Slashdot Mirror


Linux for Asia: Asianux

kiwimate writes "Two Linux distributors (one each from China and Japan) are building a common Linux platform for Asian companies. Using Oracle software to create the product, which is dubbed "Asianux", they have declared they'll create a common kernel so that the two companies' offerings can interoperate with ease."

153 of 276 comments (clear)

  1. Asianux by pheared · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess that's better than Lasia. Not much better though.

    1. Re:Asianux by brett_sinclair · · Score: 5, Funny

      And it is (ever so slightly) better than Anux.

    2. Re:Asianux by davidhan · · Score: 5, Funny

      C'mon, no one said "It should be called Rinux" yet?

    3. Re:Asianux by curtisk · · Score: 2, Funny
      C'mon, no one said "It should be called Rinux" yet?

      *rimshot*

      LOL or should I say ROR?

      --

      Sehr geehrter Toilettenbenutzer!

    4. Re:Asianux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I heard a few Canadians were working on their own flavor...

      Cannux!

      Ba-dum-ching!

    5. Re:Asianux by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      Linasia or Asiax would have been better than what they chose.

    6. Re:Asianux by HiggsBison · · Score: 1

      Not Craw, Craw!
      Really Mr. Smart, you don't speak Engrish very well.

      --
      My other car is a 1984 Nark Avenger.
    7. Re:Asianux by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 1

      I guess that's better than Lasia. Not much better though.

      Yeah, I had that done about a year ago. My eye doctor had been recommending it for a while. I can see so much better now! Thanks Lasia!

      --
      I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
  2. More open source in Asia news... by tcopeland · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...can be found on AsiaOSC.

    There's a note on the front page there about a recent Mongolian Linux release, too.

    1. Re:More open source in Asia news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      How soon they will be sued by AsiaSCO?

  3. Wouldn't LinAsia have sounded better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Or is that just my wacky English speaking mind?

    1. Re:Wouldn't LinAsia have sounded better? by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't LinAsia have sounded better?

      That sounds like some sort of nervous system disorder. No thanks!

      --
      I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
  4. Cooperation! by TwistedSquare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And there was us thinking Asia couldn't teach us anything about how to do IT, but then they turn out to have companies that actually agree on common standards at the outset!

    1. Re:Cooperation! by t0ny · · Score: 5, Funny

      Cool! Now that countries like India and China are starting to move toward Linux, they can stop writing Windows viruses and begin writing them for Linux.

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    2. Re:Cooperation! by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      And we can start outsourcing Linux tech support...'cause you know how overpaid open source developers are here.

      --
      What?
  5. Chinx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    was just too politically incorrect.

    1. Re:Chinx by DerOle · · Score: 1

      What about "Chix" ?

    2. Re:Chinx by Kiyooka · · Score: 1

      oops, messed up my back/forth in my browser, my comment on the "humour" of "chinx" should be one level up....

    3. Re:Chinx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      How about "Me likey the Rinux! Me go to univeristy at age 15! Me get master's degree in two years, steal high-paying job from American Joe-Sixpack! Me have beautiful wife and big house and young child violin prodigy! Me laugh and point at white hillbilly inbred!" Linux?

  6. Asian geography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they have forgotten that Asia is more than just the area of China and Japan. Turkey, Syria, Indian...and even Iraq are all Asian countries as well.

    1. Re:Asian geography by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they have forgotten that Asia is more than just the area of China and Japan. Turkey, Syria, Indian...and even Iraq are all Asian countries as well.

      Iraq is not an Asian nation. It is in the middle east. Syria is even farther to the west. What kind of a crazy map are you looking at??

      Afghanistan (which BTW borders China in one spot), India, Pakistan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, and one other "istan" which I can't remember right now. Those are the nations of "central asia".

      --
      I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    2. Re:Asian geography by RALE007 · · Score: 1
      Iraq is not an Asian nation. It is in the middle east. Syria is even farther to the west. What kind of a crazy map are you looking at??

      The middle east is not a continent. If Iraq is not a part of Asia, would you consider it be part of Europe or Africa?

      --
      Beware blue cats moving at .99c
    3. Re:Asian geography by r00zky · · Score: 1

      I will consider it part of America

      --
      I'm a chainsmokin' alcoholic sociopath, so-ci-o-path
  7. Complete with by gwayne · · Score: 5, Funny

    keystroke-logging lib_bigbrother.so.0 no doubt

  8. Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by Michael+Crutcher · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Why the hell does the asian market need its own linux distros? Isn't there asian character support in current linux distros?

    Is this just a national pride thing designed as a big middle finger towards western development? Wouldn't they be better served if they helped make current distros better?

    Aren't you tired of stupid questions?

    1. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by Penguinisto · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Actually, character support in any OS (including Windows), is spotty, bug-ridden, and limited at best. I suspect that this is more a chance to re-write the thing from the ground up as a native ideogramatic OS, instead of installing a native Western-char OS, then tacking on the packages afterwards.


      Makes things less clunky that way.

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    2. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by geoffspear · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why the hell does the US market need more than one Linux distro? Wouldn't all the developers be better served working on just one of them?

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    3. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by Kenja · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Stick a Linux distro CD in a drive and boot. What do you see? If you answered "English words" then you win.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    4. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Consider this:
      - Japan has two character systems
      - China is using different character system
      - AFAIK South-Korea is using another different character system
      - Thailand is using completely different character system

      So now we have at least 4-5 different character system in south-east Asia (not counting India). I seriously doubt that any wester n distribution provides excellent support to all those characters.

    5. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by sloptaco · · Score: 1

      Yes, you are very ignorant. I've set up Chinese and Japanese input support on my gentoo box, and while it wasn't that hard, I wouldn't call it trivial. Besides, I haven't even gone to the next step: full localization. Imaging replacing every (*every*) software component (besides simple unix utilities) on your Linux system with cjk-compliant version. Because of the complex character sets in Japanese and Chinese (we're taking thousands of characters 1,988+ for Japanese and 6,000+ for Chinese, plus most historical and obscure characters, and not only to mention subtle and sometimes large differences in character sets for Taiwan, Hong Kong, Mainland, etc.) text support is not as trivial as it is with systems in English et al. If I wanted a fully localized Chinese or Japanese Linux box, I would definitely considering going with an Japanese or Chinese only distro. Merging the 2 is a great idea, since a large portion of the characters are common.

      -sloppy

    6. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by trickycamel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why don't you RTFA?

      It's not about the middle finger, or about just having 'asian character support'. They want to create a product for businesses ("server-operated environment"), and for that you need tech support.
      From the article:
      "The two companies also aim to set up a joint support centre at Oracle's Beijing facility to provide technical assistance to China customers using Asianux-based products"

      Basically, it's a choice between having to resort to mailing lists and dealing with people who don't have a clue( 'CJK support? What does that mean? Why don't you just use UTF like everyone else???"), and tailoring the kernel to their exact needs with good tech support behind it. Seems pretty obvious to me.

      --
      Sig? What sig?
    7. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by Echnin · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Right about South Korea (and North for that matter).

      I'm curious as to whether this will include support for both Traditional (DPRC)and Simplified (HK & Taiwan) characters. The DPRC were, I read somewhere about a year ago, outraged that the RC (Taiwan) flag was included somewhere in some Linux distrubution.

      --
      Lalala
    8. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by sloptaco · · Score: 1

      Why don't you just use UTF like everyone else???

      Ummm... I guess you mean Western ISO like everyone else.

      -sloppy

    9. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      All I saw was a black screen, but now my cupholder works again, thanks the little ones were allways falling through the middle.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    10. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by sloptaco · · Score: 2, Interesting

      - Japan has two character systems Errr!!
      Actually Japanese uses 4 character systems:
      * Kanji (Chinese Characters)
      * Hiragana
      * Katakana
      * Romaji (Roman alphabet)

      Korean also uses Chinese characters to some extent (historically, Korean was similar to Japanese using Hangul alongside Hanzi - but now they primarily use Hangul. Hanzi is still used often for names, etc.)

      -sloppy

    11. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by Dan+Ost · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Probably, but only if you could get everyone to agree on the same distro.

      If you tried, you would probably find yourself ham-strung by people like me
      who use different distros for different purposes. I'm sure I'm not the only one.

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    12. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by sloptaco · · Score: 1

      Jesus Christ man! I was just calmly stating that you're ignorant. I guess I should have typed slower and stated it more precisely:
      You're ignorant about Japanese and Chinese text support.
      Perhaps you can argue that you aren't now, but certainly not at the time of your post. You need to tone down, man. Remember ignorant != stupid/unintelligent. Besdides, you were implictly posing the question: "Am I ignorant about this subject." And I simply answered in the affirmative: "Yes, you are." What is there to be so upset about? Relax, have a beer man.

    13. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by Scalli0n · · Score: 1

      Fuck you very much.

      --
      Sig & Below
      Yuck Fou
    14. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      i think he's talking about Shift-JIS and EUC

    15. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by jwsd · · Score: 2, Funny

      The idea is to rewrite Linux source code in Chinese, Japanese, and Korean. This way those countries no longer need to depend on American and European programmers.

    16. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by Michael+Crutcher · · Score: 1
      That wasn't me, man. You're right; I asked if I was ignorant about the subject and you responded I was. You presented a valid reason, and that was what I was asking for. I now consider myself more educated about the question which was my purpose.

      Jesus Christ man! Not all AC's that respond to reply's to the parent are the parent.

    17. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by Michael+Crutcher · · Score: 1

      I thought you thought the AC was me, but now I see that you don't even bother to look at the user id before flaming and adding me to your freak list. You know Scallion != Michael Crutcher.

    18. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

      Pretty much anything GTK+ 2.x or Qt 3.x is automatically cjk-compliant, and many applications come with asian languages as part of their i18n strings. As for the characters themselves, all you need are fonts. It doesn't matter how much there are, at worst you need one japanese, one korean, one traditional chinese and one simplified chinese.

      And then again if you run Gentoo, and have you cjk USE flag enabled, the only thing left is installing one of more input methods.

      I can run GNOME in fully Japanese flawlessly "out-of-the-box" on my Gentoo (all I need to install is an IM), so I fail to see what you are saying here by "changing everything".

    19. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by sloptaco · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I've made you a friend to try to make up for things. I was engaging in trollism/priggism as an experiment. Also, accounting for the fact I work in an open office (with anal mgtmt.) I have to be discrete with /. habit and didn't realize you weren't the guy getting irate. Nonetheless, the "have a beer" line still applies. Have a beer! ;)

    20. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by sloptaco · · Score: 1

      And I didn't mess with you Karma-Bonus modifier by the way. Hey, I've invented a new emoticon - the retarted wink:

      ;(

    21. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by sloptaco · · Score: 1

      Romaji in the general sense in not only Japanese written phonetically with the Roman alphabet. Deconstructing the word we have Roma (Roman) and ji (character). The meaning is quite obvious. Yes, Korean uses its own unique alphabet (as I stated: hangul), and I also stated the use of Chinese characters (hanzi) is not very common. So what are you trying to argue, here, besides a plea for your misinterpretation of the word romaji?

      I am almost sure that up until cirac 1960 +-10 years (I'm no specialist in the history of the Korean language), Hanzi was used in Korean newspapers as commonly as kanji is in Japanese newspapers today. (By the way, if you look at any mainstream Korean newspaper - you'll notice some Chinese chacters, mostly in parentheses next to a person's name.) Also, once when I was lost in Seoul, I was able to communcate with some older folks using hanzi written on a memo I was carrying in a successful attempt to find my way to the nearest subway station.

      Thus, the need for Chinese language support for common computing systems in Korea - for historical and geographic/demographic purposes - is still relatively strong.

    22. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by sloptaco · · Score: 1
      No, I wasn't talking about encodings.

      I'm saying how many different character systems can be mixed and matched in potentially intelligible written sentence of Japanese.

    23. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by sloptaco · · Score: 1
      Yes, I'm not advocating using a Asianix or whatever the Hell they call it. My experience has been that most commercial Linux distros suck ass! The only distros I have been satisified with so far are Debian and Gentoo. Nonetheless, I understand their marketing strategy and the potential for such a company to make money. The FUD factor: The dummies in charge of a business like things to be self-installing - fully featured and ready to go right of the box - and if their sys admins are minimal budget additions to the staff (and therefore probably dummies also) - I guess I can't blame them. From that perspective, saying things like "Just edit the USE environmental variable /etc/make.conf" is a shit-in-the-panser for most Business Managers.

      -sloppy

    24. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by hdparm · · Score: 1

      Choice, my friend. Why did they do it? Because they could. There was so much FUD spread about Linux, GNU, GPL, Open Source over the years, that's just not funny. The most ridiculous remark given to Free software developers was that they are communists. Quite opposite - if there is anything really democratic in this world, it's Open Source movement.

    25. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by zhenlin · · Score: 1

      He means character encoding, perhaps? But even then, there are 3+1 major ones:

      Shift-JIS
      EUC-JP
      ISO-2022-JP
      UTF-8

    26. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by Carpet · · Score: 1

      ahem... got your characters reversed here...

      PRC ---> Simplified
      HK/Taiwan ---> Traditional

      The two are interchangeable to a certain extent, but most people each of the respective regions can't read the other character form.

    27. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      Well, i wasn't talking about you, but the guy you replied to.

    28. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by Echnin · · Score: 1

      You're right, of course. Dumb typo on my part.

      --
      Lalala
    29. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      If there's any really democratic economic philosophy in the world, it's communism. The fact that it doesn't work as a form of government and it's only been implemented (or, at least, had some abomination of a political system implemented in its name) by dictators doesn't change what the philosophy is.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    30. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by Penguinisto · · Score: 1
      Not sure about Japanese (be it canna, kanji, or etc.), but even a "native" Chinese (simplified) Windows 2000 Pro setup tend to look like a combination of Chinese and English throughout the dialog boxes and windows. (I have quite a few recently arrived Chinese-American students, so I try to help out as much as I can.) In my admittedly limited experience, these machines tend to run much slower than a full-on native English Win2k Pro install on comparable equipment. This is why I mentioned all OSes in the earlier post... I already know that Linux is a pain the arse to get a regional language set in place.


      The Chinese ideograms also tend to look more pixellated in the GUI as well (no matter what OS), but that's just my eyeball's opinion.


      (And yeah, part of my gripe agrees perfectly that that no, it ain't seamless. )

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    31. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by hdparm · · Score: 1
      No, it (communism) just appears that way and only on the surface. In essence, it's utopia, impossible construct and particularly so in economic terms.

      The ultimate goal of communism is "From everybody according to their abilities, to everybody according to their needs."

      Fortunatelly, humans will never be on this level of thinking - that would kill all progress.

    32. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by geoffspear · · Score: 1
      "From everybody according to their abilities, to everybody according to their needs."

      Yeah, and that's just completely different from the philosophy of Open Source.</sarcasm>

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    33. Re:Maybe I'm just ignorant but... by hdparm · · Score: 1
      Your statement is totally correct if you ommit tag at the end of it.

      Nobody forces you or anybody else to use open source/Free software or to contribute to it in any capacity, even if you are using it. In communism, you have no such choice.

  9. What???! *Outrage* by curtisk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't you mean GNU-ASIANUX? *Hrmmmph*

    --

    Sehr geehrter Toilettenbenutzer!

    1. Re:What???! *Outrage* by Kethinov · · Score: 1

      No. "GNU/Asianux" would be the proper formatting for the politically correct inclusion of "GNU" in the name.

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    2. Re:What???! *Outrage* by Virtex · · Score: 1

      For most of Asia, GNU/ASIANUX will work. But in soviet Russia, its ASIANUX/GNU. Ok, I'll crawl back under my rock now.

      --
      For every post, there is an equal and opposite re-post.
  10. common kernel? by brondsem · · Score: 3, Interesting

    All linux distros have the same kernel: linux. You need more than a common kernel to get a high degree of interoperability.

    --
    "a quote" -me
    1. Re:common kernel? by axxackall · · Score: 1

      many technically undereducated editors use phrase "common kernel" instead of "common set of components". They know nothing about OS and perhaps don't know that OS has a kernel. Forgive them.

      --

      Less is more !
    2. Re:common kernel? by nandhp · · Score: 1

      Or maybe they mean common kernel configuration and versioning? This way modules compiled for one could work for the other.

    3. Re:common kernel? by pavon · · Score: 1

      No they don't have the same kernel. Every single distro uses a modified version of Linux, which makes it extremely difficult to distribute binary drivers. Whether this is good or bad left as an exercize for the reader. Red hat especially. They have so many patched applied to their default kernal that is is a nightmare to try and compile a your own kernal (say you have your own patches that you need to use) and still have have third party drivers work.

      Given how much Japanese Companies love their proprietary solutions (think Sony), binary drivers are probably a high priority for them.

    4. Re:common kernel? by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      for an example, look at the list of kernel source packages available for gentoo. gentoo-portage.com lists 43!

    5. Re:common kernel? by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

      Maybe someone should take these distros and slap them upside the head! When I use Linux, I use Slackware. One of the principles reasons is because Slackware doesn't futz around with the software. The kernel is vanilla. GCC is vanilla. KDE and GNOME are vanilla. It's enough work putting together a quality stable distribution, without second guessing other projects.

      --
      Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  11. Asia is pretty damn big by Savatte · · Score: 1

    remember, it's not just Japanand China. It's also (Soviet) Russia, India and its area, and the middle east. That's a pretty large area that doesn't seem covered by Asianux. Maybe they should have called it Orientux. That's got a nice ring to it, though it does kind of sound like an old Greek philosopher.

    1. Re:Asia is pretty damn big by Aardpig · · Score: 2, Interesting

      From Womens Studies class back in college, I'm pretty sure that Oriental is not a desired term by Chinese Americans. We read several stories by Asian American women, who all objected to use of the word. I however am not one such person, so I can't state if it truley has negative conotations. I assume it would be like calling an African American a "colored person"

      In the UK, "Asian" refers to ethnic groups from India, Pakistan, and the surrounding countries. People whose ethnic ancestry is from the Pacific rim countries, in particular those whose eyelids are characterized by an epicanthic fold, are termed "Oriential". The English-Chinese population doesn't appear to take offence at this terminology.

      Likewise, "mixed race" (argh, hate that term) people in South Africa prefer to refer to themselves as "coloured" rather than "black". So let's remember that much of the terminology used to describe ethnicity or indeed skin pigmentation is very dependent on its cultural context.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  12. This makes a lot of sense by MarkWatson · · Score: 4, Informative
    .. to both cooperate on Linux and base their IT on Linux.

    Personally, I now use Mac OS X (after about 10 years of enthusiastic Linux use :-) but there are several reasons for non-U.S. companies to standardize on Linux and cooperate on region specific versions:

    • Cost savings
    • increased security - not trusting a U.S. company (Microsoft)
    • improved CS education: really learn how an OS works in school by having the ource code
    • good performance on lower end computers
    • easier to create new inovative IT applications when you have control over the entire software stack

    -Mark

  13. And for France by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny

    And expecially for France, we will have Asterux.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:And for France by happyfrogcow · · Score: 1

      ...i don't get it.

    2. Re:And for France by Walterk · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean the Minitel?

    3. Re:And for France by lxs · · Score: 1

      The year is 2004 A.D. All of Earth is occupied by Microsoft.

      All? Not quite!
      A village inhabitated by indomitable Geeks is holding out, strong as ever, against the invader.
      Life is not easy for the Microsoft marketroids stationed in the fortified camps of Thinkpadium, Dellirium, Gatewadium and Compaqium...

    4. Re:And for France by Hydrogenoid · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is called Mandrake. :-)

  14. How open will it be? by Trolling4Columbine · · Score: 1

    As infamous as China is when it comes to the control of information, how Open will this particular Linux distribution be?

    --
    Socialism: A feeling of discontent and resentment caused by a desire for the possessions or qualities of another.
    1. Re:How open will it be? by XpirateX · · Score: 1

      One of the many driving forces in Japan to develop Linux is to encourage it's use over pirated copies of Microsoft. Why? So they may join various international organizations. I highly doubt they'll attack piracy by violating a different EULA (the GPL).
      Of course, one of the other major reasons for their (and any other nation for that matter) interest is to sprout local economy from software development instead of relying on various monopolies to supply their systems (after having a majority of the code outsourced from from their own country). It's all about retaining that value!
      Economically speaking, they have an aweful lot to gain, not only from the jobs it will supply but from also gaining better international acceptance. We'll see if this turns out as well as their trip to space/building of dams/etc. Always going big...

  15. misleading writeup by kisrael · · Score: 4, Informative

    Using Oracle software to create the product

    More like "making use of Oracle's software development centre in Beijing"--its a kind of important distinction, otherwise I was wondering what Oracle IDE they were going to use, or database they were planning to build into the distro...

    --
    SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    1. Re:misleading writeup by jazir1979 · · Score: 1


      Yeah, I was very very scared for a minute.

      --
      What's your GCNSEQNO?
  16. Taking the Li by radoni · · Score: 1

    ... out of Linux.

    thus the RMS "they're taking all the credit away from GNU" argument for GNU/Linux as a naming scheme is somehow avoided

    --
    SIGERR: laziness exceeds quota
  17. heh by pyth · · Score: 2, Funny

    I bet they'll have new commands to use: keke, kekeke, kekekeke, kekekekekekekekekekeke^_^

  18. WooHoo! by thoolihan · · Score: 1

    Increased adoption of Asianux in Asia-Pacific may give software and hardware companies a good reason to certify their wares on Linux, as they will not need to support multiple versions of the open-source operating system (OS).

    /me uncorks champagne

    --
    http://unmoldable.com W:"No one of consequence" I:"I must know" W:"Get used to disappointment"
  19. Rice-Chex by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Funny

    After this is successful, this Oriental version of Linux will be combined with the one being developed for the Czech Republic.

    We wish the new "Rice-Chex" project much success.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  20. Sounds better than by teamhasnoi · · Score: 3, Funny
    Rinux.

    Hey, before you get all crazy, I learned it from South Park...

  21. GPL! Ha! by Gothmolly · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Let's just see how well the GPL does in these countries, especially in China where piracy is rampant, and there is no such thing as private property (it's the definition of Communism, get over it flamers). Human (property) rights have never been terribly important in Asia, maybe we'll have to send in Stallman and Theo to get pissy at them when they uber-up the Linux kernel and don't publish their changes.

    -1 Flamebat, +1 Cynical, or +1 Prophetic? You decide.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:GPL! Ha! by FortKnox · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Let's just see how well the GPL does in these countries, especially in China where piracy is rampant, and there is no such thing as private property (it's the definition of Communism, get over it flamers).

      Umm, the GPL will work WONDERS in a communist state. In fact, China would be smart to support open source software. Think about it... the GPL is a very communist-like idea with communist-like ideals.

      Maybe I should ask you this:
      Which economy would the GPL work better in: Capitalistic or Communistic?

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    2. Re:GPL! Ha! by The+One+KEA · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why would it do any better or worse? Unless China completely airgapped themselves from the Internet, then the code written for Asianux will find its way back into the greater consciousness - not only does the GPL demand it, but the human race's general tendency to try to get away with disobedience wherever possible will almost guarantee it ;-) I don't think the GPL will suffer in China, but we'll see.

      --
      SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
    3. Re:GPL! Ha! by Namaseit · · Score: 1

      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1882 114981/qid=1073683060//ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i0_xgl14/102 -3439365-3740936?v=glance&s=books&n=507846 Go read that book and then come back and post.

      --
      75% of all statistics are made up!
    4. Re:GPL! Ha! by dmaxwell · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are perfectly pragmatic reasons why this isn't likely. Private forks of large OSS projects become harder and harder to maintain over time. The fork has to be regularly ported to new versions of the public project or fixes from the public project have to be ported to the fork. Either way, it starts out being a little bit of work and turns into a lot of work. Alternatively, the fork could be turned into a different animal altogether. The last option would need a dev team comparable in size to Linux itself. Every package in the distro that is forked adds to the difficulty and expense even more.

      Sure, these two companies could do exactly what you say. But how long would they be able to keep the product fresh and relevant? Continually maintaining the fork is usually going to be less costly than just passing your changes to the upstream project.

    5. Re:GPL! Ha! by deanpole · · Score: 3, Informative
      China where piracy is rampant, and there is no such thing as private property

      Funny you should mention that as they are about to vote on a constitutional amendment for it.

      Nonetheless, they already have private property except from the government who can basically take whatever they want. For the purposes of GPL and selling software, this is probably sufficient.

    6. Re:GPL! Ha! by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      China recently chaged their Constitution. Private property is NOW allowed.

    7. Re:GPL! Ha! by be-fan · · Score: 1

      and there is no such thing as private property
      ------
      Yes, and under communism, the GPL would not be necessary, because all source would be free. Communism is not realistically implementable on a large scale, but it does have certain upsides.

      Human (property) rights have never been terribly important in Asia
      ------
      Property rights != Human rights. Property rights are critical for a quickly growing, free market economy, but there is a fundemental difference between something desireable like property rights and something absolutely necessary like human rights.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    8. Re:GPL! Ha! by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      Read this guide and use this site then come back and post. Sheesh.

    9. Re:GPL! Ha! by osmethnee · · Score: 1

      "there is no such thing as private property (it's the definition of Communism, get over it flamers)"
      no. if that were true, then any society without private property would be communist. now consider WW2 prison camps. lack of private property is most definitely not sufficient, and arguably not even necessary for a communist society.

    10. Re:GPL! Ha! by ScottSpeaks! · · Score: 1
      there is no such thing as private property (it's the definition of Communism, get over it flamers).

      Um, the definition of Communism (at least according to Marx & Engels, who are widely credited with coming up wiht the idea) is that the government owns the means of production (e.g. factories, farms, etc.) Certainly in practise, Communist governments have always permitted some level of private property. At the very least, that roll of toilet paper you stood in line for four months to get and paid a million credits for is yours, and if your neighbor takes that car your family have been saving up for since the Revolution, the police will arrest him and put him in jail.

      Human (property) rights

      FYI, many people regard those as two distinct concepts.

  22. Rinux: Ready for the desktop? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can't even imagine what a nightmare the command line would look like. I'm still figuring out the switches for fsck. Hard enough to do without contructing commands out of little pictures of houses, dancing guys and trees with lines through them.

    1. Re:Rinux: Ready for the desktop? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1

      I'd just like to point out that this flamebait spawned two very interesting, well reasoned and thoughtful threads. They must be from k5 ;)

  23. I understand the Mongolian Linux by rsilvergun · · Score: 5, Funny

    will sweeping through the rest of Asia's IT, crushing foes in it's wake. Hordes of people are using it, you know. (Sorry).

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I understand the Mongolian Linux by sofakingl · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Great Firewall of China should hold them back.

  24. "Asian Russia" is Asian and Russian by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    Asian Russia (Siberia) is European not Asian.

    The majority of Asian Russia is called "Siberia". Siberia is entirely within Asia. Asian Russia is indeed all Asian (that is almost a tautology). In fact, a significant percentage of Asian land is part of Russia.

    You are correct about the Soviet Union, however.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  25. Was I going to call my distro... by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

    Amnesiux?

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  26. And for Canadians... by Mudcathi · · Score: 1

    Canux?

    --

    "He who throws mud, loses ground." - proverb

  27. Language? by mr100percent · · Score: 1

    This article was pretty light on details.

    How do they program on it? In English?

    1. Re:Language? by Nasarius · · Score: 1

      Yes, but C/C++ is largely English in terms of character set and keywords used.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    2. Re:Language? by Haeleth · · Score: 1

      C/C++ is largely English in terms of character set and keywords used.

      Which is why Perl is the way forward!

    3. Re:Language? by ScottSpeaks! · · Score: 1
      This article was pretty light on details. How do they program on it? In English?

      {sigh} The article may have left out such details for the same reason it didn't bother to explain how they'll get electricity or what calendar they'll be using. This is not an announcement that the Far East is about to start using computers, learning to develop software, etc. Chinese, Japanese, and other East Asian countries have been doing all this for decades, and Linux is already widely used in the region, with several popular distros with support for local languages. This is simply an effort to develop a standard base that they can count on to work properly with the local character sets, and handle the other sorts of localisation issues that a Michiganian such as I (or most other Euro/Americans) could only begin to guess at.

      To answer your question, however, I'll venture a guess that they'll (continue to) program using the usual popular languages (most of which do use English-derived commands), including C++, SQL, HTML, Java, Perl... just like the French, the Germans, the Finns*, the Egyptians, the Russians, and the Brazillians do.

      *Linus has always commented his code in English.

  28. I am curious by snooo53 · · Score: 1

    After 10 years of using linux (and I assume enjoying it), I'm curious why you decided to switch to OS X? You don't see too many stories out there of people going back to a proprietary system after having used linux for so long....

    --
    The sending of this message pretty much inconveniences everyone involved.
    1. Re:I am curious by MarkWatson · · Score: 1
      Good question.


      I am (mostly) a Java consultant and an author, and I found Linux to be a more productive environment than Windows (good command shell, Unix utilities, etc.). I spent way less time maintaining a Linux development system than Windows NT or 2000.


      However, I spend even less time maintaining my OS X development machines (I use 3), and OS X has all the Unix niceness that I need for software development.


      As far as writing goes, I wrote 2 published book entirely using Star Office (then Open Office) on Linux, and just imported the material into Word on Windows before shipping stuff off to my publisher. Mac OS X has both Word and Open Office.


      -Mark

      P.S. the X server for OS X is great, so running Linux apps like konqueror, yast2, etc. on my OS X desktop for my Linux server is nice. Great fonts - KDE apps look great!

  29. It's a great OS but.. by cshoes · · Score: 1

    Half an hour after you compile the kernel, your ready to compile again.

    *rimshot*

    1. Re:It's a great OS but.. by sik0fewl · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and you're lucky if you don't get gas.

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
  30. UnitedLinux? by mbrinkm · · Score: 1

    Sounds a lot like UnitedLinux minus SCO to me.

    --
    "Don't worry about people stealing an idea. If it's original, you will have to ram it down their throats." --Howard Aike
  31. There is a valid point here... by Draxinusom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...hidden underneath the ignorant ranting, which is that the GPL requires strong enforcement of licenses to function. It has nothing to do with Communism, piracy, or human rights. Countries like China simply don't have the legal infrastructure to deal with license violations. There are some indications that companies are getting away with GPL violations in the U.S.; how much easier will it be for them to do so in China, where the FSF has no legal representation?

  32. Asterix explained by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    Asterix is a popular French cartoon character. They love him in France the way they don't love Mickey Mouse. Unlike Jerry Lewis (also beloved of the French), Asterix is actually cool.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  33. obKhan Quote by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 1


    And the best thing will be when it crushes our enemies, to see them fall at our feet -- to take their horses and goods and hear the lamentation of their women.

    --

    --
    $tar -xvf .sig.tar
  34. Now that is some Soy Source by CowardNeal · · Score: 1

    ..get it hehe.

  35. I'm waiting by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    I'm still holding my breath for the ultimate linux distribution: auto-configuring, self-reparing, using state-of-the-art package management, with a killer GUI, full desktop integration, stability up the wazoo, that can take all preferences and settings from an existing windows or mac installation and import them into the new environment.

    It should be called Sexus Linux.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  36. i bet... by Kiyooka · · Score: 2, Insightful

    if the joke had something to do with punning a word on "nigger" or some such, people wouldn't find that so funny. so why is "chinx" a joke?

    this may be a flame, but if so i think it's justified: dude, stfu. "chinx" isn't funny. even if you're chinese yourself, other readers don't know that. you're being racist, and you're encouraging racism. mod me down as much as you want.

    1. Re:i bet... by theLastPossibleName · · Score: 1

      This may be a little off-topic but I agree with kiyooka. This type of racism shouldn't be tolerated but it seems society feels it's ok to make fun of Asians. It reminds me of Abercrombie making a t-shirt with the caption:

      Wong Brothers

      Two wongs don't make it white.


      What should the response to this type of racism be? Get angry and advocate the rights of Asians? I believe that would in fact be racist because you're differentiating yourself from the rest of society by race. So what is the right thing to do?

    2. Re:i bet... by Kiyooka · · Score: 1

      I too was wondering what my proper reaction to this should be:

      1) Ignore it and hope it goes away.
      2) Do what I did and fight it.
      3) Joke about it with the guy in the hopes of downplaying it. e.g. "haha well that's a little racist heh but seriously though..."

      So I thought of how nobody thinks joking about "coons" and "niggers" is funny anymore: because people educate others about racism and always fight racism in all its insidious forms. So I thought I'd try to do that. Of course, I could try to coop the word "chink" like African-Americans have to the word "nigger" (think of them calling eachother "my nigger" as a term of endearment), but I don't think asian-North Americans are fully at that phase yet to be comfortable with it.

    3. Re:i bet... by dzelenka · · Score: 1

      Oh brother! Someone thinks that encouraging Political Correctness on Slashdot is going to get some traction. How quaint.

      --
      Bah!
    4. Re:i bet... by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "This part is somewhat debatable, and opens you up to all kinds of attacks which would otherwise find less fertile grounds."

      All of that is statistically correct actually. Really though, perhaps the post was a bit a flamebait, but I really should have been modded out of the picture as offtopic. *shrugs* I had something to say and karma to burn.

  37. even better... by Kiyooka · · Score: 1

    how about stfu?

  38. you're correct in that... by Kiyooka · · Score: 1

    "oriental" has negative connotations, bringing as it does to mind the stereotype of "the quaint exotic orient" (i.e. only Europeans are rational normal folks). the term was created by the English to refer to asian countries. "Asian" is a little more neutral, since the name is a more geographic, although even the term "asia" is eurocentric, since "asia" is generally anywhere east of... you guessed it: Europe.

    The memories of our language... just can't escape it. In Chinese, I'm just a regular dude; in English, you should no longer say I'm a "chink" or "yellow", but "I" remain an "Asian" and an "Oriental"...

  39. Old name... by zulux · · Score: 1



    Sure beats the first name: Oriantalnix.

    --

    Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

  40. but what's so bad... by Kiyooka · · Score: 1

    about literally seeing the roots of a language in the language? as opposed to arbitrary squiggles, lines and curves? at least it makes it more interesting and meaningful. For example, the character for visual brightness and/or understanding (coincidentally just like in english how "bright" means smart and visually bright) is made up of the picture of the moon and the sun side by side. how cool is that? 1000's of years ago, of course the sun and moon were the brightest objects in the human knowledge. put them together, and you get the word for brightness!

    1. Re:but what's so bad... by nicophonica · · Score: 2, Interesting

      about literally seeing the roots of a language in the language I'm not quite sure what you mean by this. Written Chinese (and therefore written Japanese) originated as a pictographic language, as did the Greek character set. (The letter 'A' for instance, used to be an ox, which you can still see if you rotate the character counter clockwise and think of the two little legs as horns.) Both languages abstracted out the literal meaning of the pictures that they represented, but Chinese became ideographic (not pictographic) while the ancestor of the Greek character set ultimately became phonetic. Nothing is 'wrong' with either system they are equally expressive and cultures using both systems can attain high levels of literacy. However, it is quite difficult for someone using a phonetic system to learn an ideographic one.

    2. Re:but what's so bad... by Haeleth · · Score: 3, Informative

      An intelligent and knowledgable post, with one nit I'd like to pick:

      However, it is quite difficult for someone using a phonetic system to learn an ideographic one.

      Believe it or not, this is not true.

      Readers of ideographic systems and readers of so-called "phonetic" systems like English actually read in the same way - first they try to match the abstract shape of a word, then they break it down into segments and try to match the sequence of segments, and they only become aware of the individual components if that fails.

      For example, if you see the word "Slashdot", you probably recognise that as a single entity. If you don't know what Slashdot is, you're likely to see it as "Slash" and "dot", those being two entities you do recognise. A kid might say "Suh-ler-ah-suh-huh duh-oh-tuh" as they read it, but I doubt you do.

      Likewise, a Chinese reader seeing a common ideographic compound will recognise it as a block. They will recognise a rarer compound as a sequence of familiar characters. Only when faced with a rare character will they actually notice the component parts of that character, and then they'll have to go and look it up - just like you, faced with an English word you don't know, will have to look that up.

      The two systems are, in short, of comparable complexity. You only think Chinese is difficult because you think of the characters as ideographs rather than words.

  41. It should be called Rinux by SlashDotAgent · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There.

  42. Sigh.. u fanboys all know that by Cenuij · · Score: 1

    linux is for bitches

    --
    my other sig is written in brainfuck ;)
    1. Re:Sigh.. u fanboys all know that by petabyte · · Score: 1

      Ok, seriously now ...

      I'm a BSD user and a Linux user and you guys really, really have to get over that photo. She's cute, but if that is the reason you're using BSD, you have issues.

  43. Hordes of GNU's certainly? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Sorry, just had to get the RMS joke in. Although I am beginning to understand him more and more.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  44. China doesn't have the legal structure by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1
    Yeah right. China shoots corrupt officials. America puts them in office. Stop think china is some 3rd world nation. As for human rights issues. Was the west any better a few decades ago? Ask a black american if you don't know the answer. American police killed peace protestors, china killed human right protestors. Big frigging difference (and this is not anti-america the same happened in europe just on a smaller scale as usual)

    How china will deal with the GPL and opensource in general remains to be seen. However I think the chinese ain't completly stupid. Making a fork (wich is what happens when you make changes to the kernel and do not submit them back in to the official kernel) means you loose all the advantages off the worldwide development taking place on linux. Each time the official kernel is upgraded you got to update your fork without outside help. This would become very costly to do.

    So the question is has China understood what has made linux what it is? So far most of the really really big players have understood it. The US goverment through the SELinux project, IBM, Israel (changes to Open Office are publicly available) and others.

    Don't forget that Japan at least has had a long history of opensource with Tron. Granted here the design was opensource not always the code but the idea is the same.

    We will have to see. But if you are really really curious. Examine red flag. Its been around long enough. I haven't heard anyone claiming that it is breaking the rules so far.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:China doesn't have the legal structure by GCP · · Score: 1

      Stop think china is some 3rd world nation.

      China isn't just "some 3rd world nation". It's virtually the definition of 3rd world.

      China shoots corrupt officials. America puts them in office.

      What a pathetic joke this is. I've dealt with Chinese and Western officials for years. The level of corruption in China is in a completely different league from that in the US. China is solidly 3rd world in its corruption, like Indonesia, India, or Mexico. The law doesn't matter, just guanxi. The shooting of corrupt officials you refer to is just more corruption.

      American police killed peace protestors, china killed human right protestors. Big frigging difference.

      Ah, a favorite Chinese obfuscation tactic: one and a million are both positive integers, so they're both essentially the same.

      We're not that stupid. While the Chinese lie with their words, trying to confuse the issue to "save face", we see them demonstrate with their actions that they know very well that there is a "big frigging difference".

      I'd be willing to carry a "Time for a Different Party in Government" sign in front of the White House if I were in Washington, though I might have to wait my turn since apparently people in the US feel free to do that sort of thing.

      Would you be willing to carry the same sign in Tiananmen Square?

      --
      "Those who have never entered upon scientific pursuits know not a tithe of the poetry by which they are surrounded."
  45. Thanks, didn't know that... by Kiyooka · · Score: 1

    the characters of the alphabet were originally inherently meaningful as well. I thought english letters were originally created for phonetic distinctions, and that the visual aspect of letters were now largely arbitrary or meaningless in themselves.

    What I meant by seeing the roots of the language in the language was seeing how ideas and abstractions in the language are understood by the language itself (and hence the human mind). For example, by looking at the character for the mysterious character "Tao", we see the simple but profound picture of a person walking along a path. Seeing how the character was conceived (both in the sense of brought into the world and thought of) is tremendously interesting when you know how to look. I was trying to get the parent poster to see this beauty of characters, not trying to make other languages look bad. Apologies if I did come off too one sided; I guess I felt I had to balance his "against" with my "for". : )

  46. Asian Linux by secolactico · · Score: 1

    Woohoo! Now my computer will COSPLAY when I do!

    (because nothing is sexier than a 25 yr old man with hairy legs wearing a sailor moon outfit)

    --
    No sig
  47. Re:What's old is new... by nicophonica · · Score: 1
    The two systems are, in short, of comparable complexity.


    Comparable in their complexity, yes. But, it is an imperical fact that people whose native written language is phonetic, find it much harder to learn an ideographic language then those who have learned an ideographic language do a phonetic one.

    For example, it is very common to find an English speaker of Chinese or Japanese who is incapable of reading even the simplest text yet able to speak the language very fluently. It is quite rare to find the same situation in a Chinese speaker of English. Unless your claim is that Westerners are just very stupid or lazy, the conclusion is that ideographic written languages are very hard for non-natives to learn.

  48. Re:Ignorance by kjd · · Score: 1

    Except Asians in the U.S. are probably used to be called Chinese all the time by ignorant mistake. Being called a chink would still be insulting.

  49. Re:Answer this about Tao by Kiyooka · · Score: 1

    To be honest, I have absolutely no idea. The 2 major Chinese dialects (Cantonese and Mandarin) both pronounce it with a 'd' sound. I've seen Taoism/Daoism more and more translated with a 'D' now though. I think it's part of a new romanization system.

    Maybe it was just a mistake. e.g. I heard this before somewhere: when the first europeans saw a kangaroo they asked what the animal was called. Their guide, an australian aboriginal, said something like "kah-gah-rah-too", which means "I don't know". And that's how we got the name 'kangaroo'.

  50. what about dialects? by zlel · · Score: 1

    I think the asian market is a lot more varied than lets say the European market. Over here we have not just CJK, but also Thai, Cambodian, Vietnamese, Burmese, 2 flavours of Malay... yes, right now I'm just eating hamburgers when it comes to OS', but I think the asians know better what the asians need out of their boxes... or rather, what they would like linux to look like right out of the box, perhaps.

    Maybe this is taking it a bit far, but apart from Chinese (Mandarin) and Japanese (Hyojungo aka Tokyo Japanese), there's a whole host of dialects which would need to be localised differently - word-groups (Ci2 Hui4 in Chinese) are dramatically different in these dialects and if you tried typing in these you should find it to be as painful as trying to type Chinese via a Japanese input-method.

    AFAIK, people in Windows use special programs to aid Kansai-ben input. it'd be cool if even dialects can be built in.

    And yes, let the asians decide for themselves how they would have solved their kanji problem.

    1. Re:what about dialects? by osmethnee · · Score: 1

      "what about dialects? [...] Over here we have not just CJK, but also Thai, Cambodian, Vietnamese, Burmese, 2 flavours of Malay..." I'm sure the Thais and Vietnamese would be fascinated to discover that they speak a dialect (of which language I'm not sure), and the Cambodians would be astounded to learn that they aren't speaking Khmer.

  51. That is the funniest post by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    That is the funniest post of the France Asterux sub-thread. I'd glady turn over my +5 mod points to this comic genius.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  52. What do the need SUN for now? by beforewisdom · · Score: 2, Insightful
    If they are making their own linux distro why do they need to buy linux desktops from SUN?

    Steve

  53. Re:great idea, bad name by Gramie2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'd have to disagree. Sure, laughing at people's attempts to communicate in English is in bad taste, but these are people using English either for purely cosmetic reasons (i.e. because it is "cool"). They are also using it not in personal conversations, but for business.

    I've seen this up close (I lived in Japan for many years), so I think it's a reasonable distinction, especially when so much advertising uses English, and very poor English at that.

    (Disclaimer: I have a photo on engrish.com, the girl in the "spread beaver" T-shirt.)

  54. Re:What's old is new... by eraserewind · · Score: 1

    (As an english speaker of Japanese) I would say that the problem is not so much that it's hard to read Japanese characters (I have no problems with the ones I know already), it's the fact that there are so many of them compared to 26+punctuation for western languages (even accounting for the fact that many characters can be considered words by themselves),

    Secondly that as an adult you are way out of practise at learning to recognise new "letter" shapes, and have long passed the point where your brain readily adapts to it.

    That said I found Hesig's approach to be much easier than any other's I've tried, especially for Kana. It doesn't scale as well to Kanji, but still helps a great deal.

    Essentially I suppose that learning 1 Japanese character is no more difficult than learnign 1 western letter. The problem is the quantity.

  55. Try again. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    French love Mickey Mouse more than Asterix from what I can see too

    Living at the bottom of a troll-cave as you do, you can't see much:

    "France has a park dedicated to Asterix The Gaul, which gets 3 times as many visitors as EuroDisney, and it makes lots of money." [blogspot]

    Re: Jerry Lewis: See The Straight Dope

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  56. Re:Ignorance by kjd · · Score: 1

    -----BEGIN DRIPPING SARCASM-----
    Yes, I specifically meant Moscovites and residents of New
    Delhi out of all the possible connotations of Asian. I really
    don't know why I chose such a broad and sweeping term that
    no one could possibly understand the meaning of.
    -----END DRIPPING SARCASM-----


    In all seriousness, I'm not sure there's a great word these days to describe the 'Mongoloid race' without appearing insulting. Asian seems to be the currently-fashionable (but technically ambiguous) label in the USA.

    Of my Korean/Chinese/Japanese friends who've broached the subject, all have expressed a dislike for describing people as Oriental, which they associate with inanimate objects like rugs and food. They usually refer to themselves as a race as Asian, which to my knowledge is not the case with Indians and others who geographically match the term Asian.

  57. This calls for... by ModernGeek · · Score: 1
    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
  58. Re:You are correct in that... by shaitand · · Score: 1

    I am amazed someone could managed to get through my entire post and respond without pondering or even comprehending a word of it Mr. Anonymous Coward.

    Blacks on average get paid a smaller amount and on average fill lower end jobs because blacks on average have significantly poorer education. This certainly isn't for lack of availablity. The have the same opportunity that the average white american has, if they have a chip on their shoulder over something they themselves have never experienced and don't take advantage of it, that is certainly nobody's fault but their own. There are no small number of black american's not living in ghettos, and even ghettos have publically funded schools just like the ones that your average white citizen goes to.

    If a black american and a white american apply for a job, and both are equally qualified, the black american will get the job because there are financial incentives for the company to hire them first. THAT is discrimination, not imagined (or even real) suspicious glances when walking in a convience store. The only disadvantage here is that not as many black americans are taking advantage of the educations available to them and therefore there aren't as many with equal qualifications. Only black americans can solve that problem, nobody else.

    Another very important point, this applies to women as well. Equal rights and equal civil liberties is a relatively new idea. So I'm assuming you are excluding anyone with over 20yrs experience justifying thier high position and payrate from your numbers right? After all, since women and black americans (as well as other minorities really haven't been in an open equal opportunity environment for 20yrs yet there won't be any who are qualified to hold those positions.

    Also someone actually has to vacate a high position for someone else to fill it, it takes a long time for numbers to shift significantly there in a perfectly fair and racism free environment.

    "Obviouly they're not quite African, because they haven't been there in so long they've lost touch."

    If you had actually bothered to READ my post you would have seen that what I was saying is that most DON"T HAVE A SINGLE ROOT IN AFRICA. It's not a matter of losing touch if they were never in touch with it to begin with!!! South American natives are BLACK and are not nor have they ever been African.

    "Are you fucking stupid? The term is "Chinese", not "chink". The term is "African", or "African-American", not "nigger". You actually think "chink" or "nigger" makes me proud of my culture?"

    It's becoming more and more apparent you are one of those who has not taken advantage of education. Or perhaps you have and it simply failed to actually stimulate your brain (you can after all coast to a master's without having much of a brain). Both of the terms you mentioned are synonymous, respectively for black and chinese. They mean the exact same thing. So why exactly is it one is okay and one is not? Because you consider one derogatory? Why do you consider it derogatory? And assuming it is derogatory, what the hell makes you think you've more right to call me "fucking stupid" than I have to call you by one of those terms?

    "Maybe you've experienced a lot of counter-racism and you experience is skewed, but I think you should take a look at the larger picture around you. Racism is still alive. Most white people just wish it would go away. And I understand why: who likes to feel accused and guilty? Then again, we have to look at the larger picture: if racism ended, there wouldn't even be an issue."

    Oh I've known a few racists it's true. But few of them have been white.

    Do you believe that problem isn't solved until the trolls on slashdot become silent in terms of racial slurs. This will never happen, get over it. Do you believe the problem isn't solved until other races hold as many jobs, make as much, etc etc. Well if you want to improve the numbers for your race, go to school, or study yourself, work

  59. Re:great idea, bad name by Gramie2 · · Score: 1

    I know who Hide and Spread Beaver are (were). If you look at the pictures, you will also see that some thoughtful soul has added a definition (probably from some slang dictionary) so it looks like:

    Spread Beaver
    Showing the vaginal area

    By the way, it's nice of you to throw in a gratuitous slur on my Japanese abilities. Given that I worked in a more-or-less exclusively Japanese environment for three years, you might be surprised.

  60. Re:You are correct in that... by shaitand · · Score: 1

    "1) Racism is alive and well. Go to any black in LA and ask them whether the LAPD are racist or not. I still get called a "chink" every now and then, although less so now these few years. And when I get called a "chink", it's not in a conversational manner, as in "Excuse me sir, but are you a chink?". When they say it, they say it derogatorily. Yes, the word itself was created as an insult, with the crux of it being that you are Chinese, and therefore inferior, and so we will call you a "chink". Yes, it is a bad word. Accept that. It's like saying "son of a bitch". What's so bad about canines? Nothing. The term was created as an insult, and therefore it *is* an insult. Is that so hard to understand?"

    I may have missed something in here, are you trying to convince me of things I said myself in my previous point? I never disputed that these terms were considered derogatory. What I disputed is whether or not they are anymore derogatory than calling someone a son of a bitch.

    Bad words are a day to day thing, they are used by every person alive daily with and without anger. What makes your bad word a plague that must be eradicated from the face of the earth?

    "And when I called you "fucking stupid", it was in response to something you DID (namely, asserting that "Chinese" and "Chink" are synonymous). When you call someone a "chink", it is in response about something they ARE from birth, and can never change. Think about that. Note the injustice. Get it? No? Then go think some more."

    Ok, here is where you explain what makes it special and why it should be eradicated. Let's try to stick with "fucking stupid" you are pointing out that it's because of something I did or said. I'd like to point out that if I analyzed those terms "stupid" is inherent and "fucking" doesn't even make sense.

    If you dropped a bowl of oatmeal on me (or some such) and in response I called you a "fucking chink". I believe you wouldn't have much of an argument trying to claim I insulted you in response to being chinese, I clearly insulted you in response to your own actions.

    Now if I walked up to you when you were walking down the street, and we had no prior history of interaction, grabbed you and told you to come this way you fucking chink and carved bonzi on your forehead just before hanging you. THEN it would be more serious than saying words like "damn" "shit" "fuck" "asshole" "prick" "dumbfuck" "pig" "shit for brains" etc etc etc. Until that point this is a normal part of our culture, we have words like this for just about everything, race is one of many. It's normal and does not especially need to eradicated.

    "While you are correct in that counter-racism exists, it is called "counter-racism" for a reason. It is there in response to an original racism. Yes, there is racism today. I have only been called a "chink" by whites. If you like the naive belief that the world is free from racism and that all races are happy and equal, fine. Obviously you're quite firm in this belief, and honestly I don't feel like writing a dissertation here."

    The only one I've heard calling it "counter-racism" is you. I don't care to write a dissertation either, this post is long enough. So I'll use Asians as an example. In the case of Asians they have always closed themselves off from outsiders, strong suspicion and racism has arisen from this. Be a white man in china town and it's not exactly difficult to experience this rather quickly. They have special terms outsiders that have become racist remarks against whites (the most populous of the "outsiders").

    That's not in response to anything, it's not counter anything and the root of MOST asian racism I've seen. You'd have a better argument for white racism against asians being counter-racism to asian racism against whites. Personally I don't believe it is however, I'm simply saying that argument would have more evidence and weight behind it.

  61. Re:open your eyes by shaitand · · Score: 1

    "1)"Stupid" is an insult to intelligence.

    2)"Chink" is an insult based on the premise of a supposedly-inferior Chinese race, because if it didn't assume that Chinese people are inferior, it wouldn't be an insult in the first place.

    3)Therefore, "chink" is an insult of an entirely different order than "stupid" and is inherently racist. Since most people agree that racism is bad, and the word "chink" is racist, then the word "chink" is bad. Therefore, "chink" should not be used, because *when you say it as an insult* you are implicitly and explicitly stating that Chinese people are inferior (otherwise it wouldn't be an insult)."

    ok we'll try this one last time and then I give up.

    Sticking with stupid and chink for simplicity.

    There are a HELL of alot more stupid people than there are chinese (not many things I could say that about true as there happen to be ALOT of chinese people on Earth).

    Intelligence is a MUCH more significant matter than race. Truthfully despite what I said before, race is no more something to be proud of than to be insulted about. You intelligence level ACTUALLY MATTERS, your race ACTUALLY DOES NOT.

    Do you honestly mean to tell me that summation of your entire argument is that race is worse insult someone over because "you are implicitly and explicitly stating that... people are inferior". You do realize that this applies to EVERY insult in existance? Some state a single person, some state a great many but EVERY insult is a way of calling someone inferior in some aspect or manner. That's why they call them insults!

    Or is it worse because the aspect is race and not some other inherient aspect which is meaningless and inborn "just because"?

  62. Re:open your eyes by shaitand · · Score: 1

    The Nazi's felt their race intellectually superior. There are lots of things which have killed millions of people over thousands of years. Hate to break it to you, race is barely on the top 10 list. Religion holds spot number 1.

    Perhaps it is religion we should condemn negative remarks about. Greed is another top contender. Perhaps people who insult others for being poor, or wealthy or money grubbing, or penny pinchers. Perhaps those should be the "special" insults that are worse than the others. I ask again, why single race out?

    When you consider that stupidity is truely just the sum of ignorance (even the most retarded of human minds is capable of vastly greater intelligence than, to pick a popular choice, Einstein) then it most certainly has resulted in more than it's fair share of death. When Europeans came to the new world they slaughtered and stole from "savages" because of their ignorance. In fact it goes hand and hand with the number 1 killer, religion. Religion feeds on ignorance and stupity both to recruit and to incite conflict.

    Sex is another which tops race on the cause for violence scale. So your insult of stupid fuck actually hits two keys which have responsible for more bloodshed and violence than race could ever dream of.

    Absolishing racism means absolishing the concept of race altogether. Because if there is a characteristic of people, there will always be those who judge based on it. It's called reality, welcome to it.

  63. Re:open your eyes by shaitand · · Score: 1

    Kiyooka, I agree the whole racism debate got boring a bit back. I think we've both given a bit of ground and come as close to a middle ground as we are going to get ;)

    Was fun debating with you though, it's not often you get to debate a topic like racism that is usually met blindly by both sides of the issue.

    Putting you on my friends list, I'm not interested in seeing posts from just people who agree with my own viewpoint. I'm interested in having people there who are willing to give thought to issues and I believe you are one of those.