Slashdot Mirror


News from Mars

An anonymous reader writes "While the Beagle 2 may have been gobbled up by Mars--Eater of Spacecraft, the main part of the ESA's recent Mars mission is doing well. The Mars Express Orbiter has sent back some amazing pictures of The Grand Canyon of Mars (Valles Marineris). Yes, this is the same gigantic geological feature that was missed by Mariner 4, 6, and 7 but finally found by Mariner 9. In other news, the Spirit rover is getting ready to grind the rock Adirondack (picture)."

258 comments

  1. Image mirror by BWJones · · Score: 4, Informative

    The ESA site appears to be getting quite slow. A mirror of the large image of Valles Marineris is here.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Image mirror by tcopeland · · Score: 2, Informative

      Another one here, just in case.

    2. Re:Image mirror by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Hmm looks hand drawn... Presumably they've done their best to give a representation and make it look pretty, but it just ends up looking like an artists impression, and we have lots of those already :)

    3. Re:Image mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another mirror here up.
      ANOTHER MIRROR

    4. Re:Image mirror by BWJones · · Score: 5, Funny

      Another one here, just in case.

      In case of what? This workstation hosting the image is running OS X. :-)

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    5. Re:Image mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    6. Re:Image mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope my ISP feels the love *g* :D revenge is so very very sweet

    7. Re:Image mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a fast mirror.

      Mirror

    8. Re:Image mirror by calyphus · · Score: 1

      That shadow looks suspiciously Photoshopped.

      --


      The potato it is uninformed.
    9. Re:Image mirror by metallicagoaltender · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's probably because it is - the shadow is seperating the view from above (the top portion of the picture) from the side profile view (the bottom portion of the picture). I'd imagine the shadow is the only modified section of the picture.

    10. Re:Image mirror by calyphus · · Score: 1

      'kay, after RTFA not just VTFP I get it. Considering the number of similar comments about not realizing it was a composited image, it does point out what a bad idea it was for them to present it thusly.

      --


      The potato it is uninformed.
  2. Taking bets now by GonzoDave · · Score: 2, Funny

    Every space mission gets a conspiracy theory. What's this one going to be?

    1. Re:Taking bets now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Spirit will "stop working" as soon as it finds something interesting.

    2. Re:Taking bets now by nnnneedles · · Score: 2, Funny

      those pics look like textures. Nice gfx and all but the poly count is pretty low. And no sky box!

      --
      Will code a sig generator for food
    3. Re:Taking bets now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zack McCracken and the Alien Mindbenders was true! *looking forward to those comfy vacation homes on Mars; giant head, here I come!*

    4. Re:Taking bets now by Zebra_X · · Score: 2, Informative

      You've already had one. There's been a theory that NASA was coloring the all of the images Red, and that the sky is really blue just like earth. Of course this theory was rapidly debunked Here. But hey - no one seems to be happy with the truth.

    5. Re:Taking bets now by SparafucileMan · · Score: 1

      The rock is clearly a miniature prymaid and a map to the location of the real pryamid city of Mars. But I have no doubt that NASA rearranged all the surrounding rocks with Photoshop to throw off any on-lookers. In fact, if you re-arrange things like so...

    6. Re:Taking bets now by mikerich · · Score: 1
      Zack McCracken and the Alien Mindbenders was true! *looking forward to those comfy vacation homes on Mars; giant head, here I come!*

      I'm holding out for the Leather Goddesses myself...

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    7. Re:Taking bets now by sharkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      All they did was paint the Moon set from the '60s red, and are taking pictures as we speak.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    8. Re:Taking bets now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Different mission. That was NASA's Spirit lander. This is the European mission called Mars Express.

    9. Re:Taking bets now by luwain · · Score: 1

      When I first saw the photos from Mars I thought "well, we could have taken pictures of the Arizona desert through a red filter and saved 400 million dollars..." ; then I thought, "how do we know they didn't just taken pictures of the Arizona desert through a red filter and pocket the 400 million?". Then I thought "Bush is probably going to push for a moon base and the terra-forming of Mars and award the 4 trillion dollar non-bid contract to Halburton, as a grant, not a loan, saying we don't want to saddle those poor Martians with all of that debt..."

    10. Re:Taking bets now by Exedore · · Score: 1

      No need to rearrange the surrounding rocks... The Nazis will never find the city because they only have one side of the amulet. Their staff is the wrong length, so they're digging in the wrong spot.

      --

      I take drugs seriously.

    11. Re:Taking bets now by mikis · · Score: 1
      I think this pictures clearly prove that Mars is made of bread crust.

      Seriously, I can't wait to hear latest serious "analyses" from Mission Enterprise and Mars-News.de

    12. Re:Taking bets now by SparafucileMan · · Score: 1

      That's the thing, the drugs take you seriously, too. It's a win-win for everyone involved.

  3. Re:Mars? by Aardpig · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is it good or is it not so good?

    That's 'whack', not 'not so good', YOU INSENSITIVE CLOD!

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  4. I'm getting ready to grind the rock too by corebreech · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just don't take pictures or issue press releases. Probably best that way.

  5. Speed by fred87 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How much time does it take it to grind a rock compared to the amount of time it takes to move one meter?

    1. Re:Speed by dekashizl · · Score: 3, Informative
      From Athena Science RAT Technical Briefing:
      The RAT is a diamond-tipped grinding tool capable of removing a cylindrical area 4.5 cm in diameter and at least 0.5 cm deep from the outer surface of a rock. This operation takes about 2 hours for a dense basalt.

      From NASA/JPL info on Rover and wheels:
      The rover has a top speed on flat hard ground of 5 centimeters (2 inches) per second. However, in order to ensure a safe drive, the rover is equipped with hazard avoidance software that causes the rover to stop and reassess its location every few seconds. So, over time, the vehicle achieves an average speed of 1 centimeter per second.

      So moving one meter takes very roughly ~100 seconds (about a minute and a half). Grinding takes roughly two hours. But grinding is just grinding, and you still would want to do some science after that. Also consider that moving will generally be interrupted by other delays such as taking photos. Check the link in the sig below for all kinds of info and links on this type of stuff.

      --
      For news, status, updates, scientific info, images, video, and more, check out:
      (AXCH) 2004 Mars Exploration Rovers - News, Status, Technical Info, History.
  6. OMG... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    OMG... that rock is like, a pyramid! I wonder what secrets it holds?!

    1. Re:OMG... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recommend sending Geraldo there to find out its secrets. One way ticket, of course. :-)

    2. Re:OMG... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recommend sending whoever moderated the post as "informative". Sheesh...

    3. Re:OMG... by Tycho · · Score: 1

      Probably all there is to learn is that Adirondack is a pyramid shaped piece of basalt. Which is what you can tell from the picture.

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
  7. Looking for a new house myself. by numbski · · Score: 1

    Perhaps I should be looking at mars? Everyone else is. :)

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  8. ESA is not very clever. by Krapangor · · Score: 2, Funny

    The pictures would be more detailed if they would let Mars Express fly a little lower. And they would have a decent chance to find Beagle 2, too.

    --
    Owner of a Mensa membership card.
    1. Re:ESA is not very clever. by morcheeba · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you fly lower, you'll make more orbits per day, making the images zip past the camera even faster. With a pushbroom-type sensor such as this appears to be, this can actually lead to worse resolution in the direction of travel. But, being closer would make the perpindicular direction a little better -- it's all about compromises.

    2. Re:ESA is not very clever. by Quixote · · Score: 1, Funny
      I thought the beagle had been sighted?

    3. Re:ESA is not very clever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The pictures would be more detailed if they would let Mars Express fly a little lower. And they would have a decent chance to find Beagle 2, too.

      A lower orbit also means less marginal for errors. They'll play it safe during the main part of the mission, but when the major scientific tasks are complete and the spacecraft is nearing its end of life that may change. I wouldn't be surprised if they lower the orbit to get some close-ups before they use the last ounce of fuel to put the spacecraft on a trajectory that will eventually move it out of Mars' gravitational reach.

    4. Re:ESA is not very clever. by Lispy · · Score: 1

      Hey, actually they don't have to fly lower. They are alrady looking for signs of the airbags since the resolution of the cam is very high and they should be able to detect it. But, they don't know where exactly the beagle landed and therefore this could take some time. Still, there is a chance that beagle2 can be found on January 24th. The device (if still in one piece ;-) switches into emergency mode from this date on and Mars Express could have a chance of picking up a signal. Well, I don't think it will, but there is a chance. Theoretically. ;-)

    5. Re:ESA is not very clever. by rocksh · · Score: 0

      "If you fly lower, you'll make more orbits per day" not really significant effect. If apply Kepler's law (1619) - "The squares of the periods ... are proportional to the cubes of semimajor axes" - lowering the orbiter by 300km over Mars which has polar radius 3397km will make only ~(300/3397)^3/2 ~15% more orbits per day... at the same time risking to hit the surface.

      --
      >
    6. Re:ESA is not very clever. by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      good point. I didn't realize it was such a low orbit already -- LMO (low mars orbit). Yep, even halving it to 150km would make the perp. enlargement bigger than the speed-increase-resolution-loss. I guess they've already maximized this problem and that's how they got that orbit...

    7. Re:ESA is not very clever. by bendude · · Score: 1

      From TFA: "This first spectacular stereoscopic colour picture was taken on 14 January 2004 by ESA's Mars Express satellite from 275 km above the surface of Mars by the High Resolution Stereo Camera"

      From the parent post: "lowering the orbiter by 300km over Mars"

      Lowering the orbiter by 300km will get you 25km under the surface. I would consider this a little more than a risk of hitting the surface.

      Am I missing something or is should Rocksh try RTFA?

      --


      Get the Hell off my planet, you slimy mobster Bush!
  9. We all know how it goes... by fred87 · · Score: 1

    "The chances of anything coming from mars are a million to one - but still... they come!" (War of the Worlds by HG Wells, musical version)

    1. Re:We all know how it goes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      WHAP! (/me is floored by a sudden rush of early-80's nostalgia.)

      Do you still have the fold-out poster that came with the double-album set?

      Anonymous Kev
      Proudly positing as AC since 1997

    2. Re:We all know how it goes... by fred87 · · Score: 1

      My dad does, i just have 2 cds i ripped from the LP's...

  10. Press release is kind of funny... by JMZero · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...featuring famous landmarks on the surface of Mars 'as seen through European eyes'...

    I thank those noble European eyes that were sacrificed in order to make this European mission Euro-possible.

    It's ironic. By so blatantly highlighting the Euro-ticity of this mission, they sound very American.

    --
    Let's not stir that bag of worms...
    1. Re:Press release is kind of funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. It's not through european eyes, possibly through a european camera. I think that there's some sort of idendity thing going on over Europe right now, with the Union and ESA and Galileo satellite positioning system etc etc... Sometimes it appears as if we need to show off that we can do a lot of things by ourselves, or something. I don't know. I only know that I, for one, think that international cooperation is good. Mars Express is a good example. It even has an american instrument onboard I think.

    2. Re:Press release is kind of funny... by Puls4r · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thank you for pointing that out. I was waiting for someone to do it - and you did in a much better way than I could of. Seems like the ESA has a serious case of American Penis Envy. Scratch that. The whole damn EU seems to have it. Why does every clipping have to mention how they are doing it "better" than Americans are..... Yeah ok. I wonder if I can find a part of Mars no one has mapped, look at it with my Telescope, then make some grandiose statement about how the ESA's piece of shit probe missed this or that particular feature.......

    3. Re:Press release is kind of funny... by tommck · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Well, hell... the Brits still call the USA "the Colonies"... Sounds like "being very American" can actually be traced back to Europe in the first place :)

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
    4. Re:Press release is kind of funny... by torpor · · Score: 1

      It's ironic. By so blatantly highlighting the Euro-ticity of this mission, they sound very American.

      wait ... thats a bad thing right?

      welcome to the new order, anyway. europe is a superpower on the rise, or so it would appear ...

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    5. Re:Press release is kind of funny... by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 4, Funny

      Mars, as seen through various eyes:

      European: Look! We've boldly gone where the Americans have gone before!

      Chinese: Look! Maybe we can mine it an populate it just to piss of the americans!

      American: Look! It doesn't have a McDonalds! NUKE IT!

      Trekkie: Look! We're going to build a planet based space dock there!

      Conspiracy theorist: Look! That's where the aliens are! They're just using their invisibility rays!

      Slashbot: FIRST LOOK!

    6. Re:Press release is kind of funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truth is apparently troll. That's quite an unorthodox perspective on things, but I'm always interested in listening to what americans have to say about that, as well...

    7. Re:Press release is kind of funny... by DanBrusca · · Score: 1

      Well, hell... the Brits still call the USA "the Colonies"

      Maybe we do, in that strange twilight world where we all wander round wearing bowler hats, drink tea at 4pm and where Daphne from Frasier actually has a Manchester accent ;)

    8. Re:Press release is kind of funny... by tommck · · Score: 1
      Well, you need to talk to some of your countrymen, because I was in a bar in LONDON in 2003 and the patrons there were calling the USA "the Colonies" in conversation.

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
    9. Re:Press release is kind of funny... by DanBrusca · · Score: 2, Funny

      A bar in London? They were probably Australians ;)

    10. Re:Press release is kind of funny... by Gorgeus · · Score: 1

      > They sound very american.

      So be it. Why is it forbidden for other countries other than the US to be proud about something? They are not saying "We're better than you." All they are expressing is some justified pride.

      The good side of patriotism, if you ask me.

      George

    11. Re:Press release is kind of funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's just when 'mericans do it it's "chest thumping".

    12. Re:Press release is kind of funny... by devilsadvoc8 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Don't count Europe as a super power yet. With all of the infighting and France's "do as I say not as I do attitude", the EU just may break apart quite quickly. As long as the special interests hold sway over fiscal and economic policy the EU and all the benefits of a super political/economic power will evaporate

      --
      B O R I N G
    13. Re:Press release is kind of funny... by dddno · · Score: 1

      I'd be thankful for just one sample where ESA expclicitly says they're 'better than the Americans'. What ESA does, and I think you can't seriously bash them for that, is to point out with little modesty what parts of the Mars Express mission are novelties unparalleled as of yet (like the hi-res camera or the ground radar). No offence meant, but we do get boasty statements like that in large doses from the US all day long, and not just in space science.

    14. Re:Press release is kind of funny... by Silverhammer · · Score: 1

      American: Look! It doesn't have a McDonalds!

      Guess again...

    15. Re:Press release is kind of funny... by torpor · · Score: 1

      Funny, but living here I see things completely differently. Frances' 'attitude' in this group seems not to be ruffling any serious feathers, just providing weather for trade warfare between the states. Normal, healthy stuff.

      Not to mention the fact that the EU keeps getting bigger - i.e. more states are added, ex-eastern-bloc, etc.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    16. Re:Press release is kind of funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm, actually... It's more like 4:20pm, and it ain't exactly tea...

  11. The picture appears composited by SquareOfS · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The large picture of Valles Marineris appears to be composited. It looks like the background (with the small black border) is the real picture, and then they've extrapolated something closer to a surface view where you can see elevation, slapped it in front, over the border, and projected a shadow back over the join where they laid the forground over the background.

    What gives? That's remarkably annoying -- why not just show us the picture as taken instead of this cutesy mockup?

    1. Re:The picture appears composited by SquareOfS · · Score: 2, Informative
      Oops.

      RTFA, and "The lower part of the picture shows the same region in perspective view as if seen from a low-flying aircraft."

      Still annoying, though. And should be disclaimered better somewhere on the picture or at least on the detail page where you get the high-res version.

    2. Re:The picture appears composited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFM: it shows a portion of a 1700 km long and 65 km wide swath which was taken in south-north direction across the Grand Canyon of Mars (Valles Marineris) from ****two perspectives****. It is the first image of this size that shows the surface of Mars in high resolution (12 metres per pixel), in colour and in 3D.

    3. Re:The picture appears composited by tds67 · · Score: 1
      What gives? That's remarkably annoying -- why not just show us the picture as taken instead of this cutesy mockup?

      Be patient...we're only just now finding out that Mars has a blue sky.

    4. Re:The picture appears composited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Suppose that each pixel 3D is:

      • 12 bits colour (4096 colours CMKY).
      • 12 bits float height in meters (with mantissa and exponent)

      open4free

    5. Re:The picture appears composited by zeux · · Score: 1

      Here it is.

      Are you all blind ? Everything is here.

    6. Re:The picture appears composited by spikeham · · Score: 1

      After all the complaints about NASA "modifying" photos so that the colors are "inaccurate", it's amazing that there's not more screaming about ESA releasing a completely fake image, which, to most people, appears to show a deep dark canyon, but actually is overhead and landscape views crudely stuck together.

      Some propagandist at ESA must have designed the image to look really dramatic. It certainly worked for the press.

    7. Re:The picture appears composited by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Man I need a vacation: a virtual one. "Blue Skies on Mars" sounds good. Hook me up, doc.

  12. Spirit not that impressive...? by troon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Check out Lunokhod, two Russian moon rovers from the early 1970s that drove around for months.

    Not to bring down the Spirit guys or their great work, but their talk of pioneering 30cm moves sound a bit dull compared with Lunokhod, or the Pathfinder. Also look at the Russian Venera probes that managed to return images from the surface of Venus, at temperatures hot enough to melt lead and pressures of 90 bar.

    --
    Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
    1. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The major differences between Lunokhod and Spirit is the moon is a heck of a lot closer to Earth than Mars will ever be so the Soviets were able to manually control the rovers due to the relatively short timelag whereas Spirit must figure out how to get around on its own.

      Yes, the folks down here on Earth can send messages to Spirit to maneuver this way or that but for the most part the rover has to do things on its own.

      Not trying to dimish what the Soviets did. Hazaah for them! Just pointing one major difference.

      One a side note, did anyone else notice the close resemblance in design between Lunokhod and Spirit?

    2. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by corebreech · · Score: 1

      Whoa! We had images of the surface of Venus???

      Where was the news media?

    3. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by Aniquel · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting that the Mars Rover is autonomous. NASA gives it high-level instructions (move over there), and Rover figures out the best way to get there on its own. Lunokhod is remote-controlled.

    4. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Informative

      Check out Lunokhod, two Russian moon rovers from the early 1970s that drove around for months. Not to bring down the Spirit guys or their great work, but their talk of pioneering 30cm moves sound a bit dull compared with Lunokhod.....

      Lunokhod had the advantage of a 2-second message turnaround time instead of the approx. 20 minutes one gets from Mars. Thus, Lunokhod did not have to carry a brain of any kind. Spirit can travel quite a distance on its own, making navigation decisions if one lets it. However, they are being cautious at this point in the mission. They are likely to get braver toward the end of the mission when there is less to lose.

      Lunokhod was just a RC car more or less. But still a bold craft for its time. I read that it took 5 guys to drive it.

    5. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by snake_dad · · Score: 1
      "it weighed just under 2,000 pounds and was designed to operate for 90 days while guided in real-time by a five person team at the Deep Space Center near Moscow"

      That's a whole lot different than the semi-autonomous driving of the MER's. You may think it's dull, others see the value in going easy, step by step, evaluating each step before a bigger step is taken. Well, maybe it is dull, but IMHO it's the right thing to do with a $800 million asset...

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    6. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by Thrymm · · Score: 1

      Wow, I have done a lot of looking at the US space missions of the past, yet I never looked into the Russian ones which obviously were impressive. I had no idea there were images from Venus' surface, awesome! Thanks for the link!

    7. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by hcg50a · · Score: 1
      Where was the news media?

      The media covered it, but I believe the Soviets hampered the coverage a bit, with their secretive ways.
      --
      HCG 50a = 2MASX J11170638+5455016
      11h17m06.4s +54d55m02s
    8. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and we had people driving around the Moon before that even.

      Mars is not the Moon... it's a lot further away, it's a harsher environment in many ways, and there's a lot less known about it. Really it's the "further away" bit that makes it difficult -- you have to spend an immense amount of energy to go really fast in order to get there. And then you have to get rid of all of it once you're there unless you want to just plow a new crater. The Russians sent, what, 9 probes to Mars in the 70s as well -- only one survived. And only for a few seconds at that.

      As for comparing it to Pathfinder, realize that Spirit fits into the same physical space as Pathfinder. But Pathfinder left the computer, the camera, and most of the sensors back on the lander. Spirit has to pack all of that onboard, as well as some actual science tools (of which Pathfinder had nearly none) into the same physical volume, with only a 50% mass increase (which necessitated redesign of the entire landing system, since the Pathfinder airbags and parachute couldn't handle the additional load). It'd also be nice if Spirit doesn't get stuck on a rock -- so toss in improved mobility as well as some basic self guidance capability.

      Venera was impressive -- but that doesn't diminish the accomplishments of Spirit. Nor does Spirit diminish the accomplishments of Venera. Despite what you may think, this isn't a game of "mine is bigger".

    9. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by InfoVore · · Score: 1

      Not to bring down the Spirit guys or their great work, but their talk of pioneering 30cm moves sound a bit dull compared with Lunokhod

      Yup, they sure don't build them like they used to... Why in my day we did things in space... put men on the Moon... robots were big clunky and lasted for years... Hey where are you going ya young whipper-snapper...

      Sorry, couldn't resist.

      Cheers,
      I.V.

      --
      "These laws they're passing won't even compile anymore, let alone execute." - anon
    10. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      I think another major difference, was that Lunokhod was nuclear powered as opposed to solar/battery. Spirit only has a few nuclear heaters to keep the electronics warm.

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    11. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by QuantumFTL · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not to bring down the Spirit guys or their great work, but their talk of pioneering 30cm moves sound a bit dull compared with Lunokhod, or the Pathfinder.

      Oh come on, you can't compare a an ancient real-time controlled rover like Lunokhod to an autonomous, self-navigating rover like Spirit. Spirit could easily run around all over the place if a human were driving it, that's not the challenge. The challenge is the navigation and safety aspects, and without a human controlling it one has to be very conservative.

      Also remember that sunlight is much dimmer out on Mars than it is on the moon, adn the gravity is higher, thus speeds tend to be slower.

      And as for pathfinder, the rover had almost no science instrumentation, and it got stuck.

      I know comparing apples and oranges is a slashdot favorite, but please don't put down an engineering triumph because you don't understand the differences in mission parameters!

      Cheers,
      Justin Wick
      Science Activity Planner Developer
      Mars Exploration Rovers

    12. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1

      I suspect the Americans weren't exactly over-eager to cover Soviet successes at the height of the cold war either.

      --
      "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
      - JRR Tolkien.
    13. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by richard_za · · Score: 1

      Is it true that spirit makes use of Java? Or does only the "client" software used to control it,use Java. Does it have an OS and if so which/or what type? Does it use a RTOS or Linux or a BSD?

    14. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by craw · · Score: 1

      Some trivia. The Venera 13 and 14 photos were digitized and spatially transformed to a coordinate system similar to the Viking lander panoramas. This was done by some American graduate students after the Soviets gave them the photos (hardcopy only, IIRC). The Soviet scientists were not pleased to have been out-done by their foreign colleagues.

      The work was done by James Garvin, Paul Helfenstein, and Maria Zuber. Garvin (who has a MS in CS from Stanford) is now the NASA chief scientist for Martian exploration. Helfenstein wrote software for the space shuttle before attending grad school. Zuber is now a prof at MIT.

    15. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I think another major difference, was that Lunokhod was nuclear powered as opposed to solar/battery. Spirit only has a few nuclear heaters to keep the electronics warm.

      I don't think that would make a significant difference, other than perhaps extending the mission life and maybe allowing night treks. The biggest difference is real-time navigation that the distance of Mars makes impossible. If a rover falls down a crevice or gets stuck in sand, it does not matter much what powers it. Its still hosed. The further you travel, the more likely you are to encounter dangers.

      However, if the nuclear cell was powerful enough, then perhaps the probe could have digging tools and other corrective-action doodads. But, that adds to cost.

    16. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by mikerich · · Score: 4, Informative
      I think another major difference, was that Lunokhod was nuclear powered as opposed to solar/battery.

      Solar powered, there were solar cells under the lid. It used a polonium 210 source to keep it warm during the 14 (Earth) day long lunar night.

      Since at least one Lunokhod failed to make Earth orbit (February 1969) that means a lot of one of the nastiest radioisotopes known to man came raining back to Earth.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    17. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets also remember that the Russian rover was developed almost 40 years ago.

    18. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by QuantumFTL · · Score: 5, Informative

      Is it true that spirit makes use of Java? Or does only the "client" software used to control it,use Java.

      Much software ON THE GROUND at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory is written in Java, but not software on the spacecraft.

      I wrote some of the software used for the mission in Java, and it worked very well for our purposes, namely due to platform independence and quick development time. We had a heck of a time with some of the GUI code, however.

      The rover runs VxWorks from Wind River. Very solid. Cheers,
      Justin Wick
      Science Activity Planner Developer
      Mars Exploration Rovers

    19. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      One thing whimsical about Soviet probes is that they usually resembled 1950's style kitchen appliances, while US probes resemble polygonal insects.

      The Soviet moon rover looks like a stew pot on wheels, and their Venus landers look like blenders. The engineers must have been hungry during the design or something.

    20. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by ScottMaxwell · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Also remember that sunlight is much dimmer out on Mars than it is on the moon, adn the gravity is higher, thus speeds tend to be slower.

      And why is sunlight a limiting factor? Because, for political reasons, we couldn't put an RTG (radioactive power source) on the rovers. That leaves us with solar only, which is what leads to the limited speed and the limited vehicle lifetime. If we could fly an RTG on Spirit, we could make it last for years. Maybe we'll be able to do that with a future mission.

      As it is, I think we've done pretty well: we're going to drive a 384kg rover a kilometer (or more) and operate it for three months on just about the amount of energy it takes to power two light bulbs (~140W peak). And we're going to do it again with Opportunity, starting in just a few days.

      --

      ``Life results from the non-random survival of randomly varying replicators.'' -- Richard Dawkins
    21. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by mikerich · · Score: 5, Informative
      The Russians sent, what, 9 probes to Mars in the 70s as well -- only one survived. And only for a few seconds at that.

      I make it seven.

      1. Kosmos 419 (May 1971). Mars orbiter intended to beat Mariner 8 to the planet. It reached Earth orbit but the booster failed to restart, it re-entered the Earth's atmosphere a few days later. The only positive point is that it did get further than Mariner 8 which ended up in the Atlantic.
      2. Mars 2 (May 1971) . Mars orbiter and lander. Reached Mars and deployed lander which entered the Martian atmosphere at the wrong angle and crashed. The orbiter successfully returned data for three months.
      3. Mars 3 (May 1971). The twin of Mars 2. The probe succesfully deployed the lander which touched down on Mars - the first craft to do so. Data was returned from the surface for 20 seconds - the reason for the failure is unknown - either the probe was toppled by a raging storm or there was a failure with the uplink to the orbiter. (The same storm delayed the return of images from the US's Mariner 9 orbiter). The Mars 3 orbiter failed to enter the correct Martian orbit and was put into a highly elliptical orbit. It returned data for almost three months.
      4. Mars 4 (July 1973). A Mars orbiter intended to serve as part of a fleet of four ships. It was damaged by radiation on the voyage to Mars and failed to fire its retro engine. The orbiter passed by Mars, taking some pictures of an astonishingly high quality (better than those obtained by the US to the time) and performed some work on the Martian atmosphere.
      5. Mars 5 (July 1973). The twin of Mars 4, but this one entered an orbit around the planet. It returned surface images before after less than a month. Again the images were superb.
      6. Mars 6 (August 1973). A heavy lander intended to use Mars 4 and 5 as relays to Earth. It entered the Martian atmosphere and relayed data to Earth during the descent. It is believed the retro rockets failed to fire and it smashed into the surface at high speed. Nevertheless, the Soviets were the first to make measurements of the Martian atmosphere, sadly much of the data was badly mangled during transmission.
      7. Mars 7 (August 1973) The twin of Mars 6, but this one didn't even land on Mars. For some reason the lander was ejected from the bus stage far too early and it missed the planet. Both stages went into solar orbit, neither returned any data.

      So a pretty depressing story for the Soviets (especially compared to their successes on Venus), it has been suggested that a good number of the failures were caused by solar radiation eating away the microchips in the probes causing them to die or malfunction. Certainly when you think of the longer flight times to Mars than to Venus it appears to suggest that it was something going on in-flight that caused the failures.

      Having said that, they did achieve some successes and I can only imagine the elation of Mars 3's controllers when they started getting that first grainy image of the Martian surface - only for it to suddenly stop.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    22. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by ScottMaxwell · · Score: 5, Informative
      Is it true that spirit makes use of Java? Or does only the "client" software used to control it,use Java. Does it have an OS and if so which/or what type? Does it use a RTOS or Linux or a BSD?

      We do use Java to write the rover command sequences. I wrote the software, RoSE (the Rover Sequence Editor), that we use for that; RoSE was also used to command both spacecraft in cruise.

      RoSE is part of a suite called RSVP, the rest of which does 3-D visualization, simulation, and playback. Our 3-D stuff is very, very cool (I feel OK about saying this because I didn't write that part :-): we do kinematic simulations as the rover drives across the terrain; you can see it articulate realistically. If you've watched the press conferences, you've probably seen one of our playbacks. That visualization stuff is all in C and C++, though, not Java.

      Java is also used upstream of RSVP, to do image browsing and to plan science goals for the sol. That's Maestro's role.

      The rovers themselves run VxWorks, a well-known real-time Unix variant that's used a lot here at JPL.

      --

      ``Life results from the non-random survival of randomly varying replicators.'' -- Richard Dawkins
    23. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by ScottMaxwell · · Score: 3, Informative
      RoSE is part of a suite called RSVP, the rest of which does 3-D visualization, simulation, and playback. Our 3-D stuff is very, very cool (I feel OK about saying this because I didn't write that part :-): we do kinematic simulations as the rover drives across the terrain; you can see it articulate realistically. If you've watched the press conferences, you've probably seen one of our playbacks. That visualization stuff is all in C and C++, though, not Java.

      I should clarify that RSVP as a whole is used to write the rover command sequences now that we're in surface ops, not just RoSE. RSVP provides a visual editing environment for command sequences, so that you can (for instance) mark a spot in the virtual 3-D world and tell the rover to go there. This adds a command to the sequence just as if it had been added in RoSE.

      --

      ``Life results from the non-random survival of randomly varying replicators.'' -- Richard Dawkins
    24. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that managed to return images from the surface of Venus, at temperatures hot enough to melt lead and pressures of 90 bar.

      Yeah? What'd they build it out of? For that matter, how many images? One diagonally cut off one before the probe sank into Sulfuric Acid Bay?

    25. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, fuck. I was wrong. All this time and nobody ever mentioned a probe actually landed on Venus.

      Nice links!

    26. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by Cosmonut · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The sad thing about the early Russian (aka Soviet) efforts at landing on Mars is the probes probably weren't sterilized very well, if at all. Soviet-era space electronics were tube-based, not transistor based, and were prone to heat-induced failure. Even their unmanned vehicles were pressurized to air-cool the electronicsm, and some of their early failures are probably attributable to loss of pressure in the probe itself, leading to heat-induced failure. What's this got to do with Mars? The Soviets couldn't 'cook' their probes high enough temperatures, for long enough periods of time, to sterilize them properly. Several of these probes (Mars 2, 3 and 6) made it to the surface, and it's entirely possible that they carried some hardy, tough bacteria with them.

    27. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      It looks okay in Lego with Biff Starling and Sandy Moondust on Mars (Kind of combining two continuing /. stories.) They even have Lego rovers that you can drive by web. I don't suppose they use the Maestro software? A working Lego Mindstorm rover would be cool--with experiment add-on packs. Imagine the probes that would be built by people who had been playing with them since they were kids?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    28. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by james_marsh · · Score: 1

      Lunokhod was just a RC car more or less. But still a bold craft for its time. I read that it took 5 guys to drive it.

      You forget: in Soviet Russia the rover drives you!

    29. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As it is, I think we've done pretty well: we're going to drive a 384kg rover a kilometer (or more) and operate it for three months on just about the amount of energy it takes to power two light bulbs (~140W peak).

      Why only 3 months? Do the solar panels become too damaged to generate electricity or is the battery toasted or what? Just curious.

    30. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by mandolin · · Score: 2, Informative
      The rovers themselves run VxWorks, a well-known real-time Unix variant

      Pedantic: VxWorks is not a Unix variant; it has some Unix-like properties, since Wind River started tacking on POSIX API support. But every task lives in the same address space (although I think they added support for different address spaces recently?). Coding for it felt like linux kernel module coding, but with a better interface, but without accessible source code.

      The only hard real-time Unix variant I know of is QNX.

      You can get a taste of the VxWorks API here.

    31. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by ScottMaxwell · · Score: 4, Informative
      Why only 3 months? Do the solar panels become too damaged to generate electricity or is the battery toasted or what? Just curious.

      There are several problems, some of which interrelate. You touched on a couple of them. Things that I can think of offhand:

      • Dust builds up on the solar panels, and they stop generating (enough) power. The developers experimented with various mechanisms to avoid dust buildup and/or to remove the dust, but never got anything satisfactory. Perhaps a future mission will have some fix for this; Spirit and Opportunity will tell us more about the properties of Mars's dust, which may help.
      • The batteries can be cycled only so many times before they stop working.
      • Mars gets farther and farther from the sun (which also starts to move north in the sky), further reducing the amount of solar power available.
      • As the available energy declines, the rover has a harder and harder time storing up enough energy to keep itself warm at night. Eventually, the internal components are subjected to sufficient cold that they fail. (Interesting fact: the rover parts that most need to be kept warm live in its main body, that shiny gold box. It's called the WEB, or Warm Electronics Box, for that reason.)
      • There are limits on the lifetime of the rover's motors.
      • This is unlikely to be a limiting factor, but radiation may destroy vital electronic and computer components.

      There are probably many other conditions; I'm not a hardware guy. I just drive 'em. :-) Per my original point, most of the problems can be mitigated by using RTGs, though some would have to be attacked in other ways.

      Spirit and Opportunity will not reach sol 90 and immediately shut down, of course. Instead, they will slowly degrade, like a human body entering old age. It will be a matter of morbid curiosity to see what goes first. It makes me sad to think about it.

      --

      ``Life results from the non-random survival of randomly varying replicators.'' -- Richard Dawkins
    32. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by sploxx · · Score: 1

      This is one of the coolest things about slashdot. To look at and respond to comments from "nerd VIPs" like you!
      No, really, I'm currently checking the marsrovers website several times a day. Very cool stuff!

    33. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by Skip666Kent · · Score: 1

      Gotta love them Cold War Russians...putting WarHammer style spikes on their Venus lander.

      I wonder if it had a spear for a flag-pole with an American skull on it?

      Totally evil!

      --
      **>>BELCH
    34. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by QuantumFTL · · Score: 1

      Hey Scott,

      Since you went into a bit of detail about your work, I'll tell slashdot a little about RSVP's planning counterpart, Science Activity Planner.

      Science Activity Planner is used by scientists for planning before the Science Operational Working Group meeting, in which the final plans are made on SAP.

      Scientists can visualize doownlinked data products and create high-level plans which are then later converted to sequences by the sequencing team using RSVP and a few other tools (like MAPGEN).

      RSVP is aimed towards the engineering aspects of seqwuencing, and has precise simulation, etc. SAP is aimed towards the scientific part of the process, that is designating high level targets, analysing data that's come down, and planning things in a somewhat rough level.

      We also have a 3D visualization environment which isn't too bad (especially considering it's Java3D!) Our simulation is much rougher (but very fast) and is used to give scientists a good idea of what their plans will do, and leave the details to the sequencing team.

      The public version of Science Activity Planner is known as Maestro and can be downloaded at Maestro Headquarters. It has essentially the same functionalities, however the data is significantly compressed, and of course the planning has had all the sensitive bits removed.

      It's really amazing all the effort that goes into one day on mars, from examing the data to sending the final sequence. Too bad there's no public version of RSVP, otherwise everyone could see how awesome it is :)

      Cheers,
      Justin Wick,
      Science Activity Planner Developer
      Mars Exploration Rovers

    35. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by richard_za · · Score: 1

      Wow! Thanks for all the info, I just wish I had a job as interesting as yours. [It's 1:20am in the morning in South Africa, and I just got back from work, fixing badly written oracle queries]

      Seriously, how democratic is the planning process? In what forum are disputes resolved? I'm sure the debate over which rocks to explore can get quite heated.

    36. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by ScottMaxwell · · Score: 1
      We also have a 3D visualization environment which isn't too bad (especially considering it's Java3D!) Our simulation is much rougher (but very fast) and is used to give scientists a good idea of what their plans will do, and leave the details to the sequencing team.

      [...] It's really amazing all the effort that goes into one day on mars, from examing the data to sending the final sequence. Too bad there's no public version of RSVP, otherwise everyone could see how awesome it is :)

      Well, as long as we're blowing smoke up each other's bodily orifices :-), I should say that SAP is really nice as well. I rely on it to get my daily pix fix (yes, I know it's more than an image browser; I don't mean to denigrate it; that's just what I use it for ;-). I keep meaning to play with the 3-D stuff, but haven't gotten to it yet. Maybe tomorrow.
      --

      ``Life results from the non-random survival of randomly varying replicators.'' -- Richard Dawkins
    37. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by ScottMaxwell · · Score: 1
      Seriously, how democratic is the planning process? In what forum are disputes resolved? I'm sure the debate over which rocks to explore can get quite heated.

      To simplify a bit (sorry, but it's a complex process), the planning happens in two big meetings.

      First, there's a daily downlink assessment meeting, in which the various groups report the state of their instruments and talk about what happened yesterday. They also throw around ideas about what to do tomorrow. Mostly it's at a high level. This meeting is fun and interesting, and I attend it whenever I can. There's almost always a beautiful PANCAM or MI image being displayed on one of the big screens as well, which helps. :-) People go away from this meeting with a candidate set of activities for the next sol, with assignments to explore the possibilities, generate preliminary versions of their sequences to see what's possible, and so on.

      Later, there's the Science Operations Working Group (SOWG) meeting, which is like having your teeth pulled. That's where they do the nitty-gritty work of fitting everything into the available resource constraints -- time, energy, downlink data volume. (SAP (Maestro) is the main tool for this.) This meeting finalizes the plan for the sol, though it's common to deliberately overcommit resources in case we discover late in the process that we have more time than we thought, or that some things can't be done after all, etc. If we've overcommitted (intentionally or otherwise), we throw out stuff during sequencing until it works.

      In both meetings, there's a lot of horse trading, and there's a dictator for each, whose job is to say, "You get this today, you get that tomorrow" -- if it comes to that. But that's usually necessary only to keep things moving, not to resolve disputes. The scientists are generally very polite and respectful of each other, and the meetings are mostly consensus-driven.

      I'd have to say I haven't seen too much heat yet. (Then again, I'm not on the scientists' email lists, so there may be more going on than meets the eye.) It is certainly a fascinating process to watch.

      --

      ``Life results from the non-random survival of randomly varying replicators.'' -- Richard Dawkins
    38. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although the technology behind Spirit and Opportunity is very cool, it doesn't solve the one interesting question that Beagle2 could have answered.

    39. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by QuantumFTL · · Score: 1

      (yes, I know it's more than an image browser; I don't mean to denigrate it; that's just what I use it for ;-)

      Most of my work was with the downlink browser, so I don't care if you use any of Jeff's stuff. Okay so I did shared targets too (and that was a ton of work to get right as well).

      Cheers,
      Justin

    40. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      There's a nice replica of one of those, not more then ten miles from where I lived. Not to mention being able to touch an SR-71 that flew, and being able to stand less then 5 foot away from the original Apollo 13 command module . . . long live Kansas.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    41. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Since at least one Lunokhod failed to make Earth orbit (February 1969) that means a lot of one of the nastiest radioisotopes known to man came raining back to Earth."

      Did anyone survive?

    42. Re:Spirit not that impressive...? by GMontag · · Score: 1

      Thank you for this post. I was thinking the same thing about contamination of the surface, but was not armed with as many facts as you.

      One thing about tube-based electronics is that, in general without shielding, they are not as susceptable to radiation damage as solid-state electronics.

      The pressurization requirement negates this of course, when pressurization is lost.

  13. Re:Grind a rock in Arizona desert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Why not just land in one of their city's then we'll know for sure there's life?

  14. Fake by JewFish · · Score: 1

    I am wondering why the imagine looks so fake, particularly the bottom half. The surface sure doesn't look that fake from the pictures I have seen from Spirit. What gives?

    1. Re:Fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The top part of the picture is the actual image. The part along the bottom is a 3D rendering of what it would look like to a low-flying plane.

      You can see both images seperately on this page.

    2. Re:Fake by RedWizzard · · Score: 1
      What gives?
      The usual: you didn't RTFA.
  15. Adirondack? by twoslice · · Score: 3, Funny
    grind the rock Adirondack

    Since when did NASA scientists stop calling rocks after cartoon characters. The last visit to Mars we had Scoobydoo, Popeye and Barnicle Bill. Those names were really scientific sounding too...

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
    1. Re:Adirondack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they got Cease and Desist orders from media corporations, and had to stop using other people's copyrighted material and trademarks.

    2. Re:Adirondack? by Tassach · · Score: 1

      Would you prefer perhaps a system based on range & bearing from lander? Scientific? Yes. Accessable? No. When you are dealing with $800M of the taxpayer's money, you have to play the PR game if you want to keep doing science.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    3. Re:Adirondack? by Cujo · · Score: 1

      Scientists are people too. The names they give the rocks are just convenient labels that facilitate discussion. It's a lot easier to say "Adirondack" than to quote a range and bearing. I doubt the PR people have much to do with it.

      --

      Helium balloons want to be free.

  16. Re:Grind a rock in Arizona desert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    perhaps they are looking for intelligent life

  17. From NASA with Love... by JoeLinux · · Score: 3, Funny

    How sweet!

    I was bored....

    JoeLinux

    1. Re:From NASA with Love... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Maybe the Brits will return the favor by finding the Polar Lander Crater with their orbiter.

    2. Re:From NASA with Love... by paranode · · Score: 1

      Registering on Slashdot: Free

      Making sarcastic snide comments: Free and funny

      Having someone use your comment, make a picture out of it, and post it back to Slashdot: Priceless!!

      I'm so proud.

    3. Re:From NASA with Love... by JoeLinux · · Score: 1

      Yup....I laughed so hard when I read your comment I blew coffee all over my monitor. Thanks for the chuckle.

      Joe

  18. Re:Mars environment by CGP314 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I am lazy(don't want to google), but I also thought it would be interesting for other people to know. But what is the envirnoment like on Mars? Oxygen? Gravity? High/Low temps? etc..

    Here is the last two lines of your post entered in google, except with `environment' spelled right, you lazy bastard.


    --
    In London? Need a Physics Tutor?

    American Weblog in London

  19. Re:Mars environment by Stud1y · · Score: 4, Informative

    temp is between 5-15 degree's celsius. here's a fact sheet, i tried to post it here but it said there as too many "JUNK" characters... fact sheet here

  20. Re:Mars environment by ThosLives · · Score: 2, Informative

    Try Here for more info. It's got info on all the planets.

    --
    "There are a dozen opinions on a matter until you know the truth. Then there is only one." - CS Lewis (paraprhase)
  21. Re:Grind a rock in Arizona desert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The rover is already in an area of mars that, when warm, is dozens of degrees below freezing.

    The poles are even more so, cold enough for the atmosphere itself to freeze and fall to the ground. It would take about 15 minutes to kill anything battery powered there.

  22. Re:Mars environment by CaptainAlbert · · Score: 1

    Here [google.com] is the last two lines of your post entered in google, except with `environment' spelled right, you lazy bastard.

    That is absolutely the funniest thing I've read on Slashdot for an incredibly long time.

    --
    These sigs are more interesting tha
  23. The best is yet to come. by tr0llb4rt0 · · Score: 1

    Once the orbiters have been in place for a while there should be some truly excellent hi-res images returned.

    The must have coffee table book for x-mas 2004 :)

    --
    Worst .sig ever!
  24. Wow by GonzoDave · · Score: 1

    the Spirit rover is getting ready to grind the rock Adirondack

    Science article->Pulp Fantasy in just 1 sentence

  25. Re:Grind a rock in Arizona desert by hottoh · · Score: 2, Informative

    1) It is less complex to insert a craft from earth near the equator than at the poles.

    2) There is more solar energy available at the equator.

    3) They are more interested in the geology of a lake bed [IE, history of liquid water than they are looking at ice.

    4) Not much is known about the surface of Mars. The two landing sites are good candidates for exploration.

  26. Looks familiar? by j0hnfr0g · · Score: 2

    Looks something like a repeat.

  27. Ready to grind the rock Adirondack by Malc · · Score: 2

    "[...] ready to grind the rock Adirondack"

    Is this a rock that they've given a name to? Or is it an American colloquialism that I'm not familiar with? Or is it something else? Aren't the Adirondacks a mountain chain in NE N. America?

    1. Re:Ready to grind the rock Adirondack by riverz · · Score: 1

      Adirondack means 'bark eater' in Iroquois, a Native American Tribal Confederacy based in Upstate New York.

      Yes, the Adirondacks are a chain of mountains in upstate New York.

      Go here for a better explanation:

    2. Re:Ready to grind the rock Adirondack by grunherz · · Score: 1

      Yes and it's really @#$%ing cold here right now in the Adirondacks (plural) too.

      (The Olympic Winter Games in 1980 were held in Lake Placid in The Adirondacks just up the road from where I'm sitting, if you need a mental image)

      --
      Four weeks, Twenty papers, that's two dollars ... plus tip.
  28. Re:Grind a rock in Arizona desert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Water?? who said anything about water??

    Beagle is there.. it found oil.. oil in the desert.. :) water at the poles.. it's not lost either.. it sunk into the tar sands.. they know where it is..

    make sense now?

    Why do you think bush wants to get on the moon ASAP.. it's not the chinese.. it's the oil! oil from mars!

  29. Russia's impressive record by ad0gg · · Score: 1
    --

    Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

  30. Nothing to see here. Move along. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eurotrash display their well-earned inferiority complex. Film at 11.

  31. HERE IS THE MIRROR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  32. Story already posted! by zoney_ie · · Score: 1

    I did already submit this news yesterday, and the story was posted... What gives?

    The image is indeed a composite of two processed images. The background is the top down view. The foreground is an extrapolated "aeroplane" view, using the information provided by the stereoscopic camera image.

    I imagine the background too is "fake" if you wish to call it that. The stereoscopic image, again, has probably been processed and this is the top-down view of the 3D model.

    --
    -- *~()____) This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds...
    1. Re:Story already posted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's non-composited versions of the images available - there's still that weird, slightly 'painted' look to them, but I imagine it's partly due to us being brought up on grainy, monochrome images from other probes. :)

      I found a page with some fairly in-depth information on the camera. There's also some other images that it's taken, of both Mars from a distance and of Earth. It's interesting that the instrument was originally designed for the ill-fated Russian Mars 96 mission - but the quality is still impressive now.

      It's a big instrument - it comes in at a hefty 21.2kg, compared with the 60kg Beagle 2. Still, 2m resolution is rather impressive...

    2. Re:Story already posted! by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      It took me a few moments to figure it out.. i was looking at the image with my Red/Blue glasses, then I scrolled down and saw the texture-mapped sideview. I have seen a documentary about the imager and the scientists were looking at a screen with 3D glasses (polarized), so when the headline said "3D", I was a bit biassed and excited. This quickly turned into disapiontment.

      This image is what I call "3D".

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  33. euro != uk by Rhubarb+Crumble · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I thank those noble European eyes that were sacrificed in order to make this European mission Euro-possible.

    It's ironic. By so blatantly highlighting the Euro-ticity of this mission, they sound very American.

    I think you're missing the point. I think it's a dig at the UK, who hogged all the publicity with the (UK-built) Beagle lander, which then turned out to be a turkey. This is them pointing out that the rest of the mission, designed on the "continent", works just fine.

    Remember that, especially in the UK, the "opposite" of european isn't american, it's british. "Fog in channel, continent cut off" and all that.

    1. Re:euro != uk by Open_The_Box · · Score: 1

      Hmmn. Could be. But I reckon it's less about showing you're better than the other guy than showing you're good enough to keep being funded. Y'know, along the lines of "we can do this, this and this while they can only do that, that and maybe that. So you see we deserve the (limited amount of funding for what is essentially pure science) money, not them."

      To the best of my knowledge, these missions are split between research in different countries on a who's-best-for-the-job type approach with all sorts of infighting and back biting for the larger portions of the pie. Pretty much like all academia really. And hey, sometimes standing up and shouting "Hey, see what I can do!" is the only way to go.

      Even if they do look a bit daft when it doesn't work...

      --
      If you can't think of something nice to say then don't say anything at all. No, REALLY.
  34. Ah yes... The MAIN mision... by Mulletproof · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "While the Beagle 2 may have been gobbled up by Mars--Eater of Spacecraft, the main part of the ESA's recent Mars mission is doing well."

    Um, excuse me, but wasn't the main part of the mission eaten by Mars? Let's not sugar-coat this now-- The biggest reason for going to Mars was to put something on Mars. That said, it's nice to know they're making use of the leftovers.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:Ah yes... The MAIN mision... by VdG · · Score: 5, Informative

      No. Mars Express was always the main mission.

      Beagle 2 was a last-minute afterthought, built in a hurry, on a shoestring. It also had a very limited mass-budget, so that it could piggy-back on the same launcher.

    2. Re:Ah yes... The MAIN mision... by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1

      Not true. Mars Express existed as a concept before Beagle 2 ever did. It just turned out to be convenient to piggyback the one on the other.

      --
      "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
      - JRR Tolkien.
    3. Re:Ah yes... The MAIN mision... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true, the orbiter was and always has been the main part of the mission. Beagle-2 was added later and just hitched a free ride with the orbiter.

    4. Re:Ah yes... The MAIN mision... by danielobvt · · Score: 1

      Oh, I would say that they definately put something on Mars. Probably many little pieces of stuff.

    5. Re:Ah yes... The MAIN mision... by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

      Nope.. Mars Express was the main mission.. Beagle was a last minuite add on...

      --
      Have a nice day!
    6. Re:Ah yes... The MAIN mision... by Tonytheloony · · Score: 1

      NO
      Mars express was first planned without the Beagle2 lander. Television here in France called the Beagle2 a minor part of the mission *BEFORE* it even attempted to land.

      --
      The quickest way to become an atheist is to study the Bible thoroughly.
    7. Re:Ah yes... The MAIN mision... by Tonytheloony · · Score: 4, Informative

      ok... since some people still seem convinced that beagle 2 was the main point of the misson, check this news release from ESA dating back to 1998 where they endorse the initial mars express payload:
      News release
      No mention of beagle 2. "Possibility left open of a small lander"...

      --
      The quickest way to become an atheist is to study the Bible thoroughly.
    8. Re:Ah yes... The MAIN mision... by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

      Really. The hype made over beagle before it got eaten says otherwise.

      --
      You need a FREE iPod Nano
    9. Re:Ah yes... The MAIN mision... by VdG · · Score: 1

      Landing on Mars is much more exciting than just orbiting, hence the hype. Check the details of the project, though and you'll find that Beagle 2 was quite definitely an afterthought.
      Colin whatsisname heard about Mars Express and saw an opportunity for a small lander to piggy-back it. He did a marvellous job in pulling everything together. Shame it didn't work. :-(

  35. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  36. Re:Mars Image by mantera · · Score: 2, Funny


    My childhood suspicions are confirmed;.. Mars is one friggin' big toffee pie!

    see for yourself... this is Mars, and this is what it's made of

  37. Re:Truss me....it's whack!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    No, goddammit - it's WACK!

    WACK! WACK! WACK!

    I swear, you people need to have your Kool Moe Dee records confiscated.

  38. Something definately wrong with these. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If you look at the other picture, it was made from height maps and generated in 3D .. But the actual photo looks like they did a top down view of they 3D gen and then took a screenshot .. I dont think these images are real at all. Something was definately done to retouch this in some sort of way.

    Why was the parent article marked as flame bait?

  39. Re:Grand Canyon pictures by bhny · · Score: 1

    umm, i wasn't flame-baiting

    there is something very unnatural looking about the hi-res image

  40. Mars ate Beagle 2.... by tUrBzY · · Score: 3, Funny

    and now Beagle 1 is eating up our computers!

    --
    --tUrBzY
  41. Strange feeling by haggar · · Score: 1

    I have a 50% deja-vu ;o)

    --
    Sigged!
  42. the picture by ajs318 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Note that wallpaper ain't just for Windows! KDE users can download it, open a root console, and copy it to /usr/share/wallpapers/, from where any user can then set it as their desktop wallpaper. {This may or may not also work for GNOME -- haven't been able to test as I don't have Gnome installed on this machine}.

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  43. Re:Furpile, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [Khan]

    > you anime-tainted musk-huffing fools

    [/Khan]

  44. Competition by siskbc · · Score: 0, Troll
    Why does every clipping have to mention how they are doing it "better" than Americans are.....

    That's particularly difficult now, at a time when the American probe phoned home and the European one did not. Kind of sounds hollow and desperate.

    Seems like the ESA has a serious case of American Penis Envy. Scratch that. The whole damn EU seems to have it.

    Sounds as if Europe has decided to try to be a superpower again after 50 years of regional isolationism? Trying the "bigger, better" competition like the Soviets? Hopes it works out better for Europe.

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  45. Re:Mars environment by Seehund · · Score: 2, Informative

    temp is between 5-15 degree's celsius.

    From that fact sheet you linked to:

    Average temperature: ~210 K (-63 C)
    Diurnal temperature range: 184 K to 242 K (-89 to -31 C) (Viking 1 Lander site)

    --
    Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
  46. to paraphrase homer.... by notcreative · · Score: 1

    "Oh, anyone could miss Europe, all tucked away down there!"

  47. Party-line-towing, anti-Semitic lunatics ...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Party-line-towing, anti-Semitic lunatics who are Castro apologists

    1. Re:Party-line-towing, anti-Semitic lunatics ...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ...I'll take "Who are the Democratic candidates for President" for $500, Alex.

  48. What is the point of this all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't we do all the mapping of Mars in the name of America decades ago? This is a completely pointless and redundant mission. Typical of the Europeans to be so behind.

    1. Re:What is the point of this all? by confused+one · · Score: 1
      The ESA mission has a higher resolution camera. It also includes ground penetrating radar, which the other's didn't carry along with them...

      Each mission adds a little something by improving on the measurements made by the previous ones...

  49. Main part of ESA's mission? by BigChigger · · Score: 0, Troll

    I doubt it. That sounds like a little revisionism to me. BC

    1. Re:Main part of ESA's mission? by VanillaCoke420 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Whoever told you Beagle2 was the main part, was wrong. I am sure it's been said many times before (and judging by the number of people still not knowing what it's all about, it was said in vain, nevertheless...), it was not the main part of the mission. It may have recieved most press and media attention, but it was not the main mission. Ah, why do I bother.

    2. Re:Main part of ESA's mission? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tee mission had eight components. Beagle II was just one of them. In addition, it was the last objective to be added, because there happened to be some space left.

  50. Mars Mission... by BigJimSlade · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...the most expensive computer wallpaper generating space mission ever.

  51. Re:Mars environment by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

    Colin, you are sounding like a Brit now.. oops.. actually you shoudl have said "You lazy bugger"...

    At least your got the British Sarcasm ;)

    --
    Have a nice day!
  52. Haven't you heard . . . Re:Adirondack? by StefanJ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    . . . of "Adirondack Al," the wise-cracking otter from the Allegheny Animation Studio's show _The Runciple Potts Hour_?

    You know, ran on the Muntz TV Network?

    Had the guy who played Commodore Langly on _Space: Mission Upwards_ as Runciple Potts, the friendly lumber deliveryman who introduced the cartoons?

    Jeeze, kids these days don't have appreciation of culture.

    Stefan

    1. Re:Haven't you heard . . . Re:Adirondack? by calyphus · · Score: 1

      Adirondack Al? Sounds like they're running out of cartoon names to use when they have to dig that deep.

      --


      The potato it is uninformed.
    2. Re:Haven't you heard . . . Re:Adirondack? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're making this up, aren't you?

    3. Re:Haven't you heard . . . Re:Adirondack? by StefanJ · · Score: 1

      "You're making this up, aren't you?"

      Yes. I was going to put in more clues, but didn't want to make it TOO obvious . . . #B^)

  53. amazing tactics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    this is an amazing tactic(!):

    send three probs. you def. know that the
    mars-probe-eater is insatiable and gon get one.

    so you send three probs. a small cheap one that's
    going to lure the mars-probe-eater away from
    the the two real probs! amazing!

    maybe next time the lure-probe won't actually
    need all the fancy equipment. some bright
    fancy LED, some flowers and maybe a small
    altar and some nitty-pitty glas juwlery might
    just do better job.

    maybe adding a few pounds of c-4 will then get
    rid of the mars-probe-eater once and for all? :P

  54. Have a nice European day! by Picass0 · · Score: 1

    The european picture looks like it's artwork. It does not seem real.

  55. Re:Grind a rock in Arizona desert by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Informative

    if the purpose of these landers is to discover water or traces, why didnt they land at the poles where some people are convinced there is water instead of landing in the middle of a desert

    They are there to solve a mystery, not just find water. The crater area of the landing site LOOKS likes like it used to be a lake because it is filled in like a dry lake and because it has (now-dry) river-like channels flowing into it. What made the channels? If Mars used to contain large lakes near the equator, that is an important find. It could mean that Mars was once more Earthlike.

  56. I hope they have audio gear! by CaptCanuk · · Score: 4, Funny

    I hope they have audio gear on that expensive digital camera just in case that rock says "Owww! Stop grinding me!"

    --
    ---- The geek shall inherit the Earth.
  57. Geological Event by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

    Looking at this picture(small) (Large), I see what looks to be 3 high areas that seem to have their tops sliced off. They look to be flat, almost like what you'd see here on Earth, like Devil's Tower.

    I'm wondering if these features were caused by similiar forces. Given the apparent size of the features on Mars, I'm thinking that whatever happened, it must've been big. Or maybe it was just gravity, given that these features are part of the canyon wall.

    I'm no geologist, or rocket scientist by any means. However it looks pretty interesting to me.

    wbs.

    --
    Huh?
    1. Re:Geological Event by AJWM · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not that the tops were sliced off. The whole area was probably a pretty flat plain before whatever (zillions of gallons of water, most likely) carved out the canyon. The flat areas are what's left of the original surface.

      You'll see the same thing in canyon areas on Earth. As the valleys widen you get less and less of the original surface left, until the whole terrain is rugged.

      --
      -- Alastair
    2. Re:Geological Event by bmalia · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, that they were flat plains eroded by water. just thought I'd point out that http://www.nps.gov/deto/geology.htm It would be cool to see volcanic activity on mars.

      --
      There's no place like ~/
    3. Re:Geological Event by Shoden · · Score: 1

      Okay, Here you go... volcanic activity on mars: http://www.solarviews.com/eng/marsvolc.htm

    4. Re:Geological Event by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      Given the apparent size of the features on Mars,

      You're doing better than me if you had any idea of the scale. At first look I couldn't tell if it was a microscopic or macroscopic image. Finally reading the text I get "The picture shows a portion of a 1700 km long and 65 km wide swath" which gives me an idea (how big of a "portion"?), but I still wish these guys would put a simple scale bar on the images for people like me.

    5. Re:Geological Event by AJWM · · Score: 1

      Oh, sure, Devil's Tower is some kind of igneous intrusion. The top was levelled off as a landing zone for UFOs (see CE3K) (grin).

      As for volcanic activity on Mars, as the other poster's link points out, Mars has some of the biggest volcanoes in the solar system -- Olympus Mons and the other volcanoes on the Tharsis Bulge. Pavonis Mons is almost exactly on the equator -- if you were going to build a beanstalk on Mars, that'd be the place to anchor it.

      Probably not active, though. For that you'd have to go to Io.

      --
      -- Alastair
    6. Re:Geological Event by CuteAlien · · Score: 1

      Resolution is 12.5 meters per pixel. Just count the pixel and you know the size.

    7. Re:Geological Event by CuteAlien · · Score: 1

      oh - but look at the original picture for that:
      http://www.esa.int/export/externals/images/ Colored Map_hi-res.jpg

  58. I found the Beagle ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...it just arrived in my Inbox.

  59. Re:Grand Canyon pictures by chadm1967 · · Score: 0

    Wow, that looks fake......

  60. Re:stfuz omg lolz by HerringFlavoredFowl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    >stupid mars probe. Also, hooray for communism!

    Lets see,
    links for the history of missions to the red planet

    US Mars Missions
    16 Launches containing 21 different probes (4 fly by, 8 orbiter, 4 landers, 3 rovers, 2 penetrators) of which only 7 where lost (1 fly by, 3 orbiters, 1 lander, and both penetrators).

    Communist missions
    19 Launches containing 25 different probes (6 flyby, 12 orbiter, 7 landers, 0 rovers, 0 penetrators) of which all where lost or failed.

    Hurray for ?

    And for those keeping score the European orbiter and lander went up on a russia rocket (1 orbiter, one lost lander).

    --
    TastesLikeHerringFlavoredChicken
  61. clouds? fog? ice? by doceddi · · Score: 1

    What's the white stuff in the valleys?
    http://www.esa.int/export/externals/images/Colored Map_hi-res.jpg

    1. Re:clouds? fog? ice? by robvs68 · · Score: 1

      Foaming rock from the pumas in the crevasses. (read)

    2. Re:clouds? fog? ice? by kubla2000 · · Score: 1

      cocaine.

  62. Not only is it a blatant dupe... by Gleng · · Score: 1
    --
    "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
    1. Re:Not only is it a blatant dupe... by haggar · · Score: 1

      Oh, that reminds me: did you know that Google has released the API to their search engine? ;o))))

      (that's the infamous triple dupe, of which two were Tacos)

      --
      Sigged!
  63. Re:Grind a rock in Arizona desert by Richthofen80 · · Score: 1

    don't forget, that the last time we tried to go to the poles of mars, we lost the lander. that was in 1999.

    --
    Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
  64. "than I could have" by glrotate · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    not "could of". idiot.

  65. Re:What are the odds.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It could easily be a rendered rendition of something real, but rendered nonetheless.

    (Score:0, Redundant)

    Now, who can look at that and still say all mods are smoking crack?

  66. How about pictures of the old Viking probe? by MongooseCN · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Didn't this rover land near the old Viking probe sent down in the 70's? How about sending the rover off on it's last mission to get a picture of the Viking Probe? NASA could see how the probe has held up all these years. NASA would also get mad props too. :)

    1. Re:How about pictures of the old Viking probe? by Thrymm · · Score: 1

      Not a bad idea considering after going to the crater, that they want to send it to some hill/mountain which it may never make within the 90 days of power. Snap some shots of the Viking!

  67. does anyone know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    what the atmosphere is like in the deepest part of that canyon (pressure, composition, etc.)?

    it's probably thicker there than anywhere else on the planet, so i reckon it'd be the best place to build a permanent base.

  68. Be wary of strange rocks! by way2slo · · Score: 1
    In other news, the Spirit rover is getting ready to grind the rock Adirondack (picture)."

    As we have clearly seen in Star Trek TOS episode 38, "The Apple".
    http://www.ericweisstein.com/fun/startrek/TheApple .html

    Strange rocks must be handled carefully.

    1. Re:Be wary of strange rocks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Damn-it, Jim! I'm a doctor, not a bricklayer!"

    2. Re:Be wary of strange rocks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's from The Devil in the Dark, not The Apple.

      (By correcting you about Star Trek trivia, I "win." Chicks will flock to me, not you!)

  69. Re:Mars environment by RedHat+Rocky · · Score: 1

    From the definitions:

    "Average temperature: Mean temperature of the body over the entire surface in Kelvin."

    "Diurnal temperature range: Temperature range over an average day in Kelvin."

    One would assume the Diurnal is also over the entire body.

    So, these quick stats don't really apply to a single point on Mars.

    --
    Anything is possible given time and money.
  70. Re:Mars environment by plj · · Score: 1
    User Seehund already posted the temp info from that fact sheet, but I'll add a piece of advice... use
    <ECODE>
    tags to avoid junk character errors.
    --
    “Wait for Hurd if you want something real” –Linus
  71. No, the orbiter was the main (nt) by Thrymm · · Score: 1

    Beagle was going to be the icing on the cake. But the stuffing is the orbiter!

  72. Re:Grand Canyon pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There IS something unnatural about the image. It is a composite of two ASSEMBLED images. This is not the same as a photograph.

  73. Re:Grand Canyon pictures by bmalia · · Score: 1

    That image is from two different camera angles... I first looked at it seeing a long dark canyon, then I noticed the craters looked the same. The dark actually seperates two pictures. The top is the original image, and the bottom is some computerized attempt to show what it'd look like from the horizen

    --
    There's no place like ~/
  74. Looks like a painting! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Makes me wonder if they got there or took pictures at all, or couldn't do it and now are faking images.

    1. Re:Looks like a painting! by waltc · · Score: 1

      That was exactly my thought on viewing these images in high-res, as well. They have definitely been processed and enhanced--by hand. It's fairly obvious. I read the text to see if they'd explained their post-processing techniques, but they didn't make any mention of them. I can only think the actual images were so rough and pixellated, maybe, that they felt compelled to retouch them by hand for release. Very odd.

  75. Re:Grand Canyon pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks organic.

  76. Re:Grand Canyon pictures by tommy_teardrop · · Score: 1

    It's not so much the images themselves, as the colouring. It looks more like they scanned in a poster than took data from a satellite. I don't question that these are real, just why they have such a crappy finish close up. I'd have prefered them just giving us the black and white images, rather than this media token. But they will want to keep the science data to themselves - ESA are a little more closed mouthed than NASA when it somes to this kind of stuff.

    --
    -- IANAL, BIPOOTV
  77. Re:stfuz omg lolz by tommy_teardrop · · Score: 1

    Must not mention Venus. Must not mention Venus.

    Doh!

    --
    -- IANAL, BIPOOTV
  78. Check out the alien skull... by waltc · · Score: 1

    http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/spiri t/20040120a/2P127438461IOFP2269L456C6_V3-A17R1_br. jpg

    Look at the rock in the bottom center of the screen--talk about optical illusions--looks like an inverted skull--missing/ragged jawbone pointing north. Below it are ocular sockets to either side, with a nasal socket in between (eye & nose sockets filled with Martian dust/soil), and note the striations on the "forehead." This *looks* like a single rock, and is much different from any others in the images in terms of size and shape.

  79. It's our turn to be cultural imperialists by zoney_ie · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey, it's Europe's turn to try out cultural imperialism (again), don't knock it. In no time we'll have you Americans eating French fries and pizzas, using European languages (e.g. English, words from French like derriere, cafe), trying to learn the Metric system, setting your time system based on a location in England, madly trying to trace your roots back to Ireland, coming over here to see our old castles and achievements predating the founding of the US, yearning for Mercedes Benz and BMWs...

    Remember, Europe is the best. The whole world should accept our values, try to imitate us, buy all that we have to sell, use our currency... Eire go deo, Vive la France, God save the Queen, etc., etc. 15-25 times.

    Kind of sickening isn't it. I guess being proud is not something to be proud of.

    --
    -- *~()____) This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds...
    1. Re:It's our turn to be cultural imperialists by superyooser · · Score: 1
      In no time we'll have you Americans eating French fries and pizzas

      Au contraire, that's Freedom Fries here in America.

  80. Re:Mars environment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mean one aren't you ole Colin at CGP@ColinGregoryPalmer.net

  81. Are these colors real? by gnalle · · Score: 1

    I was just wondering. The pictures look very colorful. Do the colors on these photos correspond to the actual colors on Mars, or have the colors been enhanced?

  82. Re:stfuz omg lolz by HerringFlavoredFowl · · Score: 1

    >Must not mention Venus. Must not mention Venus.

    Hmmm... Venus

    From the big list

    US ... 6 Launches towards Venus plus two flys by probes to other parts of the solar system (Galileo,Cassini). Only one Failure Mariner 1. First Sucessfull flyby, Four Atmospheric Probes, Never attempted a lander program.

    USSR ... 32 Launches towards Venus containing 42 vehicles (13 Flyby, 8 Orbiters, 21 Probes (landers, atmospheric probes, and baloons)) with 17 failures. Only country to really explore Venus, still managed to loose 17 of 42 Vehicles they sent to Venus. Much better than the mars record.

    --
    TastesLikeHerringFlavoredChicken
  83. Not fake, just not accurate. by dripwipeflush · · Score: 2, Informative

    The images will never be perfect. The page you reference on the space.com article was not the exact image stored on the rover. When the images are transmitted from the Rover back to JPL, there is a transmission loss in the retro-bias diagonal frequency bass carrier that causes the image to be distorted. The fuzzy look we receive is then dithered and poly-metrophased with the dark "shadows" you see. This brings the image back to what we could theoretically predict it would be if the image was proper.

    Somewhat offtopic, though much software ON THE GROUND at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory is written in Java, but not software on the spacecraft. This doesn't have any problem, but due to Java's slow execution rate on the Rover's computer we actualy lose tetra-physical carbonic exposure rate because the camera simply can't be operated as quickly in Java as if the comman protocol were operated through a more iffecient lower-level language such as C.

    Needless to say, I wrote some of the software used for the mission in Java, and it worked very well for our purposes, namely due to platform independence and quick development time. We had a heck of a time with some of the GUI code, however.

    The rover runs VxWorks from Wind River. Very solid. Cheers,

    Jim Cobgrobbler
    Science Activation Planning Developer
    Mars Exploration Rovers

  84. Can spirit use Beagle orbiter by NSupremo · · Score: 0

    Not, likely im sure... but it would be nice if the working lander to make use of the useless Beagle orbiter to perhaps increase the number of hours of use and images we can get back.

    --
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_U.S._Election_co ntroversies_and_irregularities
  85. That canyon by DrDNA · · Score: 1

    I wonder if that canyon was formed by the big flood in the bible, like the Grand Canyon was. That's what a book being sold in the GC gift shop says.