Slashdot Mirror


"Virtual Bridge" Between London, Vienna Et Al.

dr.matrix writes "Read in Heise (German) how Tholos Systems wants to create a huge outdoor 360 degree video conference between all european capitals, starting with London and Vienna." Pretty impressive technology, but the purpose is still a bit unclear.

141 comments

  1. That's clear! by quigonn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Pretty impressive technology, but the purpose is still a bit unclear.

    That's art! It doesn't have to serve a purpose, but still may be useful for somebody.

    --
    A monkey is doing the real work for me.
    1. Re:That's clear! by richie2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That's art!

      Well, 13% of the screen time will be dedicated to advertising...

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    2. Re:That's clear! by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 1, Funny

      Pretty impressive technology, but the purpose is still a bit unclear.

      The latter half of that sentence is also a good description of what an Slashdot editorial role is all about.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    3. Re:That's clear! by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1

      We'll need a Euro-wide system to manage our armed forces when Bush decides that the present governments aren't forthcoming to US business interests, and that we need a regime change. ;-)

    4. Re:That's clear! by boomgopher · · Score: 1

      Here's a similar art piece:

      Tunnel Under The Atlantic

      --
      Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
    5. Re:That's clear! by Scaba · · Score: 1
      That's art! It doesn't have to serve a purpose, but still may be useful for somebody.

      It will probably be most useful for flipping off persons in other countries.

    6. Re:That's clear! by ralphclark · · Score: 1
      Pretty impressive technology, but the purpose is still a bit unclear.

      That's because it's in German, you insensitive clod!

  2. huh? by CGP314 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Read in Heise (German) how Tholos Systems wants to create a huge outdoor 360 degree video conference between all european capitals, starting with London and Vienna." Pretty impressive technology, but the purpose is still a bit unclear.

    You're description doesn't help either. Is this a circular wall that will span from London to Vienna? What's the point of a 360 degree display if the opposite wall is hidden by the curvature of the earth.

    1. Re:huh? by sebi · · Score: 3, Informative
      They plan to install two pretty big cylinders. One in Vienna, one in London. They are linked via a 100 MBit network connection. One will film a panorama in London and project it in Vienna. The other will, well, do the exact opposite. Apparently people standing in front of one will be able to talk to people standing in front of the other.

      Since I live in one of the two cities about to be connected this way and you seem to live in the other (judging from your URL) we will both see what it is like in May. I am just wondering how it will work once more than two cities are connected. Imagine being involved in an animated conversation with someone in Berlin only to be switched to Stockholm in mid-sentence.

    2. Re:huh? by Davak · · Score: 2
    3. Re:huh? by Davak · · Score: 1

      Very cool. What about traffic?

      It seems that this is going to be a huge attention grabbing thing that is going to lead to massive congestion around these areas.

      From this, one also realizes its purpose... profit! Having this will drawn people into this area causing a huge increase in tourism. Hell, I wanna see this thing now.

      Who wants to bet how long it's going to be before some body decides it wants to flash multiple countries at once? Too bad David Blain didn't think of this first.

    4. Re:huh? by sebi · · Score: 2, Interesting
      While it doesn't say so explicitly after reading this article I am under the impression that they will install the things in the purely pedestrian areas at the centre of the participating cities. It seems like the boss of the company hinted on a possible placement in front of Vienna's Stephansdom. That placement would be perfect for traffic, but maybe not that ideal for unifying Europe. The Stephansplatz is where you will always find more tourists than natives (expect maybe at new years eve) anyway, but I couldn't think of a better place myself.

      And about the flashing: That will definitely come from the brits. They seem to be really crazy about the sport. Definitely more so than other countries.

    5. Re:huh? by fuzzybunny · · Score: 4, Funny


      "Look, Klaus, zer is a fat drunken Englander pulling down his pants at us from across ze ether! Isn't technology vunderful?"

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    6. Re:huh? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "I am just wondering how it will work once more than two cities are connected. Imagine being involved in an animated conversation with someone in Berlin only to be switched to Stockholm in mid-sentence."

      Well, depending on how financially successful this is, they could simply make more cylinders. You want to talk to someone in France? Go to the French cylinder. Or they could section off portions of the cylinder to be linked to different areas.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  3. The Beast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny
    The purpose is, of course, to facilitate the tyranny of the forthcoming European superstate and its ruler, the Whore of Babylon to whom all the nations of the world, except Israel, will yield.

    The end is nigh.

    1. Re:The Beast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The purpose is, of course, to facilitate the tyranny of the forthcoming European superstate and its ruler, the Whore of Babylon to whom all the nations of the world, except Israel, will yield.

      I for one welcome our new whore overlady. Really.

  4. What a pointless exercise . . . . by Tetsugaku-San · · Score: 2, Funny

    So another application of wonderfull technology without any clear aim eh? Have no fear - some EU tech minister who couldn't tell the difference between a ZX-81 and a Pentium will pop up soon to tell us how "This will bring the nations of Europe together" Pffft :(

    1. Re:What a pointless exercise . . . . by fastdecade · · Score: 1

      Yep, says above the the purpose isn't clear. To me, this could be a very good thing --- lots of great technology has been driven by putting things "out there" and waiting for the innovative ways people use it.

  5. deaf europeans by The+Shrubber · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Could stand in front of these bridges and sign to each other, sign languages being more mutually intelligible than spoken languages.

    1. Re:deaf europeans by Ianoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Considering that a lot of British people don't speak Austrian German, I would suggest most people, hearing or deaf, would resort to the internationally understood language of giving them the finger.

    2. Re:deaf europeans by sebi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Considering that a lot of British people don't speak Austrian German, I would suggest most people, hearing or deaf, would resort to the internationally understood language of giving them the finger.

      A lot of Austrian people speak English, though. Or they are at least faking it on Slashdot. Look at me for a perfect example. And English people quite frequently give two fingers instead of just the one.

    3. Re:deaf europeans by Ianoo · · Score: 1

      People on Slashdot speak English?

      But seriously, you have a point. I wish fewer people in this country (England) would be so xenophobic towards other Europeans.

    4. Re:deaf europeans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I don't know. Speaking as an Englishman who has a Dutch father and married an American, I think the whole supposed "xenophobic attitude" that England is supposed to have is simply a myth blown way out of proportion by the usual tabloid media.

      I do wish people would be less schitzophrenic about the E.U though. Thats the tabloid media influance yet again though.

    5. Re:deaf europeans by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1


      Und ve could tell zem ja, zis is how yoo become successful in der English-shpeaking countries. Yoo can even become Gubernator of der California!

      Now how would you convey that in sign language?

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    6. Re:deaf europeans by famebait · · Score: 1, Funny

      Not just deaf people; it could really revolutionise things for other minorities too. Exhibitionists, for example.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    7. Re:deaf europeans by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Yah, most of the English are half foreign anyway - Norman, Saxon whatever. And that's not even mentioning their Royalty.

      Back when I was in England, I practically laughed when a Brit commented on someone not being pure blooded English (I doubt he was being racist - just one of those off the cuff comments). Coz that's almost oxymoronic.

      The English are ok - the Scots probably have xenophobia towards the English. And the sheep probably have a phobia vs the Welsh or something ;).

      The reason why I say the English aren't that bad? They dare hold a "Commonwealth Games" and the most of the former colonies actually bother showing up. Except the Yanks for some reason ;).

      The Brits might be a bit more reserved, but hey you'd be if it rained most of the time ;). Plus some theorize it's an islander thing.

      --
    8. Re:deaf europeans by bluGill · · Score: 1

      What is your source for that? British sign language is from all reports different from American sign language (which is similear to french sign language). I'm told that the two are not particularrly mutually intelligible.

      I'm not deaf, and I don't know any sign languages so I can't claim it is true, but I given that I question your claim.

    9. Re:deaf europeans by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "The Brits might be a bit more reserved, but hey you'd be if it rained most of the time"

      That's a common misconception. It hardly rains at all in Britain (compared with somewhere where it REALLY DOES, like Seattle), the reason we have this reputation is that it's overcast (and therefore looks as if it MIGHT rain) fully 50% of the time.

      Honestly, this year in particular it's been amazingly dry, and we've still had only a few days of significant rainfall in London since the start of summer.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    10. Re:deaf europeans by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Well, they're Austrians, so a Nazi salute would seem appropriate.

      Fucking Nazis. Nothing changes.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    11. Re:deaf europeans by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I know I know :). I was in Manchester for a while.

      And almost everywhere else in England is dry compared to Manchester - a friend there insists that the Sun is a mythical object (not the newspaper).

      BTW, these past years the weather has been crazy...

      --
    12. Re:deaf europeans by djhertz · · Score: 0

      Correct. I have take a few years of American Sign Language, and it is indeed different from sign language of other countries. It is related to French sign language though.

      --
      Modest doubt is called the beacon of the wise - William Shakespeare
    13. Re:deaf europeans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American & British sign language is not so different that my (Non-deaf) American mother in law couldn't understand some bits of British sign language when she saw it.

    14. Re:deaf europeans by witte · · Score: 1

      Not entirely correct.
      I read in the papers (De Morgen, weekend edition) that the system will be equipped with a whole lot of directional mikes and speakers, so you could talk with whoever is displayed before you. This will be quite cool stuff actually, like a community-vidphone.
      I wonder how long it takes before the first marriage-over-tholos :-)

    15. Re:deaf europeans by djhertz · · Score: 0

      Yah, I believe it. Something kind of neat about sign language, is there is the 'correct' sign, and more casual signs, but the whole point is to get your idea across. So, from what I remember, people that didn't know each other sign language, could sort of puzzle out what they were saying and pick it up fast. I would say much faster then if I was trying to talk with somebody from a different country.

      --
      Modest doubt is called the beacon of the wise - William Shakespeare
  6. OK, but by jabbadabbadoo · · Score: 3, Funny

    The problem with 360 degree screens is that I loose 180 degrees of information...

    1. Re:OK, but by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      You let it go?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    2. Re:OK, but by wombatmobile · · Score: 1
      I lose 180 degrees of information...

      Use your two feet to move around the outside of the display. Keep doing this for as many degrees as you would like to experience.

  7. The facts. by sebi · · Score: 5, Informative
    This is not a direct translation, but rather the gist from the original German article. Please forgive the shitty English.

    The first two cylinders are supposed to be installed in March of 2004. They plan to connect all European capitals by 2008. The plan is to have them feature views from other cylinders in the "best picture quality". Additionally people will be able to contact their counterparts at the other cylinder in "sound and picture"

    The cylinders seem to cost about two million Euro a piece. They plan to earn money by selling advertising. The advertising will be limited to a maximum of 13% "airtime". Since they plan to be on air 24/7 that translates to 192 minutes of ads per day. They will sell advertising time to "exclusive content-partners" to "not endanger the THOLOS concept" and stop any "dilution" through additional programmes.

    Inside the cylinder you will find eight HDTV-projectors, 22 microphones, 22 loudspeakers and three cameras. Networking is done via 100 MBit-Lines. To protect from vandalism the glass walls will be coated with a "special nano-structured anti-graffiti-protective-coating". And they want to hire security personnel to keep an eye on the expensive hardware around the clock.

    1. Re:The facts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "Additionally people will be able to contact their counterparts at the other cylinder in "sound and picture"

      Now that's what I'm talking about. Being able to talk to loved ones in other cities. It does bring up interesting questions though, such as "if one were to drop trow and flash someone in Vienna from London who has the jurisdiction?"

    2. Re:The facts. by Talinom · · Score: 1

      To protect from vandalism the glass walls will be coated with a "special nano-structured anti-graffiti-protective-coating".

      Ever see the movie "Turk-182"? This will last about 5 minutes.

      --
      "Giving money and power to governments is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." - P.J. O'Rourke
  8. Since when did technology need a purpose? by iapetus · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Pretty impressive technology, but the purpose is still a bit unclear.

    I thought we were meant to be nerds - since when did cool technology need a purpose? Build the huge outdoor 360 degree video conferencing system and we'll find a use for it.

    Anyone for the biggest game of UT ever? (And don't even try to tell me nobody's going to try to use it for that...)

    --
    ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
    Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
  9. "teleconference" clarification by the_pooh_experience · · Score: 4, Informative
    What it is is a circular building (see this link for the concept) that has a TV or projection systems such that the image is around the outside of the building. In the case of this article (I am assuming, as I cannot read German) is that the thing being projected is another EU city. In fact, this is a "teleconferencing" system, so there can be interaction. There is sound, etc...
    A run down of the technology (sparce as it is) is:
    • 66m2, 360 panoramic digital screen
    • 20 mega pixels - five times HDTV resolution high resolution video projection
    • built-in high-performance graphic system supporting text, video and 3-D visualization
    • digital audio, featuring Hypersound(C), a revolutionary directional sound technology
    It sounds cute. It is meant to bolster "pan-European identity"
    1. Re:"teleconference" clarification by houston_pt · · Score: 1

      I kept trying to find the UnderScore Hosting logo on those pages, don't know why... ;-P

      --
      coffee | nose > keyboard ©
  10. Wired News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
  11. Web Cam on Steroids by bacon-kidney-pie · · Score: 5, Informative

    They have a similar thing here in Sydney in one of the tall buildings. When your going up your lift has a tv in it showing the person going down. Typically they will make rude signs at you and theres nothing you can do about it. There should be more of this. People take themselves far too seriously these days.

    1. Re:Web Cam on Steroids by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Is it a hotel? Man, that would be a fun hotel to play hotel hide-and-seek/capture-the-flag in ...

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  12. Cool by kinnell · · Score: 3, Funny

    Anything with a nano-structured anti-gravity protection shield gets my seal of approval.

    --
    If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
  13. There's an article about it by timbloid · · Score: 5, Informative

    here: http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_830469.html?m enu=news.technology

    It looks pretty cool, and pretty useless at the same time...

    1. Re:There's an article about it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not useless at all. Now I can communicate with other cells... er... I mean my friends in other cities far more easily.

  14. Re:Th GPL is for thieves? MOD Parent Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it is the GNU General Public License.

  15. Yes, but... by dphoenix · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Yes, but can they watch "Friends" on it?

  16. finally! by c4ffeine · · Score: 0

    Remember how in all those crappy movies, the bad guy hacks into some big projector thiny to tell the leaders of the world of his evil plans? Now everyone can do it... even the script kiddies.... oh crap we'd better help secure it, otherwise some wiseass will broadcast "All your base are belong to us" over this system... heh, sounds fun...how long until this is implemented? sounds fun! sorry for the crappy post, i haven't slept in a ferw days, just finished a playable graphics test demo of my massive 3d game

    --
    "73% of quotes on the Internet are made up" -Ben Franklin
  17. this is great! by ActionAL · · Score: 2, Redundant

    just use your imagination.. you can be in paris and be near the gateway cylinder and see people in london and wave to them and they can wave back. it's just a form of friendly communication. sure it doesn't make a ton of money, but it will be *fun*

    1. Re:this is great! by timbloid · · Score: 1
      It will make a ton of money from 13% of it's airtime being adverts...

      And I think it will be more like;

      guy in london waves to you

      you lift arm

      screen in London switches to Rome

      screen in Paris switches to adverts

      you wave to no-one
      I hope not, but that's how I imagine it :-(

    2. Re:this is great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      very true.

      im glad some people aren't so concerned about PROFIT!

    3. Re:this is great! by butane_bob2003 · · Score: 1

      In light of France and Englands past personal encounters, I am guessing that there will be lots of flipping of the bird, showing of the buttocks, and shouting of personal insults. The last thing any Englishman wants to see is a Frenchman, and vice-versa.

      --


      TallGreen CMS hosting
  18. hehe by Loosewire · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The purpose is unclear"
    who cares - it would be coool :-)

    --
    Slashdot - The one stop shop for procrastination
  19. Will LED drums be used for the televisions? by kobotronic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In Japan, at the Yokohama central train station there is a large cylindrical television about 2 meters in diameter. It's visually quite impressive and the colors are good. When you touch the glass you can feel the powerful hum of the revolving drum inside. From examining photographs of the outside of the cylinder taken at various exposure times, it appears it's made with approximately 24 groups of 3 vertical LED bars, one for each primary color.

    These bars sweep by the viewer at great speed and 'paint' each pixel dozens of time per second. Similar to DLP projectors, each pixel is illuminated in turn by the different colors. When you look close on one pixel, you can see it's sort of fluctuating. What you're really looking at is a rapid progression of dozens of different colored LEDs flashing their light at you at the same physical point in space. The final result is a very smooth and stable image with a high refresh rate, great brightness and very rich LED colors.

    I wonder if a technology similar to the one above will be used for these booths. Although a busy train station at a major earth quake zone could be considered a particularly hostile environment for a precision engineered rapidly rotating drum of considerable mass, I could easily imagine some european capitals constituting an even more hostile environment in terms of rampant vandalism.

    The technology required to build these things are probably nothing much special, but I think it's a fun neat idea. Perhaps each drum will be switching between cities on regular posted hours and according to some kind of schedule so you can plan ahead to "meet" a friend from another city. These things should be placed by plazas and intersections with lots of pedestrians.

    Another thing - just 3 cameras? That'll probably mean highly oblique angles for most of the people standing right next to the drum, which in turn might mean you don't get all that much out of 'meeting' someone. It would be something truly special if you could look directly at the virtual representation of someone standing right alongside the remote screen and they'd look right back at you.

    1. Re:Will LED drums be used for the televisions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being this is digital, wouldnt "highly oblique angles for most" simply be corrected in software?\

    2. Re:Will LED drums be used for the televisions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, silly. Bongo drums will be used for TCP/IP.

  20. Will it work as intended? by Psychic+Burrito · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As I see it, this is a free, virtual window into another city. Very nice for separated love couples in two different cities: "Let's meet at the cylinder" etc.. And funny for innocent passer-bys that can see wave and say "hi" to people from another city.

    However, I think the most critical question is: will people be able to look into each other eyes like you would when you are looking trough a real-world window? Well the answer lies in the german article: "Im Inneren eines Zylinders sind sechs HDTV-Projektoren, 22 Mikrofone, 22 Lautsprecher und drei Kameras untergebracht" - "Inside the cylinder there are 6 hdtv projectors, 22 mics and 3 cameras". Only 3 cameras! How will it be possible for more than 3 people to look into their eyes then? Not at all, methinks...

    I think not being able to look into each other's eyes through this virtual window will reduce the coolness factor of the cylinder to an overhyped TV/webcam combo...

    1. Re:Will it work as intended? by vidarh · · Score: 1
      Since when did it become a problem to have cameras that could capture 120 degrees each?

    2. Re:Will it work as intended? by DaneelGiskard · · Score: 1

      I've been wondering about that as well. They must be really wide-angel cameras for a 360 view with only three of them. So, if you both (from different cities) do not stand right in front of the camera, it would look like you are both looking at another point (the center of the camera) when in fact you are standing right in front of each other.

      On the other hand, having only three cameras keeps the necessary bandwidth low of course. Three video streams with hdtv quality should already need quite some bandwidth, specially if they plan to use the internet as a transfer medium and not dedicated lines. The 22 seperate audio streams should add something on top of that as well.

      Still, it seems like a very nice idea. But I'm sure that the same is possible for much less than their projected price of 2 Million Euros using alternative technologies. Think of ordinary TV technology instead of HDTV-Projectors and add the 3 cameras and 22 microphones and speakers on top of that and I'm sure you could go with much less than 2 Million Euros. Add the necessary computer Hardware and the softare and I'm sure you could nicely do it for a tenth of their projected price.

      Well, anyways - I love the idea. Reminds me of a Star Trek episode (original series I think) where they find a planet with similar portals to other places.

    3. Re:Will it work as intended? by Psychic+Burrito · · Score: 1

      The problem is that for true eye-to-eye communication, for every eye that looks into the screen, you will need a camera at the other city to cover the view (think 3D, and think people are not always perfectly perpendicular to the screen).

      Which of course means a lot more cameras, a lot more bandwith or a very clever 3D simulation. But a very clever 3D simulation still needs more than 1 camera for 120 degrees to work its magic.

    4. Re:Will it work as intended? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moreover, although you raised a touching point Mr. Burrito, if two couples really wanted a video relationship with some intimacy they could could simply get DSL and their own cameras. I think the broader issue is that most people don't want video relationships. The problem is that we've been raised to associate video with scripted plots and tend to feel uncomfortable when placed in a live camera situation with no meta theme. The one exception is porn because amateur porn has it's own inherent plot. But, again, we're not talking mainstream.
      Look at home videos. This technology has been around for ages now and while it seemed exciting when it was novel, the novelty soon wears off. These days many people think of home videos as a kind of torture.
      I'm not dismissing the efforts of amateur film makers. God bless the independent film makers and may all financial barriers fall before them, but serious amateurs are a small minority compared to the masses that have tried to point and shoot to save some precious and touching moment and only ruined it with their dictatorial morph into director mode.

    5. Re:Will it work as intended? by Otto · · Score: 1

      First off, I think the idea is freakin' genius.

      But I fail to see why you think only three people would be able to look directly at one another? If you have a 120 degree angle view, say, then rear project it onto a circular screen, distortion caused by the wide angle will be eliminated by distortion from the shape of the screen itself.

      In other words, anyone looking directly at the circle appears to be looking directly out of the circle on the other side, no matter what their position is in relation to the camera. There's no three person limit that I can see here. Yes, the view of the camera is distorted in relation to each person, but it's distorted back on the other side.

      Anyway, if I were doing it, I'd use fisheye lenses to get a 180 degree view on each camera. That gives you 60 degrees of overlap, and the parts in the middle of two cameras where a person could stand will have two cameras looking at him from each side which could then be interpolated by the hardware to produce the correct perspective view on that section on the other side of the connection. So he'd appear to be looking directly out of the circle too.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  21. Think Spy Novels... by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

    Its like a key point in a spy novel... no one thought about this hunk of art lying around, until revolutionaries use it to orchestrate a massive simultaneous attack (or a bunch of artsy types use it for massive simultaneous silliness)

    --
    meh
  22. Telecom companies against the project by G4from128k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Think of all the lost long-distance telephone revenues if you can just agree to meet your friend "at the wall' and talk all you want. I wonder if fights will break out over people who are wall hogs.

    Of course, if the wall crowd is too noisy, then people will just get on their cellphones to talk to their wall-buddies. And with those cellphone cameras, you can take a picture of your remote friend on the wall who is taking a picture of you on the their wall and exchange pictures.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Telecom companies against the project by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

      I doubt they'll even notice. They're too busy being de-nutted by VoIP and Instant Messaging.

  23. Cool idea., but by Bunji+X · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What bothers me is that there is no sign of any technical specifications at all.

    20 mega pixels - five times HDTV resolution

    Sure, very nice if they were to show it on a screen as large as a 28" TV, but on a screen with an area of 66 m^2? 560 pixels/m? That doesn't sound very highres to me.

    Lets calculate bandwidth. 20 Mpix = 20971520*24*3 = 1440 MB/s, uncompressed. That's a lot. Let's say they manage to compress the video 20 times, which could be difficult or expensive with real time compression. That leaves us with 72 MB/s video only over far distances, excluding sound. How are they going to get that through the 100 MBit network they mention in the article?

    Also, I can find no references from google regarding "Hypersound(C), a revolutionary directional sound technology". If it was that revolutionary, someone would have written something about it, you might think.

    I really don't know. It's a cool idea, but it sounds fishy. Is there a working prototype at all, or are they still in the attract-investor-money phase?

    --
    ---
    The combined human population is enough to feed every living tiger for app. 28000 years.
    1. Re:Cool idea., but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DivX movies achieve about 1:100 compression with near -DVD quality. A PC can do this in real time at that resolution, so I think dedicated MPEG4 hardware of some sort could handle this...

    2. Re:Cool idea., but by Bunji+X · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ah, but then you forget that I forgot that we need at least 15 to 20 images/second for anything resembling life-like video. My calculations was based on 1 frame/s. (not likely)

      We would get 20971520*24*20=9600 MB raw data every sec. Which at a 1:100 compression rate would be 96 MB/s. Still way too much for a 100MBit network to handle, excluding audio.

      --
      ---
      The combined human population is enough to feed every living tiger for app. 28000 years.
    3. Re:Cool idea., but by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The amount of bandwidth needed would vary enormously depending on how much movement is around the unit. For instance, if it's a quiet afternoon and there's 5 people in visual range, it'll hardly need any bandwidth as it's only having to send scene changes across the line.

      I'd be willing to bet that on a parade day with it's cameras full of moving people, it'll run terribly because they likely didn't build it to run 23-30fps, sending an entirely redrawn scene every frame.

    4. Re:Cool idea., but by SirCyn · · Score: 1

      You're a little off on the math, but close.

      20MegaPix = 20971520 pixels
      Times 24 Bits per Pix
      HDTV uses 29.97 Frames per second
      Times 3 cameras.
      20971520 * 24 * 29.97 * 3 = 43156.8 MegaBits or 5394.6 Megabytes.

      Now, using multiple 100Mb connections it would take 432 connections just to handle the uncompressed data.
      Someone remarked that Divx can compress 100:1 with no loss. I use video compressors alot. Divx has horrible loss, especially with high resolution. Not to mention you'd have to compress the video 432:1 to get it to fix, and that's theoretically fitting (in practice this will not work).
      Mpeg4 is slightly better, but the data rate to keep acceptable loss would still be very high.

      As for the resolution:
      20 MPix Time 3 Cameras Divided along 66m2 of Screen: 20971520 * 3 / 66 = 953250 Pix/m2
      Take the Square Root to get the pix Horz and Vert: 953250 ^ 0.5 = 976
      For all those who use US units thats: 24.8 pixels per inch.
      A normal computer monitor is around 72 Pix/Inch.
      To put this in comparison take an 18" Flatscreen and set it to 640x480 resoluion, the lowest refresh rate, and you'll know what this system will look like.

    5. Re:Cool idea., but by Bunji+X · · Score: 1

      The amount of bandwidth needed would vary enormously depending on how much movement is around the unit. For instance, if it's a quiet afternoon and there's 5 people in visual range, it'll hardly need any bandwidth as it's only having to send scene changes across the line.

      Yes, that *might* be true. But the article stated that they would place these devices at the centre of the biggest cities in europe. In these places a quiet afternoon with five people moving about is a rare event. By curiosity people would probably tend to move close to the thing to check it out, by that occupying a large part of the cameras FOV = lots of changes. And I think I remember from my courses that every shift in amount of light (clouds, cars's headlights) would cause most of the frame to be redrawn.

      Also, the keyframe technology is accounted for in the estimated 1:100 compression rate of DivX/MPEG4.

      Add to that 22 channels of sound, and you'll have to have massive bandwidth available. I don't think 100 MBits will be enough.

      I'd be willing to bet that on a parade day with it's cameras full of moving people, it'll run terribly because they likely didn't build it to run 23-30fps, sending an entirely redrawn scene every frame.

      Agreed.

      Don't get me wrong, I think these thingies would be mighty cool, I am just a little bit sceptical to the workings of them, given the very diffuse specs given by the company.

      --
      ---
      The combined human population is enough to feed every living tiger for app. 28000 years.
    6. Re:Cool idea., but by Bunji+X · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the corrections. Just made some quick esitmations for the sake of discussion.

      Although to my understanding the 20 MegaPix was meant to cover data from all three cams?

      --
      ---
      The combined human population is enough to feed every living tiger for app. 28000 years.
    7. Re:Cool idea., but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A little googling turned up this link about Hypersound: http://www.holosonics.com/technology.html

    8. Re:Cool idea., but by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

      As always, it only takes being around tech for a few years to go ahead and start knocking 20%-99% of whatever a company quotes on the capabilities of an item before it's actually put into service.

    9. Re:Cool idea., but by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      I've seen the Hypersound technology banded around over the years, not sure what its actual name is or how it works (something to do with modulating the sound with a higher frequency maybe) but its basically a highly directional speaker that can only affect a specific area and once you move out of that area the sound quickly goes. Looks impressive, ive only seen it on TV science shows but it seems to work. Even so it would probably be simpler to have the screens in a more enclosed space so you could get better sound quality.

      Your right about the video - putting massive amounts of HDTV over the internet is just not going to work, they should use a dedicated link - who wants to fund a satellite? ;)

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  24. Any publicity is good publicity, open the gates! by donscarletti · · Score: 1
    If I was doing something like this, I would make the security deliberatly crappy. Imagine if a week after it got created, it got 0wn3d and someone used it to deliver a funny message. This would give it great (albeit humiliating) media coverage and cause people to watch it day and night in the hope of seeing something like that again. And of course all this attention would bring int millions in advertising dollars.

    Who said hackers were bad for buisiness?!

    --
    When Argumentum ad Hominem falls short, try Argumentum ad Matrem
  25. someone should tell them.. by fuckfuck101 · · Score: 0
    --
    Comment: Yes I realise the username 'fuckfuck101' makes me sound intelligent, no you cannot buy it from me.
  26. Abuse by big_gibbon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Knowing my countrymen as well as I sadly do, I can't help but feel that while this is a very cool idea, it would soon be hijacked by the wrong elements.

    Look, for example, at the reaction David Blaine got here for his "living in a box" stunt - heckled, taunted, and attacked by a man with golf balls. Personally I was massively entertained by this as Mr Blaine chose to put himself at the mercy of the English public - however, once a few BNP party members are out drunk and want the opportunity to abuse and insult some foreigners, they're going to make their way to the cylinder, where it'll be innocent Viennese passers-by who get the heckling.

    Cool idea, but I can't help but feel it'll engender more international hostility than co-operation. Cynical, aren't I?

    1. Re:Abuse by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 1

      Yep, I forsee a lot of international mooning incidents.

    2. Re:Abuse by meadowsp · · Score: 1

      ...and obviously they'll have to do that as it's very difficult to find real life foreigners in London.

    3. Re:Abuse by big_gibbon · · Score: 1

      But why bother when there's a readily available source who can't fight back or complain as readily?

  27. Ah... My bad. by Bunji+X · · Score: 1

    Of course it is not "20971520*24*3 = 1440 MB/s, uncompressed". It is 20971520*24 = 480 MB/s. 24 MB/s , compressed 20 times without audio. Still, a bit much for a 100 MBit network to handle.

    --
    ---
    The combined human population is enough to feed every living tiger for app. 28000 years.
  28. It does serve a purpose! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, this is art. A modern form of art. Live art. It is not art like we find burried in the dirt that will survive years and years to come but everyday art. Even if it doesn't help countries get closer together politicly it will give common people (living in these large cities) a feeling of bond with these other cities. Even if you don't know anyone in the other city one can listen to people walking by and seeing faces you know are far away instantly. I for one think this could create a new sensation. Video conferencing is one thing, public video conferencing in this manner is a completely different thing, it is an everyday live art piece that surves the purpose of getting people to think of other things than their grey everyday.

  29. This means nothing to me... by Dan-DAFC · · Score: 3, Funny

    oh, Vienna.

    (I'll get my coat...)

    --
    Suck figs.
  30. Hahaha by lee7guy · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new Ultravox overlords.

    --
    Ceterum censeo Microsoftem esse delendam
  31. English Translation by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1
    --

    Lodragan Draoidh
    The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
  32. This means nothing to me. by floydigus · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Ah! Vienna.

    --

    All things in moderation; including moderation

  33. Call me back when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... they hook up the worm holes.

  34. Wired article by moonboy · · Score: 2, Informative

    I submitted this last week with a link to the Wired article that can be found here.

    I think this is a wonderful concept because of the bad reputation that we Americans (and other countries as well) get because of our governments being essentially our "representatives" to the rest of the world. Also, distance plays a factor as well. I think that if we could have a "face-to-face" with the people from other countries, we could see that we are not all that different from each other. Certainly the language barriers still exist, but that can be overcome as well. I think this has a lot of possibilities.

    --

    Co-founder and designer at Music Nearby: http://musicnearby.com
  35. Manual translation by Apogee · · Score: 1

    for what it's worth ... sounds a bit like a PR release to me

    Open air videoconferencing

    Tholos Systems aim to build a virtual bridge between London and Vienna using "communication cylinders".
    These cylinders, about 3m high and with a 7m diameter feature a 360 projection surface. On these, an "encompassing panorama
    of the current scene" will be visible in highest picture quality, for one. On the other hand, people shall be able to instantaneously
    interact personally with each other. The two prototypes in London and Vienna are scheduled to go online in May 2004. Until
    2008, the operators want to weave a "virtual net" between all european capitals.

    A single cylinder will cost about 2 million Euro. Tholos Systems plan to amortize these costs through advertising:
    On the plan are a maximum of 13% commercial time, for a "broadcast time" of 24 hours. These 192 minutes will be offered as packages
    to "exclusive content partners", so as to neither endanger the "concept of THOLOS" nor water down the message by additional programming.

    Inside of the cylinders, there are six HDTV projectors, 22 microphones, 22 loudspeakers and three cameras. The colums shall be interconnected
    using 100MBit lines. In order to protect against vandalism, the glass walls will be coated with a special nano-structured anti-graffiti layer.
    Moreover, the operators want to hire a security service that will watch the expensive hardware around the clock. (wst/ct)

  36. happened before (apparently) by Apogee · · Score: 1

    In Basel, Switzerland, pretty much what you describe has happened a few years ago.
    A local TV station with only a few hours programming per day had put up a camera on the main square, and the images of people passing by were broadcast when there was no programming. The camera was about 2-3m up in the air, but resolution was fairly good.

    For the first couple of months, you'd occasionally see people waving or grimacing to the camera. A few months later, they had to take it down, apparently because people in prison get that channel, too, on their TV, and organized crime used this one-way communication channel, by signaling in front of the camera...

  37. Re:Any publicity is good publicity, open the gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not the publicity you are looking for.

  38. This is a remake of the hole in space (circa 1980) by thbb · · Score: 3, Informative

    This project is a rework of the infamous Hole in Space project, dating back to 1980.

    This project consisted in linking together by audio and video two public spaces, without telling the passerby anything about the installation. At some point, bystanders would realize the link was bidirectional and started impromptu conversations between the two locations.

    By a funny twist of things, this project inspired much of the 1980's and early 90's work carried at Xerox PARC and the University of Toronto Telepresence project.

    These in turns nurtured a number of startups, such as PictureTel/Polycom, still a leader in videoconferencing technology.

    Notice that by the time, the technology was fully analog, and for having used it in the early 90's, I can say the link quality was far better than most current IP-based videoconferencing is today.

  39. Hey, let's do this in the US! by TheSync · · Score: 1

    If anyone is interested in setting up "video portals" between places like Internet cafes, wired coffee houses, art galleries, colleges, etc., go ahead and contact me.

    Video projectors are easy, it is the audio that would be the biggest challenge. A combination of traditional sound reinforcement techniques (directional mics) and active de-echoing would be required to make it work well.

  40. An excellent way to propagate banned source code by Illserve · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Set up a huge panel with DECSS clearly printed on it and aim it at the Washington DC cameras.

    Seriously though I wonder though if they intend to do anything about nudity and obscenity. You know that there are going to be people flashing themselves and holding up big banners with obscenities, particularly anti-Bush stuff (assuming, god forbid, that he's re-elected).

  41. Ohh, me, me... I know... I know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One's a throw-back from a bygone age and the other was the successor to the ZX-80.

  42. Purpose? by TLouden · · Score: 1

    Why of cousre, they're plotting to kill us all. hehehe

    --
    -Tim Louden
  43. the purpose by gotem · · Score: 1

    now all the rulers of the nations can be easily contacted by Dr. Evil to tell them his plans of destroying the world

  44. public trials by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

    Hey we can really have some interesting public trials with this stuff. We could even do it just like in the beginning of Superman the Movie when Jor-El was trying those 3 criminals.

    "The sentence is...death..death...death..(not that will happen in Europe mind you)" :-)
    sri

  45. Needs a better name.. by GeneralEmergency · · Score: 1



    And I'm suggesting "Kumbaya-Vision" (TM)

    No...thank you...No. Hold your applause. Greatness is its own reward.

    .

    --
    "A microprocessor... is a terrible thing to waste." --
    GeneralEmergency
  46. Vienna? by semanticgap · · Score: 1

    Why whould they pick Vienna of all places?

  47. William Gibson - Virtual Light? by theolein · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of the book where the Magic Dragon franchise had video columns in front of each one showing images from other franchises around the world.

    I think it's a brilliant idea. It has little practical use apart from a sort of virtual meeting point, but I can see this becoming a huge hit. Normal people, who unlike us geeks, will not be worrying about bandwidth, bitdepth, framerates etc will love the idea.

    1. Re:William Gibson - Virtual Light? by n3k5 · · Score: 1

      the chain is called 'Lucky Dragon' and appears in gibson's 'all tomorrow's parties'

      --
      but what do i know, i'm just a model.
  48. Re:An excellent way to propagate banned source cod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The police in a good number of countries frown upon people getting naked, but that doesn't mean it won't happen. There is no reason to assume any action will be taken regarding flashing or people holding signs, as there is no more reason to censor someones ideas that are transmitted over the internet than there is to do so in real life.

  49. "Very nice for separated love couples..." by marnanel · · Score: 2, Funny

    Very nice for separated love couples in two different cities: "Let's meet at the cylinder" etc..

    I can see how the pressures of long-distance relationships might give people ideas for novel uses of the technology. Maybe the security guards would turn a blind eye, but you'd need to watch out for those London winter temperatures.

    --
    GROGGS: alive and well and living in
    1. Re:"Very nice for separated love couples..." by Jardine · · Score: 1

      They get winter in London?

      From the chart I'm looking at, the average temp in January is 36F. That's not even 0C.

      It's not winter until your snot freezes.

  50. video column by celimage · · Score: 1

    This is the sort of thing that politicians love and will have their picture taken standing near it. It will attract large crowds for awhile. In three years it will sit idle due to budget cuts with a sign reading "Temporarily Out of Order"

  51. Good Idea.. for once? by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Actually sounds like a good idea, i've seen big screens being wasted on much more pointless projects (namely that stupid coke sign that looks suspiciously like a giant flash application). I can imagine the fun drunk people will have at night with it ;) I dont know how its going to work or how much it will cost but it would be cool to walk into a square and have live screens all around europe/the world and it seems like the sort of thing that would bring people of countries together and make them less ignorent of eachother.

    Im now very confused, its rare that we get actual cool uses of technology that dont involve selling something, screwing someone over or something that doesnt work?

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  52. The phonebooth of the 21st century. by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    So this is the phonebooth of the 21st century. How cool would this be if they shrunk it down and just made life-size video conferencing booths? I have a feeling that once video-conferencing technology gets a bit cheaper, and bandwidth gets a bit bigger and cheaper, that we will indeed see these sorts of things. I personally think it would be an awesome idea to setup a restaurant around one of these at both ends. They could be two entirely different restaurants and you could be observing the other one.

    Or perhaps a martini lounge or something.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  53. Global Village Square project by nathan+s · · Score: 1

    This, or something very similar, has been in the works at the University of Toronto since last year.

    An article about this can be found, and the McLuhan Center's current projects page has some more information.

  54. You know, I learned something today... by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

    video conference between all european capitals, starting with London and Vienna

    Vienna is a capital! I didn't know that!

    --
    "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey