to have been done by the opposition or the Caracas anti-Chavez cops.
      Sheesh. Here in Canada we had one or two little kidnappings and a letter bomb or two and the prime minister invoked the war measures act and sent in the troops. There's no way we'd put up with the kind of crap Chavez has put up with. And the US would be worse. Can anyone here imagine George W. Bush, or Al Gore, or one of the Clintons, letting TV stations run ads calling for the overthrow of the government? Everyone involved and thousands more vaguely suspected of involvement would be in jail without trial or lawyer right now.
      Compared to the often quite nasty governments that have gone before even up to quite recently, Cavez is a beacon of human-rights light. Heck, by some measures he's a beacon of human-rights light compared to the United States of America, or even Canada.

      Rufus Polson

    60. Re:I know far less than I should. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the fact is that those missiles were in the 12,000 page declaration. They were not "found by the weapons inspectors", they were declared. The Iraqis don't think they're illegal, but they told all about them and handed over the specs. On looking at those specs, the inspectors concluded they had 20 or 30 klicks too much range.
      Incidentally, if you believe *anything* the mainstream American media says about Iraq, you are what's known as a "dupe". Not only do they misrepresent and slant, they outright lie--and they tell lies that contradict the lies they told a few months ago. The politicians do the same, except the self-contradictions tend to go in terms of days. And they never seem to get called on these inconsistencies. It's a circus--the only thing I find myself wondering is who out there is gullible enough to believe any of it any more.

      Rufus Polson

    61. Re:I know far less than I should. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The amount of ignorance being displayed here by you people is apalling. I will say this with the utmost honesty: please, please don't even attempt to share your uneducated thoughts on this until you actually inform yourself of what is happening in Venezuela.
      Anyone who thinks Chavez is anything but a self-delusional, thieving, megalomaniacal "El Dictador" wanna-be who dreams of being Fidel Castro with oil, is simple completely ignorant of the issues at hand, a complete idiot, or a combination of both.

      Alternatively, if you at any time in your life have worn a tshir

    62. Re:I know far less than I should. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Chavez's supporters opened fire on anti-Chavez protestors"

      This is one of those 'big lies'. The mainstream broadcasters showed carefully edited footage of unknown people going down and claimed it was Chaves' troops firing at anti-Chavez protestors.
      Unfortunately for them, other cameras also present showed more of the scene. Snipers shot people--but the people they shot were the *pro*-Chavez protestors, many of whom (like the average American citizen) had pistols. They hit the dirt and started returning fire ineffectually.

      Chavez' government arrested some suspects shortly before the coup began, but during the brief coup administration they disappeared. How convenient.

      Rufus Polson

    63. Re:I know far less than I should. by slavetrade55 · · Score: 1

      "Meanwhile, my goodness--the man enacts economic
      decrees! Oh dear! Can't have governments passing legislation relating to economic issues! There's a parliament dude. You know, elected representatives? They vote on all that stuff. It isn't by fiat of the big man."

      The legislature doesn't vote on decrees--thats what makes them decrees. The point is that Chavez now has the power to enact laws *without* parliamentary debate. So, he can indeed rule by fiat. Anyone who wants to pretend that such a move is a step toward democracy has a warped understanding of the term.

      Can you imagine the response here in canada (hi, i'm in nova scotia) they extended Jean Chretien's term, gave him the power of decree, and he started expropriating private land, driving up taxes beyond belief, demanding full governmental control of all joint public/private ventures, and trying to install his own pals as the heads of labor unions? It would make for some good episodes of Undercurrents, thats for damn sure.

      Btw, my reference to an extra-legal army *was* a bit of an overstatement. What he has is a bunch of extra-legal militias (well, armed gangs) called Bolivarian Circles, which is pretty close. Give him a few years and it will be the same thing.

      --RMT

    64. Re:I know far less than I should. by geekee · · Score: 1

      "What kind of gov't praises the overthrow of a democratically elected leader?"

      A govt. that suppresses freedon, even by the consent of the majority, is wrong. Communism is immoral because it takes away the freedom to own the product of your work. Chavez believes this is moral, and he should be overthrown. BTW, he's practically rewriting the constitution and locking up strike leaders. Apparently you don't have the freedom to strike in Venezuela now.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    65. Re:I know far less than I should. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, It's kind of suprising to see how few Venezuelans read slashdot. And yes, the grandparent post is correct in general. you post seems like you have heard the highlights and are drawing conclusions.

      Let me try to explain the situation and see if it helps. By the way, I AM Venezuela. I am currently at college in USA, by a fellowship, not by my family paying for it. (By the way, Venezuela provides free education to anybody who wants it, all the way to grad school if you choose. The schools are not that great but you can be under the poverty line and still get a degree, and no, it was not 80% before chavez got in power).

      You are right. The standard of living in Venezuela has been in decline since the 80s. It was always a slow decline but people dealt with it. By 1992 there were a couple coup attempts as people wanted change. Chavez was involved in one of these.

      Later on, late 90s, Chavez ran, promising change. Who wouldn't believe that from somebody who would actually participate in a coup? His campaign was basically "we'll write a new constitution, and start a revolution to help the poor". He got elected, and things started getting worse.

      Now, I don't mean "worse" in the steady-decline form that you aluded to. I mean /worse/. Investors had no confidence in the economy because 1) Chavez had no clue how to govern a country. (His people went to new york to present their economic plan, and got laughed at) and 2) the laws were about to change, so no foreign investers were spending any money. On top of that his lack of economic policy also screwed things up.

      So when I say "worse" I mean "gone to hell". Unemployment rates soared. A large percentage of companies went bankrupt, etc.

      Chavez said that the problem was temporary, wait for the consitution and give it time and we'll get better. So people held on and waited. Constitution got apporved, and a reelection was called because of the new laws. People still believed in him enough to support him and he got reelected, on the premise of "give me a couple years and you'll see things will get better"

      Well, things have gotten even worse. By far. Unemployment rates are the *highest in history*. Most companies are either bankrupt or failing, except for oil ocmpanies and things kept afloat by the government, and even then, many government workers havent been paid in months because there is no money.

      Yes this situation cannot go on. Some poster far above in this article mentioned a coup attemp "backed by the US". That happened april 11 last year. An extremely big protest was launched look at this. Hundreds of thousands of people. A PEACEFUL protest that made me proud to be a Venezuelan. Highlights: -Oil companies are owned by the government but the government doesn't have much of a say in what goes on, Execs are chosen by merit rather than political afiliation. -Chavez wanted his people to control the companies. -Chavez went on TV and wen one by one through a list of people going "So and so, you're fired" "so and so, you're out" (This is the kind of guy he is, they call him now "el loco chavez", crazy chavez). Peaceful protest marching around Caracas in support for the oil company execs. Supporters of the government SHOT AT the crowd on cold blood (and got caught on tape, it is sad to see someone walking t othe edge of the bridge above the crowd and just empty a clip and turn around and walk back looking like he doesn't care). The part where stories diverge is tha tin the evening aparently chavez was confronted by the top armed forces officials and asked to step down. According to the version going out in the media, chavez was getting ready to leave the country,but went with the officials peacefully. On saturday (this was a thrusday night), armed supporters of the government went around the city in protest, terrorizing TV stations and media in general, and showing that he still had support. The interim government that had sort of been fset up had proposed to change too many things too quickly, so they got no support (Venezuela has pretty much a phobia against dictatorship, so when the guy said the chavez controlled congress would be suspended until the quick proposed elections, that lost him a lot of support). So at that point chavez spoke up saying thathe was forced out and he never signed anything saying he was quitting. The truth about that night will probably never be known.

      BTW, one of the things he plays is to put the cast the media as the bad guy, turning into a we say/they say scenario, which is why the international media tries very hard to look neutral. They don't criticize the Venezuelan goverment much because the official word is everyone loves them. That also makes the media a target of violent attacks (which is of course denied by the government, but ask any foreign reporter covering the april 11th stuff and you will see it did happen).

      So come december, and things getting worse. A national strike is called. And it is observed by something like 80% of the population, including the oil companies. On any country in the world, the governor would try to figure out a way to end the strike before it hurts the economy. Chavez just didn't care. For a few weeks his people went on the air denying that anything was going on. Everyday, there were marches on Caracas in protest of the goverment, people walking all around the city. This climaxed one day with the biggest crowd seen in history (I think it was estimated at 2.6 million people, or about 10% of the Venezuelan population getting off their asses and walking all day to protest the government). The goverment also organized one, with busses bringing people from aparently all around the country. It was pitiful on TV. Estimated less than 10 thousand people.

      Etc. etc. etc.

      It was interesting to see the commercial on TV on support of the strike (I was there for a month over chirstmas). One of them was a clip from when Chavez's last campaign, where he is talking about how times were tough, but in a couple of years things would settle down and get better, and he says "if in two years the people are not happy with me I will gladly step down". Yes, it has been two years. Another interesting one was like this: just words appearing on the screen all silent. goes: "In the next 10 seconds, think of all Chavez has done for you", then they take the time to actyually count down from 10 on screen. Then it says "Couldn't think of anything, right?" "welcome to the majority". This is how bad his governemnt has been that thinking of all he's done counts against him.

      etc. etc. etc. this is the dragging on part on the article.

      In the end, a consultive referendum was called for february 4th (basically a poll, no effect of law, but it would be as trustworthy as any election, because it is exactly the same procedure). If you can get I think 1 million signatures on any issue, such a rerendum gets called, it's in the constitution. They got over 2 million. This would've shown the worldand everybody that Chavez is governing a country that really wants him out. So of course they tried to stop it. In fact, the first time that the goverment said that the strike was affecting the economy was to say that they had no money for the referendum. In the end they found a loophole with a problem of the constitution of the body that approved it, etc. so it didn't get done.

      The strike was lifted, after almost 2 months, because everybody was going bankrupt and it was obvious Chavez didnt care that the country was going to hell, so nothing was being accomplished. Chavez took this oportunity to claim that he'd "won" and now he's striking against everybody who helped the strike, having strike leaders arrested (see this article in english), firing oil workers who helped the strike, etc.

      Things are not looking any better right now. There is suppossed to be a referengum in august, at the halfway point of his term, asking whether the people want him to step down or not. This one is part of the constitution, scheduled when he assummed power, and it is binding. People say no, he is automatically fired. But of course we expect him to prevent this. One of the things he is slowly doing is making sure that the top officials on the armed forces are his people, presumably to turn it into a dictatorship/communist regime when he has no choice, but he is biding his time until he has enough of a hold. Or at least that's what we're afraid of.

      So anyway, getting to work a couple minutes late is the least of our problems.

    66. Re:I know far less than I should. by geekee · · Score: 1

      There's something wrong with something when both business leaders AND union leaders agree it's wrong. Communism doesn't solve poverty. It merely reduces the incentive to work, creating more poverty.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    67. Re:I know far less than I should. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2 things I forgot to mention (The post was long enouhg already).

      -The poverty line has been extending a lot since Chavez came into power. It was notwhere near 80% 5 years ago. Yeah, help the poor (which he isn't) but make more poor.
      -Another poster mentioned how there was "an attempted coup, in which the US was allegedly involved". I've heard this before, it refers to the April 11th successes. As I explained above it was not a military coup and it would be hard for the USA to be involved. The question of involvement comes from two things. USA officials had talked to the leaders of the new interim government some time before, and second a whitehouse spokesperson was talking about Venezuela after april 11th, and apperently said something along the lines of "we told them they shouldn't have a coup" (them being some unidentified Venezuelans), to which one of the reporters asked "in what context did this come up", answer, "no comment".

      To a foreigner the above looks very suspicious, but there are 2 things to consider. First, the interim president was an influential/rich/owner of industres type of person, so of course they would meet with him. Secondly, by that time everybody was talking and agreeing that the best was to get rid of this guy, but noone wants any fighting. I myself had said thinks similar to what he said. This is an everyday thing.

      I sincerely doubt any USA involvement. That is acutally one of the things that pisses me off. Bush is so hung up on Iraq his governement had been staying out of the all the Venezuelan issues, while all this was going on. And no, Chavez doesn't like the united states. In fact he is a fan of Fidel Castro of all people. The USA government has been slightly more outspoken lately but not much.

      BTW, Venezuela was the 4th top exporter to the USA before the strike. (Reportedly Iraq helped the USA with their oil deficit during the worst of the strike, but I don't have a link to the article now, this was about a month ago).

    68. Re:I know far less than I should. by f0dder · · Score: 1

      North Korea reminds me of an old british comedy about a fictional country that tried to invade US so that they too can get aid just like Japan and Germany. I think it's the Mouse that Roared or something like that.

      I suspect the Bush policy on North Korea is different from Iraq becuase NK wants to blackmail the US into giving them unprecedented aid like Clinton did.

      Another reason why the US isn't rushing to take care of NK is the geography. Look at North Korea geography and it's pretty isolated. To sell their nuke they're either gonna have to send it through China or ship it.

      Look at Iraq and it is surrounded by countries or contains group hostile to the US. Iran, Syria, etc. etc.

      I understand that their will be collateral damage but to the extent that people make it to be a massacre i am not so sure.

      The people that should be shitting their bricks right now are the "Human Shields". They think they're gonna be able to go anywhere in Iraq they want (remember it's a totalitarian regime and not disneyland).

      Saddams gonna place next to his Command & Control center or near military targets so they get killed and he can play the media game he's so good at.

      If the war goes bad for the Iraqi they might treated as western whipping boys by the defeated Red Gaurd. If the war goes well then they might get beat by the liberated Iraqis. Either way I probably won't shed a tear...

    69. Re: I know far less than I should. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      right above Texas - shaped like a frying pan

      Mexico, texas, Oklahoma

    70. Re:I know far less than I should. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, hello? That constitution was voted on by the people.

      That never stopped the US from voting for stupid shit using a mixture of ignorance and propoganda (eg: PATRIOT act).

      Not that I disagree with you, though... I don't think any country but the US can be so collectively foolish.

    71. Re:I know far less than I should. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You say 80 percent of its population 'fell' into poverty. You need to look at population growth. 30 years ago, the population of Venezuela was around 1/5 of what it is now (I dont have exact numbers). who do you think had the most kids, the rich who like to maintain their standard of living or the poor?
      p.s. disclaimer i am venezuelan and 'rich'

    72. Re:I know far less than I should. by blurfus · · Score: 1
      Ahhh, the media...
      The media's been broadcasting calls for his overthrow for more than a year and he's just now responding by *taking them to court*.
      Yes, calls for his exit have been shouted by everybody, from the media to the general public to the corporations. But let's make something clear, he is not *just* "responding them by *taking them to court*". If you paid more attention to the local media (and not the North American version of it) you will hear that the National Guards (under his command) have violently invaded some of the TV stations and completely *thrashed* installations (and broadcasting equipment such as receivers, repeaters, etc) to impose censorship. Threatening to kill journalists also if they insist on calling for him to step down.
      Various opposition leaders who have been calling for his violent overthrow for about the same amount of time....

      violent opposition???? We must be talking about a different opposition. This [photo] is the one I am referring to. The one that is tired of being told what to do, tired of crime and hate. The one that is looking for a peaceful solution and calling for his resignation in a peaceful way. The one that gets killed when they hold these massive strikes (last I checked, you could still protest your government in a democracy, just like in BC with the Liberals not long ago)

      The events of April 11th, 2002 (when he was *cough* ousted), where triggered by the merciless shooting (and killing) of peaceful protesters outside their White Palace. These Generals you mention are the ones that opposed to use their own soldiers against the people of Venezuela. They asked him for a resignation, and got it (in principle). Chavez changed his mind once he found out who his "traitors" were.

      Let's examine some of the human rights violated: Can you name the military officers which you claim were forced to retire? Did you know that some of these top officers calling for his resignation were kidnapped and later found (about a week ago) with their hands tied, gagged, and killed execution style? Their families claim that the kidnappers spoke of being sent by Chavez.


      Regarding the quote:
      "On top of this, his office has violated the most human rights in a presidential term since the toppled dictatorship in '58."
      I meant to for a Venezuelan President (I am not comparing him to other Presidents in other countries, just the ones in Venezuela)
      PS I can send you more links of forums and pictures (of both sides of the argument if you want)
      --
      will work for Karma
    73. Re:I know far less than I should. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's hardly a strike. It's a lock-out, since the managers won't let the workers work!

  4. corrections! by lingqi · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not the lower power / current / whatever. It's the lower frequencies on the AC lines.

    And besides any quartz clock won't be affected anyway. The ones that will suffer is those bedside alarm clocks you plug in - those red / green ones that are oh-so-common in the US.

    Any idea why there are 0 of them in Japan? Japan runs on 50Hz east side and 60Hz west side, which would make clocks like that completely fall over itself. (something about buying geneator equipment from siemens (europe) for the east side and from US for the west-side - and stuck)

    Interesting, but I don't think it's really that much of a "news." should at least up the "it's funny" icon

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:corrections! by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Informative
      The clocks that will slow down are:
      • Digital ones that use the 60 Hz power frequency for their timing signal, rather than another oscillator like a quartz crystal.
      • Mechanical ones powered by the AC line, not a wind-up spring or battery. Pretty much all of those use a synchronous motor that locks itself to the 60Hz AC wave.
      The wind-up kind, and any clocks that run exclusively by battery power, won't be effected.

      By the way, quartz isn't the only material that can act as an electronic tuning fork. Early electronic clocks actually used mechanical tuning forks. Ceramic resonators are used, rather than quartz, in less precise applications. And piezoelectric crystals (which is what the quartz ones are) can be made of other materials, you can even make them from cream of tartar! Look up Rochelle Salts.

      Bruce

    2. Re:corrections! by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

      It's not the lower power / current / whatever. It's the lower frequencies on the AC lines.

      I know that in the Netherlands a tolerance of 0% is guaranteed for the AC frequency (@50Hz). I don't recall the interval for which this guarantee is given (continuously, minute, hour, day, week month, year etc..).

      I guess (most) other countries do this too.

      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    3. Re:corrections! by Buck2 · · Score: 1

      I know that in the Netherlands a tolerance of 0% is guaranteed for the AC frequency (@50Hz)

      That's obviously total bullshit. If they have a cash-back guarantee you should start collecting.

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
    4. Re:corrections! by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1
      All of the generators must be phase-locked to each other, or you can't put two of them in parallel. So, the timing is very precise and even phase is controlled very tightly. It seems that generators hundreds of miles from each other (if not farther) are often switched onto the same circuit.

      There must be speed-of-propogation issues when electric transmission lines of different length are fed. I'd like to hear more about them.

      Bruce

    5. Re:corrections! by lingqi · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think you mean this. (Talks about how generators are kept in phase with stuff coming from different areas, for those people (especially moderators) who don't RT(F)A)

      --

      My life in the land of the rising sun.

    6. Re:corrections! by Cindi+Hawkins · · Score: 0

      OMG it's Bruce Perens! Will you have my babies?

    7. Re:corrections! by Inda · · Score: 1

      Are there really clocks that use the 60Hz frequency?

      I stood watching a turbine spinning last week and it didn't stay at 3000rpm constantly (50Hz). Surely a sundial would be more accurate.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    8. Re:corrections! by hbackert · · Score: 1

      Any idea why there are 0 of them in Japan? Japan runs on 50Hz east side and 60Hz west side, which would make clocks like that completely fall over itself.

      I've yet to see one clock in Japan which takes the AC frequency as its base. However, large, not battery driven devices like timers for heaters (mechanical timers) have often different scales for 50Hz and 60Hz Those do lock to the AC frequency unfortunately. So if you want to have the living room heated at 7am, you better know whether you live in the 50 or 60Hz part of in Japan. It's the difference between "freezing" and "feel comfortable".

      Better heaters have a built in clock with a built in resonator (whatever type, probably the cheapest available doing the job).

    9. Re:corrections! by lingqi · · Score: 1

      Is that right...

      Everything in Japan, as far as I know, has a time. A/C has a timer, bathtub has a timer, the oil-buring room-heater has a timer. I think more expensive fridges have timers too - which is weird, why would you have a timer on your fridge? In fact, I am pretty sure AIBO have a freaking timer, which means, yes, you have a timer on your dog. I think in shibuya they put timers on their kids too... (j/k)

      Funny thing though - they (IIRC - on everything except the bathtub, cuz I never checked the bathtub's interoperability) all work in both 50 and 60Hz zones.

      Before anybody asks, the bathtub timer allows automatically filling of a specific volumn of hot water at (a) specified time(s). neato! too bad gaijins like myself mostly sticks to showering.

      --

      My life in the land of the rising sun.

    10. Re:corrections! by pjrc · · Score: 4, Interesting
      It's not the lower power / current / whatever. It's the lower frequencies on the AC lines.

      The two are related. All those generators interconnected to each other via the power lines, turn together in synchronized motion. If the sum of all power consumption is not matched by the correct rate of energy input (ultimately, torque applied) to the system, those generators will necessarily slow down.

      The AC frequency is directly determined by the rotational speed of the generators. The magnetic field of the rotor induces that AC current in the stator windings as it turns, so the speed of rotation must be maintained if the AC frequency is to be correct.

      Why they don't disconnect some loads (eg, rolling blackouts) to keep the consumption balanced with their energy input is a good question?

      The really interesting thing about power grids is how the all those generators work together in synchronous motion. Every single one of them turns at the same speed and all those rotors are at (almost) exactly the same angular position at the same instant (or equivilant angular position in the case of different generator designs with different numbers of windings). If any one generator goes not receive enough torque applied, it acts as a motor and the rest of the grid supplies power to it to keep it turning in sync motion with the rest.

      The power grid, as a whole, must be very carefully managed to keep the energy input (torque on the generators) balanced with the consumption of all the loads. If it is not managed properly, as appears the be the case here, the frequency can drift. That's actually a very big problem, not just because of all those clocks and old televisions using the line frequency for timing, but because all those transformers and motors attached to the grid were designed to operate at the specified frequency. As the frequency lowers, approaching even somewhat closer to DC, the magnetizing currents increase. That puts a lot of extra stress on all those motors and transformers. Very bad.

    11. Re:corrections! by lingqi · · Score: 1

      Actually this is something that the US do during the war. There are bombs that are nothing but carbon filaments. They are dropped onto enemy electric lines which shorts out the lines - and with a near 0 load, the generators spin out of control, and kill people in the powerplant when it busts open / bursts into flames.

      Actually it's a first stage attach to knock out power without using bombs. I still say it sucks for the people working at powerplants (when the generators suddenly explode), but pretty interesting.

      --

      My life in the land of the rising sun.

    12. Re:corrections! by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      Once in the circuit, they will be phase-locked to each other. Switching them in to the circuit needs to be done pretty much in phase or there is an extreme amount of torque to get them in phase, fast.

    13. Re:corrections! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Every once in a while you hear about a utility that gets this wrong. About 10 years ago this happened at a power plant in Kewaunee, Wisconsin. Seems the technician who was responsible for bringing a new generator online messed up when synchronizing the generator to the phase on the power grid. He managed to align it exactly 180 degrees out of phase, then threw the switch to connect the generator to the grid and... BAM! Ripped right off its mounting.

    14. Re:corrections! by Ooblek · · Score: 1

      This sounds pretty sensational. Do you have anywhere you can point us to that shows this particular weapon or discusses its use? I'm pretty ignorant in military affairs as it is, but I've never heard of this one. It would seem a bit difficult to target a power line with a bomb such as this.

    15. Re:corrections! by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      In many localities by law the power companies are required to average exactly 60 Hz. The frequency can dip and peak once in awhile, but the utilities are expected to compensate for it.

    16. Re:corrections! by warpSpeed · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It would seem a bit difficult to target a power line with a bomb such as this.

      Actually it would be quite easy to do (in theroy, I have no first hand knowledge of this). All you need is several hundred or thousand strands of carbon filamnet, and airborn dispersial mechanisim. The "bomb" will just explode over, or nearly over the power lines, preferably high voltage lines, since they are not covered with insulating material. Current technology allows for this type of bomb. The filiments, having been dispersed in the air will float down and land on the wires. The filiments will either short out between the wires or from wire to ground. With high voltage lines it not that difficult to get the current to flow to ground. Even if 99% of the carbon filiments do not hit the wires, the remaining 1% would probably be enough to quickly cause an overload on the line, and flip the big circuit breakers.

      The real benifit of this it that the power grid is quickly overloaded, the saftey equipment trips to pretect the generators, and no real perminant damage happens to the over all system.

      This takes out the enimies ability to distribute power for a short period of time without long term damage to the over all system. Perfect for an invading force.

    17. Re:corrections! by ReelOddeeo · · Score: 1

      There was an article about this in Popular Electronics in the 1970's.

      The article was entitled "How Accurate is your digital clock" or somesuch. It was comparing quartz crystal timebase clocks to digital clocks that derrived their timebase from the 60 Hz powerline frequency.

      If you looked at the quartz oscillator error, it was very small. If you looked at the 60 Hz error, it was very high. The surprise was that the 60 Hz was actually more accurate over time. If you set up two clocks and let them run for one year, the Quartz crystal oscillator clock might be off by 148 seconds, assuming all errors are in the same direction. But the 60 Hz timebase clock might be off by only 3 seconds!

      Why? Because in the US, when the powerline frequency errors have gotten off by 3 seconds or more, "factors are introduced" (whatever the hell that means) to bring it back to the correct time.

      --

      Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
    18. Re:corrections! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A generator's speed doesn't have to be exactly the same as the frequency of the alternating current it provides. In the case of an synchronous generator, the speed is determined by the number of poles in the machine and the frequency of power it supplies. If the power output from a synchronous machine is to be varied, additional torque is applied, and the machine puts out additional current - the line voltage stays the same. What you probably saw was an induction generator, which must spin faster than the mains frequency. When more power needs to be generated the induction machine is spun faster. This assumes that the generators are connected to the power grid.

    19. Re:corrections! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn straight! This is known as "slipping a pole".

    20. Re:corrections! by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1

      I think int correct to say Quartz will be less affected, as its resonance range is not unity, and (I may be mistaken) the RMS voltage difference will affect it..

      --
    21. Re:corrections! by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

      The US used them in Kosovo in the late 90s.

    22. Re:corrections! by Ignorant+Aardvark · · Score: 1

      The United States has used this technology before in wars against Iraq and Vietnam. It's not only possible, it's been DONE. A bomb is loaded up with essentially thousands of long, skinny wires. They are dropped above power plants or switching stations and explode in mid-air. If one wire ends up touching two different power lines, or even connecting wire to ground, the system shorts itself out, with severe damage to the fuses, resistors, and even generating stations. How do you think we won the Gulf War with so few casualties on our side? In the first few days of bombing we effectively knocked out electricity over huge parts of Iraq. It's had to fight wars when you don't even lights, let alone radar, guidance systems, etc. In this upcoming war with Iraq, expect to do the exact same thing. It's a very effective tactic that destroys the electricity generating component of a country's infrastructure.

  5. Zack: "Time Out" by davebarz · · Score: 2, Funny

    EVERYTHING THAT HAS to do with time-keeping has slowed down.

    So, basically what we're dealing with here is an entire country suffering from a sort of prolonged "Time Out" syndrome like Zack would sometimes cause on Saved By The Bell. Clearly, the problem will not be solved unless the Venezuelan government actively pursues an ingenious solution by Screech Powers.

    1. Re:Zack: "Time Out" by notque · · Score: 1

      And they can find him Teaching Chess. If only the Venezuelan would focus on the issues.

      --
      http://use.perl.org
    2. Re:Zack: "Time Out" by sprayNwipe · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows that the Venezuelan government wouldn't be in this kind of problem if Zack hadn't become jealous over Slater's running of the power plant. This slow clock thing is just something to make Slater look silly so that Kelly will fall back into Zack's arms!

  6. Venuzuela's Business Model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. oil industry collapses
    2. economy plummets
    3. the proletariat gets pissed
    4. ???
    5. VIOLENT COUP D'ETAT !

    1. Re:Venuzuela's Business Model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm afraid most of the proletariat support Chavez, the president, because he is a socialist.

    2. Re:Venuzuela's Business Model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You'll find that the people tend to blame those in charge when the vast majority can't afford to keep food on the table.

      This is the freakin' 21st century people! It's a sorry-ass excuse for a country that can't feed itself! (DPRNK - I'm looking at you! lamers!)

  7. this could explain a lot more by ramzak2k · · Score: 1

    Venuzualian electric frequency is reduced . We all know electricity produces magnetic fields. Since slashdot servers exist symetrically on the other half of earths hemisphere, ocassionally there is jerk in time causing Reposts on Slashdot servers.

    --

    Siggy Say, Siggy Do
  8. Thats nothing, White House's clock runs in reverse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    A quick lookie-loo over at The Guardian's website (among others) reveals the involvement of the US Government a recent coup attempt against Venezualian leader Hugo Chavez. Clearly a return to the old US foreign policy in South America of replacing democratically elected leaders with US-friendly dictators.

    Read about it here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/oil/story/0,11319,714504 ,00.html

    I suppose this means that the clocks in the White House are outputing power as they spin backwards? Now that's an alternative energy source even Bush and Cheney can support.

  9. From the better-late-than-never-dept by blurfus · · Score: 5, Funny
    But in a nation that rarely starts on schedule, ...

    That my friends, is an understatement.

    How do I know this? Well, I am from there ;o)
    Excuse me, I must go a have a nap before I finish this post...

    --
    will work for Karma
    1. Re:From the better-late-than-never-dept by kfg · · Score: 1

      Manana mi amigo, manana.

      KFG

    2. Re:From the better-late-than-never-dept by Speed+Racer · · Score: 1

      Dígalo mi pana. I remember when I lived there that somebody explained that Mexico was the land of mañana but that Venezuela was the land of the day after mañana. Oh well. Just get me a Malta (Regional or Polar please, none of that Malta Caracas crap) and todo estará chévere.

      --
      Free Mac Mini. Yes, I'm
    3. Re:From the better-late-than-never-dept by UtSupra · · Score: 1

      We, Venezuelans, do have the Maana concept... It doesn't translate as "tomorrow", but as "not today". As in President Chvez will step down tomorrow.
      Is just that the concept of tomorrow doesn't have the urgency here you guys give to it...

    4. Re:From the better-late-than-never-dept by kfg · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's exactly the sense I used it in. Not today. The great thing is, it's always today and tomorrow never comes.

      However, it's true I didn't use it in the overt sense of "Yeah, like *that* well ever happen" or the equivelant English phrases "When pigs fly" or "When hell freezes over."

      KFG

  10. so in other words... by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Funny

    finland leads the world in overclocking

    and venezuela leads the world in underclocking? ;-P

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:so in other words... by davebarz · · Score: 1

      And not coincidental to their underclocking, the shortage of power also leads to lack of heat generation.

      Silly metaphors and their subtle humor...

  11. Some thoughts about time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Time may be a great healer, but it's also a lousy beautician.
    =====
    Time is just nature's way to keep everything from happening at once.
    =====
    Three o'clock is always too late or too early for anything you want to do.
    - Jean-Paul Sartre
    =====
    Dost thou love life? Then do not squander time; for that's the stuff life is made of.
    - Benjamin Franklin
    =====
    Time is the coin of your life. It is the only coin you have, and only you can determine how it will be spent. Be careful lest you let other people spend it for you.
    - Carl Sandburg
    =====
    If you don't have time to do it right you must have time to do it over.
    =====
    Time is a great teacher, but unfortunately it kills all its pupils.
    - Hector Berlioz
    =====
    It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take Hofstadter's Law into account.
    - Hofstadter's Law
    =====
    A man with a watch knows what time it is. A man with two watches is never sure.
    - Segal's Law
    =====
    Time as he grows old teaches all things.
    - Aeschylus
    =====
    Time crumbles things; everything grows old under the power of Time and is forgotten through the lapse of Time.
    - Aristotle

  12. Selective reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There are many dozen contries with much more severe problems than Venezuela. Wonder why only Venezuela makes constantly in the headlines?

    Yup, that's right, Venezuela has oil and others don't. Thus our wonderful "independent" media doesn't care about other problems.

    1. Re:Selective reporting by DrStrange66 · · Score: 1

      Well the fact that oil shipments are being missed and delayed because of the strikes does directly affect the US. Our gas prices going up causes a lot of people to become unhappy especially when they are filling up their SUV. A country that is suffering from famine might not get as much attention because it doesn't directly affect the US. People are interested in knowing why fuel costs are rising not wondering "Hmm, I wonder what country is starving today." So the media in turn gives us what we want.

  13. Brilliant by bcwalrus · · Score: 1

    This is how we'll solve the Twin Paradox!

  14. Variable Frequency by Sanat · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The town of Highland Illinois had a company that made motors that shipped all over the world. At night the local power company would slow down the frequency from 60HZ to 50 HZ for testing of the motors and then catch up all the clocks in town by running at 62HZ for 5 times as long as the elapsed test sequence. This whole process had to be completed before people had to get up for work in the morning.

    This was about 20 yesrs ago so things have probably changed by now.

    --
    And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make
    1. Re:Variable Frequency by Monkelectric · · Score: 1
      Thats a little hard to believe... All they would need to get 50hz power would be AC-AC converters. I can't imagine getting a few converters would cost LESS then hiring people to test motors at nigh. And that's assuming the power company could even generate 50hz power ...

      Still, stranger things have happened.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    2. Re:Variable Frequency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      Thats a little hard to believe... indeed.

      What you say is correct and there are even stronger reasons to believe that's not the case. Like earlier posters say, the whole frequency thing is to keep the natiowide network in sync. In theory, one could operate for example a paper mill in "isle mode" (I've seen this in Germany) with its own power plant, i.e. separate from the national grid. But I understood this was the local plant, and how about all those customers with their 60 Hz equipment plugged in.

      BTW, generating 50 Hz or 60 Hz power isn't that different, it's basically the same process with generators doing different RPM. Of course, there's lots of auxiliary machinery that would behave differently (like electrical motors that would run 20% faster).

    3. Re:Variable Frequency by SN74S181 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I did contract work this past year at an appliance control manufacturer where they test the timing motors. There are commonly available power converters for test purposes. Program in a frequency over HPIB and run your tests. It's not hard to believe that years ago something like this would have happened, but not today.

    4. Re:Variable Frequency by danger42 · · Score: 1

      This was about 20 yesrs ago so things have probably changed by now.

      Yeah, with NAFTA, they probably moved the factories to Venezuela.

      --
      -nd
    5. Re:Variable Frequency by Goody · · Score: 1

      This sounds like an urban legend or someone pulling your leg. This would have reeked havoc with all the transformers in the system and they are designed for 60 Hz and 50 Hz would present altered impendances everywhere.

      In a former life we tested 50 Hz equipment we built with gasoline generators tweaked for a 50 Hz output, which is easy to do.

      --
      Tired of being "punished" by the Slashdot $rtbl since 2002. I'm now over at http://soylentnews.org/ .
    6. Re:Variable Frequency by Sanat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Truth is sometimes stranger than fiction. The company in the town was Basler Electric Company.

      I do need to clarify... It was over 20 years ago... wow, time does fly.

      Basler makes (or did then) huge motors that a small power generator simply could not get turning from a dead stop. Remember that when a motor is not turn that maximum current is applied until the counter EMF offsets it.

      Most of the people in Highland was affiliated in some way with this hugh employer and so they were all aware of what was occurring and knew when the tests would be, etc.

      A lot of fine people live in that town.

      --
      And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make
    7. Re:Variable Frequency by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who works in some company where they need 50Hz power for something. Their solution was a large 60Hz motor connected to 50Hz generator. Sure, it was kind of silly but it worked.

  15. a simple adjustment is all that is needed by w3svc_animal · · Score: 1

    echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_rfc1337

    --

    Error encountered in IAWebSig.clsSig.Create: Last Procedure: sPrc_Ins_tblSig

  16. Little known fact about Venezuela by infonography · · Score: 4, Funny

    Due to magnetic irregularities in regard to the south magnetic pole water swirls counter clock wise. Since there are negative magnetic waves there the United Nations Intelligence Taskforce (Venezuela) manages the atomic clocks that synchronize the world. If the atomic clocks go out of sync then this could spell disaster on a international scale. Some one Who knows about the dangers of Time should be dispached at once. Lord knows what could happen if some evil learns to Master time.

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
    1. Re:Little known fact about Venezuela by davebarz · · Score: 1

      "Due to magnetic irregularities in regard to the south magnetic pole water swirls counter clock wise. Since there are negative magnetic waves there the United Nations Intelligence Taskforce (Venezuela) manages the atomic clocks that synchronize the world. If the atomic clocks go out of sync then this could spell disaster on a international scale. Some one Who knows about the dangers of Time should be dispached at once. Lord knows what could happen if some evil learns to Master time."

      Inevitable, tomorrow we will be seeing: "Ain't It Cool News breaks the storyline of the next Bond film. Thanks to our scooper calling himself
      Infonography.

    2. Re:Little known fact about Venezuela by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're right! Quick! Send for Brigadier Lethbridge-Stewart!

      Or.. perhaps.. yes.. no need to panic. Looking closely at the photo accompanying the article, I see a blue police call-box lurking in the background..

    3. Re:Little known fact about Venezuela by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This story sounds to doctored up.

    4. Re:Little known fact about Venezuela by infonography · · Score: 1

      Who do you think would chose this story to Doctor, Who indeed.

      --
      Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
    5. Re:Little known fact about Venezuela by Artemis3 · · Score: 1

      FYI: there is an Atomic Clock in Venezuela http://diexismo.8m.com/dix00006.htm and people are expected to keep their clocks in sync.

      --
      Artix
      Your Linux, your init.
  17. Computer clocks, atomic clocks, etc... by $$$$$exyGal · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Do people in Venezuela pay attention to their computer clocks, atomic clocks, etc? Does this effect the digital clock in your, microwave, for example? I personally don't have any analog clocks in my place that are plugged into a wall socket.

    --sex

    --
    Very popular slashdot journal for adul
    1. Re:Computer clocks, atomic clocks, etc... by Sarcazmo · · Score: 1

      Digital clocks often use the 60 hz AC signal for sync because it is usually much more stable than a crystal.

      Crystals are affected by many factors such as temperature, external vibrations, and it is more expensive to make them accurate than to just rely on the AC clock. In the US at least, the 60 hz AC is extremely stable in the long run.

      Crystals used for clocking simple computers really don't need to be very stable, it doesn't matter if the computer runs at a few hertz either way, as long as the whole system is following the beat of the same drum.

    2. Re:Computer clocks, atomic clocks, etc... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      im in venezuela, and i realize this readining ni slashdot, my computer and phone its ok, it seem that the theory of frecuency its true

  18. Brings up a good question by foo+fighter · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    What keeps America or Britain or Germany or Russia or China ticking?

    Not in the literal "atomic clock" sense. How is it that America's government is still functioning when a majority of its "democratic" populace didn't vote for its leader? Judging by the past few weeks/years of protests, the other countries don't really care for their "elected" leaders either.

    How can so few people hold so much sway over so many people?

    Mayber I should take more PoliSci courses (just a poor CompSci major typing here!), but that the human populace can function at all, given the variety of personalities and prejudices, I consider a miracle.

    In fact, I think that Venezuala is one country that is acting the way things are supposed to go!

    --
    obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    1. Re:Brings up a good question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry. Someday, after you graduate, you will be a real grown-up. You will have a job, and responsibilities. It will all make sense then. Until that future date, enjoy your waning years of childhood. Once you leave them, you can never go back again.

    2. Re:Brings up a good question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're young and have yet to grasp the way the world really works, when you figure it out you will run screaming.

    3. Re:Brings up a good question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      GWB's approval ratings are 60-70%... whoever told you that a "majority" of people don't want him in power was wrong.

      Judging by the past few weeks/years of protests

      The loudest group isn't always the majority. Usually it's the minority. Often times, the louder the group is, the smaller it is. Happy people don't need to complain about anything.

    4. Re:Brings up a good question by saforrest · · Score: 1

      Actually, Bush's rating is at 53% as of yesterday, according to CNN/USA Today/Gallup.

      The loudest group isn't always the majority. Usually it's the minority. Often times, the louder the group is, the smaller it is. Happy people don't need to complain about anything.

      So the anti-Chavez protesters in Venezuela are a minority then, eh? :)

    5. Re:Brings up a good question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's USUALLY not the majority, jerkface

    6. Re:Brings up a good question by D+iz+a+n+k+Meister · · Score: 1

      Happy people don't need to complain about anything.

      Neither do ignorant people.

      --

      He painted a unicorn in outer space. I'm askin' ya, what's it breathin'?
    7. Re:Brings up a good question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be located in Venezuela.
      The "53 % as of yesterday" link you refer to is from 2001.
      WTF?

    8. Re:Brings up a good question by saforrest · · Score: 1

      Damn, you're right. I did remember having heard about his rating dropping recently, and didn't look carefully enough at the result of my Google search. Thanks.

  19. Air traffic control?!?! by cascino · · Score: 1, Funny

    An air traffic controller casually told Reuters that his office corrected its clocks every few days or months, without incident so far.
    Does this scare anyone else?
    So the moral of the story... don't fly to Venezuela :)

  20. Kreskin and "Hypno Duck" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you get when you cross Kreskin the magician with an insurance-peddling duck? "Hypno Duck" -- The latest AFLAC commercial. This spot received the highest consumer recall score for television ads in the bi-weekly Intermedia consumer survey. Our congratulations to Kreskin, star of AFLAC. Many will recall the Amazing Kreskin as being the omniscient seer who correctly predicted the death of *BSD.

  21. First post by Adar · · Score: 5, Funny

    First post...FUCK, I'm an hour late. Goddamn clock.

  22. Ever notice... by Pettifogger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ever notice that your alarm clock, microwave, stereo clock, etc. is never very accurate? The voltage and frequency do vary depending upon the load on the grid, the generation facility, usage in your home, and so on. Of course, major variations will screw things up and US voltage is pretty consistent, but it's the little variations that throw your bedside alarm off a few minutes every so often. Though slightly off topic, If you want accuracy, get a good (36,000+ vph) mechanical wristwatch, or even better, one of the old Bulova Accutrons. If you're not familiar with the Accutron, run a Google or eBay search for them; they were a HUGE hit with the geek crowd back in the Sixties. They were used as timing devices in the Apollo program and in satellites, too.

    --

    IAAL

    1. Re:Ever notice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      this is crazy. quartz will keep a much better time than any mechanical watch.

    2. Re:Ever notice... by davidstrauss · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure synching my computer's clock to the atomic clock four times a day yields pretty accurate results.

  23. Lower Frequency = More Power? Huh? by fwc · · Score: 1
    Ok, I admit it, I'm puzzled now.

    I completely understand the reason why those clocks which use the 60hz (or 50Hz) AC as a timebase go slower. It only makes sense..

    But could someone please explain to me how reducing the frequency of an electrical grid provides more power to the grid, assuming nothing else has changed? The article says they reduced the frequency to ensure they had enough power.... This kinda stuck my brain in an "Error does not compute" endless loop...

    In the US at least, the powerline frequency is actually a function of how fast the generators are turning in the power plants - specifically 3600 RPM which comes out to 60 Revs/Sec or 60 Hz. The way I understand the article is that spinning the generators SLOWER results in more power? For some reason this seems counter-intuitive to me. What am I missing?

  24. Oil Curreny War To Blame For Problems by muscleman706 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The link below discusses not just the Iraq war, but the how oil is tied to the world economies at a very low level and how Venezuela is in some sense at the heart of the matter with their use of oil as a fiat currency in lieu of the US dollar among their latin american trading partners. http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/RRiraqWar.html Although completely suppressed by the U.S. media and government, the answer to the Iraq enigma is simple yet shocking -- it is an oil currency war. The real reason for this upcoming war is this administration's goal of preventing further Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) momentum towards the euro as an oil transaction currency standard. However, in order to pre-empt OPEC, they need to gain geo-strategic control of Iraq along with its 2nd largest proven oil reserves. This essay will discuss the macroeconomics of the `petro-dollar' and the unpublicized but real threat to U.S. economic hegemony from the euro as an alternative oil transaction currency. The author advocates reform of the global monetary system including a dollar/euro currency 'trading band' with reserve status parity, and a dual OPEC oil transaction standard. These reforms could potentially reduce future oil currency warfare.

    1. Re:Oil Curreny War To Blame For Problems by pdjohe · · Score: 1

      Today on CNN, there is an article which seems to link raising oil prices instead with the treat of war. The supporting evidence is information from the Gulf War. Granted they mention briefly about the problem in Venezuala, the article seems to highlight Iraq as the source for high crude prices.

      I thought CNN distorted the facts a little. Maybe it's because people would be more interested to hear about Iraq than Venezuala.

      Question everything.

    2. Re:Oil Curreny War To Blame For Problems by jafac · · Score: 1

      Yes - the current economic downturn was spawned from Hugo Chavez' 1999 plan to "take a piece of the action" of America's booming economy. Oil prices spiked, Clinton tapped the strategic reserve, Enron fucked with the California power system causing rolling blackouts, which helped to cripple the main engine of the nation's economy by pushing SV dotcoms over the brink just as they were running out of venture capital. Microsoft didn't suffer from the blackouts, but they suffered from the DOJ case, which was backed out before any real actual damage was done to the company - only it's stock price was deflated, and of course, other tech companies suffered alongside.

      Now, California, formerly the 6th largest economy in the world, is bankrupt, socked with oppressive energy contracts it was forced into during Enron and Dynergy's scamming. Millions of people who used to be worth millions of dollars are now being forced to liquidate all their posessions and property at fire sale prices, just to buy groceries.

      Who benefits?

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    3. Re:Oil Curreny War To Blame For Problems by Psychic+Burrito · · Score: 1

      This sounds too much like some crazy conspiracy. Answer me this simple question: Why did the US not take control of the Iraq oil fields after the gulf war?

  25. lockout or strike by dmiracle · · Score: 1

    Those on strike are the management level people who run the oil industry, not the workers. In America isn't that called a lockout? It looks like the same thing is going on in Nigeria right now.

    As for why the US says little; it seems that they have had some interest in giving Chavez problems. Hasn't Chavez been elected now twice in two or three years? Is there a more favorable to US interests, less democratic option we should be seeing?

    No, the US is much more interested in promoting Democracy than securing oil interests.

    1. Re:lockout or strike by luismunoz · · Score: 1
      Those on strike are the management level people who run the oil industry, not the workers.

      This is simply, not true. A very large proportion of the oil industry and most of its contractors have joined the strike. Those that didn't join, but had to stop anyway because couldn't deliver due to the stopping of the industry, are now without a job as the government has set its sights in firing every possible employee.

      The people they're bringing to fill in for the missing ones is so uncompetent, that today, more than 30 days after the strike, they're not paying salaries because the payroll applications cannot be started.

      As a funny note (if this can be funny at all), the disorganization is so large, that there are employees that have been fired twice in the same week as well as government designated employees who has been fired by the same government.

      Regards.

      -lem

    2. Re:lockout or strike by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > Those that didn't join, but had to stop anyway because couldn't deliver due to the stopping of the industry, are now without a job as the government has set its sights in firing every possible employee.
      >[...]
      > As a funny note (if this can be funny at all), the disorganization is so large, that there are employees that have been fired twice in the same week as well as government designated employees who has been fired by the same government.

      Sad but true.

      I remember when I thought Atlas Shrugged was fiction.

  26. Re:Lower Frequency = More Power? Huh? by Tokerat · · Score: 1


    Slower speed = uses less fuel = more power because they don't need to shut the generators off everyday (i'm guessing). Then again there may be some other reason for this, I'm no AC genius by any means.

    Oh, and no pun intended. I mean, we all know the A.C.s know everything. ;-)

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  27. I've found the source of your problem by dscowboy · · Score: 3, Funny

    "'I wake with the sun,' said Rene Osurna, who works at a shipping company. 'And if you're two minutes late to the office, and everybody else is too, there's no problem.'"

    You work at a SHIPPING COMPANY and you don't care what time it is?! Are you on powerful anti-depressants? If you're two minutes late to the plane with your packages, there IS a problem.

    1. Re:I've found the source of your problem by blurfus · · Score: 2, Insightful
      but if you are "two minutes late ... and everybody else is too" (including the pilot) There still is NO problem

      get it?

      It's not just you bein late and everybody else being on time as *that* would be a problem for you...

      It's the fact that everybody is late that makes it not soo bad (over there anyways)

      cheers
      --
      will work for Karma
    2. Re:I've found the source of your problem by Spunk · · Score: 1

      Venezuela Express (VenEx): when it absolutely, positively has to get there overnight^W when we feel like it.

    3. Re:I've found the source of your problem by ivanandre · · Score: 1

      He said "Two minutes late for the office", clearly he isnt carrying the packages to te plane...

  28. Some more info about Venzuela by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, a large majority of the voting population voted for him the the election but many of those now hate him. Chavez is an inept idealist that only knows to destroy the nation and is abusing the democracy in the country. Not that the US respects democracy, George Bush cheered at the coup attempt last year which would have been rather undermocratic.

    Even so, Chavez gives support to the Colombian guerillas which have no political aim anymore except to create anarchy so that the drug trade can thrive.

    Chavez must go, but the opposition should have waited until the referendum in August because they have made the situation much worse.

    Julius

    1. Re:Some more info about Venzuela by mirko · · Score: 1
      create anarchy so that the drug trade can thrive.

      That's scary, especially when you know that drug-producing countries only get 2% of the jackpot which makes its revenue lower than the actual world-aid.

      here's a quote from the above link :
      "Only one percent of the earnings of illicit drug trade is earned by the farmers in developing countries," Emafo said. "It has been estimated that 50 to 66 percent of drug trafficking profit is made in developed countries where most of the illicit drugs are consumed," he
      said.


      So, well, they'd rather grow beans and potatoes to feed themselves instead of growing shite that will only benefit to abroad trafficants...
      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
  29. Heh Heh Heh Heh by wahay · · Score: 0, Troll

    Hey beavis. It's like funny and stuff when countries have wierd power problems and stuff after american corporate interests try and cripple their economies by instituting a lock-out, calling it a strike, and trying to overthrow their democratically elected president.

    Don't those stoopid assmunches know that they are supposed to have the business candidate swept into office by keeping the ethnic minorities out of the polls?

  30. Thinking about it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If you thought Venezuela's political crisis...

    Did anyone actually think about Venezuela's political crisis? Does anyone actually know where to find Venezuela on a map?

    1. Re:Thinking about it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as an european, i can answere both questions with yes

    2. Re:Thinking about it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bfd.

      as a USian, i can draw a freaking map of S. America with their country on it, and i know the colors in their cute little flag.

      but paraguay and uruguay, now those countries i will never be able to keep straight...

    3. Re:Thinking about it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, what an ignorant...

      Did anyone actually think about this ignorant? Does anyone actually know where to find him on a phone guide?

    4. Re:Thinking about it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, make sure you call to the united states! =)

  31. I knew it would come to this by dscowboy · · Score: 1

    Now even the clocks are on strike! Chavez, you know it's time to step down when time itself refuses to advance while you're in power.

    1. Re:I knew it would come to this by tucolino · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      good one! fuck him! he's a parasite and everything harmful the country!

    2. Re:I knew it would come to this by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > Now even the clocks are on strike! Chavez, you know it's time to step down when time itself refuses to advance while you're in power.

      Great. Now everyone's local Bolivarian Circle will be by tonight with baseball bats, clubs, and columbian neckties to beat the hell out of, and then incinerate, their capitalist running-dog timepieces. Oh well, that means more jobs (namely beating on clocks) for the poor! Viva la Revolucion!

  32. Going the Other Direction... by kevinatilusa · · Score: 4, Funny

    The book "Legends of Caltech" tells of students who played a trick on their math professor as follows: The Professor (Tom Apostol) gave very carefully scripted lectures designed to end precisely in the time allotted. For a few weeks, each day students would go in the lecture hall before class and 1) Change the clock to run 10-15% faster. 2) Set the clock backwards a few minutes so it caught up at the beginning of lecture. When the Professor (who didn't wear a watch) noticed himself seemingly falling farther and farther behind, he tended to get more and more incoherent as he tried to finish the lecture which he "knew" he had enough time to do.

  33. About the old electric clocks... by anubi · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Yeh, over the short term, they can vary. But I know they do try to make up for lost time, as they do count every cycle and make up for lost cycles. The concept of using power lines as a timing source was popularized back - in the 1910 time frame, by the Telechron company.

    These are extremely reliable clocks. I still have one. Mine was made in Ashland, Massachusetts (USA) in 1941. Its still running. Keeps good time. I did have to change the line cord though.. the old one's insulation got so brittle that just bending the wire would shatter the plastic. They did not make decent flexible insulation in those days.. but the motor itself is still fine.. its alternating layers of winding and wax paper. No brushes.

    Internally, they are shaded-pole induction motors, which use the reversals of the incoming power to generate a rotating magnetic field, upon which a magnetized rotor follows in exact sync. If the power goes off for an hour, the clock loses an hour. It restarts when it sees power again. Its not the most efficient clock though, it uses about 10 watts of power.

    About every appliance clock that had hands or those little digital "flappers" used this design.

    For what its worth, a lot of the old record players used a larger version of the same motor that drives the clocks - and it was used as a cheap means of spinning the turntable at 33, 45, or 78 RPM by means of selecting a different radius on the mechanical friction-drive transmission that drove the turntable from the motor spindle. It was a simple thing - basically a little moveable rubber-rimmed wheel that rested on one of three different radius areas of the motor spindle, then drove the inside of the turntable from that. Very inexpensive, yet robust. ( but a bit noisy - a little drive noise always was present, and we used "wow" and "flutter" to describe the low and high speed mechanical aberrations of turntable rotation).

    Probably more than you wanted to know about these things.. but I thought I would toss it in for anyone interested.

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  34. Sounds like an expedient Calif. economy... by antispamist · · Score: 1

    We're slowly grinding to a halt out here, except it's our cars, businesses, etc. I feel for them and think it would be in our best interest if we got down there and patted some ppl on the back and blew in their ears.

    --
    --Thei Antispamist A useless endevor that will cer
  35. DOJ Press Release by dscowboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Country of Venezuela is now the property of the United States government.

    The nation and it's inhabitants were surrendered to U.S. law enforcement pursuant to a federal prosecution and felony plea agreement for conspiracy to violate criminal copyright laws.

    Venezuela pled guilty to conspiring to violate federal copyright laws by illegally "modifying" the digital time-keeping mechanism of clocks. Under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Clockwork Act), the modification of clocks to display an unauthorized time is illegal, no matter what American or non-American police state you live in. "If people were allowed to make their clocks show whatever time they wanted, it might allow them to read a time that the manufacturer never intended, like 14 o'clock" declared Ayatollah Ashcroft in a press conference today. "Not only is that illegal, it's wrong, and naughty. Next thing you know they'll be bathing in the nude or teaching women to read."

    As a result, the country of Venezuela is now the property of the United States government. The country and it's people will immediately be put to their rightly intended use: the production of inferior quality candles to be used in Catholic rituals.

    1. Re:DOJ Press Release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other news, while the DNS for the venezuelan government webpage has been somehow redirected to point at a Department of Justice webpage containing a short rant against "clock modding", you can still visit them by going directly to their IP address at 172.16.1.255 (You may be able to access them at their original address for a brief time while the dns changes propigate).

      The venezuelan government's message board is still up, and perhaps we will be able to get some news from there soon, but so far the message board has been of little help as everyone with a registered account on it appears to be on some sort of strike.

    2. Re:DOJ Press Release by epukinsk · · Score: 1

      the production of inferior quality candles to be used in Catholic rituals.

      Ashcroft is a protestant.

  36. Re:Lower Frequency = More Power? Huh? by anubi · · Score: 1
    Lowering the frequency is puzzling to me too.. but then I do not know how they are set up.

    Conventional sense tells me that if you lower the frequency, you will also lower the inductive reactance, which will increase current, which will increase load power, which will make things go from bad to worse fast.

    Drop the frequency down too low and you may start to saturate the magnetic cores of the main power distribution transformers.. That will do [really bad] wonders for a system already struggling to supply enough power. Running a "starved" power grid is quit hard to do - as once you start dropping voltage, motors, especially large synchronous ones, start drawing more current as the phase difference between shaft position and power source increases, with the resulting increase in current demand causing the voltage to drop even further. The inevitable result is the motor overheats with possible and sometimes likely destruction of the motor.

    When we had this problem of insufficient power in Southern California, we handled it through three remedies..

    1) We paid whatever the "generators" asked. The state is now billions of dollars in debt. I can't quote exact prices per KWH, maybe others know this, but it was outrageous. This did not help the finances of California one bit.

    2) We had rolling blackouts. Certain service areas ( sans critical facilities ) were placed on a list, and as power dropped below the ability of the grid to support it, we dropped areas for a period of one hour. At which time, either demand had diminished, or another area would have to be blacked out.

    3) An intensive campaign to get people to conserve... lots of ads, and incentives for people to put remote load controlling boxes on air conditioners, so that the power company could shut them down remotely when a crunch was going on.

    The "brown-outs" are very destructive. And these days, its even worse, as electronic stuff is apt to do all sorts of unpredictable things when it is not supplied with the proper voltage. So, we did not have any "brown outs" this go around. Just as good as far as I am concerned... I would rather be without power for an hour at the time, and when I get power, its the correct power. Otherwise I get to replace the refrigerator compressor.

    The main Pacific Intertie the West Coast runs on means all the generators and loads are running together. If that puppy goes down, I understand its quite tricky to get it back up.

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  37. Narco News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out Narco News. It has articles that are about the whole region.

  38. Re:Lower Frequency = More Power? Huh? by pryan · · Score: 1
    Quote from the article:


    The river powering a major hydroelectric plant in southeast Venezuela lost force due to a severe drought in February 2001. To prevent blackouts, the country slightly lowered the frequency of the current.


    Just by going on the information in the article, my guess is that one side-effect of slowing down the generators is a lower frequency for the current. Why would they slow down the generators? Because slower generators use less water.

    Presumably they calculated the amount of water feeding the river and made sure that the generators used no more water than would cause the river to get too low, thus preventing the generators from stopping, thus avoiding blackouts.
  39. Re:Lower Frequency = More Power? Huh? by karlm · · Score: 1

    It's been a while since I've studied anything electrocal. However, your power lines have non-negligible inductance. Lower frequence means less voltage drop across the inductor. You also get some hysteresis losses (non-ideal inductors) which will be reduced by lowering the frequency. The first factor doesn't actually effect energy efficiency, just your ability to consume electriciy (voltage just doesn't dip as much when you can't keep up). The second factor directly reduces the percentage fo power lost during distribution. Back in HS, they told us that power was brought into the minneapolis area from power plants in the Dakotas via DC transmission lines to minimize losses. DC is better for distribution, but it's much cheaper to build an efficient and powerful AC motor vs. and equivalent DC motor. The same goes for generators.

    --
    Copyright Violation:"theft, piracy"::Anti-Trust Violation:"thermonuclear price terrorism"<-Overly dramatic language.
  40. independent media... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is over here.

  41. info by mcbevin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    there was an attempted coup, in which the US was allegedly involved.

    whether involved or not, Bush was pretty delighted at the replacement of the elected president with a dictator. and there were at least talks between the white house and the coup plotters in which the white house obviously didn't do a very good job in discouraging the coup plotters.

    for a collection of references to articles giving a good background on this issue, see my website (comments, additional info much appreciated).

    also provided on the same page is a history of similar coups over the past 50 years in Latin America which occurred to governments in response to actions similar to what Chavez has been doing (land reform, nationalisation of oil/industries). basically anything to alleviate the poor majority. it is this historical pattern which gives the biggest indication that the CIA may be behind it. however, the difference in venezuela is that the CIA supposedly stopped performing these coups.

    perhaps the failure of the coup indicates how much harder it is for them to pull them off today (they have to be much more careful to leave no fingerprints, as the public is much less likely to support them without the cold war excuse).

    1. Re:info by Dusabre · · Score: 1, Troll

      Next post try using capital letters. And perhaps note that most of the population wants Chavez out and he is refusing to hold a referendum as required by the Constitution he himself wrote. He may have been elected but he's a dictator now.

    2. Re:info by mcbevin · · Score: 2, Informative

      As far as I've read, Chavez is not objecting to the scheduled referendum, just the opposition's demands that he immediately hold one - see http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2724855.stm .

      'The Venezuelan Government has rejected an opposition call for a vote on a constitutional amendment to allow the term of President Hugo Chavez to be cut short.'

      'However, the government said it endorsed another plan - to hold a binding referendum on Mr Chavez's presidency after August.'

      'We're proposing what we always have: referendum after 19 August as laid down in the constitution," Vice-President Jose Vicente Rangel said.'

      I don't believe that Chavez is perfect, but he has done a lot of good for the poor majority of the country, and he did win the last election with a landslide. He is also lot preferable to the people trying to replace him (i.e. the coup leaders, who in the three days they had in power managed to establish a dictatorship).

      If people in America started demanding Bush hold an election tommorrow would it make him a dictator to say 'wait till the next scheduled elections'?

      Again, for more info see my website.

    3. Re:info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He just wants to have some time to spend all the money he stole from the country, and maybe meanwhile he can get rid of the 4,000,000 of signs that ask for a referendum.
      His supporters already tried to take over the place where the signs are kept.
      I already visited your website, and I have to say that your news sources don't know whats going on here. If you know spanish you should check local venezuelan news (and no, I don't think they are biased).

    4. Re:info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whether involved or not, Bush was pretty delighted at the replacement

      As would any human being with any compassion.

    5. Re:info by mcbevin · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately I don't know Spanish. However, from what I've read I have the impression that the Venezuelan media is controlled by the opposition to Chavez - I don't know if the local venezuelen news you quote falls under that category? I would very much like to get some more reliable (English) sources on the matter if you know of any. I assume you're not referring to the BBC,CNN,NY-Times when you criticise my sources?

      The only other, questionable, source I thought I used was regarding what impact Chavez has had. I can't find any major media providing any decent analysis of this, but would be interested if you could provide any accurate articles. Has he really not made significant improvements to the situation of the poor majority as my source claimed?

      btw, am I to assume from what you say that you are actually in Venezuela? Then I would interested to hear more of your opinion. Do you think the US was really behind the coup?

    6. Re:info by 2lb3rt · · Score: 1

      I do not really know of very independent information sources, but the bbc is fairly good.

      About if Chavez has made any significat improvement to the situation, I would say not at all. He is all hopes but no makes. He has the military mind too deeply rooted. He is a good talker when he wants to convice you, and has a very good memory. He is a leader, but not a good one. He cannot self-restrain, and a President should have the capability of thinking under pressure before talking. He is also surrounded by not the brightest people. He could have done so much with his popularity but did nothing. I think he had good intentions, but excessive power owerpowered himself.

      Venezuela's opposition is not better. That is the worst part. The remedy could be as bad as the disease. There are so many self-objectives in the opposition, that you wonder. The opposition has another negative point, there is no leader.

      If the US was behind the coup. I don't have any source to back it, but I'm almost 100% sure they were. As they were behind al qaeda when they fought the russians, as they were behind saddam when he fought Iran, etc. It is not the US people, it is the US government that the US people do not really know all they have done. But it is a problem with any empire, not just this one. The russians, the frenchs, the englishs, all of them has something to do with world crimes, we just don't know. It is all about power and money.

      Capitalism hasn't helped either. I do not mean comunism is good. Comunism is worst, it destroys hope. But capitalism destroys humanity slowly. Companies objective is to make money to their shareholders not to make people happy. Efficiency is beign pursue in disregards of people.

      Venezuela had all the resources to be a developed country. Greed destroyed it all. Just like the Enrons-like here. There is always hope, and there are always people who can make it, but who knows what will happen.

    7. Re:info by ZeroConcept · · Score: 1

      Try here

    8. Re:info by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Bush was pretty delighted at the replacement of the elected president with a dictator."

      In Chavez' case, it's a very, very fine line between the two. I feel there's something inherently wrong with extending your own term limits. And then there's the way he's been handling strike leaders lately...

    9. Re:info by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "If people in America started demanding Bush hold an election tommorrow would it make him a dictator to say 'wait till the next scheduled elections'?"

      Bush hasn't pushed through a constitutional amendment lengthening his own term. Perhaps there wouldn't be a need for a referendum if elections were next held according to the original schedule.

    10. Re:info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I live in Venezuela. I don't know if the US was behind the coup, but I would like that, because that would mean that maybe they can help us again. In April 11 we had many dead people, but even though, it was one of the happier days in my life, I thought that the nightmare was over, but it wasn't. The situation of the poor majority is worse than ever. Not only the poor, also the middle class is struggling with this goverment that has lost any bind with true democracy. I have so many friends that lost their jobs, and many of them already flew to other countries. That is something you won't find in news websites, that is something you can see in Venezuelan streets, abandoned children of poverty, unemployment, professionals working as taxi drivers, etc. We are not only suffering the economic disaster, we are also under a huge political and social problem. This is a very small part of all the problems we have, but unfortunately I can't describe the situation as I would like to because my english isn't good enough. Now that we have lost our democracy I think it is a blessing that few people recognize. I tried to send you some comments of whats going on here, but I couldn't find an email address at your website. Anyways, maybe this ends before I can email you all my thoughts about the subject, I hope it ends before August.

    11. Re:info by mcbevin · · Score: 1

      sounds like you've got a pretty realist view there. sad but true. if you're right about chavez (and you're in a better position to judge) then thats a pity. i hope the situation can improve at least somewhat.

    12. Re:info by Artemis3 · · Score: 1

      Meaning?

      You live under a rock or what? Venezuela's current constitution was recently approved in 1999 and new authorities were elected for the current period.

      No amendments have been made to date.

      --
      Artix
      Your Linux, your init.
  42. Re:Lower Frequency = More Power? Huh? by riedquat · · Score: 1

    Another explanation is that the article isn't quite correct. I would expect that the extra load causes the generators to slow down, and the lower frequency is an involuntary consequence of demand outstripping supply, rather than a decision by the producers.

  43. I thought it was cptlst banks breaking savings by aaron_pet · · Score: 1

    You say something about a communist leasder...

    and make it like he is at fault... maybe it is, but I heard that there were international banks that are screwing the place over.

    I remember hearing about people not being able to withdraw their savings.

    Maybe it is the leader's fault, maybe it's the banks that tricked the leader, maybe the leader resisted but was beaten down by americans.

    Or I could be thinking about the wrong conflict...
    I was thinking of one in South America though...

    --
    Please use [ informative / summarizing ] SUBJECT LINES
    Flame me here
    1. Re:I thought it was cptlst banks breaking savings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "....but I heard"...
      Hmmm..

      "international banks that are screwing the place over."

      If by 'screwing over' you mean not lending them more money after they wouldn't make the payments on the first loan...then i suppose...

      "I remember hearing about people not being able to withdraw their savings."

      See fractional reserve banking system...everyone on the planet is in the same boat.

      "Maybe it is the leader's fault, maybe it's the banks that tricked the leader, maybe the leader resisted but was beaten down by americans."

      Okay,that's it...now you're just trolling...
      How about maybe their leader is just a communist wannabe and their country is just following the long history of communist countries going down the toilet...
      Seems more likely given history...

    2. Re:I thought it was cptlst banks breaking savings by luismunoz · · Score: 1

      What you're saying about the banks is partially untrue. In fact, the banks joined the strike a few weeks ago, although with a limited operating schedule instead of simply shutting down.

      As of today, venezuelans are subjected to not being able to move (or access!) foreign currency. The reason why the foreign currency is so necessary has to do with the lack of confidence in the government.

      This is a vicious circle kind of thing, where the government keeps screwing things up and the population responds by taking its few savings out of the country. Certainly the national strikes have had a large influence...

      Regards.

      -lem

    3. Re:I thought it was cptlst banks breaking savings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably thinking of Argentina, actually.
      There have been banking issues in Venezuela, but they've been relatively peripheral.
      In Argentina, government legislation about banks did lead to major rebellions. But Argentina was a poster-child for the IMF at the time, its leadership solidly right-wing.

      Rufus Polson

  44. Hm. . . Well that's bloody weird! by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    I had no idea that plug-in clocks worked this way! Am I just reading all these posts incorrectly or what? You mess with the input electrical power of a digital clock and 'time' speeds up or slows down???

    What about power regulation circuits? What about. . . I don't know. I guess it makes sense in a variety of . . , but that's a whole can of conspiracy even I am hesitant to open this early in the A.M.

    Well. . .

    Maybe just a peek. But, bewarned; this is unfinished thinking. Not yet certified by the Lad's Fantasti-Corp proving ground and safety testing facilities. . .

    So. . , time is moving faster these days. Have you noticed? Sure you have. But, of course, if you're like the average bear, you've chalked it up to shifting perceptions resulting from growing older and such. When you were a kid, those long summer days back in the 70's just seemed to mosey on forever. (Anybody born in the 80's, sorry. You don't have enough reference to play in this thread, and frankly you got gyped out of a good childhood. But don't feel bad! You got those Ninja Turtles, right? They were cool. Sort of. Whatever. My condolances. You'll get another chance in another life.) Anyway, when I was a kid, Time was really nice and slow! I even remember getting confused trying to count how many years had passed since Star Wars came out. We'd get mixed up because we kept counting the summer holidays as a whole year. A legit error, in my books. Damn! You could get so much stuff done in a day back then!

    Not like these days, boy! Holy smokes, I get up, eat breakfast, take a shower and it's already lunch time! I do maybe two things, work like a bastard right till bed time, (getting almost nothing done), and that's it Bob! That's the day. Gone in a flash. And I certainly don't think it's just a matter of perceptions. (Well, technically, everything is a matter of perceptions on a certain level, but that's not what I'm talking about here.)

    Time always speeds up before the end, according to a variety of schools of thought. Heck, even the bible in all it's propagandized, muddied, corrupted and manipulated paragraphs describes the days being shortened near the end. --Though, I prefer the Star Fleet reasoning; Ahem. "To explain the Time Differential we are experiencing, the analogy of a sea shore is an apt example; The water is being sucked out as the Wave approaches." Or something pseudo-technical. Screw it. Blast 'em with the photon torpedos and let's get the hell out of here while everybody's confused.

    Oh, best of all! (This is just hilarious!) Even the king of tow-the-line science geeks, buddy boy, Jay Ingram over on Canada's Discovery Channel, did a short piece on how Time is speeding up. Can you believe it? It's getting so damned noticable that they had to pull out their big guns!

    Of course, Jay-boy put the expected spin on things, (Perceptions. What was the word they came up with. . ? Hm, gone now. But it was a very clever and chalk-dusty sort of phrase at any rate), and with the time-tested propagandic, "Trust your warm and safe Educational Authority Figures, Kids!" video production qualities stamped on the segment, pencil neck Jay signed off on yet another piece of "Nothing to see here, Citizen," documentary, and stalked away with that quiet yet moody air of job disatisfaction he has been displaying ever since the mid nineties when he landed the job of Science-Boy Anchor. --I wonder if perhaps on a deep level he realizes that he's shoveling shit for the Man, and despises himself for it. The world may never know. Or care.)

    Anyway. . .

    So all the clocks are rigged, eh? That's almost too juicy an idea to jump on! So I don't think I will. --Cuz, while time is a certainly deeply rooted function of awareness, and while having a round, numbered face pounding away the seconds with rhythmic All-Seeing enforcement, might serve to hold this rapidly unraveling reality in place for a short while longer, (while the power elite pack their underwear and finalize their highly unlikely escape plans), I just don't think that Time is at the beck and call of a nation of wrong clocks.

    Still. . . It's a neat idea, in a Twilight Zone kind of way!

    And when it comes to battling geeks, I bet Rod Serling could kick Jay Ingram's butt any day of the week. That's the power of imagination, baby!


    -Fantastic Lad

  45. Whoa. This is heavy! by boris_the_hacker · · Score: 1

    Great Scott! Someone find the Doc he will know what to do!

    --
    chris at darkrock dot co dot uk
    http colon slash slash www dot darkrock dot co dot uk
  46. *What*... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...The FUCK is this doing on slashdot? If i wanted to read about the failure of modern civilization to provide resources for its citisens, i'd read stuff at CNN/BBC/Local papers.

    Read the top slogan; "News for nerds - Stuff that matters". This does NOT matter.

    1. Re:*What*... by mcbevin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Amusing. While your general point is correct, I would have to disagree with a few things you say there.

      'This does NOT matter'

      So endless rants on DMCA, Microsoft's evils, the latest tech toy matter more than issues like war and the exploitation of the third world? Maybe this stuff doesn't belong on slashdot, but that it doesn't matter????

      'If i wanted to read about the failure of modern civilization to provide resources for its citisens, i'd read stuff at CNN/BBC/Local papers.'

      I think if you read the stuff at CNN, local papers etc you won't really be getting much of the story. Want to read why Latin America really is screwed up? Why the CIA overthrew so many democratic governments there (thus explaining why the idea that it tried to otherthrow the Venezuelan govt. is at least plausible), or (just as an example) why the US waged covert war on Nicaragua and still refuses to honour the World Court ruling adjudging it to owe Nicaragua $17 billion in damages, and instead sucks the life out of Nicaragua by strangling it with debt payments. Or a real discussion regarding the war on Iraq. Try finding that on US media etc with their 'selective amnesia'. I do admit however that BBC, which you also mention is better (not being corporate owned always helps).

      Forgotten History

    2. Re:*What*... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do admit however that BBC, which you also mention is better (not being corporate owned always helps).

      Take another look, Sherlock:

      BBC = British Broadcasting Corporation

    3. Re:*What*... by mcbevin · · Score: 1

      Very good point there :)

      What I should have said is that US media is owned by large corporations (i.e. Fox News by Rupert Murdoch (who owns a lot of media all over the world), NBC by General Electric, ABC by Walt Disney, CBS+MTV by Viacom (another huge conglomerate), and whats worse is that the government is looking at removing some monopoly controls which would only make the situation worse.

      BBC in contrast is independent, while admittedly a corporation.

    4. Re:*What*... by elefantstn · · Score: 1
      --
      If it ain't broke, you need more software.
    5. Re:*What*... by mcbevin · · Score: 1
      I was considering reading the book you mention, however looking at the reviews on amazon.com, I saw this -


      What's even more annoying, however, is the "Guide"'s cheerleading of the International Monetary Fund. Just about every major public intellectual -- including Noam Chomsky, Chalmers Johnson, Joseph Stiglitz, Milton Friedman, men who come from all sides of the globalization debate -- find the IMF a disastrous organization, one that should be radically reformed if not shut down completely. Many critics of the IMF accuse the organization of "root canal economics" -- especially with its advocacy of high interest rates and tax increases during harsh downturns. Critics also point out that the IMF is obsessed with balanced budgets at all costs which, time and time again, have deepened and prolonged economic recovery in many Third World nations. Yet, the "Guide" blindly praises IMF policy, never once mentioning its failures or shortcomings, and this diminishes the book's central argument -- that all of Latin America's problems are self-inflicted.

      Also, and perhaps more significant, the book totally skips over covert CIA operations in Central and South America. There is barely any mention of the 1972 coup against President Allende of Chile, nor is there any reference to the Iran-Contra scandal. And the 1954 CIA coup in Guatemala is barely mentioned in passing, as if undermining a country's democracy and leading it into a 36-year civil war is some sort of minor event. As well, the "Guide" says nothing about America's endless war on drugs -- certainly a relevant and controversial issue.

      These gaps, combined with the erroneous historical facts, deflate the book as a whole. The authors, it seems, have consciously avoided certain topics -- tough topics -- just so their thesis remains perfectly in tact. As a result, the book lacks fairness, balance and objectivity.


      Now, any book trying to put the blame for Latin America's woes on the Latin Americans as opposed to outside meddling, which completely fails to address the main cases of outside meddling, cannot claim to have seriously addressed the question. So I don't honestly see much point in reading such a book.

      I don't mind reading books with a point of view / agenda, however a book which just completely ignores the main arguments/evidence against its own thesis is a waste of time (please correct me if the review is totally wrong).

      That said, I think the thesis might have some truth, however the US's policy of exploitation over the past century is nevertheless largely to blame. The sad fact of L.A. is that the people have never been given the chance to show what they could achieve due to US meddling. It is hypocritical and unfair to blame a people for their problems when so many of their attempts to improve their situation have been thwarted by us.

  47. Re:Hm. . . Well that's bloody weird! by anubi · · Score: 1
    I had no idea that plug-in clocks worked this way! Am I just reading all these posts incorrectly or what? You mess with the input electrical power of a digital clock and 'time' speeds up or slows down???

    They are probably still using the old magnetic technology. Not "digital" per se, but they do keep track of time by mechanically accumulating the phase reversals of the power line.

    Telechron Line Operated Clocks

    They were quite popular in the States a decade ago.. they are extremely robust. I have one made in 1941 thats still working fine.

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  48. Re:Lower Frequency = More Power? Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is all about the energy put into the system. The higher the frequency the higher the amount of energy you get out of your wall outlet in a given time frame. The generators are turning slower because the energy put into the grid as a whole doesnt allow them to go any faster.

    Or something like that ;-)

  49. Hold on a second! (pardon the pun) by SystematicPsycho · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do most of the people in Venezuela plug their clocks into power sockets? Hello? Does that make much sense? Most clocks run on batteries. I think the article attempts to mislead.

    Another great piece of pathetic journalism, causing the not so intelligent people in the world to have a conversation about something that doesn't and wondering when they'll find another great story from MSNBC.

    --
    Analytic & algebraic topology of locally Euclidean meterization of infinitely differentiable Riemmanian manifold
    1. Re:Hold on a second! (pardon the pun) by micromoog · · Score: 1
      Another great piece of pathetic journalism, causing the not so intelligent people in the world to have a conversation about something...

      Thanks for joining.

    2. Re:Hold on a second! (pardon the pun) by umofomia · · Score: 1
      Do most of the people in Venezuela plug their clocks into power sockets? Hello? Does that make much sense? Most clocks run on batteries. I think the article attempts to mislead.
      I don't know where you're from, but certainly in the US, I believe at least a majority of clocks run off the electrical outlet. If the frequency were to fall behind, these clocks would lag as well. Just about everyone's alarm clock falls in this category. Also, this includes clocks like the ones on your VCR and microwave.
    3. Re:Hold on a second! (pardon the pun) by SystematicPsycho · · Score: 1

      Thanks for joining.

      --
      Analytic & algebraic topology of locally Euclidean meterization of infinitely differentiable Riemmanian manifold
    4. Re:Hold on a second! (pardon the pun) by SystematicPsycho · · Score: 1

      I'm not an electrician, but in that case it would not only be the clocks that are effected? Therefore the article should not just be talking about clocks and how screwed up Venezuela is, it should also be talking about what other real dangers there are as a result of the power fluctuating. Maybe something like traffic lights, machinery etc. I still believe the article is misleading and focusing on something that makes gullible people smile.

      --
      Analytic & algebraic topology of locally Euclidean meterization of infinitely differentiable Riemmanian manifold
    5. Re:Hold on a second! (pardon the pun) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you'd really notice it in any other aspect of life. So you wait (86400-150)/86400 the time for a red light or your blender runs that fraction as fast. Who would know?

    6. Re:Hold on a second! (pardon the pun) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, thank YOU!

  50. MOD PARENT UP !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MOD PARENT UP !!

  51. How to win the war ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take out a countries atomic clocks.

  52. THE ANSWER LIES HERE by EEgopher · · Score: 1

    By slowing down the generators, you convert the mechanical energy of their decelerating rotational inertial mass into electrical power. Quite similar to regenerative braking in electric cars. Now, once steady-state 50Hz is obtained (having dropped from 60Hz) I don't know how you could continue to get an energy boost; I'd have to look that one up.

    --
    hi, I like pancakes -.-- -.-- --..
    1. Re:THE ANSWER LIES HERE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROTFL! And assuming that this would work... it would provide extra power for, say, 15 minutes?

  53. Re:Ignorant American? by ecalkin · · Score: 1

    ** NO **

    the idiots can't admit that they are ignorant! this person has the brass to admit that he doesn't know everything! amen!

    eric

  54. Re:Ignorant American? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Isn't that just a fancy way of saying you're an idiot?"

    Isn't THAT a fancy way of saying you're jealous??

  55. News Flash: Venezuela Approaches Speed of Light by Eagle7 · · Score: 1

    Yep, that's right. To hell with Occum's Razor I say - that's a much more interesting explanation than thier A/C frequency slowing down. See, this is what happens when everyone grows up on TV and video games - no imagination. Sad.

    --
    _sig_ is away
  56. Re:I know far less than I should. (HIS NAME Is.. by teatime · · Score: 1

    His name is Hugo Chavez not 'cesar chavez'.

  57. It must be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, radio listens to YOU!
    (And that really is the case)

  58. Venezuela by gmuslera · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... is the best place to stay at the end of the world. It will come several hours late.

  59. Are you sure that Einstein was right? by PaddyM · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is this another example of special relativity? Or just another example of clocks malfunctioning which might lead one to believe that "time slows down".

  60. Uh, ever hear of circuit breakers? by JCMay · · Score: 1

    They are dropped onto enemy electric lines which shorts out the lines - and with a near 0 load, the generators spin out of control, and kill people in the powerplant when it busts open / bursts into flames.


    Even power generating facilities have equipment protecting switchgear. Very large circuit breakers. They open within a cycle or two-- very quickly. There won't be any damage to generating equipment, but there won't be any power transmission either until the lines are cleared.
  61. Re:Lower Frequency = More Power? Huh? by astro-g · · Score: 1

    has ANYBODY here actually done high school science??

    take a DC electric motor, spin the shaft - easy
    dead short the terminals, try to spin the shaft,
    if its a good motor - verry dificult - the energy your inputting into the motor by trying to spin it is being converted into current in the wires, and then to heat.
    the same principle still applies using AC generators -when all those big industrial plants fire up thier equipment it draws a huge amount of current. its going to take more torque to turn the generator, there may simply not be enough to turn the generator fast enough, the boilers, the hydro feed, the diesel engine powering the generator is no longer able to spin it as fast as usual, under ideal circimstances theey all spin at 60(where i am)Hz divided by the number of poles in the generator (take 3 as a guess) all times 60 seconds in a miute gives 1200rpm
    the rate of spin is directly linked to the frequency of the output power.
    my apologies to those of you who allready know this/have a better understanding than myself)

    the frequency is NOT lowered intentionally.
    although it will have an effect on the
    voltage/current output of a transformer, remember the voltage is transformed up at the power station, and tranformed back down at the sub stations. depending on the generators native voltage, (wich wont be anything like high tension) the affect of varying frequency on consumer end voltages should be minamal.

  62. What is going on in Venezuela? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You want to know what the hell is going on in Venezuela?
    Check this 2mb video
    (there are english, spanish, french and italian versions).

  63. Heres why. by PrimeNumber · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most clocks, I don't know about you but I use have two digital plug in clocks, they both use AC power rectified from a step down transformer to DC power using a classic 'bridge' rectifier, then use a voltage regulator chip to smooth out and regulate voltage to a much smaller but consistent DC voltage, typicaly 3-12 volts DC. The older 780x series of voltage regulator chips were good, but the more modern chips are much better. The amount of power on the grid fluctuates every day, however the frequency doesn't. Which, for older mechanical clocks would make a difference because an AC motor rotates in a direct relation to the input voltage frequency. For the type of clocks most people use it would make a difference because the chips inside use a steady DC current, which brings me to my next point.

    The problem that is likely causing your clocks to get off sync are cheap and shoddy timing circuits. An example of this would be the shoddy clock chip on the old IBM clones. This chip (Intel 8253) has a very low clock tick-resolution ~18.2 times a second, which was fine for polling a joystick, etc on the older boxes, but is terrible for accurate time-keeping. Most digital watches have millions of 'clock-ticks' per second.

    1. Re:Heres why. by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      This chip (Intel 8253) has a very low clock tick-resolution ~18.2 times a second, which was fine for polling a joystick, etc on the older boxes, but is terrible for accurate time-keeping.

      A low resolution clock is terrible for precise timekeeping. For accuracy, it's fine to use a 1 hertz timebase as long as thats all the precision that you need and the one hertz signal is accurate. The 8253 is just a counter chip, it has no bearing whatsoever on the accuracy of the frequency that it's fed. The crystal in the circuit is what determines accuracy, and that has often a problem where cheap crystals were used.

    2. Re:Heres why. by PrimeNumber · · Score: 1

      No.

      In your analogy, the chip itself would be defining its own frequency, which isn't how PC clocks work.

      See this page for more information. However an excerpt from this page verifies my explanation:

      Time Losses in System Clock on Windows 95-Based Computers
      The system clock on a Windows 95-based computer may experience a cumulative loss of time.

      When you run the Date/Time tool in Control Panel, the computer's real-time clock (RTC) is updated using the MS-DOS system time. Because the RTC is being updated by a device that is less accurate, a cumulative loss of time can occur over a period of time.

      The MS-DOS system time is accurate to 1/18 of a second. Each time you use the Date/Time tool, an incorrect time is written to the computer's RTC. The amount of time lost depends on how often the Date/Time tool is opened and the amount of time since it was last opened.

      For standalone computers, this may not be much of a problem. However, with network programs that rely upon time and date stamps to ensure the proper file is accessed, this can cause problems over a period of time.

      Synopsis of Microsoft Knowledge Base Article ID: Q157619

    3. Re:Heres why. by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      You're talking about a software bug. Latency problems caused by dropped clock 'ticks'. Get a better operating system.

      The hardware is precise to 1/18 of a second. It's as accurate as the actual frequency the crystal oscillates at, which depends on the tolerances allowed by the crystal manufacturer, temperature stability, etc., as crystals on a motherboard are not ovenized.

      If you don't know the difference between precision and accuracy, we can't have a discussion.

      Microsoft Knowledge Base?

      Yikes.

    4. Re:Heres why. by PrimeNumber · · Score: 1

      If you don't know the difference between precision and accuracy, we can't have a discussion.

      Agreed

      I know I shouldnt feed the trolls but here are the definitions of precision and accuracy:
      Precision
      1) The state or quality of being precise; exactness.
      2a)The ability of a measurement to be consistently reproduced. (Which applies to pc-clocks. - my comments.)
      2b)The number of significant digits to which a value has been reliably measured.

      Accuracy
      1) Conformity to fact.
      2) Precision; exactness.
      3) The ability of a measurement to match the actual value of the quantity being measured.

      Now that that is cleared up, there are a gazillion links for this search query on google...Read them all.

    5. Re:Heres why. by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Geez, the ignorance around here sometimes.

      So you found a crosslinked definition in a poor dictonary. That doesn't change how science defines the terms precision and accuracy.

      Precision is the degree of measurement resolution. A precise one pound scale is one graduated in 1/10 ounce. A less precise scale is one graduated in ounces.

      Accuracy is the percentage of error from a specified standard measure. A pound weight is accurate to the degree that it's the same as a standard weight at ANSI. I.e. a standard pound weight might be .01% accurate.

      They are as different as volume and weight.

      Not everything you find on the Internet is right. This is eight grade science stuff here. Stop digging yourself deeper into a pit of ignorance.

  64. Missing poll option by Xaleth+Nuada · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't have a clock you insensitive cl...

    ...oh wait.

    --

    I read Slashdot for the .sigs
  65. Geek and politics don�t mix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I think Geek should stop speaking about politics becauuse they seems known NOTHING. Actually I liv in Venezuela, I los my job beecause th company I was working for (an Amrican one) left the country, Im now one of the 24% people without work, Im an Electronic Engineer with a PhD. If you think Tech Jobs in the US are scarse here they are inexistent. You find Eengineers, arquitects, IT Pros, etc selling Cds on the streets (just an example) or driving Taxis. Our currecy dropped more than 200%. Of coursee yoou complain for the gas price, and I understand you, but for all this guys telling that only the richs are afected by this stupid goverment, are really really wrong. THis president has a TV show each sunday, ad talk for 6 hours, speaking bad about your cointry and any country or people not thinking as him. LAs sunday he spoke about Colombia, Spain and US, and Today US embasssy iss cclossed by a terrorist warning, and on thuesday two bomb explodes in the Colombia and Spanish embassy. He also chain all the Private TV each nigth and speaks for hours, what you think if Bush do the same???. And this is only few things we have here.

    1. Re:Geek and politics don�t mix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Judging from your mastery of English orthography and grammar, you appear to be a pre-teen rather than a PhD electrical engineer.

    2. Re:Geek and politics don�t mix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I wonder if your mastery in Spanish orthography and grammar is better than his English.

    3. Re:Geek and politics don�t mix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks my friend, some people think that the only language in the world is english.

  66. I live this every day by ivanaponte · · Score: 1

    I live in venezuela. This have been for almost a year I think. Every day I have to adjust the alarm clock 3 min. the drift seemed to stop on december. But it started again on january

  67. Re:Lower Frequency = More Power? Huh? by astro-g · · Score: 1

    why would DC be better for distrabution?? you cant run it through a transformer. using high voltage/low current minimises loss of power in the transmission lines (P=i*(r^2)) increasing the voltage by a facto of 100, and decreasing current by a factor of 100, at the transformer means that you only use 1% of the power you would otherwise have done heating up the high tension lines. DC motors are very easy compared to AC motors, nikolai tesla was told as a child that an AC motor was a physical imposibility by his science teacher, (whom tesla proved worng in fairly short order) on the other hand, AC generators had been shown to proved to be much more efficent allready by this time. (remember, tesla basically invented the modern power grid - from the exact type of generator, the three phase/mono phase scheme (although he favourd universal twin phase) to the transformers, industrial motors, and an knock off of eddisons lightbulb(tesla had worked for eddison, when he first mooved to america, they didnt get along, and tesla ended up working for General Electric Corporation, GEC won. tesla/gec could transmit power hundreds of times further than edisons low voltage DC system could manage.) here in NZ we use a 500KV DC+ve line to run power from the south island to the north island,(-ve is ground return!) where it is instantly re-inverted to AC, and transformed down. DC is only used where special cercumstances make it neccesary (about 70%(?) of NZ's power generating capacity is in the south island, and the gap, cook straight is big enough that running 3 wires is much more than a trivial problem, compared to 1 wire.) anyways, DC is ineficeint, except in special circumstances, its to be avoided, because you cant transform it. DC motors are ineffecient, but conceptulally simple. AC motors need a bit more thought, but the eliminate the most ineficent part of a (good) DC motor - the comutator brushes. and AC motor can use bearings, or rotoate the magnets, and leave the coils stationary (even better) AC generators ar massivly supereor to a dynamo. especially b/c if you want AC so you can use transformers, from a dynamo, oyu need to build an inverter, which is a horrid mess of transistors, or higher capacity equivelents and hideously expensive.

  68. Chaves is a fascist dictator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    "He certainly is not a communist, marxist, or even a socialist."

    He is certainly all of them. His economic policy is very socialist as it involves taking power from the people and concentrating it in the hands of the state rulers. Like extreme communists, he opposes worker rights, and he wants to ban worker-controlled labor unions (to make the place more like Communist paradises Cuba and North Korea.

    He has expressed great admiration for the current leftover Soviet colonial government that is ruining Cuba. Who else but a communist would do that? An even more troubling question, who else but a puppet of Castro would so love his horrific rule?

    He is very much in the model of Pol Pot, Allende, Castro, and Arbenz, trying to turn himself into "president for life" by quietly trying to get rid of political parties he does not control, and bringing media into his personal control (while censoring media outside of his control).

    The American (Bush administration) is involved with trying to restore democracy to Venezuela. This is not a secret;it is well reported. Good thing, this is!

    He's trying to turn Venezuela into another Cuba. The difference is that Chavez was elected, and Castro as a colonial governor. was installed by his Soviet masters. But the result is the same (be it imperialism or an "Election to End All Elections").

    "The economy is very much capitalist, and very much a democracy.

    Chavez has reduced both forms of freedom, and he proposes to get rid of all of it. After all, he has expressed that Castro's Cuba is his model (a place with no economic freedom or democracy). Once Chavez succeeds in making the place a one-party state, nothing will stop him.

    "In fact, his reaction to these protests seems a lot more measured than what it would be in the US."

    Yeah, right....

  69. Chavez land reform? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "starting housing projects, and engaging in land reform."

    Prisons for people who need "Re-education"? What great housing! Land reform where lands are stolen from people and added to his personal estates? Great land reform!

    He's been "undemocratic" as far as the sector of the population that has been benefitting from the oil boom is concerned

    He is undemocratic as far as everyone is concerned; he has made clear his intention to rig elections.

  70. Banana-republic thug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Chavez is another banana-republic thug in the image of Castro and Somoza.

    Unlike Somoza, he is smart enough to used silver-tongued lies about his oppression being to help the people.

    There is plenty of damning evidence against him. Too bad so many people are fooled when he speaks the invalid but seductive language of Marxism.

  71. Video signals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't the lower frequency also affect television and video since the frame rate is determined by the AC (ie. North America 60 Hz = 30 fps video NTSC, Europe 50 Hz = 25 fps PAL)? Would one hour television shows now be an hour and a bit?

    Someone also mentioned Japan running 2 different frequencies for east/west? Anyone know how that works for video?

    1. Re:Video signals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even in the US where power mais is 60HZ NTSC field rate is 59.97Hz.So, here in Venezuela, we are just adjusting our electricity frecuency to NTSC field rate to minimize interference.

  72. Hardly any US media owned by large corps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "What I should have said is that US media is owned by large corporations"

    Not true. Only a fraction of the total media outlets (the entire picture of print, radio, etc.) are owned by these companies.

    "and whats worse is that the government is looking at removing some monopoly controls which would only make the situation worse."

    Since there is no monopoly, these controls are not needed and should be removed. The need for such controls are typically brought up by those who want to censor or otherwise change the actual content of the media.

    1. Re:Hardly any US media owned by large corps by mcbevin · · Score: 1

      maybe you're right ....

      but can you perhaps explain a few things to me?

      why is no us-media reporting on iran's attempts to sue the us for its support of iraq during the iran-iraq war (in particular, its supply of chemical/biological weapons, and its destruction of iranian oil rigs)?

      or why the cnn (which another post saw fit to describe as 'leftist'???) saw fit to censor journalists during the gulf and afghanistan wars, reminding them to only provide pro-us reportage?

      or as an example of british media - the major newspaper guardian published a front page story called 'blood on his hands' with a picture of tony blair with blood on his hands, relating to blair's support of the war and also the us+uk responsibility in the deaths of 1.5 million iraqis due to lack of water,food,medication to date (see this link for information on exactly how heavy the responsibility rests on us+uk shoulders rather than saddam's). find me a major us newspaper with a picture of bush with blood on his hands as front page story, or something similar. or any story from aclaimed journalist john pilger for that matter.

      or why the cnn+times was forced to withdraw a story of nerve gas usage in vietnam by the us miliary, an unprecedented case of media censorship??

      or how many major us newspapers interested themselves in the reports on bush's election stealing? a bbc link is bbc article but i haven't found anything in a major us paper on this.

      how about the investigations into pre-sept 11 shares sales, or the alleged meeting between bin laden and the cia shortly before sept 11? all major stories in europe, obviously not important enough to warrant mention in the free-press of the us. or fox news pulling (without explanation) of its revelation into the huge israeli spy ring in the us, which was not covered by a single other paper?

  73. Is it all about oil? by GQuon · · Score: 1

    1
    2
    3
    4

    --
    Irene KHAAAAAAN!
  74. Why Latin America is screwed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "I think if you read the stuff at CNN, local papers etc you won't really be getting much of the story."

    CNN and the other left-wing media loves to blame the U.S. first.

    Want to read why Latin America really is screwed up?

    Latin America is screwed up because of West European imperialism from 1492 to 1900, US imperialism from 1900 to 1945, and Soviet imperialism from 1945 to 1989. The US's role has been positive since after ww2 (opposing imperialism in Latin America) helping make up for the first half of the 20th century.

    Why the CIA overthrew so many democratic governments there

    You cannot name ONE. from Arbenz' terror state (in which parties other than his own were outlawed) to Allende who enforced his rule with the Soviet army to the Sandinistas (who physically assaulted those who dared run against them in 1984).

    "(thus explaining why the idea that it tried to otherthrow the Venezuelan govt."

    That one is not democratic either. Hugo has made himself president-for-life, and is in the process of dismantling legal opposition to his rule.

    why the US waged covert war on Nicaragua

    You have it backwards. The Soviets waged war against this country during the 1980s. All the U.S. did was help keep Nicaraguan nationalism alive until the democratic process could actually overcome the Sandinista's rigged elections.

    "and still refuses to honour the World Court ruling adjudging it to owe Nicaragua $17 billion in damages

    Why not hold those guilty responsible. Well, the USSR is gone and Russia is bankrupt now. But maybe Castro could pay. He was personally involved with creating the Sandinistas.

    "Or a real discussion regarding the war on Iraq. Try finding that on US media etc with their 'selective amnesia'."

    The real discussion, with accurate information on all aspects, is going on in the U.S.

    "I do admit however that BBC, which you also mention is better (not being corporate owned always helps)."

    What is wrong with being corporate-owned? Most independent media is as a necessicity of corporate organization for liability reasons. The BBC is worse since it is government-run and government-controlled and thus represents actual ruling elites.

    1. Re:Why Latin America is screwed up by mcbevin · · Score: 1

      You cannot name ONE. from Arbenz' terror state (in which parties other than his own were outlawed) to Allende who enforced his rule with the Soviet army to the Sandinistas (who physically assaulted those who dared run against them in 1984).

      may i refer you to my website i find what you just say incredible. i don't mean to be rude, but your views can only be a product of propaganda. arbenz, allende, the sandinistas all represented, for their respective countries, the best thing that had happened to them. just look at what came before and after in every case!

      the russians also had nothing to do with events in latin america in this period. communism was the US's excuse of course, but there was very little russian involvement.

      Why not hold those guilty responsible

      you're incredible! so you are a better judge of this than the world court???

      You have it backwards. The Soviets waged war against this country during the 1980s. All the U.S. did was help keep Nicaraguan nationalism alive until the democratic process could actually overcome the Sandinista's rigged elections.

      what can i say? please look at my site. the sandinistas were the best thing to happen to nicaragua. the illegal attacks + sanctions by the usa caused them to limit some civil liberties (as any country does in war), but they were 100x better than somoza, who the US had supported b4 them. if you can't be bothered looking at the facts then i'll quote my site -

      An Oxfam report entitled 'The Threat of a Good Example' (which sums up precisely the threat posed to the US by Nicaragua) on the Sandinistas concludes 'in Oxfam's experience of working in seventy-six developing countries, Nicaragua was to prove exceptional in the strength of that government commitment [to meeting the basic needs of the poor majority]'. This should be contrasted with Nicaragua's neighbours at the time (Guatemala and El Salvador) who had 'military dictatorships responsible for the sheer institutionalisation of state terror, installed and propped up by the US. Tens of thousands of civilians were regularly slaughtered by government death squads trained and armed by the CIA. The vast majority of the populations were impoverished'.

      or how about this regarding arbenz and his 'terror state'

      The dictator Ubico is overthrown and Guatemala enjoys the 'Ten Years of Spring' with two popularly elected and reformist Presidents. President Arbenz permits free expression, legalized unions and diverse political parties, and initiates basic socio-economic reforms. One key program is a moderate land reform effort aimed at alleviating the suffering of the rural poor, by which only plantations of very high acreage are affected, and only in cases where a certain percentage of such acreage is in fact lying unused. In these extreme cases, the unused portions of the land are not expropriated, but simply purchased by the Guatemalan government at the same value declared on the owner's tax forms. The property is then resold at low rates to peasant cooperatives. To set an example, President Arbenz starts with his own lands.'

      do you prefer the civil war, terror, and 100,000 civilian deaths that followed the CIA's removal of him???? or perhaps you prefer US-backed pinochet to allende???

      need i repeat - everything i say here is well backed up by reliable sources at my website

    2. Re:Why Latin America is screwed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "may i refer you to my website [bevin.de] i find what you just say incredible.

      Been there, done that.

      "i don't mean to be rude, but your views can only be a product of propaganda."

      Propaganda... does that mean information you don't agree with?

      arbenz, allende, the sandinistas all represented, for their respective countries, the best thing that had happened to them.

      They all represented the worst. It was just Soviet imperialism. For example, we can look at the Miskito Indians. Somoza was a reactive dictator; these Indians on the fringe had little to do with his affairs, so he left them alone. Along came the Sandinistas. They attempted to exterminate these Natives, and put them in concentration camps.

      "the russians also had nothing to do with events in latin america in this period."

      They had everything to do with the events, starting with Che, and mainly through the colonial territory of Cuba. Castro, for example, created the Sandinistas in the early 1960s.

      "you're incredible! so you are a better judge of this than the world court??? "

      Of course. The world kangaroo court. These world bodies are often quite wrong about things.

      "sanctions by the usa caused them to limit some civil liberties"

      Of course. Dictators who would limit civil liberties anyway always use that as an excuse. Some would claim Bush is doing this too! You forget, of course, the fact that the Sandinistas lowered the boom BEFORE the contra retaliation. No wonder most of the Contra rank and file were peasants kicked off land due to "land reform".

      but they were 100x better than somoza, who the US had supported b4 them.

      No, they were worse in all respects. Religion? The Sandinistas torched synagogue and expelled Managua's Jewish population. Defenders of this tell me this is good, as Jews are rich and greedy. Freedom of the press? Anti-government papers which hung on during Somoza were finally shut down at times during the Soviet occupation (Sandinista rule).

      "Nicaragua was to prove exceptional in the strength of that government commitment [to meeting the basic needs of the poor majority]'."

      Yet, the Nicaraguans disagreed. The poor peasant population opposed the Sandinistas (who had their main support in the cities).

      This should be contrasted with Nicaragua's neighbours at the time

      The quote you provided has falsehoods in it, and it ignores the cause of the problem which was the Soviet armies (FMLN, etc) attacking this countries.

      "The dictator Ubico is overthrown and Guatemala enjoys the 'Ten Years of Spring' with two popularly elected and reformist Presidents

      As if greedy grabs and the removal of legal opposition is a "reform"! You will notice he stole lands from United Fruit and kept them, instead of actually turning them over to peasants.

      "President Arbenz permits free expression, legalized unions and diverse political parties"

      Talk about propaganda. The lie is put to it by Che Guevarra who wrote about how strict the Arbenz dictatorship was, only some kinds of Stalinists were allowed (and not Che's which is why Che complained). "One key program is a moderate land reform effort aimed at alleviating the suffering of the rural poor"

      Yeah, it alleviates suffering to force people into government-controlled slave plantations ephemistically called "cooperatives". About as cooperative as the Borg are.

      "or perhaps you prefer US-backed pinochet to allende???"

      Actually, yes. His death toll of a few thousand is a mere pittance compared to what Allende's allies did and what Allende planned. The Spaniards who sued Pinochet recently were actually enemy agents at war with Chile. For gods sakes, Allende enforced his rule with storm-troopers from East Germany! Pinochet was chosen by Chileans, actually, but the U.S. rightly supported this at the time since it was an improvement over the Stalinist.

      Allende's land reform as also false, as he took land and kept it. Show me one Marxist land reformer who actually turns land over to peasants (directly, not through government-controlled cooperatives)

      About Guatemala's later bad governments. The U.S. is not am imperialist power. It is anti-imperialist, which is why it kicked the Soviets out of Guatemala.

    3. Re:Why Latin America is screwed up by mcbevin · · Score: 1

      look i'm not sure what to say to all that. let me just say that i've read a fair bit and researched a fair bit about the events in these countries, and the stuff you're saying doesn't quite fit anything i've read.

      now, i'm not saying you're wrong. but i'd appreciate if you could provide some form of references to back up these claims, as i really find them rather extraordinary.

      ignoring the confusion of russian's / soviets with communists in general, the main news to me is your attribution of everything to communists, i.e. 'soviets' attacking various countries, castro creating the sandinistras. i would be interested in more information regarding this stuff.

      pretty much everything i've read views the russians as having virtually no influence in the affairs of these countries - any leftist leaning groups in the area being products of the countries themselves and having little or no affiliation with the ussr or even cuba (typically only making contact with the ussr after the usa sanctions them etc and they are forced to turn to someone else for help, however the role of the ussr in these cases being very secondary).

      also, the idea of allende enforcing his rule with storm-troopers from germany sounds interesting. can you provide me with more information on that? i find it rather surprising given that allende only came along in the 70s, a wee while after the time of ww-ii and all that.

      btw, i don't mean to sound critical. its just what you say is all rather strange and thus i'd be really interested to see more information if you can provide it.

    4. Re:Why Latin America is screwed up by mcbevin · · Score: 1

      Talk about propaganda. The lie is put to it by Che Guevarra who wrote about how strict the Arbenz dictatorship was, only some kinds of Stalinists were allowed (and not Che's which is why Che complained).

      i thought i'd take a bit of time to read guevara's book 'back on the road' - see if i could confirm what you say.

      however, what i find is a guevara who is in guatemala at the time of arbenz' overthrow, who however is still quite non-political, and certainly by no measure a hardened marxist/communist. these views come much later, and are in fact largely shaped by resentment at the us he feels after the us overthrow of arbenz.

      i also read him claiming that the population is united with arbenz against the militia which the us creates to overthrow him. he also has no problem understanding that the us is only in there to support the united fruit company rather than any idealogical ideals or to fight the russians or any other such rubbish.

      che's general opinion is of guatemalas hopes being crushed by the us, an opinion well born out by the historical truth commission in 99 - 'A U.N. sponsored truth commission report has concluded that the United States gave money and training to a Guatemalan military that committed "acts of genocide" against the Mayan people during the most brutal armed conflict in Latin America history - Guatemala's 36-year civil war [1960-1996]. The report of the independent Historical Clarification Commission ... contradicts years of official denial about the torture, kidnapping and execution of thousands of civilians in a war that the commission estimates killed more than 200,000 Guatemalans.' reports the New York Times.

      in short, i hardly see che guevara as someone you can use to support your claims.

      given what the following us advisor said at the time, i cannot understand how you manage to so rewrite history to see arbenz as evil, and the US and dictators before and after him as relatively good. the US went in there to defend business interests and in doing so destroyed a country - i don't see how you can support any other reading of the history (but i AM willing to consider your views if you can back them up) ...

      Charles R. Burrows of the Bureau of Inter-American Affairs writes 'Guatemala has become an increasing threat to the stability of Honduras and El Salvador. Its agrarian reform is a powerful propaganda weapon; its broad social program of aiding the workers and peasants in a victorious struggle against the upper classes and large foreign enterprises has a strong appeal to the populations of Central American neighbors where similar conditions prevail.'

      again, these quotes are referenced on my website

  75. Re:Lower Frequency = More Power? Huh? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

    I toured the Bonneville Dam Power Station on the Columbia River between Washington State and Oregon. There's a huge powerhouse on a hill overlooking the dam (on the Oregon side) that produces DC to send to southern California. It uses two current-carrying conductors - one at +750kV, the other at -750kV with respect to ground. Talk about HUGE rectifiers! They claim that over the distances they send the energy that DC is 10-20% more efficient even with the conversion loss on either end. It also avoids phase lock issues (as mentioned ad nauseum).

    see this excellent PDF on the subject.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  76. website address fix! by mcbevin · · Score: 1

    woops - i got the links to my website wrong! i meant this. (is it not possible to fix your own posts?)

  77. BBS is not independent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fox, ABC, etc are independent media, accountable to their audiences. BBC is government controlled, accountable to the ruling class.

  78. computers dont need a stable clock? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    good lord, I am glad you don't design digital circuitry. 60Hz stable? why would someone in digital design use an analog reference full of noise from the outside as a sync for internal clocking? and crystal they would use would be on the order of Mhz and small changes from temperature would not be needed. unless you are going from -40 to +130 you would not see alot of drift on a xo. you could even go as far as getting a vcxo for the clock, but that's over kill.

    heh you don't want a stable clock in your computer? what do you use an abacus? it needs to be stable and consistent. the point is that all parts of the computer dont follow the beat of the same drum and any clocking introduced into each part needs to be locked to a common source (ie xo referenced pll)

    sheesh, fucking learn before you open your mouth

  79. Reasons, red herrings, and (gasp!) honesty. by John+Bayko · · Score: 1
    It seems that nobody can seem to figure out why GW Bush wants war in Iraq. There actually is a very simple reason I'll get to later. But the main problem is that the U.S government has put forth an absurd position which the administration continues to advocate.

    The official position is, of course, "weapons of mass destruction". The argument is, if inspectors find such weapons, it shows Iraq has violated U.N resolutions and must be disarmed by force (war). If inspectors find nothing, it shows Iraq is hiding evidence and is violating U.N resolutions, so must be disarmed by force (war). The absurdity is obvious - I'd like to see someone challenge Bush or Cheney to explain their self-contradiction here.

    There is more - the mere fact that the U.S has allied itself with Pakistan, which boasts of its weapons of mass destruction, especially nuclear. And other countries which possess them, like Israel. This is because possession of such weapons is irrelevant anyway. There is no guarantee that whatever administration takes over in Iraq won't develop its own chemical or biological weapons, if current American allies are allowed to (after all, Iraq was such an American ally). The issue is trusting the country not to use them.

    Is it possible to convince Iraq not to use chemical or biological weapons? Obviously yes - the threat of equal or greater retaliation convinced Iraq not to use them during the last Gulf War, when it both posessed them and had them ready to deploy. The policy of containment worked against the Soviet Union until it fell apart, it can easily work against a powerless Iraq indefinitely.

    So the arguments are both logically flawed, and just plain too dumb to believe. But the American administration is not that dumb. Nobody is dumb enough to believe that without being diagnosed as mentally retarded. It is, however, an international lever that I think they hoped to use to get U.N approval (apparently Powell thinks this is important and was the one advocating it). Unfortunately for them, there are others who are every bit as skillful manipulating international opinion as they are, so this hasn't gone as well as they had boped.

    Bush isn't really smart enough to have planned this all out on his own, and it's probably against his nature - he likes being straightforward in what he says. Which probably explains why he's done so badly at trying to mislead the world.

    Given that, speculation abounds as to what the real reason is. The number one choice is oil, but that doesn't make sense either for a variety of reasons. The easiest way to get the oil would be to lift the embargo, then just buy it - prices are set internationally, so it doesn't really matter if American, French, or Russian companies control production in Iraq.

    There's more, but the oil argument is pretty flimsy.

    Other arguments are a personal vendetta (finish Daddy's unfinished business), Israeli conspiracy (popular among the the Arabs), or simply that Saddam Hussein is can't be bought and is disobedient to the American masters of the world.

    This last one is probably closer to the truth. Most countries in the world can be persuaded by diplomacy (Britain), or by simple bribery (Turkey), to do what America wants. Especially the small, insignificant countries like those in the Middle East. Iraq and Iran are alone in the area in having actual principles, and refusing to be bought (hence being included in the axis of evil and all that).

    But this still ignores important things, such as Cuba. It has been a festering thorn in the American side since the revolution. Incidentally, it also has a very advanced pharmaceutical industry - so advanced that the U.S trade embargo was pardoned for one of the vaccines (for a type of hepatitis, I think) developed in Cuba but not available in the U.S. Ths means that Cuba has a capacity for chemical and biological weapons exceeding Iraq, plus is disobedient, and on America's doorstep.

    But there's no cry for war with Cuba. Or other countries that vex U.S demands.

    There is an alternative possibility. One that is not only unlikely, but outrageously unbelievable, but at the same time has a moral strength to it that would appeal to someone like Bush.

    As I said, it's unbelievable, so feel free to not believe it. But consider it.

    In a recent speech, Bush detailed a rosy future for post-war Iraq, where democracy and human rights flourish, and which serves as an inspiration for democracy throughout the Middle East. What if... what if he believes that?

    David Frum, a former speechwriter for Bush (the one who's credited with the "Axis of Evil" phrase, but actually wrote "Axis of Hate") explains it in a book recently published. It is the American (Republican) point of view that America has served as a force of good in the world, and a bringer of democracy. As Bush remarked in his speech, they believe that America was responsible for making Germany and Japan democratic after the WW II, and further strengthened it with the Martial Plan for rebuilding Europe, as well as the other countries it had liberated, including Korea (before the war) and the Philippines among others. And later, their intervention stabilized Central America and brought human rights and elected governments to the region.

    Please stop laughing. The facts don't matter, it's what they believe.

    According to Frum, it is the sincere belief that American influence "fixed" Central America. And the Republican administration wants to now turn its attention to the formerly neglected Middle East and reform those countries there.

    In this scenario. Iraq is the single biggest obstacle - it is the most repressive, most totalitarian, and most beligerant country in the region. In order for any progress to be made, it must be dealt with, and that means "fixing" it first. War is the only option, given it's leadership.

    You know, this isn't a new policy. You can be sure that America (under presidents such as Reagan and Nixon) would have done the same thing against the Soviet Union, if they had the ability - you can see it in Reagan's "bombing begins in five minutes" quip when he didn't know a microphone was turned on. And I think they really believe it would have worked - after all, there's the refrain "look at Japan and Germany, and remember the Marshal Plan" (the Marshal Plan is held in almost religious reverence by U.S foreign policy advocates, overshadowing all other "missteps").

    It also explians their position on North Korea, doesn't it?

    Why wouldn't Bush and company have said this in the first place? Probably two reasons. First, there is the lack of universal support for it - a nice way of saying that they've got a reputation for shitting on the faces of countries they've tried to help, and nobody trusts them. The first response would have pointed out Chile (ask them what "September 11" means to them), Vietnam, Cambodia, Nicaragua, and more, and it would have turned into a shouting match of who's more moral than whom.

    At least nobody's going to say "but I think Iraq should have weapons of mass destruction!".

    The second is that they would lose immediate support from almost every country in the Middle East - in that area, only Turkey and Israel are democratic (and almost the Palistinian territories, if Israel would ever allow an election). All the others have a vested interest in keeping things as they are. Nobody would allow the U.S to use their territory, or cooperate in other ways, even in exchange for massive foreign aid - they would be paying for their own eventual overthrow.

    Already, there has been significant negative reaction to what Bush has said about his post-Iraq vision.

    Of course, Iraq is not the end solution, and the administration realizes this. It would be a decades long project to bring democracy to the Middle East. And, I fear, they are both ignorant and short sighted about a number of things.

    A war and regeime change will probably create more chaos than they imagine, and may cause the disintegration of everything they expect in the area. Bad. They also have a poor track record of success when interfering with other countries, often making them worse than when they started. More bad. And they're counting on future adminstrations to carry on the policy that they are starting. There is no guarantee, or even likelihood, of that.

    I think war with Iraq is going to be the first step into a giant swamp of muddy problems that will bit their asses like, you know, swamp alligators or something. That is the real danger, and that is also far more frightening than even the worse speculations involving oil or chemical weapons. The United States may be starting what amounts to a low level war with the entire region for the next fourty years. And associated terrorsm. And the cost!

    Honestly, I'm glad I don't live in the U.S.

    1. Re:Reasons, red herrings, and (gasp!) honesty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone find the comment of John Bayko interesting? I did, and I would like to hear more from him. I have no knowledge to check the level of the validity of his comment, but I am willing to learn mostly because I am completely helpless in figuring out why the U.S. gov. wants the war.

      If Mr. Bayko reads this, or any others who share all or some of his opinions, would you please be kind enough to point me to the readings that could help me out? I will try my best digging up what are available on the web. The book recommendations would help me greatly, and the most of all, your personal judgements (on books, and authors). I will try to run my not-so-good-yet bulshit detector at its best, so please throw me your gutsy opinions (like the original post of Mr. Bayko) without worrying shallowing me (after all, it is my own fault if I am ill-advised).

      many thanks.

    2. Re:Reasons, red herrings, and (gasp!) honesty. by John+Bayko · · Score: 1

      A good place to start is probably the book "The Right Man: The Surprise Presidency of George W. Bush" by David Frum. I haven't read it, but he also writes a column for Canada's National Post newspaper, which published exerpts that I've read.

  80. It's all relative. by Erris · · Score: 1
    and venezuela leads the world in underclocking? ;-P

    Computers in Venuzuela think they are running faster. This condition lasts until overcurrent blows out your ac compressor and blowers.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  81. you realize that makes you look like a kook, right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's an interesting argument, although it reeks of crazy conspiracy guy.

    I don't understand your mention of Venezuela using oil as an ersatz fiat currency. How can something with actual value be a fiat currency? It's impossible. A barrel of oil has in intrinsic value and therefore cannot be an instrument only based upon trust such as a fiat currency is.

    I thought we talked about fiat currencies before and at that time you seemed to understand well what a fiat currency is. I don't understand what happened.

    Just adds more to making you look like a crackpot. Crackpots love to flog terms the general public doesn't understand (even when they aren't applicable) as a way of making their arguments seem more erudite.

  82. lowering voltage? by upper · · Score: 1
    Another way they could maintain their frequency with inadequate energy input would be to lower the line voltage a bit. If I'm not mistaken, they could lower the voltage by reducing the field current. This would reduce the current drawn by most loads and thus reduced torque and keep the frequency stable.

    I'm claiming this is a good way to do it. Significant voltage reductions will destroy many motors, among other things. But (if it's linear, which I don't know) they could get the 0.1 hz they need by lowering the voltage by .17 percent -- 0.2 volts for 120v lines. The input voltage tolerances are big enough that that won't mess up equipment -- unless, of course, they've already lowered it to the bottom of the range.

    Something like this was done in Vietnam a few years ago, and probably still is. I don't know what the frequencies were, but the voltage was said to vary from 90v during peak use to 300v in the middle of the night. Every TV I saw when I was there was plugged in to a voltage stabilization box -- basically an induction dimmer adjusted by a servo.

    1. Re:lowering voltage? by PD · · Score: 1

      There's already some leeway for this. Our wall voltage is always listed as 110-125 volts AC. And Europeans have about 20 volts of variance that their appliances should handle without any problem.

  83. US and Al Quaeda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "As they were behind al qaeda when they fought the russians

    Al Qeada did NOT exist when the U.S. was backing Afghanistan independence fighters.

    "as they were behind saddam when he fought Iran, etc. It is not the US people, it is the US government that the US people do not really know all they have done. But it is a problem with any empire, not just this one"

    Actually it is anti-imperialism. Iran at the time was attacking 2 or 3 Middle Eastern countries which made it a greater imperialist threat. The USSR, the real empire in this time, had conquered Afghanistan, and the U.S. helped Afghanistan out.

    "Companies objective is to make money to their shareholders not to make people happy. "

    In reality, if a company does not make people happy it will not have customers or workers. The incentive for corporations to make the people involved happy is very strong.

    1. Re:US and Al Quaeda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Al Qeada did NOT exist when the U.S. was backing Afghanistan independence fighters. "
      You are right every time I think of crazy Bin Laden I think of Al Qaeda

      "Actually it is anti-imperialism. Iran at the time was attacking 2 or 3 Middle Eastern countries which made it a greater imperialist threat. The USSR, the real empire in this time, had conquered Afghanistan, and the U.S. helped Afghanistan out. "
      It is not anti-imperialism, it is trying to keep their own empire. They don't fight because they are good (in these cases they didn't fight), they do it because they want to keep the empire they have.

      "In reality, if a company does not make people happy it will not have customers or workers. The incentive for corporations to make the people involved happy is very strong."
      The problem is that the happy people are just a few. And every day they are fewer. If the objective of the world was to fight poverty and make the majority happier, it could be done, but that it is not the objective. Every day there are more and more jobs lost and this trend will continue, because for the sake of efficiency and making more money with less people, we are losing our main target the people, and that is you and me. We are working hard to destroy ourselves. We need a better economic solution, but that will be a task for our nobel prizes to do, because I know very little about it.

  84. Slightly OT by Enzo1977 · · Score: 1

    After looking over a few interesting explainations as to why Venezuelan clocks are running slow, is there any idea why my VCR clock runs fast? I've noticed that over the span of ten months it has advanced on its own by about one minute a month. Any thoughts?

    --
    I hate all sigs, even this one.
  85. /sheep accuse Bush of rewriting a constitution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And completely ignore it when Hugo Chavez does it.

    They accuse Bush of attempting to silence his critices, and completely ignore it when Chavez silences his critics - permanently.

    As Lenin said - useful idiots.

  86. Bush protecting the Constitution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....when in fact he is protecting it. Filing a brief to strengthen the 2nd Amendment. Opposing the University of Michigan admissions policy that punishes people for having the wrong skin color (a violation of due process). Nominating judges who actually want to protect Constitutional rights, not protect unconstutional laws that deny people's rights.

  87. Back in the USSR! (waiting in line for bread) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're in Soviet Russia, by definition, something is wrong!

  88. Overthrow of a dictator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "What kind of gov't praises the overthrow of a democratically elected leader?"

    One that has recognized that he is an anti-democratic fascist who has proclaimed that he will not let anything, even future elections, get him out of power. One that in WW2 went to war to help overthrow a "Democratically elected" leader in Germany.

    Same gov't that overthrew [named other dictators]

    Yup.!

  89. The hell with them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Technically, they're just barely Americans!

    Hell, they're not even White!

  90. But Chavez makes things interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "He may be elected but most of the country wants him out"

    But Chavez makes things interesting. But for Castro's Gulag (did you know that the prisoners at Camp X-Ray often have more rights than the average Cuban citizen?), Latin America is a peaceful place in the process of rebuilding after 40 years or so of Soviet aggression.

    The wars in Nicaragua and El Salvador ended with the Soviet regime causing them fell out of power.

  91. US interest is in democracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Is there a more favorable to US interests, less democratic option we should be seeing?

    No. but since the U.S. interest is in democracy, the two go together.

    "No, the US is much more interested in promoting Democracy than securing oil interests"

    Exactly. U.S. policy has nothing to do with securing oil interests anywhere.

  92. Ha, that's nothing by skintigh2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Try using a US analog clock in a country like Thailand that has 50Hz power. You loose 10 minutes every hour!

    Make sure to use a converter as 120v clocks don't like 240v.

  93. Huge motors by dmanny · · Score: 1
    Remember that when a motor is not turn{ing} that maximum current is applied until the counter EMF offsets it.
    My father had a project at Boeing Wichita that contemplated using an electrical motor that was already available. It was a large open frame 3-phase motor, IIRC 440V. It sticks in my mind that it was rated with a locked rotor current (surge at startup) of 1450 Amps . Although this motor was on site, its original use was long past and they abandoned the possibility of re-use because of the input power demands. It would have required rework all they way back to the substation. They went with an engine instead.

    Not everything will run on a Coleman generator. If more people understood back EMF there would be a lot fewer smoked motors.

    --
    All my previous sigs now look like this one, I wish they were permanetly recorded when used. :-(
  94. Re:Hm. . . Well that's bloody weird! by ajedgar · · Score: 1

    Older clocks, like the ones in grade schools back in the 60s and 70s (and also many of those old electromechanical wall timers) work by following the 60 hz cycle from their AC supply. Typically an 1800 or 900 rpm motor scaled down with a planetary gear. Quite simple and clever if you ever open one up.

    They're losing 9000 cycles per day (150 seconds * 60 cycles/second * 24 hours). Which works out to 59.896 cycles per second. They're running at 4-nines instead of 5-nines. :-)

    I'm not sure how clever it is to lower the frequency since that will more power consumption by the load. Here in Silicon Valley -- and elsewhere in north america -- when the power company wants to conserve energy they lower the voltage -- say to 110V or even lower some times -- again this requires more current draw from the load (P=V*A) but this way you make the consumer pay for the below par service. Their appliances are running less efficiently, heating up and burning out. It's not a bad idea to keep track of the quality of your mains power.

  95. Im from Venezuela.... by tit0.c · · Score: 1

    And i have to tell you that he has been trying every single tactic to delay new elections because he knows hes lost the support that elected him back in 1998.

    Where do you get this "fact" that he has done a lot for the poor people here? Have you been here lately? Have you seen the rising number of homeless and unemployed here in the streets?

    And know hes trying to shut down TV stations that disagree with him and has 3 political prisoners with more to come, just because we went on strike to defend our democracy.He doesnt sound very democratic to me...

    Ill be everyday on the streets of Caracas marching to defend my country till I see this little Fidel Castro wannabe out of here....

    1. Re:Im from Venezuela.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's right, be a good nice US whore. That's the way we like you.

  96. Tourism by Estevan · · Score: 1, Funny

    Venezuela's department of tourism slogan was recently chaged to "We don't even need accurate clocks, because in Venezuela, it's always BOOTY TIME!"

  97. intellectual honesty by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    let us play tit for tat

    i admit that the cia has and is doing nasty things in venezuela

    agreed? i am being intellectually honest

    ok, now for your intellectual honesty:

    the people of venezuela- with or without the cia with them, want to overthrow chavez

    agreed?

    good, now we can proceed without taint of propaganda from the right OR the left

    geez

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  98. That is not really that independent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, indymedia is not any more independent than other non-government media. What makes indymedia stand out is that it claims to be some sort of valid objective source, when it is really, more than most others, hogtied by such very stringent ideology that the facts are filtered through (if they are facts at all).

  99. Imagine a beowulf cluster of Venezuelas. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, had to.

  100. Name one please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Clearly a return to the old US foreign policy in South America of replacing democratically elected leaders with US-friendly dictators."

    Name ONE south american democratic leader overthrown by the U.S. Just one please.

    It is clear the clocks are moving forward in the White House: Fascist dictators in Latin America should be a thing of the past, and Hugo is such a relic.

  101. False premises by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "It seems that nobody can seem to figure out why GW Bush wants war in Iraq"

    That is the start; a false premise. He doesn't want war. He is trying to end Saddam Hussein's ongoing war and aggression. He has given Saddam plenty of time to and opportunity to end it. Face it, there is war over there. Saddam is attacking Israel through proxy PLO armies. He is engaging shooting at peacekeepers in the no fly zones. He is killing tens of thousands of Iraqis each year.

    "If inspectors find nothing, it shows Iraq is hiding evidence and is violating U.N resolutions, so must be disarmed by force (war). The absurdity is obvious"

    Out of date! The weapons keep turning up every few days ago. Inspectors are not finding "nothing".

    "This is because possession of such weapons is irrelevant anyway."

    Very relevant for an aggressive imperialist power like Iraq. Not relevant for Israel.

    "The policy of containment worked against the Soviet Union until it fell apart, it can easily work against a powerless Iraq indefinitely."

    Powerless? This is a country funding war against Israel. They are using the food distribution system to kill civilians. It is a place where rape is a punishment dealt out as part of the criminal justice system. No weapons inspections stop any of this. With containment, his aggression continues.

    "So the arguments are both logically flawed, and just plain too dumb to believe"

    You based your arguments on false pretenses (like that Bush actually wants war, or that inspectors might find nothing when they already have found plenty)

    "Bush isn't really smart enough to have planned this all out on his own, and it's probably against his nature"

    Guy's pretty smart, actually.

    "Which probably explains why he's done so badly at trying to mislead the world."

    He's been honest, up-front, and straightforward on all of this so far. That he has done "Badly" in some places is that some places cannot handle the truth.

    "There's more, but the oil argument is pretty flimsy"

    Certainly, for reasons you name. It is much easier to get oil with Saddam's help than against him.

    1. Re:False premises by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the start; a false premise. He doesn't want war. He is trying to end Saddam Hussein's ongoing war and aggression. He has given Saddam plenty of time to and opportunity to end it. Face it, there is war over there. Saddam is attacking Israel through proxy PLO armies. He is engaging shooting at peacekeepers in the no fly zones. He is killing tens of thousands of Iraqis each year.

      By your logic the US should attack Israel today! They have weapons of mass destruction, they are slaughtering and opressing the indigenous population, spying on the US, and colluding with our enemies! Israel is an aggressive imperialist! Ever heard of a country called Palestine? Or Syria? Or Egypt? Or Jordan?

      Israel is using social repression, territory grabbing, and outright murder to further its racist and imperialist goals. It is a place where murder with no trial is used to infuse terror into the political enemies of Israel's government.

      I am not an anti-Semitic, but you need to redirect your attention to a place a couple of hundred miles from Iraq where many tactics employed against Jews in Nazi Germany are being used by Israel against the Palestinians in Israel and the surrounding Arab countries.

      The irony of that situation is cold and bitter.

  102. The facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "As Bush remarked in his speech, they believe that America was responsible for making Germany and Japan democratic after the WW II"

    Yes. The U.S. had a major role in making Germany democratic, and was the only one that transformed Japan.

    "And later, their intervention stabilized Central America and brought human rights and elected governments to the region. Please stop laughing. The facts don't matter, it's what they believe."

    THe real history is pretty close to this. Especially Latin America. Of course, it should be mentioned that the end of the USSR got rid of the main reason for war and human rights abuses in the area.

  103. an intelligent synopsis of venezuela's situation by earache30 · · Score: 1

    don't waste time on CNN or the like - read this: http://www.heritage.org/Research/LatinAmerica/bg16 23.cfm

  104. The Nation: Venezuela's Media Coup by haaz · · Score: 1

    by Naomi Klein,
    The Nation

    Poor Endy Chávez, outfielder for the Navegantes del Magallanes, one of Venezuela's big baseball teams. Every time he comes up to bat, the local TV sportscasters start in with the jokes. "Here comes Chávez. No, not the pro-Cuban dictator Chávez, the other Chávez." Or "This Chávez hits baseballs, not the Venezuelan people."

    In Venezuela, even color commentators are enlisted in the commercial media's open bid to oust the democratically elected government of Hugo Chávez. Andrés Izarra, a Venezuelan television journalist, says that the campaign has done so much violence to truthful information on the national airwaves that the four private TV stations have effectively forfeited their right to broadcast. "I think their licenses should be revoked," he says.

    It's the sort of extreme pronouncement one has come to expect from Chávez, known for nicknaming the stations "the four horsemen of the apocalypse." Izarra, however, is harder to dismiss. A squeaky clean made-for-TV type, he worked as assignment editor in charge of Latin America at CNN en Español until he was hired as news production manager for Venezuela's highest-rated newscast, El Observador on RCTV.

    On April 13, 2002, the day after business leader Pedro Carmona briefly seized power, Izarra quit that job under what he describes as "extreme emotional stress." Ever since, he has been sounding the alarm about the threat posed to democracy when the media decide to abandon journalism and pour all their persuasive powers into winning a war being waged over oil.

    [read the whole thing over here ]

    --
    -- haaz.
  105. The Nation: Censor critics of dictator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The odd slant to this is not surprising, given "The Nation's" sterling track record in defending left-wing dictators and twisting things to support them.

    The big point of this which is overlooked in the sequence of events:

    Baseball commentators say bad things about the dictator.

    A so-called journalist, a stooge for the dictatorship named Izarra, calls for pulling the licenses of the TV stations just for being critical of the government.

    This so-called journalist is forced from his job.

    Now, what is wrong with a TV station firing someone who claims to be a journalist but calls for pulling the licenses of stations critical of the government?

    "Ever since, he has been sounding the alarm about the threat posed to democracy when the media decide to abandon journalism and pour all their persuasive powers into winning a war being waged over oil."

    Two whoppers in there. For one, this has nothing to do with oil. For another, Chavez has railroaded Venezuelan democracy. He is the main "threat to democracy". Not baseball commentators who call the dictator what he really is!

    Reading between the lines, this story does show how another aspect to the unpopularity of the dictator.

  106. Re:facts by mcbevin · · Score: 1

    hi,

    well its good to hear from some people in a position to know more than the limited amount we can find out through the papers.

    my e-mail address should be on the website, but its mike@bevin.de .

  107. Secrets from the Power Plant by BeanyandCecil · · Score: 1

    Having worked for an American electric company (AEP) at a power plant I can tell you how clock sync problems used to be handled. On the wall of the control room was your average electric clock. Next to it was a hand wound (highly accurate) chronometer. Every night at midnight the time was compared between the two clocks. If the electric clock was ahead, the Hz would be turned down a little until the clocks synced. If behind then the Hz would be increased. By morning they would be in sync.

    Of course that was years ago. With modern technology this is no longer a problem. Oh, and while I have you attention, the turbine always spins at 3600 rpm. No we don't make it spin faster when we need more power.

  108. Thanks, I was thinking of Argentina then by aaron_pet · · Score: 1

    Thanks,

    I was thinking of Argentina then

    The IMF is what I've been told is bad.

    does right-wing = capitalist or communist?

    imo, both can be done right or wrong...
    So, I think there are some good capitalists and some good communists... but there are bad communists and bad capitalists...

    --
    Please use [ informative / summarizing ] SUBJECT LINES
    Flame me here
  109. Optimizing our investment by jdfox · · Score: 1

    This sounds too much like some crazy conspiracy. Answer me this simple question: Why did the US not take control of the Iraq oil fields after the gulf war?

    Because there was no need to. It was much cheaper to keep Saddam "contained", and buy his oil in practically inflation-free dollars, in a market that the US could keep control of.

    That high-minded Foe of Terrorism, Dick Cheney, was doing exactly that via his company Haliburton, until Saddam started demanding payment in Euros.

    I agree with you, it's absolutely mindboggling. But it's true. Cheney has successfully managed to keep this out of the press though, and keep Congress from subpoenaing papers that described his involvement, using court injunctions.

    Why do you think the US grabbed Saddam's recently submitted documentation on WMD, and then distributed an "edited version" to the other members of the UN Security Council? Because all the dirt on US and European companies was in there, and Bush and Blair's "moral case for war" would have been made a laughingstock.
    This is all about the money.

  110. Polls and the Right in VZ by jdfox · · Score: 1

    No, I can't find any hard evidence that a majority in Venezuela wants to overthrow Chavez. The polls coming out of there all seem to be sourced from the same two polling companies, both run by his opponents, one of whom has stated publicly that Chavez should be killed. So getting the straight facts on the situation is not quite as easy as it looks.

    1. Re:Polls and the Right in VZ by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      no it's easy: the us is the center of all evil in the world. there is no such thing as homegrown evil. the us supplies it all to the world. have i regurgitate the proper party line now?

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    2. Re:Polls and the Right in VZ by jdfox · · Score: 1

      Well, you did say:
      let us play tit for tat
      i admit that the cia has and is doing nasty things in venezuela
      agreed? i am being intellectually honest
      ok, now for your intellectual honesty:
      the people of venezuela- with or without the cia with them, want to overthrow chavez
      agreed?
      good, now we can proceed without taint of propaganda from the right OR the left
      geez


      I took this to mean that you want to have an objective dialogue about this, free of partisan dogma. But you coupled this with the assertion that "the people of VZ... want to overthrow Chavez". You offered no proof for this, and the only evidence I've seen cited to date is polls and TV pictures. Both can be misleading. Why do you believe that all the people of VZ want to overthrow Chavez?

  111. Not only this is old, how come /. is interested??? by Artemis3 · · Score: 1

    Bah, my old Sony clock near the bed, whose original purpose was to act as a "timer" for an old piano key VCR has been slowing down for almost a year, and it is just now you notice? How is this news for /.?!? I don't get it, considering it wasn't much of a news for me living here either!

    They reduced the cycles to save power a bit. Maybe we should adopt Japan's standards for power distro.

    --
    Artix
    Your Linux, your init.
  112. LIAR! We don't care your anti-chavez attitude by Artemis3 · · Score: 1

    You hate Chavez, say it aloud, but that doesn't give you any right to spread BULLSHIT, just because you don't know any better.

    It is a FACT WRITTEN IN THE CONSTITUTION that the PRESIDENT does NOT have the FACULTY to advance elections. If there is something to blame him for, is his advocacy for following the constitution we approved in referendum in 1999, and the respect for the law.

    And he is also not trying to shutdown any damn TV station!. But boy they deserve it, and God knows enough chances for them to redeem have been granted. There is enough evidence of their involvement in the failed coup of the past April 11, and their open calls to the military to rise up in arms against the democratically elected government. However, unlike the dictator you want him to be, Chavez is not the LAW, and the courts will decide.

    Hello? Did he order the arrest of the terrorists you call "political prisoners"? No. It was a Judge, following a petition from a public prosecutor, because there is plenty of proven evidence that these people commited ACTS OF TREASON AND TERRORISM against the country.

    Don't spread that mockade about "strike to defend our democracy", when the first thing these terrorists did in April 11, was to abolish the constitution, the Parliament, the Supreme Court, all the Governors and Mayors, the very same people that instigared the recent acts of SABOTAGE AGAINST OUR OIL COMPANY and endangered MILLIONS OF LIVES by blocking by force the suply of fuel to our local market and all of our international clients, like the United United States of America.

    They are also so mad in their hatred against the Chavez, they even dare order us to not celebrate Christmas! Who are they to speak about democracy when they can't even accept somebody thinking different? And Caracas has suffered enough acts of FASCISM only reminisent of Germany and Italy of the 30ies.

    Sure, so easy to say "we went on strike" but why don't you tell them what they do to those "daring" disobey the "strike"? Why don't you tell them about the Brigades of black weared people going on motorcycles everywhere to mark and close by force the industries and shops wanting to open their doors during December and January? How about the attacks to the people that don't openly express hate against Chavez? The workers locked out by force? The big MALLs locking out the doors to sop the shop owners wanting to open their doors, and the brigades of black weared people harassing them just because they wanted to work?

    How about your beloved TV stations chained together broadcasting political anti Chavez propaganda 24 hours a day the whole month of December, not only instigating people to go out and cause violence, but also calling the military and foreign countries alike to rise in arms against the democratically elected government?

    There is plenty of everyday evidence of everything happening here, and there is no amount of lies that you people so insanely out of your own minds can spread in the world for them outside to be confused anymore. When those of you attacked the foreign media, who dared not speak against Chavez, you, yourselves showed the world your true face.

    For those of you knowing spanish, i have a very slow page with some videos about what happened the last months in Venezuela. If you are interested, come and see the facts, then decide by yourselves.

    http://artemis3.no-ip.org:10100/ve.html

    --
    Artix
    Your Linux, your init.
  113. Premises by John+Bayko · · Score: 1
    I should ignore this, but what the heck...
    That is the start; a false premise. He doesn't want war. He is trying to end Saddam Hussein's ongoing war and aggression.
    War against whom? Since the Gulf War, Iraq hasn't had the resources to properly equip its military, let alone wage war.
    Saddam is attacking Israel through proxy PLO armies.
    Iraq has funded Palestinian organisations, but not explicitly terrorist ones. Many of those organisations have both a political or chairity wing, and a militant wing. Funding is shuffled around internally. What this means is that the question of Iraqi funding is unclear - you can argue it either way.

    However, that is not war. Remember, much of the funding for the IRA came from the U.S.A - that does not mean America was at war with England. In addition, PLO and other organisations are also funded by Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and most other Arab countries which the U.S calls "allies".

    He is engaging shooting at peacekeepers in the no fly zones.
    The military patrols of the no-fly zones were never authorized by the U.N. - the U.N had passed a resolution forbidding Iraqi agression against the Kurds, but did not authorise force. Details get murky about what this actually means, but most countries have accepted the U.S/U.K interpretation of patrolled no-fly zones.

    However, the partols are not "peacekeeping" activities. "Peacekeeping" means stopping military activity - that is, keeping peace. Attacks on air defense installations are military activity - not peacekeeping. Most countries don't deny Iraq has the right to try.

    If Iraq ever brought down an aircraft, things would get complicated. Luckily, it's academic at the moment.

    He is killing tens of thousands of Iraqis each year.
    Definitely a bad thing, but again, not "war". A country killing one's own citizens (e.g. at Kent State?) is immoral, but an "internal matter". I'd certainly like to stop it, but in a way that doesn't result in the deaths of hundreds of thousands more (if killing tens of thousands is bad for Iraq, why would it not be bad for the U.S and U.K?).
    "If inspectors find nothing, it shows Iraq is hiding evidence and is violating U.N resolutions, so must be disarmed by force (war). The absurdity is obvious"

    Out of date!

    Rhetorical. The point was, the demands contradicted themselves.
    "This is because possession of such weapons is irrelevant anyway."

    Very relevant for an aggressive imperialist power like Iraq.

    Formerly agressive - Iraq hasn't been militarily agressive against anyone for a decade.

    I explained why its irrelevant - if they're never used, it makes no difference. The important thing is to ensure they are never used. This is why most countries want to possess them - for deterrence, not for use.

    [George W Bush] Guy's pretty smart, actually.
    In his way, I suppose, but there's a lot of people who think otherwise. He is fairly inarticulate when he departs from a prepared script, and doesn't do much more than double-talk when challenged or asked an unexpected question. He doesn't give much public indication of having a lot of deep thought (I'm a bit less charitable - I think he sounds like a football coach when he speaks on his own, and about as smart).

    From what I've read, it's mostly Powell who came up with the U.N strategy.

    That he has done "Badly" in some places is that some places cannot handle the truth.
    That's a pretty empty assertion. "Handle the truth" means...? Assuming it is the truth - his more recent speech seems to indicate it wasn't.
  114. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    There was once a programmer who was attached to the court of the
    warlord of Wu. The warlord asked the programmer: "Which is easier to design:
    an accounting package or an operating system?"
    "An operating system," replied the programmer.
    The warlord uttered an exclamation of disbelief. "Surely an
    accounting package is trivial next to the complexity of an operating
    system," he said.
    "Not so," said the programmer, "when designing an accounting package,
    the programmer operates as a mediator between people having different ideas:
    how it must operate, how its reports must appear, and how it must conform to
    the tax laws. By contrast, an operating system is not limited my outside
    appearances. When designing an operating system, the programmer seeks the
    simplest harmony between machine and ideas. This is why an operating system
    is easier to design."
    The warlord of Wu nodded and smiled. "That is all good and well, but
    which is easier to debug?"
    The programmer made no reply.
    -- Geoffrey James, "The Tao of Programming"

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...