Slashdot Mirror


An ID Number for Everything

jon323456 writes "Put this in your privacy pipe and smoke it. According to news.com, MIT researchers have cooked up a new barcode that has enough dataspace to include a unique serial number for everything. And in combination with RFID tags...."

44 of 391 comments (clear)

  1. 96 bits??? by corebreech · · Score: 5, Funny

    Damn man, MIT must be slipping. I could give you uniqueness using only 64-bits.

    So could any coder who cut his teeth on machine language.

    We need to stop teaching Perl/Python/Java as a first language. Make the uber-generation deal with opcodes and registers. Assembler will put hair on your chest boy!

    The point is, bits aren't cheap. If we're going to set standards for their allocation, let's let somebody who knows what they're doing do it. Yes?

    1. Re:96 bits??? by michiel.h · · Score: 4, Funny

      The point is, bits aren't cheap. If we're going to set standards for their allocation, let's let somebody who knows what they're doing do it. Yes?

      Yeah, those so called 'researchers' at MIT are nothing but frauds. We need people who know what they are doing. We need experience. We need expertise.
      I say we ask Ballmer. He'll help us out.

    2. Re:96 bits??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "Assembler will put hair on your chest boy!"

      Mnemonics are for wimps. Gimme back my toggle switches.

  2. Barcode? by l810c · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why call this a barcode? It's an ID tag. Kinda like a DSL 'modem' I guess.

  3. You read that right. by ajuda · · Score: 5, Funny

    It takes all those PhDs to figure out that a really, really big number can hold lots of information.

    1. Re:You read that right. by twoslice · · Score: 4, Funny

      It takes all those PhDs to figure out that a really, really big number can hold lots of information.

      Actually, it is worse than that. It takes all those PhDs to figure out that you can count really high if you just keep counting...

      --

      From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
    2. Re:You read that right. by tiled_rainbows · · Score: 4, Funny

      When my brother worked at a supermarket checkout, he'd just wave the item vaguely in front of the reader and then pass it on, whether the barcode was read or not. He was the most popular checkout guy ever.

  4. Wow this is pretty dumb.. slow news day? by phunhippy · · Score: 4, Funny

    So basically.. they're using a 96 digit bar code instead of a 12 or 14..

    wow stop the presses.. thatis revolutionary..

    oh wait I got an idea.. lets use 128.. or better yet 1024!!! we'll never need to make a new standard for thousands of years!

    woooo!(ric-flair like woooo)

    1. Re:Wow this is pretty dumb.. slow news day? by cdrudge · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why not just assign everything an IPv6 IP address under the notion that someday you will be able to plug it in. There's enough addresses in that space to go around...plus your sweater and can of chicken soup one day will be net-enabled anyways.

  5. Great! by cyclist1200 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I can start tagging my subatomic particle collection!

    1. Re:Great! by alexre1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      In recent news, Stanford's physics department took a leaf out of the infamous "Pet Rock" success story, and made an absolute killing with their new product line "Pet Subatomic Particles" (marketed by Mattel). They come in two varieties: the cute and cuddly "Pet Lepton", for those little girls out there; and the big and fierce "Pet Quark". Each Pet Subatomic-Particle is stamped with it's very own, unique ID number! You can get your very own for only 5 easy payments of $99.99 US!

      In related news, this move pissed the hell out of the MIT researchers who developed the so-called "Everything Barcode", which they claimed had enough dataspace to uniquely indentify everything. Said one reasercher, (off the record): "Man, did this come as a surprise. I mean, we made space for every single atom in the entire friggin' universe in this barcode system, but did we think about Quarks and Leptons! Argh! We'll have to go back to square one on this. Give us another two years, and we'll find a number so big, that ... well, you get the idea!"

  6. Even the tinfoil? by dthable · · Score: 2, Funny

    So, my tinfoil hat will now have a unique code as well. What's a paranoid /. geek to do?

    1. Re:Even the tinfoil? by MrLint · · Score: 2, Funny

      Im sorry sir you cant return that tin foil because it didn't block the mind control lasers, as this barcode clearly states your warranty has expired.

    2. Re:Even the tinfoil? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I, for one, welcome our new megacorporation overlords.

  7. Lets see by chrispycreeme · · Score: 4, Funny

    that's 2^96 = 79,228,162,514,264,337,593,543,950,336
    hosts... minus 2 for the broadcast and the network address. Um...No thats not right.. damn cisco.

  8. Hmmm... by hak+hak · · Score: 5, Funny

    To start with, let's give each of those ID chips a number! Oh wait... now there are no numbers left for all my other stuff!

  9. MOT by Brahmastra · · Score: 1, Funny

    Maybe, at this rate, MIT will rename themselves to MOT - Ministry of Truth

  10. Isn't there only about 10^80 particles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thus with 80 digit barcode you should able to label every particle in the universe :)

  11. Same technology to *fix* CD's by Malicious · · Score: 4, Funny
    If you beleive that bar-codes are infringing on your privacy rights, there is a simple solution.
    Take a felt tipped marker. Make one of the lines thicker.

    Problem Solved!

    Did I just violate DMCA?

    --
    01101001001000000110000101101101001000000110001001 10000101110100011011010110000101101110
    1. Re:Same technology to *fix* CD's by Gudlyf · · Score: 4, Funny

      Great, so instead of it looking like a bought that innocent bag of chips, I show up as having bought an anal dildo.

      --
      Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    2. Re:Same technology to *fix* CD's by Blue+Stone · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you're visiting a chip shop that sells anal dildoes, I'd consider buying your chips elsewhere.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
  12. Oh no by l810c · · Score: 4, Funny

    This barcode tatoo on the back of my neck is going to seem So Dated.

  13. Get your requests in early! by kcornia · · Score: 2, Funny

    Everyone knows how much street cred you get with a low /. ID..

  14. Number the RFID tags! by iapetus · · Score: 2, Funny
    And in combination with RFID tags....

    Hmm. If everything can have a unique ID, and an RFID tag to go with it, then my cunning solution is to insist that each RFID tag has its own unique ID (and tag) as well. Privacy intrusion defeated by the power of recursion!

    --
    ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
    Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
  15. Re:Hey! What is my number? by Pirogoeth · · Score: 2, Funny

    OK... You are now number 675474! Congratulations!

    --
    Happiness is like peeing yourself. Everybody can see it but only you can feel its warmth.
  16. Knee Jerk by tunabomber · · Score: 4, Funny

    Put this in your privacy pipe and smoke it.

    Maybe the things that I smoke in my privacy pipe is my own freakin' business- that never occurred to you now, did it?

    --

    pi = 3.141592653589793helpimtrappedinauniversefactory71 ...
  17. The ghost of Bill Gates... by Xaroth · · Score: 2, Funny

    "79228162514264337593543950336 bar codes ought to be enough for anyone."
    --MIT, 2003

  18. Re:Hey! What is my number? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 5, Funny

    These people looked deep within my soul and assign me a number based on the order in which I joined.
    -- Homer J. Simpson.

  19. Can we pick serial numbers? by MoeMoe · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe it'll be like vanity phone numbers... I got dibs on 1337!!!

    --
    Business \Busi"ness\, n.;
    A scam in which all people involved perceive as beneficial...
    1. Re:Can we pick serial numbers? by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 2, Funny

      Too late, you are already serial number 659154.

  20. This could be called... by weston · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow! This needs some kind of cool name, like... like...

    MIT Everyware, perhaps?

  21. Huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Brilliant. I've still got cancer though.

    1. Re:Huh. by reiggin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Guess that's one less person to worry about Barcoding.

  22. I hearby claim first bar by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hearby claim first bar

    |

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  23. Privacy? by Wvyern · · Score: 3, Funny

    So where are they gonna put this barcode, oops, ID Tag on people? If it's on the ass no one will be able to scan mine through all the hair.

    --
    "Sheep just follow the easiest path and run from scary noises and intimidating creatures." - Me
  24. and the total number of IDs is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    6^66

  25. Re:No more inventory counts by GeckoX · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, no, no, you'd label each _molecule_ within the paint can and query that silly ;)

    --
    No Comment.
  26. Re:An ID on every car axle? by Mortanius · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, the raw tag number is unique within any given state, but looked at nationally, each number could have up to 50 duplicates, ignoring the state of origin. Besides, what can you tell from a license plate itself? There's a much more serious issue in the automotive industry; the VIN.

    The VIN is truly unique; no two cars have the same number. They are unique amongst a common manufacturer, and unique amongst all automotive manufacturers. Every car, truck, minivan, SUV, etc. has one of these numbers, often written in multiple places, and oftentimes PHYSICALLY STAMPED in the material of the car so as to prevent fraud (it's illegal to remove this privacy-infringing device!)

    These numbers are not protected at all; they're prominently displayed on the dash of all vehicles equipped with them, so that anyone simply walking past your car can look in and record the number. From it, they'll know what manufacturer produced your car, the car's series, its body style, engine type, emissions, what model year it is, what factory it was produced in, and on top of that, A SIX-DIGIT UNIQUE IDENTIFIER!

    This problem has existed for decades, and few people actually know the evils that lurk inside! This must be stopped! Stand up to your car manufacturers, tell them you WILL NOT BUY another vehicle from them until this travesty is corrected!

    (Peace out, yo.)

  27. Re:No more inventory counts by Whispers_in_the_dark · · Score: 3, Funny

    You'll always have a need to do a physical audit.

    Unless, of course, that your whole business is the warehousing and distribution of RFID tags. If that's the case, you're probably just about set.
  28. Re:IPv6? by Xenoproctologist · · Score: 2, Funny

    Indeed. IPv6 will not be complete until people can run a traceroute on their underwear to make sure they remembered to put it on.

  29. MIT by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 2, Funny

    Morally
    Indifferent
    Technologists

    --

    There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
  30. Uh-Oh by not_a_george · · Score: 1, Funny

    Bad situation:
    mom and dad walk by little jimmy's room, pull out the scanner, and find jimmy has:
    2 packs of cigs
    5 porno videos, including the tommy lee video
    a 50 pack of condoms
    and a "3 foot long tobacco enhacement product (tm)"
    dad says to mom "thats my boy!"

    --
    Linux: Helping nerds look smarter since the late 90s.
  31. Obligatory joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now every SCO lawsuit and every RIAA subpoena can have its unique idenitifier.

    Their products can also have an unique ID. for SCO I suggest 2 and RIAA 3 ...

  32. Did they actually say it? by deeLo57 · · Score: 3, Funny

    MIT Researcher 1: so , should we make it 96 bits or 128? MIT Researcher 2: "96 bits should be enough for anybody."