Slashdot Mirror


Post-crash Salary Survey

MrRules writes "It's that time again; the 2002 salary survey's are out. This year there's an interesting twist: SAGE, SANS and Sun's BigAdmin site have combined to run the largest global participation sysadmin salary survey ever done. What I like is that this is different to those surveys done by HR departments -- this is real data on how you spend your time, by sysadmins for sysadmins. It'll be interesting to see how things have changed over the past 18 months."

57 of 342 comments (clear)

  1. military by drizuid · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, I'm a systems admin for the army, and you know what? I am almost positive every sysadmin job's salary is higher than mine.

    1. Re:military by corbettw · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, maybe not. I'm a sysadmin in the Navy (IT2, that's SGT to you, ground pounder), and with BAQ, BHA, BAS, completely free medical, per diem, 30 days vacation a year, and so forth and so on, I'm making roughly the equilivant of about $50,000 a year. There are some sysad jobs out there now making far less than that, and my last civilian job didn't pay much more.

      Of course, being in a hostile fire zone (read: no taxes) helps some. :)

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    2. Re:military by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Of course, being in a hostile fire zone (read: no taxes) helps some. :)

      Until some of that hostile fire comes your way. No thanks, my life is worth more than ~$1K/month to me.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:military by Eric+Ass+Raymond · · Score: 3, Funny
      Until some of that hostile fire comes your way.

      What about friendly fire coming your way?

    4. Re:military by Flamerule · · Score: 4, Funny
      I'm making roughly the equilivant of about $50,000 a year.
      [...]
      Of course, being in a hostile fire zone (read: no taxes) helps some. :)
      Until some of that hostile fire comes your way. No thanks, my life is worth more than ~$1K/month to me.
      Hm... $50,000 / 12 months = $4166.67 per month. Is your life worth more than that? Surely not.
    5. Re:military by billysara · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Try working in Academia....

      I'm the sole admin, postmaster, backup/veritas & webmaster, for a network over 120 UNIX machines, with everything from Linux PC's&Mac's, through Ultra5's, to E6500's, 48-processes IBM pSeries and 30-way SGI boxes.
      About 350 users worth of "drag" to go with it...

      Salary works out at about 29,000 dollars.

      Which is why I code pr0n sites "out of hours" :-)

    6. Re:military by Surreal_Streaker · · Score: 2, Informative
      Until some of that hostile fire comes your way. No thanks, my life is worth more than ~$1K/month to me.

      How about your freedom?

    7. Re:military by tim_uk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only if you are British...

    8. Re:military by Sethb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ugh, I work in Academia too, and you're getting screwed. Our campus won't even hire a full-time IT person of any type for under $33K or so. Now if you're a part timer, or a temp, then you may get less, of course...

      --
      When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout. --Robert A. Heinlein
    9. Re:military by headchimp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Military sys jobs are great but take a look at the majority of the techno geeks out there. Do you really think most of them are fit for military service?

  2. small job by Syncroswitch · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am currently admin for my laptop "." And I have to tell you I dont pay myself squat. damn the management.

  3. Sobering Thought by zeoslap · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Don't know about you but I get worried that this is as good as it gets salary wise, after big jumps through the bubble it's quite possible that this is the pinnacle of our (techies) earning potential for a long time to come (I know boo hoo, but still a strange position to be in)

    1. Re:Sobering Thought by dev11 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I am not sure if this is the peak or not. Certainly it is at best at a state of diminishing returns right now. I think this is just part of the shakedown that was inevitable after the boom of the 90's. The day of the HTML "developer" making 100k a year are long past. The overall quality of the tech sector will be better but smaller in size. Those of us are competant will still be able to find work, although some concessions may be necessary, such as relocating.

      At least with sysadmin, I would think the chances of having your job outsourced to India or somewhere else are less, at least some on site presence is still required. With a smaller tech sector, I think a diverse skill set will be mandatory. I myself am a part time admin, part time developer, and am always looking to expand my skill set. Browsing employment ads recently, employers seem to want an ever expanding set of skills and experience. I have BS in CS, and 6 years experience, but I may end up doing some of the (mostly meaningless) certs that HR drones seem to like.

    2. Re:Sobering Thought by teaserX · · Score: 2, Insightful
      > At least with sysadmin, I would think the chances of having your job outsourced to India or somewhere else are less, at least some on site presence is still required.

      Sure. Then they move all of the machines to India.

      --
      We really need your help
      http://www.gofundme.com/help-sherry
    3. Re:Sobering Thought by 4of12 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Those of us are competant will still be able to find work

      Of course, it wouldn't hurt if we wuz gud spelerz ether:)

      Seriously, though, competence is only the first step.

      A close friend manages a couple of dozen IT people and frequently is in a position to evaluate candidates for positions. Turnover is less than the booming late 1990's, but still happens.

      She looks for people that are

      1. competent technically (in fact, top-notch)
      2. have a professional and friendly attitude (yes they'll fill out the stupid TPR reports on time and won't cuss out stupid lusers)

      There have been a few candidates that have met the first criterion, not the second, and were passed over.

      And yes, the flip side is true, too. Professional friendly people without technical expertise translates into "Aren't there any other candidates?"

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
  4. why do they need my e-mail??? by targo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Any survey where the very first question is "What is your e-mail address?" makes me very very suspicious, especially when they collect all sorts of financial data as well.
    Still, given Slashdot's anti-spam attitude, I thought that maybe they are a decent organization and checked their privacy policy. Vain hope, it actually bluntly says: SAGE might also use this email address to notify you of other related news and we all know what this usually means, right?
    Now call me paranoid but I've been burned by much more innocent looking sites asking for my e-mail address.

    1. Re:why do they need my e-mail??? by PD · · Score: 5, Informative

      They need the address because, contrary to the misleading /. article write-up, the surveys are not in fact out. They haven't even been handed in yet. That's the deal. You fill out the survey, and you hand it in. They calculate things, and then they will hand it back out with the results on May 1st. The e-mail address is so you can have a copy sent to you.

    2. Re:why do they need my e-mail??? by chriskenrick · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you're that worried about giving out your email address, why not use one of the disposable email address providers such as sneakemail . Then you can create a brand spanking new address for sage, and if they start sending you junk, just set it to block any mails they send.

    3. Re:why do they need my e-mail??? by Modern+Hamlet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now call me paranoid but I've been burned by much more innocent looking sites asking for my e-mail address.

      No offence, but how exactly is someone knowing your email address getting "burned"? Can we please get a little perspective? You weren't mugged or shot. You weren't targeted by the government because of your beliefs. You weren't even called by those annoying telemarketers. You got some email, that you probably filtered out anyway. Or deleted it in .5 seconds.

      I hate spam too, but please think outside the monitor every once in a while. This is why people don't treat geeks seriously.

      mh

  5. Pay Rise? Hah by rf0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In my last job which I left a few months back there had been a pay freeze on for 3 years. Whilst the price of good went up our wages stayed the same so in essence we were taking a pay cut. Going from what I've been hearing frm other people who are looking is that people are offering pretty much the same of down. Thats the way I'm reading it.

    The economy is down and as there are so many people desperate to get jobs companies know they can offer lower rates and there will normally be someone who will be able to do the job well and except whatever the company is willing to pay.

    I would be interested to know if there were still any growth areas but I think not apart from prehaps skills in very specialised subjects

    Rus

    1. Re:Pay Rise? Hah by jawtheshark · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Scruffy lawyers dont instil confidence - they NEED £500 shoes!

      Sure they do, no doubt about that. But then I'd rather trust a SysAdmin that is unshaven wears a tshirt and short and you can smell from 10 meters away. Because, honestly: who would trust a SysAdmin in a suit that has a nice perfume on?

      (Writing this myself at work while wearing a suit... Damn coporate policies..."

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  6. Are there still sysadmin only jobs out there? by zorkmid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I had to take a position as Sysadmin, Oracle DBA, Developer (mostly java) in order to keep my phony baloney 6 figures salary when my dot.com went dot.bellyup. Are there still jobs out there where you're just doing systems administration?

    1. Re:Are there still sysadmin only jobs out there? by gujo-odori · · Score: 3, Funny

      > shit, where are the 6-figure positions???

      Yeah, but s/he didn't say how many of those six figures were to the left of the decimal point :-)

  7. Hard data... by Monkelectric · · Score: 3, Funny
    My salary declined 100% to 0 FUCKING DOLLARS per hour, week, month AND year. And i'm pretty sure its a republicans fault.

    (before you mod, learn to take a joke)

    --

    Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    1. Re:Hard data... by Malcontent · · Score: 4, Interesting

      " My salary declined 100% to 0 FUCKING DOLLARS per hour, week, month AND year. And i'm pretty sure its a republicans fault."

      you may be more right then you think

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    2. Re:Hard data... by cliveholloway · · Score: 2, Funny
      wow, so you were on $0 before as well. amazing...


      cLive ;-)

      --
      -- Trinity in high heels carrying a whip: The donimatrix - there is no spoonerism
    3. Re:Hard data... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Clinton had the benefit of a very good economy in the 90's. You will notice that even Clinton's record surplus started declining in 2000, the same time as the economy.

      And undoubtedly exacerbated by then newly minted "President" Bush who spent every moment talking down the economy until it started rolling downhill, just so that he could propose his "tax cuts for the rich" program.

      Mark my words, we're gonna feel the negative effects of this one-termer's indifference to the economy (as it relates to the bottom 80%). Can you say Reaganomics? Well, this is worse. Just like daddy, he's a free market sort (money belongs in the hands of the rich multinational companies, not in the hands of American workers). Not that a free market is a bad thing, it's just that companies shouldn't be handed a blank check to make money (tax shelters) by going out of the country, yet reaping the benefits of other American companies.

      Do I think the world would be all rosy and sunshine if the guy who was probably elected actually got into office? No, but I think it would have been a hell of a lot better than it is and much better than it is going to get after Bush II's legacy has been passed to the next President.

    4. Re:Hard data... by Malcontent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      " I know that chart makes Clinton look good and Bush look really bad, but I'm not quite sure you can assign the blame/credit quite so easily"

      OTOH you also can not claim that he had nothing to do with it.

      GW for example created a brand new dept which ended up being one of the largest departments in history. In other words he grew the size of the federal govt more then anybody else in recent history.

      He also undertook one of the largest rollbacks in civil rights in history.

      He of course also went to war and caused insane amounts of deficit spending.

      All under a republican senate and house.

      Anybody who says republicans are for a smaller govt or that republicans care about individual liberties may now proceed to eat their own words.

      "You will notice that even Clinton's record surplus started declining in 2000, the same time as the economy."

      When I was growing up my parents thought me to save money for a rainy day. That's the purpose of surpluses, to build up reserves in case something bad happens.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

  8. Pay Cuts by md81544 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I work as a contraact programmer in the City, London, and over the last year have taken on extra work in C, C++, VB, PHP, JSP, ASP, Oracle, SQL Server and shell scripting as a result of other guys leaving.

    Over the same period I've had four ten percent "take it or leave us" pay cuts, leaving me with a huge dent in my take-home pay.

    How are other programmers faring? What's your plan? I'm sticking where I am for the time being and DEFINITELY plan to move on as soon as the market picks up.

    1. Re:Pay Cuts by rf0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Unless you are working as contractor pay cuts are not legal in the UK. I would check with your HR dept or the CAB. If you were fired for not taking a pay cut you would have good grounds for an industrial tribunal

      Rus

    2. Re:Pay Cuts by archeopterix · · Score: 2, Funny
      I know that they probably have the best intentions, but which is preferable? Cut 5 peoples salary 20% and keep them all on? Or fire one person because you can't cut salaries?
      Declare bankrupcy, go unemployed and take advantage of the benefit system. Socialism rocks :-)
    3. Re:Pay Cuts by WiPEOUT · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Take it quietly for now, then remember it when the market picks up again and you get to choose: who to work for, when you want to leave, and how much to charge. >:)

      My current plan is to ride this out in my current, moderately stable job where I'm still earning dotcom-boom money, and spend even more time than usual on skilling up.

    4. Re:Pay Cuts by rich_r · · Score: 2, Informative

      The DTI regs on redundancy and the regs on breach of contracts.
      And, as an added bonus, the definition of various types of dismissal.
      Enjoy!

  9. heh.. we don't do much.. by marcushnk · · Score: 5, Funny

    If the /.ed state of the server is anything to go by.. We just sit around /. all day and bring down servers collectivly..

    oh well.. back to my coffee..

    --
    "Consider how lucky you are that life has been good to you so far. Alternatively, if life hasn't been good to you so far
  10. As a developer... by netsavior · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It would be nice if my company (and my previous company) could afford a Sysadmin... Be happy if you can be in the Sysadmin survey cause every developer I know is in a "Self-admin" shop... where the network has 100 band-aids and nobody can quite remember all of the Root passwords.

    1. Re:As a developer... by jawtheshark · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Very funny...

      Admin passwords for workstations usually is the serial number on the machine. That's very effective, and someone who has no physical access to the computer will have a hard time to figure it out. It's not as if you can do a dictionary scan on a serial number...

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  11. If you comply about the US by LynXmaN · · Score: 2, Informative

    Take my word, don't come to Spain
    I'm thinking about moving to Germany or something like that to get a good pay

    --
    May the source be with you!
  12. This survey is only going to tell 1/2 of the story by Sensor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It won't suprise me at all if this survey shows negligable changes in salaries over the last 12 months - companies prefer to make redundancies to cutting wages as the effect on moral of those who are left is much less.

    However, if the statistics were an equivalent of GDP for IT industry professionals (i.e. an estimate of the total take home pay of the profession) then the figures would almost certainly be utterly horrible.

    According to www.jobsmeta.co.uk and www.jobstats.co.uk advertised vacancies in the UK are running around 50% of the middle of last year - in addition the hourly rate/annual salaries have also slipped (due to simple supply/demand). It wouldn't suprise me if IT-GDP (for want of a better term) was down 20-30% on the year.

    Really this is just a way of saying things are tough all over - I'd like not to complain, but as one of the many people who are looking at the moment this market sucks and the reasons can't really be reduced to simple one-liners or attributed to anyone/thing in particular.

    Right now a couple of months off to get some R&R thats been lacking over the last 5 years doesn't go amiss - but in a couple more I'm likely to get really flexible in what I'll look at just to avoid going mad at home. My main concern isn't a pay-cut (my essential bills are around 30% of my last salary) - but I don;t want to take a job outside of my key skills, people pay a huge amount of attention to your last role so it would be like writting off my career to date.

    In the mean time I'm doing the odd day of freelance work - its not a lot but its covering the bills.

    I guess we'll see where we end up.

  13. The punchline? by Captain+Beefheart · · Score: 3, Funny
    "If you worked less than two months during 2002, please skip this survey."

    Houston, we have a problem.

  14. Crash? by Devil's+BSD · · Score: 2, Troll

    OK, although many /.ers are out of jobs, THIS IS NOT A CRASH. It's a recession. Even Alan Greenspan, the 20th time winner of the Most Boring Person Award, says so. Also, although i hate to add a political twist to it, it's not the Republicans' fault: it started when Clinton was in office and exhibited itself fully when Bush took over. September 11th just 'broke the camel's back' so to speak.
    If you want a system administrator job, look into the medical field. At least, if you're a surgeon, you won't have to worry about people installing new versions of their innards.

    --
    I'm the Devil the Windows users warned you about.
    1. Re:Crash? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It depends on what your field is.

      For regular bussinesmen its a recession. For IT workers its not just a crash but a depression. Not only are our jobs being cut but we are being outsourced to India at the same time. The good news is that the pay rate is so rediclously low that many people who went into IT for the money will leave. This leaves true geeks left assuming they have college degrees and years of experience.

      I myself am applying at Wallmart tomorrow. I am young in my 20's and have great computer knowledge but only 2 years experience and no college degree. HR actually thinks computer science degree's teach you desktop troubleshooting as well as system administration and programming skills. Its a shame even linux kernel developers can not get jobs today because they have no cs degree as the same time vb weenies who are gifted in mathmatics are taking the jobs instead because hr thinks that degree will make them better programmers.

    2. Re:Crash? by afidel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is the first tripple dip recession in history and while Greenspan has done a phenominal job of keeping it from being a crash Bush has not helped one bit. In fact his retarded trickle down let's give the top .25% 80% of the tax benifits policies are sure to extend the downturn and keep millions of working folks underemployed for years to come. Sept 11'th had little effect on the economy other than the airline industry and general consumer outlook (though even that is debatable given the strong housing market, people generally don't invest in big ticket items unless they feel at least somewhat good about the future)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:Crash? by volkris · · Score: 3, Informative

      Tripple dip?
      No such thing.

      There was barely a first dip, and not nearly a second. Claiming a third is completely making up numbers.

      But then again, your picture of the "tax benefits policies" is so incredibly breaking from reality that it's no surprise you seem to be working from a different set of numbers on the recession count also...

    4. Re:Crash? by NonSequor · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Hmmm... Have you ever worked for someone who made less than you.

      I haven't.

      SOmething to think about with this trickle down bashing.


      Nonsense. If you want to add wealth to the economy and insure that it circulates the most it makes the most sense to add it to the bottom. The wealthiest people are more likely to save a larger portion of their money or to invest it overseas.

      You can't give 1 million dollars to the rich and expect all of it to end up in the hands of the less wealthy at some point in time. But it is much safer to assume that if you give 1 million to the poor it will trickle up.
      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    5. Re:Crash? by Quill_28 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      3 people:

      1. pays $90,000 in taxes
      2. pays $9,000 in taxes
      3. pays $1,000 in taxes

      You realize that you overcharged and have $10,000 extra dollars. How should the money be divided up?

      Then people complain when the 3rd person only gets $100 dollars back/cut and the 1st person gets $9,000 back/cut. Saying the tax cut/rebate was just for the rich.

    6. Re:Crash? by Kombat · · Score: 2, Informative
      let's give the top .25% 80% of the tax benifits

      Gee, has it occurred to you that the reason it seems that the "rich" (defined as "anyone who makes more than you") are the beneficieries of all the tax cuts is because they're the ones who pay BY FAR the most taxes? Perhaps 80% of the tax benefits are going to the top 1% because the top 1% contribute 80% of the government's tax revenue? Hmm?

      WARNING: I made those numbers up, but my point remains. The majority of tax dollars come from a small minority of taxpayers (the actually rich, not just the ones YOU consider "rich").

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    7. Re:Crash? by jacobcaz · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's nice if investment increases as well, but you don't generate wealth unless people spend money and recieve something tangible in return.

      You don't generate WEALTH by spending your money on things. You may generate wealth for the company making the widget, but not for yourself.

      If you want to generate wealth for yourself, you have to invest and let your money work for you. When you invest, your money doesn't sit in some dark drawer somewhere growing an multiplying; it gets lent out to other companies and people so they can build and buy things. That's where the growth comes from. You don't have to produce anything to stimulate the economy, you just need to induce a flow of money (with your investments).

    8. Re:Crash? by KieranElby · · Score: 2

      I think the argument is somewhat more persuasive in the classic 10 men having dinner analogy (not sure who came up with this):

      <quote>
      I was having lunch with one of my favorite friends last week and the conversation turned to the government's recent round of tax cuts. "I'm opposed to those tax cuts," the retired West coast college instructor declared, "because they benefit the rich. The rich get much more money back than ordinary taxpayers like you and me and that's not fair."

      "But the rich pay more in the first place," I argued, "so it stands to reason that they'd get more money back." I could tell that my friend was unimpressed by this meager argument.

      So I said to him, let's put tax cuts in terms everyone can understand. Suppose that every day 10 men go to a restaurant for dinner. The bill for all ten comes to $100. If it was paid the way we pay our taxes, the first four men would pay nothing; the fifth would pay $1; the sixth would pay $3; the seventh $7; the eighth $12; the ninth $18. The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

      The 10 men ate dinner in the restaurant every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement until the owner threw them a curve. Since you are all such good customers, he said, I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily meal by $20. Now dinner for the 10 only costs $80.

      The first four are unaffected. They still eat for free. Can you figure out how to divvy up the $20 savings among the remaining six so that everyone gets his fair share? The men realize that $20 divided by 6 is $3.33, but if they subtract that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would end up being paid to eat their meal.

      The restaurant owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same percentage, being sure to give each a break, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay. And so now the fifth man paid nothing, the sixth pitched in $2, the seventh paid $5, the eighth paid $9, the ninth paid $12, leaving the tenth man with a bill of $52 instead of $59.

      Outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings. "I only got a dollar out of the $20," complained the sixth man, pointing to the tenth, "and he got $7!" "Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he got seven times more than me!"

      "That's true," shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $7 back when I got only $2? The wealthy get all the breaks!" "Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor."

      The nine men surrounded the tenth man and beat him up. The next night he didn't show up for dinner, so the nine sat down and ate without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They were $52 short! And that, boys, girls and college instructors, is how America's tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes should get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up at the table any more.
      </quote>

    9. Re:Crash? by randyest · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What country do you inhabit? I pay more than $25k in taxes on $120k inccome. Please, please, tell me how to fit my data point onto your curve. You can't. No one can. I'm screwed anually by taxes and you think I'm skating along. You dick.

      You are utterly clueless on this topic. ALL of your numbers are hopelessly wrong. Let me suggest you start at irs.gov and try a few test runs.

      The "10 men at dinner" post below is much gentler and effective than I can possibly be on this, but let me just say: go to hell you confused moron and all of your ilk who spend MY money like it's yours and cry when I get a little break. Seriously, go right to fucking hell you prick. God, you suck, and are so damn clueless it makes me irate (can you tell?).

      You think I get 25x services/benefits for my taxes than someone who pays $1k/year in taxes. Think again. Yeah, I live in a nice neighborhood in Mass, but I pay state and local taxes too. Grrr fucks like you piss me off.

      Morons like you who assume all "rich" people (i.e. anyone who makes more than you) somehow magically evade taxes infuriate those of us who pay massive taxes and have no idea how you can really believe such nonsense. It's such a common miscomception, and arguing against it inevitably coaxes out conspiracy therories a la Eddie Murphy dressing up as a white guy and learning that white business owners give away their products and sefvices to other whites for free. That was a parody. It DOESN'T HAPPEN between white people, and it DOESN'T HAPPEN between the irs and people who make more than you.

      Just STFU until YOU make some cash (that takes work though, you probable leech, so be ready to get off the couch if you want a taste of the unpleasant reality). Until then, shut up.

      --
      everything in moderation
  15. For once... by mikeophile · · Score: 4, Funny

    It looks like us geeks are bringing down the curve.

  16. A Grammar Nazi Writes .... by Burb · · Score: 5, Funny

    survey's? surveys!

    --

  17. My condition by Devil's+BSD · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Before:
    Occupation: Student (K-12/Post-secondary) with a side dabbling of NT and UNIX administration.
    Salary: After:
    Occupation: Student (K-12/Post-secondary) with a side dabbling of NT and UNIX administration.
    Salary: How many of you share my plight?

    --
    I'm the Devil the Windows users warned you about.
  18. In a twist of irony... by Regul8or · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...the sysadmins that run the linked site in the article get a payraise for dealing with a /.ing.

  19. Re: Don't forget the Indian factor by Billly+Gates · · Score: 5, Informative

    Do not ignore the India factor. 38% of all IT jobs are now outsourced for minimal wage in India according to the garnet group. This was done not just for companies looking for cheap labor but also to keep the American market oversatuared and thus salaries go down to rock bottom.

    Most admin jobs are typically in the mid 30's now for 5 years experience and if you have many years perhaps you can make as much as 50k. The .com era is diffinetly over. I saw an ad in the paper for a jr FreeBSD admin for only 20k a year!

  20. Why sobering ? by MosesJones · · Score: 4, Interesting


    What you are saying is that the last 4 years have created unrealistic salaries for people who skills do not give the business benefits those salaries demand.

    Or to put it another way, if you plot the salary curve for the last 20 years and factor out the .com boom we are actually not doing too badly at all.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  21. Re: Don't forget the Indian factor by oPless · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do not ignore the India factor. 38% of all IT jobs are now outsourced for minimal wage in India according to the garnet group


    And boy just about now, people are beginning to wonder why the hell they outsourced. Slowly *very* slowly the penny is dropping with management that cheap != good.

    Make no mistake, those that have been biding their time over the past 18-24 months are starting to see market improvements, and are in place to maximize this.

    I've seen people that have been made redundant 12 months ago get re-employed by their ex-employers, and other people rewriting huge portions of overseas-outsourced work.
  22. Why insist on $US salary? by MellowTigger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have a question for the people who are mourning the decline in salaries. Have you considered moving to where the same job would be more profitable?

    I ask this question because I am considering it myself. I am a programmer specialized on a platform that is practically dead. (Natural/Adabas, if you're curious.) A search 2 weeks ago on monster.com showed that there were more jobs for this platform available in India than in the rest of the world combined. Here, there were only 8 jobs posted across the nation. (Did I mention that this platform was practically dead?)

    Yes, I realize that these Indian jobs are probably just contracted back here to the U.S., but I will apply next week for a passport. When I receive it, I will then begin checking on these Indian jobs. "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em." Ya know? I'm assuming that the relative pay in India will still be better than taking a lower-paid job here in the U.S. on a modern platform. I intend to talk with an Indian programmer soon to get his opinions.

    Have other people pushed this option out of their minds? I just wanted to point out that it may still be valid.