Slashdot Mirror


Who Wants to be the Next Dell?

cybercomm writes "Tom's Hardware has a very interesting column regarding the future of beige-box manufacturers, such as Dell, gateway, Compaq, et all. I found this article really thought provoking, since the author has raised some really interesting issues, especially concerning the fact that the writer of the column compares reviewers to the lowest ring of the ladder, and asks one simple question: Instead of whining, why not do it? Why should you learn all the specs on the latest processor and slam the competition just because you may happen to own a P4? Why not start the same way that the Dell, Apple, Gateway, and other founders took by forming your own store, getting in touch with Asian suppliers who "are more than willing" to give you discounts, just so that they can get their foot in the lucrative N. American and European markets. Very interesting reading, that raises another what-if scenario (what if you succed and your business is based on Chinas' dragon CPU, XGI card, open-source OS...)."

345 comments

  1. beige boxes? by RiscIt · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can you still GET a beige box from dell these days?

    1. Re:beige boxes? by Brahmastra · · Score: 1

      All the Dell desktops are black boxes as far as I know

    2. Re:beige boxes? by rylin · · Score: 1

      We have some 90 Dell Dimension 8300 boxes here at work. Black & dark-grey are the only colors they come in, afaik.

    3. Re:beige boxes? by jkinz · · Score: 0, Informative

      In consumer computer products, a beige box is a generic personal computer -- thus, an Intel PC as opposed to a video game console, a Macintosh, or a Unix workstation. The term is also sometimes used to distinguish generic "clone" PCs from name-brand models such as Dell and Hewlett-Packard. Most generic PC cases are in fact beige in color.

    4. Re:beige boxes? by jkinz · · Score: 0

      http://www.wordiq.com/cgi-bin/knowledge/lookup.cgi ?title=Beige_box&PHPSESSID=25e972fe4b3820d98f88c5f 6f446e40c In consumer computer products, a beige box is a generic personal computer -- thus, an Intel PC as opposed to a video game console, a Macintosh, or a Unix workstation. The term is also sometimes used to distinguish generic "clone" PCs from name-brand models such as Dell and Hewlett-Packard. Most generic PC cases are in fact beige in color.

    5. Re:beige boxes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey idiot, everyone already knows that. These people are just joking around. It's amazing that not only did you totally miss the joke, but you posted essentially the identical reply to two different posts within the same thread.

    6. Re:beige boxes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an old Dell beige box (733 Mhz P-III). If you really want a beige box, I can sell it to you for $3000.

    7. Re:beige boxes? by rylin · · Score: 1

      That said, dell boxes are far from "generic".
      For instance, they have a dos (pc-dos, afaik) based boot-menu, license embedded in the bios and what not.

    8. Re:beige boxes? by Brahmastra · · Score: 1

      There is no DOS based boot menu. There is a boot menu but it has nothing to do with DOS. Why would a boot menu be DOS based?

    9. Re:beige boxes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Can you still GET a beige box from dell these days?

      Sure, but if you want one in blue you can simply double your estimate and get one from Apple AND a regular PC to actually run mainstream software on.

    10. Re:beige boxes? by Azadre · · Score: 1

      I am certian the Armada notebook from compaq has a dos boot up.

    11. Re:beige boxes? by swein515 · · Score: 1

      The actual joke is that the original poster, RiscIt, wasn't being rhetorical when he asked if Dell still produces beige boxes; he was asking seriously.

      That being said, whatever.

    12. Re:beige boxes? by chiph · · Score: 5, Funny

      You can, but you have to speak Hindi in order to place your order.

      Chip H.

    13. Re:beige boxes? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1
      Can you still GET a beige box from dell these days?

      Any beige box as long as it's black.
      Or black and silver.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    14. Re:beige boxes? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > I am certian the Armada notebook from compaq has a dos boot up.

      Fortunately, for rylin, he was talking about Dells. Not Compaqs.

  2. is it just me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Or is THW paying /. to link to all their articles? It seems anything submitted is approved...

    1. Re:is it just me by jrrl · · Score: 1

      Like, Oh My Gawd! Tom's Hardware is the next Geeklaw!

      --
      Self Serving Sig: Hosting Comparison
    2. Re:is it just me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems anything submitted is approved...

      How do you know which submissions are not approved?

  3. it could work by lotas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    i have seen some of these white box laptop systems. all you have to do is put in a hard drive, ram and os. some come with CPUs already. if you did something like this and sold it cheap enough, you could get your foot in the student laptop market. same with pcs them selfs. interesting idea. now for a business plan......

    --
    Lotas T Smartman www.lotas-smartman.net
    1. Re:it could work by kfg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Buy low, sell high.

      It really doesn't get much more complicated than that when dealing with commodity goods. The rest is just fluff for the VCs and investment bankers.

      But when doing something like this take the article's advice. Don't involve the VCs and investment bankers. Do it from the garage or basement. Scrape up whatever funds you can from your own signature, friends and family.

      Buy some stuff. Sell it. Roll over the profits into more stuff. Sell some. Rinse and repeat.

      Sleep on one of the folding tables you build systems on and eat Ramen noodles for a few years. It's a good experience and gives you stories to annoy the hell out of your grandchildren with. Earn your way up instead of borrowing it.

      It really is as simple as just doing it. My last brick and mortar was three months from conception to opening day, starting with nothing in my pocket but a few hundred bucks and credit card with a $1000 limit.

      I didn't write a business plan and have it bound in leather, or spend the next 5 years shopping the plan about. I Just did it.

      You can too.

      KFG

    2. Re:it could work by mprinkey · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have to agree here. My partner and I started a successful business right out of grad school doing consulting work and building clusters. We did it without VC funding and haven't really needed to borrow much along the way except to buy parts for larger projects when we couldn't fund it internally. This will not make you Bezos rich, but it isn't a bad life. Honestly, I don't know how much faster I would want to grow. More money means more headaches. Just being comfortable and busy is good enough for me.

    3. Re:it could work by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      if you did something like this and sold it cheap enough, you could get your foot in the student laptop market.

      A G4 iBook starts at $999 (student discount price) and is the best student laptop on the market hands-down. How are you going to compete with Apple? For even bigger cheapskates there are the $699 deals on Dell laptops. You just can't touch that if you're a startup and intend to make a profit (you know, that thing that helps pay for you to eat and sleep in a warm comfortable home at night?).

    4. Re:it could work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Kentucky Fried Gopher"?

    5. Re:it could work by kfg · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm a vegetarian. I grow much of my own produce. I don't follow traditional farming/gardening techniques. I sow a small number of plants and tend to each one by hand as if it were a valuable, prize winning rose.

      I grow some really, really nice veggies.

      As a result it seems as if every gopher within a 20 mile radius has heard of me and decided my yard is the place to live. It became a real problem.

      But then I had a realization:

      I'm growing the plants for me to eat. I don't get to eat my plants because the gophers are eating them instead. Well, that means that, in essence, the gophers are my plants.

      Problem solved. Would you like extra crispy or regular recipe?

      KFG

    6. Re:it could work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does KFG stand for Kentucky Fried Gopher?

    7. Re:it could work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course not, you moron. Where did you get that idea?

    8. Re:it could work by shaitand · · Score: 1

      You can if your laptops come pre-loaded with linux. May you don't have the market share potential out of the gate that windows companies have. But you'll have very little competition and literally millions of interested customers who won't mind paying a couple bucks more for something that works right. Of course the key is to get slashdotted, there could be no cheaper advertising than clicking submit.

    9. Re:it could work by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Lack of a good linux laptop is the reason I don't have one now. The $699 cheapo at Best Buy would fit my needs, but it doesn't have a third mouse button, (there is space for it, and it looks like linux laptop venders have higher end models with that third button.) I'm not sure if the hardware is compatable, and I don't want to pay a MS tax. (well I do, but only so I can work from home with that machine, I don't use windows for my personal use)

      All the linux laptops I've seen are a lot more than that.

      There is a market. I however cannot tell you if the market is big enough to make it worth your while. I can't even promise I will buy, the trip I wanted the laptop for is over. I'd still like that machine, but I don't need it again.

    10. Re:it could work by shfted! · · Score: 1

      You are definitely the funniest, and one of the wisest people on slashdot. I wish I had the honour of knowing you.

      --
      He who laughs last is stuck in a time dilation bubble.
    11. Re:it could work by lotas · · Score: 1

      personally, i wouldent try an compete with apple. i actually would like an apple laptop my self, but not a lot of people would go for an apple because its not windows. this could be a problem for starting a company since i wouldent be selling windows either.

      --
      Lotas T Smartman www.lotas-smartman.net
    12. Re:it could work by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      I don't know anything about laptops but do keep in mind that modern 2 button wheel mouse often have the wheel as a 3rd button. That's how my desktop PC is right now. Two buttons in appearance but the wheel can be clicked and so is really a three button mouse.

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    13. Re:it could work by kfg · · Score: 1

      I wish I had the honour of knowing you.

      The wonder of the internet is that, at least in some limited sense, you do.

      And vice versa I might add.

      KFG

    14. Re:it could work by bluGill · · Score: 1

      The subject is laptops though. My wheel mouse does have the third button as the wheel. A few laptops have a "wheel" slider on the touch pad, but AFAIK, few have a third button there.

  4. Store? by Brahmastra · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Why not start the same way that the Dell, Apple, Gateway, and other founders took by forming your own store, getting in touch with Asian suppliers who "are more than willing" to give you discounts, just so that they can get their foot in the lucrative N. American and European markets
    Dell's business model is successful because they don't have a store. The computers are made only after they are ordered. Opening up a store defeats the purpose of the Dell inventory model
    1. Re:Store? by tonyray · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I own one of the oldest computer stores in North America - we started in the Spring of 1982 - and we have been building White Boxes since 1985. We have seen a lot of Dells and Gateways come and go over that time.

      The big weakness of such companies is their size and thin margins. These companies cannot take a sales hit for any reason without bleeding red ink all over the place. Lets face it, cheap Packard Bells killed Leading Edge, ..., cheap Compaq's killed Gateway and Micron, cheap HP's killed Compaq, cheap eMachines killed HP, cheap Dells killed eMachines and cheap what is going to kill Dell? Oh yah, some of these companies still exist but they will either be sold to someone else, find specialized nitches or the product lines simply dropped.

      Many of these companies helped in their own demise. After a while they found they had to support the cheap c**p they sold and that is expensive, very expensive. When you are growing rapidly and most your computers out there are right out of the box, it seems manageable. But when sales start peeking and machines start aging it becomes a real problem, an expensive problem. (Why do you think Dell has moved it's customer support to India?) These companies' heydays rarely last more than 2-3 years.

      And selling White Boxes? Well, we can sell twice the machine a similarly priced Dell sells for - so Tom is right. And we can save people's data if the HD starts going bad - something the Dell's won't even try. But frankly, most people can't see value when it is staring them in the face. So everytime a new Dell comes along, sales slump and then steadily grow as people become disenchanted. Then another Dell comes along and it starts all over again. Few people ever learn. Even people who have bought our computers will buy a Dell, eventually admit their mistake and buy another of our computers. But they bought the hype and the Dell anyway. They can't tell the difference until after the sale. And they'll do it again, you can bet on it.

      So, if you want to be big, at least for a couple years, put a fast processor in the cheapest (slowest) box you can find and pay the pc magazines to rave about your box and company. Stuff your money in a foreign bank account and close the company as soon as repairs exceed profits.

      But I have a question for you all. People don't believe a small store can match or beat the big boys for value even though they can easily do it. So people don't even ask or look. If we advertise like they do, then we would have to sell the same c**ppy computers. So what is the solution? You might say "amazing support" (which we have) but the average person doesn't think about support until they need it - after the sale. So, what is the solution?

      ** For those of you who take things too literally, I'm using the word "Dell" to represent any company that has reached the top, however short that stay was.

    2. Re:Store? by TClevenger · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I used to work for the 'local' computer store. People would come in and I would spend an hour with them, explaining processors and video cards, hard drives and options. They would get a price quote and leave.

      A week later, I'd get a call on the phone. The user got his machine from Walmart because it was a couple hundred dollars cheaper, and now he's having a problem with it, and would I help him out over the phone.

      No thanks.

    3. Re:Store? by Dragoon412 · · Score: 1
      But I have a question for you all. People don't believe a small store can match or beat the big ... after the sale. So, what is the solution?

      *sigh*

      I had a long, thorough reply typed out, and then kicked the reset button my my PC...

      In short, I'll offer these suggestions (based solely on my experiences, so take 'em for what they're worth). Keep in mind, I've never run a store, but I spent my college years building PCs and small networks for beer money, and have seen dozens of shops come and go.

      First off, while your store may be different, local stores are rarely ever competetive on price. It seems to be due a lack of small stores revising the costs of hardware as subsequently faster hardware becomes available. Because of this, prices seem to go up and up and up, while older hardware never comes down in price. For instance, I've seen many cases of previous-generation video cards with higher price tags than the current generation's analogue occupying the same shelf space.

      Second, many local stores seem to stock sub-par products, and do so almost exlcusively. In one case, a local store stocked nothing but those big, ugly, cheap-feeling Kensington pointers, and then had the nerve to charge even more than their competitors did for higher-quality products from Microsoft and Logitech. Another store I visited (and sadly purchased from) carried nothing but ECS and no-brand mainboards. They offered to order an Abit mainboard for me, and quoted it at ~$250, when the exact same mainboard was going for a little over $150 on GameVE.

      Finally, local stores don't seem to understand their customers. Their stock is too low-quality to attract enthusiasts, too expensive to attract regular builders or bargain hunters, and their almost inevitably snotty sales staff, deluded into thinking their A+ certifications are worth a damn, have a tendancy to irritate the hell out of real geeks, and treat the laymen - the people who'd otherwise just be buying Dells - like they're unworthy of even setting foot in the store. ...okay, maybe that's a bit of an exaggeration, but honestly, buying a PC can be an intimmidating experience for someone that's not very knowledgable about them, and very few exployees I've seen in local stores seem to understand that.

      I guess in closing that what I'm saying is that even if your store does everything right, so many other stores do so many things wrong that I honestly do think that good service, friendly staff, high-quality components, and happy customers who tell their friends about you are the only way to go. I know that, given my past experiences with local PC stores, I don't even bother anymore. I go straight to GameVE and NewEgg, but if a friend recommended a local store to me, I'd definitely be willing to check it out.
    4. Re:Store? by emptybody · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you needed to modify your pre-sales techniques.

      Did your store only help people with gear bought from you? I doubt it.

      You should have given the information - to a point - other wise they start to feel they are "experts" and can do it all themselves.

      A person gets a used car. Goes to a mechanic. Talks about the problems. gets a quote. does the work themselves and it doesn't work. comes in for help. the repair of the repair will most likely cost more.
      Why?
      Because the mechanic must now clean up the problems that the owner did to their gear.

      Same for most other "mechanic" businesses.

      Be honest and upfront. Fix their problem. Tell them why it costs more from you than from wallmart or dell.

      The components can come from anywhere. They are not buying only components. They are buying reputation too.

      --
      comment directly in my journal
    5. Re:Store? by sosegumu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, we can sell twice the machine a similarly priced Dell sells for - so Tom is right. And we can save people's data if the HD starts going bad - something the Dell's won't even try.

      I agree. I operate a small business that provides networking and data solutions to small-to-medium-sized businesses. A fairly small part of our business is providing new computers. Our computers are all assembled using high-quality components and cases, we benchmark and burn in all systems, we neatly cable tie and/or use plenum to make the inside of the unit look nice and to maximize airflow, we use round IDE and floppy cables, etc...

      When I look inside any mass-produced system, including Dell, I think it looks like somebody dropped a pound of spaghetti into the case.

      We can match or beat Dell's price and provide a much better value, but they seem to have some folks brainwashed.

      The thing is, if someone is a mindless Dell zealot, I won't even sell them a system. I'm not falling into that trap. Because, if something goes wrong with a Dell, it's because something just went wrong with it. If something goes wrong with the system I built, it's because it's not a Dell.

      Which is okay, because like you said, let them try to get Dell to transfer over their critical data or pick over their bug-infested registry. Quite frankly, that's a more profitable business and far less troublesome.

      --
      It's easier to wear the spandex than to do the crunches. --David Lee Roth
    6. Re:Store? by operagost · · Score: 1

      You left a step in there righty after Packard Bell killing Leading Edge. I guess it's because Packard Bell wasn't killed by anything by their reputation for making the poorest quality product and not supporting it. They've been dead for years and I can still bring up the name and get shudders from most of the people in a room.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    7. Re:Store? by ddt · · Score: 1

      A couple suggestions, Tony:

      1. For one, don't put interesting posts on slashdot without a URL next time. Hits + non-zero conversion rate = sales. I couldn't even find your e-mail address.

      2. Artwork. Everyone overlooks how much "pretty" sells. Look at gateway's cow theme or Dell's slick site and case designs. Artists are absurdly cheap. Contract them. Don't have an ugly store or ugly boxes or ugly website or ugly ads. Technology goes out of date fast, but gorgeous artwork does not.

      3. Offer free home consultation to anyone with any kind of computer. When you're there, if you see a responsible sales opportunity, take it. If you see crap hardware, then pull up reviews of that crap hardware from Google, and rub their noses in their mistakes.

    8. Re:Store? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Buddy of mine bought a white-box CDROM the other day. It was an 8X drive with a Packard Bell label.

      Good thing it was really, really cheap. : )

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    9. Re:Store? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yup been there done that. the problem is in the quote process. you can't let that quote leave the store - period. that represnts too much of your time and experience they are getting scott free. There's fees for quotes on home building or repair why not computers? that's right, charge em for the help and quote and take that fee out of their price to buy the pc if they buy itfrom you. for what its worth though theres more money in service work anyway so you could almost let em bye anyway from whereever you don't make any money on pc parts these days anyway people won't pay the markup you need to do to make a profit.

    10. Re:Store? by Blackneto · · Score: 1

      Finally, local stores don't seem to understand their customers. Their stock is too low-quality to attract enthusiasts, too expensive to attract regular builders or bargain hunters, and their almost inevitably snotty sales staff, deluded into thinking their A+ certifications are worth a damn, have a tendancy to irritate the hell out of real geeks, and treat the laymen - the people who'd otherwise just be buying Dells - like they're unworthy of even setting foot in the store. ...okay, maybe that's a bit of an exaggeration, but honestly, buying a PC can be an intimmidating experience for someone that's not very knowledgable about them, and very few exployees I've seen in local stores seem to understand that.

      Very well put. I usually buy from the local stores for a customer because I'm not a reseller. I've been that route and don't like it. All my work is pure service.
      I deal with one store almost exclusively now for emergency NIC's, Drives and the like. The reason for this is the other stores would try to talk me out of what I wanted or gave me difficulty with a return.
      But when it's time for my own non-emergency stuff I won't even buy from the store I like. Even including shipping I can get a better deal from NewEgg.
      I've talked with them about this and they know it's a problem. They make money on bench repairs, not hardware.
      Kudo's to them for making it work. It's not easy.

      --
      Ursula Andress, Catherine Deneuve, and Charo, twice...
    11. Re:Store? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have bought and used (biz and home)nine machines over the last few years.
      - 2 from a nearby computer store (white box)
      - 2 toshiba laptops
      - 1 compaq laptop
      - 4 dells

      The machines with most problems (SW and HW) have been the whiteboxes. The ones with no problems have been the dells.
      At the end the most expensive ones have been the white boxes both in terms of failed HW and time wasted with SW incompetabilities.
      I have learned my lesson and will never ever touch the whitebox c**P

    12. Re:Store? by ingenuus · · Score: 1

      I agree. I really want to support my local independent computer builders / store, but after a few bad experiences (buying computers containing irreparably buggy or incompatible hardware), the lack of useful support, and average prices (at best) I've decided to avoid them as well (at least the ones I've already tried... though now I'm even skeptical of new ones).

      It's a shame, really, since I'm willing to pay a little more for the convenience of having an honest, good, and knowledgeable builder near me.

    13. Re:Store? by facelessnumber · · Score: 1

      That's a pretty messed-up attitude I think.. It's like saying over the years you've bought two Fords, two Hondas, a Toyota and four Nissans, then saying you've learned a lesson about American cars. That all Chyslers and Chevys suck because your Pinto and Festiva did. "White Boxes" can be damn near anything. I can hop online and build a machine so shitty it would put a Packard Bell to shame, or I can build a G5-killer. I could even use the same case for both. Are they both crap because they're "White Boxes?"

    14. Re:Store? by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      Your store has been around almost 20 years, so you seem to know what you are doing.

      However, I've dealt with local computer shops a couple of times and had lots of little problems that make me hesitant to try it again.

    15. Re:Store? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > When I look inside any mass-produced system, including Dell, I think it looks like somebody dropped a pound of spaghetti

      Don't know which Dell you are looking at, but All of them I have seen (Optiplexes) are very clean inside, with the ribbon cables running entirely along flat surfaces, perfect length, and held in place by those black cardboard-like things.

      > The thing is, if someone is a mindless Dell zealot, I won't even sell them a system

      So, instead of selling them a good computer, you send them BACK to Dell? Not very good business sense...

      No, Dell will not transfer all of your old files. If they did that, they would have to also transfer all the programs you need to view those files. To keep in line with licensing, they would have to rewove them from your old Hard Drive as well (assuming commercial software). Sure, you could use open-source alternatives, but the user will complain that you deleted their program. If the luser stored files in strange locations (you know it happens ALL THE TIME) and Dell didn't find them, they would get all pissed off that "Dell deleted my files!" No, unless a business has an actual tech shop in your area, I would never even suggest that they transfer data for the users. That's a horribly stupid idea, and to think you say that is part of their downfall means you haven't thought long enough about it.

      I don't know you, but you sound like an automatic anti-Dell zealot.

    16. Re:Store? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > rub their noses in their mistakes.

      That's a guaranteed way to never again get money from that person or anyone they know. Users do not like to be reminded that they are idiots, especially when they really are. The rest of your ideas, however, are pretty good.

    17. Re:Store? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Store" is not a figure of speech. There really are specific business facilities called "stores" that let customers browse a collection of retail goods (even the name derives from "storage"). Dell is well known for excluding this from their business model, and if their marketers claim they have any stores, they're lying.

    18. Re:Store? by sosegumu · · Score: 1

      Don't know which Dell you are looking at, but All of them I have seen (Optiplexes) are very clean inside, with the ribbon cables running entirely along flat surfaces, perfect length, and held in place by those black cardboard-like things.

      You got me there (mea culpa)--I really haven't seen the innards of any of their most recent offerings. To be fair, I really ought to have a look inside of a new one before I shoot of my mouth, but I must say that the ones I have seen are nowhere near as pretty as the ones we produce.

      I don't know you, but you sound like an automatic anti-Dell zealot.

      Not at all--my notebook is a Dell Latitude X300. And really, if I had to pick from the mass-produced units out there, I would probably choose a Dell.

      But maybe I didn't word my diatribe carefully enough--I'm not against Dell or any other brand; I'm just saying that we build a better box for the same amount of $.

      So, instead of selling them a good computer, you send them BACK to Dell? Not very good business sense...

      As for my business sense, you seem to be a nice enough and intelligent enough of a person, so I will just assume that you aren't presumptuous enough to think that you know my own particular business, that I have been doing for many, many years better than I do.

      I will try to explain why I don't try to change minds. The very reason we don't try sell our machines to Dell zealots is that I have learned from experience that if someone has a fixation on a particular brand of product, whether it's a Dell, a BMW, or jewelry from Tiffany's, they're just not going to be satisfied with anything else but that brand, and will tend find fault with other brands.

      Case in point: a friend of mine who is a John Deere zealot bought a John Deere string trimmer for $189, even though a mutual friend of ours showed him that it was actually a Homelite with a green and yellow cowling instead of a red one. Exactly the same. Although the Homelite retails for $99, he bought the John Deere, because 'nothing runs like a Deere.'

      That's a horribly stupid idea, and to think you say that is part of their downfall means you haven't thought long enough about it.

      I never said that Dell should do data transfers, and I certainly never said that it would be 'part of their downfall.'

      Dell appears to be a pretty good company, and obviously their market strategy has been working pretty well or they wouldn't be where they are. My one and only point is that I think that we produce a better computer for the money.

      --
      It's easier to wear the spandex than to do the crunches. --David Lee Roth
    19. Re:Store? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > My one and only point is that I think that we produce a better computer for the money.

      I am sorry. I've become hardened by /. and in posts I see pissed-off/bitter tones where they are not.

    20. Re:Store? by sosegumu · · Score: 1

      You are so right. There are a couple of little 'mom-and'pop' computer stores in our area that sound exactly like what you're talking about.

      That's why we don't operate a retail storefront--it's too much overhead to keep products in stock that are almost perishable in nature. And sometimes it's cheaper for me buy certain hardware (sometimes memory, printers, monitors) from Sam's Club or Best Buy than from my distributors, so I can't compete on components for DIY types like yourself.

      But what we sell isn't hardware--we sell hope. Most non-technical small businesses who can't afford an IT department are very frustrated by computers and networks. As often as not, their stuff isn't working well and they know that it's costing them money. They're not looking for the lowest price--they're looking for someone to partner with them and help them to make good decisions about technology. They're usually more interested in response time and good service than in trying to shave a few nickels off of the price.

      --
      It's easier to wear the spandex than to do the crunches. --David Lee Roth
  5. Margin by codepunk · · Score: 4, Informative

    You see the problem with hardware is all about margin. Unless you are moving a huge amount of goods you will loose your ass. Software on the other hand is all margin, big profit ratio's. Why do you think so many restarants go out of business? Small margins, same goes for grocery stores.

    --


    Got Code?
    1. Re:Margin by Tyten · · Score: 1, Informative

      that's exactly right. at our store, we only make approx $100~$200 on a PC we sell. service is our big profit maker, at $50 an hour. Software and power supplies we're able to sell at %200 cost.

    2. Re:Margin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ugh, it pisses me off that for the price of a good power supply, I can get the same power supply in a good case.

    3. Re:Margin by brejc8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You take advantage of the things that you do have. As a single person you do not have the buying power but you do have a much better reaction speed to waht the market wants. Make opteron machines, they are what people want but Dell etc haven't realised that yet. Make fully custom setups (PC/Linux based DVR's, Fileservers to sleep in the other roomand run P2P). Big companys take ages toreact to market forces. Look at IBM, they fell behind simply because they were huge.

    4. Re:Margin by wfberg · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You see the problem with hardware is all about margin. Unless you are moving a huge amount of goods you will loose your ass. Software on the other hand is all margin, big profit ratio's. Why do you think so many restarants go out of business? Small margins, same goes for grocery stores.

      While it's true that the margin on hardware is virtually nothing, your average restaurant will be worrying more about turn-over than margin; the bulk of costs for a restaurant is in the fixed costs (i.e. renting a place, taxes, employees, fresh ingredients that you have to stock in case people do show up, but that expire quickly whether they do show up or not).

      Ever notice how just about every "meal" at a fast food restaurant costs about the same? That's because they're in the business of extracting $5 per visitor rather than being interested in the exact margin on stuff. That's also why fries and a coke are thrown in their meals for a relatively low price, and they cost a lot more separately -- it's all about discouraging sub-par revenue customers. (Grocery stores (or Fast Moving Consumer Goods Retailers as they like to call themselves) have things slightly better than restaurants in that they sell a lot of non-perishables as well - stocking more and more non-food items has been an ongoing trend in supermarkets and grocers' for ages now).

      Of course, fixed costs are also a big barrier to entry for any would-be competitors of Dell. Spending a few million here and there to set up a plant and do distribution is peanuts to Dell since they're shipping insanely large volumes, so even relatively large fixed costs translate to a small cost-per-unit. Plus, they can get volume discounts from OEMs. Without a large initial investment it's pretty hard to suddenly gain such a big market share that you can compete with the economies of scale that Dell enjoys. Dell is the Wallmart of PC systems.

      Added value is the only way to go for smaller would-be competitors; e.g. better after sales service, warrantees, real life expert human salespeople, full-service-one-stop deployment, etc. Of course, it may well turn out that it's cheaper for you to only offer the added value and buy the systems themselves from Dell!

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    5. Re:Margin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I certainly wouldn't want to 'loose' my ass.

    6. Re:Margin by spideyct · · Score: 1

      Your message is accurate (a single person can react to specific customer demands better), but your supporting evidence is flawed.

      1) Just because Dell doesn't sell an Opteron machine, doesn't mean they haven't realized there is *SOME* demand. There are probably more factors involved (and they probably involve deals with Intel).

      2) I emphasized *SOME* because it is a pretty wild statement to claim the general population is clamoring for Opteron machines. In fact, I think if asked 20 random people if they would like an Opteron machine, at least 19 would probably ask "what the heck is an Opteron?"

    7. Re:Margin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although I've heard people say this before, I really have a hard time believing that restaurants are a low margin business. Agricultural and wholesale food prices have been steadily going down over the years (or at the very least have been increasing at a rate far less than inflation), and the only restaurant employees that make a decent wage are the ones paid mostly in tips. Yes, there are the fixed costs like rent, utilities, advertising, etc. But when you are selling things at an 800% markup, possibly even more than that for liquor sales, how can you not be rolling in money? My opinion is that the reason a lot of restaurants go under is because a lot of people who open them have no idea how to run a restaurant.

    8. Re:Margin by brejc8 · · Score: 1

      I only mentioned the opteron machines as they do have a large margin.

    9. Re:Margin by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      But the most expensive part of your cheeseburger is actually making it! the burger itself is cheap. figure even a minimum wage worker really costs $10+ per hour after you add taxes, work comp, etc...If you have a staff of 6 workers that means you need to sell 60 $1 burgers just to pay for them to stand there...then sell some more for overhead, LICENSE fees, rent, etc...

      That said, too much retailing in general is after the "walmart" model of selling way to close to the break even point and opening stores everywhere. many of the corps in involved in the resturant business started opening stores just like walmart in every little town...but those stores don't actually make enough profits to justify being there [actual profits per store have fell by alomost half in real $$ in the last 10 years!]...but it's the workers/ franchisers at the stores that take the brunt...the corps get the license/accounting/rent fees "off the top" whether the store actually makes a profit or not. Most chains business models are about real estate and licensing, not actually selling stuff!

      The joke of "walmart" is that it creates deflation! After all, if the workers make less real money, then the stores have to sell cheaper and cheaper to sell stuff to them. It's the dirty secret of the "recession"...it wasn't a recession at all, but an attempt by the fed and wall street to prevent their stock portfoilos from going down approperiately like everyone else's paychecks did! After all, when interest rates went down faster than the fed rate, you know you have problems. But figure that $100K actually buys MORE right now than 2-3 years ago and that's deflation...the top cats just want to make more $$ and buy more stuff and ignore that!

    10. Re:Margin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To your mention of just buying the systems themseleves from Dell....

      Dell offers a program for exactly what you are talking about. It is designed to sell fully built, unbranded machines to small businesses. The businesses then can add value through service, add-ons or whatever they believe their customers want, and resell the machine as their own. This keeps the "little guys" from having to get invloved in the mess of margins on part prices and sell to the customers who would prefer to buy from a smaller more personal establishment. Dell likes it of course because they get to sell to a market which they may not have been able to sell to normally.

    11. Re:Margin by operagost · · Score: 1

      Taxes aren't added to a wage- they're subtracted from it. Haven't you looked at your paycheck recently? If you're in the USA, you also get a W-2 at the end of the year that tells you how much was withheld. The only stuff an employer has to shell out on top of the wage is any benefits (which is purely their option) and possibly unemployment compensation or workmen's comp, as you said.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    12. Re:Margin by ordinarius · · Score: 1

      Ever notice how just about every "meal" at a fast food restaurant costs about the same? That's because they're in the business of extracting $5 per visitor rather than being interested in the exact margin on stuff. That's also why fries and a coke are thrown in their meals for a relatively low price, and they cost a lot more separately -- it's all about discouraging sub-par revenue customers.

      What are you talking about? A fast food restaurant buys coke syrup by the gallon for something like $4. A large coke contains about $0.09 of syrup. Unless you're going to get 15 "free" refills of your drink they're still going to make money off of you. There's absolutely nothing to discourage anyone from going into a fast food restaurant and buying *just* a coke. Of course they want to entice you to buy more. But they are most definitely not losing money.

      The french fries are even worse, I think they're the highest margin item in the store. Read _Fast Food Nation_ by Eric Schlosser. Its in your local library, and at Amazon etc. He goes into detail on most aspects of the fast food business. Its not pretty. The last couple chapters on the meat processing industry will have you swearing off burgers for a good long time. I still haven't been able to eat beef since I read that book. And it'll put the current Mad Cow issues in perspective.

    13. Re:Margin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems to have worked out OK for this guy.

    14. Re:Margin by wfberg · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? A fast food restaurant buys coke syrup by the gallon for something like $4. A large coke contains about $0.09 of syrup. Unless you're going to get 15 "free" refills of your drink they're still going to make money off of you. There's absolutely nothing to discourage anyone from going into a fast food restaurant and buying *just* a coke. Of course they want to entice you to buy more. But they are most definitely not losing money.

      No, they are in fact horrendously overcharging you on coke, hoping you might opt for a full meal instead, so they make their $5-a-visitor target.. It's all about the average revenue per user (arpu) - which is a very trendy figure to report if you're a telecomms company these days.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    15. Re:Margin by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      Actually, Social security, medicare, unemployment, workers comp....are all added additionally to your employer's share based on your wage...that's money they spend that you don't ever see on your W-2. Generally, they figure 1.5-2x your per hour wage as what the company actually pays out for you.

  6. The markets are wide open.. by Tirel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Enthusiast sites helped to widen up the market for Asian suppliers, of which there are many, many more waiting in the wings to get into the lucrative North American and European markets. These supplies are hungry. They can feed hungry White Box vendors, but I grant that White Box vendors have to contend with the general ignorance of the people.

    The people like Gateway, and the sound of those Intel chimes. They fear computers and the big Tier One OEMs feed on that fear.

    1. Re:The markets are wide open.. by jkinz · · Score: 0

      So does anyone have a pointer to a web site, email list or news group which makes it easy to contact large numbers of the asian suppliers who have business reps here in the US? I have been able to find a few companies which export components or systems from the Pacific rim but none who do so at a cost which allows you to build/assamble systems more cheaply than you can buy them from the high volume PC marketers. How about it? Anyone got a pointer? Lets see whats possible!

    2. Re:The markets are wide open.. by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 3, Interesting
      They can feed hungry White Box vendors, but I grant that White Box vendors have to contend with the general ignorance of the people.

      Please don't underestimate the ignorance of the people either. Aside from reasonable prices your next biggest item should be the best tech support money can buy. Without good tech support people will just go elsewhere. You WILL get people calling you that don't understand how to plug in their color-coded cables or even how to turn it on even though it's clearly explained in a 3 foot by 3 foot fold out poster in very simple pictographs. This isn't 1990 when most of the people using computers were either businesses with support personnel or very techie home users who were used to dealing with DOS and drivers, boot disks, config.sys, etc. The majority of people today using computers are complete and utter morons. That is the problem with success: Once you've exhausted your techie base you're left with the common cattle to support your profit margins.

    3. Re:The markets are wide open.. by Basehart · · Score: 1

      Once you've exhausted your techie base you're left with the common cattle to support your profit margins.

      I think this is one of the main reasons why Dell got so big in the first place, because there weren't enough of your "common cattle" type consumers to turn around to Dell and say "your PC's suck" (back when they did).

      Instead you have tens of thousands of corporate techies providing just enough support to stop those proles of yours from turning around and telling them to stop buying Dell. Maybe that's why they closed down most of their tech support call centers, they didn't need them because you were doing their job for them.

      So maybe if it wasn't for the MCSE endowed techie base calling the purchasing shots for the past ten years maybe Apple, and others, could have gotten a little more credit, and market share, allowing for further diversity into what almost became a totally Dell, Intel, Microsoft controlled World if it hadn't have been for the like of Torvalds, Jobs and the like.

  7. Right on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Good idea .. why doesn't Omid do it, then?

    We'll check on how well he did two years from now.

    1. Re:Right on! by Slime-dogg · · Score: 2, Funny

      For those that didn't RTFA, including the mods, Omid is the guy who wrote the article.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
  8. Sun is also trying to become another dell/hp by stonebeat.org · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Sun plans server with AMD's Opteron instead of Ultra Sparcs

    1. Re:Sun is also trying to become another dell/hp by Kevin+Burtch · · Score: 1


      Sorry, it's not "instead of", it's to supplement the bottom-end... big difference.

      They plan to use dual, and possibly quad-cpu Opterons in their bottom-end product line, but this does not compare to machines that can hold many more CPUs, nor does it compare with the versatility or reliablity of the higher-end SPARC architecture.

      If you've ever worked on their recent (SunFire), you'd know what I mean.
      Full remote administration via OpenBoot/OpenFirmware (drastically more versatile and usable than the feeble attempt at a PC-based equivalent - speaking from experience here).
      Hot swappable CPUs, RAM, interfaces, etc... not just drives any more.

      There are many architectural advantages to the SPARC cpu itself, ask anyone who's ever done assembly-language programming on an x86 (and ANY other cpu) if you want some seriously shocking details.

      The day Sun stops selling SPARC-based systems is the day the company folds, and Scott knows this.

      --
      - Preferences: Solaris 10 (servers), Ubuntu (desktops), Solaris 11 (personal servers) -
    2. Re:Sun is also trying to become another dell/hp by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      There are many architectural advantages to the SPARC cpu itself, ask anyone who's ever done assembly-language programming on an x86 (and ANY other cpu) if you want some seriously shocking details.

      Is there really any kind of market for hardware that is programmed at the Assembly Language level anymore?

      I know I enjoy it. I also know that all the pundits consider it backwards and obsolete. I can count on the toes of one hand the number of good reference books on Sparc assembly language programming I've encountered.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    3. Re:Sun is also trying to become another dell/hp by AJWM · · Score: 1

      Is there really any kind of market for hardware that is programmed at the Assembly Language level anymore?

      That's not really the point. The point is that assembly language programming will intimately acquaint you with the design flaws (and wins) of the processor. At the programming level, this is something that compiler writers worry most about. But it has performance (and price/performance) ramifications to everything based on that CPU.

      Eg if a different architecture lets me add a few general purpose registers but still save on overall transistor count, I can have a lower power, lower cost chip that may well be faster (for a given clock freq) because the required code is simpler, hence smaller, hence less likely to blow the cache.

      Lots of interacting variables there, of course, but the original point was that the x86 architecture blows chunks, and being able to run it at several gigaherz (at some ridiculously high power density) doesn't necessarily make up for that.

      --
      -- Alastair
    4. Re:Sun is also trying to become another dell/hp by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      Agreed, but some of the baroque hardware on x86 architectures is really powerful, and as long as one or several people understand it well, they can develop a C compiler to do blazing fast things with it.

      All the new instructions in the newer Intel processors come to mind. It's become a hellaciously complex architecture, but if you use Intel's compiler you get really, really fast code out.

      The x86 architecture isn't really a 'design,' it's more an out-of-control evolution. It's a trivial point to maintain that a team of crack designers could come up with a better solution. That's a bit like 'optimizing' the fresh water supply system in New York City, though. It could be ripped out in it's entirety and redone to be far more efficient. Ain't gonna happen, though.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
  9. Commie Freaks Finagle Their Way Inside The Box by segment · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You sold me there on that story. Obviously I'm passing this on to all of those Berkeley, MIT, Carnegie, Harvard, Yale grad CTO's and marketers who work at places like Alienware, Sager, Toshiba, and other smaller comp makers who spend the big bucks. This guy is definitely on to something, and I'm glad Slashdot didn't waste my time posting garbage.
    At least the Russian Revolution had a Lenin, and a Trotsky. Stalin was no fun, but he sure knew how to rule a party. I mean, give me a break, these socialist computer haters are not revolutionary, they're just whiny
    Oh yea, that guy's good.
    1. Re:Commie Freaks Finagle Their Way Inside The Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      At least the Russian Revolution had a Lenin, and a Trotsky. Stalin was no fun, but he sure knew how to rule a party. I mean, give me a break, these socialist computer haters are not revolutionary, they're just whiny

      Yeah, what the fuck was this guy talking about? It sounds like he's living in the 1980's. You think he'd mention parallels within the computer industry, rather than attempt to make a analogy with Russian leaders and socialism.

      If anyone is a whiner, it's the author of the original article.

    2. Re:Commie Freaks Finagle Their Way Inside The Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not being able to add much more to the two previous points, I'll just add that this article was the most poorly written piece I've probably read from a tech-hack, in recent times. It's like some horrible "motivational piece" dressed up with a few facts and deficient assumptions. How any man could find this "interesting reading" really needs to broaden their horizons.

      tom

  10. End of the Beige Box? by linux_user_31337 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Personally, I think the days of selling general-purpose computers to home users are coming to a close. Within a few years, real computers will be limited to businesses and hobbyists (those who use computers for their hobbies, and those for whom computers *are* a hobby).

    "Joe Sixpack" will surf the net on an "Internet Center", listen to MP3s (or whatever DRM-crippled crap has replaced it) on "Media Center", etc. Regular people will stop thinking of these things as computers, and they'll just be happy that they work. To be honest, I don't know what to think of this. If Apple has survived in its niche, I'll still be able to get the stuff I need (heck, *somebody* will make sure that Linux can still run on these devices), but it's a little sad to think that this era might come to an end.

    1. Re:End of the Beige Box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if it means the end of beige box tweaking and hacking but the beginning of greater efficiency and less wasteful ways of getting work done, then i'm all for it.

    2. Re:End of the Beige Box? by Jesus+2.0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I don't know. Possibly. But I doubt it. You can get a computer that can adequately perform all the tasks that "Joe Sixpack" wants for what, like three hundred or four hundred dollars now. And in all likelyhood, prices will continue to drop.

      And if the things you mention - "internet center", "media center" - are so important to your "Joe Sixpack", computers will come with them preconfigured and simple to use.

      So ten years out, why would anyone want to buy an "internet center" and a "media center" and an "et cetera", when they can buy all of them (and more) at once, for a low low price of $29.95?

    3. Re:End of the Beige Box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could work within Joe sixpack model. Linux makes a great embedded OS. Why not make your own ISO install for a single purpose appliance and sell your white box for $300. Tivo is the best example, but another one I've seen recently is http://www.mirra.com/

    4. Re:End of the Beige Box? by Hanji · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because the "Internet Center" and "Media Center" and so on all have one redeeming quality that general-purpose computers will likely always struggle with - They will Just Work.

      With generality comes complexity, and people don't like complexity, not one bit.

      Computers are pretty good about Just Working, but especially with Windows boxes, you have to worry about things just randomly blowing up, viri, whatever. A specialized "Media Center" can be built from the ground up to do one thing, and to do it well and consistently, much more so than Joe User can configure their PC to do the same things.

      --
      A Minesweeper clone that doesn't suck
    5. Re:End of the Beige Box? by Reziac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But the "web appliance" thing has already been tried by WebTV, I-Opener, etc., and failed to gain any market significance. Most people do at least get that they want a computer that "will do everything" -- in fact, I hear those very words all the time from clients who in fact have no real use for the computer beyond email and MP3s.

      I think the only way it will happen i the greater market is if OEMs start squeezing functionality out of commodity PCs, and to be viable in this market, they'd have to collude on the specs. (Tho "Trusted Computing" may well provide the specs and collusion for them.)

      Sometimes, consumer ignorance works in its own favour. If average users didn't have fantasies about how much they can do with a honkin' big PC that's overkill for their real work, the general consumer market might never have gotten out of the 486 era. (Which, personally, I don't miss. :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    6. Re:End of the Beige Box? by Torgen · · Score: 1

      This is what Microsoft is banking on, and is why they've poured millions into a) cable set-top boxes b) Web TV c) Xbox They've decided the way to control all of your entertainment options (the electronic ones at least) is to take a loss on each Xbox in order to grab market share, then expand its functions until it's the only thing you use as far as computing, games, etc. This will become more likely as HDTVs make inroads into the average American home (eliminating the objection of "crappy resolution" while web surfing on the TV.) Xbox is the leader among consoles in supporting higher display resolutions. We all know that, for the home user, the only reason for beefy computers is games. In comparison, the horsepower needed for email, web browsing, etc is minimal. So, by tying the games to a console standard, Microsoft eliminates the bloat and complexity of the games (unfortunately, also eliminating the in-depth strategy games I favor) and has plenty of horsepower to run web surfing and email (and already comes with the hard drive for storage.) We may be seeing the Black Box replace the Beige Box.

    7. Re:End of the Beige Box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, but I'm not talking about web applicances. There are other forms of black boxes.

    8. Re:End of the Beige Box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The WebTV, I-Opener, etc. were no XBox2. Soon people like me (Microsoft computer programmer) will tell their mothers and mother in laws to go get an XBox2, buy the Windows productivity suite XBox DVD (which includes IE for XBox), and any games that they might want (My mother in law is really wanting to play EQ2), and any attachments that they would like (Camera, printer,etc...), keyboard and mouse will eventually come free with the system.

      And we will do this because we know that we will not have to go out to their house and figure out why they cannot get their latest font pack to install.

    9. Re:End of the Beige Box? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      one redeeming quality that general-purpose computers will likely always struggle with - They will Just Work.

      Or, you could buy a Mac...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    10. Re:End of the Beige Box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Joe Sixpack" will surf the net on an "Internet Center", listen to MP3s (or whatever DRM-crippled crap has replaced it) on "Media Center", etc. Regular people will stop thinking of these things as computers, and they'll just be happy that they work.

      I didn't know Larry Ellison read Slashdot!

    11. Re:End of the Beige Box? by luigi22_ · · Score: 1

      That's only the beginning. Imagine, 40-90 years from now, with Wi-Fi enabled nanobots, M$ can offer them as a wireless, always-on internet and computing solution. Until someone tries to switch to linux, then the nanobots will be programmed to kill the host and make it look inconspicuous, like a stroke. The Feds will pay M$ to monitor everyone, all the time, by seeing what we do through our eyes. Entire political scandals could be erased from people's memory by having the bots alter brain cells, and of course the entire thing would be DRM-ed, closed-source, and unhackable in any way. Thta's a litttle too Orwellian for my tastes.

      --
      On /., first you get the karma, then you get the power, then you get the women.
    12. Re:End of the Beige Box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. That's an alternative to 'just working.'

      That's 'just working, but costing more.'

      There's a small upper-middle-class market for that kind of thing.

    13. Re:End of the Beige Box? by superbondbond · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the fact that Dell is already marketing PCs as just that, an "Internet Center" or a "Media Center" or a "whatever center." The recent Dell television spots come to mind where they urge consumers to stop worrying about Giga-this and Mega-that, and just explaind to the friendly sales rep what you want to use it for. And we all know that inside the "Internet Center" or "Media Center" the hardware is more or less identical.

    14. Re:End of the Beige Box? by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      Macs definitely don't "just work" anymore. And really, they haven't for a long time. They're darn good machines, but they require know-how and troubleshooting skills.

      The idea that macs "just work" is a myth, and always has been. They're easier to get working right than a Windows PC, for sure, but if they do develop problems they can be harder to work with, because you're locked into one vendor, and they don't always like to admit that their boxes break, and there's generally less info out there in support of Mac-specific issues.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    15. Re:End of the Beige Box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah. People have been saying this for years, and saturation of the computer market has gone UP, not down. Take my dad, for instance. He HATED computers until he saw how much faster he could run his business (insurance adjusting) if he implemented the technology I was advocating (all digital photos, all digital billing, writing estimates in-field on a tablet, etc.). Now his enthusiasm for PCs has seeped into his everyday life as well, and he wants top of the line (i.e. white box machines with no BS in them provided by yours truly) for his home as well as his office.

      And this isn't just for people with companies. I worked for Best Buy last Christmas (Hey! I had just moved and was broke! Don't poke fun!). You know what I found? Most people WANT as much computing bang for the buck as possible. Some people come in and say "I want the cheapest PC you have--BECAUSE I JUST WANT TO CHECK EMAIL," in which case you show them an eMachine with a little lecture about quality. But most people want more toys and bells and whistles and want to do more than just check email and are willing to pay for them whether they need them or not.

      Saying we'll all be on appliances in a few years is preposterous in just about any capitalist country and especially in the US. People are motivated by marketing and routinely buy things they don't need. If we all thought pragmatically here in the good ol' US of A, we wouldn't be driving around in gas-guzzling, hoodad-encrusted, overpricey SUVs. We'd be riding fast, cheap, efficient public transportation. But the automotive industry can't afford to have that happen, and Americans HATE not being in control (rugged individualism and all that). Hence, I feel that I can say with relative confidence that we will NEVER see Internet terminals take the place of actual computers in the US or other Western markets. MAYBE in Japan, where people are more pragmatic, but even there it's all about affordable notebooks with neat hoodads as far as PCs go, and Internet access via mobile phone (done right, unlike here in the US).

      The fact that anyone is still trotting out this crazy idea is baffling. The PC is here to stay.

    16. Re:End of the Beige Box? by jonhuang · · Score: 1

      Once upon a time, machine shops only had one expensive motor. Belts were used to attach it to different machines for different purposes. Then motors got cheap..

    17. Re:End of the Beige Box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, right, "joe sixpack" will need a cutting-edge computer just to run the latest version of Windoze Bloatware v7

    18. Re:End of the Beige Box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where iOpener missed the boat is they tied it to an online service.

      I took my iOpener, bumped the memory to 128MB, added a 6.4GB (9.5mm) laptop drive, a USB ethernet adapter for around $200 and 30 minutes of my time. The original box came with a 200MHz WinChip (x86).

      While I'm sure the original box cost them more than $99 to build and ship, I'm at a $300 price point with a modest performing machine capable of doing things that 99.9999% of Joe Sixpack wants to do.

      I now have the perfect machine to run on our kitchen counter - it runs a tightly-configured Gentoo and my wife loves having this small footprint machine she can use for email, web surfing, recepie lookups, MP3 playback, etc.

      If I could find the original vendor who supplied the hardware to Netpliance, I could move these things all day long for $350-$400 each. At which point, I'd have a reason to go shopping for wholesale RAM, disks, USB ethernet, and a disk imager. ... and make a reasonable profit doing so.

      -AC

    19. Re:End of the Beige Box? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Thomas Watson Sr.] - I've said it before and I'll say it again, the worldwide demand for electronic computers is limited to five units.

    20. Re:End of the Beige Box? by Geekbot · · Score: 1

      I'll second that. It always drives me nuts when I hear people ask why a computer can't "just work" like a phone. Of course it's because a phone just sits there and rings, it doesn't have to be an arcade, media center, telephone, xxx theatre, dirty magazine, public chat forum, video production studio. And it doesn't need to be updated every week to protect against vulnerabilities or communicate with your friends 2 week more recent computer.

      Personal Computers are made to be able to handle a wide variety of tasks and to be customizable. For the home user who has trouble operating a VCR, a PC is going to be a problem. I think customized computers are definitely the future. TIVO for instance.

  11. Whiners and doers by NineNine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The thing that this jounalist is writing about (very well, I might add) occurs in every industry/walk of life. There are the whiners, and there are the doers. What he doesn't realize is that doers just do it, and ignore these whiners. He ends the article well... "get a grip". Personally, I don't give people like this even that much attention.

    1. Re:Whiners and doers by timotten · · Score: 1

      There are the whiners, and there are the doers. What he doesn't realize is that doers just do it, and ignore these whiners.

      I think that's a bit unfair. Our society embraces a lot of specialization, and there are necessarily more consumers than producers. Now, individual consumers in most markets (should) have an interest in how the market works -- but (individually) lack the power to change the market. That creates a feeling of powerlessness -- which leads to legitimate whining. A few individuals who move from consumption to production may complain less, but you and the journalist will still be overwhelmed by the remaining consumers. In short, there must be and should be whining, and meta-whining won't stop it.

  12. Bulk purchasing clout is needed... by bc90021 · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...and while it is tempting to get into the whitebox market, it requires a significant amount of capital. Why? Bulk purchasing (ie for processors) is only really worth it pricewise if you do it in the thousands. Dell et al. do that easily now, but for "the next Dell", unless he/she/them are able to take advantage of those discounts by purchasing parts in huge multiples, it will always be cheaper for the end user to buy from current whitebox manufacturers, even if "the next Dell" provides better quality. The vast majority of people are willing to save a buck, and unless "the next Dell" can compete on price as well as everything else, it is unlikely that there would be "another Dell".

    1. Re:Bulk purchasing clout is needed... by NineNine · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Now, you'd better sit down for this one.... but price is NOT the only competitive advantage! In fact any successful businessperson will tell you, it's the WORST way to run a business, because somebody will always be cheaper. Not everybody is looking for cheaper and cheaper. Simple example: MS Windows vs. Linux. Linux is a LOT cheaper, but people still aren't interested. Whatever the reason is, it's very obvious that price is NOT the issue here.

    2. Re:Bulk purchasing clout is needed... by bc90021 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I never said it was the only competitive advantage, I said it was the main one. And it's a barrier to entry for anyone who wants to become a white box seller.

      When I lived in California, I worked for a small computer store that sold computers that were custom built. Building computers (while I was there) went from being barely profitable to a loss section of the store. Why? Because people stopped buying better custom built computers, and started buying HPs at the Best Buy that opened 30 miles away. People were driving an hour (round trip) to save $200 on a computer. From what I've heard, the store no longer sells custom built PCs - they can't compete with that.

      However, their tech support division is making record cash fixing HPs. ;)

    3. Re:Bulk purchasing clout is needed... by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The vast majority of people are willing to save a buck, and unless "the next Dell" can compete on price as well as everything else, it is unlikely that there would be "another Dell".

      Bollocks.

      Considering I work in a computer retail store selling "white box" PCs, I think I'm allowed to have a say in this, even more so when you consider I'm supposed to sell PCs to the cheapest people around, the Dutch, hehe. Anyways, people want QUALITY instead of cheapo bargains. They will not want that at first but our best costumers are those who previously had a Dell/Compaq/Packard Hell and are now nearly BEGGING for some quality in the way of support, quick warrenty procedures, quick helpdesk support ( Which in our case consists of "Just call the damned store and someone will guide you through" ) and carry-in services. Considering we're a small store we'll often through in some nice little deals to sweeten up the whole issue, like installing PCs at home, delivery or helping the costumer set up his/her network.

      Sure, our PCs are nearly twice, sometimes even THRICE as expensive as Dell and Packard Bell, but the services provided are FAR superior then anything they have to offer. We can put customers in touch with the technical/assembly dept, the manager and we have direct contacts with some manufacturers and suppliers of critical components. Coupled with the fact we don't assemble PCs with onboard crap and bare minimal RAM, I think we do a pretty good job. Anyone who wishes to argue about this approach being a joke, feel free to come over on a Saturday; the store is busy as hell on Saturdays and I'm pretty sure we can find someone to give you an honest and positive review of our store.

    4. Re:Bulk purchasing clout is needed... by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      Likely they built their name, and their market, by selling the clones. If they didn't have the mindshare in their area from having done that in the past, they probably wouldn't now have people bringing in the machines they bought from Best Buy to get repaired.

      Granted, undercutting the only part of the Best Buy operation that makes BB any money, the service plan, does have considerable appeal.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    5. Re:Bulk purchasing clout is needed... by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      Windows comes "free" with the computer. If people had to actually pay for windows, linux would be huge. (Admittadly, becasue it's also better).

    6. Re:Bulk purchasing clout is needed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps a little price comparing is in order ? Check out similarly equipped machines from Dell and from your local mainstreet store. The mainstreet guys are generally cheaper. Dell is making money because people don't know any better, because most Americans get their education from TV commercials.

    7. Re:Bulk purchasing clout is needed... by akuma(x86) · · Score: 2, Informative

      In a commodity based business, the lowest cost producer wins.

      A commodity is something that is NOT unique. It is easily replaceable and has almost no differentiation from one producer compared to another.

      Given that all of these PC makers are basically selling the same machine (commodity), the one with the lowest cost structure will have the highest profit.

      Dell wins hands down. They have literally only about 2 hours of inventory (meaning that a computer will live in a warehouse for about 2 hours on average). This is an amazing feat for a company of this size.

      The size of Dell also works to it's advantage. It's called economies of scale - the larger you are - the cheaper it is for you to produce your goods.

      With Dell being so large, they can act like Walmart and squeeze their suppliers (Intel, Taiwanese mobo makers, Korean/Chinese DRAM makers etc...) for sweetheart deals on components.

      Let's say you have the same machine from Dell, HP and Gateway and Dell offers the lowest price, what do you think the majority of consumers will buy?

      PCs are commodities - there is very little that can differentiate one producer from another. The minute one producer offers an advantage on their PC, 3 nanoseconds later all of their competitors have copied them and offer the same thing. The only way to differntiate youself is through price. Cheaper wins.

    8. Re:Bulk purchasing clout is needed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't "the cheapest people around" be the Jews (or the Dutch Jews, then)?

    9. Re:Bulk purchasing clout is needed... by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      You are incorrect. The vendor pays a fee to Microsoft for pre-installing Windows on the computer for you, and they factor that fee into the price tag. Just go to a website where they offer PCs with and without Microsoft Windows, and check the difference in price. It's typically around $90.

    10. Re:Bulk purchasing clout is needed... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > The vendor pays a fee to Microsoft for pre-installing Windows

      But the user does not know that.

      > go to a website where they offer PCs with and without Microsoft Windows, and check the difference in price

      Actually, it's typically $0. The "Microsoft Tax."

    11. Re:Bulk purchasing clout is needed... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Check out similarly equipped machines from Dell and from your local mainstreet store. The mainstreet guys are generally cheaper.

      One of the following is true:
      1) You live in a city
      2) You are lucky to have a large "mainstreet" PC store
      3) your are on some seriously good crack

      I live in a small city, but the few computer stores here are all WAAAAAY overpriced for the crap they sell. Here, people who want a reasonable price buy off the Internet.

  13. How wants to become the next Tom's Hardware? by secondsun · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apparently Slashdot does, or is this a funny attempt at turning his servers into a crater one at a time and remove his sold out ass from the world?

    --
    There is nothing wrong with being gay. It's getting caught where the trouble lies.
    1. Re:How wants to become the next Tom's Hardware? by FFFish · · Score: 1

      Or is Taco being fed advertising revenue from Tom for helping him increase his readership?

      I honestly thought Tom's Hardware would be bankrupt by now, overwhelmed by his incompetence.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    2. Re:How wants to become the next Tom's Hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, Slashdot has become Tom's bitch. I don't know what it is about Tom's content that compels mods to post so many submissions.... maybe it's the ad-filled pages, or the completely biased "reviews." Either way, it's getting blatant to tbe point of being sickening.

  14. am i immature? by acxr+is+wasted · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You know how it is? When you don't get enough fibre in your diet. Things get all, well, you know, repressed, which is the nice way of putting it. Then, you have a prune juice, or have a fat friend jump on your stomach, and before you know it, you feel like the fog has lifted, and everything is going to be okay.

    Damn it, milk just shot out my nose and now it's gonna feel weird all day.

    --
    "Come on, let's go drink till we can't feel feelings anymore."
  15. How many companies... by gkuz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ..has the author of that column started? His beef is people who complain about hardware rather than building, but he just complains about people who complain. Where's that in the food chain?

    1. Re:How many companies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Or people who complain about people who complain about people who complain...?

  16. Two problems by Moderator · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The two biggest obstacles I can see are name recognition and the Microsoft tax. If someone were selling a computer with similar specs to a Dell machine, most people are going to go with the Dell just because it's a company they've heard of before (and therefore one they can "trust"). The other problem is Microsoft: if you are going to install Windows on the computer (and possibily Office), you will have to sell your machines at a loss to compete. This is to compensate for the fact that Microsoft gives big name vendors like Dell and HP discounts on their software. I think the best way to overcome these two obstacles is to invent a product truly unique, so that people actually WANT to pay more for your system. Look at Apple. Innovation is what helped Apple rise from their own ashes, first with the iMac and now with the iPod and OS X. Jump a feature that you think will be big in the next few years, and then have the guts to use it as the cornerstone for your business.

    --
    The World is Yours.
  17. You should forget about going into business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    what if you succed

    You're not going to be very successful if you can't spell or at least use a spell-checker.

    1. Re:You should forget about going into business by dunelin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      (Read the whole thing and you'll see this is constructive criticism and not just a rant.)

      Not only a spell-checker, but a nice proof-read for clarity would help too. I, for one, had no clue what the article was actually about other than that the article was "thought provoking" and "interesting" reading. For example, where did this sentence come from and what does it mean?
      "Why should you learn all the specs on the latest processor and slam the competition just because you may happen to own a P4?"

      Huh? This relates to building and selling your own computers how, exactly? The entire paragraph is incoherent. I'm sorry to rant about this, but I get very frustrated when I have no idea what the article is about from the submission. Why would i even want to RTFA if I have no clue what it's about. In cases like this, the Slashdot editors should quote or summarize to clarify exactly what's going on.

    2. Re:You should forget about going into business by setzman · · Score: 1
      In cases like this, the Slashdot editors should quote or summarize to clarify exactly what's going on.

      Very good points, but you forgot one thing. The slashdot editors don't edit. They just post stuff that people send in, minus the editing function that is supposed to go on.

      --
      C:\>
  18. a whiner himself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    His article is whiny, not motivational (nor even educational). Not even spell checked.

    Another 2 minutes down the drain.

  19. What if people realized... by leereyno · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...that the market for commodity systems is already saturated.

    Trying to compete with companies like Dell only makes sense if you're the star of Brewster's Millions.

    There is certainly money to be made in the computer industry. But the days when hardware firms could be started out of someone's garage are long, long gone.

    Of course I'm sure there will be a whole army of dreamers and wet-behind-the-ears schmucks lined up to argue with me about this for the simple reason that the truth I speak is a threat to their pipe dream. Well I say they need to put that crack pipe down and start looking for sectors and markets that don't already have dozens of 800 pound gorillas stomping about. Just because you have a love for something doesn't mean you can turn it into a successful business, especially when that business would be servicing a competitive market with razor-thin margins.

    The most anyone could hope for would to eek out a marginal existance selling highly customized systems built from hand-picked components for gamers and similar enthusiasts. (Most of whom can do it themselves, or at least think they can)

    Lee

    --
    Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    1. Re:What if people realized... by NineNine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...that the market for commodity systems is already saturated.

      There's *always* rooom for improvement. That's what competition is all about. It might be a tough fight, but if somebody can find a competitive advantage, it can always be done. Hell, the pizza delivery market was saturated about 10,15 years ago, but Papa John's came right in and kicked ass. It *can* be done. I don't know the computer market well enough to know what that advantage could be, otherwise I'd be doing it, but I don't think it's every time to just call it quits.

    2. Re:What if people realized... by Queuetue · · Score: 1
      Trying to compete with companies like Dell only makes sense if you're the star of Brewster's Millions.
      When will you cruel people stop making fun of John Candy? Just let the poor man rest in peace.
    3. Re:What if people realized... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I don't know the computer market well enough to know what that advantage could be

      Assuming broadband gets cheaper and faster at the present rate my bet would be: remote mirrors for backing up your terabytes of pr0n and warez.

    4. Re:What if people realized... by Reziac · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In fact, you're describing the clone market. Yes, in a big market like Los Angeles, it does well (well enough that clones are about 40% of all PCs sold). But I still see a lot of clone dealers give it up after 3 or 4 years, and those that do stick with it, while they make a living, aren't getting rich. And most (being Asian) get their parts thru family deals in Asia, at prices those without such connections can't hope to match.

      A few clone shops go on to become successful chains (PC Club comes to mind) but that's not the norm.

      Myself, I no longer build new custom machines for clients, because there's no money in it. When they need a new box, I give 'em specs and point 'em at my favourite clone shops.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    5. Re:What if people realized... by madcow_ucsb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, I wouldn't want it to be my sole income, but sometimes you can get a nice bit of additional income dealing on ebay.

      One of my roommates did that (our last 2 years of college) and made a *lot* of money without a whole lot of work. What'd he do? He bought Dells *from Dell* with whatever the gotapex deal of the day was and made a fancy looking page and put it up. And retards would pay *more than pre-discount retail* for the things.

      Same with Apples. Scour ebay for the shitty-looking pages that aren't selling, buy it, make a fancy page with an insanely high BuyItNow (which most people used), and bang, people are paying more than retail for a used machine.

      Volume was always pretty low, but at any give time he'd typically be working 5-10 machines and he made enough to pay his share of the rent and take a nice chunk out of his tuition...all thanks to the morons who think "If it's on ebay, it *must* be cheaper!" without ever shoppoing around.

      That said, it's more of a hobby than a business...I'd never try to compete with a big guy.

    6. Re:What if people realized... by spideyct · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree that trying to compete with Dell on high volume, low margin computers would be extremely difficult. However, the possible opportunity is hinted at in your last paragraph:

      The most anyone could hope for would to eek out a marginal existance selling highly customized systems built from hand-picked components for gamers and similar enthusiasts. (Most of whom can do it themselves, or at least think they can)

      Don't compete with Dell on generic boxes. Create customized, high end machines. It is possible to sell commodity items above commodity prices with a little bit of value-add and a LOT of marketing. Think Monster cables. They sell $5 A/V cables for $50.

      Sell your super fancy computers for $10,000. You won't sell a lot of them, but maybe you will sell a few to the filthy rich who want to feel that they deserve better than the Dell that ANYONE can afford.

      Yes, I realized the irony of me doing exactly what the article was railing against: spouting off "the solution" without actually doing anything about it. What can I say, it was a good, accurate article about the state of the online nerd culture.

    7. Re:What if people realized... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Traditionally, the money for clone shops was in networking, not computers.

      A couple years ago, I talked to a guy who basically sold desktops at cost. However, for a "server" with MS Small Biz software, he could charge a huge markup. People who would quibble over $50 on a desktop would have no problem dropping $5K for a server. He also marked up DSL service, routers, etc.

      I know another guy who bought a house based on the Novell business he had years ago. Even back in the early 90s, the hardware margins were so thin that he gave up on desktops.

    8. Re:What if people realized... by gooberguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hell, the pizza delivery market was saturated about 10,15 years ago, but Papa John's came right in and kicked ass.

      Who?

      --


      Karma: Meh (Mostly from meh.)
    9. Re:What if people realized... by Repugnant_Shit · · Score: 1

      You don't sound bitter.

    10. Re:What if people realized... by bluGill · · Score: 1

      You don't order pizza much do you? Either that or you live where they haven't expanded to yet. Papa Johns is IMHO the best large chain pizza there is. There are small mom and pop places with better pizza.

      Look in the phone book, see if they are near you yet. If so, try them next time you want delivered pizza. You decide if it is better.

    11. Re:What if people realized... by gooberguy · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I was joking. I have heard of them, but I don't order pizza that often. It's expensive compared to cooking the pizza yourself. If I do get pizza, I pick it up myself instead of getting it delivered. Poor college students can't afford to be waited on hand and foot by pizza delivery men.

      --


      Karma: Meh (Mostly from meh.)
    12. Re:What if people realized... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And most (being Asian) get their parts thru family deals in Asia..."

      Gee, lucky for them they can save $$$ since all 20 billion Asians are related.

    13. Re:What if people realized... by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > > if you're the star of Brewster's Millions.
      > When will you cruel people stop making fun of John Candy?

      Just as soon as you stupid people realize that he wasn't the star of Brewster's Millions.

    14. Re:What if people realized... by xmuskrat · · Score: 1

      Yeah, wasn't that Richard Pryor? :P

      --
      activestudios web design
  20. Because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I don't have the money for the lawyers who will defend my success in N. America.

    Ok, this answer is highly optimized, but it's redundant also.

  21. Wrong thinking... by Svartalf · · Score: 4, Informative

    They DO have stores (They've got Dell Direct sales kiosks in the mall- where you get to see something of what you're ordering through the system) and the online sales system for Dell (Whether it be by phone or by web) is also a store.

    It's just that they didn't have brick and mortar storefronts until very recently- and these don't keep inventory, they're solely there to show off the wares so people can see what they're buying.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    1. Re:Wrong thinking... by Reziac · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think the point wasn't that there aren't local ordering points (which is what you're describing), but rather, that Dell doesn't have *inventory* in local stores. With a market that goes obsolete so fast, half the investment in local inventory is wasted anyway. So the way to make money is by just-in-time manufacturing -- which I gather is how Dell does it: don't make it til it's been ordered and the money to pay for it is already a done deal.

      Obviously there has to be some parts inventory always in their pipeline, so they can deliver in a timely manner, but by the time you get to their size, you KNOW you're going to use, say, 10,000 of a particular video card every day.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  22. One tip... by tcdk · · Score: 3, Informative

    Make sure to get enough venture capital, when you start you new hardware store, that you can hire somebody else to take care of customer-support.

    But seriously, it's all about volumn. You have to buy a lot of parts to be able to compete - the margin on hardware is small. Your fortune isn't made just because you can sell a thousand boxes and make 10 or 20 bucks each. Now you have to be read, when half of them calls you and tell you that they can't figure how to connect that 56k modem to their adsl line or that the cup holder is broken.

    Good luck...

    --
    TC - My Photos..
    1. Re:One tip... by JordanH · · Score: 2, Insightful
      • Make sure to get enough venture capital, when you start you new hardware store, that you can hire somebody else to take care of customer-support.
      Dell didn't have any venture capital when he started. I'm sure the "common wisdom" at the time was that you couldn't compete with IBM or Compaq without lots of capitalization, too.

      Maybe you can't become Dell by starting out selling computers out of your trunk while you attend college, that path is fairly worn out, but there may be other similar ideas that will lead to your becoming extremely successful.

      True, doing tech support for dummies is expensive, but I'd be willing to pay less for none of that kind of support. Script-reading support has always just gotten in the way with me. Admittedly, I don't know how to sell computers without that kind of support, but maybe someone else does. Maybe sell long distance only to those who will take the risks and sell through mom&pop's that will take the cup holder calls otherwise. This might not work, but maybe there is a formula that will.

    2. Re:One tip... by tcdk · · Score: 1

      The first line about venture capital and customer-support was ment as a joke....

      Anyway, I've been thinking about it for a bit, and I got one idea: Besides volumn (e.i. compete on price), you need to have a hook.

      I would go for the people who are going for their computer number two. Either because the old one is crap or because the wife/kid needs one. This marked must be fairly big and it can only get larger.

      Do not make the mistake of thinking these customers are tech-savy and lighter on support. Just because they've had computers for years, does not mean that they have a clue as to what they are doing.

      But they do know that they hate about their old computer. They probably hate that they cant put more ram it it (filling out all the sockets with small sticks is often cheaper then buying one big or even worse - they got RAMBUS), that they can't put a new and faster cpu in it (because the bios can't be accessed), that they got the 20$ graphics card instead of the 30$ one and now they can't play games. That the PSU isn't standard, so they can't even add a new harddrive.

      The big ones are pulling stunts like that all the time and have no idea until the day arrive where they want to upgrade and their tech-savy friends, just goes "sorry, compaqs aren't build to be upgraded - you paid more for less".

      Go for those people and it just may happen.

      --
      TC - My Photos..
    3. Re:One tip... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > But seriously, it's all about volumn.
      > ...compares reviewers to the lowest ring of the ladder...
      > ...what if you succed and your business is based on Chinas' dragon CPU...
      Can nobody spell this morning? ;-)
    4. Re:One tip... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The big ones are pulling stunts like that all the time and have no idea until the day arrive where they want to upgrade and their tech-savy friends, just goes "sorry, compaqs aren't build to be upgraded - you paid more for less".
      The funny thing is, I have a Compaq that serves me very well. To its credit, most of the things you can switch out (HD, CD/DVD drives, RAM) are upgradeable. The only thing it doesn't have is a damned AGP slot! I can even see the spot on the motherboard where an AGP slot would go!
  23. Common by brejc8 · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is nothing new. I have funded my drinking habbit for years by making people computers. There is no need to have a store to do it. Most people don't realise how easy it is and they usually want something special. This is how the Dell bloke goty started anyway. For the office I make all the machnes now, we wouldn't even consider buying machines ready made (unfortunately except for Sun machiness)
    The dragon CPU is not supported very well (or at all) currently and does not bring a huge advantage yet. Its hard enough to convince someone to use a non windows/x86 machine when you are a huge company nevermind when you are a singly guy knocking them out of your garage.

  24. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the answer to everything in America that could harm other peoples money.

  25. No next, please. by djupedal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Dell works to hollow out their suppliers, leaving behind dead and worthless companies. We don't need them, just like we don't need Wal-mart.

    The Dell model, such as it is, is already dead. It may have worked for Mikey, but it won't work if cookie-cutter'd. There won't be another Dell, thank god.

    1. Re:No next, please. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Hadn't heard Dell was doing the Walmart thing to their suppliers; more info, please?

      I do think you're right that there will not be another Dell. Most of the OEMs from the past have long since gone tits-up, or are struggling to stay alive (like Gateway), or have other divisions that can even out the bottom line (like HP/Compaq).

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:No next, please. by djupedal · · Score: 5, Informative

      I just finished working 4 years for a Korean firm that makes Dell branded equipment. We lost money dealing with Dell, but we did it to keep them from going to our competitor. No one wanted to handle the Dell account. They are cold and single minded.

      Dell always came out as the worst to deal with, compared to IBM, Sun, HP/Compaq. Dell would negotiate for a certain number of units at a certain price, then order 25% of the original quantity, while demanding the original unit price. Sounds like smart business? When they break their original commitment, and then bully their way on, it's bad business.

      The end result is their suppliers keep waiting for the 'big' contract that never comes along. They lose money and go out of business. Dell moves to another supplier and doesn't look back. That is one less supplier for the other buyers. Another carcass on the fire. It's called 'hollowing out', and most companies know better than to go down that road.

      If you do business with me, you expect a certain percentage of every dollar we handle. Under ideal circumstances, I get 60 and you get 40. This proportion lets us both survive. Dell seeks 70/30...this helps Dell grow, of course, but the 30 means slow death for the other side. Most businesses honor the 60/40 balance, knowing that anything more will be abusive...Dell has long ago decided to cross that line.

      The hope is to take the market, and then go back to 60/40...but with no suppliers left willing to take the abuse, Dell will be alone and cutting their own throat.

    3. Re:No next, please. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the info. Seems this sort of behaviour is tempting for any business that's still climbing upward over the backs of smaller competitors. :(

      As to "their suppliers keep waiting for the 'big' contract that never comes along" -- this is something one has to learn to avoid doing in ANY business. That big contract may sound wonderful, but if it never happens and meanwhile you have to short your existing regulars to keep enough inventory on hand to fill that pending but still uncertain "big one", all you've done is turn off your existing customers, and then you've got NO income. Ooops.

      If there are no suppliers left but one or two, there are also no suppliers for the clone market, which (since per all stats I've seen, comprises about 40% of all PCs sold) Dell probably regards as its biggest competitor. No clone parts, no clones. Simple!!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    4. Re:No next, please. by djupedal · · Score: 1
      :)

      Right, many use this tactic to climb, but they know when to turn it off. Problem with Dell, is they use this as their principle business model.

      Breaking a rule isn't innovative. Dell will die the death it deserves, sooner or later.

    5. Re:No next, please. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure this is a recipe for Dell's (or Walmart's) ultimate death -- but it sure is a route to a market entirely free of options or alternatives, cuz they've all gone out of business :(

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    6. Re:No next, please. by djupedal · · Score: 1

      Law of the jungle at that point.

      With no prey, the predator can no longer survive. Natural forces work to insure they either curb their hunger (and play fair as part of the chain), or be forced out of the game when the food supply dries up. At that point, cannabalizm sets in and evolution takes over.

      Give it time.

    7. Re:No next, please. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Unless the predator can survive on a mono-diet. Frex, if Dell manages to put all video card makers out of business except ATI, then we'll all have to use ATI video cards, like it or not, and regardless of whether we buy Dell machines or not. But that won't hurt Dell any, so long as they don't kill off that LAST supplier.

      Now, if you stupidly kill ALL the suppliers, then you *and* everyone else will die.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    8. Re:No next, please. by djupedal · · Score: 1

      Dell's model hasn't changed in that regard. You'd think they would, but they're a one-trick pony, refusing to follow a proven model. Their version of 'think different'.

      Dell is moving into other areas, such as printers and MP3 players because they are killing off the last suppliers in their current core business. The predator is simply altering his diet, and moving into other feeding grounds.

      Again, nature says fine, but you'd better grow gills, change your digestive system and learn how to camoflage under water if you want to eat free range turtle.

    9. Re:No next, please. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Will be, um, interesting (in the sense of the Chinese curse) to see what Dell does over time, and what happens to their business and the market in general. Printers are already a very sick market, if the throwaway-vs-refills controversies are any indication. I vaguely recall that Dell was rebranding some real quality printers [!], like Lexmark.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    10. Re:No next, please. by S.Lemmon · · Score: 1

      So, how long will it be before suppliers decide not to do business with Dell? If they're really that bad then it can't be worth the cost no matter how big of a buyer they are. Letting them go to the competition and bleed them dry instead might be a good business strategy.

    11. Re:No next, please. by monstermagnet · · Score: 2, Insightful
      We lost money dealing with Dell, but we did it to keep them from going to our competitor. No one wanted to handle the Dell account. They are cold and single minded.
      So why didn't you make a strategic decision to let your competition take it in the shorts?

      Electronics suppliers that I've bought from were quite upfront about a sliding scale for more units, lower price. If the bid says 1 widget at $10/ea, 100 widgets at $1/ea, no one expects to get one widget for $1.

      There's probably more complexity to this scenario, since I'm unclear on what stage of the bid/offer/accept stage of writing a contract you're talking about. But it seems like some more effort in negotiating might help the manufacturers, since Dell is clearly employing good/ruthless ones.

    12. Re:No next, please. by djupedal · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Factor in cultural attitudes, and the scenario becomes quite complex.

      Electronics suppliers that I've bought from were quite upfront about a sliding scale for more units, lower price. If the bid says 1 widget at $10/ea, 100 widgets at $1/ea, no one expects to get one widget for $1. - This is where Dell gets dirty. They break these types of agreements with impunity. 10 for $1 or 5 for $1.10 becomes 5 for $1 or we'll go to your competitor.

      As I said, there's always that promise of the next contract being the big one...kind of like one more pull on the slot machine. The fear is that the payoff will come just as you let your competitor step in.

      Then there is also the image thing. You can tout them as a client, pretending you're in control. The hope is your competition doesn't see you bleeding, and they give up the fight, thinking you've managed to beat the beast at their own game. It's a complex issue, and one that is only slightly better grasped by being consumed and worn down. Is it better to lose face by not engaging them in the first place, or do you worry about losing face by being beaten up down the road...?

      There is no honor in sitting on the side lines. You got into this business to compete. But when Dell moves the ball after the whistle blows, you'll lose everytime.

    13. Re:No next, please. by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      But you don't have to kill every manufacturer to eliminate people willing to deal with you. Your bargaining clout is gone once people (eventually) catch on. As that starts to happen, they demand a higher percentage of the profits, messing up Dell's overall margin (even if only slightly).

    14. Re:No next, please. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Well, it sounds like Dell deserves to have their margin messed up. But it only takes one supplier willing to cross the picket line and you've got everyone by the balls again :(

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    15. Re:No next, please. by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > With no prey, the predator can no longer survive.

      Microsoft is an example that could go both ways. They have been in a situation where, realistically, they were the only choice and they survived just fine. Of course, they ended up investing in their competitors (sort of) to help keep them afloat...

  26. Errr, Apple? by ljavelin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why not start the same way that the Dell, Apple, Gateway, and other founders took by forming your own store, getting in touch with Asian suppliers who "are more than willing" to give you discounts

    Um, I wouldn't put Apple in the same group as Gateway or Dell.

    Gateway and Dell did start by piecing together PCs... not much innovation there, just source some parts, stick 'em together, bundle it with an OS, and then you've got yourself a PC business! With good marketing and by learning from mistakes, you could have a billion dollar business!

    In contrast, Apple was a manufacturer first. Basically, Apple designed a computer, made boards, designed a custom power supply, had a custom case designed, wrote software, wrote some technical manuals, etc etc.

    That's pretty much how Apple does it today, with the exception that Apple has been taking more advantage of some commodity components like drives (they always have) and highly integrated ICs.

    Admittedly, Apple has become quiet adept at marketing - and that's a good thing, because Apple has a niche business that requires both innovation (both in marketing and technology) to stay relevant.

    It's only recently that Apple started to get into the retail business.

    1. Re:Errr, Apple? by ajagci · · Score: 1

      That's pretty much how Apple does it today, with the exception that Apple has been taking more advantage of some commodity components like drives (they always have) and highly integrated ICs.

      Some commodity components? Judging by what happens when I boot Linux on my Mac, the machine is almost completely like a PC: graphics card, bus, drives, keyboard, mouse, etc. The main thing that seems custom about it is the case, the BIOS, and the use of a PPC chip, plus the little bit of hardware glue that probably entails.

    2. Re:Errr, Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How true. Dell and Gateway simply buy motherboards and power supplies, and stick it in a custom case.

      On the other hand, Apple has always had a custom motherboard (99% of what a computer is).

      Of course, more and more standards have emerged over the years, so it makes sense for Apple to embrace industry standards like USB bus, PCI, AGP, etc.

      But in any case, Apple does manufacture the bulk of it's computers, except for the off-the-shelf junk like power cords, connectors, CPUs, and standards-based technology.

    3. Re:Errr, Apple? by sql*kitten · · Score: 2, Insightful

      not much innovation there, just source some parts, stick 'em together, bundle it with an OS, and then you've got yourself a PC business!

      Au countraire, Dell is highly innovative. You're just looking in the wrong place. It doesn't innovate much technologically, but its supply chain is state of the art. You can count the corporations that know as much about supply chain as Dell on your fingers. Apple does innovate technologically - but its supply chain is relatively ordinary and compared to Dell's (or Walmart's), quite inefficient.

    4. Re:Errr, Apple? by aldoman · · Score: 1

      Apple uses 'commodity' components because they are far far cheaper. I mean it's the choice between ordering 1 million 56k modem chips for $1 or designing, testing and making a fab to produce them which will cost a lot more.

      Also, all of Apple's logic boards (motherboards) are all custom designed. They have a circular (!) board for the TFT iMac's...

    5. Re:Errr, Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Embrace industry standards? Like USB and Firewire, not that they came out on Mac's first or anything... :)

    6. Re:Errr, Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aha, but what about those who don't boot Linux on their Macs? Mac OS X, despite borrowing from Mach and BSD, is not a commodity OS. It takes money to develop, and it takes more money to write the proprietary firmware (not "BIOS") needed to support it. This, I would say, is the most valuable "component" in a Mac.

    7. Re:Errr, Apple? by Steve+Jobbs · · Score: 1
      But in any case, Apple does manufacture the bulk of it's computers, except for the off-the-shelf junk like power cords, connectors, CPUs, and standards-based technology.

      Actually we get Taiwanese contract manufacturers like Compal to build stuff like PowerBooks and iBooks. I should know. I'm the CEO! And I resent you calling our power cords 'off the shelf junk'. We are planning to release a special 'Woz autographed special edition power cord' for the 20th anniversary of the Macintosh. Woz will be personally autographing each one, just before he heads off the the UC Berkely Center for Repetitive Strain Injury Research.

  27. Dumb question by fleener · · Score: 1

    He asks why the reviewers critical of Dell don't just start their own computer biz? Ya, why don't movie reviewers shoot their own movies? Why don't the people in my office all become computer technicians? Sorry, I think I'll skip this article. The author is obviously too wise for me. I wouldn't understand.

    1. Re:Dumb question by NineNine · · Score: 1

      If you have to ask, then you're the target of this article. He's saying essentially: "shut up or put up", knowing full well that 99.9999% of all people whining will never do anything about it, and instead just sink deeper into their armchair. I had a customer who bitched and bitched about a product that I wouldn't carry. After she bitched about 10 times, I told her that if she didn't like my store, she could open her own. She quit bitching and is now a regular customer.

    2. Re:Dumb question by fleener · · Score: 1

      "Put up or shut up." Yep, unless you do something personally, you have no right to complain. So we should eliminate reviewers altogether unless they produce productas themselves. All reviews should be written by the manufacturers. That will solve our problems.

    3. Re:Dumb question by kneel · · Score: 1

      maybe you should write your own article.

      --

      indierock / punkrock band photos and more... http://www.digitaldefection.net

    4. Re:Dumb question by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Reviewing a product is very different from somebody saying "I can build a machine for $$ cheaper". Read the article.

  28. Gotta be anon for this commentary... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    THe problem with the summary above is that it totally misses the point. Now how many of you read forums at hardware sites? I'm sure most of you have dabbled in it. What do all of us see? Well, through the woefully-poor signal-to-noise ration there may be a few posts that are truely gems. However, most posts focus on bickering over silly issues that are more than likely the fault of the user not the hardware. The rest of the remaining comments tend to focus on the proverbial pissing contest. For example (we see this on /. too): "AMD sucks" and then a very intellectual poster will say "No Intel sucks" and post that hideous picture of that man with a gapping butthole to somehow prove their point. What the Tom's Hardware article is saying is that people need to get off their butts and stop complaining. If people think they know how to do it so much better, then its time to put your money where you mouth is and start building computers. Once in the work field, the true nature of the industry comes out and people learn that its not always as easy as it looks.

    I guess the best way to describe is all those people who complain of such-and-such feature missing or being substandard in a GPL'd project. To that most respond that the complainer should start coding it or shut up. This article says the same to hardware enthusiast complainer: "build it or shut up".

  29. I tried to be the next Dell once... by Fortunato_NC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    and I've got plenty of advice for those who might want to try it.

    1. Don't take on any partners. My company had 3 owners. If it had had one owner and 2 employee's I'd still be in business. Multiple owners means that profit is divided. While you're getting started, you have to live off of whatever miniscule profit you generate. If you have to divide those profits three ways, you're going to have to learn to love Top Ramen.

    2. Dealing with local distributors is a great way to get parts quickly, but their prices are awful. Get contacts overseas, and import your own parts, or work with national distributors such as Tech Data or Merisel. Just be aware that their prices will be awful too until your volume comes up.

    3. If you're selling computers via mail, etc, be careful with credit cards. Chargebacks come right out of your bank account. Visa/Mastercard/etc. do a great job of protecting the customer because they can steal from the merchants. If you're hit with a chargeback, it doesn't matter that you've been victimized, too. We once had three high-end PCs (marked for signature delivery) "stolen" from a customer's doorstep. Then, when the customer decided he didn't want us to ship replacements and hit us with the chargeback, we were out nearly $10,000. I still believe the customer saw an opening and stole those PCs, but I'll never know for sure.

    4. Control support costs. Many small "white-box" PC makers provide top-notch support, but customers will eat you alive if you let them. I realized that when I went over to a good customer's house to help them with a PC problem and ended up looking at a laptop we didn't even sell them. A corollary to this is that if you're going to be providing "personal touch" service, make sure that your pricing reflects it. You can't visit people's houses if you're selling a $500 PC @ 5% margins.

    5. Watch inventory. Keep as low a supply on hand as possible, because when component prices drop, customers expect assembled PC prices to drop accordingly, and immediately. Your competitors watch their inventory, too.

    6. If you're planning to offer services and support in addition to hardware, consider becoming a VAR instead of a system builder. You can benefit from the marketing opportunities that the Compaqs/IBMs/etc offer, and you don't have to deal with warranty support of your own boxes. If you have a service department, the companies you deal with will pay you to do warranty work.

    All in all, I can't say I recommend starting a PC company. Because you're selling what is essentially a commodity, your margins are constantly being squeezed. And that sucks! But, if you have access to Asian manufacturing and can control your costs, you just might prove me wrong. Good luck to all the future captains of industry out there!

    --
    Blogging Weight Loss, Distance Education, and more at verlin.com
    1. Re:I tried to be the next Dell once... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      In fact, your post is +5 advice for anyone starting a business in a tough market, especially a commodity-driven market, whether PC-related or not. Could just as well apply to a restaurant or a novelty shop.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:I tried to be the next Dell once... by RicoX9 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Fortunato has hit most of the nails right on the head. There are a few he didn't even swing at.

      I started selling computers in college. Opened a storefront. Did it for 8 yrs. Was a success in every way except financial. We kept our heads above water most of the time.

      Margins went from passable (1990) to total crap (late 1997). Margins seemed to move in inverse proportion to my sales. It gets to the point where even doing decent volume and being reasonably well connected isn't worth the time.

      98% of my customers are what I now refer to as "End Users" (this is NOT a compliment). Clueless losers who wanted everything for free. When they break something, it's my fault.

      Most people have no clue when they go into business. There are LEGIONS of government agencies that show up at your doorstep. Every year it seemed that there was a new agency that I needed to pay protection money to. Tax reform is the best thing ever, if only it happened on the state level where it would make more of a difference. I can't imagine how bad it would have been in California or New York instead of Alabama.

      People I meet find out that I ran a business, and will usually end up saying something about how that would be so great (it was, for a while). I then spend 30+ minutes educating them on what they're getting themselves into. I change a lot of minds.

      I started my business to do something I liked doing: Working on computers. The last 2 years I spent 75% of my time pushing paper. 80 hrs a week because there was too much to do, and I couldn't afford the extra employee to make up the difference.

      Things I got by working for someone else (that I didn't have for 8 yrs):
      Health insurance, life insurance, retirement, vacation (8 yrs is a LONG time not to take more than a 3 day weekend), 40-50 hr work week, respect, 8 x increase in pay...

      AND - 99.8% fewer End Users. (I'm a network admin - 2 layers of support to go through to get to me)

    3. Re:I tried to be the next Dell once... by davew666 · · Score: 1

      1. Don't take on any partners. My company had 3 owners. If it had had one owner and 2 employee's I'd still be in business. Multiple owners means that profit is divided. While you're getting started, you have to live off of whatever miniscule profit you generate. If you have to divide those profits three ways, you're going to have to learn to love Top Ramen.

      I don't think I agree to this one, although all the others seem to make sense. If you have a limited amount of money to survive with, then you are more likely to be able to do it by sharing with partners than by paying salaries. Unless your employees are very understanding, then they will want their money regardless of how the company is doing, and this could be the end if there is not enough to pay them. With partners, everyone has an interest in keeping the company afloat, and will not want to take money if it means they and the company go under.

    4. Re:I tried to be the next Dell once... by pz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We once had three high-end PCs (marked for signature delivery) "stolen" from a customer's doorstep. Then, when the customer decided he didn't want us to ship replacements and hit us with the chargeback, we were out nearly $10,000. I still believe the customer saw an opening and stole those PCs, but I'll never know for sure.

      This was an excellent and informative post. But I'm curious about this particular bit -- wasn't the carrier liable since you specified signature delivery and, presumably, no signature was obtained?

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    5. Re:I tried to be the next Dell once... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think there is insurance for this sort of thing.

    6. Re:I tried to be the next Dell once... by Fortunato_NC · · Score: 1

      You'd be surprised how that (doesn't) work out. Many large companies count on one fact to protect them from lawsuits, and that is that it costs too much in terms of time and money for a small company to sue anyone. We took it to our lawyer, and he told us that we'd be looking to spend $14K to try to recover $10K.

      One thing it taught us was to add insurance coverage to all our shipping.

      --
      Blogging Weight Loss, Distance Education, and more at verlin.com
    7. Re:I tried to be the next Dell once... by CowBovNeal · · Score: 1

      Just wondering.. did you have the same network experience before you setup shop or while you were running that shop? Did you current employer hire you on the basis that you ran a computer business for 8 years and knew networking?

      I'm not saying working for somebody else is bad.
      Its just that sometimes you have to go through the grind of life to get to a stage where you can sit and and reminisce about your hard days. Good luck.

      --
      Bush is on fire and its not good for my lungs.
    8. Re:I tried to be the next Dell once... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yup. add insurance. thats what its for. too bad you got hit by such a large amount.

    9. Re:I tried to be the next Dell once... by shepd · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the advice!

      As a small startup doing exactly the same thing (check my URL), it's very good. I've dealt with #1, #4, and #5 already, but didn't even think about #2 or #3. If you're feeling generous, I'd love to chat with someone who has been in the business before.

      And yes, the 5% profit margins are 100% correct. That's why I sell so many other items (and I *loathe* the customers that want 1 hour of phone tech support to drag and drop items to Nero Express).

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    10. Re:I tried to be the next Dell once... by RicoX9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good point - I did learn a lot and make my contacts that led to future employment from that store. It did lead to my current good fortune.

      The point I'm trying to make is that TODAY, there is no longer enough money in this business selling PC's. And that being self-employed is not the Nirvana that a lot of people in college think it is. It's by far more work than working for someone else. Usually for little to no reward.

      IF you start a services based business, you can probably get by. That market is also pretty well saturated. The big boys have most of the lucrative service contracts.

      I have worked for a Tier 2 ISP (CLEC), city government, Cisco Systems (dot-bomb layoff), and now a non-profit hospital (that actually makes money and profit shares with the employees).

      There's a lot of BS in any job. At least you get some level of security and benefits with a "real" job. I'll never go back unless forced to. I have some ex-employees that have pestered me for years to join them in some sort of new enterprise or the other. It wouldn't happen unless I'd run out of options. I have family to consider now too.

      Just my $0.02 worth. The grass is not greener.

    11. Re:I tried to be the next Dell once... by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Ford makes it a point to fight every lawsuit. They have a small repuation of not being the one to sue unless you are right. It eliminates frivious lawsuits, but the cost to fight overall is about the same for them as giving in for everyone else. (As I understand it, obviously anyone who ise interested should do research)

      I recomend you fight every such case you can. In the long run your loss is about the same, but fradusters are brought to justice once in a while and that is worth doing.

    12. Re:I tried to be the next Dell once... by benliong · · Score: 1

      Me and my partner are in a car part distribution business, and we occasionally sell parts to end customers with credit card charges. These are the few things we learn:

      1) Always wait a day or two before the money is shown "Settled" into your bank before shipping the products out.

      2) ALWAYS ALWAYS save information about tracking number, and ALWAYS put full insurance coverage on shipment. DO NOT USE USPS. If you lose your shipment, customers will dispute the charges and you'll end up losing these shipments.

      3) Must write up a clear and formal policy and have the user agree to it whenever they purchase your products online. This doesn't always protect you, but it does help you fight off Credit Card Dispute sometimes. Put in there clearly that you are not responsible for shipping carrier's fault (shipment lost or damaged)

      4) Give yourself a 15 business days leeway in the policy mentioned above, and stick to it. You need to look into it when the customer claim that they didn't receive the package or it's not the right item or what not. The customer's actually not always right, and they are not always acting with good faith. Always protect yourself.

      Personally I like distribution business (which I am in) a lot better than dealing with end customers and Credit Cards. Credit Card Companies always make it a point to give customers more protection than they do to business, especially in America.

    13. Re:I tried to be the next Dell once... by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      I have something like "The Idiot's Guide to Personal Finance" (can't remember the exact title). The guy is up front that the most effective way to build wealth is to run your own successful business. He's also up front that 95% of all business startups fold within the first 5 years. It takes courage to do something like that. Congrats on getting 8 years out of it.

    14. Re:I tried to be the next Dell once... by pz · · Score: 1

      One thing it taught us was to add insurance coverage to all our shipping.

      Although this might sound like a wise-ass comment, it is meant seriously. Is it easier to get money out of an insurance company by filing a claim than it is to get money out of a shipping company by suing them? Even when the so-called insurance is being sold by the same shipping company who is handling your package (and therefore you'd be making an insurance claim against the same company you'd previously had just sued for breach of contract)? Have you had a chance to test the theory?

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    15. Re:I tried to be the next Dell once... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason you went out of business, is that you didn't support Ogg. Nobody wants to use your crappy computer if it doesn't play Ogg, because then they have to spend another $15000 on patent licenses. No wonder the business failed.

  30. Oh goodie by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, where are the horizntal bar graphs comparing Dell, Gateway, HP, Compaq & Packard Hell? Why aren't there 30+ advertisements for whoever gave Tommy the most dough? Why isn't there a seperate section in the article with benchmarks on a bunch of those brand-name PCs? I want to know how Quake 3 will run at 1600x1200! How good are these babies in overclocking? This isn't Tom's Hardware! Someone messed with my DNS settings!

    Untill I see at least 20 useless horizontal bar graphs with various benchmarks that mean nothing, at best, I refuse to believe we're talking about Tom's Hardware.

    1. Re:Oh goodie by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      When that happens, I just use Dan's graph. Dansdata.com to the rescue!

  31. Ergh... by The-Bus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's almost like saying "You don't like Chevrolet? Make your own car and compete!"

    You have to look at it realistically. As a national manufacturer / re-seller the road will be very tough. Hardware isn't profitable to begin with (margin-wise) and there's not much room in the market. Only company I can think of that "came in" was eMachines, but I don't know anything about them, I just know I didn't see them 10 years ago. But for example, what happenned to Packard Bell?

    I think where a lot of value and opportunity lie would be any niche market... Take for example, AlienWare, who makes specific game-oriented PCs. IIRC they will even install games for you and tweak them for your hardware configuration (at no extra cost). Dell doesn't do that, so they're not in direct competition.

    So where are there niches? Could someone compete with AlienWare? What about a super high-performance company that sells already-cooled OCd systems? Or an anti-Wintel company that is setting itself up correctly so that, no, you won't be clogged by DRM in a few years? I could imagine a company setting up computers for very cheap that, say, boot up in 10 seconds or less. Sort of internet or email machines for other parts of the home. Or extremely sleek looking systems -- hire a good designer and make stuff that looks better than Apple's, but is a PC inside.

    There's lots of room for interesting business models. But why would you need another Dell?

    --

    Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    1. Re:Ergh... by rotciv86 · · Score: 1

      I beleive Packard Bell got bought by NEC.

      --


      My ghEtt0 webpage.
    2. Re:Ergh... by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      Yes, they did. E-Machines was indeed a surprise entry, though.

    3. Re:Ergh... by MikeXpop · · Score: 1
      Could someone compete with AlienWare? What about a super high-performance company that sells already-cooled OCd systems?
      Someone's trying to.

      Disclaimer: There are a LOT of rumours about this company being fake, but there's a lot of substantial evidence that they're for real. Buy at own risk.
      --
      Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
    4. Re:Ergh... by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      What about a super high-performance company that sells already-cooled OCd systems?

      I doubt there's a market in this. OC'ing a system decently usually costs about as much as you speed it up, but if you do it as a vendor, you'll have to recoup the work hours. The overclockers are more about sticking it to the man than about saving money. You're not sticking it to the man if you let someone else do the OC'ing for you, so I doubt the OC crowd will be interested in this kind of service.

      The only OC'd systems that might be interesting would be the very ultimate high-end, the ones that don't have same-speed alternatives at dell or gateway. But despite how many people claim they would like such a sytem, few people will actually shell out the dough for it, so it would be a very low-volume business indeed.

    5. Re:Ergh... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Chevrolet is a horrible comparison. Prior to WWII and prior to various regulatory requirements beginning largely in the 60's, there were hundreds and hundreds of foreign and domestic competitors to Chevrolet. The reason you can't compete with Chevy has very little to do with tech, and everything to do with safety and emissions requirements. It's almost trivial in most of the US to build your own car. But to build them and sell them. Good luck.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    6. Re:Ergh... by bluGill · · Score: 1

      It happens all the time. Remember Northgate computers who were everyone's favorite long before Dell was heard of? They didn't last as long as Dell has, but they were once a big name. (And their keyboards are still well thought of) Dell somehow came into the picture. So have a lot of other companies, some made it for a while, others didn't last long. A few have managed to stay so far. Its anyone's guess though who the big name will be in 5 years.

    7. Re:Ergh... by houghi · · Score: 1

      But for example, what happenned to Packard Bell?

      They closed shop in the USA and they are still strong in Europe where they are in the top 3 or top 5, depending on what or who you listen to. Production or assembly, if you like, is being done in Europe for the desktop. The advantage they have compared to the competition is the amoubnt of software wich is important for the first time buyer. Here for some info.

      For the second time buyer, the mothercompany NEC Europe has the legend. A no frills good machine wich is there so be solf as fast with as little support as legaly possible. Legend

      The mother company is Nec Computers who do NOT sell in Japan and China.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    8. Re:Ergh... by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      You said it. Electronic cars, alternative fuel vehicles, people trying to break into the automotive market with their own auto brands, and even new advances in steam car technology are all hampered significantly by all the red tape they have to climb through to be certified road-worthy.

      They started with the best intention, protecting John Q Public, but it really hinders competition and new entrants to the market.

    9. Re:Ergh... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      I lay much of the blame squarely at the feet of Ralph Nader. Much as I'd like to vote for a 'spoiler candidate' for president, I can't stomach the lies he told in 'Unsafe at Any Speed'. And the thought of voting for a man without a driver's license is almost as absurd as voting for a man who had never seen a checkout price scanner prior to 1990.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    10. Re:Ergh... by DuckDodgers · · Score: 1

      He lies a lot in it? I'm not surprised, considering the other stuff he has done - but I didn't know. Maybe I'll look it up some time. Thanks.

    11. Re:Ergh... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      It's kinda like that iPod battery replacement fiasco. GM had a car (the Corvair) that did one or two things to make it cheaper. It was identical to some things VW, Fiat, and some others did. But Nader wanted a name, so he went after GM, not VW (who sold a lot more Bugs with the defect than GM could hope to sell of the Corvair). Furthermore, GM *knew* about the problem, and was in the process of fixing it in a later model. It was released, and was a heckuva little car, but the damage had been done. GM decided 'to hell with it' and went back to building boring, large cars for another couple decades. Send email if you want me to go into the specifics.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  32. THG vs Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THG is the only site more useless than slashdot.

  33. Off the mark... by djupedal · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...getting in touch with Asian suppliers who "are more than willing" to give you discounts, just so that they can get their foot in the lucrative N. American and European markets.

    So much wrong with this kind of statement. China doesn't need those markets. It does need the western style of pragmatic project management, etc, but the market is now inside China/Asia, and much larger than Europe and North America. This statement only serves to show why the west is being left further and further behind.

    1. Re:Off the mark... by Cyphertube · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, China was still interested in bringing in more hard currency, which is part of the reason the yuan doesn't float.

      The belief that the market is in China is the reason many western firms have gone belly-up, including one I've worked for.

      China is still very happy to sell to the Europe and North America, especially if they think your business will even approach 1/100000th the size of Wal-Mart.

      --
      Linux - because it doesn't leave that Steve Ballmer aftertaste.
    2. Re:Off the mark... by djupedal · · Score: 1

      China brings in all the hard currency it needs from arms sales, tourism and forced local investment by western/european firms wanting to have a domestic foothold.

      Selling slippers and DIP switches keeps the mid and lower tier firms happy while the big boys play. The big boys aren't dumb enough to rely on Wal-Mart class incomes. Shut the doors on outside markets today, and China will still move forward.

    3. Re:Off the mark... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, China brings in all the hard currency it needs simply by buying it in huge quantities, which is what has kept the dollar artificially high throughout the nineties. They're starting to slow down now, though, hence the plunge in the greenback (i.e. back to where it should naturally be trading, giving the huge US trade and budget deficits).

    4. Re:Off the mark... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > China doesn't need those markets

      > This statement only serves to show why the west is being left further and further behind.

      Now that sounds like a statement that comes from jeolousy.
      Usually one doesn't imitate one that's being left behind.

    5. Re:Off the mark... by djupedal · · Score: 1

      They began slowing this effort when they started the push for WTO status. These days they want to appear to be a nicer neighbor, by encouraging currency flow vs. buying it outright.

      Not to say there aren't other actions, motives and events going on in the back room.

  34. No VC will give you the time of day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    For so many reasons that are obvious this is an idiotic plan...but lets list some:

    The market for PCs is already oversaturated

    Margins are already basically zero on desktop boxes

    Your company would not be able to scale like any of the large players

    etc etc etc

    Basically no one is going to invest startup capital in a business that has such dismal prospects from day one.

  35. I see these entrepreneurs on eBay all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just do a search for "Ultimate System" or some other catchy phrase and you'll get dozens of listings of beige box builders. The problem is these systems are often more expensive than a Dell when you factor in the shipping. Plus there is no customer support and the warranties are all isolated to the individual components. So it's never a surprise to see no bids for any of these systems, unless they are loaded with pirated apps.

  36. Scale Matters by G4from128k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Although we may all rant and rave about the wasted resources in big companies, scale does matter in the PC industry.

    1. Amortizing R&D: It costs money to develop and document a new PC (learning the vagaries of drivers, interactions with myriad software packages, and cranky connections to all the possible peripherals that customers might have). The more PCs you sell, the more you get to spread this fixed cost over the customer base. (Even if you, Mr.NewPC Inc., wants to ignore this, the vendors that must supply you with engineering data and support won't).

    2. Uncertainty of Sales: If you expect to sell 10,000 PCs tommorow, then the basic statistics of random arrivals of orders means that there is a 95% chance of recieving betwen 9,800 and 10,200 orders. So, you order parts for 200 extra systems (2%) provides cover in case of high demand. If demand is low, you can sell the extra 400 systems in the first few minutes of the following day. On the other hand, if you expect to only sell 25 PCs tomorrow, then these same statistical issues mean that there is a 95% chance of recieving between 15 and 35 orders. To cover the same range, you need to order 40% more parts than the average expected sales and a low demand day leaves you with 20 extra systems (almosty a full day's sales) sitting in inventory.

    3. Marketing Costs: If you want to be the next Dell, you need to tell people about you. A nationally broadcast ad costs the same regardless of whether you sell millions of PCs per year or only a few PCs per year. Maybe you can find more targetted ad outlets. Maybe you can rely on word of month (although given that most dissatisfied customers are more vocal than satisfied one, word of mouth is a dicy strategy). EVen if the ad is targetted, the creation of the ad is stil a fixed cost that gets divided by the number of PCs you sell.

    I'm not saying that small Mon&Pop PC companies don't have a niche (some customers will always be willing to pay more in order to buy face to face from someone they know locally). I'm only saying that big PC makers have advantages in scale.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Scale Matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see this parent comment modded-up !

  37. Yeah, right? by sethadam1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Audrey. The eVilla. The list goes on.

    Internet appliances came and went. All in the blink of an eye. What you're talking about has happened. And failed.

    1. Re:Yeah, right? by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      Heh. So have tablet computers.

      Thing is that for some weird reason Microsoft (and others, but mostly Microsoft this time) insists on trying to bring it back again and again.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
    2. Re:Yeah, right? by mblase · · Score: 1

      Internet appliances came and went. All in the blink of an eye. What you're talking about has happened. And failed.

      That doesn't necessarily mean it's the end for them -- Apple's Newton wasn't considered a failure after Palm arrived, they were "too far ahead of the curve" or "good idea poorly implemented" or "too expensive for too little".

      I think there's still a market for "internet appliances", but we need a few things in place first. To wit: widespread use of higher-resolution HDTVs to connect them to; low-cost Bluetooth or radio-frequency keyboards; a good way to use a mouse without a surface (gyroscopic flying mice come close, as do trackpads); and plug-and-play broadband (so you can plug the box into your cable or digital satellite cable as easily as you plug it into the power outlet).

      It's not unachievable by any means, but I don't expect it for several years. When it happens, though, the company that makes them first stands to make a killing.

    3. Re:Yeah, right? by Geekbot · · Score: 1

      That's because Gates does a pretty decent job of guessing what the future holds. And judging by his moves in the marketplace, he's guessing that PC's are going to lose their market. And if that happens, it's a pretty wise idea to risk some serious cash in order to find the next big thing, like Palm type computers. Telephony has been around a long time, but getting more successful now as it reaches for the internet appliance model. Who knows if that will work out, but still a good idea for someone to try throwing some money into if he can afford it.

  38. why not? by autopr0n · · Score: 2, Funny

    Because it's far, far cheaper and less work to bitch then it is to start a company :P

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  39. Keep in mind by autopr0n · · Score: 2, Informative

    That a TiVo is a general purpose computer running Linux. It's not hard to make a general purpose machine 'just work' for what you buy it for. The problem comes when people add in new software and drivers. If you buy a new dell, it'll 'just work' as long as you like as long as you never upgrade the hardware or software (assuming you don't connect it to the internet, or that no security patches break the system... )

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  40. Why not pt 2. by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Actually the reason not to get into the PC business is because it's stupid. Unless you have tons of money to advertise, why would anyone buy from a 'no name' company when they could get a Dell, probably for cheaper? Anyone who knows enough about computers to judge their quality would just build their own anyway.

    Maybe if you made super-high end systems like Alienware, or some other companies, and could justify a heavy premium, you might make money.

    Of course, then you would need even more money to start with.

    Not only is it stupid, it's also unoriginal. I mean why would you would you want to get into the business of selling basically the exact same thing as hundreds of other companies? Why not make something Unique and interesting?

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Why not pt 2. by mOoZik · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the car manufacturers. Tell that to toilet paper makers. Tell that to punk rockers. The point is that you're doing something *better* than is being done. You have the extra quality that your competition does not. I make my own white boxes and sell to people. I sell only one per week, but considering I have no storefront, not website, and nothing one would expect of a computer company except a dedication to quality and excellent customer support, it isn't too bad. Looks like you fall in the "I'll say how similar everything is so I don't do jack squat" category.

    2. Re:Why not pt 2. by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Actually making toilet paper is a better business than the PC making business.

      Toilet paper prices don't go down every 2 weeks, and they don't get obsoleted by new models every quarter.

      There are far better business to go into, but hey I'm happy if all of you go into the PC making business. Coz PCs make for fun toys, and the more of you around, the cheaper my toys get.

      --
    3. Re:Why not pt 2. by delmoi · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the car manufacturers.

      How often do you see new Car companies crop up? Not to often. Other then specialized ultra-luxury, or ultra-performance everything is made by a few companies with several brands.


      Tell that to toilet paper makers.


      First of all, most toilet paper are part of huge corporations that make lots of different items for use around the house. And if you make too much toilet paper, you can keep it stocked up for years, or decades even, untill you sell it. If you make too many computers, in a few months they'll be worth less then what you paid to make them.

      Tell that to punk rockers.

      Maybe punk-rock sound all the same to you, but in fact each CD is generally different from the other ones. And people have a pretty easy way of directly measuring the quality of the music before they buy the disk. Unlike PCs who's quality is much more difficult to measure.

      The point is that you're doing something *better* than is being done.

      Yeah, right. And how is anyone supposed to know that? The only company (eMachines) that actually managed to break into this feild did so by making all their products worse then the rest.

      You sell one PC a week. How much profit do you make on each one? How many actual hours do you spend doing "excellent customer support", huh? I doubt you're making much money.

      --

      ReadThe ReflectionEngine, a cyberpunk style n
  41. That's funny by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    http://www1.us.dell.com/content/topics/segtopic.as px/kiosk?c=us&cs=19&l=en&s=dhs&~section=pa

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  42. Re:Mirror of article by eatdave13 · · Score: 1

    Your goatse link needs to be hidden better.

    --
    "Verbing weirds language." -- Calvin
  43. Any color you want... by vjlen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...if you pay for it. I believe you can literally get a white-colored case under this program (I've seen photos elsewhere of the cases.)

    Dell's white box program

  44. Dell really doesn't have inventory by RadioheadKid · · Score: 3, Informative

    Dell uses just-in-time inventory and has the component makers store the parts until Dell needs them. Basically the parts aren't Dell's until they are in the system.

    --
    "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -Homer Simpson
    1. Re:Dell really doesn't have inventory by Reziac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do you mean Dell has no investment in the components at all until they actually go out Dell's door? Boy, is that ever putting the financial onus on the supplier!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:Dell really doesn't have inventory by Cyphertube · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's the same strategy used by a lot of JIT companies. I do believe that Toyota functions that way, at least in their Japanese factories, and I know that Nokia works like that.

      With Nokia, the idea is that that they can push on both quality and price, because if you, Mr. Supplier, can't meet what they need, someone else will, and they can also upgrade parts immediately if necessary. (At least that's how one parts supplier explained it to me.)

      --
      Linux - because it doesn't leave that Steve Ballmer aftertaste.
    3. Re:Dell really doesn't have inventory by RadioheadKid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yup, most suppliers have to warehouse their product near Dell factories. JIT inventory was pioneered by Toyota. Do a quick search on google and you'll find information about it. Interesting stuff.

      --
      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -Homer Simpson
    4. Re:Dell really doesn't have inventory by Reziac · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Occurs to me that it then behooves suppliers to sortof avoid offering innovations until all their old inventory is used up, otherwise they'll be stuck with it. JIT manufacturing from raw materials (rather than from components) strikes me as a much more difficult juggling act.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    5. Re:Dell really doesn't have inventory by TheLink · · Score: 3, Informative

      The picture is even better for Dell:

      Dell gets order from the customer first.
      Dell gets confirmation that customer's money is good from Card Company. +$$$
      Dell then gets the parts from their suppliers.
      Dell sticks em together and ships the stuff to customer.
      Dell pays the suppliers sometime later. -$$
      -
      whereas for the other companies with stores and stock, the -$$ comes way before the +$$$.

      Given that computer parts tend to go down in price as time goes by and you'd see why that makes an even bigger difference.

      --
    6. Re:Dell really doesn't have inventory by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know that you can only claim the +$$$ when you ship.

      But it looks good to say you have XXX orders.

      --
    7. Re:Dell really doesn't have inventory by Reziac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And no doubt like most companies in such a position, Dell pays grudgingly and late. Meanwhile the supplier gets to absorb all the debt interest, too.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    8. Re:Dell really doesn't have inventory by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      Yes, and some people characterize 'Just-In-Time' inventory methods as not having warehouses, but instead storing your inventory in semi-trucks that circle the plant until the parts are needed.

      Which isn't far off. It's somewhat an accounting swindle.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    9. Re:Dell really doesn't have inventory by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      Yep. It's a corrosive business environment.

      Similar to how WalMart does things.

      The Yuppies have grown up, and are in charge. The 'Me' generation, it's sometimes called. Short term profits are everything. Pink Floyd's song 'Money' wasn't sarcastic.

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    10. Re:Dell really doesn't have inventory by jbplou · · Score: 1

      You need to read your business history again. The first successful full implementation of JIT inventory system was used by Harley Davidson. It is what changed them from being on the brink of going out of business to becoming a highly profitable company.

    11. Re:Dell really doesn't have inventory by RadioheadKid · · Score: 1

      Prove it. I've found many references to Toyota being the pioneer.

      --
      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -Homer Simpson
    12. Re:Dell really doesn't have inventory by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Most vendors doing JIT delivery pay Net30. As it has been in manufacturing for decades. Have you ever DONE business with WalMart?

    13. Re:Dell really doesn't have inventory by RobYoung · · Score: 1

      When the revenue comes before the costs, Dell will also get interest from the bank. This is also how payroll companies make all their money, from interest.

    14. Re:Dell really doesn't have inventory by bluGill · · Score: 1

      JIT is very hard. A supplier cannot just wait for the old stock to be used up, they need to be sure the old stock will be used up. Holding off on innovation means someone else can be substiotuted who has that innovation and is willing to sell it now. If you have excess inventory and the new tech is ready to go, you don't date wait on shipping it, lest someone else take your place. By shipping now you ensure the customer doesn't go looking for a different suppler that can get it. If you have excess inventory of the old stuff, you either throw it, or sell it at a loss. Either way get rid of it. (there are more options, but essentially they are the above)

    15. Re:Dell really doesn't have inventory by Reziac · · Score: 1

      In fact, now that you mention it, I vaguely recall a story from maybe a decade back, about some such arrangement that wound up forcing cargo ships to sit at the dock (running up docking charges, not to mention making no money) until the receiving company bloody well felt like collecting their cargo.

      Accounting swindle, indeed! I'm reminded of banks that refuse you use of your deposited funds for 2 to 7 days, but meanwhile are collecting interest on THEIR use of this very same money (since it is lent out to others).

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    16. Re:Dell really doesn't have inventory by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I think it's time to update that old saw:

      "First thing to do, is to shoot all the managers."

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    17. Re:Dell really doesn't have inventory by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Yeah, those concepts and worse came to mind as this discussion raged on. My brain hurts.

      Probably the only thing worse is being in a business where you have to do all your manufacturing on spec, then HOPE you have buyers!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    18. Re:Dell really doesn't have inventory by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Everything I say is from a theoretical point of view. Someone with experience correct/add to my thoughts...

      The whole point is not to have any inventory--not just by the retailer but also the supplier. So the supplier is supposed to have some JIT system with their supplier, and their supplier is supposed to be using JIT with theirs and so on. It is difficult to implement but once done it is almost seemless. Computerized systems ensure that you don't run into too many problems. All the companies along the supply line are connected together. If someone places an order for a product, everyone in the system will know that an order was placed. So your supplier doesn't have to wait for YOU to give them the order, and your supplier's supplier doesn't have to wait for them to give the order, and so forth.

      The motivation behind JIT has to do with inventory costs. Generally inventory has a HUGE cost. In many industries it is one the most costly elements of a business that you can control (as a side note, the most expensive component of many industries are wages--hence the capitalist attempt to lower wages all the time). The cost includes more than just storage costs. You also have to account for things like insurance, spoilage, obsolescence, and so forth. I guess for the tech industry, obsolescence is the primary cost of inventory. You have a small window to sell your product and if you don't, it is worth ZERO. No one wants last year's video card, any more than they want last year's CPU. JIT systems will minimize these inventory costs.

      The downside to JIT systems are its initial costs, and the unpredictability during economic swings. Setting up a JIT system is quite expensive. You need computer networks that connect with each other, pass customer information and so forth. Large companies can afford them but for medium sized businesses this could be a big one-time cost. However, large corporations implementing JIT systems force their suppliers to implement them. You either implment it or you lose business--simple as that. During bad economic times (like recessions), someone usually ends up paying for the decreased demand. In the past, the large retailers often lost money. Nowadays, the suppliers (usually medium-sized) end up paying for the decrease in demand during recessions.

      Just for reference the best example of JIT systems are car manufacturers. Unlike the old days, cars manufactured today are built as you order. Computer systems by Dell and Compaq are supposed to be like that too (although I am not familiar with them).

      Sivaram Velauthapillai

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
    19. Re:Dell really doesn't have inventory by Reziac · · Score: 1

      The problem is that ultimately there is one company at the end of the supply chain who actually manufactures all these parts, and with JIT implemented *all the way along the entire supply chain*, ALL the burden of risk, cost, and interest debt is shifted to this actual manufacturer. And that's killing these actual manufacturers.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  45. If not Dell. Where WILL people buy machines? by rueger · · Score: 1

    The real question which bears some discussion is where and how people will be buying hardware in the future. For a long time Dell or Gateway could count on business because of their reputations. Those reputations seem to slipping.

    If a couple of large companies aren't holding a large share of the market, who will? It's not likely to be the local computer store, which is less than welcoming to mom and pop. Judging by the lack of ongoing success thus far, companies like Wal-Mart or Sears won't be selling branded machines in any volume (and wouldn't want the support headaches anyhow).

    I believe that there is a spot in the market right now for something new.

    The problem with buying from retail outlets is that you get a one size fits all machine which usually isn't quite what you need or want. Maybe we'll see something along a Dell model, but aimed at non-business purchasers. On-line or phone sales, but allowing customers to customize the system for say music use, or gaming, or to downgrade for someone who just does e-mail and word processing.

    Install the apps or games or features that the customer wants, and ignore the ones that they don't. Maybe offer a shiny branded Linux box that will do everything that the WinXp boxes do, but a bit cheaper.

    There is a market of people who just want to buy a box that works, and who don't necessarily want all the extra gobbledy gook that retail systems include. If you can add quality customer service you can probably even charge a premium.

    Remember, Dell's market wasn't built on price, it was built on a reputation for quality, for building the system that you needed (optional iupgrades tec), and for having top notch support.

  46. Re:Dumb questioner! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you have a point!
    It is easy to be pompus and critical from a seat of ignorance! You are typical of what it wrong with your generation of Americans. Smart Mouth, ignorant mind.

    Put up or shut up!

    My local Community college has a "PC Management" class that just built 36 kickass whitebox CAD systems. Most parts were from Tiger Direct, not the cheapest place, but the return policy help when a student scorches a Motheboard. The Students learn hands-on, and the college gets a price break on better'n'dell equipment. Win-Win Situation.

  47. There will never be another Dell by RadioheadKid · · Score: 1

    Well maybe not never, but it seems that computers are on the verge of going completely to a commodity device, if they already haven't.

    As computers get cheaper, which in turn makes them more disposable, which in turn makes the purchase of one not that big of a deal, people will seek out the lowest price, not caring as much about quality, if they can get another one cheaply. We're not there yet, but almost. It's looking like the new opportunity is laptops, they are coming down in price and accounting for more and more computer sales, but Dell is already leading there too.

    I think the more interesting part, is what's going to happend to Apple as computer prices keep going down. The price jump to a Mac seems to get longer and Apple's computer sales keep dropping.

    --
    "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -Homer Simpson
    1. Re:There will never be another Dell by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      People certainly don't seek out the lowest price right now. If they did, they wouldn't be buying Dell at all, and Dell would either have to go out of business, or start offering competitive prices.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    2. Re:There will never be another Dell by RadioheadKid · · Score: 1

      You are correct, because it's still a 'big purchase' to buy a computer. But if the prices get low enough, computers will start becoming more like DVD players where you can just grab whatever is on sale.

      --
      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -Homer Simpson
    3. Re:There will never be another Dell by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      That's not about prices. If the 'sale' items don't have the specific parts I want, it's not going to happen.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  48. Sorry, this is off topic, but... by Lobo_Louie · · Score: 1

    ... I have built my computers from parts for years, however it looks like my next box *might* be a Dell. I need 1 question answered: If I choose to purchase an operating system with a new computer, is it going to be actual Microsoft CD or some "welcome To Dell. Here's Your Shovelware CD". I ask because a new box will run Debian and I'd probably opt to install Windoze on an old (non-Dell box).

    1. Re:Sorry, this is off topic, but... by Blrfl · · Score: 1

      Dell gives you a CD that will restore your system to something close to the way it came from the factory. Some others (HPaQ, for example) give you a shovelware CD that preps the machine and then turns it over to a real Windows CD for the rest.

      If you read the accompanying licenses carefully, you'll probably notice that the copy of Windows you have is licensed for use only on that box. Gates didn't get rich allowing OEM copies of his products to be installed elsewhere...

    2. Re:Sorry, this is off topic, but... by Lobo_Louie · · Score: 1

      That's what I thought. I really don't want a computer restored to factory configuration, I want a clean install (just windoze, Java, JBuidlder and maybe some anti-virus software). Thanks.

    3. Re:Sorry, this is off topic, but... by Roydd+McWilson · · Score: 1

      In my experience, Dell gives what acts like a standard Windows install CD, but it wouldn't boot on a non-Dell PC.

      --
      THE NERD IS THE COMPUTER.
  49. Interesting New Version of History by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    > Why not start the same way ... Apple... took by
    > forming your own store, getting in touch with
    > Asian suppliers...

    Um, perhaps you should actually _read_ about how Apple started?

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  50. Re:Why not pt 3. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I sell whiteboxes like more than 20 companies in my metropolitan area! I sell my expertise with each and every system. Training, troubleshooting, hand holding, etc. Hardware customers get a discount rate on my consulting services.

    My total advertising budges is spent on a yellow-pages advert. I do attend the local trade shows, and all of the local computer parts shows. Satisfied customers are my advertising agency.

    You can beat my prices at Dell, gateway, Walmart, even Radioshack, and at the other no-name shops. Price is just a number, support is the key.

    I have more customers than I can handle alone, I have had to expand and take on employees. I am a VAR, That stands for Value Added Reseller. Better yet, I am local, I speak the local dialect, and I can service my clients faster and more efficiently than any large outsourced corporation.

    I started out on a shoe-string 6 years ago, with $5000 of personal savings. I'm clearing 6 figures yearly with no outside investing, the bigest loan I had was a note for the company van, $26K.

    So, I am making money on Average systems, selling at a premium, and making money. How does this reality fit your theory?

    Ahh, it takes more than wishes and wants to get ahead, get off your chair and do something! Or as Tom said, stop whining.

  51. Support _matters_ by InsomniaCity · · Score: 1

    The problem that I come up against is support: What if it goes wrong? they whine.

    I get commission from leads to my mate's beige-box PC business... and my friend provides a warranty, but he doesn't have the time or means to pick up and drop back PCs, or swap out 95% of the system if necessary.

    Some of the people i've come accross (ie the potential customers) almost seem to know that they can get an identical system cheaper... but will not make the leap to someone who they've never heard of. It seems like they want to pay 1/minute for tech support, as opposed to local rate!

    For those of you (in the UK) interested in earning me some commission, check out Pro's Friend :)

    --
    You cant make anything foolproof, they'll only invent better fools.
  52. The next big thing... by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 1


    I personally think that the next big thing that people will want although they don't know why are Mini-ITX computers.

    Look at the apps.

    It is a computer, but it looks like a gamecube in size and is a good price. It is the new WebTV with REAL FEATURES.

    Laptops are great, and WebTV was a great idea that never caught on, but why not Webtv? Well my mother had one and this is all I can say:
    1. It was only one service, and that was getting expensive. Dial up only.
    2. When a person gets net savvy, they want features after a bit. WebTV offered no features.
    3. NO MOUSE. You just cannot navigate the web without a mouse. END OF DISCUSSION.
    4. It really is a computer. But it looks like an appliance.

    Somewhere in the future, the Webtv, Xbox, and Mini-ITX computer will merge.

    That is when it will get interesting.

  53. Success is a double-edge sword by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

    You want to have a small number of beige boxes that are solid and need virtually no support.

    But offering only 2 models, your business probably won't last very long.

  54. "Store" is a figure of speech... by aquarian · · Score: 1

    ...you witless geek!

  55. What the article is really about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    The article writer finally has realized that most of his readers are 13-16 year old kiddies.

    Yes, indeed the component and barebones system manufacturers want to do business and SELL their wares! Gosh!

  56. Terrifying speeds... by mick29 · · Score: 1

    ... could be achieved by combining this with recent failures of GPS in Europe. See this article here (in German).
    Abstract: Satellite SVN23 (PRN23) has gone off-line due to an "anomalous condition", which led to people having their GPS devices telling them they flew 14 km high with 120kph.

  57. Forget the other comapnies by lithiumfox · · Score: 1

    Forget them. If you aren't able to put a computer toghether yourself, instead of buying a cheap suitable Dell or Compaq computer for your internet and basic needs, just go buy an extremely overpriced IBM T40P.

  58. Economies of Scale by gears5665 · · Score: 2

    Economies of Scale require any competitors to Dell to have massive amounts of venture capital, which prohibits what you suggest. Also Dell has had years to develop appropriate automation, quality control procedures, and customer support systems which would require a great deal of work to be able to compete with a 500$/computer. Of Course, I don't touch on all of the issues involved in a business or even this idea but these are a few of the things that would stop me from even spending time(=money) researching the possibility.

  59. Computer Engineering by Detritus · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Building a white box computer from generic parts is not computer engineering. The world does not need more generic boxes assembled by trained monkeys in someone's garage. There are plenty of OEMs who can produce thousands of systems per day, properly tested, documented and packaged, for less money.

    If you want to start a business, identify a real problem or need, and develop a product or service to address it. If you want to build computers, don't try to copy Intel and Microsoft. Design a computer that does something new and unique, or does it significantly better than existing systems.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  60. People think they need more than they do.... by FatSean · · Score: 0

    ...and this fuels the sales of general purpose computers. How many people buy the top of the line Dell to do Email and Web Surfing? Lots I'm sure...and some of them must be smart enough to know they can do those things for less...easier...with a dedicated device.

    Thing is, they don't want to look like 'wussies' infront of their buddies (You mean you got the 6? should have got the V8 man!) and some actually do believe that they will use their new PC to make world class films and music. Heh.

    Some trend that sells tarted up trucks as 'SUVs' to people for whom a station wagon would be overkill.

    --
    Blar.
  61. et all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, but I had to point out that "et all." is incorrect. The real abbreviation is "et al." It is short for "et alii," meaning "and others."

    I actually laughed when I saw what seemed to be just a randomly used Latin conjunction.

  62. A true Linux-based consumer PC by Animats · · Score: 5, Insightful
    It's been tried. Remember Packard-Bell? e-machines?

    Consider this: Design a Linux-based home PC targeted at Wal-Mart customers and their kids. The "no nonsense, no excuses" PC for America.

    • Preload it with all the software a Wal-Mart customer typically needs. Good media players, a good browser, OpenOffice. Partition the disk with a read-only system backup partition, a system partition, and a user file partition. Provide a boot loader that can recover the initial state of the machine without wiping out the user files. Use the most reliable file system available. Run NSA Secure Linux and put the browser in a jail, so that nothing that comes in from the outside world can mess up the system. Provide a backup to DVD capability and have the software encourage people to use it now and then.
    • Clean up the aesthetics of your Linux distro. Get some good looking icons designed. Fix the rough spots in the interface. Remove features if necessary. Bring in Susan Kare.
    • No user serviceable parts inside. The user can't easily open the box, and if they do, it voids the warranty. Everything is soldered onto the motherboard. No slots. Conformal-coat the board, so if the kiddies spill Coke into the thing, it's unharmed. Test the thing over a wide temperature and voltage range, put it on a shake table, find the weak points, and fix the design. It's cheap to make it rugged in the design stage.
    • User test. Bring in families with kids and have them take it out of the box, set up the system, surf the web, write and print a school essay, and play some music. Without opening a manual. Videotape this. Watch the tapes. Fix everything that gave them problems. Repeat until over 95% of testers have a seamless startup experience.
    • Find an offshore supplier to make the thing. Manufacturing cost should be low; it's one board, a hard drive, a DVD drive, a power supply, and a case. Make sure the power supply is UL approved. Get a bid from Flextronics and go down from there.
    • Offer an optional equipment replacement program, like cell phones. Any customer can get a new unit any time they want one, up to two per year, no matter what happens.
    • Head down to Bentonville, Arkansas and the Corridor of Doom. Convince Wal-Mart to stock the thing.
    1. Re:A true Linux-based consumer PC by lorenc · · Score: 1

      The biggest problem in this plan is that Wal-Mart would demand pricing that was better then what they get for regular PC's ... and if you did that, you would probably not have any margin left - or you would be losing money. BTW, designing and making a "locked down" case, and conformal coating the board etc. would really jack your costs. Also, the testing/R&D required to test it like you are saying would be pretty expensive (in time or money depending on how you go about it...

    2. Re:A true Linux-based consumer PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how many million will this cost?

    3. Re:A true Linux-based consumer PC by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      Weren't Sun supposed to be trying something like this? Well, aside from the aesthetics... the screenshots look pretty average compared to a stock KDE install...

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    4. Re:A true Linux-based consumer PC by Animats · · Score: 1

      And how many million will this cost? Several. Maybe 0.1% of what VA Linux blew.

    5. Re:A true Linux-based consumer PC by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1

      Oh, so you mean become Apple.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
  63. Business 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an observation on your point #1. Your company can have as many owners you want, as far as your business plan takes that in count. When you are starting your company you cannot expect to make profit inmediatly, Amazon in it's complex business model took 4 year to have profit, this time was planned.

    If you want to receive money from day 1 then you need to include your salary (and the other owners' salaries)in the expenses, if you don't have earning after the considered amount of time when the equilibrium point is calculated. Once you have passed this point, if you have revenues then you can split with all your partners.

  64. duh, its obvious by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    You can get parts cheaper than an assembled pc. That makes perfect sence. Dell, Gateway and others have to Pay for it to be assembled, shipped, marketed ect. In addition to that they must make enough to pay for the lights, executives, tech support, and all of the other bills they pay. So yes individuals that do not have to pay for all of those things can build pc's cheaper, but not at the volume that any major pc manufacurer does.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  65. The future! by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

    Haha, then perhaps the future of efficiency demands that Dell become Apple's reseller and distributor; Apple then gets higher volume, and Dell gets higher margin, and both companies win : )

  66. Don't forget businesses... by cgenman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you are looking to sell expensive boxes, don't forget businesses. Build sharp, top-of-the-line boxes into shiny piano-black cases, then offer to setup their office network if they buy 3 or more of the things. Want 802.11g wireless and a 5 year warranty on that? Insurance against fire, flood, acts of god? I can keep that printer of yours topped off for just $50 a month. Know moore's law? For $100 per month I'll keep your system up-to-date (every 1.5 years).

    There are a lot of niches to be filled while working with businesses. They're focused upon doing something other than computing, and could really care less about what WEP encryption is. Outsourcing that to someone else makes a lot of sense, and being the guys who sold them the hardware is a good way to get into their offices... and vice versa.

  67. Commodity market by Infonaut · · Score: 3, Insightful
    There's an established and dominant vendor (Dell) in the PC hardware business. There are several big, strong competitors (HP, Hitachi, Sony, et. al.). The price of PC hardware is dropping like a stone. The components themselves have long ago become commodity items, and the cost of providing support for customers is not insignificant.

    Unless you want to go after a niche market (witness Alienware's success with PC gamers), taking on established vendors in what is now in many ways a commodity market is a very dangerous proposition.

    Low margins, relentless competition, and an undifferentiated product aren't exactly the factors that would lead an experienced entrepreneur to want to enter a market.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  68. Business Plan . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's the plan.

    1. Collect Underpants
    2. ?
    3. Profit

    It can't be beaten I tell you.

  69. I'm interested in starting such a biz by DanielCarden · · Score: 1

    Let me know if you want to join in. I want to serve several niche markets. Unfortunately we will have to start with a biz plan that discusses ownership and how the venture is managed. If 8 people contact me, I figure 4 of us will have compatible ideas on how to proceed. Daniel dot Carden at cox dot net

  70. eMachines is #3 in sales. by gelfling · · Score: 1

    And for the prices they charge you don't really care all that much about the specs. I'm sure there are some 1337 Gamerz who have to have that last 0.8% of performance.

    I'm also sure that PHBs and suits will ALWAYS buy only HPaq. Or IBM Thinkpads or whatever they think they need.

  71. Re:X-BOX vs. PS 2/X by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My guess is that the huge battle for the home PC user in the near future will be between X-BOX vs PS 2/X. Actually we are looking at the warm-up round now. The home PC will soon be gone. Why start a new business that is already doomed.

    X-BOX/PS2 with email client, browser, VoIP ports (like CISCO ATA186 and a friendly VoIP provider ~ Vonage, 8x8 or even AT&T), Video/Audio on Demand (with copyright issues settled), perfect gaming experience including online commuinty, DVD playback/record... And I don't care about OS, RAM, CPU. The big question will be about the shape of the services mix but the free market will have the last word...

    And my wildest guess is that the X-BOX/PS2 will be provided by the service providers for FREE. Currently you get CISCO ATA 186 worth 140 USD for free when you sign up with Vonage ot 8x8. New PS2 at Amazon.com is priced at 149 USD. Well that's true only if you have Broadband. So keep your eyes on KOREA...

  72. Uhhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's like asking who wants to be the next Michael Jackson. Or something.

  73. Major Name Computer Manufacturers are Done. by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

    This isn't 1980s. This is the 2000s. You don't have a vendor or two (IBM and Compaq in Dell's case) selling a 'home computer' upwards to $5000 without a $800 monitor.

    Assembling your own white-box for $2000 with a $500 monitor in your apartment could be done pretty easily.

    But now you have to build a white box system, offer 3 years of idiot level support & 3 years of parts warranty in order to begin to compete - and then you'd have to do it 20 - 30% less expensive than Dell who already has driven the bottom of the market low.

    Unless there is something new out there that I don't see on Newegg.com or something, it'd be a lot harder than it was when Dell did it in the 80s.

    --

    As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

  74. Do any Slashdotters build their PCs? by solprovider · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The posts so far are about Dell's business model, but the article is asking techies to ignore Dell and build their own PCs, then build a business and negotiate for better prices. Why isn't anybody discussing building PCs?

    I build PCs for myself, my friends, and my family. Most of them have custom "Solprovider" machines. I pick the parts; I build it; I install the software; I support them. PCs I build remain usable for over 5 years, and I average about 1 support call per machine per year. (If you are interested in what I build, see my October recommendations from the last time I built a PC.)

    I am not attempting to turn this into a business. I have a very successful career, and the effort is too high and the margin is too low for this business to be worth my time. I refuse any money, although I expect a home-cooked dinner for my trouble, but then I only build PCs for people I care about. The other side is that these people know that I will never interrupt my paying work to help them, so sometimes their problems can take over a month to solve.

    But why aren't you trying to sell PCs? You are already technical. You probably understand what the hardware does. You can learn how to use a screwdriver. You already know how to install software. The bad side is that you might have to install MSWindows if the buyer insists, but you could install grub for dual-booting, so every time the buyers watch it boot there is a chance they may choose Linux.

    (Use the Maxtor 160GB drive. Use only 10GB for Linux and they will not complain. Tell them it is there so you can troubleshoot easier, but they can try it if they want. I am actually installing a new hard drive this way this week.)

    I usually spend several days to research my recommendations. One day is spent researching the new technologies; one day is spent researching the various products; and a few hours are spent checking prices. Someone who builds more than one PC every 6 months would spend much less time per PC because their knowledge would remain current.

    --
    I spend my life entertaining my brain.
    1. Re:Do any Slashdotters build their PCs? by Cyphertube · · Score: 1

      I'd actually love to sell PCs. I don't know how to get in touch with suppliers that won't cost me an arm and a leg. I'm not looking to make a huge business out of it, but if I were to sell five a week, I could easily fund my studies.

      Being that I will be on campus all the time and around students, I know that laptops would be of interest. Anybody have recommendations on where to find good suppliers?

      --
      Linux - because it doesn't leave that Steve Ballmer aftertaste.
    2. Re:Do any Slashdotters build their PCs? by crisco · · Score: 1
      I skimmed your page and found most of your reccomendations fit very well with my own experiences. However, a couple caught my eye as being quite the opposite of my experience so I thought I'd ask for clarification.

      First, the Win98 over XP reccomendation. In my experience, the stability advantage of 2000 or XP far outweigh the lightweight but fragile 98. The DRM of XP is a factor, but 2000 doesn't have that and only is only slightly less compatible with older software. The XP vulnerabilities on installation are easily avoided with a little preparation, especially by someone that builds the occasional system.

      Second, your reasoning behind the Intel over AMD reccomendation. Wasn't Intel's 400 MHz (now 533 and 800) bus designed for the narrow but fast Rambus memory? While Intel definately has a memory bandwidth advantage, they suffer higher latency (compared to AMD) throughout the design, resulting in comparable performance at AMD's marketing performance ratings (AMD more effecient per clock but can't hit the GHz that Intel does). In my opinion the AMD is worth the $100 (or more) savings.

      Overall though, your reccomendations closely match my own personal experience. Buy the cheap end of the CPU performance curve and spend the savings elsewhere on quality components.

      --

      Bleh!

  75. The fine art of supplier save-driving by XNormal · · Score: 1

    ...getting in touch with Asian suppliers who "are more than willing" to give you discounts,

    Those Asian suppliers are obviously more than willing to meet Dell's ridiculous demans for lead times that force their suppliers to rent warehouses in Austin at their own expense, store large stocks at their own expense, have every product return by a customer -- even if it has nothing to do with that supplier's hardware -- counted against them and generally be treated like dirt, bullied around and periodically be bumped off the supplier list with no warning just "to keep them on their toes".

    Dell knows how to use their massive buying power and that a Chinese factory will work at cost or below just to avoid firing their employees.

    --
    Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
  76. Just the Start of the Glowing Box! by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Actually I think that a new era of small time vendors is just getting started, only we're not building Beige Boxes, we're building Glowing Boxes using cheap aluminum pre-customized cases along with nForce motherboards whose built in video cards (with 4X/8X AGP slot too) blow away anything I've seen built into most of the Beige Box vendors machines for a very affordable price. The only problem is customer financing. Most people can afford to go down to their local Best Buy and put $500 to $1500 financed on a computer, however have a hard time doing $500 to $1000 one time cash/check/MO to a small time operator who can't afford to deal with credit and creditors.

    From the article:
    So, why the rant and rave? Why don't I get notes from people saying:

    Hey, bastard, I've set up my own company, and I am going to be build and sell the best PCs that money can buy. People are going to be buy from me because, I'll know more about one add-in card in my system than the whole of Dell's offshore technical support team will know about a 90 day warranty.

    The little guy that can, the guy who can go on to build PCs for resale, is called a White Box vendor.

    Actually I prefer Glowing Box vendor, but what the hell. With WindowsXP and a bunch of free and open source programs (Fire/Thunderbird, etc) a small time vendor can do alot more than any time in the past ten years to provide a safe and good user experience to the massses. And I'm too busy trying to be a small time vendor working from home while my wife works outside the home, keep the two tech savvy friends who work as my full time road techs working (and one more part-timer/trainee), and get my new 2004 website online to actually sit down and write something about it. ;)

    HighSchool Startups building basic companies for dummies
    Tech from home Part 1 and Part 2 A must read from someone who has "done it"
    Incorporate or LLC Online One stop business creation for any state
    U.S. Business Advisor sponsored by the SBA and a great resource.

    Jonah Hex
  77. Open Hardware by midgley · · Score: 1
    The startup I want to see succeed is something that if things go badly we are going to need - open hardware.

    So interesting though the Chinese processor is, a SPARC based on one of the open specifications, is what I'd like to see turn into a viable business.

    I don't see programmable gate arrays getting the sort of speed we want, at the sort of cost, in the near future, but again, knowing that processors can be built in those devices is reassuring.

  78. If at first you don't succeed ... by __aadkms7016 · · Score: 1

    > What you're talking about has happened.
    > And failed.

    Sometimes it takes a lot of tries for a
    new thing to stick. There were many
    hypertext systems before Tim
    Berners-Lee did his variant. There
    were many pen computers before
    Palm broke through. Early failures do
    not indicate a hopeless idea.

  79. Two problems-The loyalty gene. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot the loyal customer base. Apple was hurting not only because they couldn't bring in as many new customers. but a lot of dedicated Apple users left, not always willingly. Apple ditched the braindead managment, and brought back the iconic steve jobs. He got rid of a lot of the unnecessary variety, and concentrated on what Apple was good at. Not only did he pick up new customers, but brought back many that left. Now how can Dell generate that kind of loyalty?

  80. XGI CARDS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you see the benchmarks? You're not going anywhere if you use those....

  81. *Three* groups, actually... by hlh_nospam · · Score: 1

    I have always viewed this business as being divided into three distinct groups:

    1) Those who make things happen,

    2) Those who observe what's happening, and

    3) Those who wonder what the Hell happened.

  82. Don't overlook the inefficiency of big business by utahjazz · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've worked at a lot of companies big and small (120,000 employess down to 20 employess)

    I've learned that big companies are doomed to becomming appalingly inefficient. I mean, words just can't describe how inefficient they are. The worst part is, most people at big companies started there, and have always worked there, or at another big company so they have no idea what the other world is like.

    Honestly there are things that take a month at a big company that take 5 minutes at a small one. (Not because of cutting corners on needed process, but just plain inefficent stupidity).

    So how do big companies survive? Just what eveyone's been posting, margin and big-company bullying. This is what balances things out.

    But don't assume you can't beat Dell because you don't have their margins. You also don't have their inertia.

    Incidentally, one exception is Microsoft (yah I worked there too, probalby should post AC). MS operates like a small company with 20,000 employees. My group consisted of 31 people: 30 engineers, and 1 admin. That would be unheard of at any other big company. They feel much better with like 5 working engineers, 5 people with engineer titles that do nothing, and 20 people that make spreadsheets that track what day today is, and what day tomorrow will be etc...

  83. Not as easy as you'd think. by forevermore · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I work for one of the more prominent server integrators. We're a small company, but have a number of large clients (realnetworks, MIT, several divisions of Microsoft) and are growing quickly. One market that the owners haven't tried to move into is the desktop market. Sure, we do build/sell desktops as a favor to customers who want them, but we can't compete with a company like Dell, who can sell an entire machine for less than we pay wholesale for just the motherboard and CPU.

    So we've focused on a different market. There is no "Dell or Compaq" in the server market - sure they sell rackmount machines, but they can't get the same discounts on them as they do on desktop hardware, so small companies like us can compete with the "big guys" (and we usually come out below their prices). We also offer better quality workmanship and customized modifications (something that can't always be said of our competitors) - the case manufacturers don't always understand that 1/16 of an inch tall or wide can make a difference between "fits" and "doesn't fit" in a rack, or that certain pieces of metal sticking up might short out certain motherboards.

    --
    Do you really need reason for beer? Wingman Brewers
  84. With a statement like that you deserve a Dell! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope you have such joyful experiences with
    a pre-built piece of shit that you throw it out
    the window onto your car windshield.

  85. Cheap is the key word by gtrubetskoy · · Score: 1
    , cheap eMachines killed HP, cheap Dells killed eMachines and cheap what is going to kill Dell?

    All this is true on the assumption that cheap is good. Cheap is good so long as computers are expensive (i.e. over $300 in my opinion). When the price gets to about this level, cheap will stop equating to good, and people will start looking for what is really better. In this scenario high quality makers like Apple and Sony will be the winners.

    As a comparison - look at the audio/video equipment. People no longer look for the cheapest camera/dvd player/tv, they look for the highest quality (for as long as it is not obscenely expensive, and even then it's not a problem). I made the mistake of buying a cheap cd-player last month for the kids - it lasted about a week. I think computers are going this route as well.

    1. Re:Cheap is the key word by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > People no longer look for the cheapest camera/dvd player/tv, they look for the highest quality

      Then you only know rich people. In the real world, however, people still buy cheap crap because they want Cool Item X! but don't want to pay $500 for it. A lot of people I know, when shopping for electronics, find what they want as cheap as possible. Some of them then take that price +10% or so, and buy whatever falls into that category. They don't look for quality, they just have some semi-random estimate of what it should cost, then buy slightly-more-expensive crap. Sometimes the more expensive stuff is crap.

      For instance, I know a lot of people who have Apex DVD players 'cuz they are dirt-ass cheap. None of them have had any problems (average ~1.5 yrs owned), but another friend with a slightly more expensive Pioneer had it break within a few months.

  86. Shows how little you geeks understand business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Dell is who they are because no one else can duplicate their business model.

    Sure, you can say you line up Asian manufacturers, blah blah blah blah blah.

    Do you think that IBM or HP/Compaq or Gateway haven't tried that?

    Dell's business model is a one-of-a-kind distribution/supply chain mechanism that no one has been able to duplicate. They have such incredibly tight controls over inventory and they have pounded their suppliers into giving them everything that they want in terms of how their parts are delivered, when, at great prices.

    The PC hardware business has a razor-sharp margin, and this this situation, the only way you can make big money is by volume. They have such great control over prices, they actually make money on the depreciation your computer undergoes by the time you place your order and by the time they ship your CPU.

    I have built every single computer I've owned since 1988. My latest computer, Intel 2.4 GHz 800 FSB was a Dell for $412. How the hell can anyone compete against that? For $412, I'm getting a 40 GB hard drive 128 MB ram, 2.4 GHz CPU with a motherboard that supports AGP 8x, SATA, etc. And best of all, Dell's CPU cases are awesome! Not one single screw I need to use, everything is snap on. The case alone is worth $100+. So instead of building and making my computer, I went with Dell.

    This is why you can't compete against them.

  87. More like... by Kjella · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just-in-time assembly. I imagine they're not stocking parts in a just-in-time fashion, at least not all of them.

    In a purely JIT shop, everything would be obtained as it is needed (purely pull, no forecasts, no stock in principle). The primary downside is lag - you can't deliver until the slowest part has arrived/been produced and assembled.

    The point is to use JIT where it's needed, on parts that drop fast in value / become obsolete very quick.. I'm sure they have lots of stock in Dell casings, ATA cables and Dell stickers (or companies which are basicly Dell inventory holders, if not), and very little of *the* fastest CPU/GFX card at any given moment.

    JIT isn't a wonder cure, it needs to be applied with some sense. Computer assembly is a something of a star example though - well defined interfaces (PCI, AGP, CPU sockets) and modularity. It's no doubt it's the most important factor in Dell's success.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:More like... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking, that they must keep SOME stuff in stock if only because they KNOW they're going to use a ton of it (generic stuff like cases, that don't change much from one month to the next, but you know you're going to ship 10,000 of 'em between now and whenever). Then someone piped up with a statement about Dell not keeping ANY inventory, and ... well, true or not, it's an interesting concept. Far less interesting if you're the poor bloke with your cash tied up in it!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  88. You are retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anonymous Cowards are mentally deficient.

  89. identify a problem or need by goon · · Score: 1

    correct but only one piece of the puzzle ...



    successful innovations had some, or all, of the following features: they were moderately new to the market, based on tried and tested technology, saved money, met customers' needs and supported existing practices. By contrast, the products that failed were based on cutting-edge or untested technology, followed a "me-too" approach, or were created with no clearly defined solution in mind.

    Economist, Expect the unexpected talking about Why Innovation Fails , Carl Franklin

    --
    peterrenshaw ~ Another Scrappy Startup
  90. putting *s in the word "crap" by victorvodka · · Score: 1

    Since when did CRAP become an obscenity needing *s in place of letters? Bro - you did this twice! What's next, we can't say "yellow" anymore because it's too suggestive of pee which is too suggestive of poo?

    --

    The flag just makes more sense than the constitution. - Judas Gutenberg

  91. You know greater OSS adoption will by PotatoHead · · Score: 1

    help quite a bit with this. Why? Services.

    Anyone can sell a cheap box, so folks shop for the cheapest they can find. Well, every last one of those people are going to have problems. Next time they buy, they are going to be looking for solutions.

    The current state of affairs strongly discourages this. What the big software companies want you to do is sell the cheap box, and their software. You build their business while just getting enough to sustain your own. Oh, you get the front line support calls too --thanks for playing!

    With OSS, you can provide solutions and services that solve problems on a local scale. Now you get the customer and the dollars for servicing them. Each and every one of those support calls is now a chance for you to build your business instead of your suppliers...

  92. Wow... by Maudib · · Score: 1

    This story is great. I never thought of that.

    Now would the writers just be so kind as to fork over the 100k I need in startup capital.

  93. Spelling Nazism by snilloc · · Score: 1
    ...find specialized nitches or the product lines simply dropped.

    Sorry, I've seen this way too many times on /. to let it slide again.

    The word is "niche"
    .

  94. Re:X-BOX vs. PS 2/X by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    If it's really all about the services, it would be great to see the XBox services offered to the other platform which would obviously cope: PC. Yes, we have everything the XBox has...

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  95. Why ask why? by t0ny · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The reason people dont do it is because its easier to complain and criticize others (Microsoft, Intel, Dell, whoever) than it is to put your ass on the line and try to get something done.

    Here's to Slashdot and all the armchair geeks!

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    1. Re:Why ask why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet you don't get work done while you criticize people here.

    2. Re:Why ask why? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Slashdot and all the armchair geeks!

      No, we are real geeks. Armchair geeks are people who think they are geeks, but still call the case "the CPU" or, even better, "the Modem."

  96. well first by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

    you need money,
    so you need to start saving up to buy a lot somewhere, then you need money for advertising, then you need money to buy low end parts.

    So, here's a plan:
    start your store up as a kind of computer thrift store, and rebuild old computers and everything, sell them for low cost, and accept donations, and contribute a chunk of your profits to some noble cause (such as cacner or opensource, etc)
    and eventually start building your own quality line of computers, that will start having their own part of the store..
    and while you're at it open a small coffee shop area that allows people to browse the net at a small fee like most net cafes, do things that bring people to your store, then wit the more money you get, open more stores, and then just keep it all up.
    get contracts with companies like bawls and get some vending machines and snacks people can get, soon you'll have a place that will appeal to your hardcore customers. namely the gamers and the geeks.

  97. Dell PC price is less than the sum of it's parts. by Nonesuch · · Score: 1
    You can get parts cheaper than an assembled pc.
    It's tough to get all of the parts cheaper than the price of a complete PC at Dell, particularly if you take advantage of the various discounts (free shipping, $100-$200 off, free RAM upgrades) from Dell.

    Add in assembly and a warranty, and Dell is cheaper than buying parts.

    Dell, Gateway and others have to Pay for it to be assembled, shipped, marketed ect. In addition to that they must make enough to pay for the lights, executives, tech support, and all of the other bills they pay.
    For a "good enough" consumer PC for my family, I prefer that they buy a PC from Dell, at about what I'd pay for the parts. They get warranty support from Dell, I get to keep the time I'd have spent assembling a machine from parts.

    The mid-range Dell personal desktop machines are actually very good. While I've run into complications upgrading Gateway and Compaq machines, it's easy to add storage, drives, and cards to Dell. Just about anything except the motherboard and powersupply is standard and can be replaced.

  98. I was wondering... by HiggsBison · · Score: 1
    Whatever happened to Kuo Feng Corporation and their cheap monitors. Last I heard they were selling somekind of fried...

    Oh, that's a "G". Never mind...

    Oh! A "G"! [long pause] Oh!
    It took me way to long to get that. Sorry.

    --
    My other car is a 1984 Nark Avenger.
    1. Re:I was wondering... by kfg · · Score: 1

      Oh, that's a "G". Never mind...

      Blame my parents. Lord knows I do.

      KFG

  99. "more than willing" Asian suppliers by ElliotLee · · Score: 1
    How do I find these "more than willing" Asian suppliers?

    I'll sell it on eBay.

  100. Thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I thought I was the only one who felt that "whitebox" assembly was a monkey's work. The business, however, is fraught with pitfalls arising from the typical cheap-assitude used to put together these piece of shit computers. Hell, even if they use topline parts the fact that said parts have not been matrix tested together holds these generic computers to a QA disadvantage.

    Monkey's work, and one would have to have a monkey's intelligence to have the desire to enter the "whitebox" business.

  101. Check out my idea by sundling · · Score: 1

    There are a bunch of us techies that know their stuff in computers. The real way to do is to work together and make an employee owned version of a dell.

    Here's how we do it:

    1. we get a central group together that sets up a distribution center, gets the asian low cost, volume deals and then a JIT supply chain. The center assembles and ships the computers either to customers or our local reps. This entity would have a salary cap on "executives" so that there wouldn't be some big CEO, CFO, etc that takes the company profits. There would be an employee based oversight committee on major changes or those affecting executive salaries. All profits by this main entity would be put towards the business, marketing the main brand or profit sharing. News and technical information would be shared with all members.

    2. In local comminities, those like us would be trained / certified to handle PC support. These reps would work somewhat like technical francises.
    There would be a shared repository for problems and solutions that would be shared. We'd quickly develop support best practices and our high level of knowledge would enshure customer loyalty. Certain support plans would cost more money.

    We'd stick to some standardized PC choices to limit the number of configurations, like just 1 or 2 motherboards for each of the AMD/Intel lines.

    Bottom line, if we worked together, it could really be something. Once it hit our stride it'd be like open source going against microsoft.

  102. The pink case by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1

    I was going to build a PC for my girlfriend.... but all the cases at the parts shop were either silver, black, or beige.

    So she found a company that built computers in pink cases, because pink looked "cute".
    Actually they took about 2 weeks to build it, and it was damn cheap. ....but all it took was a pink case (hard to find) which sealed the deal.

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
  103. I think it is MUCH HARDER than people think by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

    I haven't read the article. Sorry about that. Having said that, I'll inject my thoughts :)

    I think what the thread proposes is MUCH HARDER than people think. If the proposal is correct, how come the thousands of small business stores that sell clone PCs aren't doing it? I'm sure one of these stores would have tried it. I mean, there are probably 300 PC stores in Toronto. I would imagine some of them would have tried it.

    I see several potential problems. First of all, margins in the PC industry are VERY LOW. You are literally making nothing. This might sound good to a small business since they can accept lower margins than large corporations. That's true in some cases but not here. The large corporations simply will have higher ECONOMIES OF SCALE. They will also be able to get better prices from their suppliers. Someone who ships 10,000 PCs has greater clout and can get lower prices than someone who ships 10. Companies like Dell won (in the 90's) because they competed with others like IBM, etc who had higher costs. Unfortunately for you, you'll be competing with Dell's present day low margins. I'm not sure you can win against that. Sure, you have lower advertising costs, are more flexible, can possibly ship lower cost software (eg. GNU/linux), but I don't know...

    I think it'll end up being similar to the small farmer vs agribusiness issue. The small farmer loses all the time (unless some socialist ideal is used to save the farmer eg. subsidies, heavy restrictions on how big a farm and how many farms a large corporation may own, etc).

    Having said all that, I don't want to discourage any of you. If you like it, do a market study and if it seems viable, go for it. It's just that I don't see it working out--but then again I'm a loser :( I personally would rather attempt to start a small business that INNOVATES and introduces something new.

    Sivaram Velauthapillai

    --
    Sivaram Velauthapillai
    Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  104. bad example by djupedal · · Score: 1

    That is a myth.

    Microsoft didn't invest...they paid a settlement to avoid being found guilty over patent infringement. Which I don't need to point out is another predatory practice so many companies are fond of when they don't have any ideas of their own...same as Dell.

    1. Re:bad example by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > Microsoft didn't invest.

      Okay, I put that in because I didn't want to seem one-sided. Sorry :)

    2. Re:bad example by djupedal · · Score: 1

      :) funny...

  105. AMD vs. Intel by solprovider · · Score: 1

    The whole webpage is a "recommendation", so it is defined as an opinion. It is MY opinion, but still just an opinion. I am glad you enjoyed it.

    --- Operating System ---
    I was an avid gamer. (I have not had the time for a couple of years, since I am trying to launch several software products.) Windows98SE is still the best gaming platform. The PCs I build are for single-user, so the multi-user abilities of the NT line are more of an annoyance than a benefit.

    A friend uses Win2K, and had problems with many games. We tried to troubleshoot them, but he eventually just gave them to me. We also had a few hardware issues. (He returned that stuff.)

    I do not like WindowsXP. I do not like the interface, and even after changing everything back to "normal", it still performs differently in ways I do not like. (I also use several Linuxes, so just different would not bother me.) I also seem to have the ability to crash XP often. I know people who are using it, but I cannot recommend it.

    My recommendations have not stopped several of my friends and family from running XP. It does mean they have to listen to me say "I told you so" every time they call me for software support, which is much more often than the Windows98SE users.

    --- AMD vs. Intel ---
    I did start that recommendation with "I do not understand".

    The savings is less than $100. According to SharkeyExtreme's DEC 31 CPU Price Guide, the P4 2.6Ghz 800Mhz bus is $162. The "equivalent" Athlon XP 2600+ (2.08GHz) 333Mhz bus is $90. So you save $72.
    - The P4-2.4 800bus is $153. Athlon XP 2400+ (2GHz) 200bus is $75, so the savings is $78, but the AMD bus is one fourth the Intel.
    - You are running a slower chip and get less than half the bus speed. Does the higher latency more than halve the speed of the bus? Is the equivalency valid when comparing to the 800Mhz bus?
    - AMD's fastest CPU is 2.2Ghz, but even the Athlon XP 3000+ (2.16GHz) costs more than the P4-2.6, so you cannot compare at the same CPU speed. According to AMD's chip speeds, every 80Mhz increase for AMD is equal to a 200Mhz increase for Intel. Can this be true?
    - Apple has been selling better quality but slower speed CPUs for years, so the "equivalency" system has tradition. It feels like AMDs equivalency system is a marketing ploy from when AMD had the faster bus and could prove the numbers, but it is still used because AMD fell behind in the 32-bit CPU technology and needs to appear better.
    - $72 is not much when the system still costs over $1000. If buying the Intel makes the system usable for a few more months, and gives better performance during its life, than it is worth it. My whole recommendation is about spending the money where it makes a difference.

    If using an AMD gives a true perfomance increase, then please give me details. If it is to save a few bucks at the cost of any perfomance, then I would prefer to stay with Intel.

    --
    I spend my life entertaining my brain.
  106. Re:Dell PC price is less than the sum of it's part by mgcarley · · Score: 1

    This does not surprise me in the least. Where I work, we generally do computers at 17.5% margin, large parts (eg colour laser printers) at 20%, software at 25% and normal parts at 35%. Laptop accessories (specialized equipment) is typically done at 35%.

    We get away with it, and have for just over 10 years. We are the only local manufacturer with English-speaking staff and good service, which probably helps.

    All of our stuff is off-the-shelf componentry. Typically, a system will contain motherboards from Gigabyte, Seagate Hard Drives, AData RAM, Intel CPUS, Hyena or Enermax Power Supplies, Dynalink (Askey) or US Robotics Modems, Panasonic Floppy Drives, LG optical drives, LG, AOC or Viewsonic Monitors (depending on CRT/LCD), Genius or MS Keyboards/Mice, Genius, Altec Lansing or Creative Speakers... all pretty good stuff. Not necessarily top of the line or tweaked to perfection, but it works, and we have very few problems.

    Stuff that we do have problems with is generally fixed within 2 days or so. The staff (well, mostly me, anyway) is knowledgable in most fields - be it Hardware or Software related. (Well, I do have some quips...)

    (Those that live in NZ will roughly know the story of why NZ's LARGEST manufacturer went bust... check www.nzherald.co.nz and type PC Company in the search box... look for stories around September/October 2003...)

    We keep a balance of good service by not supporting software to a great extent (like, we tell customers, nicely, to piss off if they ask us how to use Kazaa or Grokster or if they are having problems with that stuff on their systems... We can fix it, but we charge :)), and if something can't be solved in 10 minutes (over the phone), then we say that it's easier if you can bring your machine in...

    Just my donation of 2c.

    --
    Founder & COO, Hayai India (hayai.in) / USA (hayaibroadband.com) // t: @mgcarley