Slashdot Mirror


Free VoIP for Dartmouth Students

dtfusion writes "After upgrading their network infrastructure and doing some testing over the summer, Dartmouth is making free voice over IP available to incoming freshman. It turns out it was costing them more to bill the students for local and long distance than for the calls themselves. What will the success/failure of VoIP on this scale have on telecom?" There's an older story and a newer story from the Dartmouth public affairs office; that second one probably spurred the NYT article. The sysadmin-types are planning to study usage during the rollout.

194 comments

  1. No Registration Link by davemabe · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:No Registration Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what is that girl using to talk/listen that laptop in the article photo? that looks so useful

    2. Re:No Registration Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's actually a Hello Kitty USB-powered vibrator...

  2. Does this apply... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does this apply to dial-a-pr0n lines???

    1. Re:Does this apply... by yerricde · · Score: 1

      Not if you go to an engineering school with 10 men for every woman.

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
    2. Re:Does this apply... by NightLamp · · Score: 1

      Yeah how long before P2P over VOIP?
      How could you tell the difference between pr0n and asking mom for more beer money?

  3. Non-NYT link by mrpuffypants · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://news.com.com/2100-12-5080449.html

  4. stupid by Boromir+son+of+Faram · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is a really bad idea. Most students have cellular phones these days, so having any sort of voice capabilities in dorms is a waste of resources. OTOH, students have extremely high data transfer needs. The bandwidth being wasted in VoIP would be much better utilized in data connections. Oh well, I guess the kids can just use modems over the VoIP lines.

    --

    Boromir, son of Faramir, King of Gondor and Minas Tirith
    1. Re:stupid by Brahmastra · · Score: 3, Insightful
      OTOH, students have extremely high data transfer needs

      Do students have high data transfer needs or high data transfer wants? There's a big difference between wants and needs
    2. Re:stupid by kwerle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is a really bad idea. Most students have cellular phones these days, so having any sort of voice capabilities in dorms is a waste of resources. OTOH, students have extremely high data transfer needs.

      No, a few geeks have high data transfer needs. And if you rule out kazaa and other "pirate networks" (which a campus seems likely to do), what does that leave?

      The bandwidth being wasted in VoIP would be much better utilized in data connections.

      Like what?

    3. Re:stupid by Planesdragon · · Score: 4, Funny

      OTOH, students have extremely high data transfer needs

      Yeah. They need to scan in their handwritten notes and send them to their professiors sans-compression, which takes all of--no, wait, that's not it.

      I mean, yeah, they need to stream WAVs of the lectures from the professors... no, not that.

      er, I mean, they need to transfer their written by-hand linux configuration to their CompSci professor--no, wait, that can better be done by handing in a burnt CD, and no one would waste class time on that...

      Wait, I got it! Students need to engage in a copyright-free multimedia environment that's littered with, ah, er... entertainment...

      VoIP sounds like a better and better use of student bandwidth--especially given that most student projects can be transmitted in a manner of minutes over a dial-up connection. As long as the acutal research projects at the University still have enough, no one should really care.

      Especially when you realize that the dollars spent on maintaining the POTS system can be funneled into networking, thus offsetting the cost of the new VoIP system once POTS can be discontinued.

      (Oh, and one more thing--if you've ever seen a VoIP system, it needs a real data connection--otherwise it wouldn't be "VoIP".)

    4. Re:stupid by swordboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is a really bad idea. Most students have cellular phones these days

      So what happens when cell phones start coming with a flavor of 802.11 and SIP built in? Oh, then you can roam onto your residential VoIP service (like Vonage or packet8.net without *any* per minute fees. Same thing on the campus LAN. Or Starbucks. Or McDonalds (free minutes with the purchase of a happy meal).

      'Tis only a matter of time before we won't need PSTN anymore. This is the first step to that.

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    5. Re:stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope. not possible.

      Voice over encodes and compresses the analog signal into a digital signal. At the other end, the signal is reconstructed to give something that sounds like your voice. It won't work with a traditional modem since the modem relies on being able to transmit very precise analog data over the phone line. As well, the modem needs to synchronize with the RAS device (those tones that you hear when you dial up). The signal reconstructed by VoIP is almost, but not quite similar enough to the original signal for this to work.

    6. Re:stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they (or rather their parents) can afford Dartmouth, phone charges are NOT an issue.

    7. Re:stupid by phoxix · · Score: 4, Informative
      This is a really bad idea. Most students have cellular phones these days, so having any sort of voice capabilities in dorms is a waste of resources.

      Not true!

      My friend goes to DM, and she says that few have cell phones at the school. Additionally, if you look at all the major cell phone providers of the USA, none claim to have service in Hanover NH (the school's location). (There is a way you can get service over there via AT&T, but thats another story.)

      So what this school is doing works out well.

      Sunny Dubey

    8. Re:stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hook, line, and sinker.

      You, sir, have been had.

    9. Re:stupid by echeslack · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So nobody at Dartmouth gets loans or financial aid?

    10. Re:stupid by DoctorHoe · · Score: 1

      What about those who connect to their dorm wirelessly? Can they still use the VoIP apps on their laptop or PDA?

    11. Re:stupid by frufry · · Score: 1

      Do students have high data transfer needs or high data transfer wants? There's a big difference between wants and needs

      Not really. The difference between wants and needs is irrelevant.
      From the prespective of the IT/IS department, they need to worry about how much bandwidth consumption there's going to be, and that's it.

      There are exceptions for very particular things that hog an unusually large amounts of resources (i.e. file trading) which they need to evaluate and deal with on a case-by-case basis, but otherwise, it's not practical to make any distinction between a student doing research and one downloading porn.

    12. Re:stupid by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Probably.

      But the best way to react to trolls is to, for the most part, not akwnowldge their existance.

      Must be my interactions with real human beings, who frequently are just as bad as the worst troll's aping. Ce la vie.

      At least I got karma for it. ;)

    13. Re:stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least I got karma for it. ;)

      Touche. :)

    14. Re:stupid by Mister+Attack · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, most students nationwide may have cell phones, but I'd say less than 10 percent of Dartmouth students do. For one thing, the reception is spotty at best, and I think only AT&T serves Hanover. For another, campus e-mail use is phenomenally high -- everyone uses Dartmouth's BlitzMail system, which works kind of like IMAP in that messages are stored centrally and you can get to them from any computer on campus (in fact, public computers are often referred to as "Blitz terminals.") You can even order pizza, Chinese, and all the other delivery options in town online -- so really the only use for a phone at Dartmouth is to call businesses (see who sells CO2 for your kegerator) or to call home. Dartmouth just made calling home free, which you have to admit is pretty nice.

      As an aside, I disagree strongly that it is a waste of resources to have voice capabilities in dorms. In most cases, the wiring is already there, so it's a sunk cost -- might as well use it. When you're building new dorms, the marginal cost of adding phone wiring is minimal, so you might as well do it. Additionally, the capabilities have to be there for emergency services. Finally, there are plenty of people out there (myself included) who just don't have 500 bucks a year to spend on a cellular calling plan. All in all, it's definitely not a waste to keep phones in the dorms.

      (Dartmouth '03, BTW, so I know what I'm talking about wrt campus phone use)

    15. Re:stupid by aliens · · Score: 1

      Games, lots and lots of 64 person BF1942 and DC servers please.

      And 128 person servers for HL2. (/me starts rumor)

      --
      -- taking over the world, we are.
    16. Re:stupid by bladernr · · Score: 1
      The bandwidth being wasted in VoIP would be much better utilized in data connections.

      VoIP does not consume bandwidth unless an actual call is transferring actual data (ie, speaking). Merely having VOIP available uses 0 bandwidth. In-process calls are rarely considered a waste.

      These days, most mobile phone calls are hauled on circuit-switched lines from the cell-site onward. On the communication infrastructure as a whole, that makes most mobile phone calls more wasteful than a "pure" VOIP call (pure being defined one that never transitions to the PSTN). Those "pure" calls are pretty rare, unless they are PC-to-PC type, but they will become more and more common. At some point, I expect that mobile phone backhaul networks will switch to primary VOIP technology as well.

      In other words, VOIP conserves, not wastes, communications space.

      --
      Sarcasm and hyperbole are the final refuges for weak minds
    17. Re:stupid by kwerle · · Score: 1

      Games, lots and lots of 64 person BF1942 and DC servers please.

      And 128 person servers for HL2. (/me starts rumor)


      OK, I'll bite. In the incoming freshman class of 1000 (according to the article), how many of those do you suppose will be playing BF, DC, or HL2 at any given time? How many will be playing on a server that's off-campus?

      And if there's any contention of bandwith, who do you suppose the admin is going to frown on - the games or the voip?

      Yeah, I know you're mostly kidding, but I'm mostly replying to "borimir" in the grandparent piece...

    18. Re:stupid by stevesliva · · Score: 1
      Actually, many or most students at Dartmouth eschew cellphones in favor of email, using Dartmouth's proprietary BlitzMail protocol. While I say this from my experience as a recent graduate, there was a recent NY Times article about this. (Katie Hafner, the reporter for both that article and this new VoIP article, is a Dartmouth alum, so she has a good perspective on how technology is used at Dartmouth.)

      Dartmouth just recently stopped billing students for long distance calls because administering billing was more expensive than the total charges... no doubt this VoIP initiative will help them save on total campus phone bills without overburdening the network. Dartmouth has been pretty chill about P2P-- they allowed a home-grown P2P program to be used for awhile. I'm pretty sure that even back in the heady days of Napster, they never totally banned its use, but rather metered Napster bandwidth. Regardless, they've recently upgraded network capacity to connect hubs with gigabit ethernet, and don't anticipate VoIP being a bandwidth burden.

      --
      Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
    19. Re:stupid by Slurpee · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not really. The difference between wants and needs is irrelevant.
      From the prespective of the IT/IS department, they need to worry about how much bandwidth consumption there's going to be, and that's it.


      Not quite right. Sure, some IT departments may take that approach, but when I worked in the IT department of the school of Computer Science and Engineering (CSE) at UNSW, we cared a *lot* about the difference between needs and wants.

      We implemented a bandwidth quota for students and staff. Bandwidth would be allocated (generously) based on what courses people were doing. Research, PHDs and staff got heaps more. You got a minimum each session, plus a certain amount per subject you were doing. IE If you did Comp1011 (Intro to computing), you only needed a small amount of data. If you were doing three subjects, you got an allocation for each subject. If you were doing Networks, you got more bandwidth. The limits were set by the lecturers, and was very generous. It was very fair, and generally speaking, people didn't have a problem with their bandwidth. Students were able to buy extra bandwidth at cost price if they wanted more. It cost them less from us than any ISP.

      Local bandwidth (Uni-wide) was not charged. Local (Australian) was charged what it cost us (fairly cheap..4c a meg or so) and international was charged at 9c a meg or so. This was all cost price. Aarnet was not charged at all (A local Aus mirror which holds heaps), plus we held heaps of local mirrors of all sorts of stuff. If the data was fetched from our proxy, you weren't charged.

      At the end of the day, it was a complex system that worked to make sure people had enough data for Uni needs, plus a bit extra for personal. if you were big into downloading heaps of stuff...you paid for it yourself. The system had a lot of thought put in to make it as fair as possible, and to make sure that only "at cost" was charged. It wasn't fair that non-leeching students payed for leechers. We didn't want to make money out of it...just stop bleeding money ourselves.

      Why not give everyone as much data as they wanted? We did up until about 2000, but the bandwidth cost was starting to kill us. In Australia we pay through our teeth for data. We didn't want to charge...but the bandwidth had to be payed for somehow.

    20. Re:stupid by raju1kabir · · Score: 2, Insightful
      This is a really bad idea. Most students have cellular phones these days, so having any sort of voice capabilities in dorms is a waste of resources.

      One of the reasons they are doing this, and which I think justifies the entire thing on its own, is that they want to study the social and infrastructural impacts of a widescale wifi/voip deployment. That kind of knowledge is going to be useful for all of us, either directly or through the next-generation networks that build on it.

      OTOH, students have extremely high data transfer needs.

      You're confusing yourself with the 99% of society who do not have "extremely high data transfer needs" and are much happier on the phone than on Slashdot.

      Actually I think you're just jealous.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    21. Re:stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasted bandwidth??

      Most vocoders are 8kbps and under ... they just require a low latency, low jitter network -- a property which exists in most properly designed enterprise LANs.

      The internet is a little bit of a wilder place, but with good/ok transit, your calls will sound fine. A hell of a lot better than your cell phone ...

    22. Re:stupid by YetAnotherDave · · Score: 1

      the actual bandwidth usage of most codecs used with VoIP is very low.

      Latency is the major issue, not bandwidth.

    23. Re:stupid by randolph · · Score: 1

      Cell service is way overpriced, and probably won't work inside most of the campus buildings, anyway. Voice traffic, with predictable levels, predictable average connection length, and limited bandwidth, is scarcely noticeable in a well-designed wireless system.

  5. VOIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Voiceover Intellectual Property?
    What, is McBride being dubbed in German now?

  6. Do this anyway by Brahmastra · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If someone makes a large number of long distance calls, it is more sensible to use Voice over IP anyway rather than use a regular phone. There are many reasonably priced Voice over IP services out there for people in colleges that don't provide this.

  7. Voice Over IP... GREAT!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now, how do I make it work over my cell phone????

    1. Re:Voice Over IP... GREAT!!!! by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How do you know that your cell provider isn't already using VoIP to route the calls through its own systems? GSM/CDMA/TDMA are just the protocol from cell phone to tower(s)... and if the call is already in digital form...

  8. Local and Long Distance? by kevin_conaway · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is this setup to connect to a POTS somewhere (to make local and long distance calls) or is it just around the campus?

    1. Re:Local and Long Distance? by LostCluster · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yep, the idea is to route the within-campus calls locally, and only give the PTSN the calls that need to head off campus. The advantage of the univerisites doing it themselves (whether it's VoIP or just a PBX) is that the school can route local calls to the local phone monopoly, but can hand long-distance calls directly to the long-distance carrier of choice to bypass the ILEC and save even more.

    2. Re:Local and Long Distance? by xnickmx · · Score: 1

      RTFA:

      Using the software together with a headset, which can be plugged into a computer's U.S.B. port, the students can make local or long-distance telephone calls free. Each student is assigned a traditional seven-digit phone number.

  9. Free long distance? For college freshmen? by Steve+G+Swine · · Score: 2, Funny

    Pity the guy whose girlfriend goes away to Dartmouth... how many hours will he spend on the phone while she flunks out?

    --
    "Consider yourself a member of a virtual corporation with Mr. Torvalds as your Chief Executive Officer." - Linux Advocac
  10. "Too cheap to meter" by strudeau · · Score: 5, Interesting
    It turns out it was costing them more to bill the students for local and long distance than for the calls themselves.


    This feature of services shows up a lot -- where accounting for / metering the use of something makes up a significant (sometimes the significant) cost of a system. Mass transit is another example. Are there other, more efficient ways to pay for these "too cheap to meter" types of service? Tuition and taxes are one way.
    1. Re:"Too cheap to meter" by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      Mass transit??? Pushing people around costs a lot more than pushing packets, my friend. Most public transit systems get only a portion of their revenue from fees, and must also get support through the general tax fund (which is well worth the investment in reducing traffic and pollution).

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    2. Re:"Too cheap to meter" by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the cost associated with such services deters use. If a presently pay-per-ride mass transit system were made free, its costs would go up because there'd be more people using it.

      It's easier to roll phone service into tuition to save billing costs because very few college students choose not to use any phone service. Not quite such an easy sell with mass transit and taxes... I don't live within walking distance of a subway system where I sit.

    3. Re: "Too cheap to meter" by buelba · · Score: 1

      I agree with the parent post, but I don't really understand how long distance telco is too cheap to meter. My provider provides all long distance at 3.8 cents/minute, web billing with itemization, credit card required. In other words, it's gotten pretty cheap, and the metering has changed to get cheaper itself, but metering still works. And this company and its many competitors in the low-end LD market, presumably, wouldn't do this if they weren't making money.

      We all know Dartmouth is a very technically savvy place, so presumably they could duplicate these results. Or were they charging less per minute of talk? It seems to me that something's odd about the idea that LD telco is too cheap to meter. I applaud the idea of not metering it, which is great social policy for Dartmouth. But I don't really see how it can be an economic gain.

    4. Re:"Too cheap to meter" by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 1
      This feature of services shows up a lot -- where accounting for / metering the use of something makes up a significant (sometimes the significant) cost of a system.

      I just payed my last phone bill from EIU about a week ago, to Consolidated Communications actually, not the university. It was $0.21, and they actually bothered to send me a bill! It probably cost them $0.50 - $1.00 to send me the bill. Talk about stupid. It cost me $0.37 for the stamp + about $0.05 for the envelope + about $0.05 for the check.

    5. Re:"Too cheap to meter" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find that completely bullshit. I pay $25 a month for local phone service, and long distance is on top of that. Are they trying to say it was costing $25 to COLLECT the bill from someone? Sounds like a load.

    6. Re: "Too cheap to meter" by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      We all know Dartmouth is a very technically savvy place, so presumably they could duplicate these results. Or were they charging less per minute of talk? It seems to me that something's odd about the idea that LD telco is too cheap to meter. I applaud the idea of not metering it, which is great social policy for Dartmouth. But I don't really see how it can be an economic gain.

      They didn't say it was costing more to bill than they were taking in, they said (essentially) that billing was the highest cost. They were probably making a healthy profit. Especially if their rates were as high as what I've seen at most schools. I'd bet that the real reason they switched was due to the terms of some equipment or cash donation, since that's usually the only way to get a school to turn it's back on a revenue stream, even if that revenue stream isn't in the student's best interests.

    7. Re:"Too cheap to meter" by MisanthropicProggram · · Score: 1

      I hate that. I lived in an apartment complex here in ATL (Post) and they used a water sub-metering company - USI. USI has a "service" charge of $4.95 and the actual water costs were less than $3.00. Yes, I was paying more for their FScking Service charges than for the actual water. Their excuse was .."we're providing customer service." Yeah, right! You'd call up and wait for an hour to talk to them and then they would just say," Pay up or we're sending collections after you!"

      --

      There is no spoon or sig.

    8. Re: "Too cheap to meter" by FreeLinux · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There are two reasons at play here. The first reason is that thanks to VoIP the per minute cost is somewhere around 1 cent per minute and may be less. This is due to a combination of VoIP and volume discount contracts between Dartmouth and long distance carriers.

      In the case of normal carriers, their very large subscriber base can be easily used to spread out the cost of the call accounting system that they use for billing and they have no issues. However, Dartmouth's subscriber base is infinitely smaller. Also, Dartmouth is using Cisco's VoIP solution whose call manager and accounting system is less than stellar in quality and capability and more than outrageous in price.

      This results in a situation where it would cost Dartmouth much more to purchase and maintain the crappy accounting system than it would to give away the 1 cent per minute calls. Now, in the case of most companies this would not stop them from charging 25 cents or more per minute to cover the cost of the accounting system. But, it seems that someone at Dartmouth realized that long distance service is already available in that area for this price or less so no one would use their service and Cisco would not "underwrite" their lab. By giving the service away, it costs Dartmouth very little but, they get a high tech lab with all of the latest Cisco toys. It results in a win for Dartmouth, a win for Dartmouth students and a win for Cisco who will go around bragging about the thousands of stations that they have deployed, just like they do about all the other VoIP systems that they have given away. Ultimately, some PHB is going to fall for their sales pitch and actually pay them for their crappy system that actaully describes "Dial Tone" as a feature.

    9. Re:"Too cheap to meter" by jrumney · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most public transit gets support through taxation precisely because the cost of ticketing is so high. For an example of how it is being dealt with, witness how London Transport has recently declared that tickets must be bought from machines before you board buses in central London, and announced price freezes for prepay smart cards and long term passes (which have low collection costs per journey) for 2004, while increasing the cost of single journey fares by up to 25%.

    10. Re:"Too cheap to meter" by iabervon · · Score: 1

      If mass transit were actually too cheap to meter, the costs associated with the extra riders would be recovered due to not trying to charge either the existing customers or the new riders. For that matter, if you just don't add more trains, you'll limit the ridership due to crowding instead of cost.

      Mass transit is not actually too cheap to meter, because metering it is pretty cheap, and the constant costs of mass transit are relatively high. Mass transit is actually a different case, where the incremental costs are small compared to the constant cost. It doesn't cost the subway anything to take you from point A to point B, provided they don't run another train due to you. So the subway doesn't care about turnstile-jumpers so long as there aren't enough that paying riders notice or there is overcrowding.

    11. Re:"Too cheap to meter" by jrumney · · Score: 1

      You think that's bad? Last week I got a gas bill for -5.80. I'm waiting to see whether I get a reminder, or whether their system is smart enough to figure out I've got nothing to pay so they give me a negative prompt payment discount next month.

    12. Re:"Too cheap to meter" by dna_(c)(tm)(r) · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If a presently pay-per-ride mass transit system were made free

      Well, actually, in Belgium there is a city where public transport is free (yes, as in beer) for everybody. Or more correctly, everybody pays, regardless if they use it or not(payed for by taxes).

      The actual cost might have decreased, if you calculate private cost, increased tourism revenu, ... Might make an interesting case study to (dis)prove your point

    13. Re:"Too cheap to meter" by line.at.infinity · · Score: 1

      Although pushing packets are cheaper than pushing people, the internet would be much more expensive if ISPs tried to collect money each time you pushed a packet. Imagine how many bills that would add up to!

      As seen in Tokyo and New York, one way to cut costs is to switch away from tickets and tokens to reusable cards, and to replace people with machines for selling and collecting the tickets.

      As seen in Frankfurt and Prague, another way to cut costs is to not check people, but have the police check only a few and fine them when they don't have a pass.

    14. Re:"Too cheap to meter" by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Well, actually, in Belgium there is a city where public transport is free (yes, as in beer) for everybody. Or more correctly, everybody pays, regardless if they use it or not(payed for by taxes).

      Isn't this also the case in the center of Portland or Seattle? One of those rainy cities, anyway.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    15. Re:"Too cheap to meter" by aallan · · Score: 1

      Isn't this also the case in the center of Portland or Seattle? One of those rainy cities, anyway.

      Yes, there is a "free ride" area in Portland that covers most of the central city area.

      Al.
      --
      The Daily ACK - Eclectic posts by yet another hacker
  11. Bandwidth problem by MigrantHail · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We use VoIP at my work, and it works pretty well. The only problem we have is that sometime the thing just doesn't respond at first. You have to wait and re-try again later.

  12. VoIP DDoS by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    Get all your Dartmouth friends to call the Help Desk on their leet VoIP phones and yell "PING" repeatedly when the person answers.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:VoIP DDoS by cybermace5 · · Score: 0, Troll

      That's got to be the funniest thing I've read today. I actually snickered, which is saying a lot after 8 mindnumbing hours at work.

      --
      ...
    2. Re:VoIP DDoS by jehreg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wouldn't that be "IP over Voice", or IPoV ?

    3. Re:VoIP DDoS by sean23007 · · Score: 1

      Dartmouth people have friends? Just kidding. ;)

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
  13. But why Dartmouth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Because Dartmouth students talk a lot.

    Ba-dam PISSHHH! Thank you, I'll be here all week.

    1. Re:But why Dartmouth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ba-dam PISSHHH! Thank you, I'll be here all week.

      I'm leaving now then.

  14. Effect? by turbotalon · · Score: 4, Interesting
    "What will the success/failure of VoIP on this scale have on telecom?"

    Um, doesn't the telecom industry own much of the data backbone as well? When they quit making money from local service, they start making money on bandwidth.

    Some sort of universal agreement will have to be made with ISP's about badwidth usage so that 1) users can use VoIP all they want without bandwidth caps, and 2) Telecom companies have margin for profit.

    Perhaps per GB unmetered home access at resonable per GB rates?

    Just my $.02

    --

    I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy

    1. Re:Effect? by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When they quit making money from local service, they start making money on bandwidth.
      But that's losing a market with high margins and a high barrier to entry for competitors, while gaining a market with low margins and many competitors already in place.
      It will be a shift of revenue, but it's far from a zero-sum game.

      --

    2. Re:Effect? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "What will the success/failure of VoIP on this scale have on telecom?"

      Um, doesn't the telecom industry own much of the data backbone as well? When they quit making money from local service, they start making money on bandwidth.


      They make a LOT more money selling a retail toll-call voice connection to a consumer than they do from selling the equivalent amount of bandwidth wholesale to an ISP or backbone provider.

      A LOT.

      Like several orders of magnitude.

      Think about it: One phone call, WITHOUT compression, is 64k bps. Your 1.5 Mbps download DSL link is the equivalent of one side of 24 simultaneous calls to anywhere in the world, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Say you've only got 256k uplink: That's still 4 calls 24/7. Imagine what you'd be paying for THAT if it were retail long distance. What are you paying - retail - for your DSL? (And the tellcos are selling that wholesale to your ISP.)

      Assume it's only three orders of magnitude: That turns every billion dollars of revenue into a million. Yet it doesn't decrease their costs of operation enough to mention.

      Add in the fact that their profit is the DIFFERENCE between cost and revenue, and they aren't running anywhere near 10,000% return on investment, and you can see what a disaster it is for the telcoms.

      Then add in the fact that they haven't amortized (paid off) their current infrastructure - which had maybe a 30-year ammortization schedule - and you can see that they're caught between a rock and a hard place. Drop the prices, they can't pay the interest on their bonds. Bankruptcy.

      That is why the telecoms cut WAY back on buying new equipment for voice telephony - strangling or bankrupting a bunch of suppliers in the "telecom crash" - which is still underweigh. And why they're frantically trying to convert their networks to VoIP, before the upstarts eat them alive.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    3. Re:Effect? by turbotalon · · Score: 1
      First of all, I don't make 24/7 phone calls from my house, and I don't use 100% bandwidth all the time. If they were to truely charge for bandwidth, the more I used the DSL, the more expensive it would be, like making long-distance calls.

      The only difference is that with my phone line I could make 24/7 LOCAL calls and not be charged squat. Perhaps that would apply to bandwidth used to connect to servers within the network?

      --

      I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy

  15. Free? by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1
    The $50 headsets are being sold at the campus computer store. "But most headsets will work," said Bob Johnson, director of network services at Dartmouth. "It's just a question of what kind of voice quality you want."
    The article I read Also it seems that this software is windows only.
    1. Re:Free? by emkman · · Score: 1

      Whats the big deal about having to buy a headset? They aren't limiting your choice or saying you have to buy theirs.

      Your complaint is like a golf course offering free course usage and you complaining that you have to buy/rent clubs. Usually you pay for both.

      As for software choice, its 3rd party, out of dartmouths hands. And they are working on Pocket PC and Mac versions anyway.

      --
      Moderation Totals: Flamebait=2, Troll=1, Redundant=1, Insightful=6, Overrated=1, Underrated=1, Total=12. (not mine)
  16. What a slap in the face by immel · · Score: 1

    "...freshmen can download free software that allows their Windows computers to function as telephones..." Jeez. That's a real slap in the face to a lot of mac, linux, etc. users out there. Actually, I'm surprised that similar software isn't out for linux, too. Or maybe it is and the article doesn't mention it. Either way, was inserting the "W" word in there really neccessary?

    --

    10 Bits= $.25
    100 Bits= $.50
    110 Bits= $.75
    1000 Bits= 1 byte
    1. Re:What a slap in the face by immel · · Score: 1

      Dartmouth's computer store even reccommends MacOS for the students!

      --

      10 Bits= $.25
      100 Bits= $.50
      110 Bits= $.75
      1000 Bits= 1 byte
    2. Re:What a slap in the face by DoctorHoe · · Score: 1

      Linux has Gnomemeeting!

    3. Re:What a slap in the face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, their website shows that they are migrating to Windows and they recommend that incoming freshman go with a Windows PC.

    4. Re:What a slap in the face by normal_guy · · Score: 0

      If they're going to be using Cisco physical phones along with the softphones, it's undoubtedly compatible with most SIP-enabled software. The article is taking marketing copy and making it news.

      --

      Linux: Free if your time is worthless.
    5. Re:What a slap in the face by xadhoom · · Score: 2, Informative

      unfortunately, SIP isn't the 'preferred' protocol used by Cisco. Cisco mainly uses it's main protocol, called Skinny, aka SCCP . Softphones only works with Skinny. Only high end phones like 7940 or 7960 support SIP, but with a different firmware, not loaded by default. the other phones works only with sccp or h323. A good idea is to have gateways to support all VoIP protocols, so a linux (or mac) user could use software like gnomemeeting for h323 or kphone and linphone for SIP. As far as I know, there isn't a skinny client for linux. Only asterisk (an opensource pbx) seems to have a sccp channel driver, but is in beta stage.

      --
      I was there.
    6. Re:What a slap in the face by sketerpot · · Score: 1

      No, it wasn't. They probably just meant that Dartmouth was linking to Windows client software, and they never got around to including others because they want to annoy the rest of us.

    7. Re:What a slap in the face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out www.gnomemeeting.org and www.linuxjack.com for VOIP for Linux

    8. Re:What a slap in the face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      linuxjack.com, aka Quicknet.

      Just don't give them an e-mail address you intend to use for anything else. If you can, give them an entire subdomain that you can turn off in your DNS once the transaction is complete.

      Otherwise, you'll be on the receiving end of their spam engine. 5xx rejections do nothing. Filtering them at the IP layer does nothing, since they occasionally pick up new address space and keep on spewing, despite being blocked for months.

      Their cards are decent, but they need to be severely beaten with the clue stick. If you can find alternatives, try those first.

    9. Re:What a slap in the face by dsandras · · Score: 0

      You don't even need a Quicknet card in the configuration described in the announcement. A pure gnomemeeting with a soundcard should work without any problem. The quicknet card is needed only if you are using commercial PC-To-Phone services which require G.723.1 as codecs. But Cisco routers used at Dartmouth can be configured to accept other codecs, so that would perfectly work to use GnomeMeeting as softphone in their configuration (provided they are using H.323)

  17. Free calls? by NumLk · · Score: 1

    I couldn't find this info anywhere on the link from the college article, but does anyone know how much the hardware for these free calls costs? If it is much more than a typical phone, considering the low cost of long distance / wireless, it could very well never pay off to use the service.

    --
    Children in the backseats don't cause accidents. Accidents in the back seats cause children.
    1. Re:Free calls? by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      $50 USD if you get the official headsets.

      But any standard PC microphone/speaker combo will work

    2. Re:Free calls? by NumLk · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info. I guess that really isn't too unreasonable, considering any decent cell / wireless phone is going to cost at least that.

      --
      Children in the backseats don't cause accidents. Accidents in the back seats cause children.
  18. It's easier on a campus... by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In a college campus situation, a lot of calls are within the campus exchange itself where there's no need for routing it through the PTSN, and plenty of bandwidth available between the buildings.

    When it comes off-campus calls, a lot of those calls are long distance, which can head out over the university's huge bandwidth pipe to the Internet (or maybe even Internet2 or another academic-only network) to a more appropriate entry point into the PTSN to save long distance charges.

    The remainder are local calls which aren't too expensive anyway.

    So, it makes perfect since for schools to boot out the local phone monopoly and provide their own phone service to students. The only downside I see is the high costs of a VoIP phone, but once those start getting mass produced that should drop too.

  19. quality vs latency by jakedata · · Score: 5, Informative

    I played quite a bit with H.323 voip via 802.11b, and found that as the article states, it is possible to enjoy quality equal to or superior to a standard telephone call. I was using IP phones rather than the softphone package the students were given.

    The price for quality is latency. You need a fairly large buffer to compensate for wireless' retries. I was able to get it to work pretty well, but if the buffer was too large, it was reminiscent of a cell phone call with just enough delay to make you talk all over the other person.

    I settled on a 16 kb/s codec and a 250 ms buffer as a good balance between performance and sound quality, and I never had complaints on that front.

    -j

  20. Dear God! by jared_hanson · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh well, I guess the kids can just use modems over the VoIP lines.

    Yep, they can also use rabbit ears to pick up television even though cable is supplied for free.

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    1. Re:Dear God! by aceat64 · · Score: 0

      You get free cable? I had to go tap into my neihbor's to get free cable....uh not that I did....

  21. Why do they still have wired phones? by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 1

    I don't think anyone I know in our dorms has even bothered getting phone service hooked up - cellular is the way of the future...

    Tim

    --
    Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    1. Re:Why do they still have wired phones? by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      Maybe because cellular is more expensive, especially for those who make a lot of calls?

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
  22. Wow by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1

    Now there's a great idea! Seriously. When I first started out at college, I budgeted around $30/mth for myself in phone bills. That's right, $30/mth because I am from Ohio, and was attending school in Florida. The long distance charges calling a few friends cross-country and my family cross-country can add up QUICK! Especially for a freshman that's in a whole new environment. (Trust me, living amongst so many retiree's is like living amongst a bunch of retarded space-aliens, not that all old people act like retards, but a lot do tend to be rather crusty)

    Seriously, for a freshman to not have to pay the phone bill each month, it's DEFINITELY worth it to stay on campus! That's about 6 extra Papa-John's pizza's per month!

  23. "Free" by psyconaut · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, if I drop $30k/year in schooling costs at Dartmouth, I get free local and long distance calls? Wow. What a deal ;-)

    -psy

  24. Free phone service to students* by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Funny

    Free, with purchase of $150,000 degree program.

    1. Re:Free phone service to students* by jc42 · · Score: 1

      I also noticed that the article said the IP phones were only available to students with Windows computers. I wonder if a student had their own Mac or linux box and their own IP phone, would they be allowed to use the campus VoIP system? Or is part of their intent to make sure that every student has a Windows box?

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    2. Re:Free phone service to students* by theoddball · · Score: 1
      The college is still largely a Mac campus in the academic departments. Dartmouth cut a sweet discount with Apple in the early 80s, ad was the first school to require students to bring a computer--an Apple computer. The legacy of this is a far-above-average number of Macs around.

      If they aren't going to provide for non-Windows machines, they're going to have angry staff and administrators if they deploy this beyond the students...

  25. Re:stupid - yes. But whom? by The+Ancients · · Score: 3, Insightful
    How can you bemoan an advance like this, based upon students have extremely high data transfer needs.

    I don't want to get into the argument about whether these perceived 'needs' this is based upon are legal or not, but there are also other perspectives. This is surely a reasonable test of VoIP, which should be welcomed as a step forward along this technical path. Not only that, but sooner or later (I'll leave others to debate which this will be) the majority of us may very well have a need for concurrent high data transfer and VoIP capabilities. Would you prefer this technology was further refined in a suitable environment (due to technical, physical, and informational resources) such as this, or not at all?

  26. Re:Free long distance? For college freshmen? by syphax · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dude, if your girlfriend goes to Dartmouth, consider yourself dumped.

    - Class of '94

    --
    Simple Unexpected Concrete Credible Emotional Stories
  27. VOIP question by zymano · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember there used to be alot of free internet phone VOIP services on the internet but they have all died out and are now charging money. But my question is how do you get your internet call over regular phone lines ? How is it done ?

    1. Re:VOIP question by FreeLinux · · Score: 2, Informative

      These should help you;

      Vonage
      Net2Phone
      Quicknet

  28. JESUS, another "Umm..." Post. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Learn to FUCKING talk.

  29. Voip phones, the downside by Olin+06 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Olin College has done a similar deal with their students for the past year, but it ended up turning out abysmally. All phones on campus are VoIP phones, but the cost of the hardware is prohibitively expensive. Using the computer software would be great, except for the fact that here, laptops are standard, meaning they run out of batteries, move from place to place, and the like, making it not an expecially palatable idea. In practice students have overwhelmingly given up land-lines for cell phones with no long-distance, no roaming, satisfying all phone needs.

  30. Power Outage by rf0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But will it work if there is a power outage and you have to call 911?

    Rus

    1. Re:Power Outage by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      If power is out on a major college's campus, police and fire respond automatically anyway. Besides, most colleges have their own backup power systems aside from the main grid.

    2. Re:Power Outage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? They didn't do that here last week when Isabel knocked out the juice. Police and fire had their hands full with real problems.

      Solution: most kids already have cell phones anyways. This just saves them some minutes.

    3. Re:Power Outage by afidel · · Score: 1

      Sure, power the phones with PoE and keep the switching gear on UPS's and/or generators. That's basically how the POTS or PBX systems work anyways, your phone is powered by the voltage supplied from the central office or PBX switch. VoIP phones do suck about 4x as much power as dumb phones but so what?

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:Power Outage by narftrek · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I can't figure out if this is a troll or a legitimate question. Every time someone posts a story about VOIP phones someone just has to point this out. The same answer applies each time. NO. You have to run a UPS. Why is that hard to comprehend? VOIP is not a replacement for standard telephony-it's an alternative. A better one in my book. If it ran just like the phone service how would it be better? It's like the Linux\Windows debates. Linux doesn't have to be just like Windows to be successful on the desktop-it just has to work. VOIP works. Not exactly like the Bells but good enough.

      Maybe some slashdotter out there should start another stupid beowulf cluster/soviet russia/I for one jokes with this damned tired VOIP question. IE:

      HEADLINE: AMD launches new Athlon 64 CPU.

      "/.er": Yeah but will it work during a power outage and you need to dial 911?

      See how that works? Just as retarded as those other worn out jokes.

      Oh and BTW I for one welcome our new VOIP overlords.

    5. Re:Power Outage by cmj · · Score: 1

      Yes - "Backup generators have been installed as part of the upgrade, ensuring that network service will never be compromised and 911 service will continue to function in an emergency."

      But that would have required you to actually READ the linked articles before posting.

  31. Genius by silentbozo · · Score: 1

    I think that setting up VoIP in lieu of a traditional campus-based PSTN is genius. You consolidate your switching structure (everything ends up as ethernet packets), you enable cheap long-distance (these are college students, they're going to call home), and extremely scalable local communications (build a new dorm, put in cat-5 and hook them up to the campus backbone.)

    The only problems I see are possible quality of service issues if the network is saturated with traffic... like that generated from filesharing.

  32. slightly offtopic by the+idoru · · Score: 2, Interesting

    how do you all pronounce VoIP?

    cause i say it as one word, kind of like poi (the food) but with a P at the end and a V instead of a P at the front. am i insane for doing this?

    course i pronounce gnu as "new" but that's just my own heresy.

    1. Re:slightly offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gnu is pronounced new. It's an animal.

      I pronounce VoIP "voice over internet", or Vee Oh Eye Pee. I hate lame ass buzzword/acronyms. If someone said "voypuh" to me I'd probably kick him in the nuts.

      I also pronounce SQL "Ess Cue Ell", not sequel or squeal.

    2. Re:slightly offtopic by normal_guy · · Score: 0

      I prefer VUH-OY-P, one syllable.

      --

      Linux: Free if your time is worthless.
    3. Re:slightly offtopic by generic-man · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apparently you've never seen teen girl squad (Flash required). The only way to pronounce "VoIP" is exactly as you have it: "voyp!"

      --
      For more information, click here.
    4. Re:slightly offtopic by dsnail2000 · · Score: 1
      Naw... every geek I know in Northern VA looks at the acronym and says it as "V over IP"

      and UUNET is headquartered only 10 miles from where I live.. i know a lot of networking geeks that work with VoIP on a daily basis...

      --
      ControlBooth.com
      Technical Theater Made Easy!
    5. Re:slightly offtopic by kidgenius · · Score: 1

      lol...pronouncing "gnu" as "new" is actually the correct way to say it. I was talking to someone who was saying "guh-new" and i was like "I believe it's 'new'". He said "Nope, 'guh-new' like the animal." If you check websters....it's pronounce "new"

    6. Re:slightly offtopic by the+idoru · · Score: 1

      pronouncing "gnu" as "new" is actually the correct way to say it.

      oh good. i've always been under the impression that gnu was *supposed* to be pronounced with a hard G and that i was committing geek heresy for refusing to do so because it sounded so stupid. the below post mentions gnumeric, a good example of why gnu with the hard G is so dumb. up til now, though, i've just considered myself lucky not to run into a grammar nazi geek who would ridicule me for my "new" pronunciation. but now i have at least 2 /. posts to back me up. woot!

    7. Re:slightly offtopic by generic-man · · Score: 1

      GNU's home page recommends that you say it "guh-new." To me, that makes sense: saying "new software" sounds confusing.

      Now if they could do away with the semantic arguments (free, Free, gratis, libre, free-as-in-whatever, GNU/Everything) then we'd be all set. :)

      --
      For more information, click here.
  33. The billing cost more than the calls. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Boy, I wish they would put that up in big bold letters right on the front page of the New York Times. When I've suggested this in the past, people have called me all kinds of nasty things.
    This is a very interesting point because seems to put the lie to the myth that markets of for-profit enterprises are always efficient and state run enterprises are always inefficient. It's beauracracy that's inefficient. And as this story shows, profit and income itself can actually create inefficient beauracracy. Whether an instituion is privatized and for profit or government operated is not the important point.
    A privatized telephone network that is charging most of its fees just to support its billing infrastructure is in no way more efficient than a state run telecom that gives away telecoms service.
    Maybe that's why I get my 1.5meg DSL for twenty bucks a month with free local phone service here in Taiwan where our biggest ISP is the government.
    Just remember kids, regime change begins at home.

    1. Re:The billing cost more than the calls. by ahfoo · · Score: 1

      Ouch! Hey, that wasn't supposed to be AC. That was me. I posted it. Go ahead call me a commie. I don't care. I'm so far left I'm on the far right too.

    2. Re:The billing cost more than the calls. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not simply being "for-profit" that makes for efficient use; it is having competition in the marketplace that make people do better.

    3. Re:The billing cost more than the calls. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Maybe that's why I get my 1.5meg DSL for twenty bucks a month with free local phone service here in Taiwan where our biggest ISP is the government."

      Or maybe it is because your entire country could fit into a Wal-Mart parking lot here in the U.S.

    4. Re:The billing cost more than the calls. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could you give us some more details about how the competition works in this cash free no profit market.
      How do you prove you "kicked ass" and beat everybody up when there's no score.

  34. so when your computer crashes... by aberson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    this is absurd... any voip solution needs to NOT be based on a computer with a headset, and needs to be based on a standalone handset solution as the PRIMARY means, perhaps with the computer as an option...

    I can't reboot or turn off my computer while talking on the phone? what if i'm calling for tech support (I know, I know).

    What if there's a blackout? Better be all UPS'd out.

    I can understand the whole billing probelem tho... when I went to college they farmed out the billing and plenty of students just didn't receive bills from this ultra-shady 3rd party billing company.

  35. Free? by stratjakt · · Score: 1, Funny

    Free as in buried in the dorm fees, which go up year by year.

    It's neat and all, but dorm fees are so fucking high you'd expect a butler to serve you filet mignon on a silver platter every night.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  36. Re:stupid - #645464 by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

    oh, i think boromir may have fancied himself the future king of gondor more than once...

  37. Umm...another Jesus Post. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm...WWJD?

    1. Re:Umm...another Jesus Post. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm... We Want Jelly Doughnuts?

  38. POTS vs. VoIP? Who cares? by retro128 · · Score: 1

    I've always been fascinated by the VoIP vs. POTS argument. I doubt the telecoms will lose money in the switch...After all, who owns all of the underground cable? If everything switches to VoIP, the only difference is that more data capacity will be needed as opposed to voice capacity. Not only that, VoIP is the Wild West compared to POTS, which is regulated to hell and back. In a VoIP house, the telecoms kick back, take their money, and only worry about the customers having a solid data connection from the main office to whatever endpoint the connection is going to. After that, quality of service issues are strictly in the hands of the customer.

    This makes it even easier for the telecoms to tell you "it's not our problem". If I were them, I'd be pretty happy about the popularization of VoIP.

    --
    -R
    1. Re:POTS vs. VoIP? Who cares? by afidel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In a VoIP house, the telecoms kick back, take their money, and only worry about the customers having a solid data connection from the main office to whatever endpoint the connection is going to.

      That's basically all they do for any major customer. With a PBX system they just provide the T-1 circuit and setup the billing codes, everything else is automated. Basically you can get voice grade SLA's on your data lines, hell our SLA's were better than regulated voice line standards, we always had a telecom engineer out the same day, regulation is 2 days.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:POTS vs. VoIP? Who cares? by retro128 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Technically the T1 you are talking about is a voice circuit. I guess it was a mistake for me to reference POTS instead of voice circuits in my original post, but here's my point: At my company we do it both ways. We have a PRI for voice and a separate Internet feed from Qwest via a T1 point to point link though Verizon. I have some telecommuters on DSL endpoints with Nortel VoIP phones hooked into our network though IPSec tunnels. If those telecommuters are getting crappy voice service, who are they going to call? Me. If I call Verizon and tell them, "hey, my VoIP phones are cutting out, what's the deal?", they will first laugh at me, and then proceed to tell me that the T1 line to Qwest is in perfect condition and it's not their problem.

      If there's a problem with the PRI on the other hand, it's all about them getting it fixed. Now. Whether the problem is with the PRI itself or with the voice circuits. And they have to jump though hoops until the problem is fixed.

      So you see, my point is that VoIP takes a load of responsibility off the telecom's shoulders. All they have to worry about is the phyical connection. Everything else? Your problem.

      --
      -R
  39. Voice Spam by amplt1337 · · Score: 0

    So... if you get a telemarketer call over a VoIP network, does it fall under the control of anti-spam legislation?

    --
    Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
    1. Re:Voice Spam by infonick · · Score: 1

      na, when a telemarketer calls you whill your using free VoIP, you simply let them talk to you, and if your not interested, you inform him/her that your computer currently has 516days uptime, and that you will not hang up.

      (for thoughs of you who dont know, telemarketers arnt allowed to hang up untill you do.)

      --

      You are confusing me with someone who cares.
  40. user interface by line.at.infinity · · Score: 2, Interesting

    From the NYT article:

    When running, the software appears on the screen as a phone with a dial pad. Phone numbers are dialed by clicking the numbers on the key pad.

    I doubt many people would be so afraid of keyboards that they'd rather use a mouse! I'm guessing that there'd also be a feature where you type or click on a nickname from your personal address book to make a call. I can see softphone in the future working with fake urls, sort of like those aim:// urls that Aim has.

  41. Re:Free long distance? For college freshmen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, if your girlfriend goes to Dartmouth, consider yourself dumped.


    If your girlfriend goes to Dartmouth, chances are excellent that she wasn't exactly a severe hottie to begin with. Raise your standards and consider yourself lucky.

    --Class of '03

  42. Dartmouth Phone System by querencia · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here may be the reason why they're doing it:

    When I was at Dartmouth (Class of '94), everybody on campus knew that if you did the following:

    1. Dial 1 and the area code
    2. Click the receiver once
    3. Dial the rest of the number

    you got free long distance calls. I had a roommate with a girlfriend in Spain, and he figured out how to do it for long distance.

    If that still works, I bet nobody at Dartmouth will be using VoIP.

    1. Re:Dartmouth Phone System by Dolohov · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, I don't think it does. Not from my lab, at least.

  43. Damn US-centric slashcode by jrumney · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why does slashcode filter out pound and euro signs, but leave the far more dangerous environment variable tag intact?

    1. Re:Damn US-centric slashcode by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 1

      Don't feel too bad, it also ignores ¢, otherwise I would have used it instead of $0.xx. Speaking of which, does the euro symbol go before or after the number?

  44. Continuing the BASIC tradition by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 5, Interesting

    But why Dartmouth?

    Because Dartmouth students talk a lot.


    But seriously...

    Dartmouth has quite a tradition of making hi-tek utilities free to their students. In particular:

    Back in the bad old days of computing "a computer" was a room full of million-buck grey boxes attended by white-coated priests with PhDs. Any user who was not a member of the priesthood (and some who were) was billed by the second for its use and had to hand in his job at the window as a deck of punched cards, coming back hours later for the printed and maybe punched results.

    An invention was made in these days: "Time Sharing". (A computer running a multitasking OS that in turn runs multiple copies of a command language processor, each copy serving a separate, directly-connected user. Think "dialup shell account".)

    At first it was limited to fancy directly-connected terminals. Then a relatively cheap multple-teletype interface was invented to use the relatively-cheap TWX machines as terminals. Mechanical Teletype (r) machines, typically running 110 baud 8-bit ASCII. And a few, expensive, "Dataphone" modems could be used to allow remote teletypes to dial in over the TWX network.

    But CPU time was still billed by the second, as was connect time on the expensive dialup lines or the less expensive directly-connected terminals.

    But then the regents of Dartmouth U got a bee in their bonnet: They were a University. A University was SUPPOSED to be in business to teach students. So this resouce should be available to The Students.

    Not just students taking a computer class. Not just grad students on a special, sponsored, project. ALL the students. ALL the time. NO bills.

    So Dartmouth put in a bunch of Teletypes, all over campus. And wired them to the Computing Center. And gave EVERY student an account. Even entering freshmen. All of 'em. CPU time, disk storage, the whole shebang.

    And because they couldn't afford the manpower to babysit the entire student body they invented a very easy-to-teach interpreted computer language, with a built-in, simple, text-file editor. And wrote manuals and lessons that could be read (and run) on-line.

    You've probably heard of it.

    It was called BASIC.

    A fellow named Gates got his start in the industry by porting it to the Altair - the first home computer.

    So it doesn't surprise me AT ALL, now that voice telephony is becoming a "marginal good" (i.e. "too cheap to meter", like electirc elevators without ticket-takers or coin slots) that Dartmouth should be the first institution to make it available to their people without an extra fee.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:Continuing the BASIC tradition by stevesliva · · Score: 1
      But then the regents of Dartmouth U got a bee in their bonnet: They were a University. A University was SUPPOSED to be in business to teach students. So this resouce should be available to The Students.
      That's Dartmouth College! Retaining "College" in the name of the institution reflects the College's focus on undergraduate teaching, despite meeting all definitions of a University.

      Well, that, and the small fact that back in 1815 the state of New Hampshire tried to make the private Dartmouth College a public Dartmouth University in the Trustees of Dartmouth College vs Woodward Supreme Court case.

      "It is, Sir, as I have said, a small college. And yet there are those who love it!" - Daniel Webster

      --
      Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
    2. Re:Continuing the BASIC tradition by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      But then the regents of Dartmouth U got a bee in their bonnet: They were a University. A University was SUPPOSED to be in business to teach students. So this resouce should be available to The Students.

      That's Dartmouth College! Retaining "College" in the name of the institution reflects the College's focus on undergraduate teaching, despite meeting all definitions of a University.


      I stand corrected. B-)

      And that focus on giving undergraduates a good education fits right in with both the Dartmouth BASIC timesharing program and the current free-VoIP move. It's great to see such traditions upheld!

      (I was unaware of the distinction because I wasn't a Dartmouth student myself. But I have fond memories of Dartmouth Basic - on which I cut my programming teeth {somewhat unofficially} by late-night long distance from Ann Arbor back in '64-'65 - before I could get into a programming class and get access to the local machines.)

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  45. Bandwidth != bandwidth by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Games need bandwidth, not global bandwidth. This bandwidth can be provided by a LAN with 100BASE-TX switches to a gigabit backbone. Besides, some university IT departments (such as Rose-Hulman's) already have AUPs that ban connecting to an off-campus game server or opening a game server to off-campus connections without express written consent, granted only in cases where students are developing the game for a grade.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Bandwidth != bandwidth by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 1

      You realize that games are generally made to use as little bandwidth as possible? If I had to guess I'd say you'd get more bandwidth saved by banning porn...

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
  46. A little more on John Kemeny by kupci · · Score: 1

    Kemenywas a Hungarian by birth, mathematician and co-inventor (with Thomas Kurz) of the BASIC language.

  47. TWX? Isn't that Time Warner? by yerricde · · Score: 1

    dial in over the TWX network.

    Wasn't TWX called AOL until a few days ago? Was the TWX network a remote ancestor of Q-Link, the service that became America Online?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:TWX? Isn't that Time Warner? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      dial in over the TWX network.

      Wasn't TWX called AOL until a few days ago? Was the TWX network a remote ancestor of Q-Link, the service that became America Online?


      Nope. No relation to Time Warner (whatever the X was for).

      TWX was the TypeWriter eXchange. AT&T's answer to Western Union's Telex exchange back in the days of monopoly regulation on wired communication.

      Both were mechanical Teletype (r) machines with built-in 110-baud FSK modems. (And they were the same FSK modem standard that is still used for 110 and 300 baud compatability modes today.)

      The TWX used the same infrastructure as the AT&T telephone network. (Even the dials/touchtone pads/card autodialers/6-button control selectors installed in the Teletype were manufactured by Western Electric - the Bell System wholly-owned manufacturing arm.) But it was regulated differently.

      In particular: Every call (even local) was a toll call. Bummer!

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    2. Re:TWX? Isn't that Time Warner? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      The TWX used the same infrastructure as the AT&T telephone network. But it was regulated differently. ... In particular: Every call (even local) was a toll call. Bummer!

      Oops: Turns out there were two versions. Here is a writeup from the Phrack archives (1989!) on the history of the TWX network.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  48. This lets you go after advertisers. Maybe Pfizer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This lets a recipient go after advertisers, not just senders of spam. From the preamble to the new law:
    • There is a need to regulate the advertisers who use spam, as well as the actual spammers, because the actual spammers can be difficult to track down due to some return addresses that show up on the display as "unknown" and many others being obvious fakes and they are often located offshore.

      The true beneficiaries of spam are the advertisers who benefit from the marketing derived from the advertisements.

    Courts will have to untangle who the "advertiser" is in ambiguous cases. Sometimes it's unambiguous (Sony Style, Target).

    A more questionable case would be a multibillion dollar suit against Pfizer (makers of Viagra). Pfitzer might lose such a suit, too. All it takes is someone who can prove that a Pfizer sales rep provided a Viagra spammer with some promotional consideration. Clearly, Pfizer profits from Viagra spam. Now it's time for them to pay. Start looking for that smoking gun now.

  49. GNU pronunciation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gnu is pronounced new. It's an animal.

    GNU != Gnu. Gnu, the animal, may be "NOO", but GNU, the operating system, is pronounced "g'NOO".

    1. Re:GNU pronunciation by kidgenius · · Score: 1

      I believe ur wrong...otherwise "gnumeric" as in one of the gnome calculators would be pronounce "guh-numeric" instead of "numeric" where the latter would make much more sense.

  50. Re:Non-NYT link NEW AND IMPROVED AND CLICKABLE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    click


    Was it that hard?

  51. SBC responds to IP Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SBC has been calling small business customers telling them that they will match any rates offerred by Vonage http://www.vonage.com/, one of the leading IP phone providers

  52. Re:No Registration Link - It's a USB phone by icenine4u · · Score: 1

    It's a Clarisys USB phone. They work nicely with the Cisco softphone. http://www.clarisys.net/

  53. yep by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 3, Funny

    I just spent a ghetto-riffic weekend in New Hampshire and was amazed to find that I could only get a GSM signal on my ATT Wireless phone within about 2 miles of the Manchester airport.

    Fortunately, they do have electricity in New Hampshire, so I was able to do some offline work on my powerbook...

    1. Re:yep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work at Dartmouth and my cellphone works fine (US Cellular). It is true that there's 802.11 coverage nearly everywhere, indoors and out. But what's funny is that our floor just got new hard lines and we were told that we have the first 100-T ethernet on the whole campus! Wacky.

    2. Re:yep by zlexiss · · Score: 1

      The engineering school has been wired with 100Mbit since about '97..

  54. Well this is a case of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    discarding the fact that the NYT published this article. FUCK the NYT. New Yarc is not the center of the universe.

  55. Re:No Registration Link - It's a USB phone by Gortbusters.org · · Score: 2, Informative

    Also happens to be a member of the Avaya developer program, an excellent way to benefit if you want to develop VOIP applications!

    --
    --------
    Free your mind.
  56. re: Without an extra fee... by GreenKiwi · · Score: 1

    So it doesn't surprise me AT ALL, now that voice telephony is becoming a "marginal good" (i.e. "too cheap to meter", like electirc elevators without ticket-takers or coin slots) that Dartmouth should be the first institution to make it available to their people without an extra fee.

    Yeah, pay $36,000 a year and we'll let you talk on the phone for free.

  57. old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the phone in my dorm room has said 3com on it for the past 2 years, my little 10k/yr school is on the cutting edge.

  58. No fanboys here by nsample · · Score: 3, Insightful


    "Separation of concerns" should sink VoIP.

    We have a nice VoIP system in the CS building at Stanford. When routers dump, people now lose the ability to work on their machines and to use the phones. It's an amazing thing to see productivity drop off so dramatically all at once. It used to be that when the power went out, for instance, and it was still light outside, people just shifted gears. They caught up on phone calls, returned voicemails, etc. Now, the world shuts down.

    VoIP would be a great idea if it *didn't* utilize the same networks and have the same power requirements of those same networks. I rue the day I lost my hard PSTN land line. (And I love my cell phone... I'm not speaking as a luddite.)

    Putting all your eggs in one basket may be cheaper, and it may be more efficient for a while, but it sure does suck to lose all services to the next blaster worm to come along...

    1. Re:No fanboys here by NoseSocks · · Score: 1

      VoIP should only be utilized if it can guarantee the same quality of service that a PBX can. Other than the local switch that the (IP) phone is connected to, there should not be any other single point of failure. If you paid a consultant/student to setup a VoIP solution that did not include fully redundant routers, servers and gateways to connect to the PSTN world, then the fault is not with the technology but with the people who installed said solution.

      For more reference on the reliability of a VoIP solution:
      The Five Nines Story

    2. Re:No fanboys here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CISCO did the consulting, installation, and roll-out.

  59. Dartmouth ROCKS!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dartmouth ROCKS!!!

  60. Not using standalone VoIP phones. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    The only downside I see is the high costs of a VoIP phone, but once those start getting mass produced that should drop too.

    They're not using standalone VoIP phones. They're using a VoIP softphone application on the students' (already required) PCs, with a headset plugged into the sound card.

    Buy the "standard" headset for $50 at the campus store or use any old PC headset you've got kicking around for zero added hardware/software cost.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  61. Has anyone tried... by marko123 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... to connect an acoustic coupler modem to a VOIP connection for 300 baud nostalgia?

    --
    http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
  62. Re:Free long distance? For college freshmen? by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
    Dude, if your girlfriend goes to Dartmouth, consider yourself dumped.

    +1, Funny.

    --
    "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  63. WiFi access in places like Starbucks by gsfprez · · Score: 1

    this is obviously another location where it costs more money for T-Mobile to meter the usage than it does for each Starbucks to install a $50/month DSL connection and a $300 (Cisco, strong and stable, not a POS linksys) base station.

    i would spend money hand over fist if i could go to starbucks and surf. in fact, Starbucks LOSES money from me because i have broadband at home - and don't want to pay for it twice. I often find myself too interested in doing something online than to go up the street and keep on working on it there - which would be no problem at all.

    well, the only problem for Starbucks is that i'm not there buying $.10 of coffee for $4

    --
    guns kill people like spoons make Rosie O'Donnell fat.
  64. I'll never... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll never subscribe to NYT. I could handle ads, popups, whatever. But this is the 500th. time they get me in their "free reg" trap. What a bunch of lousy losers! I hope they make lots and lots of money so as not to need mine, because they shall not have it.

    And, no, I won't use any subterfuges to read the articles without registering. If they want to force me to register, they'll discover they cannot.

    And this is good for you, too, Eugenia. Go tell your husband to behave, ok?

  65. Re:Non-NYT link NEW AND IMPROVED AND CLICKABLE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who modded this down? At the least it deserved it's original 1. I found it usefull.

  66. Re:so when your computer crashes... by Dolohov · · Score: 1

    But the thing is, everyone here carries laptops anyway. We check our email fanatically from everywhere on campus, and often during class. (Unless my advisor's reading this, in which case I don't)

    The rebooting question is tough; I haven't seen that yet. But then, cell phone reception up here is pretty good these days, and there are still POTS phones all over the place for those occasions -- which answers your blackout question too. Of course, this means that we can't go entirely over to VoIP, but I don't think that's really being planned anyway.

  67. Ughh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've been raising tuition ever since I got here three years ago they might as well give us something for free. They have enough money saved up that they don't even need to charge us for tuition but they do anyhow. Oh, and they're going to start charging for printing: http://www.dartmouth.edu/comp/news/stories_2003/gr eenprint_quotas.html
    I have more use for free printing than free VoIP or long distance since I've already paid for a freaking phone card and almost everyone else has a cell phone, so frankly, I'm not amused.

    -Disgruntled Dartmouth Senior

  68. Like this is new. by blizatrex · · Score: 1

    Cmon. Walmart has been using this for store to store calls for years. From any stor in the world you can call any other walmart or sams club store.

    --
    "We can dance if we want to, we can leave your friends behind. Cause your friends don't dance and if they don't dance.
  69. Re:This lets you go after advertisers. Maybe Pfize by phorm · · Score: 1

    Except that if you've noticed, viagara is a buzzword more than a product name on the internet... with many companies peddling "herbal viagara" or "safe healthy viagara alternative" etc etc. Basically it's easier to substitute viagara with pill-to-make-yer-weenie-go-boing or an obscure scientific term (although erection enhancer isn't too bad), but that doesn't mean many of these spammers are selling the Pfizer pill (or for that matter, that the products being sold even work, which many don't overly well)

  70. VoIP at Dartmouth ??!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Sigh, I go to Dartmouth and I just found out about this off Slashdot.

    Something is very wrong about that :-)

  71. Re:so when your computer crashes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would hope that at least one company has enough of a clue to put POTS service on one of the unused pairs, much like the way power over Ethernet works. If the network goes down or the power goes out, then your normally-VoIP phone turns into a POTS device.

    Obviously this doesn't work for the situation in the story where people are using real computers, but consider the case where people have these newfangled phones on their desks. They shouldn't be cut off from emergency services just because the local power is out.

    This will all have to be figured out and nailed down before the local loop ever budges from POTS.

  72. I work at the Dartmouth Help Desk by theoddball · · Score: 1

    You insensitive clod! My ears, they bleed!

  73. Re:Free long distance? For college freshmen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if she goes to RPI?

  74. Re:first they get free WAREZ, now they even get... by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

    Wow. Just found this post while doing metamod... I don't wanna metamod it as 'Troll,' but there's no 'Incoherent' option. Pity, that.

    --

    Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?