Slashdot Mirror


Sony Switches To Its Own Processor For Handhelds

Pointing to this Associated Press story carried by the Miami Herald, Jorkapp writes "Sony has announced that they will be using Processors manufactured by themselves in their next generation of CLIE handhelds, which are due to ship this Semptember. This is only the first step though, as Sony is planning to use its own line of processors for the next generation of Playstation systems. This new processor will give users 16 hours of battery life (impressive!) and the ability to play video at a smooth 30fps." And jake writes with a link to a story at mobilemag.com which also describes the new handhelds (the UX50 was mentioned the other day), and says "both the CLIE UX50 and UX40 handhelds will be available through American retailers in September for about $700 and $600, respectively, but can be pre-ordered now through Sony's website."

183 comments

  1. Self-made handheld processor name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bateium

    1. Re:Self-made handheld processor name by dasboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Close, try Betaium. Dyslexia is a bitch.

    2. Re:Self-made handheld processor name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a bicht.

  2. News: 10-15-2003 by qewl · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sony puts AMD and Intel out of business! Competition is always great..

    --

    (\_/)
    (O.o) This is Bunny. (> <)
    1. Re:News: 10-15-2003 by zonker · · Score: 0

      good show sony, this is freakin' hilarious. this story is nothing more than early buzz and an attempt to stir up speculation ,with their 'off hand comment' about the new factory, on the ps3 and psp and everyone is repeating it lemming-like... hook, line, sinker. *yawn* not all that interesting on the palm side of things, really...

  3. Five-to-TEN hours of video! by HisMother · · Score: 3, Informative

    The story says you get double the battery life with an external battery pack. Man. This thing would be sweet for watching movies on airplanes!

    --
    Cantankerous old coot since 1957.
    1. Re:Five-to-TEN hours of video! by anttik · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was thinking about watching movies on a long train trip. Aren't all electronic devices forbidden on most airlines?

    2. Re:Five-to-TEN hours of video! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dunno about the electronics, but the stylus could poke an eye out. Verboten!

    3. Re:Five-to-TEN hours of video! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever been on an airplane?

    4. Re:Five-to-TEN hours of video! by daveo0331 · · Score: 1

      Most electronic devices are allowed except during takeoff and landing. There's only a few things you can't ever use, like cell phones and portable radios/TVs (because they use broadcast signals). DVD players, video games, etc are acceptable.

      --
      Remember the days when Republicans were the party of fiscal responsibility?
    5. Re:Five-to-TEN hours of video! by common_sence · · Score: 2, Informative

      Only during takeoff and landing. Once you're above 10k feet, electronics, sans trancieving devices, are allowed.

      --
      sig? No thanks, I don't smoke.
    6. Re:Five-to-TEN hours of video! by anttik · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm feeling weird replying to myself.

      Found this link.

      I don't know if that is still good, but it states:

      "Any passenger carry-on electronic device which is not an intentional transmitter of radio signals: a. should be prohibited for use during taxi, takeoff, climbout, descent, final approach, and landing. These devices include, but are not limited to laptop computers, video cameras, tape recorders, radio and TV receivers, CD and tape players, electronic entertainment devices, and electric shavers. b. should be allowed to operate during other stages of flight (other than taxi, takeoff, climbout, descent, final approach, and landing) unless the operator of the airplanes has determined that the device can not be operated."

      So it would be cool on airplanes too.

    7. Re:Five-to-TEN hours of video! by anttik · · Score: 1

      Yes I have but I haven't had any eletronic devices with me.

      Yes I know. I'm sick.

    8. Re:Five-to-TEN hours of video! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      probably not ripped ones, a custom chip means instant DRM!

    9. Re:Five-to-TEN hours of video! by phoxix · · Score: 1
      The story says you get double the battery life with an external battery pack.

      I'm guessing you have never seen the outrageous prices sony charges for external battery packs.

      Actually, its more amazing that anyone (even sony) could even think of charging the amount they do for their external battery packs (speaking as a sony picturebook owner).

      Sunny Dubey

    10. Re:Five-to-TEN hours of video! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>The story says you get double the battery life with an external battery pack. Man. This thing would be sweet for watching movies on airplanes!

      Ok, but where can a get an external DVD ROM drive for it? How else am I going to to watch a full length DVD-quality movie on this thing?

    11. Re:Five-to-TEN hours of video! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can have a radio or a TV. Broadcasting signals (as with cellphones) is the potential problem, not receiving them. Radio signals for TV and radio are in the air regardless of whether you're receiving them.

    12. Re:Five-to-TEN hours of video! by groomed · · Score: 1

      I'd rather bring a book.

    13. Re:Five-to-TEN hours of video! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming you can fit a movie into 16Mb of RAM...

    14. Re:Five-to-TEN hours of video! by geeber · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, well I've got a processer that get's QUADRUPLE the battery life WITHOUT an external battery pack. Hang on, give me a minute, it's here somewhere...

      In other words, I'll believe the specs, when I see them for myself.

    15. Re:Five-to-TEN hours of video! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I presume the 16 hr life is for "light" useage.
      You think you can watch 30fps porn on this thing for 16 hr stright? Unlikely.

      The HP ipaq 2215 says it got a 12 hr battery on thier shinny box. Does that mean you get to play AOE on that for 12 hr without a charge? No.

    16. Re:Five-to-TEN hours of video! by Patrick · · Score: 1
      The story says you get double the battery life with an external battery pack. Man. This thing would be sweet for watching movies on airplanes!

      Sony's battery-life claims are based on using low-demand apps with the backlight off. Weasel Reader, for example, really does last the claimed 7-10 hours on a charge. Movie players don't. To watch a movie, you'll want the backlight turned all the way up, and the CPU and sound chip will be running full time. You'd be lucky to watch three hours of video, let alone ten.

      Plus two more things. Movie-capable Clies thus far have shipped with Kinoma, which uses the highly proprietary Cinepak Mobile CODEC. Don't expect your DivX;-) rips to work. (I tried converting them. No love.) And second, have you checked the price of 1GB memory sticks recently? (Hint: more expensive than buying a portable DVD player!) How exactly did you plan to store that movie?

    17. Re:Five-to-TEN hours of video! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So bring a book, then.

    18. Re:Five-to-TEN hours of video! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony hasn't included Kinoma in any of the OS5 Clie models. For the last ten months they have been including the Sony Movie Player which plays back MPEG-4 video with AAC sound. So, it's definatly Divx quality.

  4. proprietary hardware by Pompatus · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Even if the hardware is better, proprietary hardware is bad. It limits the choices of what you can do with the devicce you own. It goes beyond the "can I run linux on it", hell a valid question would be "am I able to run windows on it?"

    Beta was technically better than VHS. Look what won. Popularity is important. (possibly a bad example, I had a valid point, but I might have lost it to inebriation)

    --

    ----
    Squirrel ... It's not just for breakfast anymore
    1. Re:proprietary hardware by AntiOrganic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, I've repeated this many more times than I care to, Beta was not better than VHS. Beta tapes, while technically superior in quality (and only marginally so), were only one hour long, whereas VHS tapes, clunky as they were, were two hours long, capable of recording an entire feature-length movie unattended. Eventually, the length of a Beta tape would be extended as the standard was revised and perfected, but by this time the damage had already been done and VHS had taken hold. It was this fundamental difference that led to Beta losing the video format war, not some silly "open standard."

      Do you own a Playstation2? That's got all sorts of proprietary hardware in it. Can you run Linux on it? Yes, you can.

    2. Re:proprietary hardware by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I don't remember beta tapes being an hour. We rented regular movies all the time, and they weren't two tapes.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:proprietary hardware by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      Erm.
      • Whether BetaMax was actually better than VHS is open to question. At the very least, the short cartridges (originally 30 minutes, later an hour) was a major technical difficiency which meant it often couldn't do the job many people wanted VCRs to do. Image quality is unlikely to have been that much better with Betamax either - on my conventional TV, not exactly top of the line but an improvement on what was around in 1978 at any rate, I've seen VHS tapes that, on first use, have looked equal to DVD. NTSC does some awful things.
      • BetaMax was not proprietary or closed. Most manufacturers chose JVC's VHS system instead, but arguably this was because it was more suited to the task at hand.
      • BetaMax was the entrenched incumbent when VHS came along. It had been moderately successful, video rental stores had opened renting movies in BetaMax format, essentially VHS had an uphill climb. Yes, it ended up being more popular, but when it came out, BetaMax was the popular format.
      Not that I disagree with the general "proprietry bad, open good" sentiment of your post. I just think you picked the wrong example. ;-)
      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    4. Re:proprietary hardware by curious.corn · · Score: 1

      Sorry I don't agree. As long as there's a compiler (like gcc) and decent documentation for the architecture (boot process, board logic, etc) there's nothing to complain about it. Is intel GTL bus non-proprietary? Is AGP unencumbered? Are AMDs processors libre? Just because everyone and your neighbour own (or should I say license?) one doesn't mean it's non-propietary (take M$). If sony releases detailed specs (or even reference implenetations) for their hardware they're just as good as anyone else.

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
    5. Re:proprietary hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      90 minutes, usually. Movies were often cut to fit on a single Beta tape.

    6. Re:proprietary hardware by common_sence · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Proprietary doesn't equal non-standard. I would assume it would have to maintain compatibility with the current generation instruction sets because I can't see Sony doing away with the Palm OS.

      Look at the PocketPC...3 different processor types and they all run Windows OS. Much the same way that Linux can run on PPC, Sun and Intel chips.

      So long as compatibility is maintained and it supports the broadest range of instructions, more power to them.

      As for MS or Linux on a handheld...WHY? Sure, I'm all for it for those who want that, bu honestly the Palm OS is one of the best handheld OS's on the market. The old PSION OS was great too. I haven't played with the Sharp Linux handheld, but every MS handheld I've used is power-hungry and a memory hog.

      soapbox

      One last thing. Just because you own the device, doesn't mean it HAS to support user changes. If you don't like the way it comes, dob't buy it! You don't buy a Ford and then complain that the engine is proprietary and that you should be able to put a Honda engine in it because of increased fuel efficiency. For crying out loud, now that there's a Linux powered handheld, BUY THAT if you really must have Linux on your handheld.

      /soapbox

      --
      sig? No thanks, I don't smoke.
    7. Re:proprietary hardware by AntiOrganic · · Score: 1

      BetaMax was a proprietary technology until Sony decided to license the format to Zenith once JVC had unveiled their VHS recorders.

    8. Re:proprietary hardware by jpkunst · · Score: 1

      I have heard that VHS defeated Betamax because there was no porn on Betamax, but there was on VHS. I wouldn't be surprised if it was an urban legend, though.

      JP

    9. Re:proprietary hardware by stevejsmith · · Score: 1

      Every new medium of communication was jumpstarted by the pornography industry. It's a known fact. Cable, VHS, and the Internet, for sure. Just think about it.

    10. Re:proprietary hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a lot of non-proprietary hardware out there, twit.

    11. Re:proprietary hardware by worst_name_ever · · Score: 4, Informative
      Even if the hardware is better, proprietary hardware is bad. It limits the choices of what you can do with the devicce you own.

      Proprietary != Incompatible.

      The new Sony CPU mentioned in the article is a fairly normal ARM core with Sony's choice of peripherals built on-chip. This is a perfectly normal thing to do in the industry.

      --

      In Soviet Rush, today's Tom Sawyer gets high on you.
    12. Re:proprietary hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Intel is proprietary hardware.

      An important consideration is whether the company will
      expose their hardware to outside development. In the case
      of sony, the answer is yes. Their PS2 has a linux distro
      (courtesy of Sony). Their clie models have extensive
      company-supported development tools, from gcc to
      metrowerks.

    13. Re:proprietary hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Do you own a Playstation2? That's got all sorts of proprietary hardware in it. Can you run Linux on it? Yes, you can.

      No, you can't. Not really.

      Sony sells a Linux kit, but Linux does not run on the PS2. Sony's proprietary software runs, and creates a virtual hardware environment which runs Linux. Linux does not have direct access to any PS2 hardware, and since that hardware is proprietary, it can't run without proprietary Sony software.

    14. Re:proprietary hardware by vidnet · · Score: 1, Funny
      You don't buy a Ford and then complain that the engine is proprietary and that you should be able to put a Honda engine in it because of increased fuel efficiency.

      You don't buy chicken and then complain that it is full of salmonella and that you should be able to cut both it and the lettuce without getting sick!

      Nah. I'm a vegetarian, so I just like to mention diseases in meats. Never mind.

    15. Re:proprietary hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because you own the device, doesn't mean it HAS to support user changes. If you don't like the way it comes, dob't buy it! You don't buy a Ford and then complain that the engine is proprietary and that you should be able to put a Honda engine in it because of increased fuel efficiency.

      Uh, what? Of course if you own something it supports user changes! Just don't expect the company to help you out. But equally, you should not be sued if you tell others how to do it.

      I think you probably could put a Honda engine in a Ford, why not?

    16. Re:proprietary hardware by SN74S181 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The first thing I thought of, as an Assembly Language person, was 'where do I download the documents for the instruction set for this processor?'

      Somebody better be able to download them, because otherwise there's NOT going to be a GCC for the part.

    17. Re:proprietary hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Look at the PocketPC...3 different processor types and they all run Windows OS. Much the same way that Linux can run on PPC, Sun and Intel chips.

      Yeah, like a StrongArm and XScale (a StrongArm core with questionable extensions that can make its MHz rating higher without really improving performance much). The same executable can run on both. Seriously, MS used to support a whole variety of processors, but they've tried to cut down to just StrongArm back when they introduced Pocket PC 2002.

      As someone far more insightful than I pointed out, this latest Sony chip is still a StrongArm at heart.

    18. Re:proprietary hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DRM peripherals

    19. Re:proprietary hardware by v1z · · Score: 1
      Beta tapes, while technically superior in quality (and only marginally so)


      Hm. I rather recently did some semi-professional videorecording/editing for broadcast tv-use, and the stations wanted a Beta master tape. Are the "recent" broadcast-quality Beta-player/recorders significantly different from the original players ? They certainly have a much better timersignal than VHS.


      And MUCH higher quality.


      Are there more than one "Beta" format ?

    20. Re:proprietary hardware by Xenna · · Score: 1

      As for MS or Linux on a handheld...WHY? Sure, I'm all for it for those who want that, bu honestly the Palm OS is one of the best handheld OS's on the market.

      As a new Palm OS user, I bought a Clie TG50 a few months ago, I have to disagree here. PalmOS may have been great for the original palms, but it's starting to show limitations. The TG50 is a great little machine but for someone migrating from Symbian (Nokia 9210) there are some puzzling idiosyncracies.

      The lack of proper multitasking is annoying. I can't - for instance - have an IRC session open and quickly switch to my address book to look up a phone number. The IRC session will be dropped.

      It also seems like the support for a proper filesystem with directories has been added as an afterthought. Unfortunately that means that opening and saving files can be a problem in many applications. Even the standard Sony apps.

      IMHO the Palm OS was well suited to support electronic agenda's, but the software seems to be lagging behind the hardware, which is becoming more and more PC like...

      Regards,
      Xenna

    21. Re:proprietary hardware by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 1

      The new Sony CPU mentioned in the article is a fairly normal ARM core with Sony's choice of peripherals built on-chip. This is a perfectly normal thing to do in the industry.

      Indeed, it is also something that Sony has done before. The MIPS core in the PlayStation 2 is not only combined on a chip with other hardware, but it includes significant deviations from standard MIPS processors: floating point exception support removed, 128-bit integer registers, dozens of SIMD instructions that operate on 128-bit registers.

    22. Re:proprietary hardware by siliC · · Score: 1

      Actually, only some parts of the PS2 are encumbered in the Sony environment provided by the Linux kit. The CPU, vector processors, most of the memory, and other juicy bits are directly accessible.

      Try it, you'll like it!

      sili

  5. Damn it by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was hoping we'd see the first dual-Xeon handhelds, or even a 2GHz quad-G5 palm computer. I mean, think of the advances these would force in battery and heat dissipation technologies alone!

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    1. Re:Damn it by yomegaman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Either that or you'd see oven mitts at CompUSA marketed as "PDA accessories".

      --
      ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
    2. Re:Damn it by rmarll · · Score: 3, Funny

      Either that or you'd see oven mitts at CompUSA marketed as "PDA accessories".

      You could flip the keyboard over and it doubles as a skillet! Perfect for camping trips!

    3. Re:Damn it by brejc8 · · Score: 1

      Sadly the battery-wise there haven't been any advances since they were invented. Batteries are still made the same way they allways have been.
      What we do have a bit more of is ways to keep things cool. Not by heatsinking but by clock gating, automatic clock speed adjustments and asynchronous technology.

    4. Re:Damn it by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      what are you talking about?

      no advances...how about micro fel cells....if they use hydrogen, you can capture the water and then plop it into a recharger that reverses the process in the cell.

      how about useing one of those suckers in a remote? don't have the change the cell for 10 years!!!

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    5. Re:Damn it by brejc8 · · Score: 1

      Those are fuel cells and not batteries. They still need a few more years before they fit into an two AAA battery remote.

    6. Re:Damn it by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      I said Fuel cells....and yes, I know they still have a few years, but the first Bateries were huge.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    7. Re:Damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, did the retard enhancement come standard, or did it cost extra?

    8. Re:Damn it by Hamster+Of+Death · · Score: 1

      George Forman will be all over this!

  6. $700 price point by marshac · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I still don't understand this. At this price, you are in direct competition with a laptop, and the laptop can do a lot more. I think that HP is moving in the right direction by offering sub $300 ipaq units that are actually quite nice.

    1. Re:$700 price point by james72 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This argument again?! PDA / Laptop's have totally different use patterns. I don't/can't carry a laptop in my pocket. Windows doesn't boot in less than a second (even with suspend/hibernate). A laptops hard drive probably wouldn't take the knocking about my PDA gets... etc, etc. Chalk/cheese. Thank you!

    2. Re:$700 price point by rmarll · · Score: 1

      Everything but fit in your pocket.

    3. Re:$700 price point by jspectre · · Score: 3, Funny
      have you seen the size of this thing? it won't fit in your pocket either, and if it does it's likely to pull your pants down.

      "excuse me, is that a clie in your pocket or a brick???"

      --

      abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

    4. Re:$700 price point by BlueTrin · · Score: 1

      What the original poster meant was:

      This price is approximately equal to a small laptop. Even if a PDA has another use, the laptop can do all the things that a PDA can do and alot more even if it cannot fit your pocket. So these new PDAs are targeting the high-income market. As I am someone who works in computers, I won't buy one of these if I do not have already a decent laptop.

      I totally understand your point, comparing a PDA with a laptop would be like comparing a desktop and a laptop (some years ago, now notebooks can be really used as replacements of desktops if you can afford the price). But I think that most of the people on /. use computers as their main tool in their work. So most of them won't buy a PDA if they do not have already a laptop. Although, I agree that people who do not work in computers may prefer a really nice PDA to an entry level laptop

      That was just my 2 cents =)

      --
      Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
    5. Re:$700 price point by gladbach · · Score: 1

      I think he is right though. 700 bucks, you *can* get a laptop. Sure, a lot of geeks may/will be willing to pay that kind of money for a pda, but joe schmoe consumer will look at that 700 dollar pda in best buy, then look over towards the laptop section and see a laptop for about that amount, and think "what the hell?"

      yes, they have different usage patterns, but very very few people imho need 700 bucks worth of those usage patterns

      --
      "Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms,
    6. Re:$700 price point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, 4.25" x 3.5" and a little over .5" thick. And it weighs a whopping 6 ounces.

      My current handheld is about 4" x 3" x .5", and it isn't much lighter than 6 ounces, and it fits in my pocket just fine.

      In other words, you are full of shit.

    7. Re:$700 price point by marshac · · Score: 1

      If they have totally different use patterns, then why do they try to mimic the same functions as the laptop? Is video really necessary on a PDA? Sure, it's cool and all, but how is it useful? How does this function serve to justify the cost? Yeah, it can play mp3s, that's cool too, but again, same question as before. I have gone through several Palm units, and through 2 iPaqs. What did I use them for? Well, I played bejeweled a lot on the IIIc, and I played a few mp3s on the iPaq... oh yes, I also used the contacts / calendar functions on each. I guess that i'm starting to 'grow up' in my nerdish behavior and am beginning to realize that tech, for the simple reason of tech, is not enough. I will be the first to admit though, I do enjoy my toys.

    8. Re:$700 price point by james72 · · Score: 1

      :) But that's the whole point, a laptop can't fit in your pocket! I have a desktop, a laptop and a PDA - and use the one right for the job. A PDA like this is great when you're in the car and can't remember the address of something and need a quick google when you're stopped at a traffic light. Cheers, -James.

    9. Re:$700 price point by james72 · · Score: 2, Redundant

      I think you're missing the point... I go jogging with my PDA in my pocket, playing my latest MP3's. You can't do that with a laptop. I can't quickly lookup my mates number in the pub on a laptop. Need google when you're stuck in traffic on the way to the beach? Laptop's at home... Anyway, I think I've laboured my point enough. -James.

    10. Re:$700 price point by 73939133 · · Score: 1

      This thing fits in your pocket and has excellent battery life; neither of those is true for even the smallest laptops (which Sony also makes). And small laptops are actually quite expensive, usually upwards of $2000.

    11. Re:$700 price point by PhotoBoy · · Score: 1

      The other thing to point out about this price is, what can this device do that a PDA for half the price can't?

      What are the killer apps that will make me throw away my current PDA for it? So far I can't see anything that a decent iPaq or Palm couldn't handle just as well.

    12. Re:$700 price point by Keith+Russell · · Score: 2, Informative

      The landscape form factor makes it look bigger than it really is. Check these stats out:

      • Sony UX50: 103.0 x 86.5 x 17.9 mm
      • Sony NX80V: 131.5 x 71.9 x 21.8 mm
      • Palm Tungsten T: 101.6 x 75.0 x 15.2 mm (closed)

      It's a little "wider" than most PDAs, but it's only marginally larger in the other dimensions than a T|T, which is pretty darned small. palminfocenter.com has a picture of a Sony executive holding up a UX50 "prototype". In context, it looks rather normal-sized.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    13. Re:$700 price point by wfrp01 · · Score: 1

      doesn't boot in less than a second

      That will likely change. Google for '"instant on" computer'.

      But anyway, you're right. For now. However, I'd like to see the general purpose PC usurp the PDA. The problem is, laptops are inherently large, for three primary reasons: (1) more horsepower, (2) bona-fide keyboards, (3) big displays. I might add (4), more ports/plugs, etc.

      I don't want to give any of those things up. But I want them to fit in my pocket. I think it can happen. Moore's law will take care of number 1. A soon-to-rich inventor will concoct an extremely small form factor input mechanism to replace keyboards, mice, joysticks etc. which permits 80+ word/minute input speeds. That takes care of 2. Google for 'retinal display' or 'mems display' for the answer to 3. As for 4, who needs all those damn ports anyway? Daisy chained peripherals on an ultra fast serial bus is the future. One bus uber alles. That's fine with me.

      Now why do we need a PDA?

      --

      --Lawrence Lessig for Congress!
    14. Re:$700 price point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i aint' happy to see you either.

    15. Re:$700 price point by jspectre · · Score: 1
      ok. granted. it will fit in your pocket. but it's going to take up the whole pocket and it's not as light as my wallet, definately not back pocket material unless you wanna hear it go crunch when you forget about it and sit down. and i don't see it fitting in my shirt pocket (it won't fit in my protector ;-)

      just because something is "pocket sized" it doesn't mean you'd want to carry it in your pocket all day long.

      --

      abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

    16. Re:$700 price point by uradu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > then why do they try to mimic the same functions as the laptop?

      Because you can. My main problem with these devices is the price. There's just no way I will carry a $700 item in my pant pockets, period. And I suspect there are plenty more people that think the same way--I just can't see these things flying off the shelves. Too many hazards: knocking it against a table edge while walking, losing it while running, putting it in the wash with the pants, etc. While its features are certainly very nice and desireable, I sigh and pay $100 for an SJ20 that does most of the things I need from it, has a hirez screen, rechargeable battery, and comes as close to being disposable as $100 will ever be.

    17. Re:$700 price point by Goon+Number+1 · · Score: 1

      Take note: I'm a klutz who destroyed my Sharp Zaurus Wizard by dropping it from the whopping height of 18" onto a carpeted (but not padded) concrete floor. I've broken my nose by both walking and swimming into walls.

      I've had both a Handspring Visor Deluxe and a Sony Clie PEG-NR70V. I have NEVER damaged them by walking into table edges, dropping them etc.

      Also, because I keep so much important info in my PDA, I'm always mindful of where it is, so when I get home it goes directly in the cradle as I empty my pockets for the day.

      It's not a matter of the price of the unit, it's what I keep in there that makes it so valuable to me. These things are pretty durable to start with, especially the Clie with it's metal shell.

      --
      http://radio.weblogs.com/0103443/
    18. Re:$700 price point by Morgahastu · · Score: 1

      My Powerbook returns from sleep in a second.

    19. Re:$700 price point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For $700, I can get all new kitchen appliances! What are they thinking?

    20. Re:$700 price point by Gambit-x7x · · Score: 1

      Desent Laptop doesn't coust less then $1500
      and if you looking for top stuff and brand name
      it will run yo over $3000

      --
      Who controls the information, controls the world...
  7. just an ARM core in their ASIC by js7a · · Score: 4, Interesting
    With the meager about of cache (32Kw split) that Intel ships with their Xscales, I don't blame Sony for taping out their own chip.

    I've been trying to get Intel to increase their cache in response to the pressures from the kind of algorithms people want to run on portables, but even though they'll sacrafice battery life on the altar of huge, bright, color LCDs in their reference designs, they won't even double their cache.

    1. Re:just an ARM core in their ASIC by ceallaigh · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind Intel XScales are very expensive per chip even in large quantities it is far cheaper to simply place an ARM core in a custom ASIC. XScales are over hyped. Atmel, Samsung, Motorola, TI are among many ARM based chip broviders that offer much better price performance. This is actually a wise decision on Sony's part.

    2. Re:just an ARM core in their ASIC by brejc8 · · Score: 1

      I read both articles and I dont think it is an ARM. I wouldnt be suprised if they did write their own ISA. They have been working with IBM on the micrcores for the playstation 3 and writing a nice low power ISA with MM instructions seems quite likely to me. There are many tools to easily adapt compilers and debuggers to any instrcution sey you like. I suspect it is actually multiple core and controlibly speculative. That way you simply dont waste power but get reasonable performance.

    3. Re:just an ARM core in their ASIC by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Sony Handheld Engine has an ARM 926 core. It has to be ARM, because Palm OS 5 doesn't run on anything else.

    4. Re:just an ARM core in their ASIC by brejc8 · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. I an really disappointed. At least they had the decensy to put a reasonable Gfx processor. Unfortunately the CPU shares the on chip RAM with the video.pic. They could have done something real good with this and built a "real" low power machine reather than just another arm imbedded SoC.

    5. Re:just an ARM core in their ASIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've been trying to get Intel to increase their cache

      Hey, I've been trying to get Intel to give me the $20 bucks they owe me. Next time you see them, can you let them know? Or I'm not loaning them my lawn mower ever again.

    6. Re:just an ARM core in their ASIC by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Intel is the same company that put 1MB of L2 onto the PIII CPU that is in the Centrino chipset so that they'd get acceptable performance at a low clock.

      I wonder if this is another one of Intel's strategies to separate Xscale from their x86 line as much as possible - they just might not want anyone using an Xscale in a high performance task when a Centrino would do the job twice as poorly (for the task). Centrino is nice, but not something you want to build a palm device around.

    7. Re:just an ARM core in their ASIC by Talez · · Score: 1

      Intel is the same company that put 1MB of L2 onto the PIII CPU that is in the Centrino chipset so that they'd get acceptable performance at a low clock.

      I don't know of any Intel like that. The Intel I know of added 1MB of L2 cache, partitioned it into 32K slabs for maximum perfomance and power efficiency and then proceeded to rework the pipeline of the more efficient P3 core, introduced micro-ops fusion, dynamically change the clock of the FSB and generally sqeezed as much as they could out of every clock cycle.

      Centrino has finally given the mobile world what they wanted; A chip that would finally deserve to take the place of the ULV P3-M as well as meeting or beating the performance of most Pentium 4-Ms.

      Hell, if the 1.6GHz Pentium-M was cheap enough I'd want one in my desktop.

    8. Re:just an ARM core in their ASIC by andrewski · · Score: 1

      Holy CRAP! 32 Kw of cache? It must have high-torque RAM and a viscous differential to handle that kind of cache!

    9. Re:just an ARM core in their ASIC by chipace · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link... I'd rather read about the real thing, than listen to some geeks do a comedy routine.

    10. Re:just an ARM core in their ASIC by js7a · · Score: 1
      I wonder if this is another one of Intel's strategies to separate Xscale from their x86

      I'm afraid so. Revolt!

  8. Battery Life Impressive? Huh? by syntap · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This new processor will give users 16 hours of battery life (impressive!)

    Huh? Maybe 16 hours is impressive for a laptop computer or a Windows mobile device but this is a Palm OS device. My current color Clie gets at least that with backlight on most of the time.

    1. Re:Battery Life Impressive? Huh? by xswl0931 · · Score: 1

      16 hours idle is certainly not impressive. Personally, I'd rather they state the minimum battery life, that is how long the device will last using full cpu, full backlight.

    2. Re:Battery Life Impressive? Huh? by stevejsmith · · Score: 2

      I'm sure you'd rather that they try to be modest in their specs. But Sony would also rather sell things.

      I can see it now...

      20 minute battery life*!





      *running AutoCAD under Mac on Linux with Linux running in a VirtualPC

      What a dumb comment.

  9. And among other things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And among other this this processor will probably embbed some Sony(TM) internal DRM technology preventing you from putting the device to any good and proper use (OGG baby!). Other that that I would think that some of the more established CPU manufactureres (i.e. Motorola or Transmeta) would probably come with equaly impressive CPU solution of their own if it would be as simple as that. This is not to say that Sony doesn't have the know-how needed to produce one, but it also means that any serious attempt at this market will probably be the result of years of development and refinement. Unless they are developing the CPU on the basis of some already established architecture (ARM?) they are in for tough time if they are to produce The CPU to power their next-gen toys.

    My $0.02

    1. Re:And among other things by v1z · · Score: 1
      this processor will probably embbed some Sony(TM) internal DRM technology preventing you from putting the device to any good and proper use (OGG baby!).

      Err. A DRM that checks the currently loaded instructions to detect ... multimedialike logic sequences ?

      While they may cripple the OS, and make it hard to install a new one -- I can't see how they can prevent you from using just ogg, while allowing you to run a different non-sony multimedia app ?

      But it will be interesting to see wether Sony's computer/software devision or Sony Music/Media wins in the end. Apparently they have quite a row going on stuff like mp3.

  10. My Latitude LS gets 2 hours max by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    And that's the way I like it!

  11. Price point by The+Tyro · · Score: 3, Insightful

    700$ seem expensive, but if you get the top-o-the-line zaurus and throw in a WLAN card, you get about the same price. However, this thing has a bigger screen, and it sounds like the sony may have much better battery life.

    Marketing claims, however, aren't... we'll see when it gets independently reviewed.

    Proprietary processor though... Hmmm... that might be a red flag.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    1. Re:Price point by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Most of the people who get these will not be paying for their own, so price isn't too big of an issue.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:Price point by NotAnotherReboot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I fail to see how the processor is any more proprietary than say a Motorola processor if it will still run the same OS.

    3. Re:Price point by rmarll · · Score: 1

      Any word on if this is a variation of their "cell" processor or not?

    4. Re:Price point by 73939133 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Proprietary processor though... Hmmm... that might be a red flag.

      Well, the weird part isn't the ARM core, it's the undocumented and proprietary audio I/O, DSP, memory architecture and other devices that Sony puts into these devices. You can't even access those through the proprietary OS that runs on these machines.

      However, this thing has a bigger screen, and it sounds like the sony may have much better battery life.

      The Sharp actually seems like a nicer handheld and the Sharp screen has double the number of pixels. However, the better battery life and built-in BT and WiFi make the Sony a winner.

      Also, the PDA software on the Sharp just isn't competitive: the Palm PDA apps are far better than the Sharp, and Bluetooth configuration on the Sharp is a nightmare. Furthermore, in a twist of irony, you can develop commercial apps for the Sony for free, using all free tools, while you need to pay a lot of money to develop commercial Qt/Embedded apps.

  12. Sigh by S.I.O. · · Score: 5, Funny

    > which are due to ship this Semptember

    Damn, I was hoping for an Awegust release.

    1. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just so long as it doesn't slip to Shocktober.

  13. Where have I heard this before? by SlashChick · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "This new processor will give users 16 hours of battery life..."

    Hmm... where have I heard this before? Oh yeah... Transmeta.

    It will be great if the handheld lives up to its hype... but I'll be waiting for benchmarks of a released product before I believe it.

  14. missed it (sorta) by poptones · · Score: 1
    Both of you kinda missed it. Contrary to the (ironically) mythic "debunking" found on the net, if you'll hit the library and consult old issues of of industry print like eetimes, etc. you'll find a pretty detailed recounting of the "licensing wars." The Beta vs. VHS battle was still raging pretty well until the technology went from "consumer electronics" to commodity electronics. Both wanted desperately to hold onto their IP, but Sony was far more steadfast than the Japan Victor corp, and soon low cost VHS VCRs were flowing like coffee beans.

    And that is what sealed the fate of Beta. It wasn't just a question of not wanting to license, but not wanting to license production to cheap, mass market producers in hong kong and taiwann, that did the format in.

  15. SS1000 by SHEENmaster · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    When it comes to cache size vs. price, you can't beat my Sun SS1000. Four processors with SuperCache! I paid ~$5 for it.

    Consumer products have always been behind the times in the numbers that buyers ignore. Why does a decade-old server have more cache than a brand new desktop? Because no consumer looks at cache when buying a computer, despite the massive impact on performance.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  16. ISA diversity is a benifit to linux by brejc8 · · Score: 1

    It would be nice if sony had another instruction set on these chips. Linux can adapt very quickly to new architecuyres unlike some commercial software. Gcc is especially easy to adapt to new architecture and with tools like KMD you can have a whole compiler assembler debugger withing days reather than starting from scratch.

    Its nice that companies now have a choice to make their own chips because the software is portable across architectures.

    1. Re:ISA diversity is a benifit to linux by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      However, device makers do things that benefit them, not Liunx. Since the licensing is so cheap and flexible, it looks like the handheld market is standardizing on ARM. Making your own chips != designing your own architecture.

    2. Re:ISA diversity is a benifit to linux by brejc8 · · Score: 1

      The reason they were standardising on ARM is because they wanted to get the software support and the redy made cores. Now that the Alpha engineers are not making arms and the best designs are from over 10 years ago the architecture is not fast enough. The ARM ISA is slowing down and people want even more power in their handhelds. Intel can drive the x86 ISA for a very long time simpley because the size or the power disapation is not an issue. So you can play tricks like decode to RISC and so on but this is not possible on low poer devices. I can feel a new wave if ISAs coming through. The costs of creating new tools chains are so low that it is becoming more cost effective to change your tool chain tham pay out for MIPS and ARM licences.

    3. Re:ISA diversity is a benifit to linux by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      Now that the Alpha engineers are not making arms and the best designs are from over 10 years ago the architecture is not fast enough.

      I admit that I'm a little disappointed with XScale, but have you heard of the Halla? If you could get that core in an OMAP-like SoC...

    4. Re:ISA diversity is a benifit to linux by brejc8 · · Score: 1

      I wonder how much are they paying to arm to have an ISA licence. It was only recently that there were only three ARM ISA licences awarded. One to Motarolla, one to (the then) DEC and one to the amulet group for the asynchronous ARMs.

    5. Re:ISA diversity is a benifit to linux by js7a · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I can feel a new wave if ISAs coming through.

      I hope so, but I haven't heard of anything free in practice lately other than MIPS minus unaligned load/store patented instructions. Intel has ratcheted down the license fee for ARM ISA to literally next to nothing because they are competing against those free MIPS subsets.

      The ISA is insignificant in comparison to cache architecture in all the heavy-duty applications I care about. A/V codecs, which lend themselves directly to hardware a lot better than huristic search does, as far as I'm concerned, are only good for the, erm, health benefits.

      Can't wait for Red Star, though, I want solar powered speech toys.

    6. Re:ISA diversity is a benifit to linux by mrseigen · · Score: 1
      Now that the Alpha engineers are not making arms
      Fuck ARMs, I want an Alpha in my next PDA.
    7. Re:ISA diversity is a benifit to linux by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      This article from a sibling post makes it sound like Samsung doesn't have an architectural license.

  17. nice hardware, weird software by 73939133 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Clies are nifty hardware, but their software is getting weirder and weirder. Nominally, they run PalmOS, but the user interface is quite different and the Clies ship with a lot of applications that won't run on any other Palm.

    Furthermore, some important Palm functions, like anything using audio, won't work on the Clies because Sony has created their own undocumented and proprietary APIs. Memory on these devices is also getting really strange, with 16M of RAM, 16M of more RAM that is somehow not quite as accessible, and 29M of built-in flash memory, plus some other RAM somewhere else for some other purpose.

    Furthermore, Palm applications in general often don't scale well to high resolution or non-square screens, meaning that primarily applications designed for 320x480 landscape mode on these Clies will work well on them, while regular Palm applications will often just be scaled-up 160x160 windows.

    I guess the best way to look at Clies is as consumer gadgets, not hardware running an operating system: you get the software that comes with them. Some additional Palm software may work on them, but perhaps not all that well.

    I wish Sony would just put Palm out of their misery and buy them. They could then do something sensible like put PalmOS on top of a decent kernel, like Linux, QNX, or Symbian, while keeping the existing applications; those kernels could do as good a job at running existing Palm applications as PalmOS 5 does, and they don't suffer from the same memory management or driver stupidity as PalmOS. They would also make PalmOS a much more credible platform for enterprise apps. And, unlike PalmOS 6, they are here right now, they are debugged, they are mature, and they are efficient.

    1. Re:nice hardware, weird software by mst76 · · Score: 3, Informative
      They could then do something sensible like put PalmOS on top of a decent kernel, like Linux, QNX, or Symbian, while keeping the existing applications; those kernels could do as good a job at running existing Palm applications as PalmOS 5 does, and they don't suffer from the same memory management or driver stupidity as PalmOS.
      In case you didn't know, at least until version 4, PalmOS was built on top of the AMX RTOS from Kadak. Alledgedly, their contract did not allow Palm to expose the multitasking API to developers, but some of their own libraries did make use of multitasking.
    2. Re:nice hardware, weird software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I develop Palm apps for a living. Supporting the Clie and its various differences has been an annoyance to me in the past, but I have to defend Sony on a few points here. Sony wrote a lot of extensions to the Palm OS in their API because quite frankly, Palm was dragging its ass. Until OS5, Palm didn't have a high res API of their own, or a real sound manager API.

      So yes, something written using the Palm OS5's (more recent) sound API won't work on an older OS4 Clie. You can hardly expect Sony to put out PDAs that conform to standards that don't exist yet. Sony's newer Clies actually do run OS5 and do obey the new Palm APIs (as well as their own, for backwards compatibility with older Clies). Their different ratio screens haven't been a backwards compatibility problem for most things, as the extra space was usually used as a software silkscreen input area. I don't know how this new device will be though.

      Finally, the Sony APIs are documented. They're available with their freely downloadable SDK, along with PDF docs, Clie simulators, emulators, etc. Sony is a bastard for many reasons and their Japanese developer support can be awful. But overall they've done pretty good by the Clie.

    3. Re:nice hardware, weird software by 73939133 · · Score: 1

      but I have to defend Sony on a few points here. Sony wrote a lot of extensions to the Palm OS in their API because quite frankly, Palm was dragging its ass.

      So? I didn't make any statements that this was Sony's fault. In fact, I find it pretty amazing what Sony has been able to do with what has got to be one of the most poorly designed operating systems around.

      So yes, something written using the Palm OS5's (more recent) sound API won't work on an older OS4 Clie. [...] Sony's newer Clies actually do run OS5 and do obey the new Palm APIs

      You don't know what you are talking about: the Palm OS 5 Clies do not support the standard Palm sound APIs.

      Finally, the Sony APIs are documented. They're available with their freely downloadable SDK, along with PDF docs, Clie simulators, emulators, etc.

      Again, you don't know what you are talking about. Check AeroPlayer or Pocket-Tunes; they don't work on OS5 Clies and their developers can't get them to work because Sony isn't publishing the API.

      But, hey, if you can prove me wrong by posting a pointer to Sony's audio API documentation for OS5 (note that they have some documentation for some audio API on their site, but that's not what goes with their OS5 Clies; I think that's for their OS4 stuff, which is yet different), then I, as well as the developers of AeroPlayer and Pocket-Tunes would be really happy.

      Their different ratio screens haven't been a backwards compatibility problem for most things, as the extra space was usually used as a software silkscreen input area.

      That is precisely the problem: a decent window system would let applications take advantage of more screen space. A regular PalmOS app running on a 320x480 device will get rescaled from 160x160 to 320x320, looking very blocky, and not use 160x320 pixels. Short of displaying nothing at all, it's hard to imagine how any window system could support larger screens any worse than PalmOS does.

      I develop Palm apps for a living.

      What a depressing thought.

    4. Re:nice hardware, weird software by Tuqui · · Score: 1

      They Stress Palm to the Limits, they should change to Linux or other OS.(Sony will not use PocketPC I hope)

    5. Re:nice hardware, weird software by dschl · · Score: 1
      Again, you don't know what you are talking about. Check AeroPlayer or Pocket-Tunes; they don't work on OS5 Clies and their developers can't get them to work because Sony isn't publishing the API.

      But, hey, if you can prove me wrong by posting a pointer to Sony's audio API documentation for OS5 (note that they have some documentation for some audio API on their site, but that's not what goes with their OS5 Clies; I think that's for their OS4 stuff, which is yet different), then I, as well as the developers of AeroPlayer and Pocket-Tunes would be really happy.

      Will the Sony Sound Developer Kit suffice for your needs? According the the Sound SDK faq, it supports all Clies with enhanced sound support, including but not limited to the PEG-T400/T415/T425, PEG-T600C/T615C/T625C, PEG-NR70/NR70V, PEG-T650C/T665C/T675C, PEG-SJ33, PEG-NX60/PEG-NX70V, PEG-NZ90, and PEG-TG50.

      I also checked the Sony SDK 3.0 (for Sony Clie using Palm OS 4) for audio APIs, which appeared to be present in the Programmers Companion, unless my eyes deceive me and functions such as SndPlaySmfResource with parameters like volumeSelector are for something besides sound?

      >I develop Palm apps for a living.

      What a depressing thought.

      Given your desire to use AeroPlayer and Pocket-Tunes , you appear to use Palm apps for entertainment. Would that be considered pathetic by your standards?
      --
      Slashdot - the place where you can look like a genius by restating the obvious
    6. Re:nice hardware, weird software by Patrick · · Score: 1
      I guess the best way to look at Clies is as consumer gadgets, not hardware running an operating system: you get the software that comes with them. Some additional Palm software may work on them, but perhaps not all that well.

      Unless you've actually verified this yourself, I cry FUD. I own a Clie SJ-33, and it's lovely. It runs every PalmOS app I've tried on it. The Clie-only apps and Clie HiRes modes in standard apps (e.g., Weasel Reader) are just bonus. It's no more a "[non-expandable] consumer gadget" than any other PalmOS device.

      anything using audio, won't work on the Clies because Sony has created their own undocumented and proprietary APIs.

      As of May 1st, they released a development library and accompanying documentation for the PA1 sound chip that ships in recent Clies. Check here. Contrary to your claim of "undocumented and proprietary," the API is clearly based on MIDI, and it was documented well enough that I had an on-screen MIDI keyboard working in an evening.

      Sony's biggest sin against its Clie developers is that their Clie emulator (an extended version of POSE) doesn't run under Linux. But the GPL source is there for anyone who wants to bother porting it.

      --Patrick, happy Clie user/developer

    7. Re:nice hardware, weird software by 73939133 · · Score: 1

      Will the Sony Sound Developer Kit [cliedeveloper.com] suffice for your needs?

      No. That's been out for a while, and it is apparently not sufficient to do high quality audio playback, according to the developers of AeroPlayer and Pocket-Tunes. Those APIs apparently are good enough only for simple game sounds.

      Given your desire to use AeroPlayer and Pocket-Tunes , you appear to use Palm apps for entertainment. Would that be considered pathetic by your standards?

      I'm sorry, but I don't understand the question. Are you asking me whether I consider any kind of portable MP3 player "pathetic"? No, I don't--I see nothing wrong with portable music players.

      I do find it rather annoying, however, that I have a nicely designed piece of hardware, a 200MHz ARM machine, that is hamstrung by an operating system that is slow, crashes regularly, can't deal well with different screen sizes, and has lots of undocumented APIs. PalmOS is like DOS used to be: really awful technically, but there are good applications for it, in spite of the OS, not because of it.

  18. Except... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A PS-2 and then only to run Linux.

    1. Re:Except... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you want to run linux on a PS2 expect to say you can. For the same price, you can get a used system that will do a better job running linux.

  19. Re:Sony by CableModemSniper · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Slashdot is not a united front. It's a website. You don't see references to "self-respecting Chicage Sun-Times readers" in the editorials of a newspaper do you?

    --
    Why not fork?
  20. Magnesium...Titanium... by Stonent1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    None of them satisfy me. It's depleted uranium or nothing! I want to drop my pda on the pavement and damage the pavement and not the pda.

    1. Re:Magnesium...Titanium... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello, this is the FBI.. I mean Depleted Uranium Sales USA.. If you would like to place an order, please give me your name and address.

      Thanks,
      FB^H^H Depleted Uranium Sales USA

    2. Re:Magnesium...Titanium... by BlueTrin · · Score: 2, Funny
      Please send one evaluation load with a sticker "Intercepted in Irak" to:
      Tony Blair
      10 Downing Street
      London
      England (the country on the other side of that big ocean where you can visit the queen's castle)
      --
      Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
    3. Re:Magnesium...Titanium... by Ziviyr · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why depleted?
      Theres extra security if you can say "STOP THAT MAN WITH THE HAIR FALLING OUT!"

      Also wouldn't need a powered backlight. :-)

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    4. Re:Magnesium...Titanium... by thefroatgt · · Score: 1
      Also wouldn't need a powered backlight. :-)
      Because it glows, or you do?
  21. Sony, good design and hidden flaws ? by BlueTrin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember when I was in university, my roommate got a Sony VAIO. I think that telling its story could provide some information about how proprietary hardware could cause you headaches, especially with manufacturers such as Sony:

    At first we were amazed at its design and size. But in the following months, he had to buy stuff and accessories from Sony (Sony's stuff is not often compatible with other manufacturers hardware) which were about twice more expensive than their counterparts from other manufacturers. That is even more true with PDAs upgrades which are extremely expensive compared to the original price of the device.

    When he wanted to install a BSD, there was no support for his laptop for some months because Sony did not release at this time specs of the hardware used. Not to mention the integrated Wincam which was unusable outside of Windows

    When XP was available, he discovered that he could not install it because of the proprietary hardware and there was no drivers available for windows XP on the Sony website. Furthermore Sony does not deliver Windows install CDs, but restore disks. When he contacted Sony, the last tech he talked to said they (Sony) don't support XP Pro since it wasn't the original software installed. Sorry, but his little sticker said "designed for Windows XP".

    Not to mention some poor design about heat/small size, after a hour or more of an operation which uses alot of CPU (compiling, playing some video, picture editing), the back part of the laptop was so hot that he burned himself one time in closing it.

    You just have to search some reviews from users on google Google, to see that many users had complaints about their proprietary hardware. So knowing that Sony will use a proprietary processor in their PDA kinda scares me and I hope that future users of this device will not encounter as much problems as he did.

    --
    Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
    1. Re:Sony, good design and hidden flaws ? by m3djack · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But this isn't a Windows box. This is a palm device. No matter what Palm OS based device you buy, you're buying into proprietary hardware. Buy a Palm, and you have to buy Palm accessories, so really, what is the solution in the current market? Saying it is a proprietary processor is kind of amusing, because it has to be based on a StrongARM design. TI, Intel, and now Sony make processors based on that which will drive the Palm OS. I really don't see how Sony has become worse than Palm or the other licensees.

    2. Re:Sony, good design and hidden flaws ? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      This isn't unusual at all. Any OEM hardware you get will have the same problems...

      Lots of systems I've owned, or just come across, have some strange hardware that prevents them from working. Maybe it's common hardware, but just has a strange quirk that makes it fail with the normal drivers. This happens on Windows just as much as BSD/Linux.

      My own notebook has a SIS video chipset... SIS does not release documents on just about any of their video chips, so I should have stayed away from their products completely... But, fortunately, there is someone that reverse-engineered their drivers, and wrote drop-in driver replacements for XFree86, so I'm good...

      Now, maybe it is best to stay away from undocumented (propritary) hardware, but the facts of life are that we don't really have much choice. SIS doesn't release documentation at all... ATI releases documentation under strict NDAs to very few open source developers (eg. GATOS), but if those developers decide not to support feature X, you don't get feature X, period. NVidia is pretty good, in that they really support their drivers on Linux and FreeBSD, but they are not open source drivers, and you can't get documentation on their hardware either. So what are you left with??? Who even makes open (non-propritary) video hardware? What choices do consumers have to avoid propritary video hardware?

      You aren't quite so screwed when it comes to most other hardware in a desktop system, but you are still out of luck when looking for a notebook. Even forgiving that the video is going to be propritary, you are still almost certainly going to end up with something else that isn't documented... Ethernet, Sound, USB, etc. In fact, it's almost certain that the modem will be propritary.

      Now, back to the point... There are many many different processors around now. It is almost inconcievable that the docs for it will be kept secret.

      Also, saying that having a different processor will pose a problem is ridiculous. handhelds are NOT notobooks... People very, very rarely change the operating system on the thing, and practically no two different brands of handhelds are interoperable. The handheld will come with software that works with the hardware. That is all that is expected of a handheld, and all the in necessary of a handheld. People don't upgrade to the latest version of "Handheld OS 1.07 service pack 2", so it really isn't a concern.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Sony, good design and hidden flaws ? by BlueTrin · · Score: 1

      Actually MS is releasing a new version of Windows for handheld devices (the 2003 version) and some handheld upgrades won't be released before october (for some iPaqs), so that is becoming an issue, now that PDAs are almost what notebooks were at their beginning.

      The other issue with proprietary hardware is that they can lack good drivers and can suffer from bugs and they were not tested as widely as their counterparts.

      However, I agree with you that upgrades happens fewer often (well I suppose that s the "second Microsoft effect"(TM) =)), but maybe the firsts releases will be buggy and you may have to software reset your PDA quite often if that is the case.

      --
      Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
    4. Re:Sony, good design and hidden flaws ? by La+Fortezza · · Score: 1

      I have a Vaio (F590K) and it's the best laptop out there (except maybe Apple). I've seen the crap that Dell, Toshiba, Fujitsu and Compaq put out and I'm not impressed. I bought my Vaio in Dec 2000. In addition to the normal stuff it came with Firewire, TV out, a 15" screen, integrated DVD-ROM and two battery bays.

      I've been running Win2k, Linux, and OpenBSD on it and they work just fine. Sure there have been driver issues on Win2k, but that's too be expected. In no way was it as bad my Dell Latitude nightmare. Another nice thing about the Vaio is that the power button actually works! On my Dell, it was a stupid fscking soft power button, if the machine got hung up, to power the machine down you had unplug it and pull the battery out.

      Overall I'm impressed with Sony products, yeah the aftermarket stuff they sell is overpriced and their support is non-existant but the hardware quality is bar-none.

    5. Re:Sony, good design and hidden flaws ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you like Apple and Sony? yap, you must be gay.
      real man uses macho mechines like Dell and Compaq

    6. Re:Sony, good design and hidden flaws ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off, you bone smuggler.

    7. Re:Sony, good design and hidden flaws ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the same story with digital cameras. Most Canons, Nikons etc you Compact Flash cards, whereas Sony goes with its own proprietry memory. Point of the story: Sony memory sticks cost half as much again as CF cards.

  22. Vague? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    " the ability to play video at a smooth 30fps"

    That is pretty vague. I assume he means 480x320 mpeg-2?

  23. will we be able to hack it... by night_flyer · · Score: 1

    and install windows?

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  24. Re:Screw "dumb generics" by saikou · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know I probably gonna get whacked for "dissident option" but I think it's way better to have proprietary SPECIALIZED things.
    Yes, you can create open generic CPU, and everybody would be able to build an alarm clock or server out of it. Yet if you have a chip for alarm clock that is proprietary, but suits just fine alarm clock builders, 10 times smaller, 5 times cheaper, consumes 13 times less energy, what would you choose?

    I don't need generic thing that works 3 hours on one charge. I would go with PDA that is less flexible, can't run linux (gasp!), but works longer from the battery. When I figure out something else to do with PDA I will buy myself a bigger one, or a laptop ;)

  25. Sony: "The computer industry lacks standards..." by dpbsmith · · Score: 2, Informative

    I love it! I love it! Sony says here (if that bizarrely long URL doesn't work, just go to SonyStyle, search on UX40, and click the Specifications tab):

    "Computer Interface: The computer industry lacks standards, and therefore, there are a multitude of varying software packages and add-on hardware options. This device is not manufactured to any specific software, and Sony does not and cannot make any warranty or representation with respect to the performance of this product with any particular software packages and/or non-Sony add-on hardware option except those mentioned in this document. Sony hereby disclaims any representations or warranty that this product is compatible with any combination of products you may choose to connect. While Sony representatives or Sony authorized dealers may be able to assist you and may make recommendations, they are NOT authorized to vary or waive this disclaimer. Purchasers must determine for themselves the suitability and compatibility of the hardware and software in each and every particular instance."

    Now, I ask you, ain't that the truth?

  26. Re:Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "..self-respecting slashdotter.."

    They still make those?

  27. Re:Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The people in any group do fit a certain profile. Slashdot users work/study in the IT field, like open source software, and hate companies that play hardball.

  28. Re:Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, but only ones with a prime ID number.

  29. Re:Sony by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

    But slashdot users also like new tech toys, new processors, etc. Don't try and pigeonhole the people commenting and viewing this website.

    --
    Why not fork?
  30. Samsung Halla by js7a · · Score: 1
    I admit that I'm a little disappointed with XScale, but have you heard of the Halla? If you could get that core in an OMAP-like SoC...

    SWEET!

  31. Re:Screw "dumb generics" by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, you can create open generic CPU, and everybody would be able to build an alarm clock or server out of it. Yet if you have a chip for alarm clock that is proprietary, but suits just fine alarm clock builders, 10 times smaller, 5 times cheaper, consumes 13 times less energy, what would you choose?

    Being proprietary vs. being non-proprietary and being generic vs. being specialized are unrelated qualities.

    The question is not whether you'd use a non-proprietary generic processor or a proprietary specialized processor to build that alarm clock. The question is whether you'd use a proprietary or non-proprietary alarm clock chip to build the alarm clock.

    The original poster also appears to be confused about the word "proprietary". A proprietary design is one that someone owns. The design of Intel microprocessors is proprietary - just try fabbing your own chips from copies of Intel's masks and see how far you get. x86 clones exist because, while the implementation is proprietary, the instruction set and behavior are still _documented_, and these documents are available for anyone to view. While you can't build your own copy of an Intel processor, you can build another one that does the same thing as far as programs are concerned (possibly better than Intel's does, possibly not).

    Similarly, whether or not you can write your own software for a device has no relation to whether the device's design is proprietary - it relates to whether the device's programming specs are public or not.

    [/soapbox]

  32. Sirius Cybernetics Corp anyone? by groomed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "We have the capability of injecting wonder, joy and levels of customization into a portable device so it becomes more like a companion or a friend to a lifestyle that uses digital technology."

    -- Masanobu Yoshida, president of Sony Corporation's Handheld Computing Company

    1. Re:Sirius Cybernetics Corp anyone? by Vengie · · Score: 1

      FRIST POST AGAINST THE WALL WHEN THE REVOLUTION COMES! ;)
      sorry.....i had to...i had to...and the lameness filter is mad about my caps. three cheers for h2g2 references...

      --
      When in doubt, parenthesize. At the very least it will let some poor schmuck bounce on the % key in vi. (Larry Wall)
    2. Re:Sirius Cybernetics Corp anyone? by thefroatgt · · Score: 1
      "We have the capability of injecting wonder, joy and levels of customization into a portable device so it becomes more like a companion or a friend to a lifestyle that uses digital technology."
      Is it just me or does that sound like a certain minister of information?
  33. Who has 5-10 hours of video they want to watch? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    I don't know about you, but once I watch a movie, I am good for 10 years at least before I want to watch it again (if ever). I own very few movies (a few "classics" at $5 on sale). I have not converted any of them to other formats. Normally I let Blockbuster or Netflix store my movies for me.

    Long plane trips are perfect for reading a new novel. No batteries required.

    So, where do you get this video content you want to watch on a plane? Is it legitimate, or a copyright infringment?

    Nothing implied here, I am just looking for worth-watching content just as much as the next guy. Where is it? Is there a Blockbuster like place for PDA downloads?

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  34. My Clie Isn't Too Weird by Grincho · · Score: 2, Informative

    Several months ago, I bought a Clie PEG-SJ20. I have used the daylights out of it since then, running third-party software and X-Master hacks (think old MacOS-style INITs) galore and even using a [Sony-built or at least Sony-endorsed] external keyboard. Every Palm app I've tried has run flawlessly; this includes even a few featherweight music composition apps which use the built-in piezo buzzer thingy to play tunes. Maybe the parent post was referring to sampled audio, which my unit doesn't support. I do want to assure the reader, though, that the buzzer interface is apparently compatible.

    In all cases, my Clie delivers at least the functionality of a "normal" Palm handheld; in most cases, a superset thereof. My unit's screen is 320x320. Sony has a few (disable-able) hacks in place that can hi-res-ify some text in non-Clie-savvy apps, but, at worst, everything is pixel-doubled and looks just like it would on a normal, 160x160 Palm. I don't know what they have it do on 320x480 Clies. One would hope it wouldn't stretch things disproportionately. Can anybody chime in on this? (I must rave about the screen: it has stunningly good contrast and beautiful white LED backlighting. It looks like a sheet of paper, and I wouldn't trade it for anything. (Look at one in a store, making sure you have the brightness turned up to a reasonable level.) If you want to do high-framerate stuff like games or autoscrolling text, though, buy a different model, because it smears like mad.)

    As far as the Clie-only apps Sony ships, I expect that restriction is due to the custom hi-res API's Sony has bolted onto Palm OS 4. If you circumvented the do-not-copy bit (try the Palm app "FileZ") and tossed them onto a non-Sony Palm, they'd doubtless fail because the API's they call aren't there. Now, with Palm OS 5, Palm has written a standard hi-res API, so I expect Sony's OS 5 handhelds use--or soon will use--that instead.

    A couple other tidbits:

    • My unit is advertised as having 16MB RAM. 15MB of it are available to me. I don't know how much flash is in it.
    • This is my first Palm, but the general UI looks identical to that which I've seen in my Palm emulator, except where Sony's substituted hi-res stuff for low-res. They've also added 2 prefs panels--Hi-res and Jog--to let you disable and enable various hacks Sony offers to make non-Clie-savvy apps take advantage of the Clie's fancy screen and scroll wheel, respectively.

    P.S. What do you have to do to post an &#8212; around here?

    1. Re:My Clie Isn't Too Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apps which don't support odd screen resolutions (which most recently updated apps do), work very well on the 320x480 clies. The 160x160 apps are size doubled and then the lower part of the screen (the 160 pixels) is used as a software graffitti area.

      Works very well.

  35. Re:I fail to make sense of that post. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's seven words.

  36. Re:Screw "dumb generics" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, then, why don't you buy this amazing laptop right here! It's got eyepopping silver glitter, so you can do that something else in style!

  37. SONY's Severe NIH Syndrome by brodin · · Score: 1

    I'm not surprized at all that they are going with their own processor. SONY has the WORST case of NIH (not-invented-here) syndrome of any company that I've seen. When I worked there some (~10) years back I had to design, build, and write the software for a high end broadcast video card (made from about 64 Megs of STATIC RAM YOWZA!) because they felt that they had to have their own and didn't want to buy one! A huge waste of time but fun for me.

  38. Tensilica? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sony is listed as a customer of Tensilica.

    1. Re:Tensilica? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

      The Sony Handheld Engine has an ARM and a Teak DSP (whatever that is); I don't see any Tensilica cores.

    2. Re:Tensilica? by Gogo+Dodo · · Score: 1

      Ask and you shall receive... Info on the Teak DSP core

  39. Nice way to stop port of Linux to CLiE hardware by je_le_rapide · · Score: 0

    n/t

  40. Sorry Sony by agent+dero · · Score: 2, Insightful

    both the CLIE UX50 and UX40 handhelds will be available through American retailers in September for about $700 and $600

    I'm awfully sorry Sony, even though the Clie is cool as hell, $600!!!!

    Dell sells complete desktop systems for around $400 - $500. With monitor.

    Substitute portability for sensibility.

    --
    Error 407 - No creative sig found
  41. Re:Sony: "The computer industry lacks standards... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

    Sounds like one of their excuses to not support Apple computers. IIRC, most of their other Palm-based competitors have Mac dock software compatibility.

  42. Playstation Portable by chadlnx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Noting in your newspost that Sony will be adopting this technology into the "next generation of PlayStations", I'm going to guess that this means the up and coming PSP. If that is the case and these handhelds are getting 16 hours of battery life with a solid 30fps, I think (for the first time) Nintendo has something to worry about. Of course, games will make the processor a bit more busy than keeping your address book updated. Also, the motor for the game disc itself. It will be an interesting battle regardless. There is only one thing that looks pretty clear to me, the N-gauge is going to be left in the dust.

  43. Can you imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a beowulf cluster of these...

  44. Memory Stink by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

    Sony is doing a lot of great stuff, especially in the handheld area. If only they wouldn't be pushing Memory Stick. Why, why, do corporations have to make things incompatible with what's already there??? /me cries and runs to mommy

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  45. after support? by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

    well I'd like to get one (due to battery life) but how have Sony reassured me that it will still be useful after they have stopped supporting it?

  46. From the Nitpicking A**Hole Dept. by Hoch · · Score: 1

    FYI, uranium is only libel to explode when critical mass is reached. Dropping a piece of uranium is less dangerous than holding on to it, unless your big toe is in the way.

    -hoch

    --
    2*31*37*263
    1. Re:From the Nitpicking A**Hole Dept. by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      Depleted uranium is used in Anti-Tank guns because of it's hardness and other properties will allow it to pierce the skin of a tank. I wasn't implying it was going to blow up. I was implying a PDA that could take a chunk out of the concrete.

  47. Following in Bill Gates' Footsteps by spike+it · · Score: 1

    Do I smell another 'Microsoft' coming along? Might as well try to corner the market on handhelds and gaming consoles while you still can.

  48. Re:Sony: "The computer industry lacks standards... by Solitonjoy · · Score: 1

    The deep stains and rifts in this computing fabric are part of its winsome character and design. Before breaking the opaque sealed packaging to decide you need to return the product, please consider the natural beauty of any putative inconsistencies and uneveness in its matter.

  49. Dump Palm "OS" next! by MMHere · · Score: 1

    Now they just need to get a real operating system for their handhelds -- something other than blechy Palm.