Slashdot Mirror


Looking For God In Videogames

Thanks to MSNBC.com for their article discussing the use of religion in videogames, both overtly Christian titles and those just addressing the subject indirectly. As the article comments, "Before 'god mode' or 'god games' there were 'God games' -- low budget, PC floppy disks that married evangelical Christian thought and scripture with simple game play. The boundaries between the holy and the secular were simpler then... Today, the lines have grown fuzzier." The piece also points to religious overtones in MMORPGs: "In EverQuest, the massive online multiplayer game, new players are asked to pick from among the religions native to the land of Norrath. One of Norrath's deities, 'The Nameless' has triggered talk on discussion boards over whether 'Nameless' could be understood as the Jewish Yahweh. Some [Christian] evangelists have even used EverQuest to proselytize to fellow players."

110 comments

  1. Why the word"YAHWAH" is not what you mean by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Please don't use it, "G-d" is a perfectly good word. That is not a good translitteration of the four letter name of G-d into english. We don't know how it was pronouced as the name was only said once a year by the Kohen Gadol (High priest) on Yom Kipor in Temple days. It should also be pointed out that there is no "W" sound in hebrew, nor is there a "J".

    --
    Erlang Developer and podcaster
    1. Re:Why the word"YAHWAH" is not what you mean by wileycat · · Score: 1

      YAY!! I'm a Cohen!!!!!

    2. Re:Why the word"YAHWAH" is not what you mean by WTFmonkey · · Score: 1

      From what I understand, when it was pronounced, it was said epithetically, (phonetically) "Yo-hay-va-hay," roughly translating to "I am that I am."

      It should also be noted that I don't know what I'm talking about and that this is just a vague recollection from an undergrad mythology class I took a while back.

    3. Re:Why the word"YAHWAH" is not what you mean by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      On that note, Jesus was almost certainly not pronounced as we do today, nor are any of the names from Biblical times. In fact, Jesus is derived from Joshua which shows they were pronouncing it wrong even in the first century.

      Christian writers have a long tradition of using both Yahweh and Jehovah. Do not worry about it so much, but understand who it is that you are going to offend. To observant Jews (and others), seeing it in print or hearing it pronounced is offensive in the same way that a pornographic picture would be. The prohibition against taking God's name in vain is taken seriously. That should not be laughed off. Faith is a scarce enough commodity in public discourse these days that a little respect for it is not going to hurt anybody.

    4. Re:Why the word"YAHWAH" is not what you mean by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I am an orthodox Jew, and it does make me twitch, but it could be worse, at least with this version i know that it is wrong. As for names from biblical times, it depends on the name and the langauge. I know lots of poeple with bibilical names who use the biblical (hebrew) spelling and pronouce it as such. Most of the guys I know named Joshua use Joshua not "Yehoshua" but my friend Jon is at least some of the time "Yonaton" or "Yonason". And I've know a few Shlomos (Solomon), Yaakovs (Isaac) as well as more than one Devorah and Rivka (Rebecca).

      Ok I hang out with religous Jews.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
    5. Re:Why the word"YAHWAH" is not what you mean by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

      A quick Google search shows me that my name becomes 'Yoel' or 'Yowel'. Heh. I'll have to get you to tell me which.

    6. Re:Why the word"YAHWAH" is not what you mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should also be pointed out that there is no "W" sound in hebrew, nor is there a "J".

      All good geeks know that Jehova begins with an I... =P

    7. Re:Why the word"YAHWAH" is not what you mean by BTWR · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "Yo-hay-va-hay," roughly translating to "I am that I am."

      I'm fluent in hebrew, and that's not even close to the translation of the hebrew sentence "I am that I am" (but that's still a nice theory)

      My favorite theory I have heard (and the one i lean to) on YHVH's name is this. Take a look at these 3 hebrew words (and how to spell them in phonetic english)

      HYH = Past
      HVVH = Present
      YHYH = Future

      Therefore, YHVH, or G-d, is a combination of the 3... a code for "Past, Present and future." Those who have studied gods and mythology will understand that the G-d of the Bible is a "Gd of time" as opposed to Zeus, Ra, etc, who were "gods of nature," thus making the YHVH (G-d) name a good candidate for some sort of time-relevence.

    8. Re:Why the word"YAHWAH" is not what you mean by BTWR · · Score: 1

      And I'm a Levi... care to have your feet washed?

    9. Re:Why the word"YAHWAH" is not what you mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Orthodox Jews are allowed to use the Internet? I always thought extremist religions were pretty much anti-everyone else, leaving the Internet rather off-limits.

    10. Re:Why the word"YAHWAH" is not what you mean by superyooser · · Score: 4, Informative
      "G-d" is a perfectly good word. That is not a good translitteration of the four letter name of G-d into english

      [Zachary, I'm talking mainly to my fellow Gentiles. I know you know all of this. I hope you're not too offended at all my uses of the Almighty's name. My only intention here is to promote interest in and knowledge of the Father among the goyim.]

      The name of God, which is not the same thing as "God," appears in the original Scripture as the Hebrew letters: yud heh vav heh. These are all consonants, as the Hebrew alphabet does not have vowels. The vowels are implied. As Zachary alluded to, nobody remembers what the vowels are supposed to be.

      Therefore, transliteration is really not the best way to derive a pronounceable word for God's name. If you insist, Yahveh, not Yahweh, would be the best guess. Word substitution has been much more popular throughout the ages. Christians use "the LORD," while Jews use Adonai ("to be" in Hebrew, I think) or HaShem ("the Name"). I'm surprised Zachary didn't suggest Adonai since it's used in both Jewish and Christian circles.

      As I touched on before... The word "God" does not linguistically derive from YHVH (Yahweh/Jehovah/Lord/Adonai/HaShem), but from Elohim (pronounced Elo-HEEM). But yes, semantically, we can say that Yahweh = God, since Adonai Eloheinu, Adonai echad -- the Lord is our God, the Lord is one.

    11. Re:Why the word"YAHWAH" is not what you mean by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      > The name of God, which is not the same thing as "God," appears in the original Scripture as
      > the Hebrew letters: yud heh vav heh. These are all consonants, as the Hebrew alphabet does not
      > have vowels. The vowels are implied. As Zachary alluded to, nobody remembers what the vowels are
      > supposed to be.

      Personally, I go with Larry Gonick's "Cartoon History of the Universe" and think it should be "Yahoo-wahoo".

      Chris Mattern

    12. Re:Why the word"YAHWAH" is not what you mean by JeffTL · · Score: 1

      Much agreed. I am not Jewish, but I still abstain from attempting to use the Tetragrammation, because: (1) The use thereof is offensive to many people (2) We do not know how it is pronounced, so Romanizing it (rather than translating it to God with a capital "G") is futile.

    13. Re:Why the word"YAHWAH" is not what you mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and Adonai = Aten, no?

    14. Re:Why the word"YAHWAH" is not what you mean by bitrott · · Score: 1

      "The prohibition against taking God's name in vain is taken seriously. That should not be laughed off."

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAA. When does the real Age of Reason start so we can delegate religion to the dustbin of history?

    15. Re:Why the word"YAHWAH" is not what you mean by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 1

      If all else fails "haShem" litterally "The Name" is used my many frum Jews. When I want to sound pretentious (usually when I am in story teller mode) I will say "Ha Kadosh baruch hu" I.E "The holy one blessed is he". Normally I just say "G-d". It gets the point across the most clearly.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
    16. Re:Why the word"YAHWAH" is not what you mean by bedurndurn · · Score: 1

      Probably not for quite a long time. Feel free to try and speed up the process by organizing SinFest 2004. Try and organize a Guiness-worthy number of people to all eat some pork while yelling "God Damn It", worshipping an idol and slapping their moms simultaneously.

    17. Re:Why the word"YAHWAH" is not what you mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adonai = Lord.

    18. Re:Why the word"YAHWAH" is not what you mean by bitrott · · Score: 1

      lol. That would be REAAAL evil! Not this pissy stuff that passes for evil these days! In my day we weren't content until we desecrated several churches and spoke ill of their elders! These days you can hardly get a lewd innuendo past the fascist TV censors, or grope a willing virgin in public! Christianity is the new PC cause: whiny, over-sensitive, and fascist.

    19. Re:Why the word"YAHWAH" is not what you mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking as someone who speaks Hebrew, the word should be transliterated Yah-veh. Yahwah is the way ignorant Christians spell and pronounce it. As for its pronouncation, Yah-veh is the way it is pronounced. Everyone always knew the pronouncation back in temple days, they just didn't say it aloud often. However, Hebrew stopped being a spoken language for around 200 at one point and the name was forgotten, until serveral Jewish mystic groups verified the pronouncation.

      Also, it is not fucking refering to Jesus. It means "he who causes to create". And has references to a firey mountain, when studied in the context of older religions that had a counsel of gods. Where Yah-veh upsurps another Zeus like god. Yah-veh is also the god of war. So if you want to keep refering to Yah-veh as Jesus go ahead. Whenever you hear about god's name being used with plural nouns, this is because the priests are rewritting older tales of the counsel of gods.

      Whatever I'm done talking to your fucking ass.

    20. Re:Why the word"YAHWAH" is not what you mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To observant Jews (and others), seeing it in print or hearing it pronounced is offensive in the same way that a pornographic picture would be.

      You're saying that it gives 'em a woody?

  2. proselytize by Andy+Smith · · Score: 3, Funny
    Some [Christian] evangelists have even used EverQuest to proselytize to fellow players.
    Dictionary.com will be getting a load of hits around now...
    1. Re:proselytize by The+Munger · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't be stupid. Everyone knows proselytize means To induce someone to join one's own political party or to espouse one's doctrine.

      You're not meaning to say you had to go to a web site to look it up and copy the definition into a post you're making about someone joking about you needing to look it up are you?

      --
      Refuse to make a statement in your sig!
    2. Re:proselytize by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

      I've got some ideas that could be worked into Everquest, the crusades.You board ships in hordes, and said to the middle east. You kill all the moozlim ay-rabs you can, and anyone else who gets in the way, burninate villages, rape, pillage loot, take gold gems and jewelry! Leave nothing alive. Do it all in Christ's name. You could also work in witch hunts. Hordes Go into towns with a few mad monks wielding copies of Maleus Maleficorum, and kill witches. Burn 'em! They only way to be sure you got them all is to not leave a single woman or girl alive. Any one of them could be a witch. If you find any Synagogues, those rabbis are probably in there making golems. That's witchcraft too. Burn the Synagogues and kill the rabbis! Also, in Christian Everquest. Kill alchemists, astronomers, artists who make secular paintings, and anyone else found seeking knowledge from a source other than the dogma of the church. Christianity + The Middle Ages = Fun for Christ's sake!

      --
      How ya like dat?
    3. Re:proselytize by Omestes · · Score: 1

      And I recommended this to my local "campus crusade" and got a guilt trip for not being PC. Not the "CCC" either.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    4. Re:proselytize by @madeus · · Score: 1

      I hadn't noticed until I saw this post, but I'd never seen that word before, I was able to grok its meaning just from the context.

    5. Re:proselytize by entartete · · Score: 1

      the witch hunts didn't happen in the middle ages, it was the begining of these modern times of enlightenment and science that brought them on (random link pulled from google, you can find better ones if you look) http://www.gendercide.org/case_witchhunts.html the witch hunts didn't get into full gear until around 1550. you could also add in things like 'preserving the last embers of writing and knowledge through the dark ages', 'reintroducing the writings of aristotle that had been lost to the west by translating arabic sources', 'incorporating the teachings of jewish and muslim philosphers into church doctrine' and other scholarly pursuits to your christian game.

    6. Re:proselytize by Newtonian_p · · Score: 1

      Actually, I use Merriam-Webster. You get sound samples.

      --

      There are 2 kinds of people in this world: Those who write in decimal and those who don't

    7. Re:proselytize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the difference between people who think "irregardless" is proper english by "deriving the meaning from the context", and the people who bother to take the time to educate themselves.

  3. Cool by OneIsNotPrime · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'm sure this thread will be full of mockery and scorn, but I definitely prefer this kind of thinking to throwing out the baby with the bathwater.

    There's a clear trend of online communites, especially MMORPGs, beginning to mimick regular society more and more closely. I see missionary work in virtual communities as a natural progression of this.

    --

    ---

    WARNING:Slashdot karma not redeemable in the afterlife.

    1. Re:Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 Funny sig

    2. Re:Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess the simpletons need something to keep themselves occupied.

  4. OK, so I'm a mildly tolerant atheist... by slaker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    OK, so I'm a mildly tolerant atheist (actually, I'm not. Tolerant, particularly, but we'll pretend), or maybe just not a christian, and hypothetically, I'm paying to be involved in an MMORPG.

    Some jerk starts following me around blathering about his god and how I'm not going to his heaven and basically talking about his personal relationship with Jebus.

    At what point do I have recourse in this? I'm going about my business, and PAYING to do so, and I don't want to hear it.

    Can I complain to the operators of the service? Can I smite the moron for annoying me? Or is my only option to log off or leave because some dumbass is ruining my time online?

    --
    -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    1. Re:OK, so I'm a mildly tolerant atheist... by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That sounds like about the least offensive behavior that I have ever heard of on a MMORPG.

      I have noticed, however, that there are a lot of people in whom any mention of God or other religious topics leads to an instant feeling of revulsion. As a fellow atheist, I blame it on our hard-wiring. It is something that is terribly important to overcome. It is easy to lose out on a lot of life that way.

    2. Re:OK, so I'm a mildly tolerant atheist... by Danse · · Score: 0

      I have noticed, however, that there are a lot of people in whom any mention of God or other religious topics leads to an instant feeling of revulsion.

      For some of us, that comes from being in close quarters with obnoxiously religious people for some extended period of time. I can't stand people that can't keep their damn religions to themselves. If they want to have a relationship with whatever they believe to be a god, then fine. Just don't try to drag me into it too.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    3. Re:OK, so I'm a mildly tolerant atheist... by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

      I take it that you never talk about your denial of religion around others?

    4. Re:OK, so I'm a mildly tolerant atheist... by slaker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have other perfectly valid reasons to miss out on a lot of life. In fact, life is basically one long thing that I miss.

      Seriously, though. How can this be tolerated behavior?

      If someone walks up to me on a street that we each have an equal right to use, that's one thing. If I'm paying for the right to be there, doesn't that also (er, at least in the case of most reasonable services) give me some recourse when something as off-putting as THAT happens?

      For readers who can't empathize, I guess a decent analogy, since a lot of /.-ers were at least raised xtian and are at least nominally heterosexual males, would be a situation where you were paying for an MMORPG and every time you got online some scary gay guy wouldn't give up hitting on you (yes, like the oldmanmurray article). That's what being an atheist around rabid xtians is like.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    5. Re:OK, so I'm a mildly tolerant atheist... by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

      You do realize that you have just compared talking about religion to being hit on by members of your own sex. Surely that is not a hang up of some kind about religion, is it?

    6. Re:OK, so I'm a mildly tolerant atheist... by slaker · · Score: 0

      For me, since I work for a very small company, the only time I've said anything was the winter holiday season, when I specifically asked my coworkers to quit wishing me a merry xmas.

      I try to avoid retail spaces after early November. The assumption of xtian holidays annoys me.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    7. Re:OK, so I'm a mildly tolerant atheist... by slaker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've been hit on by members of my own sex. I've been told I need to become a mormon, a pentecostal, a baptist, one of those watchtower-carrying bastards and a catholic.

      In my experience, there's a similar level of distaste.

      Actually, I take that back. The first time a guy tried to hit on me, I was kinda flattered, which is something I've yet to experience with those who feel compelled to give witness.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    8. Re:OK, so I'm a mildly tolerant atheist... by Danse · · Score: 1

      No, I don't. At least not unless they bring it up.

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    9. Re:OK, so I'm a mildly tolerant atheist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I specifically asked my coworkers to quit wishing me a merry xmas.

      I bet you're fun at parties

    10. Re:OK, so I'm a mildly tolerant atheist... by realdpk · · Score: 1

      It's less annoying being hit on by a member of my own sex than it is to have people try to bring you in to their religion. The former simply means someone is attracted to you; the latter means someone wants you to live your life by their rules.

    11. Re:OK, so I'm a mildly tolerant atheist... by fatboyslack · · Score: 1

      OK, so some moron is annoying you for no apparent reason. Your new to online gaming, right? I'm joshing, but the point stands. I remember (get out the violin for this 'back in the day' recollection) playing online games years ago (ok, 6) and having idiots annoy me for no reason that I could fathom. At least now you can put these guys in the religion box. I use to go stupid (or more so) trying to understand why ppl would spend hours online with the pure reason of making things annoying/difficult.
      You can put cheats in this box/category too.

      /rant

      --
      Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself. -- Leo Tolstoy
    12. Re:OK, so I'm a mildly tolerant atheist... by viking099 · · Score: 1

      OK, so why can't you react the same way to them as you would to anyone else who is bothering you?
      There are systems in place to take care of the annoyances of other players in the game. Ignore them, ask them to stop, and when they don't, report them as harrassing you.
      Personally, I think you've just become a tad too sensitive about the whole thing. That other person has just as much right to be there as you do, and has as much right to utilize the system as you do. They are using it for a different purpose than you are, but I don't think there are any rules in place in most of the big MMOGs that say you can't spread the Word and attempt to bring people to believe.
      Use the tools that are given to you, that is your recourse.

    13. Re:OK, so I'm a mildly tolerant atheist... by slaker · · Score: 1

      That's what I was asking in the first place: What recourse would a player have? I'm not an MMORPG player or even a MUDer. I've seen Everquest. That's about as close as I've gotten.

      If that is tolerated behavior, I can't imagine wanting to spend time or money in such an environment.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    14. Re:OK, so I'm a mildly tolerant atheist... by slaker · · Score: 1

      I've never been to one. I wouldn't know.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    15. Re:OK, so I'm a mildly tolerant atheist... by thomas.galvin · · Score: 1

      It's a game. You have a thwump stick. Draw your own conclusions.

    16. Re:OK, so I'm a mildly tolerant atheist... by viking099 · · Score: 1

      Ahh. Understood.
      Yeah, you'd just treat it like someone constantly asking you for money or equipment. Most games offer commands to completely ignore someone, and if they're a constant nuisance, you can report them.
      But I don't think you'll find it to be a problem with your gaming sessions, should you choose to join. Just looking at it from a numbers perspective makes such a situation highly unlikely.

    17. Re:OK, so I'm a mildly tolerant atheist... by harrkev · · Score: 1

      Let me just put it this way...

      Christians have a world view that they (we) believe is real. The simple belief is that if you do not have a relationship with Jesus, then you will go to hell (a very un-fun place). By telling you about Jesus, they are actually trying to HELP you. For them to do otherwise would go against their world view.

      But I do freely admit that a lot of people go about it in completely the wrong way.

      Also, keep in mind that religion is all about the truth. You believe that there is no God. That is your choice. I believe that Jesus is part of the trinity. That is my choice. BUT we both cannot be right at the same time. Either there is a God or there isn't. It can't be both ways.

      So, the essence of religion is the search for truth, not personal preference. I can have a belief that watching TV and eating potato chips and ice cream is the best way to stay healthy, but reality doesn't really care what I think no matter how much I believe it (if you don't believe me, I can e-mail you a picture of myself). God is the same way -- he either exists or does not exist no matter what you believe.

      Before you entirely dismiss Christianity, you should read the book "The Case for Christ" by Lee Strobel (available here -- The author is a former newspaper reporter, and is the one who exposed the whole "exploding Ford Pinto" story). Since religion IS the search for truth, you should at least know about the evidence in favor of Jesus being God before dismissing it.

      And I would like to apologize for all of those Christians who were jerks to you.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    18. Re:OK, so I'm a mildly tolerant atheist... by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Speaking as an athiest as well, when someone decides to proselytize to me I usually just do it back. It's really fun when you tell them that they are 99% of the way to being a total athiest, just like me, and they get all shocked. Then I tell them,

      "When you understand why you deny the existance of all gods but the one you worship, then you will understand why I deny yours as well."

      (Para-phrased quote by Stephen F. Roberts)

      I try not to be smug when I say it... =]

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    19. Re:OK, so I'm a mildly tolerant atheist... by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Christians have a world view that they (we) believe is real. The simple belief is that if you do not have a relationship with Jesus, then you will go to hell (a very un-fun place). By telling you about Jesus, they are actually trying to HELP you. For them to do otherwise would go against their world view.

      I have a world view that people should leave me alone when I tell them I'm not interested in listening to them. For all the random people that walk up to me when I'm waiting in line to see a movie or knock on my friggin door on a weekend morning to assume they know anything about me based on the simple answer that I'm not interested in listening to them is offensive. For all they know, I could be a Biblical scholar with no interest in discussing the matter at the moment, or a firm belief that people should study the Bible on their own and not allow themselves to bend to my beliefs just because I may have studied more thoroughly than they have (not that this is necessarily true).

      But I do freely admit that a lot of people go about it in completely the wrong way.

      And bugging me about Christianity while I'm playing Everquest, an RPG based in a world in which Christ certainly did not exist, is at least as annoying as people running around going 'D00dz, did j00 c the Simpsonz last nite?'. Never mind that I have to pay to play the game.

      Also, keep in mind that religion is all about the truth. You believe that there is no God. That is your choice. I believe that Jesus is part of the trinity. That is my choice. BUT we both cannot be right at the same time. Either there is a God or there isn't. It can't be both ways.

      That's the difference between you and me. I see religion as a system of beliefs, each person holding to a different system (this being true even if all of those people attended the same church through the same time period at the same age and devoted the same amount of time to studying their religion). It can be both ways, or it can be neither way.

      So, the essence of religion is the search for truth, not personal preference. I can have a belief that watching TV and eating potato chips and ice cream is the best way to stay healthy, but reality doesn't really care what I think no matter how much I believe it (if you don't believe me, I can e-mail you a picture of myself). God is the same way -- he either exists or does not exist no matter what you believe.

      The last sentence is certainly true, but your analogy is not the best. With most religions, you're dealing with things that are at best hard to prove, and therefore it is not so much the search for truth that is important in religions, but faith and belief, and the search for meaning. People want to know why they are here and what happens when they die, this is the primary focus of religion. The secondary (and what I believe is more important, even though it seems overlooked by some) focus of religion is morality. No one can easily prove that morality is truth, nor what happens when we die, because in the case of morality it is subject to what is taught and in the case of when we die all of the observable functions tend to cease, what we can prove to be life is gone, and no one comes back to let us know.

      Before you entirely dismiss Christianity, you should read the book "The Case for Christ" by Lee Strobel (available here [amazon.com] -- The author is a former newspaper reporter, and is the one who exposed the whole "exploding Ford Pinto" story). Since religion IS the search for truth, you should at least know about the evidence in favor of Jesus being God before dismissing it.

      Personally, I'd rather read the actual texts (or as close to them as we can get given age and language barriers) instead of someone's interviews with Christians and interpretations of what those people have said. Most of the Christians I've run into (doing their little conversion game) have too little understanding of the Bible itself, and instead rely heavily on what they are told by the church. It could be said (and the case could be made) that this in itself goes against the teachings of Christ.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    20. Re:OK, so I'm a mildly tolerant atheist... by Chelloveck · · Score: 1
      Actually, I take that back. The first time a guy tried to hit on me, I was kinda flattered, which is something I've yet to experience with those who feel compelled to give witness.

      Amen. At least being hit on by a member of your own sex is still being hit on. And those guys tend to take "no" for an answer better than most Jehovah's Mormons.

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    21. Re:OK, so I'm a mildly tolerant atheist... by bitrott · · Score: 1

      "It is easy to lose out on a lot of life that way." REally?!? Like all the thrilling discourse I've been missing out on at my local church's pancake breakfast, where drooling old people and insufferable white trash blither on about how THEY'RE THE VICTIMS of ALL the moral injustices in our secular world? Or am I missing out on all the bible studies groups that claim all us athiests have a deepseeded need for spiritualism that we're all ignoring, but in actuality don't have the bloody time between all our baccanals and sacrificial offerings? Fugg off. the only thing I find offensive is this species tendency to abscond the empirical for the FANTASTIC.

    22. Re:OK, so I'm a mildly tolerant atheist... by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 1

      Every mmorpg has an /ignore command, where you won't see any text this person sends, for similar reasons.

      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
    23. Re:OK, so I'm a mildly tolerant atheist... by Jad+LaFields · · Score: 1

      Some jerk starts following me around blathering about his god and how I'm not going to his heaven and basically talking about his personal relationship with Jebus.... I'm going about my business, and PAYING to do so, and I don't want to hear it.

      You've never been on a New York City subway, have you? =)

      At least in games you can use an ignore command or just kill them.

      --
      [SIG] It's like putting a moose in the blender -- a recipe for disaster!
    24. Re:OK, so I'm a mildly tolerant atheist... by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

      I find this post hilarious.

      For years people have been saying to the religious folks that if you don't like what's on tv, radio, etc then turn it off or don't listen.

      So the same thing is happening to you but the another way around. Oh the irony!!

    25. Re:OK, so I'm a mildly tolerant atheist... by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

      Odd, as a religious person with some atheist friends, they always seem to find me quite interesting and ask some excellent questions.
      I find them to be not hostile but rather curious
      about my beliefs and such.
      My favorite question is
      "How can someone as smart as you believe in God?"

      But I am not an in your face kind of person, maybe that's makes a difference??

    26. Re:OK, so I'm a mildly tolerant atheist... by slaker · · Score: 1

      ... or don't subscribe in the first place, since the vast majority of folks in the US have some kind of for-pay TV service. I can go along with that.

      But, um, how do I switch the channel on Everquest? Where do I find the game that doesn't have proselytizing xtians?

      Cable and radio both have outlets for entirely-religious programming in largely secular media. So far as I know there's no such thing as a secular MMORPG, and here there's evidence that at least some people want to de-secularize these games as well.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    27. Re:OK, so I'm a mildly tolerant atheist... by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      At what point do I have recourse in this?

      What if I followed you around asking you to join my in-game guild?

      Tell the "jerk" that you're not interested, and if you were interested, you'd seek out Chrisitians in real life, not at an MMORPG. They should leave you alone after that.

  5. All praise the cow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Moo

    1. Re:All praise the cow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silly moderator... didn't read the article... Check the picture of the cow temple. It specifically says, All praise the cow.

    2. Re:All praise the cow. by xSauronx · · Score: 1
      you for to say

      "eat mor chikin"

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    3. Re:All praise the cow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and forgot to spellcheck...

    4. Re:All praise the cow. by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      'eat mor chikin' is a reference to the advertising of a fast-food chain called Chick-Fil-A (http://www.chickfila.com/) in which cows write various slogans, including 'eat mor chikin' and 'Leefy not Beefy'. Of course, it's not nation-wide, and I never would've known about it had I not moved from one coast to the other about a year ago.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
  6. What if I want to BE god? by Metroid72 · · Score: 1

    Let me play ActRaiser...

    I really loved when people got into the temple to 'reproduce'.. hehehe...

    1. Re:What if I want to BE god? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing like a good may day celebration. Well shoot, most pagan celebrations are fertility rites.

  7. stories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think God in video games is a completly ignored subject. There is so much subject matter that could be used for material. It's amazing in these days where most people complain about storylines in games that they don't just use stories from the Bible? After all there is a lot of stories in there that many people don't read. Such as the political actions of the kings of Israel and Judah are complex. And what about the prophesies and visions that are in the Bible. And talk about complex characters, WOW. I really think that if most people get past there own bias and unfortunatly sometimes hate they would really like the Bible even if they don't chose to beleive it and I think they would really be impressed by any game that you could make from the history in it. History based or fictional.

    -Emperor Alikar who for some reason can't rember his password... *sigh*

    1. Re:stories by JeffTL · · Score: 1

      I agree. Frankly, I'd love to see more historical games set in Biblical Israel etc. Or an Acts of the Apostles RPG. Yum.

    2. Re:stories by Geckoman · · Score: 1
      The main problem with games based on Biblical stories is the same problem faced by any games based on well-known stories: the interactivity and freedom are necessarily curtailed somewhat in order to stay true to the story. Except in this case, that problem is compounded by the fact that deviating even slightly from the story could be highly offensive to a large portion of the target audience (mainly Christians and Jews).

      While a good RTS or Civ-style game based on the post-Exodus conquest of Canaan might be pretty cool, there's not really much room for variations in most of the stories. Imagine a game where the player controlled Christ, and the in-game choices determined whether He would be a good messiah or an evil messiah. That's pretty blasphemous on multiple levels. The tempest stirred up by The Last Temptation of Christ would look like a mild April shower in comparison!

      There could be (and maybe have been?) some cool games based on wars between angels and demons, but even in those cases, the mere possibility that the powers of good could be defeated (especially if the player were controlling the forces of evil) could be pretty offensive.

      However, I hear from friends who have played them that the Xenosaga games stray off into some blasphemy and heresy, and there hasn't been any great backlash that I know of.

      The core problem remains the same, though. While the characters are exciting and complex, and the stories have been compelling for thousands of years, and they've been the basis for countless plays, books, and movies, those traits don't necessarily make for good games. Either they're sacrificed in favor of player control and flexibility, or they lead to a game that's more like interactive fiction than a true game.

  8. Catechumen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Ive played Catechumen, and would like to report that it was the most horrible game of all time. Who wants to get a giant sword, only to zap people with it? I got stuck in one of the levels because i was surrounded by people newly 'converted'. Where's the fun in that.

  9. Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...no offense to Mr. Loftus' article, but it is practically IMPOSSIBLE to mention religion and gaming without bringing up Xenogears (as well as Xenosaga), as well as a couple other notables. I understand that it wasn't exactly the point of the article, but he could've easily included religious (not necessarily Christian) influences on gaming (perhaps in part 2?).

    http://www.toastyfrog.com/features/features/reli gi on_01.shtml

    1. Re:Um... by StellarEX · · Score: 1

      Yeah this surprised me too... the Xenogames are the highlight of religion in gaming, yet no mention at all of them, wierd. Even GTA Vice City is mentioned, heh!

    2. Re:Um... by mink · · Score: 1

      I cant believe they missed the story about misuse of religions and poer that was Grandia II.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  10. So-called "Christian games", bad journalism by jensend · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Most games which are supposed to provide Christian entertainment are neither equipped with a meaningful Christian message nor entertaining. (See my comment in a previous discussion.)

    The last part seems like another instance of somebody finding an arcane way to state the obvious and meaningless, prepending the phrase "existential analysis" in front of their banter, and pretending that they have therefore stated something profound and rich with meaning. Kierkegaard et al must have turned in their graves at that. Overall, the writing of the article positively reeks of "I'm on deadline for my column and thus just spouting out the following crap; I hope it gets by our editor and that our readers find it either funny or profound." I mean, is "Will firing up the game console ever be considered a sacred act?" supposed to be funny? It's positively moronic.

  11. it's too bad about the obnoxious minority... by snooo53 · · Score: 1, Insightful
    I have noticed, however, that there are a lot of people in whom any mention of God or other religious topics leads to an instant feeling of revulsion.

    IMHO It's too bad that the people in the few denominations of Christianity (or any other religion) that are obnoxious about spreading their views ruin it for everyone.

    As a Christian myself, I have become more and more annoyed at the overly religious people who think everyone needs to think and believe the same as them. Not too long ago I was approached by someone at a mall who would not go away and was very persistant that I accept God right then and there. Talk about a turnoff! It's very dishearting knowing that normal people are being scared off by these obnoxious few who think it's their duty to approach every random person they see on the street and do the 5 minute conversion. I've always thought the best way to share beliefs is to actually develop a relationship with someone and having them first be actually interested in what you think. And even then, it's their own path to discover and follow.

    By and large, the more popular denominations (Lutheran/even Catholic for the most part,etc..) interpret the bible more liberally, and are generally really tolerant. Authors like CS. Lewis express it best when he says through his writing you don't have to even believe in the same God to go to heaven.

    It's the ambitious, power seeking, and issue-centered people (ie. religious right) and the denominations that think you have to have a long list of people you have converted that are the least tolerant. Those are the ones to watch out for. The ones that read and follow every word in the Bible literally but manage to ignore the thousands about compassion and tolerance. But by and large I think the majority of religious people are NOT like those few who try to impose their beliefs on everyone. Don't get disheartened about Christians in general... the 95% more realistic, normal day to day Christians are just being drowned out by the loud, obnoxious minority.

    --
    The sending of this message pretty much inconveniences everyone involved.
    1. Re:it's too bad about the obnoxious minority... by Dave114 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Authors like CS. Lewis express it best when he says through his writing you don't have to even believe in the same God to go to heaven.

      I've read a fair bit of C.S. Lewis, but I've yet to come across something along those lines in there. What (book, chapter, page?) specifically are you drawing this conclusion from?

    2. Re:it's too bad about the obnoxious minority... by MacBrave · · Score: 1

      Hear! Hear! I couldn't have said it better myself. I think my pastor summed his philosphy about converting people to Christianity pretty well with the statement: "I'd rather love a person into heaven than scare them out of hell."

    3. Re:it's too bad about the obnoxious minority... by snooo53 · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of the last book of the Narnia series, where some the people who worshipped Tash(?) were accepted to the surprise of the Narnians (it's been so long I could be wrong though). I suppose that part can be interpreted a lot of different ways, but that's the conclusion I came to after reading it.

      --
      The sending of this message pretty much inconveniences everyone involved.
    4. Re:it's too bad about the obnoxious minority... by LadyKat · · Score: 1

      Aslan, who is a representation of the Christian God in the purest form as he gave his life in sacrifice, informed the people of Narnia (the land he created) that if something was done of love, of truth and the virtues that he represents it was done in his name, not the name of Tash. The Chronicles of Narnia I read as a child like most read Tolkien (over and over. :) ) Even though I am not a Christian, I could not and did not want to ignore the blatant religious overtones. However I found the message to be one of love and not oppression as one normally thinks when approached by 'religious freaks'. Granted in Narnia is was allot easier to believe in Aslan since he did make quite a few appearances as opposed to the Christian God so he wasn't exactly a presence one had to take on faith, even if they were few and far between. He was also a huge male lion and frankly I wouldn't care to be the one who had to look at him and say " Hey, you know I am just.. NOT convinced that you exist." Interesting side note here, Tolkien and C.S.Lewis were very good friends. In fact the character TreeBeard was a gentle poke at C.S. Lewis as both ent and human were known for their slow and deliberant manner of speaking.

    5. Re:it's too bad about the obnoxious minority... by erobertstad · · Score: 1

      Hrmm... I suppose I could go on about a big rant like everyone else... blah... I'll stick the classic that fits for a strange reason at this time:

      Preach on sister Ladykat! :)

      Besides, Christ was an alien.... I have been watching UFO stories all day on History. "And as they still went on and talked, behold, a chariot of fire and horses of fire separated the two of them. And Eli'jah went up by a whirlwind into heaven". Chariot of fire my ass... sounds like how stupid people would talk about a flying craft if they never saw one and had no words for such a thing. History channel rocks.

      I can feel my karma drifting away from me already... oh yeah, what karma! :)

  12. hebrew names in English by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 1

    I assume your name in English is Joel. I don't remember what the hebrew spelling is. I can't look it up now as I am planning to move to Israel next week, so all of my books are packed and in storage until I can have them shipped over. However its one of those cases where you can transliterate the herbrew with or without the "W" and defend both as a reasonable thing to do. Both would be written the same way with hebre charecters.

    --
    Erlang Developer and podcaster
    1. Re:hebrew names in English by BTWR · · Score: 1

      it's Yud-Vuv-Aleph-Lamed

      General rule-of-thumb, most hebrew names ending in "el" will be spelled "aleph-lamed" because the name derived from "of G-d"

  13. Looking For God In Videogames by Zork+the+Almighty · · Score: 1

    "Looking For God In Videogames" : in particular, I find myself drawn to Populous...

    --

    In Soviet America the banks rob you!
    1. Re:Looking For God In Videogames by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't look for God in video games, They only way to The King is through his music!

  14. Buddhist concepts by The+Munger · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's a discussion going on flipCode about Buddhist Concepts in games.

    --
    Refuse to make a statement in your sig!
    1. Re:Buddhist concepts by Prien715 · · Score: 1

      Interesting discussion, however, nothing mentioned in the article is actually unique to Buddhism. The idea of dying, coming back, and trying to escape this cycle through learning is common to Hinduism, Jainism, and even Pythagorean religion.

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
  15. What I want to know is... by randomizer9 · · Score: 1

    Do spawn-campers, aimbot users and other smacktards go to Virtual Hell?
    [sound of rocket launcher being readied]
    Let's find out...

    --
    A little nonsense now and then, is relished by the wisest men... --Willy Wonka
  16. The devil by stardeep · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "There have been too many games," said Bagley, "Where the devil always wins or is one of the strongest characters."

    But surely if this guy is a Christian, he will have to admit that according to his religion, the devil is one of the strongest "characters"? I mean, he's possibly the second-strongest being in the universe, second only to the Big Guy in the Sky.

    I have nothing but contempt for these pick-and-mix religious types.

    (Although the thought of fighting for the soul of a "troubled teenager" kinda turns me on...)

    --
    Sentimentality is merely the Bank Holiday of cynicism.
    - Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:The devil by tiled_rainbows · · Score: 2, Funny

      Although the thought of fighting for the soul of a "troubled teenager" kinda turns me on...

      Tried that, been there. She dumped me.

    2. Re:The devil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, that's not the case at all. Christians who believe the Bible, the whole Bible, and nothing but, don't believe the devil to be second strongest being in the universe at all.

      The view of Christianity where there's a yin-yang power struggle and we're all waiting to see if Jesus or the devil wins is *NOT* a Biblical view of the devil.

      I won't bore anybody with scripture references, but those who read/believe the Bible see Satan as a defeated, powerless enemy.

  17. Not necessarily by stardeep · · Score: 1

    > I mean, is "Will firing up the game console
    > ever be considered a sacred act?" supposed to
    > be funny? It's positively moronic.

    Not necessarily. In many religions, perhaps most notably Zen Buddhism (which, incidentally, has no concept of a god) even the smallest everyday act becomes something sacred.

    As a Christian, you are probably inclined to think of this life as a kind of dress rehearsal for the next. In other religions, including for example Chassidic Judaism, this life is where we find or (re-)constitute God.

    Try taking off your blinkers and start recognizing the sacredness and uniqueness of every flower you smell, every dish you wash and every shambler you frag.

    --
    Sentimentality is merely the Bank Holiday of cynicism.
    - Oscar Wilde
  18. Philosophy lab by RobotWisdom · · Score: 1
    Imagine taking an ethics course where the 'lab' work involves playing thru various simulated ethical challenges and comparing the outcomes of different choices...?

    To create such a sim will require precise analysis of all the relevant psychological factors.

    One of the trickiest is modeling self-knowledge-- perhaps the player's character could have its own impulses that have to be understood and worked with? [more]

    1. Re:Philosophy lab by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 1

      This was already done in a very simple way for character creation in the Ultima series. A visit to the gypsy trailer, some ethical questions on various situations and voila! You have your character based on your answers.

    2. Re:Philosophy lab by Jad+LaFields · · Score: 1

      I think the game Black and White at least touched on this. Its by Lionhead Studios and 'god'-games god Peter Molyne-frenchsomethingoranother. I have a friend who really liked it, but he's one of those friends who like everything.

      --
      [SIG] It's like putting a moose in the blender -- a recipe for disaster!
  19. Wind Waker by DarkZero · · Score: 1

    This, unfortunately, is the reason that I have a bad taste in my mouth when I think about this game. I'm going to take a lot of heat for what I'm about to say, but I'm honestly disappointed in the spiritual content of WW. The Great Faeries somewhat resemble the Hindu goddess Shiva. Link gains the ability to "possess" certain objects and even a few specific people. resemble Every few minutes it's "the gods this, and the gods that...", the Windwaker contains "the power of the gods", you get a certain ability from the wind god and the ability to travely quickly through cyclones from the cyclone god, and the Tower of the gods has the G in gods capitalized (yeah I know, it's part of the name but still...), and the two sages when mentioned are said to be praying to the gods. The only redeeming thing from the entire gods issue is in one instance you have to kick the cyclone god's butt (which I really enjoyed). What really did it for me though, was that there is a point in the game where it is required to seek out two sages to pray to the gods for the master sword to be reenergized. The game actually says something along the lines of "your prayers were answered and the master sword regained some of its power!" And for people whom would try to say "oh it's just fantasy" try talking to your pastor about it and see what he says... be sure to tell him about the Temple of the gods and the two wind gods, and the praying sages. But I'm a "thou shalt have no other gods before me" kinda guy, so I took this game back and asked for a refund. Yes, I've already been criticized for this, and surprisingly mostly from Christians. For those that think a 2 is too harsh, I would have given this a 1 except for the fact that I felt this game didn't deserve to be placed in the ranks of Diablo and Grand Theft Auto III. If it weren't for the praying bit, I'd have given this a 3 and would probably still have the game.

    I'm glad he finds something "redeeming" in a work produced by a polytheistic culture that features... polytheism, even if he's "honestly disappointed" by it. Thankfully, he doesn't believe that other cultures should be placed in the ranks of GTA3.

    I wonder if strict Shinto believers are offended when an American work makes a vague hint toward monotheism, such as Warcraft III's "The Light". I'm guessing not, but I could be wrong.

    1. Re:Wind Waker by shadowcabbit · · Score: 1

      I'm glad he's looking for spiritual content in video games. This way when he dies, St. Peter won't be waiting for him at the gates, but Pac-Man.

      Seriously, has our culture (as a world, mind you) fallen so far that we are now unable to separate reality from fantasy for the hours spent playing a video game-- for even a moment? Lots of great literature would be lost if it were judged on its political-religious correctness factor; specifically the Greek and Roman myths. The rest of the world should not be punished for a few people's inability to exercise suspension of disbelief.

      Personally, as an ex-Catholic, I don't think there's anything wrong with playing a game where the character worships different or many gods. After all, all I'm doing is pushing a button. I'm not actually praying. What's the big deal?

      --
      "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
  20. I have a better idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's just call it "The Demon" instead. All gods are inimical to human life, human reason, and human freedom. It's not apostasy, but justifiable deicide.

  21. God does not play dice... by presearch · · Score: 1

    He plays tranquility .

  22. No "W" sound in Hebrew? by Lady+Jazzica · · Score: 1
    It should also be pointed out that there is no "W" sound in hebrew

    Maybe that's true in modern Hebrew, but not ancient Hebrew:
    Some pronounce this name with a "v" sound for the third letter from the right, the "vav." It is true, in today's Hebrew, that the letter "vav" is given a "v" sound.

    The "Vav," today pronounced with a "v" sound, was originally pronounced as a "w" (the letter name is often written as "waw"). Biblical Hebrew: A Text and Workbook, by Kittel, Hoffer, and Wright; Yale University Press 1989, page 1.

    Other texts have described this change to the "v" sound as coming from the European influence, mainly Germanic, which language had no "w", sound so the "v" was substituted. Hebrew really did not need this letter to be a "v" sound, since it already had a "v" sound in its second letter, Bet, when the dot (the dagesh) in the center of the letter is absent.
  23. Re: "Gott wurfelt nicht!" by @madeus · · Score: 1

    Yeah, sez who, Einstein? Pfft :P

    God not only plays dice with the universe, but sometimes throws them where we can't see them.

    --Stephen Hawking

  24. It's still just bad journalism. by jensend · · Score: 1

    If you want to extend the usage of the word sacred to include a general spiritual approach to life in all its particulars, that's fine by me (though one would need a new term to designate the specifically sanctified and hallowed). But the journalist's sentence is even more moronic under that interpretation; if all actions are sacred, it makes no sense to wonder if one specific act will (presumably thanks to human effort, given the context of the statement) become sacred at some point in the future.

  25. Acts RPG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, do you get a full-body tactical feedback device for when your Steven or Paul characters get stoned?

  26. Time to reactivate my station account by billcopc · · Score: 1
    Some [Christian] evangelists have even used EverQuest to proselytize to fellow players.


    Alright, come on and proselytize to me in the PK arena!

    (/me is an aggressive antitheist - quit believing or quit breathing!)
    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  27. The Nameless by Experiment+626 · · Score: 1
    I think the purpose of The Nameless is not so much to make parallels to a real-world religion as to create one that is internally consistent. In games such as EQ you find a mythos of lots of minor gods, but these aren't really omnipotent beings so much as superheroes/villians. They have lots of cool powers and a distinctive sphere of control (war, nature, justice, whatever), but they have serious limitations to their power and can eventually be defeated by player characters.

    In short, they don't work very well as the ultimate beings in the universe. Their motives are all-too-human, and their power too limited for them to be the entities who created the universe. So some fictional settings combine this polytheistic approach with a sort of agnostic monotheism. They introduce a behind-the-scenes god who IS all powerful and who created everything, but doesn't get involved in the affairs of mortals. The Nameless in EverQuest is this type of entity, as is Ao in the Forgotten Realms, the Creator in the Wheel of Time, and so on. This two-tiered approach gives authors a convenient way to provide for battling gods / immortals / heroes / whatever while still resolving the big philosophical questions of their universe in a way that is analagous to the way many people answer them in real life.

    As far as preaching on MMORPG's, I'd say unless you are doing so privately with your friends that you know well enough to discuss serious and personal topics with, keep it in character. It's good roleplay to say "You tree-hugging fool, forsake the worthless Tunare and follow the dark path of Innoruuk!" but running around starting arguments about real-life religions would not be.

  28. Nice by jtheory · · Score: 1

    Very good point. If you want to promote/criticize belief systems that are part of the game, rock on... but discussion of a real-world religion (including telling another player, "Come worship the Nameless One with me - He's the same as the Jewish G_d!") should be as taboo as trying to sell real-world vaccuum cleaners to other players.

    --
    There are only 10 types of people: those who understand decimal, those who don't, and, uh, 8 other types I forget.
  29. Ignorance of others is the problem in the world. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish fucking idiots would not talk about other religions if they don't know jack shit about them.

    In the article they talk about how the fairies in Wind Waker resemble the Hindu Goddess Shiva.

    Having spent some time in India and studying the religion in some areas, Shiva was most definitely a male god, worshipped mostly for fertility.
    It turnsout with some investigation details about Shiva do vary depending on location and what religion you investigate him in. A few say he is both ale and female, but as all of them show him taking Parvati as a wife... I dunno.
    People worship/make offerings to a Shiva Lingam. A phallic stone on a pedestal with a downspout, if you have seen League of Extraordinary Gentlemen the tower/deck of the Nautilus was one. I had to suppress my laughter every time I saw it.

    Some other eastern cultures do have depictions of Shiva as female, but I didn't run into any in India itself, so I assume much like how they have a female representation of Buddha they wanted a female Shiva.