Slashdot Mirror


Warspying in San Francisco

hak_fan writes "SecurityFocus has a story on a group of radio hobbiests in San Francisco who occasionally go out warspying for wireless cameras in the 2.4GHz band, using some customized equipment. Their latest expedition turned up some interesting finds."

85 of 282 comments (clear)

  1. Ugh. by DarkHelmet · · Score: 4, Funny
    It's stories like this that make me never want to go naked on webcam ever ever again.

    Not that you slashdotters would want to know such a thing.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:Ugh. by millahtime · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's stories like this that make me want my really hot girlfriend to never be naked on webcam again. Me i could care less, who really wants to see me in the nude.

    2. Re:Ugh. by El+Torico · · Score: 5, Funny

      The risk of seeing naked slashdotters makes me never want to go warspying.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
    3. Re:Ugh. by B'Trey · · Score: 4, Funny

      This kind doesn't count!

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

    4. Re:Ugh. by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2, Funny
      OMG. An eBay category I was previously, blissfully, unaware of.

      I really wish you had not shared that -- information may want to be free, but some of it should be locked up.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    5. Re:Ugh. by pyr0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You mean like this guy? And no, it's not goatse or tubgirl, although possibly just as disturbing because the guy is an idiot!

    6. Re:Ugh. by Papa+Legba · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You sir, have destroyed a peice of my faith in humanity that I was unaware that I had. This revelation is wrong on so many levels. I weep for the humanity of it all.

      --
      Papa Legba come and open the gate
    7. Re:Ugh. by digitalsushi · · Score: 4, Funny

      See, now, I'd go in the other direction. Let's say I found an office broadcasting with an X10 camera that was monitoring an empty executives's office.

      I'd grab some footage, go home, set up my place to look the same way, invite some interesting people over, do some interesting things, and then go back to outside the office, and broadcast MY signal at 10 times the power, overriding the original one and have my image be the one that gets recorded.

      I'd know it works when I read about it in the papers the next day...

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    8. Re:Ugh. by ashoooo · · Score: 2, Funny

      And no real girlsfriends for sale! Whats wrong with this world?

    9. Re:Ugh. by FIRESTORM_v1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      i buy broken hds.. they make really geeky clocks.. ;)

      the best ones are the old Quantum bigfoot drives.. those are the right thichkness for the clock. Drill out the hub and replace with a clock movement. Poof! easy $50.

      --
      Partnership for an idiot free America!
  2. Interesting. by Scott+Lockwood · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The most fascinating part of this article to me - was the fact that it's NOT a violation of the wire tap act. It seems video isn't considered snooping. Talk about technology out pacing legislation. I wonder how long before we have one of those sites devoted to "hidden camera" porn? Oh, wait...

    --
    But this is slashdot. A slashdoter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber!
    1. Re:Interesting. by sckeener · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually it's been covered in the media. There is one story of a man who setup video cameras all over the house and then sold it. The attic was accessible from the outside, so he'd climb up and swap the tapes in a VCR. There wasn't any sound only video so the most he could be charged with is stealing electricity

      --
      "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
    2. Re:Interesting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Umm, that was just a Law & Order on the other night. Law & Order != Real Life. Step outside and take a deep breath of fresh air dude.

    3. Re:Interesting. by Skorgu · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It really has very little to do with legistlative sloth. The problem with legislating against this sort of thing is that its so tangled up in the issue of surveillance cameras. If you make videotaping an unknowing or unwilling person in a "public place" illegal, all surveillance cameras are then illegal. The problem is that drawing the line between useful surveillance and spying is so difficult. In this case, the transmissions being intercepted are not encrypted or even hidden. No attempt to keep them private has been made, and the owners/operators have no expectation of privacy. IANAL, but I can't see any way to extend the laws to cover this without being draconian. One other point: voyeur-type hidden cameras are usually beaten in civil court if the voyeur charges money for the video; it may be legal to spy on others without their permission, but selling it is usually a no-no.

    4. Re:Interesting. by Secrity · · Score: 5, Insightful

      IANAL It wouldn't be illegal to receive this stuff no matter what the format. There is no reasonable expectation of privacy for transmissions in this band (it is not even intended for communications use). One really cool thing about this band is that no license is required to operate in the band and there are tons of perfectly good 500 to 1000 watt 2.4 MHz magnetrons with power supplies discarded every year -- free for the taking from dumpsters and the sides of residential streets. You can even buy a new 2.4 MHz magnetron with power supply for almost nothing.

    5. Re:Interesting. by CaptnMArk · · Score: 2, Funny

      how could anything "wireless" be a violation of "wiretap" act?

    6. Re:Interesting. by Scott+Lockwood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Try snooping on someones cell phone conversation, and then use that as your defense in court.

      --
      But this is slashdot. A slashdoter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber!
    7. Re:Interesting. by mangu · · Score: 2, Informative

      Magnetrons do not have enough frequency stability for that. However, that would be a nice way to interfere with wireless equipment, if that bothers you in any way. Problem is, make sure to get out of the way before your balls get fried...

    8. Re:Interesting. by phaggood · · Score: 2, Funny

      There is one story of a man who setup video cameras all over the house and then sold it.

      That's dumb. Was this guy a real estate agent? How'd he know some young, nubile (i.e. watchable) couple would move in?

      Grandson: "Okay, grandma, grandpa. Here are the keys to your retirement village".
      Gramps:Okay, son. See ya. Hey honey, wanna try out the four-poster upstairs? Lemme unpack the Ben-gay and I'll see you in the bedroom in an hour!"

      two days later... Guy: Okay, just pop in the video, hit play and ... AAAHH! MY EYES!! THE HORROR!!! IEIEYEEEYIII!!!
      much writhing, followed by cardiac arrest.

    9. Re:Interesting. by mazarin5 · · Score: 3, Informative

      If I remember correctly, he owned consecutive properties and rented out one to his friends. There was sound, but since it was his house/equipment it was illegal. They did end up busting him, but it was for secretly recording the woman and her daughter changing at his house when they were invited over to use the hot tub. Because the girl was 15, they got him for kiddie porn.

      --
      Fnord.
  3. Interesting Finds? by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they found some interesting finds, they left them out of the article. They found exactally what you would think they would find... cameras pointed at places in offices... not the hot lesbian orgy that you would hope for. Besides, isnt this a dupe?

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    1. Re:Interesting Finds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "could" "they" "?"

  4. "hobbiests"? by Cyclopedian · · Score: 3, Funny

    I didn't know the letter 'y' was taking a break today.

    Where, oh where have all the *hobbyists* gone?

    -Cyc

    1. Re:"hobbiests"? by sysadmn · · Score: 2, Funny

      The hobbyists were out-hobbied by the hobbiest warspiers.

      --
      Envy my 5 digit Slashdot User ID!
    2. Re:"hobbiests"? by MrRTFM · · Score: 3, Funny

      no, its actually hobbitses - and quite frankly a blantant plug for ROTK in the oscars :)

      --
      You can't expect to wield supreme executive power, just because some watery tart threw a sword at you
    3. Re:"hobbiests"? by svallarian · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, the letter
      "Y"
      was off today, making a suprise appearance on sesame street.

      So look out if the number "12" is missing from any posts today too.

      Steven V.

      --
      I patented screwing your mom. But it got revoked for "prior art."
  5. Hmmmm by djrogers · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From the ./ blurb
    Their latest expedition turned up some interesting finds.
    and from the story
    But just what are the video sniffers picking up? If the San Francisco expedition late last week is any indication, the answer is, not all that much.
    Methinks the reality high-tech peeping tom world is probably quite a bit less sexy than some people's fantasies of it....
    --
    Think outside the... Hey, where'd the friggin' box go?
  6. Broadcast privacy by nuggz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When you broadcast something, you shouldn't expect it to remain private.

    If you want it to remain private, do something.
    Encrypt it, or don't send it out to everybody.

    1. Re:Broadcast privacy by theLOUDroom · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When you broadcast something, you shouldn't expect it to remain private. If you want it to remain private, do something. Encrypt it, or don't send it out to everybody.

      Yep. That used to be they way it was for all radio broadcasts. It was legal to build a reciever that could recieve anything (DC to daylight), and if you didn't want people listening, you had to encrypt/obfuscate the data.

      Then, some buttmunch decided that cellphones should transmit an unencrypted, analog signal, receiveable by any radioshack scanner. Instead of realizing that someone made a big mistake, the FCC just banned scanners that could receive cell frequencies.

      Of, course, it's still trivial to recieve cell frequencies, but now it's "illegal". And now that everyone is switching to digial anyways, the law is still in place and the precendent has been set. Why bother to design things properly when you can just buy a law?

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    2. Re:Broadcast privacy by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The previous law, the 1934 Communications Act, was a good balance. It was legal to listen to the radio, but illegal to disclose or profit from anything you intercepted.

    3. Re:Broadcast privacy by Troed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Any encryption can be broken given enough time.

      If the universe has stopped existing before you've broken the encryption I think most people consider that to be "unbreakable".

      Modern crypto is that strong.

    4. Re:Broadcast privacy by glinden · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unfortunately, most wireless products on the market ignore security. Baby monitors, wireless cameras, cell phones, etc. should all be encrypted by default, but they're not. Ideally, consumer pressure would force the companies to implement features to prevent snooping, but most consumers don't understand the security and privacy issues with these technologies.

  7. interesting finds alright... by I+Be+Hatin' · · Score: 5, Funny
    Their latest expedition turned up some interesting finds.

    From the article:

    A few other cameras pop up, but nothing exciting -- until the financial district, where on the same block as the office cam, MWD's receiver picks up the very freeway camera that marked the start of the expedition. The camera is more than two miles away, while most wireless video cameras have trouble reaching the curb. The appearance of the signal so far from its source energizes the team. "That's definitely the catch of the night there," says MWD.

    So the "catch of the night" is a freeway camera. Woo-hoo! Oh well, at least now I know there are bigger dorks than myself.

    --
    I know god exists. I read it on the internet, so it must be true.
  8. Social stigma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "The problem is, if the cops take an interest in you while you're doing something like this, the only way to get out of the situation is to admit that you're a dork," says MWD. "I'd almost rather be taken back to the station."

    This is why we're losing jobs to India. Indians don't have to worry about looking like dorks because they're interested in science.

  9. I warspied the article ....... by Njoyda+Sauce · · Score: 2, Informative

    and found nothing of interest.

    --

    You can only be young once, but you can be immature forever.
  10. Maybe no lesbian orgies, but by Z-MaxX · · Score: 2, Insightful
    these are geeks we're talking about, not perverts:
    With a little detective work, MWD will eventually discover that the signal is a directional transmission from the camera to a local TV station that features the feed on its website and in its nightly newscast. His satisfaction at the discovery hints at the real nature of warspying: at least for WMD, the appeal isn't voyeuristic at all -- it's pure geek.
    --
    Dr Superlove 300ml. I use my powers for awesome
    1. Re:Maybe no lesbian orgies, but by plams · · Score: 3, Funny
      these are geeks we're talking about, not perverts
      what are YOU talking about? the words 'geek' and 'pervert' seems mutually inclusive to me.
    2. Re:Maybe no lesbian orgies, but by swb · · Score: 5, Funny

      With a little detective work, MWD will eventually discover that the signal is a directional transmission from the camera to a local TV station that features the feed on its website and in its nightly newscast.

      So really the trick is to override their feed during the nightly news with more provocative content. It might be amusing to be real subtle about it, such as periodically putting footage from the wrong season or another time of day, CGI-ing the skyline (burning buildings, missing buildings, buildings that aren't really there, etc), using a different city skyline, etc. Just putting the goatse guy on would be a little less interesting.

      Ideally you'd have a reachable PC generating the video, with the ability to remotely switch between the real camera's feed and your feed to keep 'em guessing.

      All the more ironic that "The Conversation" was filmed in SF.

  11. Wireless Camera Detectors? by Milican · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Anyone know if the wireless camera detectors they have at Radio Shack (still carry?) work? They were a small cigarette ligher sized detector. Didn't seem to me that it would work all that well...

    JOhn

    1. Re:Wireless Camera Detectors? by KitFox · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, they actually DO 'technically' work... however, you have to either be VERY close (1 foot or less) from the source of the transmission, or you need to be ready to see it going off constantly due to cordless phones if you set it too sensitive. (Says the guy who worked for Radio Shack for a while). Whenever we saw one of those leave the store, we knew it would be back in a day or two. Think about it... It basically detects all 'strong' radio frequencies in a number of ranges, but it is NOT directional. SOOooo, if you want to sweep it over your body to see if somebody has wired a bug into your clothes, shoes, or pen, it's good to go, however, for anything else, it's not that great. For the average person, it's useless. That is, unless you like saying "Look! This thing beeps just before my cordless phone rings!".

      --

      @Whee

  12. I call movie rights! by The+I+Shing · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This sounds like a good plot starter for a political thriller.

    A college student goes out to look at wireless cameras and witnesses a murder, which is later ruled a suicide by the coroner's office in a massive political coverup. He has the murder recorded on the hard drive of his notebook computer, and shortly after he hands a CD he burned with an MPEG of the murder over to his uncle, a police detective, his uncle is then found dead, another "suicide." Then the kid realizes they'll be coming after him next, and a merry chase ensues.

    Has this already been done?

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
    1. Re:I call movie rights! by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Enemy of the state?

      --


      He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    2. Re:I call movie rights! by dk.r*nger · · Score: 2, Funny

      Has this already been done?

      Hmm.. let's see..

      A [innocent person] goes out to [do something not everybody would do, but still peaceful] and witnesses a murder, which is later ruled a suicide by the coroner's office in a massive political coverup. He has [evidence of the murder, possibly in a non-trivial geeky way], and shortly after he [hands the evidence] of the murder over to his uncle, a police detective, his uncle is then found dead, another "suicide." Then the kid realizes they'll be coming after him next, and a merry chase ensues.

      Yup, I've definitely see that one a few time.

    3. Re:I call movie rights! by The+I+Shing · · Score: 4, Funny

      But my movie will have a talking pie.

      --
      You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
    4. Re:I call movie rights! by gkuz · · Score: 2, Informative
      All you geeks would love an old Coppola movie starring Gene Hackman as a surveillance expert who hears something he's not supposed to; it's called "The Conversation". I'm sure you can rent it if you hunt around.

      The movie holds up well, even though it's technologically dated with all the analog tape recorders and stuff.

  13. Quote of the Day by sysadmn · · Score: 4, Funny
    This has got to be the quote of the day:
    The problem is, if the cops take an interest in you while you're doing something like this, the only way to get out of the situation is to admit that you're a dork," says MWD. "I'd almost rather be taken back to the station."
    --
    Envy my 5 digit Slashdot User ID!
    1. Re:Quote of the Day by El · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have a simular situation. "Honey, are you surfing slashdot again?" "Uh, no... I'm just downloading porn!"

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  14. WMD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "His satisfaction at the discovery hints at the real nature of warspying: at least for WMD, the appeal isn't voyeuristic at all -- it's pure geek."

    He starts off as Massive White Dude (MWD) and ends up as Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD). Interesting... Terrorist.

  15. Massive White Dude? by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't know what's funnier -- the fact that the warspying guy's name was "Massive White Dude" (or "MWD" for short), or the fact that the reporter misspelled it as "WMD" in the second to last paragraph...

    1. Re:Massive White Dude? by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 2, Funny

      So does that mean we finally found them?

      Yes, we now have the white massive dudes in our possession.

  16. Dear Slashdot... by ShaggyZet · · Score: 4, Funny

    I never thought this would happen to me. I was warspying around Clevland and found myself in a low-rent part of town. I didn't want to stop for long, but I glanced at my equipment while stopped at a red light and saw the most beautiful girl in the world. She must have forgotten to turn off the camera, because the things she was doing.... Well, let's just say it was even more exciting than the goats.cx guy, or the thought of Natalie Portman with hot grits down her pants. I went right up to her place, and secured that camera for her by setting up a linux firewall. But the really good part is, I put in a backdoor for myself!

    1. Re:Dear Slashdot... by pboulang · · Score: 4, Funny
      Letter back from Penthouse editors:

      In the future, could you please not reference "goats.cx" and "put in a backdoor for myself" in the same paragraph? We are now busy trying to poke out our inner eyes.
      --

      This comment is guaranteed*

      *not guaranteed

  17. Or the fact by The+Tyro · · Score: 2, Interesting

    that they are driving around with a police scanner in their vehicle... that's against the law in some states too.

    Ironically, they'd be OK here in Florida... you can drive with a scanner in your vehicle here but only if you're a licensed HAM operator or newsguy.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    1. Re:Or the fact by harrkev · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I should hope not. I carry this with me every day. It receives 100KHz to 1.3GHz, and can monitor nearly all analog voice modes. I doubt that this would be illegal in any state, and if it was, the ARRL would be all over them. An amateur radio operator is licensed by the feds. This trumps any state law. IANAL, and this is a gross simplification of the facts, but legal precedents have been set as far as having amateur radio tranceivers in a vehicle.

      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
  18. Re:I can't believe they aren't in jail yet... by tr0llb4rt0 · · Score: 5, Informative

    feed the troll .... :-D

    rtfa gives you

    "This kind of snooping doesn't violate federal wiretap laws, which generally protect audio communication, but not video, says Joseph Metcalf, an assistant professor at the University of Oregon law school. Moreover, the law keeps it legal to monitor radio transmissions that aren't encrypted or scrambled in any way, unless they're in a band specifically protected by statute, like analog cell phone signals. "If a communication is readily accessible to the general public, that communication is not protected by the federal Wiretap Act," says Metcalf. "

    Basically if you don't encrypt it it's your fault that someone else can read the signal.

    --
    Worst .sig ever!
  19. Re:I can't believe they aren't in jail yet... by Aardpig · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It is no different than a voyer.

    First, it's voyeur, not voyer.

    Second, your comparison is fallacious. Sure, I have a right to be protected from people spying on me in my own home. However, if I plastered naked photos of myself all over the 'hood, then I think it reasonable to assume that I've waived this right. Same goes for wireless transmission; if I can receive the transmission in a public place, then those producing the transmission have effectively waived their right to privacy.

    In fact, we could take this one step further. If I picked up a broadcast from a security camera, which happened to be pointed at two people fucking on the office copying machine, the company might be liable for broadcasting obscene material.

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  20. Re:I can't believe they aren't in jail yet... by lxs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nobody has a right to sniff like that.

    If you don't want people sniffing you, you shouldn't stink up the place.
    This is equivalent to communicating with your neighbours by shouting out of the window and then complaining that people are listening to what you say.
    As another poster pointed out, if you're broadcasting, you shouldn't expect privacy. If you're sold a wireless system as a private link, then the people to complain to are the sellers of the hardware for false advertising.

  21. Re:I can't believe they aren't in jail yet... by eggoeater · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I know this is a troll but.....
    If you're stupid enough to BROADCAST anything without encryption, then you're waving your right to privacy. There's plenty of cameras out there that don't use wireless. If you're worried about privacy, use those.
    What IS illegal is enforcing you're own "justice" with a large hunk of wood.
    --

  22. War prefix now means roaming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wardialing was coined after Matthew Broderick did that activity in the 1983 movie War Games. It was a little bit clever to mutate that into wardriving, but that took the prefix right up to the edge of Fonzie's ramp.

  23. The hairs on the back of my neck.... by boris_the_hacker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... just stood up all at once. The worst thing was that out of all my dvds, the one at the top of the pile was Enemy Of The State. Great film, although this story just make you wonder how many electronic eyes are watching you....

    --
    chris at darkrock dot co dot uk
    http colon slash slash www dot darkrock dot co dot uk
  24. Uhm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But MWD doesn't relish trying to explain that to the San Francisco Police Department. Even when he's not warviewing, he keeps a police scanner running in his car, to "keep an ear on the pulse on the city," and tonight it provides some comfort by not squawking out calls about strange men carrying alien-looking ray gun equipment, or driving slowly and suspiciously though the city's varied neighborhoods in an ominous black '64 Volvo.
    isn't it highly illegal to have a police radio scanner in a moving vehicle? I thought it was only legal to posess them if it was in a fixed location like your living room

    *oops*

    1. Re:Uhm by jim_deane · · Score: 2, Informative

      isn't it highly illegal to have a police radio scanner in a moving vehicle? I thought it was only legal to posess them if it was in a fixed location like your living room

      Not necessarily.

      Some states do not have such restrictions on scanner use (or state explicitly that it is illegal only if used in the commission of a crime).

      A *lot* of states also explicitly exempt amateur radio operators. Even states that do not may not be able to support their case against an amateur radio operator in court if the "scanner" is actually an amateur radio transciever with extended recieve capacity (which is "most" amateur radio transcievers these days...).

      It is essential to check the law in your state! There are many sites with "scanner laws" state-by-state--google for them.

      Jim kc0lpv

    2. Re:Uhm by MadHungarian1917 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you are a _licensed_ ham radio operator the scanner bans do not apply in 99.9% of the cases. There are some exceptions especially in the washington DC area.

      There are also areas in maryland where transmitters are barred as well and along a certain portion of the canadian border you are limited in modes/power

  25. same as baby monitors by shlomo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is exactly what happens with your typicall baby monitor. People dont realize they are broadcasting their life to all their neighbors.
    In fact thats what happened to me, i bought a monitor, but its useless, since all the channels are being used by my neighbors.

    At least I have something to do if I'm ever bored.
    Its like a baby crying radio channel :)

    --
    sorry officer, left my sig in my other computer.
  26. Most bang for the buck by EastCoastLA · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Unless you are going to build your own hack it seems that for the less technically inclined of us cash will be king. To get in the game the article suggests the two best options. Any feedback on which one gives the most bang for the buck?

    ACN53292
    http://www.actiontvusa.com/ACN53292.ht ml

    and the

    Icom IC-R3
    http://www.texastowers.com/icr3.htm

  27. "warviewing"? by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Insightful
    MWD first went warspying (he prefers the neutral term "warviewing")

    What the hell is this crap? It's NOT neutral. I can see it now...

    Reporter: "So Mr. Car Thief..."
    Thief: "Please. I prefer the term Vehicle Posession Transferal Agent".

    You ARE spying. You're looking where you shouldn't; that's spying, just like eavesdropping on 802.11b is spying; you know your victims are probably not expecting you to be looking, and you know it's wrong. If your neighbor has a 8-foot high shrub, and you stick your head through it to see what's going on in his yard, that's considered intrusive by most of the world unless you know 'em pretty well. It's not considered "viewing". If you put a mirror over the top of the stall in the bathroom to look at the guy next to you, that's spying. Not "viewing".

    Why do I get the image of Comic Book Guy reading about MWD? Even the "please, call me..." crap is the same.

    1. Re:"warviewing"? by thentil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is *not* spying. In both your bathroom example and neighbor-shrub example, the bathroom wall and shrub are erected to prevent viewing; thus, circumventing that could be 'spying'. Walking or driving around picking up unencrypted, broadcasted video signals is not circumventing anything. If they had been doing decryption, then it could be spying; the way it is, they're merely sightseeing. Don't want people admiring the architecture of your house, or your landscaping skills? Erect a wall/shrubbery. Don't want people viewing your nanny-cam? Encrypt the signal. Otherwise, you're putting that signal out there for sightseers.

  28. Re:I can't believe they aren't in jail yet... by LittleBigLui · · Score: 2, Insightful
    People have a right to privacy.


    some might tend to think you don't want privacy if you broadcast videos of your life all over the place
    --
    Free as in mason.
  29. under the hot lights by Bizzarobot · · Score: 2, Funny

    "The problem is, if the cops take an interest in you while you're doing something like this, the only way to get out of the situation is to admit that you're a dork," says MWD. "I'd almost rather be taken back to the station."

    Wow, imagine the interrogation this guy would get:

    Cop: What's your name, son?
    MWD: Massive White Dude.
    Cop: I see that, but what's your name? And what's with this wire and little television?
    MWD: It's, uhh... top secret, government stuff. I need to speak with Special Agent Dana Scully. It's a matter of national security!
    Cop: Dana Scully... and what department does agent Scully work for?... And did you know the tags on your 1964 Volvo are expired?
    MWD: Oh, Appelbaum's Mom didn't send in her regis... I mean, it's the agency's car. You'll have to contact Agent Scully, she can clear all of this up.
    Cop: How old are you? You look a little old to be an agent...

    13 minutes later...

    MWD: yes, it's true, I'm sorry! That thing is an antenna to pick up wireless camera signals of hot chicks in blue dresses. We've been driving around for hours in my friend's mom's car trying to find some naked girls showering on camera. I'm 60! I'm 60 years old, and I all my friends refer to me as "Massive White Dude" I'M A DORK. YES, YES, I CONFESS, I'M A DORK! CAN'T YOU SEE!

  30. WTF? by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I won't admit I'm a dork to three or four cops, I would rather admit it to thousands of people in an interview and various discussions that follow.

    Logic anyone?

    or maybe he figures because he used is alias, he wont' be found out

  31. "y" is (C)opyright by SCO by mangu · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's true: the letter "y" appears several times in *.h files.

  32. Re:I can't believe they aren't in jail yet... by kb1efz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Where is this right to privacy documented?

  33. Confidentiality & Right to Privacy by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Generally speaking I believe that you only have the right to privacy if you have a 'reasonable' expectation that your actions cannot be viewed/heard by others.

    For instance, with respect to attorney client privledge, if you talk to your lawyer in a public place and yell your conversation to the word, you waive your priveledge. If you talk to him behind closed doors in your office, you don't, even if somebody is eavesdropping.

    I realize that Joe Everybody probably doesn't realize that unencrypted radio waves can be intercepted by anyone, but golly gee whiz. Broadcasting an unencrypted signal IS yelling out to the whole world.

  34. Encrypted Wireless Video by WC+as+Kato · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is exactly the reason why I opted to use a hard wired camera for my home. Before I hooked up the camera, I search all over the place for an encrypted wireless camera. I could not find a single one, not even a high priced professional camera that James Bond would use. It certainly seems like this kind of product would exist. Anyone know of any encrypted wireless video cameras?

    --
    --- I'm Green Hornet's sidekick not Inspector Clouseau's!
    1. Re:Encrypted Wireless Video by BJH · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Panasonic KX-HCM170 can do encrypted video (40/128-bit WEP, but it's better than nothing).

    2. Re:Encrypted Wireless Video by macemoneta · · Score: 4, Informative

      The D-Link DCS-1000W is an Ethernet/802.11b wired/wireless camera than can use 128-bit WEP. It's only $200 at CompUSA (the lowest price I could find, even comparing mail order when I purchased it). It has an on-board web server and can even email/ftp date/time stamped images when motion or switch closure is detected (or time based). More here:

      http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=41

      If you'd like to use it as a time-lapse security camera, I have a script on Sourceforge:

      http://sourceforge.net/projects/dcs1000w

      --

      Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

  35. 64 Volvo pics? by Zeno · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who can find pics of his 64 Volvo? I'd rather see those.

  36. Cops with antenna? by garstka · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a question that EEs or radio enthusiasts might consider banal...

    I have a RadioShack Pro-94 handheld scanner...I was under the impression that, because it is passive and not a transceiver, it's not detectable. Isn't that the case with their ICOM scanner as well? Maybe I misinterpreting the reason why they split when they saw the cop waving the antenna.

    Any RF experts out there? What's the deal?

    1. Re:Cops with antenna? by vpreHoose · · Score: 2, Informative

      Any receiver can be detected. In the UK they listen out for TV's to fine anyone who doesn't have a licence.
      The easiest way to find one is to use something called a dip oscillator. Basically if you are receiving an RF signal you are resonating with it, and sucking power. If you, the detector, are radiating a signal at the frequency the receiver is operating and measuring your power output you can tell if someone is receiving the signal.
      Also used in WWII to winkle out the spys.

    2. Re:Cops with antenna? by andrewjj20 · · Score: 2, Informative

      theoretically it can be detected. if you look at radar detectors that some states/countries?? have banned the older ones can be detected because every electronic device emits some form of RF energy. The newer ones though are sheilded making it virtually impossible to detect, even with extreamly sensitive equipment. the same goes for scanners, it can be detected if it doesn't have good sheilding

  37. Re:Admitting you're a dork? by mamba-mamba · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He didn't say jail. He said be taken back to the station. There is a big difference between getting hauled in to the station and being booked overnight at county.

    They don't strip search you at the station.

    MM
    --

    --
    By including this sig, the copyright holders of this work or collection unreservedly place it in the public domain.
  38. Legal for licensed amateur radio operators by tweakt · · Score: 3, Informative
    isn't it highly illegal to have a police radio scanner in a moving vehicle? I thought it was only legal to posess them if it was in a fixed location like your living room
    It depends on the state. However "in 1993 the FCC preempted all restrictive state and local laws and ruled (FCC PR 91-36) that it is legal for licensed amateur radio operators, who have a copy of their FCC license in their possession, to operate - anywhere in the USA - an amateur radio transceiver capable of receiving police and other emergency services frequencies in their vehicle." -- http://www.rarchams.org/scanlaw.htm
  39. They found one watching a parking booth. by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 2, Funny

    Damn, I could watch that for hours. Maybe next week they can find a janitor waxing a floor.

  40. wait a tic by crabpeople · · Score: 2, Funny

    um correct me if im wrong but aren't

    girl 1 and girl 2 the same ebay user id with different pictures and descriptions???

    also the first one is 265$ USD. wow. for that price im SURE you can buy a quality whore or about 10 cheap ones...

    --
    I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
  41. A slightly related story... by BernManUNC · · Score: 2, Informative

    A relative of mine is a special assistant to the state prosecutor of a New England state which I will not mention here. He works in a pedophile unit. One of their more interesting/disturbing cases involved a fellow in a dense residential neighborhood who was setting up a wireless (I assume X10) video camera to keep an eye on his infant while he was on the other side of the house. He turns on the video receiver, and is rather surprised when he starts receiving video from his neighbor's daughter's bedroom. (We'll say he is in house 100, his neighbor is in house 102). He walks next door, and asks the man of the house why there's a camera running in his (teenage) daughter's bedroom. As it turns out, the next neighbor over (house 104) had given the girl a lava lamp for her birthday... with (you guessed it) an embedded X10 cam. As it turns out, he had a camera running in another neighbor's house as well. Today, he is still in jail.

    Did no one else wonder if this might happen after seeing X10 popups, month after month, featuring candid shots of scantily clad women?