Slashdot Mirror


MIThril Jacket Showcases Wearable Computing

Codeine writes "The Seventh Annual International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC), to be held later this month, will again feature members of MIT's Media Lab showing off the group's MIThril jacket. Taking its name from J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings trilogy, the jacket combines body-worn computation, sensing, and networking in a clothing-integrated design, according to the project." According to a new paper (PDF link) to be presented at the conference, the latest version of this long-evolving system uses a Sharp Zaurus running Linux.

162 comments

  1. Umm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wasn't Mithril an extremely tough, lightweight metal? If you take a look at the picture, it looks anything but light & sturdy.

    1. Re:Umm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      String a few commodity computer parts on an ugly jacket, and bam! You're an MIT grad student.

      I think less and less of those guys every day.

    2. Re:Umm by rwven · · Score: 0

      lol and any one of us knows we'd want it... It's a total gimmick, but it's be fun to show off (in the confines of your room where no one could see how much of a dork you really were...) The problem is that everything is external. they need to WAY cut back on some of the components there and enclose it INSIDE a jacket where people cant see it. Also, if you're going to make a jacket that has that much to it, it had BETTER be powered by something faster than a PDA. they have hard drive sized wearable computers out there that have real pentium CPU's in them. If you ask me, this jacket is a it of a waste of space and $$. fun idea, but no one would REALLY want to use it for its intended purpose. only to show off to their fellow nerds...

    3. Re:Umm by Pxtl · · Score: 0

      From the pics, it looks like this is just a cut-up PC stuck to a jacket.

      IMHO, the only thing revolutionary about it is that its the worst case-mod ever.

    4. Re:Umm by epiphani · · Score: 0

      Not only that, but whats with all the wires? Isnt this type of application where bluetooth is supposed to take over? MIT should be leading that charge.

      --
      .
  2. Mithril? by ComaVN · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm guessing all it has in common with the Tolkien metal is it's price.

    --
    Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
    1. Re:Mithril? by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Funny

      i dunno, all that hardware might protect you from stabbing as well!

      (geez, just look at the pic)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Mithril? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stab protection.. maybe if integrated with this swedish outdoors sweater, in KEVLAR, also called
      Mithril..

    3. Re:Mithril? by mahdi13 · · Score: 1

      i dunno, all that hardware might protect you from stabbing as well!

      But it won't save you from the resulting electrocution!!

      --
      "Some things have to be believed to be seen." - Ralph Hodgson
  3. So very tired... by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 3, Insightful

    WHY would I want to wear a computer?

    Don't get me wrong, I'm a geek, but technology is just getting absurd. I have no desire to "wear" my computer. Nor do I have any desire to play games on my cellphone. (In fact I don't even own a cellphone because of the hideously overpriced services).

    Maybe I have to hand in my geek membership card, but wearing a computer ranks right up there with wearing a refridgerator.

    1. Re:So very tired... by torpor · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. I'm a certified geek (got my socks in '78) and I have no intention whatsoever of ever wearing a computer.

      Of course, I'm quite happy to lug around my Clie NX70v, my Siemens cell phone, the WLAN card, and a few other things, though.

      Come to think of it, I've changed my mind. If someone can build me a PDA/Cell combo that fits in a nice stylish leather jacket, I'd wear it. But it'd have to be a jacket first, computer thing second - none of this crappy TechVest shit!

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    2. Re:So very tired... by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "I have no desire to "wear" my computer."

      Of course not, the technology's being developed, then the apps that make it interesting will come. Personally, I think auto mechanics would love to have a wearable computer. Imagine having instant access to the internal workings of the particular car you're working on. Instant reference.

      " Nor do I have any desire to play games on my cellphone."

      What's wrong with that? Well I guess I can't entice you, but personally I've enjoyed having simple games to play. At the last movie I saw, I played snake while waiting for the stupid previews to be over. When I'm alone for a bit, like waiting for my meal to be served, I get on the net with my cell phone and get updated on the news. Can I live without? Sure. But I can make a little use of my time.

      " (In fact I don't even own a cellphone because of the hideously overpriced services)."

      Hideous? I pay about 10-15 bucks a month more than a landline, all my long distance is free, and my phone's with me all the time. I get better service and it only costs a little more than a landline that only works at.. uh.. home.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:So very tired... by binary+paladin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not just wearing a refrigerator but putting a putting a computer on your refrigerator. That always struck me as the most retarded thing.

      Funny thing about being a geek is this: A geek would do something like turn his Dreamcast into a web server or install a computer in a blender for the sake of doing so but would never use any of these devices.

      Now a toilet computer... that's what I want if for no other reason than the internet has much better bathroom reading material than my local paper and sometimes, when I really have to go, I don't have time to grab a book or the paper.

      And if Hot Topic can sell WWF material and still be frequented by fishnet wearing, coffee shop dwelling, whiny ass poets... then you can hate this device and still be a geek.

    4. Re:So very tired... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you can electrocute yourself after coming home very late after a heavy nite of GPS-enabled drunken carousing and taking a shower. MIThrill :D

    5. Re:So very tired... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A fridge would not help me remember the name of the person I'd just been introduced to. That feature alone would be worth the price of admission as far as I'm concerned. I cannot count the number of times I've been screwed just because my worthless goddamned head couldn't burn their name in the first time.

    6. Re:So very tired... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact I don't even own a cellphone because of the hideously overpriced services
      Move to the UK then! I have a sweet new Nokia running on Orange for a flat 15 pounds per month - more if I make a load of calls. Biggest bill has been about 23 pounds when I was working away from home and on the thing all the time. Mobiles are the coolest thing on the planet when you need them - and trust me - you DO want to play games on them.

    7. Re:So very tired... by kinnell · · Score: 1
      WHY would I want to wear a computer?

      In order to do research into wearable computing?

      This is a research project to study wearable computing, and associated fields, such as augmented reality. I doubt they have any intention of trying to sell it to people like you. This kind of thing could be very useful for field technicians, soldiers, paramedics - all sorts of people.

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    8. Re:So very tired... by kinnell · · Score: 1
      I cannot count the number of times I've been screwed just because my worthless goddamned head couldn't burn their name in the first time.

      That's funny, I can't remember the number of times I haven't been screwed just because my worthless goddamned head couldn't burn their name in the first time.

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    9. Re:So very tired... by TGK · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's an MIT thing. I don't know why they don't just give it up. It's a stupid idea.

      No, it's not just an MIT thing and its not that stupid an idea. ENIAC didn't exactly conjure to mind a Micro PC with a flat panel display either, but the point was it was one of the first strides toward the kind of computing system that is becoming a fixture in Western homes (and many other parts of the world).

      Wearable computing is a technology that simply hasn't come to maturity yet. Things need to get smaller. But as some further down this page have done lets look at the possibilities.

      First, realize that the human body isn't designed to support any large quantity of hardware where most of the sensory organs are clustered, consequently we have to seperate the display from the CPU. The torso is an ideal place to put this sort of thing, both for weight purposes and for its relitivly easy access for the user (try typing on your head sometime).

      As for applications, the possibilities are limitless. I'll stick to Augmented Reality for most of my examples.

      1.) Imagine a surgon with a system capable of integrating the data from Xrays, CAT scans, and other probes on the fly and displaying that data in real time, actualy altering the view of the patients body. This amounts to fewer head movements, faster surgeries (particularly key in an ER), and fewer mistakes. This same principal can be extended to an auto mechanic, or any number of other occupations.

      2.) Tired of lugging your laptop, cellphone, PDA, etc around? Meet the ultimate virtual office. A pair of MEMS projectors mounted on a pair of sunglasses traces the "office" in 3d onto your retinas. Tracking systems (much like those allready in use today) track the movement of your fingers in relitive position to your body. By tracking these movements the user can type on a non-existant keyboard and navigate a 3d "desktop" in real space. Metaphors provide interfaces for important applications. Integrate an audio device with this and you can easily move your entire office to the bench in the park without anyone being the wiser.

      It doesn't take a lot of immagination to work out how this could be an amazing application. Yes, right now it looks like a bad cross between C3P0 and a Electircal Engineering project gone awry. Nonetheless, in 10 years you'll probably see it integrating into the lining of a designer series of jackets, sunglasses, and hats worn by every trendy highschool and college kid in the country.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    10. Re:So very tired... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Wearable computing is a technology that simply hasn't come to maturity yet. Things need to get smaller"

      Isn't the future of computing a global computer - sort of like the internet except the internet will BE the computer - it'll compile programs, run databases etc. And you'd just have a thin client at home for real-time stuff like games and writing emails. You could already carry such a client around, such as a PDA or mobile phone. So lets not bother putting hardware into clothes. It'll just get damaged when it rains or you wash it or whatever.

    11. Re:So very tired... by dick980 · · Score: 1

      WHY would I want to wear a computer?

      As opposed to having it in a small, portable device? Because you can misplace your phone/pda or whatever device it is, and it's much easier to steal. It's much harder to lose a piece of clothing that you're wearing.

    12. Re:So very tired... by fritter · · Score: 1

      Maybe I have to hand in my geek membership card, but wearing a computer ranks right up there with wearing a refridgerator.

      Absolutely not! You can't have a case of beer on hand at all times when you wear a computer.

    13. Re:So very tired... by mrtroy · · Score: 1

      Before you start trash talking...

      "At the last movie I saw, I played snake while waiting for the stupid previews to be over. When I'm alone for a bit, like waiting for my meal to be served, I get on the net with my cell phone and get updated on the news. Can I live without? Sure. But I can make a little use of my time."

      What happened to talking to your "significant other" while waiting for dinner to be served, or waiting for hte movie to start. Hell, what happened to talking to any friends at these occasions. I can not stay I have ever went to dinner or a movie alone.

      I do not mean to be rude, but the technology that is supposed to be bringing us closer together is not doing its job. Instead of talking to the person beside you in public places, we are talking on or playing games on a cell phone. Instead of spending quality time with people, we are on the Internet.

      Of course I am hypocritical, but everyone can agree its true.

      --
      [I can picture a world without war, without hate. I can picture us attacking that world, because they'd never expect it]
    14. Re:So very tired... by colmore · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree, I'll quote one of my all time favorite philosophers, Calvin's Dad (from Calvin & Hobbes)

      "If we wanted more free time, we'd make devices that did things more slowly"

      Frankly, the prospect of leading a lifestyle that requires this level of access to information terrifies me. It pisses me off enough that I can't get any of my friends to write me a letter, even more that, because everyone I know now relies on cell phones, I have to have one too.

      I find technology to be expensive, time-consuming, and impersonal. I try to only use what I actually need.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    15. Re:So very tired... by hedgefrog · · Score: 2, Funny
      What happened to talking to your "significant other" while waiting for dinner to be served, or waiting for hte movie to start.

      This is slashdot; what significant other?

      --

      I lost my copy of the green golf ball joke can anyone find it for me?
    16. Re:So very tired... by Hacksaw · · Score: 1

      To view the MIThril as a general computing device is to miss the point. It can be one (it's actually two :-) but it's function is to be an always available PDA. The project is trying to make it into a tool that actively assists you in a variety of ways. One way is to provide a map of the area you are in, with a "you are here" pointer that updates as you walk. The uses for this in professional work are immeasurable. Soldiers, fire fighters, warehouse workers, couriers, police, and many other would find this useful.

      Another function they're researching is for the wearable to be aware of your context, and give you hints that you might want. For instance, the wearable might search your database of people you have met, and remind you who you are talking to at a conference.

      In short, equating the MIThril with the box on your desktop is the wrong view. Look at it as a super PDA, and you are heading in the right direction.

      --

      All the technology in the world won't hide your lack of vision, talent, or understanding.

    17. Re:So very tired... by BSD+Yoda · · Score: 1

      He has a significant other. He told us, he was playing snake on it. Personally, I want to get this vest, and have 10 of my friends get one too. We'll all go down to the bar at JFK airport, never fly anywhere, just sit in the bar, acting really drunk, and talking about how much we love Allah. Then, we'll run Morpheus on them, throw them un unsuspecting passersby, and call the RIAA, what glorious fun.

    18. Re:So very tired... by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with that? Well I guess I can't entice you, but personally I've enjoyed having simple games to play.

      I have a Palm. If I really wanted to play games on the go, I'd buy a Gameboy. I don't expect a Gameboy to make phonecalls. I don't expect my phone to play games.

      Hideous? I pay about 10-15 bucks a month more than a landline, all my long distance is free, and my phone's with me all the time.

      I barely make any phonecalls. I have to have a landline installed to get DSL service (cable is not an option where I am) so a cellphone is pointless. Plus your phone being with you all the time is the biggest problem I have with cellphones. You're now a slave to a phone if that is the case. I like being able to get away from the phone.

    19. Re:So very tired... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "What happened to talking to your "significant other" while waiting for dinner to be served, or waiting for hte movie to start."

      Who says I don't? Why do you have to assume it's "Oh, he just plays that game, he doesn't talk to anybody or have any sort of social life"? Give me a little credit, will ya?

      My girlfriend doesn't like all the same movies I do. Simple as that. She wouldn't go with me to see Star Trek or Terminator. Hence, I went alone.
      " I can not stay I have ever went to dinner or a movie alone."

      I do, from time to time. I eat at restaraunts for lunch. My gf lives too far away for me to go have lunch with her. Simple.

      "I do not mean to be rude, but the technology that is supposed to be bringing us closer together is not doing its job. Instead of talking to the person beside you in public places, we are talking on or playing games on a cell phone. Instead of spending quality time with people, we are on the Internet."

      You look *way* too deep into what I said. You're assuming I'm playing games and not talking to anybody. You're assuming I play on the internet and don't talk to anybody. You probably think I don't go out or do anything exciting but watch Slashdot all day. Again, I say, give me some credit.

      For the record, technology is keeping me in touch with a lot of people from all over the world. I've been to Brazil, Australia, and Canada, and are still in touch with many of the people I've met there. I've got a friend I routinely IM with over my cell phone, she lives two towns over. My GF and I email each other while I'm at work. My friends around the city use IRC to get a gathering going. And then there's Live Journal, which provides me with a deeper insight into what's going on with my friends.

      Technology isn't bringing us closer together? While you're busy telling me I'm doing nothing but playing games on my cell phone, I'm actually quite entrenched with technology and how it relates to my social life.

      Maybe you should come out of your world of absolutist logic and assumptions that are ill-concieved. It's turning you into a pessimist.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    20. Re:So very tired... by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      I agree. I look at the wearable computers people are putting together, and all I see is a rats nest of cabling and parts, just hanging all over the place. It's bulky, it's messy, and it doesn't do as much as a garden-variety PDA you can buy for under five hundred dollars. Wearables totally leave me cold; I think they're already obsolete, and they're not even a "mature technology" yet!

      Here's what I think is going to find its way into wide use: combination PDA/Cell Phone systems with a heads-up display that works like a set of slim walkman earphones. Basically, you'd have your PDA/Cell in the vest pocket of your jacket, and a clip-on display would be hooked to your glasses. Just like an old walkman, a form factor people are already accustomed to.

      Think about it: cell phone and PDA convergence is already happening, the technology is already almost as good as that in laptops, and the clip-on heads up displays are already on the market.

      Why would anyone want to buy clothing that contained electronics, which you couldn't wash normally, and which couldn't be changed from year to year as fashions change? Clothing and computers just don't mix. No one is ever going to buy it.

      Nah, my money is on hybrid cell phones and PDAs run by fuel cell, with onboard GPS and a slick heads up display modeled like walkman headphones. They're smaller, you can waterproof and shockproof them, and they'll look cool when you show them to your friends.

      Common sense, isn't it?

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    21. Re:So very tired... by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      Everything you're suggesting can be done in a PDA without sewing it into an article of clothing (just tuck it in a shirt pocket, and plug in a HUD shaped like a pair of headphones). Binding computers to clothing IS kinda dumb. Using Augmented reality has nothing to do with the act of sewing a computer into a coat, ok? They're two separate things. Augmented Reality => smart, Computer Clothing => stupid. Just my opinion, of course, but I'd bet dollars to doughnuts that computer clothing would flop in the market harder than a fat man diving into an empty pool.

      I'll tell you what everyone and their mothers are going to buy: convergence -- combination PDAs, GPS receivers, and Cell Phones. But you can fit all that in a case the size of a small paperback book. Why sew it into a jacket??? See what I mean?

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    22. Re:So very tired... by Hacksaw · · Score: 1

      Given that it's a research project, why don't you cut them a break? Yes, they want the computer to be entirely contained within a false tooth, and earring and an eyelash, and be powered by body heat. Until then, it's a vest so it's not a giant lump hanging off a belt.

      But instead of reacting to someone's post about the thing, and making yourself look like an uninformed nincompoop, go read the site, where you can find out things like this, and understand just why they made the design choices they did.

      For instance, when they started the design of the Mithril, the Sharp Zaurus didn't exist, and no other PDA has anywhere near the power they needed.

      --

      All the technology in the world won't hide your lack of vision, talent, or understanding.

    23. Re:So very tired... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      " If I really wanted to play games on the go, I'd buy a Gameboy. "

      No you wouldn't. I seriously doubt you'd carry it around with you. A cell phone, if you had one, would be with you all the time.

      "I barely make any phonecalls"

      Same. Which is why I have a cell phone. Sound silly? Not really. Why pay for something I can only use at home when for a little more I can have something at all times? I like the idea of being able to dial 911 if I witness an accident.

      " Plus your phone being with you all the time is the biggest problem I have with cellphones."

      Having a cell phone != being a slave to it. I usually let my voice mail get the the call. The nice thing about cell phones is that you get a neat little mailbox icon if you have messages. It's on vibrate so unless I'm nearby to get it, I won't feel the dying need to answer it, plus it doesn't bug anybody else.

      So no, I'm not a slave to my phone. Sorry.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    24. Re:So very tired... by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      Sigh...

      Typical Slashdot silliness. Go ahead and attack me because I state the obvious. Why should I sympathize with someone whose research is already obsolete? Perhaps he should have realized "Oh! They've released tiny little PDAs which outclass and unman my device. Perhaps I should switch gears and change with the times!" These people have just kept doggedly pursuing an idea which is already dead, and you claim fatuously that I'm just "an uninformed nincompoop". God, whatta maroon. What a pidgeon you are.

      I've checked out a lot more pages on this subject than I'd guess you have, as it's a secret hobby of mine. And, I know something about the needs a person with a portable device must consider. Let me clue you in on a few things:

      1. A single, compact, ruggedized device is far superior to a bunch of non-ruggedized devices hooked up with several feet of wiring. Why? Because every connection in their wiring is another failure point. Another place where water may get into the system, shorting it out. Another place where strain hardening will eventually break the wiring, breaking the system. Another place where the wiring itself might get hung up and torn. Another place where the connection might loosen and separate, causing the device to fail. Should I go on? Or do you get the point?

      2. One single compact device is superior to a collection of connected devices because it can be ported quickly from one set of clothing to another, for example when you get soaked in a downpour or fall in some mud and want to change clothes.

      3. One single compact device is superior to a collection of connected devices because it is easier to clean when something nasty gets on it, something that would be of interest to the surgeons mentioned in another post.

      4. One single compact device is easier to upgrade.

      5. One single compact device is more portable, smaller, easier to store, and easier to SELL because it can be packaged in a smaller, neater package.

      Should I go on, you uninformed and overconfident noob? You're a schmuck hiding behind your geek fetishes. The vast majority of people will react in EXACTLY the same way as I have when presented with this idiotic technology. No one will buy it. They'll already have converged PDAs. They'll laugh at your silly tech, and it'll flop. Hard.

      Live with it. Deal. And, quit picking on the messenger. It isn't MY fault your pet interest is already obsolete. It isn't MY fault you can't change gears and adapt. You and everyone like you is an evolutionary dead end waiting to happen.

      Good luck with that.

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
  4. Don't know if I would "wear" computing by Arciryon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Integration is all good, but as for integrating functions into clothing I believe it can be at the expense of flexibility. I would much rather have a lot of functions integrated in my mobile, and be able to bring those functions with me in situations that I might choose another attire.

    1. Re:Don't know if I would "wear" computing by nacturation · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Integration is all good, but as for integrating functions into clothing I believe it can be at the expense of flexibility. I would much rather have a lot of functions integrated in my mobile, and be able to bring those functions with me in situations that I might choose another attire.

      On the other hand, as computers get smaller and cheaper, eventually the kind of functionality people would want embedded into their clothing could be put into tons of different things.

      Think RFID tags -- when the price gets low enough, why not embed it into everything? All you would need is a central repository which you could snap into place, or have your shirt/jacket/sarong/whatever pick up the info wirelessly.

      Combine this with "paper" displays and you might eventually be able to check your schedule on your shirt sleeve, update it, and wirelessly transmit the changes to a server where it gets distributed to people who have subscribed to your calendar.

      Presently, you're right. It's far too bulky to be considered for anyone but die-hard geeks. Similar to someone hundreds of years ago considering lugging around a grandfather clock on their wrist. Or thinking of carrying a phone in your pocket thirty years ago. Eventually, it becomes cheap enough and small enough where it makes sense.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    2. Re:Don't know if I would "wear" computing by Arciryon · · Score: 1

      Presently, you're right. It's far too bulky to be considered for anyone but die-hard geeks. Similar to someone hundreds of years ago considering lugging around a grandfather clock on their wrist. Or thinking of carrying a phone in your pocket thirty years ago. Eventually, it becomes cheap enough and small enough where it makes sense. Agreed. It is of course good that some pioneers show us how it can be, but I'd much rather have implants.

    3. Re:Don't know if I would "wear" computing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It is of course good that some pioneers show us how it can be, but I'd much rather have implants."

      want me to forward a few emails which offer help? :)

    4. Re:Don't know if I would "wear" computing by chain_from_hell · · Score: 1
      They are overshooting a little. They should think 'gadgets' and not personal networks for the time being.

      Storing data in your cloathes is not very practical. 'Damn, left my pr0n on my jacket and my mom is washing it right now.' Jewelery is more fitted for this. A watch with hard disk and bluetooth connection for example, or a necklace.

      There are other applications that can be very fun, although not immediatly practical. Combine electronic ink and T-shirt. You get a T-shirt that can change it's print and color. This one is ready to become the next hype, next to the ring tones and logo's on cell phones!

      Besides, I don't like the idea that a PC is watching me all te time.

  5. I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    if they'll have "wearable" computers like this.

    OH YEAH! Wearable on the inside, baby!

    1. Re:I wonder... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      They should combine that with an MP3/Og player. "I've got 10,000 songs. . . .up my butt!"

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  6. Would you want this? by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

    This is indeed a cool proof of concept, but would you want one?

    I'd prefer a lot of computing power in my cell phone, a display integrated into my glasses and interaction via voice commands (think headset) or a wristband keypad.

    Thoughts?

    --
    .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    1. Re:Would you want this? by tiled_rainbows · · Score: 1

      I would go further - I wouldn't want one, and I can't really see what "concept" it's "proving". It looks to me like they've just got a waistcoat with a whole bunch of pockets, carrying some electronics.

      I'm not going to even start getting excited until materials technology reaches the point where the processsor and display elements can actually be woven into the fabric of the garment. Animated T-shirt designs would be cool. Being able to write notes directly onto my trousers and having OCR software translate this into text would also be cool.

      seeing how many gadgets one can fit in one's waistcoat pockets is, however, not cool.

    2. Re:Would you want this? by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      so you would rather have to dig out your cellphone and dial from it instead of having you cellphone as a device on your belt and you simply say "dial steve at office" to dial steve's office number and then talk to him through the bluetooth headset?

      what you want is EXACTLY a wearable computer. just make the "cellphone" a black box with no buttons or silly microphone + speaker, oh and give it a decent processor, ram, storage, etc...

      nahh give me a wearable computer with a cellphone attachment.. think pcmcia card here...

      90% of the hardware you see is power and battery management. and that is the biggest problem. batteries today are a complete and utter joke compared to everything else... almost no power and life for a gigantic size.

      wearable computing is very cool, I used to be faster at typing on my handykey twiddler one handed keyboard than a regular keyboard. do I still do the wearable computing thing??? nope. but I'm not in college anymore with thousands of hours to spend on my projects (or get credit and funding for my projects!)

      but wearable computing is going that way... It's that you call it a cellphone and think of the phone as the central piece where as the "phone" really is a small accessory to the main computer.

      the thing holding it back is dirt cheap bluetooth and batteries that dont royally suck.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Would you want this? by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

      so you would rather have to dig out your cellphone and dial from it instead of having you cellphone as a device on your belt and you simply say "dial steve at office" to dial steve's office number and then talk to him through the bluetooth headset?

      You seem to have missed my point. I would like to have all the necessary technology integrated into my cellphone, as it's always with me. The dialing bit can naturally be handled by a heaset solution, my phone can do that already.

      It's that you call it a cellphone and think of the phone as the central piece where as the "phone" really is a small accessory to the main computer.

      If this thing should go mainstream we need to have something tangliable to put it in. PDAs have never really kicked in. I've used a Palm, but since my phone is always in my pocket I end up using the more limited calender etc. on it instead.

      What the hardware inside is doing is irrelevant. My watch is actually a computer, despite of the analog interface it has. It stopped working a while back and my clocksmith reset all settings in the memory, now it works again. I still call it a watch though.

      My point is simple: I believe beefing up "phones" and adding features from "computers" is a better aproach for mainstream "wearable computing" than dedicated gear. The only crucial bit missing is a display which can be embedded into ones glasses, the rest is pretty much there already.

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    4. Re:Would you want this? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      If this thing should go mainstream we need to have something tangliable to put it in. PDAs have never really kicked in. I've used a Palm, but since my phone is always in my pocket I end up using the more limited calender etc. on it instead.

      this is the point....

      you have to touch your pda to use it... pda's are a kludge..

      either you can retrieve info from the wearable via voice commands and voice response (reading a memo to you, a light ding and a "dentist appointment in 20 minutes at 2 pm") or the heads up display, a small device you can simply glance at (it's built into your glasses or a small clear protrusion into the corner of your field of vision) that you can see the infotop that you can navigate from your watch control buttons (turn the ring around the dial to scroll up down, buttons to select or scroll otherwise.) or control from voice...

      imagine this... you answer the phonecall from dave (555-1212) your wearable brings up the file on dave in the heads up display so you can see any notes you have on dave.. "remember, dave owes you 40 bucks"

      it's simple, and again the problems are cheap bluetooth and batteries...

      imagine having to charge your headset, hmd, watch, keyboard, and wearable 5 times a day...

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:Would you want this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm not going to even start getting excited until materials technology reaches the point where the processsor and display elements can actually be woven into the fabric of the garment.

      Exactly right. Now, how do you think materials (and other) technology is ever going to get to the point where processors, displays, and applications are small enough and useful enough that people will want to use them? Perhaps we will get there by having researchers work on the technology, experiment with different alternatives, and present the results at workshops and conferences. Oh wait, that's what the FA is about.

  7. Good-bye pocket protectors... by mcpkaaos · · Score: 4, Funny

    Because nothing says, "Please kick my ass," quite like wearing your computer.

    --
    It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
    1. Re:Good-bye pocket protectors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Slashdot t-shirt on the other hand is the height of cool.

    2. Re: Good-bye pocket protectors... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny


      > Because nothing says, "Please kick my ass," quite like wearing your computer.

      Mithril Robe of *Geekiness* [2,-25]. +1 to intelligence, -5 to charisma. Aggravates nearby jocks and cheerleaders; provides immunity against getting laid. Activates every 50+d50 turns for spellchecking. This item is heavily cursed. If warn while riding a Segway, may polymorph your character into a dork.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re: Good-bye pocket protectors... by mcpkaaos · · Score: 1, Funny

      I stand corrected.

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
    4. Re: Good-bye pocket protectors... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > I stand corrected.

      You have to wonder about the market for Geek Warez that even Slashdotters ridicule.

      I wonder if they'll market it with an "As laughed at on Slashdot!" tag line.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    5. Re: Good-bye pocket protectors... by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny
      Activates every 50+d50 turns for spellchecking.

      Is strongly affected by the Slashdot Blog of Poseur. When in melee range of the Blog, the spellcheck function must make a saving throw against Posion, or be affected. Effects: spellcheck is activated every 1+1d6 turns. Blog will cause egregious spelling and grammar errors. Every 4+2d4 rounds it will cause the massive duplication of what has gone before, lasting 3 turns.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    6. Re: Good-bye pocket protectors... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Yeah....its not enough that by merely wearing this thing you are labeled a geek......then comes the question, "What IS this thing?"

      "Well my friend, this is Mithril"

      "What is Mithril?"

      "Mithril is a magical metal alloy created by the elves of Middle Earth.........hey, why are you picking up that bat? AAAAARRGHHH!!!!! HELP HELP!!!! DON"T HURT ME!!!!!"

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  8. lingerie by Psychotic_Wrath · · Score: 2, Funny

    I cant wait to see some hot chick in a Palm Pilot

    --

    Doctors do Massage in Longview WA now, who knew?
  9. Its allready been done by Psychotic_Wrath · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Ducks started doing this a long time ago GIZMO DUCK

    --

    Doctors do Massage in Longview WA now, who knew?
  10. good idea but the weight!!! by fantomas · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can see some useful embedded applications (excuse the pun, ho ho) in having portable computing power, but look at the photo - the weight of it all. I'll wait till they get it a bit more slimline. Reminds me of 80s "mobile" phones compared to today. Why's it all so cumbersome? ok, batteries I understand we still have to work on, but the rest?



    1. Re:good idea but the weight!!! by mahdi13 · · Score: 1

      But you'll get a good workout lugging around all that weight! It's a geeks fitness program!

      --
      "Some things have to be believed to be seen." - Ralph Hodgson
  11. Darlng.. by adeyadey · · Score: 3, Funny

    You didnt put my jacket in the wash.. er.. did you?

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
    1. Re:Darlng.. by Porthwhanker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You didnt put my jacket in the wash.. er.. did you?

      I think you're onto something here. What do you do when your wearable computer starts to stink? You can't put it in the washing machine. I doubt it's dry-cleanable...

    2. Re:Darlng.. by JimPooley · · Score: 1

      I rather suspect a lot of the people who will want to wear that won't mind, as it'll have a long way to go to overcome their body odour...

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    3. Re:Darlng.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somehow I don't think Dorktron 2000 wearers are going to need to worry about loved ones mistreating their garb.

  12. OT:So very tired... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In fact I don't even own a cellphone because of the hideously overpriced services.

    Actually, my cell phone saves me a *lot* of money. I live on the west coast and most of my friends and family live on the easy coast. My long distance bill was extremely high until I started using a cell phone to make my calls. I guess it can be expensive if you go over your monthly allowance of minutes, but I have yet to do that in the year+ I've had one because I get more than I can use for $40/month. Good deal IMO.

    1. Re:OT:So very tired... by CowardWithAName · · Score: 1

      most of my friends and family live on the easy coast.

      don't kid yourself... it's not that easy.

  13. Womanizer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Man, If wearing that MIThril jacket won't get me laid, nothing will!

  14. Standard unfunny gag. by ideatrack · · Score: 2, Funny

    Gives new meaning to "running Linux".

    I'm so funny.

  15. And this next slide is... by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 0, Funny

    Geekus Majoris

    Previously thought to be only legend, the Geekus Majoris was discovered in the basements of MIT and UC Berkeley simultaneously in the mid 1960's. Their main habitat is underground and they frequently live with their parents until they find a mate and move out.

    They have in recent years become more common outside of their primary habitat and are frequently seen skulking about shopping malls and video stores. They seem to have an affinity for Japanese anime which explains their attraction to small woodland animals.

    They are the masters of camouflage. Some have developed the ability to blend in with the normal populace, though most are only able to appear homosapien. To determine if the creature you are viewing is a Geekus Majoris observe the fingertips. Bright orange fingertips are the telltale sign of the species.

    Approach with caution and do not attempt to feed.

  16. Trilogy? by Tychoma · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Umm, since when was The Lord of the Rings a Trilogy?

    --
    Karma: Shitty (mostly due to American moderators)
    1. Re:Trilogy? by panurge · · Score: 1, Funny

      Since the term "trilogy" applied to a book in three volumes. Which describes LOTR. er, what part of this don't you understand?

      --
      Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    2. Re:Trilogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He is right - Tolkein wrote The Lord of The Rings as a book, which was published in three _parts_. A trilogy is more properly three _books_ that form a _series_.
      (It's just not terribly important :) ).

    3. Re:Trilogy? by peragrin · · Score: 1

      um actaully it is 1 volume, normally broken down into 3 phyiscal volumes, each with 2 books inside.

      okay I have had my geek quotien for the morning I am good till noon

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    4. Re:Trilogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You can add to that the fact that Tolkien specifically said (ok, wrote) that it was *not* a trilogy, it's in Letters of JRR Tolkien, I'd give a more exact reference but I'm not at home (it has the best indices I've ever seen anyway, not hard to find).
      A trilogy is composed of three independent stories that are related, try giving someone who hasn't read any Tolkien books the second volume (The Two Towers), see if he understands anything at all... specially considering books 3 and 4 (lotr is divided in 6 books plus apendices, and it has been sold that way) are separate, since the fellowship splits at the end of volume 1 (the fellowship of the ring) and doesn't get back together until volume 3 (the return of the king).
      Oh, and yeah, I have the 1 volume edition illustrated by Alan Lee :P which at first got me wondering how anyone would call the book a trilogy since there is no split anywhere!
      Damn, I'm a geek.

    5. Re:Trilogy? by javatips · · Score: 1

      Someone mod this guy up. He's actually right! There is 6 books in the Lord of the Ring "trilogy". Plus a whole lot of other books related to it.

    6. Re:Trilogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point, except that it isn't supported by, like, the actual definition of the word. E.g., one dictionary gives Shakespeare's Henry VI as an example of a trilogy.

    7. Re:Trilogy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That it's six books in three volumes?

      Time to revoke your geek card! ;)

  17. Another target for the MPAA,... by panurge · · Score: 1

    or perhaps the Tolkien estate. Isn't this a copyright infringement? Don't laugh. In a reverse version, some years back, Disney had to pay damages to the Bussmann company, who had registered "Tron" as a trademark, even though the film had nothing to do with electrical fusegear. The vague "electronic" connection was enough."

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    1. Re:Another target for the MPAA,... by rwven · · Score: 1

      no one holds any rights to the LOTR name or story. It's public domain. it was written ages ago before that stuff even existed. the MPAA cant do crap about it...

    2. Re:Another target for the MPAA,... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      no one holds any rights to the LOTR name or story. It's public domain. it was written ages ago before that stuff even existed. the MPAA cant do crap about it...
      Mickey Mouse, who was created in 1928, is still under copyright. "The Hobbit" was written in 1937 and the first LOTR book was written in 1954. So LOTR is still under copyright.
  18. More like Star Wars than LOTR by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 2, Funny
    Seeing as it looks like C-3PO in the "Phantom Menace", before he got his gold lame suit.

    As for its potential street cred, I don't think the combination of bare computer hardware, Linux and a Tolkien-derived name will see you having to beat off the hotties with a shitty stick ;-)

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    1. Re:More like Star Wars than LOTR by sharkey · · Score: 1
      having to beat off the hotties with a shitty stick ;-)

      Well, the beating off will still apply just as much as before.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  19. Shoplifters! by slaida1 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    But it isn't stealing if you only "infringe" those cds' music into your pockets. Shopinfringers maybe?

    Have anyone of you thought of going into music store, asking if you could test if a cd played properly in your "portable cd-player" (external cd-rom drive connected to the laptop in his backpack..) and rip it while chatting away with salesman how RIAA is doing the right thing and how you at least support them all the way.. heh heh

    --
    Preserve old classics: copy your collection onto all hard drives.
    1. Re:Shoplifters! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What music store has salespeople on the floor?

    2. Re:Shoplifters! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's every saturday morning for me

  20. Locutus by tnmc · · Score: 1, Funny

    Great, be your own Borg...

  21. Not as good as the real thing. by CGP314 · · Score: 1

    Yes but can it protect me from a spear that would have skewered a wild boar?

  22. Looking forward to the Wireless version... by Solo-Malee · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In this day an age why the hell is anyone putting stuff together with so many cablkes. I can count at least 10 in the picture! Surely they can do better than this with the Bluetooth and Wireless possibilities that exist now? Nice idea, but I think I'll wait for the StarTrek Tricorder hologram projecting version instead

    --
    "If it's lost, it'll turn up. Things always do" "I love it when a plan comes together"
    1. Re:Looking forward to the Wireless version... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA - it uses 802.11.

    2. Re:Looking forward to the Wireless version... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would happen in a room full of people using similar "wireless" devices?

      How you going to power it?

      Might as well use the cables to power it as data channels. Plus using wireless stuff would make it more expensive and be against the goal of using as much commotity hardware as possible.

    3. Re:Looking forward to the Wireless version... by jim3e8 · · Score: 1

      The FAQ addresses the question of Bluetooth.

    4. Re:Looking forward to the Wireless version... by Solo-Malee · · Score: 1

      So they have that covered it seems. Fair argument, I bow to their greater wisdom...darned experts always have a smart answer for everything ;)

      --
      "If it's lost, it'll turn up. Things always do" "I love it when a plan comes together"
  23. MIT's dumb idea?? by Porthwhanker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There's been a few comments about how the whole wearable computing thing is silly, and "it's an MIT" thing. Let me clear this up a bit. Maybe it started as an MIT thing way back in the late 50's/early 60's, at least according to this paper. But I know Carnegie Mellon has been working on this stuff for over 5 years because they had ongoing wearable computer projects when I was a freshman there in 98'. And there's a lot of others besides MIT and CMU working on this stuff, just look here under the Organizations section.

    This area of technology is already being targeted at consumers. Try to have a little imagination and realize how powerful this technology could be. For example, what if you had a little speech translator that fit in your ear, recognized nearby spoken speech in foreign languages, traslated it to your language, and used a voice synthesizer to repeat it back to you in your native tongue. Just wait a few years and you'll be saying "damn, I need one of those".

    1. Re:MIT's dumb idea?? by kahei · · Score: 1


      Why, yes, a speech translator such as you describe *would* be useful. If I had one, I would be sure to avoid inextricably attaching it to an item of apparel.

      I would like to propose a hypothesis:

      "The usefulness of any already-useful electronic tool N is drastically reduced by sewing N into the lining of your damn jacket."

      --
      Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    2. Re:MIT's dumb idea?? by digitac · · Score: 1
      "..what if you had a little speech translator that fit in your ear, recognized nearby spoken speech in foreign languages, traslated it to your language, and used a voice synthesizer to repeat it back to you in your native tongue."


      Why don't you just put a fish in your ear?

      ::digitac
    3. Re:MIT's dumb idea?? by blitzrage · · Score: 1

      Hrm... well, this is a page about Canadian wearable computing.

      http://wearcam.org/

      --

      I have no signature
  24. Practical Applications... by binary+paladin · · Score: 1

    Why is it the only thing I could come up with was some way to hook this thing up to one of my guns? Now that I think about it, please refrain from answering the question.

  25. Hi! by Linux+Newbie+Girl · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If they could produce a classy Linux skirt I'd definitely use it!

  26. i read slashdot on mine by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    sony P800, opera and GPRS = even more pointless hours spent reading slashdot whilst in queues...

  27. Re:fp by adeyadey · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "First Post". Its a competition around these parts for some..

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
  28. What is the deal with "wearable"...? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1
    For example, what if you had a little speech translator that fit in your ear, recognized nearby spoken speech in foreign languages, traslated it to your language, and used a voice synthesizer to repeat it back to you in your native tongue. Just wait a few years and you'll be saying "damn, I need one of those".
    Or how about a tiny HUD in my specs, combined with a camera and face recognition to display people's names over their heads so I don't have to remember them? I'd buy one of them!

    But please don't call these 'wearable'... What you describe is just a fancy hearing aid... since when do we call them 'wearable'? Is my bluetooth wireless headset a 'wearable telecoms device'? Are my headset and Glasstron a 'wearable entertainment centre'? The problem that I (and others, I guess) have with the term 'wearable' is that it is something that sounds like a hype, and implies merging electronics into clothes... for which I cannot imagine any advantageous use whatsoever unless the electronics involved are really cheap. In all cases the electronics are best left separate from the clothing, and made small so they can be carried around. We already did this with cellphones, PDAs, and walkmans, and we didn't start calling these 'wearable' just because our coat has a special pocket for them, did we?
    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    1. Re:What is the deal with "wearable"...? by Porthwhanker · · Score: 1
      But please don't call these 'wearable'... We already did this with cellphones, PDAs, and walkmans, and we didn't start calling these 'wearable' just because our coat has a special pocket for them, did we?
      I agree there's definitely some issues with the buzzword surrounding this technology. What a pointless adjective: it's on your body, you're wearing it, we get it.

      Ironically, half of CMU's "wearable" computing projects don't even appear to be wearable!! Start with the TIA-P link and you'll see what I mean... apparently, being able to hold it in your hand makes it "wearable". I just submitted this post with my wearable mouse :P

      We need a new term for this sort of thing. Actually, we need two more terms. One for the useful stuff, and one for the stuff pointlessly sewn into clothing that can't even be washed because it has electronics in it.
    2. Re:What is the deal with "wearable"...? by HeyLaughingBoy · · Score: 1
      In all cases the electronics are best left separate from the clothing, and made small so they can be carried around.

      You're forgetting that there can be special purpose devices like there is special purpose clothing:

      A mechanic might be able to purchase overalls that come with a built in On Board Diagnostics interface with a screen on the sleeve. Or as others have noted, his glasses might project repair manuals that the computer built into his clothing is accessing through the shop's network.

      Mountaineering jackets can have body-monitoring functions that pick up signals from sensors embedded in gloves or underclothing to indicate you're getting frostbitten or have passed out and call for help, relaying your position & altitude with GPS.

      Wetsuits can do something similar like monitoring water depth, respiration rate, time at depth, %blood nitrogen, etc.

      Of course all of these devices assume that the cost of hardware drops to negligible amounts, but that's happening rapidly anyway. Priced right and packaged to withstand users' abuse and washing, etc, and it will become normal to expect that some clothing does more than just protect you from the elements.
      The advantage you say you don't get is not having to carry extra items around. Look at fishermen for a simple example. Fly fishing vests have pockets designed to carry flies so there's no need for an external tackle box as the user is often in areas where one wouldn't be feasible anyway. In fact as I write this, I'm thinking that waders that measured water temperature/flow and stream bottom composition and relayed that to the vest that uses GPS to figure out where I am while monitoring light levels and tell me what my odds are of catching something at that time of day in that location are would be worthwhile if it only added say $20 to the cost of all the clothing. That additional cost is not unreasonable considering how quickly I've seen the cost of electronic components drop in the last 10 years.
  29. The coolest thing about 802.11x by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    >Now a toilet computer... that's what I want if for no other reason than the internet has much better bathroom reading material than my local paper and sometimes, when I really have to go, I don't have time to grab a book or the paper.

    Get with the program man!

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    1. Re:The coolest thing about 802.11x by binary+paladin · · Score: 1

      You realize that the geek thing to do in that situation would be to use some sort of amplified antenna to get internet service in the bathroom not from your room with the wireless router... no... but from like... your friend's house a few blocks away.

      And suddenly I have this terrible image of IMing while taking a dump.

      Hey, everything come out all right?
      Yeah, it was great. ;) Thanx.
      I think my wax ring just seg-faulted.

      I was gonna go on but... yeah... I should be sleeping.

    2. Re:The coolest thing about 802.11x by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I think my wax ring just seg-faulted."

      God I didn't think I'd ever read those words in the same sentance...

  30. Re:Great! by j0l · · Score: 1

    Damn speed scanning; I though this was about Michael Jackson's jacket, circa Thriller, or maybe that optical fibre one.

  31. Useful clothing technology... by Yousef · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Make clothing that cleans itself.
    Make clothing that dries itself.
    Make clothing that automatically reacts to the weather etc.

    But putting a computer in your clothing, just doesn't make sense!

    Technology should be intelligent, useable, and not make you look like a freak while using it (Bluetooth wireless headsets come to mind).

    --
    -- "To ask a question is to show ignorance; Not to ask a question means you'll remain ignorant."
  32. Sorry! by stewwy · · Score: 2, Funny

    when u take it in the rain and it shorts out.... will it be a smoking jacket?

  33. MIThril vest is more like it, I'd say by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1, Funny


    Clearly simoniker is not a dedicated follower of fashion. A search of the MIThril page shows that the word jacket is never used. Most probably this is because it is a vest .

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  34. For it to catch on it needs by stewwy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1. to be under $500 2. to have sensory feedback ;) 3. to be something that does porn

  35. Looks like.. by DrBytes · · Score: 0

    .. the Borg Queens evening dress..

  36. What's Wrong With This Project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I had to wade through more buzzwords than I could handle before encountering any plain, simple descriptions of what the thing actually does. The site comes off like venture-funded arm-waving. The only thing it lacks are stock pictures of young business suits standing around shaking hands and smiling confidently.

    Aside from the display goggles, it doesn't look like there is nothing particularly cutting edge about the hardware. If you can do something interesting with a 25-pound PC strapped to your back and a big fat extension cord trailing behind you, it won't take MIT undergrads to stuff the applications into some lightweight jacket-mounted hardware. Thus, it's all about the applications.

    So what about the applications? Where are they described? I don't know. I got about as far into the site as I could before my little eyelids started to droop and my tongue started falling down the back of my throat, and I still didn't know what the killer apps were that I would be running if I had that jacket on right now.

    So, without a clue about what that jacket can do now, here're a few things I can think of that I would want it to do. Maybe it does these things.

    1) Something that allows me to quickly record, index, and play back audio and video snippets. If somebody says something, I want to be able to hear it again 5 seconds or 5 hours later. In the event of any Rodney King scenario, traffic stop, zeppelin accident, or anything else that one might want to have recorded later, I want to be able to start streaming whatever I'm seeing and hearing to remote backup.

    2) Something that allows me to know where I am right now and how to get somewhere. I want GPS, Mapquest, and if I go hiking in the cascades with it, I want the optional emergency locator beacon too.

    3) Something that allows me to surf. Finding restaurants and movie theaters and spare batteries will always be high on the list.

    4) All the PDA stuff you can think of. Phone book, calendar, alarm (with a snooze button that isn't too hard to find) and a cell phone.

    Y'know, when you get right down to it, putting this stuff on a jacket isn't really where you want it for day to day use. You want to stuff it all into something that you can put in your pocket. I think Nokia is already working on most of this stuff.

    1. Re:What's Wrong With This Project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      1) Something that allows me to quickly record, index, and play back audio and video snippets. If somebody says something, I want to be able to hear it again 5 seconds or 5 hours later. In the event of any Rodney King scenario, traffic stop, zeppelin accident, or anything else that one might want to have recorded later, I want to be able to start streaming whatever I'm seeing and hearing to remote backup.

      Go one step further and "start recording from 10 seconds ago".

      Imagine the possibilities of having everything you hear and see in a cyclic buffer of say 5 minutes, that you can dump to disk or offsite at any time.

  37. Gee thats neeat...not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because you can sling a bunch of shit over a jacket does not make it "wearable".

    I realize that we are looking at prototypes, but it seems that they are completely forgoing any sense of "wearability" or form in the name of function.

    I guess that comes later.

  38. MIT Geeks are just a little too into themselves. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm wearing a Sharp Zaurus right now.

    I've got an 802.11 card, a BlueTooth card, a BT GSM Phone, and a BT Headset.

    If I call it a wearable personal network will I get on slashdot?

    I just call it my PDA and my phone.

    Other articles in this series:

    MIT Student Uses Voice Teleporter Device.

    MIT Student Operates Internal Combustion Driven Personal Re-location Device.

    MIT Student Projects his Emotional State Over Thousands of Miles Using only the ":" and ")" Characters.

  39. Pay me how much? by gorjusborg · · Score: 1

    You couldn't pay me enough money to wear that thing. It looks like the interior designer for TGIFridays made it.

    On second thought, I guess it would stop all those sex-hungry girls from chasing me around.

    --
    If it's not one thing, it's Steve's Mother
  40. But will it stop a spear from an ogre? by DirkDaring · · Score: 0

    If so, sign me up!

  41. Leave it to MIT... by silent_poop · · Score: 1

    ...to glue a motherboard to a vest and call it wearable.

    --

    --
    silence is poetry.
  42. Zaurus (off-topic but interesting :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My friend ran a password cracker on his Zaurus, and found the root password in 11 seconds. (Very useful if you want to start fiddling with lower-level things on your Zaurus.)

    root p/w: 4545

  43. Where does the "geekness" stop? by not_a_george · · Score: 1

    don't get me wrong, I like to play with toys. I just don't think you need to wear something instead of just putting a PDA in your pocket. It's already small, lightweight, and has plenty of usefull "applications".
    Why does technology ALWAYS have to get smaller? I NEED a cell phone that can reach at least halfway between my ear and my mouth. Anything smaller and I will look like I am having a seizure when I am talking on the phone.
    everynow and then I also like NOT looking like a geek.

    --
    Linux: Helping nerds look smarter since the late 90s.
    1. Re:Where does the "geekness" stop? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      what about a cell phone that just hooks on your ear?
      How about glasses that displays relivant facts while havne a conversation?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  44. Re: Targeting Systems by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

    Actually, I've been wanting a 'SmartLink' for some time. IIRC, I picked that term up from a cyberpunk RPG.

    Think about it, a position sensor on your weapon and a stereo HMD connected through a small processor. Wherever you point at a target, a dot is superimposed over reality via the HMD and you can tell where the slug will hit.

    You could even have the computer calculate drop, drift, and estimated inaccuracy due to an unsteady grip. Of course, those last three don't apply if you're using a TBW which is so much cooler than a conventional gun, what with it's phaser-like effects and all.

  45. Re: Targeting Systems by binary+paladin · · Score: 1

    I know what you're saying, chummer. It'd be nice to have one of those hooked up so that the next time some slothead gives you drek you're able to blow the frag outta him. I loved that game...

  46. ME not THRILled by javatips · · Score: 1
    Why so many research is done trying to wire many components into some clothes.


    We can already wear computers (Palm devices) and we do not need any wires bewteen it and other component such as network access devices (GSM Phone) thank's to Bluetooth.


    The only thing that may be missing is lightweight glasses with a display (something that look like a glass) that connect without wires to the computer and maybe some input device (voice would be nice and already exists with bluetooth headset. We just miss the voice recognition in a Palm device) and we are set.


    All these things can be worn with existing clothes and are not very intrusives.


    The future is in wireless PAN, not wired PAN.

  47. Re: Targeting Systems by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

    That's it... it was ShadowRun. Thanks for the memory jog. I've still got a bunch of sourcebooks I never used because my RPG friends were unable to get over D&D.

  48. I already own one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I own a wearable computer and it only cost me $6

    It's made by a company called Casio.

  49. Funny by MrClean · · Score: 1

    The jacket may be using Linux but the PDF paper is written using Word. You would think they could let the jacket write the paper at least then it would use latex :-p

  50. Re:MIT Geeks are just a little too into themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad you don't have any friends to call on that phone.

  51. mistaken by Boromir+son+of+Faram · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ITYM troll, not ogre. Tolkein never mentioned ogres living in Middle Earth. Frodo was stabbed by a mountain troll.

    --

    Boromir, son of Faramir, King of Gondor and Minas Tirith
  52. I concur by Anaphiel · · Score: 1

    Y'know, I walk through the MIT campus pretty much every day, and I can say with conviction that I do not want those kids designing my clothes.

  53. Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ironic; Tolkien was nothing if not a Luddite who despised technology as empty and an affront to nature. I think he'd be rather unimpressed. If people are so into naming things after LotR stuff, why not set up a nature preserve?

  54. RIAA take note by Graemee · · Score: 1

    RIAA, take note of where you'll have to go to get his mp3's.

    Pry them from his cold, dead spincter.

  55. For those bitching about the unwieldlyness by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I think you should just complain about the name. Frodo's mithril shirt was so thin it looked like a thermal. This looks like hot buttered crap. But the point of all of it is that it's prototyping. You're doing what you can now, in preparation for tomorrow. These devices are getting smaller and smaller and eventually they'll be built into your snaps and zippers.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  56. Long-term effects... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, it's all fun and games until one day your dick falls off from all the radiation...

  57. The real question .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is whether it will deflect arrows, bullets and swords!

  58. HUD by squarooticus · · Score: 1

    What I really want is a heads-up display, but not some big, bulky goggle crap; I want something like a small light transmitter on the frame of my glasses that projects an image straight into my eyeball. Something small, light, and which allows me to overlay the display over my normal vision without having to preprocess and delay my normal vision.

    This kind of interface is a prerequisite IMO for me wearing any kind of computer.

    --
    [ home ]
    1. Re:HUD by rwven · · Score: 1

      what you're thinking of is the virtual big screen's that they have. there's a dealy that goes in front of one eye and is about an inch wide and a half inch tall but after calibration for your eye it looks like it's 60". It's a really sweet little deal. there is already a wearable computer way smaller than that that uses it.

      anyone know anything about the landwarior system that the military uses? they have a wearable computer for that that is smaller than a portable cd player, has GPS built in, runs a modified version of windows, allows troop communication and has a pentium 3 CPU. it's a heck of a lot cooler than that crap. i honestly dont know how they got THAT much stuff ti make a wearable computer. there are much smaller solutions already on the market...

    2. Re:HUD by smartalix · · Score: 1
      There are several devices from MicroOptical that would satisfy your needs. They even have a 35-gm eyeglass-mounted QVGA near-eye monitor that can handle both bit-mapped and text input from Bluetooth-equipped PDAs and PCs.
      Wireless near-eye monitor frees portable apps

      --
      Read a preview of my novel CYBERCHILD at www.smartalix.com/cyberchild
  59. Oh, great. by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 1

    This is going to add a whole new painful dimension to scuffing your feet along the carpet and shocking your friends...

    "ZAP!" "You bastard! I just bought that RAM!"

  60. And just like Bilbo and Frodo... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...if you wear this, you'll never ever ever get laid.

  61. Here's a pretty geek-skin to wrap a borg drone in by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 1

    If it were known that geeks had such hides, all the muggers of Middle-earth would be riding to comdex.

    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
  62. Re:So very fired... by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1
    Sadly, many of us are more attached to computers than to our clothes, anyway. Who among us with a new laptop and Wi-Fi in house hasn't traded the wife's (or Mom's) Better Home & Gardens in the mag rack for Slashdot while, er, "downloading"?

    As to cellphone games...if you have a Kyocera 23xx phone and want to score big on the first screen of Brick Attack do this:

    • Click "New" to start a game
    • Move the paddle all the way to the right ...
    • Wait for the ball to get just about even to the top row of bricks
    • Scoot all the way to the left!
    • Wait for the ball to bounce over to the left and just as it begins the return trip
    • Scoot to the right!
    • Now the ball will complete the bricks for you (no matter what you do with the paddle from this point)
    • Score: 31.
    • Not bad. But wait! Don't click Resume, instead, click New and do it again
    • Score? at least 67.
    • Rinse, repeat.
    • Haven't found an upper limit.
    When did I discover this? Waiting in line, sitting in business meetings (turn sound and backlight off), and I perfected this while driving home on the 405 (don't worry...there's time to do a lot between momemtary brake pedal releases).

    As to wearing a fridge...many off us could be accussed of hiding one on our person on a cold day...

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  63. Alec Guinness disagrees by ianscot · · Score: 1
    Ever see the old UK comedy "The Man in the White Suit"? Alec Guinness plays a man who discovers the perfect material -- it's perpetually clean and dry in all conditions, and it won't wear out. Of course, clothing manufacturers and everyone else turn on him in a heartbeat.

    My point being, if someone does get to those qualities you're talking about, hey, the computer's going to be the part that goes obsolete every two years, or that fries in the rain, causing you to run out and buy a new outfit at the outlet mall. Go wearable computing! Keep those garment workers' consumer confidence up!

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  64. I think by Microsofts+slave · · Score: 1
    I Think i'll skip this short stage in wearable computers. That or i'll just ride out the entire thing and wait for a direct neural interface.

    But I dont wanna wait!

    --

    Tragek