Slashdot Mirror


The Weak Signal Challenge - Decode and Win $100

superid writes "Several years ago while reading comp.dsp I found a link to The Weak Signal Challenge. On that page is a .wav file of a morse code signal bounced off the moon. The page author Mike Cook is offering $100 to the next person to successfully decode the morse code. Since I was the one who originally solved this, I promised Mike that I wouldn't divulge the answer or provide any clues. I can say thought that I didn't use anything special other than traditional signal processing techniques, octave, matlab, and patience. I think that overall I spent about 24 hours total sitting at my '486. I think it would be great to generate some interest in this. Maybe someone could come up with a novel solution and win $100!"

214 comments

  1. Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm there.

    1. Re:Sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "One...small post....for AC...


      One big...troll...for...CmdrTaco..."

  2. The code is... by AtOMiCNebula · · Score: 0, Redundant

    "Sorry, too late." [ducks]

  3. shut up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shut up

  4. Re:fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you mean "SP"? YOU FAIL IT!

  5. Partial translation by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 5, Funny

    It starts out, "ALL YOUR BA--"

    I'll finish up translating the rest tomorrow.

    --

    How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    1. Re:Partial translation by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      It starts out, "ALL YOUR BA--"....I'll finish up translating the rest tomorrow.

      The complete message is: "ALL YOUR BAD JOKES GET YOU MODDED DOWN".

    2. Re:Partial translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod sibling down

    3. Re:Partial translation by kurosawdust · · Score: 4, Funny
      "Be...sure...to...drink...your....Ovaltine?!?"

      Cripes! It's a crummy commercial!

    4. Re:Partial translation by kesteloot · · Score: 1

      It starts out, "ALL YOUR BA--"....I'll finish up translating the rest tomorrow. The complete message is: "ALL YOUR BASES BELONG TO SCO!"

    5. Re:Partial translation by Dorothy+86 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I, for one, welcome our new bad joke overlords.

    6. Re:Partial translation by rootofevil · · Score: 1

      in soviet russia, bad joke mods down you!

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    7. Re:Partial translation by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome our new bad joke overlords.

      You with Jay Leno cult?

    8. Re:Partial translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent up

    9. Re:Partial translation by rarkm · · Score: 1

      My translation is:
      "All your base are belong to us...You have no chance to survive, make your time."

      Where do I collect my $100?

      --
      [Insert pretentious and semi-clever sig here: ______ ]
  6. The joke's on you, Gary. by xenoweeno · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is nothing more than a recording of a McDonald's drive-through speaker.

  7. Contract rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Man $100 for 24 hrs of work? Is that even minimum wage?

    - Moomin

    1. Re:Contract rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you are an asshole? $4.16, eh? I bet you
      just took that calculator out of your stinkin
      hole.

      - Moomin

    2. Re:Contract rate by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      No, but if he sells the solution to someone for $50 more it will be.

    3. Re:Contract rate by code_echelon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You asked thought I would help you out. By the way that post was not off topic it was answering your question perfectly.

      Heres your original post: "Man $100 for 24 hrs of work? Is that even minimum wage?"

      And in my post you see: "No, its not minimum wage its about $4.16 an hour."

      If your gonna ask a question do you not want the answer?

    4. Re:Contract rate by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

      actually, in the us that's not half bad.

      I bet some hungry code monkeys will rush to the challenge

      we don't have no stinking communist unions over here you know

      --
      How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    5. Re:Contract rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What country? Here in the U.S. the minimum is $5.15.

    6. Re:Contract rate by Second+Vampyre · · Score: 0

      You're -> You are
      Your -> Belonging to you

      Thought I would help you out.

  8. $100??!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    sorry, i don't work that cheaply.

    1. Re:$100??!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No - but I bet your sister does ....

    2. Re:$100??!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be confused, thats his mom.

    3. Re:$100??!! by nyseal · · Score: 1

      I thought all Linux geeks work for free

      --
      [SIG] Remember Mattel handheld games?
    4. Re:$100??!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and your dad!

    5. Re:$100??!! by terminal.dk · · Score: 1

      $100 for 24 hours on a 486.

      Let us assume it is a 66MHz machine. Let us also assume your machine today is a slow 2GHz model. Then 2000/66 = 30. So your machine is 30x faster.

      24 hours / 30 = 0.8 hours. $100 / 0.8 hours = $125/hours. This is probably OK for some unemployed geek, and is way over my hourly salary working as an employee.

    6. Re:$100??!! by Sayan · · Score: 1
      Present: Outsource it to India... hire 10 Indian PhDs and pocket the remaining $90.

      After 2 years: 2 of the PhDs have discovered a new way to do signal processing and earn $10 million from it. While you have spent your $90 on a video game and beer :)

      Disclaimer: My being Indian has not biased this response.

      --
      resurrect my .sig
  9. I like the moon by fsandford · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Re:I like the moon by code_echelon · · Score: 1

      That was truly mind bending. I don't know where that came from but its pretty funny.

    2. Re:I like the moon by ryanw · · Score: 1

      Now, dude, you weren't supposed to post the link to the answer of the encrypted message.

    3. Re:I like the moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for those of us who are Flash-impaired, what the hell does it say?

    4. Re:I like the moon by ross.w · · Score: 1

      To think I actually installed the flashplayer on Mozilla so I could see this.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    5. Re:I like the moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a very bizarre song played to some animated somethings. One is playing a guitar, the other is riding around on a small moon. The song is, as I said, quit bizarre, and the demented animated creatures only add to the humor (what there is of it).

      It's not likely something just anyone is going to find amusing. For some odd reason it amused me, and several people I know, but it's not one of those things I can explain. It's something you'll have to see. (Like the skeletons doing the YMCA in Japanese, or Gonads and Strife... it shouldn't be funny but for some odd reason, it is.)

    6. Re:I like the moon by KingAdrock · · Score: 1

      Spase Peepole inhabit the moon.

  10. Easy money by calcifer · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I think that overall I spent about 24 hours total sitting at my '486." With my Intel Pentium II processor, with the power to make the internet come alive, i should be able to complete the problem in one tenth the time of your 486! and since this is multimedia, my MMX processor should really speed things up!

    1. Re:Easy money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "and since this is multimedia, my MMX processor should really speed things up! "

      Yeah, but it's the internet, so an Intel chip would make the internet go 3 times faster! Oh, what to choose...

    2. Re:Easy money by gantrep · · Score: 1

      WTF are you talking about? MMX is an Intel buzzword.

    3. Re:Easy money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's more than a buzzword though, there are some instructions that assembly programmers can use. If they don't mind breaking compatability with older x86 CPUs, heh.

  11. Code Broke by CherniyVolk · · Score: 5, Funny


    "This should send the guys at SETI on a wild goose chase."

    1. Re:Code Broke by c_oflynn · · Score: 3, Informative

      BTW, on the page it DOES mention that the code is a call-sign, so for people suggesting that its some odd thing ("Eat at Joe's", etc)... RTFA (unless its slashdotted).

  12. motivation? by mlush · · Score: 2

    I would be interested in the motivation behind the challange, its clearly not a 'how good are your ear' challange as the first winner used a computer. Does he hope to boost some obscure area of signal processing or just hand out $100 just for the fun of it?

    1. Re:motivation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I would be interested in the motivation behind the challange, its clearly not a 'how good are your ear' challange as the first winner used a computer. Does he hope to boost some obscure area of signal processing or just hand out $100 just for the fun of it?"

      Well, there's one guy who set the competition, and there's one guy who won it, and is telling is.

      And then there's you.

    2. Re:motivation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a very interesting area of signal processing, known as detection theory. The idea is that you want to look for a signal that is buried in noise. Can you extract the information which is in the signal? That is the idea. This sort of problem could be posed in a graduate EE class on statistical signal processing.
      It's still tough, though, and there might be a few ways to solve this, though I haven't put much effort into this yet.

    3. Re:motivation? by mlush · · Score: 2, Funny
      Well, there's one guy who set the competition, and there's one guy who won it, and is telling is.
      And then there's you.

      Is this another compertition to extract meaning from obscure data???

  13. Interesting that he mentioned the '486 :) by JessLeah · · Score: 4, Funny

    On a gamer forum, mentioning a '486 would get you laughed out in about ten seconds.
    On a non-technical forum, mentioning a '486 would get a bunch of (the digital equivalents of) blank stares.
    On SlashDot, only a couple of people think it's anything out of the ordinary...

    It would seem that the Internet has a wide variety of computing cultures ;)

    1. Re:Interesting that he mentioned the '486 :) by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about "out of the ordinary". It just made me wonder how long ago he did it...

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    2. Re:Interesting that he mentioned the '486 :) by JeffTL · · Score: 1

      I still have my= 486, KVMed with my Pentium III.

    3. Re:Interesting that he mentioned the '486 :) by tomakaan · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah. He'd only get the blank stares if he mentioned he was using Windows ;)

    4. Re:Interesting that he mentioned the '486 :) by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      I know why he used that as his example. Who actually uses, by default, a 486? Everybody in technology has something more powerful. Een a GBA has more CPU power.

      Also, a lot of HAM's who're in digital transmissions use around a 486. Plenty of serials, paralells, ISA for handmade cards, PCI for those 10BT + 10B2 + AUI combo networking cards all in something you wouldnt mind if a wee too much signal went through it ;-)

      --
    5. Re:Interesting that he mentioned the '486 :) by AchmedHabib · · Score: 1

      For some reason, I still find it funny to pull out my Pentium 75mhz motherboard with 64mb ram, place it on a phonebook on the livinroom table, put a network card, vga card and a 512mb HD and then install FreeBSD. hmm

    6. Re:Interesting that he mentioned the '486 :) by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      The top article says a few years ago, they didn't say how long ago, it could have been ten years ago for all we know.

    7. Re:Interesting that he mentioned the '486 :) by borius · · Score: 0

      Yeah, on Slashdot you get some story about how lucky you are to have 486's, how other people have to run Linux on their Gameboys, and that you should make a Beowulf cluster.

    8. Re:Interesting that he mentioned the '486 :) by don.g · · Score: 1

      Bah! Try using an XT motherboard in a similar state because you want to read some EPROMs and it has a spare socket for them :-)

      --
      Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
    9. Re:Interesting that he mentioned the '486 :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im running an 8086 supported by a minivac 6010 now thats strange

    10. Re:Interesting that he mentioned the '486 :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On a gamer forum, mentioning a '486 would get you laughed out in about ten seconds.

      The Commodore 64 is the best gaming device of all time.

    11. Re:Interesting that he mentioned the '486 :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and it's CPU is a 6502 which kicks the crap out of an x86 anyways. :P

    12. Re:Interesting that he mentioned the '486 :) by Josh+Booth · · Score: 1

      ...and hysterically laughed at if he mentioned that he was using XP.

    13. Re:Interesting that he mentioned the '486 :) by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      I have my old 486 right here on my desktop. It's a paperweight.

      Not the box, but the CPU itself. The box went to the old COMPAQ home about 11 months ago.

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
    14. Re:Interesting that he mentioned the '486 :) by harrkev · · Score: 1

      Bah.

      Real geeks use a 5v power supply, a breadboard, a handful of resistors, a couple of DIP switches, and a handul of LEDs.

      Don't forget the manual for hand-disassembly.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    15. Re:Interesting that he mentioned the '486 :) by don.g · · Score: 1

      I believe they often use semiconductors, too. They're quite useful, you know. Much more reliable than a monkey flipping DIP switches in response to flashing LEDs (but not as much fun).

      --
      Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
  14. Time Worth... by c_oflynn · · Score: 1

    So your time is worth approximately $4.17 an hour I take it ;-)

    Very cool link though - sounds like a fun challenge.

    Damn though, somehow I think if I end up doing this my time will come out being worth about $0.05 an hour... all for the fun of it ;-)

    -Colin

    1. Re:Time Worth... by ryanw · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Damn though, somehow I think if I end up doing this my time will come out being worth about $0.05 an hour... all for the fun of it ;-)
      Well, thats still more then something like counterstrike or equiv can offer. Pay $40 for the game, play for hundreds of hours, and get nothing back in return except for a few broken mice, carpal tunnel, blood shot eyes, etc.
    2. Re:Time Worth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL! So that would be NEGATIVE time worth then?

    3. Re:Time Worth... by revmoo · · Score: 1

      Well, thats still more then something like counterstrike or equiv can offer. Pay $40 for the game, play for hundreds of hours, and get nothing back in return except for a few broken mice, carpal tunnel, blood shot eyes, etc.

      And what, is the negatiev affects?

      --
      I would expect such blatant racism on Fark, but on Slashdot? Mods please ban this asshole.
    4. Re:Time Worth... by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 1

      How much did you get paid to write that post? I guess your (and my) time is worth $0.00.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
  15. Translated Message by Herkum01 · · Score: 4, Funny

    50 SWM, seeking 30-40 SWF for laughs and good times. Please contact me at XXX-XXX-XXXX.

    1. Re:Translated Message by yroJJory · · Score: 1

      The number you omitted was:

      877-779-3974

      This number courtesy of Dave Barry and the Direct Marketing Association.

      --
      Jory
    2. Re:Translated Message by petecarlson · · Score: 1

      877-779-3974

      were sory, you have reached a number that has been disconnected.

      Guess the SWM 50 had to change his number because SWFs wouldn't stop calling him...

      Note to self: Look into bouncing number off the moon...

    3. Re:Translated Message by harrkev · · Score: 1
      Note to self: Look into bouncing number off the moon...

      Hams can do this no problem. It is called EME (earth-moon-earth). All it takes is some patience, a HUGE antenna with a pair of rotators, a back yard, and being willing to withstand the icy stares (and death threats) of your neighbors for putting an antenna like that up.
      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
  16. Who needs Matlab? I can hear the morse code beeps by joshv · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can clearly hear the morse code beeps. With some head phones (if I knew morse code) - I could decode this using only the world's most powerful real-time signal processing and pattern recognition device - the human brain.

    -josh

  17. I'm sure it will say by rf0 · · Score: 1

    "Eat at Joes" or something equilly monumental

    Rus

    1. Re:I'm sure it will say by ScottSpeaks! · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Watson come here, I want you."

    2. Re:I'm sure it will say by kdsolutions · · Score: 0

      "Sorry, we're not home right now, please leave a message at the beep-beep. beep. beep-beep-beep-beep, beep, beep beeep-beep. Oh, and by the way, you owe me $100, sucker!"

      Damnit, I knew it would be some stupid shit like that!

      --
      Error 666 - Satanic SCO code found in your Linux kernel.
  18. How to deal with weak signals: by WegianWarrior · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe someone could come up with a novel solution...

    Turn the volume up - a lot.

    --
    Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
  19. Money well earned. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $100 for 24 hours == 4.16/hr. I think Walmart pays their stock boys more for the time they put in. ;)

    1. Re:Money well earned. by fantastic · · Score: 1

      Try writing a book, if you don't get a best seller you would probably earn even less

    2. Re:Money well earned. by kfg · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah, but Wal-Mart doesn't let you stock shelves in your underwear while eating Doritos and chugging Mountain Dew.

      No, I don't want to talk about it.

      KFG

  20. In the spirit of a recent story: by bersl2 · · Score: 1

    It's TCP/IP over Morse code.

    Talk about lag...

    1. Re:In the spirit of a recent story: by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      Or maybe it's Morse code over bongo drums?

      From the Moon. Talk about loud...

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    2. Re:In the spirit of a recent story: by phre4k · · Score: 1

      Yeah short is a hit on the drum. Long is.... A loooong hit on the drum

      --
      "Nobody really checks their email any more. They just delete their spam"
    3. Re:In the spirit of a recent story: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      TCP/IP over bongo drums?

      Networking thousands of smelly hippies.

  21. Not given it away? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I promised Mike that I wouldn't divulge the answer or provide any clues. I can say thought that I didn't use anything special other than traditional signal processing techniques, octave, matlab, and patience.

    Why, you've given it all away! I can tell that since you mentioned traditional signal processing techniques that the answer is clearly not in the neural network in front of you but being that you know that I know you're a Sicilian you obviously wouldn't put it in a simple band pass filter in front of me! Aha ha...Aha ha ha *clunk*

  22. Re:I just did a fucking huge shit AND I ENJOYED IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next time, tease yourself with it. Wait until you're busting, then let it out a little and then pull it back in. Do this until you jsut can't hold it anymore, then have the best dump of your life!

  23. Ham stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee, I decoded parts of it... "CQ CQ CQ ... de ..."

    *GRIN*

    1. Re:Ham stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The full message is: CQ CQ This is W9GSO, come back? CQ, this is Eleanor Anne Arroway, are you there?

      It ends up with a strange sound, going WUMP WUMP WUMP...

    2. Re:Ham stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. You forgot to toss in a couple of callsigns, etc, etc, etc. =p

  24. It says.... by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    "Stop! Your radio waves are killing our moon babies! First it was Country Music, and now this."

  25. Suid is showing off! by stevew · · Score: 1

    Hey Suid - you made Slashdot!

    --
    Have you compiled your kernel today??
  26. Re:Who needs Matlab? I can hear the morse code bee by c_oflynn · · Score: 4, Informative

    Umm.. thats not quite the point. The page says this:

    Do you think you are good at copying weak signals? Well here's a test for you. I am posting a zipped 1 minute wav file of a VERY weak EME station calling me. I am offering $100 and a free copy of the FFTDSP42 to the first person who can tell me the call sign of the calling station. The signal is strong enough to just copy my call (AF9Y) near the middle of the 1 min period. The mystery station is sending a simple repeat of his call and my call. The characters "DE" may or may not be between the two calls.

    So you CAN hear one of the call-signs... its harder than just listening carefully. Otherwise it would make no sense.

  27. WTF? by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 4, Funny

    You spent 24 hours trying to win $100?

    Dude, you could make more than that working at Wendy's.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:WTF? by yarbo · · Score: 1

      he said it's $100 for the next person to solve it, it's possible first (or whatever) place got a larger prize.

    2. Re:WTF? by po_boy · · Score: 1

      While you're at it, collect your useless use of cat award.

    3. Re:WTF? by Felinoid · · Score: 1

      No I couldn't

      Me:[monotone] "Welcome to Wendys may I take your order."
      Costummer: "I want a pizza with everything and a big mac"
      Me[Shooting costummer]: "Next"

      --
      I don't actually exist.
    4. Re:WTF? by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine works as a management trainee at JP Morgan. We once calculated:- she'd be earning more at the local 24 hour McD's if she worked the same number of hours she puts in at JP Morgan. Think about it.

    5. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But given a choice how to make $100 would you want to work at Wendy's? I'd rather work on some useful skills than serve up food (BTDT).

    6. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for JPMorgan..... She makes shit because we give all of our money away to Enron and other deserving companies like that. Now they decide to sue us because the fraud we helped them commit got them in some trouble. I'm gonna go apply at Wendy's.

    7. Re:WTF? by telstar · · Score: 1
      "Dude, you could make more than that working at Wendy's."
      • Last week, the woman working the register at the Wendy's I went to was named Wendy... ya think she thinks she owns the joint?

    8. Re:WTF? by instanto · · Score: 1

      You do know that people die without food?
      What do you recon is more usefull than helping people avoid death?

      --
      // instant - "I for one welcome our new Decaff Coffee-Flavoured-Coffee Overlords"
    9. Re:WTF? by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 1

      Perhaps this prize's symbolic nature would be clearer if instead of $100 is was a pair of rusty pliers.

      --
      This is not my sandwich.
    10. Re:WTF? by Planx_Constant · · Score: 1

      Dude! They're giving out rusty pliers, too? Man, I've gotta get cracking!

      --
      Heisenberg might have been here.
  28. Re:Who needs Matlab? I can hear the morse code bee by joshv · · Score: 1

    No, I could hear the signal from the very beginning of the wav file. Very faint, but it was there.

    -josh

  29. "Do you want fries with that?" by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is nothing more than a recording of a McDonald's drive-through speaker.

    It is the repetion in the message that allows humans to know what they are really saying. Thus, we hear, "Vu Vu Von Vie Vih Vah", and know from prior experience that they are saying, "Do you want fries with that?" Otherwise, I often would not know what the hell they are saying.

    1. Re:"Do you want fries with that?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude that _was_ funny and should have earned a -

      (Score:7, Fucking Histerically Wet My Knickers)

    2. Re:"Do you want fries with that?" by GoatJuggler · · Score: 1

      The obvious response is for some one to reply with the following message in morse code "And Theeeeeeeen!?!?"

    3. Re:"Do you want fries with that?" by TheBadger · · Score: 1

      and some cookies fortune.

  30. Don't forget... by CritterNYC · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... to drink your Ovaltine.

    1. Re:Don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the uninitiated... it is a reference to the secret message conveyed via radio in A Christmas Story that the little boy had to decode with his decoder ring.

    2. Re:Don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, you beat me by 2 minutes.

  31. I got it... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Be sure to drink your Ovaltine. Ovaltine? A crummy commercial?

  32. Re:fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no, it's the third post. YOU FAIL IT. put taco's dick back in your mouth and stfu.

  33. mod up funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somebody mod this up as funny.

  34. Hrmph by Lozzer · · Score: 1

    This is one small signal for man, one giant signal for mankind.

    --
    Special Relativity: The person in the other queue thinks yours is moving faster.
    1. Re:Hrmph by Eric+MB+Lard+MD · · Score: 1
      No, that's not it at all. That's the NASA cover up.

      What Neil Armstrong really said

  35. moon messages by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny


    Reminds me of story somebody told me once, but I have yet to verify it.

    During preparations for the Apollo moon missions, some members of NASA were sent out to record greetings messages from various communities to be included on a recording that was to be left on the moon by the astronauts.

    After visiting a Native American tribe, one Native American man refused to tell NASA what he had just said into the recorder in his native tongue. So, they eventually found a translator, and the message said something like, "Watch out for these guys. They will take your land too. Explorers, my ass".

    1. Re:moon messages by plone · · Score: 2, Informative

      False. Seriously man, is it really necessary to spread such bullshit urban myths when 2 seconds at Snopes shows that it is fake? Oh wait, I guess you must be one of those people that believes that a litre of Coke will dissolve a steak in 2 days.

    2. Re:moon messages by Richard_at_work · · Score: 0, Troll

      I actually tried the steak thing while doing Science at college level. It works.

      We used a standard sized sirloin steak, in a glass bowl and a litre of normal Coke, left it covered in a normal 22 deg c room over the weekend, and on monday morning all that was left was some really icky coke and scum on the surface.

      Sometimes it pays to try out some of this stuff, if you can. This was cheap and simple to try, so I tried it. Oh and all this was before I was even on the Internet.

    3. Re:moon messages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      teeth, not steak

    4. Re:moon messages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "is it really necessary to spread such bullshit urban myths"

      I didn't think it was true for an instant, but it made me laugh out loud. I bet you watch science fiction movies with a physics text and complain about all the events which are `clearly in contravention of the basic laws of physics` too, right?

      "I guess you must be one of those people that believes that a litre of Coke will dissolve a steak in 2 days."

      I guess you`re one of those people who NEVER GET LAID.

    5. Re:moon messages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually tried the steak thing while doing Science at college level. It works.

      Well, it didn't work for these guys.

      Indeed, Snopes themselves dispute it.

    6. Re:moon messages by FPCat · · Score: 1

      When I was in school, the last thing I would have done is ruin a good sirloin steak with Coke. However, I would dissolve it with beer (in my stomach!)

    7. Re:moon messages by stevesliva · · Score: 1
      He forgot to mention he used "Coke with active bacterial cultures" and "white castle sirloins."

      *I* thought it was a tooth that Coke dissolved. mmmm... coke.

      --
      Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
    8. Re:moon messages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you believe that snopes is the ultimate bible of truth for determining if a story is true or not? You are the scarrier one. If snopes put the Holocaust in there, you would probably believe it was an urban legend.

    9. Re:moon messages by aceat64 · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oh, sorry about that, I ate the steak...

    10. Re:moon messages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd sooner believe them than believe you.

    11. Re:moon messages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, man. You mentioned White Castle. Now I've got the crave. I guess I'll have to pick up a crave case with 30 sliders and a week of shit farts.

    12. Re:moon messages by danila · · Score: 1
      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    13. Re:moon messages by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      Seriously man, is it really necessary to spread such bullshit urban myths when 2 seconds at Snopes shows that it is fake?

      Why not? He didn't present it as truth, and it's a cool story, true or not.

  36. Sorry for my ignorance.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, I've eliminated the background interference and now I have this funny sound (almost musical) going up and down (and repeting itself like the autor of the web-page said), and now I'm suposed to tell what this means?

    I thought morse code was small and long beeps ALL in the same frequency (all in the same note), is this some kind of advanced morse code? :)

    For the record ... where I live 4.5 $ / hour is a relativly good wage !

    1. Re:Sorry for my ignorance.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The signal in centered around 500-600hz, use a notch filter to single out that part of the spectrum and go from there. You're working with an extremely high noise floor, so you'll almost certainly need to use some form of DSP in conjunction with this method.

  37. What I would do. by geekee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd assume the beeps are a single tone. Run a fourier xform on the signal and look for any dominant tones (peaks) in the spectrum. Once the frequency is known, run the signal through a narrow band filter at that frequency to eliminate the noise. After that the tones should be recognizable enough to decode by ear.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
    1. Re:What I would do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't run it through a narrow band filter... You will get ringing and all the tones will run together. You won't get what you want with any standard window function. You need to use logic in your filter, which is why the only person to get it so far used Matlab, not Goldwave or Cooledit. (BTW, I have tried what you suggest several years ago)

      BTW, the article links pictures of AF9Y's program which does the first part of what you're talking about.

  38. Obligatory by hazman · · Score: 0


    1. Enter "Slashdot Solve the Morse Code Contest"
    2. ???
    3. Prof.... What $100?... Never mind.

  39. Re:I just did a fucking huge shit AND I ENJOYED IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "And this little piggy went wee, wee, wee all the way home!"

  40. Re:Who needs Matlab? I can hear the morse code bee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe not all of the morse code is that faint, but if you actually read the point of it all, the call sign is harder to distinguish.

  41. All i can say is you get what you pay for....$4.50 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of my client's outsourced my contracts to India.... hmmm $4.50 /hr and i'm charging $65/hr. And when i turn the keys over for all (355) the servers i admin.... i hope the shit literally hits the fan... especially in the accountants offices?.. they get what they deserve??bastages (On a lighter note i hope when the shit hits the fan all they can use to access those fine Citrix servers i built is bongo drum's)

  42. Are you geek or something?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You solved this? Are you a geek or something?! Get out of here, Michael!

  43. Re:Who needs Matlab? I can hear the morse code bee by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here: Morse Code info.

    Now all you need is a pair of headphones. I'm sure you can find a decent pair for less than $100 and make some quick money.

    Try it. I'm betting it's harder than it sounds, but hey: people's hearing does vary. You might just be good at this.

    --
    'Sensible' is a curse word.
  44. Umm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YHBT. YHL. HAND.

  45. Code is solved by bigjnsa500 · · Score: 1
    Solved and translated by my transmografier:

    Resistance is futile

    --
    This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
  46. Reminds me... by gbooker · · Score: 2, Informative

    For my senior design project, we had to make some dedicated hardware to exactly this. It was solved using an FFT inside a Vertex-II Pro FPGA using a sliding window.

    Now, as far as this contest goes, this can be done quite easilly in a computer. In fact, we had made a bitwise simulation of the FPGA using matlab before doing any Verilog to make sure that our design worked. My favorite was the little setup that we did in LabView. Took about 30 minutes to make, and would solve this quite easilly. It was very nice to see the result in color intensity with frequency along the x axis, and time across the y. Seeing the data in there was quite easy even though the SNR was so low that you couldn't even hear most of the tones.

    In short, if you want to do this, read the data into matlab (or octive), do an FFT on a small window of the data, slide the window over, repeat. Take all the FFT's and plot in an intenisty graph (not sure what the matlab term is, but I am sure it has such a thing).

    --
    You see? It's like I've always said. You can get more with a kind word and a 2x4 than you can with just a kind word.
  47. Open-source the solution! by Schnake · · Score: 1

    Can someone please open-source the solution (probably after winning the reward). I'd also like to see the original author's solution -- matlab code, and whatever.

    Thx!

  48. Novel Solution by Gwala · · Score: 1

    Maybe someone could come up with a novel solution and win $100!

    Sounds like the best solution could just be a Gaussian filter could be passed over all the values to lessen the noise, then have the remaining values leveled on a linear scale - then finally have the translated solution passed through a common acronym/spell checker.

    -Gwala

    --
    #!/bin/csh cat $0
    1. Re:Novel Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you get ringing so you can't hear the stops and starts of the tones. It's not that simple.

  49. Oh crap .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Drink more Ovaltine"

  50. I kinda see the signal by tftp · · Score: 1

    I took a professional signal analysis software package and analyzed the file in detail. There is indeed a signal, quite discernible, at about 570 Hz. However the package that I have is visual only, it is not suitable for audio playback, and I am too lazy to add audio output to it... not worth of $100 for sure. Also, the signal drifts considerably.

  51. WTF? by DF5JT · · Score: 1

    From af9y.com:

    "The mystery station is one of the calls in this list of all known 2 mtr EME stations: all2eme.txt (18 K Bytes)"

    peter@df5jt $ wget http://www.webcom.com/~af9y/all2eme.txt
    peter@df5jt $ cat all2eme.txt|grep -i df5jt
    DF5JT
    peter@df5jt $

    Where's my 100 bucks?

  52. Coherent detection by artch · · Score: 1

    google is your friend. First came across this technology in the 1970's in a paper from the Naval Post Grad School. The problem them was how to communicate with submerged subs using only very low frequency keyed CW. google will lead you to more modern applications, e.g., "A technique for removing noise and emphasizing coherent events from multiple channels of seismic data."

    1. Re:Coherent detection by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Can you use coherent detection if all you have is the output of the demod?

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  53. Re:Who needs Matlab? I can hear the morse code bee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Matlab is overkill for this kind of job.

    A combination of Waves Xnoise, Q10 with high/low pass filters, and a peak at about 600hz, followed by C1 brings it out quite clearly.

    If you work in audio production like I do, you deal with worse recorded tracks every day.

  54. I got it! by MongooseCN · · Score: 1, Funny

    "Please send help! Drowning! Will not last much longer!"

    1. Re:I got it! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      No, it says, "Congratulations! Your hundred bucks is waiting for you on the moon. Come pick it up." (emph. added)

  55. Don't Analyze It, Just G R O O V E to it by BlackBolt · · Score: 1

    Why bother translating it? Getting all technical is the best way to ruin perfectly good music.

    1. Re:Don't Analyze It, Just G R O O V E to it by BlackBolt · · Score: 1

      Which reminds me, I've started my own contest with the white noise from my tv set after closing time. Anyone who can guess what channel I was watching wins.. uh.. uh.. something really good.

      hint: people were naked.

  56. Can't beleive no one has said it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "So long and thanks for all the fish."

  57. Message decoded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "In Soviet Russia, moon bounces YOU!"

  58. So long, and thanks for all the fsshhh by juglugs · · Score: 1

    I bet the answer is 47 - it's always bloody 47..

    --A Million-in-one chance will work out 99% of the time...

    --
    This sig is in Spanish when you're not looking....
    1. Re:So long, and thanks for all the fsshhh by Luigi30 · · Score: 0

      It's 42, you insensitive clod!

      --
      503 Sig Unavailable

      The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
    2. Re:So long, and thanks for all the fsshhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean 42 surely...

    3. Re:So long, and thanks for all the fsshhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do. And don't call me Shirley.

  59. Something's going to happen... by One+Louder · · Score: 0


    All these moons are yours
    except Luna
    Attempt no landing there

    1. Re:Something's going to happen... by LouisZepher · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess we're fucked then, eh? Better watch out for giant domino-wannabes plummeting from the sky...

  60. Why no morse code posts on slashdot? by ubiquitin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I had a nice morse code response here, but the slashdot lameness filter won't let me post it. Talk about lame. "Reason: Please use fewer 'junk' characters." I'll readily admit that ASCII graffiti is junk, but morse code? C'mon! ;)

    --
    http://tinyurl.com/4ny52
    1. Re:Why no morse code posts on slashdot? by WWWWolf · · Score: 1
      I had a nice morse code response here, but the slashdot lameness filter won't let me post it.

      You're using wrong character encoding so the lameness filter deduces that it will show up as a bunch of garbage to most people. You could try recoding it to ASCII first...

    2. Re:Why no morse code posts on slashdot? by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      use letters instead of . and -, maybe i and t (see the dot and dash along the middle of the row?)

    3. Re:Why no morse code posts on slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tit titti tittit it tittit tit tit i tittit titi tii titti itit...

      I like it, I think I could get used to this sort of communication..

  61. i downloaded the zip by wmaker · · Score: 2, Funny

    i downloaded the "zip" file and ran mplayer on it... it's BITTERSWEET by FUEL... WTF

  62. I got it! by pherris · · Score: 1

    It's STENDEC (or ETA LATE).

    --
    "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
  63. Sounds like a spectrogram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whats the difference between this and a spectrogram? An easy one line command in octave or matlab.

  64. Re:Who needs Matlab? I can hear the morse code bee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, that's great if you're a fucking bat, because that's about what you would have to be to hear that.

    I have pretty good hearing. I hear all sorts of shit that most other people I know can't, and I couldn't copy that signal in raw form if my life depended on it, and I'm somewhat practiced with morse code.

    Yeah, it's there. That's known. Clear? Hardly.

  65. Is it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Be sure to drink your Ovaltine?"

  66. Re:Who needs Matlab? I can hear the morse code bee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I call bullcrap.

    You listening to 3 seconds of it instaltly make you an expert?

    In fact I'll bet you $200.00 that the worlds best morse code expert cannot copy the whole message from "just listening to it" because it needs some significant signal processing and tricks to get the full message out of the noise.

    Listen to it again, this time the WHOLE file...

  67. Assume that by Rock+Ridge · · Score: 1

    there must be some certain-frequency signal in the "noise" that occurs in the noise for two durations: the duration of a morse dit and dah. Wouldn't an FFT and analysis of the relative amplitudes and durations suggest what the message is (to a person knowing morse code)?

    So, why do people use LabView for this?

    1. Re:Assume that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Analyzing relative amplitudes and durations isn't always possible with EME signals. The moon is a poor reflector, and due to it's rough surface signals tend to fade in and out rather erratically, often to well below the noise floor. Though operators usually repeat themselves several times in the hopes that their call will make in across during a fade-in, in extremely weak signals like this even the strongest signal may be so near the noise floor that it would be nearly impossible for a computer to accurately analyze. In these cases you simply have to isolate the signal as much as possible, then listen to it or look at it on a spectrum analyzer and try to discern the signal yourself.

  68. Re:Who needs Matlab? I can hear the morse code bee by edwinolson · · Score: 1

    detecting and decoding are two very different things.

  69. Re:Who needs Matlab? I can hear the morse code bee by Ceadda · · Score: 2

    **I call bullcrap. You listening to 3 seconds of it instaltly make you an expert ** Well, he's right. I also can clearly hear the dots and beeps in that file, with nothing more than turning up the treble amp on a pair of laptop speakers. Three other "witnesses" in the room with me at the time can also hear it just fine. And yes, we listened to the whole thing. Doesnt sound like a very long message. Since I've got better things to do with my time than jot it all down and translate it, I'll leave it to someone who actually has to work to earn the $100, not someone who can hear it. PS. You know those "unhearable, ultrasonic" pest repeller things? I know 5 people, inluding myself, who can hear those damn things ticking :p

    --
    *There's Klingons on the starboard bow, scrape em off Jim!*
  70. A tip to hear with just ears. by Ceadda · · Score: 1

    Put the file into XMMS or Winamp, depending if your in linux or windows. Turn on the AMP/Equalizer, and drag everything except 12-14k down to nothing. Play, turn up speakers, unplug ears and listen. You'll hearn a pattern starting out with what sounds to ..-...-.- It goes by way to fast for me to pick up much more than that. But I suppose I could get less lazy and slow it down.

    --
    *There's Klingons on the starboard bow, scrape em off Jim!*
    1. Re:A tip to hear with just ears. by DF5JT · · Score: 1

      " Put the file into XMMS or Winamp, depending if your in linux or windows. Turn on the AMP/Equalizer, and drag everything except 12-14k down to nothing."

      and you won#t hear a damn thing, because the signal is roughly at 600 Hz, effectively filtered out by your settings.

    2. Re:A tip to hear with just ears. by Ceadda · · Score: 1

      That's nice. Now stop being such a moron and go try it. You can, and will, hear the morse if you listen.

      --
      *There's Klingons on the starboard bow, scrape em off Jim!*
  71. This is really sad... by Ceadda · · Score: 1

    Took the wave file, loaded it onto a windows pc. Loaded Nero wave editor. Select All. Analize Noise, Remove Noise, adjust equalizer... Clear, perfect morse code file... All in 15 seconds work... Sad, isnt it?

    --
    *There's Klingons on the starboard bow, scrape em off Jim!*
  72. Solved by Matrix2110 · · Score: 1

    I was indeed able to pull out a legible signal using Cool Edit 2000, I don't speak morse. I sent the file to the folks at the center.

    I will post any results to my journal.

    If I win anything it is going to the EFF. (Protecting grannies from the RIAA. 24/7)

    Arnold is looking pretty good right now.

    1. Re:Solved by coolmacdude · · Score: 1

      I used the same thing. However I didn't get a clear sequence of morse. It was more of a constant tone interrupted by breaks. I couldn't make out any detailed signals that would be letters.

      --

      -You may license this sig for only $6.99.
  73. I cant hear past the static... by culov · · Score: 1

    Anyone want to recommend what programs to use to change my levels so i can decipher static from morse?

  74. I cant get past the static.... by culov · · Score: 1

    Anyone want to recommend a program so i can adjust my audio levels to hear past the static so i can decipher the damn morse?

  75. Re:All i can say is you get what you pay for....$4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With grammar and spelling like that, I'd outsource you too.

  76. You do? Well then.... by gantrep · · Score: 1

    Q. How do you fix a broken chimp?
    A. With a monkeywrench.

    1. Re:You do? Well then.... by BSD+Yoda · · Score: 1

      Q: What do you get when you drop a piano down a mine shaft?

      A: A flat miner.

    2. Re:You do? Well then.... by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1

      Q: Who do you call when the internet gets clogged?

      A: Roto router.

      --
      if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
  77. Re:Who needs Matlab? I can hear the morse code bee by flyonthewall · · Score: 1

    Got it!!!!

    WKRP

    --
    "The avalanche has already started. It's too late for the pebbles to vote." - Kosh
  78. Eh? by theTerribleRobbo · · Score: 0


    Ever heard of something called 'fun'?

    How about 'a challenge'?

    Climbing mountains just because they're there can be rewarding, you know.

  79. Song Lyrics for those w/o Flash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we like tha moon
    cos it is close to us
    we like tha moon!!!!!
    but not as much as a spoon
    cos thats more use for eating soup
    and a fork isn't very useful for that
    unless it has got many vegetables
    and then you might be better off with a
    chop-stick
    unlike tha moon
    it is up in the sky
    it's up there very high
    but not as high as maybe
    dirigibles and zeppelins
    or lightbulbs
    and maybe clouds
    and puffins also i think maybe
    they go quite high too
    maybe not as high as tha moon
    cos the moon is very high
    we like tha moon
    tha moon is very useful everyone
    everybody like tha moon
    because it lights up the sky at night
    and it lovely
    and it make the tide go and we like it
    but not as much as cheese
    we really like cheese we like zeppelins
    we really like them
    and we like kelp and we like moose
    and we like deer and we like marmots
    and we like all the fluffy animals
    we really like tha moon

  80. How I'd do it ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... if I had the time:

    Bretthorst-style Bayesian periodic signal detection with a sliding window to pull out individual dots/dashes. Adaption of the Gregory-Loredo pulsar detection algorithm for Gaussian noise would be better. If you wanted to build a serious dedicated program, you could incorporate more prior knowledge about the structure of the signal (e.g. that it's composed of single-frequency dots and dashes of specific probable duration, and you could even tell it to look specifically for only codes appearing in the list of station call signs).

  81. Ah Damn... by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

    You mean that signal spike in SETI@HOME was just an ovalten commerical...I thought it was ET phoning home....

    --
    "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
  82. What's next? by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    "Hey /. I found this Differential Equations take-home final that has been BOUNCED OFF THE MOON and I'll give $100 to the first person that completes it! Should only take about 24hrs, and I think it would be great to generate some interest in this."

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  83. noone yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how come noone has posted the answer yet? I would have thought for sure that someone would have figured this out by now. I mean is it really harder than everyone is saying? I've seen nothing but posts saying how everyone can hear the code straight out, but not even a partial translation yet. I figure that at least someone must around here must do this kind of thing for a living and have dirrect and quick access to something that can just give them the result... so post the answer already :)

  84. Adn to decode.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the morse code for normal humans, use Convert::Morse from search.cpan.org...

  85. Hmmmmm.. .Wheres my dad? by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 1

    My dad ran crypto for the Navy back in the 50's, was even given a citation from the Pentagon for his ability to pick out weak Morse Code on the fly..and decode the stuff, realtime, in his head! Spent like 6 years up in Adak, Alaska listening to Russian freighter traffic. Three cheers for Cold War paranoia!

    I'll pass this along to him. :)

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

  86. What a woos!!! by JamesP · · Score: 1

    Man,

    The solution is called matched filter...

    If you need to ask is because youre not going to understand anyway...

    --
    how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
  87. It's a bit if Music on the Moon's history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's what I got so far:

    "We're whalers on the moon,
    we carry our harpoons..."

  88. How to cope with noisy signal by lipi · · Score: 1

    It's easy: subtract white noise and there you go :-)

  89. Doppler shift by lipi · · Score: 1

    I'd assume the beeps are a single tone. Run a fourier xform on the signal and look for any dominant tones (peaks) in the spectrum. Once the frequency is known, run the signal through a narrow band filter at that frequency to eliminate the noise.

    The frequency of the signal may change during transmission, due to Doppler effect. In this sample it constantly increases. So running a Fourier transform on the signal won't show you any distinct peaks.