Slashdot Mirror


Fully-functional Miniature Notebook Planned

florin writes "Check out this upcoming extremely cool micro-sized notebook from Microsoft-cofounder Paul Allen's company Vulcan (who were previously mentioned on Slashdot some time ago). Despite being small enough to fit in the palm of your hand, this is a fully blown x86-compatible computer capable of running Windows XP - or, presumably, a Unix of one's choice. Featuring an 800x480 pixel display, 256 MB of memory, sound, USB2, WLAN and optional Bluetooth, GPRS/CDMA or Firewire, this is far more than just another PDA, yet still small enough to carry with you at all times." Looks really cool, but I wouldn't plan on using full typing speed on it's tiny keys.

225 comments

  1. I've got a more powerful mini-computer by tcd004 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This think looks cool, but it doesn't hold a candle to the palm pilot built by jesus.

    tcd004

    1. Re:I've got a more powerful mini-computer by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

      Oh crap now I'll have to get trifocals

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
  2. To type fast by MickLinux · · Score: 5, Interesting

    To type fast, use hall-effect touchpads on either side of the computer, and simply redesign the keyboard for one of three modes: one-pad (left-or-right), stylus, or two-pad.

    People who want to learn to type on it quickly will find it takes less than a month to be proficient. And if the human-factors engineering is good, then they may find that they can type faster on it than with a normal keyboard.

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    1. Re:To type fast by Snowspinner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am not going to engage in a piece of technology that has a month-long period without proficiency. This may be because I'm enough of a gadget geek that I'm used to one or two day proficiency, but if it would take me a month to become proficient, I'd stop trying around a week.

    2. Re:To type fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am not going to engage in a piece of technology that has a month-long period without proficiency. This may be because I'm enough of a gadget geek that I'm used to one or two day proficiency, but if it would take me a month to become proficient, I'd stop trying around a week.

      Hang on a tic... just how long did it take you to become "proficient" with the good old QWERTY? How long to become expert? Did you memorize all of the Palm character sigils instantly? Now, I don't know what sort of purpose you'd think of putting this thing to, but for a good input device for a general purpose device a month wouldn't be too bad. If you're just thinking of using it to save phone numbers, well that's a different story, but if I could type at reasonable speeds on something this size, a month is nothing to invest.

    3. Re:To type fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You'll try as long as Paul Allen wants you to try -- he will intimidate you with his frighteningly grotesque teeth!

    4. Re:To type fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We don't know he is using QWERTY, maybe he has a keyboard with the keys in alphabetic order. Or maybe his secretary typed it.

      He did have six minutes to type that message, so he could have used "the Columbus method" ("find them and land on them").

    5. Re:To type fast by dopyko · · Score: 2, Informative

      Check Dasher. According to users, it takes just half an hour or so to learn to write quite fast.

      (mentioned here before)

    6. Re:To type fast by zaxus · · Score: 1

      The Palm Grafiti system can be learned in about a day, using their little "Giraffe" game. The sigils are so close to the letter they represent, that you're only really learning about 4 letters (x, k, and v are the weird ones that spring to the top of my head). Taking a full month to learn something is a bit of a strech, especially when I would like to be using my new toy now rather than later.

      --
      /. zen: Imagine a Beowulf cluster of Beowulf clusters...
    7. Re:To type fast by russellh · · Score: 1

      The only thing that matters is where the control key is.

      --
      must... stay... awake...
    8. Re:To type fast by lactose99 · · Score: 1

      Palm took me less than 3 days to get down, when I started using Graffiti on a regular basis. QWERTY is a different story, as its the standard for keyboards (unless you count DVORAK, which I really don't). Trying to learn a new method of typing/character input that isn't a standard across the board isn't worth it IMO.

      I'd rather just get something slightly bigger (like a Transmeta-powered laptop) that does use a standard keyboard layout.

      --
      Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
    9. Re:To type fast by ebassi · · Score: 1

      The only thing that matters is where the control key is.

      Since this "star trek"'s tricorder-like thingy comes with Windows XP, I'd also be looking for Alt and Del keys... ;-)

      --
      You can save space. Or you can save time. Don't ever count on saving both at once. -- First Law of Algorithmic Analisys
    10. Re:To type fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know why DVORAK hasn't gained a wider acceptance. If the ergonomics benefits are true (ie, causes less stress and less chance of RSI), then we should make a general push to switch to it. Out of curiosity (and also an abundance of spare time and computer parts :)) I took one of my keyboards and rearranged the key layout to DVORAK and then hooked it up to play around with it. While I'm sure it would take a little time to get to my QWERTY speed (100-110 wpm), it didn't take me long at all to pick up the new key layout (within an hour of practice I was doing 20 wpm). I guess QWERTY is just too standard, but I really think that if the benefit is there switching to DVORAK would not be as difficult as most think.

    11. Re:To type fast by Snowspinner · · Score: 1

      Largely, I don't use the Grafiti system because of an existing fine motor disability that renders my handwriting illegible to many people, little yet a handwriting recognition machine. This is an extreme case, but the people I know who have used the Grafiti system and things like it tend to have enough problems with their handwriting to not really make that a viable option. I just tend to have an even worse problem. =)

    12. Re:To type fast by Snowspinner · · Score: 1

      I got my first computer at age 3.

      I don't know exactly when I became a fast typist... but by the first time I was actually tested (6th grade) I'd hit 60 WPM with no trouble, and have since doubled that.

      Regardless, for me, at least, typing and computer interfaces, much like console video game controllers, were something that were just a developmental part of my life. I learned them as I was learning language, and other really fundamental things.

      At 21, I no longer really have the patience, nor the basic mental wiring, such that endeavors like that are remotely... pleasant.

  3. Graphics Capabilites by GoldMace · · Score: 1

    If it can do graphics halfway descent it might make a cool gameboy.

    1. Re:Graphics Capabilites by SirDaShadow · · Score: 1

      If it's fast enough you can actually play Gameboy Advance Games

    2. Re:Graphics Capabilites by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      If it's got enough horsepower to run XP, it should run about any emulator. If they include any half way decent 3D chipset this thing could be a really cool $1200+ handheld game.

      For now I'll just stick with my GP32.

    3. Re:Graphics Capabilites by Zigg · · Score: 1

      If it's got enough horsepower to run XP, it should run about any emulator.

      Well, my Toshi 1805-S254 came with XP, and runs that and Linux decently, but don't even try emulators on it. The graphics performance is absymal, even for the DOS mode emulators.

    4. Re:Graphics Capabilites by lactose99 · · Score: 4, Funny

      If they include any half way decent 3D chipset this thing could be a really cool $1200+ handheld game.

      If they include any halfway decent 3D chipset, you could probably fry eggs on the thing.

      --
      Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
  4. My PDA (Axim) looks more useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The thing just looks like a real waste of time.

    Key too small to type
    Screen looks like crap

    I'm a gadget geek but this aint something I'd rush out to buy

    1. Re:My PDA (Axim) looks more useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh-huh, sure dude.... what, 4x(if not more) as much memory? and how many times as much storage? the ability to put xp(let alone ANY version of windows) and possibly any other x86 operating system on it? and were you insulting the screen? oh really, what the hell is the resolution on your axim??? quit trying to justify your purchase.

  5. Slashdot editors strike again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    Looks really cool, but I wouldn't plan on using full typing speed on it's tiny keys.



    Just think of how much faster you would type if you didn't insert unnecessary apostrophes into words!

    1. Re:Slashdot editors strike again by Glock27 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      "Looks really cool, but I wouldn't plan on using full typing speed on it's tiny keys."

      Just think of how much faster you would type if you didn't insert unnecessary apostrophes into words!

      IIRC, you use the apostrophe with it to indicate possession, but not for the contracted "it is".

      If not, I've been doing it wrong for years...which is entirely possible. ;-)

      --
      Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
      Score: -1 100% Flamebait
    2. Re:Slashdot editors strike again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The possesive form of it doesn't take an apostrophe. Saying "It's true" is correct while saying "It's name" is not.

    3. Re:Slashdot editors strike again by cperciva · · Score: 1

      You've been doing it wrong for years.

    4. Re:Slashdot editors strike again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slash'dot doe'snt have editor's, they have moderator's. I don't think th'ey care about errant apostrophe's.

    5. Re:Slashdot editors strike again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      If not, I've been doing it wrong for years...which is entirely possible. ;-)

      You have been. "It's" vs. "its" is a common confusion, since it is the opposite of the usual use of an apostrophe.

      it's = it is
      "its" is used for possession

    6. Re:Slashdot editors strike again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      IIRC, you use the apostrophe with it to indicate possession, but not for the contracted "it is".

      If not, I've been doing it wrong for years...which is entirely possible. ;-)

      You've been doing it wrong all these years. It goes like this:

      pronoun -> possessive pronoun
      he -> his
      she -> hers
      they -> theirs
      you -> yours
      we -> ours
      it -> its

      None of the possesive pronouns have apostrophes.

      All contractions have apostrophes:

      do not -> don't
      could not -> couldn't
      they will -> they'll
      it is -> it's
      can not -> can't
    7. Re:Slashdot editors strike again by ryanr · · Score: 1, Informative

      Exactly the opposite. With most words, you can use 's to indicate possesive or contract with is. You don't use 's to indicate possesive with it, you use its.

      Here, I'll let Bob explain further

      http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif

    8. Re:Slashdot editors strike again by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      According to the standard rule you would put the apostrophe after the s like its', but with "its" you don't actually use an apostrophe at all. The contraction for "it is" uses one though--it's.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    9. Re:Slashdot editors strike again by ClippyHater · · Score: 1

      It's confusing, but the rules are "it's" means "it is", and "its" is possessive. I.E.:

      It's a fine day == It is a fine day.
      ...I wouldn't plan on using full typing speed on its tiny keys == ...I wouldn't plan on using full typing speed on the device's tiny keys.

    10. Re:Slashdot editors strike again by jpkunst · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just think of how much faster you would type if you didn't insert unnecessary apostrophes into words!

      Q. What is the purpose of the apostrophe?
      A. The apostrophe is used mainly in hand-lettered signs to alert the reader that an 'S' is coming up at the end of a word.

      (Dave Barry, "Claw your way to the top")

    11. Re:Slashdot editors strike again by xigxag · · Score: 2, Funny

      it's = it is

      True, but as a Lisenced Speling and Grammer Expert, allow me to further note that:

      It's also = "It has", as in

      It's been three minutes since trying to figure out thes'e damn apostrophe's has caused me to loose my temper!

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    12. Re:Slashdot editors strike again by Glock27 · · Score: 1
      Ah well...nothing like getting a very public grammar lesson.

      Let's hope I can keep it straight from now on. ;-)

      --
      Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
      Score: -1 100% Flamebait
    13. Re:Slashdot editors strike again by RabidOverYou · · Score: 1

      Noone ever get's that right; its alot harder then it looks.

    14. Re:Slashdot editors strike again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this confusing?

      You don't write hi's or her's, so why should you want to write it's?

    15. Re:Slashdot editors strike again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soon, sony can start selling the HSX-700, or Mini robotic hands for typing on ultraportables. They could charge an arm and a leg for it (rimshot).

    16. Re:Slashdot editors strike again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IWVCTBT
      I Was Very Close To Being Trolled...

    17. Re:Slashdot editors strike again by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
      I was finally able to master that grammar trick by remembering that: The possesive does not posses an apostrophe.

      That seems wrong but isn't.

      Also: The contraction is the longer of the two choices.

      Again that seems wrong but isn't.

    18. Re:Slashdot editors strike again by sessamoid · · Score: 1, Offtopic
      Here's an easier way to keep "it's" vs. "its" straight. Pronouns don't use apostrophes for indicating the possessive. The other possessive pronouns:

      her
      his
      their
      my
      your
      our
      --
      "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
    19. Re:Slashdot editors strike again by brain159 · · Score: 1

      "lose". L-O-S-E. Just the one "O" :-)

    20. Re:Slashdot editors strike again by F1_Fan · · Score: 1

      A nice little digression on the subject of one of my primary pet peeves.

      I don't know what posseses people to use the apostrophe at the end of words that don't need it. Maybe they get nervous and stick it in because it looks more right? Maybe they were just smoking too much weed in elementary school.

      My latest sighting of this embarassment to public education was in a restaurant menu. New to the menu were "Stirfry's".

    21. Re:Slashdot editors strike again by xigxag · · Score: 1

      Being that I was pretty much trying for an areal density of errors similar to my last Deskstar HD, if "loose" is the only typo you noticed, I gotta wonder about ya, Brain. :-)

      Hmm, maybe I should tell you the same thing I told IBM: "Ease up on the pixie dust, ya heard!" :-)

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
  6. The problem all of these have by Snowspinner · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The tiny keys issue really gets at the problem I have with PDAs in general. Interfaces at that size are a real bother. My handwriting is far too bad to use the handwriting recognition, and any other input method is just painful. I can get a fold-out keyboard attachment, but at that point the device becomes sufficiently big that I can't carry it around in the pocket of anything short of my trenchcoat.

    PDAs are a wonderful idea, and once someone solves the interfacing problem I'm sure they'll be as common as full-size or notebook computers. But in their current form, I just can't use them, and I doubt that I'm the only one with this problem.

    1. Re:The problem all of these have by Blaine+Hilton · · Score: 1

      This is why the only mobile device I would use is a cell phone or laptop. I had a PDA and it was always a pain to use, so I didn't use it.

    2. Re:The problem all of these have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      but at that point the device becomes sufficiently big that I can't carry it around in the pocket


      If you don't insist on carrying the whole setup in your pocket, you can have just a PDA there for quick access of information and keep the keyboard in a briefcase or bag when you need to sit down and type. I'm a student and that works for me for lectures.

      Also some keyboards are not too big. This one is 5.5" x 3.9" x 0.5" when closed:
      http://www.thinkoutside.com/products/palm xt-specs. html
    3. Re:The problem all of these have by evilviper · · Score: 1
      PDAs are a wonderful idea, and once someone solves the interfacing problem I'm sure they'll be as common as full-size or notebook computers.

      And Psion has been around for how many years now??? Selling all their hanhdelds with build-in keyboards... Still not as common as notebooks.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    4. Re:The problem all of these have by Snowspinner · · Score: 1

      In general, when someone says something like "Given innovation X, Y will catch on", it is safe to assume that one is also assuming that the product is marketed sufficiently, that it is available in places where people shop, that all other aspects of it beyond innovation X work well, ect.

      I do not know which of thse is a problem with Psion, though, having never seen one in Circuit City, and never heard of one until you posted that, I'm guessing at least the first two conditions are not met.

  7. Ah, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it forced to have WinXP on it by default, issuing out the legendary Micro$oft Tax?

    1. Re:Ah, but by ryanr · · Score: 1

      Yup, burned right into the BIOS.

  8. Mini Notebook Buttons by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    Will it come with finger extensions a la Freddie Krueger? That would be neat and would keep away those annoying WiFi cops. Well at least until the SWAT team shows up.

  9. HID by rwa2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The small keyboard shouldn't be a problem:
    Just stick on a USB twiddler. Chording keyboards can be much faster than full keyboards. And perhaps someday you'll never need to use a normal keyboard again - just use your personally-customized portable keyboard and point at the computer you want to type to.

    1. Re:HID by secolactico · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I always wanted to try a chording keyboard. Connecting one to this device, however, would negate it's portability. If the chording keyboard were part of this device, it would be ideal. It might scare away potential users, however.

      --
      No sig
    2. Re:HID by Parsec · · Score: 1

      I've been wondering why we haven't seen chording keyboards on PDAs yet. Wouldn't it seem ideal for a hand-sized device to be able to enter data with the same hand you're holding it with? Of course you'd need some way to keep a thin PDA steady in your hand, but that is probably doable with a little velcro strapping.

    3. Re:HID by Caltheos · · Score: 1

      There is no way chording keyboards would ever replace normal keyboards. For one, a large portion of people can't touch type as it is, and you expect them to remember the chords for every key. Secondly, try using any app that requires pushing more than one key at once, ala games. I'd love to see someone play quake on a chord keyboard

      --
      We've secretely replaced the Enterprise's dilithium crystals with Folgers crystals. Lets see if they notice.
    4. Re:HID by Sean+Riordan · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Have been tthinking of building one of those small palm sized keyboards for use in portable computing anyway ... just haven't found the right PC for it yet and the prices on the fiber projection displays is still way out of my price range. This type of unit could work well for wearables though, certainly at the development level. I think usign some sort of wireless, possibly Bluetooth, rather than USB would make it a lot more useful however.

      --
      Sig? What if I prefer Glock?
  10. Snowspinner Horsey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Snowspinner Horsey!

  11. Fancy PDA? by Larkfellow · · Score: 1

    And I thought the keyboards on a standard laptop were hard enough to use. That is just PDA sized, and as such, means thumb usage for the keyboard.

    No, as far as I'm concerned laptops can't get much/any smaller now as it is, otherwise they stop being feasable for actual usage other than as a PDA.

    --

    -- Never monkey with another Monkey's monkey

    1. Re:Fancy PDA? by pVoid · · Score: 1
      That depends on what you use your laptop for.

      If you want to go sit at a Starbuck's and type your resume on it, yeah, this one might be slightly cumbersome. But as far as I'm concerned, I've got plenty of reasons to want the power of a laptop in the size of my palm. Most important things being: using it as a docking station for my mp3 player, quick fast access to email (and emails *are* short little messages in my books), IM, and SSH/connectivity... anything that'll give me a way to monitor remote servers.

      When I'm out on vacation or something, I don't like lugging around an extra briefcase containing a laptop. And, I do like checking the state of my servers every once in a while.

    2. Re:Fancy PDA? by Draigon · · Score: 1

      It's a sad state of tech design when you can honestly say your childhood Speak-n-spell keyboard was designed better.

      The way things are going (cell phone size, pda size, mini-pc size) we better start investing in better design or genetic engineering for smaller fingers.

      --
      -Rabbit
  12. How is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A fully-functional miniature notebook has been around since 2001.

    It's called an "iBook"-- and now there's an even smaller one called a "PowerBook".

    Did the Slashgeeks not get those memos???

  13. Fujitsu already have one by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Lifebook series by Fujitsu, and much better specs. http://webshop.fujitsupc.com/fpc/Ecommerce/buildse riesbean.do?series=P1

    --
    I came, I conquered, I coredumped
    1. Re:Fujitsu already have one by Apreche · · Score: 2, Informative

      yeah, my friend has one of those. Runs Linux on it and everything. The thing in this article doesn't even hold a candle to it. Even the mini Sony VAIO is better than this. Sure they're both a little bigger, but they are small enough.

      --
      The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    2. Re:Fujitsu already have one by SWTP_OS9 · · Score: 1

      There have been a bunch of these over the years. Even Atari had one. Ran Dos and even smaller!

      The think is like MS they have the idea of "We invented it first!" Sheech!

    3. Re:Fujitsu already have one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Or clickable:

      click here

    4. Re:Fujitsu already have one by Florian+Weimer · · Score: 1

      yeah, my friend has one of those. Runs Linux on it and everything.

      Is the Linux power management able to guarantee extended battery life?

      I'm still looking for something which can run Linux, has mass storage, can run Emacs confortably, and can run without reload for 5 hours or more.

    5. Re:Fujitsu already have one by Trejus · · Score: 4, Informative

      I just got one a few weeks ago, and the answer is, I'm not really sure. I think the answer is probably, but it will take some time and tweaking on the user's part.

      The problem is that the newest model, the P2120 (I can't speak for the P1000 series), only has support for ACPI, which means that all your powermanagement is controlled solely by your OS.

      Unfortnately, ACPI is not quite there yet on linux and the controls it does have are somewhat hard to configure. I don't think there are any gui's that make it easy. It is also in experimental status. The 2.4.x series has it, but it's not that good. I hear 2.5.x is better, but I haven't had time to try it yet.

      As for the other things, Mandrake 9.1 workes reasonably well right out of the box. It comes with a 40 gig harddrive, and the keyboard feels prety natural after a few hours of use. X requires some tweaking because it has a funny resolution, 1280 x 768. And USB devices crash the kernel, but I think that's because USB shares an interrupt with the buggy ACPI.

      --
      "To save the planet, I had to go to the worst spot on Earth, and that was Philadelphia." -- Sun Ra
    6. Re:Fujitsu already have one by usotsuki · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and it was used in T2. BTW, ever heard of the "Poqet PC" ?

      -uso.

      --
      Dreams, dreams, don't doubt dreams, dreaming children's dreaming dreams. Sailor Moon SS
    7. Re:Fujitsu already have one by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've had a P2046 for almost a year, and have been running Gentoo Linux on it the whole time. Here's my observations:

      - I've been running the 2.5 series kernels (currently staying with .60) because of increased speed. I've tried experimenting with ACPI, but it never suspends right, so I've stuck with APM.
      - USB works a lot better in 2.5 than 2.4
      - The integrated WLAN also is a lot better in 2.5, though it still has some problems (every once in a while the driver hangs, and I have to rmmod and modprobe it again)
      - Lately, it's been hanging a lot when coming out of suspend

      Other than these issues, it's a great machine. It's certainly not a speed-demon, but is great for what I got it for (taking notes, web browsing, etc.). Battery life is great - 10 hours with the screen brightness up all the way with the extended and bay battery, and over 15 hours if it's closed and I'm using it for MP3's.

      If you're looking for more info, check out the P-series forums.

    8. Re:Fujitsu already have one by mocm · · Score: 1

      Have a look at this link for help with the P series. Powermanagement is done by longrun. You only need ACPI for suspend which doesn`t work for me yet (I have a Loox T93C the Japanese version of the Lifebook P2120). Longrun handles the processor states. ACPI works for detecting lid close, power button and battery status.

      --
      ***Quis custodiet ipsos custodes***
    9. Re:Fujitsu already have one by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      Umm... the Lifebook is a full-size laptop. If you hadn't noticed the Vulcan is a palmtop. That's like comparing your Lifebook to a desktop.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  14. Too small by CausticWindow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My hands are too big to operate one of those.

    The perfect size for laptops is something like the Dell x200. Very lightweight, but with a keyboard where you actually can hit individual keys.

    I think the smaller is better craze is only good to a certain point, this is in my opinion, beyond.

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    1. Re:Too small by russellh · · Score: 1

      I'm all for smaller the better, but not in that form. I'd rather have it small enough that it can safely be embedded in a nice leather portfolio, for instance.

      --
      must... stay... awake...
    2. Re:Too small by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your comments remind me of the problems I have with cell phones. I don't have large hands, probably average for a 6' 3" male (I can't but almost can palm a basketball), and slender fingers (good for keyboarding, string instruments, etc.).

      I can type about 30 wpm on some of the Psion keyboards, but I forget which model I was messing with.

      I have the older Nokia 6160. Pretty decent size, thinner may be better, but dimensions are otherwise ideal.

      The next model up at the time (available in red, blue, and grey) was WAY too small. I could hold it, but holding the thing for 10 minutes would cramp the 2-3 fingers holding the darn thing. I could palm it, but that was more like I was holding the side of my head.

      The folding phone models are way too small.

      So far, I like the progession of not trying to make the cell phones smaller, but adding better features while roughly keeping a smallish form factor--color screen, higher resolutions, camera, video, etc. T68i size is about ideal, although a little larger but thinner would be better (and more screen--why hasn't someone figure out an LCD on the front and a screen on the back is better?).

      Anyways, if this trend carried over to the laptop/pda world, someone might get a clue and figure out a better form factor. Maybe with flexible screens (whenever they come about) and harking back to wristwatches, I think a semi-rigid device that fit on inside forearm area would be ideal. Touchscreen, so you can write, but large enough for "keyboard" space if removed, all good for the quick input with your dominant hand (putting the device on the forearm of the non-dominant hand, so you can write or input with your dominant hand). Decent size screen possible too, and while short in screen height, more HDTV or 16:9 aspect ratio like, and not that far off from screens you see on some of those small sony models like the PCG-C1 and some of the Libretto models).

  15. Re:just to small by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oops... typo.. it was sapposed to say "way to much emphasis", but I guess that would be wrong also.

    Change it to "way too much emphasis"

  16. Linux??? by georgep77 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Looks good... which distro installs on it? I mean with something that cool you wouldn't want to run "your Mother's OS" (tm) on it would you? It's too bad they aren't selling these *WITHOUT* a display, You could actually bring your own personal BEOWOLF cluster of these on trips etc.

    Just a thought...

    Cheers,
    _GP_

  17. But the question you have to ask is... by IwannaCoke · · Score: 2, Funny

    With the screen having such an odd resolution, will Quake III still work?

    1. Re:But the question you have to ask is... by lactose99 · · Score: 1

      I've tried Q3 on my laptops (a ThinkPad 570 and a sorta-new Dell C640), and the LCD screen makes any FPS almost completely unplayable IMO. Its just not as fluid as the CRT on my computer desk. 2D games that don't require 30-60 frames-per-second work fine, but anything that needs to redraw the screen that fast just doesn't play well.

      Of course, YMMV. I'm sure there are plenty of people who don't mind FPS-type games on their laptops. I just couldn't play without having to resort to a docking station with external CRT display.

      --
      Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
    2. Re:But the question you have to ask is... by bhtooefr · · Score: 0

      Try one of the old (400 series) Toshiba Satellite Pros. The LCDs have color problems (blotchy), but they refresh REALLY quickly.

    3. Re:But the question you have to ask is... by thynk · · Score: 1

      With the screen having such an odd resolution, will Quake III still work?

      NO NO No! The question I have to ask is, with the screen having such an odd resolution, how will my pr0n look on it?

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
  18. Sponsored by... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This unbiased story was sponsored by...

  19. Been there,done that by mattwolfewvu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One of my CS instructers came back from Japan last semester with something similar to this, (scroll down to the bottom, yes it's an old picture, only thing I could find that looked similar), but smaller and faster and without the camera. (It was a Sony though.) It also had a keyboard that you could actually type on, at least a little better than the Vulcan one. Of course, the battery was the same size and weighed more than the rest of the computer.

    --
    "I think that when you become a Republican, you don't get to score any more." -- Butt-head
    1. Re:Been there,done that by flewp · · Score: 1

      One of my CS instructers came...

      You can take Counterstrike classes now?!?!@ No wonder I'm always dying so quickly!

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
  20. It isn't special by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't really that special. Take a look at the new PocketPCs - they have taken a PDA and aimed to be a PC (really a PocketPC device is much closer to a PC than a Palm Pilot), whereas Vulcan are taking a PC and aiming to be a PDA. Sure there are still some differences (the ability to run the OS of your choice, and a useless keyboard to use with it) but ultimately in a generation or two they will be at the same point.

    Actually MS already have their Tablet PCs that seem to have filled this role. Neat idea, but nothing new.

  21. They've invented the Toshiba Libretto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the kind of product that comes from shortsighted product research - I'm sure test users love it for the three hours they use it. After that, the novelty wears off quickly on these damn tiny things. They're just too small to do any useful work with (well, anything that involves typing).

    Wishing 'em good luck anyway...

  22. Re:SARS is punishment for leftists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By that logic, "poverty" is the first Political affliction.

  23. Dunno... by kotj.mf · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I didn't notice an MSRP anywhere on the site; I've gotta wonder if something like a Zaurus C700 wouldn't be more cost-effective.

    I mean, if it's a complete pain in the ass to type on the teeny tiny keyboard on either model, what's the point of a 20 gig HD?

    Plus, the Vulcan is fugly.

    --
    hang brain.
    1. Re:Dunno... by isaace · · Score: 5, Informative
      From a USA Today article on the Vulcan:

      "Though pricing will be left to the companies that ultimately put their name on the device, Vulcan estimates its cost at $1,200 to $1,500."

      Full article available here.

    2. Re:Dunno... by ryanr · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you sign up to be spammed, it asks

      "Interested in reserving a spot on the wait list to purchase a Limited Edition Mini-PC for $1,999, available late 2003:"?

      I don't know if "Limited Edition" means more expensive than usual, but that gives you an idea of the order of magnitude of the price. :)

    3. Re:Dunno... by HiTek-LoLife · · Score: 1

      The Zaurus C700 came to mind immediately for me too, and seems much more desireable. The problem with an x86 machine at any size is that you still have to deal with boot time (or at least standby/hibernate resume), defeating the "instant on" feature that I feel is mandatory for a true PDA. This micro x86 clamshell form-factor is also really nothing new; anyone here remember the Mitsubishi Amity?

    4. Re:Dunno... by bhtooefr · · Score: 0

      Hibernate resume doesn't take long at all (15 secs. tops on a PC designed for XP), and standby resume takes 10 secs.

  24. Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, who here is going to be the first to get Linux running on this thing?

    Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Bueller?

  25. What's the target market? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Too small to be used on a regular basis and a bit too large to be treated as a PDA. I'm sure after the initial cool factor wears off, and eye strain sets in, you are going to have a user wondering what to do with that thing.

  26. Surprised no one has asked this yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but what is the battery life on this thing? I mean, with a processor able to handle windows XP, and an actual HDD, this thing must take a lot of energy.

  27. It's so tiny - needs some pink paint and fur by nate.sammons · · Score: 1

    It should be turned into something like this hello kitty laptop.

    -nate

  28. YES, BUT CAN IT RUN LINUX ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I mean Jesus is alright but his disciples are rather thick and ordinary" - JL

    1. Re:YES, BUT CAN IT RUN LINUX ?? by jagne · · Score: 0

      The spec says "x86 compatible". Ok, that's vague, but one can see on the photos and read on the Details that it runs an XP.
      It doesn't say either that Microsoft did an special version of XP for this thing (and the Paul Allen mention is only about "concept", not that he's actively behind this project).

      Executive summary: it *should* run Linux.

    2. Re:YES, BUT CAN IT RUN LINUX ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he was talking about the Palm Pilot.

    3. Re:YES, BUT CAN IT RUN LINUX ?? by zora · · Score: 1

      Of course it can run linux, I've seen some really bored people get linux to run on just about anything. If someone can get linux to run on an xbox or even a fucking Nintendo some bright individual will figure this out as well

      --
      In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet, and say to us, "Make us your slaves, but feed us." - Dostoevsky
    4. Re:YES, BUT CAN IT RUN LINUX ?? by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      Yes it will run linux but you can only run this one distribution.

  29. Ow! My Eyes! by Dr.+Mojura · · Score: 1

    My eyes already get sore with straining to read 9pt fonts on my 15" laptop display after a few hours. I think my eyeballs will explode from the pressure on trying to read the same 9pt font scaled down to 15cm!

    --
    "Nothing exists except atoms and empty space; everything else is opinion." - Democritus
    1. Re:Ow! My Eyes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get glasses.

  30. As Usual, Taking Credit Where None is Due by sparkhead · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From the page: "The Mini-PC is a concept from MicroSoft co-founder Paul Allen's Vulcan, Inc...."

    No, it isn't. IBM and other manufacturers have had palmtop computers for a long time.

  31. Use it in place of jukebox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like an iPod++ in a way. Of course it would have no shock protection or other hardware features for portable music, but if you are just letting the thing sit on your desk, you could run a fully functional music jukebox program and use it as a slightly more featureful iPod.

  32. Already done before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    First of all you admitted that you've reported on this before. Second of all this isnt revolutionary.

    I currently have a Sony PCG-U3 which is the current titlle holder for smallest laptop. It runs a 900mhz crusoe CPU, got 256mb ram a 20GB hd and 800x600 display. This tiny laptop is only sold in Japan. The keyboard makes it really difficult to touch type, because you have to watch out to make sure your fat fingers dont touch other keys by mistake.

    1. Re:Already done before. by Linux+Ate+My+Dog! · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I am so jealous of you. I am still working on a PCG-C1VN, which is somewhat bigger. I can still type on it fine.

      One thing that struck me was how ugly the Vulcan minipc is. Compared with Sony's U1, U3, the upcoming U10, or Samsung's Nexio or Sharp's keyboard Zaurus, the minipc just screams "I got this with my HotWheels!"

      I wouldn't want to be seen with that cheap-looking thing.

    2. Re:Already done before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah? Well I'm typing on a Sony PCG-FXA59. It's small if you consider mid-70s Buicks to be compact cars.

    3. Re:Already done before. by turing0 · · Score: 1

      You can get the Japanese Micro-Sub notebooks in the States though http://www.dynamism.com -- the Sony U101 is due out shortly - 6"x5.5" consuming 30watts. 30GB drive also - as stated re Vulcan, so what?

    4. Re:Already done before. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the Sony U3 has a 1024x768 screen, 6.4"...the 800x600 resolution is if you hit the "zoom" button. Compared to the Vulcan's 5.8" 800x480 resolution, and the Vulcan seems like sheer crap. The only saving grace will be if they price it at $200 or something. But if they mean to compete with real mini laptops, that screen has gotta go...VGA was 480 pixels high in 1987. I mean it's fine these days for cell phones or wristwatches, but a laptop? Gimme a break!

    5. Re:Already done before. by toddestan · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, it matches the default XP interface perfectly!

  33. Compelling but... by jasonditz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't see any mention of price.

    One would expect that the cost would be more than a normal laptop of comparable specs. While its got some compelling features this thing in the end looks like it can't decide if it wants to be a PDA or a laptop. At 800x480 resolution its probably not going to cut it as a replacement for a proper laptop, but at the same time, I wonder how usable an XP system would be as a PDA.

    Its neat as a "gee whiz" thing, but what sort of people need a PDA with more power than the present ones enough to shell out laptop prices and likewise what sort of people need a laptop that small but are willing to give up screen resolution?

  34. Holy crappy site, Batman! by phillymjs · · Score: 4, Funny

    Could it be any lighter on details?

    Great job with the photos. Dide we really need FIVE photos showing the size comparison to a mobile phone? Or THREE showing how a ThinkPad dwarfs it? Would it have killled them to show the back of this thing, so I could see the ports and answer this question: Are the actual ports built into the device, or does it have some stupid, proprietary mega-port and a funky, easily-losable-and-expensive-to-replace port replicator cable that breaks the mega-port out into FireWire, USB, etc?

    Or does connecting anything to it in the field require lugging around some docking station that negates the whole point of having a dinky computer in the first place?

    ~Philly

    1. Re:Holy crappy site, Batman! by istartedi · · Score: 1

      The only thing worse than that is this. Click on the "how big is OpenBrick" links and you get enormous JPEGs of the OpenBrick next to phones and stuff. The JPEGs are so big that I lost patience waiting for them to download over dialup. Maybe the dimensions are at the bottom of the picture, but I'll never know. I had to go to some other site to get dimensions on the OpenBrick. Sheesh! 100k to convey the information "7.1 x 4.6 x 1.6 in". That's got to be some kind of record for a crap-to-signal ratio (excluding cases where the content is 100% crap).

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  35. Swivel screen for use as a pad? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    That, plus a decent-sized HDD would make this a compelling little linux box & mplayer...

  36. PDAs vs Laptops... by SStrungis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have used PC laptops, Powerbooks, Newtons, and Palms over the years. I have switched from Newton to Palm and back to Newton again. Yeah, it's big, but it does lots more for me from a practical end. Easy email, notes, books, scheduling, and MP3's on my Newt! Also easy connectivity via an older 3Com Ethernet PCMCIA card. Sure, it weighs a pound and is not pocketable...That's the sucky side. I use an older Toshiba laptop for SuSE, and Win98 to keep up with the "rest of the world" and my iBook for everyday work. I have to agree with the above posters. A keyboard, whether chorded or not, has to have something that approaches full sized keys. I have an external KB for my Newton and it is as small as it can be and still be comfortable. Before getting my iBook I regularly used a 2400c and that was a small KB as well. Heck, lots of times when I see a 2400c on the swap lists, or auction block or whatever, one of the chief complaints for selling is that the KB is too little for folks with big mitts. Its all about size versus useability versus the right tool for the right job. My Newt is all big and clunky, but for me it blows a Palm away. Others might be different. Just my $.02 Scott

  37. Re:just to small by kinnell · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Is it just me or is way so much emphasis being put on having a small product?

    The whole point is that you can stick it in your pocket. Laptops are too big and heavy, even the subnotebooks. For the kind of thing you want a laptop for, there is a certain size below which it becomes counterproductive. Likewise, for the kind of thing you use a PDA for, there is a certain size above which it becomes impractical. The catch is, though, that PDAs lack the power, storage space or expandability for many tasks which they would otherwise be ideal. This is the niche which this device is meant to fill.

    --
    If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
  38. Ugh by MagPulse · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not only is the keyboard small, but it's made of those rubber buttons that are on cell phones. Can you imagine typing for any period of time on those? Plus it has a trackball in the upper right?! How about a pointer stick in the middle?

    Give me a traditional PDA with a full-sized collapsable keyboard any day. With the screen doubling as the mouse input device, it's still very compact. If you need to do serious work, a 2.7 pound ultralight laptop shouldn't be too much to carry around.

    1. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus it has a trackball in the upper right?! How about a pointer stick in the middle?

      Once again, 20% of the US doesn't matter to computer companies. Is it really that hard to make a device both left and right handers can use?

    2. Re:Ugh by L0rdJagged · · Score: 1

      I think CS people will just evolve very powerful thumbs. I've been getting pretty good at entering messages on my cell phone that way since I got one that does emails. But yeah, I probably wouldn't buy such a tiny laptop.

    3. Re:Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey can you get one of those for the blackberry?

  39. Finally! A useful travel machine by 71thumper · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As an Operations guy, man, I have wanted something like this for years. Full featured enough to handle remotely connecting in for sudden downtime events, yet not nearly as large as a laptop. With 1xRTT, it means you can take it into a restaurant and, if you pager goes off, be able to check system status without having to clear off the entire top of the table.

    Not to mention that it makes checking Moviefone.com a lot slicker than the current PDA browsers are.

    It's not going to be for everyone, but for those who need it, doggone, it's the cat's meow!

    And it'll impress the babes :)

    Stev

  40. Vulcan? by tedrlord · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't believe this. No Vulcan would build such an illogical keyboard. ... I'm so sorry.

    --
    [insert witty quote here]
    1. Re:Vulcan? by Joehonkie · · Score: 1

      Wow I didn't even THINK of Trek until you said that...

      How sad that a Greek mytholigical reference has been so utterly overtaken by pop culture. Next thing you know people will only assume Genesis refers to the band...

    2. Re:Vulcan? by 11223 · · Score: 1

      Next time you make an analogy to undermine a Star Trek reference, make sure it's not a Trek reference itself.

    3. Re:Vulcan? by Joehonkie · · Score: 1
      Hey don't blame me, I don't know enough about Star Trek to make more references to it. That won't stop me from making fun of it though.

  41. Re:Fully Blown?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    f1r5t

    Or not.. dumbass.

  42. typing speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > I wouldn't plan on using full typing speed on it's tiny keys
    yeah, especially if you're going to waste your time typing useless apostrophes.

  43. I'd hit it. by druzicka · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just to balance out the mostly negative posts so far... I think that there is real value in having a full desktop OS in my pocket (WinXP or Linux) for 1) maximizing downtime and 2) permitting me to leave my apartment when I'm on call.

    I tried Palm OS - great PIM, great battery life, small form factor, large software library... But extremely limited in processing power and networking options.

    Pocket PC - Poor battery life, poor software library, but excellent wifi and cellular data connectivity options.

    Linux on iPaq (Familiar, Opie, GPE) - Cool to have a shell prompt, but EXTREMELY limited in storage space. Otherwise, Opie and GPE are maturing nicely, and I can get a good deal of work done when I have the right programs installed

    Unfortunately, the best solution I've found so far is an iPaq running Pocket PC with wifi connectivity, running JSLandscape at 640 x 480, running terminal services to my WinXP desktop. Yeah it's slow and sucks battery life like a pig, but at least I can run real applications...

    This Vulcan Handheld PC would let me run my VPN and full mail program (Lotus Notes - sux but that's what my company uses) along with the entire library of X86 windows/linux software.

    --
    If Happy Fun Ball begins to smoke, get away immediately. Seek shelter and cover head.
    1. Re:I'd hit it. by twalk · · Score: 1

      These things and tablet PCs are going to kill PPC.

      Most people (like you) who get a PPC really are wanting a tiny full powered PC.

      What are the differences between a PPC and a small tablet PC? Processor type, amount of memory, and the HD. With the new tiny and cheap HD coming out, it's only a matter of time before a tablet PC comes out the same size as the PPCs, and costing only $100-$200 more.

      Palm can't kill PPC, but MS will. MS gets something like $15 for both WinCE for PPC and Pocket Office. MS gets something like $65 for each XP license, and another $200+ for Office. The more successful that PPC is, the more money it will cost MS.

    2. Re:I'd hit it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that carrying around an XP machine in my pocket would maximize the amount of downtime I encounter every day.

  44. Definately cool! by jamesjw · · Score: 1


    I gotta get me one of these!

    Beowulf cluster of these? Anyone? Anyone? :)

    But seriously, linux or bsd on one of these babies would make walking around your co-lo room doing trivial maintenence on boxes would be awesome..

    Harddrive big enough to do network installs off on client sites etc..

    Rock on!!

    --
    -- If at first you don't succeed, lie!
  45. Great, but what speed x86? by kni52 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How fast an x86 processor will this take? There seemed to be no mention of processor beyond soimply "x86 compatible".

    --
    My subtext is just a figment of your imagination.
    1. Re:Great, but what speed x86? by usotsuki · · Score: 1

      4.77 MHz? *g*

      Sorry, couldn't resist.

      -uso.

      --
      Dreams, dreams, don't doubt dreams, dreaming children's dreaming dreams. Sailor Moon SS
    2. Re:Great, but what speed x86? by pben · · Score: 1

      Well Paul Allen does own stock in Transmeta so a Crusoe might be a good fit.

    3. Re:Great, but what speed x86? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      don't expect something very fast. Think of the battery-life. It would have to be a Crusoe or a VIA C3 to meet he power requirements. If it's a Crusoe then it's going to be very slow, so it will be okay for web browsing, word processing and taxes. it wouldn't be good at running games or Maya or anything like that. But on a mini 800x600 display would you even want to?

      If they go with VIA you could get some real performance out of it. 400Mhz - 900Mhz could theoretically fit in that form factor. (8.5W at 800Mhz). Floating Point on the VIA is slow though because of it's 486-like FPU architecture. (it is capable of running MMX and all the extensions you expect out of a P-III. just not as quickly).

      The Transmeta is not going to perform quite as well, even if you get a 800Mhz one.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  46. OQO by Joehonkie · · Score: 1

    What about the OQO?

    What happened to this? It was supposed to be out by now but they haven't updated the website in eternity. It would have had laptop and desktop enclosures to solve the actual typing problem when you needed to use it as a full-on PC, and was just generally loaded with good features. But since I don't seem to be able to buy one, what's the point

    Oh yeah...*cough* keys on this Vulcan thing to small!

  47. Dear Lord! by 11223 · · Score: 1
    5.8? (15 cm) LCD with 800x480 resolution
    Dear Lord! How can you even read on that screen, let alone type?

    I think somewhere a line has to be drawn. That line is crossed when you have to use a magnifying glass to read your laptop's screen and a microscope to find your cell phone when you misplace it.

    1. Re:Dear Lord! by Phork · · Score: 1

      if you think thats small, try reading at 1024x768 on a 6.2" screen. Thats what sony's vaio u1 has, and i dont find it to hard at all, but i do frequently end up zooming the screen to 640x480.

      --
      -- free as in swatantryam - not soujanyam.
  48. Genesis? by TheNumberSix · · Score: 3, Funny

    Genesis? Is planet forbidden!

    --
    Never confuse feeling with thinking.
  49. meh by ALpaca2500 · · Score: 1

    all it is is a miniature laptop. there's really nothing special about it. personally, i like the design of this thing. now, if something like that ever became available, i'd be all over it.

  50. It's not the keyboard, it's... by hsmyers · · Score: 1

    the price! Its listed as P.A. 'concept'---this must be his concept of users as fools...

  51. I just love coding by jeanjean83 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I just love the coding, I don't do it for anything else, except pure love. If someone else wants to make money from what i write, let them. I just want to code. If someone else wants to modify my writings, let them. As long as I'm able to code, no-one can take away the fun from me. If someone wants to write closed source software, let them. It's just fun to write, if I can in any way help some-one else, while I'm having fun, why not. It's just plain and simple fun, let's keep it that way

  52. Imagine.. by wfberg · · Score: 5, Funny

    A beowulf cluster of these beasties, kitted out with 802.11g wireless networking and mounted on RC model vehicles, roaming around autonimously, trying to find unsecured wifi hotspots so you can use their bandwidth for p2p!

    --
    SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    1. Re:Imagine.. by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      Imagine... all that effort just to pirate metallica songs.

  53. IBM already did it by soupforare · · Score: 5, Informative

    Bow down to your one and true Master, fellow nerds
    The PC110 was, and until this M$ thingee comes out, is the smallest laptop ever made.
    Now, they go for insane amounts of money on ebay. As a 486, she goes for more cash than the pentium Librettos do
    I'm a huge palmtop fan (HPLX/Amity/Libretto/etc), and if this new thing is priced right, I'd be interested... but it'll probably suck :/

    Yet more proof that anything anyone has ever done, IBM did first

    --
    --- Do you believe in the day?
  54. Re:Fully Blown?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The name... is Dumass.

  55. When I look at this I don't see a PDA... by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

    I see a way to massively increase the density of servers in my server cabinet.

    If it can run directly off a wall wort and accept a CAT5 cable instead of wireless, it's perfect as a (very) small office file server.

  56. It's all really cool but I only have 1 question by LeoDV · · Score: 1

    *How* *much*?

  57. As a former Psion 5mx owner... by OwnerOfWhinyCat · · Score: 5, Informative

    I can state for a fact it is possible to learn to touch-type on these little keyboards, but this is greatly affected by keyboard travel and the keyshapes giving good positioning feedback.

    On a regular keyboard I can break 80 words per minute pretty easily (up until about 2 a.m.), and on the Psion I was able to average about 25 w.p.m. with some considerable practice. The Psion however was designed with good keytravel, and the chopped pyramid keystyle gave comfortable tactile feedback as to how my hands were positioned.

    The essential ingredient to getting the speed up was increase one's (right to left) hand tilt to about 45 degrees and learn to stike the keys a little more with the outside edges of your fingers. The extra tilt works like the arms of an old manual typwriter letting typing elements that are normally to fat for the space they have to share swing into each other's flight paths to share (in the typewriter case a single spot) a smaller space.

    I would strongly caution anyone who needs typing speed against purchasing this online. Go to whatever computer store might stock such a thing and make sure that the tactile and positioning feedbacks are going to be sufficient for your needs. This will probably be at least a $1000 toy, so no-one is going to begrudge you a few 30 minute sessions standing in their store playing with it.

    1. Re:As a former Psion 5mx owner... by yomegaman · · Score: 2, Informative

      From the photos at the site it appears that the "enter" key is not on the home row, but rather one row above it. Bah!

      --
      ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
    2. Re:As a former Psion 5mx owner... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an original Series 5 owner, agreed. (The 5, or mine in particular, is a little too flexible under the spacebar, which tends to ruin the otherwise wonderful experience.)

      The thing is, this thing obviously has a rubberized chicklet arrangement, rather than the mostly-decent 'laptop' movement of the Psion. Microsofties have had 'good'/'geek' taste in continuing to push one-unit keyboarded form factors (vs. Palm, say)... but like many of the early HPCs, this suffers from the same horrid rubber keyboard.

      I assume this comes from the same 'big hand' engineering that brought us the XBox controller- I know some people who physically can't type on the 5 (and the Revo was even tinier) - given the larger spacing and higher physical resistance of the chicklet keys, perhaps they find it more suitable for fat-fingering?

      Thing is, of course, people come in different shapes and sizes... If you can't type on a 5's keyboard, it's time to give up and get a regular-sized subnotebook- you'd probably be happier, anyway.

  58. This was more promising but vaporware ... by adzoox · · Score: 1
    The OQO PC was much more promising and elegant than this:

    OQO Press release

    But as you will read that hasn't been updated in over a year.

    I'd agree with the posts about the Newton (excluding fanatics) that the Newton still holds it's own, even now because it can use 802.11 PC cards and play MP3's plus control iTunes

    To all that want a Pocket Computer - I would strongly suggest a top of the line Clie or The Sharp Zaurus

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  59. some alternatives by rewdy · · Score: 4, Informative
    with devices becoming smaller and smaller like this i give it a decade before these pda/laptop hybrids are so small you have to surgically attach your retina to the screen to see them. that's why i don't like devices like these, they're just too small.

    the ibm pc110 started it all back in the mid-90's. i have one actually. it's tiny, a pain in the ass to type on until you're used to it and terribly underpowered. i can imagine one of these things being more powerful, but even smaller? speaking from esperience, it'd make it useless to most every user (though i do admit, the server room maintenance idea was good). that's why i've been keeping my eye on similarly powerful machines of a usable size.

    the sony vaio u-101 is the brand new update to the vaio u series. most notably to the speed and memory enhancements it adds a lay-flat design and a display that rotated to landscape with the push of a button which is nice for reading e-books or any long document.

    and my favorite the jvc interlink mp-xp7230. also the latest in it's series. it's much larger than the vulcan and u-101 placing it at the smallest end of the sub-notebook category rather than a real mini-pc. i've used one of these and typing isn't even an issue. the pointing decive is a tried and true, blue, rubber nipple in the center of the keyboard with laptop-style mouse buttons along with a touch pad below the keyboard. no proprietary mega ports here. everything is seperate so there's no need for an expensive port replicator or converter dongle which we will all eventually loose.

    both of these devices have been mentioned before and linux runs perfectly on both aside from some yet to be reproduced proprietary features you'll never miss anyway. and for those of you worried about jvc's first forray into this area, i can tell you it ran rock solid both on and off ac power for three months wile the friend i borrowed it from was away at basic training.

    if the ink weren't still wet on my mortgage papers, i'd sure as hell have a jvc interlink mp-xp7230, fully expanded with an external cd-rw/dvd-rom.

  60. zaurus anyone? by hfastedge · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but its justa glorified tablet pc to me why? moving parts i dont care if its small if I cant throw it in my coat and go biking down the street.

    Id rather go with zaurus and 512-1gig of flash.

    Heres a post of mine detailing prices for some real Solid state storage: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=61888&cid=5803 961.

    --

    -- -- --

    Help my mini cause: My journal

  61. Zaurus, better and cheaper by Gothmolly · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My Zaurus 5500 does all these things, with the exeption of WinXP, although it DOES run bochs.. For $178 + $16 for screen protectors + $51 for a 10/100 card, and flashing with OpenZaurus 3.2, I get:

    206 MHz CPU, 64MB of RAM, 16 MB flash
    (you can even create swap to increase RAM)
    Linux
    320x240 full color GUI
    SSH client and server
    VNC client and server
    SMB client and server
    Apache
    MySQL
    Perl
    serial terminal
    Word/Excel compatibility
    Full functionality web browser
    IMAP/SSL email
    wireless, bluetooth or ethernet
    up to 1+ GB of directly accessible storage
    keyboard
    handwriting recognition
    Oggs/MP3s/_MPEGS_

    and it's about 1.5x the size (mostly increased length) of a Palm.
    Why do I need WinXP, or x86 compatibility? Am I going to develop for Win32 on this thing?

    It's all about what you need, and what tool will get you there.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:Zaurus, better and cheaper by genka · · Score: 1


      I have a Fujitsu P1110, and there are some things where it can't be touched by PDAs:
      1 Watch movies from HD
      2 Listen to music (a lot of it)
      3 Store pictures from digicam
      4 Navigation with all the maps you want
      5 More or less normal keyboard
      6 1024x600 display
      I noticed that it is 4x size of a PDA, but I need the functionality PDA can't provide

    2. Re:Zaurus, better and cheaper by g4dget · · Score: 1
      1 Watch movies from HD 2 Listen to music (a lot of it) 3 Store pictures from digicam 4 Navigation with all the maps you want

      You seem to be under the mistaken assumption that the Zaurus is very limited in terms of storage. But it has two slots (SD and CF), so you can put in several gigabytes of solid state or HD storage into it.

      5 More or less normal keyboard

      Get a PocketTop IR keyboard: it folds down to the size of the Zaurus but is suitable for touch typing.

      6 1024x600 display

      Yes, that the Zaurus doesn't have. The C700, however, has 640x480.

      The P1000 and P2000 series machines are really nice, but you underestimate what modern PDAs can do.

    3. Re:Zaurus, better and cheaper by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      My Zaurus 5500 does all these things ... For $178

      Where the hell do you shop, man?
      The cheapest I've seen the thing is $350.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    4. Re:Zaurus, better and cheaper by Lucky+Kevin · · Score: 1
      Where the hell do you shop, man?
      The cheapest I've seen the thing is $350.

      Home Shopping Network (of all places!) had a special a few weeks ago where the 5500 was $200. Luckily Sharp sent a note around beforehand and I snapped one up. Subscribe to Sharp's mailing list for upcoming specials.

      --
      Kevin
      "It's not the cough that carries you off, it's the coffin they carry you off in" O. Nash
    5. Re:Zaurus, better and cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TigerDirect.com has it for $200.00

    6. Re:Zaurus, better and cheaper by iamhassi · · Score: 1
      The Zaurus is a PDA, not a palmtop.

      not to mention the Vulcan handles a resolution 5x more than the Zaurus (800x480 vs 320x240), very important if you're going view websites since nearly every site is designed for at least 800 across. 320 would require quite a bit of scrolling.

      And we'll just ignore the fact that the Vulcan has a 20 gig hard drive verus the Zaurus's 64 meg.

      But hey, when you close your eyes, ignore the specs and keep mumbling "but it runs linux..." then they're identical!

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    7. Re:Zaurus, better and cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Where the hell do you shop, man?
      The cheapest I've seen the thing is $350.

      There's this new thing called 'the Internet'. Might want to check it out.

  62. Yes & you made his point for him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Yes & you made his point for him by Joehonkie · · Score: 1

      Since when is economic freedom the main point of the Left? Not saying that the Fingerlickans are pushing for it like they are supposed to be, but still...

  63. toshiba libretto ff 1100 by Zenex13 · · Score: 1

    I managed to get my hands on an older Libretto ff 1100. Absolutely awesome. It's a little old, so it runs a P266 w/ 128 ram, and boots win98 by default. The thing also has a USB port, SmartCard slot, and PCMCIA slot. It has a decent usable keyboard. Screen res is 800x480, which is, for me, fine to read on. I actually had to decrease the font size though to fit configuration windows on the screen (sometimes its just too short, and nobody designs programs for 640x480 screens anymore). Unfortunately, it was never sold in the US (except by Dynamism.com). Bablefished page is here (original). Scroll down for pics. The little orange thing on the right side of the screen is the mouse. The two buttons are on the back of the screen. Very usable, and original. Too bad you can't get these anywhere anymore. I run Linux on mine, with no problems.

  64. Three Success Factors by -tji · · Score: 4, Insightful

    - Decent price. It's not a full laptop, it's basically a mobility tool. Don't expect consumers to pay laptop prices.

    - Battery Life. Many similar devices are handicapped by their short power duration. Especially for a mobile/wireless device, the ability to run for a reasonable amount of time is key.

    - Broad WiFi access. This is outside of their control, but from the design, it appears they are counting on it. If WiFi rolls out as broadly as many think it will, this type of device will do a lot of business.

  65. Re:As Usual, Taking Credit Where None is Due QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bullshit. Post a link to a FULLY functional unit (PARTICULARLY with a screen with a usable horizontal resolution), or shut up.

  66. Vapor? by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

    Doesn't it seem there's another handheld, x86 compatible bit of vapor about every year or so?

  67. Wow, just what the world needs by gelfling · · Score: 1

    I am speechless. Wow. A smallish PC with a smallish screen, hard to type keyboard and a bunch of gewgaws.

  68. Reminds me of an HP200LX by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of the old HP200LX 80186 MS-DOS 5.0 based palmtop with PCMCIA. People were dying to get those back in the day. (I have 2 of them off ebay for about $50 each). You can run most of your favorite CGA-based apps on it's 640x200 16 shade grayscale LCD. A favorite is to run Police Quest and Space Quest. :)

    the $2000 price tag on this mini-pc is a bit steep. You could theoretically make one cheaper using one of the DIMM PC or simular products, and honestly the LCD isn't expensive, smaller LCDs are cheaper. getting a good battery and power friendly components are the only thing I see that could beef up this cost.

    We should just start a project to build our own out of dimmPC or MediaGX or VIA C3 processor and show those guys that it's not that hard to do at all!

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  69. I thought of making a computer to sell like this ! by zymano · · Score: 1

    Whats the price of it ?

  70. uses the transmeta CPU? by kraemer · · Score: 0

    So who thinks this thing will use the CPU from that other Vulcan Venture, Transmeta?

  71. It's a $2000 toy. by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Ah a fellow Psion owner. Psion's are great. I own a Revo myself. They keyboard on the 5mx is pretty nice even though it's tiny. I usually touch type with my first two fingers on each hand and do pretty well. (about 20wpm).

    It wouldn't be worth dropping $2k on this miniPC until you can get your hands on one and try it out. It looks significantly bigger than a Psion so this miniPC looks like it might not be as convient for portability.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  72. Small Screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't mind that the screen will be so small, it's just that with a resolution of 800 by 480, the text and icons may be too small to even read. With my glasses, I have pretty good vision and like 1024x768 on my 17" monitor. The 1280x1024 resolution has text and icons a little small for me but this thing will probably need a magnifying glass to do anything on.

  73. Say-Gah! by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Next thing you know people will only assume Genesis refers to the band...

    That's funny; I thought it was a 16-bit video game console.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  74. Wimp. by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    I usually use 12pt fonts on a 12.1" display (my ibook). I sit infront of that thing for hours (actually i lay on the couch and use it). 15" laptops are GROSS, i don't know why anyone would want such a beast.

    I suspect your eyestrain would be more from a crappy display on your 15" than the physical size of your text. Also it helps if you turn anti-aliasing OFF on any font smaller than 14pt. anti-aliasing tends to make LCDs more difficult to read than better. (because they have poorer constrast than a CRT).

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  75. The article says "Standard Laptop Keyboard" by pecosdave · · Score: 1

    isn't that an oxy-moron?

    I've never actually seen a standard emerge other than being generally QWERTY

    --
    The preceding post was not a Slashvertisement.
  76. One word. by clmensch · · Score: 1
    VAPORWARE

    (What else would you expect from an ex-Microsoftie?)

    --
    There is no gravity...the earth just sucks.
  77. There is no such word as "ITS'" by mindstrm · · Score: 2, Informative

    You never add an apostrophe AFTER the s, as you just suggested.

    Let's go over the rules for commas.

    1) Contractions: When two words are run together with letters ommitted -

    This question's difficult = This question is difficult.
    I can't understand = I can not understand.

    - In formal writing, contractions should be avoided.

    2) To indicate posession:
    John's book. The teacher's pen.

    - If the noun is plural AND ends in an S already, we put an apostrophe AFTER the final S
    "The students' books"
    "The teachers' lounge"

    - If the noun is plural and does NOT end in an S, we add an S after the apostrophe:
    The women's washroom

    - Indicating posession with names: (some variation in some schools on this)
    For an english name that ends in an S, you add 'S
    James's book.

    - For an english name ending in S but pronounced "iz", you just add an apostrophe after the final S
    Bridges' play. (because we don't prounce it "Bridgeses play, it sounds wrong.. but Jameses sounds okay)

    The killer: ITS and IT'S (there is no its')

    ITS (no apostrophe) indicates posession. Always. There is never an apostrophe when we want to talk about something belonging to IT. Yes, this is totally backwards.
    IT'S means IT IS or IT HAS (basically a regular contraction)

    ALSO: NEVER add an apostrophe when changing something to the plural, ie:
    1990s, not "1990's",
    My celeron 500s temperature, not "My celeron 500's temperature", and so on.

    1. Re:There is no such word as "ITS'" by xigxag · · Score: 1

      Let's go over the rules for commas.

      Sigh. ITYM "apostrophes".

      Okay, here's my question. How many times did you go over your post to make sure it was perfect? No misspellings, no out of place periods, commas, etc.

      Then you hit "reply".

      Then: "D'oh!"

      Another poor sucker burned by his own spelling/grammar flame!

      This is of course a universal law, but if it has a name, I'm not aware of it. Maybe "Teh Backdraft Efect"?

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    2. Re:There is no such word as "ITS'" by Xabraxas · · Score: 1

      actually if you want to be technical your statement, "My celeron 500s temperature" is incorrect and the statement, "My celeron 500's temperature" is correct. you are not talking about your many celeron 500 processors, you are talking about your processor' s temperature. it is possesive not plural.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    3. Re:There is no such word as "ITS'" by Snover · · Score: 1

      You know, it would be a lot easier to just link to this.

      --

      [insert witty comment here]
  78. Sony U3, Just a bit bigger. by Jagasian · · Score: 1

    Sony has a line of tiny laptops that are so small, you can hold them in one hand. Check it out.

  79. Wonder what this would look like... by HoldmyCauls · · Score: 1

    ...in comparison to a cell phone...?

    for the humor impaired: ;)

    --
    Emacs: for people who just never know when to :q!
  80. Wow! by E1v!$ · · Score: 1

    It's almost as small as the transmeta sonys! That's INCREDIBLE! AWE STRIKING!

    I have to pee!

  81. sharp too by zome · · Score: 1

    sharp actius mm10. My friend just bought one. 2.1lbs, 0.5" thick..
    http://www.transmetazone.com/articleview. cfm?artic leID=1348

  82. April's fool! by amentia · · Score: 1

    The article about running linux on a N64 is an april's fool joke.

  83. Vulcan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The word on the streets of Seattle is that Vulcan is a joke and has never made dime.

    More funny, Allen's girlfriend runs the company at her whim (again, with profits being a non-issue).

    The environment has been described as a high school popularity contest.

    They are oh-so-appropriately located right next to Amazon.com.

  84. Size and Voice by Enkerli · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The issue of size seems to be a difficult one, especially with any device requiring visual I/O. How about voice? A cell-phone size would do. Speech recognition and synthesis are coming along and there's a lot you can do with your voice. Dictate something, have it read back, edit it, send it. Look for info using standardized commands. Play audio games... ;-)

    --
    Alexandre http://enkerli.wordpress.com/
  85. Talk for yourself. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    I, my wife and my dog can use Graffitti proficiently.

    Perhaps not good enough to write a novel, but good enough to jolt a note or write a phone number (which is what a PDA is suppossed to help you with in the first place).

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Talk for yourself. by lactose99 · · Score: 1

      My only problem with Graffiti is that it doesn't learn from the user. I think we are a few years off from including a learned method of input in a PDA, but I do find many instances where I try to write an "x" and it comes out as an "h" or a "p" on my Handspring Visor. This is after using my Visor daily for the last 2 or so years (probably need to get an upgraded model, since 2 years is nearly abacus-equivalency in the PDA world).

      --
      Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
  86. Re:type fast on that keyboarding thingy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just hope they gave it an alternative keyboard layout, eg. Dvorak!! Oh, and a choice video card would be OK too.. I don't like my media playback jerky-style.

  87. I already have one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its called a Zaurus.

  88. Well by mindstrm · · Score: 1

    Thanks for sorting that out... Now nobody will be confused by my typo and think I was talking about commas. Your post was so.. meaningful.

    And as for how many times I proofread: none

    Feel better now?

    1. Re:Well by xigxag · · Score: 1

      Thanks for sorting that out... Now nobody will be confused by my typo and think I was talking about commas.

      I didn't think anyone was confused. Did I give you that impression? Rather, I simply find it interesting to note the general rule of thumb -- that posts designed to correct grammatical errors tend to have a higher than normal probability of having grammatical errors themselves.

      I'm certainly not the first person to note this, see here, here, and here. Nor, unfortunately, will I be the last.

      If somehow you got out of my comment that I was looking to make an example specifically of you, or to expose you to ridicule, well, that wasn't the case. Actually, your post was both informative and interesting, and by virtue of the typo, funny to boot.

      And I do feel better now, thanks for asking!

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
  89. Small laptops by genka · · Score: 1

    I used to have Toshiba Libretto with 800x400 screen. 400 pixel isn't enough to dispaly some Windows XP dialog boxes. "Autohide" for taskbar helps in some situations. I upgraded to Fujitsu P1110, and I am mostly happy with it. Touchscreen really helps.

  90. Great for travelers by rollingcalf · · Score: 1

    I would have loved something like this when I was traveling frequently on business. It's not great for regular use, but it sure beats lugging around a laptop. As for the tiny keys, it has USB so you should be able to just pop in a USB keyboard.

    --
    ---------
    There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
  91. or check out... by g4dget · · Score: 2, Informative
    Or check out Dynamism, or Oqo, or Tiqit, or Antelope, or the Sharp MM10, or the Sharp C700. There are plenty of tiny computers out there, many of which even run Windows XP.

    It's all a trade-off between power, size, and cost. And it doesn't look like Vulcan has any better technology than anybody else.

  92. The ergonomics are just wrong. by Dr.+Mu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sure it looks neat -- like a mini laptop with teeny tiny keys. It's so cute! But even ignoring the tiny keys for a moment, just how do you use this thing? Do you balance it in one hand while typing with the other? I don't think so! That's about as awkward an arrangement as I can imagine. But what's the point of having one if you have to set it on a desk to use it? And when you're typing, your hands will be right it front of the screen, blocking it from view. This isn't radical, it isn't innovative, and I submit that it's not even useful.

  93. You *can* touch-type on a keyboard this small! by RevAaron · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You *can* touch-type on a keyboard this small. Up until just recently, I was using a Jornada 720 for a lot of things, and it is about the size of this MiniPC. I could touch-type quite easily- and after a couple hours of getting used to it, was typing about as fast as I do on my iBook or on a desktop. I could type fast enough to use it as a definate iBook replacement- I used it for writing papers in LaTeX, coded, web browsing, SSH/telnet, email, even running apps remotely with XFree86. (And yes, all under WinCE)

    However, I do notice one huge difference between this miniPC and the Jornada720 (or a Psion)- the keyboard of the latter was meant for touch typing, while the miniPC's keyboard doesn't look like it was. Look at a photo of it, and it looks to have little rubber chicklet keys rather than a regular low-travel spring keyboard mechanism. A keyboard built like a real one, just 25% smaller than full size, is why people can type so fast on a Psion or a Jornada 720.

    The only reason I don't use it still is the screen isn't reflective like you find on most color PDAs now, making it useless during the summer, when I do these computing tasks outside on the porch or in the woods up against a tree.

    Why can't one company make a device that does what so many of these different new small computers are aiming for? All of them seem to have some imperfection-

    1. The Sharp Zaurus C700: The keyboard mechanism and size is way too small for doing any real typing on. It is a thumboard, although one slightly bigger than on the SL-5500. I guess a PXA255 XScale CPU instead of the PXA250 would be nice too.

    2. The OQO may never come out, but would be damn close to the perfect thing if a good, yet small (75% of 'full size', size of most Psion and Jornada 720 keyboard) attachable keyboard is available.

    3. This miniPC has the bad kind of keyboard and cannot be configured into a tablet mode like the C700. There doesn't appear to be a touch screen, so it does seem that the Vulcan folks really weren't thinking, and didn't consider a tablet mode. Any computer aiming to take the place of both a notebook and a PDA really should accomodate the wide variety of situations that are hindered by a keyboard that isn't needed hanging around by allowing the user to hide it and operate the computer with a touchscreen.

    4. Almost all TabletPCs are too damn big.

    --

    Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  94. Re:As Usual, Taking Credit Where None is Due QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    here

    Today, go to dynamism.com for under 2 pound computers.

    Beyond that, stop bullshitting yourself--you are clearly completely out of touch.

  95. As opposed to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...a non-functional one?

  96. Re:Fully functional miniature... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, well... troll, again... maybe humour was a passing fad, who knows?

    Maybe I change to sadder figure, too... but not now! :-)

    Humour is fun, humour is life!

    You pathetic moderators, don't stay sad, get a life!

  97. Re:Zaurus C700 between, still better than vulcan by tz · · Score: 1

    The C700 is available form Dynamism (otherwise still only in Japan). Runs Linux 2.4.18 with some embedded patches, and uses an ARM XScale processor, but comes with Hancom office clone apps. Just slightly larger than the 5500.

    The screen is tremendous. Touch sensitive, VGA (640x480, 16 bit depth) and brighter than most laptops. And it pivots 180 degrees from landscape/laptop to portrait/PDA mode.

    And it has a qwerty touch keyboard that seems to be like the vulcan - I can touch type with two or three fingers per hand, but there are external keyboards.

    Battery life and compatibility with hardware are very good.

    The Vulcan may run the XP Bloatware, but I probably have more things on my Zaurus than would fit on the V. And Bloatware eats batteries unless it runs glacially instead of merely slow and there isn't that much room for a batteries. The Vulcan is 800x480, but that is still not that much bigger and an unusual aspect ratio.

    [Bloatware Battery Bludgeoning is a matter of physics and why WinCE devices will never beat Palm, with the Zaurus in the middle - CE executes far more instructions, so does more cycles and the rest is physics - to the point that the power consumption goes up with the square of the clock speed]

    It may be interesting to see though. Especially if they can get Linux running. But they don't mention any CF or PCMCIA for hardware.

  98. some people by dollargonzo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...make up for SOME things with big computers...oh wait

    --
    BSD is for people who love UNIX. Linux is for those who hate Microsoft.
  99. Re:SARS is punishment for leftists! by Uber+Banker · · Score: 1

    So Canada [democratic], Hong Kong [democratic weighted towards capitalism, no communism in sight], and Singapore [democratic capitalism] are socialist?

    That about Cuba [communist socialist] the UK [a socialist party in government, you know socialist isn't equal to communist huh???!!!] France [socialist] Germany [socialist] Finland [socialist] Sweden [socialist]....... all don't have SARS

    And Hong Kong, Singapore are far more capitalist than most western european countires.

    I guess they all have yellow skin so must be socialist, huh?

  100. This is kind of a posting "black hole" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once you get a -1, nobody will see your post and you're doomed to stay -1 for good.

    Check everything2 to see what a troll really is.

  101. Sucky ergonomics of the small keyboard by alumshubby · · Score: 1

    If it's a small, minimally functional personal computer you want, but you can't deal with typing on a keyboard that small, the AlphaSmart Dana might be a workable alternative. I'm thinking about getting one instead of a conventional laptop.

    --
    "How many light bulbs does it take to change a person?" --BMcC-->
  102. Unfortunately the Zaurus software sucks. by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    What can I say. I've got a Zaurus, I also have a Psion S5 and the Psion software is at least 3 years ahead of the Zaurus. Unfortunately, the screen died on the Psion after 5 years of constant use, prompting a replacement.

    That's OK though, cos the main competition (Palm and WinCE) are just as shit as well.

    It's really difficult to go from a high quality palmtop like the Psion to something that's been cobbled together like the Zaurus. I mean, for christ's sake, the spreadsheet can't even draw charts or graphs. The word processor can barely be called a word processor, it doesn't support styles, never mind embedding charts or tables. It doesn't even spellcheck. The agenda and addressbook are similarly basic compared to the Psion equivalents.

    The keyboard on the Zaurus sucks, but is better than not having a keyboard at all. The Zaurus UI requires constant switching between keys and pen taps, there's no quick way to switch between applications. In short, it's a shite system for day to day use as a PDA, a real step backwards.

    And you know what? The Psion does it better in 8Mb of RAM (with plenty spare) and an 18MHz CPU.

    The one benefit the Zaurus has over the 6 year old Psion S5 is connectivity.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  103. Linux by DoctorPepper · · Score: 1

    I just left an email on their site, asking if it would be able to run Linux. I'll bet that if enough of us (politely!) asked this question, they might consider it.

    --

    No matter where you go... there you are.
  104. The competition from Big Blue by jwold · · Score: 2, Informative

    IBM Research's Metapad is similar in form factor. I really like this size for the power and the screen resolution (800x480) is just right to be useful and scalable.

  105. Re:To type fast, use a USB keyboard by billstewart · · Score: 2, Informative
    To type fast on one of these things, plug in a full-sized or semi-compact USB or Bluetooth keyboard, as well as plugging in a monitor if you want. For most applications, if you're not sitting at a desk, you don't need to type all that fast, though there are occasional exceptions like taking notes in a meeting or working on an airplane.

    If you want some kind of fancy chordboard or touchpad thing, fine; one that I like is the Half Keyboard which uses the QWERT half of a keyboard and a shift key, and has one model with USB for Macs and also a wrist-mount version, but it's not usually necessary to do silly things.

    What I didn't see mentioned was an Ethernet interface (though USB frobs can work) or any discussion of power (batteries? 3-pound AC power bricks? battery lifetime?) or price, but I assume that everything except price will be reasonable.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  106. Is that a BeoWulfPack? by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Sorry....

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  107. Re:As Usual, Taking Credit Where None is Due QWZX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, both those units are MUCH larger than what we're talking about.

    In other words, bullshit.

  108. Vaporware? by YetAnotherName · · Score: 1

    At least this one's less vaporous than the Oqo, which, whenever it may be released, will be no more powerful than any of the remote controls on my coffee table.

  109. Nail on the head. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it weren't for that crappy space bar, and the fact that it won't charge the batteries even though the powersupply was obviously specd. for the job I'd still have mine. Gave it the good college try, got Linux to boot, got X up, picked up a 256Meg flash card when they were the second largest size, but in the end it was just a hair too annoying.

    A real dissappointment considering my investment in time and energy. I can however recommend them as the ultimate portable terminal. There was nothing quite like walking up to a box (router, firewall, prinserver, faxserver what-have-you) with a serial port, pulling it out of my pocket to have it instantly wake up, setting the baud rate, and configuring the device. No unpacking the laptop, fiddling with cables, finding a decent place to sit (so that one might have a lap). Too easy. I miss that.

  110. Re:To type fast, use a USB keyboard by HR · · Score: 1

    What I didn't see mentioned was an Ethernet interface The specs say 802.11b wireless for network access.
    battery lifetime? just says: Optimized battery-life allows full day use

  111. Ether vs. 802.11 by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Yes, it did say 802.11. There are times that's what you want, but since this seems to be a relatively expensive small machine rather than a cheap small machine, some of the market for it will be specialized applications like system administrators who need to be able to plug it in to various networks to measure things. You can do USB internet if you want, and USB2.0 is even fast enough to support a fast ethernet (as opposed to 12 Mbps max), but it's somewhat annoying.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks