Slashdot Mirror


The Best and Worst Technologies of 2003?

Phoe6 asks: "Last year, at Hexadecimals discussion group we shared a news that Worst Technology of 2002 was TIA (Total Information Awareness by DARPA). What is the Worst Technology of 2003? For the Best, Time Magazine seems to have adjudged Steve Jobs' iTunes as the Invention of 2003. What are your ratings?"

82 of 451 comments (clear)

  1. iTunes for Windows by deliciousmonster · · Score: 2, Funny

    let's make it two in a row...

    --
    I have a plan. Using mainly spoons, we'll tunnel our way out of the city...
    1. Re:iTunes for Windows by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sorry, but iTunes seems to be pretty worthless to me. I can't find anything I like on it. I go to search for "Foo Fighters" and it suggests Too Fighters instead. What kind of online music store doesn't have Foo Fighters!? I open up Poisoned, type in Foo Fighters and voila. Tons of songs available for free. The problem with all these online music stores is selection and overpriced tracks IMHO. It's certainly not the best invention of 2003. Napster on the other hand probably was the best invention of its year.

  2. Slashdot Subscriptions by satanami69 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'll not saying best or worst though.

    --
    I really hate Dan Patrick.
    1. Re:Slashdot Subscriptions by corbettw · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'll not saying best or worst though.

      It's OK, you don't have to.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  3. Worst invention: OSDN Personals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh, the horror...

    1. Re:Worst invention: OSDN Personals by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 4, Funny

      Shy, pasty, antisocial geek seeks like-minded sentient girlfriend to share parent's basement. Slashdot subscribers need not apply.

    2. Re:Worst invention: OSDN Personals by jeffehobbs · · Score: 4, Funny


      Hey -- don't say anything bad about Slashdot personals! That's where I plan to meet my future ex-wife.

      ~jeff

    3. Re:Worst invention: OSDN Personals by Geek+of+Tech · · Score: 5, Funny
      Must enjoy C, D&D, and be able to hold her own at Unreal or Battlefield 1942.

      --
      Stop the Slashdot effect! Don't read the articles!
    4. Re:Worst invention: OSDN Personals by k4_pacific · · Score: 2, Funny

      I dated that girl. She knew C, enjoyed D&D, swore by Emacs, and she was one of the most beautiful people I have ever known. I met her at a LUG meeting. After the meeting, I went up and started talking to her. We went out for drinks. A relationship developed. We were a couple in perfect harmony. We finished each other's #defines. But there were irreconcileable differences. She used KDE, I used Gnome. We fought over it. One day, it got so intense that we agreed it would be better if we parted. I haven't seen her in over a year, but I still think about her almost daily. So Crystal, if you are out there and you miss me, send me an email.

      Mike

      "Software is like sex, its better when its free."
      -- Attributed to Linus Torvalds

      --
      Unknown host pong.
    5. Re:Worst invention: OSDN Personals by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hold her own? The whole point is that you don't want to have to hold your own...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  4. Hmm by nepheles · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There's this thing called "two-point-six" or something that Bill keeps ranting about... I dunno... maybe that's it

    --
    ((lambda x ((x))) (lambda x ((x))))
  5. FREECIV 1.14.1, BABY, YEAH, BABY, YEAH! by James+A.+C.+Joyce · · Score: 3, Informative

    And the CVS now has AI diplomacy. All, right!

    --

    Slashdot: when news breaks, we give you the pieces.
  6. I'de have to say... by akaina · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... the pissing videogame from those kids at MIT

    --
    Remembering that you are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose.
    1. Re:I'de have to say... by akaina · · Score: 5, Funny

      link here: http://web.media.mit.edu/~hayes/mas863/urinecontro l.html

      And remember, urine control

      --
      Remembering that you are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose.
  7. My Pick and Pan by mcwop · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Pick: Apple - for pumping out the goods all year long.

    Pan: SCO - do I need to list the reasons.

    --

    "I don't think it's selfish, to eat defenseless shellfish." -NOFX

  8. PowerMac G5 by oaklybonn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd say the PowerMac G5. For one thing, its a completely new design internally, losing a lot of the legacy of old Mac OS machines. (Which they can do since they don't need to support a 20 year old BIOS or OS.) Another advancement is the attention spent on creating a case that can effectively, efficiently, and quietly cooling the new design.

    1. Re:PowerMac G5 by BWJones · · Score: 5, Informative

      The G5 is great technology that takes many aspects of architecture design ideas from other systems such as the SGI Octane. For instance, in the G5 (and the Octane) all of the busses are completely independent from one another. So, this means you can completely saturate say, your hard drive bus while keeping your CPU to memory bus completely untouched. This is hugely important to scientific computing (and other areas such as video editing) making the G5 system a much more cost effective solution that the SGI Octane. My Octanes were about $40-50k each while the dual G5s cost me around $5K each with 4GB of RAM and half a terrabyte of storage. Not too shabby eh?

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    2. Re:PowerMac G5 by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      (Which they can do since they don't need to support a 20 year old BIOS or OS.)

      You now, 10 years ago I would be most annoyed with this. I mean, part of the reason I went with the PC was because of the massive amount of legacy ability. I could, for example, run a copy of ms-dos v 1.1 {now with graphics} in the event that I actually needed to. Downward compatability one of the major things that sold me on the PC.

      In the year 2003, I could care less about downward compatability. I can get new versions of software online easily.

      On the mac front... getting yellow dog installed on a pre g5 powermac is a pain in the tookus, and it's not like there are many things I miss... though that old style monitor connection with a db15 to HD15(vga) with dipswitches that define bootup resolution was kinda spiffy.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    3. Re:PowerMac G5 by BWJones · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i'm nitpicking here, and i know what you meant, but you just described dma, not independent busses. for newbies, it's the same difference as between a ethernet hub and a switch.

      So, I should have used more specific terminology describing point to point architectures that do not share a common bus, which is decidedly not dma.

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
  9. Best technology by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Rutan's rocket ship! Broke the sound barrier in 2003, though it's suborbital spaceflight will be in 2004.

    --
    This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
  10. Worst Technology of 2003 by kawabago · · Score: 2, Funny

    It would have to be Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction! America actually fought a war against vaporware!

    1. Re:Worst Technology of 2003 by BiggyP · · Score: 5, Funny

      you're forgetting the true technological breakthrough that Iraq's technologists made when they perfected cloaking for said WMDs ;)

    2. Re:Worst Technology of 2003 by kawabago · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hope they don't sell it to the Romulans or we're all fucked!

    3. Re:Worst Technology of 2003 by cheezedawg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, Iraq's chemical weapons are NOT from the United States.

      http://projects.sipri.se/cbw/research/factsheet-19 84.html

      According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, they are probably German or Japanese. In fact, they explicitly ruled out the possibility of them coming from the US.

      --
      "The defense of freedom requires the advance of freedom" - George W Bush
    4. Re:Worst Technology of 2003 by cheezedawg · · Score: 2, Informative

      UN resolution 687 in 1991 required Iraq to produce an accurate declaration of the location, types, and quantities of all of their WMDs. That resolution was passed unanimously under Chapter 7 of the UN resolution that requires member states to enforece it. Iraq never complied with that resolution.

      You see, it was never a question of whether or not Iraq actually had the weapons. The world saw him use them, for cryin out loud. The question now is what has happened to the weapons. The UN told Iraq they had to show us their weapons and prove the were destroyed. The fact that the whereabouts of WMDs is still a mystery is proof enough that Iraq was not in complience with the UN, and that alone is enough justification for military action.

      --
      "The defense of freedom requires the advance of freedom" - George W Bush
  11. The Slashdot DDos: What about the children? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    While I agree that the Slashdot DDoS attack caused many people quite a bit of annoyance and frustration, I think leaving the impact at that is very short sighted.

    Firstly, I don't think the blame for this DDoS can be centered on just one person or group. Obviously, those who attacked Slashdot are to blame, as are Slashdot's sysadmins, and the people at Arrowpoint. And secondly, the costs of this are much greater than you might think.

    I have an eight year old daughter. We had a family pet - a rabbit, black, named Midnight, and my daughter was very fond of it. Midnight, sadly, passed away about two months ago. A week or two after Midnight died, my daughter came to me in tears and asked me, "Daddy, why won't God bring Midnight back? I've been praying like Deacon Simmons told me to."

    Naturally, I had to think about how to respond to this. I finally answered, "well, honey, God is a little like Slashdot. He can seem arbitrary, cruel, and unresponsive, but he's really a nice guy who's just a little out of touch and is a little slow at responding to requessts."

    This was fine, and I thought that would be the end of it. However, when Slashdot went down last week, my daughter burst into my den, positively sobbing and wailing, and managed to choke out "Daddy! Daddy! I can't get to Slashdot!" "Honey," I said, "it's just a website." But, between sobs, she said, "but you said God is just like Slashdot, remember? Does this mean God is dead?"

    I tried to console her as best I could, but nothing seemed to work. When Slashdot came back up, she seemed to return to normal, but she hasn't been quite the same since. She doesn't ask me about God so much any more, and she seems less interested in Church.

    As a good Christian, I will turn the other cheek, and not call for the punishment of those responsible. But to the heinous criminals and negligents responsible for this, I must ask, how do you feel about destroying a small girl's sense of innocence and wonder about the world? About crushing her childish dreams and idealism? About shattering her faith in God and his benevolence? About possibly having crushed her soul and emotion forever, leaving her to live the rest of her days in spiritual agony as a broken, scarred husk of a person?

    I hope all of you think long and hard about what you've done. What is the soul of a child worth, next to a few double-checks of the router?

    Thank you.

    1. Re:The Slashdot DDos: What about the children? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your eight-year-old reads slashdot? don't you think /. is a little too juvenile for her?

  12. Electronic voting machines by twelveinchbrain · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This has to be the least welcome technology to have come to the public's attention in 2003. Thanks alot, Diebold.

    --
    Not Found
    The requested URL /signature.html was not found on this server.
    1. Re:Electronic voting machines by lurker412 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Fortune Magazine agrees. It named paperless voting the worst technology of 2003. Runner up was a skin-implantable RFID chip from Applied Digital Solutions.

  13. SATA by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How about Serial ATA drives which became popular this year. It was about time that the old fashioned ribbon cables were replace with something more modern.

    --
    This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    1. Re:SATA by DFAoBolinho · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are many computer-related technologies that for legacy purposes advance in a turtle-like ritm while others tend to evolve in a maniac-style speed. It's nice to see some efforts to evolve all components of the systems so that we wont see more of the gargals we are used to now. I'm still very interested to see where this PCI Express may lead us too...

    2. Re:SATA by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      However, isn't SATA150 itself faster then most modern HDs can handle? And for that matter, isn't PATA133/100 still far too fast for most modern HDs? Correct me if I'm wrong, please...

    3. Re:SATA by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The trouble with SATA seems to be it's even worse than ATA was with drive support. Now I can only have ONE drive per bus? It was bad enough I could only have two per channel when SCSI had at least 7-14 devices per channel, but now I only have one per port. That's just nuts. To top it off the new motherboards only have 2-4 ports for SATA. Why not build them with 12 ports?

    4. Re:SATA by ncc74656 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Windows XP doesn't play nice with Linux.

      The dual-boot WinXP/Gentoo box I'm using right now disagrees with you. I let LILO write itself to the MBR on /dev/hdb. The first block of /dev/hdb is then copied to a file on a floppy:

      mount -t vfat /dev/fd0 /mnt && dd if=/dev/hdb of=/mnt/bootsect.lnx bs=512 count=1 && umount /mnt

      Upon booting into WinXP, the flie is copied to c:\ and boot.ini is modified to add a Linux boot option...something like this is added after (or before) the WinXP boot option:

      c:\bootsect.lnx="Linux"

      On booting, the first thing you get is the NT boot loader, which gives you options for Linux or WinXP. If you select Linux, LILO takes over. If you select WinXP, it boots as it normally does.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  14. Bouncing balls... by Anonymous+Chicken · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...also known as "Beagle 2". I don't have to say which one this belongs to, do I?

    --
    This signature is intentionally left blank.
  15. Linux by Apreche · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Linux Kernel 2.6

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
  16. Longhorn by eyeball · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ok, technically it's not out this year, but they have started releasing beta copies to people.

    Right before windows XP came out, the majority of home/business users were finally 'getting it' -- they were figuring out the filesystem, the menus, etc.

    Then XP came out and turned their world upside down. Sure you can revert the theme and menus back to win2k, but I don't know anyone that has done that. Not to mention new features integrated into explorer, like CD burning and MP3 playing. Quite a steep learning curve for XP's majority users.

    Longhorn is going to come out, and users buying a new Dell or Gateway will get it automatically. Sidebars, and SQL data storage? Their world will be turned upside down once again.

    --

    _______
    2B1ASK1
    1. Re:Longhorn by happyfrogcow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Is this listed as a "worst" or a "best"? I'll assume "worst" in the context of slashdot, but it is irrelevant, so assume "best" if you want. Either way...

      Even though I'll be marked Troll, I have to say this is the dumbest thing I've read in the past week. Longhorn is nonexistant as a operating system. It is a concept in the minds of project managers, designers, and a few MS fanboys/girls. They have some work done, maybe some betas that do fandangly something-somethings, but imagine all the cancelling of features and unintended feature creep that will occur between now and it's released date of 2006(?). Anything that exists as "Longhorn" today, will bare only slight resemblance to the "Longhorn" that will be released "whenever". So if you are calling it a "best" then hold your guns, it could diminish into a pile of steaming poo in 2 years and not ever be released. if you are calling it a "worst", then also hold your guns. It could improve into a top-notch computer operating system by learning from mistakes of the past.

      Simply mentioning such a premature thing as the best/worst of 2003 it idiotic. Longhorn has not had any significant impact on anyone at all.

      "Then XP came out and turned their world upside down. Sure you can revert the theme and menus back to win2k, but I don't know anyone that has done that."

      I did exactly that on my parents machine. It wasn't hard. Most people who have used a previous version of windows to a moderate (daily) extent would be able to find information on how to go about doing so.

      "Longhorn is going to come out, and users buying a new Dell or Gateway will get it automatically"

      Have people you know buy locally. You'll get better support, better hardware and you can probably have them install whatever OS you want or do it yourself. "If it aint broke, don't fix it"

  17. DVD multiple formats... just have one! by samdaone · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just to touch on the other topic posted here about DVD burners the fact that there is multiple formats out has got to be the worst. I don't think the VHS/BETA fight took this long to figure out a winner. One format would help everyone in the long run and its about time we got to it!

    --

    Make me your friend. All my friends get +1 modifier and I need friends :)

    1. Re:DVD multiple formats... just have one! by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't think the VHS/BETA fight took this long to figure out a winner.

      The VCR format war lasted roughly from 1975 to 1985.

    2. Re:DVD multiple formats... just have one! by osgeek · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's this really cool news aggregation web site called Slashdot.

      I heard that it even has an article about how there are yet more competing standards for the next generation of DVD.

  18. Worst Technology. by dnahelix · · Score: 2, Troll

    Electronic Voting run by Republicans.

    --
    Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
    They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
    I Hate \.
  19. The Worst is Yet to Come by handy_vandal · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's too soon to judge the "worst technology of 2003". Whatever it is, we'll find out later, when the side-effects have made themselves known.

    Probably it's some bio-tech invention we haven't heard about, which is going to render us all sterile and hairless, several years from now.

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
    1. Re:The Worst is Yet to Come by biendamon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sterile? That I can deal with. But hairless.... Ye Gods, people! Think of the children! Bald children!

      Oh, wait...

  20. Best and Worst of Tech by strredwolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Best: Sharp Zaurus 5x00SL series Linux PDA's.

    Worst: Spammer Viruses

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
  21. TIA is not entirely dead -- it's being outsourced by GuyMannDude · · Score: 4, Informative

    I was reading an article in a recent issue of DefenseNews recently where they were reporting that a lot of TIA isn't being scraped, it's being given over to private contractors to perform. The feds still think it's a wonderful idea to track everything we do, they just don't want to so directly involved for political reasons. Private companies are not subject to these sorts of pressures and have considerable leeway on how much tracking of customer information they perform. So DARPA is looking to them to do most of the work and simply provide the government with the processed information.

    Remember folks, just because CNN says that TIA is over doesn't make it so, necessarily. The privacy vs. terrorist-defense war isn't over -- it's just beginning. And next time, the government won't be so bloody obvious about what it's trying to do.

    GMD

  22. Worst technology: Disposable Digital Camera by pimpbott · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Lemmie see if I got this straight. Inferior camera, none of the advantages of digital apply here, costs more than a disposable film camera.... what's the advantage again? Okay, I can see saving one use film strips, so it is 100% reusable, but that is the only benifit. OTOH, now that it can be hacked, there may be one benifit. A cheap digital that you can take in poor environemntal conditions and not feel bad about wrecking it. ALso, you can use it in situation where you know you will destroy it, such as taking close up pics of explosions, etc.

  23. MY 2 cents: by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Funny

    CmdrTaco's gently-used sex-toy emporium.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  24. EFI - worst technological idea by morelife · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Extensible Firmware Interface EFI

    Worst technology introduced. MS/Intel

    Replaces traditional PC BIOS and Consumer Rights simultaneously.

  25. Singing Fishes by Capt_Troy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm just glad this year passed without further proliferation of those damned singing plastic fishes.

  26. Best and Worst by supun · · Score: 4, Funny

    Best: Super Model Cloning Kit

    Worst: GE Bathtub Toaster ( fresh hot toast while you bathe )

    --
    :w!
    1. Re:Best and Worst by skryche · · Score: 4, Funny
      Best: Super Model Cloning Kit

      So: the concept here is... what? You clone a supermodel, raise her from infancy to adulthood, then have sex with her?

      That's pretty fucked up. (Not to mention the 18-year wait.)

    2. Re:Best and Worst by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Agreed, the latency is a bit a high but it's easy to increase troughput with very high level parallelism. Plus models need hardly any food.
      And you only have to wait 14-16 years(incidentally also the best age for natural self-replication) with models. Unless you prefer women in their prime (30 yrs.)
      Nevertheless, the ROI is huge even if only 1 out of 10 model clones make it Super.

  27. Worst Technology of 2003 by Fortunato_NC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd like to nominate the Longhorn hype machine for worst technology. All the press garnered by an OS we won't see until 2006 at the earliest is stupifying at best, and patently annoying at the worst.

    Plus, with OS X Panther, I have 95%+ of the Longhorn "Innovation" today - tell me why I should wait three years?

    --
    Blogging Weight Loss, Distance Education, and more at verlin.com
  28. The Best, the worst and the ugliest by MrsPReDiToR · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hardware central have a great review of the year here: http://www.hardwarecentral.com/hardwarecentral/edi torials/5139/1/ Personally I cant decide what I would class as the worst. There's plenty to praise and plenty to whine about.

    --
    It could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a warning to others.
  29. My Picks for Worst by Gudlyf · · Score: 5, Interesting
    • Segway -- Lots of hype for not a whole heck of a lot.
    • Camera-phones -- Some people may love this invention. I think it's just plain silly.
    • Smart ID WiFi Detector -- What use is this when it doesn't tell you if the AP is encrypted or not?
    • TurboTax 2003 -- When Intuit decided to put key info. in an "unused" portion of the boot block area, causing all sorts of crashes for customers, many who have now sworn off TurboTax for good. Nice one.
    --
    Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
    1. Re:My Picks for Worst by Total_Wimp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, I'll call you on the camera phone.

      Reason why I think it's one of the best inventions: I never seemed to have a camera around when I wanted one until now. And there are a lot of cool things you can do with a camera when one is around all the time.

      Cool things to do with camera phones:

      - Shopping in the "real world" and see something cool that you'd like to check out on-line later? No problem. Take a picture of the tag or box and you'll get the exact product number, etc without having to do a bunch of writing. Bonus points of those of you who send it to a friend and have him check on it while you're still in the store.

      - Also great for those things you need to show your wife before plunking down cash.

      - Screen shots for those error messages on non-networked-and-not-hooked-up-to-a-printer computers. I'm not kidding. It's great.

      - Not to mention the "screen shot" of the inside of that computer that's giving your brother-in-law so much trouble. "Yes, Bob, you really do need to hook up that other little wire for that new SATA drive to work".

      Camera phones rock. Once we get them to 2 mega pixels and beyond, they'll rock even more. It's amazing how much more useful some technologies can be when you give them just a little boost.

      TW

  30. Simultaneous - RFID tags by xC0000005 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The radio tags for billing/tracking. There's a technology with a lot of promise for being very, very cool, and at the same time, possessing vast potential for abuse.

    I can see the arms race now. RFID tags, RFID countermeasures.

    Stores selling things by RFID, and claiming countermeasures are the providence of theives (echos of RIAA, MPAA).

    Sigh.

    --
    www.voiceofthehive.com - Beekeeping and Honeybees for those who don't.
  31. Worst invention? by PierceLabs · · Score: 4, Funny

    The evidence SCO invented to claim ownership of Linux.

  32. I'm thinking Diebold voting machines by Kickstart70 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Removing democracy from the voters is about as bad as it gets.

  33. Re:Yeah But We WON by be-fan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, but we won the war.And most everyone is better off for it.
    -----
    I *hate* that argument. It's so stupid. Of *course* we won the war!!! We're the United States! Were we expecting to *lose*? It's like saying that the war was right because we found Saddam. Of *course* we found Saddam! We're the United States! Were we expecting not to find Saddam? Thinking that maybe one man would somehow elude the grasp of the most powerful nation on earth???

    We went to war over WMDs. We went to war because we were lead to believe that there was an immediate threat to the saftey of Americans. If there were no WMDs, than we went to war for the wrong reason, and that makes the war wrong, plain and simple.

    As for them being better off, that's an incredibly arrogant and paternalistic thing to say. Its their country. Let them run it. Don't assume that we are blessing them with our precious system of government, because honestly, they don't want it. Why do you think the reaction in Iraq has been: "thanks for getting rid of Saddam, now get the fuck out!" They don't want to become another America, plain and simple.

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  34. Gas powered children's toys by Stalus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I woke up on Christmas to little kids driving up and down the street on gopeds and mopeds outside my parent's house. At first I thought they were battery powered and didn't go very fast, but I was apparently wrong. They honk at each other and idle them outside, polluting the air in more ways than one. They fly down the road faster than anyone without traffic sense should be allowed. And people wonder why americans are generally overweight and unhealthy.

    So in evaluating technologies as best and worst, are there any personal feelings people rate these with? Personally I would say that improvements to communication and travel are good because it brings family and friends closer - 1200 miles doesn't seem as far as it used to, and it's a lot cheaper to get there (It was actually cheaper for me to drive home for Christmas than fly this year). On the other hand, people like my father refuse to use a self-propelled lawn mower because it forces him to get some routine exercise. He wouldn't say it's a bad technology, just not useful to him.

  35. Network Solutions DNS Search by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 4, Funny

    Shudder...

  36. haven't found the weapons; did find the victims by mschuyler · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Right. 250 mass grave sites have been reported and only 40 or so have been investigated so far:

    + 1983: 8,000 Kurds rounded up an executed

    + 1988: The "Anfal campaign" 180,000 Iraquis disappeared

    + 1986: Sarin, VX, and Tabun chemical weapons kill between 8,000 and 24,000 Kurds, injure thousands more. There are pictures of the attacks where you can see the gas over the villages and pictures of the victims, not to mention Iraqi documentation.

    + 1991: Tens of thousands of Shites killed

    + Iran-Iraq War: Up to 1 million dead. Numbers likely unknowable. Documented chemical attacks against Iranians. Iran estimates 60,000 affected.

    + 4000 Kurdish villages wiped off the map.

    + Human Rights Watch reports from 50,000 to 100,000 Kurds killed in the various attacks and purges over the years with 500,000 becoming refugees.

    + So far: 300,000 victims in mass graves. Some with hands tied behind their backs apparently buried alive.

    And we also have credible reports of medical experimentation, beatings, crucifxion, hammering nails into fingers and hands, amputating penis and breasts with an electric carving knife, spraying victim's eyes with insecticide, branding with a hot iron, raping children and wives in front of parents and spouse, nailing tongues to wooden boards, extracting teeth with pliers, cutting off of tongues, victims shredded in plastic shredding machines.

    Victims so far: approaching a million in a country with a population of something like 25 million.

    --
    How about a moderation of -1 pedantic.
    1. Re:haven't found the weapons; did find the victims by the+gnat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually you are not correct. One of the MANY reasons the U.S. and 60+ other allies declared war on Iraq was because of the weapons of mass distruction. The core reason the war came about was because of Iraq's unwillingness to comply with their U.N. agreement. Now I can't say that I blame them, because they got away without compliance for almost 9 years, and believed that the current administration would behave the same as the last.

      This is correct, and some liberal commentators said that the war was justified entirely on these grounds, without the phony "imminent threat" that the Bush administration cooked up.

      Perhaps the last administration didn't feel that a full invasion and nation-building was the appropriate way to respond, given that Hussein appeared to have been more or less neutered and Iraq was a far more advanced country than Kosovo or Somalia. (Look up the recent history of Kurdistan for an example of how continued Allied military presence kept Saddam in check.) It would, of course, be interesting to know why Saddam continued rebuffing the UN/US, if he didn't really have weapons.

      Another point for war was that it was shown that there is a connection between O.B.L. and Sadaam.

      Bullshit. This has still not been proven; the Mohammed Atta connection remains wishful thinking. The terrorists operating up near Kurdistan haven't been shown to be either linked directly with al Qaeda, or (as far as I know) directly supported by Saddam, and they certainly weren't operating outside of Iraq.

      Another point was that Iraq was training terrorist for use against the U.S. and it's friends.

      He was indeed supporting Palestinian terrorism on the side, but that's no justification for a US invasion. It certainly wasn't at the level of the Taliban hosting bin Laden. Hussein even had Abu Nidal, one of the founders of modern Islamic terrorism, killed because he became an embarassment.

      I'm very wishy-washy on this subject, and I certainly don't care for the chorus of leftists that keeps comparing Bush and Saddam and thinks it's all about oil. However, the retroactive justifications from the right sound more absurd each time I hear them. Answer the fucking question, don't make up excuses about how you really had other reasons all along.

      There are many places in the world where far worse human rights abuses occur (and where the US doesn't have as long a history of aiding or ignoring these issues, as HW Bush and Reagan did with Iraq); Congo and Sudan come to mind. I'd love to see us clean them up too, but I don't hear the neocons using those crises as a justification for invasion.

  37. It isn't even the best of 2003! by rtilghman · · Score: 3, Insightful


    I mean come ON, how many free rides does Apple get? I like Apple, they have great designers, but don't you think it's kind of retarded to give best invention/product to a product that is, in essence, just a rip off on numerous products already made? Not only that, but don't you think its a sad statement on Apple AND The industry if we give props to a program that is neither original nor all that great?

    I mean let's see here. First you have the annoying fact that iTunes is sooooooo horribly limited from a technology perspective. AIFF is the testicle sweat of codecs, AAC is just Apple's way of invading your womb, mp3 is a blind man's bluff, and (jump back) IT HAS WAV CAPABILITY. Hold the phones, get Sony circa 1982 on the phone, WE CAN RECORD A CD IN A 20 YEAR OLD FORMAT! Point is I don't consider a measly four options for codecs very good, especially when adding in the rest is literally point and click.

    But, you say, I have the iTunes store! You sure do partner, but its kind of a one way trip since AAC files are a pain to convert out of AAC (see capturing audio) and you can't shop anywhere else with iTunes. Yeah, nothing like the glorious method of using one product to force use of a second product, eh? Wait a second, that sounds like a similar plot I saw someone in Redmond try! ;)

    From just a format perspective, how about the fact that winamp5 has like 10 codecs (haven't looked, but it supports everything I've trried including WAV, MP3, OGG, FLAC, etc.). True, I like the iTunes interface a lot more, but the program itself is more robust in winamp than iTunes.

    So basically the grand point here is that unless you use an iPod iTunes isn't required reading, and while the program is snazzy it isn't necessarily the best and is definitely not original.

    -rt

    1. Re:It isn't even the best of 2003! by HeghmoH · · Score: 3, Informative

      iTunes uses QuickTime to play its files, meaning that it supports any file that QT supports, which is a hell of a lot. Not only that, but QT is very extensible, so third parties can add more formats. There's already an ogg plugin out there, and anybody who wanted to could make whatever they wanted. Although as far as I know, it only supports arbitrary QT formats for playback, not for encoding.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    2. Re:It isn't even the best of 2003! by lotsofno · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "iTunes is definitely the best in terms of overall quality and and ability"

      Sometimes, users get so attached to their product of choice, they don't even realize how much they've fallen victim to the company's hype machine. While yes, iTunes is regarded by many as a worthwhile music app, it'd be foolish to assume the rest of the world (especially those who've taken the time to explore other options and features) agrees.

      There's more to Winamp/Foobar/QCD/etc than just the number of codecs and a smaller download. The large margin between iTunes and other mp3-players is artificial, meant to downplay the features and hard work put into their competition. Have you really looked at Winamp 5? While it may not have it's own store, the media library is just as powerful if not more, and it's Internet TV implementation runs easier than I've seen with any other program (And of there's free pr0n, too). Throw in all the customization possibilities as opposed to iTunes limiting look, and the strong community support with plug-ins for nearly anything imaginable... It's hard to imagine this program not only uses drastically less resources than iTunes, but even Winamp 2x.

      I use iTunes on my Mac, but there are much better alternatives, in terms of "quality and ability," on the PC.

  38. OnStar for Both by DynaSoar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I nominate OnStar vehicle GPS system for both best and worst.

    Best because (among other uses) if your car gets ripped off, they can find it fast.

    Worst because it can be used as vehicle-embedded spyware.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  39. Re:Yeah But We WON by October_30th · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Actually, he's quite right.

    The most dangerous people in the human history have been those who have an unwavering right in their own righteousness. Hitler, Stalin, Jesus, several Popes and so on.

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  40. Re:THAT'S NOT A LINK, DUMBASS, THAT'S JUST A URL. by Total_Wimp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You are so very correct, yet I can't help but wonder if leaving off the "DUMBASS" might have helped.

    It is possible that if you had left off the "DUMBASS" the poster whom you corrected might have seen your post and thought, "hark, a link _would_ be more useful than a URL. I shall use that next time." Instead, with your technique, the poster might think, "Oh my, I am truly a DUMBASS. Since I can't do anything right I may as well not post at all... sniff," and we would miss the benefit of his knowledge.

    Thank you for your informative viewpoint, but please keep in mind that we all learn faster we use our polite voices. Have a nice day! :-)

    TW

  41. Abandonware, maybe by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Vaporware is a 'never has been'
    Abandonware is a 'had it, but sold/disposed/threw it out'.

    We know he had them, the UN knows he had them, *he* knew he had them. His Kurdish and Iranian victims certainly knew he had them.

    Go back a few years and ask Al Gore about Saddams WMD's. Ask Hans Blix. Ask Tom Daschle. Jaques Chirac. John Kerry. Madeline Albright. See what they say.
    They were all campaigning hard to go to war, because we knew (or they told us) that Saddam had, and was building more, WMD's. Now, because Bush says the same things and actually does something about it, suddenly it's all a falsehood. An 'illegal war'.
    Why weren't you yelling "vaporware" when Clinton attacked with those cruise missiles?

    The real question is...what happened to all that stuff? Did he, in fact, dispose of it? Well WTF didn't he provide unambiguous proof of that? Or is it merely buried out in the desert, like they did with some frontline aircraft.

    "It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
    --Sen Hillary Clinton, Oct 10, 2002
    "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
    --President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

  42. Politically Correct by Kenshin · · Score: 2, Funny
    Now I can only have ONE drive per bus?

    Hey, no worries about politically incorrect "master/slave" references anymore...

    --

    Does it make you happy you're so strange?

  43. Give me a GXX DXXXXX break! by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Time Magazine seems to have adjudged Steve Jobs' iTunes as the Invention of 2003.

    Steve Jobs is an asshole. His products are constantly being praised by the societal elite, but you know what? No one else cares! Apple has held a consistantly small market share for 15 years. The Apple faithful will continue to be, the rest of the world will continue to not care.

    Personally I think that iTMS is pretty cool, but so what? How is it the best technology of 2003?

    My vote would be for cheap ($100) dual format +R/RW & -R/RW DVD writers.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  44. UN makes resolutions about lots of things by billstewart · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I already modded myself down for off-topicness.

    If you're going to use UN resolutions as a justification for anything, please enforce them in numerical order.... The US's ally, Israel, has never complied with most of the UN resolutions about their denial of civil rights to Palestinian residents. There are probably UN resolutions that the US is in violation of, as well as International Criminal Court actions the US ignored about their mining of Nicaragua's harbors, which is an act of war.

    And besides, this isn't a UN war. That resolution was from the *old* UN, that did whatever the US told it to. The *current* UN has France and Germany in it, so this war was run by the Coalition of the Willing, which let the US do whatever they wanted to.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  45. Re:Windows 2003 by zbowling · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I would have to say your wrong on this point. Windows Server 2003 is the most complete Windows os to date. I'm not saying this because I'm pro MS in anyway, but the 2003 operating system is 100 times better then Windows 2000 and about 100 times better then XP (giving into the fact that XP is better then 2000 in many ways but opens many new problems that were are almost tottaly fixed in 2003). I enjoy the control and flow of 2003, and I praise them for locking it down in the install. This turned out to be a very valueable feature for our company that does Windows (as well as Linux and BSD) webhosting on both dedicated and shared systems (so we have 100s of machines to setup that we don't have to us an image system for that install right off the cd or over the lan without a hitch. Also as provider of distrubted LAN solutions for small to medium sized companies that can't afford full time IT departmarts, 2003 Server (including Small Biz Server 2003) simplifies setting up the distrubtied network and keeping it secure (all be it, it costs more for the hardware and software aspect to something that Linux could do with 5% of the resources required, but it still averages less then hiring someone full time).

    Windows Server 2003 has the ability to do things that previous versions couldn't even fathum from a programming aspect. The networking aspect is about a thousand times better with the ablity to (not super dooper but good anough that anyone with experience with routing couldn't work something to just make it work).

    Understand that I'm a born Linux user myself, and I end up installing Cygwin, Mozilla (Firebird mostly), GCC, Apache, PHP, Perl, TLC, and about a hundred other Linux tools on just about every windows machine I come across that I have to use for more then 10 minutes. I know that Windows has querks but I would rate it towards the top in this case.

    --
    No.
  46. SCO Doesn't Qualify by yintercept · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is about companies that actually create things...not law firms.

  47. BAD: Govt Surveillance by rueger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If there's one technological move that scares the bejeezus out of me it's the US government's rapid deployment of intrusive technology to monitor individuals, or to track their movements and actions.

    Whether it's Patriot Two, and the far reaching powers that it gives government agencies to snoop at just about anything you can think of in your life, or the fingerprinting and scanning of people entering or leaving the country, or the increasing use of things like EZ_Pass by law enforcement, it seems that overall this is probably the worst abuse of technology that we can imagine.

    Add to these the powers given to corporate interests by things like the DMCA, and it seems that technology is being used to strip away many, many fundamental rights that we should enjoy as citizens.

  48. the best technology is easy.. by kemster · · Score: 4, Funny

    Easily the best technology of 2003 was the Slashdot Dupe-Post-Checker(c). Using the up-to-now unknown technologies of "regular expressions" and "pattern matching", the wiz-kid staff at Slashdot was finally able to automatically check if a story had already been posted before.

    Oh wait, I'm getting ahead of myself.. that isn't due out until 2004, right? Or maybe it's just vaporware..

  49. Re:Yeah But We WON by IronicCheese · · Score: 2

    So they're not better off?

    - rape rooms
    - 300,000 dead spread over multiple mass graves
    - torture chambers

    Say what you will about the war and the bad planning of the aftermath, about the needless alienation of the world over the reasons for it and the often cynical rewarding of contracts for Iraq's reconstruction, but to assert that Iraq was better off under Saddam is to show that you're not thinking straight.

  50. Worst Tech of 2003? by gad_zuki! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Unencrypted wireless keyboards. Oh man, how did that get out of the gate?

    ActiveX Spyware. Looks like an official message from the OS, better click on it.

    MP3 players under 256 megabytes. Look ma! I have the convience of spending over 200 dollars for something that barely holds more music than carrying around a el-cheapo CD player and two CDs, plus with the added advantage of lossy compression!

    The Color T-Mobile sidekick. "Whoops, we screwed the pooch on licensing so we're going to remotely delete your games. Also, there is no software to download from developers. Enjoy your vendor lock-in!"

    Anything targeted at "business people." "Oh hi IT department. I saw a cool ad for this treo/PDAphone/speech2text/etc but I'm too stupid to read the instructions so lets setup a time where you can train me on the stupid stuff I can afford to buy every week and then never use again."

    Email to phone services. "Now I can get spam read to me by a computer voice on my cell phone!"

    "Speed-up" dial-up web proxies that cost almost as much as DSL. Geez people, just get the damn DSL line.

    Segway HT Has yet to revolutionize anything but has shown us how the media can be exploited for free advertising.

    Red Hat Linux.

    RH:Screw you guys, we're going corporate, you know, where the money is.

    ME:But, but I'll pay you for updates! In fact I do!

    RH:Too bad kid.

    Lindows. Worst. Name. Ever. Its like a Sonyo or a Magnetbox.

    Windows/Office activation. Pain for when you need to re-install and pushes people back to the 2000 products.

    Cellphone earpieces with hanging mics. You look like a crazy person talking to yourself. No really, you do.

    AGP 8x Thanks for making my old AGP cards obsolete and bringing back old PCI cards for PCs that don't need kick-ass 3D.

    Best tech:

    Alltheweb.com Google now has a kick-ass competitor.

    The T-mobile sidekick. Once you get over the vendor lock-in its the best mobile browser out there, sans java-script.

    The Treo600. Camera and all the palm apps you can handle and it plays MP3s.

    Google text-ads. This should be self-explanatory.

    Mandrake policy. Nice to see a distro care enough to say how long they're willing to support the product.

    Gnomemeeting. Its like a big geek party.

    DVD players that can play SVCDs. Finally.

    Adapative spam filters. Just golden.

    The Firebird/Thunderbird projects. Bye, bye IE/Outlook on windows.

    Wifi everywhere. Love it.

  51. The Worst List by Valen0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Here is my "worst" list:

    1. TIA/MATRIX/etc. - The last thing we need is a "democratic" government starting up 24/7 survelience on everyone. The whole scheme stinks of facist and police state policies.

    2. DRM/Palladium/Trusted Computing/etc. - This technology is appearing in more and more retail devices and computer software. When I buy devices or software, I expect them to work... Not lock me out because I might be some pirate.

    3. RFID Customer Products - This technology might be good for mass inventory scans, but it starts becoming scary when it starts being implemented in the retail product. I do not like the idea of my good broadcasting what they are to anyone that asks.

    --
    -Valen