Slashdot Mirror


2002 SAGE Salary Survey Finally Released

Ted Cabeen writes "The 2002 Salary Survey run by SAGE, SANS, and Sun's BigAdmin Group profiled in a March Slashdot Article has finally been released. Everybody who participated in the survey is entitled to a copy, as well as current members of those groups. How does your salary stack up in the post-crash economy?"

63 of 343 comments (clear)

  1. What salary?!?!? by bryan1945 · · Score: 5, Funny

    You insensitive clod!

    (so bored... so bored... so bored...)

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  2. Selection bias by Steve+G+Swine · · Score: 2, Funny

    The most underpaid were also too psychotically busy to answer the survey...

    Or was it done on Slashdot?

    --
    "Consider yourself a member of a virtual corporation with Mr. Torvalds as your Chief Executive Officer." - Linux Advocac
  3. Questions with no answers... by pongo000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    How does your salary stack up in the post-crash economy?

    Is this a trick question? How would I know how my salary stacks up if I'm not entitled to a copy of the report?

    1. Re:Questions with no answers... by muffen · · Score: 4, Funny

      Is this a trick question? How would I know how my salary stacks up if I'm not entitled to a copy of the report?

      Step 1: Release report.
      Step 2: Get people with good salaries to buy report.
      Step 3: Profit!

  4. Why is it always about the money? by grub · · Score: 4, Insightful


    I know many people that make some decent coin but hate their jobs. I make a nice salary and love my job. I wouldn't consider leaving (maybe for a good 1/3 increase in the cash and the same freedoms I have here).

    The survey should ask more than just income: the real question is: are you happy at your job and content with your income?

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Why is it always about the money? by krinje · · Score: 2, Funny

      How rude. How dare you enjoy your work and get a decent wage for it!

      --
      "He treats objects like women, man!"
      - The Dude, The Big Lebowski
    2. Re:Why is it always about the money? by smatt-man · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >I make a nice salary and love my job That's what well paid employees say. Me, I'd shovel manure for an extra $2 an hour.

      --

      ---
      Lousy rotten karmic retribution.
  5. Alternative link to survey by while(true) · · Score: 5, Informative

    Can also be downloaded from SANS here.

  6. Re:Post the text by gfody · · Score: 4, Funny

    from highest to lowest

    PHB $300,000
    Executive Mgmt $150,000
    Engineer (Pro) $80,000
    Engineer (Hack) $60,000
    Engineer (Guru) $$$ here and there + unemployment
    I.T (Mgmt) $50,000
    I.T (Reboot Monkey) Minimum Wage + unemployment
    PR/Accounting "are you guys interested in equity" + unemployment
    Legal (depends on the company $$$$(SCO))
    Sales (commission only = $0) + unemployment
    VC all dead apparently (mass suicide??)

    --

    bite my glorious golden ass.
  7. Re:Mirror? by rde · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hear they're looking for a sysadmin to fine-tune their system so it doesn't happen again.

  8. Short summary by while(true) · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Despite economic coldrums, the average of all the salary changes (including the negative ones) for 2002 came across full-time workers worldwide was plus 8.15% when calculated for annulized salaries. Fully 1,810 respondents (24.03%) saw no salary change or reduced their salary. Of the 54.54% who increased their salaries 0-30% the mean increase was 8.88%"

  9. salary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    i catch my own fish and grow my own vegees... and for net access, i got wifi... and i live in a card board box rent free under a bridge

    fuck salary

    1. Re:salary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You, sir, are a troll

  10. Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    The very finest in unavailable information.

  11. Re:Getting paid in Rupees. by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 3, Funny

    The damn elves took my rupees!

    I wish I could make a living smashing pottery and shit. Those dudes at the beach the metal detectors are thinking like my man Link, but I hear they don't generally do so well...

    --
    Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
  12. Survey is /.'d, but I need to post anyway. by jeaster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I work for a rather large unicolor octo-barred-logo company. Our salary reviews come once a year, in April, with little chance of a raise in between them. This year they handed down a new policy. Part 1: All employee's below a certain band, err, salary range, and who are performing at at least the "I have no reason to fire you" performance rating, get a raise. A 3% raise, but a raise none the less. Part 2: The "variable" bonus which is counted as part of our salary, is now cut in half. This "variable" bonus by the way, has gone down each and every year I have been with this company. Now instead of top performers getting somewhere between 12.5% and 16%, I believe 6.5% is going to be the best you can do. Part 3: To save money this year, all pay increases, which normally take effect May 1, will not take effect until July. I was one of the 'lucky' ones. I got a Band, err, salary range increase, which usually guarantees a better raise. Not this time. All told, if I am a top performer (not handed out too often) with my variable bonus, I will be making slightly less than the bottom figure on my new pay scale. Great. Makes the frequent 80 hour weeks (no overtime pay) Sooooooo worth it. I do however, understand that I am in fact lucky to have a job to bitch about. I am lucky I am not one of my contracter coworkers whose pay has been cut multiple times over the last year, and get two weeks off, without pay. I also understand that what makes some of this possible is also the same reason I can't spell the name of any internal help desk agent I have to call, or understand half of what they are saying. I truly dread seeing this Salary Survey.....I am afraid once I see the numbers, my Red Swingline(tm) and I will have to take action. Good Luck to us all, thanks for the forum to get this out. J.

    1. Re:Survey is /.'d, but I need to post anyway. by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A 3% raise, but a raise none the less. Part 2: The "variable" bonus which is counted as part of our salary, is now cut in half. This "variable" bonus by the way, has gone down each and every year I have been with this company. Now instead of top performers getting somewhere between 12.5% and 16%, I believe 6.5% is going to be the best you can do. Part 3: To save money this year, all pay increases, which normally take effect May 1, will not take effect until July.

      Be glad you are getting a raise. As a state employee (who is quite thankful to have a job and not have been laid of in June) I am looking at a possible 1.5% *decrease* in wages 12/31/2003 *and* 12/31/2004 (that's a 3% decrease) with no COL increase (was supposed to get that 7/1/2003). I am looking at decreased benefits, no raises, no chance for promotion, and possibly no pay while they go on strike (which will accomplish little if anything).

      The Bush Administration is trying to make changes to the law to stop OT pay all together for most workers and instead let the employer "repay" you by giving you time off at THEIR conveinience. Interesting.

      Again, while I am thankful that I have a job, I am NOT happy that I have to take pay cuts, lose benefits (my low hourly wage was supposed to be offset by great benefits), and worry that I will lose a month's pay as I am forced to go on a strike I am uninterested in going on.

      Please don't complain when you actually are making more money each year. Please.

    2. Re:Survey is /.'d, but I need to post anyway. by rarose · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As a twice-former employee of said horizontally shredded firm (I quit once and later got laid off) I feel your pain. I quit when I was passed over for a band change for 2 years in a row. After 2.5 years with "Steven & the Interns"'s company I returned to Company-of-the-Acronym-that-must-not-be-named maxing out a position 2 bands higher. 4 months later, review time. My new boss managed to give me a 5% raise. Whoo! The following year I got another 5% raise and talk of my future promotion to Senior. Whoo^2! Then 2 months later everyone in Beaverton got laid off.

      At least my severance package was based on that awesome salary I was making for 2 months!

      --
      --Rob
    3. Re:Survey is /.'d, but I need to post anyway. by arnie_apesacrappin · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The Bush Administration is trying to make changes to the law to stop OT pay all together for most workers and instead let the employer "repay" you by giving you time off at THEIR conveinience. Interesting

      I just went through a re-org where my functionality fell under a department at a different, larger location within the company. At this location, no one gets overtime. If they put in more than 40 hours, they get the time off you speak of. My new boss sat down with me to talk about it.

      I simply pointed out that if we started this policy Jan 1 2004 and I worked about the same amount of hours that I did this year, he would have to give me October through December off. He quickly decided that paying for OT would be fine.

      --

      Still, with a plan, you only get the best you can imagine. I'd always hoped for something better than that. -CP

  13. Job Futures by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 4, Informative

    is a good site for work info in Canada, including salary and employment statistics.

    Job Futures

    --
    Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
  14. Re:Post the text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Metro Area || Avg. Salary || %Incr || %Resp
    San Francisco/San Jose/Silicon Valley, CA Metro Area 87,238 6.2 11.4
    New York Metro Area 85,010 8.3 8.1
    Boston, MA, Metro Area 77,211 4.7 6.7
    Washington, DC Metro Area 75,614 10.3 12.6
    Philadelphia, PA, Metro Area 74,343 5.5 3.6
    Dallas,TX Metro Area 73,390 7.4 4.7
    Los Angeles/ Orange Co., CA Metro Area 73,285 9.4 7.7
    Atlanta, GA Metro Area 70,809 7.0 4.8
    Chicago, IL Metro Area 70,448 8.5 7.5
    Denver, CO Metro Area 69,493 5.1 4.6
    London, England Metro Area 69,486 6.5 1.3
    Seattle/Redmond,WA Metro Areas 69,082 7.6 5.6
    San Diego, CA Metro Area 68,969 11.0 3.5
    Houston,TX Metro Area 68,194 7.7 2.7
    Research Triangle, NC Metro Area 67,261 6.8 2.5
    Austin,TX Metro Area 65,606 9.3 2.6
    Ottawa, ON Metro Area 52,520 4.0 2.2
    Toronto, ON Metro Area 50,506 9.8 2.9
    Sydney, Australia Metro Area 50,503 10.6 1.2
    Vancouver, BC Metro Area 44,451 6.9 2.2
    Montreal, QC Metro Area 43,616 10.9 1.6

  15. Vacation days by Malc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So Americans have to work 20+ years with a company to get the standard holiday allowance for a European in their first year on the job. Americans who change jobs won't on average ever reach that level. I wonder how worker happiness compares between the two continents - and no, I don't give a fig about where the businesses are more profitable, that doesn't equate to happiness.

    1. Re:Vacation days by zasos · · Score: 2, Informative

      My guess - worker/consumer/citezen/human happiness is lower in the US...
      on the other hand, if 250 mill. people work 2 weeks more than anywere in the world, the country should firmly stay ahead of its competitors... and noone gives a f*ck about worker happiness if the head of non-for-profit organization makes $150mill because of the extra 2 weeks that the shmucks put in...

      --

      Just because I don't care, it doesn't mean I don't understand. Homer J. Simpson
    2. Re:Vacation days by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Worker happiness is about liking your job. I have about a month of vacation time racked up, but I don't plan on taking it any time soon, and wouldnt think of taking it all at once.

      I like my job, and I'd much rather be here writing code than sitting at home eating cheerios.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:Vacation days by ojQj · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I'm an American working in Germany. I've been at the company 3 years. I get 29 days of vacation a year, but my after tax, after health insurance net is about half of what I figure it would be in the States. Clothes, cars, and apartments are also all more expensive in Germany. Food is less expensive. My health care is more expensive and of a lower quality here than it would be in the states. On the other hand I get access to good public transportation, the streets are clean and in good condition. Violent crime rates are also low.

      Worker happiness doesn't vary in response to one variable alone.

      That being said, I really do enjoy my 29 days of vacation, and I can live reasonably comfortably on my pay.

    4. Re:Vacation days by paitre · · Score: 3, Informative

      I get 12 sick days, 22 vacation days, 2 floating holidays plus 11 regular holidays.
      I had 15 personal days plus 9 holidays at my last job (and yes, that -is- part of why i left it).

      I'd say that most Americans need to put between 5 and 10 years into a position to get to 4 weeks vacation. That's a far cry from 20+ and never reaching it.

      Most Americans don't change jobs nearly as often as us tech geeks, either :)

    5. Re:Vacation days by Malc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When I said worker happiness, I wasn't just refer to being happy on the job. I was referring to life in general. When I said worker, I meant a person who workd for somebody else and doesn't own their own business. Do you work to live, or live to work? I'm happiest when work enables me to have a good life. Insufficient vacation time makes it harder to relax or have a good life. Even if I enjoy my job, time spent with my wife, my friends, doing what I want to do, travelling, etc makes me far happier. How many people do you know that don't have sex very often because they're too tired from working their jobs? This is one of commonest reasons for poor sex lives in marriages in N. America. Of course, things can be taken to the other extreme (and I don't agree with extremes), like in France.

    6. Re:Vacation days by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wait, wait, wait...medical care is of *lesser* quality and food is *cheaper*?

      Last time I saw a German physician, it took me about twenty minutes from check-in to a prescription for antibiotics. In the 'States with HMOs, I have to force any infections to give a two-month notice, because that's the average wait time with my medical group (not kidding), and I think even the ER is backed up for about a month (kidding, but not by much). I don't know a single German who worked in 'Mericka who was happier with the so-called 'healthcare system' when it was compared to their native Deutschland.

      Food was more expensive, but that's because most of it is organically grown, and because German consumers are by-and-large willing to pay fair trade prices for their groceries, unlike most of their brethren in the 'States. Goods are more expensive, especially apartments, but this is mostly balanced by the excellent public transportation (which you mentioned), meaning that you don't need to own a car -- personal vehicles are a luxury item, after all.

      Take-home pay should be about 75% of what you would get in the 'States, not half, but like you said -- you do get something for that trade-off (eighteen months[1] unemployment, good healthcare, good transportation, effective police[2], etc.)

      [1] Has Schroeder shortened this to twelve yet? I know Labor would be pissed, but it really makes more sense than eighteen.

      [2] The police carry submachine guns; H&K MP5Ks, as I recall, and Do Not F*ck Around when it comes to crime. Pot is minor (in reality, although The Letter Of The Law says differently), they don't care about speeding on deserted roads, but if you drive drunk or rape someone, expect to be at the business end of a very angry machine gun.

    7. Re:Vacation days by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "In the 'States with HMOs"

      Yes, HMOs are awful, but remember, "health insurance" doesn't necessarily mean "HMO". With my plan (PacifiCare), I can visit any doctor who takes my insurance (most) and get diagnosed and treated in about 20 minutes. It's a $10 fee to visit any doctor, which isn't bad a all.

      "I don't know a single German who worked in 'Mericka who was happier with the so-called 'healthcare system' when it was compared to their native Deutschland."

      Despite your slang, I must disagree. I have a German coworker who is thrilled by the US healthcare system. Case in point: he was held up two hours at the hospital just to see a doctor (this was around 1:00 and he had a stomach bug). In the US, he got the same bug (around 2:00). He simply went to the nearest doctor's office (5 minutes from his house), got diagnosed in about 20 minutes, and walked next door to the 24 hour pharmacy to get his prescription. YMMV, but healthcare in the US can range from awful to excellent (depending on your health insurance).

      Is it a perfect system? Absolutely not. It leaves far too many people without adequete healthcare.

      "Food was more expensive, but that's because most of it is organically grown, and because German consumers are by-and-large willing to pay fair trade prices for their groceries, unlike most of their brethren in the 'States."

      We have stores in the US that sell nothing but fair trade organic products. "Wild Oats Market" built their business on this. But we also have Super Wal-Mart. Super Wal-Mart makes the other food stores look expensive.

      "effective police[2]"
      The police are surprisingly effective in the US. The problem is not enforcement of the law, it's that 18,000 people a year are willing to kill others. When you have such a violent society, it's nearly impossible to prevent crime. It's not the cops that are the problem, it's the people.

      "eighteen months[1] unemployment"

      Many corporations in the US give 12 to 18 months severence pay. Plus there is governmental unemployment aid, so long as you are "looking" for a job.

      "good transportation"

      Transportation in major US cities is surprisingly good. In DC, the Metro is efficent and fast. The NY MTA system is older, but it works fine. The major thing we lack is inter-city transportaion by rail. You can travel by rail, especially in the east, but the trains only go about 80 miles/hour. Far from the high-speed trains in Europe. However, people forget the sheer size of the US. Even at 160 miles per hour, with no stops, it would take 18+ hours to travel from New York to Los Angeles. Airplanes can do it faster and cheaper.

  16. Fine, thank you by Seahawk · · Score: 4, Funny

    My economy is fine, I jsut earned $12500 by suing Registar.com... ;o)

  17. For People in the U.S. by gfxguy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Try this one.

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
  18. Pardon my rant... by ArmenTanzarian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    but all these surveys do is give people false impressions of worth. You could glean from this thing that you should be making 70k with a bachelors degree or that being a woman with the same experience as I have you're worth 10k more than I am.

    A young woman at my last job got fired because she went in to demand higher pay after she got her masters in accordance with one of these surveys. She worked for the company for the whole time and they paid for her education, but she decided to hop up the ladder and start emailing stats like this to the VP's. I mean really, what loaded sysadmin women fill these things out and do they need a developer and/or boyfriend!?!

    1. Re:Pardon my rant... by mattdm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's a sad world we live in. We don't value education. We value money.

      That may be true, but it's not illustrated here.

      Computer science degrees are great, but they're largely theoretical. Most computer-related jobs are highly practical. Therefore, education doesn't correlate with knowledge and skills. In fact, an argument can be made for an *inverse* correlation -- many people with a CS degree are in the field chasing the dream of high-paying jobs (looks easier than law or medicine!), whereas highly-skilled and experienced non-degree techies are in it for pure love.

      I don't mean to disparage those with CS degrees -- that theoretical background *can* be very useful, and obviously there are those who have both the degree and the real-world geek cred. It's just that there's a good reason "level of education attained" shouldn't be a primary factor in computer jobs.

  19. Re:Salaries are for sissies! by Oddly_Drac · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I'm in Italy and i found a way to start my business online for just 20 bucks a month... and now i am my own boss, and make more than i did at my previous job."

    Why am I expecting the next line to be 'Herbal Viagra really works! Here are some testimonials...'

    --
    Oddly Draconis
    Too cynical to live, too stubborn to die.
  20. Execs getting better by benpeter · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just read in Tuesday's Australian Financial Review that Executive salaries were still high (and growing) in the IT sector, comparable to other industry sectors, but the rest of the IT workforce was not enjoying the same percentage increase and ridiculous high salaries.

  21. My boss didn't lie to me. by reboot246 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought he meant I'd be paid weekly, but he really meant weakly .

  22. Re:Post the text by confused+one · · Score: 3, Funny
    Hmmm... I fall between DC and Research Triangle. I'm making a little over half of the so called "average". Somehow that makes sense... (half way between, making half as much, twisted humor :p

    *Puts on Happy Helmet* I love my job, I love my job, I love my job, glad I have a job...

  23. Amen by InterruptDescriptorT · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would, right now without hesitation, take a 15% pay cut for five weeks' vacation a year.

    What is so funny to me is the huge emphasis that the government and pressure groups put on the notion of 'family' here in the US, and yet at the same time don't want to give workers the rights to rear their children (in opposing the Family Leave Act), nor want to give them enough time off to actually spend time with them.

    The average American worker works an obscene amount of hours. I am 100% positive this does not stem from any sort of American 'work ethic', but rather from the fact that you have to be seen as working more than your co-worker in order not only to get ahead, but to simply keep your job. The high levels of stress that follows are what lead to domestic problems like drug abuse, alcoholism and violence.

    The idea of four weeks' vacation would never fly here, because greedy CEOs and stockholders don't want to see their all-precious profits possibly drop. But imagine the long-term benefits: Lower health care costs (rested workers are less stressed; less stressed workers are healthier), more motivated employees, and a happier populace with spare time to spend money vacationing.

    It's a win-win situation, but I'll never see it in my lifetime. I'm a Canadian living in the US, and I've been thinking about using my right of return privileges (my grandfather was a UK citizen) to go to the UK and work for a few years. Sounds like, as usual, the Europeans don't have their heads up their asses like in this country.

    --
    Karma: Excellent Birds (mostly as a result of listening to Laurie Anderson)
    1. Re:Amen by Malc · · Score: 2, Informative

      "I've been thinking about using my right of return privileges (my grandfather was a UK citizen) to go to the UK and work for a few years."

      Do you have British citizenship yourself? Your eligibility depends upon your father or mother's status. If they were born in the UK, then you probably qualify. If they weren't then they can't pass the right on to you. Check out the Home Office's web site - I think there are two classes of citizenship: otherwise than by descent (their citizenship can inherited by their children); by descent (they inherited citizenship, and they cannot pass it on to their children.) If you get the opportunity, I would take it, especially if you're still young as it gets harder with age and you will regret it later if you don't. Even if you don't like the UK, being a citizen will allow you to live and work anywhere in the EU. That's very appealing to me as my travels and living overseas are one of the best things I've been able to do in my life. Somebody who posted a reply to something I wrote on /. recently has done this move from the US to London, and you might find his blog interesting.

      As you might guess, I've looked in to this a little. I've been interested in this for my future children and for my Canadian wife. I emmigrated from the UK at 21 and have thought of moving back to find out what it's really like to live there as an adult. Three years of residence will also get my wife a European passport. At that point, I think we'll know enough to decide which side of the Atlantic we're happier on. There are trade-offs and advantages for us in either Canada or the UK, but which suits us the most, I don't know yet.

  24. My all time favourite salary survey conclusion by mccalli · · Score: 4, Interesting
    At the first job I had, the technical department had a number of issues with the management there, not least of these was salary.

    Eventually, management's answer was presented to us in a meeting. They explained that, after surveying the market, they were paying us correctly. The said that the reason we could see the higher figures elsewhere was because everyone else in the world was paying too highly...

    Oh, and they also claimed that we couldn't actually get these figures we read. My response was "empirical studies suggest otherwise", which got a bit of a look. I resigned within two weeks, and another guy I was at the meeting with resigned the next day.

    Cheers,
    Ian

  25. Work Ethics by clickety6 · · Score: 3, Interesting


    Americans Live To Work
    Europeans Work To Live

    How else do you explain American vacation allowances? I recall seeing figures that showed productivity in American companies wasn't marekedly higher than their European equivalents, despite their longer hours. have to see if I cna track it down on Google.

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    1. Re:Work Ethics by gfxguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem is the perspective you take on it. The employee/employer relationship should be considered a private contract between the two, the government ought not stick their nose where it doesn't belong.

      Someone mentioned they'd take a 15% pay cut to get more vacation time - that should be something negotiated with your employer, not a government mandate.

      As for me, after 5 years I was getting 23 days of paid time off per year. Next year will mark my 10th anniversary and I will get an additional 5. That was a private deal between my company and myself (it is company policy, but some people have negotiated other deals). If the government were to come in and FORCE companies to give 4 weeks (20 days) and X number of sick days, I would be much worse off - sick days are scrutinzed when bumped up against holidays and vacation days. I'd rather have 23 days I can use whenever I want then 27 with restrictions (and pretty soon I'll have 28 anyway).

      This would be as bad as the government sticking their noses in W.R.T. overtime. It's simply none of their business.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
  26. Re:Dammit by the+Man+in+Black · · Score: 3, Funny

    Definitely quit. You're being treated completely unfairly. In fact, e-mail me the name of your company and the name of your immediate supervisor and I'll send him a stern e-mail explaining that his employees are unhappy due to his mismanagement. I'll attach my resume and cover letter so that he has an idea of how well off other workers in the world are. Yeah. That's the ticket.

  27. Re:Summary by TopShelf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The article you link to only project Saudi's IT growth at 8,000 jobs annually - hardly a threat to the American IT worker. Quit your whining and compete for your job just like most manufacturing workers have had to over the last several decades.

    Repeat after me: international trade is not a zero-sum game, and the growth in international trade has lifted hundreds of millions of people out of poverty over the last two decades, while providing rich countries with cheap, high quality imports. If you can't handle change, what are you doing in IT?

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  28. BS by gfxguy · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Please don't complain when you actually are making more money each year. Please.


    I'm sorry, I really am, but just because there are people getting screwed worse doesn't mean that those of us who aren't getting screwed as bad can't complain. If that were the case, then no one posting here has any right to complain about anything at all.

    Put it in perspective - please don't complain when you actually have a job, a roof over your head, a computer... you have a lot more than most of the population in the world.

    So please don't complain that people are complaining - while you may have more to complain about, it doesn't mean they don't have a right to complain, too.
    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
  29. Re:Dammit by mschoolbus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I read the unemployment documentation yesturday. It basically said if you got fired you can still get unemployment, as long as you didnt intentionally get fired. Which ruled out my idea of breaking the boss's nose...

  30. Don't understand numbers by DoctorNathaniel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This may be nitpicking, I look at something like this and immediately distrust it: they quote percentages to four significant figures, yet they only had 10000 respondents. Anyone who understands sampling errors knows that 10k data points means approximately 1% error on any number you measure with them.. possibly much less.

    And it's hard to read with all them number things.

  31. Is it just me? or do these numbers seem odd by Kevin+Stevens · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Maybe I am just getting F'ed... but I am in the 1-2 years experience range, and I know hardly anyone (programmers included) in the IT field who are making 50k a year (the average reported in the survey is (50,558 for 0-1 year guys w/ a bachelor), and certainly not any sysadmins at all- and thats in the NY metro area, where the costs of living (and thus salaries) are quite high. The fact that those in the 2 year range see a 5k drop in average salaries really makes me wonder if they had enough of a random sample, and a large enough sample altogether. Similarly, when I see average raises in certain metro areas being 87.5%, I think there is something significantly flawed in this survey to actually use it for anything meaningful. I get the feeling this survey attracted types who wanted to show off their earnings, or raises. I mean how can the group of 5-9 years guys get 6.8% average raises, while guys w/ 10-14 years experiene recieved a whopping 22.6% increase, yet their elder 15-19 group also only recieved 6.9% raises. I just cant see how this could happen to the actual group overall. Another glaring hole- guys with 1-2 years experience falling into the ambiguously defined 'level 4' (4 being highest) group. That many people came out of school and rose to CTO in a year? It is interesting, but to use this as a basis for actual salary comparison doesnt seem right. It seems even less scientific than a slashdot poll to me.

  32. Working Too Hard? by Accord+MT · · Score: 5, Insightful
    WORKING TOO HARD?

    Ten hour days? No vacation?

    Training your replacement in your company's new Bangalore office???

    STOP!

    How would you like to get out of that rat race? I have stumbled on a secret way to free yourself from the wage slavery and mind burn-out you are suffering at your current job. And I'm giving the secret away for FREE!

    Let me tell you something, folks. I used to be a lot like you. I was working for a company that insisted on pushing their employees over the edge. What I found was, most workers not only took it, but gladly bent over and rubbed in the vaseline! These folks never understood the secret that I am about to reveal to you absolutely FREE!

    So here it is! Follow this simple four step process to dislodge yourself from corporate America once and for all:

    1. Quit your job!!! The most obvious step is the step that is the most inconceivable to the average American worker. Every day at your job is living hell. You dread going to your job every morning. Your job is the source of all your frustration and grief. QUIT! It's that easy. QUIT! When I realized I was working for a company that couldn't give a shit about me and was trying every day to find ways of milking more work out of me, I just up and left... It was such a breath of fresh air. Get a part-time job bartending or doing manual labor while you accomplish the rest of the steps...

    2. Kill your monthly expenses!!! Pay off those high-interest credit cards! Only spend with them what you can pay off in full every month. Most of my former co-workers were so buckled under credit card debt but they were happy to keep spending more, because all they ever payed was the monthly minimum. They're going to be in for a surprise in three or four years. Sell the shit that drains your wallet! That Lexus SUV sitting there in your garage? Sell it immediately and buy a 5 year old Honda with cash. Let me tell you you won't miss that $600/mo payment! Expensive home or apartment in the city? Get out of that lease or sell it, and buy a nice humble townhouse in the suburbs. You might not be able to get rid of this "monthly" but it sure feels nice taking $500/mo or so out of it. Health club contract? Multiple cell phones/pagers? Expensive Internet connection?? You guessed it! Get them out of your life. Live SIMPLY. Not only is it cheaper, but you don't feel like such a consumer whore every month when you pay the bills!!

    3. Stop buying so much shit! Al Greenspan says consumer spending is good for the economy, but who is he kidding? It's only good for the corporate execs you are currently freeing yourself from. Buy generics if you have to buy at all. Spend your money not on gadgets and trinkets but on things that fulfill your life--travel, a humble home that's yours and not the bank's, that little restarant you were always wanting to start up--whatever is your thing.

    4. Do hourly contract work when you need money, and relax when you don't. Look at your new budget. Hell you can probably contract at HALF of what you were making before, and have plenty of time for what is important in your life.

    Follow this four step process and rid your life of the work-consume rat race!

    I can't emphasize it enough. That first step is crucial. QUIT THAT JOB NOW. QUIT QUIT QUIT QUIT QUIT QUIT QUIT. Or, even better, get fired and collect unemployment! You've been paying for unemployment your whole life, so take a little for yourself! Make a promise to yourself: I will quit by next Thursday. I will quit after the next paycheck. And DO IT! Don't go updating your resume, looking for another sinking ship to jump to. JUST GET OUT OF THAT HELL HOLE OF A JOB RIGHT NOW!

    Today is a lot better for me than it was two years ago, and I make LESS than what I used to! I work hourly, doing contract work for whoever needs a little programming. When I want

    1. Re:Working Too Hard? by scovetta · · Score: 2, Funny

      I agree, you people should all quit, that way, there'll be a job for me out there. Suckers!

      --
      Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
    2. Re:Working Too Hard? by CrazyTalk · · Score: 2

      Only one problem with step 1 (in the US) - health care. If I quit my job, I have no access to healthcare, and with a "pre-existing condition" that requires treatment, thats not an option for me. I'm sure others have reasons they cannot just quit as well - kids in college, etc. Sometimes, you do what you have to do. Of course, lowering monthly expenses is always a good idea. Fortunately, I'm not being worked to death in my current job, so not being able to just quit is not an issue.

    3. Re:Working Too Hard? by jabber01 · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's all really good, sound fiscal advice. But, because of the way it is laid out, with the numbered lists, the bold text and the tone, I kept looking for the "GET A BIGGER PENIS NOW!!!!!" paragraph. :)

      --

      The REAL jabber has the user id: 13196
      What you do today will cost you a day of your life

    4. Re:Working Too Hard? by crazyphilman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wow... you took a relatively interesting premise and went kinda loopy with it. That's cool, though, I'm hip... But let me voice my take on this idea:

      First of all, DON'T quit your job. You need a job. But do try and find a less stressful job with reasonable (i.e. 9-5, 40h/wk) working hours. All you need vis-a-vis benefits is health insurance, really, anything else is gravy. Preferably, take a job where there's not too much risk of physical injury and there aren't many environmental hazards. Civil service is pretty cool (go county or state).

      Second, pay off all your debts but keep one small credit card around "just in case", either a 500.00 or a 1000.00 card. Maybe have a department store card in case you have to pick up some clothes in a hurry (you never know what could happen). But don't USE the cards unless you need to, and pay them off asap.

      Third, yes, live simply but FOR THE LOVE OF GOD don't drop your internet connection!!! I pay 112/month for internet and cable, and I love it. It keeps me connected and informed, and I wouldn't want to live without it. Another tip is, keep the cell phone and drop the land-line. Cell phones are more useful and you usually get free long distance. It's a better deal.

      Grocery shop instead of eating out, etc, etc, don't get sucked into the whole consumerist thing, it'll bleed you dry, ignore Greenspan, he's there for corporations, not you... Um... That's about it, I guess.

      Basically, live frugally, spend minimally, take it easy and don't wear yourself out. That's my point of view...

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    5. Re:Working Too Hard? by Watts+Martin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm tempted to say something flippant, like "but I don't want to stop consuming, dammit." And there's some truth to that. But your point is well-taken... there are just caveats. If you're good enough at both the actual work you want to do and at selling yourself, you can cut your ties to the working life. And if you're in the right area. Those are bigger "ifs" than you're making them out to be.

      Through an odd chain of events, I ended up moving to Silicon Valley in November of last year; I'm employed in large part because of a friend who kept throwing positions his company was opening up at me until one of them stuck. Even so, I'm a "fulltime contractor," which equates to all the work and no benefits other than pay. In fact, I'm actually making less money than I was in Tampa. (My expenses are also slightly lower.)

      Fortunately, I like the company I'm at and I like the people I work with, and this is keeping the negatives (no benefits, wonky hours, long commute) in a fragile balance. But the reality is that right now I don't have the money saved up to just cut my ties and hope. (Well, technically, I do, but that money's to pay taxes next year--and given that this is my first time doing the 1099 thing, I have a strong suspicion I'm not setting aside enough and that I'm going to face penalties for not having done estimated taxes.) If I did, let's face it: I'm in Silicon Valley after the dotcom crash and my last few jobs were web development on FreeBSD, Solaris and OS X using PHP. The fact that I actually know good typography and layout and can apply it to web pages (using XHTML, CSS and all those other buzzwords) does me very little good--by resume I look like every other Java-less web monkey. My work now, in fact, is doing data analysis with Microsoft Excel. Someone in this part of the country just cutting loose as you suggest better expect to move out of IT entirely, or better have the resources to move--even if it's just an hour or two away where the streets aren't filled with desperate contractors holding signs reading "Will hack Linux for food."

      I doubt I'll ever move into a field that's unrelated to computers, but I'm starting to seriously look at fields that involve just using computers as tools for other things--pushing into fine typography and book design, for instance. I don't think I.T. is a bad general field to be in (there's always going to be a demand, let's face it), but it's a field I sort of blundered into, and I'm having to face the fact that I don't have the breadth of experience employers are increasingly looking for nor, if I'm honest with myself, the interest to develop that breadth. (I've tried to learn Java for years. I'm farther along in learning Cocoa programming.)

      So as enchanting as the "free yourself from that slave job you have" mantra may be, people need to ask themselves if they're really able to do that, and if the answer is "no," how they can get to that point if it's really their goal. Going over Niagara Falls in a barrel and surviving uninjured requires either sheer dumb luck or some planning--and one probably shouldn't count on the dumb luck.

    6. Re:Working Too Hard? by durdur · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This was great advice in 1999. Not anymore. When times got tough, guess who we let go first? All those expensive high hourly rate contractors. They were the first to go because they're expensive, and because there's no hassle about letting them go, since they were temporary from the get-go. Have we hired any in the last 2-3 years? Not that I know of.

    7. Re:Working Too Hard? by HardYakka · · Score: 2, Informative

      A more realistic approach for most people would be to:
      1) Stop buying items you don't really need.
      2) Get out of debt ASAP
      3) Live on half your pay and invest the rest. It's easier than it seems once you do 1 and 2.
      4) Keep your job until you can live off your investments. If you follow steps 1,2 and 3, it will happen faster than you expect.
      Knowing the day is coming soon can help reduce the stress of your current job.

      One technique that works well to get the whole family on board for step 1:
      3 months after all purchases over some amount (e.g. $50), re-assess the value of the item.
      Ask yourself, am I happy with the item or would I rather have my money back?
      You'd be surprised how this can adjust your purchasing decisions.

  33. my advice... by *weasel · · Score: 2, Informative

    if you enjoy your job, and the money is competitive: DO NOT LEAVE.

    even for more cash.
    because you will find that more cash means that people who are making that much dough normally are not biting. big cash is indicative of a bad work atmosphere, high turnover, or terrible products/tools/requirements.

    that's why the people who demand the highest prices tend to work contract. because the companies that have to pay that much for the work, you don't want to be with over the long term.

    --
    // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
  34. fed employes get 4.1% raise today by peter303 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sounds like one of the few sectors where pay is actually increasing. State and local gove worksers being cut. Must be nice to work for an organization where you can print money at will.

  35. Re:Post the text by molarmass192 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The salary levels makes sense to me but the increases are way out of whack from anything I've heard. I haven't heard of any salary decreases but I know of VERY few companies in the valley that do not have salary freezes in place. I've heard of a few targeted (ie. not across the board) raises and even those are only in the sub 5% range. So, if somebody would please post the names of those companies in the valley that are offering the 20% increases needed to pull the average up to 6% it would be much appreciated.

    --

    Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
  36. Slashdotted by SlightlyMadman · · Score: 2, Funny
    The site's slashdotted, here's a summary:


    Everyone's making more than you.
    --

    Money I owe, money-iy-ay
  37. Funny, yes, but... by autechre · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you poorly manage your money, then your salary can be nearly irrelevant.

    One interesting concept is the "true wage", as described in the book Your Money Or Your Life. In order to figure out what you really make, you have to factor in all time spent, including travelling to and from work. You then have to count your work-related expenses, including eating lunch out, business clothes, car maintenance, etc. You're also supposed to figure out the "life energy cost" (i.e., if your job is hellish, the rest of your life will not be great), but even leaving that aside, jobs might compare much differently than they look on the surface.

    Additionally, it's easy to waste money and so create a "need" for more money. Living on frozen pizzas/TV dinners is expensive, and will probably lead to more health-related expenses. There's a lot to be said for having a lower salary, whether by working less or taking a lower-paying job that's more fulfilling, and lowering your cost of living by driving a good used car, not buying ridiculously overpriced "designer" clothes, etc.

    Then you get into wisely investing your money, etc., and you start to see how people who don't look so great on paper are better off after everything has been added up. It really is how you use it rather than the size. Of course, if you take this to an extreme, you start expending more effort than is worth the money you might save, but as with everything else, balance is key.

    --
    WMBC freeform/independent online radio.
  38. More changes by r_j_prahad · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to be a Unix sysadmin and took a five year hiatus, it being necessary to my mental health. So last month I decided to get looking and went to two interviews. What a disappointment they were, the duties were more for senior operator. Point and click, simple, repetetive tasks. The managers at both businesses were very rude, elitist, maybe even racist. I was reminded of mainframe positions we used to derisively call "tape apes" in the olden days.

    So even though I miss the money, I won't be going back to sysadminning. I will stay where I am and enjoy my pagerless weekends.

  39. Study: Americans, Less Paid Leave than Europeans by tux_deamon · · Score: 2, Informative

    Your anecdote is well received, but you must grant us that you receive more paid leave than the average American. Consider the findings a 2002 Center for Economic Policy Research study:

    CEPR Study

    Minimum MANDATED (by law) annual paid vacation days:
    Austria 30
    Denmark 30
    Finland 30
    France 30
    Spain 30
    Luxembourg 25
    Sweden 25
    Germany 24
    Belgium 4 (weeks)
    Greece 4 (weeks)
    Ireland 4 (weeks)
    Netherlands 4 (weeks)
    United Kingdom 4 (weeks)
    Portugal 22
    European Union 4 (weeks)
    Canada 2 (weeks)
    United States 0

    Of course, the above are just the minimum legal requirements, in practice, the contrast is even more stark:

    AVERAGE Annual Paid Vacation Days and Holidays

    (vacation/total vacation+holiday)

    Italy 37/45
    Finland 37.5/44.5
    Netherlands 31/38.1
    Germany 30/38
    Luxembourg 28/38
    Austria 26.5/36
    Portugal 22/36
    Spain 22/36
    Denmark 27/34
    France 25/34
    Sweden 25/34
    United Kingdom 25/34
    Switzerland 24.3/33
    Belgium 20/31
    Greece 22/31
    Japan 18/31
    Ireland 21/30
    Norway 21/28
    United States 12/23