Slashdot Mirror


New iMacs (and iPods)

Dilaudid writes "According to this story at MacWorld Apple has just announced three new iMac models - all with Bluetooth and AirPort Extreme. More importantly there are new iPods too. Cool." The iMacs got a speed bump up to 1.25GHz, and the iPods were capacity-bumped up to 40GB.

143 of 748 comments (clear)

  1. How about an American link... by ih8apple · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...with prices in Dollars?
    From Apple.com to avoid having to convert British pounds into prices that would be for the wrong market anyway...

    1. Re:How about an American link... by Mattb90 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Head over to this page on the Apple Store for prices in US Dollars.

      --
      Mattb90
      Editor, allaboutgames.co.uk
  2. Still no OGG by AkaXakA · · Score: 3, Informative

    *cries*

    Good thing I have an iRiver discman though ;)

    -----Article:
    >>>Apple upgrades iMac range

    By Jonny Evans

    Apple today introduced new iMac configurations featuring up to a 1.25GHz G4 processor and faster 333MHz DDR memory as standard.

    Three models of iMac are now available as standard from the company: the 1GHz 15-inch screen Combo drive (CD-RW/DVD-ROM) iMac; the 17-inch model (with SuperDrive), hosting a 1.25GHz processor; and the 17-inch SuperDrive Plus model, which offers 1.25GHz, and ships with AirPort Extreme and Bluetooth built-in.

    The 15-inch iMac costs 999; the 17-inch SuperDrive costs 1,449; and the 17-inch SuperDrive Plus costs 1,713. Prices include VAT.

    All models are AirPort Extreme and Bluetooth ready, though the highest-end model is the only iMac with these features pre-installed. Other features common across the range include: 80GB hard drives (high end, 160GB); 10/100Base-T Ethernet; 56K internal modems; and Apple Pro speakers.

    The new iMacs have three USB 2.0 ports and two FireWire 400 ports. They do not offer the new FireWire 800 standard.

    The 15-inch model has an NVidia GeForce4 MX graphics card installed with 32MB dedicated DDR video memory - up from a GeForce2 MX. The two 17-inch iMacs offer NVidia GeForce FX 5200 Ultra graphics cards with 64MB DDR memory installed. Previously the 17-inch models featured the GeForce4 MX.

    With Mac OS X 10.2 and Apple's iApps (iPhoto, iMovie, iTunes and iDVD), the software bundle includes: QuickTime, iCal, iChat, iSync, DVD Player, AppleWorks, Mac OS X Mail, Internet Explorer, Mac OS X Chess, Otto Matic, Deimos Rising, FAXstf, Acrobat Reader, and the Apple Hardware Test CD.

    Apple has also introduced new iPods with a maximum 40GB storage:

    >>>40GB iPod launched

    By Macworld staff

    Apple has introduced a 40GB iPod for 398.99 including VAT.

    The new version replaces the 30GB iPod, although the price is unchanged. The 40GB model can hold 10,000 songs, and weighs 176 grams.

    The 15GB version has also been replaced by a 20GB version, with pricing fixed at 299.

    All iPods include earbud headphones, an iPod power adaptor, a FireWire cable and a 4-pin-to-6-pin iPod FireWire adaptor.

    20GB and 40GB models include the iPod Dock, a carrying case and wired remote.

    1. Re:Still no OGG by hype7 · · Score: 5, Informative

      this was the other big piece of Apple news today:

      http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2003/sep/08musicst ore.html

      iTunes Music Store Sells Ten Millionth Song

      Cupertino, California--September 8, 2003--Apple(R) today announced that music fans have purchased and downloaded over ten million songs from the iTunes(R) Music Store since its launch just over four months ago, averaging over 500,000 songs per week. The ten millionth song, "Complicated" by Avril Lavigne, was purchased and downloaded at 11:34 p.m. (PDT) on September 3.

      The combination of the iTunes digital music jukebox, the pioneering iTunes Music Store and the market-leading iPod(TM) digital music player provide users with a complete solution for buying, managing and listening to their digital music collections anywhere. The iTunes Music Store will be available to Windows users by the end of this year.

      "Legally selling ten million songs online in just four months is a historic milestone for the music industry, musicians and music lovers everywhere," said Steve Jobs, Apple's CEO. "Apple offers the only complete solution for digital music with iTunes and the amazing iPod, which now holds 10,000 songs in your pocket."

      "We are honored and grateful to be one of the top selling artists in the iTunes Music Store," said Chris Martin, singer/songwriter of the Grammy-award winning band Coldplay. "It's clear Apple has delivered a working and successful platform for music fans to discover artists and purchase both albums and single songs instantly with ease. We embrace these efforts enthusiastically and see them as the future of our business."

      The revolutionary online music store offers songs from major and independent music labels, groundbreaking personal use rights, and one-click download directly into Apple's integrated digital jukebox software, iTunes--all for just 99 cents per song. Users can listen to free 30-second previews of any song in the store, then purchase and download their favorite songs or complete albums in pristine digital quality. Songs can be burned at no extra cost onto an unlimited number of CDs for personal use, played on up to three computers, and listened to on an unlimited number of iPods.

    2. Re:Still no OGG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Complaining that Ipod doesn't support Ogg is like complaining it doesn't support LP's. Put simply on the consumer digital music scene Ogg is a noshow. That's not to say nobody uses it, but the people who do probably make up .002% of all consumers. Why should Apple even bother with a format nobody uses?

      MP3 is freely available and is the defacto standard. There is no shortage of MP3 players both hardware and software based, nor apps which rip to MP3. Ogg while not "patent encumbered" is a solution in search of a problem.

      I think its great that game companies are going Ogg(although where's the savings for me??) and I think its nice that for commercial products you have this good free codec. But for the rest of us will stick with what works and what is standard, free, and easily available.

      So cry all you want for Ogg but don't be surprised when we all ignore you and stick with what works.(Not a flame)

    3. Re:Still no OGG by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 3, Informative
      Positron Records (label of Chris Randall / Sister Machine Gun) uses OGG formats for sample downloads.

      Welcome to reality. Coat-check is on your left.

    4. Re:Still no OGG by aldoman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      75% of games nowadays use OGG, simply because they don't have too pay the 50 cent patent fee. This usually means they install a ogg codec. While I agree that mp3 is not very popular on kazaa etc, I'm sure it will do as people realize they can fit 160k mp3 into a 80k ogg, and know that they can play it on other peoples PCs...

    5. Re:Still no OGG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why should Apple even bother with a format nobody uses?

      Because they sell computers that nobody uses? Sounds like providing OGG would be par for the course.

    6. Re:Still no OGG by Craig+Maloney · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Where "exactly" are those .ogg files you talk about? Sorry to say, I have seen NONE in my life. Yes, I am a win32 user, I have NEVER seen a .ogg file in my life.

      ...
      Wow, a record label I've never heard of, featuring Artists I've also never heard of, uses OGG _in addition_ to mp3. How convincing.

      Gee... going from "I've never seen an OGG file" to "Yeah, so some record label out there uses 'em along with MP3 files. Big deal". I provide an example of a place who uses 'em, and you scoff at the example provided. Talk about being closed-minded. :)

      Oh, and you might want to download some of those OGG files and pop them into your favorite player of choice. There's some good music waiting to be discovered there. Just because you haven't heard of it before doesn't mean it's not good.

    7. Re:Still no OGG by larkost · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just a small note: MP3 is not free. It is owned by the Fraunhofer institute in Germany. They license it to a number of companies, in this case Apple. Apple pays a fixed sum per year to them on their customer's behalf.

      There are a number of free players and encoders out there that are not liscenced, but these are explicitly infringing on Fraunhofer's patents. They simply have not been taken to court. This is very similar to the whole gif case (the algorithm behind the gif format was patented... recently expired in the US).

      Ogg Vorbis is a small player, but it is a truly free one.

      And as an owner of a iPod, why would you use mp3 when AAC is so much better.

    8. Re:Still no OGG by jtrascap · · Score: 2, Funny

      err...Cry me an iRiver?

      Crikies! Am I old enough now to get that joke?

    9. Re:Still no OGG by jayspec462 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Dang it, I was totally buying music at just about that time! I must have just missed it.

      Or maybe I did buy the ten millionth song, and they didn't want to admit that it was "Sexy Motherfucker" by Prince...

      --
      $comment =~ s/($verb)\s+($noun)/IN SOVIET RUSSIA, $2 $1s YOU!/g;
  3. Wrong link... by Viceice · · Score: 4, Informative

    The link to the actual article is:

    http://www.macworld.co.uk/news/main_news.cfm?New sI D=6857

    --
    Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
  4. Headless iMacs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why can't Apple make a less expensive headless box? All thier lower-priced units have some sort of monitor attached (e/iMac). Why not have an iMac-class system without the screen? Their product line seems to be all or nothing (G5 tower or iMac with integrated monitor).

    1. Re:Headless iMacs by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They did this with the Cube, but it didn't catch fire like the original iMacs did so I doubt they'll be trying that again. I think their all in one solution for the iMac is sound - it provides a great entry into Apple, at a competitive cost - while providing that 'apple' feel with the design and control of the monitor.

      Having said that, I would like to see another go at a 'cube type' solution.

      CB

    2. Re:Headless iMacs by jceaser · · Score: 3, Informative

      They keep using quality parts, which tends to keep the price up.

    3. Re:Headless iMacs by Angostura · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because the iMac is postioned as a plug-and-play consumer appliance. That is its positioning, its raison d'etre. The towers are positioned as the professional boxes - lots of options, upgradable etc. Now, you can argue that this is a purely marketing-led distinction, and you would be right. But Apple has decided that consumers like their machines simple and are put of by more choice than 'fast, faster, fastest'

    4. Re:Headless iMacs by boaworm · · Score: 5, Informative
      Why can't Apple make a less expensive headless box?
      They did this with the Cube, but it didn't catch fire like the original iMacs did so I doubt they'll be trying that again.


      Not exactly true. The G4 Cube was monitor-less, but it was far from cheap. It cost just below a PowerMac with the same peformance, but with very limited expantion slots.

      The cool thing with the cube was that it was almost completely silent (no fans what so ever!). Only a 5400rpm disk.

      Another interesting thing with the cube is that it's second hand value is still very high, often around 500 to 900 dollars (ebay), even though the model is old. That's about half its retail price as new...

      --
      Probable impossibilities are to be preferred to improbable possibilities.
      Aristotele
    5. Re:Headless iMacs by PierceLabs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The cube was anything but cheap. Personally I think they should revive the cube line because its more in line with what I'm looking for in my next system - something headless because its going to be acting as a server, deco enough to sit in the living room, quiet enough to go unnoticed, and with a cheap price. The last Linux box I built to serve this purpose was just too loud. All of the Intel and Athlon processors are too hot. If Apple doesn't come out with something I may just try something with a VIA C3 in it.

    6. Re:Headless iMacs by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 5, Insightful

      give it 10 more years and it will be worth more than the origional retail price.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    7. Re:Headless iMacs by King+Babar · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Why can't Apple make a less expensive headless box? All thier lower-priced units have some sort of monitor attached (e/iMac).

      I thought about this, and I came with at least 4 reasons.

      1. The demand for headless boxes is probably less than you'd imagine. Most Mac buyers are not switchers, so I don't think they are as likely to have a dreamy monitor hanging around *unless* they were already buying the PowerMac line, and that's headless.
      2. Headless has gotten more complicated to do right and do well. A dirt-cheap headless box would ahve to be pretty well integrated, but then you face the immediate problem of whether or not to provide DVI connectors, or what size monitor you want to support.
      3. A lot of monitors people have lying around to use with a headless box are pretty poor quality, and the one thing Apple *doesn't* want is people running Mac OS X and having the result look crappy. Graphics people have nicer monitors, and would know better than to blame the platform if they used a cheap monitor and it looked bad. The extreme entry level crowd is different.
      4. The notebook is the new headless Mac! OK, so it's not really headless, but the low end notebooks (iBook and 12" powerbook) can fill a part of the headless niche, and be notebooks, too. They perhaps aren't optimized for this usage yet, but they can do the job. Or, put it this way: your choice would be a $700 slab or a $999 iBook or a $999 iMac. The difference here is that one of these is *also* a notebook, one of thes comes with a *very nice* LCD monitor, and the other one is just a slab. I don't think it would be such a hot seller.
      --

      Babar

    8. Re:Headless iMacs by cosmo7 · · Score: 4, Funny

      but it didn't catch fire like the original iMacs did

      You're thinking of the PowerBook 5300.

    9. Re:Headless iMacs by axelbaker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I assume you never owned one. Your vent argument holds true for every monitor on the market but no one mentions that. The Cube however had its touch sensitive power button and drive access on top so, no one who owns one would think about setting a drink or some thing with crumbs on top, just as no one would think of setting a drink or some thing with crumbs on top of their monitor (well no one smart enough to consider the consequences). To this day the only thing ever set on top of my cube was the clipboard of an idiot the cable man, and he got yelled at with in 3 seconds.

      The Cube was also much more than a headless iMac. It was the test bed for Apple to develop the G4 Powerbook. It has all the complex problems of designing a laptop solved. Small space, heat dissipation with little/no ventilation, and running with low power consumption.

      As far as expandability a large percentage of consumers will never even consider upgrading. If they do they will upgrade maybe RAM and maybe the harddrive, Both those are easily upgraded the cube. That is why the iMac is popular, that is why laptops are popular (no one whines about their lack of expandability) thats why the Cube still has its cult following.

    10. Re:Headless iMacs by PsychoSpunk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ahem!

      This is the same price as a low end iMac.

      Any more baseless questions?

      --
      ALL HAIL BRAK!!!
    11. Re:Headless iMacs by 68k+geek · · Score: 2, Insightful
      you face the immediate problem of whether or not to provide DVI connectors, or what size monitor you want to support.

      today even entry level vid cards (e.g. radeon 9200) have both DVI and analog connectors, and they can operate at resolutions high enough to 'support' all popular sizes of screens (and many unpopular ones as well)
      Most Mac buyers are not switchers

      It may very well be because apple has no atractive low/mid-range solution - and said healess box might be it.
      A lot of monitors people have lying around to use with a headless box are pretty poor quality

      other then the fact that they tend to brake up pretty quickly (2-3 years, which is less of an issue because their so cheap) todays cheap monitors are of rather high quality (image quality, that is). I can honestly say i can barly tell the diffrence in image qulity between low end monitors and high end monitors these days... how many people use a lot more then ~1024x768 on 17" or ~1280x10?? on 19" anyway? probebly 5% or less.
    12. Re:Headless iMacs by gothicpoet · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If you look around eBay you'll realize quickly that Macs in general maintain their value much better than PCs do. Resale values for even really old Mac models are much higher than for more recent PCs.

      This is especially true for their PowerBooks.

      It's good to see that they have the sense to keep at least one of the new iMacs in that sub-$1000 spot. Still means that a cheap PC is a lot cheaper than the cheapest Mac, but maybe that's part of the reason they keep their resale value. Better design and construction than those cheap PCs.

      --
      Quoth he ::
      "It's all academic anyway..."
    13. Re:Headless iMacs by andrewski · · Score: 2, Funny

      Translation: I only have 300 bucks, and want to by a Mac. I can almost buy a shitty Dell or Gateway, why can't I almost afford a Mac, too? It's not fair.

    14. Re:Headless iMacs by King+Babar · · Score: 2, Insightful
      you face the immediate problem of whether or not to provide DVI connectors, or what size monitor you want to support.
      today even entry level vid cards (e.g. radeon 9200) have both DVI and analog connectors, and they can operate at resolutions high enough to 'support' all popular sizes of screens (and many unpopular ones as well)

      True, but that's basically my point. The problem with an ULTRA-CHEAP headless machine, which is what we were talking about, is that you have to make sure both that people would buy it, *and* that the people who do buy it would not have bought one of your higher margin products. You and I both probably know that a decently designed G4 headless system with a nice monitor would be a pretty awesome deal. The problem, though, is that it would cannibalize other sales. And that's the problem: if you need to offer a DVI connection to sell it, I think you're very likely to cannibalize sales. If you don't offer the DVI connection, then why should anybody buy this rather than an eMac?

      Most Mac buyers are not switchers
      It may very well be because apple has no atractive low/mid-range solution - and said headless box might be it.

      No, that's not it. If you need Windows, the lock-in factor is obvious. If you don't, there are other options (including cheap Linux boxes, by the way). The iBook is very attractive in the cheap notebook market, and the eMac is (now, after price drops) quite capable at $999. The problem is that Apple basically can't do a $500 box that would run Mac OS X acceptably and turn a decent profit, so you're then stuck in this $700+ region where being headless won't compete against ultra-cheap PCs given Windows lock-in, but then $700+ for the slab plus a $200 monitor puts you in the eMac price slot. I think a better option would be to grind the price of an eMac down to $850 or something.

      A lot of monitors people have lying around to use with a headless box are pretty poor quality
      other then the fact that they tend to break up pretty quickly (2-3 years, which is less of an issue because their so cheap) todays cheap monitors are of rather high quality (image quality, that is). I can honestly say i can hardly tell the difference in image quality between low end monitors and high end monitors these days...

      You really aren't looking hard enough, then. Seriously, look at the "monitor line-up" at your local computer superstore and tell me that the ultra-cheap monitors look the same. They really don't, and both Mac OS X and XP make this really obvious. Quality has improved recently, but the real headless market is for people who already own the nice monitor already (then buy a power mac) or those who want to be ultra-cheap. Apple has an offering for the first group, and tells the second group to go for just "cheap" and skip the "purchase really cheap monitor" step. Maybe that's not ideal for growing lowest end market share, but Apple is actually trying to maximize profits, and I can't see that they're leaving much on the table.

      --

      Babar

    15. Re:Headless iMacs by laird · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I remember attending one of Apple's World Wide Developer Conferences and getting in a bit of a fight (many years ago) about the need for a 'headless' consumer Macintosh. Their argument then was that Apple could provide an all-in-one system for a lower cost than buying a CPU and monitor separately, because there would only be one power supply, simplified cabling, etc. I'm not sure that this is still the case...

  5. Nice! by Shenkerian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Get these (relatively) unimpressive updates out of the way to make room for the real ones at Apple Expo in Paris.

    --
    You tell me how "whilst" differs from "while," and I'll stop calling you a pretentious jackass.
  6. Dual 1.42 DROP?? by kylector · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Did anyone else notice that with this announcement came a speed drop of the Dual 1.42 Ghz PowerMac to 1.25 Ghz???

    1. Re:Dual 1.42 DROP?? by SlamMan · · Score: 4, Informative

      Thats not new. The speed drop came when they announced the g5's, since the 1.25's could still boot into 9, while the 1.42 can't.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
  7. For a minute there, by Mordant · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I thought you were saying that the new iPods had BlueTooth and Airport Extreme support, heh.

    Now, that would rock. Apple, are you listening?

    1. Re:For a minute there, by diamondsw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What would you use it for? You're not really going to copy over your MP3's at a miniscule 20Mbps, when Firewire is 20x faster?

      --
      I don't know what kind of crack I was on, but I suspect it was decaf.
    2. Re:For a minute there, by geekoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      sweet. then you could put on some light weight P2P software and be sharing music with inbody within range.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:For a minute there, by ottffssent · · Score: 4, Interesting

      No, no, no. Not for bulk copies. For updates.

      The iPod is small enough (or thereabouts), lasts long enough (I'd imagine), has enough features, (though vorbis audio support would rock), and enough space (there abouts). What it doesn't have is enough convenience.

      When introduced, ipod + itunes were dramatically more convenient than their brethren, and rightfully won in the marketplace. Now, they need to continue to evolve to maintain that lead.

      Consider: palm pilots need to be charged / sync'd. Cellphones need to be charged and sometimes sync'd. Digital audio players need to be charged / sync'd. All of this introduces clutter and inconvenience; it's time to move forward. The ritual of coming home, plugging in all your gear, running some software, and then getting on with your evening has become familiar to many of us, but is no more reasonable a way to conduct business than using Office out of habit.

      While the ipod has come a long way, it has a long way to go in terms of convenience. Bluetooth networking, in combination with magnetic induction chargers provides the technical foundation for another leap ahead in usability. Nobody will begrudge a company a bit of one-time-setup hassle such as plugging in an ipod to grab a few dozen gig of music. But consider the long-term convenience of having a device that you can toss in a corner and expect it to just do the right thing. Personal electronics should enhance and adapt to my lifestyle, not require me to adapt my lifestyle to my gadgets. Having to periodically be within a few feet of a power outlet and a firewire or USB jack is not the right way to interact with one's gear.

      A PDA or cellphone or music player or whatever else comes along should be more aware of its surroundings. It should notice when it is in range of its home network and should download new music, new contacts, new appointments or avantgo info, whatever it needs. When it finds itself on a little charging mat, it should charge. When I pick it up in the middle of a transfer and walk away, it should deal with it seamlessly, without complaint or error.

      Apple made the first leap; others have followed. It's time for them to move again.

    4. Re:For a minute there, by Belgand · · Score: 2, Funny

      At the student union the other day a guy was sharing music with everyone around wirelessly within a pretty hefty range. I was two floors up and behind some doors and still got pretty good fidelity. I really wish he would have stopped though. Ugh, what is it about terrible musicians that makes them think people want to hear them, even for free?

    5. Re:For a minute there, by the+pickle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...in combination with magnetic induction chargers...

      Right, because I want a big magnetic field half an inch away from magnetic storage media.

      Bluetooth would be useful. I'm afraid someone's going to have to make RF-based power transmission more efficient before you can cordlessly charge an iPod, though. My toothbrush doesn't have any hard disks inside it.

      p

  8. iPod longevity by bokelley · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's been a while since the iPod came out, and it still seems to be one of the best MP3 players out there. So what's next? Seems like more storage doesn't make a difference at some point (ooh 15,000 songs instead of 10,000).

    --
    warning: epoll_wait is not implemented and will always fail
    1. Re:iPod longevity by Shenkerian · · Score: 4, Informative
      Making it smaller and giving it recording capabilities.

      Oh wait, they already did that.

      --
      You tell me how "whilst" differs from "while," and I'll stop calling you a pretentious jackass.
    2. Re:iPod longevity by mrpuffypants · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I still firmly believe that Apple would do well to release a cheapper version of the iPod ($100-200 range) for those that still want an iPod but can't drop $500 on one.

      However, I still appreciate the looks that I get walking to class with my 30GB; I sure wouldn't want to become just "one of the crowd"

    3. Re:iPod longevity by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, but then they lose their "hipster status symbol" appeal.

      I mean if [high end fashion designer] sold t-shirts at $2 fruit-of-the-loom prices, they wouldnt be [high end fashion designer], would they? They rely on people not knowing that it's the same stupid cotton t-shirt.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:iPod longevity by mrpuffypants · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But don't forget that even they are a "hipster status symbol" they also are the #1 selling MP3 player in the world.

      There's a lot of hipsters out there.

    5. Re:iPod longevity by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 2, Interesting
      So what's next?

      So how about a color LCD screen? Backlighting is good, but I hate monochrome when they can do better.

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    6. Re:iPod longevity by Frymaster · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I mean if [high end fashion designer] sold t-shirts at $2 fruit-of-the-loom prices, they wouldnt be [high end fashion designer], would they?

      well, you're working under the assumption that the hipster label shirt is the same as the fruit of the loom shirt. of course you are correct (as a side note, tommy hilfiger actually manufactures nothing. not a damn thing. they just license manufacturers to put the log on their shirts.).

      given the features (storage, connectivity, price &c) the ipod is actually fairly reasonably price. you can find comprable players for maybe ten or twenty per cent less but that's a very thin margin compared to the fashion industry!

    7. Re:iPod longevity by IM6100 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Color LCDs use significantly more power than monochrome ones.

      Perhaps, just for you, they will come out with a color plasma screen version. With a thick cord that tethers it to the big 70 pound lead-acid battery that you wheel around in a cart.

      Mercy!

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    8. Re:iPod longevity by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 2, Funny
      With a thick cord that tethers it to the big 70 pound lead-acid battery that you wheel around in a cart.

      Of course not! I was thinking of one of those gas-powered portable generators, with keyed ignition, naturally.

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    9. Re:iPod longevity by in7ane · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What does RIAA think about this? If you look at how many people buy the 15,000 song iPods - have as many people bought 15,000 songs, at a cost of around $15,000 (taking the price from, say, from the iTunes music store)?

      More importantly, will RIAA now subpoena the list of people who bought the large iPods to prosecute them?

  9. Clarification: Not all of them have BT & WiFi by Gubbe · · Score: 4, Informative

    Only the 1,713 17-inch SuperDrive Plus has BlueTooth and AirPort Extreme pre-installed. The cheaper models are just "AirPort Extreme and Bluetooth ready."

  10. I thought the IPod was "Lame" by maan · · Score: 5, Funny

    To this day I still can't forget the comment Taco made when he posted the initial IPod announcement:

    No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.

    Oh well, I guess opinions change.

    Seriously though, the ipod is great...

    Maan

    1. Re:I thought the IPod was "Lame" by Xerithane · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That just means you aren't the target market. The thing that you get with the iPod is decent storage space, decent hardware, and really great system integration.

      It is pricey, but so are Plasma TVs. If it's out of your price range, it isn't for you. It's for the millions of people who do buy them. It's ok to not want to buy something, for whatever reasons. I have an Archos mp3 player, it has 6GB of storage. It has good battery life, it's integration is mediocre and it's footprint is fairly large. It still works perfectly fine for me, as it's just a USB hard drive and I don't need iTunes to listen to music.

      The iPod isn't for me. I'm ok with that.

      I don't need to post a comment bitching about something I'm not going to buy, though. But, if everybody didn't do that there would only be about 15 comments under this story.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    2. Re:I thought the IPod was "Lame" by pHDNgell · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The big selling point for me was being able to use it for backups. My nightly really-important-to-me backups are far too big to fit on a CD. They do fit on a DVD if I want to wait a couple of hours to master and burn it. It's just a couple of minutes to copy it all to the iPod, though.

      Oh, and I get to carry a crapload of my music around at the same time, which means I'm more likely to actually have the thing with me most of the time.

      --
      -- The world is watching America, and America is watching TV.
    3. Re:I thought the IPod was "Lame" by darkov · · Score: 2, Funny

      So you're cheap, or poor. Congrats. If you really wanted to save money you could buy a transistor radio and listen to tracks really cheap. Or for free if you just rember the tune and hum them to yourself.

    4. Re:I thought the IPod was "Lame" by King+Babar · · Score: 3, Informative
      the iPod might be great but it is terribly overpriced.

      I disbelieve. There are two heuristics to tell if something is over-priced. The first is: nobody buys the thing, or you sell fewer than you expected. The second is: you have *reliable* marketing research tells you that a lower price would sell you more than enough additional units to make up for the reduced price. I don't think it's always easy to justify the second course of action. If we pretend that the gross profit on an iPod is about $100, than a $50 reduction in price would halve that number, and we would have to sell twice as many of them to make up the difference. I think you can see the risk here. The iPod is the best seller in its category, and while you can find cheaper hard-drive based players, nobody has come out with a clearly better one. I think the nominal prices will drift down over the next couple of years, but the real price will (and has) sunk like a stone. The original iPod was 5 MB for $500. The top-of-the-line model is now 40 MB (8 times the capacity) and comes with much better interface options. That's huge real improvement in 3 years...

      --

      Babar

    5. Re:I thought the IPod was "Lame" by amichalo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Wow, re-reading the score 4-5 /. posts when the iPod was first announced is really quite interesting.

      It would be interesting for /. to run a "year in review" and highlight some threads of technology announcements and other geek worthy news with 365 days worth of hind sight to see how people's first impressions can be accurate...or not.

      I particularly like the Apple share holder who was upset at the pricing...that it won't sell because it was $400, not $200. I suppose teh same share holder is pretty happy the high margin audio player is the #1 digital music device in the world.

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    6. Re:I thought the IPod was "Lame" by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Funny
      Or for free if you just rember the tune and hum them to yourself.


      It worked for this guy...

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  11. Where are the PowerBooks? by dusanv · · Score: 3, Interesting

    All current models are pretty old and especially the 15'' (introduced November last year). The rumour is that Motorola has trouble churning out the latest G4 in any significant quantities. Or maybe they'll go G5 :) Anybody got any info?

    1. Re:Where are the PowerBooks? by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 2, Funny
      Or maybe they'll go G5 :) Anybody got any info?

      Is there space to fit 9 fans into a Powerbook chassis? Maybe they'll make it bigger.. say 5 inches thicker.

    2. Re:Where are the PowerBooks? by frankie · · Score: 4, Interesting
      The new PowerBooks will be announced on Tuesday, September 16. Personally, I'm annoyed that they have been delayed for so damn long. I wanted to replace my dear old Pismo last month.

      If the new AlBook 15 doesn't have at least FX 5200 video, I'll probably buy a marked-down TiBook instead.

  12. Notice that the pricing is in Pounds, not Dollars by djh101010 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Before you freak at the prices, those are in pounds, not dollars. 1,713 works out to about $2,715 at today's rate.

    Still not a bad price, considering what you get. I'll probably settle for more RAM for my iMac rather than replacing it with one of these, but it's an awfully nice machine.

  13. Geez, why not point to the Apple site instead? by mblase · · Score: 4, Informative
  14. Bluetooth&Airport only included in High End iM by SwissMike · · Score: 4, Informative

    The two smaller models are just Bluetooth and Airport ready, that means you have to purchase the add-on cards for 50$ respectively 99$ (according to Apple Store).

    Make sure you order your internal Bluetooth module with your iMac, it can't be added later on (you'll need to use an external Bluetooth-USB-Dongle...).

  15. Bzzt! by 11223 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Slashdot once again displays its inability to perform even the most basic fact checking. The new iMacs do not come with AirPort Extreme or Bluetooth. They have internal slots you can fill in a CTO configuration.

  16. iMagine... by Serious+Simon · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... an iCluster of these ...

  17. Ipod question by BenjyD · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is there anyone out there who has actually filled up a 20Gb Ipod and would want a 40Gb version?

    I'm not trying to knock Ipods- I'd actually really like to know if anyone does have that many MP3s etc. I think my entire CD collection would fit several times over in that much space.

    1. Re:Ipod question by finkployd · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have mine filled up but it is only about 50% music. The rest is backups of datafiles and source code. One of the great things about the iPod is that is is also a regular firewire disk drive and can be used as that as well.

      Finkployd

    2. Re:Ipod question by chia_monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Is there anyone out there who has actually filled up a 20Gb Ipod and would want a 40Gb version?

      I know some people out there actually use their iPods as part of their DJ ensemble. Whereas a typical song may only be 3-4 minutes, a decent trance mix may last half an hour or so. Have a trance section in your iPod, a drum and bass section, house, trip-hop, and you'll see that it fills up rather quickly.

      --

      "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
    3. Re:Ipod question by tbmaddux · · Score: 4, Informative
      Is there anyone out there who has actually filled up a 20Gb Ipod and would want a 40Gb version?
      My MP3 collection is too big to fit on my 30GB iPod, but that iPod is big enough that I went through my iPod playlist to remove artists/songs/albums that I did not want, rather than picking the ones that I did want. I also leave several GB of space open to transfer other data from computer to computer. The automatic updating of play counts and the ability to rate the songs I like/dislike has me using only my iPod to listen to music - I connect it to my home sound system rather than hassle with CDs. The iPod is definitely not lame, and it continues to get less lame.
      --
      Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
  18. missed it by Oliekirk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I love it when my beloved mac rumor community misses stuff like this ipod. Chaos mint knew about an ad campaighn but no numbers 'The apple rummor community was caught napping with its trowsers down'

    1. Re:missed it by erwass · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Actually As the Apple Turns had it in Friday:

      http://www.appleturns.com/
      Ok its not a real mac rumor site but still...
  19. Mirror by inertia187 · · Score: 3, Informative

    In case the site is slow, here is a mirror.

    Martin Studio Slashdot Policy

    --
    A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
  20. 40GB.... how... revolutionary by StewedSquirrel · · Score: 2, Informative

    Funny, there are a ton of other 40GB MP3 players that have been on the market for a little while.

    This one is a bit cheaper than the iPod:
    Archos

    So, you might argue that the iPod is the smallest 40GB player out? Wrong again. Check this one out:
    Rio Karma

    Not that it's a BAD player- it's just not as Revolutionary as the Mac fanboys claim. :-)

    Those iMacs don't look so bad... even if they're next to impossible to upgrade. :-)

    Stewey

    --
    There are 10 kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who don't.
  21. Not to mention 10,000,000 songs downloaded by amichalo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Also announced along with larger capacity ipods (20 and 40 to replace 15 and 30 GB models with no other changes in HW or SW stated) and faster iMacs (the 1.25 Ghz 17" now packing a 160 GB HD) there is even more significant news.

    The real news here is that since April 28th when the iTunes Music Store opened, there have been more than 10,000,000 songs downloaded by the US Apple consumer base runing OS 10.1 and iTunes 4. Very impressive in my opinion. The 10,000,000th song was "Complicated" and was sold on September 3rd. Apple stated they are selling 500,000 songs per week.

    The first week Apple stated they sold 1,000,000 songs so that plus half a million a week after corroberates the 10 MM song claim and shows a steady rate.

    It would be interesting to know how BuyMusic.com is doing with their knowck off...especially after all the bad press and sites like BoycottBuyMusic.com and DontBuyMusic.com have exposed some shady dealings with artists, consumers, and their advertising.

    And Apple a day keeps Windows at bay

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    1. Re:Not to mention 10,000,000 songs downloaded by zpok · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "It's interesting that you make BuyMusic.com plaintext, but BoycottBuyMusic. com and DontBuyMusic. com hot links."

      Not really. See, in order to go to BuyMusic.com you need to run Windows and use IE something or other.

      Now, how many \. fall in that category?

      Another poster had a good address for those tin foil hat thingies, I'm getting one now, you interested?

      --
      I think, therefore I am...I think.
  22. I'm waiting for the model with mic/line in by jcsehak · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No, there's no actual proof that they're ever going to make one, but c'mon, isn't it the obvious next step? Record your entire classroom lecture for study purposes, record the next Phish show, record your own demos -- with a simple little multitracking app, it could kill portable 4-tracks. Or, plug your iSight into a video in and turn it into a video camera.

    Also, with a mic in, you'll be able to use Apple's speech recognition software to give it voice commands -- no more fuddling around with menus, just speak into the mic: "iPod, play Smashing Pumpkins, album Gish" or something like that.

    --

    c-hack.com |
    1. Re:I'm waiting for the model with mic/line in by smithmc · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, there's no actual proof that they're ever going to make one, but c'mon, isn't it the obvious next step?

      You can have this now, from Neuros - plus FM in and out, and swappable HD or flash "sleds" to boot. I'm seriously considering buying one.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  23. Re:Best Buy? by catseye · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, Best Buy has been selling iPods for a while. They started carrying them when the current Gen. 3 models (slim design, "dock connector") debuted several months ago. You're correct, though: It's only recently that they've been test marketing Apple desktops at select Best Buy stores, presumably in an effort to prepare for a company-wide push.

    -A.

    --
    What did the walrus say to the penguin? "No soap, radio."
  24. I just started using Bluetooth by sjbe · · Score: 4, Informative

    Interesting that these machines use Bluetooth. My Thinkpad has bluetooth built in and I've just picked up a Bluetooth phone (Nokia 6310i). Bluetooth is *really* slick. I love not having to get my phone out of my bag to check contacts or sync with my address book. I can send SMS messages from my computer via Mobile Master again without having to locate my phone or punch text into a keyboard not designed for it.

    I'm now very seriously considering getting a car speaker set for my vehicle and I'm certain my next PDA will have bluetooth. My next laptop will probably be a Powerbook and I hope they have bluetooth built in by then because I'm going to want it. It's one of those nifty technologies you wonder why you didn't bother with before.

    Oh, if you do have a Nokia phone, their Nokia Connection Manager software is a bit hit/miss as to whether it will work with a given bluetooth device. Doesn't work with my T30 but I've been able to work around it. YMMV.

    1. Re:I just started using Bluetooth by hype7 · · Score: 3, Informative
      Interesting that these machines use Bluetooth. My Thinkpad has bluetooth built in and I've just picked up a Bluetooth phone (Nokia 6310i). Bluetooth is *really* slick. I love not having to get my phone out of my bag to check contacts or sync with my address book. I can send SMS messages from my computer via Mobile Master again without having to locate my phone or punch text into a keyboard not designed for it.

      I'm now very seriously considering getting a car speaker set for my vehicle and I'm certain my next PDA will have bluetooth. My next laptop will probably be a Powerbook and I hope they have bluetooth built in by then because I'm going to want it. It's one of those nifty technologies you wonder why you didn't bother with before.

      Oh, if you do have a Nokia phone, their Nokia Connection Manager software is a bit hit/miss as to whether it will work with a given bluetooth device. Doesn't work with my T30 but I've been able to work around it. YMMV.


      Bluetooth is standard on the 12 inch and 17 inch powerbooks; you have to buy an adaptor to use it on the 15 inch ones, but everyone expects that will change at MacWorld Paris.

      The BT integration in OS X is fantastic. It works with a lot of different devices, and all the functionality that you talk about in your post is built in - no third party tools required. iSync syncs contacts via Bluetooth (and for your iPod etc, just not wireless :) and lets you do the SMSing and dialling/answering from the computer.

      The other cool thing is connecting via GPRS via Bluetooth. You can have a semi-fast totally wireless connection without even getting your phone out of your bag, just your computer.

      -- james
    2. Re:I just started using Bluetooth by hype7 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I must have mis-spelt a HREF tag on that post - it's Address Book, located here that lets you do the SMSing and dialling, etc.

      While I'm at it, I guess it would be pretty hard not to mention Salling Clicker, the most awesome little Bluetooth app I've seen. You can effectively control your mac through your phone because of this - it can run scripts to do all kinds of stuff, from presentations to controlling iTunes and DVD player. You can create more scripts through AppleScript too. The sky is the limit! :)

      -- james

  25. Think of it as backup and insurance :D by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've got 80+ albums at an average of $22 each or so (a lot of import CDs from Japan), so maybe $1,760 worth of music resides on my iPod... my then $399 now $299 10gb iPod is cheap insurance against my music collection getting stolen in my car, for example, while simultaneously allowing me to access *all* my music in a simple fashion.

    Then there's the fact that my iPod is *also* a backup of my PowerMac, which is worth much more to me than $299; the peace of mind of having a portable bootable backup is immeasurable, short of spending 2 years recreating all the data on my PowerMac.

    Sure, there are other hard drive based mp3 players, but none that allow me to boot my PowerMac, and none that allow me to copy my entire music collection onto it in 6 minutes.

    1. Re:Think of it as backup and insurance :D by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2, Informative

      But how about an MP3 player that holds all of my songs? What would you suggest, on top of buying a $60 HD?

      *Note, with an iPod, all the music is synched, so I've actually got two backups; my PowerMac is the main copy, the iPod is the backup of my music.

      **Data storage is actually cheaper using DVD-Rs than HD, so I archive to DVD

      ***iPods provide 'offsite' backup insurance, where a 120gb HD does not.

    2. Re:Think of it as backup and insurance :D by johnrpenner · · Score: 2, Interesting


      rule of thumb: your stereo should cost about as much as your CD collection.

      so, if you've got a small CD collection (10 CDs * $20) - then you should get a $200 gheto blaster to play them on.

      if you've got a larger CD collection (100 CDs * $20) - then you shouldn't feel bad about getting a good stereo (~$2000) to listen to them on.

      your mileage may vary...

      john

  26. Damn. Missed it by two weeks. by Mr.+Darl+McBride · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I just bought a 30g iPod, and Apple made me wait 4 weeks for shipping because they were drop-shipping from out of country. The phone representative said it was really unusual and she wasn't sure why they were doing it this way.

    Guess I know now. They were clearing out the 30s to be replaced by the 40s at the same price. Ah well. It holds more than enough music to keep me engaged.

    Out of curiosity though, did anyone get lucky and order a 30, then get notice that they'd receive a 40 at the same price? That they aren't selling the 30 at all right after the announcement makes me think they waited until they'd completely exhausted inventory before the release.

  27. You are so lazy! by Macka · · Score: 3, Insightful


    You could have looked up http://www.xe.com/ucc and done the conversion yourself in less time than it took you to complain about it.

    Consider it a reminder that you don't live in the center of the universe, and that there are actually people living elsewhere on this spinning rock that are just as entitled to have their currency represented as you are!

    1. Re:You are so lazy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      uh, no. America is THE most important country in the world. Sorry man, that's how it is.

    2. Re:You are so lazy! by Hoser+McMoose · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't live in the States either, but if I'm posting prices, I post in either US dollars or Euro. Why? Because those are two currencies that MOST people in the world are fairly familiar with.

      The simple fact of the matter is that there are only three hard currencies in the world today, the US dollar, the Euro and the Yen. My Canadian dollars are just fine here in Canada, but everywhere else they're pretty useless. Same with the british pound, it's only good for Britain (hell, sometimes you can't even use Scotish-British pounds in England or Northern Ireland-British pounds anywhere aside from Northern Ireland!)

      Fortunately it seems that the British parliment actually does appear to be considering taking their blinders off and switching to the Euro (something they SHOULD have done two years ago if they had been smart).

  28. ipod by MoFoQ · · Score: 5, Funny

    D'OH!!!!

    And here I am with an out-dated 30GB ipod....

    Maybe it's time for those pitchforks and flaming torches again....

  29. Yes they do (well, sort of) by crow · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you go to the Apple Store, there are three base models of iMacs to choose from. The top model has the AirPort Extreme and Bluetooth built-in.

  30. Brilliant! by green+pizza · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought you were saying that the new iPods had BlueTooth and Airport Extreme support, heh.

    Now, that would rock. Apple, are you listening?


    Wow, I'll bet Steve Jobs is reading your Slashdot post right now thinking "wireless! Damn, why didn't I think of that!".

  31. *BSD is dying! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "*pple : proudly going out of business for 25 years!"

    1. Re:*BSD is dying! by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 2, Funny


      Yeah, and Apple is so proud of their lead in dying that they even incorporated the BSD userland for OSX so their customers could get twice the dying for the same price.

      Apple, may you continue dying for the next hundred years.

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
  32. Re:Don't like pricing... by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Cheaper model Macs would ruin Apple.

    Thing is, if you keep prices high, you keep the status symbol thing. They don't want everyone running around with iPods.

    Look at how the image of owning a Porsche has fallen since they introduced low-end vehicles like the Boxter. It's not nearly as impressive to see one when the road is full of them, it's just another car. Folks are actually more impressed by a Nissan Z roadster these days.

    If Rolex made a $20 watch, how do you brag "look at my Rolex!"? You dont, and that's about the only real reason to buy a Rolex.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  33. Please Apple, by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful



    Could you please just make a PDA already?

    If anything, it will force other PDA makers to keep up with you and we call can have better products.

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
  34. Re:40GB.... how... revolutionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Both of those are ugly as sin and lacking in basic features. No FireWire. No AAC support, either encrypted or unencrypted; oh-so-useful WMA instead. No on-the-go playlists. No synching with iTunes. No support for storing contacts and calendar items. The list goes on.

    Nobody said the new iPods were revolutionary. (The first one was, of course.) Rather, they're simply better products than the competition.

  35. Audio in by zoidberg2k · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The new Imacs have grown an analogue audio in port.

  36. are you hiring? by Bizzarobot · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...to help me at my freelance gig where I copy a 17 Meg file from one folder on the hard drive to another folder.

    I have experience in copying files of all sizes and can provide references! What's the pay-scale?

  37. ARRRRRGGGGHHHH! What?!? No audio input? by GryphonTech · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What are they thinking? This is what everyone wants.

    This is what everyone is screaming for! (at least I am)
    I mean, what with Sony being paranoid with their MD format, the market is screaming for a digital recorder that you can actually use.

    Why is this so hard for Apple to understand.

    -- I drank WHAT!!??!! , Socrates

  38. eDigital's player by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 2, Informative


    eDigital's been selling their Odyssey 1000 player for a very long time, which is almost the size of an iPod, stores 20GB, and though it doesn't appear to have a line-in, it does have a built-in mic to record your lectures. Also, its mic does the voice-recognition thing so you can cue up your Phish shows without having to press any annoying buttons. Battery lasts 12hrs, and it also sports an FM tuner.

  39. Great use for 802.11 & || bluetooth on ipods by Dave500 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I am beginning to wonder when apple will be brave enough to release what has to be the "killer" 802.11 application for mp3 players - personal streaming.

    Just imagine how cool it would be to share your music and playlists with any other ipod user within range. Tired of your own collection? Try listening to Bob's ipod 4 seats behind you.

    The register has also thought about this - http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/39/28467.html

    What do people think? I would love this, but there are - erm - interesting legal aspects.. ;)

  40. What's really interesting... by edremy · · Score: 5, Interesting
    is how little money this must be making Apple

    10M songs? Yeah, but it's only 0.99 per song, so that's less than $10M. IIRC, Apple keeps about a third of that, so ~$3M.

    How much did it cost to program, to feed the lawyers to get all the contracts, to set up the servers/bandwidth needed? (And the Apple Store is *fast*- they didn't skimp here.)

    I can't imagine this is going to have a big positive impact on Apple's bottom line, unless (and it's a big unless) the publicity they are getting sells more Macs/iPods. I wouldn't be surprised if this is the sole reason they are bothering.

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
    1. Re:What's really interesting... by hype7 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      is how little money this must be making Apple

      10M songs? Yeah, but it's only 0.99 per song, so that's less than $10M. IIRC, Apple keeps about a third of that, so ~$3M.

      How much did it cost to program, to feed the lawyers to get all the contracts, to set up the servers/bandwidth needed? (And the Apple Store is *fast*- they didn't skimp here.)

      I can't imagine this is going to have a big positive impact on Apple's bottom line, unless (and it's a big unless) the publicity they are getting sells more Macs/iPods. I wouldn't be surprised if this is the sole reason they are bothering.


      All those costs you talk about are fixed costs.

      In other words, when this is deployed to Windows (the other 95% of the computer using population) - it will suddenly make up a lot more than 10 mill in revenue. It will go spastic.

      That will in turn encourage iPod sales, and those iPod sales will in turn encourage more music store purchases. Then they can start the real cross-pollination; "buy an iPod, get 10 free songs at the Apple Music Store".

      If enough people start doing it, it's gonna hit a critical mass then just explode. The only risk Apple faces is if MS/whoever starts eating Apple's dinner. OTOH, very few of the other solutions will work with the world's most popular MP3 player - the iPod.

      -- james
    2. Re:What's really interesting... by discstickers · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, I think that Fred Anderson, Apple's CFO, basically said that. The iTMS is a trojan horse to get people to buy iPods and the iPod is a trojan horse to get people to buy Macs.

      --
      I have a shitty sig!
    3. Re:What's really interesting... by NightSpots · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just to nit-pick:

      Servers and bandwidth are not a fixed cost.

      When your load increases by a factor of 19, your costs for servers and bandwidth also go up.

    4. Re:What's really interesting... by Renderer+of+Evil · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...and Macs are like a Trojan Horse to Microsoft. Once you go Mac, you never go back.

      Funny how it all works.

    5. Re:What's really interesting... by cosmo7 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Remember: coffee first, then post:

      The other commercial solutions are not offering MP3s because they cannot get labels to agree to distribute music in that format. Most of the others are going the Microsoft route, which does not support the iPod.

    6. Re:What's really interesting... by sessamoid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The other commercial solutions are not offering MP3s

      Neither is the iTMS, which uses the AAC format specifically because it's DRM-enabled. Granted, the DRM is less onerous than any of the other competing choices, and the fact that AAC provides better sound quality at the same bitrate is a bonus.

      --
      "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
  41. Still no radio?!? by Baki · · Score: 2

    Argh, still no radio built in. I need an AM/FM radio and don't want to always take 2 devices with me, how much would it cost to add a radio and satisfy the wish/requirement of many?

    It has kept me from buying an Ipod until now. Once Irivers IHP-100 gets a larger harddisk (min. 15GB) I'll buy one of those.

    1. Re:Still no radio?!? by gamgee5273 · · Score: 2, Funny

      What is this "radio" of which you speak?

  42. Video iPod by SoupaFly · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Surprised no one has mentioned it yet, but I think the next 'big' thing in the iPod line is adding a good screen and video capability.

    1. Re:Video iPod by IM6100 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why not big internal speakers and a permanently attached subwoofer?

      Heck, each unit could ship on it's own pallet.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
  43. Get a Neuros by Joseph+Vigneau · · Score: 5, Informative
    Get a Neuros.
    • Plays Ogg Vorbis files (DI employs one of Vorbis' founders).
    • Can sync w/ Linux.
    • "Backpack" system lets you remove the hard drive when you want to go solid state. Also allows for upgrades (like the upcoming USB 2 backpack).
    • Open source cross-platform song manager (NeurosDBM)
    • Built-in FM tuner.
    • "MiSi" feature, which allows you to record a clip from FM, and have it identified when you sync.
    • Low-power FM transmitter, which can be picked up by a car stereo, boom-box, etc.
    • Embraces the open source community.
    • Stands behind a social contract

    1. Re:Get a Neuros by PhoenixK7 · · Score: 4, Informative
      You forgot something.

      • Big and honking
    2. Re:Get a Neuros by ZackSchil · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Does not play iTMS DRMed files
      Costs the same amount as the iPod ($399, 20GB Models)
      Is larger and heavier than the iPod: 5.3" x 3.1" x 1.3", 9.4 oz. vs 4.1" x 2.4" x .62", 5.6oz.
      Cannot use Firewire or USB 2.0 without a special "backpack" (iPod uses a USB/2.0 adaptor kit to translate pins)
      Not nearly as good looking
      Difficult syncing
      No smart playlists
      No Mac support

      Your average listener does not have any OGG Vorbis files. The FM transmitter and tuner sound cool but not cool enough. Apple will add voice recording to the iPod with a firmware update, the hardware to do so is already in place. This player sounds cool but it's by no means at all an iPod killer. Has any one out there actually used one as well as an iPod? How do their features compare? Ease of use?

    3. Re:Get a Neuros by Greedo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Playing music from the portable over FM radio is a great feature that I wish was available in the iPod.

      They buy a Belkin TuneCast or a Griffin iTrip.

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
  44. The "insert technology here" ready con by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A number of computer manufacturers are using the marketing con, of "'insert technology name here' ready". For example "bluetooth ready". In most cases taking a closer look at the specifications reveals that the computer does not come with the technology mentioned, but simply has a slot that will accept the device. So in the case of the iMac, you are going to have to buy the bluetooth card, unless it says something like 'bluetooth included'. I know of a couple of friends being caught on this one.

    --
    Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    1. Re:The "insert technology here" ready con by GlassHeart · · Score: 2, Informative
      In most cases taking a closer look at the specifications reveals that the computer does not come with the technology mentioned, but simply has a slot that will accept the device.

      I don't know about Bluetooth, but when Apple says "Airport ready" they mean you get the slot for the card, and that the antenna is already built into the case. The antenna connector is of the right length, and neatly tucked to the side of the Airport card slot. The Airport card itself doesn't come with anything else, because the computer is "ready" for it.

  45. Reality Distortion Field by +MG · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Look, I am as big an Apple fan boy as the next guy, but minor product updates on the front page of slashdot? I think Hemos has been hit by the Jobian Reality Distortion Field.

  46. Just a thought... by raptor21 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Assuming that a Apple user only downloads songs legally through iTunes MS.

    The 40GB ipod would hold $10,000 dollars worth of songs. That's a little too much change to be carrying around in you pocket don't you think. You could get mugged for that kinda dough.

    Mugger: hand me you wallet.... no wait, Say, that's one of em new 40GB iPods ain't it, whats that iPod worth.
    Guy being mugged: I'd say about 5 grand, it's only half full.
    Mugger: Screw the wallet, hand me that iPod.

    1. Re:Just a thought... by Damek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, it makes perfect sense. Most open source advocates are just tired of being involved with a system where the big players don't play fair. Microsoft routinely cheats and lies. They are a convicted monopolist. Perhaps Apple just hasn't had the opportunity yet, but they don't regularly cheat and lie. They sell proprietary software, but they are generally nice and fair in their business dealings. There's little (if any) reason to dislike them like Microsoft.

      Just because Company A and Company B both sell proprietary software, this does not make them same in every respect.

      Heck, Apple even makes use of open source software and plays fair with open source programmers.

      I can't really comment on the lesbians you've been around, except to suggest that perhaps they weren't really lesbians, but instead "adult performers" only claiming to like other women to get you to pay them more.

    2. Re:Just a thought... by mrpuffypants · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And imagine how much more the robber could get if all that music was bought on CDs?

  47. G5? by worm+eater · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Man, I was really hoping to see a G5 in there. Too hot? Or would that spread the limited G5 supply too thin? BTW US dollar prices are: $1299 $1799 $2448

    --
    Maybe partying will help...
  48. About $35 by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 3, Informative

    It'll cost you about $35 to add FM capability to your iPod.

  49. Re:ARRRRRGGGGHHHH! What?!? No audio input? by shawnce · · Score: 2, Informative

    I believe they understand the market fairly well.

    Of the 10 iPod users I know not one is interested... a couple would like to see an FM tuner but none want recording ability.

  50. Re:I want a NVRAM iPod by Microlith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not when said NVRAM devices still cost several times more per MB than a hard drive does.

    Apple can cram 40GB into this device for far less than it'd cost for an NVRAM device of the same capacity.

  51. Re:IE by 90XDoubleSide · · Score: 2, Informative

    IE is bundled with 10.2, Safari is bundled with 10.3.

    --
    "Reality is just a convenient measure of complexity" -Alvy Ray Smith
  52. So, what about price drops? by fuzzeli · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been waiting for this... not because the extra speed is so great, but because I want a 17" 1ghz iMac at a more reasonable price than $1800. I've read on mac rumors sites that the channel is flooded with inventory (I think Insight had several hundred units in stock), so when will the price drops come to help clear out inventory? Macmall has the new models, and "add to cart for new lower price!!!" on the 1ghz model. I was stunned this morning to see an amazing... $22 price drop. Although now that it's a little later in the day, it's down to $1594, a $200 price drop. That's more like it.

    clicky clicky...

  53. Current iPod models are Amazon #1 #2 #3 by afantee · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In fact, there are 8 iPods in the top 20 best sellers. The question is would the new models kick the competitions out of the top 10 altogether.

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/t g/browse/-/300330/ref=br_bx_c_1_5/002-8192629-3045 663

  54. Re:ARRRRRGGGGHHHH! What?!? No audio input? by GryphonTech · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I see your point. But I amvery much active in the music arena. Not just listening but writing, performing, scoring,....

    I have already found the iPod to be great in the editing and scoring field. It allows me to carry entire scores and move them from home to the recording studio for laydown onto film.

    Yet having the ability to be able to record a practice, or live instruments, along with the portability of the iPod would make it ideal.

    I know that several hundred would be sold here at UCLA film just for that reason alone.

    I just think lots of people would find that a useful feature if it was there. recording voice memos, phone numbers while you are driving. I think there would be many uses othere than just music....

    Just my .02

  55. I know, don't feed the trolls... but, by justMichael · · Score: 2, Funny
    I have recently upgraded from a Mac 8600/300 w/64 Megs of RAM to a new G5 dual 2GHz with AGP 8X and PCI-X to help me at my freelance gig where I copy a 17 Meg file from one folder on the hard drive to another folder. On the G5 I spent about 20 minutes trying to install Adobe Arcobat 6. 20 minutes.

    OK, Problem one appears to be that are are using a box that doesn't ship for 3-5 weeks. That tends to make them slow. So in reality I'm guessing that it will take you ($delivery_date + $unpacking_time + $boot_time + 5min) to install Acrobat 6.

    Also, are you sure you are qualified for a job that requires you to copy a file form one folder to another? Maybe you should practice the following: "Would you like fries with that?" and "Do you want to SuperSize that?"

    Have a nice day ;-)
  56. Re:Headless slashdot poster... by ErnstKompressor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    'Do you feel better now'

    No, I don't really feel better...I can't express the depths of my dislike for those who feel the need to endlessly disparage my choice of computing platform...

    This is a heartfelt plea...I have dealt with morons like the parent poster for over a decade. It never ends. I don't know what drives these people(or is it you?) to perpetually carp on about us 'Mac-Heads'...I have never gone out of my way to insult linux-users or Windows-users and have only done so sparingly, in response to trolls. How insecure is the rest of the computing population that they feel compelled to ridicule people who choose to use a Mac -- insulting them at every turn, and then accusing them of being elitist or some other B.S.

    I use a Mac because I get my work done -- regardless of what it cost me...and that is my choice -- and a good one that has clothed, fed, and housed my family for many years in the past, and many years to come.

    What part of the fabric of society has frayed to the point that abuse of a minority is fashionable...Grow up, back off, and let's just try to get along somewhere in the middle.

    Thank you for listening...

    --
    We apologise for the fault in this post. Those responsible have been sacked. -- Signed RICHARD M. NIXON
  57. Think of the whole business... by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    10M songs? Yeah, but it's only 0.99 per song, so that's less than $10M. IIRC, Apple keeps about a third of that, so ~$3M.

    Forget about the money Apple is making from the store, and notice that it is a great big Get Out Of Jail Free card for Apple.

    The Apple platform is so great for digital media because it provides a set of powerful and easy tools for manipulating digital content. With a moto like "Rip, Mix, Burn," and products like the MP3-playing iPod apple was about half a step from Napster's legal trouble.

    With the iTunes Store, Apple has turned into the best way for the music industry to market their wares online. Legal trouble averted. Cool thing is that they have made three million dollars doing this. Double Cool!

  58. You can always buy a refurb... by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Apple Store has previous generation ten gigs for as low as $170

    I actually bought a second-gen 10 gig from Target for $199.99 when they clearenced them when the 3rd-gerneration ones came out.. Drove around to 3 targets until I found one that had several, bought all 5, resold the other 4 for a profit. I love iPods.

  59. Re:Double Bzzzt... you failed to check too by 11223 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Nope. I was entirely, 100% correct. I am very, very familiar with Apple's product lines and offerings.

    No base iMac comes with either of these options. Only CTO iMacs do. The fact that Apple just so happens to conveniently put a maxed-out CTO on their store page does not make it stock. You can't buy this iMac at the local Apple Store, nor can you add Bluetooth later if you don't buy the CTO.

    Please, moderators, check the information yourself before moderating down because ignorant replies don't bother to check the facts themselves. There are only two stock iMac models; two SKUs that Apple sends out. Anything else is CTO.

  60. When the iPod will come with bluetooth or WIFI? by javatips · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Instead of increasing the disk capacity of the iPods, they should include bluetooth or WIFI.

    This would allow one to listen to live stream with their iPod. This could also be used to use the iPod as the computer headset so you can ear the system sounds while listening to your music.

    Another use (which the RIAA would certainly not approve) would be to allow one to stream it's music to somebody else (make it to one device at a time with not recording feature, so the "industry" is not to grumpy about it) listen to ones tracks.

  61. Qube by SLot · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why not just pick up a Qube II off of e-bay?

    It'll run Woody just fine and some minimal upgrades would give you a pretty decent box for simple file serving/mp3 storage pretty cheap. Dual NIC interfaces, extra PCI slot for wireless, etc. etc.

    And it *is* totally silent. At least mine is. ;)

    Check out http://www.shon.org/qube/ for more info (although his is running NetBSD).

  62. Re:vw by michrech · · Score: 2, Funny

    Your wallet must get very heavy. You also must have a very strong belt, or use both a belt and other means to hold your pants up..

    I'd hate for my notes to weigh that much..

    --
    bork bork bork!
  63. Re:Great use for 802.11 & || bluetooth on ipod by mrpuffypants · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And if anybody could do it well and end-to-end then it would be Apple. Anybody who's ever used Rendezvous in iTunes can attest to how easy and freaking cool it is to listen to other people's music in their libraries over the network.

    But the tradeoff would be that doing that much streaming would either increase the size of the ipod (big no-no) or make the battery life seriously dip off (another no-no)

    I wouldn't hold my breath, however cool it would be.

  64. Accessory? by Swannie · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does anyone else find it funny that apple lists a VW New Beetle as an iPod accessory? Wait until I tell my wife...

    --
    :q!
  65. Wow! by dacetone · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyone else notice that the new iMac configurations are shipping with Tony Hawk Pro Skater 4? Right on.

    --
    Just follow the day, and reach fo
  66. Re:Great use for 802.11 & || bluetooth on ipod by amichalo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One possibility would be to use bluetooth as a "splitter" for multiple, wireless headsets. It would be great to keep the ipod safely away in a backpack or coat pocket, while a bluetooth remote controlled the tracks (and duplicated the display) and a bluetooth headset played the music. a friedn could them easily "authenticate" their bluetooth headset for the iPod and share the tunes, er, itunes.

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  67. Those who live in Mac houses... by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Owning the Mac does put you in a statistical minority, to be sure, but taking some barbs from PC owners shouldn't be compared with something important like racism or sexism. Pleading you're discriminated against because someone doesn't like your computer and forecasting the end of society is going too far, my friend.

    It's especially unfortunate that you don't like being called an elitist, when everything from Apple's ads to pricing is pitched at elites. You don't think it's the Volkswagon Beetle of computers, now, do you? (I'm referring to the cheap VW Bug of yesterday, obviously, not the expensive mutation built today for elites--and featuring an iPod deal right now, LOL!)

    I bought my Mac for various reasons, and people can think whatever they please. But one thing is certain: Apple designs and markets its machines for a niche audience, not for Everyperson, and that strategy invites invidious response just as all expensive goods do. Why pretend otherwise?

  68. 20x faster? Hardly. Maybe 3x. by LFS.Morpheus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unless you're running RAID, it is highly unlikely that you will fill the bandwidth of Firewire 400, let alone Firewire 800. The fastest 7200 RPM hard drive on the market does 55 MBps tops, just 5 more than 50 MBps, and not even close to 100 MBps. I guess its good to have headroom for firewire hard drives or something, but seriously, its not even going to come close.

    Let alone what the iPod has in it. A 3600 RPM drive if you're lucky. Probably not. 20 MBps? 10? My roommate says he can transfer at 2 MBps; highest report are 7-8 MBps.

    --
    The space unintentionally left unblank.