Slashdot Mirror


Astronauts Attach Mannequin to Outside of ISS

lhouk281 writes "According to Space.Com, astronauts have attached a mannequin to the outside of the International Space Station to study the effects of radiation on the human body. The mannequin contains actual bone surrounded by simulated organs and synthetic skin, with sensors studded throughout." There's another story that has detail on how the spacewalk went: a suit malfunction caused the spacewalk to end prematurely.

194 comments

  1. actual bones by tsunamifirestorm · · Score: 4, Funny

    to they actually take a skeleton? or do they grind up a bunch of bones to make a kind of solid substance?

    1. Re:actual bones by ObviousGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Space mannequins are made of people!

      --
      I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    2. Re:actual bones by Hello+this+is+Linus · · Score: 1

      "The dummy, a mock-human of natural bone, simulated organs and synthetic skin..." Well, thats what the article says..whoever posted the article was off by a bit.

      --
      Hello, this is Linus Torvalds, and I pronounce Linux as Linux!
    3. Re:actual bones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here's the mannequin. I seriously doubt that they use human bones, since animal bones of comparable size would interact with radiation in the same way.

      I'm not sure what you're suggesting with ground-up bones... an ossified version of particle board?

    4. Re:actual bones by bhmit1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      So that's what happened to the third astronaut.

      "No, wait, I want to stay inside to keep an eye on the station!"

    5. Re:actual bones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      okay, which /. reader managed to insert that line in there? ;) (follow link in parent).

      'Dummies test you' indeed :p

    6. Re:actual bones by TioHoltzman · · Score: 1

      ossified version of particle board
      Particle Bone!

  2. Dude... by JoeLinux · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...what if air leaked out into space? That would suck!!

    *ducks*

    1. Re:Dude... by unknown51a · · Score: 0

      baaaaaaaaaaad joke

      --
      I had an imaginary sig once, he said I was a loser and ran off.
    2. Re:Dude... by nacturation · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, it would blow. Common misconception, sir.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    3. Re:Dude... by Saltation · · Score: 1
      I can see the "Post Anonymously" option, but where do I find the "Post Humously" option?
      If by "humous" you mean "humus", as in errr... natural fertiliser, then, why sir, you've found it!

      :)
      sorry, couldn't resist.

      --
      Sal

      Writings: saltation.blogspot.com
      Wravings: go-blog-go.blogspot.com
    4. Re:Dude... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If by "humous" you mean "humus", as in errr... natural fertiliser, then, why sir, you've found it!

      Try this one instead. :)

    5. Re:Dude... by rodney+dill · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... And if the hole was big enough, it would Blow Chunks

      (and in this case my SIG doesn't apply)

      --

      Use your head, can't you, use your head,
      You're on earth, there's no cure for that
      - S. Beckett
    6. Re:Dude... by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      Leak, blow :-)

      Seriously, what does happen to air in space? Where does it go?

    7. Re:Dude... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I hate to be a party pooper (okay so I lied) but given that it's all about equalization of pressure, what's the difference, whether you go from suck to blow, or blow to suck?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Dude... by nacturation · · Score: 2, Informative

      I hate to be a party pooper (okay so I lied) but given that it's all about equalization of pressure, what's the difference, whether you go from suck to blow, or blow to suck?

      It has to do with what force is acting on the gas to make it go from a pressurized area into a vacuum. Does the vacuum exert some kind of attractive force on the gas to pull it out? If so, then it would suck. Or is the force caused by the atoms of the gas colliding and pushing the other atoms away? If so, then it would blow.

      Just like when you blow out a candle, the low pressure of the surrounding room doesn't magically suck the air out of you -- it is you creating a higher pressure and consequently blowing which is the cause. Technically speaking, there isn't such a thing as 'sucking' in physics. When you use a straw to sip a drink, you create a low pressure area in your mouth (and, by extension, the straw) and it's the higher pressured surroundings which pushes the drink up the straw.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    9. Re:Dude... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Or in geekier terms, it isn't space trying to download you from your spacecraft, it is the atmosphere in your spacecraft trying to upload you into space.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  3. Mannequin attached to outside of space station...? by Reneumann · · Score: 4, Funny

    I could almost swear this was the subject of a Far Side cartoon..

  4. Hmm... by venomix · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That synthetic skin would have to be really strong for this thing not to blow up due to low pressure, wouldn't it?

    1. Re:Hmm... by 1s44c · · Score: 4, Informative


      I believe thats a myth.

      There just isn't enough pressure in the human body to make it explode in a vacuum like you see in sci-fi films.

    2. Re:Hmm... by MoonFog · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here's how they do it:

      The space mannequin's "skin" is a coat of multi-layer insulation containing thermo-luminescence dosimeters, detectors that glow in proportion to the amount of radiation they receive. Those detectors are distributed about every inch (2.5 centimeters) throughout the torso to give scientists a depth-dose profile of radiation exposure. (...) Encapsulating the Phantom torso is a protective canister of carbon fiber-reinforced plastic.

    3. Re:Hmm... by Hello+this+is+Linus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Right. If you some how found yourself floating around in outer space with out a space suit, you would just suffocate. Unlike in 'Mission to Mars', when the guy takes off his helmet and his head freezes instantly.

      --
      Hello, this is Linus Torvalds, and I pronounce Linux as Linux!
    4. Re:Hmm... by Tango42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Indeed, you wouldn't freeze, because there's nowhere for the heat to go. Usually things lose heat by conduction (and convection), which is fast, in space you have only radiation, which is much slower. (However, if you were walking around on the dark side of the moon you might lose heat throught your feet to the ground)

    5. Re:Hmm... by Angostura · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't freeze eh? because radiation is much slower.

      Who would have thought that the sun heated the earth through convection eh?

    6. Re:Hmm... by AlecC · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Who would have thought that the sun heated the earth through convection eh?

      The sun is about 6000K: you are about 300K. Since radiation goes as the fourth power of temperature, the sun is about 20^4 times as good a radiator as a human body.

      You would, of course, eventually freeze in space. But it would be many hours after you suffocated.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    7. Re:Hmm... by no+longer+myself · · Score: 5, Interesting
      OK, so at the risk of showing off my ignorance (I know... already too late.) Here's a question I've been pondering for some time now:

      Obviously if you just abruptly depressurised a person, they'd form nitrogen bubbles in their blood and contract the bends, and probably die. But what if... And this is a big morbid what if... What if you slowly depressurised a person while having an oxigen mask securely (but comfortably) attached to their face? Could you eventually bring a human body down to zero atmospheres and they'd be able to stay alive?

      If not, what would be the lowest limit?

    8. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I did research subjects related to this for a discussion on a forum a few years ago. Both the US and Russians had astronauts who suffered 'explosive decompression' down to almost no atmospheres. One was due to a large rip in a mock spacesuit, and the other due to decompression of the entire capsule they were in. Both survived, despite being decompressed for up to 45 seconds. They lost consciousness very quickly, after 10-15 seconds, and had no ill effects afterwards.

      One of the problems with long term decompression is that blood vessels near the surface expand greatly... suck on the inside of your arm for an example - it happens bodywide. Not a problem for a few minutes, but it will end up bruising tissue badly after long term exposure.

    9. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Encapsulating the Phantom torso

      Phantom torso?
      Is it made by Infinium Labs?

      Will it ever be released?!

    10. Re:Hmm... by lxs · · Score: 4, Interesting

      if you breathe 100% oxygen, you'd still have to have about 1/5th of an atmosphere of gas in your lungs to function properly (since the human body is designed for ~20% oxygen @ 1atm) you may be able to go a little lower than that but that's still an awful lot of pressure to contain, unless you start breathing liquids, which AFAIK has only been tested at high pressures, but might equally provide advantages at near vacuum .

      The other problem would be evaporation. Your sweat would boil off in a vacuum, which would leave you extremely cold and with very dry skin.

      And if you're in space, prepare yourself for the ultimate in sunburn.

      Needless to say, I won't be volunteering for tests.

    11. Re:Hmm... by Tango42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sweat wouldn't cool you down any more than it does in an atmosphere, in fact, it would cool you down less. Liquids boil in a vacumn because of the low pressure, temperature has nothing to do with it. Sweat cools you down because the water uses heat from your body to evaporate, as it doesn't need heat to evaporate in space, it wouldn't cool you down.

    12. Re:Hmm... by lxs · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm sorry but evaporation always leads to heat loss. If you evaporate a fixed number of grammes of a given liquid, you lose a fixed number of joules. This heat comes from the breaking of vanderwaals forces between molecules, not from acting against ambient pressure.

    13. Re:Hmm... by lxs · · Score: 1

      I meant to say that the heat goes into the breaking of Vanderwaals forces.

    14. Re:Hmm... by Endive4Ever · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here's an unrelated question I have about space being a vacuum.

      Could we have equipment out in space that used vacuum tubes without the glass envelope? If space itself is a vacuum is it possible that electron tubes could be simply fabricated in the 'open' as part of electronics equipment? Maybe it's time to revive the old tube-type computer designs from the 50's.

      --
      ---
    15. Re:Hmm... by Tango42 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the amount of heat required to break those forces is much smaller in a vacumn. It's the same reason that means you can't make a good cup of tea on top of Mt. Everest.

    16. Re:Hmm... by lxs · · Score: 4, Informative

      You really need to learn some physics.

      Some points to consider:

      1. the molecules don't 'know' whether there is a vacuum or not. They just feel an electrostatic force due to each other's proximity.

      2. temperature and heat are two different things.

      3. The boiling point is the temperature at which the vapour pressure of the liquid equals the ambient pressure.
      When a liquid reaches boiling point, evaporation goes much faster (since it can occur throughout the liquid not just at the surface which leads to great heat loss, which means that the temperature cannot rise any further. So at lower pressures, the boiling point is lower.)

      4. It's saturday and sunny out (at least around here it is), so instead of arguing about physics, it's far more fun to go outside.

    17. Re:Hmm... by no+longer+myself · · Score: 2, Interesting
      OK, so let's assume that you're entitled to a really nice puffy winter coat to help conserve heat, and you cover the skin with baby oil to help prevent chapping (And I don't assume to know that either of these would be effective in the least). So what is the lowest possible atmospheric pressure the human body could reasonably achieve?

      And yeah, it's probably a good idea to assume you'd be breathing pure oxigen so you could keep the O2 pressure as low as possible to help the body adjust.

    18. Re:Hmm... by Tango42 · · Score: 1

      I do need to learn some physics, which is why I am studying it (and really should be doing coursework, rather than reading /.), so I think I'll stick with commenting on point 4 for now: It's not sunny here, because "here" is England, and it is never sunny in England, so I'll stay inside and have fun doing coursework. (Spot the delibrate mistake...)

    19. Re:Hmm... by CowboyNick · · Score: 1

      I doubt this would be a good idea because of the risk that space is not always a consistant vacuum. If some whif of atmosphere from the earth came by, you would ruin your electronics. Plus, the electronics would need to be shielded with a radation hardened material in the first place, otherwise they would get zapped pretty quickly.

      --
      -CowboyNick
    20. Re:Hmm... by fatman1683 · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of SCUBA diving, in which the diver is breathing air at a pressure equal to the surrounding water pressure. At such high pressures, the nitrogen concentration in the air increases dramatically, thereby increasing the nitrogen level in the blood to the point of supersaturation. When the pressure is relieved during decompression, the supersaturated state can no longer be maintained, and the excess nitrogen begins to evaporate out of the blood, causing bubbles. In a spacesuit or spacecraft, the atmosphere is usually kept somewhere below normal atmospheric pressure, to reduce strain on the hull. The blood never becomes saturated with nitrogen, so any decompression sudden enough to potentially cause the nitrogen to evaporate would probably burst the blood vessels first. As to your what if, remember that in order for a gas to dissolve in a liquid, it must be under pressure. If you attempt to reduce atmospheric pressure to zero, any gas becomes insoluble in any liquid. So in order for the lungs to function properly, you'd have to supply oxygen at or near normal atmospheric pressure. Of course, when you do so, you're creating a volume of air inside the body of much greater pressure than the surrounding environment, which would eventually result in the chest cavity exploding. Remember also that there are many, many small airspaces scattered throughout the human body, and not all of them are easily vented. Even if you decreased the pressure very slowly, the subject would still be subjected to extreme pain as these airspaces expand and try to ventilate. It would literally be like someone sticking a fire hose up your ass and opening the valve.

      --
      Look, defenseless babies!
    21. Re:Hmm... by SpaceGhost · · Score: 1

      Did someone get rid of the latent heat of vaporization?

      it's a fixed amount when you boil a liquid - it may take a lower temperature to get there at a lower pressure, but it's still the amount of energy needed to break the bonds. less energy = cooling.

    22. Re:Hmm... by highwindarea · · Score: 1

      I am far from an expert but it does make sense. If I'm right you could use it to create a galactic scale beowulf cluster; serving pr0n and /. to the entire universe

      --
      I think this internet thing sounds like a good idea
    23. Re:Hmm... by no+longer+myself · · Score: 1
      In a spacesuit or spacecraft, the atmosphere is usually kept somewhere below normal atmospheric pressure, to reduce strain on the hull.

      Any idea on how much lower they keep it? And what the lowest limit would be?

      Even if you decreased the pressure very slowly, the subject would still be subjected to extreme pain as these airspaces expand and try to ventilate. It would literally be like someone sticking a fire hose up your ass and opening the valve.

      Some people do that sort of thing for recreation... I think they call it a "high colonic"... But seriously, if there are air spaces that would expand when depressurised, wouldn't it be able to at least slowly leak out? Otherwise, how did the air get there in the first place?

      So far I see that the biggest factors to consider are: Liquids boil at lower temps, gas needs pressure to disolve in liquid, (but I'm not sure this applies to the chemical bonding of Fe02 in the blood), your ears might need to be modified, and your diet would likely need to be synthesized so as not to contain anything that would produce even minimal flatulence.

    24. Re:Hmm... by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      yeah, you get the bends, that's why austronaught have to breathe pure oxygen for 2(IIRC) hours before going out on a space walk - the pressure in the suit is far less than 'normal' pressure inside the ship/station.
      YOu also have to make sure that you let all air out of your lungs, otherwise they migh pop - another scuba diving related danger!
      Not sure if you would be able to live for extended period in a vacuum but with a oxygen supply. Nasa had an incident with a suit getting decompressed and the guy was OK, but fainted because of lack of oxygen he stayed consious for about 20 sec. you can read more about it here

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
    25. Re:Hmm... by Temporal+Outcast · · Score: 1

      You really need to learn some physics.

      That, my friend, is true for almost the whole of Slashdot - not just for physics, but also law, economics, blah blah :)

      --

      Vote for a Man, Vote for Bush!
      Not a liberatarian flipflop hippie.
  5. it'll be... by nomel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    it'll be interesting to see what space debris does.

    1. Re:it'll be... by randyest · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The dummy is strapped to the space station; whatever space debris does to the dummy, it'll do to the station itself. Let's hope it does nothing, as in no space debris hits the space station. Mmkay? ;)

      --
      everything in moderation
    2. Re:it'll be... by charboy1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Let's hope it does nothing, as in no space debris hits the space station.

      Actually space debris and meteoroids hit ISS quite often. So far they have been very small and as you say hopefully it remains that way. ISS is designed to withstand impacts up to a certain size and probability by placing an additional wall outside the pressurised module to absorb and diffuse the impact. Learn more about the general policy in Protecting the Space Station from Meteoroids and Orbital Debris. Or see a short explanation of the Meteorid / Debris Protection System for Node 2.

      - charboy

    3. Re:it'll be... by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      Maybe the dummy will save the station from any debris that would hit it.

      Perhaps all space stations should be surrounded by these dummies. Even, perhaps, they could be dummies with sound producing mechanisms in them that intone, at seven second intervals, the sound 'Mmkay.'

      --
      ---
    4. Re:it'll be... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      I suggest you either watch the anime or read the manga for a series called Planet ES. Deals with exactly that topic from the perspective of a team of garbage collectors in space. The garbage men and women of the future.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  6. Pretty Wacky.... by SisyphusShrugged · · Score: 2, Funny

    Zany if you ask me, is there really much benefit to be had from viewing the extremely damaging effects of space on an un-protected body.

    I thought the fact that space was incredibly dangerous to the human body was already quite well proven (look at the scenes in all the sci-fi movies whenever anyone gets ejected into space, it isnt a pretty picture!)

    1. Re:Pretty Wacky.... by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      look at the scenes in all the sci-fi movies

      Amm... You think that's air you're breathing? Eh? :-)

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    2. Re:Pretty Wacky.... by torpor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Its not unprotected, it is in fact protected, and wtf? You're second-guessing rocket scientists and NASA's/Russia's elite teams of biological scientists?

      There's tons of value to be had. Space is an extremely hostile place for a human being to live. The effect of radiation on bone marrow alone is something to fear.

      If we don't do experiments like this, we won't have clues needed to propose, test, and develop treatments for injuries or possible accidents that may occur in future human space exploration...

      Imagine this scenario: astronaut Charlie goes outside, an accident occurs and their suit is damaged. They survive, make it back inside, but are badly injured.

      Given the results from this experiment, its feasible that forms of treatment and understanding of pathology may give Charlie a chance of living to fly another day ...

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  7. Cheaper Alternative by metallic · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why do this research in space when you could do the same research on a certain CEO in Utah in a lab for much cheaper. Oh, wait... too late.

    --
    Karma: Positive. Mostly effected by cowbell.
  8. One careful owner mannequin by Trillan · · Score: 1

    One careful owner mannequin, now in space. Previously used only in car pool lanes around KSC.

    1. Re:One careful owner mannequin by charboy1 · · Score: 1

      One careful owner mannequin, now in space. Previously used only in car pool lanes around KSC.

      I guess you mean Baikonur in Kazakhstan. Do they have car pool lanes there?

  9. *sigh* by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 4, Funny
    If sci-fi films from the 70s and 80s haven't taught us anything, its that you shouldn't expose real human bones covered in anything to radation.

    Unless the real reason is to create space zombies for the purposes of space exploration. Think about it: no need to pack along food, no need to pack along oxygen...perfect for GW Bush's planned invasion of Mars.

    1. Re:*sigh* by Endive4Ever · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Why clone anything?

      It sounds like a perfect use for liberal ex-congressmen/women.

      --
      ---
    2. Re:*sigh* by jwriney · · Score: 1

      *beep* BRAIIIIIIINS *beep*

      --riney

  10. Dummy discovers external radiation effects by gringer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While scientists have used Phantom-like dummies in the past aboard the space shuttle and inside the ISS, the radiation hazards of open space on sensitive body organs is still unclear.[emphasis added]

    I'm just wondering how they would make claims from this - "See, the radiation at 2.5cm below the middle of the first left rib is X, therefore it will cause a mild nausea".

    Sure, artificial organs would give a slightly better idea of the radiation penetration, but why would such knowledge be useful?

    --
    Ask me about repetitive DNA
    1. Re:Dummy discovers external radiation effects by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      ...but why would such knowledge be useful?

      Because it's fun?, Besides, `knowledge is power' and how can you say that power is not useful? :-)

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    2. Re:Dummy discovers external radiation effects by betelgeuse-4 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would have thought radiation would be the last of your worries if you found yourself in open space. The low pressure and lack of oxygen would be a bigger problem.

    3. Re:Dummy discovers external radiation effects by keot · · Score: 1

      I'm just wondering how they would make claims from this - "See, the radiation at 2.5cm below the middle of the first left rib is X, therefore it will cause a mild nausea".

      if you're after light and flexable spacesuits, you need to start looking at what parts of your body need the most protection.
      take your example. if that was the only effect, they could make a new spacesuit which just protected the region below your ribs.

    4. Re:Dummy discovers external radiation effects by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1

      News flash: "NASA Puts Testicles in Space". AP wire - Today, three researchers carefully stapled testicles to the outside of the space station in a bizarre research project. When asked "Why?" Dr. Hans Olos stated "Because we could." When asked the source of the organs, Dr. Olos noted "Utah."

  11. Re:it was a REAL DOLL.. check their website by venomix · · Score: 1

    Hey, I checked the real doll website and I couldn't find any Sally model. You must've been thinking of the Anna Mae model =)

  12. The effects of "radiation" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah right. I think it's more to "study the effect on a human body of being tied to the outside of the fucking spaceship".

    Or, more specifically: "Put the fear of God into cosmonaut Josif by telling him if he forgets to put down the seat on the vacuum-toilet one more time, we're putting him out there next".

    And next week, in the interest of furthering science and our understanding of the universe, the ISS will be installing a plank.

    1. Re:The effects of "radiation" by PornMaster · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Fear of god?

      You mean that all cosmonauts aren't godless commies?

    2. Re:The effects of "radiation" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having a cosmonaut named Josif is just as likely as having a U.S. president named Jawaharlal. You probably mean "astronaut", not "cosmonaut"? :)

      A Russian joke:
      Dennis Tito, the first space tourist, is giving an interview after his return to Earth.
      "What Russian phrases did you learn during the flight?"
      "Spasibo, pozhaluista, and "keep your f*cking hands off that thing!"

    3. Re:The effects of "radiation" by raider_red · · Score: 1

      And next week, in the interest of furthering science and our understanding of the universe, the ISS will be installing a plank.

      It gives us some idea of what Bush and co. are likely to do when they finally catch Bin Laden.

      --
      It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
    4. Re:The effects of "radiation" by dj245 · · Score: 1

      I agree that there are better science experiments to be doing, but perhaps the threat of throwing Justin Timberlake out the nearest airlock will have a bit more weight now.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  13. Cool idea by thogard · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Now if the ISS was high enough to make this expierment useful, then it would be a great idea but the ISS is in a very low orbit well inside the protective magnetosphere of earth. While there isn't enough atmosphere to protect anyone from small particles, there is enough to slow its orbit down.

    1. Re:Cool idea by r00tdenied · · Score: 1

      Apparently you know nothing of the ISS orbital inclination. It's orbit is high enough that it is at the absolutely upper limit that the shuttle can reach.

      --
      Platinum Networks Hosting www.platinum-networks.com
    2. Re:Cool idea by thogard · · Score: 1

      Now if the shuttle was high enough to make this expierment useful, then it would be a great idea but the shuttle is in a very low orbit well inside the protective magnetosphere of earth. While there isn't enough atmosphere to protect anyone from small particles, there is enough to slow its orbit down.

  14. Space.. the final frontier... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Once upon a time NASA decided to send three astronauts to space for two years.

    One was American, One was Russian and the other was English.

    NASA allowed each of them to take 200 pounds of baggage each.

    The American decided to take along his wife, the Englishman decided to take along books to learn how to speak German, and the Russian decided to take along cigarettes.

    Two years later, when the space shuttle landed, there was a big crowd waiting to welcome them home.

    First came the American and his wife and each of them had a baby in their arms.

    Next came the Englishman speaking fluent German. They both gave their speeches and got a rousing round of applause.

    Suddenly, out came the Russian with a cigarette in his mouth. He walked up to the podium, snarled at the crowd, and asked "Has anyone got a match?"

  15. Re:it was a REAL DOLL.. check their website by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Man, those big eyes on her just freak me out. I much prefer the Mai model.

    --
    Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
  16. TRUE STORY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    When Apollo Mission Astronaut Neil Armstrong first walked on the moon, he not only gave his famous "one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind" statement but followed it by several remarks, usual com-traffic between him, the other astronauts and Mission Control. Just before he re-entered the lander, however, he made the enigmatic remark "Good luck Mr. Gorsky."
    Many people at NASA thought it was a casual remark concerning some rival Soviet Cosmonaut. However, upon checking, there was no Gorsky in either the Russian or American space programs. Over the years many people questioned Armstrong as to what the "Good luck Mr. Gorsky" statement meant, but Armstrong always just smiled. Just last year, (on July 5, 1995 in Tampa Bay FL) while answering questions following a speech, a reporter brought up the 26 year old question to Armstrong. This time he finally responded. Mr. Gorsky had finally died and so Neil Armstrong felt he could answer the question.
    When he was a kid, he was playing baseball with a friend in the backyard. His friend hit a fly ball which landed in the front of his neighbor's bedroom windows. His neighbors were Mr. & Mrs. Gorsky. As he leaned down to pick up the ball, young Armstrong heard Mrs. Gorsky shouting at Mr. Gorsky. "Oral sex! You want oral sex?! You'll get oral sex when the kid next door walks on the moon!"

    1. Re:TRUE STORY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dumbass http://www.snopes.com/quotes/mrgorsky.htm

  17. Suit Malfunction? by Balial · · Score: 5, Funny

    I didn't know Janet Jackson was on the space station!

    1. Re:Suit Malfunction? by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of Michael Jackson.

      And no, the flip-down rump access flaps on NASA space suits were omitted from the final design. I think you're referring to the 'open source' spacesuit design, as proposed by the scary bearded older dude who hangs out at LUG meetings in the back.

      --
      ---
  18. Re:it was a REAL DOLL.. check their website by venomix · · Score: 1

    Yeah, the Anna Mae model is butt ugly, still though, the original reference to the Sally model was because of the large bust... and I think Anna Mae has the body model with the biggest such.

  19. Re:Mannequin attached to outside of space station. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeh, that's a good point. They should have used a cow instead.

  20. A spaceship filled with a dummy by gringer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Encapsulating the Phantom torso is a protective canister of carbon fiber-reinforced plastic.

    So, they're making a mini spaceship and putting a dummy inside it. I guess the carbon fiber and plastic won't take away much of the radiation, but it still seems a bit weird. Why not just dress them up in a real space suit (or, given the form of the dummy, a cut-down version)?

    --
    Ask me about repetitive DNA
    1. Re:A spaceship filled with a dummy by MoonFog · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe I should've posted more of the text -
      Itself replete with radiation sensors, the canister's interior supports an oxygen environment to better mirror its human space suit counterparts.

      Also, this is just the torso, not an entire dummy. No arms or legs.

    2. Re:A spaceship filled with a dummy by edbarrett · · Score: 1
      No arms or legs.

      Hey, what do you call a dummy with no arms and no legs strapped to a space station floating in space ?

      Phantom!

      Oh, that was so not funny I hurt. Excuse me.

  21. There is a graphic novel in there somewhere. by mikeophile · · Score: 1
    This just sounds too much like a supervillan origin story.

    Bombarded by radiation, the manniquin of bone and synthetic flesh became imbued with a kind of life...and a malevolent intelligence.

  22. Manequin 3: space by mr_burns · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hope this doesn't mean that they'll make another sequel to those manequin movies where the mall manequin comes to life. Only this time in space. I've had enough bad 80's background music and forced jokes about window displays. Saving the ISS from the mars mallrats is a half-plot I can't bear.

    --
    "Let him go, Ralph. He knows what he's doing." --Otto Mann (simpsons)
  23. Ah.... by kcbrown · · Score: 5, Funny
    Now we know what they had in mind for Lance Bass if he had been allowed to make the trip!

    Such a shame...testing on a mannequin just isn't the same, but I guess you just make do with what you have.

    :-)

    --
    Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
  24. Oh, bullshit. by AltGrendel · · Score: 4, Informative

    Read the truth here.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

  25. Nothing critical, just a SUIT MALFUNCTION by Alsee · · Score: 2, Funny

    a suit malfunction caused the spacewalk to end prematurely

    On the bright side it did not cause the spacewalker to end prematurely.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    1. Re:Nothing critical, just a SUIT MALFUNCTION by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      "It's strangely warm," Kaleri said. A few minutes later, he radioed: "It's amazing. I have rain inside the helmet. I have water on the visor."
      Yes, it was just a warm damp suit malfunction.
      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Nothing critical, just a SUIT MALFUNCTION by Endive4Ever · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      My cheap Shuttle 'Spacewalker' PC Clone motherboard ended prematurely all on it's own, thankyouverymuch.

      --
      ---
    3. Re:Nothing critical, just a SUIT MALFUNCTION by bhmit1 · · Score: 1

      "It's strangely warm," Kaleri said. A few minutes later, he radioed: "It's amazing."

      Dude, no farting in the space suit!

  26. Far Side cartoon by gringer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, here's something that might be slightly related.

    --
    Ask me about repetitive DNA
    1. Re:Far Side cartoon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FWIW, text of the parent's picture is as follows:

      "It's time we face reality my friends...
      We're not exactly rocket scientists."

  27. That must be creepy... by Zakabog · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...wake up in the morning and there's a body hanging outside your window. "There's something on the wing!"

    Anyone else think one of the astronauts ordered a real doll and when the other astronauts caught him with it they put it outside? Then when NASA asked about the body outside the space station they just answered "Uhh well we're ummmmm testing the affects of radiation on the human body, yeah that's it."

    1. Re:That must be creepy... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      "There's something on the wing!"

      Did someone let Shatner have a window seat again?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  28. Why use a mannequin? by adept256 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why not use an organ donor? Or one of those people who want to have their ashes put into space? I'd do it, if I were dead, that is... better than being wormfood.

    Is that why air is such a precious commodity in space? They need it to blow up their girlfriends? Must get mighty lonely up there :)

    --

    I ran a benchmark on my quantum computer, now I can't find it anywhere!
    1. Re:Why use a mannequin? by Ronald+Dumsfeld · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why not use an organ donor? Or one of those people who want to have their ashes put into space? I'd do it, if I were dead, that is... better than being wormfood.
      Well, if they used a human body the only data they'd get would be when they got it back and cut it up. That would only let them see how much damage the radiation had done.

      Their mannequin is stuffed full of sensors that will record the radiation levels a body would be exposed to. These circumstances can be reproduced repeatedly in the lab with real bodies or organs.
      --
      Where's the Kaboom?
      There's supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom.
    2. Re:Why use a mannequin? by adept256 · · Score: 1

      If I were being serious, I'd say they could probably stuff some sensors into a corpse. But I'd be ignoring what the vaccuum of space would do to it, namely quake 3 style gibs resulting from instant depressurisation. Actually, that would be a good experiment...

      --

      I ran a benchmark on my quantum computer, now I can't find it anywhere!
    3. Re:Why use a mannequin? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      think about it for a second, how long would the real organs stay in state similart to being in a real body? I know it's a vacuum & etc, but that's not going to help preserving it in the long run.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:Why use a mannequin? by lxs · · Score: 1

      (tinfoil hat time)
      Who says they didn't? It's not like you and I are able go up there and check. This mannequin is nothing more than a cover story.

      Wait for the first astronaut to return screaming: "People! mannequin is people!"

      Or maybe not. However, in the late 1950's they used to use real corpses instead of crash test dummies in simulated car accidents. (Since you can't make a good dummy if you don't know how a real body reacts) It's the logical thing to do, even if it isn't the most socially acceptable.

    5. Re:Why use a mannequin? by Endive4Ever · · Score: 1

      The problem was likely all the feral dogs who started hanging around the auto crash test sites.

      Reminds me of the one Farside comic the did get self-censored. Apparently it featured a dog hanging around an operating table begging for scraps.

      --
      ---
  29. Fark by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I foresee a new Photoshop contest appearing on Fark in 3.......2.......1..........

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Fark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, here's a picture of the Phantom test object if anyone's interested...

  30. Whats its Name? by torpor · · Score: 2, Funny

    I nominate "Ned Kelly".

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    1. Re:Whats its Name? by mattjb0010 · · Score: 1

      I nominate "Ned Kelly"

      The way the ISS is going, it seems Ned Kelly will be reappearing in the Australian outback sometime soon...

    2. Re:Whats its Name? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      How about "Keith Richards"?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Whats its Name? by torpor · · Score: 1

      Right, like all good space stations do, sooner or later, heh heh ...

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  31. Therefore... by gringer · · Score: 1

    Space people are made of mannequins.

    --
    Ask me about repetitive DNA
  32. Worthwhile Experimentation... by Genda · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mayhaps in a similiar vein,

    We could attach the "SCO Legal Team" to the bottom of a space shuttle, and find out what the radiation effects of reentry are on a pack of gravy sucking pigs...

    Genda

  33. Face... by danormsby · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm all for scientific experiments in space but why did this dummy get the face of Darl McBride? Did he upset someone?

    --
    Omnis amans amens
  34. related material by Momo_CCCP · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you missed the 60s because you weren't born, here's a good link : http://www.apolloarchive.com/
    Now that high definiton microcams exist, I wish the astronauts would broadcast a little more...

  35. Re:Mannequin attached to outside of space station. by Seehund · · Score: 4, Funny

    I could almost swear this was the subject of a Far Side cartoon..

    I could almost swear they are trying to reenact a couple of Kraftwerk albums.

    Showroom dummies, outside the Spacelab, to study Radio-Activity?

    --
    Help savingAmigaOS and a free PowerPC market
  36. In later news by moltar77 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Later today, mission control was shocked as astronauts relayed a new message. What they had once mistaken for a mannequin was actually former vice president Al Gore. Barely affected by the radiation, Mr. Gore said he felt "quite stimulated" from the venture, and that he would like to plan a return flight in the future. At this time there is no comment from NASA administration on Mr. Gore's proposal.

  37. True, but Radiation's still surprisingly effective by Saltation · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yeah, I've always thought this too. And it's mostly right -- you certainly will never see that cringe-worthy bad-sci-fi staple of liquids "freezing and boiling at the same time."
    But interestingly, I discovered just last week if you take a spaceship out of direct sunshine, it starts to lose heat pretty substantially. One of the first space stations (I forget which) had its heatshield buggered up by over-early deployment and it started to overheat dramatically. An astronaut pushed an umbrella arrangement out an airlock to provide cover from the sun, and the temperature "immediately began to drop" (ok, a little obvious) and was within the expected range within a day. I saw this on "The Planets" TV show which was excellently researched, so I'd assume this was pretty valid.

    In summary, radiation of heat seems to still provide a pretty good cooling mechanism in space, despite being much slower than conduction.

    So while you'll be relieved to know you'll asphyxiate in comfort and warmth, you'll eventually become a corpsicle if you stay out of the sun(light).

    cheers, Sal

    --
    Sal

    Writings: saltation.blogspot.com
    Wravings: go-blog-go.blogspot.com

  38. Re:True, but Radiation's still surprisingly effect by Tango42 · · Score: 1

    A spaceship has a much larger surface area than a human, so it would take longer for a human to freeze.

  39. Why not use the real thing? by Saltation · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't understand. Surely they could have found a real person on the internet who had a fetish about being strapped to the outside of a rocket and shot into space? Their results would be guaranteed to be realistic that way: actual bone surrounded by actual organs and actual skin.

    Legally, as long as they didn't eat him they should be all right.

    cheers, Sal
    --
    Sal

    Writings: saltation.blogspot.com
    Wravings: go-blog-go.blogspot.com

  40. HOLY CRAP! by kir · · Score: 0, Redundant

    There's another story that has detail on how the spacewalk went: a suit malfunction caused the spacewalk to end prematurely.

    Now THAT'S a wardrobe malfunction!


    [Think Jackson and Superbowl.]

    --
    3cx.org - A truly bad website.
    1. Re:HOLY CRAP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      a suit malfunction caused the spacewalk to end prematurely.

      How do you think they got the mannequin?

      once everyone is space walking outside the station...
      Shuttle Commander: Well Bob, you were the lucky winner in our little on-board lottery... I've already briefed the other crewmembers. Just slip your limbs into these straps for a sec. You're gonna love the mystery prize.
      Crewman Bob: (expectantly) Cool! What is it?

  41. Waste of time and effort by Frantactical+Fruke · · Score: 3, Funny

    There is already plenty of literature on the effects of cosmic radiation on the human body:

    The Fantastic Four by Marvel Comics.

    I wonder which powers the Super Dummy will manifest next week.
    "Oh look, it's the Invisible Thing!"

  42. So... by natrius · · Score: 0, Redundant

    So... you mean it's a Real Doll (NSFW)? Why would you waste one of those up in space when it could be put to good use down on earth...

  43. RIP.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you wonder if there is any credit given to whoever bones are/were out there?

  44. Virtual Crash Dummies by jxliv7 · · Score: 3, Funny
    .


    I wonder if there's another inflatable dummy that the guys use inside...?

  45. Re:Mannequin attached to outside of space station. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...a scarecrow for the field of space-corn

  46. This should have been a poll by plams · · Score: 1

    Who to put on the outside of ISS? Cowboyneal!

  47. RealDoll by fazil · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hehehe.. I guess the real doll started to smell :)

    At least in space, she wouldn't be so heavy :)

    Scary that the new models have the moaning option.. with sensors in all the appropriate nasty places ;) Only problem I see with it.. is the ethernet cable that comes out of her head, back to your computer, that holds 1000's of .wav files..

    Actually.. while on the subject of Real Dolls.. heheh.. you've got to read this article.. it's HILARIOUS.. the dude from Nerve.Com decided to experience one.

    Here's the link.

    www.nerve.com/regulars/ididitforscience/sexdoll/

    --
    -=-Ze End-=-
    1. Re:RealDoll by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      Thats brilliant! worth a slashdot story on its own! Damn if i had come up with this, advertising on slashdot alone would have made me my first few millions! Some people just need to be extorted

      One chap even wanted a replica of a canine. "He offered me $50,000 to do it," Matt confided, "but y'know . . . I just couldn't."

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  48. RANDO by charboy1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    That synthetic skin would have to be really strong for this thing not to blow up due to low pressure, wouldn't it?

    Actually the phantom is made up of several slices, about 30, stacked on top of each other on a central rod. (Think of the old baby toy.) The main material of the phantom is called RANDO(R). It's embedded with bits of bone and polyurethane to simulate organs. I believe the "natural bone" is ground up and reshaped into bone like structures.

    To answer your question, there's really nothing to "blow up" during depressurisation. All of the phantom slices are solid with lots of cut-outs for radiation detectors.

    - charboy

    1. Re:RANDO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Eastman! He comes out of the East to do battle with the amazing RANDO!"

  49. Aliens by $exyNerdie · · Score: 1


    Aliens are gonna steal the human bones and start cloning on their own planet to make some slaves!!

    Aliens are coming .....Aliens are coming.......

  50. Re:True, but Radiation's still surprisingly effect by Saltation · · Score: 2, Informative

    other way round, actually.
    the human's proportion of surface area to volume is much much higher than a space ship. as you make objects larger, the surface area tends to increase in square proportion, the volume in cubic proportion. so the ratio of surface-area to volume decreases as things get bigger. cats freeze quicker than humans, humans freeze quicker than elephants (not least 'cos they're buggers to get into the fridge).

    i could be a smartarse at this point, and point out that the spaceship, being comprised primarily of metal in its solid state, is in fact already frozen. but i won't.

    --
    Sal

    Writings: saltation.blogspot.com
    Wravings: go-blog-go.blogspot.com

  51. Re:True, but Radiation's still surprisingly effect by Tango42 · · Score: 1

    Good point, a small object would reach a certain temperature faster, but that's because it has less energy to start with. It still losses energy slower.

  52. Is the dummy wearing a spcaesuit? by Nihynjahs · · Score: 2, Interesting

    it sounds like the dummy is not wearing a spcaesuit and you wouldnt purposefully be in space without a space suit would you? so the test doesnt sound all that great to me cause you would think that a spacesuit would block some of the radiation wouldnt you?

  53. Again by Epistax · · Score: 0, Redundant

    There's another story that has detail on how the spacewalk went: a suit malfunction caused the spacewalk to end prematurely.

    Will these wardrobe malfunctions never cease!?!?

    1. Re:Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the wrong trousers, Grommit, and they've gone wrong!

  54. does the dummy have a name? by martin-boundary · · Score: 3, Funny
    I hope the dummy's name isn't Dave.

    "I'm sorry, Dave. I can't let you in, Dave."

  55. They had to call AAA by Racine · · Score: 1

    They locked their keys inside...

    --
    Tcl my Pico! There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't.
  56. Identity of Mannequin... by rodney+dill · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    .... Major Tom?

    --

    Use your head, can't you, use your head,
    You're on earth, there's no cure for that
    - S. Beckett
  57. Slight misunderstanding by kramer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I read they were strapping a dummy to the outside of the space station. I thought they were getting back at old G.W. Bush for cutting the hubble funding. Wrong dummy, I guess.

  58. radiation effects are well documented by kippy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's nothing special about radiation in space. It can and has been reproduced here and there had been extensive research done on it. This looks to me like another science fair type experiment on the ISS. It's like when I didn't water a plant in 4th grade, recorded that it died and called it a project.

    1. Re:radiation effects are well documented by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      ' This looks to me like another science fair type experiment on the ISS. It's like when I didn't water a plant in 4th grade, recorded that it died and called it a project."

      Oddly enough, I did a similar science fair project in 4th grade, only it wasn't a plant, it was a fish. Then I got to meet the nice school psychologist.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  59. It's a Ferrari! by charboy1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The outer container of the Matroshka experiment is made by DTM, formerly known as Ferrari S.p.A Space Division. The DTM logo is visible on the outside of the composite container. This composite, Carbon Fibre Reinforced Plastics, is similar to those used for the better-known Ferrari Formula 1 cars (although a special mould was made to get the shape of the Matroshka container since not too many cars have that shape). The container is leak tight to maintain an atmosphere inside until it's brought back inside ISS (scheduled in ~1 year).

  60. eerie by jdkane · · Score: 1, Redundant
    The dummy, a mock-human of natural bone, simulated organs and synthetic skin, was installated on the outside of the station's Russian Zvezda module during a spacewalk today by Expedition 8 crewmembers Michael Foale and Alexander Kaleri.

    Sounds like the start of a good horror movie -- Radiation mutates doll with human tissue into a monster with its own evil will. How do the astronauts sleep at night with the shadowy profile of a simulated human stuck to the outside of the SS.

  61. A Nasa chief said on TV.... by HogynCymraeg · · Score: 0

    ....that the main difficulty in doing a manned mission to Mars was the radiation. He said on TV that there was not sufficient technology to prevent Astronauts getting fried. So can someone tell me how they landed on the moon without getting frazzled? This is a genuine question.

    1. Re:A Nasa chief said on TV.... by praksys · · Score: 1

      Its mostly a matter of duration. The moon missions took weeks. Astronauts spend months on the ISS. But a mission to Mars will take years.

  62. Perhaps you would like to volunteer? by Chemisor · · Score: 1

    I wonder if there are any openings at NASA for a "Radiation testing dummy. An exciting opportunity in space research available on the space station. The perks include travel in space, room (well, it really depends on what you call "outside") and board on delicious standard space rations. The ideal candidate would have some spacefaring experience, but training can be provided. Must not be overweight or overheight; must be a team player and have good communication skills. Send a resume and three character references to jobs@nasa.gov"

  63. Re:True, but Radiation's still surprisingly effect by tigersha · · Score: 1

    Thats the same reason that cats can fall from higher elevations than humans without getting hurt and you can drop an insect from anywhere and it will not die when it hits ground. An elephant can die from a 1 meter fall.

    --
    The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
  64. I'm sailing! I'm sailing! by RubbBubb · · Score: 1

    nuff said...

  65. Re:True, but Radiation's still surprisingly effect by Saltation · · Score: 2, Funny
    An elephant can die from a 1 meter fall.
    :) so can a cat if the elephant falls on it

    nb: the same applies to humans under 1meter tall

    --
    Sal

    Writings: saltation.blogspot.com
    Wravings: go-blog-go.blogspot.com
  66. ol' saw by jms · · Score: 1

    On Soviet Russian space station, the vacuum and radiation study YOU!

  67. Re:True, but Radiation's still surprisingly effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    And it's mostly right -- you certainly will never see that cringe-worthy bad-sci-fi staple of liquids "freezing and boiling at the same time."
    -----

    Ahem. Someone needs to learn about something called the triple point. At that temperature & pressure, the substance will exist in all three phases and be able to shift between them.

    From the wiki link above:
    "For example, the triple point temperature of water is exactly 273.16 kelvin (about 0.01 C) and the triple point pressure is 611.73 pascal (ca. 0.006 bar)."

    This is high school physics, not sci-fi, man...

  68. Why not use animal meat... by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...then they could have the first solar powered barbeque in space...and could analyze the results within a few orbits.

  69. Hey, wait a minute... by macthulhu · · Score: 1

    I would think that, with charges pending, Michael Jackson wouldn't be allowed to leave California, let alone Earth.

    --

    Someday a real rain is gonna come...

  70. The zombie'll be the closest guy to the station... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So after the mannequin animates and turns into a space zombie, he'll be the closest guy to the station when the astronauts leave the station alone and do an EVA leaving it unoccupied (see article). Why is it that nobody at NASA has ever seen a space zombie movie? We know what is going to happen!

  71. I just can't get it out of my mind... by trainsnpep · · Score: 2, Funny

    That sorta reminds me of truck drivers attaching stuffed animals to front of their rigs...

    To test the effects of radiation on humans sounds like testing the effects of flies on Tickle Me Elmo...

    --
    --<Mike>--
  72. Re:Mannequin attached to outside of space station. by Fermata · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, it sounds to me more like a high-budget episode of MythBusters (http://dsc.discovery.com/fansites/mythbusters/myt hbusters.html).

    Since when did Jamie and Adam become astronauts?

  73. Sure, they *say* it's for testing radiation.... by kcubkg · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...but we know it's really a scarecrow to keep away those pesky space aliens!

    --
    5 out of 4 people have trouble with fractions.
  74. In SG1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eh... Two of the guys just wade around space in nothing but their airforce fighter suites. Heh!!

    On a serious note, wouldn't the vac cause the eyes to explode?

  75. NASA COVERUP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's really a scarecrow to keep the UFO's away

  76. No dummy there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was no dummy actually - it was Ralph Nader in another vain attempt to stroke his ego now that the re-election bid has failed to generate enough energy.

  77. Notice the funny part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget the Russian and his smokes, the real point is the weight of American women. It's funny cause it's true.

  78. Suggestion to NASA - remote tethered camera. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't these guys use a remote-controlled jet-propelled camera on a tether to inspect the outside of the station? Given the tech already in place, it should be almost trivial to build (heck I bet the guys up there could put one together in their spare time with parts available). I bet the space shuttle could use one too...

  79. Fascinating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like they've turned the space station into a frat house. Maybe it's their way of saying, "Houston, send some women and alcohol up here, now!"

  80. Re:Mannequin attached to outside of space station. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nah, you're thinking of Trans-Europe Express!

  81. What have scientists been doing all this time? by madpierre · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    study the effects of radiation on the human body

    Don't they *know* by now?

    Chernobyl, God knows how many submarine accidents.
    Atmospheric testing of nukes ... etc etc.

    Seems like we're funding a bunch of really *slow* scientists.

    So for their benefit i'll type this s l o w l y ..

    You take on a bunch of rads. You're fucked. Sheesh!

    --
    siggy played guitar
  82. That was Skylab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I belive you're referring to the Skylab space station with the thing about the umbrella. It was launched unmanned and was supposed to deploy automatically, but there was a problem due excessive vibration in the Saturn V rocket during launch. Because of this, a meteoroid shield ripped off alongside half of the solar panels, and the internal temperature reached around 50C.

    The posterior manned mission Skylab 2 corrected the problem with a parasol that lowered the temperature to twentysomething degrees quite fast.

  83. A better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or Justin Timberlake?

  84. Niven... by Tmack · · Score: 1
    Must bring up something I always though interesting in reading Larry Niven's work. His idea for futuristic space-suits was what he termed Skin suit, basically a full-body suit that was ultra thin, made of radiation blocking material that would let sweat though, and would keep the body pressurized by its compressiveness (think of spandex, modernized a bit and radiation proof). the suit of course had a helmet about the same as current ones, big glass bubble..

    Tm

    --
    Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
  85. Obligatory Jack Handy Reference by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you ever get stranded outside of the ISS, just go real limp, because maybe you'll look like a dummy, and people will try to recover you because, hey, free dummy.

    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  86. Total SCAM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok. Let me get this straight...

    2 Guys alone on a space station for a 6 month mission with a mannequin.

    Nasa says, "Ok guys, bring the RealDoll Mk2 (Now with Skeleton and *MORE* organs!) outside and stick her to the hull so we can see what radiation does to her."

    Astronauts, "Uhm, Mission control? We appear to have a problem, my uhm spacesuit water tube thingie? It's bent and stuff, and we have to go back inside. And we're like really busy an stuff for the next few months, so I don't think we'll be able to attempt this one again".

  87. Oh pish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I expect a couple of lonely ISS residents requested a RealDoll for "research purposes", and this is what NASA sent them...

  88. Ground control to Major Tom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The good news is, we've discovered where Darl disappeared to...

  89. Designed? by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

    What? Who the hell authorized putting the swallow tube in the same path as the breath tube?

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  90. Keep an eye on it... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    They'd better keep a close eye on it at all times, or else it will be bad news for Kim Cattrall.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?