Slashdot Mirror


Verizon Rolling Out Nextel-Like PTT Service

aberson writes "Verizon Wireless announced today that it is rolling out a PTT (push to talk) phone service, targetted at business customers. They claim better coverage, 'presence' (away/available), and wireless web for about $10 more than Nextel and $10 more than a non-PTT Verizon plan. Pricing doesn't mention how 'high-speed' data will roll into this (which you can't get on Nextel), but you are using the CDMA2000 network to essentially do VoIP. If only it could be something cross-networkable like Sonim. Just wait a few months for the other carriers to catch up and cellular number portability to be enforced. Ironically, you can only get it on a Motorola made phone. Also, Verizon seems to be not caring about Nextel trying to copyright a generic technical term."

173 comments

  1. Does anyone use this stuff? by floamy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Am I the only one who wants a cell phone that does nothing except phone calls and maybe handle a list of peoples phone numbers? All these crazy features are making me crazy :(

    1. Re:Does anyone use this stuff? by seinman · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot... we like our cell phones to do everything under the sun. Because if he had something that just worked well for one purpose, it's not a fun enough toy.

    2. Re:Does anyone use this stuff? by Kethinov · · Score: 1, Interesting

      God I know. Want yourself a miniature computer then buy a damn PDA. I'm less concerned with cell phone gadgets and add ons and more concerned with range. I'd rather have a cell phone I can use anywhere in the world than one that I can play Pac Man on. I can't believe people actually buy into this crap.

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    3. Re:Does anyone use this stuff? by scottj · · Score: 1
      Am I the only one who wants a cell phone that does nothing except phone calls and maybe handle a list of peoples phone numbers?
      Hrmm, my phone already does this!
      --
      .-.--
    4. Re:Does anyone use this stuff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one who wants a cell phone that does nothing except phone calls and maybe handle a list of peoples phone numbers?

      amen, brother!

      you just earned a spot on my friend's list.

    5. Re:Does anyone use this stuff? by Adam9 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't care for PTT to be used by people in stores, etc. because I find it highly annoying. However PTT is great for company use, especially on construction jobs. I believe Verizon is going to be targeting corporate users first for PTT.

    6. Re:Does anyone use this stuff? by bb_referee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is a feature that people will actually use. At work, I am stuck with a piece of junk Nextel phone which I would like to run over with my car most days. I have a Verizon phone for personal use, and have always been pleased with the service. Any competition against Nextel's Direct Connect feature is a good thing.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    7. Re:Does anyone use this stuff? by awtbfb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We did during demos and field tests. The catch was the Nextell walkie-talkie signal was interfering with one of our sensors so we had to be careful when we used it. Didn't seem to be a problem during normal calls though.

    8. Re:Does anyone use this stuff? by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 1

      Actually, all I want is to:

      1. Make phone calls.

      2. The "walkie-talkie" feature so I can call my wife any time of the day when I'm out of town, and not get roaming/long distance bill.

      That's pretty much all I care for. Don't want games (my NES emulator on my Palm and my GBA fill that bill), internet/email (nothing against others - but I can't use a little screen), text messaging (if I want IRC sex, I'll do it without cramping my thumbs to death).

    9. Re:Does anyone use this stuff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The "walkie-talkie" feature so I can call my wife any time of the day when I'm out of town, and not get roaming/long distance bill.

      wouldn't a calling plan with free roaming and long distance for normal phone calls be more useful in such a situation?

    10. Re:Does anyone use this stuff? by nlh · · Score: 1

      I'm with ya man....I think it's really annoying to use, and I'd never pay for the service.

      BUT -- I think it's _extremely_ popular among the busines community, especially in industries where walkie-talkies or standard radios are used regularly. So think messenger services, taxis/limos, tow-trucks, etc.

    11. Re:Does anyone use this stuff? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh boy, another luddite slashdot post about how mobiles should make phone calls and nothing else!

    12. Re:Does anyone use this stuff? by FroMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll vouch for that.

      My father-in-law and brother-in-law both do construction and are constantly using it to get ahold of each other. My other brother-in-law runs a landscaping business and are the same way with his sons.

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
    13. Re:Does anyone use this stuff? by Adam9 · · Score: 1

      Some (most?) carriers, like Verizon, offer Mobile to Mobile minutes (M2M), which is a separate bank of minutes. This is good so you won't burn through your daytime minutes.

    14. Re:Does anyone use this stuff? by nolife · · Score: 1

      Our whole IT department has Nextel's. The PTT si nice for a quick question but nothing else. "Recall is here for the backup tapes, where did you put them". You reply with "On the 3rd shelf". Anything other then that and it is a complete pain in the ass. Very specific things like ip addresses or configuration items or anything that requires an explaination or more then a quick one line response definately requires full duplex that the PTT does not have. PTT is even much worse in low signal areas. You will hear 1/3 of the reply and end up yelling back and forth. When that happens, I simply reply back for them to call the phone directly.
      I personally do not think it is hard too dial a number and wait for an answer, my personal cell phone has voice dialing with a speaker phone (Sanyo 4900) which makes it very easy.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    15. Re:Does anyone use this stuff? by SamHill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The school I work for uses these 'phones for coordinating emergency response stuff. They actually switched to Verizon a few months back because Nextel's coverage on campus was problematic.

    16. Re:Does anyone use this stuff? by MicroBerto · · Score: 1
      I used to think the same exact thing. Then I began a co-op assignment at a GE plant and see how useful it is. Rather than paging the whole plant, engineer A can just blip engineer B and say "hey come to the front lobby real quick" or ask a quick question.

      I'd hate it if I saw someone using it in the restaurant beeping and talking real loud, but in a work environment, it's a cool tool.

      Nextel just sucks though. My personal cell phone is Verizon, and I think they'll do a much better job of it.

      --
      Berto
  2. Sprint has been working on VoIP PTT by NitroWolf · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sprint is about to launch a PTT VoIP solution as well, if they can overcome the technical issues. PTT VoIP is harder than it sounds, given the need for authentication, etc... unless you like waiting 30 seconds after you push the button to talk :)

    1. Re:Sprint has been working on VoIP PTT by Reefa · · Score: 2, Informative

      From what I heard last VoIP PTT on Sprint/Verizon network had call setup times of 2-8 seconds. I think Nextel has a call setup time of less than 1 second.

    2. Re:Sprint has been working on VoIP PTT by Hardwyred · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, call setup time is pretty much the same for all of them, between 5 to 8 seconds. After the initial setup though, it drops closer to 2 seconds

      --
      www.linux-skunkworks.com
    3. Re:Sprint has been working on VoIP PTT by Saige · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, call setup time is pretty much the same for all of them, between 5 to 8 seconds.

      That's wrong. Completely.

      Calls between CITIES are required to have a call setup time of significantly less than that. And those calls are longer to set up than ones in the same city.

      Call setup time and cell switching reconnect times are tightly watched during testing, and have to meet strict requirements. And the ones doing the testing are more than happy to log a defect against the system when the times exceed the requirements. And Nextel wouldn't be happy if the system didn't meet those requirements either - I suspect they're stated in the contracts signed between the two.

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
  3. Amazing, but true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They managed to come up with something more annoying that cell phones. Everyone walking around with publicly broadcasting walkie talkies. Great idea. More noise for us all.

    1. Re:Amazing, but true by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      These are not publicly broadcasting. They use the exact same cellphone network. Kind of funny huh?

    2. Re:Amazing, but true by micromoog · · Score: 1
      Besides that, why do people want to pay more for reduced usability and reduced QoS requirements on the provider?

      This just seems like a way for the provider to more efficiently use their networks (e.g. if the network is very busy, maybe your PTT messages have a 2 second delay. Not acceptable for "live" conversations, but perfectly OK for PTT).

      Oh, then they decided to call it a "feature" and charge more for it. Amazing the way marketing works.

    3. Re:Amazing, but true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect the parent is referring to the "speaker phone" nature of Nextels.

    4. Re:Amazing, but true by realdpk · · Score: 1

      And yet, that feature is worth charging for. Having to answer the phone within 4 rings is not always an option - sometimes it ends up a "mad rush" to get to it. With Direct Connect you don't have to rush.

      If it's more efficient for them, and more efficient for me - well, then everyone wins!

  4. Crappy Nextel phones by SpaceCadetTrav · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sweet, maybe this will inspire Nextel to start offering phones designed in the 21st century.

    1. Re:Crappy Nextel phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have one, it's called the i95cl

    2. Re:Crappy Nextel phones by SpaceCadetTrav · · Score: 1

      I know, I want more choices that are more affordable.

    3. Re:Crappy Nextel phones by juanfe · · Score: 1

      Um:
      1 - GPS on all new phones released since Nov 2002 [http://www.mostlycreativeworkshop.com/article123. html].
      2 - MIDP 2.0 on all new java phones launching after October [http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105-978294.html] -- one of the first MIDP 2.0 rollouts in the world, probably the first in the US.
      3 - Plans for phones that swap between 802.11 and iDEN network
      [http://www.infoworld.com/article/03/03/1 7/HNnexte l_1.html].

      But perhaps when you say 21st century you mean shiny?
      https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/forms/b lobs/ret rieve.cgi?attachment_id=337871&native_or_pdf=p df

      --
      ***Foucault is watching you..***
    4. Re:Crappy Nextel phones by geniusj · · Score: 1

      i90c. I'm very happy with it. It has all the features of the i95 (or vice versa I should say), but it has no color screen and it's a tad smaller. The only feature that it doesn't have that the i95 has actually is native SMS. But Nextel has it locked out on the i95s, so it's irrelevant. SMS with Nextel uses the WAP browser (so that it work on all of their phones).

      Cheers,
      -JD-

    5. Re:Crappy Nextel phones by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      I'm not to worried about that. I've got three family members who use Verison because it's the cheapest.

      It's almost like they don't offer service. It doesn't work indoors, the signals are always weak, and you can go out of the coverage areas very often by crossing the street.

      They don't blanket their coverage zones with recievers like a lot of other companies do. And in case you're wondering, they live in Orlando - which is a place that has very, very good phone services for the other companies because three of them have headquarters there and also because the tourism makes it quite marketable.

      How are they possibly going to get data rates that high when they can't get normal calls to go through?

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    6. Re:Crappy Nextel phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Verizon is one of, if not the most expensive cellular providers. 2. Verizon's coverage is generally considered the best of any cellular provider in the US.

    7. Re:Crappy Nextel phones by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      1) For a family package they are cheaper than all the other big name providers because most of the others DON'T OFFER a family package. They also have the lowest rates of all of them if you want unlimited wireless.

      2) It's nice to claim things, isn't it? I'm in a very metropolitan area, and the service here stinks. Look at the coverage map. They say that they've got coverage in Orlando, and considering how many people use it, it would be good to back it up. It may be "generally considered" to be the best, but it's certainly not the best here, at least not in my experience.

      I don't see any reason to conclude that it would be the best elsewhere. My family travels extensively, and have gotten bad results in pretty much the whole southeast US. So...maybe it's the best in places OTHER than the southeast US.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    8. Re:Crappy Nextel phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. AT&T, Cingular, T-Mobile, and Sprint ALL offer family packages for the zip code I checked.
      I'm not sure who you are considering when you say "...most of the others..."
      2. It is nice. It's even nicer when your claims are correct. Yours aren't.
      3. Get a friggin' clue, moron.

    9. Re:Crappy Nextel phones by chefmonkey · · Score: 1

      I would mean "a phone that weighs less than your average housecat, with a standby time of more than 12 hours."

    10. Re:Crappy Nextel phones by thynk · · Score: 1

      Sorry your part of the network seems to be bad my friend. I have Verizon and have wonderful coverage nearly everywhere I go. Including my 6 times a year trips to Kansas. I'd suggest that you might have a problem with your phones, and should consider upgrading to a tri-mode phone if you haven't already - makes all the difference. Before switching to Verizon, I had T-Mobile back when they were voice stream. One freq - I could only use my phone between work and home - never ever ever to be used in the house or at work.

      Or maybe Verizon just sucks down there, I honestly don't know.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    11. Re:Crappy Nextel phones by juanfe · · Score: 1

      My friend, sounds like you're using a mighty old phone--I get about two days of standby on my i95 with some heavy usage, and the heaviest phone Nextel sells nowadays (the i58sr) weighs in at 6.7 ounces, and that's the ruggedized, run-a-truck-over-it beast-a-phone.

      --
      ***Foucault is watching you..***
  5. There is nothing more annoying by aardwolf204 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is nothing more annoying than hearing someone try to use this "walkie-talkie" function in public. I sure hope SprintPCS never gets this.

    --
    Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    1. Re:There is nothing more annoying by Adam9 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sorry..

      Verizon Wireless want to attract the same type of customer as Nextel, one that is willing to pay $20 more a month for the walkie-talkie feature. Nextel's service is popular with groups such as constructions crews and financial traders. Sprint Corp.'s PCS unit has said it will introduce a similar product this year.

    2. Re:There is nothing more annoying by EarwigTC · · Score: 5, Interesting


      Blame the user, not the technology. Every Nextel phone I've seen lets you turn off the group speaker and use PTT with the phone to your ear. It's too bad more users don't figure out how to do that.

      --
      Promote civility: mod down any post starting with 'ummm'.
    3. Re:There is nothing more annoying by The+Old+Burke · · Score: 5, Informative
      Actually push To Talk, or walkie talkie over cell-phone as you might as well call it, is quite handy.

      If you allreadt have established a connection to someone all you do is press the button then talk. If you make many small phonecalls a day the service is perfect. Many craftsmen and workers are using it, for them its perfect, and the phone cost actyally goes down as you don't have to hold the line forever.
      Currently the phone companies charges a premium for PTT, but I guess its only reasonable since the service is new and pretty high tech. The phone companies have invested a lot of money in this, but now they can sent the conversation in small packets over the IP-network.

      At my company we just got this and I'm vert satisfied, monitoring of the workers are easier and takes less time. At the same time the productivity went up, so we can charge our customers more fore the time we work.

      --
      Proud patriot and republican voter.
    4. Re:There is nothing more annoying by nlh · · Score: 1

      I have bad news for you my friend:

      SprintPCS Pushes Instant Voice Into Beta

  6. Nextel + Verizon 4eva by vaderhelmet · · Score: 1

    I'm hoping that somewhere down the line, as technology along these same lines becomes more widespread, some standardization and collaboration between cellular carriers will occur... Obviously, end result becoming a direct connect network from any provider, to people who have other providers.

    If only a couple more carriers start their own versions, it may not be long before we see 2-way as widespread as cell phones. Cool huh?

    1. Re:Nextel + Verizon 4eva by Adam9 · · Score: 1

      I doubt this will happen in the near future because they're going to be used to get people's friends signed up. For example, the Mobile to Mobile minutes (M2M) is only for phones on the same carrier to encourage people to get their friends to sign up. It's easy to get 1000+ M2M minutes, which are good for the day time. If they market PTT like this, it'll encourage people to refer people to Verizon. This is partly why Nextel got so many customers.

    2. Re:Nextel + Verizon 4eva by xxltjx · · Score: 1

      I doubt it.

      You'd need all the major carriers to agree on ONE standard of transmission, and there's no way the GSM providers are all going to convert to CDMA, and vice versa.

      Standardization would be wonderful...but will it happen?

      I'd have better odds at a date with Anna Kournikova. :-)

  7. PTT.. by wfberg · · Score: 2, Informative

    ..Also means "Post Telegraph & Telephone". A lot of European countries used to have a single, government run, phone and postal service; PTT remains shorthand for ex-State telephone companies, like "ma Bell". (And as such it has negative connotations to the point that all telcos are moving away from that name..)

    --
    SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    1. Re:PTT.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked on a project for PTT in Holland back in '97!!

  8. Nokia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I won't go for this until Nokia goes for it.

    1. Re:Nokia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, maybe you shouldn't get a CDMA phone at all, since Nokia can't make a decent CDMA phone. CDMA must be broken.

    2. Re:Nokia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nokia IS going for it. AT&T Wireless is rolling out a similar service based on Nokia tech.

    3. Re:Nokia by xxltjx · · Score: 1

      Then go to a GSM provider. But trying to find a good one in the US is hard unless you never leave heavy urban areas.

  9. Great, just what we need by mhesseltine · · Score: 4, Funny

    BEEP - Can you hear me now?

    BEEP - Yes.

    [Verizon guy takes 2 steps]

    BEEP - Can you hear me now?

    BEEP - Yes.

    Continue ad infinitum

    --
    Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
    1. Re:Great, just what we need by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      Nah, more like:

      Verizon man: *beep* Can you hear me now?

      (Pause)

      Phone: *beep beep* (loudly)Fsshhhhhshshshshhhsh...yes...fsshhhhhhh *beepbeep*

      Verizon man swigs another mouthful of beer. Fellow restaurant patrons getting increasingly aggitated around him.

      Verizon man: *beep* Can you hear me now? *Hic!*

      (Pause)

      Phone: *beep beep* (loudly)Fsshhhhhshshshshhhsh...yes...fsshhhhhhh *beepbeep*

      ....continue ad infinitum...

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:Great, just what we need by babbage · · Score: 1
      That, or...

      [disembodied VOICE] BEEP - Can you hear me now?

      [Verizon GUY] BEEP - Yes.

      [EVERYONE in the room glares. the Verizon GUY takes 2 steps]

      [disembodied VOICE] BEEP - Can you hear me now?

      [EVERYONE in the ROOM] BEEP - YES. SHUT THE FUCK UP. Continue ad nauseam

      :-)

  10. walkie talkies by Digitaltodd · · Score: 0

    Great. People driving on the road talking on walkie talkies. Just what we all need.

    --
    You can get more with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word alone. - Al Capone (1899-1947)
    1. Re:walkie talkies by Transfan76 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm curious as to how this and Nextel phones are seen by laws such as the ones in NYC. Since there are provisions in the law that continue for the use of CB radios without hand free devices, shouldn't these be allowed to be used without handfree devices in cars when you're using the PTT feature? I know they don't transmit over the CB frequencies and that's why State Laws can't overpower federal regulations. But if I got a ticket for using my PTT phone in New York without handsfree, I would think I would have a good fight in court

  11. In a related development by AtariAmarok · · Score: 0

    "In a development related to Verizon suing others over using the PTT acronym, the regional telephone company Vazuvuz (formerly known as Comquaac) has sued Anson Williams claiming that his Happy Days character "Potsie" violated the trademark they filed in June 2003 for the "POTS" acronym referring to for their plain old telephone service."

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  12. High speed wireless = 40 to 60 kbps by awtbfb · · Score: 3, Informative


    From their site:

    Express Network is capable of data speeds bursting up to 144 kbps, delivering average speeds up to 40 to 60 kbps. You may experience slower data speeds.

    1. Re:High speed wireless = 40 to 60 kbps by filrock · · Score: 1

      Well, that's better than Full Speed Wireless, which is 1/40 of High Speed.

    2. Re:High speed wireless = 40 to 60 kbps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thrilled to find out that I could get an average around 60kbps while mobile (in passenger seat, of course) at around 65mph. It peaked (frequently) at around 120kbps. The best part: it's deducted from my normal monthly voice minutes, with no additional charges. Which means it's free at nights and on weekends. My setup: $40/mo 400 min plan, $7/mo wireless web plan, $100 LG VX4400 phone, $20 usb cable.

      PS -- Wireless "web" SUCKS, mainly because it's slow, there isn't enough content available, and I don't feel like wasting 20 minutes of my monthly plan trying to find out what time a movie starts.

  13. Wake me up by DRWHOISME · · Score: 1

    When Wi-Fi cell phones for 10 dollars a month are available.

  14. Seeking a clue by SedentaryZ · · Score: 1

    OK, I'm way behind the curve when it comes to the latest gadgets and stuff. Can anyone explain what this PTT feature does and what it's good for? I may not have a good imagination, but it seems to me to be a cell phone that you hold out in front of you, instead on next to your head. Is there more to it than that?

    1. Re:Seeking a clue by WhytTiger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      well, basically there isn't a huge difference. The main advantage to a 'walkie-talkie' type feature is you can communicate with groups of people all at the same time. The other advantage is, some plans include unlimited PTT service, allowing you to talk to others with the same PTT service as much as you want.

      --
      My Sig Beat up your Honor Roll Sig
    2. Re:Seeking a clue by LoadStar · · Score: 4, Informative

      The best way I can describe PTT when compared to a standard voice conversation is that PTT is almost like a voice SMS. It's useful for communicating short bursts of information quickly.

      Advantages to PTT/"Direct Connect (TM)" is that as soon as you push the button, you're connected to the other party - you don't have to wait while the other end rings and for them to pick up. Also, communication using PTT is closer to a walkie talkie than a phone conversation.

      Example:
      Them: *chirp* (press the button and release it to page them, indicating you want to talk to them)
      Me: "Go."
      Them: "What's your 20?"
      Me: "3rd and Maple."
      Them: "Copy. Need assistance?"
      Me: "Negative. Thanks."

      As you can see, it can be a little quicker than a phone conversation. Additionally since the mike is only on while you have the button pressed, I typically am doing other things at the same time, like talking to others, without the other end hearing it.

      The advantages are mostly visible when you have an entire department or company equipped with PTT phones. If you are the only one, then PTT is kind of silly, admittedly.

    3. Re:Seeking a clue by macmouse · · Score: 1

      Okay.

      Digest version is - it pretty much turns your cell phone into a "walkie talkie".

      The long version- ...except, it works through the cell phone network. So if you get no signal, even if your right next to the person, then no go. Don't even *think* about using these guys in an emergency either. Phones/Cell phones are one the first things that go out during an emergency.

      You are somehow "coded" to each other, so you can only talk/listen to the people you care about (family/boss/whatever).

      Beneift is don't have to worry about being line of sight (or within range). Also its on your cell phone which you allready carry around with you. Also, you "don't have roaming/min charges". Of course, I feel that will change...

      The obvious downside is, only works if you got good cell reception and its costs more money (per month). Also, will only work if your on the same network, and probably have the same plan.

    4. Re:Seeking a clue by juanfe · · Score: 1

      It's like voice instant messaging.
      Or like instant voice multicast to a group of people.
      It's also a billing thing--it's cheaper to use because two parties aren't being billed for two-way airtime during an exchange--they're only billed for the time during which there was actual transmission. Conversations tend to be shorter, so monthly bills tend to be lower.

      --
      ***Foucault is watching you..***
    5. Re:Seeking a clue by Reefa · · Score: 1

      From the service providers point of view, PTT is better because it uses less system resources (at least in the Nextel case). Since a PTT call is half duplex, the same channel can be used by 2 different users. One uses the uplink the other uses the downlink channel.

    6. Re:Seeking a clue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      PPT Also enables your everyday life to sound like something from COPS.

      Over and out.

    7. Re:Seeking a clue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you see that annoying fuckhead holding his cell phone two inches in front of his face after it makes that annoying beeping sound, and then you heard the other person scream some unintelligable incomplete sentence, and then the fuckhead shouts a reply back.

      Yeah, that's what the PTT feature is. Almost as annoying as the jackass in my office whose cell phone ring is "You have an incoming call.... You have an incoming call... you ...."

      Be fucking considerate for a change people.

    8. Re:Seeking a clue by AntiTuX · · Score: 1

      I actually use nextels at work. PTT is much more efficient than cellular phones.

    9. Re:Seeking a clue by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      The biggest problem is with high-traffic. We use Nextel's at my courier company where I'm a nighttime dispatcher. Nothing is more annoying than talking to someone and someone else "gets in". You then have to tell that person to hang on, wait for the phone to be "ready" again, manually dial the other person's phone, and then resume conversation until some other jackass "jumps in". The workflow disruption in high-traffic (many-to-one relationship?) is crippling.

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    10. Re:Seeking a clue by TClevenger · · Score: 1

      Talk to your sales rep. My sales rep told me they can program the phone to lengthen the delay after you release the button so nobody else can get in. Of course, I worked for a very large customer...

    11. Re:Seeking a clue by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      OK having worked at a company that everybody had nextel phones they are a great time saver with PTT. You just chirp in as a manager and ask your questions often from meetings if something came along that you werent sure about without having todrag the person there. The big thing is most home users arent responcible enough to turn off the PTT speaker when it's not usefull like in the movies. Add to that that PTT minutes were unlimited on a lot of plans meant a lot of people spent to much time instead of making a phone call. Persoanly Nextel's service is a lot better than Verison simply because it's the only company that realy was pushing to corprate users. Go into a 3rd story underground datacenter from most ISP's that didn't have an affiliated cell phone division and Nextels would work do to repeaters.

      On the bad side Nextels are far from small but do take a beating and most people with a fashion sence consider them ugly. Persoanly I like my i95 it just works unlike the phones from any other provider (mostly Sprint and SBC)

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    12. Re:Seeking a clue by LinuxHam · · Score: 2, Informative

      By and large, you are correct, but...

      You are somehow "coded" to each other, so you can only talk/listen to the people you care about (family/boss/whatever)

      Not true. I've always been able to DirectConnect with any other Nextel users (co-workers, my limo driver) regardless of the area I'm in, even when not my home area. Plus, now that Philadelphia "came online" a month ago and I work near NYC, I've started to get some "wrong number" DirectConnects coming out of Philly. Its important to note that the cross-market DirectConnects are only paid for by the originators, not both parties, as cell minutes are usually charged. I have special pricing and features available to me as an IBM employee, and one feature is "Cross Fleet", so that may explain why I've always been able to connect with literally any Nextel user. You "dial" a DirectConnect session as a regular phone number but as xxx*yy*zzzz and then hit the PTT button (hitting "alert" first is kinder) instead of "Send"

      Also, will only work if your on the same network, and probably have the same plan.

      Also not true. Each plan participant must pay for DirectConnect minutes in some way shape or form. I am on the Free Incoming 400 with 400 peak outbound mins, free incoming cell calls 24x7, free nights & weekends, with unlimited local (included) and cross-market ($10) DirectConnect. My wife is on a zero minute plan with unlimited local DirectConnect included. The IBM contract gives her 100 bonus cellular minutes, which she never exhausts. If she needs to talk to me, she alerts me for free, and I DC back to her cross-market.

      And all of the comments about public use of the 2-way are absolutely correct. They are annoying as hell. I want to walk up to people DC'ing in a restaurant and show them how to turn off their speakerphone. I have approached cell nirvana, that is, having a consistent bill for basically unlimited use (and minimizing it), but my main gripes about the carrier are the coverage. Living in Philly and working in New York leaves few dead spots, however. Unless of course someone hacks the power grid, then all bets are off :)

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    13. Re:Seeking a clue by LinuxHam · · Score: 1

      they're only billed for the time during which there was actual transmission

      Its actually rare to be on a plan that doesn't have unlimited direct connect minutes, either local-only or nationwide. Then it gets REALLY cheap as your usage skyrockets.

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    14. Re:Seeking a clue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take that back. Upon reread I see you were referring to Group Chat, which is always billed.

      As you were!

    15. Re:Seeking a clue by bluGill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In addition to the above:

      PTT is a public conversation. When the foreman calls the boss to get the answer to a question I asked, I hear the boss's response and go do it. A speaker phone would work instead, but our with the generator nearby that would be more annoying to the other end than we want. (and the boss isn't far from his generater either)

      The other thing is you know don't have to answer the phone nessicarly. Someone with PTT can just ring out to everyone "Joe fell off the ladder, ha ha". (Which is something we do when whoever is unhurt and we should all enjoy a laugh, if he was hurt the message would be worded differently, and come after first aid) If whoever you call is not in a place where he can answer the phone, they may or may not get the message, it isn't important enough to ensure it is recived, but you would like to send it.

      Lastly, drivers using PTT seem to be less distracted and thus safer than on a phone. I don't know why, but I've been a passenger with the foreman when on a normal call, and a PTT call, and even though the same information is exchanged over a long conversation, he is a better driver under PTT. Not scientific, but something to consider.

    16. Re:Seeking a clue by Saige · · Score: 1

      xxx*yy*zzzz

      Quick decode for those curious.

      The "xxx" indicates the urban area. Unless you're calling someone in another city via private call (the official iDEN term for it), you don't need this.

      The "yyy" indicates fleet. Early on with the system, you could only private call others on the same fleet. Well before they realized how many people would be on the system. If you have your phone as part of, say, a company, then you'll likely all be on the same fleet (unless it is a LOT of people), and you probably won't need to use this either.

      The "zzzz" is your individual private id.

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
    17. Re:Seeking a clue by babbage · · Score: 1
      Them: "What's your 20?"
      Me: "3rd and Maple."
      Them: "Copy. Need assistance?"
      Me: "Negative. Thanks."

      *boggle*

      Does it really work better if you sound like truckers talking on their CB radios?

      Buford T. Justice: Hey boy, where is Sheriff Branford at?
      Sheriff Branford: I AM Sheriff Branford.
      Buford T. Justice: Oh, pardon me. For some reason you sounded a little taller on radio.
      Or is it more fun to have long, rambling monologues to yourself, with your co-workers etc as the audience, to the tune of...

      This is Jack Burton in the Pork Chop Express, and I'm talkin' to whoever's out there.

      [....]

      Now I'm not saying that I've been everywhere and I've done everything, but I do know it's a pretty amazing planet we live on, and a man would have to be some kind of FOOL to think we're alone in THIS universe.

      [....]

      Just remember what ol' Jack Burton does when the earth quakes, the poison arrows fall from the sky, and the pillars of Heaven shake. Yeah, Jack Burton just looks that big old storm right in the eye and says, "Give me your best shot. I can take it."

      [....]

      When some wild-eyed, eight-foot-tall maniac grabs your neck, taps the back of your favorite head up against the barroom wall, looks you crooked in the eye and asks you if ya paid your dues, you just stare that big sucker right back in the eye, and you remember what ol' Jack Burton always says at a time like that: "Have ya paid your dues, Jack?" "Yessir, the check is in the mail."

      [....]

      You know what Jack Burton always says... what the hell?

      Heh... :-)

    18. Re:Seeking a clue by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      Lastly, drivers using PTT seem to be less distracted and thus safer than on a phone. I don't know why, but I've been a passenger with the foreman when on a normal call, and a PTT call, and even though the same information is exchanged over a long conversation, he is a better driver under PTT. Not scientific, but something to consider.

      That is very true. I remember this very well from using HAM radio from the car (also a PTT system) and the introduction of mobile phones. You can do a lot of chatting while actively driving around in the city. Try the same using a phone and you putting everyone around you in danger.

      It is now outlawed here to make phonecalls while driving and not using a hands-free phone, but the hands-free aspect actually has very little relation to the safety. It may be a little less safe when having to handle the phone, but the big difference is in the fullduplex conversation. People are just distracted from driving while discussing something in a phone conversation.
      (they slow down, look only forward, indicate direction too late, break too sudden when they notice something on their path, etc)

  15. Restrain self! by NMerriam · · Score: 5, Informative

    Must not...point out difference...between copyright and trademark...yet again...not...strong..enough!

    You know when your relatives say they need 3 gigs of memory to install a game, or ask why they don't just put the hard disk in the TV screen, or why a computer needs to be plugged in if it is wireless? That's what it is like to read the same trademark/copyright/patent goofs made over and over and over again.

    Trademarks are solely for marks used in trade. ie "We bring good things to life", a slogan, an icon, a piece of IDENTITY. You get trademarks so that consumers will not be confused about who produced a product. If you stop using a trademark (or it becomes common, no longer distinct to your company), you can lose it. It's sole purpose is to protect companies from imitators.

    Copyrights are for the right to copy creative works. ie, novels, poems, computer programs, paintings, etc. You never have to sell, buy or process anything to get a copyright. it cannot be lost no matter what, but you can give it away or sell it. It is to protect AUTHORS, not companies or money (at least in theory).

    Patents are for novel inventions (and lately, processes). You can't patent a book, or a painting, or a slogan, because they don't do anything. It protects inventors, not writers or marketing folks.

    --
    Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    1. Re:Restrain self! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's sole purpose is to protect companies from imitators.

      Uhm... if you're going to post about the correct use of language, please use it correctly yourself. :)

      It's = it is.

      - Your friend, the apostrophe

  16. Sure they do by wordisms · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why do you think Verizon is picking up this feature? Because companies are leaving their current cellular provider for Nextel just for PTT.

    It comes in particularly handy when businesses and oranizations have employees off-site. Everything from delivery to maintenance, sales to construction. It is a very valuable feature for both convenience and saving money.

    Bottom Line: People will leave Verizon for Nextel, and they don't want to lose market-share.

  17. Re:Wake me up by SamDrake · · Score: 1

    Who wants a cellphone you can only use within 10 feet of a Starbucks?

  18. why PTT without dedicated circuit? by obtuse · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why are they implementing this as a push to talk feature?

    It seems to me that PTT isn't going to save them much bandwidth because human conversation tends to be mostly half duplex anyway. Since it's a packet-switched network, it's not like you're using a dedicated circuit (like in a walkie-talkie or analog phone line) when you're not conversing. Keeping the connection up shouldn't cost much bandwidth at all. If they're using something like TDMA from the phone to the transmitter, you should use almost no bandwidth there keeping the connection open either.

    Shouldn't packet switching and TDMA like technologies make the walkie-talkie limitations irrelevant?

    I've always thought that this was a way of making the service just inconvenient enough to use that users don't burn so many hours. They don't want me spending my entire commute talking to my wife.

    Jut wondering.

    --
    Assembly is the reverse of disassembly.
    1. Re:why PTT without dedicated circuit? by Hamstaus · · Score: 1

      They don't want me spending my entire commute talking to my wife.

      Guess what? No one wants you to spend your entire commute talking to your wife.

      If you keep it up, you might get a visit from these guys.

      --
      I moderate "-1, Fool"
    2. Re:why PTT without dedicated circuit? by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      exactly! Making it a "walkie-talkie" is a completely arbitrary restriction! I've been trying to explain this to my friends who has this service and they don't understand me.

      It's also the same thing with the text messaging service, the amount of bandwidth you use to send one text message is less than a tenth of a second of voice conversation, yet they'll charge you more for that tenth of a second than for regular voice.

      I wonder if it would be more fair to charge people based on network utilization than on 'minutes' or messages sent.

    3. Re:why PTT without dedicated circuit? by AlphaOne · · Score: 2, Informative

      Shouldn't packet switching and TDMA like technologies make the walkie-talkie limitations irrelevant?

      Wireless providers are not rolling this out to save bandwidth... they are rolling it out to court business users utilizing trunked (or even conventional) radio systems.

      The providers see this as a way of being the "killer app" for dispatch-based businesses that rely on rapid easy broadcast communications.

      Trunked radio systems are limited by a service area and reception issues. Cellular wireless providers already have blanket networks in urban areas (for the most part) with coverage extending way out into the rural areas.

      In short, businesses can dump trunked radio in favor of this for less per month and get more coverage.

      On an unrelated note, what the heck is up with Slashdot lately? It's sluggish as all hell!

      --
      All opinions presented here aren't mine.
    4. Re:why PTT without dedicated circuit? by Adam9 · · Score: 1

      It's mostly about the idea of PTT rather than the bandwidth usage. Keeping the connection open would be almost the same thing as a phone call. Looking at PTT from a social perspective, is supposed to be quick messages being sent rather than an entire conversation. In a full conversation, you may greet the person, ask how they're doing, what they're doing, etc. For PTT, if you have a simple question to ask or a message to give, you just give it, without the formalities of a phone call.

      Also, Verizon is a CDMA network, not TDMA. TDMA is outdated, and any networks using TDMA (ATT, Cingular and Rogers) are switching to GSM. However, you're correct about bandiwdth usage when people aren't talking on the line (when using a CDMA network with EVRC or some other vocoder), the vocoder will compress whatever is being transmitted, so empty air takes up very little bandwidth. GSM on the other hand, uses a higher bandwidth at a constant rate, which is why CDMA networks handle stress much better. This was seen when Verizon worked for the most part in NYC during the blackout (4x the normal traffic) but GSM carriers like Cingular, AT&T, etc. didn't do so well.

    5. Re:why PTT without dedicated circuit? by afidel · · Score: 1

      Mostly it has to do with saving the setup/teardown time for a normal phone call. Once you push the button on the walkie talkie feature the connection is open and you can start talking, no need to wait for a call setup and the phone to start dialing.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    6. Re:why PTT without dedicated circuit? by Falrick · · Score: 1

      While the backhaul network may be packet switched (I'll take your word that Verizon has made that leap forward as most carriers are still doing circuit switched), the radio interface in CDMA is essentially circuit switched. When I connect to the cell tower, that tower is going to assign me some of its finite amount of resources (traffic elements, walsch codes, etc) to me. Once the tower runs out of traffic elements (or other resources), it can no longer accept any new calls.

      If, on the other hand, the connection is only established for a short period of time, say 2 to 10 seconds, then while there is a lag in the conversation some of those resources are freed up.

      Another advantage of push-to-talk is that when I'm listening, the cell system knows that I can't be talking. I'm then able to move to a lower power transmit mode (say 1/4 rate in IS95) where I transmit at a lower power level. This saves on battery life. The tower also only has to process data frames (error control) and no voice frames.

      Now, admitedly, I'm not familiar with how this has actually been implemented for Verizon, but that is the general idea. It's likely that there will be a time-out window where the system will hold on to my connection resources just in case a response has been made so things don't get better right away, and there are still problems to deal with such as the overhead associated with initiating a connection (something that is actually non-trivial from the cellular point of view).

      --
      something clever
    7. Re:why PTT without dedicated circuit? by Falrick · · Score: 3, Informative

      I hate to tell you, but GSM is a TDMA system. UMTS, the 3G system which is supposed to replace GSM, is CDMA.

      --
      something clever
    8. Re:why PTT without dedicated circuit? by pablo_max · · Score: 1

      NO NO and NO. First Verizon is on a CDMA network. TDMA is more like GSM then it is like CDMA. Bandwitdh will greatly saved do to the nature of how CDMA works. It is not a direct connection that is true. This is why they can put on more users. CDMA basically stacks users on the same channel and changes the power level rapidly depending on several factors. As the the combined power becomes to great thats when users are dropped. This is why people who mess with their phones by phasing to max power are kicked off towers...you are causing many other people to drop a call. Verizon's push to talk is a software feature of a phone. We have not changed the hardware at all except for adding the speaker and omni mic. When you PTT someone you are in fact making a very short call. And NO people its not VoIP. IT's a radio!! Its just a different mod scheme.

    9. Re:why PTT without dedicated circuit? by TClevenger · · Score: 1

      It's even more than that. Nextel's PTT uses less bandwidth than regular phone calls because it uses a lower sampling rate, and conversations are always half-duplex. (Even when only one person is talking, a phone conversation is full-duplex.) PTT eliminates the call setup time (more bandwidth), and also eliminates going through the public switched telephone network, so Nextel doesn't pay long distance carriers to carry those conversations.

    10. Re:why PTT without dedicated circuit? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      TDMA is both a type of technology and the popular name of a US mobile phone standard built upon that technology. GSM is a system that also uses the TDMA type of technology. The system popularly known as TDMA is also known as D-AMPS, IS-136, and by other names, and is what the person you're responding to was refering to. That standard most definitely is _NOT_ GSM and bares no resemblance to it.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    11. Re:why PTT without dedicated circuit? by Adam9 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for clarifying, I tried looking for the answer you gave (before you posted) in some other docs about TDMA, but I drowned in the sea of cell phone standards.

    12. Re:why PTT without dedicated circuit? by grumling · · Score: 1
      Don't forget that Nextel is (acording to the FCC) a dispatch service, not a cell phone service. They are in a completly different band that was set up for taxi cabs and pizza delivery services.

      http://wireless.fcc.gov/releases/011121-letter.t xt

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
    13. Re:why PTT without dedicated circuit? by bkjano · · Score: 1
      Keeping the connection open would be almost the same thing as a phone call. Looking at PTT from a social perspective, is supposed to be quick messages being sent rather than an entire conversation. In a full conversation, you may greet the person, ask how they're doing, what they're doing, etc. For PTT, if you have a simple question to ask or a message to give, you just give it, without the formalities of a phone call.

      This is close to true, but there are many years of research on lightweight audio communication suggesting that open connections can actually lead to behaviors very like push-to-talk (short bursts of talk) - at least, if you are connecting people who want to be connected. After a while, the open connection is no longer considered as much of a "social contract" to pay attention (compared to the phone), and the formalities still go away.

      For some recent social research on young adult use of Nextels, see http://www.parc.com/audiospaces/ptt.htm.

      It'll be interesting to see how well some of the non-iDEN providers do with this. Having to wait several seconds for the receiving phone to wake up and poll the network for incoming connections seems sort of crippling for PTT.

  19. Re:Do you remember... by Delirium+Tremens · · Score: 1

    Hum, let me explain...
    Well, the blackout story was yesterday. It is an event that happened in the past. Since then, time has ellapsed and the information got old.
    In comparison, an article about Verizon going PTT is today's news. That's the kind of info you find on news sites. If you do not like that, you should visit archive web sites instead. Capite?

  20. Fits my lifestyle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    `jitter`jitter`jitter`

    Fits my lifestyle

    `jitter`jitter`

  21. muhuahaha.... by ArmenTanzarian · · Score: 1

    You'd think this guy copyrighted the term trademark or trademarked the patent process!

  22. Call your wife any time of day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " The "walkie-talkie" feature so I can call my wife any time of the day when I'm out of town,"

    How many times do you call hoping to catch her once, to hear a man's voice on the other end?

    1. Re:Call your wife any time of day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Collect call from Mr. Floyd to Mrs. Floyd...he keeps hanging up.

  23. That's why I like it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use the PTT feature myself to call your wife any time of day when you are out of town. It rocks!

  24. Re:I welcome our masters by Delirium+Tremens · · Score: 1

    Yes, trolls are a welcome attraction on a slow Friday afternoon.
    I didn't get the space-invading thingy in your post. Are you trying to link that to the ALL YOUR BASES stuff? I think you missed your post. It could have been such a nice one-liner.

  25. Features by phorm · · Score: 1

    So far, the only extra feature I've ever found useful on my phone are the forced-network commands (not all phones let you force Analog when you need to get a signal through) and VAD (Voice Activated Dialing) for when I am on the go. No comments about cellphones and cars please, I try to avoid such usage unless I'm getting directions.

    However, a lot of features are rather cool, just not useful to the average person. A cellphone shouldn't be a PDA, and in most cases I'd rather get extra battery life than a slew of useless features.

    However, if they could come up with a standardized interface for cellphones, perhaps they could enable them all to interact with existing devices a little better. It's hard to make something that uses a cellphone to dial-up internet connections when different cell manufacturers all have a different interface. I mean, at least let me have a car charger that works in more than 1 phone!

    And for built-in features or operating system, how about flash-cards? Plug a new one in and have a cellphone upgrade.

    Of course, most of these things will be avoided by cellphone companies, because interoperability mean s it is easier to switch to a competitor's phone, and making phones more upgradable would simply lose the profit from idiots who buy a new cellphone every year....

    1. Re:Features by Gaijin42 · · Score: 1

      They make phones plugs different for every phone (even for the same carrier and mfgr) because they give the phones away (or sell at a deep discount for high end phones) and need to break even on the accessories.

  26. Ironic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    Ironically, you can only get it on a Motorola made phone.

    Somebody needs to look up "ironic" in the dictionary.

    Why is is ironic that this feature is available on a Motorola phone?

    1. Re:Ironic? by xoff00 · · Score: 1

      Its ironic because Motorola for years had a near monopoly on licensed spectrum "walkie-talkies".

      --
      ...Xoff
      Phineas J. Whoopie, you're the greatest!
    2. Re:Ironic? by Saige · · Score: 1

      Until now, Motorola's iDEN system has been the only system that supports the walkie-talkie style calls.

      Verizon making this available hurts Motorola, because they're not going to be using the Motorola iDEN infrastructure - which has been their most profitable sector over the past couple years. While all those layoffs were going on inside Moto, pretty much none of them came from iDEN.

      And the system competing with iDEN will be using Motorola phones. I guess it's still better for Moto than NOT using Moto phones, but still.

      --
      "You know your god is man-made when he hates all the same people you do."
  27. Compatibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if only it could be something cross-networkable like Sonim

    you're expecting cross-network compatibility from a US company?!

    welcome to the land of "freedom": "freedom" is available from company A for $0.69, and "freedom" is available from company B for $0.79. you can't share freedom "A" with freedom "B" users, though freedom "B" users can share for an additional $0.10 per use. got it?

  28. EVDO is Coming by Bruha · · Score: 2, Informative

    Evolution Data Only will be over 2 Megabits.. currently in testing in the beltline area of Washington State..

    Also by Verizon Wireless not to be confused with Verizon :)

    You can get info here

  29. Re:Do you remember... by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The largest blackout in the last thirty years leave 50 million people in the dark andy you geeks are carping about the latest electronic leash from your masters?!!! GET SOME PRIORITIES!
    Yes, how dare we! We should put this forum to good use and help out those poor pople in the NE. Let's start by.. uh.. Hmmm. Exactly what should we be doing?

    I bet you're the same kind of person who believes SETI@Home is wasteful and everyone should be working on curing cancer instead. Any why work for a coorporation when we should all be doing volunteer work for Greenpeace. And why buy that $3.50 cup of expresso when there are starving kids in some foreign land. Get over yourself.
  30. Re:Do you remember... by TheOtherChimeraTwin · · Score: 0
    We should put this forum to good use and help out those poor pople in the NE.

    Exactly. Look, what you do is this: Everyone should connect wires directly from your nearest AC outlet to your cable modem, and then post a reply to this comment with a subject line of "POWER FOR NE". Wait about 5 minutes so the comment can get fully charged with electricity, and the select "Subject". Important note: do *not* press "Preview", as that would waste all the power. Then disconnect the wires from your AC outlet. Slashdot readers in the NE can then read the replies to this comment to power up their PCs.

  31. I use it and it is THE DEVIL by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Imagine, if you will, sitting in a car with a hot member of the opposite sex...Okay, make that just a member of the opposite sex, since this is /.

    Things are going well...VERY well. And then, with no warning, your phone makes a little BRRREEP noise, and a voice says LOUDLY, "Hey man, you get any on that date tonight?"

    This is a technology that has few practical applications, and offers a whole WORLD of annoying possibilities.

    Just my opinion.

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    1. Re:I use it and it is THE DEVIL by GlassUser · · Score: 1

      Hahahahaha. I did that to my brother last week. On purpose. Hey, if I ain't getting any, nobody needs to be getting any.

      Seriously, I think the PTT can be as much as a liability, even outside sexual endeavors, as anything else on the phone.

    2. Re:I use it and it is THE DEVIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously have never used the PTT feature. The person you're trying to contact has to push the button on their device to activate a conversation. If they don't, you can't just "auto-broadcast" through their phone...

    3. Re:I use it and it is THE DEVIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would just laugh it off in that situation. If she freaks because some guy other than you is a jerk, then let her go.

    4. Re:I use it and it is THE DEVIL by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      First of all, NO, TRUST ME, you do not have to initiate the conversation. AT ALL. I used these damn things for more than a year, it's burned into my head. You push the button, and then you start talking.

      Handy fact, in case you have an annoying boss who jabbers on and on about nothing: If you push the talk button on your side, all you get is an annoying beep, but if you push the "cancel" button, THEY get the annoying beep, and it may startle them enough that you can mash down your own talk button and get a word in...Or you can HOLD DOWN THE BUTTON FOREVER! Let them hear nothing but your maniacal laughter! MUAHAHAHAHAHA!

      Just my opinion.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    5. Re:I use it and it is THE DEVIL by radixvir · · Score: 3, Insightful

      i just turn off the speaker when i dont want any radio calls. nextel phones are the best in my opinion because the menus and the way they work in general is the same no matter what phone you have. just hit the speaker button on top once and it mutes it.

    6. Re:I use it and it is THE DEVIL by devilspgd · · Score: 1

      Have you actually tried it?

      Unless you "ALERT" first, then indeed you can just start talking, just like a good 'ol fashion walkie-talkie

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
  32. GE Cease and Desist by FroMan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You have used our copyrighted slogan "We bring good things to life (T)" in your post without crediting GE Corporation (Patent Pending #12335134). This message is trademarked (C) by SCO and used through a patent (R) legally licensed through (T) copyright act (Sonny Bono always Sucked act of 1970). The rights to this (R) post will expire with the heat death (C) of the universe.

    SCO^H^H^HGeneral Electric(T)

    --
    Norris/Palin 2012
    Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
  33. Re:Wake me up by nelsonal · · Score: 1

    What's wrong with a global network that is expanding to the rest of the solar system within the next year. I think starbuck's managment thinks that investors buy their stock based on the number of stores they can see at any given time. Perhaps they are correct in that assumption. Our town of 25,000 just got two and they are across the street from each other. They are adding a third in two months.

    --
    Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  34. Re:Does anyone use this stuff?-Command line. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Because if he had something that just worked well for one purpose, it's not a fun enough toy."

    Explains the death of the command line.

  35. Article Errata by dmccarty · · Score: 1
    PTT (push to talk) [...] for about $10 more than Nextel

    Not true:
    Verizon: $59,99, 400 minutes (unlimited Push to Talk)
    Nextel: $59,99, 400 minutes (unlimited Direct Connect)*
    After that the plans leapfrog each other, Verizon going with the sleek $79, $99 options and Nextel picking the oh-so-stylish $69, $89 price points.

    Pricing doesn't mention how 'high-speed' data will roll into this (which you can't get on Nextel)

    Not true. Nextel offers Packetstream Gold, which give about 56k download speeds (but at a $54.99/month charge, it's expensive, too).

    *Keep in mind that for Nextel nationwide Direct Connect there is a $10/month extra charge. Not sure about Verizon.

    --
    Have fun: Join D.N.A. (National Dyslexics Association)
  36. Stupid feature.... by ziplux · · Score: 1

    It seems like the reason people like the PTT feature is because it connects within a few seconds, instead of the 10 or so it takes to make a phone call. Why does it have to take more time for the cell phone to connect a regular phone call than a PTT call? Also, it doesn't seem like the phones are really operating as "walkie-talkies" because they still send the data to a cell tower and back to destination cell phone....if they're going to bundle a walkie talkie, why not make it a real one that doesn't use your cell minutes? Also, last time I used it, PTT was only half duplex...what's the point of a phone if only one person can talk at a time? It's not as if they're short on bandwidth...in fact I'd rather trade off sound quality for full duplex.

    Maybe someone who knows more about PPT can tell me why anyone would use this feature.

    1. Re:Stupid feature.... by realdpk · · Score: 1

      A big part of it is that with PTT you're not so inclined to do the whole "Hello" sequence or the "Bye" sequence. You hit the PTT button, they respond "Yes?", you hit it again "Where's that pie?", they respond "On the shelf" - the end. Total of something like 15 seconds, vs however long it takes to do the hello/goodbye/etc sequence, or the risk of reaching the dreaded voicemail.

      There's also no "dead air" time while people are talking - if you use digital cell phones you may know what I'm talking about. When a conversation goes silent, you can't hear anything at all - you have to take the phone from your ear and visually check the display to see if you're still connected. With PTT, there's a clear chirp at the start, and a different chirp at the end.

      The Nextel I have (i90c) lets me assign "Private ID" (PTT) and regular phone numbers for each person on my list, so if something's not short enough to be asked over PTT, I can just hit a different button and call instead.

      It's a sweet feature.

      Unfortunately, on the Nextels, you tend to trade quality for this feature (specifically, the voicemail notification system is totally bad). But with competition, this may change.

    2. Re:Stupid feature.... by LinuxHam · · Score: 1

      specifically, the voicemail notification system is totally bad

      Where do you have problems? In PA/NJ/NY (and even Paris & Montpellier, France and Greenock, Scotland) I get really good notifications.

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    3. Re:Stupid feature.... by hatmouse · · Score: 1

      You explained the Nextel PTT advantage very well.

      It's all about quick communication, not a replacement for cell or land line communication.

      If I can't resolve a problem using the Nextel PTT within a few minutes, I go for the cell.

    4. Re:Stupid feature.... by realdpk · · Score: 1

      I'm in WA, and often times I won't get any notification at all for voicemail (this was on my old i1000plus and now the i90c) for days - then someone else will leave a message and I guess it "pushes" the first one through the system.

  37. Verizon during the blackout by MobyTurbo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One of my friends had a Verizon cell phone at work (Brooklyn). Everybody else's cell phones (and the office phone) weren't working but his Verizon cell phone was. He said that the only time it was down was 9/11. After noticing this I decided that if I get a cell phone it'll be Verizon and I'll reccomend it to friends.

    1. Re:Verizon during the blackout by choose-two · · Score: 1

      We're a downtown Brooklyn cellphone store chain - 8 stores and counting - and have every carrier (and every piece of hardware). The blackout scorecard: Verizon, Nextel, ATT, Sprint and a distant last, T-Mobile.

    2. Re:Verizon during the blackout by mcknation · · Score: 1


      I don't know about that I have verizon DSL and the service suc

      ----NO CARRIER---------

    3. Re:Verizon during the blackout by MicroBerto · · Score: 1
      Agreed. I have verizon (and a 20% corporate discount at a corporation i no longer work at!!) and the national coverage is excellent. It also rated #1 in that last slashdot link about it.

      I only have a cheapo phone (audiovox), but it works like a charm and does everything I need.

      --
      Berto
  38. Copyright/Patent/Tradmark.. who cares, right? by gatekeep · · Score: 1

    Verizon seems to be not caring about Nextel trying to copyright a generic technical term.

    The article linked here talks about a trademark verizon is trying to obtain. The article was also corrected, because it initially called it a patent. Now this article links to it and calls it a copyright. Seriously, there's enough confusion about the differences between these things without the /. editors' incompetence clouding the issue.

  39. isn't it ironic, don't you think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    here, let me save you the effort. as the parent implies, there is no irony present in this situation.

    irony

    Pronunciation: 'I-r&-nE also 'I(-&)r-nE
    Function: noun
    Inflected Form(s): plural -nies
    Etymology: Latin ironia, from Greek eirOnia, from eirOn dissembler
    Date: 1502
    1 : a pretense of ignorance and of willingness to learn from another assumed in order to make the other's false conceptions conspicuous by adroit questioning -- called also Socratic irony
    2 a : the use of words to express something other than and especially the opposite of the literal meaning b : a usually humorous or sardonic literary style or form characterized by irony c : an ironic expression or utterance
    3 a (1) : incongruity between the actual result of a sequence of events and the normal or expected result (2) : an event or result marked by such incongruity b : incongruity between a situation developed in a drama and the accompanying words or actions that is understood by the audience but not by the characters in the play -- called also dramatic irony, tragic irony

  40. Competition is always good by Zygote-IC- · · Score: 1

    The walkie-talkie feature on Nextel is the whole reason my wife and I switched. While it may sound annoying to some people it is like crack once you get your hands on it.
    It's infinitely easier to push the button and just speak rather than finding the number, waiting for it to dial, waiting for it to ring and hoping someone answers.
    It does take some getting used to. You don't want to call your wife and start dropping F-bombs while she's at the neighbor's house playing with their children. (Unfortunately, I know this one from personal experience.)
    With other companies trotting out comparable services, the marketplace can't help but get better. Until now, Nextel knew if you wanted the service you had no choice but to go to them, so they tended to skimp on customer service.
    Did you know they have no tech support on the weekends? Our service blanked on Saturday and there was no one anywhere to call to get it fixed.
    Nextel, how business gets done...unless it's the weekend.

  41. I will be happy with a non-Moto phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finally, competition in the PTT arena and hopefully other manufacturers than Motorola will make the devices.

    My experience in dealing with Nextel is much like dealing with any monopoly. They have a decent service but have no competition, and thus offer crappy phones at high prices.

    This is a much needed kick in the pants for Nextel/Moto and I am happy.

  42. PTT by prdawson · · Score: 1

    I had to go to Nextel as it was the only one that worked at home...Verizon, Sprint, et all did not (yeah, I live out in the middle of BFE). My wife and I (and my family on my father's side) all have Nextel now, and the PTT feature is the main reason we have it. It annoys me to no end how people will just carry a conversation on one of those in public when they can choose to mute the entire conversation...all it takes is to turn off the group speaker and you can still carry on your conversation, although you *Gasp* have to hold the phone up to your ear to hear the other person.

    1. Re:PTT by realdpk · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tip. I had no idea it worked that way. Every time I've had it on vibrate I couldn't hear the person at all, but maybe it was just that much quieter (never thought to try it, basically).

  43. Ummm whatever ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... just stop saddling your kids with weird names like Darl, mmmkay?

  44. The Ocoee Passport by Cyburbia · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dear sweet Bob, no! I used to live in Ocoee, a western suburb of Orlando, Florida. "West Orange," as the area was known, was home to a disproportionately large number of people who worked in the building and construction trades. EVERYBODY, and I mean EVERYBODY, had a brick-sized Nextel permanently grafted to their hips; they were called "West Orange County passports" among some in the area. You know the frustration experienced by those who have to put up with yuppies and loud cell phone calls in public? Well, jack it up a couple of orders of magnitude higher in West Orange County. In stores, restaurants, coffee houses, anywhere, you couldn't go more than five minutes without hearing "BREEEEEEP! blah blah drywall blah blah Bobcat blah blah Sunbelt rentals blah blah framing inspectors BREEEEEEEP!" Yes, even at the movie theater, blue collar bubbas would be droning on about pouring concrete, and NOBODY CARED. Why? Everybody else was armed with a West Orange County passport. BREEEEEEEEP!

    1. Re:The Ocoee Passport by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice. If you think that's annoying my friends and I reguarly "tour" high-end shopping malls w/ FRS radios turned on to max volume. We talk on them pretending to be fighter pilots with the microphone waaaay tooo close to our mouths. Once a while we'd stumble on a shell-shocked 'Nam Vet and scare the shit out of him. However, with FRS it works as long as you have proximity. No waiting for service or anything. What's even better is CB which has better range and entertainment value (TRUCKERS!!!).

  45. why should they? by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
    Also, Verizon seems to be not caring about Nextel trying to copyright a generic technical term."

    Why should they? If a competitor tries to claim "like the Joy of a Root Canal" as their slogan, would you stop them? PTT is a pain, no one wants to have to push to talk. Sure, Nextel doesn't own the concept or term (Hams amoung others have been using it for decades), but Verizon would be much better off trying to spin it into a positive concept (how about"Automatic privacy mute on button release") than in trying to stop Nextel from laying claim to something they should not want.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  46. Looking to switch...Does it have bluetooth? by peterdaly · · Score: 1

    There are three of us out of a company with about 20 Nextel phones who are looking to switch to Verizon. The Nextel network and converage is horrible.

    Sometimes on normal phone calls the static is horrible....if we have coverage at all. Verizon in the same area has crystal clear calls. We are looking to switch for that reason alone.

    Do these phones have bluetooth? Among the three of us, we all have at least one reason for wanting a bluetooth enabled phone.

    Anyone know?

    Thanks,

    -Pete

    1. Re:Looking to switch...Does it have bluetooth? by xxltjx · · Score: 1

      Very few CDMA phones have bluetooth. The 2 major manufacturers of Bluetooth phones (Sony Ericsson and Nokia) are known for their manufacturing of primarily GSM phones. So no...the Verizon PTT's will not have bluetooth.

  47. Disabling 2-Way by LinuxHam · · Score: 1

    ** Attention Nextel Users **

    Use the Call Filter feature of Styles to do things like filter out 2-way calls or alerts, and even limit *who* can call your phone! Yes, when you put the call filter into "Some Phonebook" mode, you can actually choose who in your phonebook (up to 5 people) are allowed to call you. Pair that up with the Datebook feature, and when you have a recurring meeting each day or week, you can force the phone to go into that "restricted incoming" mode automatically for the length of your meeting and never have to remember to switch your phone to vibrate.

    How many people here see the rush of people to put their phones in vibrate when that one idiot forgot to switch his before the meeting? I never have to do that, nor do I ever have to run out of the room to answer calls. I automatically shunt my friends to voicemail during the meeting, week after week :) Of course, I have an i95cl, so ymmv.

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
  48. The problem with people in general! RUDE! READ!! by Genjurosan · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I use nextel and love PTT. It's fast and I know I'll never go over any minutes.

    But here's the thing.. Just like my neighbors letting their dogs piss on my grass.. those same people don't use "PRIVATE MODE" for PTT. It's simple.. you push one button and you put the phone to your ear and PTT works just the same. I ALWAYS use private mode with PTT unless I'm in the privacy of my own home or in an area with no people.

  49. Not as good as Nextel... by J.J. · · Score: 1
    The Economist recently did an article on how all the major carriers are rolling out the "push to talk" features in the coming months.

    What Verizon doesn't tell you:

    And compared with Nextel's service, which connects users almost instantly, it can take two seconds to establish a PTT connection over a GSM network, and four to six seconds over CDMA, says Bob Plaschke of Sonim, a firm selling PTT upgrades to operators.
  50. or this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Them: calls you.
    Me: picks up phone.
    them: what's your 20? need assistance?
    Me: 3rd and Maple. no. Thanks.

    hangup.

    If you want to talk in short bursts, there's no reason you can't do it on a phone call. The only difference in the end is that you aren't necessarily holding your phone to your face when waiting for the other end to answer. If you don't like that, use a speakerphone to being the conversation.

    All you are doing is using a different paradigm to talk, less chit-chat. So do it on a regular phone.

    The only advantage for PTT is that the phone starts yelling at you before you pick it up. This can be invaluable if your hands are full. Great for construction types.

    That's the only advantage. But the social problem of people carrying around devices on their hips that just starting yelling at random is severe.

  51. PTT should be banned by nedron · · Score: 1
    It's bad enough I have to hear one side of an inane cellphone conversation, but to be subjected to both sides in a checkout line just because the person is:
    1. Too stupid to find out what kind of Pop-Tarts the S.O. wanted before going to the market.
    2. Too lazy to hold the freakin' phone to her/his ear.
    The feature may be useful in the construction industry, but it has zero use otherwise (for otherwise normal people).
    --


    * As is generally the case, my opinions do not reflect those of my employer.
  52. Hopefully... by xxltjx · · Score: 1

    ...since Verizon's just using Voice over IP, these phones will not be subject to the nasty "nextel effect"

    Ever see a Nextel phone ring next to a TV/CRT? Makes for an interesting effect which we locally have dubbed the "Nextel effect"

    1. Re:Hopefully... by Duckz · · Score: 1

      can you discribe for those of us who haven't seen/heard/smelled the nextel effect?

      --
      Todd

    2. Re:Hopefully... by xxltjx · · Score: 1

      Snowy screens / wavy lines over the screen / various other forms of interference.

      I'm amazed the FCC still allows them to be on the market, with THAT much interference.

  53. A step back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think about this for a second.... Nextel and their PTT is actually a step BACK in technology. It's only half-duplex for crying out loud which in and of itself is highly annoying. To beep someone, you still have to pull their ID out of your phone book, so why not call them and have a full-duplex conversation?

  54. Give the phones away? by phorm · · Score: 1

    Where did you get this information?

    When I signed up for my cellphone *plan* 3 years ago, my phone came with the plan. However, I'm fairly sure that the phone was still paid for, and the telco was taking the hit in order to snap me in a 3yr contract.

    At about 2.5 years, the stupid little startac phone took one last jump from its holster (the plastic holster it comes with really sucked) onto a concrete floor and split in half. Repair price was >$100.

    So, I went out and bought a new phone, a compact LG with which I am rather satisfied. However, with a $300CAD price on a refurb, and a $500CAD price on a new phone, I can't see how phone companies are taking a loss on these. Open them up, not a lot of components here, other than the main chip - at $500 I'm thinking that some companies at least are pulling decent profit on these phones.

    1. Re:Give the phones away? by Gaijin42 · · Score: 1

      If you buy that phone with a new 2 year contract, the $500 price will drop down to 200 or so.

      A phone that is $100-200 will be free with the contract.

      Go by any one of those verizon or Mlife kiosks at the mall, and compare the retail price to with contract.

      For example, if you get new phone service, and end up losing that phone, if you paid $100 to begin with with the contract, the replacement phone could be around $400 (

      This is why it actually makes sense to buy the $4/mo replacement insurance.