Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft SPOT Watches

Octagon Most writes "PocketPCThoughts has a report from a graphic designer who worked on wristwatches using Microsoft's SPOT. Tons of design images here and a soon-to-ship model from Suunto here. Data plans from MSN Direct will be USD$9.95 per month. This is the coolest vapor from Microsoft in a long time. It's geeky _and_ stylish!" Our older story about the watches also notes that since it's a proprietary service, when the service provider decides to stop providing it, the device becomes useless.

175 comments

  1. Stock is down! by leinerj · · Score: 5, Funny

    Notice in this picture - it shows MSFT stock is down. Nice marketing images designer >:-)

    1. Re:Stock is down! by darnok · · Score: 1

      "MSFT appears to be a bargain at the moment - press left button 3 times, then right button twice to buy"

  2. "Design Photos" by WTFmonkey · · Score: 1

    How come none of them actually look like a watch? Looks like something Kaptain Kirk would wear.

    When Rolex or Citizen makes one, I'll think about it.

    1. Re:"Design Photos" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rolex and citizen are junk!

      spend some time at timezone.com and learn about horology, philistine.

    2. Re:"Design Photos" by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 1

      You got it all wrong. Those were meant to go on the forehead.

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
  3. Realistic Images by SiliconJesus · · Score: 5, Funny

    This image shows the watch, complete with BSOD. Sorry - I saw it, had to comment...

    --
    Clinton made me a Republican. Bush made me a Libertarian. Trump is making me question reality.
    1. Re:Realistic Images by ruprechtjones · · Score: 1

      That's a real-time image. They were running the timezone server off of the watch, it's toast now.

      --
      Kip Hawley is an idiot.
  4. Microsoft STOP Watches by ciroknight · · Score: 2, Funny

    Whoa.. I completely misread this.. I thought it said Microsoft STOP Watches.

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of those!!! (shoot me)

    But sheesh, do we really need any more inaccurate stopwatches? I already incorrectly measured gravitational acceleration as 3.1415 M/S^2 thanks to my piece of crud watch... Give me Timex any day.

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    1. Re:Microsoft STOP Watches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut the fuck up.

    2. Re:Microsoft STOP Watches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ** BANG **
      This has been a service of your local troll-hunter. Please support your local troll-hunters. Donate now!

    3. Re:Microsoft STOP Watches by antis0c · · Score: 1

      What? Everyone has it memorized, it's an accepted 9.8M/S^2.

      --

      ..There's a-dooin's a-transpirin'
  5. limited time offer by Ineffable+27 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    But Microshit would never, ever screw its customers by discontinuing this service....

    --
    "He'd be a broader guy if he had dropped acid once." - Steve Jobs on Bill Gates
    1. Re:limited time offer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      microshit! you are teh funny! oh wait, no you aren't.

  6. And, by qorkfiend · · Score: 1, Troll

    Microsoft can track anyone wearing one! This sounds like a great idea!

    1. Re:And, by RevAaron · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is very unlikely that MS could track the people wearing these. Have you read any of the articles?

      The SPOT watches use FM as the method of data transmission. FM. Like FM Radio. The watches are one way. You can get info on weather, IMs, stocks, etc, but you cannot send any data out. Any perception of "asking" for data is faked- the watch simply filters out data that doesn't apply to it.

      Unless you think MS will start including 10kW FM radio transmiters in these watches and GPS recieves. MS SPOT watches: now with a big ass generator in every box!

      The only thing close to MS having the ability to track is your geographical region. The MSN Direct stuff sends out data depending on your location; the local radio station will send out weather data for that area. There is a chance that if someone wanted to IM your watch, you would have to select the region first- otherwise, the IM would be sent to every MSN Direct station there is. But then again, there's probably just as much of a chance (or perhaps higher) that they will do that.

      Frankly, if MS wanted to know what state I was in, they could've figured that out already by a number of means. I would be uncomfortable with MS or any other company tracking my relatively exact position, GPS or even something more coarse.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    2. Re:And, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, if there is no data being sent, how can it confirm your subscription?

    3. Re:And, by Squarewav · · Score: 1

      the watch has docking station from what i understand so you can keep track of apointments and such, when you subscribe the watch will just turn on the recever or posibly have the radio station broadcast in encription that can only be unlocked by a serial number uploaded by the docking station. but im sure just like direct tv someone will comeup with a way to crack it

    4. Re:And, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but im sure just like direct tv someone will comeup with a way to crack it

      Well in this case then, I'm sure it would be better for Microsoft to invest in two-way communication. Not only would it open a lot of new features for the watch, it would also keep everything much more secure. As long as the watch needs to return certain subscription data every so often (while wireless), it wouldn't be (or at least would be much harder to) crack.

    5. Re:And, by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      Microsoft can track anyone wearing one! This sounds like a great idea!

      /me grabs his tin-foil hat.

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    6. Re:And, by paulychamp · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean...

      In Soviet Russia, Microsoft watches you!?

    7. Re:And, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't talk SHIT... it's a ONE-WAY service; the watch is a receiver ONLY, MORON.

    8. Re:And, by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny
      Microsoft can track anyone wearing one!

      Well, I hope they do a better job than they do tracking email. I'm STILL waiting for Bill to send me some rich stuff.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    9. Re:And, by darnok · · Score: 1

      > The SPOT watches use FM as the method of data
      > transmission. FM. Like FM Radio. The watches are
      > one way. You can get info on weather, IMs, stocks,
      > etc, but you cannot send any data out. Any
      > perception of "asking" for data is faked- the
      > watch simply filters out data that doesn't apply
      > to it.

      Yep, just like that big Russian TV I've got in the loungeroom. Funny thing though: I still like it's watching me...

    10. Re:And, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two way communication will never happen. You would have to transmit, from the watch, with enough power to hit the nearest FM tower (likely to be miles).

    11. Re:And, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got a "GPS Enabled" cellphone and a rather small two-way pager, I hardly think it'd be difficult to make something watch-sized that could send your data.

      As far as FM goes, I fail to see why it couldn't send 'reply' messages on a different frequency if they so chose to implement that. Say... the same frequency as my two-way pager?

  7. New Twist to Old Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    hey, remember those C:\ C:\DOS\run run DOS run jokes? Now we can do C:\SPOT jokes!

    1. Re:New Twist to Old Joke by Joey+Patterson · · Score: 5, Funny

      C:\>SPOT
      C:\>SPOT\RUN

      RUN SPOT RUN
      Bad command or file name.

    2. Re:New Twist to Old Joke by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      $ cat spot | run

      Errr...
      I guess spot must be a chi-wawa...

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    3. Re:New Twist to Old Joke by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Obligatory Simpsons quote...

      Lisa: (reading Comic Book Guy's t-shirt) see-DOS. See-DOS-run. Run, DOS, run! Wow, only one person in a million would find that funny!
      Prof. Frink: Yes. We call that the "Dennis Miller ratio." M'hey.

      --
      For more information, click here.
  8. Stylish? What? by Mikey-San · · Score: 1

    I don't mean to MS-bash here--even if this /is/ Slashdot--but these are ass-fugly timepieces. That, plus really crappy ad mock-ups, equals /not/ "stylish".

    Remind me again why we need a watch that does twenty million things? I was fine when my watch just told me what time it was.

    --
    Mikey-San
    Karma: +Eleventy billion (mostly affected by watching Celebrity Jeopardy)
    1. Re:Stylish? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to agree that the watches leave a lot to be desired... especially considering MS supposedly paid this guy for over two years to develop product concepts and potential marketing materials. Maybe I should contact MS and see if I could get a design job with them...

    2. Re:Stylish? What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Luddite.

  9. Yes... But... by fishynet · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Does it tell time?

    --

    Cats: All your base are belong to us.
    Captain: Take off every sig !!
    1. Re:Yes... But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing not, my relatively cheap timex (~40 CDN) has always kept better time than any computer clock I've seen.

    2. Re:Yes... But... by Squarewav · · Score: 1

      computer clocks suck for the most part couse windows and even a few linux distros will just take the time from the clock then keep track of it with software (why? I dont know maybe couse they can keep track of mili and micro seconds better with software Im just guessing) then when you goto shut down the os (or the os decides its time to save the clock)it saves the time back to the system clock, of course when something happens such a system lockup for a few seconds the software time will become off by that much so the next time the os saves the clock its off by a bit, ms is aware of this little problem so they started that silly clock time server that will reset the time to what ms thinks it should be, which is oftin wrong sometimes by hours even if you set timezone right

    3. Re:Yes... But... by FlamingWarVagina · · Score: 0

      No, they don't suck, you just don't know how to set them and keep them updated: On Windows 2000: net time /setsntp:clock.redhat.com (Alternatively, look up time service on MS Knowledebase.) On linux: ntpdate -b clock.redhat.com

    4. Re:Yes... But... by allanc · · Score: 1
      Actually, with regards to Linux:


      1) Every distribution keeps track of the clock with software. That's just how the Linux kernel handles it. I think that the actual reason is because it's much quicker to do it in software than to query the hardware clock every time something wants to know what time it is.


      2) Linux does not save the software time to the hardware clock unless you specifically tell it to. The fact that software clocks drift is well understood, so saving the software clock to the hardware clock would be braindead stupid unless you've just set the software clock from a good source (IE, your cheap digital wristwatch or a costs-a-fortune atomic clock, depending on how anal you are about such things).


      3) A good Linux distribution will come with ntp stuff, which will let you set the clock occassionally from a time server (which is, generally, attached to an atomic clock. Though maybe through a couple of other servers). The NTP protocol is really quite clever, and it takes into account the amount of time between the client going "Hey, what time is it?" and the server going "Oh, roughly noonish" to find out when it was exactly noonish and set the clock accordingly. It'll also figure out the drift between your hardware clock and the software clock and deal with that for you. Also, it will make you coffee in the morning. Yay NTP!


      If you really desperately want to keep your software clock always set to match your hardware clock, start a cron job that runs 'hwclock --hctosys' every once in a while.


      I don't know how Windows does it. My guess is that there's a server at Microsoft which Bill Gates personally sets the time on from his watch and all Windows machines update from, with a protocol that can (by EULA) only be used if you agree to let Microsoft dictate when you take your lunch break for the rest of your life. Either that or they use NTP too. One of those.
      --AC

    5. Re:Yes... But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't know how Windows does it. My guess is that there's a server at Microsoft which Bill Gates personally sets the time on from his watch and all Windows machines update from, with a protocol that can (by EULA) only be used if you agree to let Microsoft dictate when you take your lunch break for the rest of your life. Either that or they use NTP too. One of those.

      I used to work at a place who supported links (golf game published by ms). There was this problem with the newer dell computers where the pc couldn't really keep track of its uptime correctly. The links game would use this uptime figure to time the golfer swinging the club (not too sure why they did that, but anyway). You could download a program that reported the uptime of the machine and it would be days, even weeks off. Heck, you could reboot the machine, check the uptime and it would say 6 days. The company I worked for was doing contract support for microsoft, so we were never able to get a correct answer on why it was, and dell support was no help either. Here is the article on it. In any case all 300 or so of those support jobs now have moved to India. Yay Microsoft!

    6. Re:Yes... But... by CommandNotFound · · Score: 1

      It makes you wonder why all motherboards don't come with receivers that can automagically receive the (shortwave?) time pulses sent from the atomic clocks (one is in Colorado, US). I know you can get a wall clock that will do this for about $20-30USD at Wal-mart; I'm assuming the actual parts needed on a M/B would be about a dollar or two of parts.

    7. Re:Yes... But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, GNU/Linux also has a utility (I can't think of its name right now) that lets you tweak the kernel's time constants. It even lets you type in the exact time (with an error tolerance) and will keep a small database of sotware times and actual times; then it extrapolates (for lack of a better word) the entries and modifies the time constants automatically.

      I left my Pentium 150 running for a couple weeks or so (until I realized its HDD was failing :-( ) just so I could set its time exactly! I think I got it so precise that the time would be off by only one second every 100 years or something (I did it only in the winter, so it might actually run too fast in the summertime).

      BTW, Windows simply uses the hardware clock to get and set the current time; at least 98 and before do it that way AFAIK (I don't know about 2000 and XP -- they might use software clocks).

    8. Re:Yes... But... by kruczkowski · · Score: 1

      at work we have one of those clocks at it's off by 10 minutes. I check my time on my GPS and www.time.gov.

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
  10. A watch that can do... by ciroknight · · Score: 1

    ..everything except TELL TIME.... figures.
    :-/

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    1. Re:A watch that can do... by DigitalJEM · · Score: 1

      worst part is.. not only does it not tell time, you'll have to reset it daily and install patches on a weekly basis.. and it still won't tell time

      --
      -Joshua
    2. Re:A watch that can do... by mcspock · · Score: 1

      It tells time synchronized from an atomic clock. Also you dont have to patch it, it automatically downloads updates from the network.

      --
      -- Patience is a virtue, but impatience is an art.
  11. "Useless" watches by Joey+Patterson · · Score: 1

    since it's a proprietary service, when the service provider decides to stop providing it, the device becomes useless.

    True, true... that is, until the hardware hackers port Linux to the watches and write their own software for them.

    1. Re:"Useless" watches by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Or, until someone reverse engineers the protocol, which is likely quite simple considering the simple hardware and the means of transmission. There is no reason you couldn't have a little FM transmitter in your house, spitting out IMs and data for your watch to grab once this protocol was laid out.

      Then again, something like this- a watch which recieves FM data- is pretty useless without a lot of money and stations backing it. What good would it do if we had an open protocol? As soon as the company providing it stoped doing so, you'd be SOL no matter what. Unless you just wanted to have your own low-wattage FM transmitter in your own house, mentioned above.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  12. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    For a second I thought the design images link had misdirected me to a fark photoshop contest. That âoeyouâ(TM)ve got maleâ was particularly pukey. I just donâ(TM)t think it's proper to learn of a birth from your watch.

  13. 10$ for weather ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful


    seeing as these watches are no more than glorified pagers 10$ a month seems a bit steep just to recieve very trivial information, hell i can get a mobile phone with free minutes for 10$ a month, even my mobile GPS is free

    why not build the price into the watch instead of _another_ monthly subscription, are our lives desending into a rental culture ? where i spend cash but never actually own anything and when i stop the investment i have made in the device it instantly becomes worthless as the device ceases to function without the constant input of $

    whatever happened to buying shit that is MINE, is that concept to hard to grasp !

    1. Re:10$ for weather ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because MS wants to move to a subscription model. That way, they can jack your subscription to $20 when they see fit.

    2. Re:10$ for weather ? by JeffSh · · Score: 1

      better yet, i can look around me for a weather report.

    3. Re:10$ for weather ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems fairly reasonable to charge monthly for a service which presumably requires upkeep on the dealers part. In fact, it would seem better (IHMO) to make the actuall watch as cheep as possible while making the real payment through the subscription; that way it isn't such a loss if they cut the service. I don't generally like subscriptions, but this seems like the logical way to handle this particular situation.

    4. Re:10$ for weather ? by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      With Suunto, I expect a lot more than a glorified pager. I'm not so sure about SPOT, but I can't wait until some of the technology that goes into a device like this makes it into their other wristwatch computers (diving, sailing, etc.).

      As for subscription services... it's ok, as long as you get value from it. Most electronic gadgets are better off with their initial sale than a monthly subscription because once the gee-wiz factor wears off, people realize they can live without it, and avoid spending the extra money each month.

    5. Re:10$ for weather ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can get a mobile phone with free minutes for 10$ a month

      Where do you get a mobile with free minutes for
      10$ a month ?

    6. Re:10$ for weather ? by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 1

      This is a good point. It's probably smarter to come up with a cell phone the size of a watch, instead of a new service that adds little over existing devices. Last I looked, cell phones displayed time anyway.

      --
      Sleep is for the Weak
    7. Re:10$ for weather ? by metamatic · · Score: 1

      You're not paying $10 a month for a pager. You're paying $10 a month to wear a watch that screams "I am a Microsoft whore".

      Still, for not much more than $10 you could get a T-shirt printed and be done with it.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  14. Ewwwww! Hella ugly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And how do you download hotfixes and service packs onto these things?

  15. serveral issues by minus_273 · · Score: 1

    1. battery life.. does it need recharging? 2. display .. most watched can take a few bumps and bruises.. i wonder if this can 3. why does teh guy in the picture look so dorky?

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
    1. Re:serveral issues by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      "3. why does teh guy in the picture look so dorky?"

      he hs a watch that you need a service provider for, what did you expect? at least pock protectors are ^H^H^H were practical and usefull.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  16. adobe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i w o n d e r i f t h e y u s e a d o b e p h o t o s h o p . . . i h e a r d i t s t h e b e s t e s t .

  17. K.I.T.T. by sxltrex · · Score: 3, Funny

    But can you talk to K.I.T.T through it to get you out of tough scrapes with a blast of TurboBoost?

    1. Re:K.I.T.T. by fireman+sam · · Score: 2, Funny

      Because, as we all know here, Microsoft is evil. On that premis, the watch would therefore only communicate with K.A.R.R.

      For those who don't remember, this was the first prototype, K.I.T.T's "older" brother.

      Mmmm 80's tv, -5 lame

      --
      it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
  18. Heh by Jailbrekr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    also notes that since it's a proprietary service, when the service provider decides to stop providing it, the device becomes useless.

    A proprietary service is the ONLY means of pulling something like this off. Open Source does not have the time, resources, or coordination necessary to produce the hardware, software, and services required. But you forgot to mention that.

    --
    Feed the need: Digitaladdiction.net
    1. Re:Heh by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      what does that have to do with open source? the comment is towarsd its service. If they used an open standard(does not mean open source), then other companies could pick up if the original one stopped providing serve. Perhaps even(GASP!) competetion to provide the service!

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Heh by Eu4ria · · Score: 1

      A service that was run by several companies though would mean that no one company could ever just pull the plug

    3. Re:Heh by cascino · · Score: 2, Funny

      If they used an open standard(does not mean open source), then other companies could pick up if the original one stopped providing serve.
      Yeah. And just as easily, L33T H@X0R from down the street could broadcast "pirate" signals to hack the time, stock quotes, weather settings...
      Though I do figure it would be funny if someone hacked the MSFT stock ticker to "+100" while displaying the weather in Hell, MI as 27/snowy :)

    4. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That may or may not be correct, however the issue here is not so much that it is proprietary as that there will only be one company providing the service.

    5. Re:Heh by geekee · · Score: 1

      No one bitches about Tivo, etc. having proprietary services. Instead, the hackers go out of their way not to let you use a free alternative, even though the information you need is freely available on the internet. Why pick on MS?

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    6. Re:Heh by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

      Dude, FM antennas and power for them are EXPENSIVE. And the inexpensive kind used by pirate (okay, COMMUNITY) radio enthusiasts don't reach more than a mile, and are easily snubbed out by even the weakest corporate station.

      If I set my iTrip to 102.7, I have trouble getting the station in my own CAR due to interference from a radio station 200 miles away in Vermont.

      It sucks to hafta use FM...but I'll bet MSOFT got a good deal with those ClearChannel fucks.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  19. where are the PICTURES? by fishynet · · Score: 1

    wow! they can draw pictures of watches! Show me a real picture of a real prototype...

    --

    Cats: All your base are belong to us.
    Captain: Take off every sig !!
    1. Re:where are the PICTURES? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err, the actual prototypes aren't that visually pleasing. I mean, they fit on your wrist and have similar displays and all, but they are hand built.

  20. So pessimistic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    "when the service provider decides to stop providing it, the device becomes useless"

    Don't worry. Some contingent of hackers will figure out how to:
    1. Install *BSD/Linux on the watch
    2. Get their watch to receive stuff from their local WAP
    3. Start a pirate wireless radio service that broadcasts l33t content just like the regular service does, thus allowing more features like Slashdot updates, pr0n, and broadcast messages from their system at work.

    So, don't be so pessimistic. There's no way a hardware device will die just because the provider stops service.
  21. well.... by Klimaxor · · Score: 1

    ...how long will it take MS to monopolize the watch industry?

    --
    your sins into me, oh my beautiful one.
    1. Re:well.... by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      I've got a Breitling on my wrist, so I'm out of MS's grasp for a while.

  22. No Color Screen? by mozumder · · Score: 1

    You'd figure something this futuristic would use an OLED color screen already...

  23. Fossil Watch by SunBug · · Score: 5, Informative

    Fossil already has a watch designed to work with SPOT, and it is supposed to be available this summer. It looks a little bulky, but definitly useable.

    Click here to see it.

    1. Re:Fossil Watch by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

      Need to fight temptation....

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
  24. Microsoft hired the wrong dude by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Instead of hiring that web designer Rob to make smart watches, they should have hired, say, Jasmine St. Claire. Now I bet any Smart Personal Object Technology gizmo she would design would be a huge seller, much more than a silly wristwatch.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  25. awww crap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You'll even have the option to have an alarm automatically set itself earlier based on traffic delays or poor weather conditions"

    There goes my 2 favourite excuses on why I'm late for work!

  26. photoshop contest? by Patrick13 · · Score: 1

    Why do half of these ads look like they're straight from a fark.com photoshop contest?

    --
    ::.. check out some Cell Phone Reviews
  27. looks cool by Squarewav · · Score: 1

    but I see 2 problems cost and text input, If they could sell them for under 200$ I may get one but chances are they will easly be over 300, as for input, one of the best things about a pda is that you can enter data without having to write it down first, if I have to cary an adressbook to write stuff down whats the point of having a pda. hell you can get a casio with basic phone, adress and calculator functions for around 50, and you have a keypad to use, sure they look geekish but they are usefull

    1. Re:looks cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The price points are under $150, i've heard under $100 even, but i dont know whether or not those are accurate

  28. shouldn't this rather be a STAIN? by mousse-man · · Score: 1

    I'd definitely call this thing STAIN: S: Superfluous T: Throwable A: Awful I: Interface N: Novelty

  29. Is Microsoft SPOT... by winkydink · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...Microsoft Bob's dog?

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  30. Their main use... by hexdcml · · Score: 1, Funny

    pr0n at the flick of the wrist. heh. sorry, just couldn't resist. But seriously though, "flick, flick flick, flick" for each "image". ;) and plus its for geeks so, even better!

    --
    Fight Crime - Shoot Back!
    1. Re:Their main use... by kruczkowski · · Score: 1

      You know that some watches are powerd by movment right? I forget what it's called.

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
  31. And exactly HOW do you enter data into this? by Gldm · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I really can't see how you're supposed to get text onto this thing. Stylus? Nah, it's too small. Voice recognition? Yeah that won't look weird and stupid talking to your watch all the time, plus I doubt it'd be very accurate especially in noisy environments. Looks like it's upload from another device then, which makes it seem pretty lame to me. Either that or some really lame button combos to get text on it, which is even worse, even if the buttons are onscreen.

    --

    Introducing the new Occam Fusion! Now with sqrt(-1) fewer blades!

    1. Re:And exactly HOW do you enter data into this? by smallpaul · · Score: 1

      You upload data to the server through a web page and it sends it over the air to the watch.

    2. Re:And exactly HOW do you enter data into this? by davidc · · Score: 1

      You know, if Maxwell Smart can talk into his shoe, I can certainly talk into my watch. :-)

    3. Re:And exactly HOW do you enter data into this? by binarybum · · Score: 1

      and if This guy can do that with his shoe, than I would hope these things can take snapshots too.

      --
      ôó
  32. Microsoft's poor choice of quotes by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

    Check out that page from the SPOT page, and dig that quote :

    "This is the next evolutionary step in personal computing."

    - Bill Mitchell
    Corp Vice President,
    Microsoft

    No ? Really ? Messrs Microsoft, you should at least find someone who doesn't work for you to praise your products. We're certain Bill Mitchell is genuinely impressed by SPOT, from the bottom of his heart, but in any case it's not like he's ever going to say SPOT sucks toilet water as long as he's one of your employees. This quote is so useless it makes you wonder about the rest of the product ...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Microsoft's poor choice of quotes by toopc · · Score: 1
      No ? Really ? Messrs Microsoft, you should at least find someone who doesn't work for you to praise your products.

      From the very page you linked to:

      "The most significant development since the invention of the quartz movement some thirty years ago."

      - Donald R. Brewer
      Vice President of Technology at Fossil

      "These sports wristops will be indispensable to the active sports participants as well as a much broader segment of the market."

      - Dan Colliander
      Managing Director of Suunto

    2. Re:Microsoft's poor choice of quotes by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Uhh, both of those people are trying to sell watches. Therefore, their opinions are as irrelevant as the MS drone's.

      Missed the Critical Thinking seminar in kindergarten, did you?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    3. Re:Microsoft's poor choice of quotes by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      These sports wristops will be indispensable to the active sports participants as well as a much broader segment of the market.
      So I'm out there, doing the linebacker thing, and my watch bleeps (maybe it's telling me it's a draw, I'm unsighted), and I look down to read it and CRUMP!, a huge fat guard sits on me.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:Microsoft's poor choice of quotes by dcavanaugh · · Score: 1

      "No ? Really ? Messrs Microsoft, you should at least find someone who doesn't work for you to praise your products."

      The last time they tried that, it was the Valerie Mallinson "Switch" campaign. Oops! She worked for M$ (indirectly) also. At least now they admit it when the kudos come from their own people.

  33. How is this any different? by WankersRevenge · · Score: 5, Insightful

    when the service provider decides to stop providing it, the device becomes useless.

    How is this any different from Windows XP? (I'm specifically thinking of product activation here)

    1. Re:How is this any different? by Squarewav · · Score: 1

      well while it is true that ms could decide to kill the activation system to force people to upgrade to windows 2008 ( I forget how long ms stops supporting software that are no longer sold I think its 5 years) but all it would takes for windows activation is a small script, but even a realy evil company like MS will want to avoid the P.R. mess from killing it, to avoid people from switching to mac or linux knowing that ms could kill activation at any time, so im sure the'll keep a small server running the script at least till 2010 ( well maybe) the reason why they could easly kill the subscription to the stop service is it cost them money to keep radio stations broadcasting the signal and if only 1,000 or so people stay subscribed its not worth the cost to keep it running

  34. Wonderful- by Mu*puppy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now I can look down at my watch and see "1 H4X0r'd U! YuR 5P0+ iz m4 b17c|-| N0w!"

    --
    There's no wrong way, to eat a Rhesus...
  35. All geeked up? by sbillard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was pretty geeked about the tablet PC
    A laptop while docked - and a PDA while in a meeting, or on the plane...

    I still don't have one

    And I don't wear a watch, my mobile phone can tell time, messages, surf sites, play games, remind me of date/times, yay.

    blah blah blah

  36. Its a pager by barnaclebarnes · · Score: 1

    Its oneway..data to your device. Not 2 way entry. If there is 2 way entry it is just to update small things.

    BTW: Did anyone notice that the snow report was for packed powder but he was riding 2 ft of fresh?

    And 9.95 a month? i would only pay 9.95 a year! /b

    --
    [Please type your sig here.]
  37. never by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    never will they monopolize watches.

    the american watch companies have been out of business since the 70s. even timex is now owned by japanese.

    you can't compete with the japanese for quartz movements, nor the swiss for mechanical/automatic.

  38. Joke? by I+start+fires · · Score: 1, Funny

    Person A: "Hey, what time is it?"
    Person B: "Time for you to get a watch...that tells time!!!"

    --
    "I've been called worse things by better people." -Pierre Elliott Trudeau after being called an asshole by Richard Nixon
  39. Looks familiar by tarquin_fim_bim · · Score: 1

    Didn't one of those babies shoot out of John Hurts belly in Alien?

  40. Phaeton Sez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True, true... that is, until the hardware hackers port Linux to the watches and write their own software for them.

    Dewd!

    1) I just had to compile my GNU/WATCHKERNEL last night

    2) Of course it runs NetBSD

    3) Tell my boss that I won't be able to show up for work today, i'm under a Denial Of Time Attack!

    4) Linux is not ready for the WristTop!

    5) Apple announces the worlds fastest 64-bit watch

  41. And they're a steal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And they're a steal at just $599.99 + $9.99 a month. Oh, and the annual support license at $299.99, and the annual software upgrade at $199.99, and...

    I love my $50 fossil that's last me about 15 years now.

  42. The picture they don't want you to see.. by witten · · Score: 4, Funny
    1. Re:The picture they don't want you to see.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they really didn't want us to see it, they would have submitted it to /. with the other pics.

    2. Re:The picture they don't want you to see.. by gregfortune · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on. That's not just a Photoshop job, that's a *really* terrible Photoshop job...

    3. Re:The picture they don't want you to see.. by witten · · Score: 1

      Correction. It's a really terrible Gimp job.

    4. Re:The picture they don't want you to see.. by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      Well what do you expect? You ever try to cut-n-paste on a screen that is only 0.75 x 0.5 inches? :)

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  43. Remember the seiko receptor? by snubber1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seiko had the nifty watch that could act as a pager and you could subscribe to all sorts of nifty alerts like weather a sports and whatnot.
    A bit before they discontinued the service a document was floating around detailing a way to cheat the service. All you had to do is subscribe to everything, and they would send a message to your watch to tell it to start reciving particular messages.

    Then all you had to do is turn off your watch and cancel everything. When you turned your watch on in the next day or two, it would of missed the unsubscribe signal and continue to get everything it thought you were supposed to.

    I wonder if they thought of that this time around.

    --
    I don't really mind double posts on //..
    1. Re:Remember the seiko receptor? by mbstone · · Score: 1

      Every Jan 1 at 8:00 AM Seiko would always page its subscribers Happy New Year. When I woke up the 2nd time I eventually talked myself out of throwing it off an overpass.

  44. Service vs. Goods by lpret · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I wish my macroeconomics prof could see me now...

    Here's why we're seeing more services vs. goods. Services allow the company a continuous revenue that is flexible with what people can/will afford. If X cellphone company needs more money, they'll do a CBA to see if it's better to raise rates or raise advertising or something to attract new customers. Also, services allow you as the consumer to be more flexible (in theory). Say you're leasing a car, but you don't like the way it rides. Turn it in, get another one, no big deal. You rent an apartment, but the neighbours upstairs have very loud sex (I speak from experience...), you can move out.

    If you owned a car and you didn't like it's styling, too bad -- unless you want to sell it permanantly, which takes time and then you have to buy another car (meanwhile, losing thousands of dollars in value).

    We're becoming a very fluid society in which change is the very essense of who we are. Therefore, services instead of goods is to be expected -- I mean, do you want to pay $5000 for a cellphone and then never pay for minutes? What if you break yours, another 5 grand? Or a new model comes out?

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
    1. Re:Service vs. Goods by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      plus companies like a nice, recurring revenue stream. And selling high-price, one-time purchase (e.g., your $5000 no-minutes cell phone ;) is much more difficult than selling a cheap, recurring service.

    2. Re:Service vs. Goods by multi+io · · Score: 1
      You rent an apartment, but the neighbours upstairs have very loud sex (I speak from experience...), you can move out.

      .. or join in! :-)

  45. Fossil article by zlite · · Score: 1

    Wired Mag had a good profile of Fossil a few months back, covering both the SPOT watches and the Palm OS ones.

  46. hrm by houseofmore · · Score: 1

    wonder if spot is powered by bob?

    1. Re:hrm by kruczkowski · · Score: 1

      Don't know, but I think it uses MOM for managment.

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
  47. But can you code on it? by leoc · · Score: 1, Informative

    I can on my Linux watch. :)

    --
    STFU about slashdot bias.
  48. Will Batman escape this repeat of DCMA/XBOX ??? by HydeMan · · Score: 1

    Will these devices be sold at a loss to get recurring subscription revenue???

    Will OSS hacks try to reprogram the watches to run Linux???

    Will Batman and Robin escape the trap set by Mr. Gates???

    Tune in next time. Same Bat-time, same Bat-channel!

  49. Coverage... by ktakki · · Score: 4, Funny
    According to this:
    DirectBandâ will initially cover over 100 top metropolitan areas across all 50 U.S. states, plus the top 13 Canadian cities.

    Outside of these areas? Sorry. Stuck in the subway or the Lincoln Tunnel where FM signals can't reach? Too bad. Should have brought a back-up watch just in case SPOT can't latch on to a signal, maybe one of those $1.99 LCD Toy Story II watches you get with purchase of a Happy Meal and a medium beverage.

    On the other hand, there's the possibility of some real fun for someone who has the know-how to cobble together a low power FM transmitter that can broadcast on the SPOT sideband.

    "Hang on, I've got to check my mess...Holy Mother of Goatse.cx!"

    Damn. Now I hope these things really take off.

    k.
    --
    "In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
    1. Re:Coverage... by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      Do you really think a SPOT watch won't be able to tell time when out of range? I'm sure the watch has its own clock, which gets sync'd to the broadcast time signal only periodically (every few hours or whenever computationally convenient).

      And the broadcast signal is probably encrypted, too. So you could probably jam it, but not broadcast your own content. And after the X-Box fiasco, I bet the secret key is NOT on the watch itself. If Microsoft used public/private key encryption, the watch would only have the public key, which is useless for encrypting your own content.

    2. Re:Coverage... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct on the first part. Time is synchronized off the network, but maintained locally. It'd be stupid otherwise. On the second part, let's just put it this way: transmitting data, on a noisy analog wireless signal, is non trivial. I dont know if it's encrypted or not, but actually analysing the data would take far far more expertise than anyone here has judged.

      That being said, jamming it would be easy, just transmit another signal on the same frequency.

    3. Re:Coverage... by kruczkowski · · Score: 1

      PKI and all the encryption takes up a lot of processing power.

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
  50. More useless crap by poptones · · Score: 1, Insightful
    It's a watch pager. As someone who has been "tagged" by one of these exceedingly irritating pieces of shit before, I feel absolutely safe in saying "don't waste your money." There is nothing more irritating than being stuck in traffic and having your goddamn watch beeping at you to get back to the office NOW.

    Mine got fucked up one day when I had to change a tire and I received the third page in fifteen minutes... felt fucking fantastic to throw the POS off that overpass.

  51. 3 Steps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1)Do some reverse engineering
    2)Setup a FM transmitter
    3)Fuck with some spot users

  52. Is today Microsoft day? by EverDense · · Score: 1

    5 of the top 10 stories on /. are Microsoft stories.

    Where do you want to viral market today?

    --
    http://jesus.everdense.com/
  53. SPOT MS-BOB! by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

    So, can you SPOT BOB with it? Maybe Spot and Bob can play together, because I want nothing to do with either of them.

    1. Re:SPOT MS-BOB! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it's FUN to kick BOB across the room

  54. design bad by citroidSD · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is it just me, or do these prototype designs look really bad?

    Am I supposed to believe that Microsoft just hired someone from a forum/enthusiast site, and asked them to come up with new designs?

    When are they going to realize that if you want to create lifestyle products, design/looks has to be a number one concern? I really don't see it reflected in the current protoype images. I've seen better simulated clockfaces on my 3Com Palm III!!!

    MS needs to buy a clue from the Mac design team... become user oriented already!!!!

  55. Bleh by Illserve · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This doesn't seem like a magic nice application top me. I'd have trouble justifying its purchase even if the subscription were free, but $10 a mo?

    If I want to walk around with access to stock reports and weather, I'll get a wireless PDA or something.

    I mean, how useful can the information be when filtered through a watch? I can't web browse, I can't type or read emails, I can't even tell it what kind of food I want to eat for it to send me to an appropriate restaraunt (assuming it knows where I am).

    The whole problem with watches comes down to user input: there isn't one. This make communication decidedly one-way. So with this in mind, the only real input the user has (assuming they're not beaming IR to it from their PDA in which case why not just use a cellular internet connection), is their location in the real world. Context sensitive help has come a long way, but it's not going to let me control a watch by walking down the street in a certain pattern.

    1. Re:Bleh by amitk777 · · Score: 1

      I would liken this to be a like a newspaper or browsing google news or something. Do you need any user input there? If the costs comes down in couple of years after the hoopla dies down . lets say $3 a month. I still think its a good deal.. And who knows somebody could do better than them and start free service or something..

    2. Re:Bleh by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      $10/mo is what I pay for unlimited internet through my Sprint PCS Vision phone!

      How many people spend $120/year on watches? Add the cost of the hardware to that, and how many people are left?

  56. Microsoft has an endless stream of content... by flexstrat · · Score: 2, Funny

    for these things. They could keep the watch busy 24x7 just reporting security breaches and bug fixes in Microsoft products! Flexstrat

  57. More groans.... by nacs · · Score: 1

    + The site must be on running on the watch too.

    + Their server needs to keep up with the times if they're going to survive a /.

    + Are you telling me that the MSFT watch just BSODd?

    So many jokes, so little time.

    Oops I did it again, I'll STOP now.

    Damn, yet another. I'm done now, seriously....

    --
    "I filter at +6, and have yet to miss out on an important comment." (#822545)
  58. Just another thing to keep track of.... by Shippy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The thing I don't like about these watches (I've actually seen them being demoed) is that they require you to basically charge your watch every night. I already have to remember to charge my phone and my pda. Now I have to remember to charge this thing as well? My PDA and phone at least lasts a few days. Hopefully that's something that will change when it's released.

    --
    -Shippy
  59. stylish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no it is not
    really
    I just hope an impressionable 14 year old did not read your comment and believe it.

    really, wear that watch and you will not get laid.

  60. Another addition to my collection... by Kris_J · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Of high tech, useless watches. Don't get me wrong, they're funky, but they're more like art than any sort of useful tool. I have:
    • A bunch of Swatch Access watches with contactless smartcard technology in them, and not a single compatible service in the state (possibly now the country).
    • A Swatch pager watch not compatible with any Australian services.
    • A Casio GPS watch that has a hard time talking to satellites anywhere I'm likely to be (I'm a city boy).
    • An old Casio watch that shows the positions of the planets on a cute little display.
    • Again, a Casio digital camera watch with a picture only slightly "better" than a Gamboy camera.
    And I don't wear any of them, I just look at my mobile phone for the time.
    1. Re:Another addition to my collection... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a slow learner aren't you! :)

    2. Re:Another addition to my collection... by jred · · Score: 1

      What, no Timex Datalink?

      I've been wearing mine every day for the past 8 or so years. I can no longer update it (the communication mode doesn't work on NT/2K/XP, no direct access to video or something like that), but most of the data in there is still good.

      Now I need a replacement...

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    3. Re:Another addition to my collection... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Ah, the datalink. There's a serial port thingy you can get, that will produce the flashes. I believe it was originally marketed as the 'notebook adaptor,' as an LCD can't produce the flashes either, but they note that you also need it under NT/2000/XP for the reasons you cite.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  61. And the waterproof version... by AgTiger · · Score: 0

    And with the waterproof version, can you imagine the advertising campaign?

    "Now you no longer have to worry about the wet spot..." ...

    Uh oh, I can smell the Karma forest catching fire now.

  62. So how often... by tds67 · · Score: 0

    ...do you have to reboot the watch?

  63. What is the News Here????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am not being a pain here but why does this need media play there are second linux did it first just because they are catching up is no need for a news party. O well microsoft just made a watch does it crash yet or does it get viruses yet.

  64. Not true. by SlashChick · · Score: 1
    when the service provider decides to stop providing it, the device becomes useless.


    "How is this any different from Windows XP? (I'm specifically thinking of product activation here)"

    Actually, product activation resets itself after 6 months. That is, if you install and activate XP, and then do it again on a different computer after 6 months have passed, it won't complain.

    Also, there are plenty of ways to get around activation if you really want to (and install SP1 as well.) You can also use Windows 2000 if you want to get around activation completely. :P
  65. SPOT tech support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Joe User: My watch doesn't seem accurate since I switched default graphic design. What's wrong with it?
    MS Tech: Shut up and just reboot it.

  66. Mirror site etis rorriM by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 1

    If you hold your laptop up to a mirror and read the article, you'll get a really cool story about a micrsoft watch that stops and runs TOPS.

    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
  67. let's make the most out of it by e31 · · Score: 1

    can someone hack the watch and install Gentoo or Debian for the sake of stability?

  68. The watch pictures... by s-orbital · · Score: 1

    WTF? It's sunny in Seattle, and the Mariners are winning?

    (Disclaimer: I'm from Seattle, I can dis on them)

    --
    Patent: from Latin patere, to be open
  69. I predict by BiOFH · · Score: 1

    They're all pretty spiffy except the one with the bright blue band which is cluttered and confusing. Therefore, I predict that Microsoft will pick that design.

    --
    - I am made of meat.
  70. reboot anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    might be a trite question but did anyone notice if they put a restart button on the thing?

  71. Mobile GPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    even my mobile GPS is free

    Isn't 'mobile' the whole point of GPS?

  72. WAP anyone? by ElGanzoLoco · · Score: 1

    I don't understand... How is this different from WAP?

    WAP failed because users couldn't chose their content: their phone operator chose it for them and put it "online". This is the exact same thing, as far as I understand.

    --
    Hello! I'm a disaster waiting to happen!
  73. Style: Not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    digital watches are never stylish.

    only geeks could possibly think otherwise ;-)

  74. I'm still leaning more towards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  75. This is important by thasmudyan · · Score: 1

    I think MSFT is right to think that these intelligent little devices will be used increasingly in the future and that they should be data-linked. However, in my opinion a proprietary service from an external data source is not the way to go.
    If I wanted to buy those little gizmos for my home, I would like to distribute content from my internal network (e.g. bluetooth, 802.11). I can even imagine an optional imode-like subscription service for when you are away from home. But without open standards and without the possibility of tinkering with the content/functions those things won't make much sense to most of the geek world (which the devices are primarily targeted at).

  76. Making liberal watch wearers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course if you wear this watch and get your news from it, you will only get liberal news coming from msnbc.

  77. Yawn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This sort of thing has been available from Beepware for years now. The company I work for had one about 4 or 5 years ago and it was a neat toy to play with but not something you would actually wear as the watch was too big and klunky.

    If you really want to have info sent to you wirelessly then why not get an alphanumeric pager or a phone with text messaging and get datacast on it or use something like g-page to grab whatever data you want and send it out to you automatically.

  78. Why all the analog simulation? by PSaltyDS · · Score: 1

    Why do so many of them simulate analog displays? All of the displays are digitaly generated, of course, but the majority simulate and analog watch face. What's the point? Digital time is easier to read and can be clearly displayed on less screen area, leaving more room for other usefull(?) functions. I'm not surprised they'd have SOME analog displays, but why MOST?

    You said this watch would tell! It don't tell nuth'n, I still have to LOOK at it!

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. - Geek's corollary to Clarke's law
    1. Re:Why all the analog simulation? by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 1

      I believe (and a real design person can correct me) that analog displays are more easily interpreted by people than digital displays. This is the same reasons guages in planes and sports cars are analog and not just numbers.

      Even in cars with numbers there is usually a bar graph or some other picture representation of the amount.

      --
      Sleep is for the Weak
  79. Yeah, uh-huh. These are just like... by gosand · · Score: 1
    Riiiiight. These are just like all of those Linux-powered touch-screen web pads I have been waiting 5 years for. *cough* freepad All of the "designs" look awesome, but until they produce an actual product, they can bite me. And just redesigning the website every year doesn't fool me.

    (and I personally don't think that these watches are all that great looking)

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  80. Money by nycsubway · · Score: 1

    It's amazing what money can do... If you have enough money, you can branch out into a new market almost instantly, and provide your services. Microsoft has enough money to whatever they want.

    I really dont know why I thought of that when reading this article, but there was something about Microsoft, and watches...

  81. linux? by Rashan · · Score: 1

    Wonder how long before someone tries to put linux on one.

    --
    Insert witty .sig HERE.
  82. Open tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    also notes that since it's a proprietary service, when the service provider decides to stop providing it, the device becomes useless.

    Seems like it would be worth while to make a wrist watch that you could assign a capcode and page to it alphanumerically... being that pagers are dieing out, but companies still have the towers and equipment. Perhaps you could set your computer to send the watch certain stuff.. maybe it gets a stream of standard stuff like
    <news>Blah Blah Blah</news>
    <IM NAME=Joe>Hi man</IM>


    er.. I guess the pager companies could provide content.. via broadcast capcode, and you could provide custom content from your PC (via the internet (you can page people from the net for the most part nowadays) or by telephone.
  83. styling (or lack of...) by monkey_jam · · Score: 1

    i'm thinking that maybe they should change the name to SPOD, given the style of these mock-ups..

  84. Spot Service Pack 1 by morcheeba · · Score: 1

    Today microsoft released the first service pack for it's Spot line of watches. When the microsoft programmers who designed this watch were informed that New York and London have a five hour time difference rather than one, the blushing engineers claimed "but it looks so close on the map".

    Open source enthusiasts responded: "this is yet another case of microsoft taking an open standard and mostly complying with it, but then perverting it enough to become incompatible with the rest of the world. They are clearly abusing their monopoly position in operating systems to force changes in world timekeeping."

    Service pack 2 (to be released on Febsoft 29th, 2004) will hopefully also correct the direction of the earth's spin. Normally, London time is New York time + 5 hours, not - 1 hour.

  85. This is useless by F.O.Dobbs · · Score: 1

    virginmobile.com has pay as you go phones. The cheapest is ~$60. They can recieve unlimited SMS messages. Yahoo has free alerts. I get scores, news and weather for free daily, plus it's a cell phone with an events calendar which is all I needed from a PDA. No monthly fees. Nuff said.

    F.O.Dobbs

  86. Re:Fossil Watch from 1978 by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 1

    Wow, real stylish. Looks like they're reviving styles from 1G electronic watches.

    --
    Sleep is for the Weak
  87. Who needs a watch? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    My desire to wear a watch on my wrist evaporated when I got a cellphone. It tells me the time (synchronized to the service provider which is far more accurate than any manually-set quartz watch), plus it has a calendar/datebook, alarms, etc. Oh yeah, I can talk to people on it too.

    As far as I'm concerned, wristwatches are obsolete. At least until wrist-cellphones become popular.

  88. usable but useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another "we did it because we could" product. On the long list of things I don't want.