Slashdot Mirror


Laptop Thief Caught via AOL Login

Mundocani writes "Yahoo (Reuters) is reporting that the FBI has caught the guy who stole computers from Wells Fargo. The interesting part is that 'Investigators traced the computer to Krastof when he logged onto his own America Online account at home through one of the stolen computers.' Makes you wonder what sort of hooks the FBI has into AOL or other ISPs and what hardware identification is being transmitted at login."

45 of 524 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Mac address perhaps ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Maybe that intel CPU serial number.

  2. Re:Good vs Bad by leerpm · · Score: 4, Informative

    It not's very difficult. Once you have the IP address, you just do a query at ARIN. That will tell you which ISP the address belongs to, so you phone the ISP and ask them for the information about which subscriber had that IP address at the time you are concerned about. Almost All ISPs maintain this sort of information for auditing/logging purposes.

  3. Re:PC call home by mental_telepathy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, I would say that is less than likely. I haven't heard of any company that installs software like that by default, even on laptops. And it would be much easier for AOL to check for a MAC address Wells Fargo provided.

  4. Re:PC call home by miu · · Score: 5, Informative
    Nope, the slashdot blurb about him using his own aol account is wrong.

    According to another source "He logged onto an (America Online) account that was registered on that computer and we traced it back to his phone number and address''.

    It's the 4th item down on the page, under "Suspected thief arrested".

    --

    [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
  5. Re:PC call home by weicco · · Score: 2, Informative

    You are missing the point. If laptop had phone home - software, it could easily inform it's IP address to "home" when it detects that internet connection is available. After IP address has been received, one can easily trace what ISP computer is using. ISPs usually knows ARP address of computers (network interfaces actually) that are connected to their gateways because DHCP-servers are caching them. I don't have details about this but I'm pretty sure about that DHCP stuff.

    So one doesn't have to know MAC address, just IP address and that's enough. And on the other hand tracing MAC address in internet is almost impossible so you need that IP address.

    --
    You don't know what you don't know.
  6. Re:PC call home by Zocalo · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, the kind of security software implied by the original poster does work on IPs since you can't track a MAC address back across the Internet. When you log in, the laptop transmits its current IP address back to the servers of the "phone home" application vendor along with an ID. If that ID is flagged as belonging to a stolen system, then that IP is used to identify the ISP, who will then be informed of the situation and will hopefully be able to identify which user was using that IP at the time. Tie that user back to a person and contact details through billing records and you can proceed to make an arrest.

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  7. Re:PC call home by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Informative

    Though why AOL should be tracking mac addresses to user logins is beyond me.
    Its called good administration. AOL is a large ISP if you didn't know. They have a lot of members and non-members trying to send Spam threw them, hack other computers threw them, and hack and Spam their own systems. So when someone puts out a complaint that so and so spam them threw AOL or was being tracked threw AOL and you show them proof then they can check the logs to see when they logged in and if they actually did that, at least coinciding with the login times and the times the incident occurred. I am pretty sure that they are also recording your telephone number that you used to call in as well. This is not a part of some Evil scheme or government plot. It is a way that a company the size of AOL uses to protect its butt. Because if they don't track this information and enforce it, (And yes some times they may need to call the police and some times the police asked them for some information) then they will be getting lawsuits left and right saying your servers attacked my computer, and AOL is not even showing good faith to remedy the situation. System Administration is sometimes public administration as well, especially when the public uses your systems.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  8. Re:MAC addresses? by Viol8 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The MAC address goes no further than the first router , in this case his broadband modem if thats what he's using.
    If he's using dialup the MAC address doesn't even come into it.

  9. A more detailed version of the article by claq · · Score: 3, Informative

    I found this version posted on www.securityfocus.com. It says the thief used the laptop owner's dial-up AOL account, which the FBI had asked AOL to monitor.

  10. he did not change by linuxislandsucks · · Score: 1, Informative

    his Mac address and machine name.. what an idiot

    --
    Don't Tread on OpenSource
    1. Re:he did not change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Wrong! It is even worse than that: as was already pointed out in many comments, he used the AOL account that was already on the machine. No need for MAC address or whatever. The thief was stupid and got what he deserved.

  11. Re:so how did they get his addy? by Zocalo · · Score: 4, Informative
    Logs, logs, and yet more logs. The process works like this (although not in this case, since apparently Yahoo is wrong and Krastoff actually used the original owners account):

    1. Use WHOIS to find out which ISP owns the IP address
    2. Get the ISP to look at their logs to determine which dial-up session was assigned that IP at the time.
    3. Look at the logs for the access platform to identify the caller's line ID. This is usually the same as the telephone number, but not necessarily, and is *always* known to the remote system, even if you withhold you phone number because it's used in call setup.
    4. Take that number to the Telco that owns it and look at *their* logs to give you the physical location of the phone that made the connection (or owner of the mobile).
    5. Arrest the perp.
    While that glosses over the paperwork, and assumes that the ISP maintain sufficiently details logs of calls and authentication, which many small ones don't, that's pretty much it.
    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
  12. Used SMBIOS perhaps ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Perhaps they used the SMBIOS Serial number

    SMBIOS fields such as make, model, serial number and chassis type are populated on pretty much all tier 1/2 machines these days.

    SMBIOS table method extraction is really safe, really fast, non-intrusive and can be performed with basic level user access (doesn't require local administrator) on any Windows box without any resident drivers or services (unlike DMI).

    Moving one step futher - The collection of SMBIOS information by a large ISP such as AOL would allow for some pretty sophisticated profiling for future service provision.

    From a big brother perspective, SMBIOS will not tell your ISP your name, your credit card details or what you've been doing since your last online session.

    For example, they could profile users by processor type, or memory capacity, they could even send out email offers to users who had free memory slots.

    Back to the point - It would be relatively easy for ISPs to be given a 'stolen' list to compare detected serial numbers against, customers just need to use decent Asset Management processes so they know what was stolen........

  13. Re:MAC addresses? by crevette · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why make it so complex? The computer was reported stolen by Wells Fargo with all the information, so the FBI issued a request to AOL to notify them if anybody logs into such and such accounts. Once it happens, the FBI simply had to check the phone records to know what is the number of the guys connected and voila!

    I work at a phone company in a country without secret services and sophisticated hooks into any ISP and we would be able to pull that out in a matter of minutes.

  14. Re:PC call home by Mattcelt · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are several software packages including Ztrace and Absolute Software's Computrace which deal with the issue of laptop theft directly. It seems very likely that these computers were protected with one of these type of programs.

  15. Re:There is no story here by trystanu · · Score: 5, Informative
    ... and even then AOL didn't help *that* much:

    White said investigators had asked AOL as a routine precaution to watch for any log-ons in Gascoyne's name. He said the world's biggest online service had reported a hit earlier this month but then dragged its feet in providing information about the phone line used in the connection.
  16. Not spyware. The story is much simpler than that by Raphael · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is no need for any "Phone Home" software or anything sending the CPUID to AOL. The story is much simpler than that and rather low-tech:

    • Thief steals computer.
    • Thief tries AOL account found on stolen computer.
    • Account is known to have been compromised.
    • Connection type = dialup = phone number.
    • Phone number = address.
    • Address = thief gets caught.

    Nothing exceptional here. The FBI does not need any strange hooks into AOL. They only need stupid thieves. Case closed.

    --
    -Raphaël
  17. Re:PC call home by snake_dad · · Score: 4, Informative

    Companies server receives the unique ID. Sysadmin: "Hey, Fred just logged in, but his machine was stolen. WTF? Hmm.. what IP did his request come from? Aaaah.. 69.69.69.69. Let's do a lookup.. hey.. it seems to be an AOL modem-pool". Company goes to police, policy goes to judge, police show credible evidence that a crime was committed, judge gives warrant, AOL gives info (login account or the phonenumber that was dialed in from) on who was logged in at that time on that modem in that modempool. Police goes to address, takes laptop, returns it to Fred, jails crook. Fred: "1337!".

    --
    karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
  18. Re:Mac address perhaps ? by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Informative

    Maybe that intel CPU serial number.

    Does the Pentium III processor broadcast its serial number when it is enabled and a user is connected to the Internet?

    - No. The processor serial number is passive. Thus, it does not transmit or broadcast itself. If a person chooses to enable the feature, then, when visiting a website that can utilize processor serial numbers, the website needs to send software to the PC to read the processor serial number.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  19. Re:Mac address perhaps ? by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Informative

    ... oh, and even in a case where the P3 processor would send its serial number upon login, this only applies to P3 processors. From intel.com:

    Only the Pentium(R) III Xeon(TM), Mobile Pentium(R) III and Pentium III processors support the processor serial number feature introduced by the Pentium(R) III processor. No other Intel(R) processor supports the processor serial number feature.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  20. Re:Mac address perhaps ? by einhverfr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mac address perhaps ?

    For those of you who don't know, mac addresses are only valid on the same network segment, which means that the router would drop them, and so it can't be that (unless the login program sends that info). More likely it si something like the intel cpu id, etc.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  21. Re:PC call home by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 4, Informative
    ISPs usually knows ARP address of computers (network interfaces actually) that are connected to their gateways because DHCP-servers are caching them. I don't have details about this but I'm pretty sure about that DHCP stuff.

    Machines which dial in don't use ARP. ARP only applies to Ethernet

    . Nontheless, I can easily see a machine with sensitive information wanting to report it's IP address to a central location whenever it connects. Cookies in the web browser might also help identify a stolen machine.

    Using the default account and password stored on a machine seems stupid at first, until you consider that the guy had ID theft equipment... I don't use AOL, but I wouldn't be to surprised if you could fetch some ID-associated info by logging into the account of a stolen computer. In this case, the computer was of special interest, so the guy was picked up.

    I wouldn't be surprised if more people could be caught by this same method, it's just that police aren't interested enough in following such tracks for 'normal' owners.

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  22. Re:Good vs Bad by jridley · · Score: 4, Informative
    Yes, but it's not clear that's what really happened; it appears that the actual info may have been muddled by the reporter. I suggest looking for Krastof in news.google.com and read some other articles.

    Here's an excerpt from another article on this matter:

    The suspect led the police right to his door when he decided to go online. Gascoyne alerted the police that someone had used his account since the burglary. America Online helped investigators link the dial-up computer connection to a phone number, which SBC then linked to a phone jack at Krastof's home.


    This is TOTALLY un-scary. The Wells-Fargo guy apparently has his password cached on the machine. This guy just clicks "login" and logs in AS THE GUY WHOS COMPUTER WAS STOLEN. At this point it's a trivial bit of work to go catch the guy.
  23. Re:sed -e s/threw/through/g your_post by PReDiToR · · Score: 3, Informative

    Its ok to point out the mistake, IMO, but FGS, tell him what he is doing wrong.

    If he never took the time to do highschool, is he even going to bother looking up why you advised him to change the word?

    Grandparent:
    Threw is the past tense (means you already did it) of throw, as in PReD threw a brick at the parent.

    Through means to pass between the inner restrictions of something, as in go through a tunnel.

    No, that's OK, don't mod me up +5 informative, I don't need the Karma, but all donations are gratefully accepted.

    --

    Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
  24. Re:Wait a minute... by Bobman1235 · · Score: 3, Informative

    How was this thief even able to use this stolen laptop? Were they not running a password protected operating system, at least Windows 2000 or Windows XP?

    Unfortunately Windows2000 and WindowsXP have an option that most people un-select which says "users must enter a name and password to access this system". It pretty much defies the use of HAVING a name and password when the computer automatically boots through it. The worst part is this is the default configuration. So most users never really even SEE that Windows has a password.

    And AOL lets you SAVE the password on your computer, which is equally foolish.

  25. Re:PC call home by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Informative

    there's also similar kind of programs for gsm phones (mainly the series60 phones, 7650,3650,6600,ngage&all) that can be configured to send and sms with all the knoweledge on the new simcard if it notices that the card gets changed.

    now if i wasnt so goddamn lazy i might actually install one of those..

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  26. How about this? by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 4, Informative

    Known stolen AOL account + phone number recorded by any ISP (radius does it by default) + call to phone comany by FBI = physical location.

    No magic.

    --


    He tried to kill me with a forklift!
  27. Re:PC call home by Theatetus · · Score: 3, Informative

    Modems don't have MAC addresses.

    And, btw, tracing MAC addresses across the Internet is not "almost impossible" but "by definition impossible". Traffic on any internet (but especially The Internet) crosses routers (that's what the "inter" part refers to). Routers kill OSI Level 2 identifiers, like hardware addresses.

    --
    All's true that is mistrusted
  28. Re:Similar Experience by isorox · · Score: 3, Informative

    LAPD is way too busy with serious crime

    Like that in the UK. The Police are too busy catching people doing 80mph on the motorway to bother with the boring stuff like murder and gangland shootings

  29. Re:no warrant needed by js7a · · Score: 2, Informative
    It's Fred's account. No law prevents AOL from telling Fred what number his account has logged in from.

    I used to work as 3rd-level tech support at an American ISP, and I'd guess at AOL it is probably policy to divulge ANI phone numbers upon request when an account is reported compromised, as long as the caller can recite their credit card number or some other form of verbal ID. I bet AOL helps owners and cops find at least dozens of stolen laptops each year this way.

  30. Re:Not spyware. The story is much simpler than tha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    All this fuss, just because Yahoo messed up:

    elsewhere on /.

    "He logged onto an (America Online) account that was registered on that computer and we traced it back to his phone number and address"

  31. Re:PC call home by El+Cubano · · Score: 2, Informative

    Let's do a lookup.. hey.. it seems to be an AOL modem-pool". Company goes to police, policy goes to judge, police show credible evidence that a crime was committed, judge gives warrant, AOL gives info (login account or the phonenumber that was dialed in from) on who was logged in at that time on that modem in that modempool. Police goes to address, takes laptop, returns it to Fred, jails crook. Fred: "1337!".

    Thanks to the DMCA, they can probably skip 3 or 4 of those steps and just demand the info directly from AOL (with no judicial or LE oversight) and then raid the guy themselves.

    Were he pirating music, that is probably what would have happened.

  32. Re:PC call home by PunchMonkey · · Score: 2, Informative

    Computrace

    I know an office that uses this software... it's not bad, it stays quite hidden in the OS (Windows only of course). Login with your ID and you get a list of all your laptops and the last IP they were detected as being logged in from.

    --
    I'll have something intelligent to add one of these days...
  33. Re:PC call home by mess31173 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I work at Wells Fargo and there is a pile of 8 laptops on my desk and the images I apply to them don't have any "call home" software. FYI.

  34. Re:Password protected? by cybrthng · · Score: 3, Informative

    Not so easy as pulling out batteries on laptops.

    If you lose the CMOS/Bios password you usually have to RMA the laptop back for a new bios (unless you can find it and solder or replace it yourself). Thus requiring receipt or tracking of serial numbers of which any big company can cross reference against service contracts.

  35. Resetting/deleting WinXP admin pass takes seconds by horza · · Score: 4, Informative

    I downloaded onto floppy disc the program here and had reset the admin password on my Win XP box within seconds. Never seen anything so simple in my life. Though others recommend LC4 which also works.

    Phillip.

  36. Re:Mac address perhaps ? by frehe · · Score: 4, Informative

    Read ifconfig(8) to see how you can do it under Linux. Google for "sea.c" to see how you can do it under OpenBSD.

  37. MAC Addresses changeable by XiChimos · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't you guys realize that MAC addresses can be changed? It is fairly easy to do with software, but extremely hard to do directly to the hardware.

    If you guys really want to know how the government does the forensics, read "Computer Forensics: Incident Response Essentials" by Kruse and Heiser. Well written book that is easy to read and teaches you a lot about this type of stuff and also analyzing machines.

    It is easier to read the book than prove that Big Brother is out to get you.

  38. Re:Mac address perhaps ? by inode_buddha · · Score: 3, Informative
    I'm reading this thread for the Windows/AOL info, since I use Linux and need more clues about Windows.

    That said, the 2.6.x Linux kernels have the ability to mangle and spoof MAC addys, in addition to NAT/MASQ and building firewalls based on MAC. This is in addition to all the iptables godness.

    My firewall uses iptables *and* echoes the desired behavior into kernel-space by setting the desired values in /proc with a script at bootup. For ex:

    ## Disable accepting IP source routing

    for f in /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/accept_source_route; do

    echo 0 > $f

    done

    As far as the chmod goes, one could also use chattr to set the "immutable" bit e.g. "chattr +i foo.bar". Its more potent than chmod since not even root can touch an immutable file; you have to become root and remove the immutable bit first.

    --
    C|N>K
  39. Re:"You've got jail" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I work for WF but do not mean to represent my employer here. Your answer pretty close to right on. Our network logs ALL accesses, but of course denies access to our intranet from the internet at large. Ergo, any request in the access log (like when OutLook tries to connect to our mailserver, for example)that originate outside the intranet are automatically red-flagged. Requests to certain ports within our network are a more serious red-flag as it indicates someone is starting internal application from outside the intranet. IPs are logged, tracert to AOL, have FBI get AOL's access log to match temporary IP/date/time to originating login... not exactly rocket science, folks... There are other applications that as a matter of operation 'call home', so really the moral of the story is that it is a dumb idea to steal computers from work unless you really know how the computer is configured.

  40. Re:Not spyware. The story is much simpler than tha by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 5, Informative
    An even better quote from another source reads:

    Investigators knew where to look for the gear not because of unusually intrepid sleuthing but because Krastof allegedly used the computer to log on to an AOL account belonging to the system's owner, Peter Gascoyne.

    Seems Reuters screwed up on the facts.
  41. IBM Thinkpad by BigFire · · Score: 2, Informative

    When I was buying my IBM Thinkpad, it came with a feature of calling home, should the machine be stolen. The call home mechanism is build in, and cannot be removed. What it requires is a subscription fee to activate the feature, sort of like LoJack for laptop.

    For the people with sensative information, it's bitter price that must be pay.

  42. NO, he used owners AOL account. by babazaroni · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/ne ws/archive/2003/11/26/financial1853EST0113.DTL

  43. Find the Article Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  44. I think the media got it wrong ... by jopet · · Score: 2, Informative

    this looks as if the thief was simply attempting to log into the account of the *original owner*, which was preconfigured on the stolen laptop. Of course this is easily detectable and easy to trace back.