Slashdot Mirror


British Telecom Pushes Universal ID Check System

miladus writes "URU (You Are You) is a new ID verification scheme from BT designed to allow government and businesses to confirm identities on the net. The BBC has a full report on how, according to BT officials, 'URU will be a major ingredient in transforming and joining up government... and how it will become ubiquitous for citizens, businesses, etc.'. Apparently, URU complies with European privacy laws."

277 comments

  1. I would have made first post but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    The delay on the URU check killed me.

  2. URU by JiffySnatch · · Score: 0, Troll

    We are Borg

    1. Re:Uru by geekoid · · Score: 1

      " Myst and EverQuest."

      great, a game where you have to wait 12 hours, then have to solve some music puzzle, enev thought you are tone deaf..boy, can't wait. ;)

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:URU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up, fuckwit. Get back to rotting your brain on your heavily abbreviated cellphone messages and quit bothering the humans.

      If you can even understand regular English anymore, that is.

    3. Re:Uru by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Well, I loved Ghost Recon.

      I would question their use of Myst as a point of measure. Everyone remembers it as a very quirky, shallow, duct tape and chewing gum arrangment of hypercards. (Granted, in 1994 THAT was really cool, and yes I did play it all the way through.)

      Having never played everquest, I really don't have any way to compare.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  3. Uh oh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like Oracle bought the U.K.

  4. Do you copy? by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 4, Funny

    In phase one, the only details that will be entered are name, address and Meter Point Asset Number

    TK-421! Why aren't you at you post?

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    1. Re:Do you copy? by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      yes, I know I can't write...*sigh*

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  5. Ick by Ravenscall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nothing I would want more than a porn site to have my phone number, and therefore access to my name and address.

    Or any kind of site for that matter.

    --
    You say you want a revolution....
    1. Re:Ick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you could turn your attention to more nobel pursuits, then, like getting involved in your community, or exercising, volunteer work, or *gasp* going to Church. Then you might not be afraid of people knowing how you spend your time.

      Just an idea.

    2. Re:Ick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time that happens I end up taking a snipers stance waiting for the bad guys to get out from behind the children

    3. Re:Ick by Ravenscall · · Score: 1

      Heh, wow, it is true, fundies cannot take a joke.

      --
      You say you want a revolution....
    4. Re:Ick by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1, Funny
      I'd be embarrased if people knew I was going to church. I stopped believing in imaginary friends in kindergarten. ;-)

      Actually, people who claim to go to Church (as opposed to church) would really make me worry about being identified for my online persona. Not for porn, but violent video games, rpg's, and anything on evolution will attract the ire of the _C_hurchies. They are quite judgemental about what everyone else is allowed to look at, you know. I'll keep my details (and my freedom) to myself, thank you very much.

      Although it would be interesting to see the clergy getting busted for looking at altar-boy kiddie porn... :-)

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
    5. Re:Ick by L7_ · · Score: 2

      Some would say that going to porn sites is a form of exercise.

    6. Re:Ick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey dumass, Catholic Priest != Church. Go read a little bit. Maybe you'll learn something.

    7. Re:Ick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only acne-faced, pear-shaped, no life sweaty geeks would say that.

    8. Re:Ick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe somebody who finds women attractive.

      The pimples go away as the bank account grows and most geeks look alot better when they're 30+

    9. Re:Ick by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Hey dumbass, the whole is equal to the sum of the parts. The Church is made up of a whole lot of priests.

      Either way, that is one group that would really like to control what other people do. The potential for abuse here is staggering, considering how closely tied church and government tend to be (here, anyway).

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
    10. Re:Ick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got Hypocrisy? You essentially just judged people based on attending church, because you claim that they must automatically be judgemental on certain things that you want to do. Nice.

    11. Re:Ick by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The difference is that _I_ do not try stop them from going to church. _They_ are always trying to stop others from doing/reading/seeing things that they personally find objectionable (or are taught to object to).

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
    12. Re:Ick by josh+crawley · · Score: 4, Funny

      SO you also have a problem with C-hurch goers (aka thumpers)?

      Here's a hint on how to deal with them. Read the bible.. I didnt say BELIEVE it. That's what thumpers' only weapon is. And if taken out of context, the bible contradicts itself quite a bit.

      After you best them in an argument of "religion", make a snide comment how I'm ATHEIST and I know more about the Bible than you do!!

      Really pisses them off ;-)

      Btw, I'm Catholic, and I get thumped for playing AD&D, M:TG and various pc games (Unreal-like games, NWN, and others). So far, I'm going to hell 7 times ;-) What about you?

    13. Re:Ick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read the bible, it speaks out against that behaviour excessively, their saviour was killed using the same justification.

    14. Re:Ick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that why I can type 120 wpm with one hand and can crush a Volkwagon Beetle with the other?

    15. Re:Ick by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1
      That only proves that one of the most prominent lessons in there is one of the first to be forgotten.

      It seems that a lot of censorship comes directly from church groups imposing their will on others. For example, in my state you can't buy alcohol or a car on Sunday. Why? I've even seen a full page ad taken out on the back of the TV section trying to pressure TV stations into heavier local censorship. Totally ridiculous stuff, IMHO. If you don't want to see it, change the channel.

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
    16. Re:Ick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would he want to go to church? It's full of the old, mentally ill and gullible. Get a fucking grip, man!

    17. Re:Ick by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1
      How ironic that the best reply in the lot was from a non-AC Catholic. ;-)

      I know the tough questions to ask in a "discussion", but this thread is not so much about the rights/wrongs of religion as it is about the tendency of C-hurch to want to control or censor others. You being thumped for your hobbies (all of which I share) is a prime example. The witchhunts of recent times (D&D with Mazes&Monsters, the ignorance (I still can't cast spells with my M:TG cards), and the tendency to hold back any knowledge that doesn't perfectly mesh with the T-ruth (evolution and Darwinism) nicely highlight my worry about religions getting access to a database of "sinners". Remember, abortion doctors have been gunned down after their privacy was compromised...

      And I've lost count of how many times I'm going to hell, the rules seem to change every week. :-)

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
    18. Re:Ick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Here is a hint: Just because you find a girl attractive, it doesn't change the fact that you still smell like hell, have greasy hair, and are shaped like a pear. As you already know, there isn't a chick in the world that would go out with you because of this.

    19. Re:Ick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well, I see how *you* could turn your own attention to nobler pursuits. You could study spelling, for instance, and learn how to write "noble".

      But I *would* be afraid of people knowing to which church I went, if I did go to any. Look around you, a major reason, perhaps the most important, for wars during recorded history has been religion. Have you read the Bible? Counted all the wars mentioned there? Can you mention any of those that wasn't related to religion?

    20. Re:Ick by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Even in context, the bible contradicts itself in a number of places.

      But its' not the contradictions in the bible that get people all steamed up, its' the contradictions in the lives of people who claim to follow the bible, w/o having even read it cover to cover (after all, if they haven't read it all, how can they claim to believe it?

      Interesting fact: A seminary teacher asked his students on the first day of class how many of them had read the whole bible. None had, even though all these "fine young people were called to serve God". 4 years later, he asked the graduating students the same question.Guess what - same answer!

      Now, to get back on-topic - this post-9/11 security mentality is really stupid - especially since the latest technology a.k.a. biometrics is being touted as enhancing security. But do a google on "biometric gummy bear" to see how thumb scans, iris scans, and full-face scans can be fooled for less than $10.00, and in many cases, for free.

    21. Re:Ick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever you say, mr Pierce Brosnan incarnate

    22. Re:Ick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you got the greasy hair right anyways. It was more of an observation than a personal truth...

      BTW-you forgot small penis

    23. Re:Ick by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I have read the bible, that's a part of what turned me first atheist, then agnostic, and finally to a follower of my own path (which doesn't have much to do with any holy book).

      This doesn't help. They believe what they choose to believe for reasons that please them. The bible is merely an excuse. They ignore any parts they feel like, and calling them on this only increases their ire at you, it doesn't serve any useful purpose. I'd like to say "Morons, the lot of them", but the group includes many people who, outside of their insanity, are actually pretty intelligent.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    24. Re:Ick by josh+crawley · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ---I know the tough questions to ask in a "discussion", but this thread is not so much about the rights/wrongs of religion as it is about the tendency of C-hurch to want to control or censor others.

      Too true. It happens on many faucets. You have Wal-Mart (Sam Walton?)selling stuff based on a morality clause, and what they buy and dont can break a business. Blockbuster severly edits 'choice' films for _proper_ consumption. The list goes on and on. That's on the wide scale. On the local scale, middle and high schoolers are raided by radical parents who the schools are teaching "choice" things, or the school isnt regulating certain behaviors (like playing card games/RPG's at lunch). I've actually had a substitute teacher come to my table and start preaching at us (me in particular) that Magic:The Gathering was going to "SEND US TO HELL!!" We all just shrugged her off and went on our way playing that game. What else could we do? We were high schoolers, she had position of power (as teacher).

      ---You being thumped for your hobbies (all of which I share) is a prime example. The witchhunts of recent times (D&D with Mazes&Monsters, the ignorance (I still can't cast spells with my M:TG cards),

      What I thought was funny is when they said AD&D caused suicides. What they didnt do is to compare the suicide rate of RPG'ers to the US average. The difference was exponentially lower for AD&D players.

      ---and the tendency to hold back any knowledge that doesn't perfectly mesh with the T-ruth (evolution and Darwinism) nicely highlight my worry about religions getting access to a database of "sinners".

      I still dont believe in true evolution. Too many holes (like, where's the link from the apes to humans?). Neither do I believe in what happens in Genesis. Great story though. I simply throw the thoery of hwo we all got here in choice 3: Not Enough Information.

      I still ask myself, how did all of this stuff pop up here? I thought that matter/energy couldnt be created, and yet here it is. There's thoeries of 10D universes and other funny super-physics (hawking crap). Still, nothing to formly explain how all this material/energy popped up here.

      ---Remember, abortion doctors have been gunned down after their privacy was compromised...

      I know. I have my own belifs about abortion (hate it) but you dont kill somebody just because they killed. That's just not justification. Seriously, I dont know what IS justification for even legitimate death penalty cases. The cost of the state murdering somebody costs 3X more than if they have life sentance. It's also hard to give somebody a reprieve if they're in the ground (they really didnt do it).

      Still, my belifs are that all doctors should have MANDATORY state lookups for medical practices. Just as we look at hardware listings to compare prices and goods, I want to do the same with doctors. I also want no way a doctor can eliminate fraud, lawsuits, and settlements from his "rap sheet".

      Remember, murder is ILLEGAL And yes, I disagree with the abortion-only doctor list. Reading the websites they were hosted on made it look like a hit-list. Guess what? They were.

      And there is no privacy in the US anymore. Check out Lexis-Nexis if you dont believe me (and some of it scares the shit outta me).

      And I've lost count of how many times I'm going to hell, the rules seem to change every week. :-)

      "If you dont believ me, you go to hell!!!"
      "I'd rather go to YOUR HELL if I dont have to hear your yapping mouth anymore!"
      (I've actually said that response...) ;-)

    25. Re:Ick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      damn volkwagons... always infested with bugs..
      I know how you feel bud.

    26. Re:Ick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed the point. Catholocism != All Organized Religion. Go get yourself an education before you spout off again, okay?

    27. Re:Ick by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      A prime example of that: read Judges 19. Then you find out that the old guy is now a saint of piety/compassion or something like that...I mean, that's just sick!

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    28. Re:Ick by broter · · Score: 1

      "Catholocism != All Organized Religion"

      I believe his implication was that All Organized Religions == General Badness. Which I'm inclined to believe. I'm sure there are plenty of people who believe in [gG]od* but don't put their views on other people. I simply haven't met any...

      If you can't stop it from being abused, done put it there to begin with.

      --
      "One man can change the world with a bullet in the right place."
      - Mick Travis, "If..."
  6. Yeah this definitely belongs under "privacy" by cscx · · Score: 0, Troll

    Michael, I'm wondering, do you have a driver's license, credit card, any sort of ID, or do you not, cause that would allow "the man" access to your "private personal information?"

    1. Re:Yeah this definitely belongs under "privacy" by Dman33 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Additionally, I would like to propose that the US (of which you are a citizen, Michael) already has a system in which you and every US citizen has a unique ID. This unique national ID is required to gain access to all sorts of things like employment, credit, loans and in most cases state driver's permits.

      Yup, you and I both have Social Security Numbers... Now, they started as an honest (I hope) component of "The New Deal" and started being assigned in the mid-1930's. The problems arose during the cold war.. that is when the US govt started using the SSN as a type of national ID number... so, have you ever applied for a credit card without a SSN? Have you ever used a credit card online? (Can you even make purchases/transactions online without a credit/debit card?)

      Just my $.02 on the matter...

    2. Re:Yeah this definitely belongs under "privacy" by NetDanzr · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Actually, that's not exclusive to the US. Where I'm originally from (Slovakia), and in most others European countries, people use a form of personal ID card that also has a unique number, which in turn is used universally.

      In addition, most countries have a "birth number" - in many countries, it's in the format of YYMMDD/XXXX, where XXXX is a number assigned by the national birth registry. This number, too, is often used as a personal identification number.

      Finally, I'd like to remind you that the personal ID number for computers was already here once - remember that unique ID# embeded in Pentium III chips? The one that intel later released a patch for to disable (which almost nobody did)? Well, that's still here, and people are quiet about whether the same system is used in Pentium IV or not...

    3. Re:Yeah this definitely belongs under "privacy" by shreak · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually your USA SSN is not guaranteed to be unique. Not only that but, unlike most modern numeric IDs, it can't be validated.

      Most modern numeric IDs are generated with a built in hash (using extra digits in the number itself) So while you may only need 1000 IDs for you might make your id field much larger, say 1 - 1000000. This would allow you to use some of the digits for a "checksum"

      This would make it more difficult to falsly create IDs, but more usefull, it makes it unlikely that you'd fat-finger them when transcribing.

      All in all your SSN is a poor identifier. That's one reason (of many) why it should not be used the way it is today i.e. Everywhere!

      =Shreak

    4. Re:Yeah this definitely belongs under "privacy" by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Of course you realize it is a violation of federal law for anyone other than the Social Security Administration to use you SSN.

      My college (Drexel) back in the 90's had to go through and re-issue everyone a new Student ID number after a lawsuit. You will also note that your local DMV now issues its own number instead of your SSN.

      Banks and credit agencies don't index you by SSN, they have their own number they use. The SSN is just a way to validate you.

      Hey, how about we in the open source community nominate one of our own to be a website to issue GINs. (Global Identification Numbers.) Hell, a lot of people already have them for PGP (ie public keys.) Why wait for government, when we can create our own, kinder, gentler, big brother.

      (Yea I know about the liberty alliance, but opensource is all about doing it yourself.)

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    5. Re:Yeah this definitely belongs under "privacy" by cscx · · Score: 1

      It's easier to pencil in 237-93-8732 than BDEADF00-C265-11D0-BCED-00A0C90AB50F into a scantron sheet....

    6. Re:Yeah this definitely belongs under "privacy" by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      Patch? Wtf? You could just disable that serial number in your BIOS...no patch needed.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    7. Re:Yeah this definitely belongs under "privacy" by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      More a Hamming Space than a checksum, but yeah. Define only certain codes to be valid.

  7. Relationship to Liberty & Passport by jhh09 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How does this fit in with the Liberty Alliance / Passport authentication schemes? Is this yet another one developers will have to choose between, or this limited to UK systems? What's the point of using a single login system if there are a 1,000 such systems users have to register with and log into?

    1. Re:Relationship to Liberty & Passport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the Liberty Alliance specification explicitly doesn't control what authentication methods are used. Instead, it simply provides a framework by which the Identity Provider (aka the authenticator) and the Service Provider communicate.

      Identity Providers can use whatever scheme they felt like, so if BT wishes to Liberty-enable this madcap idea, there would be no reason why they couldn't...

  8. Welcome... by Mourgos · · Score: 5, Insightful

    to the new Big Brother era.
    How long before everyong revolts?

    1. Re:Welcome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

      I'd say we're still well within the "more disposed to suffer" phase. To move the great mass of people to fight will take far more abusive measures than have yet been taken.

      And yet, those measures will come, eventually. It's no longer a question of "if", but "when".

    2. Re:Welcome... by Pike65 · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Due to information received by Big Brother about 'every ong revolting', all of the ongs will be pre-emptively destroyed. That will be all."

      --
      "If being a geek means being passionate about something, then I pity those who aren't geeks." - Pike65
    3. Re:Welcome... by Ravenscall · · Score: 1

      This all already revolts me

      --
      You say you want a revolution....
    4. Re:Welcome... by bmf033069 · · Score: 1

      "To move the great mass of people to fight will take far more abusive measures than have yet been taken." (or that the people are aware of or understand)

    5. Re:Welcome... by gilesjuk · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Given that BT tried to get loads of revenue with some obscure link patent (which would mean mega bucks from anything using weblinks) I hope this system fails.

      They're an undeserving lot who are holding back the development of high speed internet in the UK.

    6. Re:Welcome... by knobmaker · · Score: 1
      It also requires the person to agree to have the check run and will e-mail them every time their ID is requested,...

      Great... yet another clever way of increasing the volume of unsolicited email, which of course is something we all desire fervently. Think of how many emails this will add to the daily load, as identity verification becomes more common.

    7. Re:Welcome... by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "We envisage that URU will become ubiquitous for citizens, businesses and government and we predict that in 10 years' time, 90% of ID checks will be done in this way," he added.
      Initially the system is being trialled by well-known retail banks, he said.
      </quote>

      Does this sound like one of those stupid late-90's dot-bomb schemes, full of baseless predictions. Why not name the banks, (unless they don't exist outside the promoters' marketing mind).

    8. Re:Welcome... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      How long before everyong revolts?

      Sire, the people are revolting!

      I know! I cant stand them either!

      Ok, the first of you that throws a rock at me is gonna...... THUD

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    9. Re:Welcome... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 4, Interesting
      This is really dumb.

      Short of Government Desk Jockeys, Domestic Intelligence Agencies, and Identity Thieves, I really don't who would find this all that useful.

      The fact that I CHOOSE to call myself EvilTwinSkippy, and that I am EvilTwinSkippy on a few other websites is a voluntary choice on my part. I have selected that persona, and if the persona no longer suits me at some point, I'll put it down and start a new persona.

      A number is a highly impersonal thing, like a license plate or a MAC address. Having gotten parking tickets because the meter maid was a digit off (how else could my white ford escort be mistaken for a blue chevy pickup) the oppertunity for error is amazing. Hell, my wife is getting junk mail (right down to credit card offers) for her sister because a catalogue company mixed up their 2 accounts. It also doesn't hurt that one is Sara and the other Dara. (S and D are right next to each other on a standard US Qwerty style keyboard.)

      Now harmless junkmail is ok, but imagine if medical records got crisscrossed, or criminal records? And it doesn't even have to be family, imaging if you are TT-1231-12512 and TT-2231-12512 is a wanted terrorist? Or if TY-1231-12512 has an outstanding warrent in New Jersey for driving without a license?

      URU is a very bad idea. A very very very bad idea, especially for causual use by business and beaurocrats.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    10. Re:Welcome... by addaon · · Score: 1

      Slashdot masses, defend the ongs by taking them off the web before the forces of big brother find them! (They'll never know what hit 'em.)

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    11. Re:Welcome... by no_choice · · Score: 1

      Now harmless junkmail is ok, but imagine if medical records got crisscrossed, or criminal records? And it doesn't even have to be family, imaging if you are TT-1231-12512 and TT-2231-12512 is a wanted terrorist?

      SAM: Are you Mrs Buttle?

      The WOMAN nods very slightly without looking at him.

      SAM: My name is Lowry - Sam Lowry. I'm from the Ministry of Information. (no response) I've come to give you a cheque.

      SAM takes the cheque out of his pocket and puts it on the table to tempt MRS BUTTLE into a flicker of interest but she fails to notice it - or him for that matter. SAM pushes the cheque a little way towards MRS BUTTLE but she does not respond.

      SAM: (indicting cheque) It's a refund ... I'm afraid there was a mistake.

      MRS BUTTLE: Mistake?

      SAM: (encouraged) Yes. Not my department ... I'm only records. It seems that Mr Buttle was overcharged by Information Retrieval. I don't think they usually make mistakes ... but, er ... I suppose we're all human.

      SAM looks around and sees the hole in the ceiling.

      SAM: Oh ... what happened to the ...?

      He gets nothing back.

      SAM: Actually, my bringing this here is rather unorthodox ... Usually any payments are made through the central computer ... but, er ... there were certain difficulties, and rather than cause delay, we thought you might appreciate this now ... it being Christmas.

    12. Re:Welcome... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      SAM: Yes, but do you have a 10-17 work authorization form?

      Workman:Why you ... I'll be back!

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  9. its not new by QEDog · · Score: 4, Funny

    This system is the internet version of one that has been out for a long time overthere. They used numerical IDs for the people, the most famous one being 007 James Bond.

    --
    "There is no teacher but the enemy."-Mazer Rackham
    1. Re:its not new by vidnet · · Score: 1

      Another famous one is 580068.

  10. What about possibilities in U.S.A? by +hr33 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does the URU fulfill American privacy laws? (not that it matters much anymore after the USA PATRIOT Act...)

    1. Re:What about possibilities in U.S.A? by Smallpond · · Score: 5, Funny



      What American privacy laws? Europe has privacy laws, the US has Equifax.

    2. Re:What about possibilities in U.S.A? by Jester99 · · Score: 1

      What American privacy laws?

      The USA has the second amendment. Back when salesmen were door-to-door and all, pretty much until the Internet cropped up, that's been the only privacy law we've really needed. ;)

    3. Re:What about possibilities in U.S.A? by Lawbeefaroni · · Score: 1

      What, you don't shoot your computer too? It can't connect to the 'net when it's blowed up. Pansy.

      --
      "When it rains, it pours." --Morton's Salt
  11. Phone companies with too much power aren't new by friedegg · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just look at The President's Analyst from 1967.

    --
    Google doesn't index user sigs, so stop trying to "Google Bomb" with them.
  12. The Real Question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will URU work with M$ Passport/.net

  13. Simple solution... by james_bray · · Score: 1

    "In phase one, the only details that will be entered are name, address and Meter Point Asset Number - the number in the corner of every household electricity bill which is unique to that property" - bbc.co.uk

    Time to fire up the genny then..

    --
    http://www.reeb.freeserve.co.uk
  14. E-mail compromised... by $$$$$exyGal · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It also requires the person to agree to have the check run and will e-mail them every time their ID is requested, offering a further safeguard against identity theft.

    That is a step in the right direction, but does anyone see a problem with that solution? If my identity has been compromised, then maybe my e-mail is also compromised...

    --
    Very popular slashdot journal for adul
    1. Re:E-mail compromised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We already get snail mail confirmations on credit checks in northern europe. UK / USA aliance = still far behind the rest of the world, you 3rd world countries.

    2. Re:E-mail compromised... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It also requires the person to agree to have the check run and will e-mail them every time their ID is requested, offering a further safeguard against identity theft."

      Yeah right. I doubt that a e-mail will be send if a goverment of corporation with a lot of money will make a request...

  15. Re:Makes me glad I'm an American by Mourgos · · Score: 1

    Let me just remind you that democracy originated in ancient Greece. Wait a minute, weren't the first immigrants to America from all over Europe? I don't know what to say...we're all brothers & sisters in the end.

  16. Notification by meckardt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The only thing that would make this scheme different that current identification methods is the automatic notification (by email) any time the URU identity is used:

    It... will e-mail them every time their ID is requested

    I suspect that someone's URU ID could be misused by someone else as easily as any other ID, but at least you would find out about such misuse before the cops/creditors come pounding on your door.

    1. Re:Notification by intermodal · · Score: 1

      provided of course they haven't already gotten into your E-mail as well

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    2. Re:Notification by mpe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The only thing that would make this scheme different that current identification methods is the automatic notification (by email) any time the URU identity is used:

      Not quite the idea is to have the same ID used for unconnected things. Which is a generally bad idea.

      I suspect that someone's URU ID could be misused by someone else as easily as any other ID, but at least you would find out about such misuse before the cops/creditors come pounding on your door.

      Unless they are able to also compromise the contact details. e.g. using the ID to get at your email.

    3. Re:Notification by evanhr · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I think this makes quite a difference.
      The control I exercise over my privacy is directly correlated with my perception of its use. I only worry about it if I feel there's a reasonable potential for abuse. At this point that feeling is often based on naive assumptions, I know, but with a notifcation system I'd be substantially better informed.

      Separate from any given protection scheme, I'd very much like to be informed about who wants my info and ideally why, though if I know the who I suppose I can ask them why myself.

    4. Re:Notification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So only people with a computer and e-mail will get the notification, are we in danger of creating an under class of the poor or technically challenged?

      These will be the victims who will have to cope with the cops/creditors pounding at the door and they will be the least able to defend themselves.

  17. Jumpin Jeezy Chrizzy on a pogo stick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm tired of all of these language variants. "URU" "TVMusic4U" etc. etc., it's all over the language.

    I'm tired of pop culture. Stop the planet, I want off. :\

  18. More info on URU by Mothra+the+III · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    http://www.googlism.com/when_is/u/uru/

    --
    Worst. Sig. Ever.
  19. Unique ID? by Chocolate+Teapot · · Score: 3, Insightful
    In phase one, the only details that will be entered are name, address and Meter Point Asset Number - the number in the corner of every household electricity bill which is unique to that property
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but an electricity meter is hardly unique to an individual household. I have lived in flats in the UK where fuel bills were included as a percentage of the rent, and only one set of meters existed for the entire building (30-40 distinct residences)
    --
    Modest doubt is called the beacon of the wise. - William Shakespeare
    1. Re:Unique ID? by buttahead · · Score: 1

      yikes... in the US (or at least new jersey) it is illegal to share meters. a land lord must have seperate meters for each dwelling or have a way to calculate which dwelling used how much power/gas.

      I agree about the uniqueness problem though... i posted my own thoughts before seeing yours.

    2. Re:Unique ID? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Highly doubtful though that two persons with the same name would share the same meter in the same complex is it not?

    3. Re:Unique ID? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'll be why your quote says "unique to that property" rather than "unique to that household" then.

    4. Re:Unique ID? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      Highly doubtful though that two persons with the same name would share the same meter in the same complex is it not?

      Fred J. Bloggs and (grandson) Fred J. Bloggs.
      John Smith and (no relation) John Smith.

    5. Re:Unique ID? by plugger · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are right, an M-PAN is a universal number which identifies an electricity board meter. There is nothing to prevent a landlord installing additional meters.

      (This is not entirely accurate, the M-PAN identifies a unique connection onto the electricity company's network. One of a number of operators can install a meter there. I coordinated these connections a couple of years back, hence the lame nick. And yes, the job sucked).

    6. Re:Unique ID? by plugger · · Score: 1

      Not entirely sure about this, but in the UK I think one can appeal to an independant arbiter if the landlord is charging an exessive rate for power. A crooked meter would constitute fraud anyway.

    7. Re:Unique ID? by vyzar · · Score: 1

      And what about those folks who are not connected to the electricity distribution grid? Sure these may be few and far between, but some people do live "off-net" as far as electricity goes, either doing without, or generating their own requirements using natural resources.

      Should these people be discriminated for ID purposes simply because they cannot provide the requisite base info?

      And besides, given that a MPAN only applies to a household, how do you separate members of the same household with the same name?

      It is still not *that* uncommon for say a father and son to share the same firstname, perhaps as their only firstname.

      Suddenly no unique ID. Oooops!

  20. I like the original better by L.+VeGas · · Score: 3, Funny

    If they had kept the REAL acronym, it would have made people happy.
    You Are You > YAY!!

  21. Great. by AftanGustur · · Score: 4, Insightful


    And within a year you will have to use it to authenticate with your ISP's proxy server.. (And no direct connection to the internet).

    The possibilities are endless for abuse ......

    --
    echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln80~Psnlbx]16isb572CCB9AE9DB03273snlbxq' |dc
  22. URU? by foxtrot · · Score: 4, Funny

    IMI. Y?

    1. Re:URU? by psyki · · Score: 1

      Hi, S. I R Frank.

      (old Frank & Ernest, you get 1000000 points if you remember/get it)

    2. Re:URU? by goldspider · · Score: 1

      M R Ducks!

      M R Not Ducks!

      O S A R, C M E D B D Wings?

      L I B! M R Ducks!

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    3. Re:URU? by sporty · · Score: 1

      I.R. Spinning off! I.R. Spinning off! [/joke]

      Sorry.. had to try it again.

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

  23. URU == ID card by tom_conte · · Score: 3, Interesting

    AFAIK, Britain has no mandatory ID card. This sounds weird to a lot of European people, since most European countries require every citizen to have a government-issued personal identity card which identifies them uniquely (a passport is generally accepted as an alternative). Maybe Britain is just thinking about skipping the physical step completely and going directly to the electronic ID stage. This would certainly make sense, since they are probably going to decide to create a mandatory ID anyway.

    1. Re:URU == ID card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes you so, its called the National Insurance card. No National Insurance number no work. no eat. Its also called a passport. No passport, no pub, no travel.

    2. Re:URU == ID card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This would certainly make sense, since they are probably going to decide to create a mandatory ID anyway.

      Unlikely, although it's the wet dream of whichever lot happen to be in government at the time, the fact that none of them have managed to think up a reason for wanting it means that they've never manage to go through with it.

      The traditional argument was that it'll somehow reduce crime, but if anyone asks which crimes will be reduced just ignore the question. Murders? Burglaries? Pickpocketing? Illegal parking?

      More recently it's supposed to prevent illegal immigration. Of course that could work if people were actually required to show their ID so often that it was impractical to live without one, but even David Blunket isn't going to openly propose that.

      Reality is that although the government, whichever party is in power, always desperately wants to introduce ID cards (for reasons never made clear), the public don't want them and the opposition, again whichever party that is, is always more than happy to make political capital out of tearing apart whatever flimsy arguments the government comes up with.

      I don't expect an identity card to be introduced in the UK.

    3. Re:URU == ID card by azzy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Correct, Britain has no mandatory ID card. That is, there is no ID card which a British individual /must/ have and /must/ carry. However, as to your final words.. you may not be aware of this.. but each British citizen /aready/ does have a mandatory identity. As well as having an identity, we also have a mandatory identity number in the form of a National Insurance number. Many also have passports and driving licenses. Having some form of digitally usable identity number has absolutly nothing whatsoever to do with mandatory identity cards. Not unless police can stop us on the street and demand our URU and arrest us if we don't have it on us. British Telecom is not an arm of the British security services, BT is a private company. Also, a mandatory ID card requires primary legislation.

    4. Re:URU == ID card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brittain is otherwise famous for its watertight ID-security. ID is often established by bringing an enveloppe you sent to yourself (no I am NOT joking), and when I stayed there as a EU student I went voting twice in the same election. Knowing somebody's mothers maiden name might very well give you full access to his/her bank-account, as this is a common system for identifying somebody in telephone banking applications.

    5. Re:URU == ID card by mcpheat · · Score: 1

      I've never been asked for my National Insurance number other than in connection with income tax or social security. It doesn't function as an all purpose id number in the same way as an American social security number.

  24. trying to figure it all out... by JimBobJoe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My understanding is that the British have Experian like credit history databases (which are not catalogued by a universal identification number, like the SSN, which I believe is the failure point of the US style databases.) So I'm not sure where this fits in...the article seems to imply it's for online transactions?

    The URU proposal has some interesting elements:

    *(it appears) that inclusion in the database would be voluntary, per European and British data privacy laws

    *the "check number" is essentially the electrical meter on your house. meaning that, at least in some way, the number can be changed, at least by you moving elsewhere. furthermore, there is no reason why anyone else would have that number, theoretically. it's a semi-constant.

    *you are automagically notified when someone performs a check, and i suspect that checks can only be performed when the person authorizes them.

    While the current British government is a bit fixed on putting an "entitlement card" together which will essentially be the you can't live without it national ID card, this proposal is vaguely interesting to me. I need more info to run it through a security model though.

    1. Re:trying to figure it all out... by keyslammer · · Score: 1

      this proposal is vaguely interesting to me. I need more info to run it through a security model though.

      This was my take, as well.

      One detail you omitted to mention is that the system will have access to many different government databases. It is not obvious to me how this offers any additional advantages in the way of verification (other than the obvious check to make sure that the subject is still alive), but it does set off my "major privacy concerns" alarm.

    2. Re:trying to figure it all out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *(it appears) that inclusion in the database would be voluntary, per European and British data privacy laws


      It's voluntary until you can't do anything without one. When banks require you to have one to get a home loan or car loan. Stores require it for you to write a check. The library requires it to get a library card. Yeah, voluntary.

    3. Re:trying to figure it all out... by sandman_eh · · Score: 1
      the "check number" is essentially the electrical meter on your house. meaning that, at least in some way, the number can be changed, at least by you moving elsewhere. furthermore, there is no reason why anyone else would have that number, theoretically. it's a semi-constant

      Er, except for social engineering...

      "Excuse me sir, I've come to read the meter"...
      --
      Master of Peng Shui.Ancient oriental art of Penguin Arranging)
    4. Re:trying to figure it all out... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      What if I don't have an Electrical Meter? What if I share it in a small apartment building?

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    5. Re:trying to figure it all out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeh, like having to run a Microsoft OS.

  25. great by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    BT and the UK government both well know for their liberalism and acountability think it's a good idea for people to have a number.

    Maybe, if that happens, the Government can pay me the £1,500 they've overtaxed me.
    and BT can send me details of how to cancel a service I havn't used for 9 months. (instead of the 'we are unable to reply from this address' email).

    Hey, what happens if I don't get a number? can I sell crack and get away with it?

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      >> BT can send me details of how to cancel a service I havn't used for 9 months. (instead of the 'we are unable to reply from this address' email).

      Hmm, let's see. BT are a _phone_ company. Why not pick up the fucking telephone and ring them. Or is that too difficult for you?

    2. Re:great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ummm.......... Guess what I don't use any more? I don't even have a phone.

  26. ID number? by buttahead · · Score: 4, Interesting

    what does my electric asset number have to do with my unique ID? Whay if three of the george foreman kids live in the same apartment? then they all get the same id?

    what if you move a lot? does your number change every time?

    Wouldn't something a little more unique and static be of more use?

  27. Vague on Details by keyslammer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The article seemed to suggest that an ID number used by the power company would be used as a sort of "universal id", but didn't offer any details as to how this would work (and why it would offer any more protection than any other kind of identifier). What's to keep someone from digging through somebody's garbage to obtain their ID from their electric bill? And what about people who don't have their own electric accounts?

    It seems to me that with all the nifty encryption technology now available, Big Brother attempts like this could do a better job of preventing fraud than just coming up with another global id scheme.

    Anybody have any pointers to more detailed descriptions of this plan?

    1. Re:Vague on Details by mpe · · Score: 1

      The article seemed to suggest that an ID number used by the power company would be used as a sort of "universal id", but didn't offer any details as to how this would work (and why it would offer any more protection than any other kind of identifier). What's to keep someone from digging through somebody's garbage to obtain their ID from their electric bill?

      Currently if someone got hold of your electricity customer number they couldn't do that much and you'd only have to deal with one entity to get something done about it.

      It seems to me that with all the nifty encryption technology now available, Big Brother attempts like this could do a better job of preventing fraud than just coming up with another global id scheme.

      Encryption simply protects data in transit from interception and alteration. It dosn't verify the data being sent actually is the data it claims to be.

    2. Re:Vague on Details by keyslammer · · Score: 1

      Encryption simply protects data in transit from interception and alteration. It dosn't verify the data being sent actually is the data it claims to be.

      Public/Private key encryption is an excellent form of authentication. Check out PGP. Or better yet, GPG.

    3. Re:Vague on Details by plugger · · Score: 1

      I don't think they intend to use the M-PAN as an ID number. Rather, their ID number will link a name to an M-PAN (effectively an address). Even if several people use one meter, it will still be able to link someone with a particular building, which might be enough for a quick address check.

      Getting a new storecard etc in the UK usually requires production of photo-ID and two recent utility bills as proof of address. With a little human flexibility built into the verification system, I'm sure that addresses with shared meters will still check out.

  28. Riiiiiight by Malicious · · Score: 2, Funny

    This sounds a lot like the idea of attaching your home address to your keychain, so honest people can mail you your keys if you lose them.
    Too bad most people aren't honest.

    --
    01101001001000000110000101101101001000000110001001 10000101110100011011010110000101101110
    1. Re:Riiiiiight by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
      Too bad most people aren't honest.

      Most people are honest, it's just the cost of the bad ones outweighs the value of the good ones.

  29. Re:Makes me glad I'm an American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But what happened to Greece? And why were those people in such a hurry to leave Europe?

  30. huh??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to BT the system complies with data privacy laws and will not disclose any information about the person to the company checking ID. Nice privacy laws....

  31. Re:Makes me glad I'm an American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mind you, Athenian democracy only gave a voice to the men with money. Slaves, women, and youth had no say in the government. Now, if I have to put up with any kind of government, I'd prefer the republic governing the US while Thomas Jefferson was president. Democracy these days is just a fancy name for mob rule. I prefer rule of law.

  32. URU? FU! by JPelorat · · Score: 3, Funny

    I refuse to have anything to do with something spawned from the so-called vocabulary of an SMS user.

    Will the email you get be just as undecipherable and irritating?

    --
    Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
  33. Re:Makes me glad I'm an American by Ravenscall · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Read Lysistrata lately? Women withold sex from the men till they mend thier warmongering ways. It has freedom, Greece, and buggery all in one package.

    --
    You say you want a revolution....
  34. ubiquitous government, no thanks by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    from dictionary.com:
    ubiquitous Audio pronunciation of ubiquitous ( P ) Pronunciation Key (y-bkw-ts)
    adj.

    Being or seeming to be everywhere at the same time; omnipresent: "plodded through the shadows fruitlessly like an ubiquitous spook" (Joseph Heller).

    Is this something you really want your government to be?
    I want to know where the people in the governmant are at all times.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  35. As an added feature... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They will include RFID tags to "help" you in case of emergency or track criminals (only :-) cough cough ).

    Also, they will include digital representation of your DNA for easy use by insurance companies, Big Brother, etc.

    They will say that if you are honest you have nothing to hide. Therefore, if you refuse it then you MUST be a criminal. You aren't a GOOD citizen.

    How long before we are all just one big communist/socialist utopia who will tell you when and where you can eat, drink, sleep and pee?

    And you can forget the "revolt" because by then we will have had our guns taken by force.

    America the last stronghold for true freedom and democracy willbe dragged down into the mud by those who want to destroy us unless we act now by standing up for our rights and defend our freedoms from our own government.

    A wise man once said, "Power corrupts". We see that that is indeed true.

  36. Uru by Phroggy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Name could be confused with the upcoming game from Cyan, which sounds like sort of a cross between Myst and EverQuest.

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  37. Still follows privacy laws? by trmj · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, they already seems to be tracking every property in the UK, as the article states:
    the only details that will be entered are name, address and Meter Point Asset Number - the number in the corner of every household electricity bill which is unique to that property

    But then they go and cause more distrust of the program, by stating of these numbers:
    It could also become a pre-requisite of any universal ID card

    And lastly, I feel we've all eard this one before:
    It is a pro-active way to protect your identity


    Well, ok, one more, but only because it sounds funny out of context:
    we need mega-systems

    --
    Work sucked, until it became unemployment, when it became slightly more tolerable. -Tet
    1. Re:Still follows privacy laws? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Megaweapon!! Megaweapon!! Megaweapon!!

      Make it slooooooooooooooowwwwww...

  38. whois 666 by JThaddeus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads: And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name." Revelation 13:16-17, KJV

    --
    "Love is a familiar; Love is a devil: there is no evil angel but Love." --William Shakespeare ('Love's Labors Lost')
    1. Re:whois 666 by kafka93 · · Score: 1

      Dear me -- and this got modded up to 'insightful'? This same religious nuttery that gets brought up every time *any* kind of identification method is introduced?
      At least with bar codes the identification made some sense. The battle for our rights will be better fought with intelligent discourse than with reactionary bible-thumping, I think.

      Mind you, anything that prompts a reference to the masterful Naked can't be all bad..

    2. Re:whois 666 by JThaddeus · · Score: 1

      Actually, I thought it would get modded up as "Funny". You see, although I am a Christian, I don't see much purpose in the ravings of the mad monk John of Revelations. Afterall, my end-of-days could come on my commute home tonight.

      If they were to ever reopen the Christian canon, my wish is that they would drop Revelations and substitute Dicken's A Christmas Carol.

      --
      "Love is a familiar; Love is a devil: there is no evil angel but Love." --William Shakespeare ('Love's Labors Lost')
    3. Re:whois 666 by adonoman · · Score: 1

      Well that'd be great except for the fact that there is no book of Revelations in any Christian canon at present. My bible does, however, have the book of Revelation.

    4. Re:whois 666 by Threni · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      And talketh he shit, he who quoteth from fiction of olde. And lo, verily it was fucking obvious to anyone with half a brain that this religious shit was created in order to keep illiterate peasantry in order. Believeth not the rantings of the sad, the lonely, the confused and the friendless.

    5. Re:whois 666 by mangu · · Score: 2, Funny
      If they were to ever reopen the Christian canon, my wish is that they would drop Revelations and substitute Dicken's A Christmas Carol.


      No, no, that wouldn't do at all. If you pay attention, you'll see that Revelation is one of only two books that Bible-thumpers read. They read the Genesis and, realizing how many pages there are in the whole Bible, skip to the Revelation, to see if the butler did it.

    6. Re:whois 666 by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Sorry. That wasn't "shit", it was anti-government propaganda. It's a bit hard to understand at this remove, but I understand that the 666 was meant to refer to Nero, and the descriptions were purposely obscure to limit the persecutions. (Because of the obscurity, it frequently is used to apply to some new or current government person, entity, or process.)

      This doesn't mean that it's incorrect to apply it here. Events that take place in mythic time take place in all times and places. Just as now is 1984, so now is also the time of the Great Beast. Both are reasonable, and, insofar as the descriptions match the actuality, reasonable correspondences. (Being historic doesn't prevent an event from being mythic. Now is also the time of Patrick Henry's "Give me liberty or give me death!", if you are one to whom that is true. Might be hard to work in the Virginia Legistors, though.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    7. Re:whois 666 by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Good point.

      I don't mind identifiers. I do hate having identifiers REQUIRED.

      You thought predjudice was a thing of the past? Just imagine a world where everyone knows absolutely everything about you without so much as having met you? All of their half-baked assumptions about your background, or lack of background, will get to play a guiding role in your life without your so much as knowing it.

      How many jobs now perform a credit check? How many catalogue companies mine your medical records? How many charities buy your name from a database based on where you live, what you buy, and who you gave money to in the past?

      Hell is here people. If you are reading this post, you probably missed the last boat to that place with all the harps.

      That said, and once you accept that you are no longer in control, it becomes like the weather. Hey it's cold and rainy, better wear a raincoat. Boy is it sunny, get that sunblock on.

      Now my analysis of your internet habits leads me to believe that you are in the market for my patented TIN FOIL CAP. Why yes, only the TIN FOIL CAP can prevent 99% of all brain-wave intrusions...

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    8. Re:whois 666 by dazed-n-confused · · Score: 1

      The corporate logo of BT used to be a figure playing pan-pipes. "Pan" is (of course) a goat-like pagan deity, identified by Christians as Satan.

      In the UK in the eighties, you could get your phone numbers either from BT (the incumbent former monopolist) or from their jumped-up competitor, Mercury. The Roman deity "Mercury" was known in Greek as Hermes the Messenger; who was confused in late antiquity with Hermes Trismegistus (Thrice-Powerful Hermes), the father of magic; who was identified by Christians as Satan.

      Numbers, Pan, Hermes, Satan... interesting times?

    9. Re:whois 666 by keyslammer · · Score: 1

      As a non-christian with a christian up-bringing, I took it to be an interesting and rather amusing cultural reference. I might have modded it up as such if I had mod points.

      But, of course, on /. you can't mention anything that might be seen as endorsing Christianity (or Microsoft for that matter) without inciting controversy, so maybe it's just Flamebait ;-)

    10. Re:whois 666 by Puu · · Score: 1

      I understand Revelation can be seen as a political pamphlet (personally I see it as John ate too many mushrooms on that island), but I fail to understand why it should refer to Nero -- it was written around 90 AD, twenty years after Nero's reign ended, when the notorious Domitianus was emperor (after Vespasianus and Titus after Nero).

    11. Re:whois 666 by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I don't know why it was Nero. I understand it had something to do with Hebrew numerology. (Maybe it was an oral tale long before it was written down?) And, I suppose, in this kind of context any Roman Emperor could be used as a stand-in for all the others. At least for a political pamplet kind of thing. Possibly Domitian didn't yield any interesting numbers. Somehow Nero came to stand for all that was viscious. (E.g., violins weren't invented during Nero's reign. And at the time of the great fire, he was at his country estate, and didn't even hear about it until much later, but "Nero fiddled while Rome burned!" was a standard accusation. Actually, much more fitting for a politician, he played a lyre.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    12. Re:whois 666 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This book is not literal. In fact, this passage has already happened: there was a time that you had to be 100% catholic to do anything.

      right hand: work
      foreheads: thought

      666 = imprefection, repeated for emphasis

      If you don't see where this is coming from, study the rest of the Bible first. You can't study advanced calculus before mastering arithmatic. (not to say that this interpretation is obviously the only one, but to me it's obviously the best)

  39. Exclusive : BT to patent ID checking systems by tuxliner · · Score: 1

    remember what they did with hyperlinks

  40. Orwellian by ralico · · Score: 1

    Looks like the Us has Total Information Awareness and the UK has total intrusiveness
    This looks like just another step in the abolishment of privacy. It's a mad mad mad mad world...

    --

    SCO to Hell
    1. Re:Orwellian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose this will get the automatic +1: 1984 Reference moderation...

  41. Re:Makes me glad I'm an American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and great guys wait for more equitable laws.

    Passive resistance in it's most violent form.

  42. URU by james_bray · · Score: 1

    "you are you?"

    "u are you" more like ;-)

    --
    http://www.reeb.freeserve.co.uk
  43. Re:Makes me glad I'm an American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Butthead sez: "Huhuhuhuh... Freedumb. Grease. Buggery. Package. Huhuhuhuhuh..."

  44. Just a suggestion... by ActiveSX · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't 'RUU' be a better ancronym for an ID system? I guess it loses its graphics designer-friendly symmetry then, though.

    1. Re:Just a suggestion... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      Now, because we would then be "RUU"ing the day it came out.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  45. English Imperialism Wins Again! by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm convinced that you can't get a peice of identity-based legistlation passed these days unless it make a cute acronym in English. What do the Italians, Spanish, or Germans think URU means?

    1. Re:English Imperialism Wins Again! by gilesjuk · · Score: 1

      If the system fails will it come up with an URU Mediation error? :)

  46. I don't know about you, but I'd be worried... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...about the freedom grease buggery package.

  47. And coming soon... by Kadagan+AU · · Score: 5, Funny

    The open source version: GURU

    --
    This space for rent, inquire within.
  48. What they might really want... by SolemnDragon · · Score: 1

    Think of it this way:

    Would-be airline passenger: I want to buy a ticket.

    Airline employee: Cash or credit?

    Would-be Airline Passenger: Credit.

    Airline employee: Let me check this against your ID number to verify identity... (for red non-resident 'terrorist' flags, of course)
    Would-be airline passenger: Oke, Cash.

    Airline employee: SECURITY!!!!

    Of course, this is only one scenario. But the point is: it proves residency, at least, if all the members of the household are listed as 'associate household members' in the database. This raises lots of questions of course (like, who the heck would do this voluntarily?) but it's a step towards that Total Information Awareness mess we've been facing here in the states...

  49. Security of information. by eyeye · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't forget that journalists regularly get call information of celebrities from BT, same with private investigators.
    They get caught occasionally but what about the times they don't.
    A security token is only as trustworthy as its issuer.

    --
    Bush and Blair ate my sig!
  50. Cool by DriceX · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does this officially make them part of Oceania?

  51. Re:Oh Really? by all_i_want_is_an_acc · · Score: 2, Funny

    And that, in a nutshell, is why america's stock has fallen so badly internationally. Keep those ideas in mind when you realize that your government couldn't get 4 countries to agree to a bake sale without offering 70 billion in subsidies.

  52. Re:ubiquitous government, no thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    That's what you get when you live in Europe... get used to it.

    It's a shame that America is getting more like that every day.

  53. Doubt it by mugnyte · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here in the US, "diving" through one's trash to glom semi-precious information about them is a common identify-theft method.

    If the Meter ID of every BT customer is on their bill, one only needs there name and address (probably on the same bill!) to act on their behalf.

    This seems to fly in the face of how any private key system would work. If it is a public key, what are the channels that ensure nobody else can use such an identity?

    I predict this will go up in flames. I see the electric bills of past residents of apartments all the time, simply floating into mailboxes long after they've left. If BT still thinks they live there, then "IMU" when I use this info.

    Forgive me if this opinion results from ignorance of BT magical "meter id" number. But nevertheless, private passwords exist for a reason. None of the source info here seems quite secure.

    mug

  54. Reasons to be against the war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Democracy (this form of) in north america for the most part has failed.

    When 65% of the voting population isn't voting due to mono-politics you can honestly say it has failed. If arab populations buy into it, it's our countries corporate sanctions that will be lifted and the business elite will enlarge thier coffers at our countries finacial credit expense. If our *leaders* succeed in pushing this form of democracy, there is only betrayal for the majority of arabs because this fiction cannot be maintained for long.

    1. Re:Reasons to be against the war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Democracy comes with the freedom not only to participate, but to not participate. The people that don't are making a choice. Their choice is "I'm happy with the way 1/3 of the population is running things."

    2. Re:Reasons to be against the war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Promote (I emphasis promote) "a none of the above" option on the ballot and see.

      For school I did a survey, 85% of the no-voters blamed on both parties supporting the same scheme.

    3. Re:Reasons to be against the war by cyril3 · · Score: 1
      Democracy comes with the responsibility to participate and the freedom not to participate.

      The people that don't are certainly making a choice. Their choice is "I'm not interested in thinking that hard so I'll let someone else make a choice for me then bitch and moan if I don't like the consequences."

  55. Joy, Bliss. And the problems are .... by blowdart · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can see obvious problems with this, having had my identity stolen a little in the UK.

    2 years ago I had a cheque (check) book and American Express card stolen from the post. They were stolen by either

    • Postal workers
    • People in my shared building

    From that information the thieves now had my full name, bank details and details of a credit card I held (albeit a cancelled cards and cancelled cheques). From this information they purchased mobile phones, billed to me and applied for numerous store cards. I only discovered this when the bills started arriving.

    Now, if BT's scheme goes off information available on the Electricity bill (keep in mind there are NUMEROUS electricity suppliers, so numerous databases to tie together), what is to stop someone stealing your electricity bill? Note that the electricy reference is per household, not per person. Now, tie this into the electoral role (which is already sold to marketers, and you can check and query it at your local library, so it's not private) that might almost be adequate.

    Except the electoral role is updated once a year. You can actually manage to miss it completly if you move at exactly the wrong time.

    Also people can choose to opt out of the data sharing that the electoral role provides (but not the information sharing to the credit agencies).

    Lets not forget that BT is a private company, not answerable to anyone except the shareholders. I'm not sure if this is better or worse than the government forcing a scheme through.

    1. Re:Joy, Bliss. And the problems are .... by Albanach · · Score: 1
      The electoral roll is now updated monthly and has been for a year. You should not miss being on it, because you can add your name at any time:

      see this web page

      The electoral register now comes in two formats, one which is available only to returning officers, credit reference agencies and political parties, and an edited version made available to marketers. You can opt out of being listed in the edited version if you wish.

      See this web page

    2. Re:Joy, Bliss. And the problems are .... by blowdart · · Score: 1
      The electoral roll is now updated monthly and has been for a year.

      But does joe public know this? I doubt it. They only realise when the paper mail shot arrives.

  56. All together now.... by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 1

    I am Emmett Smith.

    (Stupid-A$$ lameness filter)

    1. Re:All together now.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Puhleeez!

      Thanks. I'll be here all week.

  57. COCK, AND WHY MICHAEL SUCKS IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

  58. Who's on first? by ChaoticCoyote · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder what the folks at Cyan and Ubisoft think about this? They've announced a game named Uru: Online Ages Beyond Myst , for relase in Q4 2003. I wonder who got the trademark first?

    1. Re:Who's on first? by ChaoticCoyote · · Score: 1

      Now how in the heck is it off-topic to mention a possible trademark infringement by a company (BT) that purports to be interested in personal privacy?

      Or isn't the slashdot audience interested in intellectual property issues anymore?

    2. Re:Who's on first? by anubi · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I hate to go on as AC, but I feel I am dealing with a hot moderator here...and I have enough enemies already, thank you, and I do not need another.

      But I do think Chaotic Coyote made a good point, that the name URU is already in use. Given our present litigious environment spawned off by a Congress easily swayed against their own populace by a team of suit-wearing corporate-sponsored lobbyists, what sort of ramifications can we expect in the courtrooms by their use of the phrase "uru". After all, look what a fuss is being stirred up over the non-unique usage of the common word: "Windows".

      If I had a mod point available right now, I would have used it to bump ChaoticCoyote up one as interesting, at least.

      A few years ago, I would not have given it a second thought, but with today's mouse-trap style litigation environment?

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  59. this is double-plus-ungood by BigChigger · · Score: 2, Funny

    and if I have to explain that to you, then the battle is already lost.

    BC

    1. Re:this is double-plus-ungood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The battle was never lost, we were always at peace with Oceania!

      (Paraphrased from a little book by a Mr. Orwell)

  60. What's the format of a URU? by Visaris · · Score: 1

    I mean, if the URU is just a number or a short character string, what's the point? I might as well ditch the URU and have a password. I think it may even be better to have a passphrase, because then I can have one for each site I do business with, not to mention I can change it easily if I think someone is on to it.

    I'm guessing you have to call the URU organization if you want to change your ID. How do they know it's you on the phone? Can't use the URU, then someone could get yours and change it. You'd be screwed. How about by a credit card number? Name? Address? I need those things to verify myself online now. Name + address + ccn = a new URU. So why not just use the name and address system? Seems kinda silly to me.

    One could argue that the point of the URU is to have a way to identify yourself without having to give out your name and address. I suppose that's a valid point and think that's all the ID would be good for. But think about it for a second. What sites need the URU? Online stores banks, and auctions for example. They need the name address, and ccn anyways. What about sites like slashdot? I don't want them to have my URU! I would refuse if they asked me. My username and password is all you need to know about me.. thanks. Oh, slashdot won't use my URU execpt to verify it's me? I wouldn't want my URU to be sent out all over the net for somthing that I'm too crazy about protecting (slashdot login).

    I don't know. For the average Joe, it might save some time and password resets. For me... It's just a waste of time. I would rather the man spend all this money on somthing worth while.

    --

    I am a viral sig. Please help me spread.
  61. Why is it "reactionary bible-thumping?" by laetus · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why do you label this "reactionary bible-thumping?"

    For the subset of Slashdot readers who are Christians, this is a relevant comment. For two-thousand years, Christians have had a prophecy regarding the identification of every man, woman and child on this planet. For a Christian, the Mark of the Beast IS intelligent discourse because it is a very real concern.

    Personally, I think your slight is more of a reactionary, knee-jerk response showing your anti-Christian bias than the Biblical quote being discussed.

    --

    "We're sorry, but the website you're trying to reach has been disconnected."
    1. Re:Why is it "reactionary bible-thumping?" by kafka93 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Christians have had any number of prophecies which can be interpreted in any number of ways. Perhaps that justifies the application of any one of those prophecies to any subject that might be discussed on /., but it strikes me as a rather absurd approach.

      Incidentally, I'm using "reactionary" in the sense of "being conservative" -- such references to the Bible, a book which though beautifully written is nonetheless a difficult source for either moral or intellectual discussion, smack of hysteria. Having a "very real concern" doesn't really mean anything -- I might be worried that aliens are employing these ids to catalogue us all and thus find appropriate mates for their martian daughters, but it doesn't make it my views any better considered.

      I've nothing against biblical references, so long as there's any kind of real point or basis to them. But to start implying that the End is Nigh on the basis of nothing more than a silly government plan is, frankly, ridiculous.

    2. Re:Why is it "reactionary bible-thumping?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you believe that the implementation of URU will bring about the coming of the beast?

    3. Re:Why is it "reactionary bible-thumping?" by Threni · · Score: 1

      "have had a prophecy regarding the identification of every man"

      A rather vague one, though, don't you think? If it had been a little more specific, perhaps it wouldn't sound so...dumb?

      Christians, eh? Personally, I think the Romans had the right idea.

    4. Re:Why is it "reactionary bible-thumping?" by mangu · · Score: 2, Funny
      A rather vague one, though, don't you think? If it had been a little more specific...


      Yes, God, although He is Absolutely Perfect in other matters, is just so-so when it comes to writing documentation.

    5. Re:Why is it "reactionary bible-thumping?" by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "difficult source for either moral or intellectual discussion"

      ???
      It is a great source of moral and intellectual discussion.

      the point, which is relevent to this thread, is that the bible predicts a complet catalog of all humans.

      Now we could discuss how the effect of that statement, and peoples reaction to, it could make it a self-fulfilling prophecy, Or how in the US, the constitution could cause a seperation of believer and non believer because introducing a wide spread system mey make it difficult to purchase goods without the identifier. Maybe in the US the constitution would prevent a national ID because it would descriminate on a feligous basis.
      But I guess you wouldn't consider that a place to start an intellectual discussion.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Why is it "reactionary bible-thumping?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Romans, you mean, converting to Christianity?

    7. Re:Why is it "reactionary bible-thumping?" by geekoid · · Score: 1

      no, espcially when taken in context.

      Could you imagine even 100 years ago proposing a way to maintain tracking of every person on the earth?

      But here we are, with the technology to do so.
      You may not believe, but it is relevant, however your response really has no merit with the thread, which is about tracking people, not about the merits of christianity.

      I find it interesting you believe in a system that throws people to the lions for what they believe.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:Why is it "reactionary bible-thumping?" by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Which commandment do you not understand?

      that is pretty much the only part of the bible that God 'wrote'.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:Why is it "reactionary bible-thumping?" by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      For two-thousand years, Christians have had a prophecy regarding the identification of every man, woman and child on this planet.

      Not identification--forced tattooing.

    10. Re:Why is it "reactionary bible-thumping?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      that is pretty much the only part of the bible that God 'wrote'.


      Sez you, pardner. Ask anyone in the Bible-belt and they'll tell you God wrote every single letter and punctuation mark in the Bible. Not only that, He also did the king James translation Himself.

    11. Re:Why is it "reactionary bible-thumping?" by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      The quote sounds more like every human had the same mark on them. Analogizing a database that contains a unique ID for each person, to a single common mark physically applied to each person, is quite a stretch. Even Elastic Man can't stretch that much.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    12. Re:Why is it "reactionary bible-thumping?" by UberLord · · Score: 1

      But to start implying that the End is Nigh on the basis of nothing more than a silly government plan is, frankly, ridiculous.

      Actually, I think it's quite probable. After all, a sensible government plan would never bring on Armageddeon ;)

    13. Re:Why is it "reactionary bible-thumping?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Analogizing a database that contains a unique ID for each person, to a single common mark physically applied to each person, is quite a stretch. Even Elastic Man can't stretch that much."

      When this current plan runs a muck, i'm sure that a simple "tatoo" or "mark" used for tracking, could easily be proposed, so i don't think it's a stretch at all, considering that God's word is TRUTH.

      Having said that, I'm not so sure believers who gets a tatoo or mark used in purchasing items, will be tortured with fire and brimstone, as an angel has said something to this effect, not Jesus and not God; there have been several fallen angels, satan being the most well known by this world. Jesus says "Whosoever believes on the name of the Lord Jesus Christ will have everlasting life"(or something like that), he didn't say.. except you get marked. Besides, I'm not so sure the Scripture about the "mark of the beast" hasn't allready served it's purpose in the helping of bringing down babylon.

    14. Re:Why is it "reactionary bible-thumping?" by cyril3 · · Score: 1
      How would everyone having the SAME mark (as is suggested by the quote) on their forehead help in tracking other than to identify those that don't have the mark.

      Can I suggest that if the Bible is the inerrant word of god, not just the bits attributed to god or jesus then if the bible says an angel said something then that is the truth in your terms. I am not a believer in the inerrant truth of the literal terms of the bible and evenI realize that much.

      Unfortunately believers in the literal truth of the bible are required to hold some very intellectually tricky positions. More unfortunately many of those people are unsuited to the task.

    15. Re:Why is it "reactionary bible-thumping?" by Dirtside · · Score: 1
      When this current plan runs a muck, i'm sure that a simple "tatoo" or "mark" used for tracking, could easily be proposed, so i don't think it's a stretch at all, considering that God's word is TRUTH.
      God's word is truth? Prove the following:

      1) That what's in the Bible is actually God's word.

      2) That God exists.

      3) That God's words are always true.

      Then get back to me.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    16. Re:Why is it "reactionary bible-thumping?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cause it's God that takes the blame if you toss a brick up in the air and it falls back and hits you in the head, and it's God that takes responsibility for it, and it's God who says his rightousness is greater then mine and that scares the shit of out me.

    17. Re:Why is it "reactionary bible-thumping?" by Cally · · Score: 1

      > For a Christian, the Mark of the Beast IS intelligent discourse
      > because it is a very real concern.

      For a Christian, there is no such thing as intelligent discourse, merely debate about which form of mumbo-jumbo is the right one. Come back when you've left the Dark Ages.

      --
      "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
    18. Re:Why is it "reactionary bible-thumping?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You may have noted that, unlike many bits of Revelation, this particular prophecy is very specific. "A mark on the forehead or on the right hand".

      Not "a card they had to carry with them", nor "a mark in the corner of their electricity bill". Neither of those meets the description.

    19. Re:Why is it "reactionary bible-thumping?" by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but HE's always beeen rather prone to translation errors. For example, dating from the middleage, you can still see a lot of pictures of Moses coming down the mountain, tablets in hand, /with horns on his head/.

      Reason was something like this: the text in hebrew said something like "and Moses came down the mountain with rage" ('cos of trhe idolatry he saw), but that got translated as "and Moses came down the mountain with horns".

      Which basically menas, even if the bible were the words of a diety (whose existence I find highly suspect...why doesn't He show Himself more often? He used to come 'round every so often...is He sleeping? Or dead?), then His words have been mangled up to the point of being giberish, and thus any statement in the bible is untrustworthy.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    20. Re:Why is it "reactionary bible-thumping?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Relevant Revelations there ( Amplified Bible )

      Actually, I'd figured it'd be either microchiping ( like we do with our pets, and yes the FDA approved this for humans for ID and commerce ), especially since:
      a) the two places microchipping is approved-for is hand and neck ( yeah, very slightly off, but .. weird visions are noted for their weirdness & getting-the-details-slightly-off in communicating-the-essence ), and
      b) "stamp (mark, inscription)" is about as close as one could possibly expect, of them biblical-era people, to 'identity-microchip'.

      ... or ... maybe it meant ID-card in hand and PIN in one's head ( no cash-transactions permitted anymore, because of they're being non-traceable ).

      Weirdly, both look likely to be implemented before the climate-break destroys resource-comfort from our richer nations, and when /that/ hits ... BAM!

      .. therefore the timing is remarkably precise... ( no, I'm not a Proper Christian type, I just intend to understand everything as deeply as I can, from as many perspectives as possible, and don't assume that scientism is the only-meaningful reality, nor do I assume that conventional-interpretations of biblical texts are only-meaningful reality... God's gotta be infinite, right? Creator of Universes/Worlds? )

    21. Re:Why is it "reactionary bible-thumping?" by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      What do you mean? If I tossed a brick up into the air and it hit me in the head, it would be my responsibility, and I would blame myself. Anyone who wouldn't... has problems.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  62. Re:Makes me glad I'm an American by ak_hepcat · · Score: 1

    It's a great play. I was involved in it in college, working tech at the time.
    Lysistrata was read around the world Monday as a protest against the war. Sydney Morning Herald

    --
    Support FSF: Stop thinking with your wallet, and think with your imagination. (cc/non-commercial)
  63. And how does it insure that URU? by MeNeXT · · Score: 1
    I'm standing in line and the person in front of me states his name, address and that stupid code in oredr to confirn a URU. Now how does it stop me again?


    I go through your garbage and find a elecrtic bill, now I have your name and add. How does it stop me?


    I am employed at joe blows video rental bonanza. You come to open an account. How does it stop me?


    I fail to see how this is going to work. Please someone explain how any of this is secret?

    --
    DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
  64. URU acronym by jesser · · Score: 1

    "ICQ" was clever. "URU" is not.

    --
    The shareholder is always right.
  65. Double plus ungood. by royalblue_tom · · Score: 1

    No, they've *always* been part of Oceania.

    1. Re:Double plus ungood. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they've always been at war with Eastasia.

  66. Mods on crack... not a troll by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1
    With the ties between church and government (how many laws exist because of a solely religious imperative), this is a valid concern about online tracking.

    The fact that the AC posted going to church as a solution was simply a nice segue.

    My point is a valid one, not a troll. If I was trolling, I'd post AC.

    --
    Murphy was an optimist.
    1. Re:Mods on crack... not a troll by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1
      And if I was trolling, I'd have posted this:

      http://www.plif.com/archive/wc215.gif

      It would make a great t-shirt.

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
    2. Re:Mods on crack... not a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeh, you're right. It's not a troll. It is flamebait, though. So the -1 was justified.

    3. Re:Mods on crack... not a troll by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1
      The comic was flamebait, admittedly.

      The segue about church was a pet peeve and a point.

      The the altar boy kiddie porn comment was flamebaitish, but it still brought up the notion that the church monitors others more than itself.

      Or are you telling me saying anything negative about religion is flamebait?

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
    4. Re:Mods on crack... not a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "Or are you telling me saying anything negative about religion is flamebait?"

      No, but saying it in a derogatory or malicious manner is. There's just no reason to be nasty about it. Unless you enjoy lowering yourself to the level you think they work on.

      Just an idea, perhaps if you want to argue that your views against religion aren't flamebait, you shouldn't admit that they are before getting defensive about it.

    5. Re:Mods on crack... not a troll by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1
      Ok, that point I will concede. :-)

      TBH, I wouldn't have added that quip if the parent poster hadn't insinuated that going to C-hurch was as noble a pursuit as community, exercising, or volunteer work. I probably wouldn't have added it without the capital C.

      It still was not the true point of the post to be flamebait, however.

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
    6. Re:Mods on crack... not a troll by HiThere · · Score: 1

      O, about half of them. It used to be a higher proportion, it's probably gotten down to noticably less than half by now, but I haven't estimated recently.

      This doesn't mean that half of the laws are bad. I would estimate the proportion of bad laws as considerably higher than half, and many of the religion inspired laws are actually socially useful. You can't make any easy correlation here.

      The thing to remember is, whatever other reason a law might have (in particular for it's exact formulation), the primary purpose of the laws are to benefit those in power. Some of the people in power have felt benefited by laws that aid the common weal. Unfortunately, not only is the proportion small, it's been getting smaller as the population per representative has increased.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  67. UR-HIMOVERTHERE by LiftOp · · Score: 1

    I mean, really. Someone learns to spoof the system, and once again it only works on law-abiding citizens, right?

  68. Church? You mean like kiddie pr0n? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  69. U.R.U....what it REALLY means by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    One more step on the way to all of us becoming R.U.R's.

  70. Re:Makes me glad I'm an American by Ravenscall · · Score: 1

    I know :-)

    --
    You say you want a revolution....
  71. Chaum had a better way first by esj+at+harvee · · Score: 1

    http://www.chaum.com/articles/Security_Wthout_Iden tification.htm

    security without identification is quite an interesting article and should be considered before heading into any ID scheme.

  72. Listen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am still...awesome!

  73. Good old BT.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Famous for delaying internet takeup by many years, holding back ISDN when it was standard in many countries, holding back ADSL, holding back the local loop from competition, and still managing to make a debt mountain that puts many countries to shame.

    and now it comes up with a useless idea, trying to prove it really isn't staffed with backward idiots who date back from the old BPO (British Post Office).

    Yes BT, we love them!

  74. URU? by Doug+Neal · · Score: 1

    That's philosophically debatable...

  75. It's been a long time since I did any Bile study, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if I remember right, when John wrote Revelations (and anything that Paul wrote too, for that matter), the widespread belief was that THE END would come during their lifetimes, not anything set 2000 some years into the future.

  76. URU = u.r.u????? by arf_barf · · Score: 1

    There is a company in the US that deals with biometric products. The company name is DigitalPersona and their product is called U.r.U. Weird.

  77. And in other news.... by NiceGeek · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Norse thunder god Thor has filed a trademark infrigement lawsuit against British Telecom.

  78. Leave Aristophanes out of it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    buggery = anal sex, which nothing to do with aristophanes' play

    rogering = hetero sex

    Note these terms are exclusive to the british isles

  79. A more noble pursuit ?? by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    *GASP* going to church oughta make it easier to get access to kiddie porn at least. Get in good with your pastor/minister/priest :)

    If you are searching for a peace prize I'd suggest the nobel approach...
    http://www.nobel.se/

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  80. government regulated internet is not internet by Erris · · Score: 1
    And no direct connection to the internet

    If that's true, then what you have is not the internet. It's more like some kind of corperate advert browser. All governments can do to cyberspace is destroy it.

    Am I, in the US, going to need this silly number to read BBC News or buy something from them? S-T-U-P-I-D.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
    1. Re:government regulated internet is not internet by plugger · · Score: 1

      Am I, in the US, going to need this silly number to read BBC News or buy something from them?

      Unlikely, according to the BBC story the ID number will allow third parties to verify that a named individual is registered to a particular address.

    2. Re:government regulated internet is not internet by Lozzer · · Score: 1

      Am I, in the US, going to need this silly number to read BBC News or buy something from them? S-T-U-P-I-D.

      I doubt it, but you may if you try and claim government benefits.

      --
      Special Relativity: The person in the other queue thinks yours is moving faster.
  81. So how do you do identity theft... by A+Masquerade · · Score: 1

    The UK has a number of services to aid you in switching your energy supplier - these are often online services such as uswitch or saveonyourbills (and you can find even more at switchwithwhich).

    So you get a name and address - can do that from the phone book, or use other means.

    You create yourself a throwaway email account - ideally based somewhere that would be a complete pain to req any log data from. Maybe you also ensure theres a little more masking here - like covering up your web access.

    Then go to a switch web site, enter the property details you are interested in - don't need the right name at present, just the address (postcode and house number - say SW1A2AA, number 10), and set them up for a new energy supplier - theres basically bugger all checking on this at the early stages.

    You will then get from the switch website, or sent by email (thats why you need the throwaway account), confirmation of the details to change your electricity supply to the new supplier, and guess what, this includes the electricity meter reference number....

    So there you are, name, address, meter reference, their identity is yours for the taking, without all that dumpster diving stuff. Is this neat or what! Whats more, its going to be very hard to get the meter reference changed.

  82. Yet another insecure security code by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

    >In phase one, the only details that will be entered are name, address and Meter Point Asset >Number - the number in the corner of every household electricity bill which is unique to that property.

    This is excellent idea except for a few minor details. It is possible for tenants in a property to share the same the same meter. A couple of cases come to mind: students sharing flats, or a summer student renting a room in a family home.
    Do you really want someone with a short tenancy
    agreement to have access to a security code.

    If one of these numbers is used in fraud, it would be impossible to have the number changed.
    What happens if the meter has to be replaced. Do you have to inform BT of this change?

    Why on earth do they need to use meter numbers for. Using hashed National Survey map coordinates would seem to be far more practical.

    This idea only seems to increase the chances of increasing the chance of mail theft.

  83. Big Brother by queenb**ch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As a member of the IETF for PKI-X, I can tell you that this whole thing is about to sweep the world. It all operates off Public Key Infrastructure. Essentially, you get a cert from the government that they can use to identify you. While there are a lot of legitamate uses, I think that all forms of government should be treated with a certain amount of paranoia.

    How much more damage would Hitler have done if he had computerized access to everyone's banking records and been able to track every transaction? How about identification papers, travel permits, work passes, etc. that are signed with virtually unbreakable encryption? Let's see if that still makes you feel warm and fuzzy about your government knowing who you are when you send email, while your are surfing, and what you do when you are on line.

    Queen B
    --
    HDGary secures my bank :/
  84. Fiction can be relevant by cyberformer · · Score: 1

    Even to an atheist, the Bible can still be relevant. Just treat it as any other classic work of fiction, like the work of Shakespeare or Orwell. Good stories can retain their relevance hundreds of years after they're written, not because they're literally true, but because they're good metaphors.

    1. Re:Fiction can be relevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it provides great insight into an idiot cycle that occurs in social group, and tells you how to break out of them.

  85. Bile study? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't studied Bile. I have, however, studied mucus, semen, and occasionally sour mild...

  86. BT are the most incapable company by weeble · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I have lived and worked in the UK for many years.

    BT are a company I would never deal with in the future. They will lose your account details, they will lie to you and over charge you.

    Two years ago they were charging £10,000 for a 128k leased line when their competitors were charging half that.

    They at present run a monopoly and abuse their customers and competitors.

    --
    Slashdot Beta should die a painful death.
    1. Re:BT are the most incapable company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How on earth is this redundant?

      They are seeking to work with the Government to keep records on every citizen.

      If they are working with the government spending public money it is very relevant whether they are over charging.

      They are currently abusing their position as a monopoly, if they have all this extra information it escalates the possibilities for abuse tremendously.

      They are a corrupt and poorly organised company, do I have to point out to the readership here why this might be relevant??

  87. Typical British Invention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No offense to my English brothers, but every english computer product of the last half century has been a brilliant invention marred by lack of finish or marketing.

    This, unfortunately is much different in that it isn't even a good idea.

    Sorry.

  88. Actually, a great idea by alexo · · Score: 1

    There are a lot more Christians than privacy-aware people.
    If you want to convince Joe Average that privacy compromising is bad, comparing universal IDs to "the number of the name of the beast" may be just the ticket.

    Anyone knows any preacher that we can be converted to the cause?

  89. A translation is as follows: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your amazingly incomprehensible post has been translated by babelfish technology to the following rant:

    I'm 18 years old and pissed off. I don't have a good reason to be pissed off...after all dad sent me to school, me mum takes care of me on fall and winter holiday, and overall, I have a lifestyle that would make a 15th century minor monarch envious.

    Against that backdrop I rail about arab concerns because (a) My mom's father is 1/4 arab (b) I'm eighteen, its my job to act pissed off.

    (c) Babelfish corporation. Certain rights reserved, particularly those rights that would piss you off the most.

    1. Re:A translation is as follows: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intelligent, dismissive, and YOU FAIL IT!!!

      I could be fifty years old. I may have watched the bullshit being flung out by the goverment and advertising year after year and am use to the erosion process "what is illegal today we can climatize to tomorrow". Perhaps I've watched the same dipshits take advantage of youth and watched these dipshits wash their hands if it doesn't turn out right.

      If I was, I would say; Your being hoodwinked, things aren't the way they use to be and the level of corruption has never been as bad as it is today contrary to what the media hands out.

      Not even close to my profile, by your retortic I'd say I know what yours is, I might also say your wrong in your current assumption. Stop with the hype and get back to basics, this adversarial retortic is a step in the wrong direction. You may have more friends than you would like to imagine. But only if you were born a Pisces (that's a joke).

  90. Funny you should say that... by alext · · Score: 1
  91. Darn... by alext · · Score: 1

    Just found a much better link

  92. No ID system is the safest. by cybercuzco · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem with ID systems are that the more "uncrackable" they are, the more they are trusted. The more they are trusted, the harder it is to make things right when people circumvent those ID systems. Look at DNA evidence. Im sure that some day, some murderer is going to figure out how to plant somone elses DNA on a crime scene, thus implicating the other person. DNA= Guilt in the eyes of todays courts. The safest ID system is a minmally secure one. That way, people are naturally suspicious of an ID even if it appears to be genuine. Mistrust of ID's prevents abuse more than a so called "bulletproof" ID

    --

    1. Re:No ID system is the safest. by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      You are correct. And there's another (albeit smaller) problem: the fact that DNA testing is done on a small part of the DNA. So while it is said that DNA is unique (something like the chances of you having the same DNA as the criminal is 1/6 billion, therefore if there's a match, you are that criminal), the chances change because you are only testing a small part of the DNA...therefore, the chances of getting a match (and being matched to being the criminal, although you're not) are higher.

      That is one of teh reasons that DNA testing is considered as circumstantial evidence, not as an absolute placement of you at the crimescene.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
  93. Should I also pay for this endaevor? by Bures · · Score: 0

    We will definatly benefit from this BT system. I see it now, having a profile for every single person that goes on the net in the next 10 years. This is not the only sign of government and corporations trying to take away what ever privacy we might have left. This is just going to drag on for some time and we will have to make a decision if we want to be involved in such a system. I see benefits from this system but I also see how someone could majorly abuse this. We don't need a profile of everyone that goes on the net, what's the problem with just letting it run how it is. Well the problem is not enough money is being made and not enough lives have been taken over. I am all against this BT initiative, there just shouldn't be a database that contains profiles of a large population of people. Although there are already large profiling databases, we don't need anymore that want to take what they can grab.

    1. Re:Should I also pay for this endaevor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would support a database free from enterprise interests and a court order to use/gain access to one file or person or profile etc... I'd also back it up with years in prison, regardless of warrant for abuse of the system, and award damages to any individual to threaten the livelyhood of any company or organization using/trying to gain access to the database.

      From an MiB perspective the eventual proactive uses are huge.

    2. Re:Should I also pay for this endaevor? by Bures · · Score: 1

      Well definatly with a minimum of so and so years in prision and no maximum, creating penalties for abuse would certainly discourage violators to be violators, I would support it if also there was a list of people that would not be interested in being profiled :) But then im also showing what type of view points I have to this issue, so either way their would be knowledge of what my feelings are towards the subject.

    3. Re:Should I also pay for this endaevor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mind you it can fall in the nuclear weapons catagory. In a world where nuclear war is a preferable alternative to other weapons something needs to change.

  94. Have you seen our wives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speaking as a married man of over 15 years, believe me, its not big deal for our wives to withhold sex.

    In fact, I wouldn't be able to tell the difference if I wanted to.

    Laugh at me, but my life will be yours in 20 years.

    Laugh little man. laugh.

  95. EVERY system can be comprimised by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    and abused. EVERY system.
    Just give the black hats a good look at it and it's all but over with.

    Besides, what about the people that do not want to be cogs in the unholy beast/machine? When you are FORCED to take and use a number then you are no longer the owner of your soul.

    A number of years ago I saw a documentary about some (savage) natives somewhere who were deathly afraid of the cameras of the explorers. They BELIEVED that if someone took their picture that they were stealing thier souls.

    You know, maybe they were right....

    1. Re:EVERY system can be comprimised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The organization of the database could assist as a deterrent. Having access to millions of terabytes of info is useless if you don't know how to take advantage of it.

  96. Exploit already online! by smallduck · · Score: 1

    IBU ;-)

    --
    no sig, no plan, no clue
    1. Re:Exploit already online! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol.

  97. Re:whois 666 sorry, wrong number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where the heck does it say anything in the UBU about a mark on the forehead or hand? Shouldn't the events in question at least fit the friggin prophesy before bringing it up?

  98. Beware. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here comes the Mark of the Beast.
    (Revelation 13:16-18)
    The Bible was very right.

  99. Yeah, you right. Nothing new. by Erris · · Score: 1

    I doubt this system would have helped Derek Bond with the FBI. Sykes faked his passport and Sykes would have faked this new number too. Why is it that people think electronic cures all?

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  100. New translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your almost as amazingly incomprehensible post has been translated as follows:

    Well fuck you. Just because I'm 18 and I live with my parents, why does that make my opinion less valid?

    [rest is incomprehensible; a reasonable expection it is the equivalent of shuffling feet, looking down and mumbling "umm ummm ummm"]

    (c) 2003 The Babelfish company, St. Louis, MO.

  101. British Telecom and Amdocs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FYI, BT is a large customer of Amdocs. If you are wondering about the relationship here, do a search on google for "amdocs espionage" Not saying it is true (actually, it is, but....)

  102. BT....what a sell out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pfft...And all this time I thought BT was different from ther other label-whore musicians.

  103. A/S/L? by xixax · · Score: 1

    If the acronym was A/S/L, they'd need to put on extra servers just to keep up with the subscriptions.

    OTOH, 90% of the population would then be described as 16 yo bisexual females.

    Xix.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  104. There is no unique processor ID... by Kjella · · Score: 1

    Finally, I'd like to remind you that the personal ID number for computers was already here once - remember that unique ID# embeded in Pentium III chips? The one that intel later released a patch for to disable (which almost nobody did)? Well, that's still here, and people are quiet about whether the same system is used in Pentium IV or not...

    This is pure FUD. It's not still here, is was shot down in flames before it got running. They first wanted it on, then controlable in software, but in the end it was removed completely. You may read more about it here. It has been a taboo issue since then, obviously noone at Intel wants to remind people of their past mistakes.

    Then again, most computers do have what is usually a unique identifier, the network address MAC. You can usually change this if you like, but very few people care. So if you have the MAC, you can be reasonably sure it's the same computer, particularly those where the NIC is part of the motherboard.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  105. I don't think it's as bad as it sounds by TobascoKid · · Score: 1

    I found this link on BT's web site http://www.btplc.com/Mediacentre/Agencynewsrelease s/2003/an0327.htm

    It looks like all they're doing is pushing a web service to make sure that people's names match up with thier addresses, which is something companies already check for (any time you apply for credit they check your name and address against the electoral register). I would assume that Meter Point Asset Numbers come into it because a) only EU citizens can be on the register and b) the electricity company probably know you've moved in before the electoral register know. As an example, one of my friends had trouble buying an oven a couple of days after he had just moved into a new place because he failed the electoral register check (as he wasn't on the electoral regiter where he had just moved into and he had moved about a bit over the previous year)- had Comet been able to verify he was who he was via the the M-PAN (as he had electricty) he might have had an easier time.

    I think the only thing new here is that BT are offering a Web Service instead of whatever method companies currently use to do such checks (with a few enhancements to the current system). From an invasion of privacy issue it's no different than what people are currently subjected to, though I would assume that if it becomes easier and cheaper to do than it might happen more frequently.

    Tk

    --
    At some point, somewhere, the entire internet will be found to be illegal.
  106. hardly offtopic, asshole by JPelorat · · Score: 1

    And again with the vigilante moderator on crack.. it seems there's always someone, who comes by a day or so late, and shows his ass by modding stuff down at random.

    Having fun, poostabber? Great, now sod off.

    --
    Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
  107. Re:Oh Really? by Dannon · · Score: 1

    Actually, I'm becoming more and more convinced that no few countries would refuse the bake sale just to see if they can get us to offer more... while hoping we don't decide it's more to our interest to take our cake and cookies elsewhere.

    --
    Good judgment comes from experience.
    Experience comes from bad judgment.
  108. Battering rams by Marcus+Brody · · Score: 1
    Hmmmph.... Looks like the labour party are trying to use BT as an alternate route for their recently defeated "entitlement card" (read: national ID card). This scheme had a huge backlash because of the privacy implications. Thankfully "Big-Bro" David Blunkett had to drop the thing, with his face red and tail between his legs.


    Unfortunatley, the labour party are stuborrn gits who really dont like listening to the public much (e.g. see War on Iraq), so it doesnt suprise me they are using continue to use subterfuge as a battering ram to enstate their "entitlement card".

  109. Re:Ick (evolution revisited) by someone247356 · · Score: 1

    You said:
    "I still dont [sic] believe in true evolution. Too many holes (like, where's the link from the apes to humans?)"

    If your looking for a "link" between apes and humans, you'll never find one. Not even anthropologists claim a linkage between apes and humans. That's a common misconception that lay people have.

    An aspect of evolutionary theory, that primarily creationists, misunderstand or misrepresent is the belief that modern humans some how "evolved" from apes (or in some cases monkeys). I recall seeing bumper stickers and t-shirts proclaim that "Darwin isn't going to make a monkey out of me." or something to that effect.

    Modern evolutionary theory holds that modern complicated life evolved from simpler forms of life a long time (we are talking millions or years here) ago. At some point in time, life formed. Whether it was random chance, or Godly design is immaterial to evolution. Over time, changes were introduced to a species. As a result of these changes individual organisms were either more or less likely to survive to pass on their genes. Another means to change was the occurrence of spontaneous mutations in an individual. It provided a better chance of survival than those that didn't have the mutation, over time most of the population would exhibit that mutation. If it made the individual less likely to survive, say being born without lungs, then the individual died taking the change with them. Finally, there could be environmental factors that would lead to evolution. Large scale climatic change, mass extinctions, etc. Those species that were well adapted to flourish in the old environment may have been ill suited for the new. Those that were ill suited for the old, may be well suited to the new and now flourish. That's the ten cent tour of evolution.

    Now, back to your original quandary, the "link" between apes and humans. Humans and apes aren't related linearly they are related horizontally. If you go back far enough there was probably a single primate species, further back a single mammalian species, even further back a single vertebrate species, etc.

    Modern humans are - hominids, primates, mammals, vertebrates, etc., etc.
    Modern apes (say gorillas) are primates, mammals, vertebrates, etc. etc,

    Sure they are both primates, but that's like saying your house cat and Bengal tigers are both felines. You wouldn't be looking for the missing link between your tabby and tigers.

    It's all rather complicated and rather fascinating....

    I hope that this helps.

    --
    Just my $0.02 (Canadian, before taxes)
  110. Babelfish AC 2 | Pissed 18 year old AC 0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  111. Dayum... UT better watch out!!! by Dman33 · · Score: 1

    Of course you realize it is a violation of federal law for anyone other than the Social Security Administration to use you SSN.

    My college (Drexel) back in the 90's had to go through and re-issue everyone a new Student ID number after a lawsuit. You will also note that your local DMV now issues its own number instead of your SSN.


    My university had to switch too. It is too bad some had not switched!

    Of course, this news broke after your post but if what you say is true, UT will be in it deep with the Feds...

  112. Martian babes? by warpath · · Score: 1
    Incidentally, I'm using "reactionary" in the sense of "being conservative" -- such references to the Bible, a book which though beautifully written is nonetheless a difficult source for either moral or intellectual discussion, smack of hysteria. Having a "very real concern" doesn't really mean anything -- I might be worried that aliens are employing these ids to catalogue us all and thus find appropriate mates for their martian daughters, but it doesn't make it my views any better considered.

    Wait, I think people are missing the important thing here. What do martian women look like? I mean, do you have any pictures or anything?