Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Develops XP 'Light' for Thailand

GoatJuggler writes with this Bangkok Post report that "Microsoft announced plans to develop a discounted, slightly crippled version of Windows XP for Thailand."

83 of 551 comments (clear)

  1. You mean you can cripple it more? by Snowspinner · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's possible to wring even less functionality out of Windows XP?

    Revolutionary!

    1. Re:You mean you can cripple it more? by Mr+Guy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sure this one is just a splash screen and a blue screen, used interchangeably.

    2. Re:You mean you can cripple it more? by pe1rxq · · Score: 3, Funny

      You forget the teletubby landscape you get between those two....
      Or is that the part that is cut out?

      Jeroen

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    3. Re:You mean you can cripple it more? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh, so they've relabled WindowsME as XP lite then?

    4. Re:You mean you can cripple it more? by bad_fx · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sure this one is just a splash screen and a blue screen, used interchangeably.

      ...Uhhh... So what're they changing...?

    5. Re:You mean you can cripple it more? by ramzak2k · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I would like to get my hands on one of these if it does not include all the applications i dont need - windows messenger , internet explorer, Outlook express. Just the basic UI. I can customize it the way i need. Lesser the functionality, more secure the box will be.

      --

      Siggy Say, Siggy Do
    6. Re:You mean you can cripple it more? by jay-oh-eee! · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's funny, people complain about how MS forces you to install everything (IE, Outlook, etc) and call in "anti-competitive" and when they offer it somewhere with these things stripped out it's called "crippled". There's no winning the article poster or OP, it seems.

      --
      Photo Aspect -- an open, free, J2EE & JBoss photoalbu
    7. Re:You mean you can cripple it more? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I would like to get my hands on one of these if it does not include all the applications i dont need - windows messenger , internet explorer, Outlook express. Just the basic UI. I can customize it the way i need. Lesser the functionality, more secure the box will be.

      It sounds like you want windows XP embedded. For the embedded market, MS lets you pick & choose which parts of the OS you want.

      Strangely enough, MS also says that this is completely impossible for the regular version, and that IE cannot be separated from the OS.

    8. Re:You mean you can cripple it more? by dorsey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're not serious, right? Just because they're forcing a different option doesn't mean that they aren't still forcing the choice.

      --
      hinderfreude ('hin-dur-"froi-d&), n. The feeling of joy derived from being in the way.
    9. Re:You mean you can cripple it more? by Pharmboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, I am guessing the "crippled" comment was more of a troll for the original author. Its a sure way to get comments, but then again, thats not a problem on /.

      I agree with the other posts, I wouldn't call this crippled if it runs the apps, I would call it streamlined. I would be interested in a copy, if they "crippled" out the media players and such. Im sure it still has IE tho, since they wont let you use windowsupdate with Firebird.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    10. Re:You mean you can cripple it more? by Pharmboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's something very sad when comments I write shooting for funny get moderated insightful. =/

      No, when you shoot for funny, and get insightful, thats ironic.

      When you shoot for insightful, and get modded as funny, THAT is sad.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    11. Re:You mean you can cripple it more? by jay-oh-eee! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You're not serious, right? Just because they're forcing a different option doesn't mean that they aren't still forcing the choice.

      I'm serious exactly because they're not "enforcing a different option", they're enforcing nothing -- they're taking stuff out, not replacing it with something else.

      Since WMP, for example, isn't replace with WMP-lite.

      --
      Photo Aspect -- an open, free, J2EE & JBoss photoalbu
    12. Re:You mean you can cripple it more? by mortonda · · Score: 5, Funny

      Quick, someone mod this one "funny"... ;)

    13. Re:You mean you can cripple it more? by aauu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How about releasing a Thai language only version. I only know one person who could use a Thai version in the us. MS could produce a version of XP that only supported languages of emerging markets.

      --
      When I was young, I had to rub sticks together to compute.
    14. Re:You mean you can cripple it more? by Phrogger · · Score: 5, Funny

      > Im sure it still has IE tho, since they wont let you use windowsupdate with Firebird.

      It's even more restrictive than that! I tried to connect to Windows Update with Mozilla. Not only do they require you to use IE but they insisted that "You must be running a Microsoft Windows operating system in order to use Windows Update." :-)

    15. Re:You mean you can cripple it more? by Erwos · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm not sure whether you were ranting or being ignorant, so I'll assume someone else is ignorant and needs me to say the following:

      This is done all the time. Take, for instance, the Quadro line of cards by nVidia. You are buying an intentionally crippled card everytime you buy a GeforceFX. Same hardware, sans a couple switched transistors and a slightly modified BIOS. In other words, they made the Quadro, and then crippled it to be the GeForce.

      It's certainly not a tactic that only Microsoft employs. Indeed, most firms that sell both to the "individual consumer" and businesses do it. Singling out Microsoft as an evil corporation because they're employing intelligent (and in this case, non-monopolistic) business practices is stupid.

      Basic economics. Literally, they taught it at the very lowest level economics course at my school.

      -Erwos

      --
      Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
    16. Re:You mean you can cripple it more? by Dashing+Leech · · Score: 4, Informative
      Basic economics. Literally, they taught it at the very lowest level economics course at my school.

      Unfortunately, you left out the explanation of the economics. I've been curious about this for some time. Let me give it a shot, and tell me if I'm wrong.

      Basically, there are two ways to make profit. If you price your product cheap (small profit margin), you don't make as much per unit but you'll probably get more sales. If you price it expensive (large profit margin) you make more per unit but don't likely sell as many. The "crippled version" approach takes advantage of both by using two markets: inexpensive vs better quality/features.

      The unintuitive part is how can they sell the same product, with extra work put in to cripple it, at a lower price. Why not just leave it uncrippled and sell for the low price? The answer is that the crippled version is partially subsidized by the expensive version. You'd lose all of the bigger profit from the expensive version (since there wouldn't be one), so you'd have to sell a lot more at the cheaper price to make up for it. Having high quality at a low price will probably give you more sales, but perhaps not enough to make up the difference, especially because they are two different markets with different customers.

      Looking at it another way, it makes sense to have products for both markets (cheap vs quality). If you didn't use the "cripple" approach, you'd actually have to design and build two different products. Using the "cripple" approach, you only have to design and build one system. The extra cost to cripple it is far lower than the cost of designing and building a second product. This reasoning makes more sense when the design and labour costs are high relative to the cost of components (raw materials). Software is certainly a case where raw materials are cheap, most of the expense is in the development.

      Is this generally correct? Or am I missing something?

    17. Re:You mean you can cripple it more? by zangdesign · · Score: 4, Informative

      The "extra cost" actually becomes a slight savings, if the product is designed correctly. Consider: in the instance of two separate products, designed separately, with higher and lower functionality respectively, you require two different assembly lines, with two different approaches to creating two different products.

      With the crippled version and the non-cripple version, you still require two assembly lines, but they are duplicates for most of the line, and perhaps require only removal of one or two positions to create the cripple versions of your hardware. You save time and money by creating one assembly line and effectively duplicating it for the lesser (or perhaps the greater) version.

      You can even do it with one assembly line and some sort of selector programming where every fifth product is the higher level product (assuming it has one-fifth of the sales).

      So you save some money on the manufacturing side. You also save money on the R&D side by creating two cards with only minor differences vs. creating two completely different cards.

      It's pretty much the same as producing a car with a tape deck vs. cd player. The research is much the same, but the tape deck fits in the same slot as the CD player, and any room you would have used for the automatic changer is just extra space.

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
  2. Slightly Crippled? by Phosphor3k · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sounds like an improvement. Thats about three steps less crippled than my version, and cheaper to boot!

    1. Re:Slightly Crippled? by bersl2 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh, so you only have to put in a dime, instead of a quarter, when you reboot?

    2. Re:Slightly Crippled? by nazh · · Score: 5, Funny

      Slightly Crippled?
      But it comes with a free Frogurt.

      /ob simpsons quote

      Owner: Take this object, but beware it carries a terrible curse!
      Homer: [worried] Ooooh, that's bad.
      Owner: But it comes with a free Frogurt!
      Homer: [relieved] That's good.
      Owner: The Frogurt is also cursed.
      Homer: [worried] That's bad.
      Owner: But you get your choice of topping!
      Homer: [relieved] That's good.
      Owner: The toppings contains Potassium Benzoate.
      Homer: [stares]
      Owner: That's bad.


      snipped from snpp.com

  3. slightly crippled version by frovingslosh · · Score: 5, Funny
    slightly crippled version of Windows XP

    Boy, how can I buy this. I would much rather have a slightly crippled version rather than the massively crippled version that Microsoft supplied my OEM for use with my notebook.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  4. But Wait... by Mr.+Fusion · · Score: 5, Funny

    Didn't they already released Windows XP Home?

    -Mr. Fusion

    1. Re:But Wait... by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The pro-Linux camps, however, have something to worry about here. Basically, Microsoft is willing to create a cut-rate version of XP rather than risk the users there switching over to Linux....

    2. Re:But Wait... by Pharmboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      and no matter how much MS trims and cuts the price, Linux will still always be less than half the price ;) And no activation. And no locked into proprietary systems. And no peer to peer networking limitations (3 on home, 5 on pro). Oh, and almost no worms.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    3. Re:But Wait... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Funny
      No, as per MS standard naming conventions:

      X = ascii(88)
      P = ascii(80)

      So in MS logic, we will have to substract 11 from both letters because 11 is binary for 3 and this is the third version of XP.

      ascii (88-11) = ascii(77) = M
      ascii (80-11) = ascii(69) = E

      Hence, this version will be known as Windows ME.

      . . .

      How apropos.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    4. Re:But Wait... by SparkMan · · Score: 4, Informative

      the MS shrink-wrap licenses restrict the number of connections you are supposed to be allowed to have to the PC running the OS

      they want you to buy XP Server edition to run real servers

      --

      -- laws are the opinions of politicians --

    5. Re:But Wait... by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Im talking about the limitations of how many computers you can use in a peer to peer in Windows. How it doesn't allow you connect more. You get to buy Windows Server instead. You can't connect 10 computers running XP home in a peer to peer using Windows networking, they won't see each other. Even XP Pro has peer to peer limitations that prevent it from doing so, but a higher threshold. Windows 9x you could raise the limit in the Netbeui portion of the protocol's properties from the default setting of 10 "maximum connections". XP doesn't have that option.

      They could make this crippled version connect to an NT server only, with no peer to peer support. This is one way to cripple Windows so it won't get used in businss, but is ok for home use.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    6. Re:But Wait... by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Win2k is 10, and I am not sure about NT4. I want to say it is like Win95, being the same interface without plug and play, meaning a default of 10 but changeable in the NetBeui properties (along with NCBS, which I have no idea is for). But I can't swear to NT4 or older. I have a copy of NT 3.1 around here somewhere, I could install and see I guess:) I know WfW 3.11 had no limitations, but was rather slow. At least it would network with Win95

      There is no technical reason for the limitation, its purely a licensing thing. You know....

      3. Profit!

      Oh, on another point. I have a network with about 20 computers right now that needed a simple file server, so its got a P3/1ghz server running Windows 95, lol. The stations are all 98/ME/2k/pro. The 2k and pro boxes connect ok because I have file/printer sharing OFF on all the rest. They are more forgiving about connecting to a 9x "server". On a pure xp network, you just dont see the computers over the threshold. They don't exist.

      And no, it was not easy getting 95 to run properly and semi secure on a newer box without proper drivers, but it runs well as long as you boot it every month (it runs out of seconds to count at about 39 days and like all 95, will autocrash then). And since it is firewalled off the net (hardware and software) it does the job. Oh, and yes, its even a licensed copy of 95.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    7. Re:But Wait... by JoeZeppy · · Score: 3, Informative
      Nope, not true, never been true.

      No more than 10 computers can connect to any one windows worksatation at any time. Has nothing to do with number of PC's in a network.

      Inbound Connections Limit in Windows XP

      You know, if you Linux fanboys would get your noses out of the air long enough to actually learn something about XP, instead of spewing the same old wive's tales and self-congratulatory bullshit, you might learn that it doesn't suck anywhere near as bad as you'd like to think.

  5. Microsoft Plan by GonzoDave · · Score: 5, Funny

    1.Release product in piracy capital of the world
    2.?????
    3.Profit!

    1. Re:Microsoft Plan by phalse+phace · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, but Microsoft won't be the ones doing the profitting.

  6. How to have both... by Foolhardy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Microsoft is notorious for bundling things to cause lock-in.
    How are they going to balance that with creating a light version of XP?

    1. Re:How to have both... by Aneurysm9 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sounds like the last line of the article covered that. They're going to provide a "clear upgrade path" to XP Home and Pro. Sure, "we clear your bank account and you get to upgrade."

      --
      There was Cowboy Neal at the wheel of a bus to never-ever land.
  7. why do it? by monadicIO · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The article says "
    because of the complexity of an operating system, reducing functionality was not a simple process and every modification would have to be thoroughly tested.
    So why would it make sense to spend more money in making these reductions? Why not just give the standard package? I'm missing something here.

    --

    The law of excluded middle : Either I'm foo or I'm foobar

    1. Re:why do it? by s20451 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Am I the only one who thinks this is to keep Linux and other free operating systems out of third world countries? In that sense it would be a strategic move.

      Looks like Microsoft is finally listening to their poorer customers.

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    2. Re:why do it? by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So why would it make sense to spend more money in making these reductions? Why not just give the standard package? I'm missing something here

      Very simple.

      User buys XP Lite, uses it for a while, and then decides he needs all the functionality. User then buys XP Home/Pro.

      They have now bought two copies of the OS. Money++ for Microsoft.

    3. Re:why do it? by bakes · · Score: 4, Funny

      User then buys XP Home/Pro. ...for $2 from the nearest street vendor

      --
      Ho! Haha! Guard! Turn! Parry! Dodge! Spin! Ha! Thrust!
  8. Unfortunately, this will probably sell decently by jbardell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is quite the desperate attempt by MS to obtain a larger share of the world OS market. Hopefully those in Bangkok will learn that there's an un-crippled, stable, fast operating system out there already, and it's FREE.

  9. Thailand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...where the ILoveYou worm was named MeLoveYouLongTime

  10. Slightly Crippled? by no+longer+myself · · Score: 5, Funny
    Oh come on... With a headline like this, it's just too easy.

    Slightly Crippled?
    Yeah, it comes pre-installed with 14 viruses.

    Slightly Crippled?
    It's product activation is 30 days expired.

    Slightly Crippled?
    It's the latest version.

    Slightly Crippled?
    They wrote it using .NET

    Slightly Crippled?
    But it comes with a free Frogurt.

    Damn... I could keep this up all night.

  11. Re:Jeez, this article's pretty scant on details. by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It implies that the reason Microsoft is coming up with this "light" product is because US$99 is too expensive, so they need to come up with a way of slashing the price there without the rest of the world crying foul...

  12. Wait for it! by aztektum · · Score: 4, Funny

    And now we present to you a hundred jokes about Windows already being crippled and a hundred more forshadowing jokes about Windows being crippled.

    (Not too unlike this one)

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
  13. What's the difference? by pilot1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yes, I did RTFA, and it said nothing about what would be different between the "light" version and the normal version.

    Is it going to have fewer M$ programs bundled with it or what? And if it is, what the hell isn't too tightly integrated for them to remove? Solitare and pinball?

    1. Re:What's the difference? by confuse(issue) · · Score: 5, Funny

      Solitare and pinball?

      Hello? Remove solitaire?!?! Solitaires random number generator powers all the XP security features.

  14. Addiction by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Customers of this new entry level version of Windows would be presented with a clear and easy upgrade path to both Windows XP Home or Windows XP Professional, he added.

    In France, tobacco companies have started selling packs of cigarettes containing only 19 cigarettes instead of 20. A "crippled" pack of smokes in a sense. Why? so that those who can't afford full-size packs since the latest price rises (read: kids and teens) can buy the 19 cigarette pack and get hooked.

    Sounds like Microsoft is doing exactly that with poor countries: snare customers then pull on the knot. "buy our cheapo limited software, then when you need more functionalities, it'll be a lot more expensive to ditch Microsoft and go for free-software than pay for the Microsoft upgrade".

    But I guess it's business as usual, all companies do that sort of thing, not just Microsoft, I'm not shouting evil-M$ here. But I do hope the Thai government sees through the trap ...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Addiction by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That makes absolutely no sense at all. So reducing the price by a whopping 5% makes them "affordable"?

      No, but it keeps the price of a pack under the psychological limit of EUR 5. Over that price, studies have shown that people are much more reluctant to buy.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Addiction by Tadghe · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm not the orig poster, but here's your links..

      http://www.no-smoking.org/july03/07-25-03-2.html
      note, however
      "The law also prohibits sales of so-called "children's packs," which have less than 19 cigarettes and popular among youths because they are cheaper."

      also
      http://fr.news.globalink.org/248182.shtml
      for more about the so called "Children's packs"

      --
      Bugs Bunny was right.
  15. 1500 baht...? by jxliv7 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    that's 36 US dollars and change.

    so exactly what will be the "reduced functionality"?

    i'd bet it will have something to do with hardware compatibility.

  16. The missing feature in the "Light" version by mooredav · · Score: 5, Funny

    The End User License Agreement won't have a "disagree" option.

  17. Re:Thailand first, the world second by tftp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If this OS comes in Thai language only, then only people familiar with the language can use it. Thai is notoriously complex.

  18. Fighting Piracy For Dummies by B2K3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Software publishers in Thailand have begun to realize the huge popularity of pirated software in Thailand: the extreme price differential. You might be able to sell $100 software elsewhere, but when you are selling the $100 software a few feet away from someone selling a pirated copy for $5, what is the rational consumer going to do? Video game manufactures now produce Thai versions of games, complete with a Thai installation manual and even Thai ingame instructions, for only a a few dollars more than the street price of a pirated version. If someone isn't willing to pay 20 times more for the real version, perhaps they're willing to pay only 3 times more. Disclaimer: I was an American who I lived in Thailand for five years. Has anyone else gone shopping at Panthip Plaza?

    1. Re:Fighting Piracy For Dummies by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ..actually what they have to realise is that when it's practically impossible for you to pay that 100$ is a substantial amount of your monthly income you're not that likely to spend it on software.

      the current prices for them is like if microsoft was asking 3000$ for copy of windows to run on something that you already paid your arm, leg, lungs, both kidneys and liver for.

      .

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Fighting Piracy For Dummies by foonf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Microsoft doesn't care about piracy in Thailand or elsewhere, in fact it works largely to their benefit. If people who wouldn't be able to afford their software anyway are pirating it illegally, Microsoft doesn't lose any money, but they gain users and market share.

      The point of this effort isn't to stop piracy, and Microsoft knows it won't. The problem is that the Thai government is setting up a program for the development of a very cheap computer, and they want to distribute a legitimate operating system with it. Since they weren't going to pay Microsoft's asking price, there was the potential of a very large number of computers being distributed without a Microsoft operating system. And even assuming most of the buyers replace the preinstalled OS (Linux, whatever) with a pirated copy of Windows, it still would have the potential of creating a substantial, new base of computer users not running Windows. This plan heads off that possibility. Whether they replace it with a pirated full version of XP or not, anyone who buys this thing is going to be using Windows, and that is what matters to Microsoft.

      --

      "(Man) tries to live his own life as if he were telling a story. But you have to choose: live or tell." --Sartre
  19. Re:Jeez, this article's pretty scant on details. by Limburgher · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Reminds me of US pharmaceutical companies charging some countries more than others for some drugs. Like HIV drugs, for example.

    --

    You are not the customer.

  20. 1500 baht doesn't buy much... by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Informative

    What this article is leaving out because it wasn't writen for a USA audience is that 1500 baht is roughly equal to US$35-40 depending on where exchange rates are.

    Thailand's People PC project is a government effort to try to get the price of a PC to be affordable for the average person there. Microsoft's contribution to the project is its willingness to sell both Windows XP Home and Microsoft Office for 1500 baht... US$35-40. Uh oh, that's a drastically lower price then MS is charging the rest of the world, and MS doesn't like to have that kind of inconsistency.

    So, that's why they're working on this "light" edition that will have a few things less than XP Home, and therefore be a different product that MS can price seperately.

    Of course, the OSS folks can hop in here and point out that going with Linux would cost them 0 baht which converts to US$0... and that's what Microsoft's worried about. Better to get a little money than to risk getting none at all and letting Linux become the standard operating system in Thailand.

    1. Re:1500 baht doesn't buy much... by BigBadBri · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Bet you 1500 baht buys a weeks food for a decent sized family.

      Of course Microsoft should price products according to the target market, but given the doctrine of first sale, and the principles of free trade, if you can get a product legitimately for 1500 baht in Thailand, then that same product will become available everywhere for the same price.

      Now you can either have free trade, or you can have fair regional pricing.

      Personally, I'll take Linux.

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
    2. Re:1500 baht doesn't buy much... by bendelo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Perhaps Microsoft is hoping that users after 'trying out' XP Lite will want to upgrade to Home/Pro thus giving them more revenue.

  21. This has NO chance of working by dancingmad · · Score: 4, Informative

    I can't speak for Thailand specifically, but I know it's the same as Bangladesh, when I was over there you could get the Longhorn betas pre-burned and with covers and the whole deal. And they cost next to nothing to boost. You could get them at malls, street vendors, Internet cafes. About the only draw back was that the CDs were so cheap they stop working in a few month or so, but that's plenty of time to use it.

    Why would the average Thai pay for crippleware when they can already get XP for next to nothing?

    --
    "There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter," Jeeves, (Jeeves and the Impending Doom)
  22. Re:Thats great... by Ianoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But that wouldn't be very crippled, would it...

    Seriously, as a ardent Linux user and open source zealot, even I admit that Windows XP is a bit more user friendly for beginners. But removing more functionality than already has been removed in XP Home? Gnome and KDE will be more than a match for this setup, I'm sure.

    As if Thailand cares anyway, who's going to pay $30 for Windows XP Neutered when you can go down to your local "store" and buy Windows 2003 Advanced Datacenter Server for a dollar?

  23. Re:Thats great... by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    if crippled means, getting rid of internet explorer, the windows kernel, and everything else, and replacing it with, linux 2.6.2, gnome 2.4....

    Bingo... Microsoft is lowering the price for Windows XP to this country because if they didn't, their government would start subsidizing Linux-based PCs. This is Microsoft's last chance to make sure that the standard PC there still runs Windows.

  24. codenamed by jjeffries · · Score: 4, Funny

    thainy thim

  25. Re:Thailand first, the world second by LostCluster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's highly likely that one of the tweaks they're making to this "light" version is to lock it to the Thai language. If you want to use English, you must upgrade to the full-price XP Home at whatever the local equal to US$99 is...

  26. This is the definition of monopoly by nut · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Microsoft are going to spend money and time devaluing their product to sell it to people who can't afford it at their current price. This from a company that makes a profit of over $1 billion a quarter.

    --
    Never trust a man in a blue trench coat, Never drive a car when you're dead
    1. Re:This is the definition of monopoly by bap · · Score: 3, Insightful
      That's not fair; many sellers engage in price discrimination, i.e. they sell essentially the same product to different groups based on each group's ability to pay. This is particularly common when marginal costs are low but sunk costs are high. DVDs are a good example, with "region codes" serving that sole purpose. University education is another nice one, with "scholarships" used to set radically different price points for different customers. Clothes are another classic example. Identical cars are often sold at dramatically different prices by changing nothing but the logo on the hood. The most familiar example is probably airplane seats; the airlines have raised price discrimination to a high art.

      (This doesn't change the fact that Microsoft often engages in unethical business practices. Just not in this case, at least until them have the whole country locked in...)

  27. Re:Translation: Linux is winning there by farnz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's an EU anti-trust investigation ongoing into unfair practices by Microsoft. If MS can sell Windows and Office cheaply in Thailand, one of the EU's questions is likely to be "Why can't you do that here?"; this crippled version aims to do an end run around such ideas by giving an obvious answer.

  28. Market segmentation and price descrimination by dyfet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One hallmark of a true monoply is price descrimination and market segmentation. This is where a monopoly charges different prices to different classes of users for reasons that do not reflect actual cost differences and often where the same product is sold in different forms to create artifical price points and artificial or arbitrary market seperations. The key to price discrimination is to exploit the fact that different users have a different willingness and ability to pay for essentially the same goods and services. As such I simply view this as further evidence of monopolistic behavior, as if further evidence is even nessisary.

  29. Some other examples by uptownguy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Reminds me of US pharmaceutical companies charging some countries more than others for some drugs. Like HIV drugs, for example.

    ...or gas stations charging 10 cents more/gallon at the only downtown pump versus one of many in the suburbs.

    ...or books on the New York Times bestseller list being discounted by 15% at some bookstores but not others...

    ...or taxis and buses charging an additional "downtown zone" or "rush hour zone" rate for the same ride...

    ...or the vending machine at the movie theater charging you $2 for a 16 oz. coke when you could buy a 12 pack for less that double that...

    ...or the hip bar downtown charging $6 for a Heineken but the college bar where my brother lives sells beer for 75 cents on tap...

    ...or the cell phone company letting you make free calls on weekends but charging you 25 cents/minute for weekdays...

    Yeah. Gosh. supply. Demand. Different markets. Variable pricing strategies. Absolutely shocking. We simply must create laws so that the government can set fair prices for everyone.

    --


    I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
  30. Depends on what's missing by Valdrax · · Score: 5, Insightful

    None of the articles that I've read about this have said what functionality they're taking out of the system. For all we know, all the apps that we complain about (i.e. Explorer, Outlook, and Media Player) will be in the OS and other non-downloadable, core/system functionality will be removed (e.g. VPN, IPv6, and other networking protocols) or something else vexing but replaceable with third-party software.

    In other words, it's perfectly possible that it will be both "anti-competitive" AND crippled.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  31. Easy How-To-Eat-Right OS Chart... by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 4, Funny
    Lard: Windows XP Media Edition

    Full Fat: Windows XP Professional

    Regular: Windows XP Home Edition

    Lite: Windows XP Family Edition

    Atkins Diet: Mac OS X

    Fat Free: Linux

    Anorexia: *BSD

  32. Windows XP is already crippled by Jason1729 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Any version of XP a consumer can legally get is already crippled beyond use. It has a huge bug called "product activation" which means you can not reinstall the product you supposedly bought without Microsoft's permission. This renders the product completely useless because you won't be able to re-install it in 5 or 10 years to access old data, or if somehow newer MS code is even worse.

    Why is some other version with an insignificant additional crippiling newsworthy?

    Jason
    ProfQuotes

  33. Re:My question is... by irokitt · · Score: 3, Informative

    1. Start the Registry Editor

    2. Go to HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Curre ntVersion \Explorer\CabinetState\

    3. Right-click an empty space in the right pane and select New > String Value

    4. Name the new value Use Search Asst

    5. Double-click this new value, and enter no as it's Value data

    6. Close the registry editor

    --
    If my answers frighten you, stop asking scary questions.
  34. Re:Thats great... by metlin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hmmm, for one, OEM Vendors and established dealers who cannot afford to sell pirated copies?

    When they have to preload and bundle OSes with their hardware, a higher overhead would hurt them real bad. Which is why, they'd rather prefer something cheaper, even though it may not be the best alternative.

    If you ask, how does it make a difference to MS? Can't they sell the same thing cheaper? Then the answer would be no, simply because they'd be pressurized by other vendors in the same way.

    So the solution is to come up with an excuse for a price cut, and thats precisely what they're doing.

    It does not matter whether or not its got features added/removed. What is crucial is the price cut, and how they've come up with it. And its a means of attracting more OEM vendors.

  35. Oh give me a motherfucking break.... by Kjella · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why? so that those who can't afford full-size packs since the latest price rises (read: kids and teens) can buy the 19 cigarette pack and get hooked.

    Try to pay at least some attention next time you're in the convienience store and you'll see pretty much every commodity works this way - those fishsticks, the glass of jam, the block of cheese.

    They all reduce size. 1000g -> 900 -> 800 -> 750 -> 700 -> 600 -> 500 & new "big-pack" of 1000. Why? Because people pay a lot more attention to changes in price - changes in weight or volume go fairly unnoticed.

    Of course in this case it's pretty obvious, since they're few and easily counted. But it's the same thing. People in general have a price they find "acceptable" for a pack of cigarettes, regardless of the price of the individual price per cigarette.

    It's one of the small irrationalities of the mind, and the manufacturers are catering to it. To go from there to this being some directed attack on kids and teens is quite simply hogwash. There's more than enough legitimate complaints to make against them, without grasping for straws.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  36. MSFT must be scared by rediguana · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This would set a nasty precident for MSFT, once one country has seen that MSFT may remove their global pricing, every country with a currency weaker than the USD will be clamouring for the same benefits. Guess its part of a larger trend away from US companies that need to earn in USD to survive. If you think about that, there are some nasty implications for the US ahead in international trade because of the relatively strong USD...

  37. EVERYONE uses this strategy by Killswitch1968 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Examples:
    1. Senior rates and student rates. They are poorer and can't afford things like park admission. This is a way to get them to pay up.
    2. Coupons. Lower income people will now shop at your store. Rich people generally have better things to do with their time than clip coupons.

    Microsoft is not special, and you don't need to be a monopoly to 'exploit' this strategy.

    --

    Corporations: your universal scapegoat for all society's ills.
  38. Wasn't inextricable integration part of MS defense by saarbruck · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I seem to recall not so long ago Microsoft claiming it was impossible to remove components or offer any sort of modular form of Windows? Wasn't this one of the prime arguments that MS used in the antitrust trial? "No, your honor, we can't remove Internet Explorer. It just doesn't work that way." I really wish the defense witness had been allowed to demonstrate just how modular XP embedded is...

    --
    I am the very model of a modern major general!
  39. This is probably to avoid "dumping" by dcavanaugh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Microsoft's problem in many parts of the world is that their US & Western European prices are dead-on-arrival. People who make $200/month are not about to cough up $199 for a copy of XP Pro. If they sell at a price that makes sense in Thailand, they get accused of "dumping". Piracy has little to do with the situation. Linux is available with no piracy required. With or without piracy, customers are not going to spend money they don't have.

    If I were in charge of global marketing for Microsoft, I would create a country-specific version for certain target markets (like Thailand). It would be cosmetically "dumbed down" and priced to sell. Of course, any of the features that are not included in the base install can probably be downloaded from microsoft.com in about 30 seconds. You can't be accused of dumping if the product in question isn't sold anywhere else.

  40. Re:"Slightly Crippled" by eWarz · · Score: 5, Informative
    1) It didn't have a compiler.

    What do normal users need with a compiler? If you want one you can get one here.

    2) It had no INTENDED remote access services such as FTPD or SSHD.

    of course it didn't, that's what Windows Server 2003 is for.

    3) I was unable to manipulate graphics.

    *gasp* welcome to the world of closed source! Companies actually make MONEY here. You can do basic graphics manipulation using Paint, or you can download The Gimp of course, otherwise you should spring for a copy of Paint Shop Pro or Adobe Photoshop

    4) I was unable to use my Network Card.

    5) I was unable to optimally use my graphics card.

    6) I was unable to optimally use any piece of hardware that didn't have Microsoft written on it.

    What kind of bizarre obscure hardware where you using? Windows XP properly detects alot more hardware then linux does currently.

    It takes for ever to do anything in Notepad as compared to Vi.

    Then by all means, download vi and use it. Some people like working with this little thing called a Graphical User Interface.

    8) I had practically no system logging to speak of.

    Windows XP is a desktop OS, you can find all the logging you should ever care for at Start->Control Panel->Administrative Tools->Event viewer.

    9) I was unable to use multiple desktops.

    10) I was unable to entirely change the appearance of the GUI.

    most display drivers come with desktop management software, or you can use Windows XP's quicklogin features to have multiple login sessions. Part of the reason Windows is so successful is that you CAN'T entirely change the GUI. Windows, at it's core, always looks like Windows, even with a skin applied.

    11) I was unable to simply download much of the software needed to render Windows somewhat useful. Even though Gimp and OpenOffice run on Windows and GVIM, refer to number 4.

    See my answer to number 4.

    12) I kept getting "Access Denied" or something along the lines of insufficient permissions even though I believe I gave myself full rights over the system. On Windows 2000 this can be seen even if you are logged in as Administrator.

    Wow, Microsoft prevents you from killing critical system processes! What a shock! Oh no! what ever shall we do?!? Seriously though, the only time i've ever gotten access denied is when a file is in use, or you try to kill a critical system process (except XP, which lets you)

    13) I had to reboot fifteen times, and four hours later while windowsupdate.microsoft.com told me I needed nearly a GB of updates. Many of which could only be installed one at a time. 14) Then another two hours and multiple reboots becuase of installing device drivers (refer to number 6) and then updating those from the old drivers that were on old disgarded discs in the closet.

    with the default install of XP, there are 50 mb worth of updates + sp1, which is another 30 or so, a far cry from the 1 gb you speak of.

    15) I had next to nothing in regards to software and production....

    Compared to what you get with the average Linux ISO image.... Windows, out of the box, is a pathetic quadriplegic whose wheel chair is missing a wheel.

    Then, Microsoft goes and strips so much "functionality" from Windows XP to publicly admit it's "crippled"? What more can you take from it?

    They never stripped functionality, it was never there to begin with. Windows XP is a desktop OS for every day users, not for supergeeks.

    Disclaimer: I am not pro microsoft nor am i in any way being paid by microsoft for this comment. (On the contrary, i'm working on an open source Microsoft Windows NT Compatible Operating System called ReactOS The parent was a blatant troll and i was simply shedding some light on the truths.

  41. Smaller? I can see it now by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Blue Icon of Death

  42. It's all in the registry by superpulpsicle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Like WinXP home and professional, there is a program out there (cough.. NTswitcher) which changes a couple registry settings and poof... home becomes identical to professional. As was the same with the windows 2000 series, I am pretty sure XP light is the same thing regardless of what M$ marketing saids.

  43. Re:"Slightly Crippled" by CherniyVolk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What do normal users need with a compiler? If you want one you can get one here.

    "get one here", oh and "get one there", oh look over there, there's a cuckoo singing in the tree. Look, I had a person a Linux CD, and another a Windows XP CD... Don't give me any of this "get one here" garbage, I'm talking about what you get when you install Windows XP.

    of course it didn't, that's what Windows Server 2003 is for.

    Why should I have to buy Windows Server 2003? We weren't talking about Windows Server 2003, so why did you even mention it? Unless, you're talking about the singing cuckoo bird again.

    You can do basic graphics manipulation using Paint

    "basic"!? What is your definition of "basic"? Don't be so naive, PhotoShop is a decent product and I would purchase it alongside Gimp if they had a port to Linux. I buy software that's worth buying, the problem is, Microsoft Paint doesn't do much of anything and is a joke. If viewing a file and screwing it up with a pencil mark is your idea of "basic" graphics editing you've got some perspective issues to deal with.

    What kind of bizarre obscure hardware where you using? Windows XP properly detects alot more hardware then linux does currently.

    Now, in reference to you implying I'm a troll, what we have here is the pot calling the prospective kettle black. I have an AMD motherboard with the nForce 2 chipset on it. Windows XP, out of the box, does not have a clue how to use the onboard NIC interface. but if you care, I can list alot of other hardware aswell.

    Windows is so successful is that you CAN'T entirely change the GUI

    This is bull, as there are plenty of examples demonstrating what your claiming is irrelevant to an Operating Systems prosperity.

    Microsoft prevents you from killing critical system processes! What a shock! Oh no

    Irony, see I saw it. To bad your sense of humor is but one way as you apparently haven't seen my own facetiousness.

    Bottom line pal, if I'm root or administrator or whatever the computer better damn well do what I tell it to do and I don't care for a half-wit confirmation box. Do it, do it now. If I make a mistake, that's my ass. A lot of people write better with a pen, becuase they know that mistakes are less fogiven than with a pencil.

    Windows XP is a desktop OS for every day users, not for supergeeks.

    Here, I concur. So, why did you even argue? Windows XP out of the box has nowhere near the capabilities on many technologies as the typical RedHat CD or Mandrake CD.

    It's of little use to argue here anyway... I have to remember this is /.

  44. Re:With Pantip Plaza, it doesn't matter by Jennifer+E.+Elaan · · Score: 3, Interesting
    100 baht sounds a little steep. I saw VCD's going for more like 30-40 when I was there. And this wasn't underground either. I wasn't entirely sure that the products were actually pirate, though, because DVD's were going for only a little more (~120 baht or so).

    Still, it's true enough. The government doesn't seem to care at all about foreign copyrights. And these aren't underground operations either. This is all out for public display.

    PS. $1US ~= 40 baht.