Slashdot Mirror


GNOME Foundation Board Election Results

Anonymous BillyGoat writes "The results of the 2003 GNOME Foundation Elections have been announced. These are preliminary results, and will stand unless someone decides to challenge them. A notable exclusion from this year's list is Miguel De Icaza, whose candidacy application was rejected as it missed the deadline. In related news, barely a few weeks after the news of the death of GNOME hacker Chema Celorio in a sky diving accident, the GNOME community was shocked by the news of the sudden death of Evolution hacker Ettore Perazzoli."

242 comments

  1. Ettore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ...was a great guy. Too sad to see him leave. :(

    Anyone's know how he actually died?

    1. Re:Ettore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      This being /., it was only a matter of time before some 13-year-old here posted something like this, and I'd just like to thank you for predictably coming through for us.

    2. Re:Ettore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HEY!!! My mom may weigh 400lbs but I still find her attractive enough to go down on!

  2. Excluded? by KlomDark · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How can Miguel be excluded? Didn't he start the whole thing? That's be like excluding Linus from a Linux Foundation. Just makes the Gnome Foundation seem like a joke if they leave the founding member out.

    1. Re:Excluded? by tds67 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Just makes the Gnome Foundation seem like a joke if they leave the founding member out.

      Considering the high mortality rate associated with being part of GNOME, it's probably a good thing.

    2. Re:Excluded? by azzy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, what would make it a joke is if they ignored all of their rules for someone, regardless of who that was.

    3. Re:Excluded? by pr0c · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ya but you also lose integrity by allowing people who don't meet deadlines to slip by. It is a lose/lose situation really. I'm sure Miguel will still be very involved.

    4. Re:Excluded? by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Oh yah, rules are so important. Give us a break.

      Make him a permanent/honorary/founding member. That's done a lot to retain "keeper" people in a certain group.

      For every rule, there's an exception...

    5. Re:Excluded? by the+gnat · · Score: 1, Insightful

      No, what would make it a joke is if they ignored all of their rules for someone, regardless of who that was.

      "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds."
      -- Ralph Waldo Emerson

    6. Re:Excluded? by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Good point! :)

    7. Re:Excluded? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      on any other day, this comment would be funny.. but right now, it's in bad taste..

    8. Re:Excluded? by The+Snowman · · Score: 3, Funny

      That was crude and tasteless, even by my standards -- and that's saying a lot.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    9. Re:Excluded? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      give me a break. the guy probably coded more on the project than all the others combined. are they that much tight asses over there? Sheesh!

    10. Re:Excluded? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those KDE zealots will go to any length to beat GNOME.

      /me runs away

    11. Re:Excluded? by Lussarn · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, like David Wexelblat of XFree. He is in the core team without even using XFree because he is a windows user now. Sounds smart.

    12. Re:Excluded? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good troll. I have always favoured GNOME over KDE and I find this tasteless...

    13. Re:Excluded? by Vaginal+Spelunker · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Q: What's the difference between a skydiver and a golfer?

      A: A golfer goes, "WHACK ... Oh shit!". A skydiver goes, "Oh shit! ... WHACK!"

    14. Re:Excluded? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No, they are rules for a reason. Miguel even though he started Gnome has been doing other things as of late. If he cared enough to be on the foundation this year he would of made sure he threw his hat into the ring ontime much as everyone else did. I'd recommend reading about what the foundation is, what it does and why it was made in the first place before suggesting that honorary members me made. As the parent posted. It would be a joke if we just let anyone on the foundation. I'm sure there are no hard feelings and Miguel's ideas or suggestions are always taken into consideration so I don't see the problem.

    15. Re:Excluded? by LS · · Score: 1

      Does that make the UN a joke? The Security Council has permanent members.

      LS

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    16. Re:Excluded? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes. And because alot of representatives at the UN don't even pretend to be democratically elected it is a hilarious one.

    17. Re:Excluded? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      heheh what a funny name!

      "David"! hehe

    18. Re:Excluded? by Prowl · · Score: 1
      Does that make the UN a joke?


      Nah. The US and UK already did that with Gulf War II...
      --
      That man tried to kill mah Daddy
    19. Re:Excluded? by ebuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Airplanes don't wait for passenger 42 to come on board, even when passenger 42 is a politician or powerful businessman.

      Universities don't "reopen" enrollment for a tardy applicant, without compromising their perception of fairness.

      Deadlines exist. Mabye the years of missing them in software development has numbed us, but they still exist. And as much as I find it ironic that Miguel isn't on board, let's not cry that he deserves a spot when he couldn't be bothered to get his application in on time.

      If he was tardy in his application, that's not a pretty precedent to set as a board member. (Admittedly, I'd expect a few board memebers to be tardy at everything else, BUT the application process, hehehe)

    20. Re:Excluded? by MarcOiL · · Score: 1

      Airplanes don't wait for passenger 42 to come on board, even when passenger 42 is a politician or powerful businessman.

      Well, my father was once stranded in a plane for 45 minutes and then the queen of Spain went on board. So maybe they don't wait for politicians, but they do wait for royalty.

      --
      If I have posted far, it is because I replied to giants.
  3. don't trust it by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't trust these results. They used Diebold machines.

  4. Who gets to vote? by zomper514 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Who gets to vote for the Gnome Board?

    1. Re:Who gets to vote? by haystor · · Score: 5, Funny

      gnomes

      --
      t
    2. Re:Who gets to vote? by zomper514 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Lawn Ornaments vote?

    3. Re:Who gets to vote? by strictnein · · Score: 1

      no, not garden gnomes, just the regular kind
      you know... gnome gnomes

    4. Re:Who gets to vote? by proj_2501 · · Score: 1, Funny

      (1) Elections
      (2) ???
      (3) Profit!

    5. Re:Who gets to vote? by gouldtj · · Score: 4, Informative

      I surprised no one answered this.

      Members of the GNOME foundation get to vote for the board. Basically these are the people who contribute to GNOME. So, if you translate or code or give presentations to do with GNOME you can be a member. There is no charge or anything like that.

    6. Re:Who gets to vote? by Geek+of+Tech · · Score: 1
      Gnomes?! They're after me lucky charms!

      --
      Stop the Slashdot effect! Don't read the articles!
    7. Re:Who gets to vote? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps that is b3coz gnome is an MS plot to derail linux and it's KDE pedigree???

      gnome a m$ creation??? i have heard many less credible.

  5. Sky Diving? by Rinikusu · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You mean geeks outside of the US actually.. you know.. do stuff? Sky Diving? I mean, how many parachutes do you need to keep our fat-asses from splattering on the ground? Wow. Next thing you know, someone's going to say RMS got married.. To a Real Woman (and not a Real Doll (tm))! /flame

    --
    If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    1. Re:Sky Diving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real GNU Woman I think you mean...

  6. Who cares about gnome? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2, Troll

    I stopped caring about Gnome at about the time they started deciding Metacity is good and should be the default. When Metacity's maker puts out an egotistical manifesto that says all the features in a window manager that don't match up exactly to his way of working are just immature fluff to him, then I'm not going to want to use the thing he makes based on that philosophy. (Apparently, for example, he thinks that outline-dragged windows are frivolous fluff, while solid-dragged windows are the only useful way to do things productively, because of course all Linux users want to waste CPU cycles on the UI. And he uses the oft-repeated dodge that since computers are faster nowadays, you don't have to save CPU cycles. Bullshit. It's *my* computer, and those are *my* CPU cycles. If I'd rather use them on background processes like mathematical calculations rendering 3-D povray animations, then that's *my* business. And that doesn't change just because we measure speed by the gigahertz instead of the megahertz today. If the computer is ten times faster, I want that speed applied to the areas *I* want it applied. If I didn't care about stuff like that, I'd be using Windows.)

    --

    Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    1. Re:Who cares about gnome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the more important news here is the death of two GNOME developers. I can't believe you took this oppurtunity to bitch about your dissatisfaction with software that they wrote and freely give away.

      BTW, you are very adamant about having control over *your* computer. Why shouldn't he have control over *his* code?

    2. Re:Who cares about gnome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>When Metacity's maker puts out an egotistical
      >>manifesto that says all the features in a
      >>window manager that don't match up exactly to
      >>his way of working are just immature fluff to
      >> him, then I'm not going to want to use the
      >>thing he makes based on that philosophy.

      Yes, I like Havoc Pennington too. He is hot.

    3. Re:Who cares about gnome? by gid13 · · Score: 1

      You know, in general, I have the same ideals for a desktop, and you know what? I don't use Gnome. When I'm using Linux, I use KDE, and I assume you do too given that it's the only remotely customizeable WM.

      However, it seems to me that those that care that much about CPU cycles and that little about the UI might be better off with IceWM or XFCE or Blackbox or one of those other WMs (all of which I can't tolerate using myself, but might serve this purpose well). Gnome seems to me to provide a decent balance between the two extremes. Except for the example you mention about dragging things, Gnome seems just a touch faster than KDE to me, probably precisely because of its lack of customizeability. Personally I think it's good to have the choice there, though I doubt I'll use it in the near future.

    4. Re:Who cares about gnome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the more important news here is the death of two GNOME developers. I can't believe you took this oppurtunity to bitch about your dissatisfaction with software that they wrote and freely give away.

      Fair point.

      BTW, you are very adamant about having control over *your* computer. Why shouldn't he have control over *his* code?

      Not a fair point. Where did the post you're replying to say Havoc Pennington *shouldn't* have control over his own code? He merely said that since those changes (in window manager and in philosophy) were made, he was no longer interested in GNOME. Put another way, he didn't say `. . .and therefore I took a baseball bat to havoc and stole his code'; he said `. . .and therefore, I chose to use other software instead.'

      Duh.

    5. Re:Who cares about gnome? by metroid+composite · · Score: 1

      While I agree that the Gnome OS itself is not ideal, and tend to stick to KDE, I certainly care about Gnome programs. Gaim, Gimp, and Gnumeric are all key on my launcher list, and Ghaleon is a second Mozilla more or less (and having an alternate web browser in case something goes wrong is always a good plan).

    6. Re:Who cares about gnome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Gnome took a turn for the worse when Gnome 2.0 was released and it hasn't recovered since. At least now they aren't playing catch-up with KDE anymore. They are trying to innovate and do new things. This is good. The problem is that those new things suck. This is bad.

    7. Re:Who cares about gnome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Outline-dragging of windows seems like a frivolous issue to write-off gnome over. I can't honestly remember how my computer does it without trying. I also have a hard time understanding why people get worked up about such trivial details. How many CPU cycles do you suppose you are losing? Do you move windows around so much that this actually makes a noticable difference?

    8. Re:Who cares about gnome? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1


      I think the more important news here is the death of two GNOME developers.

      Strange that the article submitter doesn't agree with you, since that's not the title of the post. It's primarily about Miguel being left off the panel. It's *that* news (you know, the actual main point of the article rather than something mentioned briefly in passing) that prompted my "who cares" comment.


      BTW, you are very adamant about having control over *your* computer. Why shouldn't he have control over *his* code?

      Why can't you read well enough to understand what was written? He can have all the control he wants, but I will never use any of what he writes anymore. It was written with an attitude that ensures it's a a poor match for what I want and that this will never be fixed in future versions because the author doesn't see it as a problem, he sees it as a virtue.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    9. Re:Who cares about gnome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      killall metacity; xfwm4 &

    10. Re:Who cares about gnome? by sysopd · · Score: 2, Interesting
      AMEN. Responsiveness in the (G)UI is incredibly important for me. If its slower than windows (95 era or 98lite micro) then I'll stick to the CLI. I want my alternative OS to be faster, slimmer, and more stable.

      But then, thats a large reason why I don't use either GNOME or KDE. I stick with black/fluxbox, XFCE, or possibly windowmaker. Honestly, when I buy a hard drive for good seek times, fine tune my swap partition(s) and span them across multiple drives, use IDE/SCSI sw/hw RAID, and remove all but the necessary services and kernel drivers/modules-- I'll be damned if after all that I'm going to waste CPU cycles and memory on anti-aliased alpha blending of my skinned 'desktop environment' windows.

      I'd like to actually use my computer, not just use my GUI. Choice is paramount.

    11. Re:Who cares about gnome? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1


      Do you move windows around so much that this actually makes a noticable difference?

      Yup. Because, no matter how fast your computer is, if you are running a mathematically intense algorithm on it in the background, it will take as much CPU time as you let it, since the scheduler doesn't see it doing any I/O, it gets a very high percentage of the CPU time. That's not a problem if the UI isn't trying to also do things that require a lot of CPU cycles, but if it is, then you visually notice the sluggishness. Keep in mind that if a mathematical process takes 95% of the CPU on a slow machine, it will *STILL* typically take 95% of the CPU on a machine twice as fast - the fast CPU doesn't cause the program to use the CPU more sparingly, it just causes it to finish in half the time.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    12. Re:Who cares about gnome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree that is important and sad news but that wasn't the main subject of the post, right or wrong so I don't see why you have to have a go at this person.

      If you want, go take up with the poster of the joke earlier in the thread about mortality rates, not someone making a valid point about Havoc's sometimes strange ideas about GUI behaviour, many of which he breaks himself. In fact, I'll join in.

      Yes Havoc, its a good idea to say any window manager which follows these rules should work.

      Yes, there should be a default one, which is fairly sane and easy to use.

      No, Metacity isn't it (yet). It should be possible to have a lightweight configuration, to place my windows off the screen and have them stay there, to not go for anti-aliased up the woozah, opengl super duper cpu sucking, theme-tastic, microsoft bashing uber-gui that we seem to be deciding for users is best for them these days. The dude wants to use his CPU for gosh, actual computation, not bit blits and this is now bad? And he shouldn't be posting under a gnome thread. You say shame on him (or her), I say shame on you.

      And "he" does have control over "his" code, which is orthogonal to poster having control over their computer. Your argument fails.

      Ah, that feels better. Thanks for playing.

    13. Re:Who cares about gnome? by Nodatadj · · Score: 2, Informative

      Especially seeing as...

      Taaadaaaa!

      you can turn it off at the click of a button or two...[here's a hint, check gconf-editor and turn on Metacity's "reduced resources" feature]

      Yey for uninformed bitching!

      Woohooo

    14. Re:Who cares about gnome? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 3, Insightful


      I use KDE, and I assume you do too given that it's the only remotely customizeable WM.

      I didn't before. I used to prefer Gnome over KDE, but I switched to KDE after the pile of dung that is Gnome 2.0 showed me that Gnome is a dead end now. What annoys me about the Metacity manifesto is how it ruined the future of what *had been* my preferred interface.

      I'd use blackbox or icewm, except that I hate the look and feel of NeXT that they try to emulate. It doesn't waste computer resources to have resize bars on *all* sides of a window. There's no reason to make you have to use a little button down on the lower corners.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    15. Re:Who cares about gnome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He merely said that since those changes (in window manager and in philosophy) were made, he was no longer interested in GNOME.

      If he is no longer interested in Gnome, why does he waste time bitching about it on Slashdot?

      In the first place, if you're a paranoid of CPU cycles, the last thing you'll do is run a desktop environment (Gnome, KDE, whatever). You'll just fire up blackbox or something.

      His only intention is to make some pressure so Havoc Pennington thinks that there are many annoyed metacity users, and changes it to act like *he* wants to be.

      Of course, it's a waste of time, but it's amusing to read it, in a twisted way.

    16. Re:Who cares about gnome? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      Yay for uninformed belittling. The comment I made about outline drag in NO WAY said it wasn't possible to turn it off. It was in reference to the manifesto where the author bitched about how he thought it was an utter waste to include it. (There were other features he left off as not 'relevant', and he claimed outline drag should have been one of them, but he only left it in because there are too many people who are dumb enough to insist on it, not because he sees any real need for it. An attitude like that proves to me that the future of that project is going to make it even *worse* than it is already.)

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    17. Re:Who cares about gnome? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      This is proof that moderation is broken, and it's why I never bother using it when I keep getting invited to by the site. In the last 10 minutes I've seen this post sway between a score of 0 and 3 and back. People are just moderating based on what they agree with, not on the actual insightfulness or flamefulness of the post.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    18. Re:Who cares about gnome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There actually ARE a lot of annoyed metacity users.

    19. Re:Who cares about gnome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he is no longer interested in Gnome, why does he waste time bitching about it on Slashdot?

      For the same reason all of us post here: chicks.

      His only intention is to make some pressure so Havoc Pennington thinks that there are many annoyed metacity users, and changes it to act like *he* wants to be.

      I doubt it. The complaints he voiced aren't new; they've been voiced a zillion times over the last couple of years, and HP disagrees, and that's that. If all the bellyaching about the changes in GNOME's philosophy over the last two years haven't made an impact, they're not going to because one guy whined a little about it here.

    20. Re:Who cares about gnome? by Nodatadj · · Score: 0

      So really, you want him to conform to your views
      And "write off" the project because it doesn't.

      Hmm, pot calling the kettle black then.

    21. Re:Who cares about gnome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      God you are full annoying cliche.

      Re-read what he said. He doesn't agree with the philosophy and never says that they should obey his command. 'I disagree with you' and 'You're wrong' are very different and distinct.

    22. Re:Who cares about gnome? by Nodatadj · · Score: 0

      But he then "wrote it off" and has decided that the project is only going to get worse...

      That implies that "I disagree with you" is actually the same as "you're wrong"

    23. Re:Who cares about gnome? by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      When I'm using Linux, I use KDE, and I assume you do too given that it's the only remotely customizeable WM.

      [cough]Enlightenment[cough]

      KWin customisable? What else have you tried?! Sit down and spend some time with FVWM or Enlightenment (no, it isn't dead) and learn what customisation actually means. And you can use either of those within both KDE and GNOME, so choosing based on window managers is, well, dumb.

      Jedidiah.

    24. Re:Who cares about gnome? by gid13 · · Score: 1

      I don't think I've heard of KWin...

      As for FVWM and Enlightenment, if they are indeed as customizeable as you claim, then either the capabilities are not easy to find and change, or the features have been added since I last tried them (about a year ago). However, my impression at the time was that if you wanted a feature-rich WM like KDE (which I do), you might just as soon write one from scratch as start from FVWM or Enlightenment.

    25. Re:Who cares about gnome? by pyros · · Score: 1
      What annoys me about the Metacity manifesto is how it ruined the future of what *had been* my preferred interface.

      Do you honestly believe you have to use Metacity? You can use any GNOME-compliant WM. In the Sessions pref. panel, just disable the restart status of metacity, launch the WM you want, and flag it with restart status. Logout, checking the 'save session' checkbox, and log back in. Pretty easy.

    26. Re:Who cares about gnome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you should just use Sawfish and forget about the rest of the world.

      No sense in wasting cycles on KDE and qt.

    27. Re:Who cares about gnome? by pyros · · Score: 1
      I don't think I've heard of KWin...

      KWin is the WM that KDE uses. KDE is a desktop environment, which basically means it consists of the WM, a 'panel', a file manager, and a few other things. All KWin does is draw the decorations on window borders (the title bars, min/max/close/sticky buttons, etc) and places windows when apps are launched. Apparently you mean KDE is the most customizable DE.

      You don't actually have to run the WM provided with the DE, either. So you can actually run KDE with Enlightenment rather than KWin. I'm not sure how to do that in KDE, but my reply to Dunbar tells how to do so in GNOME, so you can probably extrapolate from there.

    28. Re:Who cares about gnome? by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      Well, if you tell me what exactly it is that you want to be able to configure I can tell you how you can do that in Enlightenment. Kwin, or KWM, or whatever they are calling the KDE window manager currently is NOT all that configurable.

      If you're willing to take a little time to understand FVWM configuration files you'll soon find that you can actually make that window manager do pretty anything you want.

      As I say, tell me what you want to configure, and I assure you I can tell you some way to do it in Enlightenment. Then think of the things you wish you could configure, and I'll try and tell you how you might be able to configure those too.

      Jedidiah.

    29. Re:Who cares about gnome? by pyros · · Score: 1

      DOH! I forgot to mention killing metacity after disabling the restart status. Not sure what would happen if you have two WM's running at once.

    30. Re:Who cares about gnome? by pyros · · Score: 1

      GNOME and KDE are desktop environments, not operating systems. You can run either one on just about any unix or linux available (including Mac OS X, I believe).

    31. Re:Who cares about gnome? by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1

      It sounds more like he'd like to have the option [of using less resources]. Which, given gnome cares so much about accessibility, seems only right. After all, should an extension of that principle not be that gnome should be accessible to those with older computers?

      --
      "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
      - JRR Tolkien.
    32. Re:Who cares about gnome? by nofx_3 · · Score: 1

      KWin is the KDE window manager. If you are using KDE and you haven't specifically changed your window manager yourself, then you are using KWin. KDE is a desktop environment not a windowmanager, it handles things like your taskbar, the kicker, and the menus.

      --
      Visualize Whirled Peas
    33. Re:Who cares about gnome? by pyros · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Gnome took a turn for the worse when Gnome 2.0 was released and it hasn't recovered since.

      Matter of opinion. I happen to think the jump from 2.0 to 1.4 was the first big leap towards being useable on a personal desktop, and it's been getting better ever since. I think File Type application association sucked ass in earlier versions of GNOME. Nautilus has made considerable speed and memory improvements. The panel kicks butt. they used to have different kinds of panels you could add/configure. Finally in 2.4 they figured out that they're all just panels. So now it's one kind of panel you can put whereever you want, and you can put any and all available applets on it. Some people really hate metacity. I can honestly say that I've had no change in usage patterns or productivity during the transition from Enlightenment to Sawfish to Metacity. Now we have the emerging gstreamer audio/video subsystem for GNOME apps to hook into. Totem and Rhythmbox are pretty sweet. I still use xmms every now and then, but I like having my little systray applet for rhytmbox. (I never liked the xmms gnome panel applet)

      What exactly do you think got worse from 1.4 to 2.0?

    34. Re:Who cares about gnome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not too bright, are you friend?

      You need not use Metacity with GNOME.

      If you're such a spazz, there are a number very-low resource WMs out there. You can install them. And run them! Wow! Sounds amazing, no? If you haven't figured that much out yet, you probably should be using Windows rather than pissing yourself every time a big of color finds its way onto your desktop.

      Mathematical calculations? Doooo tell! What kind of animations, son? Hentai? Please share!

      P.S. I took your .sig to heart; I modded you as a troll rather than offtopic. Cheers!

    35. Re:Who cares about gnome? by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      Someone once said to me: "Different strokes for different folks." What is something worth writing a dozen whiny posts about to one person is indeed a great feature to others. Helluva concept, eh?

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    36. Re:Who cares about gnome? by Nodatadj · · Score: 2

      which as I pointed out, works fine, but apparently that was offtopic for this thread.

    37. Re:Who cares about gnome? by WWWWolf · · Score: 1
      I stopped caring about Gnome at about the time they started deciding Metacity is good and should be the default.

      Sawfish? Metacity? People actually use those? GNOME folks forcing us to use it? You'll need to pry my dead fingers from Window Maker first... oh, wait, it's still compliant. Never mind.

      I have never cared much for a lot of GNOME's user infrastructure parts (wm, sm, panel), but the apps rule. And I think the libraries are decent from programmer's point of view.

      I do use some GNOME apps, notably Nautilus which is an excellent file manager. (Considering swiching back from GNUMail to Evolution - but only if multisync folks come up with a release that has Palm support...) And a few GNOME 1.x apps, too (Gabber hasn't yet released its 2.0 release...)

      Can't say much about the rest of your rant, as I said, I wouldn't touch Metacity with a three-meter pole, especially since WindowMaker works for me perfectly.

    38. Re:Who cares about gnome? by gid13 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the offer, but actually KDE (Kwin or KWM I guess) does everything I want, with the single possible exception of allocating screen space to gaim or kopete such that maximizing windows doesn't cover it. On the off chance you know how to do that in KDE by all means please inform me, although this is getting WAY off topic. :)

      Actually, one of the main things that I want is a good GUI config tool, which KDE (KWM?) provides ("Control Center").

      Also, apologies if I unjustly slandered other WMs. It was unintended.

    39. Re:Who cares about gnome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Gnome 2.0 showed me that Gnome is a dead end now.

      I'd say that KDE is somewhat a "dead end" in terms of Licensing. It's not a platform I would want to develop for. Technically it seems to be better than GNOME in quite a few ways though.

      Anyway, I agree that Metacity annoyed me when switching to GNOME 2.0, but after some time I got used to it. Heck, the old sawfish was so bug ridden that even if it was reintroduced, I probably won't be using that as my WM.

    40. Re:Who cares about gnome? by nutshell42 · · Score: 1
      My problem with Gnome2 is the philosophy change of gnome.

      The main argument why Gnome 1 was better than KDE always was "it's more configurable", "I can change it to behave the way *I* want it to"

      Now with Gnome 2 it's suddenly options are bad, simplicity, Joe Average, etc (Actually the last time I tried Gnome Nautilus showed folder contents case sensitive and I didn't find an option to change that - I can't imagine that my mom would want it that way, perhaps I'm blind but imho it's the wrong setting nevertheless). That's a 180 turn in the goals of GNOME and I know a number of people who really believed in the old goals and weren't just part of the anti-KDE crowd who turned away from Gnome because of it.

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    41. Re:Who cares about gnome? by NamShubCMX · · Score: 1
      right click on the title bar

      always on top

      there you go :)

      --
      We've always been at war with Eurasia.
    42. Re:Who cares about gnome? by NamShubCMX · · Score: 1
      because browsing slashdot with LYNX is so much fun, right?

      I actually agree with you, but for many people (myself included, I guess) using a computer *IS* using a GUI...

      --
      We've always been at war with Eurasia.
    43. Re:Who cares about gnome? by sysopd · · Score: 1
      You could always use Links instead :)

      Actually, I've been able to use GNU/Linux + X + some basic window manager with fast response times and low memory usage even on modest machines.

      I routinely use my P133 laptop with 64MB of RAM with Sourcemage GNU/Linux, X, and fluxbox. I use Opera and dillo on there to browse the web, and it *is* browsable. (unlike using Mozilla which is slower than molasses, which I can't even compile on there (source based distro) because its too big and takes way too long (i did try)).

      But my main point was that I use a computer to actually do something, not just tinker with the environment (not saying I haven't done it), and I'd like to get whatever I'm doing done in the shortest amount of time possible. That means the windowmanager and/or desktop environment will take microseconds to do their work and should feel instantaneous. That also means I want shortcuts and scripts to make my life easer.

      Now, I love Opera's gestures and would not consider them a frivality (like the parent's opaque/bordered window moving issue) since they speed me up (less hand to mouse to keyboard), but at the same time I would want them disable-able.

      Realistically, however, I can get much done with little (ie, a CLI). But, some tasks are better suited for a GUI (like web browsing). I guess it comes down to having the tools and the options available to you.

    44. Re:Who cares about gnome? by FooBarWidget · · Score: 1

      "The main argument why Gnome 1 was better than KDE always was "it's more configurable""

      Average users don't care about thousands of configuration options! They want things to just work!
      Your attitude is exactly what is being criticized by the "Linux-aint-ready-for-the-desktop-util-people-chan ge-their-attitude"-Slashdotters all the time.

      And if you like config options so much? Why not just use KDE? KDE sounds exactly like what you want.
      The two desktop projects have to have different goals! Why the hell do we have two desktops if their goals are the same? Joe Average doesn't want to choose between two nearly equal desktops!

      Let's keep it this way: GNOME for simplicity, KDE for configurability and raw power.

    45. Re:Who cares about gnome? by kmaraas · · Score: 1

      Just wanted to make sure you're aware that the outline drag mode is there now. You have to enable the reduced_resources GConf key in /apps/metacity/general/reduced_resources Also, do you really think implementing every possible preference ever used in a WM is a sane choice for someone implementing a new one? I think Havoc is doing the right thing by doing the ones that make sense over time and getting the implementation right instead of adding hack after hack because users can't wait for the WM to mature.

    46. Re:Who cares about gnome? by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 1
      It wouldn't let you:
      bash-2.05b$ xfwm4
      ** Message: xfwm4: Another window manager is running
    47. Re:Who cares about gnome? by nutshell42 · · Score: 1
      Huh? Did you read my post at all?

      The question was why some liked 1.4 better than 2 - I just said that the fact that 2 had a totally different goal might have something to do with it. Actually in the case of Epiphany/Galeon it was worse enough that there was a split.

      My other point was that if you reduce the number of options choosing the important ones and choosing the right default settings becomes *very* important and I don't agree with them on some decisions.

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    48. Re:Who cares about gnome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GNOME has squat for actual applications.

    49. Re:Who cares about gnome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The question was why some liked 1.4 better than 2

      Nope. The question was what went worse in 2.0. Of course, since the philosophy changed, it's hard to say it's objectively worse. You just can say it's bad or good for you.

      Personally, one of the reasons that made me go from gnome 1.4 to blackbox was the crack config options (had to tweak many options to make the panels act like I wanted them to act).

      When I switched to 2.0, I noticed the defaults were almost fine, and just had to check 2 options to leave them perfect for my tastes. I'm still using gnome (2.4), so I guess it's good for me.

    50. Re:Who cares about gnome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not saying that your explanation isn't the most likely one, but it is possible that there is justification for opposing moderator judgements: Namely, if you are aware that GNOME does not require any particular window manager, you can easily see the complaint as irrelevant trolling; on the other hand, if you don't know that much about GNOME then the post appears to be quite a legitimate complaint in an inflammatory style.

    51. Re:Who cares about gnome? by nutshell42 · · Score: 1
      The question was what went worse in 2.0.

      If some people believe that something went worse it reasonable to assume that they liked 1.4 better therefore the question was why some liked 1.4 better. =P

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    52. Re:Who cares about gnome? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Because, no matter how fast your computer is, if you are running a mathematically intense algorithm on it in the background, it will take as much CPU time as you let it, since the scheduler doesn't see it doing any I/O, it gets a very high percentage of the CPU time."

      Totally wrong. CPU bound (ie, tasks always exhaust their timeslice) get a lower dynamic priority than tasks that always sleep (waiting on IO, usually) before their timeslice is exhausted.

    53. Re:Who cares about gnome? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      You can use any GNOME-compliant WM.

      Yeah, both of them. The one that development was halted on, and the one that has a manefesto guaranteeing that I won't like it's future development.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    54. Re:Who cares about gnome? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      If the programmer in charge of the project SAYS in plain English that he doesn't want to support the features I like, (especially in a belittling manner full of lies) then it's perfectly reasonable to "write it off" as something that won't go in a future direction I will want to follow. If you're an idiot, you might equate that with "wanting him to conform to my views", but that just demonstrates your inability to think.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    55. Re:Who cares about gnome? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      You're of course forgetting about the possibility that the person reading is aware that NONE of the gnome-compliant window managers are being further developed EXCEPT for metacity, thus making their existance rather irrelevant if talking about what direction I expect gnome to take in the future.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    56. Re:Who cares about gnome? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      On a scale of configurability, it ranks like this:

      Gnome 1.x - most configurable.
      KDE - medium amount of configurability.
      Gnome 2.x - least configurable.

      So, those who like configurability lost the most configurable platform when Gnome 2 came out and Gnome 1.x was no longer being worked on, and had to settle for the one that *previously* had been less configurable - KDE. No, KDE is not "exactly" what we want. It's just the only thing left nowadays.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    57. Re:Who cares about gnome? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1


      I think Havoc is doing the right thing by doing the ones that make sense over time and getting the implementation right instead of adding hack after hack because users can't wait for the WM to mature.

      That approach is NOT what the manifesto says is happening. The manifesto says those things will never be added.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    58. Re:Who cares about gnome? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1


      That implies that "I disagree with you" is actually the same as "you're wrong"

      What convoluted path of "logic" lead you to that?

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    59. Re:Who cares about gnome? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1


      You need not use Metacity with GNOME.

      Today, yes. Tomorrow, No. This is about future directions.

      Rest of bullshit ignored.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  7. SCO is to blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    In related news, barely a few weeks after the news of the death of GNOME hacker Chema Celorio in a sky diving accident, the GNOME community was shocked by the news of the sudden death of Evolution hacker Ettore Perazzoli

    SCO is taking us out... one by one...

    I must post anon to protect myself from their "enforcers"

    1. Re:SCO is to blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look these people have only themselves to blame, they broke the law of the Lord and are being punished.

    2. Re:SCO is to blame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which law would that be? The one that commands that adulters should be stoned to death?

  8. Under Achiever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're one of those pathetic under achievers that always piss and moan until someone make an exception for you, aren't you?

    Why shouldn't Miguel be held accountable by his own rules?

    If he's too busy to submit the application on time, how much Gnome work (outside of Novell) do you think he'll have time for.

    Why don't you give us a break. Shut up and get to the back of the line!

    1. Re:Under Achiever by KlomDark · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Uh, yah, underachiever, that'd be me alright... :)

      That's pretty funny. I like that. :)

      No, what I hate is untalented folks like yourself who find it far more important to stand on ceremony and tradition and let it interfere with with actually accomplishing something. But then, when you fail (as your kind often does), at least you have a scapegoat, as you can point to the person who did things "different" to actually get the job done.

      "'m sorry sir, but we've always climbed down this cliff and up the other side, so it'd be against the rules to build a bridge across the ravine."

  9. Gnome by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 3, Funny

    Aren't Gnomes and Trolls Related?

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    1. Re:Gnome by strictnein · · Score: 4, Funny

      No no no...

      Gnomes steal your underwear.
      Trolls smell like your underwear.

      It's very easy to get the two confused...

      Although, now I'm confused. My definition directly relates them. They are connected through.... my underwear. Hmmm... must do more research on the subject.

    2. Re:Gnome by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      dunno. gnomes are wimps, unless you're a tourist or something and want to keep some weaponless game or something.

      but trolls keep on coming back after you kill them, rock trolls & etc are bitchy.

      man i hate them, especially when i'm satiated and can't eat them to get rid of the bodies so that they can't rise back to life.

      this voting though puzzles me, i though the gnomes had a king??? his wine cellar sucks though.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  10. It is an official conspiracy now by segment · · Score: 3, Funny

    Two election based articles...One day? I think Slashdot is now trying to sway the vote.

    Vote No to proposal #4839562358096-2385178934569384560345934(a(b)(d)) titled "More Electoral Based Articles on Slashdot"

  11. Sad by pavon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If I remember right Ettore Perazzoli was also largly responcible for the GNOME Virtual File System code (transparently opening tarballs as folders, FTP etc) which in my opinion was the only good thing to come out of the Nautilus project.

    1. Re:Sad by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Err, AFAIR, the GNOME VFS layer existed long before Nautilus... it was part of Gnome Commander.

    2. Re:Sad by pyros · · Score: 1
      Err, AFAIR, the GNOME VFS layer existed long before Nautilus... it was part of Gnome Commander

      man, GMC sucked.

    3. Re:Sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      man, GMC sucked.

      Oh yes, did it ever!

      Then again, of course it was a thousand times better than Nautilus.

      Whatever Nautilus is supposed to be... It sure is worthless if you're trying to do extremely complicated file management things like copying, moving, or renaming files, and stuff like that.

  12. Conspiracy theory by daserver · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anyone seen Antitrust?

    1. Re:Conspiracy theory by Kevin+Burtch · · Score: 1


      Antitrust was an excellent movie, much better than I expected.

      Someone should inform Billy that it was poking fun at him... it was not meant as a how-to!

      --
      - Preferences: Solaris 10 (servers), Ubuntu (desktops), Solaris 11 (personal servers) -
    2. Re:Conspiracy theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RMS and Rachel Leigh Cook working on GNURV?

    3. Re:Conspiracy theory by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

      Antitrust was fun, but I wouldn't call it a masterpiece of cinema (or anything close to that).

    4. Re:Conspiracy theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is those non-free software using KDE bastards picking off the competition one at a time! Will they stop at nothing? Oh the humanity!

      Now don't you wish you could mod this down as Troll with a Heartless -1 modifier?

    5. Re:Conspiracy theory by Kevin+Burtch · · Score: 1


      Neither did I, but it was much better than I expected, and even the non-techies who I know who've seen it enjoyed it.

      --
      - Preferences: Solaris 10 (servers), Ubuntu (desktops), Solaris 11 (personal servers) -
  13. Gnome == Novell, Sun, Red Hat by chill · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Novell had 5 people elected, but the charter doesn't all that many from 1 company, so 4 will sit on the board.

    Sun & Red Hat had 2 each.

    That means of the 11 sitting members, a super-majority (2/3) is in the hands of 3 big companies.

    Hmmm... the big boys are starting to pay attention. I hope this is a good thing.

    -Charles Hill

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    1. Re:Gnome == Novell, Sun, Red Hat by Mathetes · · Score: 1

      I think what it means is that GNOME's direction will be towards meeting the needs of Enterprise and business users. This may not be the direction that many hobbyists and Linux enthusiasts want. Fortunately, for those users there are other choices: KDE, XFCE, Enlightenment, GNUStep, and others.

    2. Re:Gnome == Novell, Sun, Red Hat by bogie · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well Sun and Red Hat have done well by Gnome up till now so I don't see why it wouldn't be good thing. Heck if Red Hat had gone KDE like everyone else did instead of pushing a rather unfit at the time Gnome, there is no way Gnome would be where it is today.

      The real wild card here is Novell. Novell is the outsider here and it remains to be seen if there goals will align with the opensource community's goals longterm. Sure the names ie Nat are the same for now, but Novell is going to the ones pulling the strings.

      I have to say even though I've read only good things about what Novell plans to do, it's going to be years before I can trust them. Novell wasn't exactly big in Open Source before buying Suse and Ximian.

      Two things I'd love to see are opening up YAST and Ximian's exchange connector. Its would nice to see a Truly Free,Open, and Redistributable Suse. An open Connector would really help out in getting Linux on those corportate desktops.

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    3. Re:Gnome == Novell, Sun, Red Hat by Deusy · · Score: 1

      Novell had 5 people elected

      The fifth was excluded you ignoramous.

      --

      Free Gamer - Free games list and commentary

    4. Re:Gnome == Novell, Sun, Red Hat by pyros · · Score: 2
      Two things I'd love to see are opening up YAST and Ximian's exchange connector. Its would nice to see a Truly Free,Open, and Redistributable Suse. An open Connector would really help out in getting Linux on those corportate desktops.

      While I don't use Suse, I'd love to see YAST opened up. I get really pissed off about how much flack Red Hat takes when they give all their tools back to the community and Suse doesn't.

      Regarding Connector, it'd be cool but I doubt it would happen. They're pushing the Groupwise plugin. More likely they would leave the Connector plugin as is ($), and open the Groupwise plugin. Or at least make it free beer.

    5. Re:Gnome == Novell, Sun, Red Hat by chill · · Score: 1

      The fifth was excluded you ignoramous.

      From my original post... but the charter doesn't all that many from 1 company, so 4 will sit on the board.

      Learn to read complete sentences you ignoramous.

      -Charles

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  14. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this had been another anti-Jewish anti-Bush anti-America blame-the-victim diatribe, it would have been modded +5 Interesting. Slashdot sucks.

  15. Re:missing key detail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was an accident at a gay furry orgy.

  16. In regards to History, Politics and related stuff by RedHatLinux · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    5 9s worth of the stuff is a matter of intrepretation. In this case since they do not agree with you, you label it propganda. Since he agrees with it he considers it fact. (In reality most history written is analysis)

    An example of this is the question of who was the first American President. Most people will say Washington, this is correct if you regard the Constitution as the start of the United States.

    However if you go back to the Articles of Confederation, you will see the "first" president was a man named Matthew Henson.

    As shown a simple commonsense histortical "fact" can be thrown into contention by simplying changing the interpretation of the reader/author/whatever.

    Yeah, its off topic, but I have Karma to spare.

  17. Considering his past, no biggie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A notable exclusion from this year's list is Miguel De Icaza, whose candidacy application was rejected as it missed the deadline.

    Miguel's pro-linux-above-all-else past and not being involved with the GNOME board is fine. GNOME is now a multi-platform system and a Linux bigot on the board won't help move GNOME forward, so his not being there is just fine.

    1. Re:Considering his past, no biggie by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Miguel had lots of other stupid positions as well, I for one am really glad to see him gone. Especially becase he probably would have been re-elected otherwise.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  18. MOD PARENT UP by Dav3K · · Score: 0

    Parent post is a truly funny post. Passed the wet monitor test. (ie. was drinking coffee while reading post - laughed and sprayed coffee on monitor.)

  19. Myth #11 about open source by afternoon_nap · · Score: 4, Funny
    It will withstand the /. effect:

    Warning: Too many connections in /var/www/html/fast.php on line 4

    Warning: MySQL Connection Failed: Too many connections in /var/www/html/fast.php on line 4 Unable to select database

    1. Re:Myth #11 about open source by pclminion · · Score: 2, Funny
      Warning: Too many connections in /var/www/html/fast.php on line 4

      Ahhh, shit, I knew I should have committed that faster.php I finished coding last night...

  20. Ettore's blog by zr-rifle · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here is Ettore's blog, updated to 29 November.

    On a side note, it's moving to browse through the weblog of someone who has died recently. I never knew Ettore, although I regularly use and love Evolution, but from his entries I see he was a very nice person while also being a talented hacker.

    --
    Hack your mind out of its sandbox.
    1. Re:Ettore's blog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Yes, especially considering his note from Sunday, November 2, 2003:

      • Life goes on.
  21. Bizarre election by SteveX · · Score: 1

    11 seats on the board and only 12 people were to be voted for? IMHO simply adding one seat to the board would have been better than playing "Gnome Board Survivor" to see who gets voted off the island.. Poor Sri Ramkrishna.

    The other weird thing is it sounds like Miguel was disqualified on a technicality? Considering he's the one name that most people probably associate with Gnome, having him miss being on the board because of something like this just seems wrong.

    - Steve

    1. Re:Bizarre election by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering he's the one name that most people probably associate with Gnome, having him miss being on the board because of something like this just seems wrong.

      Deadlines are deadlines. Are you trying to imply that Icaza must have special priviledges when complying with rules, just because he's one of the Gnome founders?

      Sorry, I think feudal government is not fashionable nowadays.

    2. Re:Bizarre election by SteveX · · Score: 1

      This isn't politics, it's software. Sticking to a decision that doesn't make sense just because the rules say so isn't in the best interest of anyone, except for the people who want it to be politics.

    3. Re:Bizarre election by be-fan · · Score: 1

      Deadlines are deadlines. Are you trying to imply that Icaza must have special priviledges when complying with rules, just because he's one of the Gnome founders?
      >>>>>>>>>
      Yes! I thought engineers hated beauracratic crap like that!

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    4. Re:Bizarre election by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't politics, it's software.

      Sorry, but politics are everywhere, even in software development. This is no exception. If you want organization in a huge group of people, you need some politics here and there.

      Sticking to a decision that doesn't make sense just because the rules say so isn't in the best interest of anyone, except for the people who want it to be politics.

      Why doesn't it make sense? Do you think that delaying the elections so that "Lord Founder" can apply when he wants to is much more sensible?

    5. Re:Bizarre election by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think that delaying the elections so that "Lord Founder" can apply when he wants to is much more sensible?

      Miguel missed the deadline, but it was still well before the election.

      (I realize you're just a goddamn AC troll, so I'm replying in kind)

    6. Re:Bizarre election by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Miguel missed the deadline, but it was still well before the election.

      So? Elections require some preliminars, giving time for people to register on the gnome foundation to vote, etc. etc. It's not "OK, all the buddies are here, let the voting begin!".

      I appreciate Icaza *a lot*, more than you can imagine. But if he missed a deadline, he lost it. There's no reason to keep beating a dead horse, and he still can keep working on his projects. So it's not such a huge loss as many people think.

      (I realize you're just a goddamn AC troll, so I'm replying in kind)

      Since you're the first that did something insulting (calling me troll), I really have to wonder what's your stance here...

      If anyone who thinks differently is a troll for you, even if he's not insulting anyone, perhaps you should try to relax and be a little more open minded.

  22. Re:asdf ???? by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

    I don't think Alan Funt reads this board very often, so your remarks will probably fall on deaf ears. But thanks for sharing anyway!

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
  23. Re:In regards to History, Politics and related stu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Everything is opinion" - sounds like classic moral relativism to me. I don't call something I don't agree with propaganda, I already SAID I AGREE with some of their points. However, they don't make any effort to understand or present the position of the other side. Whenever *I* comment on the Middle East, I try to understand an issue from the perspective of both sides. I may decide one side is in the right or in the wrong on certain issues, but if you spew one-sided rhetoric for either end, you aren't presenting meaningful analysis, you are presenting propaganda.

  24. Re:asdf ???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i share a bit like a care bear

    b0k

  25. File Requester Picture by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

    this do ya ?

    http://www.blackapology.com/images/kdefile.gif

    nick ...

    --
    Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
  26. Re:In regards to History, Politics and related stu by RedHatLinux · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Everything is relative. If you are a Settler in a Israeli government subsidized settlement than everything is good. If you are a 3rd generation Palestinian refugee, whose parents were killed by random IDF gunfire than your views on the conflict will probably differ.

    Also very few people attempt to show all the sides of any issue so thats a cannard.

    Analysis can be one-sided rhetoric depending on the analyist.

  27. Re:Gnome == Gnovell, Sun, Red Hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you miss-spelled it, it is now Gnovell...

  28. Who cares about gnome?-Sensitive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For you I'd recommend 2.6. I've had the load meter pegged at 100% and that wasn't reflected in the responsiveness of the GUI.

  29. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My post isn't really "Offtopic" since the story links to his home page and when you click on it, you see this information quite prominently. Since when is commenting on the content of story links "Offtopic"?

    Brilliant. Following a link to a story here about the supposed SCO DDoS attack, I saw another link on that page explaining stock hedging. So I guess discussing stock hedging would have been appropriate under the Slashdot story, huh? Brilliant.

    I'm only allowed to discuss Miguel's rejection from the Board of the GNOME Foundation on technical grounds?

    You're allowed to do whatever you want; no one's going to haul you away in irons for what you posted. If it's offtopic, though, someone might mod you offtopic.

    Do your worst to mod-slam me, Miguel's politics are just as on-topic as ESR's politics in every ESR story, or RMS's politics in every RMS story.

    Oh, whine whine whine. If there's some story about ESR that's unrelated to his politics, and someone brings up his politics, then yeah, that's offtopic.

    If somebody is supposed to represent the Open Source community on various boards and formal positions, we have the right to discuss their politics and positions on issues other than those directly software-related.

    Except he won't be, at least in terms of the GNOME Foundation, because he didn't stand for the election (as was, uh, described above in the article). Perhaps you didn't read the article, and thus didn't know what the topic *was*?

  30. Dear /. by Nodatadj · · Score: 3, Insightful

    GNOME got a new logo 2 years ago...

    Not about time to change?

    1. Re:Dear /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Politics. Again.

      Ignore one of the main successful desktops just because someone don't like it and can't be bothered. Slashdot is not nearly important enough to make my heartrate rise though, thankfully.

      Anyone dare to challenge this? The facts are undeniably true. Two fucking years.

      Why do I even care? Sigh.

      Anyone with brains (and a proper account:), please mod parent up. This is getting silly.

    2. Re:Dear /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Slashdot editors have always had a pro-GNOME slant. Not updating the logo likely has considerably more to do with laziness than malice.

      And secondly, you presented no facts. The grandparent claimed that Slashdot's icon is two years out of date, you however presented nothing but conjecture that is poorly supported by anecdote, least of all actual evidence.

  31. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I clicked on YOUR home page and you appear to either own or work for a company that sells a closed source fish screensaver for windows. How exactly is that supposed to make you a member of the "open source" community? In my opinion, you're support for closed source software makes you ineligible to have an opinion on anything related to this topic (GNOME and open source sofware). I don't mind that you support a closed source company, but I think you don't really have any right to have an opinion on open source software because of that.

  32. Re:yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, the moderators are sucking today. WTF, redundant!?!?!? How can it be redundant if it is the FRICKING FIRST POST???????? Troll yes, redundant no.

  33. Re:Ugh... by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

    Stop this crap. You can sell software and still be a part of the open source community.

    Maybe not the GNU(all proprietary software is morally wrong) community. But GNU is _not_ the open source community, thank God.

    Stop the blather.

  34. Re:In regards to History, Politics and related stu by cmehta1 · · Score: 1

    If we are gonna reference history...lets reference it right.

    Its John Hanson, not Matthew Henson.
    Checkout:
    http://www.marshallhall.org/ha nson.html

    Secondly, this says he was the 3rd Pres of the U.S In Congress Assembled:
    http://virtualology.com/uspresidents/

  35. Re:In regards to History, Politics and related stu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot to mention the views of an Israeli settler whose child was murdered by an Islamic hate-monger with some explosives.

  36. WAIT! I DO IT WRONG!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You cocksmoking teabagger, it's:
    1. Lop of the "K"
    2. Prefix a "GN"
    3. ????
    4. Profit!
  37. Re:missing key detail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Er... his webpage offers no details, but gnomedesktop.org offers some.

    Sad to die in that way really.

  38. Dont by RedHatLinux · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Raise your kids in a fucking war zone and this wouldnt happen. Also the settlers carrying and use of weapons make them a legitmate target.

  39. Re:Aussi Faggot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree. Jeff Waugh is just weird, very agressive all the time, very authorative. I just don't like his attitude when replying to people.

  40. Re:In regards to History, Politics and related stu by RedHatLinux · · Score: 1
    A) thanks for the correction, my knowledge of colonial and early American history is limited due to my lack of interest in it.

    As this page shows the first president of the US can be considered one of three people: Washington, Hanson or Samuel Huntington for the reasons listed on the page. This furthers validates my main point of history being based on interpretation and viewpoint.

  41. Re:fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    YOU FUCKING FAIL IT

  42. Who?s Killing the World?s Microbiologists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    There's not enough evidence to suggest that Open Source hackers are being systematically murdered; however, there most certainly *IS* enough to suggest that someone out there doesn't want scientists working on genetic therapies, vaccines, or weapons.

    This is not a conspiracy, but the story has nonetheless been tainted by those kooks anyway. I'm posting anonymously because I work in this field at my uni and don't want any undue attention.


    A recent spate of dead microbiologists who worked for research firms with links to U.S. weapons development is raising some eyebrows.

    Exclusive to American Free Press

    By Christopher Bollyn

    A string of microbiologists appears to have died under strange circumstances since the anthrax scare surfaced last fall. From Nov. 12 through Feb. 11, seven world-class microbiologists in different parts of the world were re ported to have died of ?unnatural? causes, while the cause of the seventh?s death is questionable, according to Michael Davidson of From The Wilderness, an Internet news journal.

    The seven microbiologists that Davidson reports to have died under strange circumstances are: Benito Que, Don C. Wiley, Vladimir Pasechnik, Robert Schwartz, Set Van, dean of the Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical Faculty.

    Benito Que was a cell biologist at the University of Miami Medical School, involved in oncology research in the hematology department, which relies heavily on DNA sequencing studies.

    Que worked for medical research facilities that received grants from Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI), which is headquartered in Chevy Chase, Md. Que was found comatose in the street near the laboratory where he worked on Nov. 12 and died on Dec. 6.

    HHMI funds a tremendous number of research programs at schools, hospitals and research facilities, and allegedly conducts ?black ops? biomedical research for intelligence organizations, including the CIA, according to Davidson.

    Three of the five American scientists who have died, Wiley, Schwartz, and Que, worked for medical research facilities that received grants from HHMI.

    Don C. Wiley worked with HHMI at Harvard University and was one of the most prominent microbiologists in the world. He had won many of the field?s most prestigious awards, including the 1995 Albert Lasker Basic Medical Research Award for work on anti-viral vaccines. Wiley was also heavily involved in research on DNA sequencing.

    Wiley, 57, vanished, and his abandoned rental car was found on the Hernando de Soto Bridge outside Memphis, Tenn. Wiley?s body was found on Dec. 20, snagged on a tree along the Mississippi River in Vidalia, La., 300 miles south of Memphis. Until his body was found, Wiley?s death was handled as a missing person case, and police did no forensic examinations.

    Vladimir Pasechnik, the top scientist from the Soviet Union?s bio-weapons program who had defected to Britain in 1989 was found dead in Wiltshire, England, not far from his home, on Nov. 23. No reports of Pasechnik?s death appeared in Britain for more than a month, until Dec. 29, when his obituary, which did not include a date of death, appeared in The London Telegraph.

    Pasechnik?s death was announced in the United States by Dr. Christopher Davis of Virginia, who stated that the cause of death was a stroke. Davis was the member of British intelligence who de-briefed Dr. Pasechnik at the time of his defection. Davis reportedly declined to say which branch of British intelligence he served in.

    Robert M. Schwartz was a founding member of the Virginia Biotechnology Association, and the executive director of Research and Development at Virginia?s Center for Innovative Technology. He was an expert in biophysics and DNA sequencing.

    Schwartz, 57, was found murdered in his rural home in Loudoun County, Va. on Dec. 10. Loudoun County sheriff?s officials said Schwartz was stabbed on Dec. 8 with a sword, and had an ?X? cut into the back of his neck. His daughter and her friends, who were

    1. Re:Who?s Killing the World?s Microbiologists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      making a mountain out of a mole hill. People die every day, including scientists.

    2. Re:Who?s Killing the World?s Microbiologists? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Thought of doing a statistical analysis?

      It would be both post-hoc and tricky, but it would at least let you put a ball-park estimate on what probability you would assign to that occurance (7 out of the top x microbiologists dying in y years?)

      The post-hoc part is what makes it tricky. Unlikely things happen all the time, but most of them aren't worth noticing. I do agree that the participation of intelligence agencies & mysterious circumstances make this more suspicious, but I have no idea how you could allow for that, so the first step would be to just use normal actuarial tables. And, perhaps, to compare the top people's lifetimes this decade against the median people, and against the prior decade. Also, figure this for several different sized groups of "top people", and use an objectively defined scale for how you rate someone as a top-person. Etc.

      So it would be a lot of work to do a good job, which is why it is rarely done.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  43. MOD PARENT DOWN!!!! by ciaran_o_riordan · · Score: 4, Funny

    > This is proof that moderation is broken

    Quick, he's on to us. Get this off the front page

  44. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So is Microsoft part of the open source community? What about SCO?

  45. Your focus is incorrect by mar1boro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    " I think the more important news here is the death of two GNOME developers. I can't believe you took this oppurtunity to bitch about your dissatisfaction with software that they wrote and freely give away."

    You need to save up the sentimental bullshit and spend it where appropriate. I assume Celorio and Perazzoli were commited to their work and had invested a considerable amount of their emotional/philosphical selves into Gnome. If so, they probably would rather have you and everyone else focus on the future of their work.

    Offer their families and friends comfort. Let them know you appreciate what these two did. But show some respect and keep focusing on the work these guys cared about. You are not showing respect by focusing on their deaths instead of their lives. Quite the opposite.

    --
    -- "It was as if the paint factories had decided to deal direct with the art galleries." - Thursday Next
  46. SCO's point of view by Gzip+Christ · · Score: 2, Funny
    An Open[*] letter by Darl McBride

    Dear Reuters,

    As of late many Linux-communists have complained of our efforts here at SCO (the owner of the UNIX operating system) to bring fairness and equality to the management of our Intellectual Property[**]. The Linux collective launched a denial of service attack on our web site earlier this week, and in doing so forced us into reciprocating with a return denial of service attack of our own. It is unfortunate that it has come to this, but we must take measures to protect our Intellectual Property[**] - it is not a choice we have made, but a course of action that we have been forced into. Our enforcers, Vinny and Spike, will continue to administer these denial of service attacks against Linux-terrorists in a freedom fighting effort for the good of all Intellectual Property ? our Intellectual Property[**] as well as the intellectual property of others[***].

    For a totally unbiased explanation of why our policy of DOS reciprocity is pro-America and good for everybody, please refer to the completely independent report by the Yankee Group's Laura Didio, who has not connection to SCO whatsoever and doesn't know anybody here and has never worked with any of us and is totally unbiased. Please quote her repeatedly as she is totally unbiased and doesn't even know us.

    Love,
    Darl McBride

    [*] This letter may be reprinted until January 1, 2004, for the nominal price of $699 provided that you can actually track down a SCO sales person that will actually sell you a license. After January 1, 2004, the price will return to the regular $1399, except that it actually won't.

    [**] I.e., all software composed of a sequence of zeros and/or ones.

    [***] I.e., all software not composed of a sequence and/or zeros or ones.

  47. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, I see, you can only do one thing at a time. You're either with us or against us, then. You can't work on closed source software to make money and still contribute to and be part of open source software projects? Thanks for letting us know, this has brought clarity to my day.

  48. Great. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    This is one way to get GWB's admin involved with Linux.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  49. Re:Aussi Faggot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is a typical corporate whore and he calls people `idiots` many times.

  50. Hackers? by adun · · Score: 1

    Will someone explain to me why Gnome developers are referred to as hackers? Seriously, I'm not trolling. It just seems a little hubristic.

    1. Re:Hackers? by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1

      It would be hubristic if they referred to themselves as hackers. When others refer to them as hackers it is a mark of respect for their ability / code / alpha geek status. Or, just possibly, an acknowledgement that gnome feels like it was hacked together with a chainsaw, a hammer and a tin of rusty wood screws ;-P

      --
      "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
      - JRR Tolkien.
  51. Re:In regards to History, Politics and related stu by Fnkmaster · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    So, since it's impossible to consider ALL sides of an issue, we should just give up on any sort of balance in our consideration. There's no hope at considering EVERY human being's viewpoint, so it's meaningless to represent any variety in our viewpoint.


    That sounds like something Fox News might say justifying their self-appellation as "Fair and Balanced". Nobody represents ALL points of view, but you'd have to be a moron to think that Fox News is "Fair and Balanced" when they present right wing propaganda as news and regularly have right wing bash-fests onto which they invite one meek, idiotic liberal to serve as a whipping boy.


    For parallel's sake, you might want to consider the Palestinian refugee and a child whose parents were killed in a bus bombing in Jerusalem. Does that mean that "everything is relative"? I don't know, that phrase is fairly devoid of meaning to me. Many statements are laden with opinion, and some are statements of fact, subject only to disagreement about definition, as the folks discussing above who the first president of the United States is (which depends on which entity you consider to define the "United States").

  52. Re:Skydiving accident? by Vaginal+Spelunker · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Q: What would you call a skydiving club for Linux geeks?

    A: I don't know about you, but I'd call it skeet.

  53. Re:GNOME IS DYING by sillybilly · · Score: 1, Troll

    As long as KDE relies on the Qt libraries, it's in a vulnerable situation to the Trolltech buyout, or not even buyout, just buy-in, where nobody notices but new people are the bosses at Trolltech. And lo and behold foking of the GPL Qt wouldn't happen til it's too late. It's very easy to run any project into the ground, on purpose, or at least just make it annoying enough so that people silently quit it. I'm not so sure that qt is giving the best performance possible.. right now gnome seems spiffier and faster, though gnome has been going downhill for a while. So before killing KDE, Gnome must be killed off, so that people don't have another option to flock to. Patience, one at a time, methodical erasure. Or maybe I'm just paranoid. But heck, I love using free software, cuz it's free, plus, as far as an end user, it's nice to know the source code is there, and I can edit it if I want to.

  54. Death Announcement Reprint by chuckw · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Some people are getting MySQL errors so here's a copy I managed to snag:

    According to Nat's blog and numerous other blogs, Chema Celorio died yesterday skydiving in Mexico.

    "The always enthusiastic and charming Chema Celorio died yesterday skydiving in Mexico.

    For those of you not in Ximian who don't know, Chema started and ran our Mexico City office, led the Ximian Setup Tools team a few years ago, was in charge of the team that managed our contract with HP, led the Ximian Desktop for a while, was one of the creators of GNOME Love, and was recently our lead sales engineer for Europe.

    Chema was one of the most loving, passionate people I have known. Being around Chema always made you want to do more and try harder. He was always questioning himself, trying to grow, taking on new challenges and never backing down.

    When I went to visit our office in Mexico I stayed at Chema's house and gripped the door handle on his car till my nuckles turned white when he drove us to work. Whenever he wasn't on sales trips or skydiving he seemed to be in my office asking good hard questions and always pushing for us to do more.

    Chema was easy to love, and he will be easy to miss. "

    Descanse En Paz

    --
    *Condense fact from the vapor of nuance*
  55. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You believe that Miguel's position on political issues is not relevant to putting him forward as a representative of the Open Source community. I can't help that this makes you an idiot, that's your problem, not mine.


    The original post was not offtopic, and the use of the moderation system to suppress opinions you disagree is abuse of the system and is not in the spirit of the forum.


    As for the rest of your post, you are the one whining repeatedly, not me. I can only conclude that you are trolling and have no real point to make.

  56. Re:Aussi Faggot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you are referring to the art.gnome.org problems. The entire community has heard of it. I belive that there is not one person remaining that Jeff hasn't had problems with. Many of us simply ignore him.

  57. It's Microsoft! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bill Gates is killing off all the hackers of the Linux desktop competitor just like in the movie Antitrust!

  58. Re: Astroturf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could you be any more obvious? Give it up, you miserable troll.

  59. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You believe that Miguel's position on political issues is not relevant to putting him forward as a representative of the Open Source community. I can't help that this makes you an idiot, that's your problem, not mine.

    No, I believe that Miguel's position on political issues is not relevant to either the outcome of the GNOME Foundation elections in which he was not a candidate, his not being a candidate because of filing after the deadline, or the death of a GNOME contributor.

    Don't be discouraged, though. I'm honestly serious: keep trying. Reading comprehension only improves with practice.

  60. Re:OS developer deaths by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2, Informative

    Way, way, way out of line.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  61. Why did Ettore Perazzoli Pass Away Exactly? by Listen+Up · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why did Ettore Perazzoli Pass Away Exactly? Every place I look, every is sad of his death, but nowhere can I find out how and why he died. Does anyone know?

    1. Re:Why did Ettore Perazzoli Pass Away Exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you think it's your business? I don't myself know any info, but I can think of several possibilities in which people (to be justifiably sensitive to his memory, his friends, and his family) wouldn't post the details.

      Honestly and WITHOUT singling you out - I don't think it's your business.

      This is represenative in my opinion, of the kinda careless and inconsiderate (though not deliberately so) probing attitude that people have all too often these days.

    2. Re:Why did Ettore Perazzoli Pass Away Exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Mister Perazolli died due to autoerotic asphyxiation.

      It's sad, and so very pathetic. What a poor lost soul. This cause of death is especially traumatic on relatives, and it is one of the reasons why they try to keep it hidden.

  62. Re:missing key detail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually that gnomedesktop.org link provides no details either.

    Where do you get "some" from?

  63. miguel still part of things! by Xtifr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He may not be an official member of the GNOME Foundation Board, but that hardly means that he's no longer a leader of the GNOME project itself. Let's keep some perspective here. I seriously doubt if anyone is saying, "he didn't meet the election deadline, we'd better shut off his CVS access." Or even, "we'd better stop listening to what he has to say."

    It's even possible that not being on the Foundation could allow Miguel to spend more time actually working on GNOME.

    1. Re:miguel still part of things! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a shame they don't say, "we'd better stop listening to what he has to say." Miguel is responsible for a number of the design blunders that have stunted GNOME's development.

    2. Re:miguel still part of things! by axxackall · · Score: 1

      Well, the question is how many GNOME Foundations can be build on a top of GNOME project? Who said "only one"? Miguel can easily found new GNOME Foundation.

      --

      Less is more !
    3. Re:miguel still part of things! by FooBarWidget · · Score: 1

      What do you mean "easily"? I highly doubt that 1) he'll even try 2) people will recognize the "new" foundation.

  64. Re:Ugh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first passage actually says: "The Electronic Intifada (EI), found at electronicIntifada.net, publishes news, commentary, analysis, and reference materials about the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict from a Palestinian perspective. EI is the leading Palestinian portal for information about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and its depiction in the media."

    Also, how on earth can you say that BBC is "the most shockingly liberal pro-Palestinian Western media outlet" you know of? Surely, if you read/watch/listen to any other source than the really big ones, you'd know that the BBC isn't anywhere near your description. If you disagree, please reference some material to make your claim just a little bit more viable.

    Please notice that I'm not advocating anything or any side in the above text, just observing facts. Stay on topic (even though we really are quite off topic), and answer me in a no-nonsense way. I just might have misunderstood your text. Sorry, if that is the case.

  65. Died suddenly euphemism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Died suddenly/unexpectedly is usually a journalistic euphemism for suicide.

    Frankly I find the comments on this board making fun of these deaths to be indicative of pretty worthless people. Congratulations, you've reached a new low. I am in awe.

    With all the standard taunts about open source people being fat, unsexy and smelly, the real truth turns out to be that some of them live life to the edge and conversely the losers who visit this site to make these comments are the truly worthless ones wasting oxygen.

    I've flown, I've rafted, I've cliff-jumped into white water and frankly I'm sick enough of this site not to bother coming back again.

  66. No not really. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GNOME's logo is a foot in the shape of a G.

    And slashdot's icon for GNOME is... a foot in the shape of a G.

    Maybe the old rendition of the logo just happens to work better as a logo icony thing on a white background??

    Meanwhile, if you've noticed, the SCO icon is still the caldera logo, the Microsoft icon is still ex-CEO Gates, and the American Flag used for YRO is missing the 13th stripe.

    IT DOESNT MATTER. It's an ICON.

  67. Re:Aussi Faggot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where do you come up with this nonsense?

  68. I Demand a Recount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And keep on recounting until Al Gore wins.

    I can't believe you'd let these guys steal the election like that. Clearly Al should have won, no matter what the vote totals. He invented the Internet, after all.

  69. Re:Aussi Faggot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go and talk with "Aldug", "Star", "Dr. Frickle", "Dobey", "Chrisime" and others on gimpnet. Some of them probably hand over some informative chatlogs to you. I have read a bunch of them.

  70. Re:GNOME IS DYING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not really, Qt has made clear that if they go bankrupt or become aquired, they'll release Qt on a BSDish license.

  71. Re: Astroturf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Troll!!!!! Ya right. Those who call us Anti-Jeff people are the Trolls themselves. We just speak out mind and most of use did in the elections. Since there was a lack of runners this year we have to put up with Jeff's fucknut anticks. Down with the Aussie!!!

  72. fuck you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pathetic little shit.

  73. Re:missing key detail? by unborn · · Score: 1

    Well, comparing to the website of the DECEASED it sure does seem to be more wordy.

  74. OT: ratings by cgenman · · Score: 1

    Oh, come now. You're post is obviously 30% troll, 30% insightful, and the last 10% offtopic.

  75. Re:missing key detail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AIDS, obviously.

  76. Re:Gnome == Gnovell, Sun, Red Gnat by Seehund · · Score: 1

    Don't forget about Red Gnat.

    --
    Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
  77. Re:OS developer deaths by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not 'funny' for fuck's sake. Somebody died. Think about it. Fucking moderators.

  78. Quasi-archaeology by devphil · · Score: 1
    On a side note, it's moving to browse through the weblog of someone who has died recently.

    I find it interesting in general to track -- in retrospect -- major events in blogs and email. For example, my own email archives have a conversation between me and another person, discussing how we're going to go skydiving the next day.

    The next email is dated about three weeks later, "here's some other event we missed while I was in the hospital."

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  79. Re:Ugh... by eldacan · · Score: 1

    No. The GNU people insist on the difference between "not gratis" and "proprietary". See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/selling.html