Slashdot Mirror


State of the E-nion

An anonymous reader writes: "Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) has posted a "state of the union" for the enlightenment project on their mailing list. It has been over 2 years since the last major release of the Enlightenment window manager. It looks like 0.17 is a ways off but it's nice to see an update."

188 comments

  1. evo is cool by fiftyfly · · Score: 1

    but even with the update it's hard to imagine it keeping up to, say, KDE. gotta check it out & compare, though, it's been a while

    --
    "Sanity is not statistical", George Orwell, "1984"
    1. Re:evo is cool by localghost · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, you could use it with KDE. It's NETWM compatible, so you could just replace the kwin window manager with enlightment. If you want to try it out, just edit you startkde script, or set the environmental variable KDEWM to the path to enlightenment (that sounds funny) before you start KDE and it should use that instead.

    2. Re:evo is cool by bsd_usr · · Score: 1

      It's probably less comparable to KDE or GNOME, but probably more comparable to say XFCE. KDE is a complete desktop with apps and a programming framework with GUI libraries and other stuff. XFCE seems to be more of a simple desktop which you are able to run apps. XFCE comes with it's own file manager, as does E17.

      I've been waiting for E17 to become stable. From what I have read and from seeing parts of E17 in action it's more of the desktop that I'm looking for. I don't need all the bells and whistles of KDE or GNOME. What I want is a desktop shell that looks sweet, is easy to work with, doesn't get in the way, and has a killer method of graphically manipulating files (i.e. good file manager). I think E17 might fit the bill.

      That's if it ever sees the light of day.

  2. Too bad... by Yag · · Score: 1

    0.17 was not just an improvement, but a really different way of thinking enlightenment, something more near to KDE or Gnome than to WMaker or Ice... sad to see that development is slowing down...

    1. Re:Too bad... by axxackall · · Score: 1
      It doesn't take too much to see that E17 is deadly slow. But itakes something to understand why it is slow.

      Typically in Open Software, the amount and quality of coders in the project is usually proportional to the task attraction, architecture design, exisiting code implementation of it and the existing team working on it. Therefore, one or more those factors are wrong with Enlightenment.

      The task is not less attractive now than it was in days of E16. The design has been even more improved. People are excited by the code quality. So, what is it? Is there any problem to work with existing team leaders?

      If not, why new, skilled and motivated, programmers are not joining to the E17 team? Why do they work for KDE and GNOME?

      Is it about money? Than why thick pockets do not pay for E17, which is "so better" than GNOME and KDE?

      It's clear that something is not clear with this project.

      --

      Less is more !
    2. Re:Too bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If not, why new, skilled and motivated, programmers are not joining to the E17 team?

      It's not allowed. Go into the Enlightenment IRC channel and ask for help understanding some bit of code in E17. Report bugs. Try submitting patches to the core team. When they don't get applied, ask why. Ask for CVS commit access.

      G'wan, I dare ya!

      Me? Help? No thanks, I'll just sit back here and watch the flames rise...

  3. stick to e16 for a wm, but e17 has nice stuff by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you want a working window manager, stick to e16; e17 isn't really being actively worked on as a window manager yet, and doesn't have many features. The work is on a lot of useful backend stuff; the joke is that once the backend is done, the window manager will be five lines of code. Take a look at the components though. Many of them are in a very good state, and the E folk are to be commended for their excellent modular development -- many of these components are already being used by other projects (imlib2 in particular), and many of the others either are or soon will be in shape to be used in other projects too.

    Of course perhaps I'm a bit biased, since E16 is still my favorite window manager (a better way to view/edit remembered window/app attributes being my only real feature request), but I think the E17 team is doing a good job contributing to the overall Free Software codebase. And though it's a bit frustrating that E17 is taking so long, reading through the components is impressive -- everything is being engineered carefully. While many window managers hack things in, everything in E -- from the theming engine to the window decorations -- is carefully designed with a clean interface. Should be impressive when it's done.

    My only main worry about E17 is that it seems to be going desktop-environment-ish, a la GNOME/KDE, which I really can't stand. Hopefully we'll be able to turn all that off.

    1. Re:stick to e16 for a wm, but e17 has nice stuff by koekepeer · · Score: 5, Informative

      [quote]
      My only main worry about E17 is that it seems to be going desktop-environment-ish, a la GNOME/KDE, which I really can't stand. Hopefully we'll be able to turn all that off.
      [/quote]

      it's going to be a desktop shell. they'll have an icon bar, a filemanager, and a desktop, epplets. now that would be rather okay, because i like their original ideas, and my guess is that it will outperform gnome/kde in that area. probably speedwise, and certainly interface-wise.

      i think E16 is the most easy to handle WM i have used (and i've used a lot of them). this is all a matter of personal preferences of course. the deal is, E has a tradition of being able to change those preferences to suit your needs. i think this is one of E's bigest merits (customisability)

      this will probably translate into the ability to switch off everything if you want to in E17. and you'll just have a WM again :)

    2. Re:stick to e16 for a wm, but e17 has nice stuff by fusiongyro · · Score: 1

      the E folk are to be commended for their excellent modular development -- many of these components are already being used by other projects (imlib2 in particular), and many of the others either are or soon will be in shape to be used in other projects too.

      Yes and no. Here's a quote from the article:

      ecore: Currently it has basic IPC wrapping, X wrapping, Evas wrapping, job handling ...

      I think it's kind of a bad sign when you have to write a wrapper for your own library to be released with your library, so you can write your program which depends on... your library.

      At the same time I commend them for the effort, and I'm glad they took the time to design it fully.

      One thing I don't like is that Afterstep seems to have just disappeared. I remember going to their official homepage a few days ago (reflected by Google) but now is evidently the really broken homepage of some graphic design girl. A few years ago I was looking into Afterstep and noticed that their people had been working on a 2.0 release for quite some time, in the process creating libAfterImage which reportedly is blazing fast and produces beautiful results. I admit it, I kind of miss the crazy thousands-of-window-managers situation that Linux was in when I first got involved. And this whole GRFXGIRL thing is just weird. Especially since her copyright is last year and the Google page shows the afterstep page as being copyrighted this year.

      --
      Daniel

    3. Re:stick to e16 for a wm, but e17 has nice stuff by rowanxmas · · Score: 1

      Disclaimer, I have not yet learned how to program in C/C++ ( I am a biochemist and Java suits the needs of a one-man show much better )

      But I am thinking of learning C and the E stuff like Evas ( and the EProg extension ) are designed to make life really easy, so you can have a window with an image in it in less than a minute. I assume that I could still use the GTK+ tool kit for GUI work, but have the faster E stuff for the connections to X. So, in terms of it being a DE, I am excited and hope that the ideas go into other apps ( like GNOME/KDE ) for improving their speed.

      That said, the BEST thing about E16 is the pager/iconbox combo. There is not a better way to manage your windows and virtual desktops, especially if you don't like panels everywhere. Once E17 has these features back ( late 2203 ) I will be very happy.
      I will also relate that many of my coworkers look at my desktop and are using E16 by the end of the day. btw, check out the C2h8 theme. My favorite.

    4. Re:stick to e16 for a wm, but e17 has nice stuff by pyite · · Score: 1

      Writing wrappers for your own libraries is common. If you have an application designed with several organizational layers and library x works on layer 1 but everything that uses it needs to work on layer 2, then you write a wrapper so they're on the same page so to speak.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    5. Re:stick to e16 for a wm, but e17 has nice stuff by kidlinux · · Score: 1

      This is a good point. I don't think the Enlightenment developers are aiming to create an environment. Instead, I think they're designing tools which will make it very easy to design a desktop environment around E. So if someone wanted to take it and add all the junk associated with a desktop env., then they'll be able to do so very easily.

      I think E itself will remain a WM, with some very nice tools and features.

      E16.5 is my favourite WM. I really, really dig its pager. But my biggest E16.5 gripe is with imlib. It constantly causes E to crash. From what I can tell, I think it has problems dealing with my 1GB of ram. I can't use it right now because of that bug, so I'm *very* anxious for E17.

      --
      -kidlinux.
    6. Re:stick to e16 for a wm, but e17 has nice stuff by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Didn't Afterstep become GNUStep?

      I have to agree with you, I miss the abundance of window managers that used to be out there. All the different approaches, the interesting ideas, etc... Now the innovation that was taking place is kind of dying. GNOME and KDE are nice, but they don't try much that is edgy. Enlightenment is about the last stop these days if you want to see some innovative ideas in GUI design.

      I think a lot of this has to do with lowest common denominator thinking. MOST people are satisfied to be able to just maximize, minimize and close windows. In fact a friend of mine still questions the need for multiple desktops and windowshading. I think the point is that we need multiple approaches to be able to satisfy varying work environments. It's kind of like writing your own .bash_profile. No two are (or should be) alike, if you are talking about an advanced user. The GUI should be the same way. That's what projects like GNOME and KDE seem to forget. They are too focused on beating Windows by being the same.

    7. Re:stick to e16 for a wm, but e17 has nice stuff by fusiongyro · · Score: 3, Informative

      Didn't Afterstep become GNUStep?

      Nope. A popular misconception however.

      Afterstep was a window manager based on Bowman, which was in turn based on FVWM 1. GNUstep is the GNU reimplementation of the NeXTSTEP libraries and interfaces (i.e. the Cocoa part of Mac OS X). As a matter of fact, they recommend using Window Maker as your window manager to complete your NeXT under Linux experience.

      --
      Daniel

    8. Re:stick to e16 for a wm, but e17 has nice stuff by Rabid+Penguin · · Score: 1

      > ecore: Currently it has basic IPC wrapping, X wrapping, Evas wrapping, job handling ...

      > I think it's kind of a bad sign when you have to write a wrapper
      > for your own library to be released with your library, so you can
      > write your program which depends on... your library.

      FYI, evas is has backends for multiple environments, including X11, OpenGL, DirectFB, native FB, Qtopia, and Windows. In order to allow this flexibility, a little setup is required to prepare an area for the evas. The ecore wrapping is just meant to simplify this setup process in X (and possibly other backends, I haven't looked at that portion of ecore). It's really not necessary, but it can make your life a bit easier.

    9. Re:stick to e16 for a wm, but e17 has nice stuff by jbolden · · Score: 1

      I know that WindowMaker is the windowmanager in GNUStep. I don't think Windowmaker used Afterstep code.

    10. Re:stick to e16 for a wm, but e17 has nice stuff by ahknight · · Score: 1
      Once E17 has these features back ( late 2203 )

      Typos hold great truth.

    11. Re:stick to e16 for a wm, but e17 has nice stuff by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

      Wow. I didn't know that. So AfterStep is really gone? That's a shame. It was my first windowmanager of choice when I moved to Linux in 97.

    12. Re:stick to e16 for a wm, but e17 has nice stuff by rowanxmas · · Score: 1

      That was actually on purpose ;), just to see if you were reading.

    13. Re:stick to e16 for a wm, but e17 has nice stuff by markhb · · Score: 1

      I just went to the above link, and it was actually the Official AfterStep Web Site, with a News entry dated February 2, 2003. The original poster might want to recheck the link he went to.

      Note: the page is, if not broken, at least very ugly in my Gecko version.

      --
      Save Maine's economy: write stuff down. All comments are exclusively my own, not my employer.
    14. Re:stick to e16 for a wm, but e17 has nice stuff by fusiongyro · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it was that page in the google cache too. I went back after reading your post, and sure enough, it's back. Must have been a DNS hickup or something equally weird like that. GFXGIRL? Weird.

      --
      Daniel

  4. I'll be retired.... by redcliffe · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...by the time that's released!

    (I've only just finished school)

    1. Re:I'll be retired.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe they should rename E17 to Enlightenment forever?

    2. Re:I'll be retired.... by Croaker · · Score: 1

      Sorta like the fusion joke:

      Enlightenment is the window manager/platform of the future... and always will be!

  5. Enlightenment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know about many of the rest of you, but I've been using E16 nearly nonstop (give or take a few weeks of experimentation with each of several other wms) since its original release four or so years ago.

    Its age causes the odd compatability problems (esp with nautilus), but there certainly aren't things which cannot be worked around...

    It does entertain me that nearly every user who was introduced to linux after RedHat switched their default wm to be sawhorse/sawfish has never even heard of what is still arguably the best looking thing out there. (I've not touched KDE3.1 yet, but seeing as I have stylistic issues with most of the KDE 'way', my subjective opinion would probably remain the same even with such an experience.)

    1. Re:Enlightenment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ...after RedHat switched their default wm to be sawhorse/sawfish...

      Sawmill, even. Oops.

    2. Re:Enlightenment by tekniklr · · Score: 1

      Its age causes the odd compatability problems (esp with nautilus)

      What type of problems have you had? I use nautilus and Enlightenment together and have not had any problems. Of course, I don't let nautilus manage the desktop (why would I want that when I am using Enlightenment?)

    3. Re:Enlightenment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'd be the chief problem, and as you say, the workaround is to turn off the drawing of the desktop feature.

      There is/was a different bug involving the use of nautilus outside of a full gnome-session, but I haven't yet felt like building from CVS and trying to crash X a few times to see whether or not it has in fact been fixed (I think my bug is NEEDINFO right now after a maybe-fix).

    4. Re:Enlightenment by Moredhel · · Score: 1

      According to discussions on the e-devel mailing list, fixes to support the newer window manager hints that Gnome2 and KDE now use are in CVS and will soon be in a new snapshot release - 0.16.6?

      I'm waiting for them to iron this out and test it before I dive in. Enlightenment, Evolution and XEmacs are my work environment and I don't like messing about with that too much. All on top of Solaris/SPARC, if that matters to anyone.

    5. Re:Enlightenment by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      It does entertain me that nearly every user who was introduced to linux after RedHat switched their default wm to be sawhorse/sawfish has never even heard of what is still arguably the best looking thing out there. (I've not touched KDE3.1 yet, but seeing as I have stylistic issues with most of the KDE 'way', my subjective opinion would probably remain the same even with such an experience.)

      Ironic, I used to run E or IceWM, then switched to Sawfish. I recently switched to KDE, and am loving every minute of it. My main bitch is not having a hot key map to make a window sticky.

      I'll test E17 out when they get something stable, but I'm not expecting it to be revolutionary. It would be revolutionary 2 years ago, but I think everybody has surpassed what E17 is going to offer.

      I hope that Evas does do well, and is used as a common layer over X.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    6. Re:Enlightenment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny that you mention Red Hat... I think Red Hat's changes in defaults really do impact what people see as Linux. I'm not up on Red Hat these days, but when I first started using Linux, their default WM was E. E is, superficially, a good window manager. You outgrow it fast, though. Or at least I did. As with the rest of Red Hat.

      Red Hat strikes me as a toy. Enlightnment, too. And GNOME/KDE. When you start off, you explore them, and you get a feel for them... Then you start to get serious about this whole "Linux" thing. You become aware of the weaknesses you encounter, and the strengths in doing things other ways... And eventually, GNOME, E, or the way shell environments are set up and behave become something that gets in your way. That was my experience using Red Hat.

      I think, first, I started hacking on a lot of scripts and packages to make Red Hat act more like I wanted it to. Then I switched distributions alltogether.

      I went through several WM phases. WindowMaker in there somewhere. I tried out saw{mill,fish,whatever it is today} for maybe 30 seconds. Yuck! Now, I'm happy with fvwm2. I do most of my file management from the shell, and use a couple apps like gaim, mozilla, and anything else I need...

  6. Linux GUIs are worsening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I know many of you won't like this post as most of you adore the Mac OS X interface, but I believe there is jus too much work being done to make Linux GUIs look nice. Intentions may be good but they don't look nice at all. They TRY to look nice but they fail... and miserably too. PLEASE lets focus on functionality and not so much on looks like those damn rounded windows and buttons. Christs sake its a functionality contest not a beauty contest.

    The Windows 95 interface is a great example in my opinion of a excellent GUI. It's not too fancy but not too plain either. A few enhancements and features to this already great gui would be the best thing to happen to linux since that faster and better new virtual memory manager.

    Thank you for your time.

    1. Re:Linux GUIs are worsening by more+fool+you · · Score: 1
      I must admit, I got hooked on enlightenment when I saw screenshots of the "hand of god" theme.

      I checked out fluxbox about a year ago and I stopped using enlightenment. Now while I'm still looking forward to checking out e17 once the wm is mostly finished, I agree that there's a point where all the eye candy just looks cheap and garish.

      Could be that I'm just getting older, boring, don't have enough time to do window dressing or all of the above.

      Either that or the teletubby theme on XP ruined the whole concept for me. Functional is good.

    2. Re:Linux GUIs are worsening by Dodecha · · Score: 1

      They _try_ to look good? damn, do you wear ugly-o-matic glasses?! The newest versions of KDE look bloody marvelous, but still i stick with e16.. the reason? the lovely themes (personally i use the mac os Aqua theme), and.. my home pc is a 400mhz which i run as a workstation and server.. so i can't spend CPU power on KDE or Gnome...

    3. Re:Linux GUIs are worsening by handybundler · · Score: 1

      IAWTP

      Every since enlightenment was abandoned by Redhat as stock option, I have been eternally let down by all other window managers. KDE 3.0 run as extension (kicker) to Blackbox or FluxBox is the only thing that will compare to the days of E.

      RH would do themselves a large favor by backwards compat'ing some of the apps that a few of us have all come to know and love through years of usage. Each new OS that comes from RH has me more cropped at the knees than ever before. And Enlightenment was one of the first to go.

      KDE is klunky, gnome isn't half as hardcore as it used to be. Any Desktop that does not give you a term window icon/option at first boot is not worth running.

      Bring on E17.

      --


      a/s/l here. Sorry, adding domain tags to your s
    4. Re:Linux GUIs are worsening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the functionality in linux GUIs is that you are able to control nearly every aspect of the GUIs appearence. KDE is configurable and changeable, so is GNOME. while, IMO most window managers arent very customizable apearence-wise, (excluding E16-) they are all (that ive seen) extremely functional. Ive had linux on my servers for 4 years now, and at the release of suse 8.1 I moved my desktop to linux, and I couldnt be happier.

    5. Re:Linux GUIs are worsening by supersoftdrink · · Score: 0

      I stand by my convictions: There Is No Excuse For An Ugly Interface; user experience is very much a part of functionality!

      These two statements are still misunderstood in many ways in the code/design community. A serious amount of thought should be given about the ease-of-use, cleanliness, and simplicity of any application you write (unless of course it's command-line-only... certain design principles still apply though).

    6. Re:Linux GUIs are worsening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brilliant analysis. If anything, I would say the 95 desktop is still too fat and nothing beats the day-to-day utility of the Windows 3.11 paradigm. After Progman.exe, all else is gaslight.

    7. Re:Linux GUIs are worsening by incripshin · · Score: 1
      The Windows 95 interface is a great example in my opinion of a excellent GUI. It's not too fancy but not too plain either.

      I don't agree. I think 95's interface is too plain and harsh to look at. People like to enjoy their experience on a computer. That is why interfaces like in OS X are popular. They look good, and they're fun to use. But I do agree somewhat, in that I like interfaces that are clean with hard edges ... not curves, and solid colors ... not gradiants. Sometimes window decorating goes too far and you get a window with a 30px border. However, that's all up to whoever designs the theme. If they want to screw it over with a bubbly design, then don't use it. Find something else.

      incripshin

    8. Re:Linux GUIs are worsening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I believe there is jus too much work being done >to make Linux GUIs look nice

      Well said. I don't need a Linux GUI to look nice, I just need a functional clipboard that I can do copy & paste reliably and consistently across apps.

    9. Re:Linux GUIs are worsening by Tukla · · Score: 1
      Any Desktop that does not give you a term window icon/option at first boot is not worth running.

      Hmm. I haven't used KDE past 3.0.1 yet, but kicker has always had a konsole icon on it, IME, all the way back to (at least) KDE 1 beta 4. Has this changed?

    10. Re:Linux GUIs are worsening by handybundler · · Score: 1

      Yes. Still got the term winodws session icon in the 'ol tool bar. I am using KDE as of current, but if I had to take a guess at kdeinit is doing to my system resources, I'd say they wer getting hosed from from too much extra bloat. Chowing on 16.3 % system resource right now.

      Blackbox, to date, has been about the lightest desktop on resources with some good graphic appeal left to itd. And syetm weight being Enlightenments only major downfall IMO.

      --


      a/s/l here. Sorry, adding domain tags to your s
  7. Argh! by Tyreth · · Score: 2

    How much longer? Enlightenment was my second window manager, Afterstep being my first. I loved enlightenment, made my system look so smooth.

    I've been waiting for e17 for so long, tried cvs occasionally but it's always got faults (unsurprising) making it not worth the effort. Especially now it's been declared as a glorified "test program" :)

    Evas looks promising though. I've just never found a home since Afterstep/Enlightenment. Ion was very, very desirable but a few applications are irritating. Still I think the pros outweigh the cons.

  8. it lives ? by SpiritC · · Score: 3, Funny

    if i think a project is dead i usually say the next version will be released just after E17

    --
    Smile... tomorrow will be worse.
    1. Re:it lives ? by leoboiko · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm waiting to run E17 in a GNU/Hurd system...

      --
      Prescriptive grammar:linguistics :: alchemy:chemistry. Stop being a nazi and learn some science.
    2. Re:it lives ? by pope+nihil · · Score: 0

      oh, that's cold. ;-)

    3. Re:it lives ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, maybe when mozilla reaches 1.0.

    4. Re:it lives ? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Don't worry... E17 will be released right after Duke Nukem Forever... I hear it's going to run on GNU/Hurd...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:it lives ? by (startx) · · Score: 1

      hahaha! That joke is even funnier when you find out that both rasterman and a guy from the GNU/Hurd project spoke at the last acm reflections/projections confrence at UIUC.

    6. Re:it lives ? by evronm · · Score: 1
      I'm waiting to run E17 in a GNU/Hurd system...

      And I'm waiting to play Duke Nuken Forever on E17 on a GNU/Hurd system...

    7. Re:it lives ? by leviramsey · · Score: 1
      And I'm waiting to play Duke Nuken Forever on E17 on a GNU/Hurd system...

      We have a winner!

    8. Re:it lives ? by sidesh0w · · Score: 1
      Actual transcipt of the announcement:

      E's not quite dead yet!

    9. Re:it lives ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm kinda posting this with Mozilla 1.3...

    10. Re:it lives ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, I was wanting to say that :-)

  9. maintenance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    * AC * dusts off the E icon

    <AC> still a few years left in it yet

  10. Very Pretty by rf0 · · Score: 1

    I use e16 on and off and must say that as a Window Manger it is really cool in terms of being able to skin it. I can skip from and Aqua skin to a BeOS skin in a few seconds. Good place to look is at freshmeat

    Rus

    1. Re:Very Pretty by Stiletto · · Score: 1

      I can skip from and Aqua skin to a BeOS skin in a few seconds.

      Now that's what I call a practical selling point. Time to call up my manager and show him this post. He'll want to switch everyone over company-wide after reading this one!

      On second thought, maybe I'll just stick with tried-and-true fvwm...

    2. Re:Very Pretty by eyeye · · Score: 1

      Most WMs are skinnable now. So much so that "being able to skin it" is now an expected feature.

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    3. Re:Very Pretty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that's what I call a practical selling point. Time to call up my manager and show him this post. He'll want to switch everyone over company-wide after reading this one!

      MEMORANDUM

      FROM: The Hackers, Users,

      TO: Corporate bitches that complain about linux not being "enterprise ready", talk about linux in terms of market share, and examine every new feature as a cost-benefit business case:

      RE: Linux is not a business

      It's is not about making money. It's about having the best and coolest operating system on the block. If you want to use it to help your business, that's great, but please don't complain about how new features are not helping to maximize shareholder value. That's just not the point.

  11. Worth the wait by vandan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah it's taken for ever. But you can tell it will be good when it gets here. There has been a long-running thread about a real-time background which represents the weather / time / moon-phase. Sounds _really_ sweet. Eye-candy galore once the libs are finally set in stone.
    I currently switch between E-16 cvs (it's got some work-arounds for rendering issues with later version of X) and E-17 cvs. Every so often I'll try out Gnome / KDE out for a couple of days, but I always end up getting annoyed enough to go back to E. It's just a better interface.

    1. Re:Worth the wait by avdi · · Score: 1

      There has been a long-running thread about a real-time background which represents the weather / time / moon-phase.

      Umm, last I checked I could do that under any window manager on my box. It's just a matter of having one of the standard X toys like the daylight globe or moon clock (don't recall the executable names offhand) occupy the root window.

      --

      --
      CPAN rules. - Guido van Rossum
    2. Re:Worth the wait by mixmasta · · Score: 1

      or ... how bout a window to the OUTSIDE!!! ... gasp!! ...

      --
      #6495ED - cornflower blue
  12. Woah! by Lolaine · · Score: 2, Funny

    I dont remember seeing the E logo in a slashdot posrt... it must be true it hasnt been news about it in ages ...

    --
    ------- The last Sig. got fired.
    1. Re:Woah! by dotgod · · Score: 1

      The last article about enlightenment was posted August 22, 2001.

  13. One key reason development moves like a snail by hellgate · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Last time I checked out e17 trying to contribute meant:

    - Pulling stuff from cvs SPLIT and HEAD branches (both
    had working and broken pieces)
    - Finding some document describing the correct order to
    build two dozen libs/apps; there was no such up-to-date
    document on enlightenment.org
    - Build failures, this month here, next month there
    - Website says: "Don't complain it doesn't build. It does."

    Nothing kills motivation like being told the problems you
    are seeing and might even feel inclined to tackle don't
    exist.

    Geez, contributing to a freakin' OS kernel is a piece of
    cake compared to the chores prospective e hackers are
    facing.

    Too bad, really. e16 is my wm of choice, and e17 has been
    looking promising from its early beginnings.

    If you read this and know better than I do, don't argue
    about the details. The point I'm trying to make is that
    e will see more contributions when it makes it easier to
    do just that.

    1. Re:One key reason development moves like a snail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think there may be some more to your narrative. The last time I checked in on this project evas was about to go through a rewrite. So everything in e17 that depended on the drawing code would have to ported to evas2 once that library stabilized. Raster became more interested in developing a highly scalable "canvas" that could be put to work on something as lightweight as a PDA. He likes embedded systems so his focus isn't aimed solely at the standard X11 desktop.

  14. Enlightenment one of the first... by ageOfWWIV · · Score: 1

    Granted, development was at a snail's pace as interest for it tapered off but E really broke ground on the linux desktop in terms of showing off how different (and excellent) X can look. Sure Afterstep, WindowMaker, etc all co-existed with E, but most if not all of the others were based on TWM. Enlightenment offered total customization, resulting in window manager eyecandy that was really unprecedented at the time. Over the years, how many people have been turned onto Linux from seeing a tricked-out E desktop? I'd say a lot.

    As a GUI junky I'm glad to hear about this update from rasterman, and even happier that slashdot reported it. Everyday I mouse around my KDE desktop I miss my tear-off/pinnable menus and wait for the day E will shine once again. Looks like that day might not be too far off.

    --

    ____
    ATS11=0 the secret to beating everyone else to a 1 line board.
    1. Re:Enlightenment one of the first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Over the years, how many people have been turned onto Linux from seeing a tricked-out E desktop? I'd say a lot.

      I definitely agree with you there. One of Linuxs big selling points on the desktop is the configurability of the windowing system. The abstraction of the windowing system and the open nature of Linux have resulted in people experimenting with different types of interface. For a taster, check these out:

      FluxBox
      Ion
      PekWM
      TreeWM
      WindowLab

  15. it's moving in that direction by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    I do agree that E17 development has seemed pretty "if you're not one of the core developers, you shouldn't be touching it," but it's moving away from that. The post linked to in this story is a good example of an increasing openness and attention to at least some documentation. A lot of documentation has appeared on enlightenment.org in the past month or two as well; the relatively new build notes are particularly useful when trying to build from CVS.

  16. WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this a tribute to TWM?

  17. mozilla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mozilla 1.3 craches on that page! (I've tested 4 times...)

    1. Re:mozilla by danormsby · · Score: 1

      Oh no it doesn't. I'm using Mozilla 1.3 and it works fine.

      --
      Omnis amans amens
  18. E? K? G? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is it with all those people? All KDE things are called K-whatever, all Gnome things are called G-whatever, and now these guys can only come up with names starting with E!

    Just so that I'm not just bitching but actually contributing: how about using a library name just once that actually describes what the library does? I have no clue what EPIG does, but if they called it EnlightenmentPersonalInformationGatherer I have at least some notion...

    Filing systems and programming languages no longer feature 6-character constraints on names. It is time we drop those names.

    1. Re:E? K? G? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I have no clue what EPIG does"

      The Story of E-PIG

      Once upon a theme, there was an Eager little PIG

      It lived in a Kool Dirty Environment and every day, when the sun of Enlightment shone upon it's face, the E-PIG opened it's Electric Eyes and visited the little Sawfish in the Aqua'rium.

      Oh how it longed to see the ocean, to go forth in a Galleon, Exploring the Internet and play at being a Konqueror, defeating Minotaurs and the evil Gnomes*.

      *GrubNabbingOverweightMuttonEaters

  19. by the time this comes out.. by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

    ..will anyone still want it? They'll have to print up an Eprom that fits into my skulljack by then. Should fit right next to my CopTalk skillchip. ;)

    1. Re:by the time this comes out.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NEUROMANCER!!! Oh sweet book of wonder!

  20. Version 0.17 coming out soon? by dagbrown · · Score: 1

    Wow! I can't wait until Enlightenment gets out of alpha and 1.0 is announced!

  21. Enlightment rocks but without much roll to it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used e16 for quite a while at work. Really liked it. I have pretty much abandoned it in favor of gnome though. I need software thats current and/or improving and trying to keep up with what's going on elsewhere rather than every minute option available under the sun. It's also a real resource hog which makes it difficult to standarize around. Plus Rasterman, (whom I have admired since before the RH days) has re-written e from scratch how many times now?

    Still I'm glad to hear the project is still plowing along. It was pretty much the cat's meow X WM out there not all that long ago...

    1. Re:Enlightment rocks but without much roll to it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used e16 for quite a while at work. Really liked it. I have pretty much abandoned it in favor of gnome though.

      GNOME isn't a window manager - there is no reason why you cannot use e with the GNOME desktop.

  22. Enlightenment Work Cycle. by ketamine-bp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not trolling, but... ;-)

    1. Write heavily hacked code that create beautiful thing.
    2. Rewrite it, using
    2.1 a more object-oriented approach
    2.2 a more conventional approach
    3. Improve the code using heavily hacked code.
    4. Goto (2).

    Well, back to the topic - Enlightenment is what attracted me to the graphical world of linux, and well, I really hate them having put off my wet dreams when I was using efm (enlightenment file manager) several years ago. I thought that they will continue with the same codebase and evolve into something like MacOS.. now that they go for a major rewrite (wel, this is old news anyway)...

    I have nothing to say now.

    1. Re:Enlightenment Work Cycle. by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1


      Is that such a bad thing?

      If you view it as the hacked version being a prototype and the rewritten version being the product then it is much better than most projects that ship an improved prototype as the final version.

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
    2. Re:Enlightenment Work Cycle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is continually re-writing the same code a bad thing? Have you serioudly just asked that question? Re-writing should always be avoided, especially on large codebases. Re-architecturing is even worse. E17 will have a longer development cycle than Mozilla did.

    3. Re:Enlightenment Work Cycle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't ESR say something in "The Cathedral and the Bazaar" (http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaa r/cathedral-bazaar/) that when writing code plan to throw the first effort away since you won't really understand the problem until you've implemented a solution. Then you can do it RIGHT. You are correct in that it is rare for people, particularily in business, to go back and re-write code once a working solution is achieved, HOWEVER subobtimal.

      (Insert obligatory /. M$ bashing comment here)

  23. Evas is cool stuff by PunkKangaroo · · Score: 1

    If you want to see something cool download evas (gentoo users just emerge evas) and run 'evas_test' ('evas_test_old' is pretty good too I suppose). You have to hand it to Rasterman, he knows how to make delicious eyecandy.

  24. Gnome2 / E16 by Joff_NZ · · Score: 1

    Is anyone working on making E16 working with Gnome / GTK 2.x ???

    I used to use Enlightenment all the time, it was my favourite window manager... but it very broken under Gnome2, and since I've moved to RedHat 8.0, I've missed it terribly..

    (btw: I now use KDE 3)

    --
    The revolution will not be televised. It won't be on a friggin blog either
    1. Re:Gnome2 / E16 by urmensch · · Score: 1

      Kinda - I run gtk2 and gnome2 apps with E but I don't let gnome take over the desktop, that way I don't have to deal with panels or icons. I load most of the apps I need after xinit and then just flip through desktops to get whatever app I need.

    2. Re:Gnome2 / E16 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a patch in CVS to make E16 work with the new Gnome / KDE hints.
      This will be released as 16.6 in a while...

      Andy

    3. Re:Gnome2 / E16 by Mandrake · · Score: 1

      yes. there is an 0.16.6 release coming out to address this problem actually. I am hoping to have it put out in the next couple of weeks.

      --
      Geoff "Mandrake" Harrison
      Some Random UI Hacker
  25. Re:G ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi oGALAXYo

    Dribbling idiot

  26. The screenshots look just as beautiful ... by YeeHaW_Jelte · · Score: 1

    ... as half a year ago when I saw them, which means they are either still the same or not up to date.

    --

    ---
    "The chances of a demonic possession spreading are remote -- relax."
    1. Re:The screenshots look just as beautiful ... by BenjyD · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... or they just drew them in GIMP to start with. Maybe it's a Zen thing - "there is no Enlightenment".

    2. Re:The screenshots look just as beautiful ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have some recent one with some themes I am working on and evidence too ;) (also using a theme of mine)
      check:
      http://gallery.codewordt.co.uk/enli ghtenment/

    3. Re:The screenshots look just as beautiful ... by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Very nice work. Ok, now I'm going to have to build the damned thing (E17, that is; I usually use E16).

  27. Enlighenment development cycle by nemaispuke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Although I do not use E, I have checked the progress of its development through www.cuddletech.com and their efforts to improve E and port it to Solaris. I actually like the idea of slow, methodical development as opposed to the "let's add every feature under the sun (no pun intended)" effort ending up in a convuluted mess of bad code and incomplete or non working features. My experiences with Gnome and KDE under Solaris attest to the "it's gotta look cool despite the bad code" effort. People complain about CDE's memory footprint, Gnome just sucks up memory like there is no tomorrow and the only "feature" I can see that remotely benefits anyone is the ability to have more than four desktops (Gnome 6, CDE 4). And lets not mention KDE's memory leaks (which I do not know if they have been totally fixed yet). All I want from a graphical interface is the ability to run graphical applications effectively. At least with cuddletech's efforts (being performed by a working system administrator) functionalty is not being lost to "cool features". Maybe it is time to take another look at E since (at least for me) I am not satisfied with Gnome and Sun's efforts to bring it to Solaris.

    1. Re:Enlighenment development cycle by bogie · · Score: 1

      "I actually like the idea of slow, methodical development as opposed to the "let's add every feature under the sun (no pun intended)" effort ending up in a convuluted mess of bad code and incomplete or non working features."

      Actually let's not confuse one projects lack of resources with another projects wealth of resources. Both Gnome and KDE have become very useful desktops for normal users. E on the other hand in its current state is only appealing to a very small group of users and probably won't be feature complete and stable for a few years at least. By then I'd imagine Gnome and KDE will be even more impressive and will still be the best desktops going for most linux users.

      I actually don't even think its worth comparing the projects since there's not much of a point, but if your going to make the effort at least try to be a little more realistic.

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  28. updated document on website by koekepeer · · Score: 3, Informative

    see subject includes some other libs as well

    the link

  29. enlightenment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was the first wm that brought me to Linux. I just do not care anymore,you hear they are working really hard on the next verison, please, they have been saying that for the past two years. I know I have been on the development list. From what I can tell E developers cannot decide on a direction, everytime they try to. Raster or some maillist person will suggest another direction. By the time 17 rolls out no one will care anymore. It will be E , vaporware

  30. What? There's a "development cycle?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hah! That is the most blatantly foolish pile of rationalization I've ever heard.

    Let me put it this way: if you can't even come out with a point release in TWO FUCKING YEARS , maybe it's time to drop the goddamned project. Everybody else has.

    Oh, and those "cool features" you were denigrating? Those are what people want in a GUI. That's why Lunix only has a 2% market share, and Windows gets to eat your lunch every day of the week (unless you maggoty Open Sores types are scrounging in the dumpsters behind their restaurant, which I wouldn't put past you).

    To wrap things up, I'd just like to say, "Eat a bag of hell, nemaispuke and Rasterman."

  31. I really wish things would pick up... by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Evas is the technology in E17 that can really turn heads. For the uninitiated, it's a display library that abstracts the pixels, handling hardware accelleration and optimization for you. The concept is very similar to Quartz Extreme on OS X (except I don't see any of the functionality of Display PostScript).

    We really need Evas and the rest of E17 to get mature -- it's something that can potentially make Linux desktop technology take off in a big way. Think about an OpenGL accellerated composited windowing system. That would lend itself to all sorts of interesting possibilities for desktops.

    For one, we'd certainly get rid of a lot of the ugly artifacting and flicker that you see with Qt and GTK today (assuming they could somehow be ported). While a lot of that could be fixed with double buffering, you still wouldn't get all the benefits of Evas.

    If you wanna see what I mean, you can go and download only the Evas package and run a small test suite. If you've got an OpenGL accellerated graphics card, you're in for a real treat -- this stuff is incredibly cool.

    Now only if they would finish it!

    1. Re:I really wish things would pick up... by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      I agree! While I'm not really that interested in E, I AM interested in Evas! Damn it looks good! I would love to see it integrated in to other desktops as well (like KDE and GNOME). OpenGL-accelerated desktop.... Yummy!

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    2. Re:I really wish things would pick up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GTK+ 2.x is already double buffered.

      For what it's worth, I've been contemplated porting GDK to OpenGL for fun. I'm sure my effort wouldn't be nice enough for anything official though ;).

  32. Here's a simple move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While it might make some folks happy that E17 is jumping the alpha-blending anti-aliasing bandwagon behind Apple's OS X, what annoys me it that they do not copy the intelligent concept behind Aqua: display PDF.

    What Apple has done is define an abstraction for graphical applications. What others are copying are some of the nice uses of those abstractions: anti-aliasing and alpha-blending.

    It's really a shame the only thing they understand is the surface details, and don't get the underlying beauty.

    1. Re:Here's a simple move... by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 1

      Someone needs to mod the parent up. Here's a repost of someone "telling it like it is":

      While it might make some folks happy that E17 is jumping the alpha-blending anti-aliasing bandwagon behind Apple's OS X, what annoys me it that they do not copy the intelligent concept behind Aqua: display PDF.

      What Apple has done is define an abstraction for graphical applications. What others are copying are some of the nice uses of those abstractions: anti-aliasing and alpha-blending.

      It's really a shame the only thing they understand is the surface details, and don't get the underlying beauty.

    2. Re:Here's a simple move... by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Actually, EVAS is much cooler than Quartz. Wheras Quartz (even Quartz Extreme) renders all those beautiful graphics via the CPU, EVAS is a high-level display manager that can take full advantage of OpenGL acceleration if its available. Since it's basically a scene graph (retained mode for you DirectX people), it takes care of all the display optimization for you, so you don't have to worry about writing efficient update code. EVAS is good step away from Quartz, and more in line with Microsoft's Longhorn.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    3. Re:Here's a simple move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's how it works. Quartz uses the integrated OpenGL technology to convert each window into a texture, then sends it to the graphics card to render on screen. The graphics processor focuses on what it does best -- graphics -- freeing the Power PC chip to do more operations in the same amount of time. Everything is zippier.

      From Apple. The joys of abstraction.
    4. Re:Here's a simple move... by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Look. I wouldn't post these things if I hadn't done anything more than read a marketing blurb off Apple's website. Check out the PDF Apple submitted to Siggraph. Look at the data-flow diagrams on page 10. Look at the line that says "Quartz2D." Note the color: orange. Now, look at the legend in the top right hand corner. Lookup the meaning of the color orange: "software," as in "software-rendered." Quartz Extreme is a misnomer. It should actually be Quartz _Compositor_ Extreme. OpenGL is only used to accelerate window compositing, not to actually draw stuff inside the window. In EVAS, the little line for Quartz2D would be red, as in "Hardware accelerated."

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    5. Re:Here's a simple move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That is not "telling it like it is".


      Enlightenment put anti-aliased text on the Linux desktop back when we were all still stuck with Netscape Navigator for a graphical web browser. Alpha has been available for years (pseudo), is a part of contemporary XFree86 (XRENDER), has been a part of the Windows desktop since W2K, and was featured in hardware accellerated GUI code on my Linux box long before OS X was beta. Indeed, while you seem to think this story is about some Johnny-Come-Lately who can't help but follow the trail blazed by the ever innovative Apple Incorportated, there are others out here who caught wind of Jaguar and thought, "Oh, cool. Just like evas."


      As for Display PDF, I can't see why it is good to traslate every drawing routine called by an application from one abstract format (func_draw(x,y,etc)) to another (pdf_start(here,there,etc)) before handing this informantion off to the renderering code, especially when the one feature this system can boast about -- vector graphic scalability -- is 1) achievable without redundant transformations before rasterization, and 2) completely unused in OS X.


      The real shame here is the unflinching belief in the technical superiority of OS X to every operating system that has come before it. Either that or the fact that I just now read your nickname. Here's your $100.

    6. Re:Here's a simple move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want display PDF on Linux? Use GNUstep. Unfortunately that has absolutely nothing to do with any acceleration whatsoever. It probably makes most things slower.

  33. Re:LUNIX SUCKS!!! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL! by Oddly_Drac · · Score: 0

    A troll, I know...

    "here is yet another linux turd that can't even do what windows did last century"

    Keep out the cold and allow light in?

    OD

    --
    Oddly Draconis
    Too cynical to live, too stubborn to die.
  34. e16 gripes by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
    I loved e16, and it was my favorite WM for quite some time. My only big gripe with e16 is the fact that window cycling and focus handling sucks. I need window cycling such as in Metacity, ie. more graphical clues as to what's going on, otherwise I just have trouble with it. And the focus switching in e16 is just terrible, eg. when you close a dialog window the focus doesn't properly get switched back to the parent window.

    Other than that, e16 is pretty damn good. I _love_ the icon box. That is the best damn feature of e16, IMO. I've been waiting 2 years for something like that to appear as a standalone app for any WM, or for Gnome or KDE to add something like that.

    Had I known it would never come, I would have done it myself. Now I'm not sure what to do...

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    1. Re:e16 gripes by koekepeer · · Score: 1

      graphical clues for window cycling: like the color of the titlebar changes when it's active? like the alt-tab that switches between windows while showing which window is active?

      as for the focus-switching: sloppy focus is default. i couldn't live without it anymore, but hey...

      you can change focus policies though, and the keys to switch between windows, and..., and...

      i recommend you read documentation, and try out some features, before you start complaining... really, there's not a lot you cannot do with e, windowmanager-wise.

      now, have you seen efm? (not maintained since they focus on E17 now). g(*&^mn, that was a fine filemanager. no clutter, a sort of mixture between command-line and graphical shell, simple yet effective windows (a-la mac-os classic), really gorgeous.

      personally, i can't wait to see what they do with E17. unfortunately, i will have to wait :(

    2. Re:e16 gripes by eyeye · · Score: 1

      I never understood the iconbox even though I have used it. What is it? its a place where minimised windows sit?

      if so then you have a kind of graphical taskbar but one that only lists minimised applications so you cant find a non minimised window to bring it to the foreground.

      It just seems like a poor taskbar to me.

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    3. Re:e16 gripes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      middle-click on the titlebar of the root window. Full tasklist.

    4. Re:e16 gripes by eyeye · · Score: 1

      So you have to shuffle around your windows to get to the root window, then middle click?
      What is the iconbox for?

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
  35. We're all off to Vegas then by evil_roy · · Score: 0

    I'll have $10 C&E

  36. Lies by oldwolf13 · · Score: 1

    Your first window was twm until you figured out how to configure X... admit it!

    --
    If I can't smoke and swear I'm fucked.
    1. Re:Lies by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > Your first window was twm until you figured out how to configure X... admit it!

      mouse, n. The funny shaped thing on my desk that I move around when I wanna type in a different xterm!

      (Actually, no joke - CDE sux0rz, but my Slowaris box has all four ugly-ass desktops covered with xterms and browser windows, so I don't notice how hard it sux0rz :)

  37. I really need glasses by racerx509 · · Score: 1

    When I saw the title, I saw "State of the Enron"

    --
    13 year old white supremacists are shitty web designers.
    1. Re:I really need glasses by sporty · · Score: 1

      That's ok, I read it as state of the onion.

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    2. Re:I really need glasses by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      And I read state of the eniac...

      Aren't those things dead yet?

  38. Will it play nice with Gnome2.2 & KDE3.1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wondering how well E17 will work with Gnome and KDE when it's released. E16 worked very well with Gnome when I tried it. But I haven't attempted to use it with Gnome2.
    I have tried using WindowMaker with Gnome2 and it didn't work the way I'd like... it wasn't as well integrated as it was with Gnome.

  39. 0.16.6 by Mandrake · · Score: 1
    it is wroth noting that there will be an 0.16.6 release in the coming week or two.

    Mostly just bugfixes, but also includes some stuff from Kim for running with current desktop hints from gnome/kde.

    --
    Geoff "Mandrake" Harrison
    Some Random UI Hacker
  40. You know.. by BuBu_ · · Score: 1

    I'm planning to run Duke Nukem Forever on my E17 install.

    1. Re:You know.. by Strog · · Score: 1

      runnning on Hurd?

    2. Re:You know.. by CoolVibe · · Score: 1

      On X12 (not X11) you mean? :) *ducks away to dodge the rotten tomatoes*

  41. CDE workspaces by jmilne · · Score: 1
    the only "feature" I can see that remotely benefits anyone is the ability to have more than four desktops (Gnome 6, CDE 4).

    I'll be picky and point out that you can definately have more than four workspaces with CDE. I'm not sure about an upper limit, but you can have at least nine, since that's what I've got set up on a Solaris workstation. Sun's got documentation to show you how to add more workspaces.

    If your only reason for using Gnome on Solaris is to get more workspaces/desktops, then you really have no reason to be using Gnome.

  42. major rewrite.. by neurojab · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is one of the annoyances of open source... the tendency of developers to undergo major rewrites.

    I've been following Enligtenment for some time, and the most annoying thing about it is that it undergoes a "major rewrite" nearly every major release. The new release always causes your current themes to break, and removes many of the features you were using.

    Major re-writes are something developers like to do, but in the commercial sector their bosses won't let them. Why not? Most of the value of the re-write is in the developer's mind: they see the code, no the final product. There are three kinds of expenses to doing a re-write 1) the cost to actually implement the rewrite and 2) time cost to not market your products in a timely manner ad 3) loss of marketability due to feature loss and increased bug count. Even though it's free, the enlightenment project suffers from these costs.

    Yes, I am a developer, and yes, I like to re-write. I'm just glad for my job's sake that my boss usually won't let me do it :)

  43. In other news (or, Look what we have in CVS!) by Azundris · · Score: 1

    e16 was just patched to work with current releases of GNOME and KDE, ie, e16.6 understands current hints.

    Lastly, evidence (Screenshot), the experimental e17 file-manager was accidentally left off the list because it resides in its own CVS @ cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonymous@cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/ evidence co evidence

  44. Another State of the Union by EVApilot · · Score: 1

    Bush gives another State of the Union at The SmokeHammer.

  45. Re:efm (is now evidence) by Azundris · · Score: 2, Informative
    now, have you seen efm? (not maintained since they focus on E17 now). g(*&^mn, that was a fine filemanager. no clutter, a sort of mixture between command-line and graphical shell, simple yet effective windows (a-la mac-os classic), really gorgeous.

    "evidence" will basically be that -- efm features (icon-view, "typebuffer" micro-shell, with a browser-view a la Mac OS X thrown in for good measure), but on top of the new e17 libs. A working (if unoptimized) version can be pulled from CVS (cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonymous@cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/ evidence co evidence, don't bother with the 0.9.4 RPMs).

  46. Re:efm (is now evidence) by koekepeer · · Score: 1

    sounds gorgeous... wil check that out

    tnx

  47. Couple of comments/quick summary by xcomputer_man · · Score: 2, Interesting

    - As Mandrake pointed out, a new patch has just been committed to CVS that will enable E 0.16 to support new KDE/GNOME Window Manager hints. For the uninitiated, this means that it will finally be possible for you to use Enlightenment as your window manager in GNOME 2 or KDE 3 (and get the best of both worlds, if you wish). So expect an 0.16.6 release very soon. :)

    - E17 as present is a moderately functional window manager, with few features but great looks. Expect this present window manager to be eventually nuked pending completion of the underlying libraries, to make way for the real Enlightenment.

    - There are several other libraries and apps that are being worked on, notably ebg, ebits, ecore, ewl (widget library), evidence (file manager, although a fairly separate project presently), entrance (login/display manager) and so on.

    Want to see what E17 looks like? Check out my collection of screenshots here and here.

    And if you've ever done some sort of GUI programming, you need to check Evas out NOW! :)

  48. Re:G ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hehe, you know I thought that same thing!
    it gotta be oGALAXYo

  49. E17 screenshots by fire-eyes · · Score: 1

    First off, that page doesn't work anymore:

    "ERROR: Forum not found"

    Second, I have some E17 screenshots up.

    http://fire-eyes1.darktech.org/gal/e17-cvs

    I ask that you not view too many of the full sized versions, which show up if you click the thumnail, then click the result again.

    --
    -- Note: If you don't agree with me, don't bother replying. I won't read it.
  50. Alternative Link by mjang · · Score: 1

    If the above link does not work for you, try this one.

  51. why do you do this do me? by dougnaka · · Score: 1

    I love E! Always have, always will. I've just got over my last round of excitement for E 17.. Why do you torture me with E 17 news!! WHY WHY WHY!!!
    On a side note, the link in the article does not work for me, I get ERROR, forum not found...
    If you haven't tried E, I highly recommend it.

    --
    My Linux Command of the Day site : LCOD
  52. Whoa. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy living fuck, that looks even better than Nautilus! Is there a Debian package for unstable?

    1. Re:Whoa. by Azundris · · Score: 1
      Holy living fuck, that looks even better than Nautilus!

      And that's not counting sick stuff like animated themes. ;-) No worries, if you don't want those, the module won't be loaded -- no bloat.
      But seriously, most of that credit must of course go to the artists. Without good icons, the icon-view is nothing. ; )

      Is there a Debian package for unstable?

      There are debs on SF, but they are out of date. I need to phase in some cleanup and optimizations. Expect new (0.9.5) debs in about two weeks.

  53. Re:it lives ?-Linux: all grown up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cold maybe, but that could be Linux: The future all grown-up. The GNU/Hurd (With capabilities) plus ReiserFS (Plugins to the rescue) plus E17 (Hardware accelerated). Everything presently is the prototype, and the future is the rewrite.

  54. I've pretty much given up ... E is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... waiting for complete rewrites of unfinished versions that were complete redesigns of it's previous version.. Ugh! I'd like to contribute, tried to contribute, but if it doesn't build and they say it does, then screw it. No ones listening, no one cares. It's always been a pet project to the core and will stay that way. E is dead to the masses. Sheesh.. I can't believe I just wrote this. I've even gone anonymous to hide my shame.

  55. 31337 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those who are 31337 will install it when they can!

  56. evas - by gridlock-lkdn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It should also be noted that evas is disgustingly easy to code for - i was making simple windows with a couple of buttons (button code writen myself - evas is just the canvas not the widget API) and resizing decently in about 3 hours - that includes the time it took me to learn the API.

    In addition to a really clear and powerful API, evas is also provides heaps of typechecking and other debugging goodness. It picks up 90% of the errors for you, and you can fix them in a thrid (perhaps a quarter) the time it would have taken before.

    if you want to dive in and have a play with evas, Id suggest going here Rephorms page and getting eprog (its a little library to abstract some of the setup of an evas for you - great if you just want a simple X app), evas and imlib, although the ones of rephorms site are a bit out of date, so CVS is your friend here.

    Another nice thing about evas, is that the only thing that differs between a X11 app, a framebuffer app, a DirectFB app and an iPaq/Zarus app is the init code basicly (and wether it needs to resize). Thats alot of power. In that line, future ports include PalmOS and MacOSX (native - its already there under their X server)

    Lots of acceleration there two; OpenGL which has already been mentioned a bit, although i dont know if Raster actually has this in the mainline code yet (it was in the old Evas, but go removed during the refactor / recode). Theres also MMX/SSE support to.

    Summary; lots of power & easy to use from a programmers perspective, and not sacrificing flexibility either. Check it out if you need a good canvas

    The Lockdown Project

  57. Re:G ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I thought was! Two people naming idiots!

    It does not make the obvious better - G.N.O.M.E sucks anyways!

  58. E is dead by Jack+Auf · · Score: 1

    Way back in the day when I finally dumped FVWM, I switched to E13 and it seriously changed the way way I thought of computers and GUI design. At the time it was a huge leap forward. Since that time elements of the E style have crept into several other platforms and UI styles, which is a good thing.

    Over a year ago I was just plain sick and tired of waiting for E17 (don't go off on the 'you should contribute' thing because they won't let you) and decided to check out OSX. I switched within a week. OSX is not as slick as E, and I still miss the glory days of E13-E15 when there was a very large and very active E theming community.

    At this point I think that Raster has pretty much killed off any real enthusiasm for E by delaying even a beta release for so long and in much the same way the E themers were killed off - "No wait, it's better if we do it this way. No, nevermind. Let's change the interface again. It'll be really better this time. Ok, now we're going to completely change the theme format, but it's much better this way, really".

    Pick formats, methods, etc and go forward. It doesn't have to be perfect, it just has to work. Release early and often.

    So, at this point who cares really? E is dead. Long live OSX.

    --
    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - BF
    1. Re:E is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really love OS X then why were you interested in enlightenment in the first place? I mean honestly now, it looks nice and clean, but it's slow, inflexible (excepting it's facillity for supporting an X11 server), and doesn't do anything that can't be done in either Windows or XFree86.

  59. E and Slack by misfit13b · · Score: 1

    Maybe when E17 comes out, Patrick will put it back in Slack so I can get my Eterm back.

    I miss my Eterm... :^(

  60. A dedicated user by mark.odonohue · · Score: 1
    I only hope Rasterman knows how popular enlightenment is, how much it is appreciated, and dispite his own pessimism, how much people are looking forward to a new release.

    - for some curious reason everyone else seems to want to look like microsoft.

  61. Yes! by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

    Duke Nukem Forever...
    In E17...
    On Xfree86 5.0 (X12)
    On The HURD...

    On new Amiga hardware!

    --
    0 1 - just my two bits
  62. Enlightenment Seduced Me by dunng808 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It was when I saw Enlightenment running on FreeBSD 3.0 that I was hooked on open-source software. The idea of a bunch of nerds cranking out free editors and compilers was fine in and of itself, but the artistry and raw sex appeal Mandrake (Geoff Harrison) and Rasterman (Carsten Haitzler) achieved was completely unexpected. It was then that I knew I had to have this stuff. I still insist there is a place for art and personal expression in computer design, a position that so far only Apple appears to appreciate.

    --

    Gary Dunn
    Open Slate Project

  63. Fuck Slashdot for censoring the truth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I came back to see if my post had been replied to - it hadn't - it was gone. Now it has been replaced with parent post.

    To reiterate:

    The USA has shot down it's own and it's allies aircraft.
    The USA has killed more of it's own than Iraq.
    The USA has used "precision" weapons on civilian targets in THE WRONG FUCKING COUNTRY - Iraq is not spelt I-R-A-N.
    The USA has launched missiles into TV stations claiming military significance.
    The USA has launched missiles into residential shopping areas.

    Don't fool yourselves - civilians are being blatantly and unnecessarily killed. People just like you and me are being fucking blown up by US missiles. Fuck you America. Fuck you and your bullshit war.

    This is not the time to be apathetic and confident of the judgement of your leaders. Ask questions. Tell them you will not vote for them again if they continue this kind of action. Hell, maybe even watch BBC World news instead of CNN "World" News. Bush and his buddies will do whatever you let them get a way with - So get yourselves informed, and call them on it when they fuck up or act against the wishes of the people of your country.

    1. Re:Fuck Slashdot for censoring the truth. by xshader · · Score: 1

      are you that stupid? England is alied with the US, so why whould you go watch their news if you arnt going to watch CNN?

    2. Re:Fuck Slashdot for censoring the truth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you even watched it? I've seen both, and I've also seen sources from other countries.

      I'm saying it because they make an effort to retain objectiveity. They present views from both sides. CNN and indeed most of the US media is acting like a cheerleading squad for the "Coallition" effort. Iraq media is doing the same in a less sophisticated manner for their country. BBC is presenting many perspectives. In fact, BBC (and TV here in NZ) has noted the lack of objectivity in current US broadcasting.

      Eg, I haven't seen any live Congress debates with Bush being put on the spot by his collegues. I've seen it with Blair in Parliament on BBC though.

      Eg, last night/this morning at the US daily briefing for reporters, when questions weren't answered, such as the issue of the shopping center attack, BBC didn't just let it go.

      Eg, they brought up the hipocracy of the US showing Iraqi POWs, but then getting upset over Iraq showing US POWs.

      Also, I think they are very aware that a large % of their viewers don't support the Coallition, and want a diverse (hopefully accurate) view of events.

      You can disagree of course. Most of us aren't silly enough to think the truth get's beamed into our TV sets every night. You've got to check a range of sources, and if that means going outside your comfort zone, so be it.

      Don't forget too, that right now ratings for War stuff are through the roof - bad news might spoil that. Also don't forget that the Iraqi TV station was targeted for a military benefit, eg Iraqi propaganda reduction - don't think you won't get similar Allied propaganda through your own TV set.

  64. vFolder file manager. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's an idea. When (not if) Linux gets database-like functionality at the filesystem level. Then "Evidence" could borrow an idea from Evolution, vFolders. The user can decide on either a hierarchical view (by nesting a 'query' within another), or a free-form one (leave'em were they lie). Combine that with something like a local Sherlock, and the future is that much closer.

  65. what about EFM? by xshader · · Score: 1

    all i want is a small FM that does wonders like EFM did. the last time i tried evidence it was too buggy to really run. anyone have a copy of EFM laying around on their HDD somewhere? i know it's not being worked on, but I want it, or something simular to it.

    JUST GIMME SOMETHING LITE AND FAST DAMN IT!

    1. Re:what about EFM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try emelfm. The phrase "Bat out of Hell" comes to mind.

  66. E16 v. E17 by Unregistered · · Score: 1

    E17 is backend stuff. the main new feature of E17 is the iconbar and it has been backported. The new backend stuff in E17 will be incredible, and make E even cooler, imo. Also, it better be as configurable as E16 since a lot of the fluff may be unnecessary for me.

    Btw, all you KDE/GNOME people complaining about a lack of aqua look and feel themes should check E. You can even make the iconbar function like a dock. Except E has more features than Aqua.

  67. E16 not building with gcc-3.2.x by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, since we are all talking about E, I'm running into a problem. E16.5 isn't building with gcc-3.2.x. I am getting failures in api.c. Just wondering if anybody else is running into the same problem before I scp over my /usr/local/enlightenment dir.

  68. Re:Windows 95 GUI by grolschie · · Score: 1

    I gotta agree that Windows 95 is still hard to beat. Even on a crappy P133 with a clean install of Win95, the GUI is FAAAASTTT!!! It's functional and easy to navigate. With every new version of Windows the performance decreases and access to vital stuff gets obscured behind layers of "more user-friendly" GUI.

    That being said, KDE3.1.1 looks awesome with it's eye candy, but wish it still had the fast response and cleanness of Windows 95.

  69. Re:I've pretty much given up ... E is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    R.I.P. !

  70. Re:F**k Slashdot for censoring the truth. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > The USA has shot down it's own and it's allies aircraft.

    True.

    > The USA has killed more of it's own than Iraq.

    Yup!

    > The USA has used "precision" weapons on civilian targets in THE WRONG FUCKING COUNTRY - Iraq is not spelt I-R-A-N.

    Again is true.

    > The USA has launched missiles into TV stations claiming military significance.

    mmmm....yaa.

    > The USA has launched missiles into residential shopping areas.

    Cannot argue here either.

    It doesn't stop there. In every war that USA is involved in, many US millitary perosnel are killed by US millitary perosnel? They call it "friendly fire".

    I think Weird Al Yancovich said it correctly when he sang these lines: "C'mon and grab your ammo, what have you got to lose?, we'll get all liquored up and shoot at anything that moves!".

  71. its not by m1chael · · Score: 1

    dead unless all development has stopped. i would say the actually e17 wm is dead at the moment but since the underlying libraries are being developed it dead state is only temperary.

    i remember the days when e was the nicest looking thing around and from some of the screen shots it looks like it can be again. however looks arent everything copout.

    --
    I know you are psychotic, but please make an effort.
  72. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    Waving away a cloud of smoke, I look up, and am blinded by a bright, white
    light. It's God. No, not Richard Stallman, or Linus Torvalds, but God. In
    a booming voice, He says: "THIS IS A SIGN. USE LINUX, THE FREE UNIX SYSTEM
    FOR THE 386.
    -- Matt Welsh

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...