Slashdot Mirror


China's War Against Wires

hodet writes "On sections of Beijing Road, you can barely see the sky. On Tibet Road, they dangle in garden-hose rolls and knots intricate enough to confound a Boy Scout. Over on Hefei Street, one enterprising apartment dweller even used them to hang-dry selected cuts of meat. Tech-happy Shanghai, the most wired city in China, has a problem: wires. Telephone wires. Fiber-optic wires. Electrical wires. Wires no one can seem to identify. Black wires. Blue wires. Magenta wires. They're everywhere, and they're gumming up the works."

244 comments

  1. Actually.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Those words are from Ted Anthony, not hodet.

    1. Re:Actually.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my God! Someone who actually RTFA?

    2. Re:Actually.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a dupe... whe had an article on this about a month ago :). Guess it must be quite a problem since the mag is runnin the same stroy with a same pic again.

    3. Re:Actually.. by oobar · · Score: 1

      Thank you! I'm really tired of these quick 'copy+paste of the first two paragraphs' submissions passing for "writing" around here for every story. If you're too lazy to actually read and summarize the link, and supply a little insight and background, then don't submit.

  2. Really? by gostats · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I though that was just real in the "imaginary world of cell phone commercials". (At least on TV it is!) -You won't understand this post if: 1. You've never seen the cellphone commercial I referenced. 2. Your tivo can skip all commercials so maybe you did see it but it looked like a commercial for spagetti instead.

  3. Not that big a problem by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Personally I've never been bothered by wires up above me. I'd rather have them up there and instantly accessible than deal with the crap of having lawn, road, path and other services dug up, just so a couple of people on the street can see the sky.

    Hint. You can see the sky anyway, wires or no wires. Wasted effort aiming for underground, if you ask me. Wireless tech is a good replacement, but isn't going to work everywhere.

    1. Re:Not that big a problem by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Did you read the same article I did?

      They are up in the sky, and they *aren't* instantly accessible. Above or below ground isn't the problem, so much as that they have intersections with 30+ pairs of wires running across them. Who do they belong to? Where do they connect? No one knows!

      If no one comes to claim them, they will be cut. *That* is the heart of the article, the simplification, regulation, and control of the wires. Not whether it's above ore below ground. It's only written to seem that way.

    2. Re:Not that big a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      > Hint. You can see the sky anyway, wires or no wires.

      hint. radiation. I sure want as less of that as I can get.

    3. Re:Not that big a problem by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 4, Informative

      Most power in the UK is delivered to homes via underground cables (although the 132,000 V national grid stuff is nearly all on pylons). The problem with running local cables overhead, besides appearance, is that storms tend to bring down trees, which pull down any nearby cables. The big pylons are well out of the way of trees.

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    4. Re:Not that big a problem by gantrep · · Score: 3, Funny

      Radiation? What radiation? You mean electromagnetic radiation? Just put on your tinfoil hat and run a wire from it to a cold water pipe and you'll be fine.

    5. Re:Not that big a problem by LittleBigLui · · Score: 5, Funny
      run a wire from it to a cold water pipe


      that's one more wire radiating electromagnetic dirt! can't we make that grounding wireless?
      --
      Free as in mason.
    6. Re:Not that big a problem by nathanh · · Score: 1
      Personally I've never been bothered by wires up above me. I'd rather have them up there and instantly accessible than deal with the crap of having lawn, road, path and other services dug up, just so a couple of people on the street can see the sky.

      Above-ground wires do bother me. I live in an area with underground power, underground telephone and underground cable. The landscape looks great when there are no cables to obscure the view. I really notice the difference when I visit Sydney or Melbourne; their overhead cables are everywhere! It's very ugly.

      Of course, I live in a neighbourhood where nearly everybody has a front garden and people take pride in the appearance of their homes. If you like to live in a techno-squalor then sure, it probably doesn't mean much to you.

    7. Re:Not that big a problem by aardwolf204 · · Score: 1

      Who do they belong to? Where do they connect? No one knows!

      What I would like to know is, what are the wires that follow train tracks? Ancient telegraph lines perhaps? Who owns them? Are they still used? If not, why the hell are they still there?

      --
      Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    8. Re:Not that big a problem by misterpies · · Score: 4, Interesting


      Actually these days (in countries with a modern infrastructure - so excluding most of the US) underground wires are run through multipurpose conduits rather than just being laid individually. You only have to dig up the road once -- to lay the conduit. After that it's a simply task simply to pull across new wires (and pull out old ones) from one manhole to the next - there are special machines for threading them through the holes.

      Most of the time when the road is dug up, it's to repair services such as water, sewage and gas - not really the sort of thing you can run overhead anyway.

      --
      The author of this post asserts his moral rights.
    9. Re:Not that big a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      What I would like to know is, what are the wires that follow train tracks?

      If it is an electrified line, then they are the power for the train. If not, then they are probably there from where the track was run on overhead power at some stage in the past.

      That's the case here in Australia anyway, perhaps it's different stateside.

    10. Re:Not that big a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fruity europeans.
      Here in the US we use real, 768kV transmission lines

    11. Re:Not that big a problem by putaro · · Score: 4, Informative

      Many communication lines are run along railroad right-of-ways because the railroad is mostly straight, runs between urban centers and is uninterrupted. Remember a couple of years ago when a tank car caught fire in a train tunnel and took out Internet connectivity for half the Eastern US? Sprint, one of the big US carriers, started life as part of the Southern Pacific railway. Here in Tokyo a lot of fibre got laid in the subway tunnels.

    12. Re:Not that big a problem by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      Underground is worth the effort remember this place has high incidence of earthquakes and harsh weather (assuming there but it seems to fit the pattern of the pac rim) putting cable underground protects it from a lot of forces making there uptime higher. They only excuse to run wires above ground is it's cheaper initialy and quicker to repair (a little preplanning and that can be fixed for underground) but above ground often needs to be repaired more often.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    13. Re:Not that big a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Aiming for underground isn't wasted effort. Fiber optics cables can be installed in the city's sewers.
      It also brings an altogether new meaning to phrase "shitty connection".

    14. Re:Not that big a problem by Detritus · · Score: 3, Informative

      At least some of them are there for the control, signaling and communication needs of the railroads.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    15. Re:Not that big a problem by josecanuc · · Score: 4, Informative
      What I would like to know is, what are the wires that follow train tracks? Ancient telegraph lines perhaps? Who owns them? Are they still used? If not, why the hell are they still there?

      At least in Rural Texas, where you see short (10 feet high) poles strung with wires, half rotted or fallen over, they were telegraph cables. The rails are still used, but the cables aren't.

      Communication to/from the train is done by radio and communication between rail stations is done by regular telephone.

    16. Re:Not that big a problem by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      this place has high incidence of earthquakes and harsh weather (assuming there but it seems to fit the pattern of the pac rim)

      Not particularly, I don't recall any earthquakes in Shanghai, typhoons are infrequent (every several years). There was flooding in 1998.

    17. Re:Not that big a problem by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      can't we make that grounding wireless?

      I would hate to be the person standing between you and the ground in that case...
      Think VanDeGraaf(sp?) generators; or better yet, the Tesla Towers in CnC:Red Alert, a perfect example of wireless grounding...

    18. Re:Not that big a problem by the_consumer · · Score: 1

      Special machines? Wouldn't a simple piece of rope or greased wire do?

      --
      "If you're thinking what I'm thinking, you're right." -
    19. Re:Not that big a problem by LittleBigLui · · Score: 1

      All i want is wireless grounding.

      But leaving a Trail of Destruction TM behind everywhere i go would definitely be considered a plus.

      --
      Free as in mason.
    20. Re:Not that big a problem by zeugma-amp · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I happen to own a copy of the Encyclopaedia Brittannica that was published in 1903. The article in it about telecommunications is particularly interesting in relation to the referenced article. At the time of course, telecom was pretty primative. Each individual phone had its own wire. Thus, if you look at period photos of New York City, you'll see these huge bundles of wires that pretty much obliterate the lower stories of buildings. The bundles of wires were huge and one might say they detracted much from the scenery (such that it was).

      In those days, and later years, the process of connecting a call was actually a process of building a single point-to-point wire that connected the two parties, which is where the patch-boards and operators came from.

      Several years ago I read a contemporary description of exactly what it was like to make a long-distance call from New York to St. Louis in the mid-20s. The caller would pick up the phone and repeatedly press the cradle that broke the circuit off and on. This would alert the operator that someone wanted to make a call, by flashing a light on her switchboard. (When the reciever was on-hook the light was off, and when it was on-hook, the light would come on.) The caller would tell the operator where to connect to - something like "Saint Louis 6 4324". The first two letters being the abbreviation for the city. Then the caller would hang up, while the operator connected to other operators across the country until the circuit was completely built, and essentially a single wire stretched between the caller and callee, and she had the callee on the line. Then she'd ring back the caller, and they'd start the conversation.

      This is basically from memory which has been somewhat corrupted with age, so take it for what it's worth. The description of the wires brought it to mind so I thought I'd share...

      and an operator would answer. (You see people repeatedly mashing the cradle of the phone in old movies.
      --
      This is an ex-parrot!
    21. Re:Not that big a problem by DzugZug · · Score: 2, Informative

      You, sir, clearly have never been to Shanghai.

      When I read the headline I instantly thought of Shanghai -- especially parts of the old city. The area east of the Huangou isn't as bad but there are places where you really can't see the sky. The photo in the arcicle doesn't give a good sense. Above every street -- all along the street in some neighborhoods -- is what looks like a net of wires. Some places it's so thick that you could crawl across it with little fear of falling through the spaces between the wires.

      I think it's a great thing that they are doing this. Not just for aesthetics but for simplicity. Part of the problem with overhead lines in a place like China is that anyone can add to the mess. Underground you need permission before you go down and lay more cable.

    22. Re:Not that big a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a tendence for cables to follow train tracks, simply because in order to lay such a cable you only have to deal with one landowner, the railway company.

    23. Re:Not that big a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Along with Sprint, Qwest also started as a railroad company for the same reason. Just a little trivia for ya.

    24. Re:Not that big a problem by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Here's a hint, we (telcom designers) don't put them up in the air for your benefit, they're much better protected in conduit, underground.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    25. Re:Not that big a problem by MegaHamsterX · · Score: 1

      Yes, I remember it well, I was one of the sysadmins who was banging my head against the desk as everyone yelled and screamed about no connectivity. All of our providers went down in one fell swoop, nasty.

    26. Re:Not that big a problem by jmanning · · Score: 1

      Well, how do you get the starter rope through? Unless you put a clothes line like system in each conduit. That's a lot of extra hardware/cost per conduit, even though it's only used on the rare occasions when something is changed.

      Special machines are an upgrade though. They used to use ferrets. No kidding. Early 1900's, they'd train ferrets to crawl through underground conduits to run cable. Tie a string on and send it through.

      ~J

    27. Re:Not that big a problem by the_consumer · · Score: 1

      Well, I would've buried the conduit with the rope in it to begin with, then every time I pull a cable, pull a replacement rope with it, but that's just me. If there's a buck to made doing something the hard way, who am I to criticize?

      --
      "If you're thinking what I'm thinking, you're right." -
    28. Re:Not that big a problem by eric777 · · Score: 1
      Yes - and that's pretty much how it works to this very day for local calls, through the magic of the 5ESS switch - still the mainstay of POTS (Plain Old Telephone Service).

      Here's a simplified picture:

      If I'm calling the lower east side of manhattan from the upper west side, I pick up my handset in my apartment. That establishes a physical straight wire from the handset to my switch (typically just a few blocks away).

      I then dial a number - say, 222-2123.

      At the switch, the computer examines the exchange (the first three digits), determines the correct remote switch associated with that exchange, chooses another physical wire that directly connects the two switches. That line is connected directly to my line, and the number dialed is forwared to the remote switch.

      The remote switch then analyzes the last four digits, find the physical wire connecting the destination phone, and rings that phone. We're then connected with a direct wire between the two points - almost exactly the same as the operator used to create, except the computerized switch is much faster than the operator :-)

      One important point - there's lots of multiplexing going on, whereby many simultaneous conversations share the same wires. At the very dawn of telephony, it was one conversation, one wire. That changed quickly. :-)

      Until relatively recently, long distance worked more or less the same way, with wires. Overseas calls were wired or via satellite, but still the same idea.

      Today, lots of traffic is carried via IP, which is a whole different ball of wax - packets fly around in no particular sequence, to be reassembled near the destination. But that's another story.

      here's a pretty good technical history, if you're interested...

    29. Re:Not that big a problem by petecarlson · · Score: 1

      I use compressed air and a thread but it only works for 50-100'. It's a nice trick to know if you need to pull cat5 through existing conduit.

    30. Re:Not that big a problem by jigyasubalak · · Score: 0

      I live in Bangalore and I can vouch for part of what you say. Bangalore is going through a period of catching up on telecom infrastructure it so needs to keep that tech edge. Every street is being dug up, wires being laid and covered up and then again being dug up...repeat suitably. The already 1.5 lane roads get hardly single laned. Add to this chaos few thousand more cars every month because of the tech boom. It's a big nuisance, to say the least.

      But then another of our neighboring high tech city Hyderabad shows the right way to do this. They just dug up the roads once in Hyderabad and laid an array of big PVC pipes criss-crossing the streets of the city. Now, anyone wants to lay a new line, they'll just have to lease some space in the already laid pipes and they'll be done in a fraction of the time!

      --
      The best planning can be done after the project completes.
  4. Who'd of known... by Ignis+Flatus · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... that stealing cable TV would be such a problem in a Communist country?

    1. Re:Who'd of known... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Join us now and share the software;
      You'll be free, hacker's, youll be free.
      x2

      Hoarder's may get pile's of money,
      That is true, hacker's, that is true.
      But they cannot help their neighbour's;
      Thats not good, hacker's, thats not good.

      When we have enough free software
      At our call, hacker's, at our call,
      Well throw out those dirty license's
      Ever more, hacker's, ever more.

      Join us now and share the software;
      Youll be free, hacker's, youll be free.
      x2

  5. Looks Like... by VariableSanity · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why does this article make me want to look behind my desk? I think its the picture of clothes hanging from the wires... maybe that is where my right sock went!

    1. Re:Looks Like... by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 4, Funny

      I lost a pair of glasses, for nearly 3 months I had to go without them.

      I found them eventually, hanging on a piece of cat5 just below sight behind my desk.

    2. Re:Looks Like... by aardwolf204 · · Score: 5, Funny

      last time you moved your equipment from one room to another, when you booted up did you notice that a third of the wires you once had in your old setup were unused...

      where do these buggers come from? its like they're breeding and no matter how hard i try to keep the female ends on the other side of the desk from the male ones it seems to happen every time.

      And why is it that even though CAT5 cables are male-male they too seem to multiply!

      --
      Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    3. Re:Looks Like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your 8 port switch is a whore

  6. That's nothing! by jkrise · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I mean, compared to the mess of wireless in the US of A. Several technologies in handsets, numerous carriers, multiple standards, disparate services, lack of inter-operability etc. etc.

    No wonder China is developing a home-grown wireless solution tailored to it's needs.

    -

    --
    If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    1. Re:That's nothing! by powlow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      big business is always creating problems where they don't exist...

      a new mediums with no inter-operability problems...solution : put up barriers...like dvd...and happening now with wireless...

    2. Re:That's nothing! by alsta · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I call that Freedom of Choice and Free Markets. Why should a wireless provider not be able to choose what carrier it wants to use to provide its customers with services? If it were obviously such a big problem, how come the wireless providers haven't picked a common carrier?

      --
      Wealth is the product of man's capacity to think. -Ayn Rand
    3. Re:That's nothing! by MegaHamsterX · · Score: 1

      There's some money to be made following standards, there's more money to be made creating them. China is a huge country, it's in their national interest to do so.

    4. Re:That's nothing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If it were obviously such a big problem, how come the wireless providers haven't picked a common carrier?

      You very likely do not know, but there is a world outside the USA, and practically all of that world standarized on a single standard. It means my cellphone works almost anywhere in the world, even in parts of the USA.. the worst coverage however is in the USA, exactly because of the lack of standarisation there.

      Of course I am just feeding a silly troll, but what the hell.

    5. Re:That's nothing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - The guy who called you a troll is being totally unfair and did not adequately substantiate his claim.

      - The first working analog system was in the US. Part of that original system still works today, quite well, for maximal coverage.

      - TDMA and CDMA came next. The competition between the two lead to eventual consolidation. I prefer Analog+CDMA, and I haven't come across any coverage problems at all. I use a Dual Band phone and have no complaints whatsoever.

      - PCS capabilities were added to these TDMA and CDMA networks. Thereby enhancing an already existing and working infrastructure.

      - GSM is generally available in metro areas with reasonable converage. Don't complain about it if you chose that over CDMA and Analog.

      - Other countries are not exactly free markets and the tax revenues of a socialist system underwrote a new infrastructure at the cost of the taxpayer. Here, infrastructure better damn well be burned out before it gets replaced. That's what happens when publically traded companies and free market are left to their own designs.

      - While I've enjoyed analog coverage for many, many years, and adequate CDMA+Analog coverage for years, others didn't have this quite as early as here. Now that the have surpassed us, lets look at why:

      The USA is 3000 miles wide, 4000+ miles on the diagonal, and 1500 tall. There is no way in hell a cell phone with a SIM card (implying CDMA2000 or GSM) will come in the outback in India and China. I have noticed that one a cross-us flight, that often the phone comes in both digital/CDMA and analog at 30,000+ feet. Now, as to the superiority of the European GSM implementation, the countries they have are fairly small, and they have quite a high per capita per square mile. I would think even with the rather high US GDP, that the GDP per square mile is lower than most of the European countries. They also had a 1000-2000 year head start on roads and towns and buildings, so I'd say the US infrastructure is rather nice.

      - Talk about freight railroads, roads and miles of copper wire and its clear the US infrastructure is not only adequate but rather well maintained over a long time.

      - My issue is mainly with the quality of service with regard to the people on the telephone, not with the implementation - my CDMA+Analog rarely has problems, and of course pricing could come down a bit - but I'd rather have less taxes and a few more expensive phone plans to choose from than a socialized system that leapfrogs a market cycle so I can sit on the phone havening rarely useful conversations as a matter of convenience. Who sits in a god damn canoe, despite my phone comes in anyway, and "does business?".

      - One also must remember Iridium and INMARSAT, people who work on boats will tell you its really nice to have.

      So, go ahead. Shit on free markets, shit on the US. Shit on Motorola, shit on Harris, shit on everyone.

      I think the guy who called you a troll should start a new, better country - or better yet, move to one, since apparently there are many out there.

    6. Re:That's nothing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - You were rude to him, and know nothing.

      - The first working analog system was in the US. Part of that original system still works today, quite well, for maximal coverage.

      - TDMA and CDMA came next. The competition between the two lead to eventual consolidation. I prefer Analog+CDMA, and I haven't come across any coverage problems at all. I use a Dual Band phone and have no complaints whatsoever.

      - PCS capabilities were added to these TDMA and CDMA networks. Thereby enhancing an already existing and working infrastructure.

      - GSM is generally available in metro areas with reasonable converage. Don't complain about it if you chose that over CDMA and Analog.

      - Other countries are not exactly free markets and the tax revenues of a socialist system underwrote a new infrastructure at the cost of the taxpayer. Here, infrastructure better damn well be burned out before it gets replaced. That's what happens when publically traded companies and free market are left to their own designs.

      - While I've enjoyed analog coverage for many, many years, and adequate CDMA+Analog coverage for years, others didn't have this quite as early as here. Now that the have surpassed us, lets look at why:

      The USA is 3000 miles wide, 4000+ miles on the diagonal, and 1500 tall. There is no way in hell a cell phone with a SIM card (implying CDMA2000 or GSM) will come in the outback in India and China. I have noticed that one a cross-us flight, that often the phone comes in both digital/CDMA and analog at 30,000+ feet. Now, as to the superiority of the European GSM implementation, the countries they have are fairly small, and they have quite a high per capita per square mile. I would think even with the rather high US GDP, that the GDP per square mile is lower than most of the European countries. They also had a 1000-2000 year head start on roads and towns and buildings, so I'd say the US infrastructure is rather nice.

      - Talk about freight railroads, roads and miles of copper wire and its clear the US infrastructure is not only adequate but rather well maintained over a long time.

      - My issue is mainly with the quality of service with regard to the people on the telephone, not with the implementation - my CDMA+Analog rarely has problems, and of course pricing could come down a bit - but I'd rather have less taxes and a few more expensive phone plans to choose from than a socialized system that leapfrogs a market cycle so I can sit on the phone havening rarely useful conversations as a matter of convenience. Who sits in a god damn canoe, despite my phone comes in anyway, and "does business?".

      - One also must remember Iridium and INMARSAT, people who work on boats will tell you its really nice to have.

      So, go ahead. Shit on free markets, shit on the US. Shit on Motorola, shit on Harris, shit on everyone.

      I think **YOU** should start a new, better country - or better yet, move to one, since apparently there are many out there.

    7. Re:That's nothing! by alsta · · Score: 1

      If you're complaining that we don't have a Communist/Socialist government which has decided that you are entitled to 5 bars even in the hills of Montana, then you are correct. We don't have such a government.

      If you are complaining that there is no trade agreement in the WTO which requires participating countries to provide uniform cell phone coverage wherever a person may go, then you are also correct. No such treaty has been ratified in the US.

      The coverage in this country is great where there is a market for coverage. Where there is no market, there is no coverage.

      The original question was;

      "If it were obviously such a big problem, how come the wireless providers haven't picked a common carrier?"

      The answer is apparent. There is no problem. There may be an inconvenience to you, but it's hardly a problem for the wireless providers. Since you're not even a resident in this country, it matters even less. If it was a problem, it would be addressed quickly.

      --
      Wealth is the product of man's capacity to think. -Ayn Rand
  7. Tell the Afghans by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A large proportion of their overhead wiring (power/telecoms) has been looted for its metal content. They're not all buying cellphones just because they like the mobility.

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    1. Re:Tell the Afghans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not stuck up arrogant Americans, that's for sure.

    2. Re:Tell the Afghans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not Americans? Why did you single them out? Anyone else helping the Afghans?

    3. Re:Tell the Afghans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A large proportion of their overhead wiring (power/telecoms) has been looted for its metal content. They're not all buying cellphones just because they like the mobility.

      Don't forget to say that Americans are somehow to blame for that. Afghanistan was a cultural center of high tech before the war with the US started right? :-)

  8. Looks like San Francisco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    With all the electric bus wires and supporting wires along with cable, telephone, electricty many San Francisco streets, especially in many outer neighborhoods, look worse than the photo in this story.

    It's ok... they still dig the streets up for gas and plumbing.

    1. Re:Looks like San Francisco by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1

      I always thought this was because of earthquakes? Especially the Marina, Sunset and Richmond are built on fairly shaky ground--rather than running around digging up ruptured cable shafts every time something moves, you can just leave it above ground, where it's got some give.

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    2. Re:Looks like San Francisco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Perhaps but if pipes that have little flex (high pressure gas, water, sewer) can run underground then so can electrical wires.

      There are many 'shaky' areas that have underground utilities.

      I think basically it costs more to bury them
      than to hang them... at least the initial cost.

    3. Re:Looks like San Francisco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Nice big country. Loads of land. And someone decides to build a city on a major fault-line. Why is that?

    4. Re:Looks like San Francisco by fuzzybunny · · Score: 2, Insightful


      I rather think that this was due to the fact that you _can't_ have those types of lines aboveground. Rather have 3 utilities toast during an earthquake than 6 (power, phone, cable TV.)

      But your cost argument is most likely a big part of it.

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    5. Re:Looks like San Francisco by Detritus · · Score: 1
      I thought the bay was created by the fault-lines. Tectonic plates moving and all that.

      Populations and natural disasters go together. The same conditions that increase the risk of a natural disaster also make it attractive for people to live there.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    6. Re:Looks like San Francisco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, somehow Dutchies want to live on the bottom of the sea (after removing the water from it).. humans are pretty silly.

    7. Re:Looks like San Francisco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, lets see... volcanic islands, check, fault lines, check, tornado alleys, check, flood plains, check. I think that covers 80% of the world's population, hmm?

  9. Establish a standard, and wait by mcrbids · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The average income in China is rather low. That means, wire is expensive.

    However, if a standard, unified, cooperative standard was released for packet-based communication was released to the public domain, and a reasonably cost-effective solution was available to anybody regardless of size, you'd see the obviation of many of these wires...

    Oh... wait... that's called the Internet, isn't it?

    Seriously, wires are only strung 'cause it's cheaper than the alternative. If there was a standard, effective method of effecting a point to point communication, over IP or whatever, and it was reasonably priced, all those extra wires would go away.

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    1. Re:Establish a standard, and wait by gantrep · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'd like to see you distribute AC house-current by IP. The problem there isn't just communication wires....

    2. Re:Establish a standard, and wait by highwindarea · · Score: 5, Informative
      --
      I think this internet thing sounds like a good idea
    3. Re:Establish a standard, and wait by c_oflynn · · Score: 1

      'Informative'? I'm pretty sure that things a joke...

    4. Re:Establish a standard, and wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice moderation. Drooling tards.

    5. Re:Establish a standard, and wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure you're wrong.

    6. Re:Establish a standard, and wait by io333 · · Score: 1

      Parent needs to be modded up... but somehow there's such an oxymoron in saying that my head is going to explode.

    7. Re:Establish a standard, and wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this moderated informative? I can't tell if the mods are trying to be funny, or if they're just trolling for people like me.

    8. Re:Establish a standard, and wait by Reziac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Some realworld figures on overhead wire vs buried cable in SoCal:

      Overhead line: $16/foot
      Buried cable: $40/foot

      These numbers are from about 20 years ago, so I'm sure it's now much higher, but I doubt the cost *ratio* has changed much.

      There can be other factors too. Frex, here overhead wire in rural areas is taxable by the regional authority, but buried cable is not taxable. So the local authority won't authorize new buried cable because they want to collect taxes on overhead wires. However, the state has a moratorium on new overhead wires. The upshot is that you have hell's own time and expense getting utilities permits for new development, especially for one-shot houses that don't have a big construction company greasing the wheels.

      Considering what I've heard about China's bureaucracy, I'm sure their situation is equally tangled (along with their wires).

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    9. Re:Establish a standard, and wait by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Informative

      If there was a standard, effective method of effecting a point to point communication, over IP or whatever, and it was reasonably priced, all those extra wires would go away.

      This is a TERRIBLE idea.

      There is a finite amount of wireless bandwidth available in the world -- only so many frequencies at which information can be beamed from place to place. Technological advances have slowly increased the upper bounds of what is feasible, so that we can use Gigahertz bands that weren't possible with the electronics of a generation ago, but at the same time transmission power is increasing, so the same frequency cannot be "re-used" in as many local areas. The more bandwidth we allocate and utilize, the more scarce of a resource it will become.

      Wired communication, on the other hand, is practically limitless. A single bundle of fiber can carry staggering amounts of information in a reasonable amount of physical space. And it's a renewable resource -- if all the existing fiber is lit, if we run out of available bandwidth, it's possible (probably not cheap or easy, but possible) to just dig a trench and lay down more cable.

      The installation costs of wired communications are far higher than those of wireless. But the long-term effects of wireless on future bandwidth ought to be considered.

    10. Re:Establish a standard, and wait by dillon_rinker · · Score: 1

      A single tear runs down my face...

      This is the FIRST TIME I have seen this point made in ANY discussion of wired vs. wireless.

      Still waiting for someone to point out that it's unacceptable for software infrastructure to be anything less than flawless.

    11. Re:Establish a standard, and wait by gantrep · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure you should look at the date the RFC was submitted and note it's April 1.

    12. Re:Establish a standard, and wait by notcreative · · Score: 1

      A limitation on bandwidth doesn't dictate a limitation on total information. Simply increase the encoding on the data. E.g. 64 QAM vs 128 QAM.

  10. Number 17 please? by Threni · · Score: 0, Funny

    Chlicken with special flied wires?

  11. Rodent contraceptives by CityZen · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the article:

    > Wires are just one urban challenge. Bedeviled by ballooning rat populations,
    > Shanghai has turned not to poison but to rodent contraceptives.

    Who gets the job of fitting all the little guys with condoms? :-)

    1. Re:Rodent contraceptives by dkaimal · · Score: 1

      I knew the pied piper would find a paying job someday!

      --
      Can I borrow your sig?
    2. Re:Rodent contraceptives by Craig3010 · · Score: 0

      Bad Job: Rat Condom Fitter
      Worse Job: Rat Fluffer

    3. Re:Rodent contraceptives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your mom.

    4. Re:Rodent contraceptives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of a joke I once heard...

      A teenager gets a job at a large turkey farm where he is responsible for collecting semen used for artificial insemination. During the course of his first day on the job, he comes upon a turkey who says to him, "Gobble Gobble!". The teenager responds, "Screw you dude, you're getting a hand job like everyone else!"

  12. Japan is just the same by lingqi · · Score: 4, Informative

    For people who has not been to Japan, rent "Serial Experiment Lain" to get an idea of what overhanging wires in japan looks like. luckily people are sane enough (or at lease shy enough, anyway) to not dry their meat on the lines; but one of my commuting routes passes a road that above it is nothing but juxopositions sy shards of visible sky, cut into pieces by wires going every which way.

    but when you dont have the chance to burry things, i guess it's inevitable. (side note, after earthquakes japan tends to use the rebuild phase as a chance to organize some of this stuff, which is neat)

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:Japan is just the same by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      after earthquakes japan tends to use the rebuild phase as a chance to organize some of this stuff

      In Japan, the glass is half full :-)

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    2. Re:Japan is just the same by jesser · · Score: 1

      I don't remember the number of wires from Lain, but I do remember the sound. Now whenever I hear an electric hum I think "Lain".

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    3. Re:Japan is just the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Japan, the glass is half full :-)
      In Soviet Russia, YOU half full of glass!
    4. Re:Japan is just the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, rent ant watch Serial Experiments Lain anyway. Is is THE best anime i've ever seen.

      --Coder

  13. just pull it out! by seanadams.com · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The reason it so bad is that they're letting practically anyone string wires. Need a line to the building across the street? Just throw it across. Nobody'll even notice one more wire! I'm sure that the vast majority of those wires are no longer in use - the article talks about attempts to identify who owns what and remove the stuff nobody can claim.

    A few years ago I was doing IT work and the company had rented an office suite in a big 30yr old building. We were pulling cat5 about 40 meters between rooms, along the main hallways. There was a four inch thick layer of ancient wires held up by the cieling panels. At least a hundred times as many wires as there were people working on that floor! The telephone closet was even worse - huge masses of jumpers going back to the MPOE where there was no connection on the other end. There were 25pair cables for old multi-line systems... everything you can imagine. We just left it all there because we had no way of knowing which 0.05% of all that cable was still live.

    Then last year I rented an office in a newer building. Lifted the cieling panels and found a rats nest but not too bad - I think it was about 10 years worth of junk, and it was a smaller place. There had been about five previous tenants and they'd all just installed new systems on top of the crap the previous one left. I just went up there and pulled out EVERYTHING except for one wire - for the thermostat. After that, installing the CAT5 wiring we needed was trivially easy, and since there wasn't a rats nest to dig through everwhere you went, it was easy to route everythign neatly and hang it way up high where it'd be out of the way of future installations.

    Anyway regarding China: there's really no solution other than to dig in, start identifying the old wire, and pulling it out. It's not really that expensive, and it gets easier as you go!

    1. Re:just pull it out! by seanadams.com · · Score: 1

      Forgot one thing... now that I think about it the building was probably about 40yrs old, and the reason there was so much crap up there was also because the ceilings were filled with asbestos so nobody wanted to spend too much time up there.

    2. Re:just pull it out! by Angostura · · Score: 5, Interesting

      London Telehouse is similarly amusing. This was one of the first purpose-built Internet colo facilities; the first in London. They rented out rack space, but didn't control who put wires where. Now they, like the Chinese have a situation where they don't know which wires thet can safely yank. A riser cabinet the size of a small room will be just filled with cables of all sizes and hues that no-one has a clue about. More amusingly, there is no so much cable in the underfloor spaces that when you walk along the corridors the floor plates rock from side to side as you tread on them.

    3. Re:just pull it out! by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Nobody gets promoted for taking an extra week to clean out the wiring closet. They do get promoted for getting the job done quickly.

      At my work nobody wants to just get the job done - you get promoted for coming up with a better way of getting the job done. As a result everybody changes every system three times a year, and the new systems break down six months after they're promoted out of responsibility for it...

    4. Re:just pull it out! by Halo- · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My father works at a major university and showed me something amazing. Back in the late 90's when tech-money was booming, the school's technology center requested a large amount of money to expand their server room. The grant was approved, and work began. All told, there were 7 layers of removable computer floor had laid down on top of each other, (one for each OSI layer?) complete with cabling over the years. It was amazingly like an archilogical dig. Anyway, simply removing the old layers of floor increased the floor to ceiling height from like 7 feet to something like 14. The money that was slated for ripping out walls went to some nice racks which now fit in the taller space, and the space recovered was larger than the proposed addition.

      I think they still have a section of the old floors in a corner as an exhibit.

    5. Re:just pull it out! by PugMajere · · Score: 1

      See, that's why modern hosting facilities (or at least, forward thinking ones) don't run cable through the floor.

      The floor is for cooling, environment control, etc. Fixed stuff.

      You run cables overhead in raceways, where it has to be visible to everyone.

      Visible problems get fixed. Hidden ones don't.

      So the lesson is, force the likely problems to be visible, so that everyone has incentive to fix them.

    6. Re:just pull it out! by canadian_right · · Score: 1

      A Gibson fan (sig)

      --
      Anarchists never rule
  14. Pfft... by dupper · · Score: 5, Funny

    They sould see my desk behind my computer. Just last month I lost 3 good men in an expedition to unplug my monitor.

    1. Re:Pfft... by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1

      Offtopic, but Ikea makes great velcro cable ties. They're about 1" wide and maybe 10" long--superb for keeping things orderly.

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    2. Re:Pfft... by PhilippeT · · Score: 1

      Now if they could only make them long enough china would be able to solve the problem... o wait did you have to assemble it yourself? Then they will never be able to do it... you ever read the instructions... it's like thier writen in some other language no one can understand somethig call "Engenires"

      --
      A psychopath can't tell the difference between right and wrong. A sociopath knows the difference - he just doesn't care.
    3. Re:Pfft... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      That's nothing. Yesterday when I went to swap in a new UPS, I pulled the wrong lead and blacked out three states!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  15. Asking the masses? Askslashdot? by millwall · · Score: 5, Funny

    "So China is doing what China usually does when confronted with such dilemmas[...]: It's mounting a campaign, asking the masses for help"

    So why didn't China post this in Askslashdot?

    1. Re:Asking the masses? Askslashdot? by Cyclone66 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because they want a solution not people yammering on and disclaimers such as IANACTE (I Am Not A Chinese Telecomunications Engineer)

    2. Re:Asking the masses? Askslashdot? by notcreative · · Score: 1

      They also have no knowledge of this one called "Chao-boi Ni-er."

  16. Tesla-coil terrorism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watch the arcs collapse the grid...

  17. Not just China! by fastdecade · · Score: 4, Informative

    Huge problem in Kyoto, Japan's ancient capital. It used to be a pristine, elegant, small city. Its streets are now a tangle of cables.

    This is a problem for societies such as China (now) and Japan (opst-war) which expand too quickly. In the pace of progress, it seems too difficult, too regressive, to take the time for really clever use of technologies, such as building cables underground, digging out walls and restoring the surface again, and, nowadays, wireless where possible.

    If you look at well-preserved places, they still have modern conveniences like aircon, alarms, etc. But they are willing to spend more, often a lot more, to get the best of both worlds.

    1. Re:Not just China! by fuzzybunny · · Score: 4, Interesting


      With Kyoto, it's not just wires--it's general shoddy urbanization. The city has no metro, so public transportation consists of fairly shabby buses, the traffic is insane, and in between historical landmarks, the place is laid out in a grid pattern filled with boxy, unattractive 1960s office buildings (at least the downtown areas.)

      It's really too bad--this is pretty typical of those parts of Japan as a whole that I managed to see (caveat: mainly built-up areas between Himeji and Tokyo.) Buildings were put up and cities planned, seemingly with purely pragmatic concerns in mind, with little regard for aesthetics. Damn shame, really.

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    2. Re:Not just China! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, we could always level the place and start over.... "NUKE AND PAVE!"

    3. Re:Not just China! by minasoko · · Score: 1
      With Kyoto, it's not just wires--it's general shoddy urbanization. The city has no metro, so public transportation consists of fairly shabby buses

      Not true about the metro, when were you there last?

      I didn't use the subway myself, I opted for the buses, which I was pretty impressed with (I am from England though ;).

      the traffic is insane, and in between historical landmarks, the place is laid out in a grid pattern filled with boxy, unattractive 1960s office buildings (at least the downtown areas.)

      You're bang on with these points. Still, out of all the cities I visited during my stay, Kyoto was my favourite.

    4. Re:Not just China! by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      So a bit like Edinburgh then, without the incomprehensible language?

    5. Re:Not just China! by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1

      Oh christ, I can't believe I forgot about it. This was in 2000 or thereabouts--yeah, there's a metro. *hangs head in red-faced shame*

      Not much of one, though--its coverage is pretty limited. And like a lot of cities that combine underground metros with fairly modern buildings, it's pretty charm-free (I just think tramways are cool.)

      Sorry bout that.

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    6. Re:Not just China! by Yokaze · · Score: 1

      Actually, only Kyoto and some cities on Hokkaido are laid out in a grid and were planned in large scale. This stems from Chinese city planning in the time Kyoto was the capital.

      Most other cities don't follow any particular order, except that of fire, earthquake and some reconstruction-plans.

      And acutally I'd say that is the reason why some parts are quite unattractive. According to the Asahi Shinbun, a new law has been proposed, which puts constraints on the buildings in that way, that they have to fit into the neighbourhood.
      Similar to the rules which are in place in Europe.

      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
    7. Re:Not just China! by fuzzybunny · · Score: 1

      That's nice to hear--it's such a beautiful country, studded with some amazing monuments to incompetent unaesthetic architecture, or landscape engineering (i.e. plonking some giant concrete thing smack in the middle of it.) Sort of like here, in Switzerland (most of whose architects should be taken out behind the shed and shot repeatedly.)

      I understand that a lot of it stemmed from the need to build stuff fast during the 1960s nascent economic boom, but I never understood why this happened in Kyoto, which was spared American bombing in WWII.

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    8. Re:Not just China! by Reziac · · Score: 1

      That was true of American cities during the early eras of urbanization too. But it happened much longer ago here, so by now most of those buildings have been aged out and replaced. Downtown Los Angeles is a good example -- if you last saw it even 20 years ago, you'd hardly recognise it today. The squat pragmatic brick boxes are nearly all gone (even those not taken out by quakes), replaced by modern architecture.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    9. Re:Not just China! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, Scottish?

    10. Re:Not just China! by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Have you ever watched an unsubtitled print of "Trainspotting"? *I'm* Scottish (although from the diagonally opposite part of the country) and I could barely understand them. Heaven help people who don't speak English as a first language (like the Japanese, or Americans).

  18. Growing Pains by gotpaint32 · · Score: 5, Informative

    These are typical of any area undergoing modernization. It is kind of elitest for anyone to say that they lacked planning. (even though they are) Just look at the United States when it was undergoing its telecommunications boom in the early 1900s; (wired one not the wireless kind) countless phone, telegraph, power and who knows what else lines were strung all over the place.

    This is just what happens, planners can't always be expected to accomodate for the booms of a volatile industry, the private sector is pretty resilient, it will work to help itself in the quickest most efficient (not necessarily pretty) way possible. Once the government has had time to catch up and realize the ensuing chaos, then they can work to make everything nice and orderly again without disrupting the oh so important rapid expansionary growth shown in these industries.

    http://www.albionmich.com/history/histor_noteboo k/ R0112.shtml

    Big government sucks!

    --
    Nuclear war would really set back cable. - Ted Turner
    1. Re:Growing Pains by Chatmag · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I remember the same thing in post war Germany. What wasn't bombed out, had wires running everywhere. That was in the mid '50's when I first went to Europe. Later, in the '60's, it wasn't as bad, so I'm assuming it took Germany about 10 years to clean up the wire tangled cities.

      --
      Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
    2. Re:Growing Pains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      Just look at the United States when it was undergoing its telecommunications boom in the early 1900s; (wired one not the wireless kind) countless phone, telegraph, power and who knows what else lines were strung all over the place.

      Yeah, but there is one very important difference in technology since then. Back then, there were no automated phone switches at all. In the very early days, lines went from point A to point B directly and were dedicated to communication only between those two points. This tends to increase the number of wires exponentially. (That is not an exaggeration -- it really is exponential.) Then they went to manual switching, which was great, but which requires all cables to be run to a single point where the person sits in front of a giant patch bay and tries to be polite all day long. Then giant, power-hungry mechanical stepper motor switches. (Each click on a dial telephone moves the stepper to a new position. Pity all the mechanical contacts have to be cleaned regularly by hand.)

      These days, we have cheap, reliable digital phone switches. AND, we have multiplexing for our digital circuit-switched traffic. AND, we have fiberoptic cables that can carry hundreds of phone calls all at once. And digital technology is so cheap that you could build tiny neighborhood switches for phone lines if you wanted (thus saving cable back to the central office), or even switches for individual homes (so that only one wire must be run even if you have 10 phone lines). And anyone building things today can spec things out so that most cables carry lots of multiplexed traffic instead of being married to a multibillion dollar investment into twisted copper pairs meant for a single analog voice line.

      The point being that is possible to do the same stuff with orders of magnitude fewer cables than, say, the first quarter of the 20th century. The ability to put more switches in more places and the ability to carry more traffic over a given number of cables both make the job a whole lot easier.

    3. Re:Growing Pains by njh · · Score: 1

      "In the very early days, lines went from point A to point B directly and were dedicated to communication only between those two points. This tends to increase the number of wires exponentially. (That is not an exaggeration -- it really is exponential.) "

      Can you explain to me why it really is exponential? I can see that it might be quadratic (n sets of wires to n people = n*n wires), but how do you get exponential?

    4. Re:Growing Pains by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 1
      Can you explain to me why it really is exponential?

      It isn't.

      I can see that it might be quadratic (n sets of wires to n people = n*n wires), but how do you get exponential?

      The folks over at Wolfram tell us that a complete graph, that is, one where every node is connected to every other node, has n(n - 1)/2 edges. Which is quadratic.

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
    5. Re:Growing Pains by HardCase · · Score: 1
      I think that the number of lines would be [n(n-1)]/2=(n^2-n)/2. Each point to point line supports a two way conversation and you don't need to call yourself. Unless you consider each line to be two wires, in which case, you don't divide by two.


      -h-

    6. Re:Growing Pains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oops. Sorry. I'm the one who wrote exponential, and it's clearly wrong. I obviously conflated exponential with superlinear. I don't know what I was thinking, except perhaps that (10^8)^2 is a VERY large number of wires, so it therefore must be an exponential function. (I'm guesstimating that there are 10^8 phones in the US.)

  19. Time to get Slashdot.CN? by taweili · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If story like this even make it to /. or it's just a slow news day?

    1. Re:Time to get Slashdot.CN? by eyeye · · Score: 1

      This is one of the more interesting stories i've read recently here.

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
  20. Gumming up the works? by sakusha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The wires ARE "the works."

    Anyway, this isn't just China's problem. Alex Kerr's quite interesting book "Lost Japan" discusses the blight of utility poles and wiring.

  21. Re:Not that big a problem - yes it is, with photos by tedshultz · · Score: 5, Informative

    The wires are such a mess that they would be considered a clear safety hazard by most peoples standards. I was in Shanghai (one of the most advanced cities in china) and I took some photos of both how low the wires were (as low at 4 feet off the ground!) and the over head rats nest . There was worse, I just didn't have my camera at the time.

  22. Look under your desk by aardwolf204 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I read the article (gasp) and then looked directly under my desk... doesnt look like I'm doing much better. So when is Power Over IP going to come out again?

    Another interesting thing to ponder, last time you moved your equipment from one room to another, when you booted up did you notice that a third of the wires you once had in your old setup were unused... where do these buggers come from? its like they're breeding and no matter how hard i try to keep the female ends on the other side of the desk from the male ones it seems to happen every time.

    Yet another thing to consider. I just came back from a 200 person LAN party this weekend. A buddy in my clan (read: geeks that LAN together, not CS \"noobs\"); was relieved that he brought his trusty Dell QuietKey keyboard rather than his wireless logitech. The clan sitting directly behind us all were using these devices are were having trouble with interference all the time. Probably could have fixed things with using different channels but by the looks of things (19" LCD, green Antec cases, blue LED casefans) these guys didnt know a CAT5 from a Hello Kitty Personal Vibrator

    --
    Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    1. Re:Look under your desk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Another interesting thing to ponder, last time you moved your equipment from one room to another, when you booted up did you notice that a third of the wires you once had in your old setup were unused.

      Nope, never had that happen to me. But then, I've had 3 or 4 jobs where I had to help maintain a wiring closet.

  23. Lots of digging up roads though by rpjs · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's not just power that we put underground - the only overhead infrastructure you see in an average British street is BT telephone wires and then usually only the last bit from the nearest telephone pole to the home.

    However, the downside is that what with utility privatisation and deregulation, we now have over 100 companies with a statutory right to dig up the roads as when they require. This means we often get cases of roads being dug up by company A, resurfaced and then a couple of days later getting dug up again by Company B. IIRC there are some roads in London that have been subject to works for more than 50% of the time in recent years.

    The govt keeps legislating to make the utilities co-ordinate with each other (I remember working on the Street Works Act system for the local authority I used to work for back in the mid-90s) but it never seems to have much effect. The latest wheeze is "lane rental" - allowing utilities to dig as they want but making them pay for the economic cost of the disruption to traffic that they cause.

    Mind you, I do think it looks nicer having everything underground. I find the overhead electric cables they have in the suburban US quite ugly.

    1. Re:Lots of digging up roads though by atomico · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In many european town/city centres, to avoid constant digging and re-digging, narrow tunnels are built where power and communication cables, along with gas and water pipes, are neatly racked along the tunnel walls. It is the typical case of high upfront investment paying off over the following decades: no more digging, no more overhead cables.

    2. Re:Lots of digging up roads though by rpjs · · Score: 5, Funny

      That sounds like far too sensible an idea to ever catch on in the UK!

    3. Re:Lots of digging up roads though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaos, but it works. Where I live in the U.S. everything was underground and all in conduits. The only time they ever dug up the street or yards were to lay conduit along with required pull-string.

      Its a great idea! I'm shocked more people don't do it.

      I used to live in another part of this country that did the same thing but it seems to be pretty rare, its a shame. Ahh well, eventually people may learn, although I doubt it.

    4. Re:Lots of digging up roads though by Mr.+Jax · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Here in Belgium to solve the problem of roads being opened multiple times the company that wants it opened has to notify the other companies that it will do so. Then they have the opportunity to put their cables in as well. The cost of opening the road is split between the different companies that put in their cable.
      A couple of years back a lot of new ISP's started putting cable and now all company buildings have wires from all the providers so they can switch to anyone they want.

    5. Re:Lots of digging up roads though by mo^ · · Score: 1

      Yup, was gonna mention that htis is the same as it is done in amsterdam.

      It means taking a while longer to get anything done, but after 3 yearsof living in the same street in Amsterdam i believe the road was only dug up once, and then a tiny area of the footpath only was needed each time.

      --
      bah!*@%!
    6. Re:Lots of digging up roads though by Xrikcus · · Score: 1

      They're working on that in the UK. Be nice if it'd actually happen.

      Worst thing here is in my own road I remember it being dug up once, other than the original laying of cable TV cabling. When it was dug up they tried to avoid digging a trench, and instead just dug occasional holes and used drilling techniques to replace the gas piping with a new plastic high pressure main. What then happened was half the road sank 3 inches at a funny angle and they had to resurface the entire thing! Sometimes even digging's better than what happens.

    7. Re:Lots of digging up roads though by I8TheWorm · · Score: 4, Informative
      Actually, there's a long term cost too. Underground lines have full time maintenance associated with them, while above ground lines don't require as much (other than the occasional tree limb or high wind).

      There are a few different kinds of underground lines.
      1. High pressure, fluid filled (HPFF)
      2. High pressure, gas filled (HPGF)
      3. Self contained, fluid filled (SCFF)
      4. Extruded dielectric (XLPE, for Cross Linked Polyethelene, plastic insulation, and one of the products my company makes)

      HPFF are the most common in the US, and SCFF are the least common, mainly because they don't do well in extreme weather. The fluids are dielectric, 200 psi oil, and saturates the kraft paper insulator of the wires. The fluid is static, and removes heat from the wires by conduction. HPGF uses compressed nitrogen to accomplish basically the same thing.

      HPFF requires a pressurizing source, usually a station at one end of the line, with an oil/gas resorvoir. HPGF requires a regulator and a nitrogen cylinder. The HPGF lines also require manual maintenance, as you can't just leave nitrogen gas cylinder's laying around.

      Couple all of that with usual line maintenance, and you've got one expensive system, all in the name of keeping the sky unobstructed.
      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    8. Re:Lots of digging up roads though by dave3138 · · Score: 1

      This would have to be for big distribution lines. The 120/240 feeds to houses are made out of cable that simply has a jacket that withstand moisture/rotting/UV. Hell, even the 13.8 kV feed to where I work looks like it uses the same cable, albeit a little heavier. (I know because we dropped a phase a couple years ago, a weakness in the wire finally burnt itself out.)

    9. Re:Lots of digging up roads though by wrax · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I'm not sure how many people actually know about Tokyo Teleport Town but that is exactly what they did with all their telecom gear, heating and power transmission cable, all underground with large tunnels to get to it if it becomes necessary.

      I live in a quite forested area of Canada (as you can imagine, it being Canada and all) and I can say it sucks really bad when a tree falls over in a storm and powerlines come down with the tree. Underground power and telecommunications is definetly the way to go, although if you're only putting them in the ground then covering them with dirt I can see how that would get annoying having to dig up the street each time you want to lay more cable or have to fix something that broke.

    10. Re:Lots of digging up roads though by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      Sure, but those feeds to houses require didding up grass and dirt, rather than digging up streets causing traffic jams.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    11. Re:Lots of digging up roads though by Pope · · Score: 1

      I grew up in Calgary in the 70s, and our subdivision had all the services (cable, electricity, gas, etc.) underground. Every time there was a severe rainstorm, the electricity and cable went out for a while. :)

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    12. Re:Lots of digging up roads though by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Funny

      Underground lines have full time maintenance associated with them, while above ground lines don't require as much (other than the occasional tree limb or high wind).

      Speaking as a canadian:

      And snow, ice, mad beavers, enraged mooses, majestic maples...

      The wires are in constant danger!

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    13. Re:Lots of digging up roads though by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      If my memory serves me, you get into the oil-filled cables around 80-100kV. These lines are comparable to major transmission lines. Great for places like Hong Kong, were there just isn't enough space to get power around otherwise.

      Also, if I recall correctly, the cost of these cables is around US$1,000 per linear foot! Compare that with $70/ft for overhead cables, and you get a sense of the cost to put things underground.

      Still worth it in my book, but... you have to understand the impact.

    14. Re:Lots of digging up roads though by La+Fortezza · · Score: 1

      I occasionally see gas cylinders around town, usually near a utility pole or manho^H^H^H^H personhole. I've always wondered what they were for.

  24. I was in Shanghai last year by HunterZero · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And my father goes over there on a fairly frequent basis for 2-3 months at a time. Always sticks me with taking care of his affairs while he's away... *grumble*

    Anyways, I went all over that damned town. I spent an entire day walking around (mostly because I got lost) and I don't honestly remember there being that much of a massive wire problem overhead. I'd remember it because I'm a geek at heart and got thrown out of more than one cyber cafe for playing around to how to break their censorship software. But I'm getting off track. Sure, there were plenty of lines overhead, but no more so than any large city I've been in, reguardless of country. There's nothing wrong with running wires overhead, you just have to be certain of what you're running and not run useless wire. If it's useless I completely agree with tearing it down.

    Personally, I still think that we should run fiber through the sewage systems to all locations. Everyone has to have sewage, and no one really cares if we run something through it. Why it isn't a standard I don't understand. The expense in the short term is offset by the long term gain in my opinion.

    --
    "They told me it was impossible. I replied with maniacal laughter." http://www.mydailyrant.com/
    1. Re:I was in Shanghai last year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is maintenence. Who would want to go down there to fix anything that went wrong?

    2. Re:I was in Shanghai last year by NickFitz · · Score: 2, Informative
      Everyone has to have sewage

      Hence the sophisticated delivery mechanisms that have been put in place.

      --
      Using HTML in email is like putting sound effects on your phone calls. Just say <strong>no</strong>.
    3. Re:I was in Shanghai last year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know i live in the boonies, but I have a septic tank and not city sewer.. So I guess not everyone has sewer.

      http://people.howstuffworks.com/sewer2.htm

      "How come the ground is moist here? It has rained for a month?"

  25. Lain by dwater · · Score: 1

    > ... sane ...

    There's nothing sane about Lain.

    Awesome series, great soundtrack, but sane? No.

    Oh, you weren't saying Lain was sane...OK; fair enough.

    --
    Max.
  26. Enterprising indeed... by infonick · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Over on Hefei Street, one enterprising apartment dweller even used them to hang-dry selected cuts of meat."

    Seriously, if the power/fiber/phone lines are that close to a building, there must be really old standards in place. You can imagine the fun someone would have if they tapped a fiber line for spamming.

    Come to think of it, if someone pulled that off, he/she would never be found because all the wires are in such a mess. It would be like looking for a needle in a field of haystacks!

    --

    You are confusing me with someone who cares.
  27. This is red-blooded capitalism! by Serveert · · Score: 0, Troll

    Darn socialists in the US wanna regulate my wires! :tinfoilhat:

    --
    2 years and no mod points. Join reddit. Because openness is good.
  28. Easy solution by Blackneto · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I didn't read the article but...
    Just publiclly annouce that people have 30-60 days to prove whats theirs and why it's there. Anything that isn't claimed is gone.

    We have this problem in our datacenters at times. Projects end or people don't need the servers anymore and don't RTS them. Time comes when theres a problem or we need to know who owns a server. When nobody fesses up we just shut it off till somebody screams.

    --
    Ursula Andress, Catherine Deneuve, and Charo, twice...
    1. Re:Easy solution by joshv · · Score: 1


      We have this problem in our datacenters at times. Projects end or people don't need the servers anymore and don't RTS them. Time comes when theres a problem or we need to know who owns a server. When nobody fesses up we just shut it off till somebody screams.


      So you let people put crap into your datacenter without getting contact, and backup contact information? One of a datacenter's primary functions should be to keep a complete hardware inventory up to date and accurate.

      -josh

    2. Re:Easy solution by Blackneto · · Score: 2, Informative

      no

      "It's not our job"

      It should be but it isn't. theres a special group thats supposed to keep track of it all but they fall short of the task many times.

      NOTHING comes in without the things you mentioned. It's just what happens after its there that causes the orphans to appear. We have a DB of it all but without the participants giving up info when necessarry it's useless.

      Basically what happens is a project starts. They order a bunch of shit, we set it up, sometimes load it and it sits there.
      Many things can happen from there:
      1. it gets used as intended.
      2. Project dies and it is RTS'd
      3. Project changes direction and orders more shit and the equipment is passed off on another group.
      4. Project ends and they don't tell anyone.

      Usually its the last 2 that give us orphaned servers. All of them are still monitored, patched and under contract. It just that after a while the reason for having it there becomes muddled because someone along the line forgets to let those responsible know when the server is not needed anymore or that responsibility has transferred to someone else.
      We're talking about close to 40,000 servers of various types and uses spread across 3 centers in the country.

      So it can be easy for things to get lost. Whats a $15000 server when you are a multi-billion dollar company.
      Anyway, when all avenues of tracking down a server's owner fails there is an "outage" and if someone yelps we can find the info we need. If no one does it's backed up and RTS'd.

      --
      Ursula Andress, Catherine Deneuve, and Charo, twice...
    3. Re:Easy solution by Idarubicin · · Score: 2, Informative
      I didn't read the article but...
      Just publiclly annouce that people have 30-60 days to prove whats theirs and why it's there. Anything that isn't claimed is gone.

      Why doesn't anybody ever read the article?

      So the city is placing public notices in newspapers, describing the various mystery cables and giving their owners 90 days to come forward.

      "No one responds, we cut them," says Li Zhenjun, who oversees the regulatory efforts. "We can't just have people putting up wires at their leisure.''

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    4. Re:Easy solution by HardCase · · Score: 1
      So it can be easy for things to get lost. Whats a $15000 server when you are a multi-billion dollar company.


      Well, in the multibillion dollar company that I work for, a $15,000 server is a valuable piece of equipment. That's why we have been able to survive this horrendous economy without having to lay off or outsource anybody. We call it "responsible management".


      We have offices around the world, and tens of thousands of servers and even more workstations. And they're all accounted for. Sure, it takes work, but, to paraphrase William Proxmire, $15,000 here and $15,000 there and suddenly you're talking real money!


      Oh, and no criticism of you...I recognize sarcasm when I hear it. The company that I worked at before I came here had the same attitude. That's why I'm happy to work where I do.


      -h-

    5. Re:Easy solution by Blackneto · · Score: 1

      Yeah it really is annoying at times.
      We've wasted whole nights on servers, calling in CE's and waking people up to get a server "back in production" only to find out from somebody that "Oh that project ended a few months ago but thanks."
      The group that oversees this mess never takes the time to follow up. Maybe they need a group to oversee them?

      Bloated Corprate america at it's finest.

      --
      Ursula Andress, Catherine Deneuve, and Charo, twice...
  29. Paradise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm packing my suitcases I'm moving over there!

  30. BAD IDEA by RMH101 · · Score: 2, Informative

    you're renting a suite on the first floor. the other five floors above you have to get their cables in through the same risers you use. rip out *a single cable* that breaks something upstairs and you're looking at a lawsuit for lost productivity and the swift application of the Cat5-of-9-tails from several BOFHs.
    Even worse if you pull something like a fire alarm cable that isn't immediately noticed...

    1. Re:BAD IDEA by weave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Fire alarm cable is *suppposed* to be in a red jacket for just this reason. But yeah, you have a good point.

    2. Re:BAD IDEA by dave3138 · · Score: 1

      Typically the fire alarm circuits will go into some sort of alert mode if a loop is whacked. A contractor or two did that where I work during some of the construction. The alarm didn't go off, but the monitoring company called and notified us. Hell, if one of the two phone lines the alarm uses to dial out is cut, it uses the other line to notify the monitorin center.

  31. Finding a Broker by awol · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You used to be able to find a broker in Shanghai, by following the yellow cable out of the exchange building and around the streets of the town as it stopped by their offices.

    Actually that's not quite true, but there was a yellow cable that left the exchange building and went to various different installations where exchange activities (including trading) took place. It was just hanging off the poles and you could easily track amongst the spaghetti at the time. That was back in '96, the last time I was there. I dread to think what it must look like now.

    --
    "The first thing to do when you find yourself in a hole is stop digging."
  32. Standardised prefabricated concrete roads by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

    With covered troughs built into the pavements for the amenities; power, telephone, cable, whatever. Want to build a new road, prepare the foundation and then drop a concrete road block into place.

    It would reduce the amount of digging up of roads and therfore traffic chaos in cities like London as well.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
    1. Re:Standardised prefabricated concrete roads by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

      Good idea in theory, but they cause extreme tyre noise and they look nasty with all the joints. I can't see them being acceptable in London, although I understand they're more popular in the US.

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    2. Re:Standardised prefabricated concrete roads by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

      You have the option of putting a tarmac covering over the top of the road surface, it isn't going to be dug up regularly. The only bits which might would be at intersections and it's easy to design for that.

      The key is to build support for the amenity cabling, piping and ducting (All stuff that seems to be an afterthought at the moment) into the pavement in a standard, easy to access manner. Want to fix or lay a cable, lift the top off of the pavement with a crane.

      Damn, I should have patented this.

      --
      Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
    3. Re:Standardised prefabricated concrete roads by Politburo · · Score: 1

      New techinques in concrete paving, specifically ultra thin whitetopping, are said to eliminate this noise. Expansion joints are still required, usually at 12 feet, iirc.

    4. Re:Standardised prefabricated concrete roads by Politburo · · Score: 1

      The problem is that roads are rarely standardized. For the same reason that we don't use prefabbed designs for the roads (only 'design guidelines', which still don't cover all situations), you wouldn't be able to use prefabbed road pieces. There are just too many variables to make it cost effective.

    5. Re:Standardised prefabricated concrete roads by Animats · · Score: 1
      Some sections of Tokyo have prefabricated, bolted-down curbs, which can be removed for cable access.

      New York City has a good system of underground conduits and vaults, and everything goes in there.

      San Francisco has totally botched this and has cable companies digging all the time.

  33. Yes, much of Asia is a wired mess by Conspire · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As an expatriate living in Taiwan and China for 13 years now, I can confirm the fact that most of the big cities here are a big wired mess. Taiwan is perhaps even worse than China, because there are many cable companies and cable is strewn everywhere. I mean it is a mess, and not a very great site to the eye either.

    Shanghai is much better than Taiwan, although still needs some improvement. I think the biggest problem is there is concrete everywhere, so unlike the US where they lay cable underground in the mass sprawling suburbs of the cities. It is hard to do that when you have no suburbs and the cities sprawl for a hundred kilometers, all concrete jungle!

    Interesting enough, I was way deep in Mainland China near Mongolia a couple years ago, and there were huge tracks where they were laying fiber on the sides of the road. I mean this was in the middle of NOWHERE, only coal mines and steel factories I was trying to figure out why they were laying fiber optic cable there. "If only they did that in the cities", I thought to myself at the time. sheesh.

    --
    Real men don't need signitures!!!
    1. Re:Yes, much of Asia is a wired mess by Reziac · · Score: 1

      That's interesting about laying cable aforethought in the middle of nowhere. Whatever else may be wrong, China apparently does learn from its mistakes, and plans better next time.

      Re your other comment... my nearest *neighbour* is barely within walking distance (1.5 miles), and that's how I like it :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  34. Booming China by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

    If a lot of people are involved in running bandit cables, and a bunch of other people get paid to remove them, I can see why their economy is doing so well.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  35. Excellent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, would like to welcome our long, skinny, electrfied, Chinese overlords!

  36. Dr. Seuss's wires in China. by Alsee · · Score: 3, Funny

    Telephone Fiber Electrical wires.
    Crossing and shorting and starting great fires.
    Sagging and snagging and causing us ires,
    down to the street and around all our tires.

    Intricate knots to confound a Boy Scout.
    Perplexing knots that no one can get out.
    So many knots that I know nothing about.
    Gordian knots I say without a doubt.

    On Tibet Road they dangle
    each and every angle
    on telephone poles
    n garden-hose rolls.

    Black wires Blue wires Magenta you see,
    it's a rainbow put there to serve you 'n me.

    On Beijing Road you can barely see the sky
    Wires no one can seem to identify
    growing and climbing and reaching so high
    all over China's tech-happy city Shanghai.

    Wires to hang-dry selected cuts of meat,
    Wires as planters for growing rows of wheat.

    Wires for poppy-san, wires for mommy-san.
    Wires for you-san, wires for me-san.
    Please do not forget some wires for Nissan!

    Wires in rows for power that glows,
    under my toes and under my nose.
    The question I pose is where it all goes?
    Where it all goes? But nobody knows!

    We are betwix it how do we fix it?
    How do we nix it? Let us sub-six it!

    Oh what a feat I jump from my seat!
    Under the street down under our feet!
    That is no cheat! That would be a treat!
    That would be neat that answer I greet!
    Could that be beat down under concrete?

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  37. Funny, by Kludge · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When I was in Shanghai last year I took this pic out of amusement.

    1. Re:Funny, by jred · · Score: 1

      A couple of more wires and they could save a bundle on umbrellas :)

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    2. Re:Funny, by fo0bar · · Score: 1
      When I was in Shanghai last year I took this pic out of amusement.

      Ehh. There are some areas of San Francisco that are worse than that.

  38. India's War For Wires by wombatmobile · · Score: 1

    In India they can't get enough wires.

  39. new york city was the same way until 1888 by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Interesting
    until 1888, this is exactly how new york city looked, a rat's nest of wires

    then came the largest blizzard anyone ever saw, they called it the "great white hurricane"

    no one did anything about the electric and telegraph poles in the city, even though wires were snapping, falling and killing people, as well as making the city look like a rat's nest

    pictures

    that is, until 1888, when the blizzard FORCED new york city to clean up it's act, and move everything underground... they had no choice! the blizzard knocked down all the poles.

    still, corporations resisted

    After the snow stopped and the winds calmed midday Tuesday, much of the mangled debris remained. In the week after the blizzard, the poles and the wires complicated the city's cleanup efforts. The New York Tribune reminded citizens in an editorial on March 13 that a law had been passed to bury the wires, that the companies had the money to make it happen, and that it was "high time to have done with tricks and subterfuges to avoid the plain requirements of duty and of common sense." Unsurprisingly, in the months after the storm, corporate opposition to the city's efforts to force burial of the wires remained strong: Brush Electric Company, for instance, threatened to leave the city if it was forced to bury its wires.


    with the attitudes of the day, you can make the case that had the blizzard of 1888 not happened, new york city to this day might resemble a rat's nest of wires like shanghai is now

    knowing human psychology: that is, don't deal with a problem until you have to, my point is that shanghai probably won't clean up it's act until a typhoon or something (do they get typhoons in shanghai?) forces the city to clean things up, just like new york city in 1888
    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:new york city was the same way until 1888 by AC5398 · · Score: 1

      Those are some great sites! Thanks for the urls!

    2. Re:new york city was the same way until 1888 by FeetOfStinky · · Score: 1
      with the attitudes of the day, you can make the case that had the blizzard of 1888 not happened, new york city to this day might resemble a rat's nest of wires like shanghai is now

      Highly doubtful. It's not as if New York hasn't experienced several strong storms before, and those are just within the past 30 years. If New York hadn't cleaned up its act in 1888, it was going to happen anyway very shortly thereafter, purely out of necessity.

      Interesting story, except for the questionable leap in logic there at the end.

    3. Re:new york city was the same way until 1888 by Reziac · · Score: 1

      The illustration of wires between buildings is amazing. Makes you wonder what the rooftops themselves were like. Tho underground at the time wasn't any better, from what I've read -- apparently there were layers and layers of steam pipes that went gods know where, public and private water and sewer lines, etc.

      The diff between a typhoon and a blizzard is that a blizzard (or even just freezing rain) can put a thick layer of ice on the overhead lines, adding enough weight to make the whole thing come down in a tangle, even if there is no wind helping things fall down (add wind and you've got a surefire disaster). Whereas a typhoon offers only wind stresses.

      But to a large degree you're right, inertia is strong, and major change tends to happen primarily as a result of Something Going Seriously Wrong in some way not previously considered.

      Bridges weren't built earthquake-proof until a few fell on people's heads, either. Same thing.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  40. irresistable corporations by wombatmobile · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Interesting story.

    "with the attitudes of the day, you can make the case that had the blizzard of 1888 not happened, new york city to this day might resemble a rat's nest of wires like shanghai is now"

    Right! Lucky that storm hit or New Yorkers would have missed 115 years of progress. Because of those damned corporations.
    1. Re:irresistable corporations by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      if you have a problem with my attitude towards corporations doing wrong in society, then i have a problem with your attitude that corporations can do no wrong

      i don't actually think you think corporations can do no wrong, so don't think i think they can do no right

      so stop attacking me the same time you thank me for my interesting story, asshole

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    2. Re:irresistable corporations by wombatmobile · · Score: 1

      so stop attacking me the same time you thank me for my interesting story, asshole

      OK. Next time I will just attack you.
  41. Well I guess... by twoslice · · Score: 1
    It is labour intensive, but on the other hand China certainly has the labourers.

    ...and in communist China you don't find work, the work finds you!

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
  42. Cost by Detritus · · Score: 1
    After a recent hurricane knocked out power in my area, the people from the electric company said that underground power lines were about 4x the cost of overhead lines. I'm not sure how large a percentage of the power company's total costs that is. Is the public willing to pay the costs of burying the power lines?

    Another issue is rural areas. Some of my relatives live on farms, and they have told me that they have to pay for the power company to string the electric wires from the county road to the buildings on the farm, and that it can be quite expensive, even for overhead lines.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:Cost by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

      It's the up front cost of buring that is higher not the TCO. Realy it's the cost of putting in the casign thats more expensive remember this can also get reused and recycled if they over build. They do save on maitnence costs as they break less. So it's a question of incuring greater up front costs to lower the maitnence costs. You also have to remember if you do the install at the right time it's a lot cheaper this is why you will see underground services in condos and other developments as putting in pipe while there is just dirt is a lot cheaper repaving and landscaping is a significant portion of the costs.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
  43. "sprawl" by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    I think the biggest problem is there is concrete everywhere, so unlike the US where they lay cable underground in the mass sprawling suburbs of the cities.

    That's why I always laugh when people knock suburbs. It's a good thing not to be packed in like ants!

    1. Re:"sprawl" by Conspire · · Score: 1

      True, but then again, I walk to work. I walk to the pub, I live in a concrete jungle because....well....it is a jungle and the suburbs are just "the suburbs". Tuesday night now, and I can walk straight to the disco club pumping with hundreds of women till dawn. When you are in the suburbs on a Tuesday night you have cable TV, Xbox or of course the fast food chain as your choices for the evening's entertainment. Until I am reach 60 years of age, I'll take the jungle.

      --
      Real men don't need signitures!!!
    2. Re:"sprawl" by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1

      If you pump with hundreds of women till dawn, you ain't gonna LIVE to 60 years of age.
      What a way to go, though ;)

  44. I'm here to talk to you about ducts... by Improv · · Score: 1

    Anyone seen the movie "Brazil"? Perhaps it's
    prophetic here... ;)

    --
    For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
  45. Another Photo and Commentary by eskinner · · Score: 1

    I was in Wuhan China a few months ago (Oct/Nov 2003) and noticed this problem. See http://www.flat5.net/ for a link and more photographs in this, and other, regards.

    --
    -- Ed Skinner, ed@flat5.net, http://www.flat5.net/
  46. Wires no one can seem to identify by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    probably antennas for clandestine radio stations.

  47. Haphazard use of the question mark? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps Ted Anthony is a bit unsure of the facts?
    Reminds me of this...

    Jake: You got a few messages, I wrote them down.
    Elaine: Where are they?
    Jake: Lets see, they are...here they are.
    Elaine: Thank you. Heh, I'll call you back. Ooh, Myra had the baby! Oh, my God that's wonderful! Who called?
    Jake: She did.
    Elaine: She did? Oh, that's so great!
    Jake: Where do you keep the corkscrew?
    Elaine: In the drawer on the right. Hmm...
    Jake: What?
    Elaine: Oh it's nothing.
    Jake: What is it?
    Elaine: It's nothing.
    Jake: Tell me.
    Elaine: Well, I was just curious why you didn't use an exclamation point?
    Jake: What are you talking about?
    Elaine: See, right here you wrote "Myra had the baby", but you didn't use an exclamation point.
    Jake: So?
    Elaine: So, it's nothing. Forget it, forget it, I just find it curious.
    Jake: What's so curious about it?
    Elaine: Well, I mean if one of your close friends had a baby and I left you a message about it, I would use an exclamation point.
    Jake: Well, maybe I don't use my exclamation points as haphazardly as you do.
    Elaine: You don't think that someone having a baby warrants an exclamation point.
    Jake: Hey, I just chalked down the message. I didn't know I was required to capture the mood of each caller.
    Elaine: I just thought you would be a little more excited about a friend of mine having a baby.
    Jake: Ok, I'm excited. I just don't happen to like exclamation points.
    Elaine: Well, you know Jake, you should learn to use them. Like the way I'm talking right now, I would put an exclamation points at the end of all these sentences! On this one! And on that one!
    Jake: Well, you can put one on this one: I'm leaving!

  48. Toronto ? Star English by scatter_gather · · Score: 1

    What is with this ? odd use of punctuation in the ? article. It is some new literary fashion statement? Perhaps the author ? got confused by the fact that chinese is a tonal language. Or maybe it is some kind of transplanted valley speak where statements are ? made to sound like questions.

  49. New York used to be like this by isoga · · Score: 1

    You dig a trench and put them underground, probably at about the same time you put in your subway

  50. This is not important to the rest of the Internet by NoSuchGuy · · Score: 1

    What about the 'war against china hosted spammer'? That's a war they should fight! and Win!

    NoSuchGuy (drowning in chinese spam)

    --
    Grundgesetz * 23. Mai 1949 - 30. November 2007 - http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/
  51. Re:Not that big a problem - yes it is, with photos by foo12 · · Score: 1

    The second picture looks like the mess in the alley behind my building --- Minneapolis, not Shanghai.

  52. Electricity over IP is an April Fools Day RFC. by UrgleHoth · · Score: 1

    April 1, 2002 to be specific.

    --

    Dogma - "let's just say we'd like to avoid any empirical entanglements."
  53. serves them right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is why those rice niggers should stick to being cheap labour building railways in western countries. They're too stupid to even do cabling properly.

  54. why should anyone post on slashdot, or any other by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    ...forum, when after they post something interesting, as you have admitted and as the comment was rated, then there is some negative troll who backlashes against it?

    i represent what is good about forums: interesting tidbits people find interesting, you represent what is bad about forums like slashdot: negative trolling... after you admitted the comment was interesting to you to boot!

    i don't get it

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  55. you are correct by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    however, if you read the link, you will see it was hell or highwater that anyone was going to actually fix the problem: laws passed that were ignored, stays of injunctions, electricians and pedestrians getting killed... until the blizzard of '88, or any one of the storms you have posted

    so you are right, my specualtion is incorrect: i don't think we'd be walking around in a rat's nest of wires in times square

    howver the spirit of what i am trying to stay is dead on: mark my words, no one is actually going to fix the rat's nest in shanghai even with people dying from shocks and laws being passed, until some horrible typhoon or earthquake or some such basically forces strong public opinion against basic human psychology and bureaucratic/ corporate inertia: don't fix it until i absolutely have to

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  56. What about the external wiring? by spiedrazer · · Score: 1
    I lived in Asia for 6 years and was constantly amazed/shocked at the state of the outside wiring. You can't imagine the scope of work that would be necessary to sort out what is in use and what isn't. As another poster said, it's not like they have utility police making sure everyone who hangs wire works for an appropriate agency and does things to spec. Hell, the utility workers themselves do just as bad a job. It WILL only get worse, so be thankful if you don't need to maintain a business there.

    --
    Keep passing the open windows...
  57. cut them all by NetMagi · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't help but think if we just cut them all that spam would decrease by 70%

    PLEASE OHH PLEASE

  58. Re:Looks Like... KUDZU!! by Reziac · · Score: 1

    Hasn't anyone told you? Those aren't wires, they're kudzu!!

    And like all weeds, kudzu reproduces via trans-dimensional warp fields. If even one kudzu is present, it will hold the warp field open, and more of its kind will soon come through and take root in our dimension.

    Now you know the truth about where all those "wires" come from -- you have an open warp port behind your computer!!

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  59. Wow a spaceship by CrazyJim0 · · Score: 1

    Yes, but look at my various assortment of wires.

  60. Somewhat different culture by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    For the most part over there if the natives are told "do not touch".. they dont..

    If you follow the requirment, 4' off the ground isnt unsafe..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  61. Re:why should anyone post on slashdot, or any othe by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

    Meh, just ignore it. There's always someone out there just waiting for the opportunity to show the world how big of an asshole they can be... and on Slashdot, they can do it without fear of being punched in the face, thus removing one of the most effective checks society has for dealing with these sorts people.

  62. Obligatory Webcomic Reference by dmatos · · Score: 3, Funny

    Are the nests of wire as bad as these?

    The Jim Saga, Part 1

    The Jim Saga, Part 2

    --

    It may look like I'm doing nothing, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away.
    --Scott Adams
  63. Signal wires by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Could be telegraph but not likely, they would have been salvaged/stolen for the scrap copper value. More likely they are line wires for Automatic Block Signal systems. A pair of wires from one signal to the previous signal. 12 V; normal polarity = yellow signal, reverse = green signal, open or zero V = red signal. Simple technology, failsafe, and still in use after about 100 years.

    Signal Guy

  64. the last straw by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    If you really want to put them over the edge, then subscribe them all up to Wired Magazine.

  65. Yeah this sounds familiar by TheTranceFan · · Score: 1
    I remember the taxi ride from the old Hong Kong airport (which was in Kowloon) to Hong Kong Island.

    There are hundreds of high-rise apartment buildings that are literally bristling with TV antennas on the roof, each individually wired down the side of the building to someone's window. What's more amazing is that there's often plumbing on the sides of the building, as if they built the building then thought, Oops, forgot the drainpipes!. And I've personally witnessed this very phenomenon in at least seven different cities, in Hong Kong, Taiwan, Korea, and Japan.

    For whatever reason, it seems that people in these cities are willing to put up with a lot more ad hoc infrastructure than you'd ever have in the USA or Europe. It's interesting that this happens in Asia, where form is so very important (e.g. feng shui), so that means that it probably comes down to economics. I haven't been to any third-world Asian countries (yet -- going to Vietnam soon), and I bet they're way worse.

  66. Digging up roads almost nonexistant in Texas now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Roads in Texas are now assigned a ride quality (1-5?) which is used to determine if they may be dug up. I believe all highways and almost any road redone in the last 8 years have a high enough rating that will prevent them from dug up. Instead, we use our oil drilling experience to drill horizontally under the road. Kind of interesting to watch them drill through the limestone prevalent in Austin. So unless something legacy breaks or the road is in piss poor shape, the road won't be dug up.

  67. Tunnel Problems by notcreative · · Score: 1

    I think parts of New York tried to make these tunnels, but it only led to Morlocks, CHUDs, and Mole People.

  68. In this day and age ... by Ex-MislTech · · Score: 1

    >We have this problem in our datacenters at times. Projects end
    >or people don't need the servers anymore and don't RTS them.
    >Time comes when theres a problem or we need to know who owns
    >a server. When nobody fesses up we just shut it off till
    >somebody screams.

    I call this Cowboy networking, the way a data center should be run
    is that all equipment that goes in the door is inventoried by
    serial #, and it's exact Rack/Row location is in a spreadsheet
    or database .

    At Cisco it was on a webpage using Perl written by a good friend
    of mine that also worked there .

    Ppl could put in requests to have the network re-routed to fit
    their needs, and me and the other lab rats made it happen .

    If we did not document the changes, and new gear our Supervisor
    would tear into use like the Tazmanian devil .

    Every single V.35, Rj-48, Rj-45 jack in that place was labelled,
    and you could trace it end to end just by reading the labels .

    Before a project could go in it had to be drawn up, and names
    given to the servers/routers/switches going into the racks .

    The best thing China could do is build a series of service
    conduits over all of their major cities .

    Put alarms on the access panels, doors, etc .

    Europe and the US has already been thru this, they could learn
    alot from our mistake and our innovations .

    With the MUCH larger population there, they are going to need to
    scale accordingly, perhaps plan for 4 times what you expect .

    Like most big Telco carriers in the US they could gave a NOC,
    and could monitor all the different cables thru a networked
    monitoring system . In the long run it would save them billions .

    In the short term it would cost alot, and would be alot of work .

    It would be an awesome project, I'd like to work on it .

    Peace,
    Ex-MislTech

    --
    google "32 trillion offshore needs IRS attention"
    1. Re:In this day and age ... by Blackneto · · Score: 1

      If you read one of my other posts under the parent you will see that Nothing gets in without what you describe.

      Its what happens after its in that is the problem.
      Things are so compartmentalized here that things fall through the cracks.

      Our team has a DB secondary to the main one that notes all the Ser#'s Names, contact etc. Ours is probably more current than the main one and has been used in the past to update the main one. A Networking team is responsible for setting up and keeping track of what server is connected to what port, etc.
      The problem is with communication. People have it in thier profiles when they are assigned equipment what needs to be done and who needs to be contatcted throughout. Notification for when they exchange equipment with another project or need to decomission equipment is part of the profile.
      But When you have people that are basically tenured in their positions you cant make them do anything.
      So we end up with a situation like i've described. After attempts to find out who's using it and who's in charge fail, it just gets shut off till somebody claims it.

      It's easy to put down on paper what needs to be done. But if the people spearheading it and the people working on it don't give a damn, the plan is worthless.

      Good on your Supervisor for keeping up. But, if you aren't notified of the changes how can you make note of them. That is our team's main difficulty.

      --
      Ursula Andress, Catherine Deneuve, and Charo, twice...
  69. And more factors by bluGill · · Score: 1

    Overhead wires, for all they are exposed to storms, are more reliable than underground wires. The insulation isn't in the wet ground rotting away, or being chewed away by moles. In the case of electric there is no insulation except at the poles where UV and weatherproof (except for hail but that is rare) ceramic insulators do the work. Unfortunatly that is for electric wires, I don't know how it plays out for communications.

    1. Re:And more factors by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I've sometimes wondered about the longevity of buried cable. I know it has a variety of sheathing and chemicals designed to prevent corrosion and discourage gopher bites, but how long does it really last? When was the first cable buried, and how old is the oldest buried cable that's still in use?

      The power lines to my house were put up in 1956, and the Edison guy says they're probably all original because they're the old-style heavier wire. Where I lived before, the phone line was strung in the early 1940s, and it was original wire all the way out to the junction box, some 1500 feet worth from box to house (again, an older type of wire that hadn't been used in decades, so easy to tell its age). And I'm sure these are far from any sort of overhead-wire lifespan record -- particularly for east coast wiring, especially since stuff is generally not so well-maintained out west.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:And more factors by bluGill · · Score: 1

      My lcol utility CO-OP claimed (about 10 years ago, I haven't heard anything and I assume newer technology is better. My memory might also be wrong, but this should be close) that underground lines last about 17 years and have something like 3 outages in that time. Overhead lines last 25 years and have something like 4 outages in that time.

      Phone wires are different I'm sure. UV from the sun would be a problem, so I don't know how that compares to rots from the ground contact.

    3. Re:And more factors by Reziac · · Score: 1

      There are materials that are very UV resistant. The power meter here recently croaked (only two years old! one of those fancy new electronic models) and was feeding back upstream, thereby trying to burn thru the wires (the original wires from 1956), and the insulation the Edison guy peeled off it to make a new connection was still fairly soft and pliable, kinda like heavy tarpaper without the stickyness. I've seen phone lines (and have a few samples here somewhere) from the 1940s that are still quite flexible even after 50+ years out in the weather.

      Re the longevity stats your co-op reports, I suspect it's not so much cable rot from ground contact as water seeping in at junction points -- as someone once put it, "water is the enemy". The buried cable samples I've seen have an exterior coating of rubbery stuff, a layer of aluminum and sticky goo (which I'm told are specifically to discourage gophers and to act as a moisture barrier, respectively), and a couple more layers of plastic, none of which are particularly suspectible to rot. However, the big difference is that a wet cable junction that's hanging out in the air gets dries out quickly once the rain quits; whereas a buried cable junction that gets wet will stay wet for days or weeks (if not year round, depending on soil conditions) -- and being damp leads to corrosion.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  70. Re:DIE DIE DIE by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    I meta-moderated this as unfair. Not because the moderation itself was unfair, but because I'm fighting back against moderators who use their mod-points to attack people. I'm sorry, but you're probably innocent in this matter. However, you should consider modding up insightful or funny posts instead of modding down people posting anonymously.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  71. Re:DIE DIE DIE by Hal+The+Computer · · Score: 1

    Funny, I just moderated the offtopic mod on the grandparent post as fair. Why?
    Because well, it's $#&*% true!
    Look, please take your crusade elsewhere. Personally, I agree with your point that moderators should use their points to increase the rating on good comments. Your .sig, however, says it all, you're being a zealot. Not all down-mods are evil incarnate. The grand-parent was utterly off-topic (even you can't dispute that) and someone has to get rid of the junk.
    If you really disagree with down-mods., you can go into your preferances and give Ratings like troll and flamebait +1 or even +2 to counter this. Personally, I think that would be insane, but I think your post was insane.
    Oh BTW, congratulations on becoming my first foe! I really hate zealots.

    --

    int main(void){int x=01232;while(malloc(x));return x;}
  72. Re:DIE DIE DIE by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "Your .sig, however, says it all, you're being a zealot. Not all down-mods are evil incarnate."

    You are absolutely right. I'm being an ass. I'm not going to argue that I'm right. I'm not. What I should do is just keep meta-moderating. When I've calmed down on the issue, I'll re-examine that.

    "If you really disagree with down-mods., you can go into your preferances and give Ratings like troll and flamebait +1 or even +2 to counter this."

    That doesn't solve a thing. Think about what would set me off for a sec. Think about what would drive me to be so harsh. Try to imagine my point of view for a sec. "I don't agree with you, so I'm modding you down." "Uh oh, you're tactfully badmouthing Mozilla, take THAT!" "Here's an AC being stupid to another AC, well I better make sure he's at -1 instead of 0. Never mind all those interesting posts out there." "Oh look at that funny comment. Too bad it's off-topic even though the FAQ says to be funny."

    I kinda hope a few dudes with mod points will read my message and my sig and think twice before abusing their mod points. If not, at least you cannot fault me for trying to fix the problem.

    "Oh BTW, congratulations on becoming my first foe! I really hate zealots."

    I don't blame you. You're right.

    At least have a happy holidays.

    --
    "Derp de derp."