Slashdot Mirror


Tales From The Perilous Realm

honestpuck writes "I find it surprising that with the current popularity of the The Lord of The Rings movies and subsequent rise in sales of the trilogy and The Hobbit that so few bookshops stock more of the Professor's other works. Fortunately this volume makes it easier. It puts four of his works in one, Farmer Giles of Ham, The Adventures of Tom Bombadil Leaf By Niggle and Smith of Wootton Major." The first and fourth of these I've read elsewhere (and enjoyed), so I'm glad to learn of the other two. Read on for honestpuck's capsule description of each. Tales From The Perilous Realm author J.R.R. Tolkein pages 192 publisher Harper Collins rating 9 reviewer Tony Williams ISBN 0261103431 summary Excellent short stories and poetry from a master story-tellet Farmer Giles of Ham This is a marvelous tale of a reluctant, and accidental, hero and a dragon who doesn't quite live up to the stereotype. The style is a little old fashioned, making it seem more like the fairy tales of your childhood than even The Hobbit, with a dry sense of humour. That said, it also seems to be the hardest for a child to enjoy (my sample size is only two, however), though personally I liked it when I first read it and enjoy it still.. It is the longest of the four works and by far the earliest written and published, 1949. The Adventures of Tom Bombadil The Adventures is a collection of 16 assorted poems, most are either partially quoted or referred to in The Lord Of The Rings. The poems are a mixed bag, ranging from the short and amusing "Oliphaunt" through to the more adult and wistful "The Last Ship" that closes the collection. All are enjoyable for the adult reader, some enjoyable for children. Iâ(TM)ve never really liked Tolkienâ(TM)s verse when he tries to be serious, in this collection I only really like "Oliphaunt." Leaf By Niggle The shortest of the three stories, in this one Niggle, whose dreams far outweigh his talent, sets out to paint the perfect tree and is caught up in his own variation of the Pygmalion myth (though it is a tree that comes to life.) It is a marvelously written tale that unfolds beautifully. Smith of Wootton Major My favourite of them all, a tale in which Smith voyages to the land of the faeries via a magical cake. Another story that revolves around the dreams and fantasies in a life. This one is a perfect fairy tale and perfect for reading aloud to a small person, full of magic and charm and whimsy it brings to mind everything I loved about The Hobbit. Conclusion

While the three tales and 16 poems all have their differences there is certainly a distinctive style across them all. Just a little old-fashioned, a little formal - in fact almost exactly how you'd expect an Oxford Professor to write fiction. This volume is worth reading, and an enjoyable read but does not quite have the magnificence of language in The Lord of The Rings nor the wonderful light touch of well-crafted children's tale in The Hobbit. They are good short pieces, that sort of excellence is hard to craft into such short works.

Anyone who enjoyed The Hobbit will find this a wonderful volume. Tolkein always talked of writing both The Hobbit and The Lord of The Rings as a way of creating truly English myth and fairy tales (he felt that Arthur was too much a tale borrowed from the French). While both of those 'grew in the telling,' this small volume gives us three marvelous (and English in feel) fairy tales and some good poetry. A must for all Tolkein fans.

Tales from the Perilous Realm is harder to find than Tolkein's better-known works, but is available from online merchants including Amazon. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

246 comments

  1. Who's Tom Bombadill? by MoxCamel · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sorry, just watched the DVD again, didn't see him. Anything other than the movie just isn't canon. :P

    1. Re:Who's Tom Bombadill? by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 1

      Why, he's one of the Lords of the Rhymes. Word!

    2. Re:Who's Tom Bombadill? by rleibman · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Sorry, just watched the DVD again, didn't see him. Anything other than the movie just isn't canon. :P

      Why, oh why, isn't there a mod for "Sad".

    3. Re:Who's Tom Bombadill? by zentigger · · Score: 1, Interesting

      heheh, while we're at it, I thik we need a mod for "-1 dumbass!"

      --

      the above is my personal opinion and does not necessarily reflect that of the little voices in my head

    4. Re:Who's Tom Bombadill? by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      He's better known as Tim Benzedrine.

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    5. Re:Who's Tom Bombadill? by mbogosian · · Score: 5, Informative

      Who's Tom Bombadil?

      Gene Hargrove has one answer, but it will only make sense if you've at least read the Lord of the Rings.

    6. Re:Who's Tom Bombadill? by MoxCamel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >> heheh, while we're at it, I thik we need a mod for "-1 dumbass!"

      Yeah...for the dumbasses who reply to the original post thinking it's a serious question.

    7. Re:Who's Tom Bombadill? by johndiii · · Score: 1

      Bored of the Rings is great, but I really wish that they had republished the original illustrations in the new edition. I really miss them. I also wish that I could find my copy (bought in 1977 or 1978) with the pictures. Envision the sheepriders...

      --
      Floating face-down in a river of regret...and thoughts of you...
    8. Re:Who's Tom Bombadill? by mbogosian · · Score: 5, Informative

      Steuard Jensen has a differing opinion. Both Hargrove's and Jensen's essays are referenced in the The Encyclopedia of Arda entry.

      From William D. B. Loos' essay:

      As to Tom's nature, there are several schools of thought.

      He was a Maia (the most common notion). The reasoning here is plain: given the Middle-earth cast of characters as we know it, this is the most convenient pigeonhole in which to place him (and Goldberry as well) (most of the other individuals in The Lord of the Rings with "mysterious" origins: Gandalf, Sauron, Wizards, and Balrogs did in fact turn out to be Maiar).

      He was IlÃvatar. The only support for this notion is on theological grounds: some have interpreted Goldberry's statement to Frodo (F: "Who is Tom Bombadil?" G: "He is.") as a form of the Christian "I am that am", which really could suggest the Creator. Tolkien rejected this interpretation quite firmly.

      T.A. Shippey (in The
      Road to Middle-earth) and others have suggested that Tom is a one-of-a-kind type. This notion received indirect support from Tolkien himself....

      For the ill-informed conspiracy theorists out there, you might wish to read this.

      And for those of you who say that public schools aren't turning out good work, you may wish to visit a less meticulous analysis (author unknown) from DPS.

    9. Re:Who's Tom Bombadill? by haystor · · Score: 2, Funny

      I have it on good authority that he later changed his name to John Galt.

      --
      t
    10. Re:Who's Tom Bombadill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, it is pretty fucking sad that you didn't get the joke.

    11. Re:Who's Tom Bombadill? by rleibman · · Score: 1

      I don't get why I got modded to offtopic. The fact that tom bombadill wasn't in the movie was modded as funny, I think it was sad, and with mod points I would have liked to mod it up as sad.

    12. Re:Who's Tom Bombadill? by 2logic · · Score: 1
      From what I've heard, Tom Bombadil represents Tolkein himself.

      You see, our good friend JRR created this world and wrote these stories for his children. The hobbits (small, inocent and candide) would seem to represent his children discovering his world. Okay, children don't usually have furry feet, but bare with me...

      The fact that Tom Bombadil is able to see into the future, that he sings enchanted songs and especially the fact that he is not affected by the One Ring show that is "above and beyond" the powers in action in Middle Earth. Might he be the creator of it all?

      Who knows really besides JRR? Or should I say Tom?

      --
      // TODO
    13. Re:Who's Tom Bombadill? by Arker · · Score: 1

      Funny that Loos doesn't even mention Hargroves argument though. It seems to me by far the strongest.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    14. Re:Who's Tom Bombadill? by csguy314 · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting essay, but I actually liked Tom Bombadill in the book. I was a little disappointed the whole ancient forest adventure was cut out. It would have interesting to see Peter Jackson's interpretation of his character.

      --
      This is left as an exercise for the reader.
    15. Re:Who's Tom Bombadill? by mbogosian · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting essay, but I actually liked Tom Bombadill in the book. I was a little disappointed the whole ancient forest adventure was cut out. It would have interesting to see Peter Jackson's interpretation of his character.

      I agree with you. I think he's an enjoyable literary character. However, I do see why the filmmakers decided to omit him from the films. I don't know if his implied significance could translate well to the big screen. If it couldn't, he would merely be a distraction. At 3.5 hours per film (remember that the theatrical versions were truncated), distractions are probably a bad thing. :-)

    16. Re:Who's Tom Bombadill? by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      I read somewhere once that a normal movie covers roughly about 40 pages of a novel.

      Given how massive the trilogy is, it shouldn't surprise me. Also remember that, for the movie to sell well, they had to get to some good action before the end of the first one. Sitting around for six hours while Tom Bombadil relates some geneaologies from the Old Testament isn't exactly much of a "WOW" factor.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    17. Re:Who's Tom Bombadill? by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      > The fact that Tom Bombadil is able to see into
      > the future, ... and especially the fact that he
      > is not affected by the One Ring show that he
      > is "above and beyond" the powers in action in
      > Middle Earth.

      Bobby the Barbarian: Dungeon Master!

      > he is not affected by the One Ring

      Beyond the ring! Even Cate Blanchette was affected by it.

      Imagine...

      Cate (in hyper-hot ghostly form): I have seen the power, but I have the will to...too...

      history shifts

      Cate: ...to...to seize the power! I shall rule with an iron fist that even Sauron cannot imagine!

      Frodo: Uh oh

      Cate: And I shall make you my sexual slave for the next ten thousand years.

      Frodo: ...ok!

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  2. Probably because of Chris's publications by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think the reluctance of shops to stock Prof Toliens other material is because of the constant issues of his dad's notes and half finished tales that Christopher Tolkien dished out for so many years. I think the LotR is brilliant, but I haven't got time to read through anyones 'works in progress'.

    --

    "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
  3. Re:Whoops... by cmeans · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Also, you'll note that the whole site below that article is in italics now :) Methinks a /I tag is needed somewhere in the article heading.

  4. inga tengwa by Stargoat · · Score: 5, Funny

    First post, in Elvish.

    --
    Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    1. Re:inga tengwa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      First post, in Elvish.

      You must get all the ladies.

    2. Re:inga tengwa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First post, in Elvish.

      You mean the language that Elvis Presley spoke after eating too many cheese burgers?

      :p

    3. Re:inga tengwa by Noren · · Score: 3, Funny

      Thank you, Larry Groznic.

    4. Re:inga tengwa by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Yes, but remember the Elvish ladies all look like Cate Blanchette and Liv Tyler -- and they've thousands of years of practicing the gentler arts of love, if you know what I mean.

      So, sir, you lose! Good day!

      I said, "Good day!"

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  5. Why surprised? by Chris_Stankowitz · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Its the fact that LoTR series has been made into Motion Pictures that is rasing the sales of the books. Maybe if some of his other works were made into TV series (not sure how well that would work) or also motion pics then his other works would sell.

    It should be noted though that the sales of his other books have risen. They obviously just havn't sold as much as the LoTR series.

    1. Re:Why surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Maybe if some of his other works were made into TV series...

      Yeah, I can just see it now. "Survivor: Middle Earth"

  6. It's all about punctuation by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The Adventures of Tom Bombadil Leaf By Niggle and Smith of Wootton Major

    Did anyone else read this as just a very long title? Goes to show that commas still have importance in the English language.

    1. Re:It's all about punctuation by _newwave_ · · Score: 1

      You don't edit Tolkein!

    2. Re:It's all about punctuation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I was tying to parse that and finally gave up and decided to just click the link and read on anyway. I mean, I had some theories as to the possible groupings of the words.

      It's strange, because this isn't a case of then/than confusion or mispelling "definitely"... this is a really confusing. Didn't somebody look at the article between the time that the submitter typed the words and the article was posted?

    3. Re:It's all about punctuation by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      The big problem is the fact that the "and" is emphasized. If it were

      The Adventures of Tom Bombadil Leaf By Niggle and Smith of Wootton Major

      you'd have parsed it correctly (though, yes, while one doesn't always have to put a comma after the penultimate item in a series, when the series is of phrases or clauses, especially titles, one should).

    4. Re:It's all about punctuation by Suidae · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I just figured it was one book entitled 'The Adventures of Tom Bombadil Leaf' written by two guys named Niggle and Smith from some place called 'Wootton Major'

    5. Re:It's all about punctuation by Earlybird · · Score: 3, Informative
      The big problem is the fact that the "and" is emphasized.

      No, the big problem is that it's incorrectly written and typeset.

      Not only is there a comma missing after "Bombadil", the titles are not emphasized correctly. Quotation marks or emphasis should be used to clearly demarcate the titles. Since the story text itself is in italics, the titles should be in roman (ie., upright) type to set them apart. The correct formatting and grammar, therefore, would be:

      • "... It puts four of his works in one, Farmer Giles of Ham, The Adventures of Tom Bombadil, Leaf By Niggle and Smith of Wootton Major."
      Of course, this is probably asking too much from the average Slashdot editor geek type.
    6. Re:It's all about punctuation by Spunk · · Score: 0, Informative

      Yeah, so did I

    7. Re:It's all about punctuation by Osty · · Score: 1

      I did worse than that. Given Tolkien's fondness of subtitles ("The Hobbit, or There and Back Again"), I figured it was one single title called Farmer Giles of Ham, the Adventures of Tom Bombadil Leaf by Niggle and Smith of Wooton Major, implying that Tom Bombadil Leaf (whoever that is) has a secret identity as Farmer Giles of Ham, and his adventures would be written in the second person by two guys named Niggle and Smith from some fictional Wooton Major somewhere in Middle Earth. I couldn't quite figure out how that translated into four different stories. My guess was that it would be like The Silmarillion, where it's technically a single book, but it's really a whole bunch of different stories.


      Punctuation is good. Use it to avoid these kinds of mistakes. And while we're at it, punctuation can be bad, too. It's not a case of more == better, but correct use == readable.

    8. Re:It's all about punctuation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreeing with someone's post is informative? Holy shit.

    9. Re:It's all about punctuation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah that was pretty fucking cool of Spunk to manage to be modded up for that!

    10. Re:It's all about punctuation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please let me Metamoderate that...

    11. Re:It's all about punctuation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      quite. But now I am rather hoping that someone mods you up too to increase the irony factor.

    12. Re:It's all about punctuation by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      > Didn't somebody look at the article between the
      > time that the submitter typed the words and the
      > article was posted?

      Mod: -10,000 Redundant

      I heard when you sign up as a Slashdot paid subscriber, they actually issue you a laminated card with that phrase on it.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    13. Re:It's all about punctuation by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      The only difference between our two postings is that I did not realize that "Leaf by Niggle" was a separate title from Tom Bombadil.

    14. Re:It's all about punctuation by Earlybird · · Score: 1
      The only difference between our two postings is that I did not realize that "Leaf by Niggle" was a separate title from Tom Bombadil.

      -- Which illustrates how badly formatted the story text in fact is. QED, really.

    15. Re:It's all about punctuation by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Which illustrates how badly formatted the story text in fact is. QED, really.

      No argument from me. You've got it.

  7. He is your personal jesus christ by arcite · · Score: 2, Funny

    Think of a Jesus Christ figure prancing through the woods with golden curls who defeats his enemies through song... then you have Tom Bombadill. Truly, a king among middle earth men. :D

    1. Re:He is your personal jesus christ by L.+VeGas · · Score: 4, Funny

      Think of a Jesus Christ figure prancing through the woods with golden curls who defeats his enemies through song.

      There actually are scenes with him (played by Richard Simmons) in the extended version available on DVD. They had to cut them because he kept bursting into tears.

    2. Re:He is your personal jesus christ by Cheetahfeathers · · Score: 1

      He's the section of the book where you skip and rather than lose something of the story, it adds to it. Just like the songs and poems in there. Tolkien's books really need a 'good parts version'. ;)

    3. Re:He is your personal jesus christ by 5.11Climber · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wouldn't put him in the class of men. I believe that he is treated more as a spirit from the first age though his origins are a bit cloudy.

      --
      Arf!
    4. Re:He is your personal jesus christ by Matrix272 · · Score: 3, Funny

      If there was a mod called "Scary" I would give you +5 points...

      Richard Simmons in Lord of the Rings? Oh dear god, what has the world come to?

      --
      "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
    5. Re:He is your personal jesus christ by L.+VeGas · · Score: 1

      What I though was even stranger was Emmanuel Lewis playing Gollum. You can read about that here.

    6. Re:He is your personal jesus christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. He's been around from when the world was sung into existance by the Ainur. Kind of like Gandalf, really.

      However, I wouldn't really compare him to Martin Gore.

    7. Re:He is your personal jesus christ by banzai51 · · Score: 1

      Tom is the final cutoff point between the childlike Hobbit story and the adult story with real consequences in LoTR. Plus, Tom re-enforces Tolkien's theme of art, song, and nature having magical power.

    8. Re:He is your personal jesus christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Riiiiiight...

      As someone that owns the extended DVD to Fellowship, and who has watched through all the featurettes and browsed a good portion of the bonus pictures and concept sketches, I've never seen this.

      IIRC good old Tom was cut very early on, probably when Peter Jackson was still working on a 2 film pitch to the studios. There's just too much time spent with Tom for so little gain (only thing are the hobbits' swords and a visit on the trip back) that in the final film was just Strider dropping swords on the ground when the Nazgul attacked for the first time.

    9. Re:He is your personal jesus christ by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1


      I wouldn't put him in the class of men.

      so richard simmons would be a perfect fit!

      Ha! I kill me. Dial 10-10-220

  8. reading aloud by trillian42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One of my favorite childhood memories is my dad reading The Hobbit and the Lord of the Rings out loud to me and my younger brother. I'm glad other people are doing that with their kids also, and it's cool that there are more Tolkein stories to delve into. :)

    1. Re:reading aloud by L.+VeGas · · Score: 4, Funny

      I used to get a huge kick out of telling my two sons that I was reading from The Hobbit and the Lord of the Rings. I was really just holding the book and telling them old "I Dream of Jeanie" episodes.
      --------
      trillian42's dad

    2. Re:reading aloud by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, and the best part is that by the time you're finished, they're old enough to drive!

      j/k - I've got 3 kids under 15 months, and can't wait to read to them....

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    3. Re:reading aloud by THX-1139 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Tolkien's works are meant to be read aloud, far more so than the other authors of his genre. He drew his inspiration from ancient works that began as oral traditions. He also participated in regular reading of his material with the Inklings and elsewhere. Some of these readings have been preserved and are a must-listen for any Tolkien fan.

      I don't think I truly appreciated Tom Bombadil, the Ent's war song, or Gollum's "gollum" until I heard Tolkien bringing them to life.

    4. Re:reading aloud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I was really just holding the book and telling
      > them old "I Dream of Jeanie" episodes.

      Sam Kinison: That Major Nelson didn't know how to use Jeanie right. If I were "Master", I'd have her get down on her knees and grow her tongue ten feet long and lick my ass from across the room.

  9. Really good book: Simarillian by MurrayTodd · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Simarillian is a must-have for anyone interested in Tolkien's world. It was actually his FIRST work, predating the Hobbit, but people told him it wouldn't sell. It was an ongoing work and his son (Christopher) edited and published it after his death.

    It goes through all the history from "In the Beginning there was darkness" sort of Genisis to the final history of Aragorn and Arwen. There you learn about where Gandolf comes from, what the Wizards really are (same tier of age as Balrogs, interestingly) as well as Soron's predecessor, Melkor.

    Repeat VERY GOOD BOOK TO HAVE!!!!

    --
    Murray Todd Williams
    1. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by CableModemSniper · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just a word to the wise, it ain't exactly light reading. Its practically the ME equivalent of the Bible, and reads similiarly in terms of style.

      --
      Why not fork?
    2. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by AnswerIs42 · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the book "Unfinished Tails"? It is almost like excerpts.. but they go into more details for certain tails. From what I remember about the preface, it was stuff Tolken had written, but then took out because he felt it was too much information for the overall story.

    3. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by mike_mgo · · Score: 2, Informative

      While I own it and have read it a couple of times, it's not a great book. It's very useful as a reference to learn about the things you mentioned, but it is not a compelling story and I doubt it would have sold very well if it had to stand on its own merits

    4. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by tuffy · · Score: 2, Informative

      And, of course, if you loved "the Silmarillion", it's good to check out "the Book of Lost Tales" 1 and 2 (especially 2) and the "Lays of Beleriand". All of them tend toward the serious, but they also feature more epic grandeur and fantasy than the more down-to-earth Tolkien works like "Lord of the Rings". I highly recommend them, but they're definitely not light reading by any means.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    5. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit, I imagine it is "tales" and not "tails".

    6. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree completely that "The Silmarillion" is /the/ Tolkien book to have... but wish to add that not only is it the "first" Middle-Earth book, it's also the last... the Professor never finished it, and it was "completed" and released by Christopher Tolkien.

      I think it is magnificent.

    7. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Silmarillion is the only Tolkien work I actually enjoy reading. Tolkien crafts his worlds with an attention to detail that borders on the obsessive, and this is what makes his worlds so rich. Unfortunately, he writes his novels in a similar manner: he details even the smallest, slightest detail with too many words. Quite simply, his writing is boring. He is not a good author, and his prose style is so horribly pedantic that without the strength of the world, his books would have long ago been thrown upon the rubbish heap.

      The Silmarillion is not a novel. It is a history of Middle Earth in the style of a classical history, and the stories within it are shorter in format. Of course, now all of the hyper-defensive Tolkienoids will accuse me of being a simpleton incapable of reading anything more complex than the TV guide. They will no doubt tell me that the man was a pioneer who defined a genre, and that all Post-Tolkien fantasy works are mere immitations. Considering how heavily Tolkien borrowed from Teutonic and Anglo-Saxon myth, I think the credit really lies with the cultures who created such myths.

    8. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by tuffy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      While I own it and have read it a couple of times, it's not a great book. It's very useful as a reference to learn about the things you mentioned, but it is not a compelling story and I doubt it would have sold very well if it had to stand on its own merits

      That's debatable, to be sure. The Silmarillion is a fine tale of good intentions gone awry and the ends failing to justify the means (strangely apropos, these days). It tends to be quite dense, featuring huge chunks of explanatory text rather than the more reader-friendly descriptive text. But, when one looks at the tale(s) and themes as a whole (especially after a second reading, or third), it's clear Tolkien knew what he was doing in terms of storytelling.

      Of course, it could've been better had he buckled-down and finished it properly. But I've come to appreciate the work itself more with each reading.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    9. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      And if you enjoy The Silmarillion, you might do well to go to your local library and check out the Poetic Edda, the Norse god/hero sagas collected by Snorri Sturluson in Iceland around 1270, one of the sources from which Tolkien heavily loaned (especially so in the case of The Silmarillion). I've only read the Finnish translation and Larrington's English translation, but I've heard that the Hollander translation is better in its accuracy and tendency to keep names in their original forms instead of trying to translate them.

    10. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by JSBiff · · Score: 1

      I quite enjoyed the Silmarillion, personally. It doesn't have the 'epic' kind of feel to it that Lord of the Rings does, but I really enjoyed the stories of the elves. A lot of really original tales, which really connect you with the people (elves included) who populate middle earth. However, I will give this warning: Silmarillion has a lot of really fairly tragic tales. Between the ending of RotK, and the Silmarillion, I got the distinct impression that Tolkien was really drawn to tragedy.

    11. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by Deagol · · Score: 1
      I have to agree. After repeatedly reading The Hobbit and the LotR trilogy, my folks got me the Adventurures of Tom Bombadil and the Simarillian.

      Bombadil wasn't too bad, but I just couldn't wade through Simarillian. And trust me, I was a Middle Earth reference geek at the time. I spent as much time pouring over the appendices at the the end of Return of the King volume as I did reading the trilogy itself. I just couldn't get enough of Middle Earth's history.

      Even after several attempts to start the book, I couldn't get past the first few chapters. Maybe I should re-visit that book, now that I'm a bit older.

    12. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought I'd ask you this since you obviously read this crap. Are these books just so long and boring that you don't have time to shower? Cause most the guys I've seen (smelled?) that read this kind of stuff smell really really bad.

    13. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by earthforce_1 · · Score: 1

      I once read this rather large book, (in fact I have a copy) and found it rather difficult to get through, rather like reading the Bible from cover to cover. I remember the 3rd age only occupied a rather slim chapter near the end. Some of the individual tales in it could well have been broken out and made into short stores or even novels in their own right. But I couldn't reccommend the Simarillian to anything less than a hard core Tolkie with a lot of time on their hands.

      Some of Tolkein's sketches from the Simarillian were quite interesting. I knew somebody who had a high quality book of them.

      --
      My rights don't need management.
    14. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by j0hnfr0g · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Just a word to the wise, it ain't exactly light reading. Its practically the ME equivalent of the Bible, and reads similiarly in terms of style.

      Just to be a little more specific, it is more like the Old Testament of the Bible.

      The New Testament narratives are usually easier to read for the modern English reader. Many people compare The Hobbit and LoTR to the New Testament, especially in the light of prophecy being fulfilled.

      As a side note, you may want to look into the books of Luke and Acts in the New Testament, which are two narratives that are relatively easy to read and are based on manuscripts with excellent Greek style (IIRC). And these two flow together, sort of like a part 1 and part 2.

    15. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Quite possibly my favorite thing about those books is that there are several tales with definitely unhappy endings. While most of Tolkein's work is based on ancient myth, several of these stories seem remarkably original and unpredictable compared to other work done before or since...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    16. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by dschuetz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, the Silmarillion is an excellent book, but definitely hard to read. I've only read it a couple times, and the last time I tried to take it one story at a time, which made it a little easier to digest.

      The other books published by his son, Christopher, have also been very interesting, though much harder to digest, and probably should be taken in publication order. In decreasing order of "accessibilty," there's probably "Unfinished Tales" (sort of an addendum to the Silmarillion), "The Book of Lost Tales" (parts 1 and 2), which covers some of the same material as Silmarillion (as well as some additional tales) but from a slightly different viewpoint, and with a bit more of a narrative frame around it, then "The Lays of Beleriand," which is basically two unfinished versions of stories in the Silmarallion presented in alliterative verse (think Beowulf).

      After that, they get much more specific to individual stories and detailed as to drafts, notes, unfinished bits, etc.

      However, I did find one very interesting tidbit recently while looking up information on Saruman. Tolkien toyed with the idea (I believe expressed in a letter but never expanded upon) that "Saruman might actually *be* the Balrog of Moria." Basically, Balrogs and the Istari (wizards), as well as Sauron, are all Maiar (sort of a demi-god, or higher-level angel), and can take any form they choose. So it's entirely possible that Saruman could have manifested himself as a Balrog. However, Tolkien never actually followed up on this idea.

      Anyway, what's best about the Silmarillion is that it ties everything together. Ever wonder what Elrond's story is? Who Galadriel is? (she's pretty much the oldest Elf there, actually). Where Shelob came from? A while back, I started trying to outline the entire history of Middle Earth, from the Two Trees to RoTK, and it was amazing to see how many threads all came back together.

      A great way to "browse" through the entire Middle Earth history is The Encyclopedia of Arda. Lots of details there, in a very well-produced hyperlinked setting.

    17. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by larien · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact it kills off Glorfindel a few hundred years before he saves Frodo in Lord of the Rings (a role taken over by Arwen in the film).

    18. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by dschuetz · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact it kills off Glorfindel a few hundred years before he saves Frodo in Lord of the Rings

      Yeah, that confused me, too. Different elf, same name. Check this out: http://www.glyphweb.com/arda/g/glorfindel.html

    19. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by dschuetz · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not to mention the fact it kills off Glorfindel a few hundred years before he saves Frodo in Lord of the Rings

      Yeah, that confused me, too. Different elf, same name. Check this out: Glorfindel

      [er...sorry...reposted 'cause I wrongly thought slash would automagically linkify a bare URL. And then I had to wait 2 minutes to correct it. Almost not worth the trouble. So I hope you appreciate it. :) (yes, I'm killing time waiting for the timer to time out).]

    20. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      1.) Mention something 90% of the nerds here have already read or heard about. 2.) Misspell "Simarillian," "Soron," "Gandolf," and "Genisis." 3.) Act like this is some sort of revelation for everyone to benefit from, when everyone knows about the Istari and that Sauron was a minion of Melkor and so forth. 4.) Get modded up by the ignorant and oblivious who don't realize this is common knowledge among the Lord of the Rings readers of Slashdot.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    21. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by Grab · · Score: 1

      It's only his first work in that in order to write tH and LotR be decided to work out more of the "back-story" behind the world. He didn't start making it into proper book/story-form until much later, although being the person that he was, I'm sure there were many individual bits completed.

      Which I guess is why it's so damn difficult to follow - it was only intended as Tolkein's "research notes" and not as a book in its own right.

      Grab.

    22. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by ellesar1 · · Score: 1

      I whole-heartedly agree, you gotta read it more than once to appreciate it. The same could be said of other huge tomes. (the bible, les miserable)
      The first time you get lost in the myriad characters and kingdoms, but you like, hate and pity Feanor and Turin while loving Beren and Luthien. Unfortunately, it is hard to grasp Doriath, Nargothond, Hithlum, Brethil, Amon Rudh, Gondolin, and all the other lands, along with their respective lords. The second and third time through you really come to know them and see the stories as a whole, complete history. It is quite beautiful and bittersweet, just as the Music of the Ainur fortells.
      Once you know the Silmarillion, Unfinished tales is fascinating, as you get a better feel for some of the characters. I especially the story of Turin Turambar, one of the best-written peices of fiction, albeit a bit unpolished and inconsistent. The essay on the istari, as well as the retelling of the hobbit from gandalf's point of view were excellent, too.

    23. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

      "It's only his first work in that in order to write tH and LotR be decided to work out more of the "back-story" behind the world"

      The body of work known as "The Silmarillion" was started way before "The Hobbit" was conceived. In fact, "The Hobbit" was sort of shoehorned into this mythic world after the fact.

      " it was only intended as Tolkein's "research notes" and not as a book in its own right."

      Tolkien makes quite clear in his letters that he did intend to get it published some day.

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    24. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Informative
      Who Galadriel is? (she's pretty much the oldest Elf there, actually).

      Cirdan is older. Galadriel was born in Aman in the days of the Two Trees, and after the Darkening of Valinor she crossed into Middle-earth across the Helcaraxe with Fingolfin, having been marooned in Araman by Feanor. Yes, she's extremely ancient - and hardcore, too, to have made that journey. But Cirdan began his life at Cuivienen under the Stars, and reached the western shores of Beleriand with the march of the Teleri; there he remained throughout the First Age until the destruction after the battle of Tears Unnumbered, at which point he moved to the isle of Balar and became a leader of the Elvish enclave around the mouth of Sirion. After the downfall of Beleriand he established himself at the Grey Havens west of what became the Shire, where he remained to the end of the Third Age.

      The only people older than Cirdan in Middle-earth, to my knowledge, are the Maiar - Sauron, the Balrog, and the Wizards - the oldest Ents, Fangorn and perhaps Finglas and Fladrif - and Tom Bombadil.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    25. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by ellesar1 · · Score: 1

      Definately try again. If you care that Strider rode with the Rohirrim and fought for Gondor, along with the history of kings from Elendil and Isildur, you may enjoy the elf-human roots of Elrond and Aragorn, the houses of noble men whose scions founded numenor, Sauron as a lieutenant of Morgoth.
      Speed read the Aiunadale and valaquenta, if you have to, that may help get you to the interesting escapades of Feanor and the elves.

    26. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing I learned from the Silmarillion is that when dwarves break a contract, they don't mess around!

    27. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by saforrest · · Score: 1

      Actually, I read The Silmarillion before the Lord of the Rings, and got absolutely hooked.

      I had no interest in reading the Lord of Rings, or even in fantasy literature beyond a bunch of David Eddings books, but the Silmarillion (from the very beginning story, the Ainulindalé) had a scale I've never seen before or since in fantasy literature.

      It also introduced me to the amazing world of philology. Seriously, it was one of the top five books I've ever read.

    28. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And pick up a copy of Blind Guardian's Nightfall in Middle-Earth album to listen to while reading The Silmarillion.

    29. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by TimeZone · · Score: 1
      Just a word to the wise, it ain't exactly light reading. Its practically the ME equivalent of the Bible, and reads similiarly in terms of style.
      Agreed, it is very dense. On the plus side, the whole of LotR is condensed into about 3 pages towards the end. ;)

      TimeZone

    30. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by Apreche · · Score: 1

      Even better if you learn how to spell.

      "The Silmarillion" is the name of the book. It mostly concerns itself with the story of Feanor, the elf who forged the Silmarils, the gods of middle earth (there's a very large heirarchy of them), and the fight against morgoth (Sauron's "daddy").

      I think it would make a really great movie, I don't know why nobody considers it. There are some pretty huge ass battles with shitloads of dragons and balrogs and insane crap like that. Even though it is a prequel, as it starts at the absolute beginning of the Middle Earth timeline, I reccommend you read it after the other 4 books. It will have a lot more meaning.

      --
      The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    31. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by eyegone · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you follow that link you'll see that they may in fact be the same person (or at least the same "spirit").

      I've always thought that The Silmarillion is pretty clear about the fact that elves can leave Mandos after a while. And the fall of Gondolin occurred at the end of the first age, which gives Glorfindel six or seven thousand years to get back to Middle Earth.

      The fact that Frodo sees Glorfindel so clearly in the shadow world (into which he is being drawn by the Morgul blade) also argues for this. It tends to indicate that he has been in Aman, in the presence of the Valar.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    32. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by devphil · · Score: 1


      The link seems to be slashdotted. So I don't know what it says.

      But I would point out that the "same name" problem was actually an accident, and that when Tolkien discovered it, he decided that they were in fact both referring to the same elf. This, over time, led him to the theory of elvish reincarnation.

      The confusion arises over the fact that he never set down "the facts" once and for all. Just kept rewriting and rewriting and amending and playing and rewriting and correcting and branching and reworking until one day he surprised himself by suddenly dying before he had all the stories finished to his own satisfaction.

      --
      You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    33. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by Fjord · · Score: 1

      5) ...
      6) Profit!

      --
      -no broken link
    34. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by dschuetz · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you follow that link you'll see that they may in fact be the same person

      Yeah, I was focused more on the fact that Tolkien himself wasn't sure about this and had been working on a way to correct it.

      The fact that Frodo sees Glorfindel so clearly in the shadow world (into which he is being drawn by the Morgul blade) also argues for this. It tends to indicate that he has been in Aman, in the presence of the Valar.

      Interesting thought. I'll have to dig into that (it's about time I started my annual re-reading, in preparation for the next film, though this time it'll have to wait until after I'm done with Potter. :) )

    35. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      > Sauron as a lieutenant of Morgoth

      That was the cool part, learning that Sauron was basically just an evil cherub assistant to one of the true main evil beings. One wonders what those battles vs. good were like.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    36. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      There are, of course, the other two of the "big three" SF&F epic stories:

      Dune
      Foundation (tho' it's more of a collection of short stories, "The Mule" is a twist-ending story like none I've ever read before.

      And, of course, if you like epic battles, indeed wars, the space war of "In Death Ground" is like none I've ever read or seen before. It dwarfs the pitiful "Wolf 359" and "Dominion" battles of Star Trek, as well as the tiny battles of Star Wars. It even supercedes anime stuff.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    37. Re:Really good book: Simarillian by stewate4 · · Score: 1

      Or even three or four really great movies. I don't think it's the stuff holywood would ever go for though. No happy endings, heros die along with everyone they love.

  10. What about his most important work?? by arcite · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Less we forget Tolkiens translation of the Pearl Poet's, 'Sir Gawain and the Green Knight'? That poem kicks ass (atleast as far as a poem can kick one's ass, that is)!

    1. Re:What about his most important work?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depending on how we rate "important" the answer changes.

      I'm not familiar with the entire canon of either his academic or fictional work, but I know that his work in Old English (Anglo-Saxon) is very highly regarded.

      For fiction, my vote goes to "The Silmarillion" on literary merit, but "The Lord of the Rings" is also incredible and far more accessible and justifiably popular.

      "The Hobbit" is a story loved by adults and children alike, so perhaps that's his greatest work.

      "Beowulf: The Monsters and the Critics" is an essay of his which although I've never read I've often seen cited and praised.

      Who knows! Can anyone suggest what William Blake's greatest work is? Is it the "Songs of Innocence" (and Experience) or "The Book of Urizen"? How about Shakespeare's..?

      I don't think it's as far of a stretch as it might seem to put the Professor in this kind of leaugue; but /where/ to put his work is a challenging question.

  11. Christopher Tolkien's "History of Middle-Earth" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Serious Tolkien readeres will probably be interested in Christopher Tolkien's "History of Middle-Earth" and the other publications which have been released.

    Everyone else probably will have comparatively little use for them. If you haven't read the "Silmarillion", I wouldn't even bother picking them up; on the other hand, if you want a "first-hand" look at how the Lord of the Rings was constructed, "The History of Middle-Earth" is very insightful (and will give you a lot of extra-geeky trivia to throw around).

    I have read "Smith of Wotton Major" and "Farmer Giles of Ham", and to throw in my two bits I think they're both wonderful stories. "Farmer" is at times outright hilarious, as the above reviewer indicates the humor is dry; I found it thoughly entertaining.

    "Smith" is another matter. I think it's a wonderful story, too, but it's a "fey-story" in the old sense, which means it's actually a little creepy at times. I loved it as a child, but found it a little disturbing. Recently reading it (~8 months ago) I thought it absolutely beautiful, and decidely bittersweet.

    Another story not in this collection that's very recommended for both whimsical adults and any child is "Roverandom", which is a wonderful fantasy about a lost toy dog who ends up in the company of wizards...

    1. Re:Christopher Tolkien's "History of Middle-Earth" by Suidae · · Score: 3, Funny

      I found Silmarillion to be a really heavy read. I could never sit still very long to read it. I solved this by leaving it on the back of the toilet, now I'm making good progress on it. Slow and steady wins the race.

  12. wait there's more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    dont forget _The Silmarillion_ and _The Lays of Beleriand_. The Silmarillion is required reading for anyone interested in the culture and mythology of Middle Earth. Besides, _The Silmarillion_ was Tolkien's life's work and the trilogy was based on the stories in this tome.

    1. Re:wait there's more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't use underscores when italic tags are available.

  13. Tolkein's Translation of Gilgamesh by codefool · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Hopefully someone here can help with this.

    I remember reading a couple of months back that some researcher requested someo f Tolkein's papers from the Oxford archives, and found within it a line-by-line translation of Gilgamesh, in Tolkein's own hand, with his comments. The article said that the translation was to be published this summer. I can find no reference to this on the web, however.

    Anyone else here of this?

    --
    "Stop whining!" - Arnold, as Mr. Kimble
    1. Re:Tolkein's Translation of Gilgamesh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'm fairly certain it was Beowulf, not Gilgamesh...and I believe it was published.

    2. Re:Tolkein's Translation of Gilgamesh by larsga · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is just wrong. Tolkien didn't know Sumerian, and never did any work on it.

    3. Re:Tolkein's Translation of Gilgamesh by doug · · Score: 1

      I think you mean Beowulf.

    4. Re:Tolkein's Translation of Gilgamesh by Shook · · Score: 1
    5. Re:Tolkein's Translation of Gilgamesh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean cuniform

    6. Re:Tolkein's Translation of Gilgamesh by Earlybird · · Score: 2, Informative

      'Twas Beowulf , not Gilgamesh.

    7. Re:Tolkein's Translation of Gilgamesh by $hecky · · Score: 2, Informative
      The found papers were a translation of Beowulf: see this story . That he had his own translation isn't really surprising since his Beowulf: The Monsters and the Critics is probably the most significant piece of Beowulf scholarship out there-- in doing any (good) criticism, you translate the subject text yourself. What we've got, in other words, is probably more like a protracted set of notes than a book.

      Most of the time, at least in my experience, these working translations aren't very good reading. What you write for publication is usually very different (hopefully less confusing) than what you note-- if you've ever picked up Aristotle, you'll know what I mean.

      If you want a great lyrical translation of Beowulf, though, try Seamus Heaney's.

      Nate

      --
      You never know who will get one.
    8. Re:Tolkein's Translation of Gilgamesh by codefool · · Score: 1

      Well, its no wonder that I couldn't find anything on it. Many thanks to all those who kindly responded. I also appreciate everyone's mercy for my getting the reference wrong. I hang my head in shame.

      --
      "Stop whining!" - Arnold, as Mr. Kimble
  14. Another Great Accomplishment by ElitusPrime · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Also worth noting is that Tolkin was one of the original translators of the New Jerusalem Bible.

    yes... yes... I know that many of you don't believe in God, etc. But, hopefully, you'll recognize that translating the entire Bible to English is quite an accomplishment for one of our favorite authors. And, just maybe, you'll even appreciate how happy it makes us Christians to have this great author bring his talents to scripture.

    Then again, maybe I'll just get modded to oblivion...

    --
    The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting; it has been found difficult and left untried. -G.K. Chesterton
    1. Re:Another Great Accomplishment by kiwimate · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well...um...yes...but...

      He worked on a couple of books (eg, Ruth, maybe, if my memory serves?), but (as was typical throughout his life) he got far too involved in the details. Being a lover of language above all else, he contributed vast reams of notes on the linguistic history of each phrase and missed out on the bigger picture. It's a bit of a stretch to talk about him translating the entire Bible.

      This comment, by the way, is not a criticism of Tolkien as such, more an observation. If you read his Letters, time and time again you'll come across apologies for being late with submissions to his publishers, having neglected this or that work...he always bit off far more than he could chew and inevitably produced rich fragments. That's why Christopher Tolkien has such a magnificent stash of notes to exploit^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hpublish.

      Interestingly enough, this happens to be perhaps the major failing of Niggle in Leaf by Niggle, despite Tolkien's oft-misquoted distaste for allegory. (The other major theme you may well see in that work is an allegory of Purgatory, which some critics claim stems directly from Tolkien's strong Catholic beliefs.)

      Tolkien, in fact, was a very staunch Catholic, and his Catholic beliefs pervaded everything he did (although for his views on this you really have to read his Letters, where he disclaims allegations of religious parallels in certain of his works). A long evening stroll that he took with C.S. Lewis was instrumental in Lewis' renewed interest in Christianity. Tolkien was naturally happy about this, but at the same time a bit disquieted and not a little hurt that Lewis went on to become so famous and well-regarded given he was almost a johnny-come-lately, having reconverted to Christianity at a later age in life. (Tolkien was also a bit miffed that Lewis became an Anglican (Episcopalian in the U.S.); he viewed Anglicanism as being a watered-down imitation of Catholicism, whose main recommendation was their beautiful cathedrals which had been perverted from their rightful Catholic purpose.)

    2. Re:Another Great Accomplishment by ElitusPrime · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. What I was actually trying to say was that he was a member of a team that translated the entire Bible; and that being a member of that very successful project was a great accomplishment. But I admit that my post didn't get that across very clearly.

      --
      The Christian ideal has not been tried and found wanting; it has been found difficult and left untried. -G.K. Chesterton
    3. Re:Another Great Accomplishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (although for his views on this you really have to read his Letters, where he disclaims allegations of religious parallels in certain of his works)

      If you haven't already, please be sure to read Tolkien's essay "On Fairy-Stories."

      It was published along with "Leaf by Niggle" in the volume Tree and Leaf. You can find Tree and Leaf in a library by itself, or as part of The Tolkien Reader.

      In a way, I am a little disappointed that this latest collection apparently includes "Leaf by Niggle" without "On Fairy-Stories," since the two are quite complementary.

      But on the other hand, I am very glad to see people reading "Leaf by Niggle," since they will be exposed to at least some of its meaning. Now, if only I could trick people into reading Purgatorio... :-)

    4. Re:Another Great Accomplishment by Pall+Agamemnides · · Score: 1

      Also worth noting is that Tolkin was one of the original translators of the New Jerusalem Bible.

      Actually, he did his translation for the Jerusalem Bible, not the New Jerusalem Bible; the latter is based on the former. By the way, in case anyone is interested in getting a copy of it, the original Jerusalem Bible is better than the new one, in my opinion.

      Also, as someone else pointed out, Tolkien didn't translate the entire Bible, but only a small amount (mainly the book of Job). You can actually recognize his writing style in that book, which is kind of strange...

      Anyway, from Tolkien's Letters (#294):

      "Naming me among the 'principal collaborators' was an undeserved courtesy on the part of the editor of the Jerusalem Bible. I was consulted on one or two points of style, and criticized some contributions of others. I was originally assigned a large amount of text to translate, but after doing some necessary preliminary work I was obliged to resign owing to pressure of other work, and only completed 'Jonah', one of the shortest books."

  15. Re:Fo Shiggle My Niggle by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 0

    Three cheers for dockers! Now, if only a broke ass stoner like me could afford some.

    --
    YOU SUCK BALLS!
  16. Happened to me! by pubjames · · Score: 4, Funny

    My favourite of them all, a tale in which Smith voyages to the land of the faeries via a magical cake.

    That happened to me at the office Christmas party! Someone tooks photos and then put them up on the notice board. It was really embarassing.

  17. 3 of 4 by gmuslera · · Score: 2, Interesting

    An earlier recopilation of most of this tales (without the one about Tom Bombadil) was Tree and Leaf (or at least, in spanish, was "Arbol y Hoja", that can be easily found in bookstores here in Uruguay). Of this 3 tales, the one I remember more is Leaf, by Niggle, is just the kind of tale that remembers you that Tolkien was a great writer even without the Middle Earth.

  18. Letters from Father Christmas by RealAlaskan · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Letters from Father Christmas .

    Every year for 23 years, Tolkien wrote his children a letter from Father Christmas, from the late 20's into the 40's. The great depression and WWII get mentioned in passing, but Father Christmas always triumphs.

    This one is good for reading to children, with wonderful pictures by Tolkien. For older children, you can sprinkle in a bit of history by telling why Father Christmas had such trouble delivering toys in 1932, and so on. For the Tolkien fancier, the book gives some insight into the author's mind. For example, my edition has samples of the ``elvish writing'' which Father Christmas sent to the children.

    1. Re:Letters from Father Christmas by mj01nir · · Score: 1

      Hey, I just wanted to thank you for pointing this book out. I have piles of Tolkien's books, but this one escaped me. Now with a 4-year-old, this looks like it could be fun, come the holidays. It's already on order.

      I knew /. was good for something!

      --
      the no .sig .sig
  19. Homer Simpson Moment. by Gumshoe · · Score: 3, Funny
    [Smith of Wootton Major] a tale in which Smith voyages to the land of the faeries via a magical cake.


    Mmmm... Brownies...
    1. Re:Homer Simpson Moment. by echucker · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps in conversation with Marge-

      Marge, you're my wife and I love you very much. But you're living in a world of make-believe with flowers and bells and leprechauns,and magic frogs with funny little hats.

    2. Re:Homer Simpson Moment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Marge, you're my wife and I love you very much. But you're living in a world of make-believe with flowers and bells and leprechauns,and magic frogs with funny little hats"

      Continued as "....and gingerbread houses...... mmmmm. gingerbread houses". And then he goes off into one of those reveries inside his yellow head where he eats the Hansel and Gretel witch house, along with Hansel, Gretel, and the witch.

  20. The Silmarillion is not his first. Maybe last by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    "The Silmarillion is a must-have for anyone interested in Tolkien's world. It was actually his FIRST work. [spelling corrected]

    The book entitled "The Silmarillion" is actually one of JRR Tolkien's LAST works. He never finished it before his death, although he intended to.

    To confuse matters, the body of myth that Tolkien started on before "The Hobbit" is also called the Silmarillion. In other words, there are two. The books on the writing of Tolkien's books are careful to distinguish the two.

    Technically, it is not true that the book "The Silmarillion" predated The Hobbit"

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:The Silmarillion is not his first. Maybe last by tuffy · · Score: 2, Informative
      Technically, it is not true that the book "The Silmarillion" predated The Hobbit"

      That's not true either. There isn't a single "Silmarillion", though Tolkien continued work on it throughout his life. After "the Hobbit" turned into a big success, Tolkien tried to get the Silmarillion into print. But after being convinced by his publisher that it wouldn't sell, he basically melded aspects of the Hobbit and Silmarillion (along with the fall of Numenor) into Lord of the Rings and got that published instead. Afterward, he continued to work on the Silmarillion until he died.

      Later, Christopher Tolkien took the most viable "cross section" of his father's continuous Silmarillion work and got it published and then went on to put all the pre-existing stuff into print as well as part of the "History of Middle Earth" series.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    2. Re:The Silmarillion is not his first. Maybe last by zdavek · · Score: 1
      Huh? You wrote:
      After "the Hobbit" turned into a big success, Tolkien tried to get the Silmarillion into print. But after being convinced by his publisher that it wouldn't sell, he basically melded aspects of the Hobbit and Silmarillion (along with the fall of Numenor) into Lord of the Rings and got that published instead.

      The "Lord of the Rings" came first. "The Hobbit" was created latter to explain how Bilbo came to possess the one ring.

  21. You answer you own question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Q: Why aren't all these other books as popular?
    A: Because they aren't as good as LOTR.

    Duh. :)

    Personally I hated the LOTR trilogy and I can't see why any of it is popular. It is a crude and awkward reading experience. Sure, it is the grandfather of fantasy - but it is by no means the best.

    I am mostly a science fiction fan, but my favorite fantasy book ever is "Magician" by Raymond E. Feist. Highly recommended even to those (like myself) that otherwise hate the genre. There are a bunch of books in the series, with prequels and sequels. All the books are seriously good, well written, very pleasant reading experience.

    "Magician". In store now! Get it today!

    1. Re:You answer you own question by Matrix272 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Lord of the Rings is so popular because it's so detailed and complex. JRR Tolkien INVENTED several languages just so he could use phrases here and there in reference in the books, and all put together, including The Hobbit and the Silmarillion, there aren't even 2000 pages worth. It's the same reason the Dune series is so popular. Frank Herbert seemed to actually like in the Dune universe, and could convey thoughts, actions, visions, conversations, etc. that happened in that universe to a degree that very, very few authors can.

      I won't deny that the Riftwar Saga by Raymond Feist is an excellent Fantasy series, but I personally don't think it holds a candle to LOTR. My reason is simple: I haven't read all of them. In fact, I haven't read any of them. I read half-way through the first book, and lost interest... and I'm pretty faithful about finishing books (and series) that I start.

      I should also mention that the book "Magician" was originally published in one hard-back novel, but was split into 2 books when they went to paperback. They are called "Magician: Apprentice" and "Magician: Master".

      --
      "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
    2. Re:You answer you own question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      JRR Tolkien INVENTED several languages just so he could use phrases here and there in reference in the books

      I think it may be more accurate that he wrote the books to help explain the history of the languages. They really developed side-by-side.

    3. Re:You answer you own question by Grab · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hmm. Very good scenes in it, certainly, and the writing generally is good. The deus-ex-machina ending is *very* poor though (don't tell me it leads into the other books; it was supposed to be a single book until it sold well), and the happy-ever-after bit with all the heroes and heroines pairing off just sucked.

      I'm just plowing through the "Memory, Sorrow and Thorn" series from Tad Williams ATM. It's good so far. Warning: the main criticism ppl have is that it's too slow. Fair enough, but the fact that everyone spends a lot of time talking means that you get to care about them, so when they get killed, you don't think that the remaining ppl are being wimps when it affects them. Ppl who you thought were fixtures suddenly get wiped out; it's more "realistic" in that way than most other fantasy series. And the main characters therefore have a more realistic "humane" approach to the constant death around them than the Gimli/Legolas head-hunting competition, where you never feel either was ever in any danger.

      BTW, not anything like any of these, and completely off-topic, but try "Grass" by Sherri Tepper for the best book I've ever read (it's kind of loose SF/fantasy). If I had to cut my shelves down to one book only, it would probably be this one.

      Grab.

    4. Re:You answer you own question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      and the happy-ever-after bit with all the heroes and heroines pairing off just sucked.
      Aww, you're not getting any, are you?
    5. Re:You answer you own question by jjo · · Score: 1

      Chacun a son gout, so far be it from me to say you are wrong. However, the thing that distinguishes LOTR from Tolkien's shorter works (and even more from writers such as Feist) is that it works on many different levels, each satisfying and valuable to the reader who can percieve and appreciate them.

      The first level is as a really good advanture story. On first reading, this is the level most people perceive, and LOTR doesn't disappoint. This is the only level that most other fantasy writers (such as Feist) achieve.

      The second level is that of language, as has been mentioned. Tolkien worked out grammar, vocabulary, and orthography for multiple languages of his own invention (and one language, that of the Rohirrim, that's based from Old English). He also relied on his vast knowledge of Anglo-Saxon linguistics to invent names that resonate with English speakers (and speakers of related languages) for reasons that they themselves may not realize. Also, he uses a form of writing that conveys an air of antiquity without being too difficult to understand. To my mind, Tolkien could really turn a phrase, and just reading (or hearing) some of Tolkein's phrases is itself a pleasure. (BTW, I have found that listening to LOTR being read gives a new perspective on the language, one I can highly recommend.)

      The third level is that of spirituality. Tolkien was a devout Catholic, and the Catholic influence is at once absent and ubiquitous in LOTR. Absent because he consciously omitted any overt religiosity, but ubiquitous because the fundamental concepts of good and evil in LOTR arise from his faith.

      You may not appreciate any of these things in LOTR, but it is perhaps unique in being a written work of such length that so many people have not only read from beginning to end, but have re-read multiple times.

    6. Re:You answer you own question by wuice · · Score: 1

      If you want really gritty fantasy, read George Martin.

    7. Re:You answer you own question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The deus-ex-machina ending is *very* poor though
      You'll be relieved to know then, that there was not such ending.

      and the happy-ever-after bit with all the heroes and heroines pairing off just sucked.

      That didn't happen either. In the end, the heros part ways in a heartrending and unresolved scene. Tolkien had to add an appendix to stop mass depression.

      Have you ever actually finished the book?

    8. Re:You answer you own question by gold23 · · Score: 1

      Just a note to chime in on the praise for Sherri S. Tepper. I have not read "Grass", but I have read a few other of her novels.

      Try "The Family Tree", "Six Moon Dance", "Gibbon's Decline and Fall", and "Sideshow".

      Your non-geek girlfriends will enjoy them too, especially the first and third.

      --
      Trust not a man who's rich in flax / His morals may be sadly lax
    9. Re:You answer you own question by danny · · Score: 1
      I thought Magician was ok, but some of the sequels are just woeful - really targetted narrowly to the teenage demographic.

      The Feist books that most impressed me were the Mistress of the Empire series he wrote with Janny Wurts.

      Danny.

      --
      I have written over 900 book reviews
    10. Re:You answer you own question by Achoi77 · · Score: 1
      Lord of the Rings is so popular because it's so detailed and complex.

      I agree. What makes Tolkien's works so appealing is that his works have so much academic value, in a geeky, Star Trekkie sort of way. I beleive that it may simply have been that he didn't have any reference to draw from - that is, other than the bible, ancient mythic literature (The Iliad, King Arthur, Beowulf, etc..), and local (and not local) folk tales.

      Oh yeah, and people like John Milton, Geoffrey Chaucer, Jules Verne, Voltaire, etcetera.

      Don't get me wrong, I love Feist, having read all his books, I find them all entertaining, but that's about it. For crying out loud, he wrote his books up based on a role playing session he had in college! There is no academic value to it; it doesn't make you THINK.

      I think the problem with most writers today is that they try and make their books too epic.

      When you read any series of Feist's books, or any contemporary fantasy writer, for that matter; you basically understand the whole world. When you read LOTR, you realize that the timeline for those three books is 11 months, and Tolkein has told you almost nothing about ME yet.

      It's all in the details.

  22. Re:Really good book: Simarillion by moranar · · Score: 1

    I hate to be anal on this, but you really should have checked a bit... It seems you were talking about "Bored of the Rings" and "The Sillibillion" instead of the real works..

    Repeat after me:

    T O L K I E N, not Tolkein
    S I L M A R I L L I O N, not Silmarillian
    G A N D A L F, not Gandolf
    S A U R O N, not Soron.

    Yet Another Tolkien Nerd.

    --
    "I think it would be a good idea!"
    Gandhi, about Internet Security
  23. Disgusting by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Troll

    I refuse to read anything "by Niggle".

    Tolkein can promote his white power agenda elsewhere, the dirty scum skinhead nazi sympathiser.

    You do know he betrayed the allies during WWII, dont you?

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  24. Farmer Giles of Ham by jpetts · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is definitely NOT a childrens book. It is absolutely crammed with in-jokes that are firmly directed at linguists and philologists and other academics.

    For example, when Tolkien talks about Farmer Giles' blunderbuss, he makes a point of saying that people might not know what a blunderbuss is, then goes on to say the "the four wise clerks of Oxenford" define it as . This is lifted EXACTLY from the then-current edition of the the Oxford English Dictionary.

    The dry, pedantic style was also directed at the similar style employed by academics.

    Also, one has to remember that this was written in the aftermath of one of the most terrible wars the country had ever seen, and also came at the end of rationing in the UK, and despite the style, FGoH is a rollicking great belly laugh, definitely one of JRRT's really intelligent works.

    BTW, was going through my papers last night and found my old copies of JRRT's poems, "Imram," which chronicles the travels of Saint Brendan, and "The Lay of Aotrao and Itroun", a very dark epic poem in the Breton tradition, which I copied by hand from the original manuscripts back in the '70s. As far as I know these have never been published, which is a shame, as they are both excellent works...

    --
    Call me old fashioned, but I like a dump to be as memorable as it is devastating - Bender
    1. Re:Farmer Giles of Ham by sgt_sloth · · Score: 1
      This is definitely NOT a childrens book. It is absolutely crammed with in-jokes that are firmly directed at linguists and philologists and other academics.
      I agree, and one of the delights of the book is how learned it is. For example, the proper names of both Farmer Giles and the King are given in Latin, with the latter having something like 8 honorific components. Only someone as erudite as Tolkien would know that during the time depicted in the story- between Rome's withdrawl from Britain in the 400's AD and the beginning of the Anglo-Saxon conquest- Latin would have been used by the island's Romanized inhabitants. Too bad most other fantasy/medieval fiction does not get into this sort of detail and so has about as much depth as something commissioned by TSR.
    2. Re:Farmer Giles of Ham by Nept · · Score: 2, Insightful

      TW, was going through my papers last night and found my old copies of JRRT's poems, "Imram,"

      Wow... is there any way you could make those copies available online? They sound fascinating.

      --
      "Teachers leave us kids alone ..." - Roger Waters, Pink Floyd
    3. Re:Farmer Giles of Ham by umrgregg · · Score: 2, Informative

      Indeed they have been published. Imram in the December 3, 1955 issue of in the Time and Tide. The Lay of Aotrou and Itroun which is thought to be written as an alternative ending for Chaucer's The Franklin's Tale and is published in the December, 1945 issue of the Welsh Review. NMG

      --
      NMG
    4. Re:Farmer Giles of Ham by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Most SF&F style writers, when inventing a language, just start heaving apostrophes into the words and proper names.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  25. Elvish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well thank you. Thank you very much. And don't step on my blue suede shoes.

  26. A slightly different 4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Tolkien Reader" (I don't know if it's still in print; I bought my copy back in the 1970s) contains Farmer Giles, The Adventures of Tom Bombadil, Tree and Leaf (an essay on fairy tales), and Leaf by Niggle.

    After all these years I still haven't read Smith but am looking forward to doing so soon.

  27. Tom raises several issues by arcite · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When I read this odd section of the book I always find Tom to be a rather creepy character. He seems to eminate power and is able to see into the future, yet he chooses to pacify his enemies though the most gentle of means (by singing!). As mysteriously as he appears, he is quickly forgotten and plays no other important part in the book. He is somehow 'above' the petty, earthly issues of the dark lord and the one ring and sees no reason to alter the forseen course that history will take. I suppose like so many other characters in LotR, Tom is an idealized figure, whose actions are constrained by the nature of his being. Otherwise, why would he not just prance down to Mordor and sing a little toon for Sauron? :D One wonders what Lucas would have done with Tom... CGI extravaganza showdown with Sauron! Bullet time anyone??? :::shudder:::

    1. Re:Tom raises several issues by magarity · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He is somehow 'above' the petty, earthly issues of the dark lord and the one ring

      This is because he is a Druidic figure who believes in balance between good and evil. Unlike the good guys who want to do away with evil and the bad guys who want to do away with good. Instead, Tom sees that the fight is pretty well balanced (despite an advantage on paper for the evil side). After all, good and bad can't exist without the other to compare against.

    2. Re:Tom raises several issues by arcite · · Score: 1

      Oh wow, that makes perfect sense. I better read up on my D&D :D

    3. Re:Tom raises several issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Balance in opposition is an eternal principle, as shown in these verse of scripture (verses 11 - 25).

      God could not exist without this balance, and neither could we. This balance defines our entire purpose for existing (verse 25).

    4. Re:Tom raises several issues by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 2, Funny
      Unlike the good guys who want to do away with evil and the bad guys who want to do away with good.

      The bad guys don't want to do away with good, they're just looking for unlimited power and control over good (much like the RIAA).
      That, and cheap labor for their smelters.

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    5. Re:Tom raises several issues by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That doesn't sound like Tolkien. For one thing, that world-view is dualistic, not Christian. Tolkien was, you'll remember, a devout Catholic. Although some Christians are dualists (in that sense, not the idealist/dualist/materialist sense), I believe that Tolkien was too intelligent for that. His good friend Lewis certainly was.

      After all, good and bad can't exist without the other to compare against.

      Not so. Good exists; in fact, God is (cf. Moses & the burning bush...). Evil is simply the rejection of existence, of reality (hence calling Satan the Father of Lies). Good is; evil is not. If good and evil are simply opposing forces, then one is not better than the other, there is no fundamental moral difference--one can freely choose between them. If one is better than the other, then there is an external yardstick, which is itself the actual good.

    6. Re:Tom raises several issues by magarity · · Score: 1

      Well, I suggest you read The Enchiridion by St. Augustine as your definition of evil has several large holes hiding right below the surface. Evil is a necessary thing to showcase good. For fun, please also read Brave New World by Huxley for an analysis of what good is like when there is no bad to compare.

    7. Re:Tom raises several issues by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 1

      Actually one of the philosophical explanations for the "problem of evil" (if God is all knowing, all powerful and all good, how can evil exist?) is that God allows evil to exist to let us know what is good. People have been arguing about this for thousands of years, and there is no "true" answer because you can't prove any of it. You actually can't prove the existence of God, mostly because you can't technically prove the existence of anything except yourself (yes that's a paraphrase of a Descartes essay.) When you get into philosophical semantics like this it can be quite frustrating. :)

    8. Re:Tom raises several issues by Jerf · · Score: 1

      Wanna-be dualists should pay close attention to those words. Calling things "good" and "evil" implies an external standard which would then, as Bob Uhl says, collapse the dualism into a unified world.

      You can hold to dualism only if you refuse to elevate one morally over the other, in which case you're stuck with "A" and "1". I name them that because there is no way to order "A" and "1", unlike say "A" and "B" where "A" comes first.

      It's really difficult to hold to this philosophically (though perhaps not impossible; not being a dualist I would be unlikely to buy it anyhow), because without being able to distinguish between "A" and "1" meaningfully, how do you know there is not a third position? Or fourth position? Etc. It is extremely challenging to avoid a nihilistic philosophy where everything is equal, because of an unstoppable multiplicity of "forces", and therefore there are no distinctions at all; perhaps true but answering all philosophical questions with "Nothing" is not satisfying at all.

      Anyways, claims that Good can't exist without Evil are really kinda silly, like claiming Light can't exist without Darkness. Yes, it can, and in fact we believe there were periods in this universe's history when light did in fact exist without darkness, right at the beginning. Generally claiming the two must both exist stem from IMO poor definitions of good and evil, and even if you define the two in terms of opposition to each other (forming a circular system) it still doesn't imply that they both must exist; "Not a cowhorsedog" exists (everything is in fact not a cowhorsedog), but that does not mean that there is a cowhorsedog. (A cowhorsedog is of course an animal that is just like a cow, a horse, and a dog, except the three are physically one creature.)

      (Note that many people use dualism practically as an attempt to escape from morality, giving them an excuse to act "evil" and claim to themselves that they are just as justified acting "evil" as "good" since they are both equal. The way dualism as a philosophy tends to collapse into nihilism if followed to the logical conclusion and not carefully tended to shows why this philosophy can be so appealing to people trying to escape from constraints like morality, and indeed I observe a strong correlation between anti-authority types and dualists in real life. Also watch for people who try to slip "Balance" in the back door; if "Balance" is a desirable state and "Unbalance" is bad, then "Balance" is Good and "Unbalance" is Bad; this is a specific example of Dualism collapsing back to a unity system.)

    9. Re:Tom raises several issues by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      > is that God allows evil to exist to let us know what is good

      Tell that to they choking, dying 6 year old who has fingers around his neck and an erection up his torn, bleeding ass.

      No, any "god" who allows that (much less created the world with the possibilities of that in mind) is a sick, sadistic bastard. (And, according to theory, one who knows and experiences both what the child experiences, and experiences the sick, voilent lust/orgasm of the attacker!)

      If that doesn't make God a sick son of a bitch, I don't know what does.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    10. Re:Tom raises several issues by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Note to fellow rhetoriticians: sadly, this is not a straw man argument. Were that it were...

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
    11. Re:Tom raises several issues by Muhammar · · Score: 1

      "Swans and typhoid - it all comes from the same place. I collect church collapses recreationaly. Have you heard about the last one - in Sicily? Just marvellous: imagine, the facade felt on sixty two celebrating grandmothers during a special mass. If he is up there, he loves it, Clarice"

      (Now this is definitely not a citation from St. Augustine)

      --
      I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
    12. Re:Tom raises several issues by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
      If evil is not allowed to exist, then we would have no free will. If we had no free will, then we could not think, could not believe, could not love and in fact would not exist as we know it. We have to be able to choose in order to be able to choose good. Once we've all chosen good, there will be no evil: an outcome devoutly to be desired.

      And the `young boys' killed by bears were young men taunting the prophet. Hardly over-reaction.

  28. Beauty on another scale... by Fjodor42 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Some years ago, I received this book as a gift from my girlfriend.
    I can neither argue the claim, that the language is simpler, nor can I claim, that I find the stories as full as the more well-known works.

    What _did_ catch me, though, was the direct narration of the stories. The poems about the venerable mr. Bombadil is a different story, as they refer to the universe of LotR, but the other stories seem, at least to me, to tell stories of important weight as to ethics and morale, and yet not tranfer the entire story to a universe of his own design, but to merely use the common notion of a parallel world of fairies, formalised by him as the world of Faerie, but known to most people already.

    To me, that is what separates those stories from his more well known works, but I dare the proposition, that it makes those stories more relevant, as they are so much easier to relate to!

    --
    "The number you have dialed is imaginary. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and try again."
  29. Top 10 Tolkein Wrong Names by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Repeat after me: T O L K I E N, not Tolkein
    S I L M A R I L L I O N, not Silmarillian"


    10. Who's that guy Fordo Prefect?

    9. Tolkien got Golem from Yiddish myth, right?

    8. Stan Lee should sue: Tolkein got "Sauron" from the X-Men Savage Land comics.

    7. Captain Kirk battled Aragorn on Star Trek.

    5. What's that bad wizard and the guy with the eye? I never get the two straight: Sarmon and Souron? Souromon and Sauromon? Whatever.

    4. If you call me with a technical support question about your Tolkien Ring network, I WILL hang up on you.

    3. Brie: cheese or town?

    2. Fangorn is that horror movie magazine!

    1. "Teleporno". Well, this one is correct: it is a real name in the Tolkien works. This is the one that should be wrong!

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  30. aye... by joss · · Score: 1

    Farmer Giles of Ham is a treat, and rather counteracts the impression that Tolkein puts too much faith in nobility.
    Offtopic, but just for bragging points, I actually met Tolkein although i was too young to remember virtually anything of that. Can any other /.ers make this claim ?

    --
    http://rareformnewmedia.com/
  31. Homer simpson moment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Farmer Giles of Ham is a treat"

    especially on a sandwich. mmmmmmmmm. ham sandwich.....

  32. Leaf by Niggle by ansak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To review Leaf by Niggle becomes a lot easier when you remember that Tolkien was a devout Catholic and a confirmed Englishman. From Niggle it also becomes clear that he was a man who loved his hobby of writing Middle Earth stories but still felt obliged to be a good host -- while himself occasionally enjoying reciprocating the demand! -- and a good neighbour. It also becomes clear that he sometimes wondered if there was any long term value in either his work (the arcane study of English language and literature) or his hobby (Et EÃrello Endorenna Ãtulien!).

    The Journey is Niggle's impending death. Parish is his most immediate opportunity to practice Christian charity and neighbourliness. Packing for the journey is the practice of spiritual disciplines.

    One could go on but ought not do so without acknowledging that Tolkien himself claimed to hate allegory wherever he could found it. Nonetheless, the story is much more enjoyable when you look at it from a point of view that acknowledges Tolkien's Christianity and uses it to interpret the various pieces of the work. What we are hearing, I believe, is Tolkien's whisperings in the Confessional Box, but instead of being obscured to the point of unintelligibilty, as velvet-lined walls would do, it's hidden in a form that Tolkien would never have used for any kind of story other than this one: a confession or a spiritual autobiography.

    And don't we all want to be considered cases for Gentle Treatment?

    --
    Still hoping for Gentle Treatment...
    1. Re:Leaf by Niggle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. In my version of Mozilla this is a page lengthening post (it is very long 100+ pages of blank right after the italics). IE it seems to be okay....

  33. A comment to the first lino only! by Fjodor42 · · Score: 0

    As I see it, I am strucked with awe, when I am made aware of the more subtle hints, but I still maintain, that the true beauty of his works is, that although he has crammed in a lot of material for the academics, he has managed to do it in a way, that still leaves his works open to children!

    --
    "The number you have dialed is imaginary. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and try again."
  34. Part of the Genius of LOTR by arcite · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ....is that Tolkien kept his characters simple but created a complex world (middle earth)for them to inhabit. As a natural story teller, Tolkien realized that kids and adults alike enjoy living vicariously though charcters in books. Frodo is the 'everyman'. He doesn't have superpowers, super strength, or even super looks :D Because of this, we the reader are able to imprint our emotions onto Frodo and other characters as they wade through the perilous and mysterious place of middle earth. Another view is that Middle Earth is a recreated 'history' of ancient England. Before there were Knights and dragons, there was middle earth. A land which was rural, simple, non-industrialized. Where everyone had a pipe to smoke, a story to tell by the fire, and a garden to tend to: an idealized time. IMO reading LOTR is like taking a relaxing walk though a field on a summers day (as corny as that may be!). Its not about the destination, but the journey(and what you see, smell, and eat along the way).

    1. Re:Part of the Genius of LOTR by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      > Another view is that Middle Earth is a
      > recreated 'history' of ancient England....A
      > land which was rural, simple, non-
      > industrialized. Where everyone had a pipe to
      > smoke, a story to tell by the fire, and a
      > garden to tend to: an idealized time

      Grumpy Old Man: Back in my day, we didn't have any anti-bee-otics. You cut your thumb, a red streak went up your arm, you died, and YOU LIKED IT.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  35. Three TV/Movie adaptions already by peter303 · · Score: 2, Informative

    "The Hobbit" TV cartoon
    "Lord of the Rings: Part 1" Bashki's movie cartoon
    "Lord of the Rings: Part 2" TV Cartoon
    "Lord of Rings" Jackson trilogy

    1. Re:Three TV/Movie adaptions already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's "Bakshi".

  36. He did not invent the languages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "JRR Tolkien INVENTED several languages just so he could use phrases here and there in reference in the books"

    No, he said he "took the initiative in creating" the languages during his CNN interview. The idea that he invented the languages is made up by Republicans.

  37. You have a point... by arcite · · Score: 1

    Its like trying to pick which Shakespeare's work is the best.... they're all the best! :)

  38. New box set by Hexact · · Score: 4, Informative
    Amazon.ca gives me also "Hobbit/Roverandom/Tales from Perilous Realm Box Set" when I search for the Tales. It should be available soon. Amazon.com does not have it.

    Tolkien.co.uk gives Feb/03 as the publication date.

    Clem.

  39. Toilet book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    " found Silmarillion to be a really heavy read. I could never sit still very long to read it. I solved this by leaving it on the back of the toilet, now I'm making good progress on it"

    Are you making progress by reading the pages, or using them when the TP is out?

    ---------------
    Clerk to George in Seinfeld: "Yeah, and here it is: You get your toilet book out of here, and I won't jump over this counter and punch you in the brain!"

    1. Re:Toilet book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Yeah, right, like that'll ever happen!" Riiiiippp!....flush

      And no dead chicks on the table please.

  40. Previously Released by Trix606 · · Score: 1

    All four of these were released previously as "The Tolkein Reader"

    --
    "Look out honey, 'cause I'm using technology" -- Search and Destroy -- Iggy Pop
    1. Re:Previously Released by kitty+tape · · Score: 1

      I don't have my copy of "The Tolkien Reader" with me, but if I remember correctly "Smith of Wooten Manor" was not included in that collection.

      --
      ----- "Type theory is like pretzels on crack." -- random friend
  41. slsahdot lysdexics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    First the story calls him Tolkein throughout, then posters copy this multiple times or even find such wonderful variations as Tolkin.

    And this by fans of a linguist.

  42. Re:Really good book: Simarillion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must be that guy Boromir, son of Faramir, Lord of Gondor. Right?

  43. Well! What are you waiting for? by stanmann · · Score: 1

    Uh, Now is the best time to read to them... The sooner you start reading to them, the more likely they are to start reading(heavily) on their own.

    --
    Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    1. Re:Well! What are you waiting for? by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      I meant waiting to read Tolkein to them - for twin 15 month-olds, there are more interesting books.

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    2. Re:Well! What are you waiting for? by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Ah, Well, IIRC the adventures of Tom Bombadil were originally told at that age, But you are prolly right. Not having 15 month olds yet.

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  44. Ethel the Aadrvark Goes Quantity Surveying... by Dr+Rick · · Score: 2, Funny

    The titles of these books remind me of the Monty Python bookstore skit... No, "Rarnaby Budge" by Charles Dikkens. That's Dikkens with two Ks, the well-known Dutch author. Do you have "Leaf By Niggle" by .... That's okay, how about "Smith of Wootton Major" by ....

    --

    Dr. Rick
    - "It's such a fine line between clever and stupid" (Nigel Tufnel)
    - Zort! (Pinky)
  45. Tokien Reader by AveryRegier · · Score: 1

    Most of these tales are in a softcover book called the "Tolkien Reader". I picked up a copy of this a few months ago at my local chain bookstore, so it should be more easily found than "Tales from the Perilous Realm."

    I have to agree with the reviewer about the poem section. I got the book wanting to read more about Bombadil but ended up quite disapointed. "Leaf by Niggle" was very enjoyable.

  46. Who was John Galt? Here is who.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please see this link. John Galt was an asylum superintendent with revolutionary ideas.

  47. Leaf by Niggle = hate crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't get caught reading "Leaf by Niggle" in some areas. The title is believed to be intended to disparage African-Americans, and reading it can be considered to be a hate crime.

    1. Re:Leaf by Niggle = hate crime by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      Quit niggling.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  48. Re:Really good book: Simarillion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, hello Mister FANCY PANTS!

  49. Slightly OT, Gollum by Caffeine+Pill · · Score: 1

    Just had to post this.

    Gollum accepting his award.

  50. Seriously, Tom Bombadill == Väinämöinen by hey! · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Or at least Tolkien must have been aware of the similarities with this hero of the Finnish Kalevala when he was writing his poems. The Kalevala wizards employed a style of magic much like Bombadil's. The Bombadil poems read, unfortunately, like a rather watered down and less earthy copy of the orginal.

    I think it's probably significant that the Bombadil chapters occur so early in LotR, when Tolkien was casting about for a theme. He was trying to create a new English folkore, and the Kalevala was an obvious model, having virtually redefined the Finnish national identity when it was published. The Bombadil chapters of LotR just feel like an unsuccessful graft from a different story. Indeed while with some effort Tolkien managed to accomodate Bombadil in his world by giving him an unique role in it, he rather ignores Goldberry, whose nature is equally problematic.

    The simplest answer is that they both belong to a different story, one that Tolkien thought he might be writing before he found his own voice in Rivendell.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  51. LDS not real scripture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LDS stuff is not real scripture. It was made up by some guy in the 1800s who wanted to create a new religion so he could have more wives.

    In creating the new religion, he exploited the racists attitudes then so common about the American Indian: part of this was the idea that the Indians were too inferior to have built those mounds, so others (such as Israelites) had to have done it.

    It is sort of like Scientology, but from a century before that.

    1. Re:LDS not real scripture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wives who were their cousins.

    2. Re:LDS not real scripture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You speak as one who has never read it, who has a very small amount of information garnered from casual conversation who is now an expert.

      You are educated beyond your intelligence.

      Read it. Then decide.

      For the record, he didn't write it, he translated it. If he did write it, he's a genious and a prophet (much of what's in there couldn't have been know in the early 1800's, and has just recently been validated and revalidated).

      But you're not interested in truth or you wouldn't speak from such a weak position (ignorance).

  52. A major point that many miss by devphil · · Score: 3, Interesting


    is that the stories of the Silmarillion aren't really meant to be read, like the published forms of the Hobbit and LotR are.

    The Silmarillion is meant to be told, out loud, in the manner of a bard in the king's hall, reciting and performing before a crowd. Modern readers find the style dry because they're used to having the facial expressions and voice tones spelled out in the text, or shown to them on television. If you read the stories aloud, you find that they're not so dry after all.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  53. LOTR movie came before book. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The "Lord of the Rings" came first. "The Hobbit" was created latter to explain how Bilbo came to possess the one ring."

    No, you have it all wrong. Ralph Bakshi created "The Lord of the Rings". J.R.R. Tolkien obtained the rights to do the movie adaptation, which ultimately became more succesful than the film.

    On a parellel track, "The Hobbit" story and characters were created by Romeo Muller as he wrote the screenplay for the Rankin-Bass telefilm also called "The Hobbit". Yes, it was the same guy who gave us Rudolph and the Heat Miser. Romeo got some of his ideas from the Bakshi movie. In fact, his Balrog was just an attempt to get his beloved Heat Miser into the film.

    Romeo copied so well that some think that these stories are related when they are made up by different people and linked by unpunished plagiarism.

    J.R.R.Tolkien, by then a popular adaptation novelist, obtained the rights also to write "The Hobbit", which he tied even more closely to "The Lord of the Rings" which he had adapted previously.

  54. An open plea to animation companies... by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...I'd seriously consider negotiating for the rights to Farmer Giles of Ham and/or Smith of Wootton Major, plus lesser-known (still very good) stories like Roverandum and Mr. Bliss, to be done as animated features. =)

    Given the way these stories are written, they almost BEG to be done as animated features. Farmer Giles of Ham done under the right producing/directing team at Disney could be one very fun movie to watch (they can borrow the drawing style of Pauline Baynes, the original illustrator of the book) and Mr. Bliss is almost perfect as a Pixar feature. How about it, folks? :-)

    (P.S. I know Tolkien back in the 1950's had qualms about Disney animation, but Disney has shown since 1995 they can go with very different drawing styles successfully, styles that he probably would have approved.)

    1. Re:An open plea to animation companies... by jpetts · · Score: 1

      Something VERY worth listening to is Derek Jacobi reading both "Leaf by Niggle" and "Farmer Giles of Ham". The narrations are really ourstanding. The tapes are pretty generally availalbe: I saw one at our local Borders.

      --
      Call me old fashioned, but I like a dump to be as memorable as it is devastating - Bender
  55. To know it is not to believe it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You speak as one who has never read it, who has a very small amount of information garnered from casual conversation who is now an expert."

    No, I speak as one who has read it and rejects it. There is something quite fallacious about your idea "to read it is to believe it".

    "If he did write it, he's a genious and a prophet (much of what's in there couldn't have been know in the early 1800's"

    He wrote it. Of course, he is a genius to be able to concoct a work of fiction and bamboozle people into believing it is true. When it comes to being a prophet, however, he is just as good as Jeanne Dixon.

    There were many crackpots in those days making up religions in order to get sex, money, and power. Few of them have survived to this day.

    1. Re:To know it is not to believe it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of those who oppose the Book of Mormon, you are one of the few who has read it. The vast majority simply regurgitate false information they've heard elsewhere and couldn't explain if their lives depended on it.

      There is no way the Book of Mormon was written in the 19th century. There are vast evidences (one example) that it couldn't have been and wasn't. Of course, as one who has such a strong handle on Joseph Smith's motives (odd that he'd willingly die for his beliefs if he's only in it for sex, money, and power, none of which he pursued except to the degree it's healthy and we all do), you wouldn't be interested in those since you're already 100% sure it isn't authentic.

      I won't reply again, since it won't do either of us any good. But to other readers of this, never base an opinion or a decision on F.U.D., regardless of the topic, regardless of the source. Either forego an opinion, or take the time to educate yourself enough to have a good opinion, regardless of what that opinion is.

    2. Re:To know it is not to believe it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hiding unsuccessfully in a jail from a mob of angry husbands is quite a bit different from "willingly" dying for his beliefs.

    3. Re:To know it is not to believe it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're pretty good at slanting history, you ought to do this for a living... unless your a preacher, in which case you do.

      He was acquited and released once, but saw that the persecution wouldn't go away and returned willingly (not in handcuffs or by armed escort, he walked alone) and turned himself in, knowing he wouldn't see his family again.

      Yes, some of the mob were married, but they were angry cowards, spurred on by mis-information and stirred up by fear-mongering preachers. They did not act in any way to protect their families or there way of life, for neither of these was jeopardized in any way.

      They spilt the best blood of the 19th century, and it was innocent blood.

      These mobs were the same ignorant groups that had tarred and feather him so many times before. These are the same type of ignorant groups that go by the name of arian nation or kkk. The cause and time may be different, the actions and ignorance are the same.

  56. Re:Whoops... by Pinguu · · Score: 1

    Funny how they corrected it after I pointed it out then modded me down -2 for Offtopic.

    --
    --
  57. Top 10 ? by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

    6. No, not sex. Six.

  58. No. 6 by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    Oops.

    6. Galadriel? Isn't that an air-freshener?

    (It was either that, or something that involved how Tolkien ripped off "Sword of Shannara".)_

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:No. 6 by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that "Ring of Shannara"? ;)

    2. Re:No. 6 by Tokerat · · Score: 1


      I thought Gargamel is that guy from the Smurfs...

      :-D

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  59. Ring of Shannara by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    unlike Brooks, at least Tolkien did not name his wizard after a detox program.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  60. More Crap? by westyvw · · Score: 1

    I read 4 boring books, and now you suggest I read a compelation of boring shit?

    Look, I like a good story, I have always liked to read. But Tolkien has a way of taking FOREVER to get to a point, WAY over descriptive and tedious.

    Give me Bradbury, Clarke, a Linux Guide, Anything but his longwinded fairy tales.

  61. good reading by maloneoni · · Score: 1

    The other works of Tolkein very enjoyable. I sugget reading the other tales to everyone else. The books are good times abd quick reading. Infact, with reading this article I think i will go read them again. Enjoy!

  62. Unfinished Tales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My favorite story from "Unfinished Tales" is "The Quest of Erebor", which describes the meeting of Gandalf and Thorin before the start of "The Hobbit", and provides an interesting insight into "The Hobbit" and LotR.

  63. As an alternative.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Try getting out more. Date some girls.

  64. Bored of the Rings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is a truly great author. But whenever I enter a used book store, the first thing I look for is Bored of the Rings, by the Harvard Lampoon.
    It's as though the Holy Bible had a concise and well written parody. But please, only read it if you enjoy laughing...

    1. Re:Bored of the Rings by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

      > It's as though the Holy Bible had a concise and well written parody.

      It does.

      --
      "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  65. Mod parent down by Pall+Agamemnides · · Score: 2, Funny

    -1 torog (i.e. "troll")

  66. Mormons were the racists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " These are the same type of ignorant groups that go by the name of arian nation or kkk. "

    The Mormons were the ones who were more the racists back then. They said that the Native Americans were too stupid to build the mounds that they built, so they made up the story that "white" Israelites did it.

    1. Re:Mormons were the racists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give me an actual source where they said "the Native Americans were too stupid to build the mounds that they built", then we'll talk. That's a load and you know it.

      Its easy to put words in someones mouth 170 years later, when you know nothing of their beliefs or teachings and take nothing in context.

  67. History of Middle Earth by LooseChanj · · Score: 1

    Now there's a truly fascinating series. Tolkien's son Christopher has edited and commented on a good deal of his father's work related to Middle Earth. As far as I know, this is the only instance of chronicling the development of such a vast story as the Silmarillion and LOTR.

    --
    Mix the failings of Usenet with the shortcomings of the World Wide Web and the result is slashdot.
  68. other works by danny · · Score: 1
    Another not so well known work is The Monsters and the Critics - that's an academic work, of course, not fiction, but it's still reasonably broadly accessible.

    Danny.

    --
    I have written over 900 book reviews
  69. Re: George MacDonald by johnrpenner · · Score: 1


    "The fairy story may be made a vehicle of Mystery.
    That at least is what George MacDonald attempted,
    achieving stories of Power and Beauty
    when he succeeded." (J R R Tolkien)

    if you like tolkien - pay a visit to the grandfather of modern fiction -- the guy who encouraged lewis carrol to publish the 'alice in wonderland' books -- check out 'Phantastes' and 'Lilith' by George MacDonald' for some of the best fiction, last century or this.

    George-MacDonald.com

    phantastes - amazon listing

    cheers,

    john.

  70. LOTR longer than 11 months by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    "When you read LOTR, you realize that the timeline for those three books is 11 months,"

    It might have taken you 11 months to read them, but the timeline within the context of the books is many years!

    See The Lord of the Rings Chronology:

    3001 September 22 Bilbos farewell party and his subsequent departure from the Shire (Fellowship of the Ring)

    3019 January 17 The Company comes to Caras Galadon in the evening.


    The chronology cuts off at this point, but you will see that this is 18+ years just for the first book.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  71. Bzzzt! Sorry! by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

    The idea that you need bad in order to showcase good is some lame philosophical idea that sounds impressive to an 8th grade Jr. High student, but that collapses when you think about it for more than four seconds.

    You don't need murder and torture to know that a flower is good. It's just a silly notion that, actually, exposes what an evil S.O.B. "the lord" is.

    It may be in the nature of a good and powerful being to create lesser self-aware beings, but it does not follow that one puts them in a world where they can harm each other.

    Ergo, God is evil. Stand with me brothers and make that judgement!

    Once you accept that, it's just a small step to concluding He, or It, doesn't really exist, and all religion collapses into what would be clownish behavior, were it not so supremely murderous and thuggish throughout history, right up thru 9/11 and beyond.

    --
    "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  72. The Tolkien Reader by bdkives1 · · Score: 1


    This book was originally called The Tolkien Reader in 1966. My copy is from 1978.

    The only difference is that The Tolkien Reader has The Homecoming of Beorhtnoth, and Beorhelm's Son; where as Tales From The Perilous Realm has Smith of Wootton Major.

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0345 345061/qid=1055031302/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/002-584963 2-1676065?v=glance&s=books#product-details

    br

  73. Mormons and American Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "....and take nothing in context"

    The context of the creation of the "Book of Mormon" was a time when America was deep in the belief in "manifest destiny" and the inferiority of the Native peoples.

    1. Re:Mormons and American Indians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I understand now, wonder boy. So what you're saying is every book written in the 1800's supports slavery, and every book written from 1992 to 2002 supports the Clintons (a collective waste of skin, but that's another topic altogether).

      To argue that the Book of Mormon is against Native Americans because it was "written" (again, translated) during a time period when America was forcing them onto reservations and murdering them is ludicrous and idiotic.

      Some of our greatest literary works have come from times of turmoil and conflict. Are you ready to dismiss all of them, because you disagree with a prominent belief at that time?